FWIW, it is perfectly possible to package the thing separately as
Glyph seem to suggest, even if the feature is enabled through an
option. For example, Debian does it:
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/python-sqlalchemy-ext
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 19:56, Kent Bower k...@retailarchitects.com
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 21:08, Bo Shi bs1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hrm, some different errors pop up. I'll move the dialog to the ticket
in question.
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/1757
Should be fixed now (hopefully). Could you test once more?
Thanks,
--
Gaëtan de Menten
--
You
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 19:32, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
Bo Shi wrote:
pep 249 specifies list of tuples for fetchmany() and fetchall()
Hrm, pep-249 seems to only specify sequence and sequence of
sequences for the fetch*() functions, specifying list of tuples only
as one
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 17:13, drakkan drakkan1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 Mar, 14:31, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Le dimanche 21 mars 2010 à 02:10 -0700, drakkan a écrit :
a really interesting feature in sa 0.6 are the c extensions, however I
think they should be implemented
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 08:48, Chris chris.g@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
Have just upgraded to this version and am having the following issue.
I use a the execute method on a ScopedSession to run generic SQL
Statements in a TextClause, in the resulting BufferedRowResultProxy
object their
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:04, Gaetan de Menten gdemen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 08:48, Chris chris.g@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
Have just upgraded to this version and am having the following issue.
I use a the execute method on a ScopedSession to run generic SQL
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 17:25, Andrew ajpere...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have a table of tasks which contain references to multiple
children and parents (tasks can have multiple children and multiple
parents in this example). These are defined as ManyToMany and so I get
an extra table
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:16, 诚子 zhicheng1...@gmail.com wrote:
detial please see
http://my.unix-center.net/~WeiZhicheng/2010/01/13/sqlalchemy-0-6-unicodedecodeerror-bug-patch/
Well, if I understand correctly, you would like a workaround for a bad
truncate algorithm in mysql (which apparently
I am very pleased to announce that version 0.7.1 of Elixir
(http://elixir.ematia.de) is now
available. As always, feedback is very welcome, preferably on Elixir
mailing list.
This release packs a few interesting new features (abstract classes
and a new collection
type providing explicit relative
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 06:57, BruceC bruce.co...@hp.com wrote:
I'm trying to implement a character counter on all textarea fields in
my Elixir-SQLA-Pylons app, need to find a way to determine the
maximum number of characters a given column can hold, so I can supply
the character counter
Hi Mike,
I see in r6413, that you use an ordered dictionary instead of a
standard one for properties, in an attempt to fix some jython
ordering annoyingness. Is this really necessary to be compliant with
Jython? Would you care to explain? I'm quite puzzled as to how that
change could have any
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 16:04, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
I see in r6413, that you use an ordered dictionary instead of a
standard one for properties, in an attempt to fix some jython
ordering annoyingness. Is this really necessary to be compliant with
Jython? Would you
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 08:34, robert rottermann rob...@redcor.ch wrote:
I am using a one to many relation, and would like the result to be ordered by
a
field of the child table. however no order by statement is executed when I
access the related property of the parent object.
this is my
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 16:49, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
We have a situation where we have an existing ScopedSession, but want
to change its scopefunc. This sounds like a strange requirement, it
is because we use elixir - the issue is discusses here:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 17:09, Gaetan de Menten gdemen...@gmail.com wrote:
Btw: Iwan, did you try:
factory = elixir.session.session_factory
elixir.session.registry = sqlalchemy.util.ScopedRegistry(maker,
scope_func=your_scope_func)
Of course, that should read :
factory
I am very pleased to announce that version 0.7.0 of Elixir
(http://elixir.ematia.de) is now available. As always, feedback is
very welcome, preferably on Elixir mailing list.
This release incorporates many small improvements and bug fixes across
the board. Please look at
Hi all,
I've been trying to work around the Session.mapper deprecation warning
in Elixir by providing the same functionality within Elixir. The
question is whether _ScopedExt is considered deprecated too ? I guess
it is but want to make sure to not duplicate code needlessly...
--
Gaëtan de
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 16:57, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
Gaetan de Menten wrote:
I've been trying to work around the Session.mapper deprecation warning
in Elixir by providing the same functionality within Elixir. The
question is whether _ScopedExt is considered
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 08:16, kportertxkporte...@gmail.com wrote:
O on a side note would you recommend elixir over declarative_base?
The biggest difference between the two is that Elixir can generate
some columns and tables for you (using common patterns). Michael
Bayer probably won't
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 08:13, kportertxkporte...@gmail.com wrote:
UGGG! I have been fighting with this for a while. I never thought to
just use an actual file for my db instead of using memory. I was
using memory because I was only wanting to test things and didn't want
to keep the data.
