Hi Stuart;
--- Lun 23/4/12, Stuart Swales ha scritto:
...
> en_GB dict? it's been in the source
> tree for ages! See
> http://svn.services.openoffice.org/opengrok/xref/OOO330_m20/dictionaries/en/
>
Hmm.. we removed all the dictionaries from
the tree after the Apache move.
Can you add the lat
--- Gio 22/3/12, Armin Le Grand ha scritto:
> Hi List,
>
> in http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
> BSD (without advertising clause) is part of Category A. I
> found no information in which category BSD *with advertising
> clause* maybe? Does someone know this?
>
I think it is also
hello;
--- Mar 20/3/12, Dave Fisher ha scritto:
...
> Hi,
>
> Just investigating and not acting:
>
> libtextcat/data/new_fingerprints/fpdb.conf
>
> This is based on this http://odur.let.rug.nl/~vannoord/TextCat/
> which is LGPL, not maintained. We are in luck since
> Apache Spamassassin has a
--- On Thu, 11/17/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>
> IMO the tango icons look uglier than the Galaxy icon set,
> but it's just
> a question of taste. And the Galaxy is the only one we can
> be sure that
> has all the required icons. (try the tango icon set and
> you'll see that
> OOo still
Hi Oliver;
--- On Thu, 9/29/11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
...
>
> Thanks for the input.
>
> Adding the URL for the origin of the copyright and license
> text is a good idea. I will add it and use it also to point
> to the origin of ksc5601.h.
> As Pedro researched the files are also found a
--- On Thu, 9/29/11, Rob Weir wrote:
...
>
> OK. So [4] is a permissive license for all files in
> the directory.
> This may seen odd, coming from the FSF, but they encourage
> this is some cases, such as when the code is very small,
> or where the code promotes the use of an open standard
> th
Alejandro;
--- On Wed, 9/28/11, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> Is there a way i can test de OOo CSS
> skin on the apache implementation?
> I had been tweaking to the current theme of the site. Also
> would be doing some custom imaging.
That's very cool, thanks!
Please open a jira issue with infra
--- On Wed, 9/28/11, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
...
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:42 PM,
> Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> > It is unlikely that machine-generated files of any
> kind are copyrightable subject matter.
>
> I'd imagine that Pixar, for instance, would have a problem
> with that
> blanket stat
FWIW;
--- On Wed, 9/28/11, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
...
> If you mean ODMA.h, I don't believe
> there is any dependency on it and you should just get rid of
> it.
>
> If you need to deal with it as third-party code, I can get
> you a version with a BSD-variant license that applies,
> although t
--- On Wed, 9/28/11, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> Well... now that I think about it
> ...
>
> The linux header (which is actually an GNU iconv header),
> can probably be dealt without too. The MIT licensed header
> in XFree86 is not on X.Org anymore so they did something
> ab
he entire Boost library installed for cherry picking.
>
> (This will all change at some point, since Boost is being
> incorporated into ISO C++. It is probably best to wait
> for that to ripple out into the compiler distributions.)
>
> - Dennis
>
> -Original Messag
Well... now that I think about it ...
The linux header (which is actually an GNU iconv header),
can probably be dealt without too. The MIT licensed header
in XFree86 is not on X.Org anymore so they did something
about it.
Is OOo on a opengrok anywhere? It would be good to see where
such headers a
Hi Bern;
From what I read, I don't think we want to get into all that
complexity right now. We have enough work already developing
OpenOffice to start developing something like EIS from
scratch :-(.
Perhaps there something opensource already that we can use to
some of the EIS functionality?
I do
Hi;
First of all, I am very glad seeing all this OOo developers
hired at IBM .. it's great news!!
FWIW, I've seen codebases fork under the same license and
never reunite (FreeBSD, NetBSD, and more forks coming out
of each afterwards) so while I don't say merging back LO
into OOo is impossible, it
Hi Oliver-Rainer;
--- On Wed, 9/28/11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will now join the folks who are working on the clean up
> regarding non-Apache license conform stuff.
>
> Looking at the wiki - http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/wiki/ApacheMigration -
> provides some low-hanging fruits f
FWIW;
I don't like the patches because I can't really examine well
the code, besides this is something the VCS handles acceptably:
commit the original sourcecode and then apply the patches in a
different commit. If we start with up to date versions there
would not be much trouble.
just my $0.02,
Hi;
There was an interesting cross-posting by Malte Timmermann
not long ago:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201109.mbox/ajax/%3c4e6dc5c3.9050...@gmx.com%3E
I am not suggesting it should be done now but perhaps
committing accfixes2 would help the IBM IA2 integration.
