RE: Bahai jihad?
So does that mean it is infallibly true and authoritative? It means it isn't. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Righteous Warfare - `Abdu'l-Bahá - The Secret of Divine Civilization [1]
In response to Gilberto's question on Righteous Warfare... part 1 of 4 `Abdu'l-Bahá - The Secret of Divine Civilization pgs. 55-59 Today we have closed our eyes to every righteous act and have sacrificed the abiding happiness of society to our own transitory profit. We regard fanaticism and zealotry as redounding to our credit and honor, and not content with this, we denounce one another and plot each other's ruin, and whenever we wish to put on a show of wisdom and learning, of virtue and godliness, we set about mocking and reviling this one and that. The ideas of such a one, we say, are wide of the mark, and so-and-so's behavior leaves much to be desired. The religious observances of Zayd are few and far between, and Amr is not firm in his faith. So-and-so's opinions smack of Europe. Fundamentally, Blank thinks of nothing but his own name and fame. Last night when the congregation stood up to pray, the row was out of line, and it is not permissible to follow a different leader. No rich man has died this month, and nothing has been offered to charity in memory of the Prophet. The edifice of religion has crumbled, the foundations of faiths have been blown to the winds. The carpet of belief has been rolled up, the tokens of certitude blotted out; the whole world has fallen into error; when it comes to repelling tyranny all are soft and remiss. Days and months have passed away, and these villages and estates still belong to the same owners as they did last year. In this town there used to be seventy different governments functioning in good order, but the number has steadily decreased; there are only twenty-five left now, as a memento. It used to be that two hundred contradictory judgments were handed down by the same mufti in any one day, now we hardly get fifty. In those days there were crowds of people who were all brainsick with litigation, and now they rest in peace; today the plaintiff would be defeated and the defendant victorious, tomorrow the plaintiff won the case and the defendant lost it -- but now this excellent practice has been abandoned too. What is this heathenish religion, this idolatrous kind of error! Alas for the Law, alas for the Faith, alas for all these calamities! O Brothers in the Faith! This is surely the end of the world! The Judgment is coming! With words such as these they assault the minds of the helpless masses and disturb the hearts of the already bewildered poor, who know nothing of the true state of affairs and the real basis for all such talk, and remain completely unaware of the fact that a thousand selfish purposes are concealed behind the supposedly religious eloquence of certain individuals. They imagine that speakers of this type are motivated by virtuous zeal, when the truth is that such individuals keep up a great hue and cry because they see their own personal ruin in the welfare of the masses, and believe that if the people's eyes are opened, their own light will go out. Only the keenest insight will detect the fact that if the hearts of these individuals were really impelled by righteousness and the fear of God, the fragrance of it would, like musk, be spreading everywhere. Nothing in the world can ever be supported by words alone. But these ill-omened owls have done a wrong, And learned to sing as the white falcon sings. And what of Sheba's message that the lapwing brings If the bittern learn to sing the lapwing's song?[1] [1 Cf. Qur'án 27:20 ff.] The spiritually learned, those who have derived infinite significance and wisdom from the Book of Divine Revelation, and whose illumined hearts draw inspiration from the unseen world of God, certainly exert their efforts to bring about the supremacy of the true followers of God, in all respects and above all peoples, and they toil and struggle to make use of every agency that will conduce to progress. If any man neglects these high purposes he can never prove acceptable in the sight of God; he stands out with all his shortcomings and claims perfection, and destitute, pretends to wealth. One sluggish, blind and surly's a poor thing, A lump of flesh, without a foot or wing. How far is he who apes and makes a show From the illumined, who doth truly know. One but an echo, though it's clear and sharp, And one, the Psalmist David with his harp. Knowledge, purity, devotion, discipline, independence, have nothing to do with outer appearance and dress. Once in the course of My travels I heard an eminent personage make the following excellent remark, the wit and charm of which remain in memory: Not every cleric's turban is a proof of continence and knowledge; not every layman's hat a sign of ignorance and immorality. How many a hat has proudly raised the banner of knowledge, how many a turban pulled down the Law of God! The third element of the utterance under discussion is, opposes his passions. How wonderful are the implications of this deceptively easy, all-inclusive phrase. This is the very foundation of every laudable
Righteous Warfare - `Abdu'l-Bahá - The Secret of Divine Civilization [3]
Continuing part 3: `Abdu'l-Bahá - The Secret of Divine Civilization pgs. 64-68 True civilization will unfurl its banner in the midmost heart of the world whenever a certain number of its distinguished and high-minded sovereigns -- the shining exemplars of devotion and determination -- shall, for the good and happiness of all mankind, arise, with firm resolve and clear vision, to establish the Cause of Universal Peace. They must make the Cause of Peace the object of general consultation, and seek by every means in their power to establish a Union of the nations of the world. They must conclude a binding treaty and establish a covenant, the provisions of which shall be sound, inviolable and definite. They must proclaim it to all the world and obtain for it the sanction of all the human race. This supreme and noble undertaking -- the real source of the peace and well-being of all the world -- should be regarded as sacred by all that dwell on earth. All the forces of humanity must be mobilized to ensure the stability and permanence of this Most Great Covenant. In this all-embracing Pact the limits and frontiers of each and every nation should be clearly fixed, the principles underlying the relations of governments towards one another definitely laid down, and all international agreements and obligations ascertained. In like manner, the size of the armaments of every government should be strictly limited, for if the preparations for war and the military forces of any nation should be allowed to increase, they will arouse the suspicion of others. The fundamental principle underlying this solemn Pact should be so fixed that if any government later violate any one of its provisions, all the governments on earth should arise to reduce it to utter submission, nay the human race as a whole should resolve, with every power at its disposal, to destroy that government. Should this greatest of all remedies be applied to the sick body of the world, it will assuredly recover from its ills and will remain eternally safe and secure.[1] [1 The foregoing paragraph, together with the later paragraph beginning A few, unaware of the power latent in human endeavor, was translated by Shoghi Effendi, Guardian of the Bahá'í Faith. Cf. The World Order of Bahá'u'lláh, pp. 37-38.] Observe that if such a happy situation be forthcoming, no government would need continually to pile up the weapons of war, nor feel itself obliged to produce ever new military weapons with which to conquer the human race. A small force for the purposes of internal security, the correction of criminal and disorderly elements and the prevention of local disturbances, would be required -- no more. In this way the entire population would, first of all, be relieved of the crushing burden of expenditure currently imposed for military purposes, and secondly, great numbers of people would cease to devote their time to the continual devising of new weapons of destruction -- those testimonials of greed and bloodthirstiness, so inconsistent with the gift of life -- and would instead bend their efforts to the production of whatever will foster human existence and peace and well-being, and would become the cause of universal development and prosperity. Then every nation on earth will reign in honor, and every people will be cradled in tranquillity and content. A few, unaware of the power latent in human endeavor, consider this matter as highly impracticable, nay even beyond the scope of man's utmost efforts. Such is not the case, however. On the contrary, thanks to the unfailing grace of God, the loving-kindness of His favored ones, the unrivaled endeavors of wise and capable souls, and the thoughts and ideas of the peerless leaders of this age, nothing whatsoever can be regarded as unattainable. Endeavor, ceaseless endeavor, is required. Nothing short of an indomitable determination can possibly achieve it. Many a cause which past ages have regarded as purely visionary, yet in this day has become most easy and practicable. Why should this most great and lofty Cause -- the daystar of the firmament of true civilization and the cause of the glory, the advancement, the well-being and the success of all humanity -- be regarded as impossible of achievement? Surely the day will come when its beauteous light shall shed illumination upon the assemblage of man. The apparatus of conflict will, as preparations go on at their present rate, reach the point where war will become something intolerable to mankind. It is clear from what has already been said that man's glory and greatness do not consist in his being avid for blood and sharp of claw, in tearing down cities and spreading havoc, in butchering armed forces and civilians. What would mean a bright future for him would be his reputation for justice, his kindness to the entire population whether high or low, his building up countries and cities, villages and districts, his making life easy, peaceful and happy for his fellow
Righteous Warfare - `Abdu'l-Bahá - The Secret of Divine Civilization [2]
Continuing part 2: `Abdu'l-Bahá - The Secret of Divine Civilization pgs. 60-63 All the peoples of Europe, notwithstanding their vaunted civilization, sink and drown in this terrifying sea of passion and desire, and this is why all the phenomena of their culture come to nothing. Let no one wonder at this statement or deplore it. The primary purpose, the basic objective, in laying down powerful laws and setting up great principles and institutions dealing with every aspect of civilization, is human happiness; and human happiness consists only in drawing closer to the Threshold of Almighty God, and in securing the peace and well-being of every individual member, high and low alike, of the human race; and the supreme agencies for accomplishing these two objectives are the excellent qualities with which humanity has been endowed. A superficial culture, unsupported by a cultivated morality, is as a confused medley of dreams,[1] and external lustre without inner perfection is like a vapor in the desert which the thirsty dreameth to be water.