crm-sig  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Crm-sig] E1 CRM Entity, E59 Primitive Value described in FOL, OWL, DL , a discussion for geeks among us(?) Christian-Emil Smith Ore
• [Crm-sig] RDF guidelines Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] CRMsoc, about business Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CRMsoc, about business Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CRMsoc, about business Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] CRMsoc, about business Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] RES: CRMsoc, about business Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Issue 336 and new Introduction & Scope Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Provisional Agenda for the forthcoming meeting Bekiari Xrysoula
• [Crm-sig] Space time volumes Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Space time volumes Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Space time volumes Dan Matei
  • [Crm-sig] issue 336 and spacetime volumes Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • [Crm-sig] Is issume 326, not Re: issue 336 s Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] issue 336 and spacetime volumes Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] issue 336 and spacetime volumes Francesco Beretta
  • Re: [Crm-sig] issue 336 and spacetime volumes Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] issue 336 and spacetime volumes Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Space time volumes Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Space time volumes Dan Matei
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Space time volumes Franco Niccolucci
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Space time volumes Francesco Beretta
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Space time volumes Franco Niccolucci
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Space time volumes Francesco Beretta
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Space time volumes Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Space time volumes Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Space time volumes Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Space time volumes Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] e: Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] e: Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Rights Modelling Discussion / Proposal for upcoming CRM SIG George Bruseker
• [Crm-sig] Issue CRMarcheo generalisation of the properties A12 Confines and A11 has physical relation Christian-Emil Smith Ore
• [Crm-sig] Issue 367: E13 Attribute Assignment Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 367: E13 Attribute Assignment Robert Sanderson
• [Crm-sig] Issue 277 "artist" Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 277 "artist" Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 277 "artist" Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 277 "artist" Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 277 "artist" Christian-Emil Smith Ore
• [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 Stephen Stead
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 326 Resolving inconsistencies between E2, E4, E52 and E92 Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Issue 380 Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] ISSUE 369, Mental Attitude Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Issue 369 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 369 van Leusen, P.M.
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 369 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 369 Francesco Beretta
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 369 Franco Niccolucci
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 369/ Scope note of E19? Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 369 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 369 van Leusen, P.M.
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 369 Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 369 Francesco Beretta
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 369 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 369 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 369 Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 369 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 369, Phase Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 369, Phase Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 369, Phase Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] ISSUE 385 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 385 Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 385 Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Issue 397 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 397 Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 397 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 397 Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 397 Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Fwd: CfP - EXTENDED deadline RODBH 2019, April 4-5 - Leipzig - Germany George Bruseker
• [Crm-sig] Fwd: [Data for History] Doctoral position George Bruseker
• [Crm-sig] EAA 2019: Call for papers. Artefacts of the Future: What do you want to have access to and what are you willing to share? Achille Felicetti
• [Crm-sig] Question about quantification + transitivity + open world Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE Question about quantification + transitivity + open world Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Meeting in March Stephen Stead
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Meeting in March Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Meeting in March Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Meeting in March Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Meeting in March Bekiari Xrysoula
• [Crm-sig] Issue 358: CRMsoc scope text Athanasios Velios
• [Crm-sig] Fwd: training course Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Issue 333: E101 as subclass of S16 Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 333: E101 as subclass of S16 Robert Sanderson
• [Crm-sig] Should the RDFS instantiate P168i ? Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Should the RDFS instantiate P168i ? Martin Doerr
  • [Crm-sig] ISSUE: define P168i Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Deprecate P78, P87? Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Deprecate P78, P87? Robert Sanderson
• [Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM Definition - Introduction Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type Stephen Stead
  • Re: [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type Franco Niccolucci
  • Re: [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type Дарья Юрьевна Гук
  • Re: [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type Stephen Stead
  • Re: [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type Franco Niccolucci
  • Re: [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type Stephen Stead
  • Re: [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type Thomas Francart
  • Re: [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type Stephen Stead
  • Re: [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type Carlisle, Philip
  • Re: [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] **NEW ISSUE** Ordinal Property for E55 Type Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Pxx_has_symbolic_content Robert Sanderson
• [Crm-sig] Using multiple instantiation Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Using multiple instantiation Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Using multiple instantiation Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Using multiple instantiation van Leusen, P.M.
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Using multiple instantiation Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Using multiple instantiation Florian Kräutli
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Using multiple instantiation Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Using multiple instantiation Stephen Stead
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Using multiple instantiation Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Using multiple instantiation Detlev Balzer
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Using multiple instantiation Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] Using multiple instantiation Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Bills / Parliamentary projects or procedures as FRBRoo Thomas Francart
• [Crm-sig] Initial temporal property use cases Robert Sanderson
• [Crm-sig] Video of my presentation at CAA-UK about CRMarchaeo, CRMinf and the future Stephen Stead
• [Crm-sig] New Member PLEASE VOTE Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Member PLEASE VOTE Дарья Юрьевна Гук
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Member PLEASE VOTE [ICS-WARNING - NOT VIRUS SCANNED] Stephen Stead
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Member PLEASE VOTE Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Member PLEASE VOTE Øyvind Eide
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Member PLEASE VOTE Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Member PLEASE VOTE Achille Felicetti
  • Re: [Crm-sig] New Member PLEASE VOTE Olivier Marlet
• [Crm-sig] Issue 363 Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Issue 360, part: P128 carries Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] HW Issue 277 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] HW Issue 277 Øyvind Eide
  • Re: [Crm-sig] HW Issue 277 Christian-Emil Smith Ore
• [Crm-sig] new technical paper Bekiari Xrysoula
  • Re: [Crm-sig] new technical paper Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] new technical paper Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] new technical paper Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] new technical paper Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] new technical paper Conal Tuohy
  • Re: [Crm-sig] new technical paper Richard Light
• [Crm-sig] Issue: Formalization of the CIDOC CRM Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] Homework for issue 340 Athanasios Velios
• [Crm-sig] HW Issue 276 scope note of event Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] HW Issue 276 scope note of event Massoomeh Niknia
• [Crm-sig] ISSUE: representing compound name strings Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: representing compound name strings Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: representing compound name strings Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: representing compound name strings Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: representing compound name strings Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: representing compound name strings Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: representing compound name strings Conal Tuohy
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: representing compound name strings Øyvind Eide
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: representing compound name strings Christian-Emil Smith Ore
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: representing compound name strings Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: representing compound name strings Athanasios Velios
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: representing compound name strings Robert Casties
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: representing compound name strings Дарья Юрьевна Гук
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: representing compound name strings gordon
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: representing compound name strings Richard Light
• [Crm-sig] Fwd: Re: Issue 383 Homework, addition Martin Doerr
• [Crm-sig] provisional agenda Bekiari Xrysoula
• [Crm-sig] ISSUE 345, P59 needs change Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 345, P59 needs change Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 345, P59 needs change Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 345, P59 needs change Øyvind Eide
  • Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 345, P59 needs change George Bruseker
• [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345) Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345) Carlisle, Philip
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345) Stephen Stead
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345) Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345) Robert Sanderson
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345) Achille Felicetti
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345) Øyvind Eide
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345) George Bruseker
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345) melanie . roche
• [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE :deprecating P149 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE :deprecating P149 Stephen Stead
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE :deprecating P149 Richard Light
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE :deprecating P149 Achille Felicetti
  • Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE :deprecating P149 Robert Sanderson

• Earlier messages
• Later messages