RE: Bahai jihad?

2005-01-22 Thread Susan Maneck


So does that mean it is infallibly true and authoritative?

It means it isn't.

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Righteous Warfare - `Abdu'l-Bahá - The Secret of Divine Civilization [1]

2005-01-22 Thread Sandra Chamberlain
In response to Gilberto's question on Righteous Warfare...
part 1 of 4
`Abdu'l-Bahá - The Secret of Divine Civilization pgs. 55-59
Today we have closed our eyes to every righteous act and have
sacrificed the abiding happiness of society to our own
transitory profit. We regard fanaticism and zealotry as
redounding to our credit and honor, and not content with this,
we denounce one another and plot each other's ruin, and
whenever we wish to put on a show of wisdom and learning, of
virtue and godliness, we set about mocking and reviling this
one and that. The ideas of such a one, we say, are wide of
the mark, and so-and-so's behavior leaves much to be desired.
The religious observances of Zayd are few and far between, and
Amr is not firm in his faith. So-and-so's opinions smack of
Europe. Fundamentally, Blank thinks of nothing but his own
name and fame. Last night when the congregation stood up to
pray, the row was out of line, and it is not permissible to
follow a different leader. No rich man has died this month,
and nothing has been offered to charity in memory of the
Prophet. The edifice of religion has crumbled, the foundations
of faiths have been blown to the winds. The carpet of belief
has been rolled up, the tokens of certitude blotted out; the
whole world has fallen into error; when it comes to repelling
tyranny all are soft and remiss. Days and months have passed
away, and these villages and estates still belong to the same
owners as they did last year. In this town there used to be
seventy different governments functioning in good order, but
the number has steadily decreased; there are only twenty-five
left now, as a memento. It used to be that two hundred
contradictory judgments were handed down by the same mufti in
any one day, now we hardly get fifty. In those days there were
crowds of people who were all brainsick with litigation, and
now they rest in peace; today the plaintiff would be defeated
and the defendant victorious, tomorrow the plaintiff won the
case and the defendant lost it -- but now this excellent
practice has been abandoned too. What is this heathenish
religion, this idolatrous kind of error! Alas for the Law,
alas for the Faith, alas for all these calamities! O Brothers
in the Faith! This is surely the end of the world! The
Judgment is coming!
With words such as these they assault the minds of the
helpless masses and disturb the hearts of the already
bewildered poor, who know nothing of the true state of affairs
and the real basis for all such talk, and remain completely
unaware of the fact that a thousand selfish purposes are
concealed behind the supposedly religious eloquence of certain
individuals. They imagine that speakers of this type are
motivated by virtuous zeal, when the truth is that such
individuals keep up a great hue and cry because they see their
own personal ruin in the welfare of the masses, and believe
that if the people's eyes are opened, their own light will go
out. Only the keenest insight will detect the fact that if the
hearts of these individuals were really impelled by
righteousness and the fear of God, the fragrance of it would,
like musk, be spreading everywhere. Nothing in the world can
ever be supported by words alone.
But these ill-omened owls have done a wrong,
And learned to sing as the white falcon sings.
And what of Sheba's message that the lapwing brings
If the bittern learn to sing the lapwing's song?[1]
[1 Cf. Qur'án 27:20 ff.]
The spiritually learned, those who have derived infinite
significance and wisdom from the Book of Divine Revelation,
and whose illumined hearts draw inspiration from the unseen
world of God, certainly exert their efforts to bring about the
supremacy of the true followers of God, in all respects and
above all peoples, and they toil and struggle to make use of
every agency that will conduce to progress. If any man
neglects these high purposes he can never prove acceptable in
the sight of God; he stands out with all his shortcomings and
claims perfection, and destitute, pretends to wealth.
One sluggish, blind and surly's a poor thing,
A lump of flesh, without a foot or wing.
How far is he who apes and makes a show
From the illumined, who doth truly know.
One but an echo, though it's clear and sharp,
And one, the Psalmist David with his harp.
Knowledge, purity, devotion, discipline, independence, have
nothing to do with outer appearance and dress. Once in the
course of My travels I heard an eminent personage make the
following excellent remark, the wit and charm of which remain
in memory: Not every cleric's turban is a proof of continence
and knowledge; not every layman's hat a sign of ignorance and
immorality. How many a hat has proudly raised the banner of
knowledge, how many a turban pulled down the Law of God!
The third element of the utterance under discussion is,
opposes his passions. How wonderful are the implications of
this deceptively easy, all-inclusive phrase. This is the very
foundation of every laudable 

Righteous Warfare - `Abdu'l-Bahá - The Secret of Divine Civilization [3]

2005-01-22 Thread Sandra Chamberlain
Continuing part 3:
`Abdu'l-Bahá - The Secret of Divine Civilization pgs. 64-68
True civilization will unfurl its banner in the midmost heart
of the world whenever a certain number of its distinguished
and high-minded sovereigns -- the shining exemplars of
devotion and determination -- shall, for the good and
happiness of all mankind, arise, with firm resolve and clear
vision, to establish the Cause of Universal Peace. They must
make the Cause of Peace the object of general consultation,
and seek by every means in their power to establish a Union of
the nations of the world. They must conclude a binding treaty
and establish a covenant, the provisions of which shall be
sound, inviolable and definite. They must proclaim it to all
the world and obtain for it the sanction of all the human
race. This supreme and noble undertaking -- the real source of
the peace and well-being of all the world -- should be
regarded as sacred by all that dwell on earth. All the forces
of humanity must be mobilized to ensure the stability and
permanence of this Most Great Covenant. In this all-embracing
Pact the limits and frontiers of each and every nation should
be clearly fixed, the principles underlying the relations of
governments towards one another definitely laid down, and all
international agreements and obligations ascertained. In like
manner, the size of the armaments of every government should
be strictly limited, for if the preparations for war and the
military forces of any nation should be allowed to increase,
they will arouse the suspicion of others. The fundamental
principle underlying this solemn Pact should be so fixed that
if any government later violate any one of its provisions, all
the governments on earth should arise to reduce it to utter
submission, nay the human race as a whole should resolve, with
every power at its disposal, to destroy that government.
Should this greatest of all remedies be applied to the sick
body of the world, it will assuredly recover from its ills and
will remain eternally safe and secure.[1]
[1 The foregoing paragraph, together with the later paragraph
beginning A few, unaware of the power latent in human
endeavor, was translated by Shoghi Effendi, Guardian of the
Bahá'í Faith. Cf. The World Order of Bahá'u'lláh, pp. 37-38.]
Observe that if such a happy situation be forthcoming, no
government would need continually to pile up the weapons of
war, nor feel itself obliged to produce ever new military
weapons with which to conquer the human race. A small force
for the purposes of internal security, the correction of
criminal and disorderly elements and the prevention of local
disturbances, would be required -- no more. In this way the
entire population would, first of all, be relieved of the
crushing burden of expenditure currently imposed for military
purposes, and secondly, great numbers of people would cease to
devote their time to the continual devising of new weapons of
destruction -- those testimonials of greed and
bloodthirstiness, so inconsistent with the gift of life -- and
would instead bend their efforts to the production of whatever
will foster human existence and peace and well-being, and
would become the cause of universal development and
prosperity. Then every nation on earth will reign in honor,
and every people will be cradled in tranquillity and content.
A few, unaware of the power latent in human endeavor, consider
this matter as highly impracticable, nay even beyond the scope
of man's utmost efforts. Such is not the case, however. On the
contrary, thanks to the unfailing grace of God, the
loving-kindness of His favored ones, the unrivaled endeavors
of wise and capable souls, and the thoughts and ideas of the
peerless leaders of this age, nothing whatsoever can be
regarded as unattainable. Endeavor, ceaseless endeavor, is
required. Nothing short of an indomitable determination can
possibly achieve it. Many a cause which past ages have
regarded as purely visionary, yet in this day has become most
easy and practicable. Why should this most great and lofty
Cause -- the daystar of the firmament of true civilization and
the cause of the glory, the advancement, the well-being and
the success of all humanity -- be regarded as impossible of
achievement? Surely the day will come when its beauteous light
shall shed illumination upon the assemblage of man.
The apparatus of conflict will, as preparations go on at their
present rate, reach the point where war will become something
intolerable to mankind.
It is clear from what has already been said that man's glory
and greatness do not consist in his being avid for blood and
sharp of claw, in tearing down cities and spreading havoc, in
butchering armed forces and civilians. What would mean a
bright future for him would be his reputation for justice, his
kindness to the entire population whether high or low, his
building up countries and cities, villages and districts, his
making life easy, peaceful and happy for his fellow 

Righteous Warfare - `Abdu'l-Bahá - The Secret of Divine Civilization [2]

