I tweaked the Javascript a bit and one line of CSS. I think this is what you
were trying to accomplish?http://jsbin.com/acori/16/
Many thanks! Yes it does.
$('#nav li ul li').hover(function()
It never occurs to me to target hover class. I thought when cursor moves away
from a li and
I am trying to achieve this via jQuery by adding a class as I don't think it's
possible with CSS (but maybe one of the CSS3 selectors can doit?).
http://jsbin.com/acori/15/
The menu is generated by the CMS system so there is restriction to adding new
class directly to a specific menu item.
Not sure if this is exactly what you are looking for, but you can try
adding another selector to this code:
#nav .current,
#nav a:hover, #nav a:focus {
background-color:#fff!important;
color:#333;
}
Like this:
#nav .current,
#nav a:hover, #nav a:focus,
#nav ul li:hover a {
I tweaked the Javascript a bit and one line of CSS. I think this is what you
were trying to accomplish?
http://jsbin.com/acori/16/
Hope it helps.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Jon Reece jon.re...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure if this is exactly what you are looking for, but you can try
adding
Hi,
I have the following navigational menu bar. The menu has multiple
parent menu items. For the sake of the example, I only provide the first menu
item. It has about five child menu items. This is a horizontal menu bar at the
top of the ASP.Net website. What currently happens is when
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Goku San gokus...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have the following navigational menu bar. The menu has multiple parent
menu items.
[snip]
What currently happens is when a user hovers over
the Parent menu item, the child menu items appear below, horizontally, of
On Jan 9, 2011, at 7:04 AM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
Make the parents the containing blocks for the absolute positioning of
the children:
#nav .sub {
position: relative
}
http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/containingblock
I hope you'll ensure that users who are not using a
These two essentially are the same. I am assuming the menu is
controlled by a javascript, best practise is to use the absolute
positioning to control submenu and use the toogle or mouseover to
trigger the sub-level.
I'm not sure this is considered best practice as keyboard users would have
On Jan 9, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
These two essentially are the same. I am assuming the menu is
controlled by a javascript, best practise is to use the absolute
positioning to control submenu and use the toogle or mouseover to
trigger the sub-level.
I'm not sure this
this functionality
through the use of CSS.
Anyway to make this possible?
Thanks guys,Andy
Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS variable navigational menu`
From: weblis...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 09:40:28 -0800
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
On Jan 9, 2011, at 7:04 AM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote
On Jan 9, 2011, at 11:42 AM, Goku San wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your responses! I added the, #nav .sub {position:
relative;}, removed the {display:none;} from my CSS file and from the ASPX
page. Still not getting a solution. The #nav .sub {position: relative;}
helped because it
On 1/9/11 10:24 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
These two essentially are the same. I am assuming the menu is
controlled by a javascript, best practise is to use the absolute
positioning to control submenu and use the toogle or mouseover to
trigger the sub-level.
I'm not sure this is considered
On 1/7/11 8:10 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Hi all,
Besides the CSS-D list, which CSS lists would you recommend subscribing to?
Thanks,
--
Thierry
These come to mind???
The appropriate w3c list, and...
http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/
http://csscreator.com/
http://bytes.com/
Best,
~d
--
These come to mind???
The appropriate w3c list, and...
http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/
http://csscreator.com/
http://bytes.com/
Thanks David, but I'm not a big fan of fora (I prefer mailing lists).
Even though a forum like sitepoint has great threads (i.e. Test Your CSS
Skills).
Check this
Hi all,
Besides the CSS-D list, which CSS lists would you recommend subscribing to?
Thanks,
--
Regards,
Thierry
@thierrykoblentz
www.tjkdesign.com | www.ez-css.org | www.css-101.org
***
List Guidelines:
http://www.css-101.org
Happy New Year!
Bonne Année!
--
Regards,
Thierry
@thierrykoblentz
www.tjkdesign.com | www.ez-css.org | www.css-101.org
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Interesting but not well viewd with android.
Happy new year to all readers.
Diego
Thierry Koblentz thierry.koble...@gmail.com ha scritto:
http://www.css-101.org
Happy New Year!
Bonne Année!
--
Regards,
Thierry
@thierrykoblentz
www.tjkdesign.com | www.ez-css.org | www.css-101.org
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Diego La Monica m...@diegolamonica.infowrote:
Interesting but not well viewd with android.
ya, read it using the browser on your computer. :p awesome work Thierry,
though i have listen to your talk this helps me to understand better.
