ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
I am getting trouble in ISDN bri link. I have a Central site Router 3640 with 12.1.8 IP/IPX plus IOS. the route has 4 port BRI module. The remote site is having 2503, all u know that it has 1 port BRI. remote site is running 11.2.1 version of IOS. The call is placed using simple DDR commands as: Cisco 3640 Router = Int bri 2/0 ip add 130.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 encap ppp dialer idle-timeout 300 dialer fast-idle 300 dialer string dialer-group 1 Remote site (2503): === Int bri 0 ip add 130.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 encap ppp dialer idle-timeout 300 dialer fast-idle 300 In this scenario, a/c to customer need, the central site is placing call.When the call has placed, and we see the debug output, it shows all the debug of ppp negotiations and ISDN events as correct, with the install route at the end. When i run 'show isdn status' it shows me all layers up with one active layer 3 call also. Also 'show isdn active' gives me successful call to remote site. So nothing seems to be wrong with config. THE problem is that after connectivity when i try to ping from central site the remote site ip address, it times out. I took the 'show ip route', and it gives me only connected routes but dont show me the remote LAN network address of each site which it should give as i m running EIGRP at both sites. The primary link is working correctly as i have an SCPC 128K link between the two sites as well and showing correct routes. The switch type in pakistan normally we use is basic-net3 (SIEMENS switch). Can anyone plzz help me, where is the issue?? i have tried everything, dialer profiles and all. but nothing seems to be working, i cant ping the other side thru BRI. Shoaib CCNP,MCSE __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2712&t=2712 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM interface troubleshooting question. [7:2249]
It is not really related to the vpi and vci number It is a PVC on
an AIP card subinterface. The remote end is a . Juniper...
I followed the trouble shooting guide for ATM interface and discovered
it should be related to traffic policying thing... typically
associated with MBS value.
At the Juniper, the MBS (max burst size) value is range from 1 - 255,
and on the manual there is no way to know (or maybe I don't know how)
the MBS so that it is conformed with the telco traffic policying
requirement. On the Juniper, I just set it as 255 (max value)
At the cisco side, I can accurately calculate the MBS value for the
PVC and I observed no crc or frame error.
A service call to telco is made and they said the ATM circuit is
okay So I predicted that it may be the policying thing at Juniper
that make the corrupted thing. Well, can't blame it, it may be due to
a wrong parameter.
Well, I will keep all of you update on this issue...
On 30 Apr 2001 18:46:59 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Liang Mark
J Civ AFRL/PROI") wrote:
>What is the vpi and vci number for the that vc? 0,5 or 0,16 ?If would be
>helpful if you could post the config file.
>
>Mark,
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Katson Yeung) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 6:54 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: ATM interface troubleshooting question. [7:2249]
>
>
>Dear all,
>
>My old 7507 is having a minor problem it is 12.0.16GD, RSP2 with
>64M ram and the ATM card is an AIP. I have only one VC associate with
>this ATM port.
>
>I found quite a number of input errors (CRC and Frames)... how can I
>know the source of that problem?? Is it the cell level, or the frame
>level problem?
>
>
>See below show interface output:
>
>
>ATM0/0 is up, line protocol is up
> Hardware is cxBus ATM
> MTU 4470 bytes, sub MTU 4470, BW 155520 Kbit, DLY 80 usec, rely
>255/255, load 8/255
> Encapsulation ATM, loopback not set, keepalive not supported
> Encapsulation(s): AAL5, PVC mode
> 256 TX buffers, 256 RX buffers,
> 2048 maximum active VCs, 1024 VCs per VP, 1 current VCCs
> VC idle disconnect time: 300 seconds
> Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never
> Last clearing of "show interface" counters 3d10h
> Queueing strategy: fifo
> Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 1/75, 40 drops
> 5 minute input rate 34782000 bits/sec, 4564 packets/sec
> 5 minute output rate 5307000 bits/sec, 3372 packets/sec
> 1174284787 packets input, 1013959162 bytes, 0 no buffer
> Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 11 throttles
> 13076769 input errors, 13054514 CRC, 22255 frame, 0 overrun, 0
>ignored, 0 abort
> 893230791 packets output, 346650156 bytes, 0 underruns
> 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
> 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2713&t=2249
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pix 6.0 debut? Anyone know when? Thanks [7:1780]
Hi The PIX 6.0 version is suppose to be released on May 11th. Enjoy -Original Message- From: Dropped Packet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 11:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Pix 6.0 debut? Anyone know when? Thanks [7:1780] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2714&t=1780 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco IOS Question [7:2545]
On Sep 20, 2:21pm, "Jason Roysdon" wrote: } } Actually, IP IOS still costs $15 (at least according to my sales folks). It } may ship with the router, but you're still supposed to purchase the IOS. It depends on how the router is purchased. If it is purchased directly from Cisco then it doesn't come with IOS, which must be purchased seperately. If it is purchased through the channel (i.e. from a distributer), then it will come with IP only (both loaded and on CD). Either way, the reseller is responsible for making sure the appropriate version is bought. Note, that according to Cisco, only the original purchaser is licenced to use a given copy of IOS. In other words, if you purchase a router off of E-Bay, you are supposed to buy your own copy of IOS from a reseller. BTW, in Canada, I would expect it to cost around $20 when shipped with a router. If you buy it seperately, it may cost more due to the overhead of handling such a small order. }-- End of excerpt from "Jason Roysdon" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2715&t=2545 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question about IP extended access-list "established" keyword. [7:2716]
While reading Richard Stevens book about TCP "RST" bit and "FIN" bit, I recalled that the "established" keyword in IP extended access-list will match those packet with "RST" and "ACK" bit set I know an orderly shutdown of TCP session is "FIN", not "RST". In case the "established" keyword is used to match those already connected TCP traffic, why not the "established" keyword matchs both "ACK", "FIN", and "RST" bits? Is it most TCP sessions are "abortive release" rather than "orderly release"? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2716&t=2716 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
I see no dialer-list command in your central site config. CM -Original Message- From: Shoaib Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 May 2001 09:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712] I am getting trouble in ISDN bri link. I have a Central site Router 3640 with 12.1.8 IP/IPX plus IOS. the route has 4 port BRI module. The remote site is having 2503, all u know that it has 1 port BRI. remote site is running 11.2.1 version of IOS. The call is placed using simple DDR commands as: Cisco 3640 Router = Int bri 2/0 ip add 130.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 encap ppp dialer idle-timeout 300 dialer fast-idle 300 dialer string dialer-group 1 Remote site (2503): === Int bri 0 ip add 130.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 encap ppp dialer idle-timeout 300 dialer fast-idle 300 In this scenario, a/c to customer need, the central site is placing call.When the call has placed, and we see the debug output, it shows all the debug of ppp negotiations and ISDN events as correct, with the install route at the end. When i run 'show isdn status' it shows me all layers up with one active layer 3 call also. Also 'show isdn active' gives me successful call to remote site. So nothing seems to be wrong with config. THE problem is that after connectivity when i try to ping from central site the remote site ip address, it times out. I took the 'show ip route', and it gives me only connected routes but dont show me the remote LAN network address of each site which it should give as i m running EIGRP at both sites. The primary link is working correctly as i have an SCPC 128K link between the two sites as well and showing correct routes. The switch type in pakistan normally we use is basic-net3 (SIEMENS switch). Can anyone plzz help me, where is the issue?? i have tried everything, dialer profiles and all. but nothing seems to be working, i cant ping the other side thru BRI. Shoaib CCNP,MCSE __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2718&t=2712 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
1)It is very obivous, definitely routing problem. since show isdn status is active and up, ppp layer is successful. 2)Define static route to the destintaiton network. Link state protocol is not recommended. For example, Eigrp will trigger your ISDN always up due to protocol characteristic. It will constant exchanger hello packet,. It is not recommended. HTH Vincent Chong ""Shoaib Waqar"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am getting trouble in ISDN bri link. I have a > Central site Router 3640 with 12.1.8 IP/IPX plus IOS. > the route has 4 port BRI module. The remote site is > having 2503, all u know that it has 1 port BRI. remote > site is running 11.2.1 version of IOS. The call is > placed using simple DDR commands as: > > Cisco 3640 Router > = > Int bri 2/0 > ip add 130.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > encap ppp > dialer idle-timeout 300 > dialer fast-idle 300 > dialer string > dialer-group 1 > > Remote site (2503): > === > > Int bri 0 > ip add 130.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > encap ppp > dialer idle-timeout 300 > dialer fast-idle 300 > > In this scenario, a/c to customer need, the central > site is placing call.When the call has placed, and we > see the debug output, it shows all the debug of ppp > negotiations and ISDN events as correct, with the > install route at the end. When i run 'show isdn > status' it shows me all layers up with one active > layer 3 call also. Also 'show isdn active' gives me > successful call to remote site. So nothing seems to be > wrong with config. THE problem is that after > connectivity when i try to ping from central site the > remote site ip address, it times out. I took the 'show > ip route', and it gives me only connected routes but > dont show me the remote LAN network address of each > site which it should give as i m running EIGRP at both > sites. The primary link is working correctly as i have > an SCPC 128K link between the two sites as well and > showing correct routes. The switch type in pakistan > normally we use is basic-net3 (SIEMENS switch). Can > anyone plzz help me, where is the issue?? i have tried > everything, dialer profiles and all. but nothing seems > to be working, i cant ping the other side thru BRI. > > Shoaib > CCNP,MCSE > > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2717&t=2712 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM Bit rate [7:2256]
Carroll, may i be so bold as to ask another question the VCI/VPI numbersi was led to beleive that this are carrier supplied and have no Overall meaning(just the DLCI type)...but i have seen that some do have meaningi searched CCO but fpound squat...any links or info you could provide would be most welcome Thanks in advance steve >From: "Carroll Kong" >Reply-To: "Carroll Kong" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: ATM Bit rate [7:2256] >Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 12:07:33 -0400 > >At 10:39 AM 4/27/01 -0400, Stephen Skinner wrote: > >Guys, > >i`m looking for a good explanation of what this is... > > > >i looked on the archives and cisco site,but beleive i am bieng thick . > > > >according to cisco the bit rate comes in various flavours > > > >UBR,VBR,CBRbut am i getting this complete leg-before-arm > > > >i thought the bit rate was a messunment of how fast the link was ??? > > > >i don`t get it ...some-one put me out of my misery > > > >thanks > > > >steve :-$ > >They are the types of "QoS". Service classes defined by the ATM >standards. (UNI 4.0) > >Unspecified Bit Rate (AAL5, pretty much Best Effort) >Variable Bit Rate (AAL2, for variable bit video, never really took off) >Constant Bit Rate (AAL1, for constant, guaranteed bandwidth) > >There is also ABR (available bit rate), (takes left over bandwidth). > >For your information, AAL0 is raw ATM cells, and AAL3/4 is combined >together. In theory, AAL3/4 is absolutely obsoleted by AAL5 since the cell >tax would have been higher. (CRCs in EACH cell vs each PDU (9180 octets or >so)). > >Also, VBR has two forms, Non-real time and real time. The actual ATM >adaption type I listed above may vary, as ATM is very complicated and the >standards get fuzzed left and right. I hope anyone with more definitive >knowledge can help you fill in the gaps I may have left. > > > > >-Carroll Kong >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2719&t=2256 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT:There is always a New Kid on the Block (CIsco) [7:2613]
the next new kid on the block will be ... foundextrmcisc plc they are ,,as we speak producing a combined layer 1,2,3,4,5 box that will revolutionise the network indusrty an insider said " in theory this device will have no practical application whatsoeverwe are very excited by this " so far they have managed Not to router somewhere in the region of 15 billion PPS,with QOS TOS SOS MPLS MLS CEF all running in parrallel on it`s 49 proccessors... the current retail price will be 4.5 billion Dollars. Microsoft,compaq,oracle have all placed pre-orders a microsoft spokesman said " well sod it ...we have more money than sence so will buy one,and then brag about it to all of you...Hahahahaha" i myself have started on there certification track..18 exams..CCNA/equivilantthen onto the 4 week lab ...i`m told you are blindfolded ...have both your arms broken ...and have to configure a 25 router SNA network in the dark with 1 ip address... i can`t wait steve >From: "Allen May" >Reply-To: "Allen May" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: OT:There is always a New Kid on the Block (CIsco) [7:2613] >Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 17:02:24 -0400 > >You know how everything follows a cycle and repeats? I think I'm gonna >find >a DOS certification and go for that before the rush hits ;) Maybe WFW will >come back in a 64-bit, unbloated version and be the best O/S ever. Hmmm. >;) > >- Original Message - >From: "ccnawan" >To: >Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 3:40 PM >Subject: OT:There is always a New Kid on the Block (CIsco) [7:2613] > > > > Hi all, > > A few days ago there was a thread about the value of cisco certs, and >how > > they were a lot of people pursuing them now. > > My first recollection of IT, was when Big Blue was King, my oldest >brother > > would bring some of the IBM computer punch cards home from his job. >Nobody > > could touch IBM then. That was still true when I started out in IT in >1981. > > A couple years later the new kid on the block was Novell Netware, and > > everybody including me wanted to be a CNE. I pursued my Netware certs. >Then, > > we started hearing rumblings about Microsoft NT. You had to be a MCSE, >if > > you did you could name your price, and that was true. As it was when >Netware > > 2.1 first came out nobody knew about NT, so I followed the new kid and >got >a > > job in a NT shop. Well, now it is Cisco, no disrespect, I am a (Cisco > > reseller) and a few years as technology changes, it will be someone else > > maybe Juniper. > > > > After 20 years in IT nothing has changed, you must be prepared to learn >new > > technology, keep your ear to the ground for the new kid on the block, he >is > > coming soon, to a neighborhood near you.. I love computers. > > > > Dan Evensen CCNAWS CNS > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2720&t=2613 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2924XL for sale [7:2721]
For sale: Cisco 2924XL EN - $1100US This is a brand new Cisco Catalyst 2924 XL EN switch still in the box. This was intended for a home lab but was never needed. Lee Sydney, Australia Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2721&t=2721 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
I personally think that using dialer profiles are better than hard coding the interface. It is also true that there is no dialer-list command to dial for interesting traffic, and you don't have a route to use the bri interface so it wouldn't know when to dial. Wouldn't you need a dialer map command for interfaces, rather than specify dialer string? Albert > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Shoaib Waqar > Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 6:15 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712] > > > I am getting trouble in ISDN bri link. I have a > Central site Router 3640 with 12.1.8 IP/IPX plus IOS. > the route has 4 port BRI module. The remote site is > having 2503, all u know that it has 1 port BRI. remote > site is running 11.2.1 version of IOS. The call is > placed using simple DDR commands as: > > Cisco 3640 Router > = > Int bri 2/0 > ip add 130.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > encap ppp > dialer idle-timeout 300 > dialer fast-idle 300 > dialer string > dialer-group 1 > > Remote site (2503): > === > > Int bri 0 > ip add 130.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > encap ppp > dialer idle-timeout 300 > dialer fast-idle 300 > > In this scenario, a/c to customer need, the central > site is placing call.When the call has placed, and we > see the debug output, it shows all the debug of ppp > negotiations and ISDN events as correct, with the > install route at the end. When i run 'show isdn > status' it shows me all layers up with one active > layer 3 call also. Also 'show isdn active' gives me > successful call to remote site. So nothing seems to be > wrong with config. THE problem is that after > connectivity when i try to ping from central site the > remote site ip address, it times out. I took the 'show > ip route', and it gives me only connected routes but > dont show me the remote LAN network address of each > site which it should give as i m running EIGRP at both > sites. The primary link is working correctly as i have > an SCPC 128K link between the two sites as well and > showing correct routes. The switch type in pakistan > normally we use is basic-net3 (SIEMENS switch). Can > anyone plzz help me, where is the issue?? i have tried > everything, dialer profiles and all. but nothing seems > to be working, i cant ping the other side thru BRI. > > Shoaib > CCNP,MCSE > > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2722&t=2712 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT:There is always a New Kid on the Block (CIsco) [7:2613]
