On Wed 23 Jun 2021 at 08:49:42 (+0100), mick crane wrote:
> On 2021-06-23 08:22, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 06:51:39AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > comm -23 <(apt-mark showmanual | sort -u) <(gzip -dc
> > > /var/log/installer/initial-status.gz |
On Mi, 23 iun 21, 16:49:28, David wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 at 13:52, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Ma, 22 iun 21, 10:57:39, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > Mistery solved by looking at the html part (the '/' are meant to denote
> > italic), the correct command is:
> > comm -23 <(apt-mark
On Mi, 23 iun 21, 09:22:24, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 06:51:39AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > comm -23 <(apt-mark showmanual | sort -u) <(gzip -dc
> > /var/log/installer/initial-status.gz | sed -n 's/^Package: //p' | sort -u)
>
> > Command
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 08:49:42AM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2021-06-23 08:22, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> >Perhaps more readable in the symmetrical variant
> >
> > diff -u <(ls dir1) <(ls dir2)
> >
> >Very handy.
> >
> does not the excellent guide also say not to try to do anything
On 2021-06-23 08:22, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 06:51:39AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
comm -23 <(apt-mark showmanual | sort -u) <(gzip -dc
/var/log/installer/initial-status.gz | sed -n 's/^Package: //p' | sort
-u)
Command substitution without '$'? I must be
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 06:51:39AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
> comm -23 <(apt-mark showmanual | sort -u) <(gzip -dc
> /var/log/installer/initial-status.gz | sed -n 's/^Package: //p' | sort -u)
> Command substitution without '$'? I must be missing something and would
>
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 at 13:52, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 22 iun 21, 10:57:39, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Mistery solved by looking at the html part (the '/' are meant to denote
> italic), the correct command is:
> comm -23 <(apt-mark showmanual | sort -u) <(gzip -dc
>
On Ma, 22 iun 21, 10:57:39, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 05:44:50PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Ma, 22 iun 21, 15:30:35, Christian wrote:
> > >
> > > /comm -23 <(apt-mark showmanual | sort -u) <(gzip -dc
> > > /var/log/installer/initial-status.gz | sed -n 's/^Package:
On Ma, 22 iun 21, 11:25:00, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 05:08:35PM +0200, Christian wrote:
> > Hi Andrei,
> >
> > thanks a lot for your reply.
> >
> > > It's unclear what exactly '/comm -23' is supposed to be
> >
> > Well, from the man pages (man comm) :
> >
> > /comm
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 05:08:35PM +0200, Christian wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> thanks a lot for your reply.
>
> > It's unclear what exactly '/comm -23' is supposed to be
>
> Well, from the man pages (man comm) :
>
> /comm [OPTION]... FILE1 FILE2//
Your mail user agent (or your editor) appears
Hi Andrei,
thanks a lot for your reply.
> It's unclear what exactly '/comm -23' is supposed to be
Well, from the man pages (man comm) :
/comm [OPTION]... FILE1 FILE2//
//
//DESCRIPTION//
// Compare sorted files FILE1 and FILE2 line by line.
-1 suppress column 1 (lines
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 05:44:50PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 22 iun 21, 15:30:35, Christian wrote:
> >
> > /comm -23 <(apt-mark showmanual | sort -u) <(gzip -dc
> > /var/log/installer/initial-status.gz | sed -n 's/^Package: //p' | sort -u)/
>
> It's unclear what exactly '/comm -23'
Dear Hans,
thanks again for your help.
> if you can see in this file, which packages are postinstalled or
dependent [...]
Alas that doesn´t seem to be the case.
As an example I post-installed the fish-shell and the respective entry
simply is:
/fish
On Ma, 22 iun 21, 15:30:35, Christian wrote:
>
> /comm -23 <(apt-mark showmanual | sort -u) <(gzip -dc
> /var/log/installer/initial-status.gz | sed -n 's/^Package: //p' | sort -u)/
It's unclear what exactly '/comm -23' is supposed to be and it seems
your mail program messed with line breaks.
mmand you provided and it seems to produce quite
> an extensive list beginning with "acl" and ending with "zlib1g:amd64".
> So it´s basically a list with all the packages which are installed by
> default plus the packages I installed afterwards.
>
> I was hoping for
ed by
default plus the packages I installed afterwards.