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 16:50, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
On May 30, 2009, at 1:56 AM, ericthompso...@gmail.com wrote:
Upon reaching the instantiation of Foo, my code blows up with the
error message in the subject. Now I realize this is often caused by
threading issues
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 03:14, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
it says to me:
Congratulations!
[Valid RSS] This is a valid RSS feed.
im not able to reproduce any issue in the straight FF reader.
Seems like somebody else fixed it, because it works today.
--
Gaëtan de
It seems like there is some bad character in one of the ticket details
as it's been a few days since I could access the Trac feed. My feed
reader (liferea) complains of:
XML Parsing Error: reference to invalid character number
Location: file:///
Line Number 20, Column 14:pre
Hi all,
For those who might be interested, I wrote an article for Python
Magazine titled Creating a collection manager with Elixir. It has
just been published in the January issue
(http://www.pythonmagazine.com/c/issue/view/90). Within the article, I
detail the creation of a simple collection
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 17:06, Eoghan Murray eoghanomur...@gmail.com wrote:
The following example uses an elixir class:
class MyE(Entity):
id = Field(Integer, primary_key=True)
f_1 = ManyToOne('OtherE')
f_2 = ManyToOne('OtherE')
date = Field(Date)
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:31, Kless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks! Anyway I've seen that it's better add extensions in Elixir,
into a declarative layer, just as has been made in DataMapper.
As I just said on the Elixir mailing list: not really. The ability to
add new types is an SQLAlchemy
Here are the suggestions that come to mind:
- You should either get rid of, or (preferably) expand/replace the
current top-level table of contents. As it is currently, there is
only one useful link in there (API reference) and the table of
contents block waste way too much space for just one
Hello all,
I've been playing a bit with polymorphic concrete inheritance, and
noticed that when you have several levels of polymorphic loading (ie
my child class is also a parent class which I want to load
polymorphically), the query for the top-level class includes the child
polymorphic join
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 15:03, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
um yeah, actually this behavior is affecting all multi-level usage of
polymorphic_union. So, while polymorphic_union is quite obviously
(since nobody has noticed this pretty glaring issue) on the decline in
the 0.5
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 16:04, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this ones big, i can handle it. the attached patch makes your case
work, but the problem represented here still makes itself apparent in
other ways and I havent strength tested this patch. you might want
to see if this
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Itamar Ravid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the answer, Mike. I was used to Oracle's behavior while writing
raw SQL, in which the case of unquoted column identifiers doesn't matter.
This behavior seems reasonable enough, although the inconsistency between
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Joril [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone!
I'm new to SQLAlchemy and I'm using version 0.5rc1..
I need every entity class to have a few common fields, so I tried
writing an abstract base class, declarative-style, that every other
entity class would
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the things I really liked about sqlobject was its versioning
plug-in. ( http://www.sqlobject.org/Versioning.html )
Is there anything similar for sqlalchemy? A google search turned up
versioned (
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Randy Syring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so I was going to try and implement a solution using the method
discussed here, but ran into a problem b/c I am using Elixir objects
and not declaring the tables directly. Can I still use this method?
How do I get
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Jim Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 16:16 -0400, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Aug 19, 2008, at 4:07 PM, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
Simpler than Elixir? How so? If you are speaking about the internal
guts, then you are right declarative
I am very pleased to announce that version 0.6.1 of Elixir
(http://elixir.ematia.de) is now available. As always, feedback is
very welcome, preferably on Elixir mailing list.
This is a minor release featuring some bug fixes (one of them to
handle a late rename in SQLAlchemy's 0.5 beta cycle), a
I am very pleased to announce that version 0.6.0 of Elixir
(http://elixir.ematia.de) is now
available. As always, feedback is very welcome, preferably on Elixir
mailing list.
Please look at: http://elixir.ematia.de/trac/wiki/Migrate05to06 for
detailed upgrade notes.
Here are the highlights for
Hi list,
Could anybody tell me what's wrong with the following code? It's only
the code in the poly_assoc example directory (the generic version)
where I'm trying to set the polymorphic part of the relationship. It
gets me the traceback below and I don't really understand why:
Traceback (most
related to
the pattern used and not even looking further...
ahh yes i had this same a week ago but i forgot.
so is u2=session.merge(u2) a cure?
i used it on some similar (test) case
a2 = sess.merge(a2) is a cure indeed.
