+1 for moving it to tomahawk.
One big open question for me is our html5 strategy at all.
Will the html5 components provide legacy html support themselfs?
Thus a calendar component will use jQuery (or whatever) calendar when a
non-html5 browser is detected,
or is this in the responsibility of the developer?
if (html5){
aaaa
} else{
bbbb //fallback
}
?
Afaik our current html5 components 'only' support pure html5 rendering, isn't?
LieGrue,
strub
>________________________________
>From: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
>To: MyFaces Development <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
>Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 10:22 PM
>Subject: Re: [html5] alpha release for myfaces html5
>
>
>@grant: +1
>
>
>regards,
>gerhard
>
>
>http://www.irian.at
>
>Your JSF powerhouse -
>JSF Consulting, Development and
>Courses in English and German
>
>Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
>
>
>2011/10/21 Grant Smith <work.gr...@gmail.com>
>
>I must agree with Gerhard. The whole point of the sandbox is for this very
>purpose. However, perhaps we should look at the sandbox more often and vote on
>components that are ready to "graduate".
>>
>>
>>
>>On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Gerhard Petracek
>><gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>hi leo,
>>>
>>>
>>>imo such an argument doesn't justify an own sub-project. i >don't< say -1.
>>>my point is that we should discuss it (esp. because the situation changed).
>>>
>>>
>>>regards,
>>>gerhard
>>>
>>>http://www.irian.at
>>>
>>>Your JSF powerhouse -
>>>JSF Consulting, Development and
>>>Courses in English and German
>>>
>>>Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>2011/10/21 Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>Hi
>>>>
>>>>The problem with move to tomahawk sandbox is those artifact can't
>>>>never be released. Do an alpha release give us the chance to know if
>>>>the bits are good enough, get more feedback, and later decide what to
>>>>do. The truth is some people only test some artifacts "after" a
>>>>release. Do it as an alpha release means "... software that has just
>>>>been compiled and ready for its initial test inhouse. ...". I think
>>>>that is enough clear.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>regards,
>>>>
>>>>Leonardo Uribe
>>>>
>>>>2011/10/21 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>:
>>>>> hi ali,
>>>>> most commits happened "directly" after the initial import. that didn't
>>>>> look
>>>>> very promising.
>>>>> it's great to hear that you plan to continue.
>>>>> however, since we haven't seen a lot of activity, we should re-visit the
>>>>> option to move the components to tomahawk (btw. tomahawk-sandbox).
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> gerhard
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.irian.at
>>>>>
>>>>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>>>>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>>>>> Courses in English and German
>>>>>
>>>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/10/21 Ali Ok <al...@aliok.com.tr>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> Thank you Leonardo for volunteering in the release.
>>>>>> Yes, it would be good discussing the future.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am still working on the project. Leonardo and I am the only ones at the
>>>>>> moment.
>>>>>> I am trying to work on the project 1 night a week, so the progress is
>>>>>> slow. I think it will be like this for a while.
>>>>>> We have a few issues to fix / features to implement already in the issue
>>>>>> tracker, and I am going to add more. There isn't enough feedback, since I
>>>>>> guess Html5 stuff is still not supported by every browser and not
>>>>>> everyone
>>>>>> can use them. So the user profile is more like enthusiasts who are
>>>>>> experimenting with Html5.
>>>>>> What we could do is providing fallback for old browsers out of the box,
>>>>>> but it is really hard to implement.
>>>>>> About the future: there is a lot to do in this area and I am willing to
>>>>>> work, but I can say I can spare limited time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's the intention of this mail. I think we should do an alpha
>>>>>>> release. I don't see reasons to block a release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree.
>>>>>> I am pretty sure a release is good for the project, more people will hear
>>>>>> about it; and hopefully we can get some feedback.
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Ali
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 10/21/11 7:56 PM, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's the intention of this mail. I think we should do an alpha
>>>>>>>> release. I don't see reasons to block a release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2011/10/21 Gerhard Petracek<gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> before we release it, we should (imo) discuss the future of this
>>>>>>>>> module.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>>> gerhard
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.irian.at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>>>>>>>>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>>>>>>>>> Courses in English and German
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2011/10/21 Leonardo Uribe<lu4...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It could be good to do an alpha release of myfaces html5 next week.
>>>>>>>>>> The site for this project is:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://myfaces.apache.org/html5/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If no objections I'll do the necessary steps.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> My Blog: http://blog.aliok.com.tr
>>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/aliok_tr
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Grant Smith - V.P. Information Technology
>>Marathon Computer Systems, LLC.
>>
>>
>
>
>