I was hoping for a list that provides just my post-installed packages.
But I assume that in view of the fact that the /i*nitial-status.gz
*/doesn´t seem to exist on Debian there´s no way of achieving this goal.
Never mind. Your command will c
-r-- 1 root root 72K Jun 16 16:59 status//
> //-rw--- 1 root root 1,2M Jun 16 16:59 syslog//
> //-rw--- 1 root root 41K Jun 16 16:59 Xorg.0.log/
>
> So my question is: Does this file exist at all (possibly using another
> path)?
> Or is there another preferred way of getting info concerning all
> post-installed packages (without their dependencies)?
>
> Thanks a lot for your help in advance.
>
> Many greetings.
> Rosika
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
t all (possibly using another
path)?
Or is there another preferred way of getting info concerning all
post-installed packages (without their dependencies)?
Thanks a lot for your help in advance.
Many greetings.
Rosika
On Sun 05 Apr 2020 at 13:17:37 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 04/05/2020 12:00 PM, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sun 05 Apr 2020 at 10:30:41 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> >
> > > I currently have a configuration of Stretch that meets most of my needs.
> >
> > > I'm setting out to do an
On Du, 05 apr 20, 11:59:17, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> I did a test run. I think I see the pattern of which packages it marks as
> manual.
> E.G. It shows systemd related items as "manual". But for *MY* purposes I
> would class them as "auto". That will not be a problem in practice. I'll
> just do
On Du, 05 apr 20, 11:52:32, The Wanderer wrote:
>
> From what I've seen, it looks as if debian-installer also flags some
> packages as manually installed, during initial install of the Debian
> system. I don't know which ones do and don't get that treatment.
At least the packages installed
On 04/05/2020 01:29 PM, Marco Möller wrote:
Once you have your list of packages in a text file, for each package one
line, you could apply the list like this:
apt install $(< mylist.txt)
Good to know that is known to work.
Consider to first do a simulation run for finding problems in
Once you have your list of packages in a text file, for each package one
line, you could apply the list like this:
apt install $(< mylist.txt)
Consider to first do a simulation run for finding problems in the list:
-s
Consider to use the following flag in order to not draw in a maybe
On 04/05/2020 12:00 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Sun 05 Apr 2020 at 10:30:41 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
I currently have a configuration of Stretch that meets most of my needs.
I'm setting out to do an _extremely_ custom *minimal* install of Buster.
The desired inventory shall list *ONLY*
On Sun 05 Apr 2020 at 10:30:41 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> I currently have a configuration of Stretch that meets most of my needs.
> I'm setting out to do an _extremely_ custom *minimal* install of Buster.
> The desired inventory shall list *ONLY* top level packages.
> [ E.G. if gfortran
On 04/05/2020 10:52 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2020-04-05 at 11:30, Richard Owlett wrote:
I moved from WindowsXP when Squeeze was the current release. In the
first year I did *many* installs from scratch to determine what I
wanted in a final system (made much use of preseeding).
I currently
On 2020-04-05 at 11:30, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I moved from WindowsXP when Squeeze was the current release. In the
> first year I did *many* installs from scratch to determine what I
> wanted in a final system (made much use of preseeding).
>
> I currently have a configuration of Stretch that
I moved from WindowsXP when Squeeze was the current release.
In the first year I did *many* installs from scratch to determine what I
wanted in a final system (made much use of preseeding).
I currently have a configuration of Stretch that meets most of my needs.
As the installation was
Rodolfo Medina wrote on 12/04/16 12:54:
> Jörg-Volker Peetz writes:
>> aptitude -F '%p %I %d' --sort installsize search '~i'
>
>
> What about reverse (descending) installsize order?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rodolfo
>
For that purpose, the unix command "tac" comes handy
aptitude
Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpe...@web.de> writes:
> Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote on 12/04/16 10:40:
>> Greg Wooledge wrote on 12/01/16 20:06:
>>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 06:38:45PM +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> P.S. http://wooledge.org/~greg/ds will
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote on 12/04/16 10:40:
> Greg Wooledge wrote on 12/01/16 20:06:
>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 06:38:45PM +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
>>
>> P.S. http://wooledge.org/~greg/ds will sort the installed packages by
>> size for you. As you can see, ma
Greg Wooledge wrote on 12/01/16 20:06:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 06:38:45PM +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
> P.S. http://wooledge.org/~greg/ds will sort the installed packages by
> size for you. As you can see, many of us have been there, done that.