2005-01-22 Thread Sandra Chamberlain
Continuing part 2:
`Abdu'l-Bahá - The Secret of Divine Civilization pgs. 60-63
All the peoples of Europe, notwithstanding their vaunted
civilization, sink and drown in this terrifying sea of passion
and desire, and this is why all the phenomena of their culture
come to nothing. Let no one wonder at this statement or
deplore it. The primary purpose, the basic objective, in
laying down powerful laws and setting up great principles and
institutions dealing with every aspect of civilization, is
human happiness; and human happiness consists only in drawing
closer to the Threshold of Almighty God, and in securing the
peace and well-being of every individual member, high and low
alike, of the human race; and the supreme agencies for
accomplishing these two objectives are the excellent qualities
with which humanity has been endowed.
A superficial culture, unsupported by a cultivated morality,
is as a confused medley of dreams,[1] and external lustre
without inner perfection is like a vapor in the desert which
the thirsty dreameth to be water.[2] For results which would
win the good pleasure of God and secure the peace and
well-being of man, could never be fully achieved in a merely
external civilization.
[1 Qur'án 12:44; 21:5.]
[2 Qur'án 24:39.]
The peoples of Europe have not advanced to the higher planes
of moral civilization, as their opinions and behavior clearly
demonstrate. Notice, for example, how the supreme desire of
European governments and peoples today is to conquer and crush
one another, and how, while harboring the greatest secret
repulsion, they spend their time exchanging expressions of
neighborly affection, friendship and harmony.
There is the well-known case of the ruler who is fostering
peace and tranquillity and at the same time devoting more
energy than the warmongers to the accumulation of weapons and
the building up of a larger army, on the grounds that peace
and harmony can only be brought about by force. Peace is the
pretext, and night and day they are all straining every nerve
to pile up more weapons of war, and to pay for this their
wretched people must sacrifice most of whatever they are able
to earn by their sweat and toil. How many thousands have given
up their work in useful industries and are laboring day and
night to produce new and deadlier weapons which would spill
out the blood of the race more copiously than before.
Each day they invent a new bomb or explosive and then the
governments must abandon their obsolete arms and begin
producing the new, since the old weapons cannot hold their own
against the new. For example at this writing, in the year 1292
A.H. [1] they have invented a new rifle in Germany and a
bronze cannon in Austria, which have greater firepower than
the Martini-Henry rifle and the Krupp cannon, are more rapid
in their effects and more efficient in annihilating humankind.
The staggering cost of it all must be borne by the hapless
masses.
[1 1875 A.D.]
Be just: can this nominal civilization, unsupported by a
genuine civilization of character, bring about the peace and
well-being of the people or win the good pleasure of God? Does
it not, rather, connote the destruction of man's estate and
pull down the pillars of happiness and peace?
At the time of the Franco-Prussian War, in the year 1870 of
the Christian era, it was reported that 600,000 men died,
broken and beaten, on the field of battle. How many a home was
torn out by the roots; how many a city, flourishing the night
before, was toppled down by sunrise. How many a child was
orphaned and abandoned, how many an old father and mother had
to see their sons, the young fruit of their lives, twisting
and dying in dust and blood. How many women were widowed, left
without a helper or protector.
And then there were the libraries and magnificent buildings of
France that went up in flames, and the military hospital,
packed with sick and wounded men, that was set on fire and
burned to the ground. And there followed the terrible events
of the Commune, the savage acts, the ruin and horror when
opposing factions fought and killed one another in the streets
of Paris. There were the hatreds and hostilities between
Catholic religious leaders and the German government. There
was the civil strife and uproar, the bloodshed and havoc
brought on between the partisans of the Republic and the
Carlists in Spain.
Only too many such instances are available to demonstrate the
fact that Europe is morally uncivilized. Since the writer has
no wish to cast aspersions on anyone He has confined Himself
to these few examples. It is clear that no perceptive and
well-informed mind can countenance such events. Is it right
and proper that peoples among whom, diametrically opposed to
the most desirable human behavior, such horrors take place,
should dare lay claim to a real and adequate civilization?
Especially when out of all this no results can be hoped for
except the winning of a transient victory; and since this
outcome never endures, it is, to 

Re: Planned obsolscence

2005-01-22 Thread louise mchenry
Religion, as in the Book of Religion, I love. I never consider that spilled milk. Light, from which lamp it shines, is light. Wisdom, no matter what inspired the wisdom, is wisdom. 

but yes, the customs and accepted interpretations of previous religions and the habits that people have developed based on their interpretation of the words of the Manifestation sometimes do feel like spilled milk to me. 

much love, 

janineGilberto Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:51:00 -0800 (PST), JS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: "jizya actually is ordained in the Quran, so if you really think it is necessarily a form of harrassment and tyranny then you should take it up with the author"  Yes, this work of the Author is well beyond the expiry date.You don't need to say it. I realized a very long time ago that Bahaisthink of previous religions as spoiled milk.PeaceGilberto-- "My people are hydroponic"__You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]Baha'i Studies is available through!
  the
 following:Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.eduWeb - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-stNews - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-stPublic - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaistOld Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.netNew Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
		Do you Yahoo!? 
All your favorites on one personal page – Try My Yahoo!

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Righteous Warfare - `Abdu'l-Bahá - The Secret of Divine Civilization [4]

2005-01-22 Thread Sandra Chamberlain
Continuing part 4:
`Abdu'l-Bahá - The Secret of Divine Civilization pgs. 69-71
Contrast with this the praiseworthy qualities and the
greatness and nobility of Anushirvan the Generous and the
Just. [1] That fair-minded monarch came to power at a time
when the once solidly established throne of Persia was about
to crumble away. With his Divine gift of intellect, he laid
the foundations of justice, uprooting oppression and tyranny
and gathering the scattered peoples of Persia under the wings
of his dominion. Thanks to the restoring influence of his
continual care, Persia that had lain withered and desolate was
quickened into life and rapidly changed into the fairest of
all flourishing nations. He rebuilt and reinforced the
disorganized powers of the state, and the renown of his
righteousness and justice echoed across the seven climes, [2]
until the peoples rose up out of their degradation and misery
to the heights of felicity and honor. Although he was a
Magian, Muhammad, that Center of creation and Sun of
prophethood, said of him: I was born in the time of a just
king, and rejoiced at having come into the world during his
reign. Did this illustrious personage achieve his exalted
station by virtue of his admirable qualities or rather by
reaching out to conquer the earth and spill the blood of its
peoples? Observe that he attained to such a distinguished rank
in the heart of the world that his greatness still rings out
through all the impermanence of time, and he won eternal life.
Should We comment on the continuing life of the great, this
brief essay would be unduly prolonged, and since it is by no
means certain that public opinion in Persia will be materially
affected by its perusal, We shall abridge the work, and go on
to other matters which come within the purview of the public
mind. If, however, it develops that this abridgement produces
favorable results, We shall, God willing, write a number of
books dealing at length and usefully with fundamental
principles of the Divine wisdom in its relation to the
phenomenal world.
[1 Sasaniyan king who reigned 531-578 A.D.]
[2 i.e., the whole world.]
No power on earth can prevail against the armies of justice,
and every citadel must fall before them; for men willingly go
down under the triumphant strokes of this decisive blade, and
desolate places bloom and flourish under the tramplings of
this host. There are two mighty banners which, when they cast
their shadow across the crown of any king, will cause the
influence of his government quickly and easily to penetrate
the whole earth, even as if it were the light of the sun: the
first of these two banners is wisdom; the second is justice.
Against these two most potent forces, the iron hills cannot
prevail, and Alexander's wall will break before them. It is
clear that life in this fast-fading world is as fleeting and
inconstant as the morning wind, and this being so, how
fortunate are the great who leave a good name behind them, and
the memory of a lifetime spent in the pathway of the good
pleasure of God.
It is all one, if it be a throne
Or the bare ground under the open sky,
Where the pure soul lays him
Down to die.[1
[1 Sa'di, The Gulistan, On the Conduct of Kings.]
A conquest can be a praiseworthy thing, and there are times
when war becomes the powerful basis of peace, and ruin the
very means of reconstruction. If, for example, a high-minded
sovereign marshals his troops to block the onset of the
insurgent and the aggressor, or again, if he takes the field
and distinguishes himself in a struggle to unify a divided
state and people, if, in brief, he is waging war for a
righteous purpose, then this seeming wrath is mercy itself,
and this apparent tyranny the very substance of justice and
this warfare the cornerstone of peace. Today, the task
befitting great rulers is to establish universal peace, for in
this lies the freedom of all peoples.
[The last paragraph is quoted in Bahá'u'lláh and The New Era
pg. 172]
__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Tabernacle

2005-01-22 Thread louise mchenry
I posted this before but I am afraid it got lost in all the other discussions. So I am being bold and post it again. 

Dear all, recently I was told that the word tabernacle in thisquote in the original persian is actually nottabernacle, but is a word for the curtain whichtraditionally divided the men's quarters from thewomen's quarters in houses in Persia when Baha'u'llahwas alive. I wonder if this word in the original language couldhave also the meaning of Tabernacle. much love, janineCXII. Behold the disturbances which, for many a longyear, have afflicted the earth, and the perturbationthat hath seized its peoples. It hath either beenravaged by war, or tormented by sudden and unforeseencalamities. Though the world is encompassed withmisery and distress, yet no man hath paused to reflectwhat the cause or source of that may be. Whenever theTrue Counsellor uttered a word in admonishment, lo,they all denounced Him as a mover of mischief andrejected His claim. How bewildering, how confusing
 issuch behavior! No two men can be found who may be saidto be outwardly and inwardly united. The evidences ofdiscord and malice are apparent everywhere, though allwere made for harmony and union.The Great Being saith: O well-beloved ones! Thetabernacle of unity hath been raised; regard ye notone another as strangers. Ye are the fruits of onetree, and the leaves of one branch. We cherish thehope that the light of justice may shine upon theworld and sanctify it from tyranny. If the rulers andkings of the earth, the symbols of the power of God,exalted be His glory, arise and resolve to dedicatethemselves to whatever will promote the highestinterests of the whole of humanity, the reign ofjustice will assuredly be established amongst thechildren of men, and the effulgence of its light willenvelop the whole earth. The Great Being saith: Thestructure of world stability and order hath beenreared upon, a!
 nd will
 continue to be sustained by, thetwin pillars of reward and punishment In anotherpassage He hath written: Take heed, O concourse of therulers of the world! There is no force on earth thatcan equal in its conquering power the force of justiceand wisdom Blessed is the king who marcheth withthe ensign of wisdom unfurled before him, and thebattalions of justice massed in his rear. He verily isthe ornament that adorneth the brow of peace and thecountenance of security. There can be no doubtwhatever that if the day star of justice, which theclouds of tyranny have obscured, were to shed itslight upon men, the face of the earth would becompletely transformed(Baha'u'llah, Gleanings from the Writings ofBaha'u'llah, p. 218)

		Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Re: Tabernacle, addition

2005-01-22 Thread louise mchenry
oh my, either my brain is going or I am suffering from lack of sleep! I keep leaving out half of what I want to convey in my messages. 