Hi, I think the one major difference between Cisco certs and the others you mention are the others are vendor specific. Cisco's certs deal with many RFC based technologies (to many to mention) that are used by almost every Networking Vendor out there. Although their are definite slants on some Cisco products the overall understanding, knowledge, and experiences you get from obtaining the Cisco certifications can be applied to almost any Network. I bet they won't have as good an interface though!! ""ccnawan"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > A few days ago there was a thread about the value of cisco certs, and how > they were a lot of people pursuing them now. > My first recollection of IT, was when Big Blue was King, my oldest brother > would bring some of the IBM computer punch cards home from his job. Nobody > could touch IBM then. That was still true when I started out in IT in 1981. > A couple years later the new kid on the block was Novell Netware, and > everybody including me wanted to be a CNE. I pursued my Netware certs. Then, > we started hearing rumblings about Microsoft NT. You had to be a MCSE, if > you did you could name your price, and that was true. As it was when Netware > 2.1 first came out nobody knew about NT, so I followed the new kid and got a > job in a NT shop. Well, now it is Cisco, no disrespect, I am a (Cisco > reseller) and a few years as technology changes, it will be someone else > maybe Juniper. > > After 20 years in IT nothing has changed, you must be prepared to learn new > technology, keep your ear to the ground for the new kid on the block, he is > coming soon, to a neighborhood near you.. I love computers. > > Dan Evensen CCNAWS CNS > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2723&t=2613 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about Teltone ISDN demonstrator [7:2687]
""Raul F. Fernandez"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have 2523,2521,2504..if I get a demonstrator(Teltone) will I need > external NT1s ? No. It comes with both S/T and U interfaces. Tommy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2724&t=2687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 1600 Serial connected modem [7:2592]
Hi Jason, I'm working on a serial port set to async with DB60 to DB25 cable. I've done them on console and aux, but struggling at the moment with serial connection. Regards, Gaz ""Jason Roysdon"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The problem is that the 1600 has no AUX port. Yes, you can get a modem to > work on the CON port, the same as you could get it to work on a PIX CON > port, but you have to make the modem do all the work. I'm not 100% certain > on this, but fairly certain. YMMV. > > -- > Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ > List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ > > > > ""Gareth Hinton"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi all, > > > > Just a quick one. > > > > Anyone connected a modem via RS232 cable to Serial interface of a 1600 for > > dial in. > > Mainly interested to see if it is possible. > > At the moment is failing, seemingly at the authentication, but no debug > for > > this other than closing call. > > Does 1600 have TTY capability. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gaz > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2725&t=2592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
Hi Dave, I am using EIGRP as routing protocol, but this will come into account when i have to reach the remote LAN, rite now EIGRP is initiating DDR, i m testing for dial backup, offcourse when the communication will begin, my task would be just to add two commands on the primary link. The issue is that 'show int bri 2/0 1' also shows the bri B channel as UP but the two peers dont ping each other, i think there is no need of a routing protocol rite now at this stage. For pinging to your neighbor of same subnet which is directly connected, u dont need a routing protocol. Now wat to do ??? Shoaib --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Shoaib > What type of routing protocol are you using ? > Have you put the static > routes in on both sides ? Can you ping from DIaler > to Dialer interface ? > > Dave > > > > > > > "Shoaib > > > Waqar" To: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > yahoo.com> Subject: > ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712] > > Sent by: > > > nobody@groups > > > tudy.com > > > > > > > > > 01/05/01 > > > 09:15 > > > Please > > > respond to > > > "Shoaib > > > Waqar" > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am getting trouble in ISDN bri link. I have a > Central site Router 3640 with 12.1.8 IP/IPX plus > IOS. > the route has 4 port BRI module. The remote site is > having 2503, all u know that it has 1 port BRI. > remote > site is running 11.2.1 version of IOS. The call is > placed using simple DDR commands as: > > Cisco 3640 Router > = > Int bri 2/0 > ip add 130.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > encap ppp > dialer idle-timeout 300 > dialer fast-idle 300 > dialer string > dialer-group 1 > > Remote site (2503): > === > > Int bri 0 > ip add 130.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > encap ppp > dialer idle-timeout 300 > dialer fast-idle 300 > > In this scenario, a/c to customer need, the central > site is placing call.When the call has placed, and > we > see the debug output, it shows all the debug of ppp > negotiations and ISDN events as correct, with the > install route at the end. When i run 'show isdn > status' it shows me all layers up with one active > layer 3 call also. Also 'show isdn active' gives me > successful call to remote site. So nothing seems to > be > wrong with config. THE problem is that after > connectivity when i try to ping from central site > the > remote site ip address, it times out. I took the > 'show > ip route', and it gives me only connected routes but > dont show me the remote LAN network address of each > site which it should give as i m running EIGRP at > both > sites. The primary link is working correctly as i > have > an SCPC 128K link between
Lost Cisco CD [7:2727]
Hi All, We have the Cisco Works 2000 package in work, I wish to re-install this software, but as usual the install CD has gone missing... I only have the documentation Can anyone tell me what the best point of contact in Cisco is for obtaining a replacement CD ?? I am thinking this process could take some time Thanks for your help... Best Regards, Peter. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2727&t=2727 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
Dear Chong, rite now this is only the testing for DDR, when the sides will start communicationg, offcourse i will be using floating static route for this, the main issue is the ping of neighbor interface , not the LAN address. I think everyone has misunderstood this scenario. Shoaib --- Vincent Chong wrote: > 1)It is very obivous, definitely routing > problem. > since show isdn status is active and up, ppp > layer is successful. > > 2)Define static route to the destintaiton > network. Link state protocol > is not recommended. >For example, Eigrp will trigger your ISDN > always up due to protocol > characteristic. It will constant exchanger >hello packet,. It is not recommended. > > HTH > Vincent Chong > > > ""Shoaib Waqar"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I am getting trouble in ISDN bri link. I have a > > Central site Router 3640 with 12.1.8 IP/IPX plus > IOS. > > the route has 4 port BRI module. The remote site > is > > having 2503, all u know that it has 1 port BRI. > remote > > site is running 11.2.1 version of IOS. The call is > > placed using simple DDR commands as: > > > > Cisco 3640 Router > > = > > Int bri 2/0 > > ip add 130.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > encap ppp > > dialer idle-timeout 300 > > dialer fast-idle 300 > > dialer string > > dialer-group 1 > > > > Remote site (2503): > > === > > > > Int bri 0 > > ip add 130.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > > encap ppp > > dialer idle-timeout 300 > > dialer fast-idle 300 > > > > In this scenario, a/c to customer need, the > central > > site is placing call.When the call has placed, and > we > > see the debug output, it shows all the debug of > ppp > > negotiations and ISDN events as correct, with the > > install route at the end. When i run 'show isdn > > status' it shows me all layers up with one active > > layer 3 call also. Also 'show isdn active' gives > me > > successful call to remote site. So nothing seems > to be > > wrong with config. THE problem is that after > > connectivity when i try to ping from central site > the > > remote site ip address, it times out. I took the > 'show > > ip route', and it gives me only connected routes > but > > dont show me the remote LAN network address of > each > > site which it should give as i m running EIGRP at > both > > sites. The primary link is working correctly as i > have > > an SCPC 128K link between the two sites as well > and > > showing correct routes. The switch type in > pakistan > > normally we use is basic-net3 (SIEMENS switch). > Can > > anyone plzz help me, where is the issue?? i have > tried > > everything, dialer profiles and all. but nothing > seems > > to be working, i cant ping the other side thru > BRI. > > > > Shoaib > > CCNP,MCSE > > > > > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great > prices > > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2728&t=2712 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
I have tried dialer profiles, legacy DDR with dialer mao statement and with floating static route too, but still same result, could not ping the neighbor. Offcourse there is a dialer-list statement to initiate call: dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit Shoaib --- Albert Lu wrote: > I personally think that using dialer profiles are > better than hard coding > the interface. It is also true that there is no > dialer-list command to dial > for interesting traffic, and you don't have a route > to use the bri interface > so it wouldn't know when to dial. > > Wouldn't you need a dialer map command for > interfaces, rather than specify > dialer string? > > Albert > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Shoaib Waqar > > Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 6:15 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712] > > > > > > I am getting trouble in ISDN bri link. I have a > > Central site Router 3640 with 12.1.8 IP/IPX plus > IOS. > > the route has 4 port BRI module. The remote site > is > > having 2503, all u know that it has 1 port BRI. > remote > > site is running 11.2.1 version of IOS. The call is > > placed using simple DDR commands as: > > > > Cisco 3640 Router > > = > > Int bri 2/0 > > ip add 130.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > encap ppp > > dialer idle-timeout 300 > > dialer fast-idle 300 > > dialer string > > dialer-group 1 > > > > Remote site (2503): > > === > > > > Int bri 0 > > ip add 130.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > > encap ppp > > dialer idle-timeout 300 > > dialer fast-idle 300 > > > > In this scenario, a/c to customer need, the > central > > site is placing call.When the call has placed, and > we > > see the debug output, it shows all the debug of > ppp > > negotiations and ISDN events as correct, with the > > install route at the end. When i run 'show isdn > > status' it shows me all layers up with one active > > layer 3 call also. Also 'show isdn active' gives > me > > successful call to remote site. So nothing seems > to be > > wrong with config. THE problem is that after > > connectivity when i try to ping from central site > the > > remote site ip address, it times out. I took the > 'show > > ip route', and it gives me only connected routes > but > > dont show me the remote LAN network address of > each > > site which it should give as i m running EIGRP at > both > > sites. The primary link is working correctly as i > have > > an SCPC 128K link between the two sites as well > and > > showing correct routes. The switch type in > pakistan > > normally we use is basic-net3 (SIEMENS switch). > Can > > anyone plzz help me, where is the issue?? i have > tried > > everything, dialer profiles and all. but nothing > seems > > to be working, i cant ping the other side thru > BRI. > > > > Shoaib > > CCNP,MCSE > > > > > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great > prices > > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2729&t=2712 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
Shoaib, y don't u add static routes...? -Original Message- From: Shoaib Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 5:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712] Hi Dave, I am using EIGRP as routing protocol, but this will come into account when i have to reach the remote LAN, rite now EIGRP is initiating DDR, i m testing for dial backup, offcourse when the communication will begin, my task would be just to add two commands on the primary link. The issue is that 'show int bri 2/0 1' also shows the bri B channel as UP but the two peers dont ping each other, i think there is no need of a routing protocol rite now at this stage. For pinging to your neighbor of same subnet which is directly connected, u dont need a routing protocol. Now wat to do ??? Shoaib --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Shoaib > What type of routing protocol are you using ? > Have you put the static > routes in on both sides ? Can you ping from DIaler > to Dialer interface ? > > Dave > > > > > > > "Shoaib > > > Waqar" To: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > yahoo.com> Subject: > ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712] > > Sent by: > > > nobody@groups > > > tudy.com > > > > > > > > > 01/05/01 > > > 09:15 > > > Please > > > respond to > > > "Shoaib > > > Waqar" > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am getting trouble in ISDN bri link. I have a > Central site Router 3640 with 12.1.8 IP/IPX plus > IOS. > the route has 4 port BRI module. The remote site is > having 2503, all u know that it has 1 port BRI. > remote > site is running 11.2.1 version of IOS. The call is > placed using simple DDR commands as: > > Cisco 3640 Router > = > Int bri 2/0 > ip add 130.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > encap ppp > dialer idle-timeout 300 > dialer fast-idle 300 > dialer string > dialer-group 1 > > Remote site (2503): > === > > Int bri 0 > ip add 130.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > encap ppp > dialer idle-timeout 300 > dialer fast-idle 300 > > In this scenario, a/c to customer need, the central > site is placing call.When the call has placed, and > we > see the debug output, it shows all the debug of ppp > negotiations and ISDN events as correct, with the > install route at the end. When i run 'show isdn > status' it shows me all layers up with one active > layer 3 call also. Also 'show isdn active' gives me > successful call to remote site. So nothing seems to > be > wrong with config. THE problem is that after > connectivity when i try to ping from central site > the > remote site ip address, it times out. I took the > 'show > ip route', and it gives me
RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
Try using debug dialer events to see if the dialing actually takes place when you ping. If the dialer doesn't come up, then it could be a dialer problem. If it does come up, and dialing fails, then it could be an isdn problem. Albert > -Original Message- > From: Shoaib Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 9:54 > To: Albert lu > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712] > > > I have tried dialer profiles, legacy DDR with dialer > mao statement and with floating static route too, but > still same result, could not ping the neighbor. > Offcourse there is a dialer-list statement to initiate > call: > > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit > > Shoaib > > > > --- Albert Lu wrote: > > I personally think that using dialer profiles are > > better than hard coding > > the interface. It is also true that there is no > > dialer-list command to dial > > for interesting traffic, and you don't have a route > > to use the bri interface > > so it wouldn't know when to dial. > > > > Wouldn't you need a dialer map command for > > interfaces, rather than specify > > dialer string? > > > > Albert > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > Shoaib Waqar > > > Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 6:15 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712] > > > > > > > > > I am getting trouble in ISDN bri link. I have a > > > Central site Router 3640 with 12.1.8 IP/IPX plus > > IOS. > > > the route has 4 port BRI module. The remote site > > is > > > having 2503, all u know that it has 1 port BRI. > > remote > > > site is running 11.2.1 version of IOS. The call is > > > placed using simple DDR commands as: > > > > > > Cisco 3640 Router > > > = > > > Int bri 2/0 > > > ip add 130.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > > encap ppp > > > dialer idle-timeout 300 > > > dialer fast-idle 300 > > > dialer string > > > dialer-group 1 > > > > > > Remote site (2503): > > > === > > > > > > Int bri 0 > > > ip add 130.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > > > encap ppp > > > dialer idle-timeout 300 > > > dialer fast-idle 300 > > > > > > In this scenario, a/c to customer need, the > > central > > > site is placing call.When the call has placed, and > > we > > > see the debug output, it shows all the debug of > > ppp > > > negotiations and ISDN events as correct, with the > > > install route at the end. When i run 'show isdn > > > status' it shows me all layers up with one active > > > layer 3 call also. Also 'show isdn active' gives > > me > > > successful call to remote site. So nothing seems > > to be > > > wrong with config. THE problem is that after > > > connectivity when i try to ping from central site > > the > > > remote site ip address, it times out. I took the > > 'show > > > ip route', and it gives me only connected routes > > but > > > dont show me the remote LAN network address of > > each > > > site which it should give as i m running EIGRP at > > both > > > sites. The primary link is working correctly as i > > have > > > an SCPC 128K link between the two sites as well > > and > > > showing correct routes. The switch type in > > pakistan > > > normally we use is basic-net3 (SIEMENS switch). > > Can > > > anyone plzz help me, where is the issue?? i have > > tried > > > everything, dialer profiles and all. but nothing > > seems > > > to be working, i cant ping the other side thru > > BRI. > > > > > > Shoaib > > > CCNP,MCSE > > > > > > > > > > > > __ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great > > prices > > > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2731&t=2712 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 1600 Serial connected modem [7:2592]
> >Hi Jason, Have you set the serial port to Async? >I'm working on a serial port set to async with DB60 to DB25 cable. I've >done >them on console and aux, but struggling at the moment with serial >connection. > >Regards, > >Gaz I have two 1600's with Dial-in over the serial ports on WIC-1Ts, they work great, 115kBaud, rather than 38K on aux ports. Rob./ _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2732&t=2592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
Dear Singh, it is already there. Shoaib --- Vivek Singh wrote: > Shoaib, y don't u add static routes...? > > -Original Message- > From: Shoaib Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 5:25 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712] > > > Hi Dave, > I am using EIGRP as routing protocol, but this will > come into account when i have to reach the remote > LAN, > rite now EIGRP is initiating DDR, i m testing for > dial > backup, offcourse when the communication will begin, > my task would be just to add two commands on the > primary link. The issue is that 'show int bri 2/0 1' > also shows the bri B channel as UP but the two peers > dont ping each other, i think there is no need of a > routing protocol rite now at this stage. For pinging > to your neighbor of same subnet which is directly > connected, u dont need a routing protocol. Now wat > to > do ??? > > Shoaib > > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Hi Shoaib > > What type of routing protocol are you using ? > > Have you put the static > > routes in on both sides ? Can you ping from DIaler > > to Dialer interface ? > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Shoaib > > > > > > > > Waqar" To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > yahoo.com> Subject: > > > ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712] > > > > > Sent by: > > > > > > > > nobody@groups > > > > > > > > tudy.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 01/05/01 > > > > > > > > 09:15 > > > > > > > > Please > > > > > > > > respond to > > > > > > > > "Shoaib > > > > > > > > Waqar" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am getting trouble in ISDN bri link. I have a > > Central site Router 3640 with 12.1.8 IP/IPX plus > > IOS. > > the route has 4 port BRI module. The remote site > is > > having 2503, all u know that it has 1 port BRI. > > remote > > site is running 11.2.1 version of IOS. The call is > > placed using simple DDR commands as: > > > > Cisco 3640 Router > > = > > Int bri 2/0 > > ip add 130.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > encap ppp > > dialer idle-timeout 300 > > dialer fast-idle 300 > > dialer string > > dialer-group 1 > > > > Remote site (2503): > > === > > > > Int bri 0 > > ip add 130.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > > encap ppp > > dialer idle-timeout 300 > > dialer fast-idle 300 > > > > In this scenario, a/c to customer need, the > central > > site is placing call.When the call has placed, and > > we > > see the debug output, it shows all the debug of > ppp > > negotiations and ISDN events as correct, with the > > in
RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
Yes i also have used an access-list to prevent eigrp to initiate call, and it dials on a ping event, as shown by the 'deb dialer events' shoaib --- Albert Lu wrote: > Try using debug dialer events to see if the dialing > actually takes place > when you ping. If the dialer doesn't come up, then > it could be a dialer > problem. If it does come up, and dialing fails, then > it could be an isdn > problem. > > Albert > > > -Original Message- > > From: Shoaib Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 9:54 > > To: Albert lu > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping > [7:2712] > > > > > > I have tried dialer profiles, legacy DDR with > dialer > > mao statement and with floating static route too, > but > > still same result, could not ping the neighbor. > > Offcourse there is a dialer-list statement to > initiate > > call: > > > > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit > > > > Shoaib > > > > > > > > --- Albert Lu wrote: > > > I personally think that using dialer profiles > are > > > better than hard coding > > > the interface. It is also true that there is no > > > dialer-list command to dial > > > for interesting traffic, and you don't have a > route > > > to use the bri interface > > > so it wouldn't know when to dial. > > > > > > Wouldn't you need a dialer map command for > > > interfaces, rather than specify > > > dialer string? > > > > > > Albert > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > > Shoaib Waqar > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 6:15 > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: ISDN BRI up but does not ping > [7:2712] > > > > > > > > > > > > I am getting trouble in ISDN bri link. I have > a > > > > Central site Router 3640 with 12.1.8 IP/IPX > plus > > > IOS. > > > > the route has 4 port BRI module. The remote > site > > > is > > > > having 2503, all u know that it has 1 port > BRI. > > > remote > > > > site is running 11.2.1 version of IOS. The > call is > > > > placed using simple DDR commands as: > > > > > > > > Cisco 3640 Router > > > > = > > > > Int bri 2/0 > > > > ip add 130.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > > > encap ppp > > > > dialer idle-timeout 300 > > > > dialer fast-idle 300 > > > > dialer string > > > > dialer-group 1 > > > > > > > > Remote site (2503): > > > > === > > > > > > > > Int bri 0 > > > > ip add 130.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > > > > encap ppp > > > > dialer idle-timeout 300 > > > > dialer fast-idle 300 > > > > > > > > In this scenario, a/c to customer need, the > > > central > > > > site is placing call.When the call has placed, > and > > > we > > > > see the debug output, it shows all the debug > of > > > ppp > > > > negotiations and ISDN events as correct, with > the > > > > install route at the end. When i run 'show > isdn > > > > status' it shows me all layers up with one > active > > > > layer 3 call also. Also 'show isdn active' > gives > > > me > > > > successful call to remote site. So nothing > seems > > > to be > > > > wrong with config. THE problem is that after > > > > connectivity when i try to ping from central > site > > > the > > > > remote site ip address, it times out. I took > the > > > 'show > > > > ip route', and it gives me only connected > routes > > > but > > > > dont show me the remote LAN network address of > > > each > > > > site which it should give as i m running EIGRP > at > > > both > > > > sites. The primary link is working correctly > as i > > > have > > > > an SCPC 128K link between the two sites as > well > > > and > > > > showing correct routes. The switch type in > > > pakistan > > > > normally we use is basic-net3 (SIEMENS > switch). > > > Can > > > > anyone plzz help me, where is the issue?? i > have > > > tried > > > > everything, dialer profiles and all. but > nothing > > > seems > > > > to be working, i cant ping the other side thru > > > BRI. > > > > > > > > Shoaib > > > > CCNP,MCSE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at > great > > > prices > > > > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations > to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great > prices > > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2733&t=2712 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
Could you give the full configuration listing. The partial config is not enough to debug with. Albert > -Original Message- > From: Shoaib Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 10:15 > To: Albert lu > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712] > > > Yes i also have used an access-list to prevent eigrp > to initiate call, and it dials on a ping event, as > shown by the 'deb dialer events' > > shoaib > > > --- Albert Lu wrote: > > Try using debug dialer events to see if the dialing > > actually takes place > > when you ping. If the dialer doesn't come up, then > > it could be a dialer > > problem. If it does come up, and dialing fails, then > > it could be an isdn > > problem. > > > > Albert > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Shoaib Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 9:54 > > > To: Albert lu > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping > > [7:2712] > > > > > > > > > I have tried dialer profiles, legacy DDR with > > dialer > > > mao statement and with floating static route too, > > but > > > still same result, could not ping the neighbor. > > > Offcourse there is a dialer-list statement to > > initiate > > > call: > > > > > > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit > > > > > > Shoaib > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Albert Lu wrote: > > > > I personally think that using dialer profiles > > are > > > > better than hard coding > > > > the interface. It is also true that there is no > > > > dialer-list command to dial > > > > for interesting traffic, and you don't have a > > route > > > > to use the bri interface > > > > so it wouldn't know when to dial. > > > > > > > > Wouldn't you need a dialer map command for > > > > interfaces, rather than specify > > > > dialer string? > > > > > > > > Albert > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > > > Shoaib Waqar > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 6:15 > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: ISDN BRI up but does not ping > > [7:2712] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am getting trouble in ISDN bri link. I have > > a > > > > > Central site Router 3640 with 12.1.8 IP/IPX > > plus > > > > IOS. > > > > > the route has 4 port BRI module. The remote > > site > > > > is > > > > > having 2503, all u know that it has 1 port > > BRI. > > > > remote > > > > > site is running 11.2.1 version of IOS. The > > call is > > > > > placed using simple DDR commands as: > > > > > > > > > > Cisco 3640 Router > > > > > = > > > > > Int bri 2/0 > > > > > ip add 130.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > > > > encap ppp > > > > > dialer idle-timeout 300 > > > > > dialer fast-idle 300 > > > > > dialer string > > > > > dialer-group 1 > > > > > > > > > > Remote site (2503): > > > > > === > > > > > > > > > > Int bri 0 > > > > > ip add 130.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > > > > > encap ppp > > > > > dialer idle-timeout 300 > > > > > dialer fast-idle 300 > > > > > > > > > > In this scenario, a/c to customer need, the > > > > central > > > > > site is placing call.When the call has placed, > > and > > > > we > > > > > see the debug output, it shows all the debug > > of > > > > ppp > > > > > negotiations and ISDN events as correct, with > > the > > > > > install route at the end. When i run 'show > > isdn > > > > > status' it shows me all layers up with one > > active > > > > > layer 3 call also. Also 'show isdn active' > > gives > > > > me > > > > > successful call to remote site. So nothing > > seems > > > > to be > > > > > wrong with config. THE problem is that after > > > > > connectivity when i try to ping from central > > site > > > > the > > > > > remote site ip address, it times out. I took > > the > > > > 'show > > > > > ip route', and it gives me only connected > > routes > > > > but > > > > > dont show me the remote LAN network address of > > > > each > > > > > site which it should give as i m running EIGRP > > at > > > > both > > > > > sites. The primary link is working correctly > > as i > > > > have > > > > > an SCPC 128K link between the two sites as > > well > > > > and > > > > > showing correct routes. The switch type in > > > > pakistan > > > > > normally we use is basic-net3 (SIEMENS > > switch). > > > > Can > > > > > anyone plzz help me, where is the issue?? i > > have > > > > tried > > > > > everything, dialer profiles and all. but > > nothing > > > > seems > > > > > to be working, i cant ping the other side thru > > > > BRI. > > > > > > > > > > Shoaib > > > > > CCNP,MCSE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __ > > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at > > great > > > > prices > > > > > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > > Report misconduct and Non
Re: ATM Bit rate [7:2256]
At 09:13 AM 5/1/01 +, Stephen Skinner wrote: >Carroll, > >may i be so bold as to ask another question > >the VCI/VPI numbersi was led to beleive that this are carrier supplied >and have no Overall meaning(just the DLCI type)...but i have seen that >some do have meaningi searched CCO but fpound squat...any links or >info you could provide would be most welcome > >Thanks in advance > >steve VCI == Virtual Circuit Identifier VPI == Virtual Path Identifier Together they define an "end-to-end" circuit, but you are correct, they only hold local significance. The actual VCI/VPI may change during it's transit to the final destination (once it hits a switch, the pair can be totally changed), just like a DLCI. They are some reserved VCI/VPIs like (x can be any integer from 0 to 256?). (not sure on the limits here, VPIs are not supposed to be as common, the VCI probably have up to 65535 as the upper bound). VPI/VCI x/1 and as the others mentioned 0/5 0/16 They are reserved for signalling or metasignalling. (UNI). I believe there are even some well known DLCIs as well (reserved). I suppose you 'could' use them, at your own peril. -Carroll Kong Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2736&t=2256 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Token ring MTU to Ethernet MTU [7:2737]
I am in the process of doing a Token Ring to Ethernet conversion. What kind of kind of effect will the difference MTU do to me in this conversion? Wm. Spencer Plantier LAN Engineer (919) 474-1300 ext 0873 Office (919) 474-1056 Fax (919)696-8848 Cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2737&t=2737 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAT Design [7:2738]
I need some advice on NAT design. Here's the scenario. This is my current scenario. I have my site at RTRA and a LAN there. At RTRA, all the vendor connections come in through it as shown by Vendor_1 and Vendor_2. Eventually, there will be Vendor_3, Vendor_4, etc. S2 LAN_SwitchRTRA---\ E1\S1 \ \Vendor_2 \ Vendor_1 What I want to do is provide NAT such that when Vendor_1, Vendor_2 and eventually Vendor_3, Vendor_4 access stuff at RTRA, they will be using a NAT address. I have three questions: 1. Can I configure NAT such that E1 is the "NAT Inside" interface and have S1 and S2 both as "NAT Outside" interfaces and then of course the statics. 2. Should I have a switch hook up to E2 (not shown in drawing), then hook Vendor_1, Vendor_2, Vendor_3, etc. hook up to the same VLAN on that switch and have E2 configure as the only "NAT Outside" interface. That way, E2 is the only "NAT Outside" interface, but all the Vendors that connect through that switch will use the same NAT address. 3. Is this sort of NAT recommended to be configure on the core router where all WAN connections come in or should I have another router that connects directly to RTRA and then do that through there and use any of the questions in 1 or 2 as the solution. Basically, what is the best design for my scenario even if my solution/question above is not right, any recommendations would be appreciated. Thanks. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2738&t=2738 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727]
Patrick, Im sorry... but if you going to bother replying at least try to be f**king helpful... if you are not... dont bother please !!! Regards, Peter. "Patrick Bass" on 01/05/2001 14:15:21 To: cc: Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] Your Rep - Original Message - From: Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:02 AM Subject: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > Hi All, > > We have the Cisco Works 2000 package in work, I wish to re-install this > software, but as usual > the install CD has gone missing... I only have the documentation > > Can anyone tell me what the best point of contact in Cisco is for obtaining > a replacement CD ?? > > I am thinking this process could take some time > > Thanks for your help... > > Best Regards, Peter. > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2739&t=2727 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Token ring MTU to Ethernet MTU [7:2737]
Configure as SR/TLB will do. MTU conversuion will be performed automatically. ""Plantier, William (Spencer)"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am in the process of doing a Token Ring to Ethernet conversion. What kind > of kind of effect will the difference MTU do to me in this conversion? > > Wm. Spencer Plantier > LAN Engineer > (919) 474-1300 ext 0873 Office > (919) 474-1056 Fax > (919)696-8848 Cell > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2740&t=2737 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727]
Peter, Just what is the matter with you??? I'm sure that DMR acceptable use policy for email doesn't include this kind of abuse. Sure Patrick simply stated the obvious - but he didn't do it in an ignorant way like your response. If you don't know that requesting help from your Cisco rep to replace a lost CD is obvious then his advice was helpful. Otherwise you do yourself and your company a dis-service by going off the deep end here. If I were Patrick I would send this thread to hr @ DMR and ask their opinion if this is the type of "advertising" that DMR wants on a high traffic, highly visible and professional mail list. Can you guess their probable reply? Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 9:43 AM Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > Patrick, > > > Im sorry... but if you going to bother replying at least try to be f**king > helpful... > > if you are not... dont bother please !!! > > Regards, Peter. > > > > > > "Patrick Bass" on 01/05/2001 14:15:21 > > To: > cc: > > Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > > > Your Rep > > - Original Message - > From: > Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:02 AM > Subject: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > > > > Hi All, > > > > We have the Cisco Works 2000 package in work, I wish to re-install this > > software, but as usual > > the install CD has gone missing... I only have the documentation > > > > Can anyone tell me what the best point of contact in Cisco is for > obtaining > > a replacement CD ?? > > > > I am thinking this process could take some time > > > > Thanks for your help... > > > > Best Regards, Peter. > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2741&t=2727 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting up Radius Server on Windows 2000 Server [7:2742]
Does any one have any info on setting this up? TIA Kevin _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2742&t=2742 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727]
I am sorry if I have offended anyone but to me a two word reply seems downright ignorant. Hence my argument if you do want to help dont If you were a customer what would you think of a two word answer to a solution ?? Not professional eitheir... Regards, Peter. "Kevin Wigle" on 02/05/2001 15:13:59 To: , cc: Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] Peter, Just what is the matter with you??? I'm sure that DMR acceptable use policy for email doesn't include this kind of abuse. Sure Patrick simply stated the obvious - but he didn't do it in an ignorant way like your response. If you don't know that requesting help from your Cisco rep to replace a lost CD is obvious then his advice was helpful. Otherwise you do yourself and your company a dis-service by going off the deep end here. If I were Patrick I would send this thread to hr @ DMR and ask their opinion if this is the type of "advertising" that DMR wants on a high traffic, highly visible and professional mail list. Can you guess their probable reply? Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 9:43 AM Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > Patrick, > > > Im sorry... but if you going to bother replying at least try to be f**king > helpful... > > if you are not... dont bother please !!! > > Regards, Peter. > > > > > > "Patrick Bass" on 01/05/2001 14:15:21 > > To: > cc: > > Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > > > Your Rep > > - Original Message - > From: > Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:02 AM > Subject: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > > > > Hi All, > > > > We have the Cisco Works 2000 package in work, I wish to re-install this > > software, but as usual > > the install CD has gone missing... I only have the documentation > > > > Can anyone tell me what the best point of contact in Cisco is for > obtaining > > a replacement CD ?? > > > > I am thinking this process could take some time > > > > Thanks for your help... > > > > Best Regards, Peter. > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2743&t=2727 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLAN's and Routers [7:2534]
You could buy a special NIC card for your server that can handle ISL
encapsulated frames. It might be cheaper to buy a router though since I
don't think the lower end switches support ISL anyway.
At 12:25 PM 4/30/01, you wrote:
>Thanks all, that clarifies somewhat.
>
>On 30 Apr 2001 14:06:09 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Karen E Young")
>wrote:
>
> > Usually there needs to be some form of communication
> >between VLANS though, so practically speaking you do need a router.
>
>What I would like to do is create broadcast domains for different
>departments, ie finance, admin. But all departments would need to
>communicate with the same server(s).
>I'd like to implement VLAN's without the expense of having to purchase
>routers, but doesn't seem like it's feasible?
>
>I have ordered P. Openheimer's (sp) Top Down Design book and that may
>better guide me in trying to implement an efficient network design.