--
regards,
Prashanth
@Diego: Smartphones are not the best device to use here since the idea behind
the demo pages is to allow people to edit/tweak CSS declarations via their
favorite dev tool. The goal is to make people get their hands under the hood to
do their own investigation - to find out what the simplest
Subject: [WSG] css
hi
http://203.193.216.214/
I have an issue with this menu it works fine but the client has asked
when you hover over
top menu that the sub menu becomes visible and the stays there until you
hover over than
part of the top menu. If I was to move the mouse anywhere on the screen
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:18 AM, PurencoolGmail purenc...@gmail.com wrote:
hi
http://203.193.216.214/
FYI...
I have an issue with the sub menus staying when I roll off the main
menu items in Safari 5 Mac. If I roll off the main items onto the sub
menu items the submenu disappears. Possibly a
http://203.193.216.214/
I have an issue with this menu it works fine but the client has asked
when you hover over
top menu that the sub menu becomes visible and the stays there until
you
hover over than
part of the top menu. If I was to move the mouse anywhere on the screen
the menu sub
hi
http://203.193.216.214/
I have an issue with this menu it works fine but the client has asked
when you hover over
top menu that the sub menu becomes visible and the stays there until you
hover over than
part of the top menu. If I was to move the mouse anywhere on the screen
the menu sub
On 15 Nov 2010, at 06:18, PurencoolGmail wrote:
I have an issue with this menu it works fine but the client has asked when
you hover over
Shame: http://www.cennydd.co.uk/2010/end-hover-abuse-now/
top menu that the sub menu becomes visible and the stays there until you
hover over than
-hotels.com
From: Nick Stone
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 9:13 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS rollovers for images + Feedback Sources??
Leslie,
This is such valuable feedback.
Thanks very much!
Does anyone have suggestions on how to obtain website
An excellent and very up to date point about accessibility.
From: tee
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 1:57 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS rollovers for images?
Caution with the use of hover for such purpose if you also want touchscreen
device user able to use
Good idea, but please remember that for someone with problems of
co-ordination or fine muscle control, hovering can be extremely
difficult. I've encountered javascript image galleries which work like
this, and on a bad day I find them completely unusable.
Lesley
On 19/10/10 21:13, cat soul
, 2010 1:57 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS rollovers for images?
Caution with the use of hover for such purpose if you also want
touchscreen device user able to use it.
In regards of touchscreen, this article explains it better than I
can do.
http://trentwalton.com/2010
.
*From:* tee mailto:weblis...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 20, 2010 1:57 AM
*To:* wsg@webstandardsgroup.org mailto:wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
*Subject:* Re: [WSG] CSS rollovers for images?
Caution with the use of hover for such purpose if you also want
touchscreen device user able to use
On 20/10/2010 10:44, cat soul wrote:
Yes, and while we're on the topic of things that won't work on phones
and iPadsis there anything else we need to know about that also
won't play nice with those two handheld platforms?
A gentle reminder that iDevices are not the only platform that has
will there be/can there be a new command/property which can be read
by each device the way it needs to be?
could there be soon a touch command so that you could write the
code like:
hover, do this. If no hover, then touch, do this. If no touch, then
__ and do this
?
On Oct 20,
AM, Kevin Ireson wrote:
An excellent and very up to date point about accessibility.
From: tee
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 1:57 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS rollovers for images?
Caution with the use of hover for such purpose if you also want
touchscreen device
*Subject:* Re: [WSG] CSS rollovers for images?
Caution with the use of hover for such purpose if you also want
touchscreen device user able to use it.
In regards of touchscreen, this article explains it better than I
can do.
http://trentwalton.com/2010/07/05/non-hover/
tee
On Oct 19, 2010
On 20 Oct 2010, at 16:59, cat soul wrote:
will there be/can there be a new command/property which can be read by each
device the way it needs to be?
could there be soon a touch command so that you could write the code like:
hover, do this. If no hover, then touch, do this. If no
From: Patrick H. Lauke re...@splintered.co.uk
On 20/10/2010 10:44, cat soul wrote:
Yes, and while we're on the topic of things that won't work on phones
and iPadsis there anything else we need to know about that also
won't play nice with those two handheld platforms?