[2] For results which would win the good pleasure of God and secure the peace and well-being of man, could never be fully achieved in a merely external civilization. [1 Qur'án 12:44; 21:5.] [2 Qur'án 24:39.] The peoples of Europe have not advanced to the higher planes of moral civilization, as their opinions and behavior clearly demonstrate. Notice, for example, how the supreme desire of European governments and peoples today is to conquer and crush one another, and how, while harboring the greatest secret repulsion, they spend their time exchanging expressions of neighborly affection, friendship and harmony. There is the well-known case of the ruler who is fostering peace and tranquillity and at the same time devoting more energy than the warmongers to the accumulation of weapons and the building up of a larger army, on the grounds that peace and harmony can only be brought about by force. Peace is the pretext, and night and day they are all straining every nerve to pile up more weapons of war, and to pay for this their wretched people must sacrifice most of whatever they are able to earn by their sweat and toil. How many thousands have given up their work in useful industries and are laboring day and night to produce new and deadlier weapons which would spill out the blood of the race more copiously than before. Each day they invent a new bomb or explosive and then the governments must abandon their obsolete arms and begin producing the new, since the old weapons cannot hold their own against the new. For example at this writing, in the year 1292 A.H. [1] they have invented a new rifle in Germany and a bronze cannon in Austria, which have greater firepower than the Martini-Henry rifle and the Krupp cannon, are more rapid in their effects and more efficient in annihilating humankind. The staggering cost of it all must be borne by the hapless masses. [1 1875 A.D.] Be just: can this nominal civilization, unsupported by a genuine civilization of character, bring about the peace and well-being of the people or win the good pleasure of God? Does it not, rather, connote the destruction of man's estate and pull down the pillars of happiness and peace? At the time of the Franco-Prussian War, in the year 1870 of the Christian era, it was reported that 600,000 men died, broken and beaten, on the field of battle. How many a home was torn out by the roots; how many a city, flourishing the night before, was toppled down by sunrise. How many a child was orphaned and abandoned, how many an old father and mother had to see their sons, the young fruit of their lives, twisting and dying in dust and blood. How many women were widowed, left without a helper or protector. And then there were the libraries and magnificent buildings of France that went up in flames, and the military hospital, packed with sick and wounded men, that was set on fire and burned to the ground. And there followed the terrible events of the Commune, the savage acts, the ruin and horror when opposing factions fought and killed one another in the streets of Paris. There were the hatreds and hostilities between Catholic religious leaders and the German government. There was the civil strife and uproar, the bloodshed and havoc brought on between the partisans of the Republic and the Carlists in Spain. Only too many such instances are available to demonstrate the fact that Europe is morally uncivilized. Since the writer has no wish to cast aspersions on anyone He has confined Himself to these few examples. It is clear that no perceptive and well-informed mind can countenance such events. Is it right and proper that peoples among whom, diametrically opposed to the most desirable human behavior, such horrors take place, should dare lay claim to a real and adequate civilization? Especially when out of all this no results can be hoped for except the winning of a transient victory; and since this outcome never endures, it is, to
Re: Planned obsolscence
Religion, as in the Book of Religion, I love. I never consider that spilled milk. Light, from which lamp it shines, is light. Wisdom, no matter what inspired the wisdom, is wisdom. but yes, the customs and accepted interpretations of previous religions and the habits that people have developed based on their interpretation of the words of the Manifestation sometimes do feel like spilled milk to me. much love, janineGilberto Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:51:00 -0800 (PST), JS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: "jizya actually is ordained in the Quran, so if you really think it is necessarily a form of harrassment and tyranny then you should take it up with the author" Yes, this work of the Author is well beyond the expiry date.You don't need to say it. I realized a very long time ago that Bahaisthink of previous religions as spoiled milk.PeaceGilberto-- "My people are hydroponic"__You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]Baha'i Studies is available through! the following:Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.eduWeb - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-stNews - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-stPublic - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaistOld Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.netNew Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Do you Yahoo!? All your favorites on one personal page Try My Yahoo! __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Righteous Warfare - `Abdu'l-Bahá - The Secret of Divine Civilization [4]
Continuing part 4: `Abdu'l-Bahá - The Secret of Divine Civilization pgs. 69-71 Contrast with this the praiseworthy qualities and the greatness and nobility of Anushirvan the Generous and the Just. [1] That fair-minded monarch came to power at a time when the once solidly established throne of Persia was about to crumble away. With his Divine gift of intellect, he laid the foundations of justice, uprooting oppression and tyranny and gathering the scattered peoples of Persia under the wings of his dominion. Thanks to the restoring influence of his continual care, Persia that had lain withered and desolate was quickened into life and rapidly changed into the fairest of all flourishing nations. He rebuilt and reinforced the disorganized powers of the state, and the renown of his righteousness and justice echoed across the seven climes, [2] until the peoples rose up out of their degradation and misery to the heights of felicity and honor. Although he was a Magian, Muhammad, that Center of creation and Sun of prophethood, said of him: I was born in the time of a just king, and rejoiced at having come into the world during his reign. Did this illustrious personage achieve his exalted station by virtue of his admirable qualities or rather by reaching out to conquer the earth and spill the blood of its peoples? Observe that he attained to such a distinguished rank in the heart of the world that his greatness still rings out through all the impermanence of time, and he won eternal life. Should We comment on the continuing life of the great, this brief essay would be unduly prolonged, and since it is by no means certain that public opinion in Persia will be materially affected by its perusal, We shall abridge the work, and go on to other matters which come within the purview of the public mind. If, however, it develops that this abridgement produces favorable results, We shall, God willing, write a number of books dealing at length and usefully with fundamental principles of the Divine wisdom in its relation to the phenomenal world. [1 Sasaniyan king who reigned 531-578 A.D.] [2 i.e., the whole world.] No power on earth can prevail against the armies of justice, and every citadel must fall before them; for men willingly go down under the triumphant strokes of this decisive blade, and desolate places bloom and flourish under the tramplings of this host. There are two mighty banners which, when they cast their shadow across the crown of any king, will cause the influence of his government quickly and easily to penetrate the whole earth, even as if it were the light of the sun: the first of these two banners is wisdom; the second is justice. Against these two most potent forces, the iron hills cannot prevail, and Alexander's wall will break before them. It is clear that life in this fast-fading world is as fleeting and inconstant as the morning wind, and this being so, how fortunate are the great who leave a good name behind them, and the memory of a lifetime spent in the pathway of the good pleasure of God. It is all one, if it be a throne Or the bare ground under the open sky, Where the pure soul lays him Down to die.[1 [1 Sa'di, The Gulistan, On the Conduct of Kings.] A conquest can be a praiseworthy thing, and there are times when war becomes the powerful basis of peace, and ruin the very means of reconstruction. If, for example, a high-minded sovereign marshals his troops to block the onset of the insurgent and the aggressor, or again, if he takes the field and distinguishes himself in a struggle to unify a divided state and people, if, in brief, he is waging war for a righteous purpose, then this seeming wrath is mercy itself, and this apparent tyranny the very substance of justice and this warfare the cornerstone of peace. Today, the task befitting great rulers is to establish universal peace, for in this lies the freedom of all peoples. [The last paragraph is quoted in Bahá'u'lláh and The New Era pg. 172] __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Tabernacle
I posted this before but I am afraid it got lost in all the other discussions. So I am being bold and post it again. Dear all, recently I was told that the word tabernacle in thisquote in the original persian is actually nottabernacle, but is a word for the curtain whichtraditionally divided the men's quarters from thewomen's quarters in houses in Persia when Baha'u'llahwas alive. I wonder if this word in the original language couldhave also the meaning of Tabernacle. much love, janineCXII. Behold the disturbances which, for many a longyear, have afflicted the earth, and the perturbationthat hath seized its peoples. It hath either beenravaged by war, or tormented by sudden and unforeseencalamities. Though the world is encompassed withmisery and distress, yet no man hath paused to reflectwhat the cause or source of that may be. Whenever theTrue Counsellor uttered a word in admonishment, lo,they all denounced Him as a mover of mischief andrejected His claim. How bewildering, how confusing issuch behavior! No two men can be found who may be saidto be outwardly and inwardly united. The evidences ofdiscord and malice are apparent everywhere, though allwere made for harmony and union.The Great Being saith: O well-beloved ones! Thetabernacle of unity hath been raised; regard ye notone another as strangers. Ye are the fruits of onetree, and the leaves of one branch. We cherish thehope that the light of justice may shine upon theworld and sanctify it from tyranny. If the rulers andkings of the earth, the symbols of the power of God,exalted be His glory, arise and resolve to dedicatethemselves to whatever will promote the highestinterests of the whole of humanity, the reign ofjustice will assuredly be established amongst thechildren of men, and the effulgence of its light willenvelop the whole earth. The Great Being saith: Thestructure of world stability and order hath beenreared upon, a! nd will continue to be sustained by, thetwin pillars of reward and punishment In anotherpassage He hath written: Take heed, O concourse of therulers of the world! There is no force on earth thatcan equal in its conquering power the force of justiceand wisdom Blessed is the king who marcheth withthe ensign of wisdom unfurled before him, and thebattalions of justice massed in his rear. He verily isthe ornament that adorneth the brow of peace and thecountenance of security. There can be no doubtwhatever that if the day star of justice, which theclouds of tyranny have obscured, were to shed itslight upon men, the face of the earth would becompletely transformed(Baha'u'llah, Gleanings from the Writings ofBaha'u'llah, p. 218) Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term' __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Tabernacle, addition
oh my, either my brain is going or I am suffering from lack of sleep! I keep leaving out half of what I want to convey in my messages. I wrote: I wonder if this word in the original language couldhave also the meaning of Tabernacle. This was actually a question which should have been followed by this: Can anybody tell me whether this word in Persian or Arabic would have also the meaning of Tabernacle? So, anybody? much love, janine van rooij dublin, ireland Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term' __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Arson
Someone on another list remarked that according to science there is a link between commiting arson and being sociopath. It seems that sociopaths manifest their affliction first by an inclination to burn down buildings. much love, janine van rooij dublin, ireland. Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term' __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Arson
