Hi all,
Is anyone in Europe interested in making tests with RFSM-8000? I am
QRV some times on 14.109,5 calling CQ RFSM and in Server Mode.
If anyone is interested please let know so that we can arrange a SKED.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Demetre SV1UY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Had a short RFSM QSO with OH2QN.
73 de SV1UY
Sorry,
The callsign of my QSO was OH3QN, Jarmo from Lahti.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
Had a short RFSM QSO with OH2QN.
73 de SV1UY
Hi,
I am sending short RFSM8000 beacons right now on 14,109.5 KHZ carrier
frequency. Anyone interested?
73 de Demetre SV1UY
:
--
Really what the FCC will decide concerns the american hams not the
rest of the world. If this group is only for americans then fair enough.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
Pactor Packet!)
73 de Demetre SV1UY
can link.
Back to yourscheduledprogramme!
73s
Jack VK4JRC
73 de Demetre SV1UY
needed. Just had to start somewhere :-)
Sadly, my antenna cannot accommodate 30 metres..
Calling you now on 21.078 Jack. I will also try your 18MHZ and 14MHZ qrgs.
73s
Jack VK4JRC
73 de Demetre SV1UY
will try again at 19.00z although probability is 1-25% because
ShortPath MUF is on 12MHZ at that time but you never know. LongPath
MUF is 14MHZ but really the best time for LongPath QSO between us is
07.00z - 10.00z, but you might be busy then.
73s Jack VK4JRC
73 de Demetre SV1UY
FORWARDING and not FORWARDING HF Mailboxes, HF to VHF/UHF GATEWAYS
etc. using PACTOR/PACKET or any other modes, work in a different way
and I am not going to go back to it because this matter has been
beaten to death already. People get sick of hearing about it all the time.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
Demetre SV1UY
that some radio amateurs that live in these places and are
also members of this list can tell us much more than I said. We can
definatelly take some lessons from them.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
Hi all,
Too many lawyers in USA killed PACKET RADIO. The way you are going on
you are going to kill all DIGITAL RADIO too.
Hey guys hold your horses. It is a hobby not a court of law.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
de Demetre SV1UY
and in PACKET RADIO.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
P.S. What happened with this petition that was attempting to bring
digital modes into the 19th century? Does anyone knows
like PSKmail much more than NBEMS.
Both can be called The poor man's Winlink2000, but really they leave
a lot to be desired as far as speed and good behaviour in bad HF
propagation is concerned.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
Hi Nick and all,
Happy New Year. I am calling CQ on PACTOR right now and I will
continue until 16.00 UTC.
Anyone from USA interested please reply on PACTOR 1 or 2.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
Calling CQ PACTOR on 7.038 KHZ (center frequency).
Just finished a 20 minutes QSO in PACTOR II with OZ1PMX. Despite the
QRM and zero signals the link kept going right through the end.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
Hi Ned/EI5DS,
Thanks for the PACTOR QSOs today. Even with S0 signals we managed the
QSO thanks to PACTOR! Hope to see you tomorrow sometime. I will post
to Andy's SKED PAGE and here first and hopefully we can have some more
QSOs on 20m.
HAPPY NEW YEAR to you and all.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
de Demetre SV1UY
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Demetre SV1UY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
And don't forget that really it does not matter if you use USB or LSB
and you can always flick the REVERSE SWITCH. This is true for all
narrow digital modes with the exception of QPSK31.
[snip]
73 de Demetre
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Leigh L Klotz, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And MFSK, Olivia, and Domino EX. They are (or can be) =500Hz.
Leigh/WA5ZNU
Thanks for letting us know Leigh. Never worked these modes OM.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
.
Is it 14.0755 MARK or CENTER FREQUENCY you are using?
I sometimes hang around 14.080 KHZ Center Frequency, so if we cannot
make it tomorrow you can try to call me.
73 and HAPPY PACTORING NEW YEAR to all!!!
de Demetre SV1UY
.