A gentle reminder
Cat,
That's the holy trinity of web design: content, presentation and
behavior. ;)
Joseph R. B. Taylor
/Web Designer / Developer/
--
Sites by Joe, LLC
/Clean, Simple and Elegant Web Design/
Phone: (609) 335-3076
Web: http://sitesbyjoe.com
Email:
Help me if I mis-interpret the writer's fine article, but this
pertains to Javascript rollovers, too.
The end user doesn't know and doesn't care whether that thing popping
up was a CSS Hover, or a Javascript rollover. S/he only knows that,
by innocently mousing around, something popped up
Well, I am down with that..I never did care for the jumpy, spinny,
whizzy things... As a print designer, I'm all about good design, good
typography, quality imagery and clear communication.
however, you sometimes get the idea that if you don't pay obeisance
to that fashion (jumpy, spinny,
On 10/20/10 10:19 AM, cat soul wrote:
The picture I am developing now is this: HTML and CSS should be used strictly
for content,
structure and formatting.
*Behaviors* are best left to things like Javascript.
But it's not that cut and dried -- CSS has always had behaviors,
e.g. :hover,
I agree thoroughly, Hassan. Yet as this is a best-practices
discussion and group, and since we've been hearing that these things
A) don't always work and B) aren't always well-received by end users,
we're left with a need.
And that need is to know: out of the universe of what we can do,
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 1:42 PM, cat soul cats...@thinkplan.org wrote:
I agree thoroughly, Hassan. Yet as this is a best-practices discussion and
group, and since we've been hearing that these things A) don't always work
and B) aren't always well-received by end users, we're left with a need.
On 10/20/10 11:42 AM, cat soul wrote:
I agree thoroughly, Hassan. Yet as this is a best-practices discussion and
group, and since
we've been hearing that these things A) don't always work and B) aren't always
well-received by
end users, we're left with a need.
And that need is to know: out of
stop sending me emails
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Hassan Schroeder has...@webtuitive.com wrote:
On 10/20/10 11:42 AM, cat soul wrote:
I agree thoroughly, Hassan. Yet as this is a best-practices discussion and
group, and since
we've been hearing that these things A) don't always work
Heh! That is pretty funny!
However, clients may have the need to ensure a universal experience.
One example of this is in their brand values, which may call for a
certain look and feel. If a person experiences one thing on their
iPad and another experiences something different on their HP
stop sending me emails
We've stopped sending this person emails. no need to comment on this. :)
Continue with this great thread!
Thanks
Russ
BTW, every WSG email that goes out has an unsubscribe link at the bottom.
Better to click that that tell 7,000 people you don't want any emails :)
Leslie,
This is such valuable feedback.
Thanks very much!
Does anyone have suggestions on how to obtain website usability feedback
from various members of the disabled community?
Thanks in advance,
Nick
--
Nick Stone, MBA
SEO, Web Accessibility, Web Development
http://nick-stone.com/
On Oct 20, 2010, at 9:11 AM, cat soul wrote
Please don't groan, but my background is in Print. Luckily, I never had to
write PostScript. Illustrator, PS, Quark, and later InDesign all do a fine
job of it.
but just imagine if I DID have to write the post script, and to know
tee...you are quite right to point that out..every medium has its
booby traps and difficulties..I've spend my share of time wrangling
with recalcitrant files myself.
cs
On Oct 20, 2010, at 4:11 PM, tee wrote:
Fixing PostScript error is like knowing browser quirks
Any thoughts on using CSS hover properties to show larger images?
The scenario I'm envisioning is one where you'd have small thumbnails
of samples, and hovering the mouse over them would invoke a hover
state in which a larger version of that same image would
appear...Larger meaning 400x600
You could certainly do that with CSS. You'll want to add javascript to
control how the image shows and fades, positioning etc.
For maximum accessibility, have the thumbnail link to the main image,
then have your Javscript/CSS hijack the link and show the image.
Everyone wins.
Joseph R. B.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:13 PM, cat soul cats...@thinkplan.org wrote:
Any thoughts on using CSS hover properties to show larger images?
The scenario I'm envisioning is one where you'd have small thumbnails of
samples, and hovering the mouse over them would invoke a hover state in
which a
Hi
I'm trying to build some attribute selectors in CSS to check for missing
content. Ie.
