Edgar,
quoting:
Usefulness is a criterion that something IS real.
That is a specious remark.
Consider, instead, that it all depends on ...Humans.
NOT The World!
Wittgenstein -- for what he's worth -- asserts and reminds us in his TRACTATUS,
that:
The World is all that is the case.
(but
Bill!,
Good distinction!
And I thought *I* was the Philosopher.
(well, I *was*. ;-) )
Well said, sir,
Kudos,
--Joe
Bill! BillSmart@... wrote:
Edgar,
No, 'usefulness' only means something gives you the results you want.
...Bill!
Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:
Bill,
Chris, Bill!, Edgar, Group,
Math is Trivial.
That's what makes it Math.
It is not Physics.
Math cannot and does not say why it so accurately appears to model the World
(for Humans, anyway; Dolphins may have another view).
Trivial means making no statement about reality. Ask any
Edgar,
Communicates? No.
Math merely insinuates (to you).
*If* you are game! You've got to be a willing, or innocent, conspirator. I
suspect you're both.
It's all up to you. And your delusions. Many people have them, so don't be
offended. You're just one other one among too many.
Joe,
I'll try to explain it simply.
In a reality which operates according to actual laws of nature usefulness means
something actually works. To actually work it must in accord with the actual
laws of reality..
Edgar
On Jul 11, 2013, at 6:14 PM, Joe wrote:
Edgar,
quoting:
Edgar,
My helpful simple explanation runs as follows; please attend:
Usefulness is a Human category.
Does it go beyond that? No.
To say so is to establish a Metaphysics. To establish a Metaphysics is not
Utilitarian, nor Pragmatist. Instead, a Metaphysics is Human, and probably
only
Merle,
Humans do sometimes use math to make bridges, but ants make bridges all the
time and I don't think they ever use math to do so.
...Bill!
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Merle Lester merlewiitpom@... wrote:
Â
 it is mathematics and it certainly does communicate..without
it's innate...they just know...
we do too..
except us folks deny our origins... born knowing in the razzlemattazle of life
we forget our origins
..merle
Merle,
Humans do sometimes use math to make bridges, but ants make bridges all the
time and I don't think they ever use math to do so.
Merle,
Are you seriously implying that a spider uses math to build his web?
It is your human intellect that judges the spider's web to be a work of
mathematically-based architecture. You are anthropomorphizing and projecting
your human delusions onto a the spider and the web.
...Bill!
---
sorry i am not..
that is how us humans learn.
how do you think the idea of a aeroplane came into being...?
i think leonardo da vinci would have your argument as wanting..
we learn from nature..
not the other way around
merle
Merle,
Are you seriously implying that a spider uses math to
Merle,
In your list of universal languages you forgot to mention Esperanto. ;)
Seriously though, all the languages (modes of communication) you mentioned
(math, art and music) are not 'universal'. You might be able to stretch them
to 'human-wide', but I think it would stop there.
You might
bill..i disagree..mathematics, art and music... no i will not include
esperanto..you have to learn that and an australian aboriginal would not have
this opportunity...that's one example...
explain to me why maths art and music are not universal languages..i might
just include architecture as
All the formerly discarded peripheral vision; the AC turns on and the
ventilation sings its shape through the drywall; the left hand has never felt
so useless -- I am making progress; time to start over.Whoa, now I gotta pee...
no choice but to get up or piss myself. Now I feel stupid for
Merle,
Math, art, music and architecture are not universal because they are products
the human intellect, and the human intellect is not universal.
If you fail to see my logic in this that's because logic also is not universal
but is a product of the human intellect.
If by realization and
PBS,
This is our first stream-of-consciousness post in a long time!
(Unless of course you count Merle's posts which sometimes come pretty close.)
...Bill!
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, pandabananasock@... wrote:
All the formerly discarded peripheral vision; the AC turns on and the
Bill,
Usefulness is a criterion that something IS real. Usefulness means it's in
synch with the actual logic of the world of forms and thus IS accurately part
of reality...
