RE: Suggestions CCIP Or CQS Security ? [7:27765]

2001-11-30 Thread Mark Odette II

IMHO- I would pursue the CSS1... only because you can never go wrong with a
strong Internetwork Security qualification.
They seem to be in rare form in my opinion, and I think that is why Cisco,
Network Associates, Checkpoint, etc. are really pushing their security
products/certifications... They know how much everyone is running their
networks with sloppy security, and are either just capitalizing on it, or
trying to emphasize the importance of it - or maybe both.

Like I said, IMHO, with firm Security understanding and certification, you
can't go wrong. (Thinking Long-term)

Mark Odette II
StellarConnection Services

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
G.E. Murphy
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Suggestions CCIP Or CQS Security ? [7:27765]


Hello fellow professionals. I hope your quests for Cisco certifications are
going well. I have a question and am curious of your opinions. I have CCNP
and CCDP and am interested in either CCIP or CQS Security (CSS1). I am not
at this time pursuing CCIE as it does not fit into my career at this time. I
have a full time job (40 hours) as a network engineer providing
support/implementation/design of an enterprise. We are rolling out new
backbone structures and a redundant data center soon (CCIP would be good
training especially metro). I also work about 10 hours on the side
consulting on mostly small business projects, VPNs, security tightening etc
and really like and it puts some nice extra change in the pocket (Cisco
Security would be a nice tag to have here) so to you out there does CCIP
just seem like another "P" and too similar or would it be better to the
three "P"s or does CCNP, CCDP, CSS1 have a better overall ring to it ? I am
just trying to get the most bang for the cert buck as I like the way things
are now as far as overall pay goes and like being popular in the consulting
arena...

Thanks for any opinions/suggestions




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27778&t=27765
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: CCNP [7:27651]

2001-11-30 Thread Hans PHAM

Chinh Pham-Tuong wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I am repair to take CCNP examination , please help me
> the `web site` that includes `question and answer`
> about CCNP
> Thanks a lot
> PTC

www.selftest.com   --> Great, very similar to REAL exam
www.boson.com --> Good , but harder than real Cisco exam. In addition, many
quesion in BOSON tests ask users to enter exact IOS commands. This is not
the case in the real exam.

Bye the way, ... YOU ARE PREPAIRING to take CCNP exams, but not ...
REPAIR   bicycle, hi` hi` :-)) Just kidding,



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27779&t=27651
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ACL on Port-channel interface [7:27780]

2001-11-30 Thread Hyun Seop Jung

Hi! Everyone!
I have a question.
Is it possible to apply acl on port-channel interface or port-channel
sub-interface?
According to my experience, Router print out following message;
'Acl is not supported on port-channel interface'
Well then, Isn't there the other method to solve this problem?
Any answer would be appreciated!!


Regards...




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27780&t=27780
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IP telephony [7:27533]

2001-11-30 Thread Patrick Donlon

Anil

First thing, are you connecting you PBX to the routers via fxs/fxo ports?
are they already in place?
As for MGCP and H323, I don't know too much about MGCP and I think it's used
for controlling gateways and higher layers features than H323 ( anyone
please feel free to comment), so go for H323 as you just want to originate
and terminate H323 traffic between your routers and CMs.

Have a look at this url on the cco for config's
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/nubuvoip/voip5300/ind
ex.htm
it's mainly about AS5300s but the platform doesn't really matter once the
interfaces are configured. Let me know if you need more info,

cheers

Pat


""Anil Kumar""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This is the Voice network  i am implementing.
> Voip on this network is working.
>
> Analog PhoneAnalog Phone
>   |  |
>   |  |
>   |  |
>
> IPtelphone->CCM3.0->3660 Router-->3640 Router-->IPtelephone
>With NM-HDVWith NM-HDV
>   (Main Office)  (Remote Office)
>
>
>
> The problem which i am facing is the call routing between
> the IP telephone & the Analog phones to both locations.
> I am bit confused, and not sure to use which type of
> Gateway Types ( MGCP, or H.323) for the 3660 Routers.
> I read that MGCP is being used for mainly FXS/ FXO ports.
>
> I am using an R2 Digital Signalling for the NM-HDV card.
> I have enclosed the config of the main location, the same
> carries for the remote location too.
>
> Request your sugesstion / Comments on this.
>
> Regards.. Anil
>
>
>
> Current configuration:
> !
> version 12.1
> service timestamps debug datetime msec
> service timestamps log uptime
> no service password-encryption
> service udp-small-servers max-servers no-limit
> !
>
> !
> enable secret 5 $1$QdNt$.YqZyaiFoHfFW.ZP1yHzG/
>
> !
> !
> !
> !
> !
> memory-size iomem 10
> voice-card 2
> !
> ip subnet-zero
> ip dhcp ping timeout 2000
> ip dhcp relay information option
> !
> ip dhcp-server 179.65.51.20
> lane client flush
> isdn switch-type primary-net5
> cns event-service server
> !
> !
> voice class permanent 10
> signal pattern idle transmit 0001
> signal pattern idle receive 0001
> !
> !
> !
> !
> !
> !
> controller E1 1/0
>  framing NO-CRC4
>  clock source internal
>  channel-group 1 timeslots 1-31
>  description connected to Branch
> !
> controller E1 2/0
>  framing NO-CRC4
>  clock source internal
>  ds0-group 0 timeslots 1-15,17-31 type r2-digital dtmf dnis
>  description CONNECTED TO NORTEL EPABX
> !
> !
> !
> interface Multilink1
>  ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.252
>  ip helper-address 179.65.51.20
>  ip directed-broadcast
>  ip tcp header-compression iphc-format
>  no ip mroute-cache
>  fair-queue 2048 2048 1000
>  no cdp enable
>  ppp multilink
>  ppp multilink fragment-delay 20
>  ppp multilink interleave
>  multilink-group 1
>  ip rtp header-compression iphc-format
>  ip rtp priority 16384 16383 1488
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/0
>  ip address 179.65.51.1 255.255.0.0
>  ip helper-address 179.65.51.20
>  ip directed-broadcast
>  no ip mroute-cache
>  speed auto
>  half-duplex
>  no cdp enable
> !
> interface Serial1/0:1
>  no ip address
>  ip helper-address 179.65.51.20
>  ip directed-broadcast
>  encapsulation ppp
>  ip mroute-cache
>  no fair-queue
>  ppp multilink
>  multilink-group 1
> !
> ip classless
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1
> no ip http server
> !
> dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
> dialer-list 1 protocol ipx permit
> no cdp advertise-v2
> !
> snmp-server engineID local 000902024B24BF30
> snmp-server community public RO
> snmp-server packetsize 2048
> !
> voice-port 2/0:0
>  no modem passthrough
>  cptone GB
> !
> dial-peer voice 100 voip
>  destination-pattern 125T
>  session target ipv4:192.168.0.1
>  codec g711alaw
>  ip precedence 5
> !
> dial-peer voice 10 pots
>  destination-pattern 116T
>  port 2/0:0
>  forward-digits all
> !
> !
> line con 0
>  transport input none
> line aux 0
> line vty 0 4
>  exec-timeout 20 0
>  login
> !
> end
>
> HO#
>
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
> http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27781&t=27533
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ccprep.com [7:27782]

2001-11-30 Thread Kenneth Yeung

Hi all,
Is anyone who has tried the lab. exercise offered by ccprep.com?
Is it good for ccie lab. preparation?  If so, I will buy it.  Thx.



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27782&t=27782
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]

2001-11-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sincerely  do not know, when you find out let me know. To me using /31 is
against all subnet rules, /31 gives you a subnet mask of 255.255.255.254,
with two host addresses each, but these addresses are not usable.

The most I have used and seen people use is /30 (255.255.255.252), for WAN
interface IP address allocations.

Regards.
Oletu

- Original Message -
From: Nicolas FEVRIER 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:39 PM
Subject: /31 subnet. [7:27742]


> Hi group,
>
> I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an interface ?
>
> Thanxx.
>
> Nicolas.
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27783&t=27742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 2500 Router problem [7:27695]

2001-11-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

You can see that Router 2 is on a different subnet other than Router 1 and
I also guess you do not have a route defined from one Router to the other.
Either give Router 2 an IP address on network 192.168.1.n (or give Router 1
an IP address on network 192.168.2.n---both interfaces must be on the same
Network) or better still, defiine a default route or a static route from
each Router pointing to the other and you will be done.

Regards.
Oletu
- Original Message -
From: James gruggett 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:53 AM
Subject: 2500 Router problem [7:27695]


> I have a lab setup as follows: 2 2500 series routers connected to a 2900
> switch.
>
> Router1 E0 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
> Router 2 E0 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
> SwitchIP 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0
>
> I can ping and telnet to Router 1 and the switch. I can not ping
> Router2. When I telnet I receive this error message(Cam't open
> connection to host on port 23, a socket operation was attempted to an
> unreachable host)
>
> I console into Router 2 and E0 looks fine with ip ans it states it is
> administrately up.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27784&t=27695
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



VPN between Checkpoint and Pix [7:27787]

2001-11-30 Thread Ramesh c

Hi guys,

Is there any site which give details(Configuration,specs)abt  VPN between
Pix firewall and checkpt firewall using IPSec.

TIA

Cheers
Ramesh




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27787&t=27787
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Home lab - 2523 [7:27788]

2001-11-30 Thread Ham web

hi folks,

Joust wanted to know if the 2523 was a good buy to act
as a frame relay/x.25 switch in a home lab

Many thanks

Ham

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27788&t=27788
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Home lab - 2523 [7:27788]

2001-11-30 Thread xie rootstock

yes, of course, 2522 and 2523 both are good buy but expensiveHam web wrote:
> 
> hi folks,
> 
> Joust wanted to know if the 2523 was a good buy to act
> as a frame relay/x.25 switch in a home lab
> 
> Many thanks
> 
> Ham
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just
> $8.95/month.
> http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
> 
> 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27789&t=27788
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



i could not deleted this config !!! [7:27790]

2001-11-30 Thread xie rootstock

ip nat translation timeout never
ip nat translation tcp-timeout never
ip nat translation udp-timeout never
ip nat translation finrst-timeout never
ip nat translation syn-timeout never
ip nat translation dns-timeout never
ip nat translation icmp-timeout never
ip classless


i did anything i can do, even erase the nvram could not worked, :(


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27790&t=27790
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Re: Retrieve Cisco config (via SNMP) [7:27791]

2001-11-30 Thread anil

Hope someone can help:
Is it possible to upgrade my c1603 to IOS 12.x using the existing hardware?
Do I need to upgrade the RAM?
Thanks
-Anil
--

 rustyb#sh ver
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) 1600 Software (C1600-Y-L), Version 11.1(12)AA, EARLY DEPLOYMENT
RELEASE
 SOFTWARE (fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-1997 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Mon 09-Jun-97 14:20 by krunyan
Image text-base: 0x0801A214, data-base: 0x02005000
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(10)AA, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc
1)
ROM: 1600 Software (C1600-BOOT-R), Version 11.1(10)AA, EARLY DEPLOYMENT
RELEASE
SOFTWARE (fc1)
rustyb uptime is 1 day, 21 minutes
System restarted by power-on
System image file is "flash:c1600-y-l.111-12.AA", booted via flash

cisco 1603 (68360) processor (revision C) with 17920K/512K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID 11324937
Bridging software.
X.25 software, Version 2.0, NET2, BFE and GOSIP compliant.
Basic Rate ISDN software, Version 1.0.
1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface.
1 ISDN Basic Rate interface.
System/IO memory with parity disabled
2048K bytes of DRAM onboard 16384K bytes of DRAM on SIMM
System running from FLASH
8K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
4096K bytes of processor board PCMCIA flash (Read ONLY)

Configuration register is 0x2102




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27791&t=27791
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Retrieve Cisco config (via SNMP) [7:27792]

2001-11-30 Thread anil

Using the MIB .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.55 you can write the config to a tftp
server on your network.

"to write the configuration of a Cisco router to tftp server the command
would be:
snmpset -c   .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.55.  octetstring "

Does anyone happen to know what the *OCTECTSTRING* is?
I presume the filename is the name of the file to be saved on the TFTP
server.
Has anyone aactually tried this command?


Thanks
-Anil




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27792&t=27792
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Using TFTP and Notepad for CCIE Lab [7:27793]

2001-11-30 Thread Wilson, Christian

I read about a lot of people using a text editor and tftp to create and
manipulate their configurations to save time on the CCIE Lab exam.  I
understand the benefits of using this technique, but sometimes it seems as
if it takes quite a while for me to set up the required routing to reach all
of my routers via tftp.  My real question concerns the use of a terminal
server in this situation.  I do not have a terminal server, but my
understanding is that you telnet to the terminal server, which in turn has
reverse telnet connections to each routers console port.  If I was connected
to the terminal server via a PC that had tftp server software installed, is
there an easy way to use the reverse telnet connection to each router for
the tftp file transfer?  If not, would I have to have a tftp server
connected to one router's Ethernet, and then set up routing to that
ethernet's subnet on each router?  I am trying to invision how this
technique would save time in the lab if a tftp server is not readily
available on a subnet common to all devices in the rack.  I know a router
can be configured as a tftp server, but I believe that it can only answer
requests and can not be copied to.  Any help would be greatly appreciated as
I sit the lab on Feb 1 and I would like to develop some solid time-saving
techniques.  Thank you!




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27793&t=27793
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Using TFTP and Notepad for CCIE Lab [7:27793]

2001-11-30 Thread Maurizio Moroni

I guess you can do two things:

1) Build a text file with all the alias command you want to use and keep it
handy;

2) Use Notepad (or vi ;-) on your PC to build all the configuration needed
for the router. When you are
   connected to the router (with a terminal emulation program, eg.
Hyperterminal), just copy & paste your command from
   Notepad to the router prompt. You can do the same with the alias
commands.

No tftp or any configuration is needed to do this.

my .2 cents ;-)

Maurizio


-Original Message-
From: Wilson, Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 November 2001 13:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Using TFTP and Notepad for CCIE Lab [7:27793]


I read about a lot of people using a text editor and tftp to create and
manipulate their configurations to save time on the CCIE Lab exam.  I
understand the benefits of using this technique, but sometimes it seems as
if it takes quite a while for me to set up the required routing to reach all
of my routers via tftp.  My real question concerns the use of a terminal
server in this situation.  I do not have a terminal server, but my
understanding is that you telnet to the terminal server, which in turn has
reverse telnet connections to each routers console port.  If I was connected
to the terminal server via a PC that had tftp server software installed, is
there an easy way to use the reverse telnet connection to each router for
the tftp file transfer?  If not, would I have to have a tftp server
connected to one router's Ethernet, and then set up routing to that
ethernet's subnet on each router?  I am trying to invision how this
technique would save time in the lab if a tftp server is not readily
available on a subnet common to all devices in the rack.  I know a router
can be configured as a tftp server, but I believe that it can only answer
requests and can not be copied to.  Any help would be greatly appreciated as
I sit the lab on Feb 1 and I would like to develop some solid time-saving
techniques.  Thank you!




