crm-sig  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Crm-sig] E21 Person, E67 Birth Franco Niccolucci
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E21 Person, E67 Birth Thomas Wikman
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E21 Person, E67 Birth Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E21 Person, E67 Birth Thomas Wikman
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E21 Person, E67 Birth Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E21 Person, E67 Birth Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E21 Person, E67 Birth Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E21 Person, E67 Birth Christian-Emil Smith Ore
• [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Update list of contributors Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] EMAIL SUSPEITO: P72 has Language Maria Jose de Almeida
  • Re: [Crm-sig] EMAIL SUSPEITO: P72 has Language Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] EMAIL SUSPEITO: P72 has Language Franco Niccolucci
  • Re: [Crm-sig] EMAIL SUSPEITO: P72 has Language Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] EMAIL SUSPEITO: P72 has Language George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] P72 has Language Franco Niccolucci
  • Re: [Crm-sig] P72 has Language Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] P72 has Language Franco Niccolucci
  • Re: [Crm-sig] P72 has Language George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] P72 has Language Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] P72 has Language Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] P72 has Language Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] P72 has Language George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] P72 has Language Franco Niccolucci
  • Re: [Crm-sig] P72 has Language George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] P72 has Language Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] P72 has Language Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] P72 has Language Franco Niccolucci
  • Re: [Crm-sig] P72 has Language Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] P72 has Language George Bruseker
  • [Crm-sig] EMAIL SUSPEITO: Re: EMAIL SUSPEITO: Re: EMAIL SUSPEITO: P72 has Language Maria Jose de Almeida
  • Re: [Crm-sig] EMAIL SUSPEITO: P72 has Language athinak
  • Re: [Crm-sig] EMAIL SUSPEITO: P72 has Language Christian-Emil Smith Ore
• [Crm-sig] CRM SIG Date: October 22-25 + Notice about Apollonis "Historical Content Metadata" Workshop Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] New ISSUE the scope notes of E59 Primitive Value and E61 Time Primitive Christian-Emil Smith Ore
• [Crm-sig] Fw: Data Modelling in the Humanities -- Call for Papers Christian-Emil Smith Ore
• [Crm-sig] Next Meeting dates DOODLE POLL Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Next Meeting dates DOODLE POLL Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Next Meeting dates DOODLE POLL Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Help wanted - Understanding P120 versus P183 Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Help wanted - Understanding P120 versus P183 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Help wanted - Understanding P120 versus P183 Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Help wanted - Understanding P120 versus P183 Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Help wanted - Understanding P120 versus P183 Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] New Issue: Pxxx holds or supports Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Pxxx holds or supports Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Pxxx holds or supports Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Pxxx holds or supports Christian-Emil Smith Ore
• [Crm-sig] Object containership shortcuts? Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Object containership shortcuts? Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Object containership shortcuts? Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Object containership shortcuts? Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Object containership shortcuts? Robert Sanderson
• [Crm-sig] [Sci] Are O9 and P171 identical? Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] [Sci] Are O9 and P171 identical? Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] [Sci] Are O9 and P171 identical? Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] [Sci] Are O9 and P171 identical? Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] [Sci] Are O9 and P171 identical? athinak
  • Re: [Crm-sig] [Sci] Are O9 and P171 identical? Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] [Sci] Are O9 and P171 identical? Robert Sanderson
• [Crm-sig] 44th CRM SIG & 37th CRM - FRBR Harmonization Meeting - Thanks George Bruseker
• Re: [Crm-sig] SOC: Proposal to remove Provision and replace with Activity Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] SOC: Proposal to remove Provision and replace with Activity Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] HW for 395 - alignment of E2/E4/E92 etc. Robert Sanderson
• [Crm-sig] Reuse identifiers of obsolete entities never published Vincent Alamercery
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Reuse identifiers of obsolete entities never published Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Reuse identifiers of obsolete entities never published Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Reuse identifiers of obsolete entities never published George Bruseker
• [Crm-sig] SOC: auction bid as proposal of an obligation? Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] SOC: auction bid as proposal of an obligation? Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] HW for Issue 332: Provide example of Oxx split from Robert Sanderson
• [Crm-sig] SOC: Exchange Activity proposal Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] SOC: Exchange Activity proposal Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] SOC: Exchange Activity proposal Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] SOC: Exchange Activity proposal Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] SOC: Provision is just Activity? Robert Sanderson
• [Crm-sig] HW for SOC - Financial Transactions Robert Sanderson
• [Crm-sig] HW Issue 411, revise scope of P103 Pat Riva
• [Crm-sig] HW: More CLP scope notes Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Issue 407: Ordinal Property for E55 Type Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 407: Ordinal Property for E55 Type Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 407: Ordinal Property for E55 Type Simon Spero
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 407: Ordinal Property for E55 Type Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] HW issue 419: Activity plans and specification of events Athanasios Velios
  • [Crm-sig] HW issue 412 : CRMsoc definition Francesco Beretta
• [Crm-sig] Agenda for 44th Meeting George Bruseker
• [Crm-sig] CRMsoc Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] HW issue 378 where to put notes Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Agenda for Upcoming 44th and 37th FRBR Harmonization SIG - Paris, June 11-14, 2019 @BNF George Bruseker
• [Crm-sig] HW: Issue 410 - basic concepts intro Athanasios Velios
• [Crm-sig] CRM SIG Logistics Paris George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CRM SIG Logistics Paris George Bruseker
• [Crm-sig] HW: CPL2 redefined Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] HW issue 332 (CRMsci): scope note for "Oxx split from" Athanasios Velios
• [Crm-sig] Issue 388 Position Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] 44th CIDOC CRM and 37th FRBR CRM George Bruseker