IMG[alt=]
{
border-width: 3px;
border-color: #ff;
border-style: solid;
}
// will place a red border around any image with an empty ALT tag
Tim,
:not() is a CSS3 pseudo-class, IE8 doesn't support any CSS3 pseudo-classes.
However you could use http://selectivizr.com/ to add that support using
javascript.
Cheers,
Ryan
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Tim Baillie tim.bail...@acu.edu.auwrote:
Hi
I’m trying to build some
Or, if you're already using a Javascript library (which many IE CSS3
replacement scripts require) - like jQuery - you can simply add a class
to the targeted element because jQuery understands CSS3 selectors, eg.
{
$(img:not([alt])).addClass(empty-image);
}
Disclaimer: I haven't used the
HI,
Joined the chat a bit late, hope the following URL is helpful
without being redundant.
http://html5boilerplate.com/
___
Christopher Kennon
Bushidodeep
Principal/Developer/Designer
(w) http://bushidodeep.com
(e) field.ni...@gmail.com
(gv) 818.322.4513
On
I explored the html5boilerplate quite a bit, but decided to come up my own
template instead.
To its credit, it has some really nice stuff in there and I have adapted to my
template too, but there are a number of elements that I found that really
shouldn't be in there.
If you are using the
MS is on board but for vista windows 7 users only
So ie pre ie9 is still going to be out there; I think that ie9 should be
released as an xp version also
the other browsers all make versions that work for xp and support html5;
though though some things would only work on ie9 (pinning tasks)
On 29/09/2010 09:59, Sam Sherlock wrote:
So ie pre ie9 is still going to be out there; I think that ie9 should be
released as an xp version also
the other browsers all make versions that work for xp and support html5;
though though some things would only work on ie9 (pinning tasks)
let's not
I don't have any personal experience with this stuff but your
discussion rereminded me of a page I bookmarked recently:
http://jdbartlett.github.com/innershiv/
Sorry if it is not relevant, have not read the whole thread in detail.
Hope it helps!
--
Cheers Ollie
@ollicle
On Wednesday, September
On Sep 29, 2010, at 1:59 AM, Sam Sherlock wrote:
MS is on board but for vista windows 7 users only
Quite true. All for-profit companies are in things for themselves.
No news flash there.
But if I could tease out the original purpose of my question once
more, it'd be to say that Flash
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 8:06 AM, cat soul cats...@thinkplan.org wrote:
Flash offers a one-stop shopping
tool, and as has been said, most/many people have the flash plug-in, so
playback is more or less assured across the intertoobs.
Except when dealing with the Mobile market where Flash isn't
Oliver Boermans wrote:
I don't have any personal experience with this stuff but your
discussion rereminded me of a page I bookmarked recently:
http://jdbartlett.github.com/innershiv/
Yep, that looks like the root of the problem: doesn't work in Internet
Explorer when an element's content is
Arnold
Sent: 29 September 2010 14:41
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS and h264 vs Flash
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 8:06 AM, cat soul cats...@thinkplan.org wrote:
Flash offers a one-stop shopping
tool, and as has been said, most/many people have the flash plug-in, so
playback is more
Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Jason Arnold
Sent: 29 September 2010 14:41
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS and h264 vs Flash
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 8:06 AM, cat soul cats...@thinkplan.org wrote:
Flash offers
On 27 Sep 2010, at 22:46, tee wrote:
Without CSS, wouldn't the browsers render the page just like normal HTML page
with browser default styling?
Yes … so the blocks would collapse back to inline.
Quote Hugo, It will create those elements for IE6-8 (and older browsers with
lack of HTML5
On 28/09/2010 07:12, David Dorward wrote:
On 27 Sep 2010, at 22:46, tee wrote:
Quote Hugo, It will create those elements for IE6-8 (and older browsers with lack
of HTML5 support) in DOM. I suppose DOM will still work in older IEs when CSS is
off yes?
Yes
To clarify though: the DOM will
Also ran into an issue when i was using js templating with html5 tags. Html5
shiv only ran once when the document loads. Either need call it again or use
html4 tags. I am choosing html4 tags for now. Sigh.
Steven
On 28/09/2010, at 6:34 PM, Patrick H. Lauke re...@splintered.co.uk wrote:
On
Steven Tan wrote:
Also ran into an issue when i was using js templating with html5 tags. Html5
shiv only ran once when the document loads. Either need call it again or use
html4 tags. I am choosing html4 tags for now. Sigh.