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27794&t=27793
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CCO CD's [7:27701]

2001-11-30 Thread VoIP Guy

Thanks guys.  I tried one last night and it worked.

Steve

""Alex Lee""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> It should be somewhere in the archives. Let me recap a group-member's
> recommendation :-
>
> Quote
> open the 'search.ini' file under CiscoCD directory, locate this line
>
>   Browser=C:\Program~1\intern~1\iexplorer.exe
>
> change it to
>
>  Browser=
>
> then save on exit.
> Unquote
>
>
> ""VoIP Guy""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Here's question that I have never got answered.
> >
> > How in te world do I get those CCO CD's to work?  I always install them
> and
> > try to open up the page and get a blank page.   I can browse the CD and
> get
> > to the home page that way, but as soon as I click on a link, it looks
> almost
> > like it's encrypted.
> >
> > I have tried IE, netscape, installing all the apps on the CD.
> > What am I doing wrong?
> >
> > Steve




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27796&t=27701
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]

2001-11-30 Thread VoIP Guy

Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses in a
/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link, so how
are there 50% of the addresses wasted.

Steve


""MADMAN""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> avaivalable addresses.
>
>   Dave
>
> Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> >
> > Hi group,
> >
> > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an interface ?
> >
> > Thanxx.
> >
> > Nicolas.
> --
> David Madland
> Sr. Network Engineer
> CCIE# 2016
> Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 612-664-3367
>
> "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27795&t=27742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: VPN between Checkpoint and Pix [7:27787]

2001-11-30 Thread Bullock, Jason

do a search on the cco and this comes up.

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cp-r.shtml

jason

-Original Message-
From: Ramesh c [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 05:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VPN between Checkpoint and Pix [7:27787]


Hi guys,

Is there any site which give details(Configuration,specs)abt  VPN between
Pix firewall and checkpt firewall using IPSec.

TIA

Cheers
Ramesh




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27798&t=27787
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: i could not deleted this config !!! [7:27790]

2001-11-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

These are default statements, I believe.

Thanx,

Mark

> ip nat translation timeout never
> ip nat translation tcp-timeout never
> ip nat translation udp-timeout never
> ip nat translation finrst-timeout never
> ip nat translation syn-timeout never
> ip nat translation dns-timeout never
> ip nat translation icmp-timeout never
> ip classless
> 
> 
> i did anything i can do, even erase the nvram could not worked, :(




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27799&t=27790
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



VIRUS - RE: RE: Security Exams Textbooks Required [7:27800]

2001-11-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

It seems a virus...






-Original Message-
From: Derek Gaff [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2001 11:56
To: Hugo Caye
Subject: Re: RE: Security Exams Textbooks Required [7:27321]=20

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/bmp which had a name of
Outlook.bmp]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27800&t=27800
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Laptop keeps same gateway even when on different r [7:27801]

2001-11-30 Thread A. Dominick Marino

Just a quick note.

That product is no longer available.

You need the Corporate Edition for W2K

Regards,

--
A. Dominick Marino
Quality Networking Inc.
516-480-2973


""Dave Nachman""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Jerry - On my laptop I am always switching around my network configs,
> someplaces I go to require a static IP, others DHCP, some require a domain
> login other don't.  Not to mention the different server names and printers
I
> have to connect to.
>
> My solution, Mobile Essentials from Symantec.  I got a free personal
edition
> software right off their web site.  Now all I have to do is configure a
> profile for each network I use, and select that when I login to my laptop,
> it will make all the adjustments and provide me with a complete connection
> anywhere.
>
> Dave Nachman
> www.davenetworks.com
>
> Jerry Deer wrote:
> >
> > > Hello all,  I am having a problem that i am hoping someone
> > who has had
> > > same experience can shed some light on. I have a laptop that
> > i use at my
> > > office and at home through frame relay network to my office (
> > using dhcp )
> > > The problem i am having is the laptop keeps the default
> > gateway of the
> > > office  ( i discovered this using a routeprint at dos prompt)
> > so i can
> > > connect to any thing at home or office but no other frame
> > relay networks
> > > that are also connected to our office. I have ruled out
> > router as problem
> > > because i can ping all subnets from the router but it is just
> > from the pc
> > > . Getting frustrated and hoping some kind soul will put me in
> > right
> > > direction!
> > > thanks
> > > JD




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27801&t=27801
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet (now with info link) [7:27802]

2001-11-30 Thread Craig Columbus

With a /30 you use 4 IP addresses (network, 2 node, 1 broadcast).  You save 
addresses with a /31.
Here's a link with more info:

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3021.txt?number=3021

Thanks,
Craig

At 08:32 AM 11/30/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses in a
>/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link, so how
>are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
>
>Steve
>
>
>""MADMAN""  wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> > avaivalable addresses.
> >
> >   Dave
> >
> > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi group,
> > >
> > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an interface ?
> > >
> > > Thanxx.
> > >
> > > Nicolas.
> > --
> > David Madland
> > Sr. Network Engineer
> > CCIE# 2016
> > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 612-664-3367
> >
> > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27802&t=27802
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet (now with info link) [7:27802]

2001-11-30 Thread VoIP Guy

I know that, but the network and broadcast addresses are unusable.  Thus the
two good addresses for hosts.
""Craig Columbus""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> With a /30 you use 4 IP addresses (network, 2 node, 1 broadcast).  You
save
> addresses with a /31.
> Here's a link with more info:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3021.txt?number=3021
>
> Thanks,
> Craig
>
> At 08:32 AM 11/30/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> >Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses in a
> >/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link, so how
> >are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
> >
> >Steve
> >
> >
> >""MADMAN""  wrote in message
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> > > avaivalable addresses.
> > >
> > >   Dave
> > >
> > > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi group,
> > > >
> > > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an interface
?
> > > >
> > > > Thanxx.
> > > >
> > > > Nicolas.
> > > --
> > > David Madland
> > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > CCIE# 2016
> > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 612-664-3367
> > >
> > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27803&t=27802
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: dial in [7:27703]

2001-11-30 Thread 416South

Anyone successfull with this using Win2000 and Hyperterm? 
If so what type of modem are you using? 

Thanks


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27804&t=27703
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Subnetting [7:27808]

2001-11-30 Thread Andy Hutchinson

Can anyone help !
I have been assigned by our Head Office a Class B address
(Let's say 172.133.205.0) with a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0
which gives me 254 hosts available.
However i have to split this between 3 locations
like so :

Loc A : Minimum Addresses Required 160 (HQ)
Loc B : Minumum Addresses Required 16
Loc C : Minumum Addresses Required 48

Loc B & C will each have a router that connects to a router at Loc A.

Any ideas on how this can done ?

Thanks

Andy Hutchinson


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27808&t=27808
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet (now with info link) [7:27802]

2001-11-30 Thread VoIP Guy

I read the RFC, so I guess it can be used.  My bad.

AM I correct in saying that one interface will be assigned the all zero
subnet as it's IP and the other will be assigned the broadcast IP address
for that subnet?

Steve



""VoIP Guy""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I know that, but the network and broadcast addresses are unusable.  Thus
the
> two good addresses for hosts.
> ""Craig Columbus""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > With a /30 you use 4 IP addresses (network, 2 node, 1 broadcast).  You
> save
> > addresses with a /31.
> > Here's a link with more info:
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3021.txt?number=3021
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Craig
> >
> > At 08:32 AM 11/30/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> > >Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses in
a
> > >/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link, so
how
> > >are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
> > >
> > >Steve
> > >
> > >
> > >""MADMAN""  wrote in message
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> > > > avaivalable addresses.
> > > >
> > > >   Dave
> > > >
> > > > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi group,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > > > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an
interface
> ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanxx.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nicolas.
> > > > --
> > > > David Madland
> > > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > > CCIE# 2016
> > > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 612-664-3367
> > > >
> > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27806&t=27802
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: /31 subnet. [7:27742]

2001-11-30 Thread Lange, Eric

I think this can sum it up.

http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3021.html

-Eric

-Original Message-
From: VoIP Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 7:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]


Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses in a
/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link, so how
are there 50% of the addresses wasted.

Steve


""MADMAN""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> avaivalable addresses.
>
>   Dave
>
> Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> >
> > Hi group,
> >
> > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an interface ?
> >
> > Thanxx.
> >
> > Nicolas.
> --
> David Madland
> Sr. Network Engineer
> CCIE# 2016
> Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 612-664-3367
>
> "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27809&t=27742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet (now with info link) [7:27802]

2001-11-30 Thread VoIP Guy

Just tried it and the router dosen't even allow an interface to use a /31
mask, even with ip subnet-zero enabled.


""VoIP Guy""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I read the RFC, so I guess it can be used.  My bad.
>
> AM I correct in saying that one interface will be assigned the all zero
> subnet as it's IP and the other will be assigned the broadcast IP address
> for that subnet?
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> ""VoIP Guy""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I know that, but the network and broadcast addresses are unusable.  Thus
> the
> > two good addresses for hosts.
> > ""Craig Columbus""  wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > With a /30 you use 4 IP addresses (network, 2 node, 1 broadcast).  You
> > save
> > > addresses with a /31.
> > > Here's a link with more info:
> > >
> > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3021.txt?number=3021
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Craig
> > >
> > > At 08:32 AM 11/30/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> > > >Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses
in
> a
> > > >/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link, so
> how
> > > >are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
> > > >
> > > >Steve
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >""MADMAN""  wrote in message
> > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> > > > > avaivalable addresses.
> > > > >
> > > > >   Dave
> > > > >
> > > > > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi group,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > > > > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an
> interface
> > ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanxx.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nicolas.
> > > > > --
> > > > > David Madland
> > > > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > > > CCIE# 2016
> > > > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > 612-664-3367
> > > > >
> > > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27807&t=27802
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]

2001-11-30 Thread Carroll Kong

Law of subnets is a tradeoff.  Bigger subnets, have higher 
efficiency, at the cost of bigger broadcast domains.  Smaller subnets have 
abysmal efficiency, at the benefit of smaller broadcast domains.
 /31 is a new RFC proposed rule which eliminates the loss of 
effiency of 50% to.. 0%.
 /30 has 2 usable addresses but loses 2 for broadcast and 
network.  So, you need 4 ips to make the subnet, but you only can use 
2.  50% efficiency.  /31 is going to let you take 2, and use 2, and ignore 
the broadcast and network need.  This is ideal for point to point.

At 08:32 AM 11/30/01 -0500, VoIP Guy wrote:
>Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses in a
>/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link, so how
>are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
>
>Steve
>
>
>""MADMAN""  wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> > avaivalable addresses.
> >
> >   Dave
> >
> > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi group,
> > >
> > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an interface ?
> > >
> > > Thanxx.
> > >
> > > Nicolas.
> > --
> > David Madland
> > Sr. Network Engineer
> > CCIE# 2016
> > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 612-664-3367
> >
> > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
-Carroll Kong




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27810&t=27742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]

2001-11-30 Thread VoIP Guy

It doesn't work in Cisco routers.

""Carroll Kong""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Law of subnets is a tradeoff.  Bigger subnets, have higher
> efficiency, at the cost of bigger broadcast domains.  Smaller subnets have
> abysmal efficiency, at the benefit of smaller broadcast domains.
>  /31 is a new RFC proposed rule which eliminates the loss of
> effiency of 50% to.. 0%.
>  /30 has 2 usable addresses but loses 2 for broadcast and
> network.  So, you need 4 ips to make the subnet, but you only can use
> 2.  50% efficiency.  /31 is going to let you take 2, and use 2, and ignore
> the broadcast and network need.  This is ideal for point to point.
>
> At 08:32 AM 11/30/01 -0500, VoIP Guy wrote:
> >Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses in a
> >/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link, so how
> >are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
> >
> >Steve
> >
> >
> >""MADMAN""  wrote in message
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> > > avaivalable addresses.
> > >
> > >   Dave
> > >
> > > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi group,
> > > >
> > > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an interface
?
> > > >
> > > > Thanxx.
> > > >
> > > > Nicolas.
> > > --
> > > David Madland
> > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > CCIE# 2016
> > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 612-664-3367
> > >
> > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
> -Carroll Kong




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27811&t=27742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Subnetting [7:27808]

2001-11-30 Thread VoIP Guy

If you really got a class B, it would be 255.255.0.0, where you could just
create 254 Class C networks.

If you got a class C network, you can't do it without more VLANs.

""Andy Hutchinson""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can anyone help !
> I have been assigned by our Head Office a Class B address
> (Let's say 172.133.205.0) with a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0
> which gives me 254 hosts available.
> However i have to split this between 3 locations
> like so :
>
> Loc A : Minimum Addresses Required 160 (HQ)
> Loc B : Minumum Addresses Required 16
> Loc C : Minumum Addresses Required 48
>
> Loc B & C will each have a router that connects to a router at Loc A.
>
> Any ideas on how this can done ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Andy Hutchinson




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27812&t=27808
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Re: Retrieve Cisco config (via SNMP) [7:27791]

2001-11-30 Thread Andrunavicius Giedrius

Yes You can; I have done the same thing on C1601 - put IOS 12.1.11 which is
allready compressed. Routers are working fine


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27814&t=27791
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]

2001-11-30 Thread Steve Smith

ctrl-shift-F6.

-Original Message-
From: Hollis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]


Does anyone know an escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) to use
while
within a Term server session.

Say I need to stop an unsuccessful traceroute... but when I do
Ctl-Shift-6(x) it takes me back to my Term server.

Thanks.

kk/USN




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27815&t=27760
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]

2001-11-30 Thread Craig Columbus

Actually, it does work with the correct platform and IOS version.
Here's the link.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122t/122t2/ft31addr.htm


Craig


At 09:44 AM 11/30/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>It doesn't work in Cisco routers.
>
>""Carroll Kong""  wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Law of subnets is a tradeoff.  Bigger subnets, have higher
> > efficiency, at the cost of bigger broadcast domains.  Smaller subnets
have
> > abysmal efficiency, at the benefit of smaller broadcast domains.
> >  /31 is a new RFC proposed rule which eliminates the loss of
> > effiency of 50% to.. 0%.
> >  /30 has 2 usable addresses but loses 2 for broadcast and
> > network.  So, you need 4 ips to make the subnet, but you only can use
> > 2.  50% efficiency.  /31 is going to let you take 2, and use 2, and
ignore
> > the broadcast and network need.  This is ideal for point to point.
> >
> > At 08:32 AM 11/30/01 -0500, VoIP Guy wrote:
> > >Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses in a
> > >/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link, so
how
> > >are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
> > >
> > >Steve
> > >
> > >
> > >""MADMAN""  wrote in message
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> > > > avaivalable addresses.
> > > >
> > > >   Dave
> > > >
> > > > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi group,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > > > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an
interface
>?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanxx.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nicolas.
> > > > --
> > > > David Madland
> > > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > > CCIE# 2016
> > > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 612-664-3367
> > > >
> > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
> > -Carroll Kong




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27816&t=27742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]

2001-11-30 Thread John Neiberger

It does work with Cisco routers, but it's a new feature in 12.2. 
Hmm...it may even be 12.2T, not 12.2, but it is definitely available
now.