• [Crm-sig] Culture bias Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] HW, F3 properties Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] SPARQL Endpoints Béatrice Markhoff
  • Re: [Crm-sig] SPARQL Endpoints Thomas Francart
  • Re: [Crm-sig] SPARQL Endpoints George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] SPARQL Endpoints Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] SPARQL Endpoints bruseker
• [Crm-sig] Regarding Ontology Versioning Joel Cummings
• [Crm-sig] meeting place of the forthcoming sig Bekiari Xrysoula
• [Crm-sig] Homework: New class Externalization for LRMoo Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Homework: New class Externalization for LRMoo patrick . le-boeuf
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Homework: New class Externalization for LRMoo Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] begin_of_the_begin /end_of_the_end is excluded from time range? Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] begin_of_the_begin /end_of_the_end is excluded from time range? Florian Kräutli
  • Re: [Crm-sig] begin_of_the_begin /end_of_the_end is excluded from time range? Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] begin_of_the_begin /end_of_the_end is excluded from time range? Florian Kräutli
  • Re: [Crm-sig] begin_of_the_begin /end_of_the_end is excluded from time range? Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] begin_of_the_begin /end_of_the_end is excluded from time range? Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] begin_of_the_begin /end_of_the_end is excluded from time range? Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Meeting Minutes of Last SIG, Preparation for upcoming SIG (Paris, 11-14 June, 2019) George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Meeting Minutes of Last SIG, Preparation for upcoming SIG (Paris, 11-14 June, 2019) Robert Sanderson
• [Crm-sig] Issue 410 homework (P11 & P12) Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 410 homework (P11 & P12) bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 410 homework (P11 & P12) melanie . roche
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 410 homework (P11 & P12) Florian Kräutli
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 410 homework (P11 & P12) Robert Sanderson
• [Crm-sig] Recurring events ? Dan Matei
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Recurring events ? Martin Doerr
• Re: [Crm-sig] Crm-sig Digest, Vol 147, Issue 33 Stefan Gradmann
• [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: Issue Man-Made Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: Issue Man-Made Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: Issue Man-Made Tony Gill
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: Issue Man-Made Maximilian Schich
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: Issue Man-Made Esther Chen
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: Issue Man-Made Francesco Beretta
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: Issue Man-Made Øyvind Eide
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: Issue Man-Made Tetsuro KAMURA
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: Issue Man-Made Florian Kräutli
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: Issue Man-Made Thomas Haensli
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: Issue Man-Made Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: Issue Man-Made Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: Issue Man-Made Christos Papatheodorou
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: Issue Man-Made Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: Issue Man-Made melanie . roche
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: Issue Man-Made Annabel Enriquez
• [Crm-sig] Changes in natural language Øyvind Eide
• [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Pierre Choffé
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Florian Kräutli
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Dominic Oldman
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Øyvind Eide
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Franco Niccolucci
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Achille Felicetti
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Franco Niccolucci
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Pierre Choffé
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Esther Chen
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Sledge, Jane
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Florian Kräutli
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Дарья Юрьевна Гук
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" melanie . roche
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Дарья Юрьевна Гук
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" Maja Žumer
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-" bruseker
• [Crm-sig] ISSUE E34 PLEASE VOTE Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE E34 PLEASE VOTE Øyvind Eide
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE E34 PLEASE VOTE Achille Felicetti
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE E34 PLEASE VOTE Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE E34 PLEASE VOTE George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE E34 PLEASE VOTE Stephen Stead
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE E34 PLEASE VOTE Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE E34 PLEASE VOTE Дарья Юрьевна Гук
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE E34 PLEASE VOTE Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE E34 PLEASE VOTE mark mudge
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE E34 PLEASE VOTE Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE E34 PLEASE VOTE Christos Papatheodorou
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE E34 PLEASE VOTE melanie . roche
• [Crm-sig] Home work, new scope note of E92 Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] New issue: Missing inverse of P189 Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New issue: Missing inverse of P189 PLEASE VOTE Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New issue: Missing inverse of P189 PLEASE VOTE Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New issue: Missing inverse of P189 PLEASE VOTE Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New issue: Missing inverse of P189 PLEASE VOTE Øyvind Eide
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New issue: Missing inverse of P189 PLEASE VOTE Christos Papatheodorou
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New issue: Missing inverse of P189 PLEASE VOTE Stephen Stead
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New issue: Missing inverse of P189 PLEASE VOTE Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New issue: Missing inverse of P189 PLEASE VOTE George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New issue: Missing inverse of P189 PLEASE VOTE melanie . roche
• [Crm-sig] Fwd: Les rencontres du Web de données list: "Des utilisateurs de CIDOC-CRM pour le prochain meetup ?" Marco Neumann
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Les rencontres du Web de données list: "Des utilisateurs de CIDOC-CRM pour le prochain meetup ?" Marco Neumann
• [Crm-sig] CRM sci useful material athinak
• [Crm-sig] Participation CRM-SIG Paris Martin Doerr
  • [Crm-sig] Participation CRM-SIG Paris, doodle Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] About prototypes and processes Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] About being man-made Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] E1 CRM Entity, E59 Primitive Value described in FOL, OWL, DL , a discussion for geeks among us(?) Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] E1 CRM Entity, E59 Primitive Value described in FOL, OWL, DL , a discussion for geeks among us(?) Martin Doerr

• Earlier messages
• Later messages