On Jul 3, 2008, at 9:31 AM, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
Hi list,
Could
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:44 PM, MuTPu4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have table wordforms and WordformMapping associated with it. Bi-
directional self-relation is expressed by using association table with
attributes named infinitives and forms. I am using Elixir for
mapping definition so I
Hi list,
Is there really no easier/nicer way to get a count of items alongside
object results than the one described at:
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/05/ormtutorial.html#datamapping_joins_subqueries
?
from sqlalchemy.sql import func
stmt = session.query(Address.user_id,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:58 PM, bollwyvl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running into similar problems, adding to the complexity the
threadpool module.
Here's a post that might help:
http://blog.uxpython.com/blog/web/view/116
I am still running into problems, however, based on parent/child
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Jim R. Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
SQLAlchemy is a great project and a growing niche. As it becomes even
more popular, there will be increasing demand for experts in the
field.
I am compiling a contact list of SQLAlchemy experts who may be
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Michael Bayer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pjoin = polymorphic_union(...)
pjoin2 = polymorphic_union(...)
employee_mapper = mapper(Employee, pjoin, polymorphic_on=pjoin.c.type)
manager_mapper = mapper(Manager, managers_table,
inherits=employee_mapper,
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Gaetan de Menten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Michael Bayer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In any case the unit tests which you were working from (im guessing
test/orm/inheritance/concrete.py) should be patched to include
Hi there,
I've been playing with concrete inheritance a bit these days (trying
to implement it into Elixir). I've run into several problems, which
might be known limitations, but I'd like to know for sure or be shown
what I've done wrong...
The two problems I get involve a chain of classes
I am very pleased to announce that version 0.5.2 of Elixir
(http://elixir.ematia.de) is now
available. As always, feedback is very welcome, preferably on Elixir
mailing list.
This is a minor bug fixes release (mostly restoring python 2.3 compatibility).
The full list of changes can be seen at:
Hello all,
I'm puzzled as I cannot seem to do a pretty simple query: I have a
many to many relationship (say from Vendor to Item) and want to get a
list of all vendors which have no item.
The obvious:
Vendor.query.filter(Vendor.items == []).all()
does not work (it produce a query without any
I am very pleased to announce that version 0.5.1 of Elixir
(http://elixir.ematia.de) is now available. As always, feedback is
very welcome, preferably on Elixir mailing list.
This is mostly a bug fixes release (especially for people using
inheritance), but we have also a few minor new features,
On Jan 23, 2008 10:24 PM, Monty Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may or may not be elixir specific...
If I have an auto-generated mapping table for a many-to-many
relationship, is there a sensible way to add another column to it that's
also has a foreign key relationship to a third
On Jan 25, 2008 9:18 PM, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008, at 2:02 PM, Kumar McMillan wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 11:58 AM, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The Session.mapper function is not worth it, in my opinion, it exists
due to the sheer popularity of
On Dec 20, 2007 8:50 AM, iain duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry if this seems a stupid question, but I thought that Mike had said
that in sa0.4, if you used session_context that this
User.query.get_by(name='john')
was the replacement for the old assign mapper convenience call.
But I'm
Since this is not specific to Elixir and I don't know what could be
the problem, I'm forwarding this to the SQLAlchemy list. You can watch
that list for the answer (which will hopefully be given) or wait until
I forward that answer to the Elixir list.
-- Forwarded message --
I am very pleased to announce that version 0.5.0 of Elixir
(http://elixir.ematia.de)
is now available. As always, feedback is very welcome, preferably on Elixir
mailing list.
This is mostly a bug fixes release, but we have also had some pretty
important changes to the default values for options.
Anybody knows about this?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mitch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Dec 5, 2007 1:06 AM
Subject: [elixir] sqlite3.OperationalError: Could not decode to UTF-8 column
To: SQLElixir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apologies in advance if this should be sent to the SQLAlchemy
Hi people,
I have some classes with standard python properties which target
another python object and also uses several columns in the database. I
also got a global factory function to create an instance of that
target object out of the value of the columns (the class of that
target object can
and filter_by.
you'll have to have whatever your property returns support
__eq__)
Of course.
On Nov 20, 4:37 am, Gaetan de Menten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi people,
I have some classes with standard python properties which target
another python object and also uses several columns
On Nov 20, 2007 11:51 AM, svilen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 11:37:29 Gaetan de Menten wrote:
Hi people,
I have some classes with standard python properties which target
another python object and also uses several columns in the
database. I also got a global
On Nov 20, 2007 5:23 PM, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 20, 2007, at 4:37 AM, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
I have some classes with standard python properties which target
another python object and also uses several columns in the database. I
also got a global factory function
On 10/30/07, Paul Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike,
use mapper.get_property(name) and mapper.iterate_properties (). I've
considered removing properties as a public accessor since it serves
no useful purpose.