All the HTML5 shiv is doing is calling document.createElement against
No, it doesn't. But if you use html5 tags in your templating, then it might.
Just something to watch out for.
One of my templates create a section and header for about 20 times.
Steven
On 28/09/2010, at 8:49 PM, Rob Crowther robe...@boogdesign.com wrote:
Steven Tan wrote:
Also ran into an
On 28/09/10 14:10, Steven Tan wrote:
No, it doesn't. But if you use html5 tags in your templating, then it might.
Just something to watch out for.
Sorry, I'm not sure what you're saying here: no it doesn't what? It
might what?
One of my templates create a section and header for about 20
Sure. :)
The issue i am encountering is when I generate HTML on the fly using js
templates. I have a couple of templates written with sections and headers tags.
Because html5 shiv only create the elements on document loads, it will not work
the html5 tags that gets appended to the document
Steven Tan wrote
So watch out if you rely on js libraries that do something like this:
$(body).append(sectionsomething/section);
$(section).text(new something); // this line will throw an error in IE.
Hope that makes sense.
Ah, I understand, interesting. I've done some example cases:
Nice setup. Thanks for explaining it better than I do. ;)
Load html5shiv, use innerHTML to create element, change with jQuery (works in
IE8):
http://www.boogdesign.com/examples/html5shiv-inner-jquery.html
Strange, I expected the innerHTML part to fail. Any idea why that works?
So it
I hope that this is within the scope of this list...
Some months back, you may have read Steve Jobs saying that Flash
could easily be replaced by a combo of CSS and h264, or something
very similar.
My CSS skills don't empower me to see how this could be..could
somebody shine a light on
On 28/09/10 23:41, Steven Tan wrote:
Strange, I expected the innerHTML part to fail. Any idea why that works?
Nope! I expected one or the other of the two (DOM and innerHTML) to fail
as surely jQuery is using one or other of them underneath?
I haven't had time to dig in to the jQuery source
Kroc Camen video for everybody
http://camendesign.com/code/video_for_everybody
I think Steve Jobs is thinking about everyone using Safari browser (or
another modern browser that support h.264 not ff3.6 but ff4 will maybe,
chrome does)
but in reality for now such modern browsers are not as wide
On Sep 28, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Sam Sherlock wrote:
Kroc Camen video for everybody
http://camendesign.com/code/video_for_everybody
I think Steve Jobs is thinking about everyone using Safari browser
(or another modern browser that support h.264 not ff3.6 but ff4
will maybe, chrome does)
but
transitions with css
here http://timvandamme.com/ some icons use transition with css with in .
vcard
in firefox the icons just use hover active
- S
On 29 September 2010 01:12, cat soul cats...@thinkplan.org wrote:
On Sep 28, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Sam Sherlock wrote:
Kroc Camen video for
that's pretty nice..
I've also been reading that MS is on board with the HTML5+ h264 combo
as an alternative to Flash, so perhaps a critical mass is forming...
I do feel that flash has its place, but that it was a mistake
jumping in head first as the web seemed to do over flash so many
Only the two Webkit browsers are able to render the header and footer
correctly.
http://lotusseedsdesign.com/css-test/templegate.html
header {
height : 300px;
width : 980px;
text-align : center;
position : relative;
clear : both;
overflow : hidden;
margin : 0 auto;
border : 1px solid #369;
try adding display: block - by default they are usually displayed as inline
in ie you need to add them via javascript before it will recognise them:
document.createElement(header);
--
Chris Knowles
On 27/09/10 8:13 PM, tee wrote:
Only the two Webkit browsers are able to render the header
A best practice: Do browser detection instead.
script type=text/javascript
function html5elm(elm) {
return !!document.createElement(elm);
}
var myArray = ['header','nav','section','aside','article','footer','hgroup'];
for (var i = 0; i myArray.length; i++){
I meant FEATURE Detection. Sorry.
Hm.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Hugo Mendes hugo.men...@gmail.com wrote:
A best practice: Do browser detection instead.
script type=text/javascript
function html5elm(elm) {
return !!document.createElement(elm);
}
var myArray =
is relevant) in your CSS.Bob- Original Message -
From: tee weblis...@gmail.com
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 11:13 AM
Subject: [WSG] CSS support of HTML5 tags not ready yet?
