Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-12 Thread Terry Blanton
Mafia?  The Italians lost out to the Russians ages ago.

>


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-12 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach

On 12.09.2021 04:04, CB Sites wrote:
The free press is amazing in sorting out what is BS and what isn't, 
and considering there is a Chinese influence program actively invading 
social media like this, and you mention Sinovax, directed it to 
'the west',  all I can say is your just a propaganda weapon. 


First for all:

Vortex is not a propaganda network. We here spread information.


I hope people find out themselves how many agents are working for the 
ruling mafia.


I mentioned 3 vaccines one from USA... The rest is experimental gene 
therapy... Just medical facts.



 I wasn't trying to attack you, your beliefs, or anything like that, so 
chill.  I was just agreeing with Jed and reporting on a Washington Post 
article that is appropriate to your propaganda.


Once more. Science is not about believes. You just did reference FUD.

The Washington post is owned by a former CIA agent and spreads deep 
state propaganda, when they are ordered to do so. Some friends of mine 
tested all major media about their willingness to publish proven science 
data/information about CoV-19. So I can confirm that also 
NYtimes/BBC,FAZ/Spiegel, Guardian, Nature, Lancet, Scientific 
American... and most news channels in Europe & USA just publish mafia 
ordered information. (= are not willing to publish science facts, that 
contradict with mafia targets)


*The same we see in cold fusion.*

It is obvious that especially in the USA the ruling mafia claims to 
follow science exactly, when they violate all rules of science. This is 
how free masons do politics since centuries.


*Same in LENR.* Physics is experiments not math. So cold fusion has been 
proven thousands times by experiments thus the claimed math (science) is 
wrong.


The same with Ivermectin. One billion Indian folks did take it and 
COV-19 is gone. This is facts not Washington post FUD. Here I personally 
asked BBC to document it. Comment from BBC: There is no public interest 
in this... So 1 billion healthy India people is a marginal issue



Here a link to the Swiss political research institute. This is a 100% 
independent think tank and gives you the most complete overview 
(references  > 100 papers) about all facts around CoV-19


https://swprs.org/covid19-facts/

May be I should ask them to do the same for cold fusion!

J.W.

--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis

+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06



Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-11 Thread CB Sites
First, I don't appreciate the kind of implied personal attack in your
reply.   I wasn't trying to attack you, your beliefs, or anything like
that, so chill.  I was just agreeing with Jed and reporting on a Washington
Post article that is appropriate to your propaganda.  The free press is
amazing in sorting out what is BS and what isn't, and considering there is
a Chinese influence program actively invading social media like this, and
you mention Sinovax, directed it to 'the west',  all I can say is your just
a propaganda weapon.

On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 5:12 PM Jürg Wyttenbach  wrote:

> On 11.09.2021 18:03, CB Sites wrote:
> > As Jed was saying the studies on it have questionable methodologies
> > for testing on in the case of the largest study, it was retracted
> > again due to questionable data manipulation.  It really needs a large
> > double blind study (just as all the other vaccines have gone
> > through). It stands to make Merke (the big pharma that makes
> > Ivermectin) a lot of money and you can be sure they want it on the
> > list of available covid treatments.
> >
> > What is foolish is using Ivermectin as an excuse not to get the vax
> > now in its current form. .Two doses, it's free, easy to get, very
> > effective and it helps everyone by not consuming hospital resources
> > and morgue space (seriously).
>
>
> This is plain nonsense: The studies have been made and the mechanism of
> Ivermectin action is well understood as it works for all virus flu,
> Hanta, Zikka, Westnil. the same way.
>
> Merck makes no money with Ivermectin. They actively block it in favor of
> their already failed $  drug Molnupiravir.
>
> Asking for an other Ivermectin study is mafia meme. It comes from people
> that have the joy to watch people die that are on a placebo. We so far
> have 71 studies!
>
>
> In the western world no CoV-19 vaccine is sold - so far only Gene
> therapies. Sinovac is out, also the Cuban vaccine.  NOVAVAX is on hold
> because the mafia blocks it fabrication certification.
>
> Gene therapies give you zero immunity for CoV-19. These therapies only
> (force your body to) produce quasi monoclonal antibodies (short time
> protection only), that vastly wane after 5-6 months. So these pseudo
> vaccines are no solution and have a track record of being > 1000x more
> damaging than a regular flue vaccines.
>
> So the result of godfather Bidens action will be millions of damaged
> people and an even worse ADE outcome for vaccinated high risk patient
> taking a booster.
>
> Anybody with a clear brain understands, that at the end the damage from
> CoV-19 (usually only severely affecting people at age >65 here 97% )
> will be far lower than the overall damage from the states actions... So
> far USA is a world wide exception due to high obesity, related diabetes,
> heart,... problems. So the only advise for USA is use Ivermectin and for
> severe cases go into a hospital where the FLCCC protocol is in place.
> All other hospitals will kill you for $$.
>
> https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/math-plus-protocol/
>
> J.W.
>
> --
> Jürg Wyttenbach
> Bifangstr. 22
> 8910 Affoltern am Albis
>
> +41 44 760 14 18
> +41 79 246 36 06
>
>


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-11 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach

On 11.09.2021 18:03, CB Sites wrote:
As Jed was saying the studies on it have questionable methodologies 
for testing on in the case of the largest study, it was retracted 
again due to questionable data manipulation.  It really needs a large 
double blind study (just as all the other vaccines have gone 
through). It stands to make Merke (the big pharma that makes 
Ivermectin) a lot of money and you can be sure they want it on the 
list of available covid treatments.


What is foolish is using Ivermectin as an excuse not to get the vax 
now in its current form. .Two doses, it's free, easy to get, very 
effective and it helps everyone by not consuming hospital resources 
and morgue space (seriously).



This is plain nonsense: The studies have been made and the mechanism of 
Ivermectin action is well understood as it works for all virus flu, 
Hanta, Zikka, Westnil. the same way.


Merck makes no money with Ivermectin. They actively block it in favor of 
their already failed $  drug Molnupiravir.


Asking for an other Ivermectin study is mafia meme. It comes from people 
that have the joy to watch people die that are on a placebo. We so far 
have 71 studies!



In the western world no CoV-19 vaccine is sold - so far only Gene 
therapies. Sinovac is out, also the Cuban vaccine.  NOVAVAX is on hold 
because the mafia blocks it fabrication certification.


Gene therapies give you zero immunity for CoV-19. These therapies only 
(force your body to) produce quasi monoclonal antibodies (short time 
protection only), that vastly wane after 5-6 months. So these pseudo 
vaccines are no solution and have a track record of being > 1000x more 
damaging than a regular flue vaccines.


So the result of godfather Bidens action will be millions of damaged 
people and an even worse ADE outcome for vaccinated high risk patient 
taking a booster.


Anybody with a clear brain understands, that at the end the damage from 
CoV-19 (usually only severely affecting people at age >65 here 97% ) 
will be far lower than the overall damage from the states actions... So 
far USA is a world wide exception due to high obesity, related diabetes, 
heart,... problems. So the only advise for USA is use Ivermectin and for 
severe cases go into a hospital where the FLCCC protocol is in place. 
All other hospitals will kill you for $$.


https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/math-plus-protocol/

J.W.