>>> "VoIP Guy"  11/30/01 7:44:28 AM >>>
It doesn't work in Cisco routers.

""Carroll Kong""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Law of subnets is a tradeoff.  Bigger subnets, have higher
> efficiency, at the cost of bigger broadcast domains.  Smaller subnets
have
> abysmal efficiency, at the benefit of smaller broadcast domains.
>  /31 is a new RFC proposed rule which eliminates the loss of
> effiency of 50% to.. 0%.
>  /30 has 2 usable addresses but loses 2 for broadcast and
> network.  So, you need 4 ips to make the subnet, but you only can
use
> 2.  50% efficiency.  /31 is going to let you take 2, and use 2, and
ignore
> the broadcast and network need.  This is ideal for point to point.
>
> At 08:32 AM 11/30/01 -0500, VoIP Guy wrote:
> >Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses
in a
> >/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link,
so how
> >are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
> >
> >Steve
> >
> >
> >""MADMAN""  wrote in message
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> > > avaivalable addresses.
> > >
> > >   Dave
> > >
> > > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi group,
> > > >
> > > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an
interface
?
> > > >
> > > > Thanxx.
> > > >
> > > > Nicolas.
> > > --
> > > David Madland
> > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > CCIE# 2016
> > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > 612-664-3367
> > >
> > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
> -Carroll Kong




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27817&t=27742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: /31 subnet (now with info link) [7:27802]

2001-11-30 Thread Lange, Eric

It's wasn't supported until 12.2(4)T.  

Check it out.  This is from a 1750 running 12.2(4)T:

> interface Loopback9
>  ip address 111.11.1.1 255.255.255.254

It works!

-Eric

-Original Message-
From: VoIP Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: /31 subnet (now with info link) [7:27802]


Just tried it and the router dosen't even allow an interface to use a /31
mask, even with ip subnet-zero enabled.


""VoIP Guy""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I read the RFC, so I guess it can be used.  My bad.
>
> AM I correct in saying that one interface will be assigned the all zero
> subnet as it's IP and the other will be assigned the broadcast IP address
> for that subnet?
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> ""VoIP Guy""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I know that, but the network and broadcast addresses are unusable.  Thus
> the
> > two good addresses for hosts.
> > ""Craig Columbus""  wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > With a /30 you use 4 IP addresses (network, 2 node, 1 broadcast).  You
> > save
> > > addresses with a /31.
> > > Here's a link with more info:
> > >
> > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3021.txt?number=3021
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Craig
> > >
> > > At 08:32 AM 11/30/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> > > >Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses
in
> a
> > > >/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link, so
> how
> > > >are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
> > > >
> > > >Steve
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >""MADMAN""  wrote in message
> > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> > > > > avaivalable addresses.
> > > > >
> > > > >   Dave
> > > > >
> > > > > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi group,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > > > > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an
> interface
> > ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanxx.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nicolas.
> > > > > --
> > > > > David Madland
> > > > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > > > CCIE# 2016
> > > > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > 612-664-3367
> > > > >
> > > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27818&t=27802
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet (now with info link) [7:27802]

2001-11-30 Thread VoIP Guy

I jusr dl'd that image from Cisco and it does work!  I learn something new
every day in thhis field. (Actually more like 10 new things everyday).

Steve

""Lange, Eric""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> It's wasn't supported until 12.2(4)T.
>
> Check it out.  This is from a 1750 running 12.2(4)T:
>
> > interface Loopback9
> >  ip address 111.11.1.1 255.255.255.254
>
> It works!
>
> -Eric
>
> -Original Message-
> From: VoIP Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: /31 subnet (now with info link) [7:27802]
>
>
> Just tried it and the router dosen't even allow an interface to use a /31
> mask, even with ip subnet-zero enabled.
>
>
> ""VoIP Guy""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I read the RFC, so I guess it can be used.  My bad.
> >
> > AM I correct in saying that one interface will be assigned the all zero
> > subnet as it's IP and the other will be assigned the broadcast IP
address
> > for that subnet?
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
> >
> > ""VoIP Guy""  wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > I know that, but the network and broadcast addresses are unusable.
Thus
> > the
> > > two good addresses for hosts.
> > > ""Craig Columbus""  wrote in message
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > With a /30 you use 4 IP addresses (network, 2 node, 1 broadcast).
You
> > > save
> > > > addresses with a /31.
> > > > Here's a link with more info:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3021.txt?number=3021
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Craig
> > > >
> > > > At 08:32 AM 11/30/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> > > > >Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses
> in
> > a
> > > > >/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link,
so
> > how
> > > > >are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
> > > > >
> > > > >Steve
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >""MADMAN""  wrote in message
> > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > > Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> > > > > > avaivalable addresses.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   Dave
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi group,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > > > > > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an
> > interface
> > > ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanxx.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nicolas.
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > David Madland
> > > > > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > > > > CCIE# 2016
> > > > > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > 612-664-3367
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27819&t=27802
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: /31 subnet. [7:27742]

2001-11-30 Thread Lange, Eric

Sorry.  Looks like 12.2(2)T.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122
t/122t2/ft31addr.htm#xtocid104191

-Eric

-Original Message-
From: VoIP Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]


It doesn't work in Cisco routers.

""Carroll Kong""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Law of subnets is a tradeoff.  Bigger subnets, have higher
> efficiency, at the cost of bigger broadcast domains.  Smaller subnets have
> abysmal efficiency, at the benefit of smaller broadcast domains.
>  /31 is a new RFC proposed rule which eliminates the loss of
> effiency of 50% to.. 0%.
>  /30 has 2 usable addresses but loses 2 for broadcast and
> network.  So, you need 4 ips to make the subnet, but you only can use
> 2.  50% efficiency.  /31 is going to let you take 2, and use 2, and ignore
> the broadcast and network need.  This is ideal for point to point.
>
> At 08:32 AM 11/30/01 -0500, VoIP Guy wrote:
> >Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses in a
> >/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link, so how
> >are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
> >
> >Steve
> >
> >
> >""MADMAN""  wrote in message
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> > > avaivalable addresses.
> > >
> > >   Dave
> > >
> > > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi group,
> > > >
> > > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an interface
?
> > > >
> > > > Thanxx.
> > > >
> > > > Nicolas.
> > > --
> > > David Madland
> > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > CCIE# 2016
> > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 612-664-3367
> > >
> > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
> -Carroll Kong




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27820&t=27742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]

2001-11-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

En riponse ` VoIP Guy :

> It doesn't work in Cisco routers.

Actually, Cisco supports this 3021...
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122t/12
2t2/ft31addr.htm

My apologies, I didn't know this url before posting...

Nicolas.


> 
> ""Carroll Kong""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Law of subnets is a tradeoff.  Bigger subnets, have higher
> > efficiency, at the cost of bigger broadcast domains.  Smaller subnets
> have
> > abysmal efficiency, at the benefit of smaller broadcast domains.
> >  /31 is a new RFC proposed rule which eliminates the loss of
> > effiency of 50% to.. 0%.
> >  /30 has 2 usable addresses but loses 2 for broadcast and
> > network.  So, you need 4 ips to make the subnet, but you only can
> use
> > 2.  50% efficiency.  /31 is going to let you take 2, and use 2, and
> ignore
> > the broadcast and network need.  This is ideal for point to point.
> >
> > At 08:32 AM 11/30/01 -0500, VoIP Guy wrote:
> > >Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses
> in a
> > >/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link, so
> how
> > >are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
> > >
> > >Steve
> > >
> > >
> > >""MADMAN""  wrote in message
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> > > > avaivalable addresses.
> > > >
> > > >   Dave
> > > >
> > > > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi group,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > > > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an
> interface
> ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanxx.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nicolas.
> > > > --
> > > > David Madland
> > > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > > CCIE# 2016
> > > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 612-664-3367
> > > >
> > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
> > -Carroll Kong




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27821&t=27742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: BGP Aggregate Route feeding back. [7:27822]

2001-11-30 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz

>Hello Group,
>
>I got a problem with BGP aggregate route being advertised out to another AS,
>and then readvertised back to the original AS through another entry router.
>
>R5_R6
>|
>   R7
>
>Basically an ethernet segment R5, R6, R7 on the same subnet. R5 & R6 in
>AS600, and R7 in AS500. R5 sends out an aggregate of 172.16.0.0/16 to R7,
>and then somehow R6 learns this aggregate route also.


Several observations.

I would advise against using no sync. As Peter van Oene has pointed 
out, it does't give a signficant performance benefit in modern AS 
topologies, and Juniper consciously doesn't even have a knob for it.

Next, I'm still confused what is being relearned, and how this 
creates a problem. Are you saying your routing policy is such that 
only the aggregating router should know about the aggregate?  You 
want something like a NO-ADVERTISE policy on iBGP but _not_ a 
NO-EXPORT policy on eBGP? Why, if so?

Again, I'm not seeing what problem is being caused, but could a 
blackhole local route for the aggregate, on R6, solve it?

>
>Configs:
>
>R5#
>router bgp 620
>  no synchronization
>  bgp router-id 10.10.10.5
>  bgp log-neighbor-changes
>  bgp confederation identifier 600
>  aggregate-address 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 as-set suppress-map sup_map
>  neighbor 10.10.10.4 remote-as 620
>  neighbor 10.10.10.4 update-source Loopback0
>  neighbor 10.10.10.7 remote-as 500
>  neighbor 10.10.10.7 ebgp-multihop 2
>  neighbor 10.10.10.7 update-source Loopback0
>  neighbor 10.10.10.7 route-map set_med out
>  no auto-summary
>!
>
>BGP table version is 16, local router ID is 10.10.10.5
>Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
>internal
>Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
>
>Network  Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path
>*> 172.16.0.0   0.0.0.0   100  32768 (610) i
>s>i172.16.1.0/24216.30.30.2  0100  0 (610) i
>s>i172.16.2.0/24216.30.30.2  0100  0 (610) i
>s>i172.16.3.0/24216.30.30.2  0100  0 (610) i
>*>i172.16.4.0/24216.30.30.2  0100  0 (610) i
>*> 192.168.22.0 10.10.10.7 0 500 400 i
>R5#
>
>
>R6#
>router bgp 620
>  no synchronization
>  bgp router-id 10.10.10.6
>  bgp log-neighbor-changes
>  bgp confederation identifier 600
>  neighbor 10.10.10.4 remote-as 620
>  neighbor 10.10.10.4 update-source Loopback0
>  neighbor 10.10.10.7 remote-as 500
>  neighbor 10.10.10.7 ebgp-multihop 2
>  neighbor 10.10.10.7 update-source Loopback0
>  neighbor 10.10.10.7 route-map set_med out
>  no auto-summary
>!
>
>BGP table version is 24, local router ID is 10.10.10.6
>Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
>internal
>Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
>
>Network  Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path
>*>i172.16.0.0   10.10.10.5100  0 (610) i
>*>i172.16.1.0/24216.30.30.2  0100  0 (610) i
>*>i172.16.2.0/24216.30.30.2  0100  0 (610) i
>*>i172.16.3.0/24216.30.30.2  0100  0 (610) i
>*>i172.16.4.0/24216.30.30.2  0100  0 (610) i
>* i192.168.22.0 10.10.10.7100  0 500 400 i
>*>  10.10.10.7 0 500 400 i
>R6#
>
>R7#
>router bgp 500
>  bgp router-id 10.10.10.7
>  bgp log-neighbor-changes
>  neighbor 10.10.10.5 remote-as 600
>  neighbor 10.10.10.5 ebgp-multihop 2
>  neighbor 10.10.10.5 update-source Loopback0
>  neighbor 10.10.10.6 remote-as 600
>  neighbor 10.10.10.6 ebgp-multihop 2
>  neighbor 10.10.10.6 update-source Loopback0
>  neighbor 10.10.10.6 route-map change_weight in
>  neighbor 10.10.10.8 remote-as 400
>  neighbor 10.10.10.8 ebgp-multihop 2
>  neighbor 10.10.10.8 update-source Loopback0
>  maximum-paths 2
>  no auto-summary
>!
>
>BGP table version is 9, local router ID is 10.10.10.7
>Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
>internal
>Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
>
>Network  Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path
>*> 172.16.0.0   10.10.10.5 0 600 i Sent out
to R7
>*   10.10.10.5 0 600 i Some how
learnt it twice
>*> 172.16.1.0/2410.10.10.6   150 600 i
>*> 172.16.2.0/2410.10.10.6 0 600 i
>*> 172.16.3.0/2410.10.10.6 0 600 i
>*> 172.16.4.0/2410.10.10.5  50 0 600 i
>*   10.10.10.6 100 0 600 i
>*> 192.168.22.0 10.10.10.8   0 0 400 i
>R7#




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27822&t=27822
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www

Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]

2001-11-30 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz

>Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses in a
>/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link, so how
>are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
>
>Steve


But there are 4 actual addresses in a /30.  Two are not usable.  All 
the addresses in a /31 are both actual and usable.

>
>""MADMAN""  wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>  Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
>>  avaivalable addresses.
>>
>>Dave
>>
>>  Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
>>  >
>>  > Hi group,
>>  >
>>  > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
>>  > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an interface ?
>>  >
>>  > Thanxx.
>>  >
>>  > Nicolas.
>>  --
>>  David Madland
>>  Sr. Network Engineer
>>  CCIE# 2016
>>  Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
>>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  612-664-3367
>>
>>  "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27824&t=27742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet (now with info link) [7:27802]

2001-11-30 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz

>I read the RFC, so I guess it can be used.  My bad.
>
>AM I correct in saying that one interface will be assigned the all zero
>subnet as it's IP and the other will be assigned the broadcast IP address
>for that subnet?
>
>Steve


Yes. It's a controlled violation of that addressing rule.

