Re: VOIP [7:31615]
Under global configuration mode, type in "enable voip" and you are all set... Seriously, though I'm not VOIP expert, I think you need to provide a whole lot more information before anyone can help you... Jim --- Amit Bhasin wrote: > Hi all, > I have to configure VOIP at my end, i am working on > CISCO equippment.. > Router: Cisco 3660 > RAS: AS 5300 > can anyone tell me how to go about configuring it at > my end.. > > Regards, > Amit Bhasin > > > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at > http://mail.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31620&t=31615 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
basically you need to remove the nat inside or nat outside command from the interface, then clear the translations and then you can remove it -Original Message- From: c1sc0k1d [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2002 20:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560] clear ip nat trans ""paul"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > can anyone tell me how i go about removing a static entry from the router ?i > am using nat (#ip nat inside source static ) , however > when i remove that entry i get : %static entry in use, cannot remove . > that host is no longer up and i am running out of solutions, any suggestions > are obviously welcome ;) > thanx. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31619&t=31560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I would like to hear from those who have taken the CCIE lab [7:31618]
They have removed ATM and Voice completely. Don't bother studying it. You should really focus on your loopback and token ring interface configuration. Make sure you can put the loopback interfaces in a 'down down' state. For the token ring interfaces, make sure you can program the router to automatically bring up a token ring interface without a mau or media filter or anything at all connected to the interface...and for that matter, if you do use a mau, make sure you can bring up the interface WITHOUT pushing in the RingIn and RingOut buttons (inside joke). You should be able to run a mile in under 5 minutes, as the cafeteria has been relocated 2.5 miles away and you only have a half hour for lunch, bring pepto and gatorade. Your lab is now written using invisible ink, make sure you can see it. You may have to repell from the third floor, bring a long rope. There will be loud music playing, and a laser light show, wear sunglasses and earplugs. The room temperature will be over 100F, dress light. You will have to solve world hunger, bring extra food. And last but not least, NDA!!! You'll find out when you get there!!! Study EVERYTHING -Brad ""Firesox"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am going for a the CCIE R/S lab in March. > I am going thru all the labs that I can find, but I would love to hear from > someone who has actually taken it recently. > I am particularly curious to see how much ATM and Voice stuff I would have > to know. > Please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31618&t=31618 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would like to hear from those who have taken the CCIE lab R/S [7:31617]
I am going for a the CCIE R/S lab in March. I am going thru all the labs that I can find, but I would love to hear from someone who has actually taken it recently. I am particularly curious to see how much ATM and Voice stuff I would have to know. Please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31617&t=31617 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VOIP [7:31615]
Hi all, I have to configure VOIP at my end, i am working on CISCO equippment.. Router: Cisco 3660 RAS: AS 5300 can anyone tell me how to go about configuring it at my end.. Regards, Amit Bhasin _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31615&t=31615 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help on putting "line protocol up" [7:31611]
For line protocol to be up, the interface must be connected to a neighbor, configured correctly, and not administratively down. If this is a serial connection then you need the following: 1. Correct cabling (back-to-back cables) 2. Clocking, provided by the router with the DCE cable attached. 3. Datalink protocols must be the same on each side. The default is HDLC but you can also use PPP or Frame Relay back to back, although frame relay requires a little extra configuration to do back-to-back. When you do a show interface you see the following: Router#sho int s0 Serial0 is up, line protocol is down The first part of that line refers to the state of the physical layer (cabling and clocking.) The second part refers to the datalink layer connection. For the datalink layer to be UP, the router must be talking to a neighbor that is speaking the same language. HTH, John Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Stephane Wantou Siantou ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Can anybody tell me how to turn "line protocol up" on an interface? > Thanks, > Stephane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31614&t=31611 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help on putting "line protocol up" [7:31611]
Cmon, gotta give us a little here, a sh ip int b at least, so we know if its up/down or down/down, adminned down, and what kind of int it is? Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Stephane Wantou Siantou wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Can anybody tell me how to turn "line protocol up" on an interface? > Thanks, > Stephane Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31613&t=31611 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ospf over eigrp preference over nbma? [7:31597]