--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis

+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06



Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-11 Thread Terry Blanton
[image: image.png]

>


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-11 Thread Terry Blanton
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 5:21 PM Jürg Wyttenbach  wrote:

> On 10.09.2021 22:09, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > As I said, if ivermectin could have this effect, this would be clear
> > from the double-blind clinical testing.
>
>
> If Jed would once read a paper and not just spread, what his FM buddies
> forward him, then he could see that it works!
>
> I sent the link some mails ago.
>
>
> https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1 OF course
> big pharma never references it...
>

Did you read the comments?  :)


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-11 Thread CB Sites
There was a really good article in the Washington Post on Ivermectin which
lays out the pros and cons of the drug and the controversy surrounding it.
It comes down to people that are untrained buy veterinarian quality
Ivermectin and overdosing the med.As Jed was saying the studies on it
have questionable methodologies for testing on in the case of the largest
study, it was retracted again due to questionable data manipulation.  It
really needs a large double blind study (just as all the other vaccines
have gone through). It stands to make Merke (the big pharma that makes
Ivermectin) a lot of money and you can be sure they want it on the list of
available covid treatments.

What is foolish is using Ivermectin as an excuse not to get the vax now in
its current form. .Two doses, it's free, easy to get, very effective and it
helps everyone by not consuming hospital resources and morgue space
(seriously).  You have to wonder if Obama care wasn't in place whether
gitting covid wouldn't qualify you to have a pre-existing condition?

On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 9:34 AM Jürg Wyttenbach  wrote:

> Jonathan Berry wrote: I have long studied repressed Cancer cures but never
> knew of Ivermectin.
>
>
> There are some key dates in Big pharma history.
>
>
> Until about 1970 everybody got his yearly worm cure. Basically
> Praziquantel. Praziquantel is a key drug that e.g. fights chlonorchis
> sinensis also call liver fluke. Most pancreas and bile cancer is caused by
> this fellow, that you e.g. get if you eat not so well cocked shrimps from
> far east (e.g. Vietnam). Also watercress is a known source.
>
> More important for the meat eaters are the nymphs of cow, pig tapeworms
> that can invade any organ in your body. Most brain strokes and also tumors
> are cause by these nice fellows.
>
> What happened around 1970?? The first chemo cure was introduced and in
> parallel countries have been ordered to stop distribute Praziquantel. So
> the main reason for a raising cancer rates is the deprivation of people
> from live saving drugs. Other deprived  drugs(in USA) are as simple
> Apricot/plum kernels = vitamin K = meracapto cyanide = induces apoptosis of
> malign cells (still free in Europe)
>
> Other famous anti cancer drugs are methadone (Heroin), Cannabis what in
> part explains the war against drugs...and not allowing a regular sale...
>
> So big pharma is not about curing you. It's about making money with your
> intentionally destroyed health.
>
>
> Regarding Ivermectin: There is a parallel drug called Nitazoxanide that is
> even more hidden than Ivermectin. Guess why?
>
> You cannot outplay Ivermectin: Why: A virus is dead and thus needs the
> living cell for replication. So if a drug stop this inside a cell then a
> virus action cannot unfold.
>
> Uttar Pradesh (and most India) states are successful because the use
> Ivermectin as a prophylaxis!
>
> J.W.
>
>
> On 11.09.2021 04:28, Jonathan Berry wrote:
>
> Well think about it, they are going to be exposed to it too.
> They need an effective cheap safe antidote.
>
> There are a LOT of suppressed cures for Cancer, including guess what,
> Ivermectin!
>
> I have long studied repressed Cancer cures but never knew of Ivermectin.
>
> My point is is one of the biggest most feared killers has many many cures
> and treatments more effective than Chemo, radiation and surgery but most
> don't know about them because "they" control the official narrative and
> only a small percentage of people aren't' too trusting and brainwashed...
>
> Then why should they fear that it will become overwhelmingly popular with
> COVID?
>
> Though they are scared that it will be realized, look at how many have
> fallen for this stupid experimental gene therapy mascerading as a Vaccine?
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, 11 Sept 2021 at 11:02, Robin 
> wrote:
>
>> In reply to  Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 10 Sep 2021 23:21:19 +0200:
>> Hi,
>> [snip]
>>
>> Hypothetically - a bio-warfare designed virus, might be created with a
>> cheap and commonly available "off switch" such as
>> Ivermectin??
>>
>>
>> >On 10.09.2021 22:09, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>> >>
>> >> As I said, if ivermectin could have this effect, this would be clear
>> >> from the double-blind clinical testing.
>> >
>> >
>> >If Jed would once read a paper and not just spread, what his FM buddies
>> >forward him, then he could see that it works!
>> >
>> >I sent the link some mails ago.
>> >
>> >
>> >https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1 OF course
>> >big pharma never references it
>> >
>> >Virus gone after two,days. PCR confirmed. Not so in placebo arm...
>> >
>> >J.W.
>> >
>> >PS: Only blind mice eat poison...
>> Regards,
>>
>> Robin van Spaandonk 
>>
>> --
> Jürg Wyttenbach
> Bifangstr. 22
> 8910 Affoltern am Albis
>
> +41 44 760 14 18
> +41 79 246 36 06
>
>


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-11 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach
Jonathan Berry wrote: I have long studied repressed Cancer cures but 
never knew of Ivermectin.



There are some key dates in Big pharma history.


Until about 1970 everybody got his yearly worm cure. Basically 
Praziquantel. Praziquantel is a key drug that e.g. fights chlonorchis 
sinensis also call liver fluke. Most pancreas and bile cancer is caused 
by this fellow, that you e.g. get if you eat not so well cocked shrimps 
from far east (e.g. Vietnam). Also watercress is a known source.


More important for the meat eaters are the nymphs of cow, pig tapeworms 
that can invade any organ in your body. Most brain strokes and also 
tumors are cause by these nice fellows.


What happened around 1970?? The first chemo cure was introduced and in 
parallel countries have been ordered to stop distribute Praziquantel. So 
the main reason for a raising cancer rates is the deprivation of people 
from live saving drugs. Other deprived drugs(in USA) are as simple 
Apricot/plum kernels = vitamin K = meracapto cyanide = induces apoptosis 
of malign cells (still free in Europe)


Other famous anti cancer drugs are methadone (Heroin), Cannabis what in 
part explains the war against drugs...and not allowing a regular sale...


So big pharma is not about curing you. It's about making money with your 
intentionally destroyed health.



Regarding Ivermectin: There is a parallel drug called Nitazoxanide that 
is even more hidden than Ivermectin. Guess why?


You cannot outplay Ivermectin: Why: A virus is dead and thus needs the 
living cell for replication. So if a drug stop this inside a cell then a 
virus action cannot unfold.


Uttar Pradesh (and most India) states are successful because the use 
Ivermectin as a prophylaxis!


J.W.


On 11.09.2021 04:28, Jonathan Berry wrote:

Well think about it, they are going to be exposed to it too.
They need an effective cheap safe antidote.

There are a LOT of suppressed cures for Cancer, including guess what, 
Ivermectin!


I have long studied repressed Cancer cures but never knew of Ivermectin.

My point is is one of the biggest most feared killers has many many 
cures and treatments more effective than Chemo, radiation and surgery 
but most don't know about them because "they" control the official 
narrative and only a small percentage of people aren't' too trusting 
and brainwashed...


Then why should they fear that it will become overwhelmingly popular 
with COVID?