>
>
>
>""VoIP Guy""  wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>  I know that, but the network and broadcast addresses are unusable.  Thus
>the
>>  two good addresses for hosts.
>>  ""Craig Columbus""  wrote in message
>>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>  > With a /30 you use 4 IP addresses (network, 2 node, 1 broadcast).  You
>>  save
>>  > addresses with a /31.
>>  > Here's a link with more info:
>>  >
>>  > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3021.txt?number=3021
>>  >
>>  > Thanks,
>>  > Craig
>>  >
>>  > At 08:32 AM 11/30/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>>  > >Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses in
>a
>>  > >/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link, so
>how
>>  > >are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
>>  > >
>>  > >Steve
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >""MADMAN""  wrote in message
>>  > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>  > > > Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
>>  > > > avaivalable addresses.
>>  > > >
>>  > > >   Dave
>>  > > >
>>  > > > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
>>  > > > >
>>  > > > > Hi group,
>>  > > > >
>>  > > > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
>>  > > > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an
>interface
>>  ?
>>  > > > >
>>  > > > > Thanxx.
>>  > > > >
>>  > > > > Nicolas.
>>  > > > --
>>  > > > David Madland
>>  > > > Sr. Network Engineer
>>  > > > CCIE# 2016
>>  > > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
>>  > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  > > > 612-664-3367
>>  > > >
>>  > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27823&t=27802
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]

2001-11-30 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz

>It doesn't work in Cisco routers.

Only in quite recent releases, and I can't tell you numbers offhand. 
Might need to be an ISP release train.

>
>""Carroll Kong""  wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>  Law of subnets is a tradeoff.  Bigger subnets, have higher
>>  efficiency, at the cost of bigger broadcast domains.  Smaller subnets
have
>>  abysmal efficiency, at the benefit of smaller broadcast domains.
>>   /31 is a new RFC proposed rule which eliminates the loss of
>>  effiency of 50% to.. 0%.
>>   /30 has 2 usable addresses but loses 2 for broadcast and
>>  network.  So, you need 4 ips to make the subnet, but you only can use
>>  2.  50% efficiency.  /31 is going to let you take 2, and use 2, and
ignore
>>  the broadcast and network need.  This is ideal for point to point.
>>
>>  At 08:32 AM 11/30/01 -0500, VoIP Guy wrote:
>>  >Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses in a
>>  >/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link, so
how
>>  >are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
>>  >
>>  >Steve
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >""MADMAN""  wrote in message
>>  >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>  > > Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
>>  > > avaivalable addresses.
>>  > >
>>  > >   Dave
>>  > >
>>  > > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
>>  > > >
>>  > > > Hi group,
>>  > > >
>>  > > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
>>  > > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an
interface
>?
>>  > > >
>>  > > > Thanxx.
>>  > > >
>>  > > > Nicolas.
>>  > > --
>>  > > David Madland
>>  > > Sr. Network Engineer
>>  > > CCIE# 2016
>>  > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
>>  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  > > 612-664-3367
>>  > >
>>  > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
>>  -Carroll Kong




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27826&t=27742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Subnetting [7:27808]

2001-11-30 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz

>Can anyone help !
>I have been assigned by our Head Office a Class B address
>(Let's say 172.133.205.0) with a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0
>which gives me 254 hosts available.



>However i have to split this between 3 locations
>like so :
>
>Loc A : Minimum Addresses Required 160 (HQ)
>Loc B : Minumum Addresses Required 16
>Loc C : Minumum Addresses Required 48
>
>Loc B & C will each have a router that connects to a router at Loc A.
>
>Any ideas on how this can done ?
>
VLSM and a classless routing protocol.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27825&t=27808
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Restrict remote users access to corporate netw [7:27759]

2001-11-30 Thread Richard Bosire

Hello  David

You'll need to make use AAA in your configuration.

Refer to http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/707/index.shtml ( CCO login
required )

./bosire

--
___
+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$

richard bosire
ccn[ap], ccd[ap], ccs[ae]





David Tran wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
>
> Perhaps someone in the group can help me with this problem.
> I have Cisco Pix515-UR (128MB RAM/16MB Flash) running PIX
> code 6.1(1) with Pix Device Manager (PDM) version 1.1(2).  This
> PIX is connected to my cable modem with STATIC IP address
> 129.174.1.13 on the outside interface.  The inside interface
> (which is my internal network) has an IP of 192.168.1.1
> with a netmask of 255.255.255.0.  On the internal network, I have
> a BSD box (IP 192.168.1.10), a Linux box (192.168.1.20), a
> Solarisx86 (IP 192.168.1.30) and a SCO Unix with IP 192.168.1.40
>
> I have successfully implemented VPN connection for remote users
> using Cisco VPN client 3.1.1 running on Win98, NT, 2000 and Linux
> to connect to the internal network.  Once these remote users are
> successfully connected, they can access all the devices on the
> internal network.
>
> I have 2 questions:
>
> 1) Let say that I just want remote users to access just the BSD box
> and the Linux box but not the Solaris and SCO, how can I make this
> happen?  I know how to do that with Checkpoint Secure Remote
> (Checkpoint use Encryption domain which specify which devices
> remote user is allowed to access).  How can I accomplish this
> in PIX?  For example, I just want remote users to ping the BSD
> and Linux boxes but not Solaris and SCO boxes.
>
> 2) I have 4 different remote users who connect to the internal network
> via VPN IPSec connection.  All of these users are using the same account
> (vpn3000) to connect back to the network.  From a Security stand point,
this
> is
> bad practices.  How can I assign each of these users different account in
> the configuration?  Again, I know how to do this with Checkpoint; however,
> I don't know how to get it done in PIX.
>
> Below is the configuration.  Please help.  thanks.
>
> PIX Version 6.1(1)
>  nameif ethernet0 outside security0
>  nameif ethernet1 inside security100
>  enable password OnTrBUG1Tp0edmkr encrypted
>  passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
>  hostname goss-d3-pix515b
>  domain-name micronetsolution.com
>  fixup protocol ftp 21
>  fixup protocol http 80
>  fixup protocol h323 1720
>  fixup protocol rsh 514
>  fixup protocol smtp 25
>  fixup protocol sqlnet 1521
>  fixup protocol sip 5060
>  fixup protocol skinny 2000
>  names
>  !
>  !--- Access-list to avoid Network Address Translation (NAT) on the IPSec
> packets
>  access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.0
> 255.255.255.0
>  pager lines 24
>  interface ethernet0 auto
>  interface ethernet1 auto
>  mtu outside 1500
>  mtu inside 1500
>  !
>  !--- IP addresses on the interfaces
>  ip address outside 129.174.1.13 255.255.240.0
>  ip address inside 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
>  ip audit info action alarm
>  ip audit attack action alarm
>  ip local pool ippool 192.168.2.1-192.168.2.254
>  no failover
>  failover timeout 0:00:00
>  failover poll 15
>  failover ip address outside 0.0.0.0
>  failover ip address inside 0.0.0.0
>  pdm history enable
>  arp timeout 14400
>  !
>  !--- Binding ACL 101 to the NAT statement to avoid NAT on the IPSec
packets
>  nat (inside) 0 access-list 101
>  !
>  !--- Default route to the Internet
>  route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 129.174.1.1 1
>  timeout xlate 3:00:00
>  timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 rpc 0:10:00 h323
> 0:05:00 sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00
>  timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute
>  aaa-server TACACS+ protocol tacacs+
>  aaa-server RADIUS protocol radius
>  http server enable
>  http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
>  no snmp-server location
>  no snmp-server contact
>  snmp-server community public
>  no snmp-server enable traps
>  floodguard enable
>  !
>  !--- The sysopt command avoids conduit on the IPSec encrypted traffic
>  sysopt connection permit-ipsec
>  no sysopt route dnat
>  !
>  !--- Phase 2 encryption type
>  crypto ipsec transform-set myset esp-des esp-md5-hmac
>  crypto dynamic-map dynmap 10 set transform-set myset
>  crypto map mymap 10 ipsec-isakmp dynamic dynmap
>  !
>  !--- Binding the IPSec engine on the outside interface
>  crypto map mymap interface outside
>  !
>  !--- Enabling ISAKMP key-exchange
>  isakmp enable outside
>  isakmp identity address
>  !
>  !--- ISAKMP Policy for 3000 VPN client running 3.0 or higher code
>  isakmp policy 10 authentication pre-share
>  isakmp policy 10 encryption des
>  isakmp policy 10 hash md5
>  isakmp policy 10 group 2
>  isakmp policy 10 lifetime 86400
>  !
>   !--- IPSec group configuration for either VPN client
>  vpngroup vpn3000 address-pool ippool
>  vpngroup vpn3000 dns-server 192.168.1.10
>  vpngroup vpn3000 default-domain micronetsolution.com
>  vpngroup vpn300

Re: Using TFTP and Notepad for CCIE Lab [7:27793]

2001-11-30 Thread Donald

I would dump the tftp server worries and just use a text editor you are
comfortable with.
Don


- Original Message -
From: "Wilson, Christian" 
To: 
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 4:50 AM
Subject: Using TFTP and Notepad for CCIE Lab [7:27793]


> I read about a lot of people using a text editor and tftp to create and
> manipulate their configurations to save time on the CCIE Lab exam.  I
> understand the benefits of using this technique, but sometimes it seems as
> if it takes quite a while for me to set up the required routing to reach
all
> of my routers via tftp.  My real question concerns the use of a terminal
> server in this situation.  I do not have a terminal server, but my
> understanding is that you telnet to the terminal server, which in turn has
> reverse telnet connections to each routers console port.  If I was
connected
> to the terminal server via a PC that had tftp server software installed,
is
> there an easy way to use the reverse telnet connection to each router for
> the tftp file transfer?  If not, would I have to have a tftp server
> connected to one router's Ethernet, and then set up routing to that
> ethernet's subnet on each router?  I am trying to invision how this
> technique would save time in the lab if a tftp server is not readily
> available on a subnet common to all devices in the rack.  I know a router
> can be configured as a tftp server, but I believe that it can only answer
> requests and can not be copied to.  Any help would be greatly appreciated
as
> I sit the lab on Feb 1 and I would like to develop some solid time-saving
> techniques.  Thank you!




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27805&t=27793
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Little OT: Re: 2511 Async [7:27749]

2001-11-30 Thread Donald

Another work around for short octal cables is. Ethernet line extenders and a
straight through cat5. I used to have my lab stacked on top of each other
now it is spread out nice.
Don

- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Cotts" 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:37 PM
Subject: RE: 2511 Async [7:27749]


> It uses rolled cables. New ones ship with green colored flat cables. The
> great part is that you can easily create your own custom length cables.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dave Luancing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 5:48 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: 2511 Async [7:27749]
> >
> >
> > I am getting a 2500 Async router with the built in
> > Async ports (RJ45). Does anyone know, do I use a
> > straight thru cable or cisco rolled cable to speak to
> > other cisco routers?  I have previously only worked
> > with the Octel cables.
> >
> > I also will be configuring this to speak to a modem
> > bank, has anyone had experience with this... Is there
> > configuration that needs to be done on the modem bank
> > side. The router will be configured to support remote
> > nodes.
> >
> > - Dave
> >
> > __
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
> > http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27797&t=27749
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]

2001-11-30 Thread Donald

Network and broadcast address not needed on p-to-p links.



- Original Message -
From: "VoIP Guy" 
To: 
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 5:32 AM
Subject: Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]


> Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses in a
> /30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link, so how
> are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
>
> Steve
>
>
> ""MADMAN""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> > avaivalable addresses.
> >
> >   Dave
> >
> > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi group,
> > >
> > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an interface ?
> > >
> > > Thanxx.
> > >
> > > Nicolas.
> > --
> > David Madland
> > Sr. Network Engineer
> > CCIE# 2016
> > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 612-664-3367
> >
> > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27813&t=27742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Typical Access Server setting [7:27437]

2001-11-30 Thread IT Guy

Marc,

Many Thanks for your reply.
Can you please guide me further how to get this done??

Tom

>From: "Marc Russell" 
>Reply-To: "Marc Russell" 
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Typical Access Server setting [7:27437]
>Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 23:08:23 -0500
>
>You can do what you want by setting the privilege on the users and the
>commands you desire. No external server required.
>
>Marc Russell
>www.ccbootcamp.com
>
>
>""IT Guy""  wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Need your help to setup my Access server.
> > I need to setup My Access server router(16 ports) such that two 
>different
> > users can get different access rights when access the Rack routers
> > (different routers)thorugh these Access server.
> > For example I want User-A to give access to only Basic mode and restric
>him
> > by using enable mode or seeeing any configurations in Access server.
> > On the other hand, I want other user to have full access..
> >
> > Any idea how to setup this??
> >
> > Thanks for help
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > _
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at 
>http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27774&t=27437
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Security: Microsoft RADIUS and Cisco [7:27554]

2001-11-30 Thread Tunji Suleiman

Which Radius server are you using? Is it listening for authentication 
requests on port 1812 or 1645? Looks like a radius server problem to me. 
Ensure it is indeed authenticating. Most radius servers have inbuilt 
facilities to test functionality.

Tunji


>From: "Pierre-Alex J. Guanel" 
>Reply-To: "Pierre-Alex J. Guanel" 
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Security: Microsoft RADIUS and Cisco [7:27554]
>Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:50:55 -0500
>
>I have the following configuration on my router:
>
>radius-server host  auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813
>radius-server retransmit 3
>radius-server timeout 20
>radius-server key
>!
>
>I have configured IAS with my router as the client and the Client-Vendor as
>Cisco
>
>The shared secret is the same as the radius-server
>
>When I telnet to the router, after having entered a valid username and
>password,
>
>I get the message "%authentication failed".
>
>I have turned on radius debugging on the router but I don't see anything.
>
>Did I miss something obvious?
>
>Pierre-Alex
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27827&t=27554
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]

2001-11-30 Thread Angel Leiva

CRTL-SHIFT-6  works for me


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Steve Smith
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]


ctrl-shift-F6.

-Original Message-
From: Hollis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]


Does anyone know an escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) to use
while
within a Term server session.

Say I need to stop an unsuccessful traceroute... but when I do
Ctl-Shift-6(x) it takes me back to my Term server.

Thanks.

kk/USN




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27833&t=27760
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]

2001-11-30 Thread Angel Leiva

CTRL-SHIFT-6 (twice) works for me

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Steve Smith
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]


ctrl-shift-F6.

-Original Message-
From: Hollis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]


Does anyone know an escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) to use
while
within a Term server session.

Say I need to stop an unsuccessful traceroute... but when I do
Ctl-Shift-6(x) it takes me back to my Term server.

Thanks.

kk/USN




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27834&t=27760
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]

2001-11-30 Thread Andy Hoang

That means changing the escape character of the device being controlled by
the termserv.  What if you have several devices on the termserv.

