discuss  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [discuss] Gmail + certain illumos lists == False-positive junk Michael Schuster via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Gmail + certain illumos lists == False-positive junk Dan McDonald via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Gmail + certain illumos lists == False-positive junk Michael Schuster via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Gmail + certain illumos lists == False-positive junk Bryan Horstmann-Allen via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [developer] Re: [discuss] Gmail + certain illumos lists == False-positive junk Bryan Horstmann-Allen via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Gmail + certain illumos lists == False-positive junk Peter Mueller via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Gmail + certain illumos lists == False-positive junk Lionel Cons via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [developer] Re: [discuss] Gmail + certain illumos lists == False-positive junk Bryan Horstmann-Allen via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Gmail + certain illumos lists == False-positive junk Bill Sommerfeld via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Gmail + certain illumos lists == False-positive junk Dan McDonald via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Gmail + certain illumos lists == False-positive junk Bill Sommerfeld via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Gmail + certain illumos lists == False-positive junk Dan McDonald via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [developer] Re: [discuss] Gmail + certain illumos lists == False-positive junk Jonathan Perkin via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [developer] Re: [discuss] Gmail + certain illumos lists == False-positive junk Nicholas George via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [developer] Re: [discuss] Gmail + certain illumos lists == False-positive junk Jonathan Adams via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] Cannot install any distro on AMD Athlon 1800 32-bit Stan Gordon via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Cannot install any distro on AMD Athlon 1800 32-bit Nikola M. via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Cannot install any distro on AMD Athlon 1800 32-bit Yuri Pankov via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Mailing list message without List-id: header?? Nikola M. via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Cannot install any distro on AMD Athlon 1800 32-bit Stan Gordon via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Cannot install any distro on AMD Athlon 1800 32-bit Andrew Gabriel via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] SMB Connections - How to view/manage? Ray Van Dolson via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] SMB Connections - How to view/manage? Günther Alka via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] Intel X520-QDA1 Schweiss, Chip via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Intel X520-QDA1 Dan McDonald via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Intel X520-QDA1 Saso Kiselkov via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Intel X520-QDA1 Dale Ghent via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Intel X520-QDA1 Robert Mustacchi via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Intel X520-QDA1 Rich via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] anyone looking for illumos ja_JP.EUC-JP support? Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] WCHAR_T <=> UTF-8 conversion Alexander Pyhalov via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] WCHAR_T <=> UTF-8 conversion Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] WCHAR_T <=> UTF-8 conversion Alexander Pyhalov via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] WCHAR_T <=> UTF-8 conversion Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] WCHAR_T <=> UTF-8 conversion Alexander Pyhalov via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] WCHAR_T <=> UTF-8 conversion Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] WCHAR_T <=> UTF-8 conversion Alexander Pyhalov via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] WCHAR_T <=> UTF-8 conversion Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] WCHAR_T <=> UTF-8 conversion Alexander Pyhalov via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] WCHAR_T <=> UTF-8 conversion Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] realtime signal delivery inverted? Ryan Zezeski via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] realtime signal delivery inverted? Ryan Zezeski via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] Do you use illumos / Sun dhcpd on an illumos platform? Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Do you use illumos / Sun dhcpd on an illumos platform? Jim Klimov via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Do you use illumos / Sun dhcpd on an illumos platform? A. P. Garcia via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Do you use illumos / Sun dhcpd on an illumos platform? discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Do you use illumos / Sun dhcpd on an illumos platform? Dan McDonald via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Do you use illumos / Sun dhcpd on an illumos platform? Peter Tribble via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Do you use illumos / Sun dhcpd on an illumos platform? Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Do you use illumos / Sun dhcpd on an illumos platform? Bob Friesenhahn via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Do you use illumos / Sun dhcpd on an illumos platform? Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Do you use illumos / Sun dhcpd on an illumos platform? Bob Friesenhahn via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Do you use illumos / Sun dhcpd on an illumos platform? discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Do you use illumos / Sun dhcpd on an illumos platform? Alan Coopersmith via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Do you use illumos / Sun dhcpd on an illumos platform? Jonathan Adams via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] PERC 5/e RAID controller can see only single volume Robson Robson via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] PERC 5/e RAID controller can see only single volume Rich via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] PERC 5/e RAID controller can see only single volume Robson Robson via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] deleting zfs filesystems with holds in place Paul B. Henson via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] RE: [OmniOS-discuss] deleting zfs filesystems with holds in place Paul B. Henson via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] how to tell what disks fs are on Harry Putnam via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] how to tell what disks fs are on Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] how to tell what disks fs are on Chris Mosetick via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: how to tell what disks fs are on Harry Putnam via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Re: how to tell what disks fs are on Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Re: how to tell what disks fs are on Jim Klimov via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: how to tell what disks fs are on Harry Putnam via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: how to tell what disks fs are on Harry Putnam via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] Re: [developer] Can we abandon wanboot? Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: [developer] Can we abandon wanboot? Peter Tribble via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: [developer] Can we abandon wanboot? Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [developer] Can we abandon wanboot? discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [developer] Can we abandon wanboot? Joerg Schilling via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [developer] Can we abandon wanboot? Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: [developer] Can we abandon wanboot? Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: [developer] Can we abandon wanboot? Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [developer] Can we abandon wanboot? Nikola M. via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [developer] Can we abandon wanboot? Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [developer] Can we abandon wanboot? Nikola M. via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [developer] Can we abandon wanboot? Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] JOB POST - Illumos System Administrator & Support Engineer Dan McDonald via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: JOB POST - Illumos System Administrator & Support Engineer Dan McDonald via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] illumos on dual motherboard with shared dual sas expander Gabriele Bulfon via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] illumos libgssapi.so Alexander Pyhalov via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] illumos libgssapi.so Gordon Ross via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] illumos libgssapi.so Milan Jurik via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] illumos libgssapi.so Alexander Pyhalov via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: illumos libgssapi.so Richard PALO via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] illumos libgssapi.so Milan Jurik via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] illumos libgssapi.so Alexander Pyhalov via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] removal of certain section 7D man page content Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: [developer] removal of certain section 7D man page content Andrew Gabriel via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: [developer] removal of certain section 7D man page content Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] illumos Overlay Networks Development Preview 01 Robert Mustacchi via illumos-discuss
• Re: [discuss] One more locale question Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] One more locale question Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] drmach_acpi: [ID 779328 kern.warning] WARNING: drmach_init: number of logical CPUs (12) in physical processor is not power of 2. Richard PALO via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] drmach_acpi: [ID 779328 kern.warning] WARNING: drmach_init: number of logical CPUs (12) in physical processor is not power of 2. Hans Rosenfeld via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] drmach_acpi: [ID 779328 kern.warning] WARNING: drmach_init: number of logical CPUs (12) in physical processor is not power of 2. Jim Klimov via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] drmach_acpi: [ID 779328 kern.warning] WARNING: drmach_init: number of logical CPUs (12) in physical processor is not power of 2. Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: drmach_acpi: [ID 779328 kern.warning] WARNING: drmach_init: number of logical CPUs (12) in physical processor is not power of 2. Richard PALO
  • [discuss] Re: drmach_acpi: [ID 779328 kern.warning] WARNING: drmach_init: number of logical CPUs (12) in physical processor is not power of 2. Garrett D'Amore
• [discuss] How to cram 4 more drives into HP xw8600 Harry Putnam via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] How to cram 4 more drives into HP xw8600 Jonathan Adams via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] anything like DRBD or HAST for illumos? Miles Fidelman via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] anything like DRBD or HAST for illumos? Saso Kiselkov via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] anything like DRBD or HAST for illumos? Miles Fidelman via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] anything like DRBD or HAST for illumos? Saso Kiselkov via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] anything like DRBD or HAST for illumos? Miles Fidelman via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] anything like DRBD or HAST for illumos? Saso Kiselkov via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] anything like DRBD or HAST for illumos? Miles Fidelman via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] anything like DRBD or HAST for illumos? Robert Mustacchi via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] anything like DRBD or HAST for illumos? Miles Fidelman via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] anything like DRBD or HAST for illumos? Paul B. Henson via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] anything like DRBD or HAST for illumos? Miles Fidelman via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] anything like DRBD or HAST for illumos? Miles Fidelman via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] anything like DRBD or HAST for illumos? Saso Kiselkov via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] anything like DRBD or HAST for illumos? Sebastien Perreault via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] anything like DRBD or HAST for illumos? Miles Fidelman via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] anything like DRBD or HAST for illumos? Richard Elling via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] anything like DRBD or HAST for illumos? Miles Fidelman via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] anything like DRBD or HAST for illumos? Richard Elling via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] any progress on Xen Dom0 for illumos? Miles Fidelman via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] any progress on Xen Dom0 for illumos? Saso Kiselkov via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] any progress on Xen Dom0 for illumos? Miles Fidelman via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] cannot persist /dev/null - error 13 Richard PALO via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] SMB 2.1 for Illumos? nils privat