Though they are scared that it will be realized, look at how many have 
fallen for this stupid experimental gene therapy mascerading as a Vaccine?





On Sat, 11 Sept 2021 at 11:02, Robin > wrote:


In reply to  Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 10 Sep 2021
23:21:19 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]

Hypothetically - a bio-warfare designed virus, might be created
with a cheap and commonly available "off switch" such as
Ivermectin??


>On 10.09.2021 22:09, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>>
>> As I said, if ivermectin could have this effect, this would be
clear
>> from the double-blind clinical testing.
>
>
>If Jed would once read a paper and not just spread, what his FM
buddies
>forward him, then he could see that it works!
>
>I sent the link some mails ago.
>
>
>https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1
 OF
course
>big pharma never references it
>
>Virus gone after two,days. PCR confirmed. Not so in placebo arm...
>
>J.W.
>
>PS: Only blind mice eat poison...
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk mailto:mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au>>


--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis

+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06



Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-11 Thread Jonathan Berry
Maybe this is why they aretrying to discourage use of Ivermectin?!

guardia
Send PM
Status Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Jul 26 2009
Posts: 60
>From Dr Kory: Ivermectin dosing increase

Interesting, thanks for the summary! Antiviral drug resistance is a thing,
so if we’ve got this virus adapting to ivermectin so quickly, this may be
the reason why governments are trying to control it? Attempting to prevent
the virus from developing resistance too quickly to this and other drugs?
That kind of makes sense. Not that they are going to succeed, but at least
it explains why they are trying to deny access from outside of hospital
settings.


So that would make sense, they want it to remain effective for them.



On Sat, 11 Sept 2021 at 16:41, Robin 
wrote:

> In reply to  Jonathan Berry's message of Sat, 11 Sep 2021 14:30:37 +1200:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >I think it is possible they wanted it easily defeated because even those
> >who want to kill want to save themselves and others they need.
>
> Yes that's what I was getting at. If someone releases such a plague, they
> can never be sure to what extent society is
> going to collapse, so it pays to have a cure that is already in widespread
> use, and thus readily available in case of
> emergency.
> They just wouldn't want everyone to know about it.
> Regards,
>
> Robin van Spaandonk 
>
>


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Robin
In reply to  Jonathan Berry's message of Sat, 11 Sep 2021 14:30:37 +1200:
Hi,
[snip]
>I think it is possible they wanted it easily defeated because even those
>who want to kill want to save themselves and others they need.

Yes that's what I was getting at. If someone releases such a plague, they can 
never be sure to what extent society is
going to collapse, so it pays to have a cure that is already in widespread use, 
and thus readily available in case of
emergency.
They just wouldn't want everyone to know about it. 
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk 



Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread CB Sites
I don't thin the Ivermectin approach will stop this virus;  indeed it's
just a sideshow for the delusional beliefs of a few.  In a month or so,
this fad will pass as just as the hydrochloroquin fad did and something new
that is politically correct for the denier crowd will refill the shoes.


On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 10:30 PM Jonathan Berry 
wrote:

> Robin, were you trying to imply they wouldn't allow for there to be an
> easy cheap cure, or were you arguing that maybe it was meant to be easily
> defeated?
> I think it is possible they wanted it easily defeated because even those
> who want to kill want to save themselves and others they need.
>
> On Sat, 11 Sept 2021 at 14:26, Robin 
> wrote:
>
>> In reply to  Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 11 Sep 2021 01:17:18 +0200:
>> Hi Jürg,
>> [snip]
>> >On 11.09.2021 01:02, Robin wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hypothetically - a bio-warfare designed virus, might be created with a
>> cheap and commonly available "off switch" such as
>> >> Ivermectin??
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >You mix up virus and in cell replication. Ivermectin basically stops in
>> >cell replication of CoV-19 and of a dozen of other virus too (what also
>> >helps to cure cancer or against flu..).
>>
>> I meant might be designed to "switch-off" when Ivermectin is
>> administered, even more so than would otherwise be the
>> case.
>>
>> >
>> >On top of this Ivermectin is one of the best antibodies for CoV-19.
>> >Other good antibodies are Heparin, Doxycycline, Hesperidin (in orange
>> >juice).
>> >
>> >This can be a problem if you have a high virus load. That case you waste
>> >Ivermectin as antibody and do not gain a replications stop. That's why
>> >we add Doxycycline!
>>
>> Who is "we"?
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >J.W.
>> Regards,
>>
>> Robin van Spaandonk 
>>
>>


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jonathan Berry
Robin, were you trying to imply they wouldn't allow for there to be an easy
cheap cure, or were you arguing that maybe it was meant to be easily
defeated?
I think it is possible they wanted it easily defeated because even those
who want to kill want to save themselves and others they need.

On Sat, 11 Sept 2021 at 14:26, Robin 
wrote:

> In reply to  Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 11 Sep 2021 01:17:18 +0200:
> Hi Jürg,
> [snip]
> >On 11.09.2021 01:02, Robin wrote:
> >
> >> Hypothetically - a bio-warfare designed virus, might be created with a
> cheap and commonly available "off switch" such as
> >> Ivermectin??
> >
> >
> >
> >You mix up virus and in cell replication. Ivermectin basically stops in
> >cell replication of CoV-19 and of a dozen of other virus too (what also
> >helps to cure cancer or against flu..).
>
> I meant might be designed to "switch-off" when Ivermectin is administered,
> even more so than would otherwise be the
> case.
>
> >
> >On top of this Ivermectin is one of the best antibodies for CoV-19.
> >Other good antibodies are Heparin, Doxycycline, Hesperidin (in orange
> >juice).
> >
> >This can be a problem if you have a high virus load. That case you waste
> >Ivermectin as antibody and do not gain a replications stop. That's why
> >we add Doxycycline!
>
> Who is "we"?
>
> >
> >
> >J.W.
> Regards,
>
> Robin van Spaandonk 
>
>


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jonathan Berry
Well think about it, they are going to be exposed to it too.
They need an effective cheap safe antidote.

There are a LOT of suppressed cures for Cancer, including guess what,
Ivermectin!

I have long studied repressed Cancer cures but never knew of Ivermectin.

My point is is one of the biggest most feared killers has many many cures
and treatments more effective than Chemo, radiation and surgery but most
don't know about them because "they" control the official narrative and
only a small percentage of people aren't' too trusting and brainwashed...

Then why should they fear that it will become overwhelmingly popular with
COVID?

Though they are scared that it will be realized, look at how many have
fallen for this stupid experimental gene therapy mascerading as a Vaccine?




On Sat, 11 Sept 2021 at 11:02, Robin 
wrote:

> In reply to  Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 10 Sep 2021 23:21:19 +0200:
> Hi,
> [snip]
>
> Hypothetically - a bio-warfare designed virus, might be created with a
> cheap and commonly available "off switch" such as
> Ivermectin??
>
>
> >On 10.09.2021 22:09, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> >>
> >> As I said, if ivermectin could have this effect, this would be clear
> >> from the double-blind clinical testing.
> >
> >
> >If Jed would once read a paper and not just spread, what his FM buddies
> >forward him, then he could see that it works!
> >
> >I sent the link some mails ago.
> >
> >
> >https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1 OF course
> >big pharma never references it
> >
> >Virus gone after two,days. PCR confirmed. Not so in placebo arm...
> >
> >J.W.
> >
> >PS: Only blind mice eat poison...
> Regards,
>
> Robin van Spaandonk 
>
>


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Robin
In reply to  Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 11 Sep 2021 01:17:18 +0200:
Hi Jürg,
[snip]
>On 11.09.2021 01:02, Robin wrote:
>
>> Hypothetically - a bio-warfare designed virus, might be created with a cheap 
>> and commonly available "off switch" such as
>> Ivermectin??
>
>
>
>You mix up virus and in cell replication. Ivermectin basically stops in 
>cell replication of CoV-19 and of a dozen of other virus too (what also 
>helps to cure cancer or against flu..).