Hello Vermill, Thank you for your answer. I cannot add a mask of 0.0.0.0 under eigrp 1 config. I can only add the network . On the central router, RTB, I can only see the OSPF routes The central router has a s0.3 multipoint config with mappings for both dlci's of the other routers. The other routers RTA and RTC also have a s0 frame relay config with mappings for the other 2 routers dlci's What would be the trick to get EIGRP to discover routes from both routers RTA and RTC? And why is OSPF taking over EIGRP? Please advise. Thank you. Here is the output of the central router, RTB: Gateway of last resort is not set 2.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets O 2.2.2.0 [110/128] via 7.7.7.2, 00:09:36, Serial0.3 4.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets O 4.4.4.0 [110/128] via 7.7.7.3, 00:09:36, Serial0.3 O192.168.10.0/24 [110/70] via 7.7.7.2, 00:09:36, Serial0.3 7.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks O 7.7.7.3/32 [110/64] via 7.7.7.3, 00:16:15, Serial0.3 O 7.7.7.2/32 [110/64] via 7.7.7.2, 00:16:15, Serial0.3 C 7.7.7.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0.3 9.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 9.9.9.9 is directly connected, Loopback9 15.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets O 15.15.15.1 [110/65] via 7.7.7.3, 00:09:37, Serial0.3 NO EIGRP routes at all!! Netw 4 and 15 belong to RTA and Netw 2 and 192. belong to RTC Netw 9 belongs to RTB itself. >From: "s vermill" >Reply-To: "s vermill" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: ospf over eigrp preference over nbma? [7:31597] >Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 20:20:49 -0500 > >I suspect that it has to do with the "additional link-state updates" that >you sometimes read about where OSPF and NBMA multipoint circuits are being >discussed. Notice that the routes are /32. I don't believe that EIGRP has >such a mechanism. So OSPF is really the only protocol that knows of the >/32 >routes. Looking at your topology tables and link-state databases in >addition to the routing table might confirm that. Or try adding a network >statement in EIGRP with a 0.0.0.0 mask for each remote router interface. >Although not something you would necessarily want to do in a real network, >it might displace those OSPF host routes and help reveal the answer. I'm >not sure about that though. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31612&t=31597 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help on putting "line protocol up" [7:31611]
Hi everybody, Can anybody tell me how to turn "line protocol up" on an interface? Thanks, Stephane Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31611&t=31611 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how do config the port to 100M port of 6500 ? [7:31610]
sad Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31610&t=31610 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN dialer watch VS floating static routes [7:31609]
When configuring an ISDN backup for a frame relay circuit do most people typically use "dialer watch" or "floating static routes". In my scenerio, it's for an eigrp network and a single router. I've seen the following article on Cisco's website: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/123/backup-main.html However, all things being equal, which one would you use? Thanks in advance, Charlie Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31609&t=31609 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Looking for CCIE Lab Partners In Ottawa/Montreal [7:31608]
Over the years, a friend and I have passed several networking certifications. We have been working in the Cisco router arena for several years. Recently, we passed the CCIE written exam. We are looking for other study partners in Ottawa/Montreal area who have also passed the CCIE written and are currently 'seriously' studying for the lab. I can be contacted at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Peter & Mark ccdp, ccnp security cne, mcse, icp, cls Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31608&t=31608 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fefault route for eigrp? [7:31592]
You are absolutely right, my friend. I bumped into this tech-note from cco and it says the same..I tried it and found out that this is the only way for EIGRP to work!! Very strange!! I have BGP running on the router along with EIGRP and also a default route of 0.0.0.0 pointing to my outbound serial. Then after redistributing this static under eigrp, all other routers inside my network can get to outside networks learned via BGP..I wonder why IGRP understands the ip default route but not EIGRP...Anyone has any ideas on this?? Thank you for your help. :-) >From: "s vermill" >Reply-To: "s vermill" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Fefault route for eigrp? [7:31592] >Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:37:07 -0500 > >EIGRP behaves a little differently than all of the other protocols. You >first have to define a static 'ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x' and then >add a 'network 0.0.0.0' to your EIGRP config. I think you have to >'redistribute static' as well. It will not propogate a default as a result >of the 'default-network' command. > >Regards _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31607&t=31592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to [7:31468]
I must be going blind. I now see that a couple of other folks had suggestions that sound a little more reasonable. Sorry about that. Let us all know. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31606&t=31468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to [7:31468]