I wrote: 

I wonder if this word in the original language couldhave also the meaning of Tabernacle. 

This was actually a question which should have been followed by this: 
Can anybody tell me whether this word in Persian or Arabic would have also the meaning of Tabernacle?

So, anybody?

much love, 

janine van rooij
dublin, ireland
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread louise mchenry


Someone on another list remarked that according to science there is a link between commiting arson and being sociopath. It seems that sociopaths manifest their affliction first by an inclination to burn down buildings. 
much love, 
janine van rooij
dublin, ireland.
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread louise mchenry


Someone on another list remarked that according to science there is a link between commiting arson and being sociopath. It seems that sociopaths manifest their affliction first by an inclination to burn down buildings. 
much love, 
janine van rooij
dublin, ireland.
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! – Try it today! 

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

re: to gilberto

2005-01-22 Thread louise mchenry
Hi Gilberto, 

I completely forgot to answer to this post of yours! 

My native tongue is Dutch. I came to ireland 7 years ago. I was born and raised in the Netherlands, aka Holland ;o)

much love, 

janine van rooij
dublin, Ireland

On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:32:35 -0800 (PST), louise mchenry[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Gilberto,  I just read this mail over and I apologise that it is not that clear as I had intended it to be. While writing I got frequently interrupted. English is not my native tongue, hence the gramatical errors! ;o)Wow, that is interesting. What is your native tongue, if I might ask? And thanks for sharing your feelings about the Administrative Order.PeaceGilberto
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. Learn more.

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Re: Ruhi - a data point from Houston

2005-01-22 Thread Sandra Chamberlain
I completely agree about Ruhi and youth.
Here is my post from 2001:
http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist/m29288.html
Unfortunately from then to now there hasn't been a Book 2 
offering in our community as many others became enthusiastic 
and there have been several more Book 1 study circles.  It has 
also been stated here in Alaska that Jr.Youth should not take 
the Ruhi course but, instead take the course (patterned after 
Ruhi) especially for Youth.  I'm not sure what that is called. 
I'm curious if it is the same elsewhere.  Regardless, it is 
only offered to Youth groups 15 and above and he is now 14. 
When will we ever focus on Jr. Youth as the House of Justice 
directed 3years ago ?!?

lovingly, Sandra 

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Arson

2005-01-22 Thread Sandra Chamberlain
Speaking of arson... I sent this several days ago... but
haven't seen it on the list.
- Original Message - 
From: Sandra Chamberlain
To: BAHA'I STUDIES
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 2:58 PM
Subject: Arson

Gilberto, you stated:   Also, since being burned alive is
the punishment for arson in the
Bahai faith, I'm not sure on what grounds you are objecting to
the above. 
Would you please provide your source for this statement - Book
and page from Baha'i Sacred Scripture ?
Thank you!
Sandra
__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,

2005-01-22 Thread Mark A. Foster
Gilberto,

I wrote:
All the perennialisms I have observed are deductive systems. They begin 
with certain first principles and read them into various religious and 
spiritual systems. That is what I meant by triumphalist.

You replied:
That seems really odd to me. I would tend to think of triumphalism more as an 
attitude of superiority.

Exactly. You don't see my point? If you begin with a set of first principles, 
and you then deductively read them into various religious and spiritual 
systems, isn't that an attitude of superiority?

Regards, Mark A. Foster • http://markfoster.net • [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger.  Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Ruhi - a data point from Houston

2005-01-22 Thread Susan Maneck
 It has
also been stated here in Alaska that Jr.Youth should not take
the Ruhi course but, instead take the course (patterned after
Ruhi) especially for Youth.

Dear Sandra,

I don't quite get that, nor have I seen anything like it in the lower 48. My
experience is that children as young as 10 or 11 grasp how to do the basic
exercises much quicker than the adults do, they stay focused better and get
through the material quicker. It is certainly not too complicated for them.

warmest, Susan


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Ruhi - a data point from Houston

2005-01-22 Thread Popeyesays



In a message dated 1/22/2005 10:32:19 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear Sandra,I don't quite get that, nor have I seen anything like it in the lower 48. Myexperience is that children as young as 10 or 11 grasp how to do the basicexercises much quicker than the adults do, they stay focused better and getthrough the material quicker. It is certainly not too complicated for them.warmest, Susan
When my daughter took the course there was no "Youth" Book 1. But she is an honor student, with a 4.0 average through middle school and high school and had no trouble with the material. I figure Ruhi is pretty straightforward, and written in a concrete reasoning kindof way. I certainly see no reason why it has to be watered down for youth. Ihave never seen a youth who could not grasp it. As it is, my daughter has finished all the available books but 5, and is one of the few people in the cluster, youth or not who has actually completed so much of the curriculum.


Scott
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread Mark A. Foster
Janine,

At 04:48 AM 1/22/2005, you wrote:
Someone on another list remarked that according to science there is a link 
between commiting arson and being sociopath.

A sociopath is more a popular than a technical term.

However, IMO, the problem with that person's statement is that it may be true 
by definition. She or he is simply placing arson under the category of 
sociopathology. It is like saying that a schizophrenic is mentally ill or 
premeditated murder is a felony. It is simple classification, not explanation.

Regards, Mark A. Foster • http://markfoster.net • [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger.  Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,

2005-01-22 Thread JS

All the perennialisms I have observed are deductive systems. They begin with certain first principles and read them into various religious and spiritual systems. That is what I meant by triumphalist.You replied:That seems really odd to me. I would tend to think of triumphalism more as an attitude of superiority.Exactly. You don't see my point? If you begin with a set of first principles, and you then deductively read them into various religious and spiritual systems, isn't that an attitude of superiority?JS: That's fascinating. Didn't realize that.
		Do you Yahoo!? 
All your favorites on one personal page – Try My Yahoo!

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,

2005-01-22 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 10:25:30 -0600, Mark A. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Gilberto,
 
 I wrote:
 All the perennialisms I have observed are deductive systems. They begin 
 with certain first principles and read them into various religious and 
 spiritual systems. That is what I meant by triumphalist.
 
 You replied:
 That seems really odd to me. I would tend to think of triumphalism more as 
 an attitude of superiority.
 
 Exactly. You don't see my point? If you begin with a set of first principles, 
 and you then deductively read them into various religious and spiritual 
 systems, isn't that an attitude of superiority?


I guess from where I'm coming from the only truly deductive system
(really) is mathematics. But if even if you want to loosen it
somewhat, I'm still not convinced
To be honest, I don't think I see everything you are talking about. I
think the Bahai view with a notion of progressive revelation is much
more susceptible to Triumphalist tendancies. The Bahai faith literally
sests up a hierarchy of the worlds religions, ranked by chronology,
where the most recent religion is the most progressed. To me that has
alot more potential for abuse, and would have a tendancy to encourage
more arrogance than the perspective which says that many different
religions in the world are basically equal in terms of their potential
for spiritual depth.

I'm certainly willing to entertain the possibility that the specific
Traditionalist groups might have been arrogant and even had fascist
tendancies but I doubt that it stemmed from perennialism per se. They
were also affluent Orientalist Europeans who probably had attitudes
typical for people in that situation.

Peace

Gilberto

My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 04:50:25 -0900, Sandra Chamberlain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Speaking of arson... I sent this several days ago... but
 haven't seen it on the list.
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Sandra Chamberlain
 To: BAHA'I STUDIES
 Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 2:58 PM
 Subject: Arson
 
 Gilberto, you stated:   Also, since being burned alive is
 the punishment for arson in the
 Bahai faith, I'm not sure on what grounds you are objecting to
 the above. 
 
 Would you please provide your source for this statement - Book
 and page from Baha'i Sacred Scripture ?
 
 Thank you!
 
 Sandra
 

That's really bizzare. I saw this a long time ago. And Mark already
gave a more complete answer to the question than I would have given a
long time ago.

Peace
Gilberto



My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread Popeyesays



In a message dated 1/22/2005 11:27:20 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wouldn't have the same respect for a Bahai who joined in on suchaccusations when their own scriptures don't seem to have a problemwith burning someone alive.Especially if we are talking about punishments found in the Quranwhich they say they believe comes from God.If you wanted to just say we are all playing a big game of Simon Sayswith God and that for the previous thousand years or so the rules wereone thing, and for the next thousand years or so they just happened tochange, that's fine.But to accuse the Islamic punishments of being brutal and inhumane issomething which is difficult if not impossible for a Bahai to do withintegrity.
No game of Simon says. The Aqdas allows death for the crime of arson, but it also says imprisonment is acceptable, that the case and its punishment have mitigation. This allows a Baha`i tribunal to imprison one ofr arson, or exact an horrific punishment for the cruelest of the crimes. Note this punishment allows for execution, but none o the Baha`i mandated crimes involve a punishment of maiming, for instance or flogging. U.S. law does not allow for "maiming" (a cruel and unusual punishment)but does allow execution. I would hate to invoke a punishment of burning to death on anyone, but I look on electrocution as much the same thing and that is not a "cruel and unusual punishment" under western codes.

I think these things reflect cultural attitudes as much as they do anything else.

Regards,

Scott
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:46:04 -0800 (PST), JS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
 Gilberto:  But to accuse the Islamic punishments of being brutal and
 inhumane is
 something which is difficult if not impossible for a Bahai to do with
 integrity.
 