Someone on another list remarked that according to science there is a link between commiting arson and being sociopath. It seems that sociopaths manifest their affliction first by an inclination to burn down buildings. much love, janine van rooij dublin, ireland. Do you Yahoo!? Meet the all-new My Yahoo! Try it today! __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
re: to gilberto
Hi Gilberto, I completely forgot to answer to this post of yours! My native tongue is Dutch. I came to ireland 7 years ago. I was born and raised in the Netherlands, aka Holland ;o) much love, janine van rooij dublin, Ireland On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:32:35 -0800 (PST), louise mchenry[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Gilberto, I just read this mail over and I apologise that it is not that clear as I had intended it to be. While writing I got frequently interrupted. English is not my native tongue, hence the gramatical errors! ;o)Wow, that is interesting. What is your native tongue, if I might ask? And thanks for sharing your feelings about the Administrative Order.PeaceGilberto Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. Learn more. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Ruhi - a data point from Houston
I completely agree about Ruhi and youth. Here is my post from 2001: http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist/m29288.html Unfortunately from then to now there hasn't been a Book 2 offering in our community as many others became enthusiastic and there have been several more Book 1 study circles. It has also been stated here in Alaska that Jr.Youth should not take the Ruhi course but, instead take the course (patterned after Ruhi) especially for Youth. I'm not sure what that is called. I'm curious if it is the same elsewhere. Regardless, it is only offered to Youth groups 15 and above and he is now 14. When will we ever focus on Jr. Youth as the House of Justice directed 3years ago ?!? lovingly, Sandra __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Arson
Speaking of arson... I sent this several days ago... but haven't seen it on the list. - Original Message - From: Sandra Chamberlain To: BAHA'I STUDIES Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 2:58 PM Subject: Arson Gilberto, you stated: Also, since being burned alive is the punishment for arson in the Bahai faith, I'm not sure on what grounds you are objecting to the above. Would you please provide your source for this statement - Book and page from Baha'i Sacred Scripture ? Thank you! Sandra __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,
Gilberto, I wrote: All the perennialisms I have observed are deductive systems. They begin with certain first principles and read them into various religious and spiritual systems. That is what I meant by triumphalist. You replied: That seems really odd to me. I would tend to think of triumphalism more as an attitude of superiority. Exactly. You don't see my point? If you begin with a set of first principles, and you then deductively read them into various religious and spiritual systems, isn't that an attitude of superiority? Regards, Mark A. Foster http://markfoster.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger. Abbie Hoffman __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Ruhi - a data point from Houston
It has also been stated here in Alaska that Jr.Youth should not take the Ruhi course but, instead take the course (patterned after Ruhi) especially for Youth. Dear Sandra, I don't quite get that, nor have I seen anything like it in the lower 48. My experience is that children as young as 10 or 11 grasp how to do the basic exercises much quicker than the adults do, they stay focused better and get through the material quicker. It is certainly not too complicated for them. warmest, Susan __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Ruhi - a data point from Houston
In a message dated 1/22/2005 10:32:19 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dear Sandra,I don't quite get that, nor have I seen anything like it in the lower 48. Myexperience is that children as young as 10 or 11 grasp how to do the basicexercises much quicker than the adults do, they stay focused better and getthrough the material quicker. It is certainly not too complicated for them.warmest, Susan When my daughter took the course there was no "Youth" Book 1. But she is an honor student, with a 4.0 average through middle school and high school and had no trouble with the material. I figure Ruhi is pretty straightforward, and written in a concrete reasoning kindof way. I certainly see no reason why it has to be watered down for youth. Ihave never seen a youth who could not grasp it. As it is, my daughter has finished all the available books but 5, and is one of the few people in the cluster, youth or not who has actually completed so much of the curriculum. Scott __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Arson
Janine, At 04:48 AM 1/22/2005, you wrote: Someone on another list remarked that according to science there is a link between commiting arson and being sociopath. A sociopath is more a popular than a technical term. However, IMO, the problem with that person's statement is that it may be true by definition. She or he is simply placing arson under the category of sociopathology. It is like saying that a schizophrenic is mentally ill or premeditated murder is a felony. It is simple classification, not explanation. Regards, Mark A. Foster http://markfoster.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger. Abbie Hoffman __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,
All the perennialisms I have observed are deductive systems. They begin with certain first principles and read them into various religious and spiritual systems. That is what I meant by triumphalist.You replied:That seems really odd to me. I would tend to think of triumphalism more as an attitude of superiority.Exactly. You don't see my point? If you begin with a set of first principles, and you then deductively read them into various religious and spiritual systems, isn't that an attitude of superiority?JS: That's fascinating. Didn't realize that. Do you Yahoo!? All your favorites on one personal page Try My Yahoo! __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 10:25:30 -0600, Mark A. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gilberto, I wrote: All the perennialisms I have observed are deductive systems. They begin with certain first principles and read them into various religious and spiritual systems. That is what I meant by triumphalist. You replied: That seems really odd to me. I would tend to think of triumphalism more as an attitude of superiority. Exactly. You don't see my point? If you begin with a set of first principles, and you then deductively read them into various religious and spiritual systems, isn't that an attitude of superiority? I guess from where I'm coming from the only truly deductive system (really) is mathematics. But if even if you want to loosen it somewhat, I'm still not convinced To be honest, I don't think I see everything you are talking about. I think the Bahai view with a notion of progressive revelation is much more susceptible to Triumphalist tendancies. The Bahai faith literally sests up a hierarchy of the worlds religions, ranked by chronology, where the most recent religion is the most progressed. To me that has alot more potential for abuse, and would have a tendancy to encourage more arrogance than the perspective which says that many different religions in the world are basically equal in terms of their potential for spiritual depth. I'm certainly willing to entertain the possibility that the specific Traditionalist groups might have been arrogant and even had fascist tendancies but I doubt that it stemmed from perennialism per se. They were also affluent Orientalist Europeans who probably had attitudes typical for people in that situation. Peace Gilberto My people are hydroponic __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Arson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 04:50:25 -0900, Sandra Chamberlain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Speaking of arson... I sent this several days ago... but haven't seen it on the list. - Original Message - From: Sandra Chamberlain To: BAHA'I STUDIES Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 2:58 PM Subject: Arson Gilberto, you stated: Also, since being burned alive is the punishment for arson in the Bahai faith, I'm not sure on what grounds you are objecting to the above. Would you please provide your source for this statement - Book and page from Baha'i Sacred Scripture ? Thank you! Sandra That's really bizzare. I saw this a long time ago. And Mark already gave a more complete answer to the question than I would have given a long time ago. Peace Gilberto My people are hydroponic __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Arson
In a message dated 1/22/2005 11:27:20 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I wouldn't have the same respect for a Bahai who joined in on suchaccusations when their own scriptures don't seem to have a problemwith burning someone alive.Especially if we are talking about punishments found in the Quranwhich they say they believe comes from God.If you wanted to just say we are all playing a big game of Simon Sayswith God and that for the previous thousand years or so the rules wereone thing, and for the next thousand years or so they just happened tochange, that's fine.But to accuse the Islamic punishments of being brutal and inhumane issomething which is difficult if not impossible for a Bahai to do withintegrity. No game of Simon says. The Aqdas allows death for the crime of arson, but it also says imprisonment is acceptable, that the case and its punishment have mitigation. This allows a Baha`i tribunal to imprison one ofr arson, or exact an horrific punishment for the cruelest of the crimes. Note this punishment allows for execution, but none o the Baha`i mandated crimes involve a punishment of maiming, for instance or flogging. U.S. law does not allow for "maiming" (a cruel and unusual punishment)but does allow execution. I would hate to invoke a punishment of burning to death on anyone, but I look on electrocution as much the same thing and that is not a "cruel and unusual punishment" under western codes. I think these things reflect cultural attitudes as much as they do anything else. Regards, Scott __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Arson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:46:04 -0800 (PST), JS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gilberto: But to accuse the Islamic punishments of being brutal and inhumane is something which is difficult if not impossible for a Bahai to do with integrity. JS: But Gilberto, none of the Laws of the Aqdas are enforced except a few related to prayer, marriage, burial, alcohol, opium, and a few others. I don't see why that would be a relevant distinction. To make the example more extreme. If your books said to round up Muslims in concentration camps and put them in ovens (something which the Bahai writings clearly do not say) it wouldn't be at all comforting to say But Bahais don't have a country yet so we can't enforce those right now. Burtal Qur'an laws are, however, enforced by Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Pakistan, etc. I wouldn't embrace any of them as truly Islamic. There is room for improvement. And even if the Bahai writings didn't say what they did about punishments for arson, how can you believe the Quran comes from God and at the same time call it brutal? My people are hydroponic __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Arson
In a message dated 1/22/2005 11:58:21 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And even if the Bahai writings didn't say what they did aboutpunishments for arson, how can you believe the Quran comes from Godand at the same time call it brutal? I agree that it is specious to say "we don't enforce it". However, the punishments invoked by the Qur'an cannot be considered brutal. They fall under the category of social laws and as such were tailored for the time and place. It is only when one tries to invoke that time and place to be THIS time and place that problems arise and comparisons are made. Regards, Scott __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Arson