Tom, Did you ever get an answer to your question? I had hoped someone would chime in on this one. I was wondering if it had something to do with subnet zero? Something doesn't seem right about that in the back of my mind, but as you pointed out, the configs are pretty much the same otherwise. What happens if you change it to 100.0.2.0/24? Regards Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31605&t=31468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ospf over eigrp preference over nbma? [7:31597]
I suspect that it has to do with the "additional link-state updates" that you sometimes read about where OSPF and NBMA multipoint circuits are being discussed. Notice that the routes are /32. I don't believe that EIGRP has such a mechanism. So OSPF is really the only protocol that knows of the /32 routes. Looking at your topology tables and link-state databases in addition to the routing table might confirm that. Or try adding a network statement in EIGRP with a 0.0.0.0 mask for each remote router interface. Although not something you would necessarily want to do in a real network, it might displace those OSPF host routes and help reveal the answer. I'm not sure about that though. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31604&t=31597 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EIGRP Hello vs Hold timers?? [7:31600]
Johan, Yes I think you have it right. The hold time is by default three times the hello interval but can be set to any value manually. Per BSCN, "if you change the hello interval, you must adjust the hold time to reflect the configured hello interval." Hold time is sent in the outbound hello, and is kept in the neighbor table of the receiving router. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31603&t=31600 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fefault route for eigrp? [7:31592]
EIGRP behaves a little differently than all of the other protocols. You first have to define a static 'ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x' and then add a 'network 0.0.0.0' to your EIGRP config. I think you have to 'redistribute static' as well. It will not propogate a default as a result of the 'default-network' command. Regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31602&t=31592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fwd: RE: CCIE preparation [7:31305]
Hi Dennis, Just a couple of comments on your lab equipment. Instead of a 2511 you might consider a CS-516. It is a 2511 without the two serial ports. They go for around $300 on ebay. On the voice you might consider a 3810 instead of adding voice to the 2600. The VCM for the 2600 is expensive. You need one on the 3810 also but there are usually quit a few for sale on ebay with this and the fxs ports installed in the $500 to $600 range. Programing the voice on them is the same as a 2600. I also bought a couple without voice for $300 each instead of the 2501's. They have a much faster processor. Thanks for all your help Wes Stevens >From: "Kaminski, Shawn G" >Reply-To: "Kaminski, Shawn G" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: CCIE preparation [7:31305] >Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 14:16:40 -0500 > >Dennis, > >What a nice and helpful write-up! > >Shawn K. > >-Original Message- >From: Dennis Laganiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:06 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: FW: CCIE preparation [7:31305] > > >Just yesturday I was putting something together for someone who used my >boson to pass the written. Most of it is just some of the common wisdom >from the history of this group. Here's what I had, and I welcome feedback >(and good hearted abuse) from the group... > > my first draft follows -- > >Read um and Weep > >Here's the short list of books I would recommend to read (at a minimum) >during your lab preparation. Find yourself a shady spot outside, and crack >the spine of each of these page-turners, it's the only chance you'll have >to >see the sun for a few months: >7 Cisco Certification: Bridges, Routers and Switches for CCIEs, Second >Edition by Andrew Bruce Caslow >7 Internet Routing Architectures, Second Edition by Bassam Halabi >7 CCIE Prof. Development Routing TCP/IP Volumes I & II, Jeff Doyle >7 Cisco LAN Switching (CCIE professional development) >7 Cisco Catalyst LAN Switching by Louis R Rossi, Louis D. Rossi, >Thomas Rossi >7 Configuring Cisco Routers for bridging, DLSW+, & Desktop Protocols >by Tan Nam-Kee >7 My own lab prep book, once I finish writing it (look for it sometime >in 2003)... J > > >Building your own Pod: > >One of the most important elements of your CCIE lab preparation is having >equipment to practice on. My advice would be put together a home pod >watching every dollar very carefully, and then sell it on ebay when you're >done. If you do everything right, your practice time should only cost you >the interest on your credit card, and the depreciation in the value of the >equipment. What follows is a list of what I think has the makings of a >great CCIE Lab practice pod: >7 One Cisco 2511 router to use as a terminal server. A 2509 would work >fine if you have one, but trust me, before long you'll need the extra >ports. >7 A router with multiple Serial ports to use as a Frame Relay switch. >Cisco 2522's are popular for this, although in my own lab I use a 2610 with >an 8-port serial module. >7 Two Cisco 2503's. >7 One Cisco 2504 (for the FatKid labs). >7 Four or five more Cisco 2500 series routers with a selection of >Serial, Ethernet and Token Ring ports, (I love 2513's, because they have >all >three). >7 One ISDN emulator. >7 One Cat2924XL or Cat5k