 JS:  But Gilberto, none of the Laws of the Aqdas are enforced except a few
 related to prayer, marriage, burial, alcohol, opium, and a few others. 

I don't see why that would be a relevant distinction. To make the
example more extreme. If your books said to round up Muslims in
concentration camps and put them in ovens (something which the Bahai
writings clearly do not say) it wouldn't be at all comforting to say
But Bahais don't have  a country yet so we can't enforce those right
now.

 Burtal Qur'an laws are, however, enforced by Muslim countries like Saudi
 Arabia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Pakistan, etc.

I wouldn't embrace any of them as truly Islamic. There is room for improvement.

And even if the Bahai writings didn't say what they did about
punishments for arson, how can you believe the Quran comes from God
and at the same time call it brutal?



My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread Popeyesays



In a message dated 1/22/2005 11:58:21 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And even if the Bahai writings didn't say what they did aboutpunishments for arson, how can you believe the Quran comes from Godand at the same time call it brutal?
I agree that it is specious to say "we don't enforce it".

However, the punishments invoked by the Qur'an cannot be considered brutal. They fall under the category of social laws and as such were tailored for the time and place. It is only when one tries to invoke that time and place to be THIS time and place that problems arise and comparisons are made.

Regards,

Scott
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread Popeyesays



In a message dated 1/22/2005 12:09:24 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alot of the Islamic penalties can be mitigated as well. They aren'tapplied in a vacum. There are all sorts of exceptions, andrequirements and its a basic principle that you want to avoid applyingsevere punishments. Make excuses for people. And the society, ifhealthy, would make it easy to keep the law. Yes, there is a harshpunishment for theft, but the ideal Islamic state is supposed to be awelfare state which would make sure that people's needs are taken careof and economic exploitation is reduced. Yes there is a harshpunishment for adultery, but the society would encourage modesty. Andit is actually really easy to get divorced and married. Even if youwanted to be really cynical, in order to convict for adultery you aresupposed to have 4 upright witness who see penetration. To get marriedyou only need 2 witnesses and it literally could just take a coupleseconds to have a legally valid marriage.
I agree that mitigations are allowed. But I see Qur'anic Shariah as social laws enacted for the time and place. It is not, however the same time and place today. It is only when the nations who, to my estimation, are not upright and ethical Islamic nations attempt to set the clock back and ignore the passage of time that such problems arise.


Regards,

Scott
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,

2005-01-22 Thread JS
Mark: In arguing for equality, all perennialists whose works I have read have imposed a certain "essence" on the different religions or spiritualities.

JS: Mark, I love the clarity of your writing, and the distinction you makebetween perennialism and Baha'i Progressive Revelation, and how the former and not the latter, is triumphalistic.
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,

2005-01-22 Thread Mark A. Foster
Mark, I love the clarity of your writing, and the distinction you make 
between perennialism and Baha'i Progressive Revelation, and how the former 
and not the latter, is triumphalistic.

Thank you. I don't personally think that progressive Revelation is 
triumphalistic. However, it can be, and has been, interpreted that way. 

Regards, Mark A. Foster • http://markfoster.net • [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger.  Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Century of Light

2005-01-22 Thread Mark A. Foster
Hi, Gilberto,

At 12:12 PM 1/22/2005, you wrote:
So why did mark attribute it to the UHJ?

I should have been more precise.

It wasn't technically written by the House of Justice, much as letters written 
on behalf of the House of Justice are written by staff persons at the 
Secretariat. 

The following is from the preface to that document (written by the House of 
Justice):


Century of Light, prepared under our supervision, reviews these two processes 
and the relationship between them, in the context of the Bahá'í Teachings. We 
commend it to the thoughtful study of the friends, in the confidence that the 
perspectives it opens up will prove both spiritually enriching and of practical 
help in sharing with others the challenging implications of the Revelation 
brought by Bahá'u'lláh.

http://bahaistudies.net/century_of_light.html

Regards, Mark A. Foster • http://markfoster.net • [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger.  Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Century of Light

2005-01-22 Thread Popeyesays



In a message dated 1/22/2005 2:41:47 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So which statements are infallible? They have to be actually writtenby house members and approved by them as the house of justice?
The House is infallible in its decision amking and consultation. The book was written for and sponsored by the House, but it is not a record of its decisions or consultation. therefore it may be guidance, it may be full of truth, but it is not part of the process which is protected as "infallible".

Regards,

Scott
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,

2005-01-22 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:02:18 -0800 (PST), JS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Mark:  In arguing for equality, all perennialists whose works I have read 
 have 
 imposed a certain essence on the different religions or 
 spiritualities.

Then if anything their sin would be in overgeneralizing or in not
seeing the particularities and differences of various religions but
that is still very different from triumphalism. If perennialist
believes all the religions have a common essence it becomes near
impossible to even articulate what it means for one religion to be
better than the other. In the Bahai faith it is exceedingly easy and
natural to say that one religion is better than the other. It is easy
to find such statements in the writings.


Incidentally,
Would you consider John Hick a perennialist? a triumphalist?

http://www.al-islam.org/al-tawhid/pluralism2.htm



My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:09:09 -0800 (PST), JS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  JS: But Gilberto, none of the Laws of the Aqdas are enforced except a few
  related to prayer, marriage, burial, alcohol, opium, and a few others. 
 
 G:  I don't see why that would be a relevant distinction. To make the
 example more extreme. If your books said to round up Muslims in
 concentration camps and put them in ovens (something which the Bahai
 writings clearly do not say) it wouldn't be at all comforting to say
 But Bahais don't have a country yet so we can't enforce those right
 now.
 
 JS: I didn't say it has anything to do with whether or not we have a
 country.  The House of Justice still has the right to decide when to
 implement the law of burning the arsonist, it at all.  I don't think it ever
 will be.

Why would the punishment be in the book if it wasn't ever supposed to
be enforced?


  Burtal Qur'an laws are, however, enforced by Muslim countries like Saudi
  Arabia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Pakistan, etc.
 
 G: I wouldn't embrace any of them as truly Islamic. There is room for
 improvement.

 JS:  So in the last 1000 years, has there been a single 'truly Islamic'
 nation?

Let me try to clarify. No nation is perfect. All countries have flaws.
All nations only partially implement their own ideals. They fall
short. And trying to live those ideals more faithfully is a process. I
think Muslims can set up governments which engage in that process and
at the same time don't betray Islamic ideals. I think current regimes
which claim to be Islamic are somewhere along that path. I don't
think everything which goes on in those countries is Islamic or
required by Islam. And I think there is certain plenty of room for
improvement.


  I don't think it is possible.  What is possible is what
 Christianity, Judaism, and Hinduism have done:  Implement a secular nation.

Much of Christendom (i.e. Europe) has become truly secular and as a
result Christianity is dying in Europe. Turkey is also rather secular
to the point where Muslims are discriminated against. China and the
former Soviet Union are also good examples of secular societies. I
don't think secular regimes are necessarily the best argument for what
you are trying to say.

Personally, I think that it is possible to outline certain features
which constitute a good government but this should be independent
from a particular ideology.
 

My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Century of Light

2005-01-22 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:49:32 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In a message dated 1/22/2005 2:41:47 PM Central Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 So which statements are infallible? They have to be actually written
 by house members and approved by them as the house of justice?

 The House is infallible in its decision amking and consultation. The book
 was written for and sponsored by the House, but it is not a record of its
 decisions or consultation. therefore it may be guidance, it may be full of
 truth, but it is not part of the process which is protected as infallible.

Isn't the book the result of a decision made  by the House?

Peace

Gilberto

  
 Regards,
  
 Scott__ 
 
 You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 To unsubscribe, send a blank email to
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Baha'i Studies is available through the following: 
 Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu 
 Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st 
 News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st 
 Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist 
 Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net 
 New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu 


-- 


My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,

2005-01-22 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:03:15 -0600, Mark A. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Gilberto,
 
 At 02:52 PM 1/22/2005, you wrote:
 Then if anything their sin would be in overgeneralizing or in not seeing 
 the particularities and differences of various religions but that is still 
 very different from triumphalism.
 
 Failing to see differences would not in itself be triumphalistic. However, if 
 one does not recognize those differences because one is committed to imposing 
 a certain essence which comes (say) from one's own religion of philosophy, 
 then one is allowing the presumed superiority, or triumph, of one's own 
 religion or philosophy over those one is interpreting.

Gilberto:
It still seems to me that the act of imposition you are talking
about might be an act of misperception, but it doesn't imply
superiority. In fact, in the case of perennialism one is explicitly
asserting equality.

At the worst, what perennialists might be doing is romanticizing the
past. Talking about the noble savage and all that. But from the
perspective of progressive revelation the past is being demonized
and  those people of the past are considered savages, without
bothering to consider them particularly noble.



My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread JS



 JS: I didn't say it has anything to do with whether or not we have a country. The House of Justice still has the right to decide when to implement the law of burning the arsonist, it at all. I don't think it ever will be.G: Why would the punishment be in the book if it wasn't ever supposed tobe enforced?JS: I think that two options are presented, and it is left to the House of Justice to pick the one most suitable to society.In a similar way, Baha'u'llah superficially allows bigamy, maybe only to present the Aqdasin the form of theQur'an. And just as theQur'anconditions polygamy on 'justice',and the Aqdasmakes 'tranquility' an outcomeof only monogamy. Who wouldn't want to be tranquil?
G: They fall short.
JS: Do you think it ispossible to have a'truly Islamic' nation? Also, don't you think that Islam is going the wrong way, I mean, it is getting more corrupted, it is deviating farther and farther away from the ideal? At one point, the Islamic worldwas the cradle of civilization, and now it has been reduced to fanaticism, terrorism, poverty, ignorance, intolerance, etc. Not a single praiseworthy Islamic nations exists on earth... What makes you think it is going to improve? And the Islamic countries that seem to be heading in the right directly are secularized/ing.
G: I don't think secular regimes are necessarily the best argument for whatyou are trying to say.
JS: What would be a better argument?G: Personally, I think that it is possible to outline certain featureswhich constitute a "good government" but this should be independentfrom a particular ideology.JS: What do you mean?__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Re: Century of Light

2005-01-22 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 16:54:40 -0600, Mark A. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi, Gilberto,
 
 At 02:41 PM 1/22/2005, you wrote:
 So if the Universal Houes of Justice is supposed to be infallible, and 
 supervises a document, and allows it to be released then that document 
 isn't infallible?
 