Only the two Webkit browsers are able to render the header and footer
correctly
On 27 Sep 2010, at 11:13, tee wrote:
Only the two Webkit browsers are able to render the header and footer
correctly.
Most browsers don't yet apply default styles to them. Current versions of IE
don't recognise them at all without a JS shim.
While you can use a JS shim and explicitly set
Thanks all for the help.
display block it's is. I am so used to expecting Firefox to render everything
correctly! When it doesn't, I couldn't think further :)
Was going to use modernizr, therefor not worry about IE browsers, but didn't
realize the script couldn't take care of CSS part.
Are
On 27/09/10 22:46, tee wrote:
Are these HTML5 tags inline elements by default or it's that (the latest)
Firefox and Opera not yet supporting them? I thought they are of block elements.
Firefox 4.0 will have support in the default stylesheet for the new
HTML5 elements. It'll also have the
As a follow-up to my original email, the following methods have been
very well designed from the accessibility point of view:
http://juicystudio.com/article/ecmascriptmenu.php
http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200705/accessible_expanding_and_c
o
llapsing_menu/
A further example
Hi Mathew,
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/keyboard_friendly_dropdown_menu/EK.asp
I have a bug report... tested against FF 3.6.4 and IE6 (no bug under
Chrome 5.0.376)
Steps to reproduce:
- click on background
- tab to focus first menu item
- hit enter to display sub-items
- tab through to
instead of JS for accessibility (was Re: [WSG] CSS
Expandable Menu)
Hi Mike,
Sorry to say this but the keyboard friendly version:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/keyboard_friendly_dropdown_menu/EK.asp
Only fires, via keyboard, on Articles E-K in IEv8 or Firefox.
This is by design. Keyboard users
As a follow-up to my original email, the following methods have been
very well designed from the accessibility point of view:
http://juicystudio.com/article/ecmascriptmenu.php
http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200705/accessible_expanding_and_co
llapsing_menu/
A further example worth
On 29 Jun 2010, at 00:30, grant_malcolm_bai...@westnet.com.au wrote:
I'm trying to avoid use of Javascript due to accessibility concerns.
Trying to shoehorn functionality (which is what JS was designed for) into CSS
(which is designed for presentation, not logic) is not good for
www.facebook.com/pages/Web-Dandy/171945798743
_
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of David Dorward
Sent: 29 June 2010 07:15
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Using CSS instead of JS for accessibility (was Re: [WSG] CSS
Expandable Menu
Thank you to everyone who replied to my email.
Kind regards,
Grant Bailey
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Ted Drake
Sent: Tuesday, 29 June 2010 10:07 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] CSS Expandable
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: Using CSS instead of JS for accessibility (was Re: [WSG] CSS
Expandable Menu)
On 29 Jun 2010, at 11:04, de...@littlegent.com wrote:
I'd recommend using one from http://www.cssplay.co.uk/menus/
The trick is deciding which one to use, really. =)
Having
I used to use cssplay menus 6+ years ago but they're not the friendliest or
most compliant to work with.
I really like superfish - i've been using that for a few years with no problems
at all. and I find it very easy to customise.
http://users.tpg.com.au/j_birch/plugins/superfish/
I
Try this for CSS menus with keyboard support:
http://carroll.org.uk/sandbox/suckerfish/bones2.html
This menu may be accessible, but is it usable?
Unless I am missing something, keyboard users need to go through *every
single link* in the menu to reach the last item :-(
I have these two:
...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Thierry Koblentz
Sent: 29 June 2010 16:22
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: Using CSS instead of JS for accessibility (was Re: [WSG] CSS
Expandable Menu)
Try this for CSS menus with keyboard support:
http://carroll.org.uk/sandbox/suckerfish/bones2.html
This menu
Hi Mike,
Sorry to say this but the keyboard friendly version:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/keyboard_friendly_dropdown_menu/EK.asp
Only fires, via keyboard, on Articles E-K in IEv8 or Firefox.
This is by design. Keyboard users could not reach these pages if they were
not focusable at least
Sorry to say this but the keyboard friendly version:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/keyboard_friendly_dropdown_menu/EK.asp
Only fires, via keyboard, on Articles E-K in IEv8 or Firefox.
This is by design. Keyboard users could not reach these pages if they were
not focusable at least from
1 - 100 of 1168 matches
Mail list logo