I meant might be designed to "switch-off" when Ivermectin is administered, even 
more so than would otherwise be the
case.

>
>On top of this Ivermectin is one of the best antibodies for CoV-19. 
>Other good antibodies are Heparin, Doxycycline, Hesperidin (in orange 
>juice).
>
>This can be a problem if you have a high virus load. That case you waste 
>Ivermectin as antibody and do not gain a replications stop. That's why 
>we add Doxycycline!

Who is "we"?

>
>
>J.W.
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk 



Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach

On 11.09.2021 01:02, Robin wrote:


Hypothetically - a bio-warfare designed virus, might be created with a cheap and commonly 
available "off switch" such as
Ivermectin??




You mix up virus and in cell replication. Ivermectin basically stops in 
cell replication of CoV-19 and of a dozen of other virus too (what also 
helps to cure cancer or against flu..).


On top of this Ivermectin is one of the best antibodies for CoV-19. 
Other good antibodies are Heparin, Doxycycline, Hesperidin (in orange 
juice).


This can be a problem if you have a high virus load. That case you waste 
Ivermectin as antibody and do not gain a replications stop. That's why 
we add Doxycycline!



J.W.

--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis

+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06



Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Robin
In reply to  Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 10 Sep 2021 23:21:19 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]

Hypothetically - a bio-warfare designed virus, might be created with a cheap 
and commonly available "off switch" such as
Ivermectin??


>On 10.09.2021 22:09, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>>
>> As I said, if ivermectin could have this effect, this would be clear 
>> from the double-blind clinical testing.
>
>
>If Jed would once read a paper and not just spread, what his FM buddies 
>forward him, then he could see that it works!
>
>I sent the link some mails ago.
>
>
>https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1 OF course 
>big pharma never references it
>
>Virus gone after two,days. PCR confirmed. Not so in placebo arm...
>
>J.W.
>
>PS: Only blind mice eat poison...
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk 



Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach

On 10.09.2021 22:09, Jed Rothwell wrote:


As I said, if ivermectin could have this effect, this would be clear 
from the double-blind clinical testing.



If Jed would once read a paper and not just spread, what his FM buddies 
forward him, then he could see that it works!


I sent the link some mails ago.


https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1 OF course 
big pharma never references it


Virus gone after two,days. PCR confirmed. Not so in placebo arm...

J.W.

PS: Only blind mice eat poison...


--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis

+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06



Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jonathan Berry  wrote:

It is not marginal, look at Africa, the places where they give Ivermectin
> routinely has basically no Covid death spikes, the places where they don't
> have the familiar looking waves.
>

These effects are more easily explained by demographics (many young people)
and by very poor data collection. They are not caused by the use of
ivermectin.

As I said, if ivermectin could have this effect, this would be clear from
the double-blind clinical testing. As noted above, many tests have been
done, and 70 in total will be done. That is more than enough to reveal an
effect. Furthermore, even if we assume that the most positive tests so far
are correct, the effect they show is so small it cannot begin to explain
the result in Africa or India.

Beware of wishful thinking and people who do not understand epidemiology
and statistics. The epidemiologists in India are right; the ivermectin
advocates are wrong. I am not aware of any epidemiological look at the
situation in Africa, but the population profiles and the poor quality of
health care and public health statistics are similar. You cannot draw
conclusions from the public health data. For example, in Uttar Pradesh
recent statistics indicate that no one has died from anything. Deaths are
zero in all categories. That can't be right. See:

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.04.21261604v1.full

QUOTE:

"For Uttar Pradesh, the raw mortality data obtained from a
Right-to-Information request contained anomalies, such as multiple
districts with zero deaths for numerous months."


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jonathan Berry
It is not marginal, look at Africa, the places where they give Ivermectin
routinely has basically no Covid death spikes, the places where they don't
have the familiar looking waves.

If it is taken preventatively and in enough dosage it is basically perfect,
almost no one dies and COVID rapidly disappears, ok, there seems to be a
few people who need more than just that according to FLCCC but it is rare.

Add in enough other things and honestly I have zero concern about COVID,
Melatonin and BHT are things I have suitable stocks of that have shown
promise.

And the full protocol with Ivermectin includes for best results an
antibiotic (little known fun fact, they also kill viruses!) and Zinc, but
the IMASK protocol is recommended.

The Vaccine is harmful and has only a very short period of masking the
vaccinated's infected status so they spread it more but are not harmed as
much by the virus, past that period they are more vulnerable than others.

Also it is clear that COVID isn't terribly deadly anymore, after the very
earliest cases (which had a high rate of fatality up to 100% of presenting
cases from some countries) it has mutated to a less deadly variety that
kills very very few even without competent treatment.

Let it run through the population and not that many will die especially
those who are younger and in good health.

However the Vaccine has the certainty of injuring to some degree everyone
it is given to and the potential to kill everyone who gets it
through multiple different pathways.

Literally if everyone took it could wipe humanity out entirely.

One way this could happen is antibody dependent enhancement, which so far
corona virus vaccines tested on animals for classic SARS has demonstrated.
When presented by the virus after some time the response to the virus (or a
new strain of it) is deadly.

Other ways it could result in death have also been explored and even some
ex Pfizer employees are warning against just that.

The fact that a Vaccine that is insufficiently tested, that is made by
companies linked ultimately to the lab that made the virus in the first
place...   Makes me think anyone taking it is taking an incredible risk and
for next to nothing because it's short period of mild effectiveness (can
still catch and spread COVID even during it's period of limited efficacy,
have same levels of transmissible virus particles as unvaccinated as the
Vaccine doesn't stop replication in the nasal tract, it works deeper in the
body) is quickly over.





On Sat, 11 Sept 2021 at 06:35, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> Jonathan Berry  wrote:
>
> Jed, You point me to a study where it was tested this way suitably, I
>> suspect it will have been highly flawed if that was the result.
>>
>
> I suspect you will say that any result you disagree with is flawed by
> definition.
>
> But you are missing my point. Even if we assume the most positive studies
> are correct, the effect is still marginal. It cannot explain the events in
> India. The drug cannot be used instead of vaccines. If you are vaccinated,
> there is no need to use ivermectin or anything else, including drugs that
> we know actually work, such as remdesivir. We don't need these things any
> more than we need iron lungs and the various therapies for dealing with
> polio symptoms. The vaccine all-but ensures you will not get a serious
> case. A third booster reduces the likelihood of infection by 95%. The
> problem is fixed. The pandemic can easily be eradicated, and driven into
> extinction in the human species. Vaccines are far cheaper than any other
> drug. Even if ivermectin works, you have to take it for days, and you are
> sick while you do that, which costs you a lot in lost productivity. Whereas
> two doses of vaccine cost practically nothing.
>
>


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach
The largest study of Ivermectin prophylaxes has been made in Argentina: 
http://pharmabaires.com/1739-resultados-positivos-del-%20protocolo-iver-car-en-la-profilaxis-de-los-agentes-de-salud.html


I usually take high dose V-D3 and zinc as a preparation. this is the 
best and most simple proven prophylaxis. Some add Quercetin since early 2020


 PLEASE stop such FUD:: You said:: The best I've seen on this are 
people that do that, get infected, wind up hospitalized and/or dead.