 IMO, infallible implies conformity with the Will of God. 

But then what does that mean exactly? At least sunni theology tends to
lean towards determinism. God's will is ultimately iresistilbe.
Everything which happens is ultimately God's will. So from that
perspective, your definition seems virtually empty of meaning because
everything would be in conformity with the will of God


Peace

Gilberto


-- 


My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,

2005-01-22 Thread Mark A. Foster
Hi, Gilberto,

At 03:24 PM 1/22/2005, you wrote:
Here's what I'm not sure you are seeing.

I understand your point about historical or longitudinal particularism versus 
cultural particularism. However, neither perspective has much to do with why I 
am calling the perennialisms I have studied triumphalist.

Really?

Yes. The idea that most progressed, according to a certain framework, implied 
superiority fueled the machine of the white man's burden, many of the 
19th-century approaches to cultural evolution (especially those of Tyler and 
Morgan), and Herbert Spencer's Social Darwinism. Progress is relative, not 
absolute, and it should not be the basis for judgments of superiority or 
inferiority.

Could you give a clearer example of what it would mean for a religion to 
claim superiority?

To say that only people who believe what I believe are going to heaven (or some 
similar idea).

In terms of school-education, they are obviously superior.

I don't believe that, because I have a Ph.D., I am superior to my students, who 
are working on their associates and bachelors degrees. If I *did* believe so, I 
don't think I would be a very effective professor. I simply have acquired 
certain knowledge which my students wish to learn. I have often found that my 
students can educate me in other areas.

Could you give an example of how this is problematic in the direction of 
triumphalism? I mean, to some degree, even Bahais do this.

Hopefully, I did so above.

For example, In order to claim that Buddha was a manifestion you end up 
having to impose some structure of Buddhism and reject the parts which don't 
fit.

I agreed with you before that some Baha'is are triumphalistic, but I would 
never do what you suggested.

I honestly don't see it. At least not in a way that is convincing. For 
example, the Bahais and plenty of others might look at the various religions 
and point out that the major religions all seem to have certain teachings in 
common. Some form of Golden rule. Honor your parents. Don't lie. Don't steal. 
Be forgiving. Be patient...etc. right.?

Intelligently acknowledging similarities, after having studied each religion, 
is different from a purely deductive approach in which one begins with the 
assumption of doctrinal similarity in advance, or in the absence, of such study.

I think that there are certain aspects where religions actually and truly 
disagree with one another but I wouldn't want to put a square peg in a round 
hole. I don't know that Perennialists always insist on doing that.

Then what is it you believe is perennial? 

Regards, Mark A. Foster • http://markfoster.net • [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger.  Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,

2005-01-22 Thread JS


MARK:One of the best antidotes for triumphalism is historicism which is opposed by most perennialists whose works I have read.JS:
Mark,are you refering to this meaing of historicism? "Most recently, Historicism has been used by post-modernist thinkers to describe the view that there is no absolute truth about deep philosophical questions that should stand for all time."
Are you also saying that Baha'i Progressive Revelation is essentially historicist?__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,

2005-01-22 Thread Mark A. Foster
Gilberto,

At 05:21 PM 1/22/2005, you wrote:
In fact, in the case of perennialism one is explicitly asserting equality.

One can only assert equality if one has a basis for doing so (like equality 
before the law). 

Regards, Mark A. Foster • http://markfoster.net • [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger.  Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,

2005-01-22 Thread JS


G:
At the worst, what perennialists might be doing is romanticizing thepast. Talking about the noble savage and all that. But from theperspective of "progressive revelation" the past is being demonizedand those people of the past are considered savages, withoutbothering to consider them particularly noble.
JS: Gilberto, I don't think progressive revelation (PR)implies a demonization of the past because it (PR) also states that truth is relative and not absolute. So this characterization (ie. saying that Islamic law is savage)is relative to what is considered savage/civil today. In the past, it would not have been considered savage.

		Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. Learn more.

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,

2005-01-22 Thread Mark A. Foster
Are you also saying that Baha'i Progressive Revelation is essentially 
historicist?

Historicism has different definitions. I am using the term as it was defined in 
the history courses I took in graduate school. (My Ph.D. minor was history.)  

For instance:

the view that concepts, beliefs, truths and even standards of truth can be 
understood only in relation to the whole moral, intellectual, religious and 
aesthetic cultures of the historical periods in which they arise or flourish.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enlr=client=firefox-arls=org.mozilla:en-US:officialoi=defmoreq=define:historicism
  

Regards, Mark A. Foster • http://markfoster.net • [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger.  Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Bahai jihad? Re: Men and Women equal?

2005-01-22 Thread Gilberto Simpson
- Hide quoted text -
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:51:39 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Defending could be nothing more than apologetics.

Gilberto:
 I could actually say the same about jihad then. There is a hadith
 which states: The best jihad is speaking the truth to an unjust
 ruler.

Susan:
 Dear Gilberto,
 Which in Islam does not rule out actual warfare in the name of religion. If
 you want to say Baha'is wage the greater jihad, that is true. We are still
 forbidden to kill in the name of our religion.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 You are allowed to apply capital punishment according to your
 religion. You are allowed to engage in collective security in your
 religion. You are allowed to engage in righteous warfare in your
 religion.

Susan:
 There is a difference between a religion allowing or even calling for
 certain things and their being done in the name of religion.


 Gilberto:
 If you are just arguing about the names that seems an odd
 distinction to make.

Susan:
 I am not at all arguing about names 


Gilberto:
So what is the distinction you refer to between a religion allowing
certain things and their being done in the name of religion?


Peace


My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Bahai jihad? Re: Men and Women equal?

2005-01-22 Thread Susan Maneck
I thought the laws were in the Aqdas?

Dear Gilberto,

Not all of them.


 Jihads are also justified to defend Muslims living in the Daru'l-Harb as
I'm
 sure you know, and bring their country into the Daru'l-Islam.

Then that's ultimately a matter of saving lives.

It can be done according to Islamic laws if Muslims in a country feel they
are not free to live as Muslims, whether their lives are directly threatened
or not. But in any case, in the Baha'i Faith we cannot fight in the name of
our religion even if our lives are at stake.
.
The whole passage already looked sinister as is. I didn't remove any
mitigating context.

Yes, you did. You left out the parts that make that passage make sense.

The specific examples given fall in those categories but there is no
statement which explicitly puts a limit on what could be included in
righteous purpose.

So? He gives the most reasonable examples there are and you call that
Orwellian?

Susan


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread Sandra Chamberlain
Gilberto:  That's really bizzare. I saw this a long time 
ago. And Mark already gave a more complete answer to the 
question than I would have given a long time ago.

Well, sometimes, posts are missing from the Archives, which is 
where I looked.  Nothing from me on the 14th and nothing from 
Mark in a search of the word *arson*.  However, I did find the 
quote from Baha'u'llah that you apparently refered to.  There 
were other posts on this subject in 2003 and 2004.

Perhaps you or Mark could direct me to the *subject* heading 
so I can look for his response ?  Often when there are so many 
posts as there are now, it's a bit difficult to find a 
particular topic with out a word search.  Subject heading 
remain the same while the *topic* changes.

lovingly,  Sandra 

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:23:16 -0800 (PST), JS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  JS: I didn't say it has anything to do with whether or not we have a
  country. The House of Justice still has the right to decide when to
  implement the law of burning the arsonist, it at all. I don't think it
 ever
  will be.

 G:  Why would the punishment be in the book if it wasn't ever supposed to
 be enforced?
 
 JS:  I think that two options are presented, and it is left to the House of
 Justice to pick the one most suitable to society.

Gilberto:
But why would that option be presented?

 In a similar way,
 Baha'u'llah superficially allows bigamy, maybe only to present the Aqdas in
 the form of the Qur'an.  And just as the Qur'an conditions polygamy on
 'justice', and the Aqdas makes 'tranquility' an outcome of only monogamy. 
 Who wouldn't want to be tranquil?

Yes. And Muslims have at times taken the Quran up on its offer and
actually practiced polygamy. So the question remains, why would the
Bahai laws mention the possibility of such a harsh punishment for
arson if it was never meant to be implemented?


 
 G:  They fall short.
 
 JS:  Do you think it is possible to have a 'truly Islamic' nation? 

Gilberto:
I think it is certainly possible for Muslims to do better.

 Also,
 don't you think that Islam is going the wrong way, I mean, it is getting
 more corrupted, it is deviating farther and farther away from the ideal?  

I think that if you look at history civilizations rise and fall and
rise back up again... and fall.. and rise back up again.. etc.

 At
 one point, the Islamic world was the cradle of civilization, and now it has
 been reduced to fanaticism, terrorism, poverty, ignorance, intolerance, etc.

Now you are thinking like a bigot. 

  Not a single praiseworthy Islamic nations exists on earth...