via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] SMB 2.1 for Illumos? Guenther Alka via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] SMB 2.1 for Illumos? nils privat via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] HEADS UP: Mandoc integrated Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: [developer] HEADS UP: Mandoc integrated Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] Integration of externally managed code (Was: [developer] Re: webrev: integration of mandoc) Hans Rosenfeld via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Integration of externally managed code (Was: [developer] Re: webrev: integration of mandoc) Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Integration of externally managed code (Was: [developer] Re: webrev: integration of mandoc) Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Integration of externally managed code (Was: [developer] Re: webrev: integration of mandoc) Josef 'Jeff' Sipek via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Integration of externally managed code (Was: [developer] Re: webrev: integration of mandoc) Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Integration of externally managed code (Was: [developer] Re: webrev: integration of mandoc) Hans Rosenfeld via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Integration of externally managed code (Was: [developer] Re: webrev: integration of mandoc) Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Integration of externally managed code (Was: [developer] Re: webrev: integration of mandoc) Hans Rosenfeld via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Integration of externally managed code (Was: [developer] Re: webrev: integration of mandoc) Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Integration of externally managed code (Was: [developer] Re: webrev: integration of mandoc) Hans Rosenfeld via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Integration of externally managed code (Was: [developer] Re: webrev: integration of mandoc) Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Integration of externally managed code (Was: [developer] Re: webrev: integration of mandoc) Josef 'Jeff' Sipek via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Integration of externally managed code (Was: [developer] Re: webrev: integration of mandoc) Josef 'Jeff' Sipek via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] switching to mandoc Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: [developer] switching to mandoc Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: [developer] switching to mandoc Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: [developer] switching to mandoc Josef 'Jeff' Sipek via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: [developer] switching to mandoc Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: [developer] switching to mandoc Josef 'Jeff' Sipek via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: [developer] switching to mandoc Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [developer] switching to mandoc Hans Rosenfeld via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] switching to mandoc Peter Tribble via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] switching to mandoc Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [developer] Re: [discuss] switching to mandoc Robert Mustacchi via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [developer] Re: [discuss] switching to mandoc Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] switching to mandoc Coy Hile via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] switching to mandoc Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] switching to mandoc discuss
  • Re: [discuss] switching to mandoc Joerg Schilling via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] switching to mandoc Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] switching to mandoc Andrew Gabriel via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] switching to mandoc Darren Reed via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] switching to mandoc Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Re: [developer] switching to mandoc Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] Hyper-V, illumos guest and several CPUs Alexander Pyhalov via illumos-discuss
  • [discuss] Hyper-V, illumos guest and several CPUs Mathieu Simon via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] pkgsrc-2014Q2 packages for illumos, OSX, and Linux now available Jonathan Perkin via illumos-discuss
• [discuss] zfs lofi file pool double mount Gabriele Bulfon via illumos-discuss
  • RE: [discuss] zfs lofi file pool double mount John McEntee via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] zfs lofi file pool double mount Reginald Beardsley via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] zfs lofi file pool double mount Gabriele Bulfon via illumos-discuss
  • RE: [discuss] zfs lofi file pool double mount John McEntee via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] zfs lofi file pool double mount Jonathan Adams via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] zfs lofi file pool double mount Reginald Beardsley via illumos-discuss
  • Re: [discuss] zfs lofi file pool double mount Garrett D'Amore via illumos-discuss
• Re: [discuss] PTPd for Illumos? Sunay Tripathi
• [discuss] reminder about newlocale() POSIX 2008 Garrett D'Amore
  • [discuss] Re: [developer] reminder about newlocale() POSIX 2008 Irek Szczesniak
• [discuss] Re: Retiring a slow drive -- occasional huge wait times reported by iostat Henk Langeveld
• [discuss] anyone seen wireless USB in the wild? Garrett D'Amore
  • [discuss] Re: [developer] anyone seen wireless USB in the wild? Saso Kiselkov
  • Re: [discuss] [developer] anyone seen wireless USB in the wild? Garrett D'Amore
  • Re: [discuss] [developer] anyone seen wireless USB in the wild? Garrett D'Amore
  • Re: [discuss] [developer] anyone seen wireless USB in the wild? Garrett D'Amore
  • Re: [discuss] [developer] anyone seen wireless USB in the wild? Garrett D'Amore
  • [discuss] Re: [developer] anyone seen wireless USB in the wild? Garrett D'Amore
  • [discuss] Re: [developer] anyone seen wireless USB in the wild? Jim Klimov
  • Re: [discuss] [developer] anyone seen wireless USB in the wild? Garrett D'Amore
  • Re: [discuss] [developer] anyone seen wireless USB in the wild? Garrett D'Amore
• Re: [discuss] OpenSXCE: To live or die J Samuel Kaye
• Re: [discuss] OpenSXCE2013.05 for x86, x86_64 EA was just RELEASED. Andrzej Szeszo
• [discuss] Re: [developer] OpenSXCE2013.05 for x86, x86_64 EA was just RELEASED. Sriram Narayanan
• [discuss] zpool/zfs settings optimization Paul B. Henson
  • [discuss] Re: [zfs] zpool/zfs settings optimization Paul B. Henson
  • [discuss] Re: [zfs] zpool/zfs settings optimization Jim Klimov
  • [discuss] Re: [zfs] zpool/zfs settings optimization Paul B. Henson
• [discuss] Failure to delete empty dirrectories via CIFS John McEntee
  • Re: [discuss] Failure to delete empty dirrectories via CIFS Gordon Ross
• [discuss] Sonicle XStreamOS repo and XStream Desktop in progress Gabriele Bulfon

• Earlier messages
• Later messages