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2744&t=2534
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727]
Your apology is noted but I think you are in the wrong. For someone losing their CiscoWorks CD I think an answer of your rep is a perfectly logical and sufficient answer. He is under no professional obligation to you - just trying to be friendly and help - maybe he is under a deadline and could only afford a larger response. I think your last response "Not professional either" is totally uncalled for. I think you are the one that has shown the lack of professionalism. -- Sean C. CCNP, CCDP, MCSE Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2747&t=2727 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: retransmission of packets in WAN [7:2525]
> >b. HDLC --> The job of HDLC is to ensure that data passed up to the next >>layer has been received exactly as transmitted (i.e error free, without loss >>and in the correct order). > >Except Cisco's HDLC doesn't do all that, and for the CCIE test you should >know the Cisco way. Cisco's HDLC does error detection only. It does not >retransmit. > >Great answer otherwise! > >Priscilla Not sure if this answer is pedantic or nuanced, but HDLC does have a role in ensuring that the receiver only passes correct data to its upper layer: the error detection causes bad data to be dropped. Reliable and "unreliable" protocols either have error detection mechanisms, or have expectations that a layer below them will have such mechanisms. The question is what to do when an error is detected: -- don't pass the data to the upper layer and, if there is a need for retransmission, let the sender detect the need and act on it (This, in general, is the IP way) -- don't pass the data to the upper layer and send a request for retransmission (Forward error control and redundant transmission (e.g., SSCOP) are beyond the scope of this discussion) > > >>c. SDLC --> Less error control than HDLC in that it only provides link >>integrity. Frames received correctly are acknowledged by the receiver while >>erroneous frames are ignored. >> >>d. Frame-relay --> There is no guarantee of data integrity at all. Error >>control is sacrificed in the interest of speed. Its assumed that higher >>layer protocols will handle all necessary error control. The network >>delivers frames, whether the CRC check matches or not. It does not even >>necessarily deliver all frames, discarding frames whenever there is network >>congestion. >> >>e. DLSw+ --> Error control is provided by SNA, not DLSw. DLSw only handles >>link control. Most bridging protocols (as far as I know anyway) deal >>strictly with getting the data from point A to point B and let the layer 3/4 >>protocols handle error control/correction. In most cases, retransmission comes from TCP, not SNA or DLSw. > > >>f. ATM --> ATM does not have error control functionality (think about what >>goes into an ATM cell - and what doesn't). Any error control has to be >>performed by the protocols that are encapsulated in the ATM cells. >> >>g. T1, E1 --> These are layer 1 protocols. T1 and E1 deals with signaling >>and encoding. At this level, its just bits, not frames or packets. Error >>control is generally handled at layers 2 through 4 (when its done at all). >> >>Hope this helps, >> Karen >> >>*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** >> >>On 4/30/2001 at 12:28 AM Kuldip Singh wrote: >> >> >Hi, >> > >> >Can someone help me find out who (router or host) will >> >retransmit the packets if they were lost in the cloud >> >while using: >> >a. X.25 --> guarantees data integrity by using HDLC to handle error >control. >> >b. HDLC --> the purpose of this protocol is to provide an error free link >>between two connected devices. >> >c. SDLC --> provides link integrity. Frames received correctly are >>acknowledged by the receiver while erroneous frames are ignored. >> >d. Frame-relay --> Think about what makes Frame-Relay different from X-25. >>There is no guarantee of data integrity at all. >> >e. DLSw+ --> Error control is provided by SNA, not DLSw. >> >f. ATM --> ATM does not have error control functionality (think about what >>goes into an ATM cell - and what doesn't). >> >g. T1, E1 --> These are layer 1 protocols. Error control is generally >>handled at layers 2 through 4. >> >to connect from one router to another. >> > >> >HostRoutercloudRouterHost >> > > > >Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2748&t=2525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DOS Command [7:2700]
FDISK should be able to see it as a non-DOS partition to delete then you can recreate and reformat. FDISK /MBR is a really kewl feature that will kill a virus in the MBR. I hear rumors of this feature being disabled in newer versions of Windows but I haven't had an MBR virus to test this yet. If FDISK can't delete the partition, use the Linux partition manager to kill it first. - Original Message - From: "Anthony J Crews" To: Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 12:04 AM Subject: DOS Command [7:2700] > What is the DOS command to reformat the MBR...I am trying to get back to DOS > from Linux native. > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2745&t=2700 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tacacs [7:2602]
Ok, maybe I wasn't clear enough :-) Unfortunately the issue I'm trying to investigate involves Tacacs+ configuration but I don't have access to the Tacacs+ servers - that's "another" group. What is happening is that a user dials in, gets authenticated and then is identified as belonging to a group. Depending on that group, a L2F tunnel gets created to a particular home gateway. You're talking having more than one Tacacs+ server - I know that can be done. My quest is to find some redundancy in how the Tacacs+ server assigns a home gateway. When looking at example code: vpdn-group 1 request dialin l2f ip w.x.y.z domain abc It looks like only one ip address is allowed. A colleague thinks that it is possible to have Tacacs+ choose a home gateway. And that's the question. Our configuration has multiple vpdn-groups and I'm still trying to figure out how a user gets allocated to a particular vpdn-group let alone discover if multiple gateways are possible. (a little difficult since the "other" group doesn't share very well) The end result is to have an automatic failover if the prime gateway goes down that the call will be accepted at the secondary gateway. Sorta like - if this destination is avail, use it - else use this one. Is this clear??? hope so Kevin Wigle > > - Original Message - > > From: "Henry D." > > To: > > Sent: Monday, 30 April, 2001 17:33 > > Subject: Re: Tacacs [7:2602] > > > > > > > I'm not an expert in TACACS but I know you can have more than 1 server > > > specified in the routers. I mainly used it just for authentication, in > > which > > > case there was no problem whatsoever with this setup. If first specified > > > server is not reachable, the other is being used. > > > I don't think there would be an issue if I used authorization/accounting > > > features either. There would simply be no need to try to fall back to > > the > > > main server in case it came up while using the backup server on the > > current > > > session. > > > > > > BTW, what do you mean by "terminating L2F tunnels" ? > > > Do you just authenticate, or you also use the authorization/accounting > > > features on the tunnel ? > > > If so, could you elaborate a bit more on this topic ? > > > > > > > > > ""Kevin Wigle"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Dear Group, > > > > > > > > A Tacacs question. > > > > > > > > Is it possible to configure Tacacs+ to use 2 different home gateways? > > > > > > > > Specifically, gate1 to be used to terminate L2F tunnels. > > > > > > > > If that fails, use gate2. > > > > > > > > And, another question if that is possible.. > > > > > > > > When gate1 is reachable again, will the users on gate2 be disconnected > > or > > > > stay > > > > there until they disconnect while "new" connections go to gate1 again? > > > > > > > > tia > > > > > > > > Kevin Wigle > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2746&t=2602 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2924XL for sale [7:2721]
Lee, just helping you with selling the switch most of buy from ebay. The exact switch you are selling you can pick up for 500 - 700 US dollars. Regards, Jason Baker - Original Message - From: "Lee" To: Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:45 PM Subject: 2924XL for sale [7:2721] > For sale: > > Cisco 2924XL EN - $1100US > > This is a brand new Cisco Catalyst 2924 XL EN switch still in the box. > This was intended for a home lab but was never needed. > > Lee > Sydney, Australia > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2749&t=2721 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question about Teltone ISDN demonstrator [7:2687]
The Demonstrator has U interfaces only. The other model can be either. Check out www.teltone.com > -Original Message- > From: Tommy Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 6:28 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Question about Teltone ISDN demonstrator [7:2687] > > > ""Raul F. Fernandez"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I have 2523,2521,2504..if I get a demonstrator(Teltone) > will I need > > external NT1s ? > > No. It comes with both S/T and U interfaces. > > Tommy > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2750&t=2687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Token ring MTU to Ethernet MTU [7:2737]
Beware of applications that are sensitive to fragmented packets. If you start seeing application response time increase OR your users begin to experience connectivity problems (especially if there are any PeopleSoft applications on the network, which really don't like fragmented packets) to app servers, sniff the segment on the Ethernet side and look for fragmented packets AND the DF bit set. Our solution was to reduce the MTU on the app server to something match Ethernet's 1500 bytes MTU (I had to set mine to 1350, but I had GRE tunnels and another weird fragmentation issue involved ). -e- - Original Message - From: "Vincent Chong" To: Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 6:57 AM Subject: Re: Token ring MTU to Ethernet MTU [7:2737] > Configure as SR/TLB will do. > MTU conversuion will be performed automatically. > > ""Plantier, William (Spencer)"" wrote in > message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I am in the process of doing a Token Ring to Ethernet conversion. What > kind > > of kind of effect will the difference MTU do to me in this conversion? > > > > Wm. Spencer Plantier > > LAN Engineer > > (919) 474-1300 ext 0873 Office > > (919) 474-1056 Fax > > (919)696-8848 Cell > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2751&t=2737 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Free Cisco CCIE labs [7:2705]
All-In-One Cisco. CCIE Lab Study Guide by Stephen Hutnik, Michael Satterlee. Hardcover (September 17, 1999) try browsing this page for some other 'ideas' http://www.networkdesigner.net/books/ccie_books.asp good luck with your lab setup! please keep us posted on your development and advancement toward the CCIE Lab Exam -e- - Original Message - From: "LandCai" To: Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:48 PM Subject: Free Cisco CCIE labs [7:2705] > Hello, > >I am preparing to setup a cisco CCIE labs which could be exposed onto > Internet for free access just from my personal view. what I need now is a > sample design for this lab, I want to test all kinds of popular protocols, > including BGP, EIGRP, OSPF, TCP/IP.IPX/SPX, APPLETALK, ISDN., FR, ATM, etc. > Could you give me any suggestion on this, or give some sample on design so I > could start to buy? > > thanks > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2753&t=2705 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2511 between cable modem and network [7:2312]
12.1(2)T supports "ip address dhcp". At least on the 4500-m. -Original Message- From: Rick Cossey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 5:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2511 between cable modem and network [7:2312] Raul, Please explain what you mean by "1 Ethernet interface".All cable/DSL modems I have workd with(It has been a lot) have a Ethernet handoff. You need 2 Ethernet interfaces to connect a cable modem to a router and then to your LAN. Also, I have not been able to get an IOS version for the Cisco 4000 that does IP Address DHCP as needed to be a dhcp client. I am currently doing it with a Cisco 2514. Rick ""Raul F. Fernandez"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Or run nat overload off the 1 ethernet interface on the router, thats how I > do it. > > Raul > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Kevin Wigle > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 4:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 2511 between cable modem and network [7:2312] > > > quick answer - no > > The connection to the cable modem is ethernet. Don't get confused by the > term "modem". > > You need a router with 2 ethernet ports. > > Kevin Wigle > > - Original Message - > From: Roberts, Timothy > To: > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 3:52 PM > Subject: 2511 between cable modem and network [7:2312] > > > > Can a 2511 be setup to connect a cable modem (ethernet) to a network > segment > > (ethernet)? I was going to use a 4000 but I do not have the flash > > requirements to run 12.1 code so that I can make use of the "ip address > > dhcp". Can I use one of the Async ports to connect to the cable modem end > > (provider via dhcp) and then enable nat to my network via the e0. Is this > > possible? Has anyone tried this before? > > Thanks > > > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is > > for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential > > and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or > > distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please > > contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original > > message. > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2755&t=2312 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BCRAN [7:2754]
Hey gang, any comments on BCRAN books, I am looking at both Cisco Press - Catherine Paquet's, and NetCerts - Thomas & Quiggle... Thanks, Duncan Duncan Wallace Network Engineer 800.COM Inc. 1516 NW Thurman St Portland, OR 97209-2517 Direct: 503.944.3671 Cell: 503.969.8248 Fax: 503.943.9371 Web: http://800.com Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2754&t=2754 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLAN's and Routers [7:2534]
Are dual NIC's feasible? Seems on the surface to be cheaper and more
straightforward but haven't seen it mentioned so I may be missing
something.
I can actually give each department their own server but accessing the
email server would present problems.
On 1 May 2001 10:47:35 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Curtis Call")
wrote:
>You could buy a special NIC card for your server that can handle ISL
>encapsulated frames. It might be cheaper to buy a router though since I
>don't think the lower end switches support ISL anyway.
>
>At 12:25 PM 4/30/01, you wrote:
>>Thanks all, that clarifies somewhat.
>>
>>On 30 Apr 2001 14:06:09 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Karen E Young")
>>wrote:
>>
>> > Usually there needs to be some form of communication
>> >between VLANS though, so practically speaking you do need a router.
>>
>>What I would like to do is create broadcast domains for different
>>departments, ie finance, admin. But all departments would need to
>>communicate with the same server(s).
>>I'd like to implement VLAN's without the expense of having to purchase
>>routers, but doesn't seem like it's feasible?
>>
>>I have ordered P. Openheimer's (sp) Top Down Design book and that may
>>better guide me in trying to implement an efficient network design.