Yes we exactly know why the pseudo vaccines stop to work after some time.

In case of Pfizer & Moderna & Astra "vaccine" we talk of an 
*experimental gen therapy*! A gen therapy that for 30% works in cancer 
therapy...


The Pfizer gen therapy according sound research does not imply a useful 
immune memory = has no vaccine like action. (that produces a broad 
immune memory pattern)


The gen therapy just forces, mostly endothelian cells, to intake & 
replicate the spike protein, what in follow up presentation reaction 
stimulates the production of spike antibodies only.


This " pseudo vaccine" never helps to stimulate/produce new antibodies 
after an infection with CoV-19. Only the surviving - but waning - anti 
bodies help to fight an illness.



In UK & Israel the efficiency of the gen therapy already reached "0" 
level for some age groups and important to know. Boosters will make 
things worse. According the UK Covid report number 22 double vaccinated 
have a higher viral load than single vaccinated This is a clear sign 
of ADE = antibody dependent enhancement due to a miss fit between gen 
therapy induce monoclonal antibodies and the new, no longer matching 
Delta spike.


Only scared to death or "mad" people kill them selves with an 
experimental gen therapy.


The pseudo vaccines already did produce some 100'000 crippled people. 
The gen therapy has > 1000x more adverse reactions (see VERS)  than the 
worst flu vaccine.



See also https://www.adrreports.eu/de/disclaimer.html  go to letter "C" 
there you find all > 1 mio adverse reactions in the EU.


J.W.


On 10.09.2021 16:28, CB Sites wrote:



  Jürg Wyttenbach says;


"Ivermectin gives a 100% protection from a COV-19 infection. Start 
dose is 2 days normal dose then weekly once for 100% protection for 
90% protetion every 2 weeks."


And you know this to be true?  So are you following your own treatment 
plan?   The best I've seen on this are people that do that, get 
infected, wind up hospitalized and/or dead. At least you won't have 
lice when you die.   It seems ironic that you would be willing to 
trust one pharmaceutical (ivermectin) and not another (the vax, the 
jab aka; Phiser, Moderna, J&J vaccines) that have been studied inside 
and are well published and documented.  We know exactly how and why 
the vax works against covid.  Yet someone with a home remedy that is 
used to treat lice infections, thinks there is a better solution even 
though there is no known science that would show how it protects 
against covid or any other virus for that matter.   Ivermectin is just 
one more of the big lies like Hydroxychloroquine or even injections of 
'sodium hypochlorite'.  Remember that crazy one that the 
science community had to be put down as fast as possible before people 
killed themselves?


I really wish you would take your propaganda and keep it to yourself 
and get your vax instead of wasting everyone time.   There are better 
subjects like Cold Fusion for us to sort out.


On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:34 AM Jürg Wyttenbach > wrote:


You cannot teach Jed


As member of the FM the ruling USA sect he has to spread, what his
buddies tell him else he will get problems.

Others would say it more rigorously. In case of the Mizuno LENR
protocol he intentionally did spread wrong details. So he is a
professional cheater.

We know this because in the mean time the Mizuno patent is
available that refutes all rubbish Jed did claim.


https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/6017-mizuno-replication-and-materials-only/?pageNo=1




Regarding Ivermectin:: Doing an RCT study for a deadly illness is
a sign of mental illness. But exactly this is what Jed references.
RCT studies for CoV-19 can only be done among very mild cases that
are completely irrelevant for the medical outcome of the pandemic.
Nevertheless. All these studies show what I said 2 mails earlier.
If you take Ivermectin then after 2 days CoV-19 is gone.

The best such study comes from Israel and does a full PCR control
on each day!

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1
 OF
course big pharma never references it

J.W.


On 10.09.2021 03:11, Jonathan Berry wrote:

Oh Jed you really do just love the Pharma li

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jonathan Berry  wrote:

Jed, You point me to a study where it was tested this way suitably, I
> suspect it will have been highly flawed if that was the result.
>

I suspect you will say that any result you disagree with is flawed by
definition.

But you are missing my point. Even if we assume the most positive studies
are correct, the effect is still marginal. It cannot explain the events in
India. The drug cannot be used instead of vaccines. If you are vaccinated,
there is no need to use ivermectin or anything else, including drugs that
we know actually work, such as remdesivir. We don't need these things any
more than we need iron lungs and the various therapies for dealing with
polio symptoms. The vaccine all-but ensures you will not get a serious
case. A third booster reduces the likelihood of infection by 95%. The
problem is fixed. The pandemic can easily be eradicated, and driven into
extinction in the human species. Vaccines are far cheaper than any other
drug. Even if ivermectin works, you have to take it for days, and you are
sick while you do that, which costs you a lot in lost productivity. Whereas
two doses of vaccine cost practically nothing.


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jonathan Berry
Jed, You point me to a study where it was tested this way suitably, I
suspect it will have been highly flawed if that was the result.

I will make a post about Ivermectin a bit later.

On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 14:04, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> Jonathan Berry  wrote:
>
>
>> But effectiveness is absolutely conclusive
>>
>
> No. If that were true, it would show up in the double-blind tests. Many of
> them have been done by proponents. None have shown more than a marginal
> effect, and they were probably mistakes.
>
> This is science. You have to use objective, scientific experiments.
> Double-blind tests are the only way to be sure a drug is actually working.
> The experiments show that ivermectin does not work. There is nothing more
> to be said. There are no other standards of truth.
>
>>


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton  wrote:

If you are truly interested, there are currently 76 clinical studies either
> on-going or completed for the efficacy of ivermectin on SARS-CoV-2.
>

76 is a lot of studies! I think we can be confident that if it has any
efficacy, that will be determined. A reliable, quantitative measure of
efficacy will emerge.

Some critics say that too much effort is being put into testing ivermectin.
Other, more promising drugs are not being tested because so many clinical
studies are being made of ivermectin.

Some supporters of ivermectin say the medical establishment has not
approved any pre-existing drug. It is dragging its feet. That is not the
case. Several drugs have been approved, such as remdesivir:

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20479976


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton  wrote:


> But effectiveness is absolutely conclusive
>>>
>>
>> No. If that were true, it would show up in the double-blind tests.
>>
>
> Many things work in vitro but not in the body, e.g.:
>

That's true too. It is important. But I was talking about a clinical
double-blind test with human patients. You give ivermectin to some of them,
and a placebo to others. You don't know who is getting what. If ivermectin
is effective, the ones who got it recover sooner, or their symptoms are
markedly less severe. Several double-blind tests have been done. They have
either shown no effect, or a very small effect. In no case has the effect
been large enough to cause what is reported from India. So, I conclude that
the Indian epidemiologists are right, and the field doctors are engaged in
wishful thinking, or they are ascribing good results to the drug which are
actually caused by the natural course of the epidemic. That may sound
unlikely, but there are many examples of that in the history of medicine.