In a message dated 1/22/2005 12:09:24 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Alot of the Islamic penalties can be mitigated as well. They aren'tapplied in a vacum. There are all sorts of exceptions, andrequirements and its a basic principle that you want to avoid applyingsevere punishments. Make excuses for people. And the society, ifhealthy, would make it easy to keep the law. Yes, there is a harshpunishment for theft, but the ideal Islamic state is supposed to be awelfare state which would make sure that people's needs are taken careof and economic exploitation is reduced. Yes there is a harshpunishment for adultery, but the society would encourage modesty. Andit is actually really easy to get divorced and married. Even if youwanted to be really cynical, in order to convict for adultery you aresupposed to have 4 upright witness who see penetration. To get marriedyou only need 2 witnesses and it literally could just take a coupleseconds to have a legally valid marriage. I agree that mitigations are allowed. But I see Qur'anic Shariah as social laws enacted for the time and place. It is not, however the same time and place today. It is only when the nations who, to my estimation, are not upright and ethical Islamic nations attempt to set the clock back and ignore the passage of time that such problems arise. Regards, Scott __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,
Mark: In arguing for equality, all perennialists whose works I have read have imposed a certain "essence" on the different religions or spiritualities. JS: Mark, I love the clarity of your writing, and the distinction you makebetween perennialism and Baha'i Progressive Revelation, and how the former and not the latter, is triumphalistic. Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term' __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,
Mark, I love the clarity of your writing, and the distinction you make between perennialism and Baha'i Progressive Revelation, and how the former and not the latter, is triumphalistic. Thank you. I don't personally think that progressive Revelation is triumphalistic. However, it can be, and has been, interpreted that way. Regards, Mark A. Foster http://markfoster.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger. Abbie Hoffman __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Century of Light
Hi, Gilberto, At 12:12 PM 1/22/2005, you wrote: So why did mark attribute it to the UHJ? I should have been more precise. It wasn't technically written by the House of Justice, much as letters written on behalf of the House of Justice are written by staff persons at the Secretariat. The following is from the preface to that document (written by the House of Justice): Century of Light, prepared under our supervision, reviews these two processes and the relationship between them, in the context of the Bahá'í Teachings. We commend it to the thoughtful study of the friends, in the confidence that the perspectives it opens up will prove both spiritually enriching and of practical help in sharing with others the challenging implications of the Revelation brought by Bahá'u'lláh. http://bahaistudies.net/century_of_light.html Regards, Mark A. Foster http://markfoster.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger. Abbie Hoffman __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Century of Light
In a message dated 1/22/2005 2:41:47 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So which statements are infallible? They have to be actually writtenby house members and approved by them as the house of justice? The House is infallible in its decision amking and consultation. The book was written for and sponsored by the House, but it is not a record of its decisions or consultation. therefore it may be guidance, it may be full of truth, but it is not part of the process which is protected as "infallible". Regards, Scott __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:02:18 -0800 (PST), JS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark: In arguing for equality, all perennialists whose works I have read have imposed a certain essence on the different religions or spiritualities. Then if anything their sin would be in overgeneralizing or in not seeing the particularities and differences of various religions but that is still very different from triumphalism. If perennialist believes all the religions have a common essence it becomes near impossible to even articulate what it means for one religion to be better than the other. In the Bahai faith it is exceedingly easy and natural to say that one religion is better than the other. It is easy to find such statements in the writings. Incidentally, Would you consider John Hick a perennialist? a triumphalist? http://www.al-islam.org/al-tawhid/pluralism2.htm My people are hydroponic __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Arson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:09:09 -0800 (PST), JS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JS: But Gilberto, none of the Laws of the Aqdas are enforced except a few related to prayer, marriage, burial, alcohol, opium, and a few others. G: I don't see why that would be a relevant distinction. To make the example more extreme. If your books said to round up Muslims in concentration camps and put them in ovens (something which the Bahai writings clearly do not say) it wouldn't be at all comforting to say But Bahais don't have a country yet so we can't enforce those right now. JS: I didn't say it has anything to do with whether or not we have a country. The House of Justice still has the right to decide when to implement the law of burning the arsonist, it at all. I don't think it ever will be. Why would the punishment be in the book if it wasn't ever supposed to be enforced? Burtal Qur'an laws are, however, enforced by Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Pakistan, etc. G: I wouldn't embrace any of them as truly Islamic. There is room for improvement. JS: So in the last 1000 years, has there been a single 'truly Islamic' nation? Let me try to clarify. No nation is perfect. All countries have flaws. All nations only partially implement their own ideals. They fall short. And trying to live those ideals more faithfully is a process. I think Muslims can set up governments which engage in that process and at the same time don't betray Islamic ideals. I think current regimes which claim to be Islamic are somewhere along that path. I don't think everything which goes on in those countries is Islamic or required by Islam. And I think there is certain plenty of room for improvement. I don't think it is possible. What is possible is what Christianity, Judaism, and Hinduism have done: Implement a secular nation. Much of Christendom (i.e. Europe) has become truly secular and as a result Christianity is dying in Europe. Turkey is also rather secular to the point where Muslims are discriminated against. China and the former Soviet Union are also good examples of secular societies. I don't think secular regimes are necessarily the best argument for what you are trying to say. Personally, I think that it is possible to outline certain features which constitute a good government but this should be independent from a particular ideology. My people are hydroponic __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Century of Light
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:49:32 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 1/22/2005 2:41:47 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So which statements are infallible? They have to be actually written by house members and approved by them as the house of justice? The House is infallible in its decision amking and consultation. The book was written for and sponsored by the House, but it is not a record of its decisions or consultation. therefore it may be guidance, it may be full of truth, but it is not part of the process which is protected as infallible. Isn't the book the result of a decision made by the House? Peace Gilberto Regards, Scott__ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu -- My people are hydroponic __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:03:15 -0600, Mark A. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gilberto, At 02:52 PM 1/22/2005, you wrote: Then if anything their sin would be in overgeneralizing or in not seeing the particularities and differences of various religions but that is still very different from triumphalism. Failing to see differences would not in itself be triumphalistic. However, if one does not recognize those differences because one is committed to imposing a certain essence which comes (say) from one's own religion of philosophy, then one is allowing the presumed superiority, or triumph, of one's own religion or philosophy over those one is interpreting. Gilberto: It still seems to me that the act of imposition you are talking about might be an act of misperception, but it doesn't imply superiority. In fact, in the case of perennialism one is explicitly asserting equality. At the worst, what perennialists might be doing is romanticizing the past. Talking about the noble savage and all that. But from the perspective of progressive revelation the past is being demonized and those people of the past are considered savages, without bothering to consider them particularly noble. My people are hydroponic __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Arson
JS: I didn't say it has anything to do with whether or not we have a country. The House of Justice still has the right to decide when to implement the law of burning the arsonist, it at all. I don't think it ever will be.G: Why would the punishment be in the book if it wasn't ever supposed tobe enforced?JS: I think that two options are presented, and it is left to the House of Justice to pick the one most suitable to society.In a similar way, Baha'u'llah superficially allows bigamy, maybe only to present the Aqdasin the form of theQur'an. And just as theQur'anconditions polygamy on 'justice',and the Aqdasmakes 'tranquility' an outcomeof only monogamy. Who wouldn't want to be tranquil? G: They fall short. JS: Do you think it ispossible to have a'truly Islamic' nation? Also, don't you think that Islam is going the wrong way, I mean, it is getting more corrupted, it is deviating farther and farther away from the ideal? At one point, the Islamic worldwas the cradle of civilization, and now it has been reduced to fanaticism, terrorism, poverty, ignorance, intolerance, etc. Not a single praiseworthy Islamic nations exists on earth... What makes you think it is going to improve? And the Islamic countries that seem to be heading in the right directly are secularized/ing. G: I don't think secular regimes are necessarily the best argument for whatyou are trying to say. JS: What would be a better argument?G: Personally, I think that it is possible to outline certain featureswhich constitute a "good government" but this should be independentfrom a particular ideology.JS: What do you mean?__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Century of Light
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 16:54:40 -0600, Mark A. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Gilberto, At 02:41 PM 1/22/2005, you wrote: So if the Universal Houes of Justice is supposed to be infallible, and supervises a document, and allows it to be released then that document isn't infallible? IMO, infallible implies conformity with the Will of God. But then what does that mean exactly? At least sunni theology tends to lean towards determinism. God's will is ultimately iresistilbe. Everything which happens is ultimately God's will. So from that perspective, your definition seems virtually empty of meaning because everything would be in conformity with the will of God Peace Gilberto -- My people are hydroponic __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,