The West has the wealth and technology it has, not because of some
divine right, not because its some birthright. It has the wealth that
it has by enslaving Africans, and by extracting resources from the
developing world, through colonization, and then through neo-colonial
arrangements. Unlike how many Bahais seem to think, technology and
infrastructure isn't some proof of divine approval. If anything, its
proof of theft. If people in the developing world seem angry at the
West it is actually a reasonable reaction to the policies inflicted on
them. I don't think any nation on earth is praiseworthy. To a
disturbingly high degree, countries do what is in their interests to
do. If they can not look like total bastards while they are doing it,
its a plus.


  What makes
 you think it is going to improve?  And the Islamic countries that seem to be
 heading in the right directly are secularized/ing.

That's not an observation. It follows from your beliefs about Islam.
For example, Saddam Hussein was a Bathist, a secular Arab nationalist.
Do you think that he would be a good model for the rest of the Arab
world to follow?

 Turkey as a society is rather secularized. The way it got there was
by discriminating against Muslims. Muslim women are not allowed to
wear headscarves in certain public contexts. Religious men aren't
allowed to go up to high ranks in the army. I know of someone who was
put in jail for giving the Adhan in Arabic. If you are trying to say
that the way for Muslim countries to progress is by persecuting
Muslims who are peacfully practicing their religion I'll have
absolutely no respect for you.

[China, former Soviet Union]
 
 G:  I don't think secular regimes are necessarily the best argument for what
 you are trying to say.
 
 JS:  What would be a better argument?

I think your argument is flawed to begin with. 

And promoting secularism is also the kind of argument which it is
difficult for a Bahai to make with integrity given that ultimately the
Bahai vision of the future certainly has its theocratic aspects.

 G:  Personally, I think that it is possible to outline certain features
 which constitute a good government but this should be independent
 from a particular ideology.
 
 JS: What do you mean?

I'm not sure how else to say it. Governments should be accountable to
the citizens. Governments should be responsive to the citizens.
Governments should strive to heed the aspirations, values, hopes,
needs, concerns of the citizens. If the citizens are 90% religious
Muslims, then that has certain implications. If the citizens are 90%
Western secular liberal capitalists, that has certain implications.


My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Re: Bahai jihad? Re: Men and Women equal?

2005-01-22 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:02:48 -0600, Susan Maneck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Gilberto:
 The whole passage already looked sinister as is. I didn't remove any
 mitigating context.

Susan:
 Yes, you did. You left out the parts that make that passage make sense.

Gilberto:
Go back and look at the original post. I had put in the entire passage
uncut. And then I posted again with the parts which were Orwellian.

Gilberto: 
 The specific examples given fall in those categories but there is no
 statement which explicitly puts a limit on what could be included in
 righteous purpose.

Susan:
 So? He gives the most reasonable examples there are and you call that
 Orwellian?

Gilberto:
No. What's Orwellian are the specific part of the passage which I
called Orwellian.

Peace

Gilberto


My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Century of Light

2005-01-22 Thread Popeyesays



In a message dated 1/22/2005 6:48:21 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Isn't the book the result of a decision made by the House?
No.


Scott
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Past Revelations

2005-01-22 Thread Smaneck




In a message dated 12/28/2004 7:37:54 A.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  "In the mundane case it is easier to deal with the idea that nothing 
  isperfect so its not a big deal for it to be improved upon later. Like 
  asports record... there is always going to be someone else later 
  whowill run faster, be stronger, jump higher, farther, etc. But 
  thinkingof God in that way comes out very much like faint praise. It tends 
  toaccuse God of limitation and imperfection."

  Gilberto, 
  
  Not the way we see it. The limitations are on are part. As Baha'u'llah 
  says: 
  
  O Son of Beauty! By My spirit and by My favor! By My mercy and by My 
  beauty! All that I have revealed unto thee with the tongue of power, and have 
  written for thee with the pen of might, hath been in accordance with thy 
  capacity and understanding, not with My state and the melody of My voice. 
  
  
  warmest, Susan 
  


__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Perennial Bab?

2005-01-22 Thread Smaneck




In a message dated 12/27/2004 7:48:44 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  I'velooked at the writings of the Bab but the stuff I've seen tends 
  not toinclude much legislation or commandments.
  
  Dear Gilberto, 
  
  
  You'd probably have to find Nicholas' French translation of the Bayan. 
  Baha'is haven't given a high priority to translating the Bab's laws since they 
  are no longer considered binding. 
  
  warmest, Susan 
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Perennial Bab?

2005-01-22 Thread JS



[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The main concept which prevented me from accepting it was the near universal understanding of "the seal" among Muslims. For that reason, I gravitated more towards Eckankar (surat shabd yoga), Thelema, Theosophy, Vedanta, and (briefly) Sikhism.

Susan: Of course Mani, the founder of the Manichean religion, used that title long before Muhammad adopted it. 

JS: On the same note, I remember reading somewhere that the notions of Sonship (one parent) and of resurrection (as in from the tomb after the crucifixion) were promoted by people before Jesus. Do you know who they were?
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread Brent Poirier

Why would the punishment be in the book if it wasn't ever supposed to be 
enforced?

For emphasis, to show divine displeasure with the prohibited deed.

If the law was intended to be enforced, Baha'u'llah would not have provided an 
alternative -- life imprisonment without parole.

This is a very unusual provision in His laws, where He reveals a law, then 
provides an alternative.  There are other examples of the Deity saying things 
indirectly to impact on human behavior.  There is a chapter of SAQ devoted to 
God's rebukes of the Prophets of God, which are for the edification of the 
people, as the Prophets are perfect.  The example of Moses being punished for 
striking the rock in the desert is discussed by Him.

I think likewise, the impact of the presence of the death penalties in the Most 
Holy Book will have a deterrent effect on people's conduct.

There is also the precedent of the severe laws revealed by the Bab, which were 
not revealed to be enforced, but for another purpose:

The severe laws and injunctions revealed by the Bab can be properly 
appreciated and understood only when interpreted in the light of His own 
statements regarding the nature, purpose and character of His own Dispensation. 
As these statements clearly reveal, the Bab Dispensation was essentially in 
the nature of a religious and indeed social revolution, and its duration had 
therefore to be short, but full of tragic events, of sweeping and drastic 
reforms. These drastic measures enforced by the Bab and His followers were 
taken with the view of undermining the very foundations of Shi'ah orthodoxy, 
and thus paving the way for the coming of Baha'u'llah. To assert the 
independence of the new Dispensation, and to prepare also the ground for the 
approaching Revelation of Bah'u'llh the Bb had therefore to reveal very 
severe laws, even though most of them, were never enforced. But the mere fact 
that He revealed them was in itself a proof of the independent character of His 
Dispensation and was sufficient to create such widespread agitation, and excite 
such opposition on the part of the clergy that led them to cause His eventual 
martyrdom.
(Shoghi Effendi, Dawn of a New Day, p. 77)

Cruelty must be understood in the context of the times.  During the time of 
Moses, He revealed the punishment for violation of the Sabbath, and several 
other laws, to be death by stoning.  In these days when society was almost 
utterly without social order, and the very basic practices needed to be brought 
into being and universally established, a severe punishment was provided.

So, nowadays the day of rest is an established practice in society, even in 
completely secular societies.  And it was brought into being by this law and 
punishment of Moses, though generally He does not get the credit.

Similarly, adultery between a married man and a married woman was punishable by 
death by stoning.  God desired to emphasize how importance the purity of the 
marital relationship was.  In the Aqdas, however, it is punishable by a fine 
that doubles with each offense, but more especially by social opprobrium and 
exposure.

Nowadays, the severe laws of Baha'u'llah are few; and as I showed above, may in 
fact never be enforced by the House of Justice; or perhaps reserved for the 
most extreme of cases.  As the House said in a letter on this subject of the 
punishment for arson (and not all arson -- only burning a house), there is a 
difference in gravity between a person who burns down an empty warehouse, and a 
person who burns down a schoolhouse full of children.  But the mere presence of 
the law in the Book will have an effect.

Another severe law in the Writings of Baha'u'llah is the destruction of a 
government that invades another county, after all the prerequisites are in 
place:  Frontiers fixed; armaments reduced; a firm covenant; the principles of 
international law established and agreed upon; fairness in enforcement of 
international law; the presence of properly constituted and universally 
recognized international bodies such as the international police force, 
tribunal, and executive.  And in that circumstance, if a country invades 
another county, here is the remedy:

The fundamental principle underlying this solemn Pact should be so fixed that 
if any government later violate any one of its provisions, all the governments 
on earth should arise to reduce it to utter submission, nay the human race as a 
whole should resolve, with every power at its disposal, to destroy that 
government. Should this greatest of all remedies be applied to the sick body of 
the world, it will assuredly recover from its ills and will remain eternally 
safe and secure.
(Abdu'l-Baha, The Secret of Divine Civilization, p. 65)

That's for the Lesser Peace.  When the Most Great Peace comes, that won't be 
necessary; and when future Prophets come, probably war will have been drummed 
out of human nature for good; then the law can be removed from the Text 

Re: Perennial Bab?

2005-01-22 Thread Popeyesays



In a message dated 1/22/2005 8:50:13 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Dear Gilberto, 


You'd probably have to find Nicholas' French translation of the Bayan. Baha'is haven't given a high priority to translating the Bab's laws since they are no longer considered binding. 

warmest, Susan 
The Bayab was not a common book for the Babis tohave. Mostly they would have the Qayyum'l Asma.

Regards,

Scott
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Century of Light

2005-01-22 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:56:11 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In a message dated 1/22/2005 6:48:21 PM Central Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Isn't the book the result of a decision made  by the House?

 No.
  

But it was under the supervision of the house?