>>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2756&t=2534
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727]
I cannot help putting in a comment here. It's funny how thin the line is between being lazy or not thinking and doing the research and thinking yourself. A question like "what's Cisco's website url?" would be lazy/stupid because it should be very easy for an individual to figure that out, especially if he/she wants to get certified. A question like "I have applied this and this on my thirteen Cisco routers, but for some reason router #4 and router #9 cannot 'talk' BGP with my router #1, which is connected through a Token Ring MAU. Here's my conf from all involved routers - can anyone help?" would be more 'acceptable', because it could take many many hours to troubleshoot a problem like that if you're new to it, but would only take a minute for a BGP guru. However, if you're really doing your research and thinking and drinking gallons of coffee, YOU WILL eventually find the solution yourself, and if everyone did that, there would be no need for this list at all. Now where do you set the border between a stupid/lazy question and an acceptable one. That is probable a different place for each one of us on this list. When I look back at when I posted my first questions on this list, I almost want to crawl down in a small hole and disappear, because I would have found many of the answers if I had just done a little research on Cisco's website. Sometimes I am so swamped at work that I do post one of those "lazy" questions if I get an emergency situation with my Cisco equipment, because I am hoping that someone that knows the solution to the problem can give it to me in a couple of minutes, because I at that point can't spend the necessary time doing the research. Anyway, to end this e-mail, I would say that Patrick could have been a little more informable, but Peter should not have replied back with that kind of language. Just my pair of cents, Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oledrews.com/ccnp NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job -Original Message- From: Sean C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 8:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] Your apology is noted but I think you are in the wrong. For someone losing their CiscoWorks CD I think an answer of your rep is a perfectly logical and sufficient answer. He is under no professional obligation to you - just trying to be friendly and help - maybe he is under a deadline and could only afford a larger response. I think your last response "Not professional either" is totally uncalled for. I think you are the one that has shown the lack of professionalism. -- Sean C. CCNP, CCDP, MCSE Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2752&t=2727 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727]
sometimes, a 2 word answer is all they need (and want). and...how was your response helpful in this case to the original poster? How does making other people wrong serve you and the people around you? To the original poster's question regarding the lost CD, *sometimes* the TAC can assist, too, if you can identify yourself as a registered owner of the software. often guilty of over-verbosity... -e- - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:38 AM Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > I am sorry if I have offended anyone but to me a two word reply seems > downright ignorant. > > Hence my argument if you do want to help dont > > If you were a customer what would you think of a two word answer to a > solution ?? > > Not professional eitheir... > > Regards, Peter. > > > > > > "Kevin Wigle" on 02/05/2001 15:13:59 > > To: , > cc: > > Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > > > Peter, > > Just what is the matter with you??? > > I'm sure that DMR acceptable use policy for email doesn't include this kind > of abuse. > > Sure Patrick simply stated the obvious - but he didn't do it in an ignorant > way like your response. > > If you don't know that requesting help from your Cisco rep to replace a > lost > CD is obvious then his advice was helpful. > > Otherwise you do yourself and your company a dis-service by going off the > deep end here. > > If I were Patrick I would send this thread to hr @ DMR and ask their > opinion > if this is the type of "advertising" that DMR wants on a high traffic, > highly visible and professional mail list. > > Can you guess their probable reply? > > Kevin Wigle > > - Original Message - > From: > To: > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 9:43 AM > Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > > > > Patrick, > > > > > > Im sorry... but if you going to bother replying at least try to be > f**king > > helpful... > > > > if you are not... dont bother please !!! > > > > Regards, Peter. > > > > > > > > > > > > "Patrick Bass" on 01/05/2001 14:15:21 > > > > To: > > cc: > > > > Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > > > > > > Your Rep > > > > - Original Message - > > From: > > Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco > > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:02 AM > > Subject: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > We have the Cisco Works 2000 package in work, I wish to re-install this > > > software, but as usual > > > the install CD has gone missing... I only have the documentation > > > > > > Can anyone tell me what the best point of contact in Cisco is for > > obtaining > > > a replacement CD ?? > > > > > > I am thinking this process could take some time > > > > > > Thanks for your help... > > > > > > Best Regards, Peter. > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2757&t=2727 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Setting up Radius Server on Windows 2000 Server [7:2742]
We recently did an implementation of this. Here's the info from Technet http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/win2000/ias.asp good luck! -e- - Original Message - From: "Kevin O'Gilvie" To: Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:30 AM Subject: Setting up Radius Server on Windows 2000 Server [7:2742] > Does any one have any info on setting this up? > > TIA > > Kevin > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2758&t=2742 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727]
I have to agree with Kevin's comments, Peter. Patrick told you exactly who your best resource is - and that's the Cisco Account Manager for your area (also known as "your rep"). They would likely be able to get you what you need the fastest. You needed an answer quickly, and Patrick provided that answer (privately I might add). It was just a bit inappropriate to dress him down in the list for a private conversation between the two of you. -- Leigh Anne > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: May 1, 2001 8:39 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > > > I am sorry if I have offended anyone but to me a two word reply seems > downright ignorant. > > Hence my argument if you do want to help dont > > If you were a customer what would you think of a two word answer to a > solution ?? > > Not professional eitheir... > > Regards, Peter. > > > > > > "Kevin Wigle" on 02/05/2001 15:13:59 > > To: , > cc: > > Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > > > Peter, > > Just what is the matter with you??? > > I'm sure that DMR acceptable use policy for email doesn't include this kind > of abuse. > > Sure Patrick simply stated the obvious - but he didn't do it in an ignorant > way like your response. > > If you don't know that requesting help from your Cisco rep to replace a > lost > CD is obvious then his advice was helpful. > > Otherwise you do yourself and your company a dis-service by going off the > deep end here. > > If I were Patrick I would send this thread to hr @ DMR and ask their > opinion > if this is the type of "advertising" that DMR wants on a high traffic, > highly visible and professional mail list. > > Can you guess their probable reply? > > Kevin Wigle > > - Original Message - > From: > To: > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 9:43 AM > Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > > > > Patrick, > > > > > > Im sorry... but if you going to bother replying at least try to be > f**king > > helpful... > > > > if you are not... dont bother please !!! > > > > Regards, Peter. > > > > > > > > > > > > "Patrick Bass" on 01/05/2001 14:15:21 > > > > To: > > cc: > > > > Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > > > > > > Your Rep > > > > - Original Message - > > From: > > Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco > > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:02 AM > > Subject: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > We have the Cisco Works 2000 package in work, I wish to re-install this > > > software, but as usual > > > the install CD has gone missing... I only have the documentation > > > > > > Can anyone tell me what the best point of contact in Cisco is for > > obtaining > > > a replacement CD ?? > > > > > > I am thinking this process could take some time > > > > > > Thanks for your help... > > > > > > Best Regards, Peter. > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2760&t=2727 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about Teltone ISDN demonstrator [7:2687]
Anyone have some NT1s for sale cheap. I see that all my BRIs are S/t interfaces. Thank you, Raul - Original Message - From: "Daniel Cotts" To: Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 11:04 AM Subject: RE: Question about Teltone ISDN demonstrator [7:2687] > The Demonstrator has U interfaces only. The other model can be either. Check > out www.teltone.com > > > -Original Message- > > From: Tommy Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 6:28 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Question about Teltone ISDN demonstrator [7:2687] > > > > > > ""Raul F. Fernandez"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > I have 2523,2521,2504..if I get a demonstrator(Teltone) > > will I need > > > external NT1s ? > > > > No. It comes with both S/T and U interfaces. > > > > Tommy > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct > > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2759&t=2687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Free Cisco CCIE labs [7:2705]
is there anything out for the ccnp track? Lowell E. Sharrah SBC-DataComm 517-241-7059 wk 517-360-0481 pgr 517-930-1993 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> "EA Louie" 05/01/01 11:32AM >>> All-In-One Cisco. CCIE Lab Study Guide by Stephen Hutnik, Michael Satterlee. Hardcover (September 17, 1999) try browsing this page for some other 'ideas' http://www.networkdesigner.net/books/ccie_books.asp good luck with your lab setup! please keep us posted on your development and advancement toward the CCIE Lab Exam -e- - Original Message - From: "LandCai" To: Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:48 PM Subject: Free Cisco CCIE labs [7:2705] > Hello, > >I am preparing to setup a cisco CCIE labs which could be exposed onto > Internet for free access just from my personal view. what I need now is a > sample design for this lab, I want to test all kinds of popular protocols, > including BGP, EIGRP, OSPF, TCP/IP.IPX/SPX, APPLETALK, ISDN., FR, ATM, etc. > Could you give me any suggestion on this, or give some sample on design so I > could start to buy? > > thanks > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2762&t=2705 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apology [7:2761]
Folks, I have taken other peoples points of view into account... You all have my unreserved apology for my earlier comments, which were inappropiate. Kind Regards, Peter. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2761&t=2761 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Excessive Retransmissions UPDATE [7:2553]
thanks for sharing and updating us. Just a few questions if you'd indulge me, otherwise have a great day. I'm kind of curious and very clueless since I don't know your network architecture, but if you have a default gateway set on the AS/400 and IP routing protocol running in your routers (even if it's static routes), then unless you're running multiple NICs with multiple paths to the outside, why would you need so many static routes in the AS/400 IP stack? Why (for example) would you not have all your IP routing handled the the router level? I usually look at static routes on a host as a band-aid because I didn't configure my network (read routers) properly - makes it hard for me to point my finger at the clueless sysadmins for eliminting routes that they really shouldn't need if I have a properly configured infrastructure. And at the broadcast storm level, do you know why your routers were not picking those up and routing them for the host? In other words, was ARP working at the host and router level? -e- - Original Message - From: "Sites, Bob" To: Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 5:58 AM Subject: Excessive Retransmissions UPDATE [7:2553] > Just wanted to update the list on this matter because I feel that it could > very easily happen to anyone of you and it was very difficult to locate the > problem. Got to blame this one on Big Blue hardware. Yes, the AS400 was the > cause of all our problems here, once again. Apparently several days prior to > this problem, the AS400 was upgraded and a rollover software called Visions > was added. This is similar in function to HSRP. A third party software that > allows rollover from one AS400 to another. Anyway, during the setup for the > rollover testing it was recommended that some static routes in the AS400 be > cleaned up and deleted. Way to go Visions! Our AS400 folks didn't know any > better and just deleted static routes down from about a dozen to 4!!! Our > symptoms were major broadcast storms of retransmissions. Got to keep a close > eye on those big blue boys! Of course, as always, it was a "network" problem > and the network team solved it!!! Is it at all possible that IBM could come > up with a more worthless IP stack? > > Bob Sites, CCNA > Winchester Medical Center > > > Do you have a TACAC's, Syslog server, & or SNMP database server. Helps you > find the who, what, where, & when things started. Sometimes you gotta dig > backwards when the obvious just won't present itself. My guess is that you > have a link down, a flapping interface, or had bounce on a link that the > protocol wasn't configured to handle. > > Please keep us posted with your success or failures > Phil > > Perhaps someone could steer me on this problem that I've been fighting for > a day and half now. We are having a severe slowdown on our network and when > looking at the IP traffic from just about anywhere to anywhere, about 1/3 > of the packets are being retransmitted? Sniffer error is "excessive > retransmissions." Spent about 3 hours on the phone this morning with the > TAC and didn't really get anywhere. It appears that we are having a > broadcast storm of the retransmissions. Any insight into what direction > to head would be greatly appreciated. Would like to isolate the problem by > blades on the switches or routers, but being a hospital this is almost > impossible. We have 2 core 6509's with duplicate sups and msfc's. Main > router is a 7200. > > Bob Sites, CCNA > Winchester Medical Center > > Confidentiality Notice: > > This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the > intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. > Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If > you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply > e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2763&t=2553 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP Labs (was Re: Free Cisco CCIE labs [7:2705]) [7:2764]
great question - I don't know the answer, but the way I stumbled onto the networkdesigner page was by doing a Google search on "CCIE books". Perhaps the same would work for "CCNP books"? -e- - Original Message - From: "Lowell Sharrah" To: ; Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 8:47 AM Subject: Re: Free Cisco CCIE labs [7:2705] is there anything out for the ccnp track? Lowell E. Sharrah SBC-DataComm 517-241-7059 wk 517-360-0481 pgr 517-930-1993 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> "EA Louie" 05/01/01 11:32AM >>> All-In-One Cisco. CCIE Lab Study Guide by Stephen Hutnik, Michael Satterlee. Hardcover (September 17, 1999) try browsing this page for some other 'ideas' http://www.networkdesigner.net/books/ccie_books.asp good luck with your lab setup! please keep us posted on your development and advancement toward the CCIE Lab Exam -e- - Original Message - From: "LandCai" To: Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:48 PM Subject: Free Cisco CCIE labs [7:2705] > Hello, > >I am preparing to setup a cisco CCIE labs which could be exposed onto > Internet for free access just from my personal view. what I need now is a > sample design for this lab, I want to test all kinds of popular protocols, > including BGP, EIGRP, OSPF, TCP/IP.IPX/SPX, APPLETALK, ISDN., FR, ATM, etc. > Could you give me any suggestion on this, or give some sample on design so I > could start to buy? > > thanks > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2764&t=2764 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Alcatel OmniPCX [7:2695]
Hi Albert, OmniPCX is not a product of NewBridge. It was there even before the acqusition. The OmniPCX is a IP Telephont PBX with the capability to connect to the LAN Data. The OmniPCX technology is proprietary & proprietary Alcatel phone set has to be used to communicate with the PBX. For more detail you need to check with the Alcatel SE. regards -Original Message- From: Albert Lu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 12:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Alcatel OmniPCX [7:2695] Hello Group, Does anyone have knowledge/experience with Alcatel's OmniPCX boxes? I would like to know what they are. Was this product from the acquisition of Newbridge Networks? Thanks Albert FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2765&t=2695 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAT Design [7:2766]
I need some advice on NAT design. Here's the scenario. This is my current scenario. I have my site at RTRA and a LAN there. At RTRA, all the vendor connections come in through it as shown by Vendor_1 and Vendor_2. Eventually, there will be Vendor_3, Vendor_4, etc. S2 LAN_SwitchRTRA---\ E1\S1 \ \Vendor_2 \ Vendor_1 What I want to do is provide NAT such that when Vendor_1, Vendor_2 and eventually Vendor_3, Vendor_4 access stuff at RTRA, they will be using a NAT address. I have three questions: 1. Can I configure NAT such that E1 is the "NAT Inside" interface and have S1 and S2 both as "NAT Outside" interfaces and then of course the statics. 2. Should I have a switch hook up to E2 (not shown in drawing), then hook Vendor_1, Vendor_2, Vendor_3, etc. hook up to the same VLAN on that switch and have E2 configure as the only "NAT Outside" interface. That way, E2 is the only "NAT Outside" interface, but all the Vendors that connect through that switch will use the same NAT address. 3. Is this sort of NAT recommended to be configure on the core router where all WAN connections come in or should I have another router that connects directly to RTRA and then do that through there and use any of the questions in 1 or 2 as the solution. Basically, what is the best design for my scenario even if my solution/question above is not right, any recommendations would be appreciated. Thanks. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2766&t=2766 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resolve Error Messages, Command Output Issues [7:2767]
Hi all, I got this from TAC yesterday, you have to be registered user on CCO, it seems very helpful. I have condensed it for brevity. Dan Evensen ccnaws cns Cisco Technical Assistance Center http://www.cisco.com/tac The New Cisco IOS(R) Error Message Decoder and the Enhanced Cisco Output Interpreter two online tools for researching and resolving error messages and command output Interpreter. All you need to do is copy an error message or a command output from your screen and paste it into the appropriate text fields of the tools. Within moments, the tools respond with an interpretation of your text. researching and resolving your Cisco IOS error messages, try out the new Cisco IOS Error Message Decoder tool at: http://www.cisco.com/tac/newsflash/error-decoder_04302001.html (available to registered users) instant router and PIX problem analysis and suggestions for problem resolution, please visit the Output Interpreter tool at: http://www.cisco.com/support/OutputInterpreter/ (available to registered users) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2767&t=2767 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab in TOKYO [7:2489]
damn good excuse for international travel.. Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Ingack Hwang wrote: > 1. the proctor is Japanese. He can speak in English. > > 2. The question is written in English. > > The nearest hotel is Keio plaza intercontinental hotel. > > > > ""Tom York"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Has anyone taken lab exam in Tokyo? I'm going to take lab exam in Tokyo in > > August, so I just want to know the lab exam situation in Japan. Is the > > question written in Japanese? I guess at least the proctor is Japanese, > > right? I appreciate for any information. > > Tomohiro > > > > > > Join 18 million Eudora users by signing up for a free Eudora Web-Mail > > account at http://www.eudoramail.com > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2768&t=2489 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flash Partition [7:2769]