>
Yes, e.g., aptitude can
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Greg Wooledge <wool...@eeg.ccf.org> wrote:
>
> P.S. http://wooledge.org/~greg/ds will sort the installed packages by
> size for you. As you can see, many of us have been there, done that.
>
I would like to mention couple of things
1) You can
thing you know is useful. When you
> get to one that you think is not useful, or which you don't recognize
> *at all*, dig into it and find out what it does. Then consider removing
> it, but be prepared to put it back if you break something.
>
> This is how you learn.
>
&g
On 12/1/16, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 30 Nov 2016 at 08:47:21 (-0500), Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> so I'm just as confused as Rodolfo
>> and I think for good reasons.
>
> I don't know whether Rodolfo is still confused after the explanation
> I gave. AFAICT once you
On 11/30/16, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> apt-mark showmanual gives you the complement of apt-mark showauto.
>> The second paragraph of apt-mark's description explains what's meant
>> by "auto". So "manual" doesn't mean what you appear to assume it does,
>> that you were
On Thu 01 Dec 2016 at 18:38:45 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Curt writes:
>
> > I think in the OP's case having asked for the whole Gnome kit and
> > caboodle upon installation he's got lots of stuff he might not even be
> > aware of necessarily that doesn't fall into the auto
Speaking of aptitude, it does remove automatically installed package if no other
package depends on it, or recommends it. This behavior can be changed by
configuration entries in /etc/apt/apt.conf, /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/*, etc.
To show any installed packages that aren't "auto"
don't recognize
*at all*, dig into it and find out what it does. Then consider removing
it, but be prepared to put it back if you break something.
This is how you learn.
P.S. http://wooledge.org/~greg/ds will sort the installed packages by
size for you. As you can see, many of us have b
Curt writes:
> I think in the OP's case having asked for the whole Gnome kit and
> caboodle upon installation he's got lots of stuff he might not even be
> aware of necessarily that doesn't fall into the auto category (or the
> high priority required category either), but that he
On 2016-12-01, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 30 Nov 2016 at 08:47:21 (-0500), Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> > apt-mark showmanual gives you the complement of apt-mark showauto.
>> > The second paragraph of apt-mark's description explains what's meant
>> > by "auto". So
On Wed 30 Nov 2016 at 08:47:21 (-0500), Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > apt-mark showmanual gives you the complement of apt-mark showauto.
> > The second paragraph of apt-mark's description explains what's meant
> > by "auto". So "manual" doesn't mean what you appear to assume it does,
> > that you
> apt-mark showmanual gives you the complement of apt-mark showauto.
> The second paragraph of apt-mark's description explains what's meant
> by "auto". So "manual" doesn't mean what you appear to assume it does,
> that you were involved in manually selecting it for installation. It
> just
Here you have the answer to your own question.
Use apt-mark to mark the packages you want to keep and all "required" packages
as "manual"ly installed. Then mark all other packages as "auto".
Then let
apt-get autoremove
do its work.
After that, use e.g. aptitude to remove remaining configuration
On 11/29/16, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 29 Nov 2016 at 23:45:51 (+), Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>>
>> If I run `apt-mark showmanual', a list of packages is ouput that are
>> supposed
>> to have been manually installed on my system but that actually I don't at
>> all
>>
On Tue 29 Nov 2016 at 23:45:51 (+), Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Rodolfo Medina writes:
>
> > When I freshly installed Debian on my present system, I chose Gnome as my
> > Desktop manager, then I switched to Openbox. To free space, now I want to
> > remove all those
Rodolfo Medina writes:
> When I freshly installed Debian on my present system, I chose Gnome as my
> Desktop manager, then I switched to Openbox. To free space, now I want to
> remove all those Gnome packages that I haven't used any more but am not sure
> what of them
rt -u | \
>> comm -23 --nocheck-order /dev/fd/3 -) 3<&0
>>
> This needs a correction, if I'm not mistaken:
>
> aptitude -F "%p" search ~i | sort | \
> (aptitude -F "%p" search ~Aunstable ~Atesting | sort -u | \
> comm -23 --nocheck
/3 -) 3<&0
>
This needs a correction, if I'm not mistaken:
aptitude -F "%p" search ~i | sort | \
(aptitude -F "%p" search ~Aunstable ~Atesting | sort -u | \
comm -23 --nocheck-order /dev/fd/3 -) 3<&0
All installed packages should be checked, not all availab
Maybe, this "one-liner" does what you want?
aptitude -F "%p" search ~Astable| sort | \
(aptitude -F "%p" search ~Aunstable ~Atesting | sort -u | \
comm -23 --nocheck-order /dev/fd/3 -) 3<&0
All three archives have to be present with the names used above in your
sources.list file (that
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 10:16:03PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>> Not sure if you read the entire thread, I ended up writing a script to
>> do this now. So, if you want to see packages that are currently
>> installed
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:58:32AM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 03-11-2016, à 18:40:57 +0900, Mark Fletcher a écrit :
>
> aptitude search ~Ajessie~i
>
> meet your needs?
>
> >>>
> >>>No, it does not. When I ran that command it did not produce any
> >>>output. What is it supposed to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:48:23PM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 03-11-2016, à 14:46:05 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>
> >>>Thanks. That's for your Debian Jessie boxes. Is that the same for your
> >>>Raspbian box?
> >>
> >>cat sources.list
> >>deb
Le 03-11-2016, à 14:46:05 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>Thanks. That's for your Debian Jessie boxes. Is that the same for your
>Raspbian box?
cat sources.list
deb http://mirrordirector.raspbian.org/raspbian/ jessie main contrib
non-free rpi
and
cat sources.list.d/raspi.list deb
On Thu 03 Nov 2016 at 14:46:05 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:29:07PM +0100, steve wrote:
> > Le 03-11-2016, à 13:58:49 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
> >
> > >On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 01:51:54PM +0100, steve wrote:
> > >>Le 03-11-2016, à 12:45:46 +0100,
>Thanks. That's for your Debian Jessie boxes. Is that the same for your
>Raspbian box?
cat sources.list
deb http://mirrordirector.raspbian.org/raspbian/ jessie main contrib
non-free rpi
and
cat sources.list.d/raspi.list deb
http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian/ jessie main ui
Hm. So my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:29:07PM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 03-11-2016, à 13:58:49 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>
> >On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 01:51:54PM +0100, steve wrote:
> >>Le 03-11-2016, à 12:45:46 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
> >>
>
Le 03-11-2016, à 13:58:49 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 01:51:54PM +0100, steve wrote:
Le 03-11-2016, à 12:45:46 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>Just wondering: what's the respective content of the /etc/apt/sources.list
>and children?
deb
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 10:16:03PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> Not sure if you read the entire thread, I ended up writing a script to
> do this now. So, if you want to see packages that are currently
> installed on your system but not part of jessie, you can do the
> following.
Thanks, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 01:51:54PM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 03-11-2016, à 12:45:46 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>
> >Just wondering: what's the respective content of the /etc/apt/sources.list
> >and children?
>
> deb
Le 03-11-2016, à 12:45:46 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
Just wondering: what's the respective content of the /etc/apt/sources.list
and children?
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb-src http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:58:32AM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 03-11-2016, à 18:40:57 +0900, Mark Fletcher a écrit :
>
> aptitude search ~Ajessie~i
>
> meet your needs?
>
> >>>
> >>>No, it does not. When I ran that command it did not
Le 03-11-2016, à 18:40:57 +0900, Mark Fletcher a écrit :
>>aptitude search ~Ajessie~i
>>
>>meet your needs?
>>
>
>No, it does not. When I ran that command it did not produce any
>output. What is it supposed to do?
I'm with Kamaraju on this, zero output. I also tried quoting the search
string
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 08:36:59AM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 02-11-2016, à 22:25:53 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit :
>
> >>does
> >>
> >>aptitude search ~Ajessie~i
> >>
> >>meet your needs?
> >>
> >
> >No, it does not. When I ran that command it did not produce any
> >output. What is it
Le 02-11-2016, à 22:25:53 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit :
does
aptitude search ~Ajessie~i
meet your needs?
No, it does not. When I ran that command it did not produce any
output. What is it supposed to do?
I get this as an output (first few in French, sorry):
i ant -
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 6:45 AM, steve wrote:
> Hi Kamaraju,
>
> Le 23-10-2016, à 20:48:46 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit :
>
>> How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
>> currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
>> testing
ackages.gz
Processed:
http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie/non-free/binary-amd64/Packages.gz
writing: /home/rajulocal/.cache/grep_insalled/jessie.gz
Step 2: Query the cache on the list of installed packages
% dpkg -l | grep '^ii' | awk '{print $2}' | grep_installed.py
--exclude-dists '
Hi Kamaraju,
Le 23-10-2016, à 20:48:46 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit :
How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
testing or sid?
does
aptitude search ~Ajessie~i
meet your needs?
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 08:48:46PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
> currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
> testing or sid?
This is a good question (sorry I don't have the answer here). I recently
p_installed.py --clear-cache
removing /home/rajulocal/.cache/grep_insalled/jessie.gz
removing /home/rajulocal/.cache/grep_insalled/sid.gz
removing /home/rajulocal/.cache/grep_insalled/stretch.gz
removing /home/rajulocal/.cache/grep_insalled
The script can also work with apt-cache search output. For
‘%p' search '~i' | while read x; do aptitude --disable-columns
versions '^'"$x"'$'; done
This will give you a list of all installed packages with the repositories they
are available from.
Here’s a sample
rbthomas@monk:~$ aptitude -F '%p' search '~i' | grep openocd | while read
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:16:56 -0400
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> But now I find that my system has lots of packages from Jessie which
> are no longer present in either Stretch or Sid. I would like get a
> list of all such packages and decide if I want to remove them.
' for all packages that are
installed on your system but not installable. If you pipe the output
through sed like that (checking for just 'available' should suffice),
the result is a list of installed packages which are not available in
the archive, using the current state of sources.list
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Michael Lange wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:36:02 -0400
>
> Hmmm...
> Here I get:
> $ apt-show-versions -b | grep "\"
> python3.4:amd64/jessie
> python3.4-minimal:amd64/jessie
>
> What does apt-cache say about python3.4? Here I
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:36:02 -0400
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> Thanks for the script. But I do not think it does what I want. For
> example, currently there is a python3.4 package installed on my
> system.
>
> % dpkg -l python3.4 | cut -c 1-72
>
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Michael Lange wrote:
>
> Nice. After these suggestions I hastily put together a small python
> script, that might come close to what Raju wants:
>
> #!/usr/bin/python
>
> from commands import getoutput
>
> allpkgs =
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:24:00 -0400
Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> Oooohhh, shiny new toy that I just found because of you. This came via
> "man apt-show-versions":
>
> To upgrade all packages in testing:
>
>apt-get install `apt-show-versions -u -b | grep
On 10/23/16, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
> currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
> testing or sid?
>
> For example, ibkasten2okteta1controllers1abi1 libkasten2okteta1gui1
>
How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
testing or sid?
For example, ibkasten2okteta1controllers1abi1 libkasten2okteta1gui1
are currently part of stable, but not present in either testing or
sid. The
Hi,
... zip ...
> Should I find installed packages like libreoffice - claws-mail - gedit
> etc., in my /usr/share/menu?
... zip ..
> Maybe the system has become accustomed to me doing this manually and
> decided to let me do it?
... zip ...
You might want to read
Using debian stretch 4.2.0-1-amd64
FVWM
Should I find installed packages like libreoffice - claws-mail - gedit
etc., in my /usr/share/menu?
They are missing there and therefore they are also missing in my Debian
menu.
I can put them into the Debian menu manually,
in /etc/X11/fvwm
On 2015-04-27, Patrick Wiseman pwise...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello:
I just updated and upgraded a 'testing' system (so listed in
sources.list) and aptitude shows no installed packages. Here's a
typical aptitude entry:
i A apache2 2.4.10-9 none
and another:
ih perl 5.20.1-5 none
(The 'h
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:19:36AM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
Hello:
I just updated and upgraded a 'testing' system (so listed in
sources.list) and aptitude shows no installed packages. Here's a
typical aptitude entry:
i A apache2 2.4.10-9 none
and another:
ih perl 5.20.1-5 none
Hello:
I just updated and upgraded a 'testing' system (so listed in
sources.list) and aptitude shows no installed packages. Here's a
typical aptitude entry:
i A apache2 2.4.10-9 none
and another:
ih perl 5.20.1-5 none
(The 'h' because I put it on hold when I saw it was among many
potentially
On Du, 02 nov 14, 00:57:45, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Thanks. This is useful and solves my first question.
Oh, missed that one[1]. Aptitude, at least in interactive mode can do
it, because it presents a Security Updates (or something like that)
package group. One can just Shift-U on the
How do I find packages installed on my machine that belong to a specific
Debian release?
In my case, I have the following entries in my sources.list
rajulocal@hogwarts:~$ stuff.pl /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free
deb-src
On Sb, 01 nov 14, 18:12:35, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Now, I want to retire the squeeze mirror. But before I do that I'd like to
find all the packages installed on my machine from this mirror. Then I can
decide whether I want to upgrade or delete or keep then as-is. Is there a
way to find
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think this should do it
aptitude search '?narrow(?installed,?archive(oldstable))'
Thanks. This is useful and solves my first question.
raju
--
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/
On Mi, 26 mar 14, 15:07:58, Chris Bannister wrote:
Hi,
Could be useful to someone:
dpkg-query -Wf '${Installed-Size}\t${Package}\n' | sort -n | less
See also:
popcon-largest-unused(8)
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users
Hi
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 03:07:58PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
Hi,
Could be useful to someone:
dpkg-query -Wf '${Installed-Size}\t${Package}\n' | sort -n | less
Nice. But
dpigs -20
(from the debian-goodies package) is still shorter :-)
--
Karl E. Jorgensen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
2014-03-26 9:26 GMT+01:00 Karl E. Jorgensen k...@jorgensen.org.uk:
Hi
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 03:07:58PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
Hi,
Could be useful to someone:
dpkg-query -Wf '${Installed-Size}\t${Package}\n' | sort -n | less
Nice. But
dpigs -20
dpig -n 20
Hi,
Could be useful to someone:
dpkg-query -Wf '${Installed-Size}\t${Package}\n' | sort -n | less
--
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing. --- Malcolm X
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Thank you Tom, this works as expected.
I was expecting ~A to match far less, but on second thought there will
be enough cases where the broader scope is essential.
All the best,
Peter
On 17.02.2014 22:04, Tom H wrote:
What is the correct filter to:
- list all installed packages coming from
is as follows:
Produce a list of installed packages whose presently installed version
is from the testing archive.
The /etc/sources.list currently holds references to squeeze/updates
(debian-security), main squeeze stable release, squeeze-updates,
squeeze-backports; and to the testing release. Through
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Peter Schott peter.sch...@ivao.de wrote:
What is the correct filter to:
- list all installed packages coming from testing release;
- while *not* listing installed packages from other releases (e.g. stable)
for which an alternative version from testing
It has been asked before, but with different answers, e.g.:
1) dpkg-query --list | awk '/^ii +/ { print $2; }'
2) dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1
3) ... etc ...
Given that the output is the same:
$ diff \
(dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1) \
(dpkg-query --list | awk '/^ii +/ {
Tino Sino writes:
It has been asked before, but with different answers, e.g.:
1) dpkg-query --list | awk '/^ii +/ { print $2; }'
2) dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1
3) ... etc ...
Given that the output is the same:
$ diff \
(dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1) \
?? Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:06:44 +0100
Tino Sino robottinos...@gmail.com :
It has been asked before, but with different answers, e.g.:
1) dpkg-query --list | awk '/^ii +/ { print $2; }'
2) dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1
3) ... etc ...
Given that the output is the same:
$ diff \
On 02/06/2014 08:17 AM, iijima yoshino wrote:
?? Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:06:44 +0100
Tino Sino robottinos...@gmail.com :
It has been asked before, but with different answers, e.g.:
1) dpkg-query --list | awk '/^ii +/ { print $2; }'
2) dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1
3) ... etc ...
Given
) \
(dpkg-query --list | awk '/^ii +/ { print $2; }') \
echo same-output
same-output
I wonder, what's the golden way to do this and why?
Personaly, I use this:
aptitude search ~i\!~M --disable-columns -F %p aptitude-packages.txt
options:
~i : installed packages
\!~M : not automatically
1 - 100 of 410 matches
Mail list logo