  
 Scott__ 
 
 You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 To unsubscribe, send a blank email to
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Baha'i Studies is available through the following: 
 Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu 
 Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st 
 News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st 
 Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist 
 Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net 
 New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu 


-- 


My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Century of Light

2005-01-22 Thread Popeyesays



In a message dated 1/22/2005 8:58:17 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But it was under the supervision of the house?
The House commissioned it, the House did not write it. The House reviewed it, they did not write it. The House made a decision to publish a book on the topic, commissioned it and reviewed it for content, but it does not reflect a consultative decision of the House in any particular. And, yes, that makes a difference.

Regards,

Scott
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,

2005-01-22 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:25:08 -0600, Mark A. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi, Gilberto,
 
 At 03:24 PM 1/22/2005, you wrote:

Mark: 
 I understand your point about historical or longitudinal particularism versus 
 cultural particularism. However, neither perspective has much to do with why 
 I am calling the perennialisms I have studied triumphalist.
 
 Really?
 
 Yes. The idea that most progressed, according to a certain framework, 
 implied superiority fueled the machine of the white man's burden, many of 
 the 19th-century approaches to cultural evolution (especially those of Tyler 
 and Morgan), and Herbert Spencer's Social Darwinism.

Gilberto:
I think white supremacy is still a factor in many people's thinking
about the world. The civil rights movement only went so far.

Mark:
 Progress is relative, not absolute, and it should not be the basis
for judgments of superiority or inferiority.


Gilberto:
Progress is invariably a value-laden term that Bahais are choosing
to use. I think that if Bahais really don't want to imply any degree
or kind of superiority it is not that hard to find more neutral terms
to describe the transitions from one dispensation to another.

Continual revelation. Recurring revelation. Repeating revelation.

There is a paper I remember reading as an undergrad once. I wish I
could remember the title right now. The author was James Snead and the
basic thesis as I recall it was to say that while Western culture
often embraced notions of progress a la Hegel, that Black culture
often didn't believe in progress as much as repitition with a
difference. From a certain point of view one really can't come up
with anything genuinely new, after all there is no new thing under
the sun so it is presumptuous to try. So you might as well get over
it, and embrace the fact that you are going to be repetitive, but just
repeat in your own distinctive way. The paper went on to talk about
the prevalence of sampling in hip-hop or the way dancehall djs do ALOT
of covers from all sorts of sources.

To me that's a really healthy way to look at things.

I'm not sure if the paper is online, but I think I found a reference to it:

Snead, J.A. 1984. 'Repetition as a figure of black culture', in Black
Literature and Literary Theory, ed. H.L. Gates Jnr (London:
Routledge), 59-80



Gilberto: 
 For example, In order to claim that Buddha was a manifestion you end up 
 having to impose some structure of Buddhism and reject the parts which 
 don't fit.

Mark:
 I agreed with you before that some Baha'is are triumphalistic, but I would 
 never do what you suggested.

Gilberto:
Ok, I believe you. But then when you are in your Bahai paradigm, and
read that the Buddha is identified with being a Manifestation, but the
teachings of real live Buddhists in the world don't seem to be
consistent with the Bahai teachings, I'm not sure what you do. Do you
bracket the paradigm of the real live Buddhists away from the Bahai
paradigm so that they are never compared with one another? Or do you
do something else?

Gilberto:
 I honestly don't see it. At least not in a way that is convincing. For 
 example, the Bahais and plenty of others might look at the various 
 religions and point out that the major religions all seem to have certain 
 teachings in common. Some form of Golden rule. Honor your parents. Don't 
 lie. Don't steal. Be forgiving. Be patient...etc. right.?

Mark:
 Intelligently acknowledging similarities, after having studied each religion, 
 is different from a purely deductive approach in which one begins with the 
 assumption of doctrinal similarity in advance, or in the absence, of such 
 study.

Gilberto:
But if you find ALOT of those actual similarities, would you ever be
justified in saying that certain religions had a common divine origin
and if they came from one source that there are likely to be further,
deeper similarities?

Peace

Gilberto

My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Century of Light

2005-01-22 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:00:16 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In a message dated 1/22/2005 8:58:17 PM Central Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 But it was under the supervision of the house?
 The House commissioned it, the House did not write it. The House reviewed
 it, they did not write it. The House made a decision to publish a book on
 the topic, commissioned it and reviewed it for content, but it does not
 reflect a consultative decision of the House in any particular. And, yes,
 that makes a difference.


Is there an exhaustive statement somewhere which explains the
difference between which actions, decisions, statements from the UHJ
are infallible (in which sense?) and which are not?

Peace

Gilberto

My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Century of Light

2005-01-22 Thread Smaneck




In a message dated 1/22/2005 9:30:40 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there 
  an exhaustive statement somewhere which explains thedifference between 
  which actions, decisions, statements from the UHJare infallible (in which 
  sense?) and which are not?

Nope. 
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Century of Light

2005-01-22 Thread Popeyesays



In a message dated 1/22/2005 9:30:38 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there an exhaustive statement somewhere which explains thedifference between which actions, decisions, statements from the UHJare infallible (in which sense?) and which are not?
The UHJ legislates, it does not interpret. It is only authoritative when dealing with what is NOT expressed in the text. Without a Guardian it also protects the faith and has the authority to decide on covenental matters. It is only authoritative when it is convened. The opinion of a single member outside the House is not authoritative.

Regards,

Scott
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:09:43 -0800 (PST), JS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  JS: I think that two options are presented, and it is left to the House of
  Justice to pick the one most suitable to society.
 
 Gilberto:
 But why would that option be presented?
 
 JS:  In my view, it is there in case human society makes a sharp left turn. 
 I think it is clear that in this day and age, imprisonment is considered by
 many as the most humane and civil punishment for murderers and arsonists.

What criteria are you ultimately using to determine whether something
is humane? Are you basically just going by popular opinion? Or
something else? Do the Bahai writings actually say that the
punishments found in the Quran are inhumane for the present day? Or is
that something you are just saying?

If you read in the Bible (or the Quran for that matter) even in
ancient times, people were imprisoned from time to time for various
offensese. If imprisonment was really the more human option, and it
existed in earlier times, why wouldn't those religions have simply
mandated imprisonment?


 
 
 JS:   In a similar way,
  Baha'u'llah superficially allows bigamy, maybe only to present the Aqdas
 in
  the form of the Qur'an. And just as the Qur'an conditions polygamy on
  'justice', and the Aqdas makes 'tranquility' an outcome of only monogamy. 
  Who wouldn't want to be tranquil?
 
 G: Yes. And Muslims have at times taken the Quran up on its offer and
 actually practiced polygamy. So the question remains, why would the
 Bahai laws mention the possibility of such a harsh punishment for
 arson if it was never meant to be implemented?
 
 JS:  I think that the Muslim jury is still out on whether polygamy is
 allowed or not. 

Gilberto:
I'm actually surprised at your statement. I think there are certainly
Muslims who might discourage the practice in many specific cases. It's
certainly not for everyone. And there are certainly plenty of reasons
not to do it. But aside from that I'm not sure I know of anyone
mainstream person who would say categorically that it was prohibited.
I'm actually curious where you would get the idea that the jury is
out? After all, Muhammad and (if I remember correctly) Ali practiced
polygamy themselves.




 JS:
  Also, don't you think that Islam is going the wrong way, I mean, it is
 getting
  more corrupted, it is deviating farther and farther away from the ideal? 
 
 G:  I think that if you look at history civilizations rise and fall and
 rise back up again... and fall.. and rise back up again.. etc.
 
 JS:  Not sure about rising back up.  What is an example?  Rome never came
 back,

NATO? EU?

The Chinese would rise and fall in terms of their prominence in world history. 


 I think that in the next few decades and centuries, secularism
 will overtake the planet, until the Baha'i Faith blossoms into maturity and
 brings spirituality back into civilization and governance.

Is that an actual Bahai prediction or is it just your opinion?


 
 
 
 JS:   At one point, the Islamic world was the cradle of civilization, and
 now it has
  been reduced to fanaticism, terrorism, poverty, ignorance, intolerance,
 etc.
 
 G: Now you are thinking like a bigot. 
 
 JS:  The statement was an honest summary of what we are fed by western
 media.  I do not necessarily agree with western media.

You gave me no indication that you had any reservations at all about
what you just said.

 
 
 
 JS:  Not a single praiseworthy Islamic nations exists on earth...
 

The West has the wealth and technology it has, not because of some
divine right, not because its some birthright. It has the wealth that
it has by enslaving Africans, and by extracting resources from the
developing world, through colonization, and then through neo-colonial
arrangements. Unlike how many Bahais seem to think, technology and
infrastructure isn't some proof of divine approval. If anything, its
proof of theft. If people in the developing world seem angry at the
West it is actually a reasonable reaction to the policies inflicted on
them. I don't think any nation on earth is praiseworthy. To a
disturbingly high degree, countries do what is in their interests to
do. If they can not look like total bastards while they are doing it,
its a plus.
 
 JS:  I am not talking about wealth and technology.  I am talking about
 tolerance and freedom, particularly for (1) women,

In several Muslim countries women could vote before they could in
certain Western countries. In several Muslim countries women have been
head of state. In Iran, women make up a majority of the university
students.  In certain respects the role of women in the world in
general, and in Muslim scoieties in particular is subject to change.

 (2) Baha'is

 (3) Jews

Historically Jews have generally thrived in Muslim lands. It wasn't
until recently with the founding of Israel that things went really
bad.The Enlightened West has also had its own challeneges being
tolerant to Jews. You may have 

Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 02:16:47 -, Brent Poirier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 Similarly, adultery between a married man and a married woman was punishable 
 by death by stoning.  God desired to emphasize how importance the purity of 
 the marital relationship was.  In the Aqdas, however, it is punishable by a 
 fine that doubles with each offense, but more especially by social opprobrium 
 and exposure.