How to combine the flash partition into ONE 16F R2501#show flash System flash directory, partition 1: No files in System flash [0 bytes used, 8388608 available, 8388608 total] 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) System flash directory, partition 2: File Length Name/status 1 4554932 igs-ir-l.110-10.3 [4554996 bytes used, 3833612 available, 8388608 total] 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) Thanks / RamG Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2769&t=2769 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Free Cisco CCIE labs [7:2705]
Why do people assume that there is a significant differences between studying for CCNP and CCIE ? The same materials used for CCIE can be used for CCNP , especially when it come to the practical. ""Lowell Sharrah"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > is there anything out for the ccnp track? > > Lowell E. Sharrah > SBC-DataComm > 517-241-7059 wk > 517-360-0481 pgr > 517-930-1993 cell > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> "EA Louie" 05/01/01 11:32AM >>> > All-In-One Cisco. CCIE Lab Study Guide by Stephen Hutnik, Michael > Satterlee. Hardcover (September 17, 1999) > > try browsing this page for some other 'ideas' > > http://www.networkdesigner.net/books/ccie_books.asp > > good luck with your lab setup! please keep us posted on your development > and advancement toward the CCIE Lab Exam > > -e- > - Original Message - > From: "LandCai" > To: > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:48 PM > Subject: Free Cisco CCIE labs [7:2705] > > > > Hello, > > > >I am preparing to setup a cisco CCIE labs which could be exposed onto > > Internet for free access just from my personal view. what I need now is a > > sample design for this lab, I want to test all kinds of popular protocols, > > including BGP, EIGRP, OSPF, TCP/IP.IPX/SPX, APPLETALK, ISDN., FR, ATM, > etc. > > Could you give me any suggestion on this, or give some sample on design so > I > > could start to buy? > > > > thanks > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2770&t=2705 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT:There is always a New Kid on the Block (CIsco) [7:2613]
Eventually auto config will work and we'll need to do something else. Cisco's config dealie already makes it easier.. Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Chuck Larrieu wrote: > My HOPE would be self configuring end devices and possibly even self > configuring internal ( not edge ) routers. > > My belief is IPv6 and the nightmare that will probably be. Should keep a LOT > of us in clover for several years :-> > > Chuck > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of EA > Louie > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 2:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: OT:There is always a New Kid on the Block (CIsco) [7:2613] > > nice Dan, thanks for the walk down memory lane, for reminding us that this > is temporary. > > and now listmembers... (drumroll please) ... who is YOUR guess for the next > new kid on the block? > > -e- > - Original Message - > From: "ccnawan" > To: > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 1:40 PM > Subject: OT:There is always a New Kid on the Block (CIsco) [7:2613] > > > > Hi all, > > A few days ago there was a thread about the value of cisco certs, and how > > they were a lot of people pursuing them now. > > My first recollection of IT, was when Big Blue was King, my oldest brother > > would bring some of the IBM computer punch cards home from his job. Nobody > > could touch IBM then. That was still true when I started out in IT in > 1981. > > A couple years later the new kid on the block was Novell Netware, and > > everybody including me wanted to be a CNE. I pursued my Netware certs. > Then, > > we started hearing rumblings about Microsoft NT. You had to be a MCSE, if > > you did you could name your price, and that was true. As it was when > Netware > > 2.1 first came out nobody knew about NT, so I followed the new kid and got > a > > job in a NT shop. Well, now it is Cisco, no disrespect, I am a (Cisco > > reseller) and a few years as technology changes, it will be someone else > > maybe Juniper. > > > > After 20 years in IT nothing has changed, you must be prepared to learn > new > > technology, keep your ear to the ground for the new kid on the block, he > is > > coming soon, to a neighborhood near you.. I love computers. > > > > Dan Evensen CCNAWS CNS > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2771&t=2613 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BCRAN [7:2754]
Follow the CCNP link below for my recommendations. Hth, Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oledrews.com/ccnp NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 9:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BCRAN [7:2754] Hey gang, any comments on BCRAN books, I am looking at both Cisco Press - Catherine Paquet's, and NetCerts - Thomas & Quiggle... Thanks, Duncan Duncan Wallace Network Engineer 800.COM Inc. 1516 NW Thurman St Portland, OR 97209-2517 Direct: 503.944.3671 Cell: 503.969.8248 Fax: 503.943.9371 Web: http://800.com Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2772&t=2754 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Free Cisco CCIE labs [7:2705]
Sure is follow the original link and the go to the bottom left of the page CCNP/CCDP/CCDA/CCNA etc. Karl - Original Message - From: "Lowell Sharrah" To: Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 5:02 PM Subject: Re: Free Cisco CCIE labs [7:2705] > is there anything out for the ccnp track? > > Lowell E. Sharrah > SBC-DataComm > 517-241-7059 wk > 517-360-0481 pgr > 517-930-1993 cell > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> "EA Louie" 05/01/01 11:32AM >>> > All-In-One Cisco. CCIE Lab Study Guide by Stephen Hutnik, Michael > Satterlee. Hardcover (September 17, 1999) > > try browsing this page for some other 'ideas' > > http://www.networkdesigner.net/books/ccie_books.asp > > good luck with your lab setup! please keep us posted on your development > and advancement toward the CCIE Lab Exam > > -e- > - Original Message - > From: "LandCai" > To: > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:48 PM > Subject: Free Cisco CCIE labs [7:2705] > > > > Hello, > > > >I am preparing to setup a cisco CCIE labs which could be exposed onto > > Internet for free access just from my personal view. what I need now is a > > sample design for this lab, I want to test all kinds of popular protocols, > > including BGP, EIGRP, OSPF, TCP/IP.IPX/SPX, APPLETALK, ISDN., FR, ATM, > etc. > > Could you give me any suggestion on this, or give some sample on design so > I > > could start to buy? > > > > thanks > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2773&t=2705 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CEF [7:2774]
Has anyone used CEF (Cisco Express Forwarding) for load balancing across multiple T1s? How is the setup? Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2774&t=2774 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Flash Partition [7:2769]
Run a search on the archives. There are tons of posts on this. -Original Message- From: RamG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 9:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Flash Partition [7:2769] How to combine the flash partition into ONE 16F R2501#show flash System flash directory, partition 1: No files in System flash [0 bytes used, 8388608 available, 8388608 total] 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) System flash directory, partition 2: File Length Name/status 1 4554932 igs-ir-l.110-10.3 [4554996 bytes used, 3833612 available, 8388608 total] 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) Thanks / RamG FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2775&t=2769 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Unity support [7:2776]
Has anyone worked with the Unity product line? I installed Unity ActiveVoice v2.45 voicemail back in February and it's working with no problems in conjunction with CallManager 3.0(8) (as a uOne port). This was my first Unity install, and I was happy to see it go as well as it did (especially happy when we got the new driver that supports g.723a so we can do compression for those accessing voicemail across the WAN). Anyway, the time has come to install Unity ActiveFax. We're using a separate box for faxing than voicemail, and using a Dialogic Gammalink CPi/400 PCI board (4 analog ports). The board driver install went great, and installing this server into the existing Exchange Directory was no problem, and even the Unity software install went through without a problem. But now, the docs just stop. No help whatsoever on making the ActiveFax software integrate with either Unity ActiveVoice and/or CallManager. Unity ActiveVoice has a configuration section for Fax Server, but it says it can't find a Fax Server at the address I give it. I'm about to place a call to Cisco TAC, but not sure of the results or even what I should expect (mainly the logistics/politics on support). Current release of "Cisco" Unity is at 2.46, and I hear it's mainly just a cosmetic facelift (Insert CISCO LOGO/TRADEMARK here, etc.). Support for a few minor issues with Unity ActiveVoice 2.45 and CallManager3 was great, so I'm keeping my fingers cross. Anyone else have any experience with the new Cisco Unity line? What bugs me the most is that I've got approval to go to training so we can get our Unity certification upgraded, but Cisco isn't offering it yet, and the original owner of Unity, ActiveVoice.com, could care less about the product. -- Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2776&t=2776 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Unity support [7:2776]
Err, that should have been g.729a. Shows how long since I've had to touch this stuff (nearly a month). I really should have taken the CVOICE as soon as we got this first AVVID install done. It's all going fuzzy since I don't touch it on a daily basis :/ -- Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ ""Jason Roysdon"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Has anyone worked with the Unity product line? I installed Unity > ActiveVoice v2.45 voicemail back in February and it's working with no > problems in conjunction with CallManager 3.0(8) (as a uOne port). This was > my first Unity install, and I was happy to see it go as well as it did > (especially happy when we got the new driver that supports g.723a so we can > do compression for those accessing voicemail across the WAN). > > Anyway, the time has come to install Unity ActiveFax. We're using a > separate box for faxing than voicemail, and using a Dialogic Gammalink > CPi/400 PCI board (4 analog ports). The board driver install went great, > and installing this server into the existing Exchange Directory was no > problem, and even the Unity software install went through without a problem. > > But now, the docs just stop. No help whatsoever on making the ActiveFax > software integrate with either Unity ActiveVoice and/or CallManager. Unity > ActiveVoice has a configuration section for Fax Server, but it says it can't > find a Fax Server at the address I give it. > > I'm about to place a call to Cisco TAC, but not sure of the results or even > what I should expect (mainly the logistics/politics on support). Current > release of "Cisco" Unity is at 2.46, and I hear it's mainly just a cosmetic > facelift (Insert CISCO LOGO/TRADEMARK here, etc.). Support for a few minor > issues with Unity ActiveVoice 2.45 and CallManager3 was great, so I'm > keeping my fingers cross. > > Anyone else have any experience with the new Cisco Unity line? What bugs me > the most is that I've got approval to go to training so we can get our Unity > certification upgraded, but Cisco isn't offering it yet, and the original > owner of Unity, ActiveVoice.com, could care less about the product. > > -- > Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ > List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2777&t=2776 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Free Cisco CCIE labs [7:2705]
I guess it all depends on your end-goal. If you're content with the CCNP (or have some requirement to have just that), then why go into the depth of the CCIE materials? Anyway, the URL is accessible from: Cisco.com -> Training/Certifications -> Select Certification -> CCNP http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan/programs/ccnp.ht ml (watch the wrap). You can click on any of the 4 exam links and get details on each test. :::waiting on Cisco TAC to answer the phone::: -- Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ ""Jason"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Why do people assume that there is a significant differences between > studying for CCNP and CCIE ? The same materials used for CCIE can be used > for CCNP , especially when it come to the practical. > > > ""Lowell Sharrah"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > is there anything out for the ccnp track? > > > > Lowell E. Sharrah > > SBC-DataComm > > 517-241-7059 wk > > 517-360-0481 pgr > > 517-930-1993 cell > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >>> "EA Louie" 05/01/01 11:32AM >>> > > All-In-One Cisco. CCIE Lab Study Guide by Stephen Hutnik, Michael > > Satterlee. Hardcover (September 17, 1999) > > > > try browsing this page for some other 'ideas' > > > > http://www.networkdesigner.net/books/ccie_books.asp > > > > good luck with your lab setup! please keep us posted on your development > > and advancement toward the CCIE Lab Exam > > > > -e- > > - Original Message - > > From: "LandCai" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:48 PM > > Subject: Free Cisco CCIE labs [7:2705] > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > >I am preparing to setup a cisco CCIE labs which could be exposed onto > > > Internet for free access just from my personal view. what I need now is > a > > > sample design for this lab, I want to test all kinds of popular > protocols, > > > including BGP, EIGRP, OSPF, TCP/IP.IPX/SPX, APPLETALK, ISDN., FR, ATM, > > etc. > > > Could you give me any suggestion on this, or give some sample on design > so > > I > > > could start to buy? > > > > > > thanks > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2778&t=2705 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT:There is always a New Kid on the Block (CIsco) [7:2613]
Wired magazine has useful content now? I looked at a few issues, was very impressed with the print and image quality, but thought the content was gossip level.. Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Tue, 1 May 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Actually its Caspian Networks. i got the name wrong. The may issue of Wired > Magazine has the article describing it. n-dimension switching and talks > about > a smart core that has peta bit capabilities. Still in the design phase, but > thats how they all start. > > joe gearhart CCNP > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2779&t=2613 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE [7:2780]
Hi all: I am preparing for my lab and I don't know how to go through.I am interested in buying any lab materials. Any body can help me in this respect. Thanks in advance. Almazi CCNA,CCNP,CCIE (written). _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2780&t=2780 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NAT Design [7:2766]
My first question is why do you want to do NAT? For security? NAT just by itself doesn't firewall or protect you. If security isn't the issue and you just want NAT, this will work. You can have multiple outside interfaces that are NAT'd to the same inside interface. My recommendation would be to use some of your public IPs for your outside NAT. Even if you don't want to have it accessible from the internet, this way they should be globally unique, and no matter what vendor connects to you, you won't have overlapping address ranges, which would most likely occur if you used private addresses (as other vendors could possibly be using those same private addresses). -- Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ ""SH Wesson"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I need some advice on NAT design. Here's the scenario. > > This is my current scenario. I have my site at RTRA and a LAN there. At > RTRA, all the vendor connections come in through it as shown by Vendor_1 and > Vendor_2. Eventually, there will be Vendor_3, Vendor_4, etc. > S2 > LAN_SwitchRTRA---\ > E1\S1 \ > \Vendor_2 > \ > Vendor_1 > > What I want to do is provide NAT such that when Vendor_1, Vendor_2 and > eventually Vendor_3, Vendor_4 access stuff at RTRA, they will be using a NAT > address. I have three questions: > > 1. Can I configure NAT such that E1 is the "NAT Inside" interface and have > S1 and S2 both as "NAT Outside" interfaces and then of course the statics. > > 2. Should I have a switch hook up to E2 (not shown in drawing), then hook > Vendor_1, Vendor_2, Vendor_3, etc. hook up to the same VLAN on that switch > and have E2 configure as the only "NAT Outside" interface. That way, E2 is > the only "NAT Outside" interface, but all the Vendors that connect through > that switch will use the same NAT address. > > 3. Is this sort of NAT recommended to be configure on the core router where > all WAN connections come in or should I have another router that connects > directly to RTRA and then do that through there and use any of the questions > in 1 or 2 as the solution. > > Basically, what is the best design for my scenario even if my > solution/question above is not right, any recommendations would be > appreciated. Thanks. > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2784&t=2766 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed CCNP [7:2786]
Hello group: I began my quest for Cisco certifications in December 2000, after getting a severance package (results of a merger) from the employer I spent 19 years adding to their profits! Getting a servance was the best thing that could have happened, even @ 48!! It enabled me to return to the field I enjoyed earlier in my career, telecom. The study materials I used and some subjective observations: CCNA - CCNA Study Guide (2nd edition) by Todd Lammle. The e-trainer was a great addition to an otherwise poorly written book. The book is laced with errors but to Sybex credit there is an errata page! CCNP - by order of study/exams Switching by Sean Odom & Doug Hammond. Exam Prep also had many errors and Coriolis had no errata page! I did like the Joe scenarios in this book. However, Sean provided support for any questions via e-mails. CCNP Routing by Claire Gough was a technically correct book but not a very good read. It too, had errors and Cisco Press had no errata! Remote Access by Craig Dennis & Eric Quinn was an Exam Cram book. A nice resource if you already have the background. I don't recall many errors with this one. Support Study Guide by Mark Buchman with an army of supporting writers! This was the best read among the books chosen. Had some errors in the most unfortunate sections; frame relay and ISDN and no errata by Syngress. I spent a grand total of $826.91 (including 5 exams) and plenty of hours of self-study but it was well worth it!! I also purchased a discounted copy of ACRC published by Syngress, I haven't completed reading it but thus far I like the content. My biggest complaint would be the quality of books out there! Particularly at the introductory level, folks new to the profession may not necessarily know the difference in what's in print and the facts. But then again I suppose they could spend to attend a class conducted/prepared by these same writers. It appears the quest for the "publisher" recognition and the incoming dollars are the motivating factor. My point is: obtaining a CCxx, MCxx or whatever cert indicates the ability to learn, not to write or teach!! Now begin a quest to find a competent CCIE level book Thanks Rick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2786&t=2786 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: CEF [7:2774]
sorry - "ip load-sharing per-packet" is a per-interface command - my slip A - Original Message - From: "andyh" To: "Roberts, Timothy" ; Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 6:39 PM Subject: Re: CEF [7:2774] > CEF will load-balance by default across equal cost routes, on a > per-source-destination address pair. > > all you need configure is "ip cef" globally on the router, and "ip > route-cache cef" on each interface where this functionality is required. > > To load-balance per-packet add "ip load-sharing per-packet" globally. You > may wish to do this if the majority of you traffic is between a single host > at each end of the circuits, where the default method will utilize a single > path, although this may mean that one circuit is used in one direction, and > other in the reverse direction - the routers have no way, or particular need > to know what path has been selected by the remote end. > > hth > > Andy > > - Original Message - > From: "Roberts, Timothy" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 6:04 PM > Subject: CEF [7:2774] > > > > Has anyone used CEF (Cisco Express Forwarding) for load balancing across > > multiple T1s? How is the setup? > > > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is > > for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential > > and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or > > distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please > > contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original > > message. > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2785&t=2774 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fwd: Re: Regarding RIF [7:2787]
for every body who needs to know RIF Regards ALMAZI >From: "Tim O'Brien" >To: >Subject: Re: Regarding RIF >Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 07:57:18 -0500 > >Have a look at this attached pdf. It was more than enough info to pass the >CCIE written as far as RIF and Token Ring differences. > >Tim > > >""Almazi Rashid"" wrote in message >news:... > >Hi All: >Could you guys know how to calculate or figure out RIF from a given network >diagram for SRT,SR/TLB,RSRB environment.Thanks in Advance. > >Regards >Almazi >CCNP,CCIE Theory unsuceesful in first attempt. > > >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/pdf which had a name of Token_Ring.pdf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2787&t=2787 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 1600 Serial connected modem [7:2592]