Before I got the SCS PTC-IIe I did the same with a KAM TNC.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
soundcard programs have a SOFTWARE
REVERSE SWITCH so that you can change it in case there is any
incompatibility in the tone pairs.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
using
it, although it is a Great system really.
de Roger W6VZV
73 de Demetre SV1UY
Demetre SV1UY
P.S. Finally if the petition wins in USA you will have to battle other
uprising unattended operations such as PSKmail, FLARQ, ALE etc. I hope
that this petition will fail because it just wants to stop any sort of
advancement in the world of Amateur Radio in USA and in the rest
.
That will not keep the anti semi-automatic guys happy, but such is
life I'm afraid.
This is one more reason for everybody to complain against RM-11392
petition to your FCC. Unless if you want to go back to the Medieval
Times for Digital communications in the Ham bands.
73,
Rick, KV9U
73 de Demetre
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
Hi Rick,
Well my old KAM Controller with it's addon PCB for supporting PACTOR
1 definatelly has Memory ARQ. Memory ARQ is a must for PACTOR
protocol. There is no PACTOR without
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
Well,
I have a KAM controller with PACTOR 1. I bet you have not even seen
one.
You know, Demetre, I am getting tired of remarks like that from you. I
have attempted to reply
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
Sorry if I made you upset Roger, but you insist on something you do
not know very well and always try to prove that the other guy is
wrong. If I was a bit harsh with you
right to
protect their code and I do not blame anyone here, I am just stating a
fact.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
that works (you already own an SCS MODEM) and give it for
free to the Radio Amateur community?
I know why. If you did that you would not have anything to whine about!!!
73 de Demetre SV1UY
world we should always be a bit more
tolerant, don't you think?
73 de Demetre SV1UY
P.S. as for automatic operations, don't forget that it is not only
Winlink2000 and W1AW who do that. There are also PACKET BBSes (the
real Robots where both ends have no human operator, the have Martians
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, W2XJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
First of all not many can afford a satellite phone, which is also not
amateur radio. A satellite phone plus connection fees are far more
expensive than a PACTOR MODEM. Second many do not even have
, and if you have a PACTOR MODEM and
have not understood it's use yet then I am sorry for you because
nothing comes even close to PACTOR 3 for emergency comms OM.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
73 de Demetre SV1UY
and automatic
operations.
Forget about PACTOR 3 being the problem because it isn't.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
--QUOTED MESSAGE From Dave-
Re: Questions on digital opposition, QRM on PACTOR PMBOS now from
DAVE, Congrats
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, kh6ty kh6ty@ wrote:
I am quoting here my reply to DAVE about his Anti-radiation missiles
tuned to PACTOR PMBO frequencies for your information!
snip
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+++ more AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Demetre SV1UY sv1uy@
wrote:
QRM from PMBOs and other deaf robots spoils the enjoyment of
amateur radio for many operators Demetre. That's why
Oh,
I nearly forgot to ask you Dave, what's the matter with you and
PACTOR-3? Has uncle Steve been bad to you recently? I can help you know!!!
73 de Demetre de SV1UY
P.S. Please smile, this is only a hobby OM. MERRY CHRISTMAS and a
HAPPY NEW YEAR to all.
buzzed
the tower and flew home to beat the commuter congestion at Hanscom.
What's your grid square?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
Well our old God APOLLO will not be kind to you Dave. Propagation is
not good between us right now so I guess I am saved for the time being!
73 de Demetre SV1UY
to be rich and tanned now?
Should we ban from the hobby the tanned rich Germans now?
73 de Demetre SV1UY
that PACTOR 3 operators do not listen before
they transmit. They always listen because they want their transmitters
to stay cool, especially if this HF radio they are using is their only
means of communication. Makes sense doesn't it? At least I hope it
does to you!!!
73 de Demetre SV1UY
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently deployed PMBOs have no way to reliably determine whether
or not the frequency is locally clear. They may be configured to detect
Pactor signals, but they cannot detect signals in any other mode.
73,
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
Well,
Do we really need contests, ragchewing, voice qsos, voice nets, cw
qsos, cw nets, on HF? Realy it all depends on what each individual
wants to do! Your millage might vary
! They are just
another form of DIGITAL MODES which you might not like but others like
them so there!!!