Hi, Gilberto, At 03:24 PM 1/22/2005, you wrote: Here's what I'm not sure you are seeing. I understand your point about historical or longitudinal particularism versus cultural particularism. However, neither perspective has much to do with why I am calling the perennialisms I have studied triumphalist. Really? Yes. The idea that most progressed, according to a certain framework, implied superiority fueled the machine of the white man's burden, many of the 19th-century approaches to cultural evolution (especially those of Tyler and Morgan), and Herbert Spencer's Social Darwinism. Progress is relative, not absolute, and it should not be the basis for judgments of superiority or inferiority. Could you give a clearer example of what it would mean for a religion to claim superiority? To say that only people who believe what I believe are going to heaven (or some similar idea). In terms of school-education, they are obviously superior. I don't believe that, because I have a Ph.D., I am superior to my students, who are working on their associates and bachelors degrees. If I *did* believe so, I don't think I would be a very effective professor. I simply have acquired certain knowledge which my students wish to learn. I have often found that my students can educate me in other areas. Could you give an example of how this is problematic in the direction of triumphalism? I mean, to some degree, even Bahais do this. Hopefully, I did so above. For example, In order to claim that Buddha was a manifestion you end up having to impose some structure of Buddhism and reject the parts which don't fit. I agreed with you before that some Baha'is are triumphalistic, but I would never do what you suggested. I honestly don't see it. At least not in a way that is convincing. For example, the Bahais and plenty of others might look at the various religions and point out that the major religions all seem to have certain teachings in common. Some form of Golden rule. Honor your parents. Don't lie. Don't steal. Be forgiving. Be patient...etc. right.? Intelligently acknowledging similarities, after having studied each religion, is different from a purely deductive approach in which one begins with the assumption of doctrinal similarity in advance, or in the absence, of such study. I think that there are certain aspects where religions actually and truly disagree with one another but I wouldn't want to put a square peg in a round hole. I don't know that Perennialists always insist on doing that. Then what is it you believe is perennial? Regards, Mark A. Foster http://markfoster.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger. Abbie Hoffman __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,
MARK:One of the best antidotes for triumphalism is historicism which is opposed by most perennialists whose works I have read.JS: Mark,are you refering to this meaing of historicism? "Most recently, Historicism has been used by post-modernist thinkers to describe the view that there is no absolute truth about deep philosophical questions that should stand for all time." Are you also saying that Baha'i Progressive Revelation is essentially historicist?__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,
Gilberto, At 05:21 PM 1/22/2005, you wrote: In fact, in the case of perennialism one is explicitly asserting equality. One can only assert equality if one has a basis for doing so (like equality before the law). Regards, Mark A. Foster http://markfoster.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger. Abbie Hoffman __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,
G: At the worst, what perennialists might be doing is romanticizing thepast. Talking about the noble savage and all that. But from theperspective of "progressive revelation" the past is being demonizedand those people of the past are considered savages, withoutbothering to consider them particularly noble. JS: Gilberto, I don't think progressive revelation (PR)implies a demonization of the past because it (PR) also states that truth is relative and not absolute. So this characterization (ie. saying that Islamic law is savage)is relative to what is considered savage/civil today. In the past, it would not have been considered savage. Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. Learn more. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,
Are you also saying that Baha'i Progressive Revelation is essentially historicist? Historicism has different definitions. I am using the term as it was defined in the history courses I took in graduate school. (My Ph.D. minor was history.) For instance: the view that concepts, beliefs, truths and even standards of truth can be understood only in relation to the whole moral, intellectual, religious and aesthetic cultures of the historical periods in which they arise or flourish. http://www.google.com/search?hl=enlr=client=firefox-arls=org.mozilla:en-US:officialoi=defmoreq=define:historicism Regards, Mark A. Foster http://markfoster.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger. Abbie Hoffman __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Bahai jihad? Re: Men and Women equal?
- Hide quoted text - On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:51:39 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Defending could be nothing more than apologetics. Gilberto: I could actually say the same about jihad then. There is a hadith which states: The best jihad is speaking the truth to an unjust ruler. Susan: Dear Gilberto, Which in Islam does not rule out actual warfare in the name of religion. If you want to say Baha'is wage the greater jihad, that is true. We are still forbidden to kill in the name of our religion. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You are allowed to apply capital punishment according to your religion. You are allowed to engage in collective security in your religion. You are allowed to engage in righteous warfare in your religion. Susan: There is a difference between a religion allowing or even calling for certain things and their being done in the name of religion. Gilberto: If you are just arguing about the names that seems an odd distinction to make. Susan: I am not at all arguing about names Gilberto: So what is the distinction you refer to between a religion allowing certain things and their being done in the name of religion? Peace My people are hydroponic __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Bahai jihad? Re: Men and Women equal?
I thought the laws were in the Aqdas? Dear Gilberto, Not all of them. Jihads are also justified to defend Muslims living in the Daru'l-Harb as I'm sure you know, and bring their country into the Daru'l-Islam. Then that's ultimately a matter of saving lives. It can be done according to Islamic laws if Muslims in a country feel they are not free to live as Muslims, whether their lives are directly threatened or not. But in any case, in the Baha'i Faith we cannot fight in the name of our religion even if our lives are at stake. . The whole passage already looked sinister as is. I didn't remove any mitigating context. Yes, you did. You left out the parts that make that passage make sense. The specific examples given fall in those categories but there is no statement which explicitly puts a limit on what could be included in righteous purpose. So? He gives the most reasonable examples there are and you call that Orwellian? Susan __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Arson
Gilberto: That's really bizzare. I saw this a long time ago. And Mark already gave a more complete answer to the question than I would have given a long time ago. Well, sometimes, posts are missing from the Archives, which is where I looked. Nothing from me on the 14th and nothing from Mark in a search of the word *arson*. However, I did find the quote from Baha'u'llah that you apparently refered to. There were other posts on this subject in 2003 and 2004. Perhaps you or Mark could direct me to the *subject* heading so I can look for his response ? Often when there are so many posts as there are now, it's a bit difficult to find a particular topic with out a word search. Subject heading remain the same while the *topic* changes. lovingly, Sandra __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Arson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:23:16 -0800 (PST), JS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JS: I didn't say it has anything to do with whether or not we have a country. The House of Justice still has the right to decide when to implement the law of burning the arsonist, it at all. I don't think it ever will be. G: Why would the punishment be in the book if it wasn't ever supposed to be enforced? JS: I think that two options are presented, and it is left to the House of Justice to pick the one most suitable to society. Gilberto: But why would that option be presented? In a similar way, Baha'u'llah superficially allows bigamy, maybe only to present the Aqdas in the form of the Qur'an. And just as the Qur'an conditions polygamy on 'justice', and the Aqdas makes 'tranquility' an outcome of only monogamy. Who wouldn't want to be tranquil? Yes. And Muslims have at times taken the Quran up on its offer and actually practiced polygamy. So the question remains, why would the Bahai laws mention the possibility of such a harsh punishment for arson if it was never meant to be implemented? G: They fall short. JS: Do you think it is possible to have a 'truly Islamic' nation? Gilberto: I think it is certainly possible for Muslims to do better. Also, don't you think that Islam is going the wrong way, I mean, it is getting more corrupted, it is deviating farther and farther away from the ideal? I think that if you look at history civilizations rise and fall and rise back up again... and fall.. and rise back up again.. etc. At one point, the Islamic world was the cradle of civilization, and now it has been reduced to fanaticism, terrorism, poverty, ignorance, intolerance, etc. Now you are thinking like a bigot. Not a single praiseworthy Islamic nations exists on earth... The West has the wealth and technology it has, not because of some divine right, not because its some birthright. It has the wealth that it has by enslaving Africans, and by extracting resources from the developing world, through colonization, and then through neo-colonial arrangements. Unlike how many Bahais seem to think, technology and infrastructure isn't some proof of divine approval. If anything, its proof of theft. If people in the developing world seem angry at the West it is actually a reasonable reaction to the policies inflicted on them. I don't think any nation on earth is praiseworthy. To a disturbingly high degree, countries do what is in their interests to do. If they can not look like total bastards while they are doing it, its a plus. What makes you think it is going to improve? And the Islamic countries that seem to be heading in the right directly are secularized/ing. That's not an observation. It follows from your beliefs about Islam. For example, Saddam Hussein was a Bathist, a secular Arab nationalist. Do you think that he would be a good model for the rest of the Arab world to follow? Turkey as a society is rather secularized. The way it got there was by discriminating against Muslims. Muslim women are not allowed to wear headscarves in certain public contexts. Religious men aren't allowed to go up to high ranks in the army. I know of someone who was put in jail for giving the Adhan in Arabic. If you are trying to say that the way for Muslim countries to progress is by persecuting Muslims who are peacfully practicing their religion I'll have absolutely no respect for you. [China, former Soviet Union] G: I don't think secular regimes are necessarily the best argument for what you are trying to say. JS: What would be a better argument? I think your argument is flawed to begin with. And promoting secularism is also the kind of argument which it is difficult for a Bahai to make with integrity given that ultimately the Bahai vision of the future certainly has its theocratic aspects. G: Personally, I think that it is possible to outline certain features which constitute a good government but this should be independent from a particular ideology. JS: What do you mean? I'm not sure how else to say it. Governments should be accountable to the citizens. Governments should be responsive to the citizens. Governments should strive to heed the aspirations, values, hopes, needs, concerns of the citizens. If the citizens are 90% religious Muslims, then that has certain implications. If the citizens are 90% Western secular liberal capitalists, that has certain implications. My people are hydroponic __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Re: Bahai jihad? Re: Men and Women equal?