Config below: hostname ** ! ! username ** password * username callback-dialstring 123456789 password *** isdn switch-type basic-net3 chat-script Callback ABORT ERROR ABORT BUSY "" "ATZ" OK "ATDT \T" TIMEOUT 30 CON NECT \C chat-script offhook "" "ath1" ok \c ! ! interface Serial0 physical-layer async ip address 192.168.30.1 255.255.255.0 ip tcp header-compression passive encapsulation ppp dialer in-band peer default ip address 192.168.30.1 async mode interactive ppp callback accept ppp authentication pap chap callin ! interface BRI0 ip address 192.168.29.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp dialer-group 1 isdn caller 0 peer default ip address 192.168.29.20 ppp authentication chap ppp multilink ! ip classless ! map-class dialer Callback dialer callback-server username dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! line con 0 password login line 1 autoselect during-login autoselect ppp script callback Callback modem InOut modem autoconfigure discovery transport input all stopbits 1 speed 115200 flowcontrol hardware line vty 0 4 password *** login ! end ""Robert Nelson-Cox"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > >Hi Jason, > > Have you set the serial port to Async? > > >I'm working on a serial port set to async with DB60 to DB25 cable. I've > >done > >them on console and aux, but struggling at the moment with serial > >connection. > > > >Regards, > > > >Gaz > > I have two 1600's with Dial-in over the serial ports on WIC-1Ts, they work > great, 115kBaud, rather than 38K on aux ports. > > Rob./ > > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2788&t=2592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passed CCNP [7:2786]
Congratulations Rick, Good luck on your expedition towards CCIE... Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oledrews.com/ccnp NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 12:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Passed CCNP [7:2786] Hello group: I began my quest for Cisco certifications in December 2000, after getting a severance package (results of a merger) from the employer I spent 19 years adding to their profits! Getting a servance was the best thing that could have happened, even @ 48!! It enabled me to return to the field I enjoyed earlier in my career, telecom. The study materials I used and some subjective observations: CCNA - CCNA Study Guide (2nd edition) by Todd Lammle. The e-trainer was a great addition to an otherwise poorly written book. The book is laced with errors but to Sybex credit there is an errata page! CCNP - by order of study/exams Switching by Sean Odom & Doug Hammond. Exam Prep also had many errors and Coriolis had no errata page! I did like the Joe scenarios in this book. However, Sean provided support for any questions via e-mails. CCNP Routing by Claire Gough was a technically correct book but not a very good read. It too, had errors and Cisco Press had no errata! Remote Access by Craig Dennis & Eric Quinn was an Exam Cram book. A nice resource if you already have the background. I don't recall many errors with this one. Support Study Guide by Mark Buchman with an army of supporting writers! This was the best read among the books chosen. Had some errors in the most unfortunate sections; frame relay and ISDN and no errata by Syngress. I spent a grand total of $826.91 (including 5 exams) and plenty of hours of self-study but it was well worth it!! I also purchased a discounted copy of ACRC published by Syngress, I haven't completed reading it but thus far I like the content. My biggest complaint would be the quality of books out there! Particularly at the introductory level, folks new to the profession may not necessarily know the difference in what's in print and the facts. But then again I suppose they could spend to attend a class conducted/prepared by these same writers. It appears the quest for the "publisher" recognition and the incoming dollars are the motivating factor. My point is: obtaining a CCxx, MCxx or whatever cert indicates the ability to learn, not to write or teach!! Now begin a quest to find a competent CCIE level book Thanks Rick FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2789&t=2786 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
I have traced the route as well, the data is not passing across the ISDN link. I also have used extended ping, but it does not ping. Shoaib --- Albert Lu wrote: > Do you know whether data is going across the link at > all? > > Try a trace to the other side, and see what route > the packet takes. > > > Albert > > > -Original Message- > > From: Shoaib Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 10:15 > > To: Albert lu > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping > [7:2712] > > > > > > Yes i also have used an access-list to prevent > eigrp > > to initiate call, and it dials on a ping event, as > > shown by the 'deb dialer events' > > > > shoaib > > > > > > --- Albert Lu wrote: > > > Try using debug dialer events to see if the > dialing > > > actually takes place > > > when you ping. If the dialer doesn't come up, > then > > > it could be a dialer > > > problem. If it does come up, and dialing fails, > then > > > it could be an isdn > > > problem. > > > > > > Albert > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Shoaib Waqar > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 9:54 > > > > To: Albert lu > > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping > > > [7:2712] > > > > > > > > > > > > I have tried dialer profiles, legacy DDR with > > > dialer > > > > mao statement and with floating static route > too, > > > but > > > > still same result, could not ping the > neighbor. > > > > Offcourse there is a dialer-list statement to > > > initiate > > > > call: > > > > > > > > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit > > > > > > > > Shoaib > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Albert Lu wrote: > > > > > I personally think that using dialer > profiles > > > are > > > > > better than hard coding > > > > > the interface. It is also true that there is > no > > > > > dialer-list command to dial > > > > > for interesting traffic, and you don't have > a > > > route > > > > > to use the bri interface > > > > > so it wouldn't know when to dial. > > > > > > > > > > Wouldn't you need a dialer map command for > > > > > interfaces, rather than specify > > > > > dialer string? > > > > > > > > > > Albert > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > > > > Shoaib Waqar > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 6:15 > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Subject: ISDN BRI up but does not ping > > > [7:2712] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am getting trouble in ISDN bri link. I > have > > > a > > > > > > Central site Router 3640 with 12.1.8 > IP/IPX > > > plus > > > > > IOS. > > > > > > the route has 4 port BRI module. The > remote > > > site > > > > > is > > > > > > having 2503, all u know that it has 1 port > > > BRI. > > > > > remote > > > > > > site is running 11.2.1 version of IOS. The > > > call is > > > > > > placed using simple DDR commands as: > > > > > > > > > > > > Cisco 3640 Router > > > > > > = > > > > > > Int bri 2/0 > > > > > > ip add 130.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > > > > > encap ppp > > > > > > dialer idle-timeout 300 > > > > > > dialer fast-idle 300 > > > > > > dialer string > > > > > > dialer-group 1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Remote site (2503): > > > > > > === > > > > > > > > > > > > Int bri 0 > > > > > > ip add 130.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > > > > > > encap ppp > > > > > > dialer idle-timeout 300 > > > > > > dialer fast-idle 300 > > > > > > > > > > > > In this scenario, a/c to customer need, > the > > > > > central > > > > > > site is placing call.When the call has > placed, > > > and > > > > > we > > > > > > see the debug output, it shows all the > debug > > > of > > > > > ppp > > > > > > negotiations and ISDN events as correct, > with > > > the > > > > > > install route at the end. When i run 'show > > > isdn > > > > > > status' it shows me all layers up with one > > > active > > > > > > layer 3 call also. Also 'show isdn active' > > > gives > > > > > me > > > > > > successful call to remote site. So nothing > > > seems > > > > > to be > > > > > > wrong with config. THE problem is that > after > > > > > > connectivity when i try to ping from > central > > > site > > > > > the > > > > > > remote site ip address, it times out. I > took > > > the > > > > > 'show > > > > > > ip route', and it gives me only connected > > > routes > > > > > but > > > > > > dont show me the remote LAN network > address of > > > > > each > > > > > > site which it should give as i m running > EIGRP > > > at > > > > > both > > > > > > sites. The primary link is working > correctly > > > as i > > > > > have > > > > > > an SCPC 128K link between the two sites as > > > well > > > > > and > > > > > > showing correct routes. The switch type in > > > > > pakistan > > > > > > normally we use is basic-net3 (SIEMENS > > > switch). > > > > > Can > > > > > > anyone plzz help me, where is the issue?? > i > >
RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
I have traced the route as well, the data is not passing across the ISDN link. I also have used extended ping, but it does not ping. Shoaib --- Albert Lu wrote: > Do you know whether data is going across the link at > all? > > Try a trace to the other side, and see what route > the packet takes. > > > Albert > > > -Original Message- > > From: Shoaib Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 10:15 > > To: Albert lu > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping > [7:2712] > > > > > > Yes i also have used an access-list to prevent > eigrp > > to initiate call, and it dials on a ping event, as > > shown by the 'deb dialer events' > > > > shoaib > > > > > > --- Albert Lu wrote: > > > Try using debug dialer events to see if the > dialing > > > actually takes place > > > when you ping. If the dialer doesn't come up, > then > > > it could be a dialer > > > problem. If it does come up, and dialing fails, > then > > > it could be an isdn > > > problem. > > > > > > Albert > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Shoaib Waqar > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 9:54 > > > > To: Albert lu > > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping > > > [7:2712] > > > > > > > > > > > > I have tried dialer profiles, legacy DDR with > > > dialer > > > > mao statement and with floating static route > too, > > > but > > > > still same result, could not ping the > neighbor. > > > > Offcourse there is a dialer-list statement to > > > initiate > > > > call: > > > > > > > > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit > > > > > > > > Shoaib > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Albert Lu wrote: > > > > > I personally think that using dialer > profiles > > > are > > > > > better than hard coding > > > > > the interface. It is also true that there is > no > > > > > dialer-list command to dial > > > > > for interesting traffic, and you don't have > a > > > route > > > > > to use the bri interface > > > > > so it wouldn't know when to dial. > > > > > > > > > > Wouldn't you need a dialer map command for > > > > > interfaces, rather than specify > > > > > dialer string? > > > > > > > > > > Albert > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > > > > Shoaib Waqar > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 6:15 > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Subject: ISDN BRI up but does not ping > > > [7:2712] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am getting trouble in ISDN bri link. I > have > > > a > > > > > > Central site Router 3640 with 12.1.8 > IP/IPX > > > plus > > > > > IOS. > > > > > > the route has 4 port BRI module. The > remote > > > site > > > > > is > > > > > > having 2503, all u know that it has 1 port > > > BRI. > > > > > remote > > > > > > site is running 11.2.1 version of IOS. The > > > call is > > > > > > placed using simple DDR commands as: > > > > > > > > > > > > Cisco 3640 Router > > > > > > = > > > > > > Int bri 2/0 > > > > > > ip add 130.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > > > > > encap ppp > > > > > > dialer idle-timeout 300 > > > > > > dialer fast-idle 300 > > > > > > dialer string > > > > > > dialer-group 1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Remote site (2503): > > > > > > === > > > > > > > > > > > > Int bri 0 > > > > > > ip add 130.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > > > > > > encap ppp > > > > > > dialer idle-timeout 300 > > > > > > dialer fast-idle 300 > > > > > > > > > > > > In this scenario, a/c to customer need, > the > > > > > central > > > > > > site is placing call.When the call has > placed, > > > and > > > > > we > > > > > > see the debug output, it shows all the > debug > > > of > > > > > ppp > > > > > > negotiations and ISDN events as correct, > with > > > the > > > > > > install route at the end. When i run 'show > > > isdn > > > > > > status' it shows me all layers up with one > > > active > > > > > > layer 3 call also. Also 'show isdn active' > > > gives > > > > > me > > > > > > successful call to remote site. So nothing > > > seems > > > > > to be > > > > > > wrong with config. THE problem is that > after > > > > > > connectivity when i try to ping from > central > > > site > > > > > the > > > > > > remote site ip address, it times out. I > took > > > the > > > > > 'show > > > > > > ip route', and it gives me only connected > > > routes > > > > > but > > > > > > dont show me the remote LAN network > address of > > > > > each > > > > > > site which it should give as i m running > EIGRP > > > at > > > > > both > > > > > > sites. The primary link is working > correctly > > > as i > > > > > have > > > > > > an SCPC 128K link between the two sites as > > > well > > > > > and > > > > > > showing correct routes. The switch type in > > > > > pakistan > > > > > > normally we use is basic-net3 (SIEMENS > > > switch). > > > > > Can > > > > > > anyone plzz help me, where is the issue?? > i > >
Re: Free Cisco CCIE labs [7:2705]
Oh my goodness, I completely misread your question - I thought you were looking for lab scenario's! My apologies... Here are links to ideas for designing and assembling your lab: http://www.psexams.com/pages/ccielab.htm http://www.solutionlabs.com/diagrams.htm hope this helps... sorry for the misunderstanding -e- - Original Message - From: "LandCai" To: Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:48 PM Subject: Free Cisco CCIE labs [7:2705] > Hello, > >I am preparing to setup a cisco CCIE labs which could be exposed onto > Internet for free access just from my personal view. what I need now is a > sample design for this lab, I want to test all kinds of popular protocols, > including BGP, EIGRP, OSPF, TCP/IP.IPX/SPX, APPLETALK, ISDN., FR, ATM, etc. > Could you give me any suggestion on this, or give some sample on design so I > could start to buy? > > thanks > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2792&t=2705 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Password [7:2793]
Hi All How do you change enable password on pix and router en password 'password' or there is something else I am missing regards = Rajeev Karamchand MCSE,MCSE+I,MCDBA,CCNA __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2793&t=2793 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Password [7:2793]
enable password "password" en is ambiguous between "end" and "enable" - routers take the command without complaining, but don't change the password. This has caught me out before on routers, be interested to know if it affects the PIX also. Andy - Original Message - From: "Rajeev Karamchand" To: Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 8:36 PM Subject: Password [7:2793] > Hi All > > > How do you change enable password on pix and router > > en password 'password' > > or there is something else I am missing > > regards > > > > = > Rajeev Karamchand > MCSE,MCSE+I,MCDBA,CCNA > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2794&t=2793 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Studygroup for lab preparation?... [7:2795]
Friends, I think I remember having two options on what studygroup to join for the CCIE preparation... One of them was meant for people who had already passed the CCIE written and had a date for the Lab Exam. Is this correct? Is there such studygroup? I learn a lot from the messages posted here, but, if there is also another group I would not mind joining... Let me know... thanks in advance. G.P. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2795&t=2795 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Password [7:2793]
Remember that the router has an "enable secret" password that takes precedence over the enable password (which is almost never used). > -Original Message- > From: Rajeev Karamchand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 2:37 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Password [7:2793] > > > Hi All > > > How do you change enable password on pix and router > > en password 'password' > > or there is something else I am missing > > regards > > > > = > Rajeev Karamchand > MCSE,MCSE+I,MCDBA,CCNA > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2796&t=2793 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Password [7:2793]
Thanks to all It worked --- Daniel Cotts wrote: > Remember that the router has an "enable secret" > password that takes > precedence over the enable password (which is almost > never used). > > > -Original Message- > > From: Rajeev Karamchand > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 2:37 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Password [7:2793] > > > > > > Hi All > > > > > > How do you change enable password on pix and > router > > > > en password 'password' > > > > or there is something else I am missing > > > > regards > > > > > > > > = > > Rajeev Karamchand > > MCSE,MCSE+I,MCDBA,CCNA > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great > prices > > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct > > and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > = Rajeev Karamchand MCSE,MCSE+I,MCDBA,CCNA __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2797&t=2793 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Password [7:2793]
At the enable prompt, type in "config t". The command to modify the enable password is "enable password ". This is on Pix 4.2(4) Heather Buri CSC Technology Services - Houston Phone: (713)-961-8592 Fax:(713)-961-8249 Mobile: Alpha Page: Mailing:1360 Post Oak Blvd Suite 500 Houston, TX 77056 -Original Message- From: Rajeev Karamchand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 2:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Password [7:2793] Hi All How do you change enable password on pix and router en password 'password' or there is something else I am missing regards = Rajeev Karamchand MCSE,MCSE+I,MCDBA,CCNA __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2798&t=2793 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
theitweb has linked to your site! [7:2799]
Hi, I visited your www.groupstudy.com website. I have similar content to you and we could each benfit with a reciprical Link. I want to trade links. I've added your website's listing to my link directory: http://www.theitweb.f2s.com/links/themeindex.html. The listing is in the Cisco theme at this page: http://www.theitweb.f2s.com/links/cisco.html. My website is: http://www.theitweb.f2s.com/. Regards, Simon McArdle [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.theitweb.f2s.com/ Info to add my website's link to your website: http://www.theitweb.f2s.com/autorank/autorank.html If you are a link partner, you will receive special treatment with your link located at the top of the page PLUS it will also be listed again in the general listing. A Link Partner image will be placed next to your link letting our visitors know you are a link partner. .. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2799&t=2799 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: Password [7:2793]
same goes for "en secret 'password'" as it happens A - Original Message - From: "andyh" To: Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 8:46 PM Subject: Re: Password [7:2793] > enable password "password" > > en is ambiguous between "end" and "enable" - routers take the command > without complaining, but don't change the password. This has caught me out > before on routers, be interested to know if it affects the PIX also. > > Andy > > - Original Message - > From: "Rajeev Karamchand" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 8:36 PM > Subject: Password [7:2793] > > > > Hi All > > > > > > How do you change enable password on pix and router > > > > en password 'password' > > > > or there is something else I am missing > > > > regards > > > > > > > > = > > Rajeev Karamchand > > MCSE,MCSE+I,MCDBA,CCNA > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices > > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2800&t=2793 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT Virus Alert [7:2801]
there is a pretty nasty virus going around http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] hit our network yesterday spred to half our Novell users and to our Nt servers in a another domain these user do not have any permissions in the development domain but that did not stop the virus. Show how much microsoft security sucks. Norton is slow to reconize this virus all our machines had the lastest update. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2801&t=2801 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727]