If a drug works, that has to show up when you do enough double-blind
tests, with enough people. One test might fail because the doctors doing it
give the wrong dose, or they give it during the wrong phase of the disease,
or for some other reason. However, there have been multiple tests of
ivermectin. As far as I know, the doctors in the field in India have
reported their doses, methods, and so on, and the doctors doing clinical
trials know what procedures supposedly work. But they are not working.


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Terry Blanton
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 10:49 AM Terry Blanton  wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 10:04 PM Jed Rothwell 
> wrote:
>
>> Jonathan Berry  wrote:
>>
>>
>>> But effectiveness is absolutely conclusive
>>>
>>
>> No. If that were true, it would show up in the double-blind tests.
>>
>
> Many things work in vitro but not in the body, e.g.:
>
>
> https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30464-8/fulltext
>
>

If you are truly interested, there are currently 76 clinical studies either
on-going or completed for the efficacy of ivermectin on SARS-CoV-2.  You
can read about or even volunteer to participate if you qualify:

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=COVID-19&term=ivermectin&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=&Search=Search


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 10:04 PM Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> Jonathan Berry  wrote:
>
>
>> But effectiveness is absolutely conclusive
>>
>
> No. If that were true, it would show up in the double-blind tests.
>

Many things work in vitro but not in the body, e.g.:

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30464-8/fulltext


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Terry Blanton
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 10:29 AM CB Sites  wrote:

>
>   Ivermectin is just one more of the big lies like Hydroxychloroquine or
> even injections of 'sodium hypochlorite'.  Remember that crazy one that
> the science community had to be put down as fast as possible before people
> killed themselves?
>

Personally, I liked the idea of endoscopically illuminating the abdomen
with UV-C to kill the virus directly.


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread CB Sites
Jürg Wyttenbach says;

"Ivermectin gives a 100% protection from a COV-19 infection. Start dose is
2 days normal dose then weekly once for 100% protection for 90% protetion
every 2 weeks."

And you know this to be true?  So are you following your own treatment
plan?   The best I've seen on this are people that do that, get infected,
wind up hospitalized and/or dead.  At least you won't have lice when you
die.   It seems ironic that you would be willing to trust one
pharmaceutical (ivermectin) and not another (the vax, the jab aka; Phiser,
Moderna, J&J vaccines) that have been studied inside and are well published
and documented.  We know exactly how and why the vax works against covid.
Yet someone with a home remedy that is used to treat lice infections,
thinks there is a better solution even though there is no known science
that would show how it protects against covid or any other virus for that
matter.   Ivermectin is just one more of the big lies like
Hydroxychloroquine or even injections of 'sodium hypochlorite'.  Remember
that crazy one that the science community had to be put down as fast as
possible before people killed themselves?

I really wish you would take your propaganda and keep it to yourself and
get your vax instead of wasting everyone time.There are better subjects
like Cold Fusion for us to sort out.


On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:34 AM Jürg Wyttenbach  wrote:

> You cannot teach Jed
>
>
> As member of the FM the ruling USA sect he has to spread, what his buddies
> tell him else he will get problems.
>
> Others would say it more rigorously. In case of the Mizuno LENR protocol
> he intentionally did spread wrong details. So he is a professional cheater.
>
> We know this because in the mean time the Mizuno patent is available that
> refutes all rubbish Jed did claim.
>
>
> https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/6017-mizuno-replication-and-materials-only/?pageNo=1
>
>
> Regarding Ivermectin:: Doing an RCT study for a deadly illness is a sign
> of mental illness. But exactly this is what Jed references. RCT studies for
> CoV-19 can only be done among very mild cases that are completely
> irrelevant for the medical outcome of the pandemic. Nevertheless. All these
> studies show what I said 2 mails earlier. If you take Ivermectin then after
> 2 days CoV-19 is gone.
>
> The best such study comes from Israel and does a full PCR control on each
> day!
>
> https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1  OF course
> big pharma never references it
>
> J.W.
>
>
> On 10.09.2021 03:11, Jonathan Berry wrote:
>
> Oh Jed you really do just love the Pharma lies don't you.
>
> Nothing could be further from the truth.
>
> First off there have been no deaths ever from overdosing with it, a woman
> who took x100 times the recommended dosage was fine after 4 days in
> hospital.
>
> The negative effects from it are rare, mild and mostly related either to
> insane dosing (which is a result of it not being prescribed by doctors) and
> it killing parasites that release toxins.
>
> But effectiveness is absolutely conclusive but to do it justice I'll do
> that in another post, but the fact remains if there is no harm (except to
> parasites and apparently Cancer) then why oppose people trying it?
>
> Why are they making up lies about it flooding emergency rooms when the
> hospital has never treated anyone for it ever?
>
> Why are they making up fake studies that don't exist?
>
> Why are they pushing an experimental that contains the harmful spike
> protein that has little beneficial effect and obvious harm?
>
> Why are trying to make it harder to enter accounts of Vaccine harm in the
> VARS database?  They have been caught making it intentionally hard with
> slow loading and timeouts in the Canadian system.
>
> All for a Virus that finally it has been admitted Faucci lied about, & was
> involved with making, the evidence for it being gain of function research.
>
>
>
> On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 09:14, Jed Rothwell  wrote:
>
>> Jürg Wyttenbach  wrote:
>>
>>> We no longer need any Ivermectin studies as we have real data from
>>> 1'000'000'000 people that now no longer worry CoV-19.
>>>
>> Leading Indian epidemiologists say there is no evidence that ivermectin
>> had an effect in India. They were interviewed in the New York Times and
>> elsewhere. Epidemiologists are better at judging these things than doctors
>> in the field. Doctors have often been mistaken about the efficacy of a
>> drug. The epidemiologists say the curves of the recent outbreaks indicate
>> the epidemic abated because of natural herd immunity in the hard hit
>> districts. The doctors took antibody tests from a sample of the population.
>> They found that the infection rate was far higher than official statistics
>> showed. It was high enough to achieve local herd immunity. Local herd
>> immunity is why there are multiple waves of an epidemic in different cities
>> over time.
>>
>> Double-blind tests of ivermectin show either a very s

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach

You cannot teach Jed


As member of the FM the ruling USA sect he has to spread, what his 
buddies tell him else he will get problems.


Others would say it more rigorously. In case of the Mizuno LENR protocol 
he intentionally did spread wrong details. So he is a professional cheater.


We know this because in the mean time the Mizuno patent is available 
that refutes all rubbish Jed did claim.


https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/6017-mizuno-replication-and-materials-only/?pageNo=1


Regarding Ivermectin:: Doing an RCT study for a deadly illness is a sign 
of mental illness. But exactly this is what Jed references. RCT studies 
for CoV-19 can only be done among very mild cases that are completely 
irrelevant for the medical outcome of the pandemic. Nevertheless. All 
these studies show what I said 2 mails earlier. If you take Ivermectin 
then after 2 days CoV-19 is gone.


The best such study comes from Israel and does a full PCR control on 
each day!


https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1  OF course 
big pharma never references it


J.W.


On 10.09.2021 03:11, Jonathan Berry wrote:

Oh Jed you really do just love the Pharma lies don't you.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

First off there have been no deaths ever from overdosing with it, a 
woman who took x100 times the recommended dosage was fine after 4 days 
in hospital.


The negative effects from it are rare, mild and mostly related either 
to insane dosing (which is a result of it not being prescribed by 
doctors) and it killing parasites that release toxins.