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:02:48 -0600, Susan Maneck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gilberto: The whole passage already looked sinister as is. I didn't remove any mitigating context. Susan: Yes, you did. You left out the parts that make that passage make sense. Gilberto: Go back and look at the original post. I had put in the entire passage uncut. And then I posted again with the parts which were Orwellian. Gilberto: The specific examples given fall in those categories but there is no statement which explicitly puts a limit on what could be included in righteous purpose. Susan: So? He gives the most reasonable examples there are and you call that Orwellian? Gilberto: No. What's Orwellian are the specific part of the passage which I called Orwellian. Peace Gilberto My people are hydroponic __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Century of Light
In a message dated 1/22/2005 6:48:21 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Isn't the book the result of a decision made by the House? No. Scott __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Past Revelations
In a message dated 12/28/2004 7:37:54 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: "In the mundane case it is easier to deal with the idea that nothing isperfect so its not a big deal for it to be improved upon later. Like asports record... there is always going to be someone else later whowill run faster, be stronger, jump higher, farther, etc. But thinkingof God in that way comes out very much like faint praise. It tends toaccuse God of limitation and imperfection." Gilberto, Not the way we see it. The limitations are on are part. As Baha'u'llah says: O Son of Beauty! By My spirit and by My favor! By My mercy and by My beauty! All that I have revealed unto thee with the tongue of power, and have written for thee with the pen of might, hath been in accordance with thy capacity and understanding, not with My state and the melody of My voice. warmest, Susan __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Perennial Bab?
In a message dated 12/27/2004 7:48:44 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'velooked at the writings of the Bab but the stuff I've seen tends not toinclude much legislation or commandments. Dear Gilberto, You'd probably have to find Nicholas' French translation of the Bayan. Baha'is haven't given a high priority to translating the Bab's laws since they are no longer considered binding. warmest, Susan __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Perennial Bab?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The main concept which prevented me from accepting it was the near universal understanding of "the seal" among Muslims. For that reason, I gravitated more towards Eckankar (surat shabd yoga), Thelema, Theosophy, Vedanta, and (briefly) Sikhism. Susan: Of course Mani, the founder of the Manichean religion, used that title long before Muhammad adopted it. JS: On the same note, I remember reading somewhere that the notions of Sonship (one parent) and of resurrection (as in from the tomb after the crucifixion) were promoted by people before Jesus. Do you know who they were? Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term' __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Arson
Why would the punishment be in the book if it wasn't ever supposed to be enforced? For emphasis, to show divine displeasure with the prohibited deed. If the law was intended to be enforced, Baha'u'llah would not have provided an alternative -- life imprisonment without parole. This is a very unusual provision in His laws, where He reveals a law, then provides an alternative. There are other examples of the Deity saying things indirectly to impact on human behavior. There is a chapter of SAQ devoted to God's rebukes of the Prophets of God, which are for the edification of the people, as the Prophets are perfect. The example of Moses being punished for striking the rock in the desert is discussed by Him. I think likewise, the impact of the presence of the death penalties in the Most Holy Book will have a deterrent effect on people's conduct. There is also the precedent of the severe laws revealed by the Bab, which were not revealed to be enforced, but for another purpose: The severe laws and injunctions revealed by the Bab can be properly appreciated and understood only when interpreted in the light of His own statements regarding the nature, purpose and character of His own Dispensation. As these statements clearly reveal, the Bab Dispensation was essentially in the nature of a religious and indeed social revolution, and its duration had therefore to be short, but full of tragic events, of sweeping and drastic reforms. These drastic measures enforced by the Bab and His followers were taken with the view of undermining the very foundations of Shi'ah orthodoxy, and thus paving the way for the coming of Baha'u'llah. To assert the independence of the new Dispensation, and to prepare also the ground for the approaching Revelation of Bah'u'llh the Bb had therefore to reveal very severe laws, even though most of them, were never enforced. But the mere fact that He revealed them was in itself a proof of the independent character of His Dispensation and was sufficient to create such widespread agitation, and excite such opposition on the part of the clergy that led them to cause His eventual martyrdom. (Shoghi Effendi, Dawn of a New Day, p. 77) Cruelty must be understood in the context of the times. During the time of Moses, He revealed the punishment for violation of the Sabbath, and several other laws, to be death by stoning. In these days when society was almost utterly without social order, and the very basic practices needed to be brought into being and universally established, a severe punishment was provided. So, nowadays the day of rest is an established practice in society, even in completely secular societies. And it was brought into being by this law and punishment of Moses, though generally He does not get the credit. Similarly, adultery between a married man and a married woman was punishable by death by stoning. God desired to emphasize how importance the purity of the marital relationship was. In the Aqdas, however, it is punishable by a fine that doubles with each offense, but more especially by social opprobrium and exposure. Nowadays, the severe laws of Baha'u'llah are few; and as I showed above, may in fact never be enforced by the House of Justice; or perhaps reserved for the most extreme of cases. As the House said in a letter on this subject of the punishment for arson (and not all arson -- only burning a house), there is a difference in gravity between a person who burns down an empty warehouse, and a person who burns down a schoolhouse full of children. But the mere presence of the law in the Book will have an effect. Another severe law in the Writings of Baha'u'llah is the destruction of a government that invades another county, after all the prerequisites are in place: Frontiers fixed; armaments reduced; a firm covenant; the principles of international law established and agreed upon; fairness in enforcement of international law; the presence of properly constituted and universally recognized international bodies such as the international police force, tribunal, and executive. And in that circumstance, if a country invades another county, here is the remedy: The fundamental principle underlying this solemn Pact should be so fixed that if any government later violate any one of its provisions, all the governments on earth should arise to reduce it to utter submission, nay the human race as a whole should resolve, with every power at its disposal, to destroy that government. Should this greatest of all remedies be applied to the sick body of the world, it will assuredly recover from its ills and will remain eternally safe and secure. (Abdu'l-Baha, The Secret of Divine Civilization, p. 65) That's for the Lesser Peace. When the Most Great Peace comes, that won't be necessary; and when future Prophets come, probably war will have been drummed out of human nature for good; then the law can be removed from the Text
Re: Perennial Bab?