73 de Demetre SV1UY
. The subbands are really
gentlements agreement! (no offence to gentledames of course who I
admire). FCC only rules USA. Don't forget the rest of the world. The
rest of the world has more radio hams than USA.
Merry Christmas!!!
73 de Demetre SV1UY
pleasure might be someone else's discomfort, but when an emergency
arises then I think that everyone else's hobby needs must back off for
a while until the emergency is over. I think this is fair! When human
lives are in danger then everything else should be of a lower priority.
73 de Demetre
have a better chance of connecting
to a Winlink2000 PMBO and download our e-mail!
Never thought about that have you? hi hi hi!!!
73 de Demetre SV1UY
.
Post by (NOT WRITTEN BY):
Bill Rimmer, N5LYG
EC Northwest Harris County A.R.E.S.
=
73 de Demetre SV1UY
for
announcements.
Rud Merriam K5RUD
ARES AEC Montgomery County, TX
http://TheHamNetwork.net
73 de Demetre SV1UY
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the initiator is typically remote from the PMBO, the
initiator cannot reliably determine that PMBO will not QRM an ongoing
QSO. You could activate a PMBO in England on a frequency that sounds
clear in
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Demetre SV1UY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein aa6yq@ wrote:
Since the initiator is typically remote from the PMBO, the
initiator cannot reliably determine that PMBO will not QRM an ongoing
QSO. You could
then.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
73 de Demetre SV1UY
.
Do you ever transmit SSB in the CW or DIGITAL subbands Dave? I'd love
to see you doing that!
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
73 de Demetre SV1UY
?
Then why you should transmit any other mode in the wide digital
subbands and complain that you have been QRMed by wide digital modes?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
73 de Demetre SV1UY
, AA6YQ
73 de Demetre SV1UY
, my HF radio etc,
and even if Linux is more difficult, although I find UBUNTU and
KUBUNTU a breeze to setup and use.
73,
Rick, KV9U
73 de Demetre SV1UY
P.S. and please keep those never ending complains. Maybe someone will
write a soundcard modem one day in the distant future that outperforms
is not true.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
73 de Demetre SV1UY
hi hi!!
73 de Demetre SV1UY
and or need is channelized, clear
channel frequencies, with no human factor strengths added. Is that
realistic to expect on the ham bands?
73 de Brian/K3KO
I'm afraid that only PACTOR 2 or 3 has any chance of making it through
these conditions OM. Everything else fails.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
in the Web but the program is nowhere to be seen. There
are a lot of references about it, but no TNC.COM etc anywhere to be
downloaded.
Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or here if you have it.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
I am calling CQ in ARQ FAE mode on 10.136,5 now.
Please answer if you hear me :)
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
OK I am calling you now.
73 de SV1UY
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Demetre,
I heard you but you was to weak.
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
OK still calling but now on 100 Watts.
Will stop in 1 minute.
73 de SV1UY
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Demetre,
I heard you but you was to weak.
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Had we used PACTOR 3 Steinar we would have managed to have a QSO.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
P.S. Going QRT now.
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
QSY 14.109,5. I have a better antenna for 20m
la5vna Steinar
OK Steinar I am there now,
But 40m is the best band for this time of the day.
SF=67 which is too low.
73 de SV1UY
,
I've put my wife in bed! hi hi hi!!!
She is a good one! hi hi hi!!!
73 de Demetre SV1UY
P.S. all of a sudden my mouse was dissappearing, I had to put 2
ferrite rings on each end. Now it works.
OK Steinar,
I can hear you but maybe I am doing something wrong with my MultiPSK.
73 de SV1UY
Hi Steinar,
Just finished calling.
One of these days we'll make it.
73 de SV1UY
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is a Pactor III modem worth considering for general ham radio
applications. If I spend a $1000 on a modem , what do I get? Is it a
thousand dollars superior to Olivia or MT63? Will I be able to have
reliable QSOs
at 19.00 UTC tonight.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
-
So if I were you and the above description covers you I would
buy an
SCS-modem. The cheapest one is the PTC-IIex.
73 de SV1UY
Andy, if you ever make it to California I
experiences with PACTOR 3.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
are on 1625Hz when I am on ARQ
FAE mode? I have setup 1500 Hz in the config window and when I am on
any other mode it is indeed 1500 Hz.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
.
--
MSc. José A Amador
73 de Demetre SV1UY
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Demetre,
Care for trying on 14.109,5 now ?
LA5VNA Steinar
OK Steinar, trying now 20:43 UTC
73 de SV1UY
Hi Steinar,
If you are still at your PC can we try 10MHZ?
73 de Demetre SV1UY
there is some
misunderstanding somewhere. But 2 Khz for 375 bps is a wast of
bandwidth I think.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
-bit patterns. Thus the bps rate is actually 3 times
the baud rate.
OK Robert,
Is it always 125X3 then? in which case the throughput will be 375 bps?
73 de Demetre SV1UY
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Rick
Calling on 14.109 now
LA5VNA Steinar
Hi Steinar,
What is the effective speed of ARQ FAE please?
73 de Demetre SV1UY
Merriam K5RUD
Hi Rud,
Some like to argue on internet than get on the air!!!
73 de Demetre SV1UY
Thanks Patrick,
I will try to participate in your skeds. Please let me know when are
you going to be on.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Demetre SV1UY sv1uy@ wrote:
Some like to argue on internet than get on the air!!!
Some try to avoid inconvenient facts by attacking the messenger
Hi again Patrick,
How difficult is it to make 125 bauds faster, say 800 - 1200 bps so
that it can at least compete with PACTOR II?
73 de Demetre SV1UY
syndrome (which by
the way does not cause problems all that often) and cause some QRM to
each other it is not the end of the world. Some seem to forget the
most important Radio Amateur Rule about Courtesy.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
Hi,
I am QRV now and until 15.00z at 14.105 KHZ (center frequency) on
PACTOR1, 2 or 3. I plan to do the same every Sunday from now on.
You are all invited for a QSO.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
that do not listen
before they transmit because the SCS controllers have the option to
listen before transmit. It is the Winlink people that have decided not
to use it.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
.
And remember PACTOR 3 is not WINLINK. Winlink uses PACTOR 3 (it is not
the only system that uses it) and if some think that they do not use
it correctly, well it is a matter of opinion.
Life is too short man, enjoy it while you can.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
our bands happily.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
. No problems with PACTOR operators that do not listen
before they transmit and spoil PSK QSOs there I guess.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
the
radios and computers we use today are also commercial in the same
sense. No offence of course.
[snip]
73,
Rick, KV9U
73 de Demetre SV1UY
are interested in
Winlink 2000 you can subscribe to
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wl2kemcomm and ask them.
I am sure someone has used your Pactor Controller in that group and
surely they will tell you about it. They are very helpful.
Happy Easter to you and to all the group.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
. It is disheartening!!!
73 de Demetre SV1UY
sigs 579.
Will try to fix a PTT circuit ASAP.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
.
---
Prof. Jose A. Amador, E.E., MSc.
You are spot on Jose,
Unfortunatelly all this name calling and mode bashing (you know, the
mode I support is better than yours etc) does not promote digital
radio at all.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
transfer data? Can it do 1200 bps or faster?
I cannot see any speed mentioned anywhere.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
suppose it has to be USB and 1500 HZ
just like other wide digital modes, or am I wrong?
Keep up the good work OM.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
correct in that PSKMail is now using PSK125 and FLDigi?
I would appreciate direct E-Mail of specs attachments on PSK125 and
FLDigi sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Txn 73,
Walt/K5YFW
Hi Walt,
Try http://pskmail.wikispaces.com/
73 de Demetre SV1UY
KHZ using 50 watts.
My 3rd on was on 23 February 1999 at 08:15 UTC with G3PLX himself,
Peter from Kendal on the same frequency using his program in Windows 95.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
at the
moment and I am very happy with it. If the measurements are also true
in real conditions too, then perhaps it is a good idea to upgrade to
PACTOR III since when conditions are good the 4 times increase is
great and one would hold an HF channel busy for shorter periods.
73 de Demetre SV1UY
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