It is better to change the escape character of the termserv itself and leave
everything else as default.

Try this on your termserv:

line con 0
 escape-character 92
line vty 0 4
 escape-character 92

Then you would press "\x" to go back to your termserv.  Everything else is
still Ctrl-Shift-6.

If you want to use different escape-character check the link below

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios112/112cg_cr/1rb
ook/1rascii.htm


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Stefan Dozier
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]


Try this

"On line console 0 add "escape 27"; when you have a ping or traceroute or
something you want to break out of, press the [ESCAPE] key."

BTW: I found this while perusing through the archives!

Stefan


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Hollis
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]


Does anyone know an escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) to use while
within a Term server session.

Say I need to stop an unsuccessful traceroute... but when I do
Ctl-Shift-6(x) it takes me back to my Term server.

Thanks.

kk/USN




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27835&t=27760
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: T-1 Encap Preference [7:27637]

2001-11-30 Thread Brent Wrisley

Although intf's won't combine packets, I usually set higher MTU's so that
larger packets with the DF flag on will be allowed through.

Brent

On 29/11/01 21:16 -0500, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:

:
[...]
 A lot of novices think that having a large interface 
:MTU is going to make a big difference, but I'm not convinced. The interface 
:isn't going to combine packets it receives into larger packets just because 
:of the larger MTU. Packets can't grow!?
[...]
:
:I'll have to look into this. Thoughts? Comments?
:
:Priscilla
:
:At 05:26 PM 11/29/01, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
:> >Found this in RFC 1661 which documents PPP:
:> >
:> >The maximum length for the Information field, including Padding, but not
:> >including the Protocol field, is termed the Maximum Receive Unit (MRU),
:> >which defaults to 1500 octets. By negotiation, consenting PPP
:> >implementations may use other values for the MRU.
:> >
:> >P.
:>
:>Hmmm...I definitely am aware of providers using 4470 on POS links,
:>and a general trend in the gigabit-plus world to use larger MTUs. Is
:>this simply industry practice, I wonder, or are there some overriding
:>IEEE or IETF documents?  Perhaps in the sub-IP area, such as IP over
:>Optical?
:>
:> >
:> >At 03:05 PM 11/29/01, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
:> >>  >Howard,
:> >>  >
:> >>  >Correct me if am wrong but, the HDLC advantage over PPP is the MTU
:size.
:> >>  >PPP supports 1500 while HDLC 4xxx (can't remember the exact number),
:> >>  >this might be helpful in situations where DF bit is set.
:> >>  >
:> >>  >Nabil
:> >>
:> >>I'd have to research this -- I don't offhand remember PPP (as the
:> >>protocol) having a MTU limit that small.  It would surprise me, given
:> >>the interest in POS.
:> >
:> >
:> >Priscilla Oppenheimer
:> >http://www.priscilla.com
:
:
:Priscilla Oppenheimer
:http://www.priscilla.com
:
:
:
:
Brent Wrisley   

2FB6 85AD 7084 80A0 8381  C116 CDE5 78B5 E959 C536
PGP Key ID: 0xE959C536  (us.pgp.net)




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27828&t=27637
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 2500 Router problem [7:27695]

2001-11-30 Thread Mcfadden, Chuck

What routing protocol are you using?  What does the "sh ip rou" command
display for you?
ccie1ab




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
James gruggett
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 5:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 2500 Router problem [7:27695]


I have a lab setup as follows: 2 2500 series routers connected to a 2900
switch.

Router1 E0 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
Router 2 E0 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
SwitchIP 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0

I can ping and telnet to Router 1 and the switch. I can not ping
Router2. When I telnet I receive this error message(Cam't open
connection to host on port 23, a socket operation was attempted to an
unreachable host)

I console into Router 2 and E0 looks fine with ip ans it states it is
administrately up.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,

James




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27830&t=27695
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Re[2]: VPN is a Backdoor !!! [7:27725]

2001-11-30 Thread Kent Hundley

Your right, but it is nearly impossible to secure the client.  The problem
is that no matter how much education you give users, most will still do the
"wrong" thing given the right circumstances.  For example, if they are in a
chat room and someone they are communicating with sends them a file, most
will open it, no matter how many times you tell them not to.

If it is a virus or a trojan, their entire machine can become compromised
and no amount of firewall software and strong authentication can completely
fix that. When prompted about a new app trying to reach the Internet, they
may just answer 'yes'.  If there's no prompt and the software doesn't work,
they may just disable their firewall. (yes, it does happen)  The problem is
worse if users use their home machines for VPN access.  If they use company
assigned laptops with WinNT or 2K, you can fix some of this by not giving
them admin access to their own machines.  This will severely limit their
ability to install new software and offer some protection, but its not a
guarantee.  I can see someone breaking into their machine to install the hot
new game they just got sent from a "friend" they met on yahoo chat who's
only too happy to help them get the software installed.

The weakest link in the security chain is almost always human factors.  In
the end, there's no silver bullet for this problem.  Policies and user
education help, but there's always a risk involved once you rely on users
for security, which is what you must do when you allow users remote access
to the corporate goodies.  Creating a secure link is easy, it's the
endpoints that tend to bite you. ;-)

Good luck,
Kent

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
SentinuS
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: VPN is a Backdoor !!! [7:27725]


But I think VPN is not Backdoor if you use right Security Policy and
right configuration. There is one issue : Client. If you can secure
your client, there is no weakness.


Thursday, November 29, 2001, 11:47:08 PM, you wrote:
PR> Even then though, you're not secure.  If the box is compromised before
you
PR> connect then even when the firewall is enforced, malicious activity
could
PR> still take a place...the attacker would not be able to connect to the
PR> machine but could leave dastardly code behind to do his job for him.

PR> I am working on this scenario now as well.  I am attempting to come up
with
PR> a best practice for cleaning a machine, installing a firewall, etc
for
PR> any vpn client.  Let me know how yours goes!

PR> -Patrick

---cut---

SentinuS
Best Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27832&t=27725
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: network simulator [7:27658]

2001-11-30 Thread William Gragido

Anthony,

Check out www.shunra.com they have a simulator called the 'Storm' that is
awesome!  It allows you to manipulate latency, jitter and packet loss.  Its
a hardware solution however I have seen a freeware version of this out on
certain linux centrix sites.  It works great though, I used it on a VoIP gig
in order to perform proof of concept tasks.

Will

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Anthony Toh
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: network simulator [7:27658]


Is there any router simulation software that I can configure to run in a
Frame Relay and ISDN network ?
Appreciate if anyone who knows can send me one.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27829&t=27658
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]

2001-11-30 Thread Hugo _

CTRL+ALT-SUPR  works for me  :)

>From: "Andy Hoang" >Reply-To: "Andy Hoang" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760] >Date:
Fri, 30 Nov 2001 11:13:12 -0500 > >That means changing the escape
character of the device being controlled by >the termserv. What if you
have several devices on the termserv. > >It is better to change the
escape character of the termserv itself and leave >everything else as
default. > >Try this on your termserv: > >line con 0 > escape-character
92 >line vty 0 4 > escape-character 92 > >Then you would press "\x" to go
back to your termserv. Everything else is >still Ctrl-Shift-6. > >If you
want to use different escape-character check the link below >
>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios112/112cg_cr/1rb
>ook/1rascii.htm > > >-Original Message- >From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Stefan
Dozier >Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:54 PM >To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: escape sequence other than
Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760] > > >Try this > >"On line console 0 add
"escape 27"; when you have a ping or traceroute or >something you want to
break out of, press the [ESCAPE] key." > >BTW: I found this while
perusing through the archives! > >Stefan > > >-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Hollis >Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:19 PM >To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x)
[7:27760] > > >Does anyone know an escape sequence other than
Ctl-Shift-6(x) to use while >within a Term server session. > >Say I need
to stop an unsuccessful traceroute... but when I do >Ctl-Shift-6(x) it
takes me back to my Term server. > >Thanks. > >kk/USN > > > > >Message
Posted at: >http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27835&t=27760
>-- >FAQ, list archives,
and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report
misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27836&t=27760
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: /31 subnet. [7:27742]

2001-11-30 Thread Mcfadden, Chuck

Sure, but then what are your network and broadcast addresses?
ccie1ab

-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 6:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]


Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
avaivalable addresses.

  Dave

Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> 
> Hi group,
> 
> I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an interface ?
> 
> Thanxx.
> 
> Nicolas.
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27838&t=27742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CCIE training [7:27776]

2001-11-30 Thread Fred Ingham

reply.

Bruce Caslow is working at NetMasterClass LLC.  He and Val
Pavlichenko are teaching new CCIE Lab Preparation courses - RS-NMC-1 and
RS-NMC-2.  There is a class being held this week in Reston, Virginia. 
Details, schedules, and outlines of the courses and an e-mail address
can be found at http://www.netmasterclass.net.

Note - I am affiliated with NMC.

Cheers, Fred.



Gus Hussein wrote:
> 
> Does any bosy know where Bruce Caslow works now?
> or any one knows his e-mail.
> Thanks
> 
> _
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27837&t=27776
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]

2001-11-30 Thread Debbie Westall

I participated in the Cisco LAN Technologies seminar
and the Cisco guy said it was recently added in their
support. I have been searching around and so far have
not found anything.

Debbie Westall

--- VoIP Guy  wrote:
> It doesn't work in Cisco routers.
> 
> ""Carroll Kong""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Law of subnets is a tradeoff.  Bigger subnets,
> have higher
> > efficiency, at the cost of bigger broadcast
> domains.  Smaller subnets have
> > abysmal efficiency, at the benefit of smaller
> broadcast domains.
> >  /31 is a new RFC proposed rule which
> eliminates the loss of
> > effiency of 50% to.. 0%.
> >  /30 has 2 usable addresses but loses 2
> for broadcast and
> > network.  So, you need 4 ips to make the subnet,
> but you only can use
> > 2.  50% efficiency.  /31 is going to let you take
> 2, and use 2, and ignore
> > the broadcast and network need.  This is ideal for
> point to point.
> >
> > At 08:32 AM 11/30/01 -0500, VoIP Guy wrote:
> > >Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2
> useable addresses in a
> > >/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a
> point-to-point link, so how
> > >are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
> > >
> > >Steve
> > >
> > >
> > >""MADMAN""  wrote in message
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > Point to point connections, with a /30 you
> waste 50% of the
> > > > avaivalable addresses.
> > > >
> > > >   Dave
> > > >
> > > > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi group,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > > > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such
> a subnet on an interface
> ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanxx.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nicolas.
> > > > --
> > > > David Madland
> > > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > > CCIE# 2016
> > > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 612-664-3367
> > > >
> > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
> > -Carroll Kong
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27839&t=27742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Question about affordable training classes [7:27840]

2001-11-30 Thread Bruce Evry

Hello,

I am a Cisco Instructor and have been toying with the idea of
running very low-cost classes that would be affordable for those not
sponsored by a corporation or rich enough to pay $2000 or more per class.
I was considering about maybe $200 to cover costs and equipment. (If
someone could not afford even that we could work something out...)

While I got my CCSI at Mentor (formerly Chesapeake) and recently
have been doing contract training at places like Sprint and Verizon, I can
still remember trying to get started, to get training, and to get that
proverbial "foot in the door". I'd like to use some of my "off" weeks when
I'm not doing corporate training to help other people get their Cisco
certifications and a good start in this career.

Classes would be held at my house, which is located just south of
Washington, DC. in beautiful Fort Washington, Maryland.

Please let me know if you think that such classes would be useful
and of interest.

Yours Truly - Bruce Evry

[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27840&t=27840
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



VPN + 1720 [7:27841]

2001-11-30 Thread paul

Maby i am asking to much ;)
anyway, here goes 'nothing';

Can anyone show me a sample config(or a url)  for a VPN on a router 1720?(
assuming it connects through a frame-relay cloud)
thanks in advance




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27841&t=27841
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]

2001-11-30 Thread Donald

You gotta have the right code.




- Original Message -
From: "VoIP Guy" 
To: 
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 6:44 AM
Subject: Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]


> It doesn't work in Cisco routers.
>
> ""Carroll Kong""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Law of subnets is a tradeoff.  Bigger subnets, have higher
> > efficiency, at the cost of bigger broadcast domains.  Smaller subnets
have
> > abysmal efficiency, at the benefit of smaller broadcast domains.
> >  /31 is a new RFC proposed rule which eliminates the loss of
> > effiency of 50% to.. 0%.
> >  /30 has 2 usable addresses but loses 2 for broadcast and
> > network.  So, you need 4 ips to make the subnet, but you only can use
> > 2.  50% efficiency.  /31 is going to let you take 2, and use 2, and
ignore
> > the broadcast and network need.  This is ideal for point to point.
> >
> > At 08:32 AM 11/30/01 -0500, VoIP Guy wrote:
> > >Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses in
a
> > >/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link, so
how
> > >are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
> > >
> > >Steve
> > >
> > >
> > >""MADMAN""  wrote in message
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> > > > avaivalable addresses.
> > > >
> > > >   Dave
> > > >
> > > > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi group,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > > > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an
interface
> ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanxx.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nicolas.
> > > > --
> > > > David Madland
> > > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > > CCIE# 2016
> > > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 612-664-3367
> > > >
> > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
> > -Carroll Kong




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27831&t=27742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: VPN + 1720 [7:27841]

2001-11-30 Thread VoIP Guy

Here's one I did a few months ago.  The only thing I wasn't comfortable with
was the access list that has to let the internal IPSec addresses back in,
but I couldn't do it any other way.  Does anyone have a better idea?  Maybe
it's the only way it can be done.