But effectiveness is absolutely conclusive but to do it justice I'll 
do that in another post, but the fact remains if there is no harm 
(except to parasites and apparently Cancer) then why oppose people 
trying it?


Why are they making up lies about it flooding emergency rooms when the 
hospital has never treated anyone for it ever?


Why are they making up fake studies that don't exist?

Why are they pushing an experimental that contains the harmful spike 
protein that has little beneficial effect and obvious harm?


Why are trying to make it harder to enter accounts of Vaccine harm in 
the VARS database?  They have been caught making it intentionally hard 
with slow loading and timeouts in the Canadian system.


All for a Virus that finally it has been admitted Faucci lied about, & 
was involved with making, the evidence for it being gain of function 
research.




On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 09:14, Jed Rothwell > wrote:


Jürg Wyttenbach mailto:ju...@datamart.ch>> wrote:

We no longer need any Ivermectin studies as we have real data
from 1'000'000'000 people that now no longer worry CoV-19.

Leading Indian epidemiologists say there is no evidence that
ivermectin had an effect in India. They were interviewed in the
New York Times and elsewhere. Epidemiologists are better at
judging these things than doctors in the field. Doctors have often
been mistaken about the efficacy of a drug. The epidemiologists
say the curves of the recent outbreaks indicate the epidemic
abated because of natural herd immunity in the hard hit districts.
The doctors took antibody tests from a sample of the population.
They found that the infection rate was far higher than official
statistics showed. It was high enough to achieve local herd
immunity. Local herd immunity is why there are multiple waves of
an epidemic in different cities over time.

Double-blind tests of ivermectin show either a very small effect,
or none at all, so it is not possible it has had a giant effect on
the Indian population. The doctors in the field are not more
skilled in administering the drug than the doctors doing the
double-blind tests. The doctors in the field have described their
methods, dosage and so on. Clinical double-blind tests did not
replicate their claims. When a drug has a small effect at best,
the way ivermectin does, the only way to confirm that effect is
with a double blind test.


--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis

+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06



Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-09 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jonathan Berry  wrote:



> Why are they pushing an experimental that contains the harmful spike
> protein that has little beneficial effect and obvious harm?
>

COVID itself, and the common cold, both produce a million times more of
these spike proteins than the vaccine does. Yet the cold does not kill you.
Therefore, the protein is harmless.

It has to be the same spike protein. Otherwise it will not trigger the same
immune response.


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-09 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jonathan Berry  wrote:


> But effectiveness is absolutely conclusive
>

No. If that were true, it would show up in the double-blind tests. Many of
them have been done by proponents. None have shown more than a marginal
effect, and they were probably mistakes.

This is science. You have to use objective, scientific experiments.
Double-blind tests are the only way to be sure a drug is actually working.
The experiments show that ivermectin does not work. There is nothing more
to be said. There are no other standards of truth.

>


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-09 Thread Jonathan Berry
Oh Jed you really do just love the Pharma lies don't you.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

First off there have been no deaths ever from overdosing with it, a woman
who took x100 times the recommended dosage was fine after 4 days in
hospital.

The negative effects from it are rare, mild and mostly related either to
insane dosing (which is a result of it not being prescribed by doctors) and
it killing parasites that release toxins.

But effectiveness is absolutely conclusive but to do it justice I'll do
that in another post, but the fact remains if there is no harm (except to
parasites and apparently Cancer) then why oppose people trying it?

Why are they making up lies about it flooding emergency rooms when the
hospital has never treated anyone for it ever?

Why are they making up fake studies that don't exist?

Why are they pushing an experimental that contains the harmful spike
protein that has little beneficial effect and obvious harm?

Why are trying to make it harder to enter accounts of Vaccine harm in the
VARS database?  They have been caught making it intentionally hard with
slow loading and timeouts in the Canadian system.

All for a Virus that finally it has been admitted Faucci lied about, & was
involved with making, the evidence for it being gain of function research.



On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 09:14, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> Jürg Wyttenbach  wrote:
>
>> We no longer need any Ivermectin studies as we have real data from
>> 1'000'000'000 people that now no longer worry CoV-19.
>>
> Leading Indian epidemiologists say there is no evidence that ivermectin
> had an effect in India. They were interviewed in the New York Times and
> elsewhere. Epidemiologists are better at judging these things than doctors
> in the field. Doctors have often been mistaken about the efficacy of a
> drug. The epidemiologists say the curves of the recent outbreaks indicate
> the epidemic abated because of natural herd immunity in the hard hit
> districts. The doctors took antibody tests from a sample of the population.
> They found that the infection rate was far higher than official statistics
> showed. It was high enough to achieve local herd immunity. Local herd
> immunity is why there are multiple waves of an epidemic in different cities
> over time.
>
> Double-blind tests of ivermectin show either a very small effect, or none
> at all, so it is not possible it has had a giant effect on the Indian
> population. The doctors in the field are not more skilled in
> administering the drug than the doctors doing the double-blind tests. The
> doctors in the field have described their methods, dosage and so on.
> Clinical double-blind tests did not replicate their claims. When a drug has
> a small effect at best, the way ivermectin does, the only way to confirm
> that effect is with a double blind test.
>
>


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-09 Thread Terry Blanton
 You could have simply said, "No."

Then I would have asked, "Why not?"

Fact is, the mRNA vaccines have created a huge number of asymptomatic
carriers of the virus.  The vaccines do NOT prevent infection in most
recipients.

These vaccinated people with a Covid-19 infection are creating mutations.
These vaccines have generated a false sense of security for humanity and
will possibly result in a Great Filter.  Already, 49 states have found the
mu variant in infected people.

You might want to reconsider using the ivermectin as a prophylactic.

Cheers!


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-09 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach
Ivermectin gives a 100% protection from a COV-19 infection. Start dose 
is 2 days normal dose then weekly once for 100% protection for 90% 
protetion every 2 weeks.


I would recommend it - as a prevention - only  for people with 
comorbidity or for a high risk like flight travel.


It is totally OK to take it on 1st CoV-19 symptoms if you before 
regularly did take zinc and V-D3. > 99% of all cases disappear after 1-2 
days. If symptoms gets stronger you have to adjust the dose. Start with 
2x normal dose daily and add 5000-1 IU's VD-3, zinc, V-C and a 
tablet of aspirin cardio - also adding Quercetin helps to increase zinc 
intake into cells.


And have a look at the world wide used protocol of FLCCC::


https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-mask-plus-protocol/


J.W.


On 10.09.2021 01:21, Terry Blanton wrote:

Do you take it as a preventative?


--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis

+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06



Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-09 Thread Terry Blanton
Do you take it as a preventative?

>


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-09 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach
Jed as usual spreads the official big pharma mafia meme of NYT, 
nature,lancet...


Nobody in India made a serious investigation that underlines this -his - 
cheating claims. The highest sera positive rate found in India was 77%, 
what is miles away from herd immunity. UK now has a 98% sera positive 
rate and still sees tons of infections/deaths because no 
treatment/prevention is done.



In Uttar Pradesh, start of May 2021 every household got a number of 
Ivermectin kits (IVR, Zink, V-D3, Doxycycline, and V-C). 2 weeks later 
CoV-19 was gone. Ivermectin does 100% prevent an infection with CoV-19. 
If a case did reoccur it was treated with the same kit and all contacts 
had to restart the Ivermectin procedure.


See: 
https://www.indiamart.com/proddetail/ziverdo-kit-kit-of-zinc-acetate-tablets-doxycycline-capsule-ip-ivermectin-dispersible-tablet-12373324255.html



Since 2 months Uttar Pradesh, has less than 50 cases among 205 mio 
people the last month less than 20 cases.All this with no vaccination!


This medication works 1000x better than any vaccination with a fraction 
of costs and no social restrictions are needed.


So basically we are all fools as we agree to be ruled by criminal mafia 
people, that just want to make tons of money...



J.W.


On 09.09.2021 23:14, Jed Rothwell wrote:

Jürg Wyttenbach mailto:ju...@datamart.ch>> wrote:

We no longer need any Ivermectin studies as we have real data from
1'000'000'000 people that now no longer worry CoV-19.

Leading Indian epidemiologists say there is no evidence that 
ivermectin had an effect in India. They were interviewed in the New 
York Times and elsewhere. Epidemiologists are better at judging these 
things than doctors in the field. Doctors have often been mistaken 
about the efficacy of a drug. The epidemiologists say the curves of 
the recent outbreaks indicate the epidemic abated because of natural 
herd immunity in the hard hit districts. The doctors took 
antibody tests from a sample of the population. They found that the 
infection rate was far higher than official statistics showed. It was 
high enough to achieve local herd immunity. Local herd immunity is why 
there are multiple waves of an epidemic in different cities over time.


Double-blind tests of ivermectin show either a very small effect, or 
none at all, so it is not possible it has had a giant effect on the 
Indian population. The doctors in the field are not more skilled in 
administering the drug than the doctors doing the double-blind tests. 
The doctors in the field have described their methods, dosage and so 
on. Clinical double-blind tests did not replicate their claims. When a 
drug has a small effect at best, the way ivermectin does, the only way 
to confirm that effect is with a double blind test.



--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis

+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06



Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-09 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jürg Wyttenbach  wrote:

> We no longer need any Ivermectin studies as we have real data from
> 1'000'000'000 people that now no longer worry CoV-19.
>
Leading Indian epidemiologists say there is no evidence that ivermectin had
an effect in India. They were interviewed in the New York Times and
elsewhere. Epidemiologists are better at judging these things than doctors
in the field. Doctors have often been mistaken about the efficacy of a
drug. The epidemiologists say the curves of the recent outbreaks indicate
the epidemic abated because of natural herd immunity in the hard hit
districts. The doctors took antibody tests from a sample of the population.
They found that the infection rate was far higher than official statistics
showed. It was high enough to achieve local herd immunity. Local herd
immunity is why there are multiple waves of an epidemic in different cities
over time.

Double-blind tests of ivermectin show either a very small effect, or none
at all, so it is not possible it has had a giant effect on the Indian
population. The doctors in the field are not more skilled in
administering the drug than the doctors doing the double-blind tests. The
doctors in the field have described their methods, dosage and so on.
Clinical double-blind tests did not replicate their claims. When a drug has
a small effect at best, the way ivermectin does, the only way to confirm
that effect is with a double blind test.


Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-09 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach
Ivermectin has been given to at least 2 billion people now + 1 billion 
from India's recent CoV-19 campain.


So the following 
:ivermectin-causes-sterilization-in-85-percent-of-men-study-finds is the 
last sign of desperation among Big pharma facing a live existence risk.


Such a study does not exist just on the pharma PR's wish list...

All Ivermectin states of India are free (= < 50 cases in total or < 0.1 
cases /mio) of CoV-19 now.



The only India vaccine terror state of Kerala where the highest educated 
live, now delivers between 2/3 and 3/4 of all daily India CoV-19 cases 
and > 50% of India's death.


https://www.mygov.in/covid-19

We no longer need any Ivermectin studies as we have real data from 
1'000'000'000 people that now no longer worry CoV-19.



But if you are unlucky and live in a western vaccine terror state like 
USA,Germany,France, Italy,...and cannot get Ivermectin or have many 
comorbidity then you either wait for the first vaccine that will occur 
soon (NOVAVAX or CUBA's vaccine) or you risk one Gen therapy shot from 
Pfizer/Moderna/Astra and try to get CoV-19 ASAP = 4-8 weeks after the jab.


1 Jab and an infection is the best you can do as the CT load of after 1 
jab is lower than after two jabs (UK report 22) so overall your risk is 
lower.


In Europe you can order Ivermectin at : 
https://www.petissimo.de/vogel/ziervogel/sh-ivermectin-spot-on.html


It's 100mg in total what is enough for a normal treatment. It's liquid 
and allows for very fine dosing. It is for singing birds and 100% human 
compatible.


(tested by friends many times!)


J.W.



On 09.09.2021 17:19, Terry Blanton wrote:

Unintended consequences

https://www.wfla.com/community/health/coronavirus/ivermectin-causes-sterilization-in-85-percent-of-men-study-finds/ 



On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 6:21 PM Jürg Wyttenbach > wrote:


The biggest crime is still ongoing.

Companies like Merck (+ vaccine makers) actively bribe CDD/FDA/WHO
to not allow *IVERMECTIN *for CoV-19 treatment. Now the USA state
mafia tops this and donates 1.2 billion to Merck for an already
failed drug.

See statement of Dr. Kory: https://vimeo.com/562286662



With IVERMECTIN we would have only a few 1000 victims from CoV-19.

India currently only uses *IVERMECTIN.* India cases overall did go
down 7x. Delhi that started early has now - after 7 weeks - about
131 cases/day far below USA level.

So you have to learn: Big Pharma does not hesitate to kill you
with bad drugs if they want to make money.


J.W.

On 16.06.2021 00:07, Michael Foster wrote:

I read a lot of scientific papers covering a broad variety of subjects. 
It's how I amuse myself, even though I am not a scientist. Some people play 
golf, I read scientific papers.  I'm sure many of you on this list have noticed 
that papers on research payed for with your tax dollars are not available to 
the the public except through for-profit companies who will charge you an arm 
and a leg for them. The companies that do this are literally making billions 
doing this. Nice, huh?

I can often dodge the pay wall by searching for one of the authors who may 
have published a paper on the same subject somewhere else. Why should I or 
anyone else have to pay to read about research that I and other taxpayers have 
already bought?

Given the state of the world today, I was reading a lot of papers on 
PubMed, the NIH website, where you could read literally thousands of papers 
covering medical research. Only about a week ago, I read one that was the most 
horrifying evidence of collusion between our benevolent government and Big 
Pharma. I was going to post the conclusion and summary of this research here 
for all of you to read and a link to the paper. Guess what? That paper has 
vanished and you can now only read abstracts of the papers on PubMed. You now 
must go the usual private company and pay to read research available for free 
only days ago.  I unfortunately didn't save the link or the whole PDF because I 
thought I could find it again with a few key words as I had before. All gone.

I will give you what I remember to the best of my ability the summary and 
conclusion of the research in question. It stated flatly through two double 
blind clinical trials that those suffering from HIV/AIDS could have their 
immune function restored by taking n-acetyl cysteine, an inexpensive and easily 
obtained supplement. The effect was raising the glutathione levels in the body. 
Glutathione is the master anti-oxidant in the human body. You could say that 
glutathione IS the immune system.

What I'm saying is that this sort of information while formerly available 
to anyone looking for it and the ability to understand it, was not likely to 
attract attention, given