In a message dated 1/22/2005 8:50:13 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dear Gilberto, You'd probably have to find Nicholas' French translation of the Bayan. Baha'is haven't given a high priority to translating the Bab's laws since they are no longer considered binding. warmest, Susan The Bayab was not a common book for the Babis tohave. Mostly they would have the Qayyum'l Asma. Regards, Scott __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Century of Light
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:56:11 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 1/22/2005 6:48:21 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Isn't the book the result of a decision made by the House? No. But it was under the supervision of the house? Scott__ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu -- My people are hydroponic __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Century of Light
In a message dated 1/22/2005 8:58:17 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But it was under the supervision of the house? The House commissioned it, the House did not write it. The House reviewed it, they did not write it. The House made a decision to publish a book on the topic, commissioned it and reviewed it for content, but it does not reflect a consultative decision of the House in any particular. And, yes, that makes a difference. Regards, Scott __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:25:08 -0600, Mark A. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Gilberto, At 03:24 PM 1/22/2005, you wrote: Mark: I understand your point about historical or longitudinal particularism versus cultural particularism. However, neither perspective has much to do with why I am calling the perennialisms I have studied triumphalist. Really? Yes. The idea that most progressed, according to a certain framework, implied superiority fueled the machine of the white man's burden, many of the 19th-century approaches to cultural evolution (especially those of Tyler and Morgan), and Herbert Spencer's Social Darwinism. Gilberto: I think white supremacy is still a factor in many people's thinking about the world. The civil rights movement only went so far. Mark: Progress is relative, not absolute, and it should not be the basis for judgments of superiority or inferiority. Gilberto: Progress is invariably a value-laden term that Bahais are choosing to use. I think that if Bahais really don't want to imply any degree or kind of superiority it is not that hard to find more neutral terms to describe the transitions from one dispensation to another. Continual revelation. Recurring revelation. Repeating revelation. There is a paper I remember reading as an undergrad once. I wish I could remember the title right now. The author was James Snead and the basic thesis as I recall it was to say that while Western culture often embraced notions of progress a la Hegel, that Black culture often didn't believe in progress as much as repitition with a difference. From a certain point of view one really can't come up with anything genuinely new, after all there is no new thing under the sun so it is presumptuous to try. So you might as well get over it, and embrace the fact that you are going to be repetitive, but just repeat in your own distinctive way. The paper went on to talk about the prevalence of sampling in hip-hop or the way dancehall djs do ALOT of covers from all sorts of sources. To me that's a really healthy way to look at things. I'm not sure if the paper is online, but I think I found a reference to it: Snead, J.A. 1984. 'Repetition as a figure of black culture', in Black Literature and Literary Theory, ed. H.L. Gates Jnr (London: Routledge), 59-80 Gilberto: For example, In order to claim that Buddha was a manifestion you end up having to impose some structure of Buddhism and reject the parts which don't fit. Mark: I agreed with you before that some Baha'is are triumphalistic, but I would never do what you suggested. Gilberto: Ok, I believe you. But then when you are in your Bahai paradigm, and read that the Buddha is identified with being a Manifestation, but the teachings of real live Buddhists in the world don't seem to be consistent with the Bahai teachings, I'm not sure what you do. Do you bracket the paradigm of the real live Buddhists away from the Bahai paradigm so that they are never compared with one another? Or do you do something else? Gilberto: I honestly don't see it. At least not in a way that is convincing. For example, the Bahais and plenty of others might look at the various religions and point out that the major religions all seem to have certain teachings in common. Some form of Golden rule. Honor your parents. Don't lie. Don't steal. Be forgiving. Be patient...etc. right.? Mark: Intelligently acknowledging similarities, after having studied each religion, is different from a purely deductive approach in which one begins with the assumption of doctrinal similarity in advance, or in the absence, of such study. Gilberto: But if you find ALOT of those actual similarities, would you ever be justified in saying that certain religions had a common divine origin and if they came from one source that there are likely to be further, deeper similarities? Peace Gilberto My people are hydroponic __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Century of Light
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:00:16 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 1/22/2005 8:58:17 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But it was under the supervision of the house? The House commissioned it, the House did not write it. The House reviewed it, they did not write it. The House made a decision to publish a book on the topic, commissioned it and reviewed it for content, but it does not reflect a consultative decision of the House in any particular. And, yes, that makes a difference. Is there an exhaustive statement somewhere which explains the difference between which actions, decisions, statements from the UHJ are infallible (in which sense?) and which are not? Peace Gilberto My people are hydroponic __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Century of Light
In a message dated 1/22/2005 9:30:40 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is there an exhaustive statement somewhere which explains thedifference between which actions, decisions, statements from the UHJare infallible (in which sense?) and which are not? Nope. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Century of Light
In a message dated 1/22/2005 9:30:38 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is there an exhaustive statement somewhere which explains thedifference between which actions, decisions, statements from the UHJare infallible (in which sense?) and which are not? The UHJ legislates, it does not interpret. It is only authoritative when dealing with what is NOT expressed in the text. Without a Guardian it also protects the faith and has the authority to decide on covenental matters. It is only authoritative when it is convened. The opinion of a single member outside the House is not authoritative. Regards, Scott __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Arson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:09:43 -0800 (PST), JS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JS: I think that two options are presented, and it is left to the House of Justice to pick the one most suitable to society. Gilberto: But why would that option be presented? JS: In my view, it is there in case human society makes a sharp left turn. I think it is clear that in this day and age, imprisonment is considered by many as the most humane and civil punishment for murderers and arsonists. What criteria are you ultimately using to determine whether something is humane? Are you basically just going by popular opinion? Or something else? Do the Bahai writings actually say that the punishments found in the Quran are inhumane for the present day? Or is that something you are just saying? If you read in the Bible (or the Quran for that matter) even in ancient times, people were imprisoned from time to time for various offensese. If imprisonment was really the more human option, and it existed in earlier times, why wouldn't those religions have simply mandated imprisonment? JS: In a similar way, Baha'u'llah superficially allows bigamy, maybe only to present the Aqdas in the form of the Qur'an. And just as the Qur'an conditions polygamy on 'justice', and the Aqdas makes 'tranquility' an outcome of only monogamy. Who wouldn't want to be tranquil? G: Yes. And Muslims have at times taken the Quran up on its offer and actually practiced polygamy. So the question remains, why would the Bahai laws mention the possibility of such a harsh punishment for arson if it was never meant to be implemented? JS: I think that the Muslim jury is still out on whether polygamy is allowed or not. Gilberto: I'm actually surprised at your statement. I think there are certainly Muslims who might discourage the practice in many specific cases. It's certainly not for everyone. And there are certainly plenty of reasons not to do it. But aside from that I'm not sure I know of anyone mainstream person who would say categorically that it was prohibited. I'm actually curious where you would get the idea that the jury is out? After all, Muhammad and (if I remember correctly) Ali practiced polygamy themselves. JS: Also, don't you think that Islam is going the wrong way, I mean, it is getting more corrupted, it is deviating farther and farther away from the ideal? G: I think that if you look at history civilizations rise and fall and rise back up again... and fall.. and rise back up again.. etc. JS: Not sure about rising back up. What is an example? Rome never came back, NATO? EU? The Chinese would rise and fall in terms of their prominence in world history. I think that in the next few decades and centuries, secularism will overtake the planet, until the Baha'i Faith blossoms into maturity and brings spirituality back into civilization and governance. Is that an actual Bahai prediction or is it just your opinion? JS: At one point, the Islamic world was the cradle of civilization, and now it has been reduced to fanaticism, terrorism, poverty, ignorance, intolerance, etc. G: Now you are thinking like a bigot. JS: The statement was an honest summary of what we are fed by western media. I do not necessarily agree with western media. You gave me no indication that you had any reservations at all about what you just said. JS: Not a single praiseworthy Islamic nations exists on earth... The West has the wealth and technology it has, not because of some divine right, not because its some birthright. It has the wealth that it has by enslaving Africans, and by extracting resources from the developing world, through colonization, and then through neo-colonial arrangements. Unlike how many Bahais seem to think, technology and infrastructure isn't some proof of divine approval. If anything, its proof of theft. If people in the developing world seem angry at the West it is actually a reasonable reaction to the policies inflicted on them. I don't think any nation on earth is praiseworthy. To a disturbingly high degree, countries do what is in their interests to do. If they can not look like total bastards while they are doing it, its a plus. JS: I am not talking about wealth and technology. I am talking about tolerance and freedom, particularly for (1) women, In several Muslim countries women could vote before they could in certain Western countries. In several Muslim countries women have been head of state. In Iran, women make up a majority of the university students. In certain respects the role of women in the world in general, and in Muslim scoieties in particular is subject to change. (2) Baha'is (3) Jews Historically Jews have generally thrived in Muslim lands. It wasn't until recently with the founding of Israel that things went really bad.The Enlightened West has also had its own challeneges being tolerant to Jews. You may have