--- On Tue, 9/27/11, Rob Weir wrote:
...
>
> Bringing it into SVN is easy. Making it into a
> release is another
> question. To do that requires going through the IP
> Clearance process.
>
Yes, I was obviously referring to the legal requirements.
>
> I'm willing to debate it for long-establ
--- On Tue, 9/27/11, Rob Weir wrote:
...
> > Another point that Rob brought would be if we need a
> SGA
> > to add the Groovy (or other) extension.
> >
> > I would think an SGA is a rather extreme thing to
> require
> > for extensions: we wouldn't require that if we want
> to
> > include stuff l
--- On Tue, 9/27/11, Kay Schenk wrote:
As Rob Weir has put it ...
...
> >
> > So obviously there is limited volunteer bandwidth to
> > migrate the wiki.
> > And I've heard from several people, on and off
> > the list, that much of what is on the wiki is
> > not very useful.
> >
>
> uh, well...
--- On Tue, 9/27/11, Rob Weir wrote:
> > Hello;
> >
> > --- On Tue, 9/27/11, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> > ..
> >>
> >> I.e. there are cases where Apache projects may
> >> want to include Category-B (EPL, CPL, MPL, etc.)
> >> tools within a distribution. This is permitted
> >> in binary form, but n
Hi;
I thought it would be a good time to bring this subject
up again.
--- On Sat, 9/10/11, Mathias Bauer wrote:
...
>
> >> and i completely forgot to mention that i've got a
> linear MQ patch
> >> series applying against OOO340 that contains the
> following:
...
> >>
> >> ause131
> >> ause130
>
Hello;
--- On Tue, 9/27/11, Shane Curcuru wrote:
..
>
> I.e. there are cases where Apache projects may want to
> include Category-B (EPL, CPL, MPL, etc.) tools within a
> distribution. This is permitted in binary form, but
> not source form.
>
Someone correct me if I am wrong, but dmake as we h
--- On Mon, 9/26/11, Rob Weir wrote:
> > --- On Sat, 9/24/11, Rob Weir wrote:
> > ...
> >> If I understand corectly, Apache considers MPL 1.1
> >> to be "weak copyleft" and we have some limited ways
> >> (as a binary of using it in our releases.
> >>
> >
> > Yes we can. I am not sure what a comp
FWIW,
It may be like fitting a square peg in a round hole but there is something
similar coming to Apache:
http://incubator.apache.org/opennlp/index.html
Pedro
Hi;
--- On Mon, 9/26/11, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> So, what IS going on? Anybody?
>
> I think (thought?) Pedro was kind of coordinating the test
> of Confluence with the infra folks but ???
>
Unfortunately not. I asked infra@ and they didn't answer: I
understand they expect us to do it.
I have r
--- On Sun, 9/25/11, Rob Weir wrote:
...
>
> Why exactly do we need to move dmake?
>
> Having copyleft build tools is not necessarily a problem,
> especially if the code is not included in the release.
If you don't include it in the release, how are people
going to build OpenOffice?
> Remembe
Hello;
As you all might've been thinking, one of the things
we really have to move out of the tree is dmake so I
just helped dmake step out by moving it to it's own
repo at Google Code.
http://code.google.com/p/ooo-dmake/
Why Google Code and not apache-extras you might
wonder: Dmake is something
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Rob Weir wrote:
...
>
> HunSpell code is tri-licensed under GPL/LGPL/MPL.
>
That particular licensing scheme is rather weird: LGPL
implies that it can become GPL so you could just say
dual licensed LGPL/MPL, and then, once you make something
pluggable, the GPL basically bec
won't have to start from scratch.
FWIW, today I made my first and final release :-P.
Pedro.
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
...
> On 22/09/2011 Pedro F. Giffuni
> wrote:
> > Hi Gianluca;
> > Is your work related to this version?
> > http://members.xoom.it/
Hello juergen;
I think the file should be named NOTICE (without the .txt extension):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/
Cheers,
Pedro.
Hi Yakov;
--- On Fri, 9/23/11, Yakov Reztsov wrote:
>
> 22 сентября 2011, 20:29 от "Pedro F. Giffuni":
> > HunSpell is copyleft so we cannot include it.
>
> Hi!
> Hunspell is C++ library under GPL/LGPL/MPL
> tri-license. (http://hunspell.sourceforge.n
,
Pedro.