Steve

Current configuration : 4387 bytes
!
version 12.2
no parser cache
no service single-slot-reload-enable
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
!
hostname Chaston
!
logging buffered 4096 debugging
logging rate-limit console 10 except errors
no logging console
enable secret 5 
!
memory-size iomem 15
mmi polling-interval 60
no mmi auto-configure
no mmi pvc
mmi snmp-timeout 180
ip subnet-zero
no ip source-route
!
!
no ip domain-lookup
!
no ip bootp server
ip inspect name STOP smtp
ip inspect name STOP tcp
ip inspect name STOP udp
ip inspect name STOP cuseeme
ip inspect name STOP ftp
ip inspect name STOP h323
ip inspect name STOP rcmd
ip inspect name STOP realaudio
ip inspect name STOP streamworks
ip inspect name STOP vdolive
ip inspect name STOP sqlnet
ip inspect name STOP tftp
ip inspect name GO smtp
ip inspect name GO tcp
ip inspect name GO udp
ip audit notify log
ip audit po max-events 100
ip ssh time-out 120
ip ssh authentication-retries 3
no ip dhcp-client network-discovery
!
crypto isakmp policy 1
 hash md5
 authentication pre-share
crypto isakmp key xx160500 address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
crypto isakmp client configuration address-pool local VPNpool
!
!
crypto ipsec transform-set Strong esp-des esp-md5-hmac
crypto mib ipsec flowmib history tunnel size 200
crypto mib ipsec flowmib history failure size 200
!
crypto dynamic-map dynVPNmap 10
 set transform-set Strong
!
!
!
crypto map modecfg client configuration address initiate
crypto map modecfg client configuration address respond
crypto map modecfg 10 ipsec-isakmp dynamic dynVPNmap
!
!
!
!
interface Ethernet0
 ip address  255.255.255.252
 ip access-group 101 in
 no ip redirects
 no ip unreachables
 no ip proxy-arp
 ip nat outside
 no ip route-cache
 no ip mroute-cache
 half-duplex
 no cdp enable
 crypto map modecfg
 ip policy route-map nonat
!
interface FastEthernet0
 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
 ip nat inside
 ip inspect GO out
 ip inspect STOP in
 speed auto
 no cdp enable
!
ip local pool VPNpool 192.168.100.50 192.168.100.55
ip default-gateway xxx
ip nat pool IntNATpool x xx netmask 255.255.255.252
ip nat inside source route-map rmap pool IntNATpool overload
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.100 110  110 extendable
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.100 25 xx 25 extendable
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 
no ip http server
!
access-list 101 permit tcp any any established
access-list 101 permit tcp any host xxx eq telnet
access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo
access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo-reply
access-list 101 permit icmp any any packet-too-big
access-list 101 permit icmp any any time-exceeded
access-list 101 permit icmp any any traceroute
access-list 101 permit ahp any any
access-list 101 permit esp any any
access-list 101 permit udp any any eq isakmp
access-list 101 permit tcp any host xxx eq pop3
access-list 101 permit tcp any host  eq smtp
access-list 101 permit ip host 192.168.100.50 any
access-list 101 permit ip host 192.168.100.51 any
access-list 101 permit ip host 192.168.100.52 any
access-list 101 permit ip host 192.168.100.53 any
access-list 101 permit ip host 192.168.100.54 any
access-list 101 permit ip host 192.168.100.55 any
access-list 110 deny ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 110 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 120 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
no cdp run
route-map rmap permit 10
match ip address 110
!
route-map nonat permit 10
match ip address 120
!
route-map nonat permit 20
!
!
banner motd ^CC
***
NOTICE TO USERS

This is a private computer system and is the property of Chaston
Associates.  It is for authorized use only. Users (authorized or
unauthorized) have no explicit or implicit expectation of privacy.

Any or all uses of this system and all files on this system may be
intercepted, monitored, recorded, copied, audited, inspected, and disclosed
to authorized site, and law enforcement personnel, as well as authorized
officials of other agencies, both domestic and foreign.
By using this system, the user consents to such interception, monitoring,
recording, copying, auditing, inspection, and disclosure at the discretion
of authorized site or Department of Energy personnel.

Unauthorized or improper use of this system may result in administrative
disciplinary action and civil and criminal penalties. By continuing to use
this system you indicate your awareness of and consent to these terms and
conditions of use. LOG OFF IMMEDIATELY if you do not agree to

ISDN BRI [7:27843]

2001-11-30 Thread Muhammad Shakeel Shamsi

Hello,
  I have found you address while going through some archives, I was
wondering if you could personally help me with a problem, I am configuring a
router a 2600 series with IOS 12.0 for ISDN connectivity to an ISP access
server cisco AS5300, the configuration i have used has been tested by me on
Cisco 1603, 2501, 2503, with little changes, the problem here is that the
router connects and the after ten seconds disconnects and on sensing out
going traffic reconnects and then disconnects again, i start a ping it stays
connected and then disconnects. All other routers that i worked with are
working ok except this one, I am searching for the solution that when i
found you. Hoping for a reply.

Regards

Shakeel Shammsi

Here is the configuration that i have put in.



router#sh conf
Using 1811 out of 32762 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 17:10:09 UTC Wed Mar 28 2001
! NVRAM config last updated at 17:10:12 UTC Wed Mar 28 2001
!
version 12.0
service config
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
service udp-small-servers
service tcp-small-servers
!
hostname router
!
enable secret 5 $1$UScn$gtVSLClesbMr2G1CpNwkK/
enable password cisco123
!
ip subnet-zero
no ip domain-lookup
ip name-server x.x.x.x
ip name-server x.x.x.x
ip name-server x.x.x.x
isdn switch-type basic-net3
!
!
!
interface Ethernet0
 ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x
 no ip directed-broadcast
 ip nat inside
 no cdp enable
!
interface Serial0
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 no ip mroute-cache
 shutdown
!
interface Serial1
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 shutdown
 no cdp enable
!
interface BRI0
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 ip nat outside
 encapsulation ppp
 dialer rotary-group 0
 isdn switch-type basic-net3
 no fair-queue
 no cdp enable
!
interface Dialer0
 ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x
 no ip directed-broadcast
 ip nat outside
 encapsulation ppp
 dialer in-band
 dialer idle-timeout 300
 dialer string 13111666 class 56k
 dialer hold-queue 10
 dialer load-threshold 200 either   Rem (if no multi link support is off)
 dialer-group 1
 no fair-queue
 no cdp enable
 ppp authentication pap callin
 ppp pap sent-username test password 7 141113180F0B27
 ppp multilink
!
ip nat translation timeout 1800
ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer0 overload
ip http server
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0
!
!
map-class dialer 56
 dialer isdn speed 56
access-list 1 permit x.x.x.x x.x.x.x
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
!
line con 0
 exec-timeout 0 0
 logging synchronous
 transport input none
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
 password cisco
 login
!
end


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27843&t=27843
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ISDN BRI [7:27844]

2001-11-30 Thread Muhammad Shakeel Shamsi

Hello,
  I am configuring a router a 2600 series with IOS 12.0 for ISDN
connectivity to an ISP access server cisco AS5300, the configuration i have
used has been tested by me on Cisco 1603, 2501, 2503, with little changes,
the problem here is that the router connects and the after ten seconds
disconnects and on sensing out going traffic reconnects and then disconnects
again, i start a ping it stays connected and then disconnects. All other
routers that i worked with are working ok except this one, I am searching
for the solution that when i found you. Hoping for a reply.

Regards

Shakeel Shammsi

Here is the configuration that i have put in.



router#sh conf
Using 1811 out of 32762 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 17:10:09 UTC Wed Mar 28 2001
! NVRAM config last updated at 17:10:12 UTC Wed Mar 28 2001
!
version 12.0
service config
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
service udp-small-servers
service tcp-small-servers
!
hostname router
!
enable secret 5 $1$UScn$gtVSLClesbMr2G1CpNwkK/
enable password cisco123
!
ip subnet-zero
no ip domain-lookup
ip name-server x.x.x.x
ip name-server x.x.x.x
ip name-server x.x.x.x
isdn switch-type basic-net3
!
!
!
interface Ethernet0
 ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x
 no ip directed-broadcast
 ip nat inside
 no cdp enable
!
interface Serial0
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 no ip mroute-cache
 shutdown
!
interface Serial1
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 shutdown
 no cdp enable
!
interface BRI0
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 ip nat outside
 encapsulation ppp
 dialer rotary-group 0
 isdn switch-type basic-net3
 no fair-queue
 no cdp enable
!
interface Dialer0
 ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x
 no ip directed-broadcast
 ip nat outside
 encapsulation ppp
 dialer in-band
 dialer idle-timeout 300
 dialer string 13111666 class 56k
 dialer hold-queue 10
 dialer load-threshold 200 either   Rem (if no multi link support is off)
 dialer-group 1
 no fair-queue
 no cdp enable
 ppp authentication pap callin
 ppp pap sent-username test password 7 141113180F0B27
 ppp multilink
!
ip nat translation timeout 1800
ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer0 overload
ip http server
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0
!
!
map-class dialer 56
 dialer isdn speed 56
access-list 1 permit x.x.x.x x.x.x.x
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
!
line con 0
 exec-timeout 0 0
 logging synchronous
 transport input none
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
 password cisco
 login
!
end


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27844&t=27844
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Question about affordable training classes [7:27840]

2001-11-30 Thread John Neiberger

I'm glad you posted this.  I'm considering doing the exact same thing at
my home.  It seems that given the high cost of formal training, some
sort of low-cost classes or mentoring would be quite useful.

John

>>> "Bruce Evry"  11/30/01 10:06:45 AM >>>
Hello,

I am a Cisco Instructor and have been toying with the idea of
running very low-cost classes that would be affordable for those not
sponsored by a corporation or rich enough to pay $2000 or more per
class.
I was considering about maybe $200 to cover costs and equipment. (If
someone could not afford even that we could work something out...)

While I got my CCSI at Mentor (formerly Chesapeake) and
recently
have been doing contract training at places like Sprint and Verizon, I
can
still remember trying to get started, to get training, and to get that
proverbial "foot in the door". I'd like to use some of my "off" weeks
when
I'm not doing corporate training to help other people get their Cisco
certifications and a good start in this career.

Classes would be held at my house, which is located just south
of
Washington, DC. in beautiful Fort Washington, Maryland.

Please let me know if you think that such classes would be
useful
and of interest.

Yours Truly - Bruce Evry

[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27845&t=27840
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Subnetting [7:27808]

2001-11-30 Thread Lupi, Guy

Well, let me start by saying that with only a class C and the amount of
hosts you specified, you are really pushing it, get more address space.
This way you will have to put a bunch of secondarys on the routers ethernet
interfaces, but it will work.  This is assuming that the point to point
circuits in each office will be numbered out of another block, or will use
IP unnumbered, and that the numbers that you gave are for hosts, and that
for the gateway address we would add one to the number given.  The only
thing I couldn't work out was location C, could only come up with 47
addresses for hosts there.  Hope this helps, ugly as it may be.  There are
other ways to do this, none of them are very nice.

172.133.205.0/25  location A 126 host addresses, 125 excluding gateway
172.133.205.128/27location A 30 host addresses, 29 excluding gateway
172.133.205.160/29location A 6 host addresses, 5 excluding gateway
172.133.205.168/30location A 2 host addresses, 1 excluding gateway
172.133.205.172/30location B 2 host addresses, 1 excluding gateway
172.133.205.176/28location B 14 host addresses, 13 excluding gateway 
172.133.205.192/29location B 6 host addresses, 5 excluding gateway
172.133.205.200/29location C 6 host addresses, 5 excluding gateway
172.133.205.208/28location C 14 host addresses, 13 excluding gateway
172.133.205.224/27location C 30 host addresses, 29 excluding gateway


-Original Message-
From: Andy Hutchinson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11/30/2001 9:37 AM
Subject: Subnetting  [7:27808]

Can anyone help !
I have been assigned by our Head Office a Class B address
(Let's say 172.133.205.0) with a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0
which gives me 254 hosts available.
However i have to split this between 3 locations
like so :

Loc A : Minimum Addresses Required 160 (HQ)
Loc B : Minumum Addresses Required 16
Loc C : Minumum Addresses Required 48

Loc B & C will each have a router that connects to a router at Loc A.

Any ideas on how this can done ?

Thanks

Andy Hutchinson




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27847&t=27808
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: VPN + 1720 [7:27841]

2001-11-30 Thread George Murphy CCNP, CCDP

Good timing Paul, I just installed a VPN module in a 1720 last week. I 
have configured the router (after updating the IOS) to establish a 
tunnel as a simple router to router "peer" over the internet, but it is 
not complete because the other side is not completely installed yet. 
Here are the links I used to get tips. Scroll down to about 1/2 of the 
page and you will see examples for several scenarios. They are pretty 
handy and should save you some time. There is even a link to enable SSH 
on the routerGood Luck!

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/index.shtml





paul wrote:

>Maby i am asking to much ;)
>anyway, here goes 'nothing';
>
>Can anyone show me a sample config(or a url)  for a VPN on a router 1720?(
>assuming it connects through a frame-relay cloud)
>thanks in advance




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27846&t=27841
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Dual Homing Novell Servers to 2 Cat 6500's [7:27690]

2001-11-30 Thread juno vtv

Bill,

If there is two cards installed in the server and it is on the same IP
subnet,then each card can have an IP in the same subnet range.  For examp
NIC1 can be 192.168.0.1 and NIC2 can be 192.168.0.2. The server will be able
to differentiate the cards.  If for instance the Cat6000's are going to be
on different subnets then you will have to assign a different IP subnet on
each card.  For example, NIC1 can be 192.168.10.1 and NIC2 can be
192.168.20.1.  I'm pretty experienced with this setup, so please let me know
if you need any more help.  Thanks!

-junovtv


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27848&t=27690
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]

2001-11-30 Thread Stefan Dozier

See comments inline...

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Andy Hoang
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]


>That means changing the escape character of the device being controlled by
>the termserv.  What if you have several devices on the termserv.

Nothing a little foresight and a couple of cut & paste keystrokes or
mouse clicks couldn't cure...

>It is better to change the escape character of the termserv itself and
leave
>everything else as default.

I won't argue that point, as I'm sure you could do it several different
ways!

Stefan




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27849&t=27760
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



EBGP multihop over MPLS [7:27850]

2001-11-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hello,
Can anyone help?

!
interface FastEthernet0/0.1
 encapsulation isl 1
 ip address 80.74.33.131 255.255.255.248
 no ip redirects
!
router bgp 1
 no synchronization
 bgp log-neighbor-changes
 redistribute connected
 neighbor 80.74.33.134 remote-as 3
 neighbor 80.74.33.134 ebgp-multihop 255
 no auto-summary
!
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 80.74.33.129



I have the above configuration on my router with this results shown below. 
BGP do not establish TCP session with opposite router. When I do EBGP 
multihop over normal network everything works fine. The opposite router 
has just a reverse configuration.

Does anyone know what I miss in my configuration?
Thank
Petr




router#ping 80.74.33.134

Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 80.74.33.134, timeout is 2 seconds:
!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/2/4 ms


router#sh ip bgp nei
BGP neighbor is 80.74.33.134,  remote AS 3, external link
  BGP version 4, remote router ID 0.0.0.0
  BGP state = Active
  Last read 1d03h, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds
  Received 0 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue
  Sent 0 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue
  Default minimum time between advertisement runs is 30 seconds

 For address family: IPv4 Unicast
  BGP table version 4, neighbor version 0
  Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2
  Route refresh request: received 0, sent 0
  0 accepted prefixes consume 0 bytes
  Prefix advertised 0, suppressed 0, withdrawn 0

  Connections established 0; dropped 0
  Last reset never
  External BGP neighbor may be up to 255 hops away.
  No active TCP connection




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27850&t=27850
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Dual Homing Novell Servers to 2 Cat 6500's [7:27690]

2001-11-30 Thread juno vtv

Here's a sample of the config for the server.

load ce1000 slot=1 frame=ethernet_ii name=nic1
load ce1000 slot=2 frame=ethernet_ii name=nic2

bind ip nic1 addr=192.168.0.1 ma=255.255.0.0
bind ip nic2 addr=192.168.0.2 ma=255.255.0.0

ce1000 is the driver, so you have change it to the lan driver that you're
using.  Hope this helps.

