On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:26:39 +0100 Michel BRIAND <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> >> - my first child is to born around 25 of december ;^)
> >
> >felictations! :) what a nice date to be born! :)
> >
>
> Here it is !
>
> It's a girl, born on 17 dec 09:05 (UTC+1), and it's firstname is Romane.
c
>> - my first child is to born around 25 of december ;^)
>
>felictations! :) what a nice date to be born! :)
>
Here it is !
It's a girl, born on 17 dec 09:05 (UTC+1), and it's firstname is Romane.
cu,
Michel
-
SF.Net email
Michel wrote:
> On the 3D topic, I've read in this list that many people want
> to keep away from 3D rendering. I've no problem with that.
>
> But improving the 2D rendering with some tricks using GL is
> the sort of things I'd like to contribute to ;o))).
>
As to the gl and 3D
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:29:44 GMT
>
> Michel BRIAND wrote:
>
>> ...
>> I'm skilled in
>> ...
>> -3D scene graph and rendering with OpenGL
>> ...
>>
>> I like very much the E config scheme that Raster ask me to
>> look into recently...
>
> Raster
Michel BRIAND wrote:
> ...
> I'm skilled in
> ...
> -3D scene graph and rendering with OpenGL
> ...
>
> I like very much the E config scheme that Raster ask me to
> look into recently...
Raster asked you to look into E config.. as opposed to maybe
getting the evas gl engine wor
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:06:53 GMT
>
> Michael BRIAND wrote:
>
>> LOL
>>
>> it's a sort of dangerous journey... being stuck into a words
>> demonstation like this...
>
> Not at all. I know that KainX is just extremely rigorous
>and demands a lot f
Michael BRIAND wrote:
> LOL
>
> it's a sort of dangerous journey... being stuck into a words
> demonstation like this...
Not at all. I know that KainX is just extremely rigorous
and demands a lot from himself -- and others. He showed me that
he did indeed know what he was talkin
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Mon, 26 Nov 2007 06:30:43 GMT
>
> Morten wrote:
>
>> >What does "HTH," mean?
>>
>> "Hope That Helps"
>
> Ahh, thanks. I kept seeing things like "Hitting The Hay",
>"Higher Than High", "Hotter Than Hot", "Humping The Hippo", ... ?
>and was
On Monday, 26 November 2007, at 04:42:59 (+),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What does "HTH," mean?
"Hope That Helps"
http://catb.org/jargon/html/H/HTH.html
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov A
Morten wrote:
> > What does "HTH," mean?
>
> "Hope That Helps"
Ahh, thanks. I kept seeing things like "Hitting The Hay",
"Higher Than High", "Hotter Than Hot", "Humping The Hippo", ... ?
and was having problems visualizing Michael and the ...
(just kidding MJ. :) )
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What does "HTH," mean?
"Hope That Helps"
--
Cheers,
Morten
:wq
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/g
Michael wrote:
> > So, either I misread your intended meaning, or you've
> > misread mine. You decide. :)
>
> You misread mine. "Of course" was used as a conjunction, nothing
> more. I could have said "however" or "but then" or any number of
> others. Had I meant "of course" as a wa
On Sunday, 25 November 2007, at 07:48:43 (+),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, not quite. You did in fact make the point that you
> agreed with Simon that there shouldn't be several toolkits --
> or at least that's what I took you mean. Here's the original
> whole of it:
>
> > > There i
Michael wrote:
> > It does sound a bit hypocritical. I would disagree with both
> > you and Simon on this.
>
> But my only point was that he was being hypocritical, so you can't
> agree with me and then disagree with me. That makes *you*
> hypocritical. :)
Well, not quite. Yo
On Thursday, 22 November 2007, at 04:57:34 (+),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It does sound a bit hypocritical. I would disagree with both you and
> Simon on this.
But my only point was that he was being hypocritical, so you can't
agree with me and then disagree with me. That makes *you*
hypocr
Michael wrote:
> > There is no good reason to have three different toolkits in
> > the same project,
>
> Of course, this is what a lot of other people said about Etk back
> before it got thrown in CVS. So now you sound hypocritical.
It does sound a bit hypocritical. I would dis
On Wednesday, 14 November 2007, at 21:45:55 (+0100),
Simon TRENY wrote:
> There is no good reason to have three different toolkits in the same
> project,
Of course, this is what a lot of other people said about Etk back
before it got thrown in CVS. So now you sound hypocritical.