--- On Thu, 9/22/11, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
From: Gianluca Turconi
Subject: Re: ooo-myspell at apache-extras.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, giffu...@tutopia.com
Date: Thursday, September 22, 2011, 10:41 AM
2011/9/22 Pedro F. Giffuni
The case of the italian support is indeed
Hi;
--- On Thu, 9/22/11, Michael Stahl wrote:
...
> > Thanks for this point. NSS is not certified and given
> the
>
> where the heck did you get that idea?
>
> http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cmvp/documents/140-1/140val-all.htm#1280
>
Ugh.. there's something broken in the iPad safari
search opt
f the original
ispell dictionary is more condescending.
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Thu, 9/22/11, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
...
> 2011/9/21 Pedro F. Giffuni
>
>
> > If some of the dictionary files can be relicensed
> under
> > an Apache License I would consider including them
> t
Hmm ...OK.
- You've been hearing I'd like to see a more Apache
(not necessarily Java) stuff.
- OCR capabilities (Google made them free) would
also be nice.
But here is a really crazy idea:
How about using the Math Template Library for calc:
http://osl.iu.edu/research/mtl/mtl2.php3
MTL4 ha
Hello guys;
I have created a new project at apache-extras.org to preserve
MySpell:
http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/ooo-myspell/
There's not much there yet: basically just the original
tarball I got from OpenOffice.org, but I felt it was
important to preserve this code in some way. I
--- On Mon, 9/19/11, Rob Weir wrote:
...
> 2011/9/19 Jürgen Schmidt :
...
> >
> > do you mean to check in the files under ext_source
> into svn and remove it
> > later on when we have cleaned up the code. Or do you
> mean to put it
> > somehwere on apache extras?
> > I would prefer to save these
Ugh ... nevermind, we already carry xmlsec !
I guess we have everything to get rid of nss but we are not using it right?
Apache Santuario is interesting though.
Cheers, Pedro.
Hi again;
I think I found the missing piece in the puzzle ...
OOo already uses OpenSSL, but in order to replace nss we need support for
xmlsecurity. This library provides just that under an MIT license:
http://www.aleksey.com/xmlsec/
Alternatively Apache has it's own stuff:
http://s
Dear Apache OpenOffice.org community;
I have been authorized, and it is my pleasure, to share
with you the good news ...
The Beanshell scripting language will be made available
soon under the Apache License version 2. Later on, this
month, the website will be updated to reflect that:
http:/
--- On Sat, 9/17/11, Rob Weir wrote:
...
>
> OpenSSL is a a validated module when run in "FIPS mode":
>
> http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cmvp/documents/140-1/1401val2009.htm#
>
> But that would still apply to AES, not Blowfish.
>
> Think of it this way: FIPS 140 defines what the
> acce
Pedro.
--- On Mon, 8/29/11, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> Am 29.08.2011 17:41, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni:
>
> > Looking a bit into Matthias' list, there's the saxon
> issue.
> >
> > I looked for a replacement and it would look like the
> > Apache Xalan p
Welcome zhong zhao!
It's nice to see people from China joining.. I guess this
project will be really alive in all timezones! :).
Pedro.
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, 赵忠 wrote:
...
> Hi all:
> I am working for the company, RedFlag 2000(China),and start
> to develope office suit two months ago. Till now,
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
..
> Backing up a little. I don't
> know if the original BSD license is a problem for Apache,
> but it becomes a problem downstream, so it is good to avoid
> having to carry that license and a NOTICE file about it
> around in Apache OOo.
>
Well, h
Ahem ...
Guys;
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
...
> If you list the functions you have in
> mind, and the names of the headers normally used to
> introduce their signatures, I will double-check the VC++
> 2008 and VC++ 2010 libraries to see what the status
> is.
>
We are far f
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Michael Stahl wrote:
...
> >
> > In FreeBSD we were using an independent library in
> some ports to
> > support getopt_long but the regular library now
> supports the GNU
> > extensions. If it's needed it can be taken from
> there.
>
> if it's not in a C standard at least 20
Hello Terry;
Thanks for doing this last stuff for us!
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Terry Ellison wrote:
...
>
> 3. I am still concerned about this whole issue of content
> attribution. IIRC, under the old OCA contributors only
> vested joint rights to Sun/Oracle and free licence on any
> patents. The
Thanks Tor, this is all good to know!
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
...
> > The question is why do we need
> this? I would think
> > all supported platforms have standard conformant
> > C/C++ libs.
