--- John Nemeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jul 6,
> I wouldn't be so quick to say that. A lot of companies
> want/need
> the best, i.e. Cisco gear, but their budgets are somewhat tight.
> Cisco
> support is generally considered to be very good. But, one of the
> complaints I frequent
The only way to do it would be to configure dialer-watch to monitor
a network that does not exist. The only problem is that the link will
never go down afterwards and you'll have a very expensive
leased-line..
I think an important question here is "why?", or "what is the
problem you are trying
gt; to explain and I'm sorry for my (Spanish) English.
>
> TIA, best regards.
>
> Miguel Angel Romero Arcas
> Dpto. Técnica de Sistemas
> CESSER Informática y Organización, S.L.
>
> - Mensaje original -
> De: "Charlie Hartwell" <[EMAIL PRO
OK, you've got a nice combination of ppp-callback, ms-callback, and
ISDN (CLI) callback all combined in that config.
You need to just have ms-callback so remove the "class test" stuff
from the dialer sting and also the "dialer caller 123 callback" line,
then change the "dialer remote-name" to
Oh man! These ruined dotcom CEO's are even in here scrabbling for
change.
--- Allen May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm still ready to stop this
thread and cash in on all the 2 cents
> thrown
> in.
> ;)
>
> Allen
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robert Padjen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <
I'm not sure if you have been on the BCMSN course (I hope you have if
you have a copy of the notes!) but that was certainly sufficient for
me. Of all of the CCNP exams, the BCMSN fitted the course notes the
best.
It's difficult when people ask questions like this because we don't
know how much exp
OK, I think the words "it depends" were written specifically for this
question.
When you go to the Cisco IOS planner page look for images with the
letters "GD" after them. This means General Deployment and you'll
find a lot of ISP's and large corporates use these because they are
considered stabl
As long as that link is OK the LED will stay on.
Now, a quiet word about the NDA When you take these tests Cisco
get a bit upset if you go around repeating the questions - and so do
people who already have CCNP. You clicked an "accept" button before
the test started that had in the small-pri
That is true and it's always enabled by default. Check the bugs for
fast switching 'cos it has quite a few issues with NAT, ISDN, Frame
Relay (sub-i/f), ISL on Fast Ethernet (sub-if again) and some other
stuff too.
--- "Yee, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if I am not wrong ip
route-cache ena
With your config you need "dialer in-band". The other 2 options are
only used for Dialer Profile configurations.
Cisco have made this command confusing, I always understood that ISDN
circuits had "out of band" dialers (ie. the D-Channel) but the
"dialer in-band" command is now used with legacy di
PPP callback from a PC client is slightly different, it is generally
called "MS-Callback". You can find example configs here:-
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/async_ppp.html
If this is ISDN you should ignore the chat-script stuff, if it is a
modem you, er, shouldn't...
Cheers
> In closing... so since I am Unix, (Solaris), experienced and
> certified, AND
> Microsoft experienced and certified, does this mean I need to run
> out and
> get some Prozac right quick
I think, maybe, that an overdose of Prozac may have contributed to
the start of this whole argument
> In closing... so since I am Unix, (Solaris), experienced and
> certified, AND
> Microsoft experienced and certified, does this mean I need to run
> out and
> get some Prozac right quick
I think, maybe, that an overdose of Prozac may have contributed to
the start of this whole argument
Apart from "it's big, beige and heavy" I guess you could try Nortel's
website
http://www39.nortelnetworks.com/products/5000BSN/
It uses internally defined "ISPs" which create a new router process
for every customer profile (not too good for CPU load). The customer
then has access to change
The IS-IS paper by Peter Van Oene at http://www.certificationzone.com
is very good as well. You do need to subscribe to get it but with all
of the other papers, test questions and labs that you get it's well
worth it.
Cheers
Charlie
--- Remmert Veen wrote: > Hey Pete,
>
> I've got a collecti
The config looks fine but we will need a bit more info to help. The
error message isn't much use on it's own, so if you do "show isdn
status", then run "debug isdn q931", "debug isdn q921" and "debug
dialer", then try to make a call it should give you more information.
If you have any trouble deci
IS
> established. If not your ISDN line is knackered.
>
> regards
> Iain Fomes
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Charlie Hartwell [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 10 July 2001 09:39
> > To: [E
o debug isdn
events it gives you all that in one go. When
> you do
> Show ISDN status check that you have a TEI number and the Multiple
> frame IS
> established. If not your ISDN line is knackered.
>
> regards
> Iain Fomes
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
There is no fault with your ISDN line but there was no interesting
traffic for the router to bring the link up - the 2 messages were for
CDP on the physical interface and a broadcast (probably a routing
protocol). They are not able to activate the link.
You need to ping across to the other side o
It depends who you are and who you work for, each CCO login can have
a different profile for access to different areas such as bugsearch
tools, upgrade planners, field notices, online forums, technical
documents, case studies...the list goes on.
Cisco are generally quite nice if you have a genuin
HSRP is a _router_ function but it is there to add extra
functionality for a LAN.
Also, I seem to remember HSRP being covered in the BCMSN course -
possibly something to do with running multiple instances of HSRP over
different VLANs. Read into that what you will, all I'm saying is that
HSRP is q
It would be interesting to see the document that recommends that
action - after all, WFQ is designed to help with low bandwidth links
without the need for complicated config.
It is more likely that it is recommended to turn off WFQ when using
ppp multilink across the ISDN connection. This is prob
The first call failed because there were no available b-channels at
the remote end (0x82A2).
>From this information I cannot see why layer 1 is going down - try
running "debug isdn q921" and "debug bri" to see if that gives any
clues - it is most likely to be a telco problem though.
Cheers
Charl
I expect the total load on your 2 active calls is above 40% so the
router is trying to activate a third channel. Obviously you don't
have 3 channels with a BRI so you get this error message.
Do you have another BRI interface in the same dialer
pool/rotary-group that is not shutdown? If you do and
You need to use a technique called "MS-Callback" it is documented on
the Cisco website in the access-dial cookbook area. It is also
documented here
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/dial_c/dccalldd.htm#xtocid75233
Sorry about the wrap.
Cheers
Charlie
With the smaller routers (700 up to 3600) you do not get an internal
battery to keep the clock correct when the router reboots. You will
need to use an NTP server for these.
If you have access to the internet then there are plenty of public
domain NTP servers that are free to use (just search in
Hi Michael,
I am interested in the Optical path but I'm not 100% sure about it
just yet. The certifications area on CCO gives some good links for
reading material for both paths and I believe they are both still in
beta.The blueprint for the Dial C&S is due in August.
It is worth noting that the
I might be repeating someone else here - I haven't followed the
thread completely. The vulnerability you are talking about is
documented in this field notice...
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cat5k-8021x-vuln-pub.shtml
You have to be VERY careful when putting XP on your Cisco switched
LAN,
--- Mahesh wrote: > Hi
> Can any one tell me the best stuff for VPN,s
> thanks and regards
>
> --
> Mahesh Chandra
>
Where do I start?
OK, do you mean training, documentation, case studies, hardware,
software, encryption..
What I'm trying to say is - can you give a bit more detail? Better
You can use this as a guide for your config - just replace the BRI
config with your PRI stuff.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/bri_3640.html
The Digital Modems are designed to accept analogue (PSTN) calls
through the digital ISDN circuit. When a call comes into the ISDN
interface it can see
Well, John Chambers is the CEO of Cisco Systems so I don't think he's
at all bothered about the career of this "Tom Chambers" you mention.
Speaking of John Chambers - I expect he's quite happy at the moment.
Since Cisco announced a restructure program (the details of which
elude me) the share pri
You want "ppp authentication chap callin" so that the router will
only authenticate incoming ppp connections but not outgoing.
HTH.
Charlie
--- Cisco Lover wrote: > Hi Guys...
>
> Any Idea how to setup one sided chap???that is only one router is
> sending
> challenge??
>
>
> Thanks for th
ds
Charlie
--- Cisco Lover wrote: > Hi Charlie,,
>
> Thanks for the help..
>
> So, the rest of the commands will remain the same??I mean we still
> have to
> put ppp authentication chap and USERNAME+PASSWORD set on both
> sides??
>
> Cisco Lover
>
> >From
I use a product called Optivity Net-id which is very useful for this
purpose. Go from the http://support.baynetworks.com site for more
info.
Please remember that this newsgroup is primarily dedicated to the
pursuit of Cisco accreditation - your post is a bit outside of the
sort of questions we dea
It depends how your frame-relay has been configured. It will be the
same command you used to set it in the first place preceded by a
"no".
It is usual to use the "frame-relay interface-dlci ### ietf/cisco"
command to define it but some strange people still configure
frame-relay maps.
Cheers
Ch
I don't know the exact details because Cisco aren't releasing exam
objectives for the BSCN. What I can tell you is that the pass mark
will be lower as it is a newer exam, it is likely to have more BGP
than you can see in the ACRC notes but the flipside is that there's
probably less "legacy" protoc
This of course leaves the way open to get your non-technical HR
person to ask bizarre, embarrasing or just plain impossible
questions.
"So, Mr Berkowitz, could you please explain when a static RIP route
would be useful between autonymous systems?"
"Mr Lammle, when you've wired the left-handed we
You might want to make sure that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is in the "to:"
field and not the "cc:" field - these are dropped to help keep down
the spam levels.
Cheers
Charlie
--- Aaron Prather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > actually, thats
not it :)
> i always respond to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> unl
> He's the one that went into shock when I told him the nurses
> refused to let me have my Palm Pilot. His comment was that if
> anyone did that to him, he wasn't sure he could survive.
Hmm, a cardiologist that *likes* his Palm Pilot? That worries me -
he sounds far too comfortable using tech
This is very true - take the trunking off the ports you wish to run
FEC on, you're not connecting to another switch and I'm sure that the
Compaq server isn't much interested in other VLAN traffic.
When you get this going you'll have to set the port channels to "on"
- the compaq cards don't use
Hang on a mo... if you put 12.0(7)T on there you'll lose any Fast
Ethernet interfaces you have. I have found 12.0(7)XK1 to be the most
complete/unbuggy IOS for 3640's.
To be absolutely sure use the beautifully named "hardware - software
compatibility matrix" at
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/fro
Hi Chris,
Sorry to tell you this but you have a 4 port hub - not 4 real
interfaces so you won't be able to address them individually.
Regards
Charlie
--- 416South wrote: > can anyone guide me
into the right direction with adding additional
> ethernet
> interfaces to my 804 router. It has 2
Wouldn't it be possible to use traditional transparent bridging
across the WAN link? I can't think of any problems with it but I
haven't tried it with .1q before.
Worth labbing anyway
--- MADMAN wrote: > It;s called LANE, don't go
there ;)
>
> Dave
>
> Fuller Michael wrote:
> >
> > Is
It pains me to respond to this but it has to be done. I apologise to
groupstudy for continuing with this. Feel free to just ignore it
(which I tried to do).
I cannot believe, at a time when the free world should be pulling
together, that some people feel the need to inflame emotions and
attempt to
Hi Cisco Lover,
This is the mail that came out of Cisco about this - I hope it
answers your question...
Hello,
My name is Lorne Braddock and I manage Cisco's CCIE program. I wish
to
address any rumors you may have heard about a so call
Probably not a lot. You need to have inside and outside interfaces so
the router knows when to translate packets.
Check the NAT section here...
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/np1_c/1cprt2/1cipadr.htm
Follow those instructions there and you can't go wrong ;)
An alternative method...
If you configure the PRI using a dialer profile for every remote site
and make each Dialer interface the backup route (using floating
statics) or backup-interface for the remote sites you can instruct
the interface to use a maximum of 2 channels.
I'm not going to go into
Just a little answer...
yes
(but not a very big one)
--- John Tafasi wrote: > Hello Group,
>
> Just a little question. Is AS400 an IBM mainframe computer?
>
Nokia Game is on again.
Go to http://uk.yahoo.com/nokiagame/ and join
48 matches
Mail list logo