Michael
--
Mi
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:45:55PM +0100, Simon TRENY wrote:
...
> As I said, imo devs should agree on a common project. Now, if a new
> sub-project doesn't respect the project's definition or if it is
> redundant with an existing project, it should not be a part of our
> common project. That would
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:44:59 GMT,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>
> Simon wrote:
>
> > > I hope that everyone can be just as excited. I know I am.
> > > I smell a new age of... Enlightenment. :) :)
> >
> > I'm really excited about this too! Especially about the new
> >
Simon wrote:
> > I hope that everyone can be just as excited. I know I am.
> > I smell a new age of... Enlightenment. :) :)
>
> I'm really excited about this too! Especially about the new
> communication plan! I actually even think we should do more on
> the communication point. It wou
Le mardi 13 novembre 2007, Simon TRENY a écrit :
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 21:54:45 +0800,
>
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> > First.
> >
> > I need to offer some big apologies. I have been pretty bad at being
> > responsive and attentive to E for a while now. I can give
Hi,
I hope I'm not intruding into this subject, but I just want to share some of my
experience and opinions on this subject.
I'm a bit in the same position as Raster but on the aMSN project, usually
everything goes by me as I'm the leader of the team, and I always try to
avoid getting in discuti
Hisham wrote:
> mailing list / #edevelop and off) share your same opinions.
> So, whats next?
I don't know what's next - we're ALL going to have to
determine that.. Carsten proposed some very good steps in his
initial email.
But I do know what's first: It's to get these
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 21:54:45 +0800,
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> First.
>
> I need to offer some big apologies. I have been pretty bad at being
> responsive and attentive to E for a while now. I can give you a
> million reasons (excuses)
> - but that not fair. I'v
On Nov 13, 2007 3:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The 'problem' here is actually deeper than some of what you
> mention Hisham.
>
> Imagine for a moment that you try to build something like an
> automobile, or an aircraft, or a tv set,... in the same manner t
Hisham wrote:
>
> As I have talked to both, a lot, about this matter, I'm starting to
> develop a feel to the true issue here.
>
> .
The 'problem' here is actually deeper than some of what you
mention Hisham.
Imagine for a moment that you try to build something lik
On Nov 13, 2007 5:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>That last email:
>
> > >
> > > so what you want is me to simply say "yes yes - do whatever you
> > > want"
> > ...
> >
> > No, I want you to put on a big "E" logo outfit and dance around
> > and
That last email:
> >
> > so what you want is me to simply say "yes yes - do whatever you
> > want"
> ...
>
> No, I want you to put on a big "E" logo outfit and dance around
> and the next/first e "rave". But that's just me.
>
> Anyway, let's leave this. Conc
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:18:26 GMT "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
>
> Carsten wrote:
>
> I'll keep this short, since I really don't want to prolong
> this sub-thread between us.
>
> > >
> > > Busy or not, you've never expressed any interest or support
> > > for
Carsten wrote:
I'll keep this short, since I really don't want to prolong
this sub-thread between us.
> >
> > Busy or not, you've never expressed any interest or support
> > for seeing this project become a true community one.
>
> i have done just he opposite - i have encou
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 17:35:29 GMT "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> Carsten wrote:
>
> > First.
> >
> > I need to offer some big apologies. I have been pretty bad at being
> > .
>
> Well, I'll give you my own thoughts on this.
>
> These new "developm
Sorry, this mail was just to raster... sometimes I just forget to
"reply to all", damn...
On Nov 8, 2007 10:44 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 12:29:10 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > yeah, finally announced
(snip)
I'm extremely excited! For a variety of reasons I've been in drift mode
but have really wanted to get back on the horse and help drive things a
bit more.
I love the idea of having better and more structured communication.
Sure, as Jose points out the free form mode has had its benefi
Carsten wrote:
> First.
>
> I need to offer some big apologies. I have been pretty bad at being
> .
Well, I'll give you my own thoughts on this.
These new "developments" in E may well be exciting new
opportunities and whatnot, but for some e-developers at least,
First.
I need to offer some big apologies. I have been pretty bad at being responsive
and attentive to E for a while now. I can give you a million reasons (excuses)
- but that not fair. I've basically been "paying the rent" with Jobs - and they
have not had anything to do with E (first) and then n
35 matches
Mail list logo