Switch. >7 One Cisco 3620 or 2620 with at least one Fast Ethernet port and a >pair of FXS ports for VoIP. >7 Two CAB-OCTAL-ASYNC. These 8-lead octal cables (68 pin to 8 male >RJ-45s) are used with the terminal server >7 One MAU. >7 Lots of DTE/DCE serial cables, AUI adapters, patch cables, and >crossover cables. > >* Please note that all 2500 series routers should have 16 Megs of memory, >16 >Megs of Flash and be loaded with an Enterprise Version of 12.1 IOS >appropriate to its physical configuration. > >The only things missing from the list above is ATM and a Token Ring switch. >I consider ATM just too darn expensive for a home pod, and a 3920 is hard >to >get, expensive, and easy to configure. For both these technologies, I >would >recommend renting some on-line lab time. > > >OK, The Equipment Looks Good on the Rack, Now What? > >You'll also need practice labs to run on your routers. Here's a list of >lab >materials I think are useful, in order of complexity (easiest to hardest): >7 Cisco CCIE Lab Study Guide, Second Edition by Stephen Hutnik and >Michael Satterlee >7 www.FatKid.com (these have the added advantage of being free) >7 www.solutionlabs.com >7 www.IPExpert.net >7 ccbootcmp > > >Advice on Preparation: > >Know the CD. When you're in the lab, this will be one of your few friends. >Know where the command reference are, and most importantly, know where the >sample configurations are. Think how much time you can save if you >cut-and-paste samples from the CD into your configurations. > >Print out and keep posted on the wall a cop
Re: help on acl setup [7:31336]
In order to permit only the odd ip addresses in subnet 192.168.1.0 try: access-list permit 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.254 To permit only even addresses try: access-list permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.254 ""Jinsoo"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello all, > > I have a question regarding acl setup. I have a network addr to deny access > on odd ip addr and permit even ip addr in telnetting. Can anyone tell me how > to setup? > > Thanks > Jin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31601&t=31336 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EIGRP Hello vs Hold timers?? [7:31600]
Hi all, Deep in EIGRP I'm seem to be a bit confused as to the inner workings of the Hello/Hold timers. The interface command "ip hello-interval eigrp 100 15" obviously sets the interval by which the interface will multicast the hellos. The command "ip hold-time eigrp 100 45" does not set the hold time on the advertising router, but on the neighboring routers interface. Thus you can never increase the hello more than 3 times without also changing the hold-time (otherwise adjacencies will be lost/reset). The hold-time can be set to any value without affecting the adjacencies (not recommended though - you'll probably get SIA-related problems instead). My conclusion: always set both this values when making a change. Beware of the SIA-timer (timers active). From the routers perspective the hello timer is set localy, whereas the hold-timer is received. Please confirm/reject/enlighten. The reason of my confusion was my previous belief that the hold-timer is set by the neighbors hellos. (RE-set would be more appropriate if the above is correct). /Johan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31600&t=31600 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SPAN [7:31590]
I'm not sure which switch you're using but, the concept is the same. Here's a link from CAT 5XXX documentation: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat5000/rel_6_1/config/span.htm HTH...Nabil Russ Kreigh cc: Sent by: Subject: SPAN [7:31590] nobody@groups tudy.com 01/10/2002 03:49 PM Please respond to Russ Kreigh Can someone recommend a good place to read about all the details of how SPAN works. I tried searching cisco.com and google.com but didn't find enough to make me happy. Basicly, I want to SPAN ports 1-4 to make all traffic go to ports 5&6. Can this be done? Thanks -Russ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31599&t=31590 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ospf over eigrp preference over nbma? [7:31597]
Hello, I have 3 routers configured with eigrp and ospf connected to a simulated frame relay network through a 4th router. All 3 routers are part of the same subnet, 7.7.7.1, .2, .3. a multipoint circuit. The middle router RTB (acting as the Central router) discovers networks from RTA and RTC via Eigrp but the multipoint circuit itself is discovered via ospf.Why is this so? Why isn't EIGRP the only protocol that shows up in the central router's routing table? I even went and explicitly stated the AD for ospf as 111 but still no luck. Can anyone advise? Thank you. Here is the routing table for RTB, the Central router: Gateway of last resort is not set D192.168.10.0/24 [90/2185984] via 7.7.7.2, 00:13:59, Serial0.3 7.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks O 7.7.7.3/32 [110/64] via 7.7.7.3, 00:05:26, Serial0.3 O 7.7.7.2/32 [110/64] via 7.7.7.2, 00:05:26, Serial0.3 C 7.7.7.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0.3 9.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 9.9.9.9 is directly connected, Loopback9 15.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets D 15.15.15.1 [90/2297856] via 7.7.7.3, 00:14:00, Serial0.3 _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31597&t=31597 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
time based dialer string [7:31596]