>
> Yeah, but the code uses non-standard library functions,
> apparently.
Both of the
I looked around, there isn't much here yet
> so this seemed the best fit.
>
> Are there other lists that would be better or is the
> project not quite that far along yet?
>
> Thanks.
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Pedro F. Giffuni [mailto:giffu...@tutopia.com]
what Jars we don't really need or we wait for
> the next version and hope the problem goes away.
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pedro F. Giffuni [mailto:giffu...@tutopia.com]
>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 12:57 PM
> To: ooo
Interesting ...
We carry an older version of saxon but we don't
carry saxon9-dom.jar
Newer versions of saxon don't carry saxon9-dom either.
Try getting Saxon-B from http://saxon.sourceforge.net/
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Tue, 9/13/11, Herter, Scott wrote:
...
> We have been using OpenOffice in t
Hi Rob;
--- On Mon, 9/12/11, Rob Weir wrote:
..
>
> I'd summarize it as saying that merging code Apache code
> into LibreOffice will be really difficult, especially
> since LibreOffice has made widespread source changes.
>
> Is there anything we can do to help LibreOffice out here?
>
Develop fa
--- On Mon, 9/12/11, Matt Richards wrote:
...
> Quick question (or perhaps a discussion point). With
> all this talk about how things used to be built in a
> data center in Hamburg. I am wondering how the
> release/build process works with Apache projects. Does the
> ASF provide facilities for a
--- On Sun, 9/11/11, Eike Rathke wrote:
> ... But the "ready for QA" and
> "approved by QA"
> states are lost. Or did someone take notes on those?
>
FWIW,
Michael Stahl mentioned these on 21.08.2011
__
readyforQA 3.4:
mh8tz
sw34bf06
mingwport35
tkr41
__
and i
Hi,
Excuse the newcomer ignorance ...
--- On Sat, 9/10/11, Michael Stahl wrote:
...
>
> and i completely forgot to mention that i've got a linear
> MQ patch series applying against OOO340 that contains the
> following:
>
> ooo340fixes
> mingwport35
>
> ause131
> ause130
> writerfilter10
> gnum
Hi Mathias;
--- On Fri, 9/9/11, Mathias Bauer wrote:
...
>
> If we can be sure about the IP situation, we should at
> least add copyright headers to the files, shouldn't we?
> Or put a license file into the repository.
>
The standard Apache policy seems to be to add them to the
NOTICE file:
htt
Hi Eike;
--- On Fri, 9/9/11, Eike Rathke wrote:
> >
> > There was also a bug with Arab glyphs but it was not
> specific
> > to the icu version.
>
> Well, yes, for those exist patches in the icu module's
> directory, that's the easy case. What I was referring
> are changes in other modules becau
--- On Thu, 9/8/11, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
...
> I see you closed INFRA-3917.
>
I like to clean my own mess, yes.
> Keep in mind that there appear to be others willing to
> struggle with Confluence migration (CWiki?).
>
That makes me very happy!
Anyone can reopen the issue: the problem I se
Hi;
--- On Thu, 9/8/11, Mathias Bauer wrote:
>
> Which version of ICU is used in LibreOffice? If they use a
> newer one,
> this probably can tell us about possible "surprises".
>
The FreeBSD port uses 4.8.1 (with local patches). so it
looks like they use "system icu" already.
I have also se
--- On Thu, 9/8/11, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
...
> Pedro, just a quick clarification,
>
> My understanding is that Infra doesn't do content
> conversions of the kind we are talking about.
>
> It is all volunteer work and it is up to the PPMC to
> resource such things. Infrastructure provided t
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Dave Fisher wrote:
...
> >
> > Please hold your horses. Terry is not here, he is in
> > his way to Greece, and we are just exploring the few
> > options that are left.
> >
> > Conversion from MW to confluence may be painful for
> > us but hopefully would be much easier for in
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
..
>
> I also have not kept up with the discussion but reading
> Terry's comments there seem to be a very huge task to
> migrate out of Mediawiki. However then I see that "due
> to lack of Mediawiki support - we are moving to
> Confluence".
> Isnt thi
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Eike Rathke wrote:
OK, I accept your reasoning.
...
>
> > There is also interest in using icu-regex for
> > replacing the copyleft regex and the latest
> > versions seem to have improved a lot.
>
> Of course, but upgrading ICU at this stage for a 3.4
> release IMHO is not an
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Mathias Bauer wrote:
...
>
> The IP of some of our i18n files is unclear and someone
> (you?) pointed out that they have been copied from ICU.
> We should clean that up. But that is not related to the
> ICU external tarball.
>
Hmm.. I thought we could use the same headers
int
Hi;
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, James Steinbraker wrote:
> I am a OOo user and have been wanting
> to ask but have not had the time. Does anyone know when
> version 3.4 may be released for broad user consumption? That
> is my only question. But I do understand that the code needs
> to be correct before r
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Eike Rathke wrote:
>
> I don't see why the current ICU 4.0.1 needed to be updated,
> what "issues with headers" are you referring?
>
> Eike
>
I am not sure exactly when the ICU license changed but
the first ICU versions had a restrictive license.
We have some code from IC
yways.
Pedro.
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Reizinger Zoltán wrote:
> 2011.09.07. 18:10 keltezéssel, Pedro F. Giffuni írta:
> > Great! Thanks to Matt!!
> >
> > One thing I didn't mention and that may be
> > interesting for international users is that
> > the new bugzill
FWIW,
The external sources include a lot of stuff that is
outdated and there may even be security risks involved.
I think I posted a list of outdated stuff before and
on FreeBSD I made sure we carry natively the latest
versions (with some care for compatibility).
Also there's the issue that was
dy else beats me to it.
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
>
> > (This just required a new subject header)
> >
> > Hi;
> >
> > As you know the bugzilla database is working already
> (very
> > well to be honest) but the UI
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Le 06/09/11 05:34, Jean Weber a écrit :
>
> Hi Jean, all,
>
>
> >> I am afraid we must still do this. Perhaps it's
> >> easier to find the people that oppose ..
> >> Can we legally make a call to everyone that
> >> opposes the change to speak up b
(This just required a new subject header)
Hi;
As you know the bugzilla database is working already (very
well to be honest) but the UI interface changes were not
brought in due to the extremely outdated version (3.2.10)
the old site was running.
Apparently it is not a difficult task and it would
Hello;
--- On Tue, 9/6/11, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Pedro has already gone over to check
> with Infrastructure about doing a test.
>
...
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
Yes, here is the post I sent to the infrastructure guys.
I guess they have the MW data and the confluence know-how
but it will probably ta
I made a call for this before but maybe it was lost:
Do we have a bugzilla UI expert here?
I have just learned that indeed the templates for
the older bugzilla are available.
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Tue, 9/6/11, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- On Tue, 9/6/11, Rob Weir
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> So I don't think we can give an answer set in
> stone.
> >
> > Aga
--- On Tue, 9/6/11, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> So I don't think we can give an answer set in stone.
Again, section 5 of the Apache License is clear enough.
Pedro.
(was Re:
> Who Wants to build
> > OpenOffice?)
> > >
> > > As far as point 2, I thought Terry had completed
> the all of the migration
> > > work and all that was left was to create a final
> export and cut over the
> > DNS
> > > entries? In
Hello Eike;
From what I discussed with Rob there is no objection
on his side wrt to integrating the CWS'.
I was waiting for the FreeBSD port to go through before
pushing this further, but in general the idea here is
that lazy consensus applies: no one objected so the
issue is left for those that
Hmm ...
It looks like I missed where the decision to use MediaWiki and deprecate
confluence
was taken. I guess it was arranged with infra as long as MW is up to date and
the extensions are documented.
I am not complaining though: it sounds like lazy consensus in action plus we can
always change
Hi Jean;
Continuing on the topic of my general ignorance ...
--- On Mon, 9/5/11, Jean Weber wrote:
...
>
> It's not clear to me that the user guides produced by
> ODFAuthors are in fact "official documentation" even
> though they are made available as ODT and PDF through
> the OOo wiki.
>
We a
--- On Mon, 9/5/11, Jean Weber wrote:
...
>
> We have established that relicensing the existing OOo user
> guides (which are licensed CC-BY) to the Apache license
> is not practical.
> Does this mean, as Rob has suggested, that these guides
> *cannot* be part of the "official" documentation fo
Ahh.. found it!
The problem is solved in section 5 of the
Apache License:
___
5. Submission of Contributions.
Unless You explicitly state otherwise, any Contribution intentionally submitted
for inclusion in the Work by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and
conditions of this L
--- On Sun, 9/4/11, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
..
> >
> > There are people who won't sign whatever CA, call it
> > philosophical conception, due to history especially
> > not if it's for OOo. If contributions are welcome
> > only under iCLA you probably
--- On Sun, 9/4/11, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
...
>
> As addition:
>
> It's also about code quality and stability.
>
I have never said the contrary.
> Currently we have already a (relative) stable code with the
> released OOo 3.4 Beta. So, it would be IMHO not clever to
> through in all the new co
--- On Sun, 9/4/11, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
...
> > Example 1:
> > - A posting in LO mailinglist from Sept 2010 says:
> > "Creating a 'bug' saw no action in 3 years
> > Here is hoping that posting the patch to this
> > new project will :-)"
> > (There goes one developer that will probably
> > th
--- On Sat, 9/3/11, Raphael Bircher wrote:
...
> Only because a patch it's included in LibO we should not
> include it automaticly here. There are many reasons to not
> include a pach.
>
> - Lisence Problems
> - The Patch is not compatible with other Operating system.
> - The patch is bad program
Hi;
--- On Sat, 9/3/11, Dale Erwin wrote:
...
>
> Spoken like a true northern Italian bigot... with all due
> respect.
>
> Please note I did not call you a northern Italian bigot...
> I said you speak like one. Maybe you are just
> misinformed.
>
I should've thought better before my original
11, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> > Neapolitan is classified as a dialect, not a language,
> for
> > good reasons.
>
> It's in ISO 639-2 so it's a language, and it's distinct
> from Italian. Among the local languages spoken in It
--- On Sat, 9/3/11, Rob Weir wrote:
...
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> > Hi Marcus;
> >
> > The exact flag in bugzilla is 3.4_release_blocker.
> >
> > Not including *ALL* these 24 bugs for the next
> release
> > would
te to OpenOffice that would now see that
their are efforts better appreciated elsewhere.
It's just 24 bugs with patches: we can do them all
before the next release (likely to happen next year).
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Sat, 9/3/11, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 09/03/2011 04:39 AM, schrieb Pedro F. Gi
--- On Sat, 9/3/11, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> > --- On Fri, 9/2/11, Rob Weir
> wrote:
> >
> >>
>> Is it worth contacting the authors of these dictionaries to
>> see if they would consider giving it a license we can use?
>
> Simply +1.
>
No need to vote.. just do it (TM).
I suggest you also start
Hi Dale;
With due respect to Italy's cultural richness (which I so
much admire being italian myself but not only because of that),
Neapolitan is classified as a dialect, not a language, for
good reasons.
Compared to standard italian you use the same character set
and gramatical rules. Furthermore
--- On Fri, 9/2/11, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> Is it worth contacting the authors of these dictionaries to
> see if they would consider giving it a license we can use?
My standard boilerplate reply was:
"Please note that we will not receive contributions under
copyleft licenses anymore. We recommen
Hi;
I went through the early LibreOffice archives
checking which issues from our database they
considered for inclusion.
I have to say it was a GREAT idea to start
from the tip of the Hg development tree as
most fixes already appear closed (applied
or integrated to a CWS).
The following 24 open
While here,
Can Apache projects rely on Mozilla's nss (MPL)?
I looked for alternatives but I only found the java based
Bouncy Castle:
http://www.bouncycastle.org/
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Thu, 9/1/11, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton
> Subject: RE: Request dev help: Info f
I think it works fine, perhaps Ray got confused with the infra JIRA, which, of
course, manages the infrastructure for all projects.
Not that it matters too much, but ... Do we have a bugzilla template expert? It
would be good if we could make it look like the previous one. Perhaps we
can even get
+1 to (y).
It is good to take advantage that some people here know well
the branches that have to be merged.
It is faster and more practical to clean IP to the merged
codebase than to do several audits.
Also it would be really nice to just finish migrating the
Oracle code that has to be migrated
--- On Tue, 8/30/11, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
...
>> (I don't know who wrote this ... )
>> I'd like to see commit log/messages containing the
>> number of fixed issue referenced and no commit
>> messages without that number.
>
> So people would not be allowed to improve things without
> first filin
--- On Tue, 8/30/11, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
...
> >
> > This is an important question. If we need another
> > preprocessor there are options(1), but we need to now
> > why.
>
> At least for idlc, I think the best solution would be to
> get rid of a C preprocessor completely. Even if
> de-fa
rated lexer."
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Mon, 8/29/11, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
...
>
> This is an important question. If we need another
> preprocessor there are options(1), but we need to now
> why.
>
> cheers,
>
> Pedro.
>
> (1) http://mcpp.sourceforge.net/
>
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