This doesn't work for me - the following code outputs:
I couldn't agree more. I mean: shouldn't the autoload part be
integrated into SQLAlchemy reflection capability if it can do more
than SQLAlchemy 0.4 currently support (or simply removed if it doesn't
do more)?
And I fact, I think the formatting part could also be integrated into
SQLALchemy
On 9/20/07, Christine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any elixir fans? Any idea on when it will finally be made an
extension? Let me know.
Not sure. I'd like to answer: When it's ready. But ven when it'll be
ready, this might not happen. There would be some positive points to
that, but also some
On 9/5/07, Paul Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
data. I did some benchmarks a while back to see how everything
stacked up as I was wondering if I was doing everything the hard way
(in C++) instead of using SqlAlchemy, etc. TurboEntity is the same as
Great work Eric.
I am quite
On 9/4/07, Acm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying out Elixir 0.3.0 over SQLAlchemy 0.3.10 in a Python 2.5
environment.
Are there any known performance issues with Elixir for CRUD (Create
Select Update Delete) commands?
Not that I know of. There shouldn't be any overhead (over raw
You might be interested by: http://techspot.zzzeek.org/?p=13
(also in the examples directory of SQLAlchemy)
On 8/24/07, praddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
##
from sqlalchemy import *
meta = BoundMetaData('sqlite://', echo=False)
#
On 8/1/07, Alexandre CONRAD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm realizing that I've been using .list() to query objects. But all the
examples in the docs talk about .all().
What's the difference ? Should I switch to .all() rather than .list() ?
Will list be deprecated in 0.4 ?
Exactly. list() is
On 7/28/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
those are fine with me. if someone could add a ticket and/or
implement that would be helpful.
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/696
--
Gaëtan de Menten
http://openhex.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
On 7/27/07, svilen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 27 July 2007 02:45:12 jason kirtland wrote:
- Catalog:
what is a sqlalchemy's metadata?
jason a catalog of tables available in the database.
to me it holds everything about the subset of database structure,
used in the app.
as i have
On 7/27/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 27, 2007, at 4:03 PM, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
so do you just want explicit_columns=True so that no auto-grabbing
of columns occurs ?
I don't know exactly what I want (or maybe it's just I don't care how
it's done). It's just
[in response to a batch-insert-is-slow complaint on the Elixir list]
On 7/19/07, AndCycle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think db define is the major problem,
it could be sqlalchemy's problem,
because currently it haven't implement real transaction command in
most db implementation,
all
On 6/13/07, Roger Demetrescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 6/13/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 13, 2007, at 8:48 AM, Roger Demetrescu wrote:
But the use of this function is to ugly to my taste (I know, the
give_me_pk_values_in_correct_order is too big
On 6/12/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we have, in fact, made a tip of the hat to SAT analogy questions
(selecting everything is to all() as selecting just the first row is
to: a. scalar() b. first() c. list()[0]).
I've already said it earlier but since you didn't comment on
Hi,
Anybody knows how I could emulate the behavior of Query.get (ie get
the result from the session if possible instead of always fetching
from the db) if I have the values for the different columns of the
primary as keyword arguments (ie not in the order of the columns of
the initial table)? I
On 6/2/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 2, 2007, at 6:02 AM, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
Hmmm, after some more thoughts there is one little aspect of that
which bothers me: once you joined to something, you can't add
filtering criteria on the initial table/class
On 6/3/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- the methods select(), selectfirst(), selectone(), select_by(),
selectfirst_by(), selectone_by() and get_by() would be deprecated.
this means they will remain present on the Query object but the
documentation would be reorganized to talk
IMHO, this solves my use case nicely. It's slightly longer than what I
proposed but doesn't reach my internal this_is_too_long_to_type
threshold and it's more explicit...
So for me it's a +1 for that solution (along with documenting the
joinpoint behavior ;-)).
On 6/2/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL
On 6/2/07, Gaetan de Menten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO, this solves my use case nicely. It's slightly longer than what I
proposed but doesn't reach my internal this_is_too_long_to_type
threshold and it's more explicit...
So for me it's a +1 for that solution (along with documenting
For what it's worth I personally vote to get rid of all those query
methods (except query() itself, of course).