Edgar
On Jul 3, 2013, at 8:10 PM, Bill! wrote:
PBS,
Math, logic, reason like all delusions should come with the
Edgar,
No, 'usefulness' only means something gives you the results you want.
...Bill!
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:
Bill,
Usefulness is a criterion that something IS real. Usefulness means it's in
synch with the actual logic of the world of forms and
Bill,
Yes, that's what reality is!
Edgar
On Jul 4, 2013, at 6:59 AM, Bill! wrote:
Edgar,
No, 'usefulness' only means something gives you the results you want.
...Bill!
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:
Bill,
Usefulness is a criterion that
Edgar,
No, I don't think so.
It's kind of like the discussion Merle and I were having about having a map and
being lost. Something is only 'useful' if you have an intention, a purpose to
fulfill, much like having destination. An example is a hammer is useful for
pounding in a nail, but its
bill. please clarify...i am suggesting universal and if one looks hard
and long and realises maths art music and now architecture are universal
..point to me where it is not?..merle
Merle,
Math, art, music and architecture are not universal because they are products
the human
Merle,
Math, music and architecture are not universal because these are all singularly
human activities. There are other beings in the universe that are not human -
like caterpillars. Like I said before, unless by 'universal' you mean 'common
to all humans' these activities are not
Bill,
True, but everyone DOES have intentions and purposes. That's what real life is
like in the REAL world of forms...
Why, for God's sake, do you think there is something wrong with that or it
isn't real?
Edgar
On Jul 4, 2013, at 8:26 AM, Bill! wrote:
Edgar,
No, I don't think so.
bill..many things have duel purposes...
what you believe and think may not be useful today will be
humans cannot do without without it scenario tomorrow...
one must keep the door opened so to speak..
for you never know..
merle
Edgar,
No, I don't think so.
It's kind of like the discussion
Merle,
A funny Freudian slip. Are you DUELing with Bill?
:-)
Edgar
On Jul 4, 2013, at 9:06 AM, Merle Lester wrote:
bill..many things have duel purposes...
what you believe and think may not be useful today will be
humans cannot do without without it scenario tomorrow...
one must
disagree... caterpillars create an architectural wonder and emerge as
butterflies... merle
Merle,
Math, music and architecture are not universal because these are all singularly
human activities. There are other beings in the universe that are not human -
like caterpillars. Like I
Edgar,
FINALLY! A good really, really good question! It's so good I'll respond
line-by-line:
...but everyone DOES have intentions and purposes.
No, everyone does not. A Buddha does not. And becoming a Buddha (or more
correctly stated, 'realizing Buddha Nature') is what zen practice is
Merle,
Maybe..but they're horrible at math and can't sing for shit...Bill!
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Merle Lester merlewiitpom@... wrote:
 disagree... caterpillars create an architectural wonder and emerge as
butterflies... merle
Â
Merle,
Math, music and architecture
Bill,
Total C..P! (censored in compliance with the new guidelines)...
The person who wrote the poem CLEARLY has plenty of purpose in life. Like
writing the poem, like eating so he has the energy to write the poem, and like
coming in out of the rain back home...
We can disagree about which
I have to share Bill's disagreement of math being a language or even being
communicative.
Thanks,
--Chris
301-270-6524
On Jul 3, 2013 10:48 PM, Merle Lester merlewiit...@yahoo.com wrote:
mathematics is a universal language as is art and music..merle
PBS,
Math, logic, reason like all
Chris,
It's really dumb to say math doesn't communicate! Of course it does...
Edgar
On Jul 4, 2013, at 3:09 PM, Chris Austin-Lane wrote:
I have to share Bill's disagreement of math being a language or even being
communicative.
Thanks,
--Chris
301-270-6524
On Jul 3, 2013 10:48 PM,
The experience of unity that is what I am trying to convey, not that
effectively, is no more sharable than the experience of unity one may
notice while taking a bath or washing the coffee mugs.
Communicators may try to use math, but these uses are always matters of
stories.