Re: Arson
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 02:16:47 -, Brent Poirier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Similarly, adultery between a married man and a married woman was punishable by death by stoning. God desired to emphasize how importance the purity of the marital relationship was. In the Aqdas, however, it is punishable by a fine that doubles with each offense, but more especially by social opprobrium and exposure. Umm... given that prostitution is actually legal in most of the west (so people are actually quite happy to pay money to have it) how exactly is that whole fining process a deterrent? Peace Gilberto My people are hydroponic __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Arson
In a message dated 1/22/2005 10:16:36 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Do the Bahai writings actually say that thepunishments found in the Quran are inhumane for the present day? Or isthat something you are just saying? The Baha`i Writings say that the social laws change from Revelation to Revelation because society has changed. Regards, Scott __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,
In a message dated 1/22/2005 8:49:14 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Gilberot:But unless you have a time machine,that justification doesn't do you any good.PeaceGilberto Its the only way to look at it. The past is studiable because it is the past. Once can barely keep up with the present and the future is beyond our ken. Christianity was for a time and place. Islam was for a time and place. The time and place justify the religion. Regards, Scott __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Arson the New World Order
G: What criteria are you ultimately using to determine whether somethingis "humane""? Are you basically just going by popular opinion? Orsomething else? Do the Bahai writings actually say that thepunishments found in the Quran are inhumane for the present day? Or isthat something you are just saying? JS: Maybe humane was a loaded word that doesn't exactly describe what I mean. A better word would have been 'applicable to our time'. It may indirectly be based on popular opinion, but it is something that becomes apparent in the light of where society and human maturity is.I cannot say that I have seen the word inhumane used in the Baha'i writings in reference to Islamic law, but I have seen statements that describe Islamic Law as no longer applicable in our time. G: If you read in the Bible (or the Quran for that matter) even inancient times, people were imprisoned from time to time for variousoffensese. If imprisonment was really the more human option, and itexisted in earlier times, why wouldn't those religions have simplymandated imprisonment?J: I would say that completely mandated imprisonment would have been an insufficient deterrant to the people in the ancient times. JS: I think that in the next few decades and centuries, secularism will overtake the planet, until the Baha'i Faith blossoms into maturity and brings spirituality back into civilization and governance.G: Is that an actual Bahai prediction or is it just your opinion?JS: Yes, this is my understanding of Shoghi Effendi's predictions. See "World Order of Baha'u'llah" of Shoghi Effendi. Here are some excerpts I separated into 5 sections below: 1)Emergence of Baha'u'llah's New World Order: The Revelation of Bahá'u'lláh, whose supreme mission is none other but the achievement of this organic and spiritual unity of the whole body of nations, should, if we be faithful to its implications, be regarded as signalizing through its advent the coming of age of the entire human race. The Revelation entrusted by the Almighty Ordainer to Bahá'u'lláh, His followers firmly believe, has been endowed with such potentialities as are commensurate with the maturity of the human race--the crowning and most momentous stage in its evolution from infancy to manhood. 2) Disintegration of today's society Deep as is the gloom that already encircles the world, the afflictive ordeals which that world is to suffer are still in preparation, nor can their blackness be as yet imagined. We stand on the threshold of an age whose convulsions proclaim alike the death-pangs of the old order and the birth-pangs of the new. 3) Secularization overtaking Islam, Europe, and America The collapse of the power of the Shí'ih hierarchy, in a land which had for centuries been one of the impregnable strongholds of Muslim fanaticism, was the inevitable consequence of that wave of secularization which, at a later time, was to invade some of the most powerful and conservative ecclesiastical institutions in both the European and American continents. This menace of secularism that has attacked Islám and is undermining its remaining institutions, that has invaded Persia, has penetrated into India, and raised its triumphant head in Turkey, has already manifested itself in both Europe and America, and is, in varying degrees, and under various forms and designations, challenging the basis of every established religion, and in particular the institutions and communities identified with the Faith of Jesus Christ. 4) Fall of Islam "O people of the Qur'án," Bahá'u'lláh, addressing the combined forces of Sunní and Shí'ih Islám, significantly affirms, "Verily, the Prophet of God, Muhammad, sheddeth tears at the sight of your cruelty. Ye have assuredly followed your evil and corrupt desires, and turned away your face from the light of guidance. Erelong will ye witness the result of your deeds; for the Lord, My God, lieth in wait and is watchful of your behavior... O concourse of Muslim divines! By your deeds the exalted station of the people hath been abased, the standard of Islám hath been reversed, and its mighty throne hath fallen." Both Sunní and Shí'ih Islám had, through the convulsions that had seized them, contributed to the acceleration of the disruptive process to which I have previously referred--a process which, by its very nature, is to pave the way for that complete reorganization and unification which the world, in every aspect of its life, must achieve. 5) Fall of Christianity That the forces of irreligion, of a purely materialistic philosophy, of unconcealed paganism have been unloosed, are now spreading, and, by consolidating themselves, are beginning to invade some of the most powerful Christian institutions of the western world, no unbiased observer can fail to admit. Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term' __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe,
Re: Arson
G: Umm... given that prostitution is actually legal in most of the west(so people are actually quite happy to pay money to have it) howexactly is that whole fining process a deterrent?JS: Doubling is the key word here. If the fine for adultery is $100, it will be $200 the 2nd time, $400 3rd time, $800 4th time, $1600 5th, $3200 6th, $6400 7th, $12800 8th, $25600 9th, $51200 10th, $102,400 11th. I don't think I would be able to affort to do it more than 7 times. Billionaires mayhave the money for25 offenses, or $1.7 Billion. Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term' __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Arson
Sandra, Here is the information again: Should anyone intentionally destroy a house by fire, him also shall ye burn; should anyone deliberately take another's life, him also shall ye put to death. -- Baha'u'llah, Aqdas: Notes, p.203 The law of Baha'u'llah prescribes the death penalty for murder and arson, with the alternative of life imprisonment (see note 87). In His Tablets Abdu'l-Baha explains the difference between revenge and punishment. He affirms that individuals do not have the right to take revenge, that revenge is despised in the eyes of God, and that the motive for punishment is not vengeance, but the imposition of a penalty for the committed offence. In Some Answered Questions, He confirms that it is the right of society to impose punishments on criminals for the purpose of protecting its members and defending its existence. With regard to this provision, Shoghi Effendi in a letter written on his behalf gives the following explanation: In the Aqdas Baha'u'llah has given death as the penalty for murder. However, He has permitted life imprisonment as an alternative. Both practices would be in accordance with His Laws. Some of us may not be able to grasp the wisdom of this when it disagrees with our own limited vision; but we must accept it, knowing His Wisdom, His Mercy and His Justice are perfect and for the salvation of the entire world. If a man were falsely condemned to die, can we not believe Almighty God would compensate him a thousandfold, in the next world, for this human injustice? You cannot give up a salutary law just because on rare occasions the innocent may be punished. The details of the Baha'i law of punishment for murder and arson, a law designed for a future state of society, were not specified by Baha'u'llah. The various details of the law, such as degrees of offence, whether extenuating circumstances are to be taken into account, and which of the two prescribed punishments is to be the norm are left to the Universal House of Justice to decide in light of prevailing conditions when the law is to be in operation. The manner in which the punishment is to be carried out is also left to the Universal House of Justice to decide. In relation to arson, this depends on what house is burned. There is obviously a tremendous difference in the degree of offence between the person who burns down an empty warehouse and one who sets fire to a school full of children. 87. Should ye condemn the arsonist and the murderer to life imprisonment, it would be permissible according to the provisions of the Book. # 62 Shoghi Effendi, in response to a question about this verse of the Aqdas, affirmed that while capital punishment is permitted, an alternative, life imprisonment, has been provided whereby the rigours of such a condemnation can be seriously mitigated. He states that Baha'u'llah has given us a choice and has, therefore, left us free to use our own discretion within certain limitations imposed by His law. In the absence of specific guidance concerning the application of this aspect of Baha'i law, it remains for the Universal House of Justice to legislate on the matter in the future. Kitab-i-Aqdas: Notes, pp.203-205 Regards, Mark A. Foster http://markfoster.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger. Abbie Hoffman __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Arson
In a message dated 1/22/2005 11:49:38 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: G: Umm... given that prostitution is actually legal in most of the west(so people are actually quite happy to pay money to have it) howexactly is that whole fining process a deterrent?JS: Doubling is the key word here. If the fine for adultery is $100, it will be $200 the 2nd time, $400 3rd time, $800 4th time, $1600 5th, $3200 6th, $6400 7th, $12800 8th, $25600 9th, $51200 10th, $102,400 11th. I don't think I would be able to affort to do it more than 7 times. Billionaires mayhave the money for25 offenses, or $1.7 Billion. Don't forget the shame involved in paying the fines for that particular offense. Regards, Scott __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Perennial Bab?
Hi, Susan, At 07:23 PM 1/22/2005, you wrote: Of course Mani, the founder of the Manichean religion, used that title long before Muhammad adopted it. Yes, but at the time (12-13 years old), I had not heard of Manicheanism. I was turned off by any religion which emphasized what I saw as finality or exclusiveness. Regards, Mark A. Foster http://markfoster.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger. Abbie Hoffman __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu