: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Listening on Ports:
1050 10.0.1.8CORBA Naming Service
1099 10.0.1.8RMI Naming
1527 10.0.1.8Derby Connector
2001 10.0.1.8OpenEJB ORB Adapter
4201
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: Tomcat
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
ServerHostName in config-substitutions.properties does not control the bind
address for Tomcat Connectors. They are
: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
see summary
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
el: public (Regular issues)
Components: commands
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
I get the following CNFE when running the 'geronimo stop' command:
2010-05-22 16:10:10,319 ERROR [AbstractEncryption] Unable to decrypt
java.lang.Cl
issues)
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
I ran into the following ClassNotFoundException during startup. Not that this
was running with Equinox.
ERROR [GBeanInstanceState] Error while starting; GBean is now in the FAILED
state
(Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
Several times, I've seen server startup fail but the "server" java process
remains active. It should stop.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply t
On May 19, 2010, at 5:12 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On May 19, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 19, 2010, at 4:28 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On May 19, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>>>
>>>
On May 19, 2010, at 4:28 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On May 19, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Good summary Lin.
>>
>> In the OpenJPA community, we've been telling users for awhile now not to
>> use the runtime enhancement, as it has known deficiencies, and should
>> only be used f
On May 19, 2010, at 4:16 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Good summary Lin.
>
> In the OpenJPA community, we've been telling users for awhile now not to
> use the runtime enhancement, as it has known deficiencies, and should
> only be used for quick prototyping and never in production.
>
> If we need
Have we had a conversation with the axis community regarding the split-package
issue?
Minor point: I note the license/notice files in the jar have different line
endings (mix of unix and windows line endings). Would prefer that we avoid
this, but end of the day it's a minor issue...
It looks l
: public (Regular issues)
Components: ActiveMQ
Affects Versions: 2.2.1, 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Assignee: Kevan Miller
It's possible to configure master-slave configurations of ActiveMQ running
within a Geronimo server. However, when a BrokerService is
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.2.1, 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Assignee: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.2.1, 3.0
OpenEJB supports "multicast" and "multipoint" cluster configurations. We don't
have a mecha
: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.2, 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 3.0
config-substitution properties are randomly ordered in the properties files.
It would be preferable to either sort them alphabetically or group them in the
On May 16, 2010, at 10:33 PM, Ben Liang wrote:
> Hi Donald,
>
> I have signed ACL and my jira ID is ben.liang please kindly add me to the
> contributor list.
Hi Ben,
You should have contributor rights, now. Look forward to your contributions!
--kevan
All,
Note the following Travel Assistance information for ApacheCon 2010.
--kevan
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Gav..."
> Date: May 16, 2010 7:25:39 PM EDT
> To:
> Subject: [Travel Assistance] - Applications Open for ApacheCon NA 2010
> Reply-To: priv...@incubator.apache.org
>
> Hi PMC's
Seeing some problems...
Following files do not have source license headers and IMO must:
pom.xml
container/openejb-osgi/src/main/resources/default.openejb.conf
Some could have them, I believe:
container/openejb-activemq4/src/main/resources/login.config
container/openejb-core/src/main/resources/l
Thanks Rick. Looks good. Here's my +1.
Apologies about the xbean-finder-shaded mistake. I was confused by the
relocation pattern in the pom:
org.objectweb.asm
org.apache.xbean.asm
Minor points:
* Copyright date in the NOTICE file has not been updated
* The KEYS file should be deleted
* Can the .properties files be updated with source license headers? Their
content is trivial/nonsensical, but if syntactically possible would be better
to have a header...
Major point:
* Th
On May 11, 2010, at 5:49 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On May 11, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 11, 2010, at 1:48 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> Every time I use jconsole I have to spend a long time trying to figure out
>>>
On May 11, 2010, at 1:48 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> Every time I use jconsole I have to spend a long time trying to figure out
> how to connect to geronimo. Not sure if its in the wiki but maybe if its on
> the dev list I'll be able to find instructions again.
>
> 1. To get the mbeans in reaso
On May 10, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> Source, signature/checksums look good. RAT looks good.
>
> I'm unable to build, however. I get a missing dependency:
>
> Missing:
> --
> 1) com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-xjc:jar:2.2
>
> I'm -1 until thi
On May 10, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> Source, signature/checksums look good. RAT looks good.
>
> I'm unable to build, however. I get a missing dependency:
>
> Missing:
> --
> 1) com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-xjc:jar:2.2
>
> I'm -1 until this
Source, signature/checksums look good. RAT looks good.
I'm unable to build, however. I get a missing dependency:
Missing:
--
1) com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-xjc:jar:2.2
I'm -1 until this is resolved.
--kevan
On May 5, 2010, at 7:31 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> Please vote for the geronimo-jaspi
+1
Source, signature/checksums, build, license/notice all look good.
--kevan
On May 7, 2010, at 8:30 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> Please vote for the geronimo transaction manager component consisting of the
> transaction manager and connector framework 3.0.
>
> The main changes in this release a
On May 8, 2010, at 8:37 AM, Ivan wrote:
> OK, thanks for all of your support, we pass the vote for Tomcat 7.0.0.1. I
> will promote it to central repository later.
> Three binding vote :
> Rick, Ivan, and Joe Bohn.
Ivan,
IMO, calling this vote was premature. No strict guidelines were broken, so
On May 4, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
> +1 (assuming the potential license issue mentioned below is not an issue)
>
> I was able to build and run the new tomcat image.
>
> The license issue pointed out last time is now resolved but there is one
> other potential issue. I noticed a nu
issues)
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
After undeploy of blog sample:
./deploy undeploy
../../samples/org.apache.aries.samples.blog.jpa.eba-0.1-incubating.eba
A subsequent deploy fails:
$ ./deploy deploy
../../samples
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-5284:
---
Description:
running redeploy of the blog sample fails as follows:
$ ./deploy redeploy
: deployment
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
running redeploy of the blog sample fails as follows:
$ ./deploy undeploy
../../samples/org.apache.aries.samples.blog.jpa.eba-0.1-incubating.eba
Using GERONIMO_HOME: /Users/kevan/Demo/geronimo
)
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Installed the Blog sample, ran it successfully. Stopped the server (kill -9 or
reboot your system ;-)
I get the following:
ka...@root> Booting Geronimo Kernel (in Java 1.6.0_17)...
Starting Geronimo Application Server v3.0-SNAPS
On May 2, 2010, at 2:17 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> Anyone else seeing this test failure trace in the tomcat module? I think I
> have up to date tomcat external and tomcat plugin...
I'm seeing the same failure.
--kevan
This is breaking 2.2 builds because of an updated dependency. It's adding a new
dependency on org.bouncycastle bcprov-jdk15. We have our own geronimo-crypto
library (which was created due to patent issues with bouncycastle library. A
new non-patent encumbered bouncycastle jar was created, I thin
Wanted to let the Geronimo community know that Donald Woods is a new member of
the ASF. The ASF membership elected Donald in recognition of his many
contributions to Geronimo, OpenJPA, and Incubator projects.
Congrats to Donald on this well deserved achievement!
--kevan
On Apr 30, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
> IIUC then I think we do need to fix this for the following reasons:
>
> 1) We are releasing these artifacts - even if they are copies of Tomcat
> artifacts. The artifact is being released under the groupID
> "org.apache.geronimo.ext.tomcat" an
FYI. Forwarding the ApacheCon CFP from annou...@apachecon.com
--kevan
On Apr 28, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Sally Khudairi wrote:
> ApacheCon North America 2010
> 1-5 November 2010 -- Westin Peachtree in Atlanta
>
> Technical Tracks: Call For Participation
> All submissions must be received by Friday, 28
On Apr 29, 2010, at 9:05 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> On 4/29/10 8:26 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> http://geronimo.apache.org/ is not correct -- there are problems in the
>> left-hand column. I'm guessing that it has been caused by the recent
>> confluence changes. An
http://geronimo.apache.org/ is not correct -- there are problems in the
left-hand column. I'm guessing that it has been caused by the recent confluence
changes. Anybody able to look at this?
--kevan
Hi Donald,
Looks pretty good. I wasn't able to install on a 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT server,
however. Is it working for you?
2010-04-27 20:54:53,060 ERROR [PluginInstallerGBean] Unable to install plugin
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.repository.MissingDependencyException: Plugin is not
installable on Geronimo
+1
Signatures, checksums, rat, build, license/notice all look good.
--kevan
On Apr 23, 2010, at 4:15 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> I've created a release candidate of a set of plugins that can be
> used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.1.3, 2.1.4, 2.1.5 or
> 2.1.6-SNAPSHOT server from OpenJPA 1.x
On Apr 27, 2010, at 11:19 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 4/27/2010 11:09 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> On Apr 27, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>
>>>&
On Apr 27, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nice stuff Rick. Thi
On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing
>> information properly. Thanks!
>>
>> One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do
Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing
information properly. Thanks!
One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have
svn:eol-style=native (i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't define the
file type in our recommended client configurati
7;ll try to contact e.g. brian fox to see what we can do about them. I
>> think usually what has happened in the past is to promote, then fix, but
>> maybe they can be fixed before promotion.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Apr 25, 2010
On Apr 26, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> We have had a couple of fixes in the 2.2 branch since the Geronimo 2.2 was
> released. Maybe it's time to release Geronimo 2.2.1 to bring all the
> available fixes to Geronimo users.
>
> If everybody agree to release the new 2.2.1 release. I'
Delos,
For scanning mailing list history, it's helpful if you update the Subject with
a [RESULT]
--kevan
On Apr 23, 2010, at 3:54 AM, Delos wrote:
> Besides, we also get +1 from Ashish and Forrest, thanks!
>
> 2010/4/23 Delos
> GEP RC1 passed the voting with following result
> 0: no
> +1: Don
Looks good. Thanks Rick! Here's my +1
--kevan
On Apr 22, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a single
> vote
> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6.
On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Can we ignore the following rat:check failures?
>
> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0 -
> src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/xml.xsd
> src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/XMLSchema.dtd
>
> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7 -
> src/test
On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Here are 3 scripts to help checkout, rat:check and build the
> tags in the vote.
Thanks for the scripts. A few comments:
1) We are voting on source artifacts, not svn. So, I use wget. (e.g. 'wget
--no-check-certificate
https://repository.apa
I'm seeing one blocker issue -- all of the checksums that I have downloaded do
not match the corresponding checksums that I compute. For instance:
$ md5sum yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz ; cat
yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz.md5
md5sum yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz ; cat yoko-1.1-source-release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-5269.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
oops.
> ContainerBase.addChild: start: LifecycleExcept
: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5269
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 2.2, 2.1.5, 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Failures of the following sort provide
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5268
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.2, 2.1.5, 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Errors like the following are difficult to debug/diagnose. We should do
something to make
Signature/checksums look good. I ran RAT and built successfully. Will leave the
testing for others. Here's my +1
--kevan
On Apr 18, 2010, at 10:28 PM, Delos wrote:
> Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse
> Plugin 2.1.5 RC1.
>
> The source code zip is here
On Apr 22, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> I've been working on moving the org.apache.geronimo.bundles components out of
> the server tree into its own top-level project so these bundles can be
> released separately. The working copy can be found here:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repo
On Apr 21, 2010, at 2:17 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 4/21/2010 2:10 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> Rick,
>> I'm having some problems building this source. There are some dependency
>> issues. For example:
>>
>> ejb 3.1 has a dependency on geronimo
Rick,
I'm having some problems building this source. There are some dependency
issues. For example:
ejb 3.1 has a dependency on geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.1. That should be
geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1.
jaxb 2.2 has a dependency on geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.3 not
geronimo-activation_1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-4991:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
> Update AXIS2 stack to 1.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4871.
--
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Not seeing this problem on 2.2 with Java 6. Java 5 doesn&#
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-5244.
--
Resolution: Fixed
No apparent problems.
> Upgrade to AMQ 5.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-5244:
---
Summary: Upgrade to AMQ 5.3.1 (was: Upgrade to AMQ 5.1.3)
> Upgrade to AMQ 5.
On Apr 19, 2010, at 4:27 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> News has been published in homepage: http://geronimo.apache.org/
> Artifacts has been published in: http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.1.5/ ,
> will it sync to mirrors in 24 hours?
I've (again) pulled the artifacts from geronimo/2
On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.0.7
Hi Rick,
This wasn't quite the spec version that I was expecting...
Our last javamail spec release was: geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.6
So, I was expecting something like geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7.0
Was t
All,
Please note the following and take action as appropriate.
--kevan
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Joe Schaefer
> Date: April 10, 2010 1:24:14 PM EDT
> To: commun...@apache.org
> Subject: [NOTICE] compromised jira passwords
> Reply-To: commun...@apache.org
>
> Hello Apache community@ [1],
Thanks for the update, Rick.
Have you made the OpenJPA community aware of this issue?
--kevan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-5243.
--
Resolution: Not A Problem
I must have been looking at the activemq-server test assembly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854915#action_12854915
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5243:
Hmm. It's in a build that I
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Assignee: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.2.1
AMQ 5.3.1 has been released with a number of fixes. We should upgrade
branches/2.2...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue
Level: public (Regular issues)
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 2.2.1, 3.0
On branches/2.2 I'm able to access http://localhost:8080/activemq-console
without authentication. Since I'm able to inspect Destinations, delete
Destinations, e
On Apr 7, 2010, at 6:39 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> In my efforts to see how much ejb stuff works in trunk I've found that we
> need at least a little bit of corba to get anywhere, at least the
> HandleDelegate, so I'm going to be trying to enable the corba stuff as little
> as possible to be ab
+1
I checked signature/checksums, source files, build, testsuite, and simple tests
with a server. All looked good to me. Assuming we pass the TCK, we should be
good to go...
--kevan
On Apr 6, 2010, at 9:46 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have managed to use maven-release-plugin to make
On Apr 5, 2010, at 11:18 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We prepared some samples regarding Jave EE 6 new features, so far including
> these:
Hi Forrest,
Cool. It's not quite clear to me how much work has been done and who has done
the work. I'm now wondering if this is significant enoug
On Apr 5, 2010, at 9:23 AM, Ivan wrote:
> For geronimo-schema-java1.4 and java 5 schemas, I wish somebody could
> double-check the descriptions in the license and notice files in the
> geronimo-schema-javaee_6 before moving them out. I have mentioned it in the
> past, and Donald gave me some s
On Mar 31, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> 2) For our dependencies, will we need real releases, or will we ship
> snapshots based on know revision levels?
Definitely real releases, IMO.
If we have specific instances where we don't think this is possible, we can
discuss alternatives
On Mar 31, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> We'll also be upgrading 2.2.1 to use this level of Tomcat, right?
Absolutely should be.
--kevan
I'm curious to hear the community's thoughts about starting to pull together a
3.0 Milestone release. I think there's been a lot of progress on trunk and that
it would be valuable to start pulling things together for a release.
If anything, just planning for a release starts to identify hat par
: public (Regular issues)
Components: commands
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
The current set of Geronimo commands (geronimo, deploy, start, stop, shutdown,
admin, client) need to be reviewed for functionality. Mostly, they are adopting
)
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
Starting up Karaf seems to consume a fair amount of time as a Geronimo server
is started. Is it needed? I think we should consider slimming down the server
startup. I'm not sure what it's buying
)
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
Starting the geronimo server on trunk is currently very verbose. There are a
lot of BlueprintContainer messages as Karaf is starting. That's followed by the
Karaf banner. Finally, followed by the Geronimo st
+1
I checked source, signature/checksums, and build. All looked good.
--kevan
On Mar 24, 2010, at 10:44 PM, Delos wrote:
>
> This voting is for tomcat-parent-6.0.26. It will be used by Geronimo
> 2.1.5.It's based on tomcat 6.0.26, built with maven. Besides, we also applied
> some patches wh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4957.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2.1
2.1.5
On Mar 24, 2010, at 5:30 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> While I always thought shared lib was a bad idea, at least pre-osgi the
> concept of a classloader that you could just toss things in made sense. I
> don't think it makes any sense in osgi. There is no dynamic-export header so
> whatever
On Mar 24, 2010, at 4:57 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Mar 24, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
>
>> Thanks. So it sounds like it will be pretty much a *requirement* that
>> applications on 3.0 need to be fully OSGi bundles,
>
> Well, the idea is that the geronimo deployment process wil
On Mar 24, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Marco Laponder wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am a newbi at building geronimo so it could be by lack of knowledge,in that
> case forgive me. I am trying to build the 2.2 branch from source. I am at the
> latest revision (927171) and followed the instructions at
> http://cwiki
Thanks Rex. Makes sense.
I guess that's consistent with our treatment of server-security-config
dependencies, but I'm not convinced we're handling them correctly. Pretty
certain that we can build alternate assemblies with the same basic problem...
--kevan
On Mar 24, 2010, at 5:40 AM, rwo...@ap
/browse/GERONIMO-5204
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.1.5, 2.2.1
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2.1
Looks like there's a problem
Sending this to any Geronimo committers having problems committing to svn.
SVN authentication is now using LDAP. See the instructions below, about
changing your LDAP password, if you do not know your LDAP password.
This information was sent to committ...@a.o. If you are an ASF Committer, you
s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12848705#action_12848705
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5198:
Is your SharedLib a dependency of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller resolved GERONIMO-5200.
Resolution: Fixed
Should be fixed. Now using ConcurrentHashMap, instead of HashSet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-5200:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.1.4
Fix Version/s: 2.2.1
2.1.5
> h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-5200:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
> high cpu load, probably result of concurrent access
On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:34 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
> Will Tomcat community plan to apply our fixes to their code base soon? If
> not, because this Friday we will ship release candidate build of G 2.1.5, I
> prefer to remove Spnego support this time.
>
> The related JIRAs that need to revert are:
>
Apologies for the broadcast message...
In thinking about ApacheCon 2010, I began to wonder if there is interest in
creating an "Enterprise Java" track for the conference. I think there is the
potential for a lot of interesting content. Many of our projects are busy
implementing JSR specs for Ja
On Mar 19, 2010, at 12:46 AM, Nandeesh wrote:
>
> I am trying deploy servicemix JBI componet servicemix-web-3.2.3.war file on
> geronimo version "geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1.4" but getting following
> exception" HttpManagedServlet - java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> org/apache/commons/pool/Obje
Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.1.5
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.1.5
I'm seeing a lot of log messages during startup of a G 2.1.5-SNAPSHOT tomcat
java ee server, that I didn't see in 2.1.4. They should be cleaned up...
INFO: Set JAA
+1
Source and build all look good.
--kevan
On Mar 3, 2010, at 4:23 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
> To support the upcoming Geronimo 2.1.5 release,I would like to release
> txmanager-2.1.4. However, we need a full TCK against it.
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/org
On Mar 16, 2010, at 6:05 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> I'm thinking of porting the work to deal with retrying stuff that didnt work
> (GERONIMO-5152) in the tx manager component from trunk back to the 2.1
> branch. However, this changes the interaction between the connection
> management and the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12846023#action_12846023
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5185:
Hmm. Are you sure the original
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-5182:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
> Fix compile errors caused by Jetty 8.0.0.M0 rele
: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
There are multiple updates in the latest Jetty 8.0.0.M0 release which are
breaking the build
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a
801 - 900 of 3111 matches
Mail list logo