On 6/1/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as it turns out, assign_mapper's monkeypatched methods (and they are
all monkeypatched, not sure why you singled out query()) dont
On 6/1/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 1, 11:37 am, Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sooner or later. Am I right that we are just talking of
john = session.query(User).get_by(name=john)
versus
john = User.get_by(name=john)
well assign_mapper
And btw, in case I didn't understand what you wanted and you really
wanted to map one class to several tables, you'll find information
about that there:
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/adv_datamapping.html#advdatamapping_joins
On 5/7/07, Gaetan de Menten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/7/07
Just use
print your_statement_variable
Or, if you need it in a variable: str(your_statement_variable) should
do the trick.
On 4/30/07, vinjvinj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to have sqlalchemy return the sql that it is going to
execute without actually executing it? I'm using
On 4/26/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 26, 2007, at 4:40 AM, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
- you have an aggregate function there. wheres the GROUP
BY ? not
just of the main table's columns but any other columns named for
eager loads.
It's unneeded in my
.
On 4/24/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 24, 2007, at 4:44 AM, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
the next way is to do it almost the same as Jonathan's blog says to
do it, except youd map the relation to some intermediary class like
Score, and then use AssociationProxy to apply
Here is an experimental patch to add generative aggregate methods on
query objects.
My use case is that I have a class which is often queried with a sum
query, from different places. But those different places usually add a
filter on top of that basic query. And since I don't like repeating
On 4/24/07, Gaetan de Menten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/23/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 23, 2007, at 3:49 PM, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
Hello there,
In a mapped object, is there any way to map a scalar attribute to an
arbitrary selectable/subquery
Hello there,
In a mapped object, is there any way to map a scalar attribute to an
arbitrary selectable/subquery?
Jonathan Ellis demonstrated how to do that for relations on this page:
http://spyced.blogspot.com/2007/01/why-sqlalchemy-impresses-me.html
I'd like to do that for scalars.
I've
On 4/19/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 9:39 AM, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
By the way, lately I've been wishing SQLAlchemy would add a column
(and possibly its table) automatically to the select clause if I do an
order by a column which
On 4/17/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 10, 2007, at 10:22 AM, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
By the way, should I create a ticket for this?
ive created ticket #541 for this,
I had already created ticket #531 for this. Sorry for not mentioning
it here (I thought you'd see
On 4/10/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hm, why is from_attr a classmethod ?
Because that way, you don't have to specify the related class at all,
and you can specify the parameters as args not kwargs. See my first
initial remark:
* I've implemented Query.from_attr, instead of
it on such relations, but since it works as expected, I see
no reason to artificially constrain the thing to to_many
relationships.
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 11:50:53 Gaetan de Menten wrote:
On 4/10/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hm, why is from_attr a classmethod ?
Because
On 3/31/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 31, 2007, at 1:17 PM, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
That's approximately what I did in my patch with the new params
keyword argument, except I only implemented the set operation, not
the add operation on the params. Anyway, what can
need a plain SA example, just ask.
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 17:22:45 Gaetan de Menten wrote:
On 3/31/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 31, 2007, at 1:17 PM, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
That's approximately what I did in my patch with the new
params keyword argument
On 4/6/07, George Sakkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using SA (with Elixir on top) and I have a parent Entity Ranker
that has many children Results; that is, for a Ranker instance rk,
rk.results gives its children and for a Result rs, rs.ranker gives its
parent. When I add new children by
On 3/26/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(and whether that be a .query() or Query() or SelectResults not big
difference imo.)
i vote Query().
I tried to implement it but I couldn't do it the way I wanted to. The
problem is: how do I construct a clause from a clause with bind
, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
Hi list,
A while ago, someone came up with a problem on the Elixir list. The
problem is that in elixir we force users to define relationships on
both sides of the relationship (ie, there is no concept of backref).
And I (mistakenly) thought that having two mappers
On 3/23/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, this is actually something people have asked for a lot. in the
beginning, recently, etc. also for different reasons...i.e.
convenience, or performance, etc. So, first off let me start by
illustrating how this use case is done right
And by the way, if you agree with that direction of things, I'd
happily work on a patch for the query-on-relation thing.
On 3/26/07, Gaetan de Menten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/23/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, this is actually something people have asked for a lot
On 3/26/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think using entry points to load in external database dialects is a
great idea.
though the current six core dialects i think i still want to load via
__import__ though since im a big fan of running SA straight out of
the source directory
Hi list,
The recent work that Michael has done about bringing SelectResults
functionality to Query made me think: what if that allowed me to do
what I've always wanted to have ever since I started using ORMs? The
thing I've wanted to do is to have one-to-many relations that you can
filter when
On 3/20/07, Mike Kent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a many-to-many relationship between two entities, call them A
and B. This is easy enough to model in sqlalchemy using Elixir.
However, to complicate things, I need an integer column somewhere
called 'priority'. In the relationship
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