Any ways, surely you
it is mathematics and it certainly does communicate..without mathematics we
would not have any bridges to cross rivers for example...merle
The experience of unity that is what I am trying to convey, not that
effectively, is no more sharable than the experience of unity one may notice
this is your opinion bill..
a delusional mind at work...
let's try a spider's web's..
tell me they are not architectural mathematical wonders...
merle
Merle,
Maybe..but they're horrible at math and can't sing for shit...Bill!
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Merle Lester merlewiitpom@...
...Bill!
Most people think of 1+1=2 as procedural, that is, that there is 1, THEN we
add 1 to it, THEN it becomes 2. They would regard 2=1+1 and 2=2 to be
different equations, but they are not in the least bit different. The
equal-sign is the present.
1+1 is already 2! And the effect IS the cause.
i say one and one makes 3...merle
Most people think of 1+1=2 as procedural, that is, that there is 1, THEN we
add 1 to it, THEN it becomes 2. They would regard 2=1+1 and 2=2 to be
different equations, but they are not in the least bit different. The
equal-sign is the present.
1+1
PBS (That's going to be my TLA (Three Letter Acronym) for Pandabananasock from
now on)...
I'll ignore all the math but do agree that JUST IF there is such a think that
could be called 'karma' it's not so much a moralistic cause-and-effect as it is
an intrinsic quality of the act itself.
But,
Bill!:
You're gonna ignore the math? I thought you said you were looking for an
impersonal language a couple posts ago... :D
The thing about using math that way is that eventually it leads you back to the
beginning. We use mathematics as an expression of the model, then we use the
model as
The thing I like about math as a source of analogies for zen is that it
shows how two different things csn br exactly the same.
Linear equations over reals are lines. Lines are linear equations.
Numbers, points, the constituents drop away as the eternal unity is seen.
Thanks,
--Chris
PBS,
Math, logic, reason like all delusions should come with the caveat 'suitable
for everyday use'. As a universal human language to communicate our logical
concepts it's very useful, but it should never be mistaken for reality.
...Bill!
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, pandabananasock@...
PBS,
I agree it's all in the present. We feel it, there.
I'll make no projections about what may be, in the future, though, regarding
karma surviving, etc. I just don't know. I have to be an agnostic about that,
because it is honest to be agnostic. To be a believer seems to require that
Neither should the reality it represents be mistaken for experience.
Fuck zen, I'm hungry!
On Wed, 7/3/13, Bill! billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote:
Subject: Re: [Zen] Say Bye-Bye to the Delusion of Cause-and-Effect and Karma
To:
PBS,
Then by all means, Just EAT!
...Bill!
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, pandabananasock@... wrote:
Neither should the reality it represents be mistaken for experience.
Fuck zen, I'm hungry!
On Wed, 7/3/13, Bill! BillSmart@...
I AM !
On Wed, 7/3/13, Bill! billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote:
Subject: Re: [Zen] Say Bye-Bye to the Delusion of Cause-and-Effect and Karma
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, July 3, 2013, 9:32 PM
PBS,
Then by all
Chris,
Except... that has nothing to do with awakening in Zen, which is having
nothing. That's not just the experience of Wu, (mu), when one experiences
it, but continues endlessly, until it's covered-up again eventually, which
always happens.
I think infinities and epsilons in math have
I wasn't talking about enlightenment however, was I?
Thanks,
--Chris
ch...@austin-lane.net
+1-301-270-6524
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Joe desert_woodwor...@yahoo.com wrote:
Chris,
Except... that has nothing to do with awakening in Zen, which is having
nothing. That's not just the
Chris,
Well, if you mention Zen, or set about to analogize it, it is only from the
point of view of Zen Mind, or No Mind, that one has any inkling of what is
meant by Zen.
Otherwise, if one mentions Zen, anything goes, to the extent it goes anywhere
accurately.
I think the appreciations of
mathematics is a universal language as is art and music..merle
PBS,
Math, logic, reason like all delusions should come with the caveat 'suitable
for everyday use'. As a universal human language to communicate our logical
concepts it's very useful, but it should never be mistaken for
48 matches
Mail list logo