ok, my internet email was down for a few hours.. You didn't offend me but you should reflect on how your response looks to the potential customers DMR could have from this list. You are using a corporate email account and therefore everytime you hit that send button, thousands of people have the availability to judge DMR through your actions. If you can't see that then I can't help you either. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 10:38 AM Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > I am sorry if I have offended anyone but to me a two word reply seems > downright ignorant. > > Hence my argument if you do want to help dont > > If you were a customer what would you think of a two word answer to a > solution ?? > > Not professional eitheir... > > Regards, Peter. > > > > > > "Kevin Wigle" on 02/05/2001 15:13:59 > > To: , > cc: > > Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > > > Peter, > > Just what is the matter with you??? > > I'm sure that DMR acceptable use policy for email doesn't include this kind > of abuse. > > Sure Patrick simply stated the obvious - but he didn't do it in an ignorant > way like your response. > > If you don't know that requesting help from your Cisco rep to replace a > lost > CD is obvious then his advice was helpful. > > Otherwise you do yourself and your company a dis-service by going off the > deep end here. > > If I were Patrick I would send this thread to hr @ DMR and ask their > opinion > if this is the type of "advertising" that DMR wants on a high traffic, > highly visible and professional mail list. > > Can you guess their probable reply? > > Kevin Wigle > > - Original Message - > From: > To: > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 9:43 AM > Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > > > > Patrick, > > > > > > Im sorry... but if you going to bother replying at least try to be > f**king > > helpful... > > > > if you are not... dont bother please !!! > > > > Regards, Peter. > > > > > > > > > > > > "Patrick Bass" on 01/05/2001 14:15:21 > > > > To: > > cc: > > > > Subject: Re: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > > > > > > Your Rep > > > > - Original Message - > > From: > > Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco > > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:02 AM > > Subject: Lost Cisco CD [7:2727] > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > We have the Cisco Works 2000 package in work, I wish to re-install this > > > software, but as usual > > > the install CD has gone missing... I only have the documentation > > > > > > Can anyone tell me what the best point of contact in Cisco is for > > obtaining > > > a replacement CD ?? > > > > > > I am thinking this process could take some time > > > > > > Thanks for your help... > > > > > > Best Regards, Peter. > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2802&t=2727 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apology [7:2761]
like I said, my internet mail was down... further reading and now I see this post. I wouldn't have sent my last post if I had read this one first. Anyway, hope this thread is now dead. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 11:55 AM Subject: Apology [7:2761] > Folks, > > I have taken other peoples points of view into account... > > You all have my unreserved apology for my earlier comments, which were > inappropiate. > > Kind Regards, Peter. > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2803&t=2761 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bridging in Token ring environment [7:2804]
Hi All, In following Token ring environment if hostA sends an explorer packet to find address and route information of HostB then how many explorer packets are received at HostB? What I read so far from the books the answer is 6. Correct me if I am wrong. Also does it matter what kind of bridging protocol in use such SRB, RSRB, DLSw etc for NetBIOS or SNA traffic. /-Bridge1--Bridge2\ /\ / \ HostARing1\/Ring2--HostB | \ / | |\/ | |/\ | | / \ | | /\ | |Bridge3---Bridge4| Thanks, __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2804&t=2804 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: retransmission of packets in WAN [7:2525]
I stand duly correct by both of you. :-) Please forgive the SNA goof. Its not something that I've ever worked with so it doesn't stick in my mind all that well. As for the HDLC/LAPB... I know better than that, I just wasn't thinking. All I can say in my defense was that I had just gotten home from a dinner with this fellow from Thrupoint. Too many caphirinas (spelling?). Never mind what I think about the "Cisco way" argument . Cisco isn't the be-all end-all of the universe, there are other fish in the pond and lets leave it at that. :-) Take care, Karen *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 5/1/2001 at 10:55 AM Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: >> >b. HDLC --> The job of HDLC is to ensure that data passed up to the next >>>layer has been received exactly as transmitted (i.e error free, without >loss >>>and in the correct order). >> >>Except Cisco's HDLC doesn't do all that, and for the CCIE test you should >>know the Cisco way. Cisco's HDLC does error detection only. It does not >>retransmit. >> >>Great answer otherwise! >> >>Priscilla > >Not sure if this answer is pedantic or nuanced, but HDLC does have a >role in ensuring that the receiver only passes correct data to its >upper layer: the error detection causes bad data to be dropped. > >Reliable and "unreliable" protocols either have error detection >mechanisms, or have expectations that a layer below them will have >such mechanisms. The question is what to do when an error is >detected: > > -- don't pass the data to the upper layer and, if there is a need >for retransmission, let the sender detect the need and act on it >(This, in general, is the IP way) > -- don't pass the data to the upper layer and send a request for >retransmission > >(Forward error control and redundant transmission (e.g., SSCOP) are >beyond the scope of this discussion) > >> >> >>>c. SDLC --> Less error control than HDLC in that it only provides link >>>integrity. Frames received correctly are acknowledged by the receiver while >>>erroneous frames are ignored. >>> >>>d. Frame-relay --> There is no guarantee of data integrity at all. Error >>>control is sacrificed in the interest of speed. Its assumed that higher >>>layer protocols will handle all necessary error control. The network >>>delivers frames, whether the CRC check matches or not. It does not even >>>necessarily deliver all frames, discarding frames whenever there is network >>>congestion. >>> >>>e. DLSw+ --> Error control is provided by SNA, not DLSw. DLSw only handles >>>link control. Most bridging protocols (as far as I know anyway) deal >>>strictly with getting the data from point A to point B and let the layer >3/4 >>>protocols handle error control/correction. > >In most cases, retransmission comes from TCP, not SNA or DLSw. > >> > >>>f. ATM --> ATM does not have error control functionality (think about what >>>goes into an ATM cell - and what doesn't). Any error control has to be >>>performed by the protocols that are encapsulated in the ATM cells. >>> >>>g. T1, E1 --> These are layer 1 protocols. T1 and E1 deals with signaling >>>and encoding. At this level, its just bits, not frames or packets. Error >>>control is generally handled at layers 2 through 4 (when its done at all). >>> >>>Hope this helps, >>> Karen >>> >>>*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** >>> >>>On 4/30/2001 at 12:28 AM Kuldip Singh wrote: >>> >>> >Hi, >>> > >>> >Can someone help me find out who (router or host) will >>> >retransmit the packets if they were lost in the cloud >>> >while using: >>> >a. X.25 --> guarantees data integrity by using HDLC to handle error >>control. >>> >b. HDLC --> the purpose of this protocol is to provide an error free >link >>>between two connected devices. >>> >c. SDLC --> provides link integrity. Frames received correctly are >>>acknowledged by the receiver while erroneous frames are ignored. >>> >d. Frame-relay --> Think about what makes Frame-Relay different from >X-25. >>>There is no guarantee of data integrity at all. >>> >e. DLSw+ --> Error control is provided by SNA, not DLSw. >>> >f. ATM --> ATM does not have error control functionality (think about >what >>>goes into an ATM cell - and what doesn't). >>> >g. T1, E1 --> These are layer 1 protocols. Error control is generally >>>handled at layers 2 through 4. >>> >to connect from one router to another. >>> > >>> >HostRoutercloudRouterHost >>> > >> > >Thanks >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2805&t=2525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internetwork Design Guide [7:2806]
The on-line Internetwork Design Guide has been recommended several times on this list http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/idg4/ Unfortunately, such a large document can be difficult to work with through the monitor. Thinking it looked familiar, I compared it with a book on my shelf. Cisco CCIE Fundamentals: Network Design and Case Studies http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1578700663/qid%3D988750320/107-269210 9-9525337 The hardbound book has the Internetworking Design Guide supplemented with 200 pages of case studies. It is possible I am the last to realize this, but just in case. Scott T. Wolfe Seattle, Washington Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2806&t=2806 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone want to trade a wic-1dsu-t1 or wic-2t for a 1602r router [7:2807]
Hi, I picked up a cisco 2620 router and need to "fill the slots with funtionality" Unfortunately I'm pretty well tapped out for a while. I have a 1602R router that I'm not using at the moment. It has a 4mb flash card and 12mb ram with 12.0.7 ip plus on it. I was wondering if anyone would want to trade for a wic-1dsu-t1 or a wic-2t? Or if anyone wants to buy it I'd sell for $350 which is what I paid for it before I bumped up the ram and put a higher IOS on it. If not it goes to Ebay Let me know if you're interested Dave H Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2807&t=2807 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT Virus Alert (7:2801) [7:2808]
According to Symantec if you had the latest virus definition files then you should have been fine. This virus is in the March 13 virus definition file, and I know that we are covered here at work with it. You might want to check to make sure that the machines really did have the latest virus definition files, and contact Symantec to be safe. This virus is a HIGH threat it seems. Kelly Dew Information Systems Security Officer Information Security Services USPS [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivering Trust in a Changing World -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 4:57 PM To: Dew, Kelly W - Raleigh, NC; [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Subject: OT Virus Alert [7:2801] there is a pretty nasty virus going around http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] hit our network yesterday spred to half our Novell users and to our Nt servers in a another domain these user do not have any permissions in the development domain but that did not stop the virus. Show how much microsoft security sucks. Norton is slow to reconize this virus all our machines had the lastest update. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2808&t=2808 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
port number list on DOS [7:2809]
OK, I have a DOS question that really is relevant to Cisco networking (sort of. ;-) This came up a couple months ago, but I can't find the answer in the archives. What is the DOS command to see port numbers (services) in use on a PC? Someone posted a command that would let you see the list of TCP and UDP port numbers. One of my students asked how to do this and I remembered that there was a command, but I couldn't remember what it was. Thanks, Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2809&t=2809 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re: Regarding RIF [7:2787]
> >Say the pdf attachment was stripped by the group mailer. Any chance >you >could send it to me at ljones at costco dot com? >Thanks! >Laurel Jones > > > -Original Message- > > From: Almazi Rashid [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 11:06 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject:Fwd: Re: Regarding RIF [7:2787] > > > > for every body who needs to know RIF > > > > Regards > > > > ALMAZI > > > > >From: "Tim O'Brien" > > >To: > > >Subject: Re: Regarding RIF > > >Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 07:57:18 -0500 > > > > > >Have a look at this attached pdf. It was more than enough info to pass > > the > > >CCIE written as far as RIF and Token Ring differences. > > > > > >Tim > > > > > > > > >""Almazi Rashid"" wrote in message > > >news:... > > > > > >Hi All: > > >Could you guys know how to calculate or figure out RIF from a given > > network > > >diagram for SRT,SR/TLB,RSRB environment.Thanks in Advance. > > > > > >Regards > > >Almazi > > >CCNP,CCIE Theory unsuceesful in first attempt. > > > > > > > > > >_ > > >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at >http://www.hotmail.com. > > >_ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at >http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/pdf which had >a > > name of Token_Ring.pdf] > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/pdf which had a name of Token_Ring.pdf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2810&t=2787 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: port number list on DOS [7:2809]
I think you are looking for "netstat". Try "nestat ?" at the command line for the options. Scott ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > OK, I have a DOS question that really is relevant to Cisco networking (sort > of. ;-) This came up a couple months ago, but I can't find the answer in > the archives. > > What is the DOS command to see port numbers (services) in use on a PC? > Someone posted a command that would let you see the list of TCP and UDP > port numbers. One of my students asked how to do this and I remembered that > there was a command, but I couldn't remember what it was. > > Thanks, > > Priscilla > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2811&t=2809 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Free Cisco CCIE labs [7:2705]
The first link is word for word the same as the Doc I have on building a lab. Eugene ""EA Louie"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Oh my goodness, I completely misread your question - I thought you were > looking for lab scenario's! My apologies... > > Here are links to ideas for designing and assembling your lab: > > http://www.psexams.com/pages/ccielab.htm > > http://www.solutionlabs.com/diagrams.htm > > hope this helps... sorry for the misunderstanding > > -e- > - Original Message - > From: "LandCai" > To: > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:48 PM > Subject: Free Cisco CCIE labs [7:2705] > > > > Hello, > > > >I am preparing to setup a cisco CCIE labs which could be exposed onto > > Internet for free access just from my personal view. what I need now is a > > sample design for this lab, I want to test all kinds of popular protocols, > > including BGP, EIGRP, OSPF, TCP/IP.IPX/SPX, APPLETALK, ISDN., FR, ATM, > etc. > > Could you give me any suggestion on this, or give some sample on design so > I > > could start to buy? > > > > thanks > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2812&t=2705 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
Hi, Shoaib.
First of all, you have to check if the ping packet is ever received by
the remote end, is it possible to "debug ip packet" at the remote end?
If it's not possible, check it at the center site with this.
access-list 110 permit ip 130.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 130.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
debug ip packet detail 110
If it's ever really sent to the remote end, then check if your isdn
interface of the remote end has any access-lists configured, which may
block return ping(echo reply) or any policy routing on that matter.
>From your post, I have found nothing wrong with ISDN configuration.
But one thing is missing at the remote end, you have to add
dialer-group command to reset idle timer when interesting packets are
passed. But I guess this is not directly related to your current
problem.
Please let me know how you solved the problem, if it's done.
Regards,
Jaeheon
On 1 May 2001 14:43:19 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Shoaib Waqar")
wrote:
>I have traced the route as well, the data is not
>passing across the ISDN link.
>
>I also have used extended ping, but it does not ping.
>
>Shoaib
>
>--- Albert Lu wrote:
>> Do you know whether data is going across the link at
>> all?
>>
>> Try a trace to the other side, and see what route
>> the packet takes.
>>
>>
>> Albert
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Shoaib Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 10:15
>> > To: Albert lu
>> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Subject: RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping
>> [7:2712]
>> >
>> >
>> > Yes i also have used an access-list to prevent
>> eigrp
>> > to initiate call, and it dials on a ping event, as
>> > shown by the 'deb dialer events'
>> >
>> > shoaib
>> >
>> >
>> > --- Albert Lu wrote:
>> > > Try using debug dialer events to see if the
>> dialing
>> > > actually takes place
>> > > when you ping. If the dialer doesn't come up,
>> then
>> > > it could be a dialer
>> > > problem. If it does come up, and dialing fails,
>> then
>> > > it could be an isdn
>> > > problem.
>> > >
>> > > Albert
>> > >
>> > > > -Original Message-
>> > > > From: Shoaib Waqar
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > > > Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 9:54
>> > > > To: Albert lu
>> > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > > Subject: RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping
>> > > [7:2712]
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > I have tried dialer profiles, legacy DDR with
>> > > dialer
>> > > > mao statement and with floating static route
>> too,
>> > > but
>> > > > still same result, could not ping the
>> neighbor.
>> > > > Offcourse there is a dialer-list statement to
>> > > initiate
>> > > > call:
>> > > >
>> > > > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
>> > > >
>> > > > Shoaib
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --- Albert Lu wrote:
>> > > > > I personally think that using dialer
>> profiles
>> > > are
>> > > > > better than hard coding
>> > > > > the interface. It is also true that there is
>> no
>> > > > > dialer-list command to dial
>> > > > > for interesting traffic, and you don't have
>> a
>> > > route
>> > > > > to use the bri interface
>> > > > > so it wouldn't know when to dial.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Wouldn't you need a dialer map command for
>> > > > > interfaces, rather than specify
>> > > > > dialer string?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Albert
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > -Original Message-
>> > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>> > > > > > Shoaib Waqar
>> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 6:15
>> > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > > > > Subject: ISDN BRI up but does not ping
>> > > [7:2712]
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I am getting trouble in ISDN bri link. I
>> have
>> > > a
>> > > > > > Central site Router 3640 with 12.1.8
>> IP/IPX
>> > > plus
>> > > > > IOS.
>> > > > > > the route has 4 port BRI module. The
>> remote
>> > > site
>> > > > > is
>> > > > > > having 2503, all u know that it has 1 port
>> > > BRI.
>> > > > > remote
>> > > > > > site is running 11.2.1 version of IOS. The
>> > > call is
>> > > > > > placed using simple DDR commands as:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Cisco 3640 Router
>> > > > > > =
>> > > > > > Int bri 2/0
>> > > > > > ip add 130.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
>> > > > > > encap ppp
>> > > > > > dialer idle-timeout 300
>> > > > > > dialer fast-idle 300
>> > > > > > dialer string
>> > > > > > dialer-group 1
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Remote site (2503):
>> > > > > > ===
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Int bri 0
>> > > > > > ip add 130.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
>> > > > > > encap ppp
>> > > > > > dialer idle-timeout 300
>> > > > > > dialer fast-idle 300
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > In this scenario, a/c to customer need,
>> the
>> > > > > central
>> > > > > > site is placing call.When the call has
>> placed,
>> > > and
>> > > > > we
>> > > > > > see the debug output, it shows all the
>> debug
>> > > of
>> > > > > ppp
>> > > > > > negotiations and ISDN events as correct,
>> with
>> > > the
>> > > > > > install route at the end. When i
RE: port number list on DOS [7:2809]
Windows= netstat -a steve -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 4:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: port number list on DOS [7:2809] OK, I have a DOS question that really is relevant to Cisco networking (sort of. ;-) This came up a couple months ago, but I can't find the answer in the archives. What is the DOS command to see port numbers (services) in use on a PC? Someone posted a command that would let you see the list of TCP and UDP port numbers. One of my students asked how to do this and I remembered that there was a command, but I couldn't remember what it was. Thanks, Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2814&t=2809 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