-junovtv


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27851&t=27690
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]

2001-11-30 Thread Andy Hoang

cut and past would work, but with hundreds of devices, I'm sure you would
see the point I'm trying to make.

-Original Message-
From: Stefan Dozier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:42 AM
To: Andy Hoang; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]


See comments inline...

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Andy Hoang
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]


>That means changing the escape character of the device being controlled by
>the termserv.  What if you have several devices on the termserv.

Nothing a little foresight and a couple of cut & paste keystrokes or
mouse clicks couldn't cure...

>It is better to change the escape character of the termserv itself and
leave
>everything else as default.

I won't argue that point, as I'm sure you could do it several different
ways!

Stefan




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27853&t=27760
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Question about affordable training classes [7:27840]

2001-11-30 Thread juno vtv

Any chance you can come out west? :-)

-junovtv


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27854&t=27840
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



VXR [7:27855]

2001-11-30 Thread Patrick Bass

Anybody know what VXR stands for?  As in Cisco 7200 VXR.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27855&t=27855
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]

2001-11-30 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

Yes, but why are all zeros and all ones in the host field disallowed? 
Because they seem to be broadcasts or refer to the entire subnet.

On a point-to-point WAN, so what if you send to broadcast? There's only one 
station on the other end anyway!

So IF devices support /31, you can use it. The only advantage would be it 
wastes fewer addresses, though.

Priscilla

  At 04:03 AM 11/30/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Sincerely  do not know, when you find out let me know. To me using /31 is
>against all subnet rules, /31 gives you a subnet mask of 255.255.255.254,
>with two host addresses each, but these addresses are not usable.
>
>The most I have used and seen people use is /30 (255.255.255.252), for WAN
>interface IP address allocations.
>
>Regards.
>Oletu
>
>- Original Message -
>From: Nicolas FEVRIER
>To:
>Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:39 PM
>Subject: /31 subnet. [7:27742]
>
>
> > Hi group,
> >
> > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an interface ?
> >
> > Thanxx.
> >
> > Nicolas.
>_
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27856&t=27742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Subnetting [7:27808]

2001-11-30 Thread Daniel Cotts

If the addresses you were assigned must be used for host addresses then VLSM
is the method. 160 addresses would require a block of 128 and a block of 32
addresses. The 48 requirement could be met with a block of 64. The 16 by 16.
The remainder could be used for serial links. Not all addresses could be
used for hosts as there is a need for subnet and broadcast addresses for
each block. The router interface will use an address from each block.
If it were necessary to put the 160 addresses on one interface then one
block could be assigned as a secondary ip address.

Another possibility would be to use RFC1918 addresses for the hosts and use
NAT to talk to the rest of the world.

> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Hutchinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Subnetting [7:27808]
> 
> 
> Can anyone help !
> I have been assigned by our Head Office a Class B address
> (Let's say 172.133.205.0) with a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0
> which gives me 254 hosts available.
> However i have to split this between 3 locations
> like so :
> 
> Loc A : Minimum Addresses Required 160 (HQ)
> Loc B : Minumum Addresses Required 16
> Loc C : Minumum Addresses Required 48
> 
> Loc B & C will each have a router that connects to a router at Loc A.
> 
> Any ideas on how this can done ?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Andy Hutchinson




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27857&t=27808
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Re[2]: VPN is a Backdoor !!! [7:27725]

2001-11-30 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

The problem is usually between the keyboard and chair. ;-)

Priscilla

At 11:07 AM 11/30/01, Kent Hundley wrote:
>Your right, but it is nearly impossible to secure the client.  The problem
>is that no matter how much education you give users, most will still do the
>"wrong" thing given the right circumstances.  For example, if they are in a
>chat room and someone they are communicating with sends them a file, most
>will open it, no matter how many times you tell them not to.
>
>If it is a virus or a trojan, their entire machine can become compromised
>and no amount of firewall software and strong authentication can completely
>fix that. When prompted about a new app trying to reach the Internet, they
>may just answer 'yes'.  If there's no prompt and the software doesn't work,
>they may just disable their firewall. (yes, it does happen)  The problem is
>worse if users use their home machines for VPN access.  If they use company
>assigned laptops with WinNT or 2K, you can fix some of this by not giving
>them admin access to their own machines.  This will severely limit their
>ability to install new software and offer some protection, but its not a
>guarantee.  I can see someone breaking into their machine to install the hot
>new game they just got sent from a "friend" they met on yahoo chat who's
>only too happy to help them get the software installed.
>
>The weakest link in the security chain is almost always human factors.  In
>the end, there's no silver bullet for this problem.  Policies and user
>education help, but there's always a risk involved once you rely on users
>for security, which is what you must do when you allow users remote access
>to the corporate goodies.  Creating a secure link is easy, it's the
>endpoints that tend to bite you. ;-)
>
>Good luck,
>Kent
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>SentinuS
>Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:35 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re[2]: VPN is a Backdoor !!! [7:27725]
>
>
>But I think VPN is not Backdoor if you use right Security Policy and
>right configuration. There is one issue : Client. If you can secure
>your client, there is no weakness.
>
>
>Thursday, November 29, 2001, 11:47:08 PM, you wrote:
>PR> Even then though, you're not secure.  If the box is compromised before
>you
>PR> connect then even when the firewall is enforced, malicious activity
>could
>PR> still take a place...the attacker would not be able to connect to the
>PR> machine but could leave dastardly code behind to do his job for him.
>
>PR> I am working on this scenario now as well.  I am attempting to come up
>with
>PR> a best practice for cleaning a machine, installing a firewall, etc
>for
>PR> any vpn client.  Let me know how yours goes!
>
>PR> -Patrick
>
>---cut---
>
>SentinuS
>Best Regards
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27859&t=27725
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: VXR [7:27855]

2001-11-30 Thread John Neiberger

Very eXhilirating Router?  ;-)

How about Very eXhorbitant Retail price?

>>> "Patrick Bass"  11/30/01 11:05:40 AM >>>
Anybody know what VXR stands for?  As in Cisco 7200 VXR.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27860&t=27855
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: VPN + 1720 [7:27858]

2001-11-30 Thread paul

Just want to say thankx to Murphy and Steve for helping out.

Thank you.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27858&t=27858
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: VXR [7:27855]

2001-11-30 Thread Patrick Bass

Thank you John.  Now I know that it is not "Very Excellent Router" ...


""John Neiberger""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Very eXhilirating Router?  ;-)
>
> How about Very eXhorbitant Retail price?
>
> >>> "Patrick Bass"  11/30/01 11:05:40 AM >>>
> Anybody know what VXR stands for?  As in Cisco 7200 VXR.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27862&t=27855
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Re[2]: VPN is a Backdoor !!! [7:27725]

2001-11-30 Thread Patrick Ramsey

Does anyone have a best practice written up concerning this? (I thought
mooching a lot of the content would keep me from typing a lot!)  : )

-Patrick

>>> "Priscilla Oppenheimer"  11/30/01 01:19PM >>>
The problem is usually between the keyboard and chair. ;-)

Priscilla

At 11:07 AM 11/30/01, Kent Hundley wrote:
>Your right, but it is nearly impossible to secure the client.  The problem
>is that no matter how much education you give users, most will still do the
>"wrong" thing given the right circumstances.  For example, if they are in a
>chat room and someone they are communicating with sends them a file, most
>will open it, no matter how many times you tell them not to.
>
>If it is a virus or a trojan, their entire machine can become compromised
>and no amount of firewall software and strong authentication can completely
>fix that. When prompted about a new app trying to reach the Internet, they
>may just answer 'yes'.  If there's no prompt and the software doesn't work,
>they may just disable their firewall. (yes, it does happen)  The problem is
>worse if users use their home machines for VPN access.  If they use company
>assigned laptops with WinNT or 2K, you can fix some of this by not giving
>them admin access to their own machines.  This will severely limit their
>ability to install new software and offer some protection, but its not a
>guarantee.  I can see someone breaking into their machine to install the hot
>new game they just got sent from a "friend" they met on yahoo chat who's
>only too happy to help them get the software installed.
>
>The weakest link in the security chain is almost always human factors.  In
>the end, there's no silver bullet for this problem.  Policies and user
>education help, but there's always a risk involved once you rely on users
>for security, which is what you must do when you allow users remote access
>to the corporate goodies.  Creating a secure link is easy, it's the
>endpoints that tend to bite you. ;-)
>
>Good luck,
>Kent
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>SentinuS
>Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:35 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Subject: Re[2]: VPN is a Backdoor !!! [7:27725]
>
>
>But I think VPN is not Backdoor if you use right Security Policy and
>right configuration. There is one issue : Client. If you can secure
>your client, there is no weakness.
>
>
>Thursday, November 29, 2001, 11:47:08 PM, you wrote:
>PR> Even then though, you're not secure.  If the box is compromised before
>you
>PR> connect then even when the firewall is enforced, malicious activity
>could
>PR> still take a place...the attacker would not be able to connect to the
>PR> machine but could leave dastardly code behind to do his job for him.
>
>PR> I am working on this scenario now as well.  I am attempting to come up
>with
>PR> a best practice for cleaning a machine, installing a firewall, etc
>for
>PR> any vpn client.  Let me know how yours goes!
>
>PR> -Patrick
>
>---cut---
>
>SentinuS
>Best Regards
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27861&t=27725
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: T-1 Encap Preference [7:27637]

2001-11-30 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

At 10:59 AM 11/30/01, Brent Wrisley wrote:
>Although intf's won't combine packets, I usually set higher MTU's so that 
>larger packets with the DF flag on will be allowed through.

Although applications may set the DF bit (usually as part of the MTU 
discovery process but for other reasons too), they still don't tend to send 
very large packets. Even once you add some slop for extra encapsulations, 
tunneling, VPNs, VLANs, etc. you don't need the MTU to be much larger than 
the Ethernet MTU because end-user applications and configurations don't 
tend to send packets that are larger than the Ethernet MTU.

This may change with time (and I'm sure there are some applications that do 
send larger frames), but typical ones don't. In fact, it's a good thing 
that they don't, as realtime (such as voice) packets get delayed when a 
(slow) interface takes a long time to serially output bits in a very large 
frame.

I don't want to beat a dead horse, but it seemed like maybe you missed my 
point ;-}

Priscilla


>Brent
>
>On 29/11/01 21:16 -0500, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
>:
>[...]
>  A lot of novices think that having a large interface
>:MTU is going to make a big difference, but I'm not convinced. The interface
>:isn't going to combine packets it receives into larger packets just because
>:of the larger MTU. Packets can't grow!?
>[...]
>:
>:I'll have to look into this. Thoughts? Comments?
>:
>:Priscilla
>:
>:At 05:26 PM 11/29/01, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>:> >Found this in RFC 1661 which documents PPP:
>:> >
>:> >The maximum length for the Information field, including Padding, but not
>:> >including the Protocol field, is termed the Maximum Receive Unit (MRU),
>:> >which defaults to 1500 octets. By negotiation, consenting PPP
>:> >implementations may use other values for the MRU.
>:> >
>:> >P.
>:>
>:>Hmmm...I definitely am aware of providers using 4470 on POS links,
>:>and a general trend in the gigabit-plus world to use larger MTUs. Is
>:>this simply industry practice, I wonder, or are there some overriding
>:>IEEE or IETF documents?  Perhaps in the sub-IP area, such as IP over
>:>Optical?
>:>
>:> >
>:> >At 03:05 PM 11/29/01, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>:> >>  >Howard,
>:> >>  >
>:> >>  >Correct me if am wrong but, the HDLC advantage over PPP is the MTU
>:size.
>:> >>  >PPP supports 1500 while HDLC 4xxx (can't remember the exact number),
>:> >>  >this might be helpful in situations where DF bit is set.
>:> >>  >
>:> >>  >Nabil
>:> >>
>:> >>I'd have to research this -- I don't offhand remember PPP (as the
>:> >>protocol) having a MTU limit that small.  It would surprise me, given
>:> >>the interest in POS.
>:> >
>:> >
>:> >Priscilla Oppenheimer
>:> >http://www.priscilla.com
>:
>:
>:Priscilla Oppenheimer
>:http://www.priscilla.com
>:
>:
>:
>:
>Brent Wrisley
>
>2FB6 85AD 7084 80A0 8381  C116 CDE5 78B5 E959 C536
>PGP Key ID: 0xE959C536  (us.pgp.net)




Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27863&t=27637
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Question about affordable training classes [7:27840]

2001-11-30 Thread Patricia Leeb-Hart

Bruce, I really wish you lived in the S.F. Bay Area!!  And I hope that other
CCSIs follow your lead.

(BTW, my husband's gearing up to do something similar to this but in PC
tech.)

>>> "Bruce Evry"  11/30/01 10:06:45 AM >>>
Hello,

I am a Cisco Instructor and have been toying with the idea of running very
low-cost classes that would be affordable for those not sponsored by a
corporation or rich enough to pay $2000 or more per class.
I was considering about maybe $200 to cover costs and equipment. (If someone
could not afford even that we could work something out...)

While I got my CCSI at Mentor (formerly Chesapeake) and recently have been
doing contract training at places like Sprint and Verizon, I can
still remember trying to get started, to get training, and to get that
proverbial "foot in the door". I'd like to use some of my "off" weeks when
I'm not doing corporate training to help other people get their Cisco
certifications and a good start in this career.

Classes would be held at my house, which is located just south of
Washington, DC. in beautiful Fort Washington, Maryland.

Please let me know if you think that such classes would be useful and of
interest.

Yours Truly - Bruce Evry

[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27865&t=27840
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: VXR [7:27855]

2001-11-30 Thread Patrick Bass

FYI... I found out it means "Voice Exchange Router"

""Patrick Bass""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Thank you John.  Now I know that it is not "Very Excellent Router" ...
>
>
> ""John Neiberger""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Very eXhilirating Router?  ;-)
> >
> > How about Very eXhorbitant Retail price?
> >
> > >>> "Patrick Bass"  11/30/01 11:05:40 AM >>>
> > Anybody know what VXR stands for?  As in Cisco 7200 VXR.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27867&t=27855
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ISDN BRI [7:27843]

2001-11-30 Thread NKP

Hi Mohammed ,
Just put

 ppp chap refuse

 in the global config mode and it will run fine , I had the same problem
with my ISDN as well and unfortunately even most of the engineers at TAC
could not solve my problem for 3 to 4 months till I met an experienced
engineer  at TAC  MrVadim Zakahri.
 Do refer to this document at and compare ur debugs with it  :
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/112/chapter17.htm

--
Navin Parwal
MCSE ,CIW , CCNP, CCDP

/
The person who knows "how" will always have a job .
The person who knows "why" will always be his boss.
  /
""Muhammad Shakeel Shamsi""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
>   I have found you address while going through some archives, I
was
> wondering if you could personally help me with a problem, I am configuring
a
> router a 2600 series with IOS 12.0 for ISDN connectivity to an ISP access
> server cisco AS5300, the configuration i have used has been tested by me
on
> Cisco 1603, 2501, 2503, with little changes, the problem here is that the
> router connects and the after ten seconds disconnects and on sensing out
> going traffic reconnects and then disconnects again, i start a ping it
stays
> connected and then disconnects. All other routers that i worked with are
> working ok except this one, I am searching for the solution that when i
> found you. Hoping for a reply.
>
> Regards
>
> Shakeel Shammsi
>
> Here is the configuration that i have put in.
>
>
>
> router#sh conf
> Using 1811 out of 32762 bytes
> !
> ! Last configuration change at 17:10:09 UTC Wed Mar 28 2001
> ! NVRAM config last updated at 17:10:12 UTC Wed Mar 28 2001
> !
> version 12.0
> service config
> service timestamps debug datetime msec
> service timestamps log datetime msec
> no service password-encryption
> service udp-small-servers
> service tcp-small-servers
> !
> hostname router
> !
> enable secret 5 $1$UScn$gtVSLClesbMr2G1CpNwkK/
> enable password cisco123
> !
> ip subnet-zero
> no ip domain-lookup
> ip name-server x.x.x.x
> ip name-server x.x.x.x
> ip name-server x.x.x.x
> isdn switch-type basic-net3
> !
> !
> !
> interface Ethernet0
>  ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  ip nat inside
>  no cdp enable
> !
> interface Serial0
>  no ip address
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  no ip mroute-cache
>  shutdown
> !
> interface Serial1
>  no ip address
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  shutdown
>  no cdp enable
> !
> interface BRI0
>  no ip address
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  ip nat outside
>  encapsulation ppp
>  dialer rotary-group 0
>  isdn switch-type basic-net3
>  no fair-queue
>  no cdp enable
> !
> interface Dialer0
>  ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  ip nat outside
>  encapsulation ppp
>  dialer in-band
>  dialer idle-timeout 300
>  dialer string 13111666 class 56k
>  dialer hold-queue 10
>  dialer load-threshold 200 either   Rem (if no multi link support is off)
>  dialer-group 1
>  no fair-queue
>  no cdp enable
>  ppp authentication pap callin
>  ppp pap sent-username test password 7 141113180F0B27
>  ppp multilink
> !
> ip nat translation timeout 1800
> ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer0 overload
> ip http server
> ip classless
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0
> !
> !
> map-class dialer 56
>  dialer isdn speed 56
> access-list 1 permit x.x.x.x x.x.x.x
> dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
> !
> line con 0
>  exec-timeout 0 0
>  logging synchronous
>  transport input none
> line aux 0
> line vty 0 4
>  password cisco
>  login
> !
> end




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27866&t=27843
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Subnetting [7:27808]

2001-11-30 Thread Andrew Cook

Well, given your minimum host requirements, this will be difficult.
Location A will need at least 2 subnets, as the need for 160 hosts in one
block can only be met by a /24 or shorter mask and you only have a /24
allocation.  If you give Loc. A a /25 and a /27, that would only be
126+30=156 hosts, so it would have to use a /25 and /26 for 126+62=188
hosts.
Loc. B would have to use a /27 for 30 hosts (a /28 would only give 14
hosts).
That leaves Loc. C, which needs 48 hosts.  Given the above netmasks, all we
have left is a /27 for 30 hosts.  If the numbers you list below are for
actual hosts (not netblocks including net address and broadcast address),
you cannot do it with your class C.  Even if you do more VLSM on the /26 for
Loc. A, it will still fall short.  Also, even if you hedge your numbers and
make it fit into the one /24, you will basically have zero room for growth.
I would suggest either obtaining another /24+ allocation or *groan*
bridging.
Alternatively, you could explore NAT, either at Loc. A for all 3 sites, or
individually at Loc. B + C.

Andrew


""Howard C. Berkowitz""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >Can anyone help !
> >I have been assigned by our Head Office a Class B address
> >(Let's say 172.133.205.0) with a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0
> >which gives me 254 hosts available.
>
>
>
> >However i have to split this between 3 locations
> >like so :
> >
> >Loc A : Minimum Addresses Required 160 (HQ)
> >Loc B : Minumum Addresses Required 16
> >Loc C : Minumum Addresses Required 48
> >
> >Loc B & C will each have a router that connects to a router at Loc A.
> >
> >Any ideas on how this can done ?
> >
> VLSM and a classless routing protocol.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27868&t=27808
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



FW: /31 subnet. [7:27742]

2001-11-30 Thread Lange, Eric

I thought  I sent this out earlier.  I may be mistaken.

-Eric

-Original Message-
From: Lange, Eric 
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: /31 subnet. [7:27742]


Sorry.  Looks like 12.2(2)T.



-Eric

-Original Message-
From: VoIP Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]


It doesn't work in Cisco routers.

""Carroll Kong""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Law of subnets is a tradeoff.  Bigger subnets, have higher
> efficiency, at the cost of bigger broadcast domains.  Smaller subnets have
> abysmal efficiency, at the benefit of smaller broadcast domains.
>  /31 is a new RFC proposed rule which eliminates the loss of
> effiency of 50% to.. 0%.
>  /30 has 2 usable addresses but loses 2 for broadcast and
> network.  So, you need 4 ips to make the subnet, but you only can use
> 2.  50% efficiency.  /31 is going to let you take 2, and use 2, and ignore
> the broadcast and network need.  This is ideal for point to point.
>
> At 08:32 AM 11/30/01 -0500, VoIP Guy wrote:
> >Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses in a
> >/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link, so how
> >are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
> >
> >Steve
> >
> >
> >""MADMAN""  wrote in message
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> > > avaivalable addresses.
> > >
> > >   Dave
> > >
> > > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi group,
> > > >
> > > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an interface
?
> > > >
> > > > Thanxx.
> > > >
> > > > Nicolas.
> > > --
> > > David Madland
> > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > CCIE# 2016
> > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 612-664-3367
> > >
> > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
> -Carroll Kong




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27869&t=27742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



VPN client, PIX, internet access [7:27870]

2001-11-30 Thread John Chang

Is there a way to configure a cisco PIX so that a user with a VPN client 
connects to the internal network and can also connects to the internet 
without doing a split tunnel on a windows 2000 professional?  This would in 
essence make the remote workstation part of the internal network.  Thank you.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27870&t=27870
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Subnetting [7:27808]

2001-11-30 Thread Mcfadden, Chuck

How about placing NAT on the external router and running a private address
on the internal networks.
ccie1ab

-Original Message-
From: VoIP Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Subnetting [7:27808]


If you really got a class B, it would be 255.255.0.0, where you could just
create 254 Class C networks.

If you got a class C network, you can't do it without more VLANs.

""Andy Hutchinson""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can anyone help !
> I have been assigned by our Head Office a Class B address
> (Let's say 172.133.205.0) with a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0
> which gives me 254 hosts available.
> However i have to split this between 3 locations
> like so :
>
> Loc A : Minimum Addresses Required 160 (HQ)
> Loc B : Minumum Addresses Required 16
> Loc C : Minumum Addresses Required 48
>
> Loc B & C will each have a router that connects to a router at Loc A.
>
> Any ideas on how this can done ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Andy Hutchinson




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27871&t=27808
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: VPN client, PIX, internet access [7:27870]

2001-11-30 Thread Gibb, Jake

Don't enable split tunneling on the concentrator for that grop when
using the Cisco VPN client or simply route all traffic through the VPN
tunnel. 

-Jake

-Original Message-
From: John Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 1:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VPN client, PIX, internet access [7:27870]


Is there a way to configure a cisco PIX so that a user with a VPN client

connects to the internal network and can also connects to the internet 
without doing a split tunnel on a windows 2000 professional?  This would
in 
essence make the remote workstation part of the internal network.  Thank
you.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27872&t=27870
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: CISCOWORKS USER GUIDE RWAN LMS [7:27743]

2001-11-30 Thread Feargal Ledwidge

RWAN = Cisco Works - Routed WAN version
LMS = Cisco Works - Lana Management Solution

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
anil
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CISCOWORKS USER GUIDE RWAN LMS [7:27743]


from Amazon.com:
What is "RWAN, LMS"?
Thanks
-Anil

--
CISCO CISCOWORKS USER GUIDE RWAN LMS
No photo available
Price:  $68.87 s&h fee $8.00
Description:  CISCOWORKS USER GUIDE RWAN LMS

Note: This merchant will not ship this item outside of United States.
Merchant:  microtechonline zShop   (9)
Seller: microtechonline zShop


Details:

CISCOWORKS USER GUIDE RWAN LMS

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Circusnuts
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CiscoWorks, Cisco Secure [7:27563]


Nope- I had to purchase the courseware and a documentation kit off of Ebay.
Cisco does offer a CBT for $10 + shipping.  There is always the Global
Knowledge bootcamp for $5,000 :o)>

All the best !!!
Phil

- Original Message -
From: "D sam"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:35 PM
Subject: CiscoWorks, Cisco Secure [7:27563]


> does any one know if there are any books for cisco works and Cisco secure
> that can be purchased by the public.
>
> rick
>
> _
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27864&t=27743
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]

2001-11-30 Thread Donald

Chuck what is the benefit of a broadcast on a p-to-p link. all stations are
gonna answer anyway. i.e. the station on the other side of the p-to-p link.

- Original Message -
From: "Mcfadden, Chuck" 
To: 
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:44 AM
Subject: RE: /31 subnet. [7:27742]


> Sure, but then what are your network and broadcast addresses?
> ccie1ab
>
> -Original Message-
> From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 6:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]
>
>
> Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> avaivalable addresses.
>
>   Dave
>
> Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> >
> > Hi group,
> >
> > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an interface ?
> >
> > Thanxx.
> >
> > Nicolas.
> --
> David Madland
> Sr. Network Engineer
> CCIE# 2016
> Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 612-664-3367
>
> "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27852&t=27742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: VPN client, PIX, internet access [7:27870]

2001-11-30 Thread John Chang

I know but how do you make it so that the client using the VPN client can 
access the internet with netscape or whatever without doing a split tunnel.

At 01:48 PM 11/30/2001 -0600, Gibb, Jake wrote:
>Don't enable split tunneling on the concentrator for that grop when
>using the Cisco VPN client or simply route all traffic through the VPN
>tunnel.
>
>-Jake
>
>-Original Message-
>From: John Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 1:29 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: VPN client, PIX, internet access [7:27870]
>
>
>Is there a way to configure a cisco PIX so that a user with a VPN client
>
>connects to the internal network and can also connects to the internet
>without doing a split tunnel on a windows 2000 professional?  This would
>in
>essence make the remote workstation part of the internal network.  Thank
>you.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27873&t=27870
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



VoIP MC-3810 [7:27874]

2001-11-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Just to confirm. Can a MC-3810 do VoIP or only VoFR?

Thanks,

Hugo




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27874&t=27874
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: VPN client, PIX, internet access [7:27870]

2001-11-30 Thread Gibb, Jake

Without split tunneling they will send all traffic back to your local
network. It is up to you to setup DNS settings to be pushed to the
client that they will use for resolution. These can be internal dns
servers set to forward unknown requests or external dns servers. We use
split tunneling to take advantage of the clients local ISP connection
for unknown IP requests that are not in our split tunneling list. 

-Original Message-
From: John Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Gibb, Jake; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VPN client, PIX, internet access [7:27870]


I know but how do you make it so that the client using the VPN client
can 
access the internet with netscape or whatever without doing a split
tunnel.

At 01:48 PM 11/30/2001 -0600, Gibb, Jake wrote:
>Don't enable split tunneling on the concentrator for that grop when 
>using the Cisco VPN client or simply route all traffic through the VPN 
>tunnel.
>
>-Jake
>
>-Original Message-
>From: John Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 1:29 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: VPN client, PIX, internet access [7:27870]
>
>
>Is there a way to configure a cisco PIX so that a user with a VPN 
>client
>
>connects to the internal network and can also connects to the internet 
>without doing a split tunnel on a windows 2000 professional?  This 
>would in essence make the remote workstation part of the internal 
>network.  Thank you.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27875&t=27870
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ISDN Simulator [7:27876]

2001-11-30 Thread Mcfadden, Chuck

I am looking for an ISDN simulator (BRI).  Anyone know of a good,
inexpensive device I can put into my home lab?
ccie1ab




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27876&t=27876
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: VPN client, PIX, internet access [7:27870]

2001-11-30 Thread John Chang

Do I have to do anything fancy to the PIX box to allow the client to do 
e-mail, netscape, ftp, or whatever on the internet?  What do you 
mean  about DNS settings on the client?  The DNS server will be on the 
outside.  We are not using a VPN concentrator.

At 01:55 PM 11/30/2001 -0600, Gibb, Jake wrote:
>Without split tunneling they will send all traffic back to your local
>network. It is up to you to setup DNS settings to be pushed to the
>client that they will use for resolution. These can be internal dns
>servers set to forward unknown requests or external dns servers. We use
>split tunneling to take advantage of the clients local ISP connection
>for unknown IP requests that are not in our split tunneling list.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: John Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 1:56 PM
>To: Gibb, Jake; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: VPN client, PIX, internet access [7:27870]
>
>
>I know but how do you make it so that the client using the VPN client
>can
>access the internet with netscape or whatever without doing a split
>tunnel.
>
>At 01:48 PM 11/30/2001 -0600, Gibb, Jake wrote:
> >Don't enable split tunneling on the concentrator for that grop when
> >using the Cisco VPN client or simply route all traffic through the VPN
> >tunnel.
> >
> >-Jake
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: John Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 1:29 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: VPN client, PIX, internet access [7:27870]
> >
> >
> >Is there a way to configure a cisco PIX so that a user with a VPN
> >client
> >
> >connects to the internal network and can also connects to the internet
> >without doing a split tunnel on a windows 2000 professional?  This
> >would in essence make the remote workstation part of the internal
> >network.  Thank you.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27877&t=27870
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   >