Umm... given that prostitution is actually legal in most of the west
(so people are actually quite happy to pay money to have it) how
exactly is that whole fining process a deterrent?

 
Peace

Gilberto

My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread Popeyesays



In a message dated 1/22/2005 10:16:36 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do the Bahai writings actually say that thepunishments found in the Quran are inhumane for the present day? Or isthat something you are just saying?
The Baha`i Writings say that the social laws change from Revelation to Revelation because society has changed. 

Regards,

Scott
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Holy of Holies = Perennial Wisdom?,

2005-01-22 Thread Popeyesays



In a message dated 1/22/2005 8:49:14 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gilberot:But unless you have a time machine,that justification doesn't do you any good.PeaceGilberto
Its the only way to look at it. The past is studiable because it is the past. Once can barely keep up with the present and the future is beyond our ken. Christianity was for a time and place. Islam was for a time and place. The time and place justify the religion.


Regards,

Scott
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Arson the New World Order

2005-01-22 Thread JS


G: What criteria are you ultimately using to determine whether somethingis "humane""? Are you basically just going by popular opinion? Orsomething else? Do the Bahai writings actually say that thepunishments found in the Quran are inhumane for the present day? Or isthat something you are just saying?
JS: Maybe humane was a loaded word that doesn't exactly describe what I mean. A better word would have been 'applicable to our time'. It may indirectly be based on popular opinion, but it is something that becomes apparent in the light of where society and human maturity is.I cannot say that I have seen the word inhumane used in the Baha'i writings in reference to Islamic law, but I have seen statements that describe Islamic Law as no longer applicable in our time.
G: If you read in the Bible (or the Quran for that matter) even inancient times, people were imprisoned from time to time for variousoffensese. If imprisonment was really the more human option, and itexisted in earlier times, why wouldn't those religions have simplymandated imprisonment?J: I would say that completely mandated imprisonment would have been an insufficient deterrant to the people in the ancient times.
JS:
 I think that in the next few decades and centuries, secularism will overtake the planet, until the Baha'i Faith blossoms into maturity and brings spirituality back into civilization and governance.G: Is that an actual Bahai prediction or is it just your opinion?JS: Yes, this is my understanding of Shoghi Effendi's predictions. See "World Order of Baha'u'llah" of Shoghi Effendi. Here are some excerpts I separated into 5 sections below:
1)Emergence of Baha'u'llah's New World Order:
The Revelation of Bahá'u'lláh, whose supreme mission is none other but the achievement of this organic and spiritual unity of the whole body of nations, should, if we be faithful to its implications, be regarded as signalizing through its advent the coming of age of the entire human race.
The Revelation entrusted by the Almighty Ordainer to Bahá'u'lláh, His followers firmly believe, has been endowed with such potentialities as are commensurate with the maturity of the human race--the crowning and most momentous stage in its evolution from infancy to manhood. 
2) Disintegration of today's society
Deep as is the gloom that already encircles the world, the afflictive ordeals which that world is to suffer are still in preparation, nor can their blackness be as yet imagined. We stand on the threshold of an age whose convulsions proclaim alike the death-pangs of the old order and the birth-pangs of the new. 
3) Secularization overtaking Islam, Europe, and America
The collapse of the power of the Shí'ih hierarchy, in a land which had for centuries been one of the impregnable strongholds of Muslim fanaticism, was the inevitable consequence of that wave of secularization which, at a later time, was to invade some of the most powerful and conservative ecclesiastical institutions in both the European and American continents. 
This menace of secularism that has attacked Islám and is undermining its remaining institutions, that has invaded Persia, has penetrated into India, and raised its triumphant head in Turkey, has already manifested itself in both Europe and America, and is, in varying degrees, and under various forms and designations, challenging the basis of every established religion, and in particular the institutions and communities identified with the Faith of Jesus Christ.
4) Fall of Islam
"O people of the Qur'án," Bahá'u'lláh, addressing the combined forces of Sunní and Shí'ih Islám, significantly affirms, "Verily, the Prophet of God, Muhammad, sheddeth tears at the sight of your cruelty. Ye have assuredly followed your evil and corrupt desires, and turned away your face from the light of guidance. Erelong will ye witness the result of your deeds; for the Lord, My God, lieth in wait and is watchful of your behavior... O concourse of Muslim divines! By your deeds the exalted station of the people hath been abased, the standard of Islám hath been reversed, and its mighty throne hath fallen." 
Both Sunní and Shí'ih Islám had, through the convulsions that had seized them, contributed to the acceleration of the disruptive process to which I have previously referred--a process which, by its very nature, is to pave the way for that complete reorganization and unification which the world, in every aspect of its life, must achieve. 
5) Fall of Christianity
That the forces of irreligion, of a purely materialistic philosophy, of unconcealed paganism have been unloosed, are now spreading, and, by consolidating themselves, are beginning to invade some of the most powerful Christian institutions of the western world, no unbiased observer can fail to admit.

		Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, 

Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread JS


G: Umm... given that prostitution is actually legal in most of the west(so people are actually quite happy to pay money to have it) howexactly is that whole fining process a deterrent?JS: Doubling is the key word here. If the fine for adultery is $100, it will be $200 the 2nd time, $400 3rd time, $800 4th time, $1600 5th, $3200 6th, $6400 7th, $12800 8th, $25600 9th, $51200 10th, $102,400 11th. I don't think I would be able to affort to do it more than 7 times. Billionaires mayhave the money for25 offenses, or $1.7 Billion.
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread Mark A. Foster
Sandra,

Here is the information again:

Should anyone intentionally destroy a house by fire, him also shall ye burn; 
should anyone deliberately take another's life, him also shall ye put to 
death.  
-- Baha'u'llah, Aqdas:  Notes, p.203

 The law of Baha'u'llah prescribes the death penalty for murder and arson, with 
the alternative of life imprisonment (see note 87). 
 In His Tablets Abdu'l-Baha explains the difference between revenge and 
punishment.  He affirms that individuals do not have the right to take revenge, 
that revenge is despised in the eyes of God, and that the motive for punishment 
is not vengeance, but the imposition of a penalty for the committed offence.  
In Some Answered Questions, He confirms that it is the right of society to 
impose punishments on criminals for the purpose of protecting its members and 
defending its existence. 
 With regard to this provision, Shoghi Effendi in a letter written on his 
behalf gives the following explanation: 
  In the Aqdas Baha'u'llah has given death as the penalty 
 for murder.  However, He has permitted life imprisonment 
 as an alternative.  Both practices would be in 
 accordance with His Laws.  Some of us may not be able to 
 grasp the wisdom of this when it disagrees with our own 
 limited vision; but we must accept it, knowing His 
 Wisdom, His Mercy and His Justice are perfect and for 
 the salvation of the entire world.  If a man were falsely 
 condemned to die, can we not believe Almighty God 
 would compensate him a thousandfold, in the next 
 world, for this human injustice?  You cannot give up a 
 salutary law just because on rare occasions the innocent 
 may be punished. 
 The details of the Baha'i law of punishment for murder and arson, a law 
designed for a future state of society, were not specified by Baha'u'llah.  The 
various details of the law, such as degrees of offence, whether extenuating 
circumstances are to be taken into account, and which of the two prescribed 
punishments is to be the norm are left to the Universal House of Justice to 
decide in light of prevailing conditions when the law is to be in operation.  
The manner in which the punishment is to be carried out is also left to the 
Universal House of Justice to decide. 
 In relation to arson, this depends on what house is burned.  There is 
obviously a tremendous difference in the degree of offence between the person 
who burns down an empty warehouse and one who sets fire to a school full of 
children. 
  87.  Should ye condemn the arsonist and the murderer 
  to life imprisonment, it would be permissible according 
  to the provisions of the Book. # 62 
 Shoghi Effendi, in response to a question about this verse of the Aqdas, 
affirmed that while capital punishment is permitted, an alternative, life 
imprisonment, has been provided whereby the rigours of such a condemnation 
can be seriously mitigated.  He states that Baha'u'llah has given us a choice 
and has, therefore, left us free to use our own discretion within certain 
limitations imposed by His law.  In the absence of specific guidance 
concerning the application of this aspect of Baha'i law, it remains for the 
Universal House of Justice to legislate on the matter in the future. 
Kitab-i-Aqdas: Notes, pp.203-205

Regards, Mark A. Foster • http://markfoster.net • [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger.  Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Arson

2005-01-22 Thread Popeyesays



In a message dated 1/22/2005 11:49:38 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

G: Umm... given that prostitution is actually legal in most of the west(so people are actually quite happy to pay money to have it) howexactly is that whole fining process a deterrent?JS: Doubling is the key word here. If the fine for adultery is $100, it will be $200 the 2nd time, $400 3rd time, $800 4th time, $1600 5th, $3200 6th, $6400 7th, $12800 8th, $25600 9th, $51200 10th, $102,400 11th. I don't think I would be able to affort to do it more than 7 times. Billionaires mayhave the money for25 offenses, or $1.7 Billion.
Don't forget the shame involved in paying the fines for that particular offense.

Regards,

Scott
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Perennial Bab?

2005-01-22 Thread Mark A. Foster
Hi, Susan,

At 07:23 PM 1/22/2005, you wrote:
Of course Mani, the founder of the Manichean religion, used that title long 
before Muhammad adopted it.

Yes, but at the time (12-13 years old), I had not heard of Manicheanism. I was 
turned off by any religion which emphasized what I saw as finality or 
exclusiveness.

Regards, Mark A. Foster • http://markfoster.net • [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger.  Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu