___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
martcards.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman
mode. This was required because at the time of the
release we had not yet an approval to use this for VS-NfD/Restricted
communication. Thus in the GnuPG VS-Desktop configuraion this option is
only set after we received the approval.
For key generation the flag is indded not set by default:
uot;?
Yours,
Rens Rikkerink
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
).
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https
b ed25519 2022-10-26 [S]
sub cv25519 2022-10-26 [E]
Thank you for your time so far.
Yours,
Rens Rikkerink
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
de GmbH GnuPG.com AmtsGer. Wuppertal HRB 14459
Bergstr. 3a Geschäftsführung Werner Koch
D-40699 Erkrath https://gnupg.com USt-Id DE215605608
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Clearsign not working on new debian install. NisT-P21.
encryption/ decryption works. Hej.
Yours sincerely
Richardh Bostrom___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
r IMAP server with user certificate based
authentication.
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnup
On Thu, 2 May 2024 16:58, Matěj Cepl said:
> rather dubious: systemd can certainly manage a dependence on
> shared resource, and concurrent running of two processes at
Right. However, systemd does not use the same locking scheme as gnupg
uses to avoid duplicate daemon startup. The
On Thu May 2, 2024 at 3:55 PM CEST, Ming Kuang via Gnupg-users wrote:
> https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2024-March/066957.html
> https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2024-March/066960.html
Just for the record, I find the explanation in the later email
rather d
t is
always enabled and thus the option is not really required.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
____
SSH crypted with GnuPG (to
> be exactly with an OpenPGP card in the phone). I can do fine:
>
> $ gpg -d id_rsa.asc > id_rsa # which asks for the PIN of the OpenPGP card
> $ ssh www.unixarea.de
> Enter passphrase for key '/home/guru/.ssh/id_rsa':
> ...
> $ rm id_rsa # so
Hey Andrew,
Yes, this happens consistently, I have not been able to add a uid at
all, using both my main yubikey and backup yubikey (which have the
same private key on them)
Yours,
Rens
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https
On 1 May 2024, at 10:08, Rens Rikkerink via Gnupg-users
wrote:
>
> Lately I've been trying to add a new uid to my public key, I have
> however so far been unsuccessful in doing so. Every time I try to do
> so, I then immediately get "1 bad signature" which wasn't pres
ND PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ed therein at https://dev.gnupg.org/T4154 would be useful to web
searchers.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 8:14 PM Jacob Bachmeyer
wrote:
>
> Bee via Gnupg-users wrote:
> >> Its is called "USER DATA" for a reason - you have to decide what to do
> >> with it.
> &g
Bee via Gnupg-users wrote:
Its is called "USER DATA" for a reason - you have to decide what to do
with it.
But a novel pinentry must be created to receive the data. Again, this
is circular.
If your really really want a passphrase, what about passing
the filename of a fi
gainst local users - are stupid policy requirements you
> have to follow. In all other cases, first come up with an attack tree
> to show that a passphrase is of any use for your application.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
se military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
;
> > Has anyone got a link to a working example of '3<' or 'PINENTRY_USER_DATA
> > which can fulfill the same task' of gpg picking up its passphrase from an
> > environment variable?
>
>
> Examine https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2024-March/067030.html
> ('
d of bug reports.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.
pg picking up its passphrase from an
environment variable?
Examine https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2024-March/067030.html
('How can I 'echo' into fd 3 to be able to use it on a gpg cmd line?') for
a more detailed example script solution, but in brief for this thread:
gs_my
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 4:55 PM Daniele Nicolodi via Gnupg-users <
gnupg-users@gnupg.org> wrote:
> I have an oldish GPG key for which I have lost the passphrase. I have a
> very good idea of what the passphrase is constructed but there are some
> characters substitution that I must
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 11:14:06AM +0200, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 21:39, Eric Pruitt said:
> > I have multiple public keys in my GPG keyring. When validating
> > signatures, I sometimes want to validate them against a specific key so
>
iption: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
one key and using that, and some cursory
searching didn't uncover any alternatives. If there still isn't a GPG
option for validating a signature against a specific key, is there a
particular reason it doesn't exist?
Eric
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
!
I think the best solution is for gnupg to ignore the `with-fingerprint`
configuration option. Modern versions display primary key fingerprints by
default anyway, so the alternative display format is both redundant and
potentially confusing.
I would be particularly concerned that pe
her wrote:
>
> On 28 Mar 2024, at 12:54, Christian Sommer via Gnupg-users
> wrote:
>
>
> when explicitly telling GnuPG to display x448 fingerprints (gpg
> --fingerprint) it just spits out the "abbreviated hex format" by takes
> the first 50 bytes and sweeping the
On 28 Mar 2024, at 12:54, Christian Sommer via Gnupg-users
wrote:
>
> when explicitly telling GnuPG to display x448 fingerprints (gpg
> --fingerprint) it just spits out the "abbreviated hex format" by takes
> the first 50 bytes and sweeping the rest under the rug! Not ver
work in retrieving it.
Does anyone know how to run john on a private key stored in the format
used by the new keystore used by gpg2?
Thank you.
Cheers,
Dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:24, Moses said:
> tried to import again, and the same error still occurred. The same
> error happened when I tried to directly execute the
> D:\software\GNU\GnuPG\bin\gpg --import command.
Well, I have no more idea on how to debug this by mail :-(.
On Linux you
error still occurred. The same
error happened when I tried to directly execute the
D:\software\GNU\GnuPG\bin\gpg --import command.
- --
M.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 3:35 PM Werner Koch wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I see in your PATH
>
> D:\software\GNU\GnuWin32\bin
>
> prior to
>
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listi
Hi,
Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 13:03, Todd Zullinger said:
>
>> In such a case, it sounds like it may be reasonable to use
>> the normal socket? Until the remote side is updated to
>
> In fact, I also did this for som
Hi,
I see in your PATH
D:\software\GNU\GnuWin32\bin
prior to
D:\software\GNU\Gpg4win\..\GnuPG\bin
May it be that you use a gpg version picked up from the GnuWin32? Check
also whether there is a gpg binary in the Git program directory.
My educated guess is that Gnuwin32 is a Cygwin based
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Thank you for your continued follow-up. I executed commands. Here are
the results:
C:\>gpgconf -V
* GnuPG 2.4.5 (cbff323b3)
MingW32
Windows 10.0 build 19045
* Libgcrypt 1.10.3 (aa161086)
version:1.10.3:10a03:1.48:13000:
cc:10:gcc:10-wi
will show anything useful for your case. Can you
start kleopatra? If so, what does its selftest tell?
What you can do is:
gpgconf -K all
to stop all background processes (or use the taskmgr or logout and in
again).
cd %APPDATA%
ren gnupg gnupg.save
cd %LOCALAPPDATA%
ren gnupg g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Returns as follows:
(just blacked out the username...)
C:\>gpgconf -L
sysconfdir:C%3a\ProgramData\GNU\etc\gnupg
bindir:D%3a\software\GNU\Gpg4win\..\GnuPG\bin
libexecdir:D%3a\software\GNU\Gpg4win\..\GnuPG\bin
libdir:D%3a\software\GNU\Gpg4
er via USB. Now if pcscd is already running and has access to the
reader scdaemon won't be able to access the reader via USB.
2.2 falls back to PC/SC if it can't use the reader via USB.
Either shutdown pcscd or add
disable-ccid-driver
to ~/.gnupg/scdaemon.conf
More debug output can be logged by addi
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
SIGNATURE-
_______
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
version" to check whether tehre is a
problem with the IPC connection.
gpgconf -L
also gives important information.
> c:\> gpg --version
> gpg (GnuPG) 2.2.15
That version is pretty old and in terms of IPC ("error sending to
agent") one idfference is that t
ioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hi,
I've encountered an issue while trying to import a private key into GnuPG,
resulting in an unexpected error message. Below are the details including
the version of GnuPG and the error messages received:
c:\> gpg --version
gpg (GnuPG) 2.4.5
libgcrypt 1.10.3
...
c:\> gpg --import p
Bee via Gnupg-users wrote:
> In the mean time, you could put something along the lines of:
>
> {CmdCalls ; } 2>&1 | grep -v -e "^gpg: problem with fast path key
> listing: Forbidden - ignored$" or something, to keep that output out
> of your stderr str
Hi Werner,
Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
>> gpg: problem with fast path key listing: Forbidden - ignored
>
> I'll suppress that message in --quiet mode for the next release.
Excellent, thanks!
> When doing a secret key listing (which happens with -K but also in
>
ues, but
then you probably want to know if / when / should that happen.
If you add --quiet now, even when the change below happens later, your
script above won't need to change again.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 5:01 AM Werner Koch via Gnupg-users
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > gpg: pr
ice. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hi,
I have been working on setting up agent forwarding¹.
One issue which I have not yet found a solution for is that
gpg prints the following to stderr when performing actions
involving the agent:
gpg: problem with fast path key listing: Forbidden - ignored
Both hosts are running gnupg
the --list-packets command. This command dates back to the
> very first release.
Please ignore my above remark; PEBKAC :facepalm:
> Given that Ubuntu's Hockeypuck is the default keyserver for GnuPG for
> most people (i.e. on Windows) it would be good if it continues to
> support a
; But let me remark for the records that GnuPG has been the entity which
>> always used the term /OpenPGP/ instead of /PGP/ or - as many Linux
>> people did - the term /GPG/ keys. Thus we, and in particular me,
>> stressed that this is the OpenPGP standard which GnuPG impleme
v4 subkeys (which are several orders of
magnitude more common).
>> different version number (since v3 did not support subkeys). Have you
>> interop-tested this with other implementations? Besides RNP? What were
>
> If there are new implementaions they should check interop wi
de-facto standards which are PGP, GnuPG and later RNP. There is also
the widely used BouncyCastle library and we have not seen problems with
it except when ppl ignore features of these library.
> 3. The term “OpenPGP” does not belong to GnuPG.
But let me remark for the records that Gn
contexts if possible.
Regards,
Marcio Barbado, Jr.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 at 07:01 Werner Koch via Gnupg-users <
gnupg-users@gnupg.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:26, Damien Cassou said:
>
> > Is that a problem? Am I missing something important? It seems this
> > causes m
hey are simply not true.
1. crypto-refresh defines a *different* set of extensions to OpenPGP than GnuPG
supports, but these do not “break” OpenPGP.
2. crypto-refresh has bumped all of its packet version numbers specifically to
avoid compatibility issues. Just because the WG have a different opinion does
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ecause they are expired: "show-unusable-subkeys"
reveal them and everything is good.
Thank you so much.
--
Damien Cassou
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill
_____
Thank you both for your answers. I would like to understand why
restoring the backup doesn't restore my subkeys. On a fresh ~/.gnupg, I
did:
$ gpg --list-packets /media/mystick/key
gpg: keybox '/home/cassou/.gnupg/pubring.kbx' created
# off=0 ctb=94 tag=5 hlen=2 plen=134
:secret key
On 28 Mar 2024, at 09:47, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users
wrote:
>
> x448 keys are created as version 5 keys and version 5 keys come with a
> 32 byte fingerprint (v4 has 20 bytes).
...
> Here is an example:
>
> pub ed25519 2016-02-02 [SC]
> FD8FEC4F8595AB1B6F60D43FC
o.
- [inside of %COMSPEC%], short answer: you can’t (*). %COMSPEC% file
descriptors are broken. See thread ending at
https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2024-March/067020.html
- cygwin64 is gnupg unsupported, and cygwin32 is deprecated. See
https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2024-M
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:54, Christian Sommer said:
> Likewise by telling GnuPG you really want the short keyID displayed
> (gpg --keyid-format short) it takes the LAST 32 bytes of the FIRST 64
> bytes of the fingerprint.
The thing here is that the short keyid is not from the spec
you are absolutely right:
when explicitly telling GnuPG to display x448 fingerprints (gpg
--fingerprint) it just spits out the "abbreviated hex format" by takes
the first 50 bytes and sweeping the rest under the rug! Not very nice.
Likewise by telling GnuPG you really want the s
te key
(.key) You should see a '#' mark for the primary key.
> My private master key is symlinked in ~/.gnupg/private-keys-v1.d:
That is intended to work but has not been thoroughly tested.
> [1] https://github.com/pinpox/pgp2ssh/issues/6
That reminds me that we have a function export_se
ignature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
seen until now i tend to accept that the short keyid 22
3 4 of above example is in fact right.
on the next occasion my search will go on, but if anybody can confirm and
tell even more about that observation, i'd be very grateful.
___
Gnupg-users mailing
rtant? It seems this
causes me the troubles mentioned at [1].
Recently, I changed my usb smart card and kept the same keys so I
believe I have everything needed in some form.
My private master key is symlinked in ~/.gnupg/private-keys-v1.d:
$ ls -l ~/.gnupg/private-keys-v1.d/
…
35A4020C4AFC2279CEE0BC36E
2.4.4 displays. please shed some light on that
observation.
liberal regards,
chris
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:55, Bee said:
> Could you make whatever notation at dev.gnupg.org is appropriate, please?
https://dev.gnupg.org/T7060
Already implemented a new option but you need to wait for gnupg 2.6.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the yo
Thank you.
I don't follow all of that, such as deep diving into
gnupg/common/sysutils.c:translate_sys2libc_fd , but I do get the
answer is: Unsupported (at least at this time).
Could you make whatever notation at dev.gnupg.org is appropriate, please?
Summary: --passphrase-fd #, where # >
Thank you.
I don't follow all of that, such as deep diving into
gnupg/common/sysutils.c:translate_sys2libc_fd , but I do get the
answer is: Unsupported (at least at this time).
Could you make whatever notation at dev.gnupg.org is appropriate, please?
Summary: --passphrase-fd #, where # >
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:33, Bee said:
> C:\Program Files (x86)\GnuPG\bin>type HelloWorld.txt | .\gpg.exe
> --passphrase-fd 3 -c 3< HelloWorld.txt
>> gpg: failed to translate osfhandle 0x0003
gpg takes system handles and not libc file descriptors. File
descriptors 0, 1,
> Don't mix Cygwin and plain Windows programs.
cygwin has nothing to do with this thread - there is no element of
cygwin within the quoted code or results.
As said, this is pure GnuPG from
> From https://gnupg.org/download/index.html:
> Windows ...
> download sig Simp
pgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 20:14, Christian Sommer said:
> building GnuPG by speedo.mk on current master branch fails. The log
That is quite possible. I doubt that anyone of us used it yet. Please
use the STABLE-BRANCH-2-4 for such things. master is for development
and things might or might not w
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 9:58 AM Werner Koch via Gnupg-users
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:26, B.S. said:
> > ... (Windows 10) [DOS] cmd ... [*NOT* powershell]
> > ... cygwin gpg ...
>
> [Do not use a Cygwin build of gpg - this is not supported. Use a
> standard
>From https://gnupg.org/download/index.html:
Windows ...
download sig Simple installer for the current GnuPG <--
https://gnupg.org/ftp/gcrypt/binary/gnupg-w32-2.4.5_20240307.exe
-
C:\Program Files (x86)\GnuPG\bin>ver
Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.19045.4123]
C:\Program F
;' or
'PINENTRY_USER_DATA which can fulfill the same task' of gpg picking up
its passphrase from an environment variable?
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
t key using its keygrip (see the "grp" line)
and put it into the ~/.gnupg/private-keys-v1.d/ directory. But you
probably took the key offline for improved security and thus you better
don't re-import it and indeed use the other box for key signing.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
The pi
Dear GnuPG,
I'm trying to sign a secondary key with my yubikey, however it fails
saying the private key is not found. I'm able to sign files with `--sign`, but
am not able to use `--sign-key`. This issue was posted about by someone else at
https://dev.gnupg.org/T6411
```
gpg --version
On 2024-03-19 00:01, Bee via Gnupg-users wrote:
However if you known the passphrase, you can pass it to gpg directly using
--passphrase-file and --pinentry-mode=loopback.
I figured, but am trying to avoid having the passphrase land on disk at all.
Due to the way a pipe works
Bee via Gnupg-users wrote:
However if you known the passphrase, you can pass it to gpg directly using
--passphrase-file and --pinentry-mode=loopback.
I figured, but am trying to avoid having the passphrase land on disk at all.
Could you set up a RAM disk for this? (I think Windows
standard shell here? In this case
> make sure that jq.exe gets its EPIPE from the failed gpg.exe.
>
> You may consider to use gpgme-json as a higher level API to gpg. But of
> course it does not work the usual way in a pipe.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
avoid potential
future conflicts.]
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
us that '( gpg.exe -d somefile.gpg | jq.exe ) | less' displays
sufficiently well - I'm guessing I'm just getting lucky with
(sub-shell?) delays, giving things time to display.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 9:58 AM Werner Koch via Gnupg-users
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:26, B.S. said:
>
gp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
r chunks can make maneory allocation a biut
> faster because every free() call needs to check the linked list of
> secure memory pools. I am not sure whetehr this is measurable, though.
Thanks for the clarification!
Best,
Bence
___
Gnupg-use
Hi!
and thanks for asking.
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 11:29, pal said:
> I am writing to express my strong interest in a 64-bit version of GnuPG for
> Windows. While I understand that currently only 32-bit systems (x86) are
> officially supported, I believe adding 64-bit compatibil
urable, though.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnu
Dear GnuPG Developers,
I am writing to express my strong interest in a 64-bit version of GnuPG for
Windows. While I understand that currently only 32-bit systems (x86) are
officially supported, I believe adding 64-bit compatibility would be a
valuable improvement for many users.
Many modern
much or not, but I haven't
found any mentions of a downside to such a setting and it seems to work as
expected, so I'm happy for now.
Best,
Bence
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ack' to '--batch',
but that doesn't seem in play yet, to that point in the sequence.)
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ter)
print(the_queue.qsize())
while the_queue.qsize() > 10:
time.sleep(0.1)
_______
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
GnuPG for OS X / macOS release 2.4.5 is now available for download via
https://sourceforge.net/p/gpgosx/docu/Download/ .
The disk image signature key is available via public keyservers, and it
can also be downloaded from https://www.seichter.de/pgp/gpgosx-signing.asc .
pub ed25519
Hello!
We are pleased to announce the availability of a new stable GnuPG
release: version 2.4.5. This version fixes a couple of bugs and comes
with some new features.
What is GnuPG
=
The GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG, GPG) is a complete and free implementation
of the OpenPGP and S/MIME
gpg (GnuPG) 2.2.40
libgcrypt 1.10.1 OS:
Debian Bookworm KEY:
16.384 RSA KEY
Encryption/Decryption is working.
Generating signatures using command line. Is not working.
Authentication might work. I don't know. I have never used it.
The private key resides in my home directory.
The key
On 8/3/24 01:24, mr_shortchange wrote:
It's very kind of you. I try to answer your questions down below.
Please help me. Thank you.
To: Stuart Longland
From: mr_shortchange
You forgot to include the list.
To or CC should include: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Using "Reply All"
1 - 100 of 3526 matches
Mail list logo