What is the best way of managing a dial up interface which needs to dial a different telephone number, dependent upon the time of day? (same IP address for both) I have tried policy routing through 2 dialer interfaces, each with time-based ACL's referenced through the dialer-group statement. This which works fine except that I also have an encrypted tunnel to which the policy does not get applied. Chris Read Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31596&t=31596 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
just want to say thanx for all your suggestions. yes, i had to clear up my ip nat translations before removing that entry. thanx. ;) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31595&t=31560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Number Expansion Question. [7:31238]
This message was for William, Sorry Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31594&t=31238 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hardware BGP? [7:31529]
Thanks Jenny, your intuition is right on!! That's exactly what I was thinking though my fingers thought otherwise :) It's times like this that the IOS command: "service do what I think not what I type" command would be very useful!! "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > Well, after a bit of brain-twisting I worked out what I think you meant by > that sentence. Of course, whether what I think you meant is the same as > what you think you meant is open for debate... > > Did you mean something along the lines of... "Pick a (hardware) platform. > If it supports BGP at all, then almost every version of IOS for that > platform supports BGP"? > > Time for my morning cuppa, after which I will no longer understand such > caffeine-deprived grammar. > > JMcL > - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 11/01/2002 08:16 am - > > > "MADMAN" > > cc: > Sent by: Subject: Re: Hardware BGP? > [7:31529] > > nobody@groups > > tudy.com > > > > 11/01/2002 > 05:32 > am > > Please > respond > to > > "MADMAN" > > > > Gawwd, I should proof the garbage I send!! :-0 If I could only > type what I'm thinking or start drinking coffee!!! > > Dave > > Ken Diliberto wrote: > > > > Dave, > > > > This was good for a chuckle. The second sentence is a riot!! > > > > Ken > > > > >>> "MADMAN" 01/10/02 10:24AM >>> > > I don't think 1600's support BGP. Actually BGP is supported in most > > all IOS of platforms that support BGP. If you just want to configure > > BGP for experience and not accept 100k+ routes I now you can use a 2500, > > 1700, 2600... > > > > Dave > > > > [snip] > > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31593&t=31529 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fefault route for eigrp? [7:31592]
Hello, Is there a command to configure a default route for eigrp speaking routers. The default-network command works for rip and igrp and the defaul-information originate command works for ospf but I am unable to inject a default route to an eigrp speaking router. I tried default-information in 10 with 10 being the access-list that permits any on RTB but no luck. Basically, I have RTA connected to RTB connected to RTC. These 3 routers run eigrp 1 while RTC also runs BGP 100 connected with neighbor RTD running BGP 200. RTC is learning routes from BGP 200 but I am unable to get to those networks from RTA or RTB. I even tried the redistribute bgp 100 command under router eigrp on RTC but still no luck. What am I missing about EIGRP that I have no problem with IGRP, RIP or OSPF? Thanks for your advise. _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31592&t=31592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hardware BGP? [7:31529]
Well, after a bit of brain-twisting I worked out what I think you meant by that sentence. Of course, whether what I think you meant is the same as what you think you meant is open for debate... Did you mean something along the lines of... "Pick a (hardware) platform. If it supports BGP at all, then almost every version of IOS for that platform supports BGP"? Time for my morning cuppa, after which I will no longer understand such caffeine-deprived grammar. JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 11/01/2002 08:16 am - "MADMAN" cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: Hardware BGP? [7:31529] nobody@groups tudy.com 11/01/2002 05:32 am Please respond to "MADMAN" Gawwd, I should proof the garbage I send!! :-0 If I could only type what I'm thinking or start drinking coffee!!! Dave Ken Diliberto wrote: > > Dave, > > This was good for a chuckle. The second sentence is a riot!! > > Ken > > >>> "MADMAN" 01/10/02 10:24AM >>> > I don't think 1600's support BGP. Actually BGP is supported in most > all IOS of platforms that support BGP. If you just want to configure > BGP for experience and not accept 100k+ routes I now you can use a 2500, > 1700, 2600... > > Dave > > [snip] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31591&t=31529 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SPAN [7:31590]
Can someone recommend a good place to read about all the details of how SPAN works. I tried searching cisco.com and google.com but didn't find enough to make me happy. Basicly, I want to SPAN ports 1-4 to make all traffic go to ports 5&6. Can this be done? Thanks -Russ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31590&t=31590 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2900 multiple monitor ports?!?! [7:31589]
Hello all, I know that on a 5000/5500 that there are alot of limitations on monitor (span) ports. However, I have a 2900 and need to have 2 ports monitor all of the others (i.e. have port 21 monitor ports 1-20 and also have port 22 monitor ports 1-20). Can the 2900 do this? I gave the commands on the two ports to have them both monitor the same port and it accepted the command. FastEthernet 0/21 port monitor fast0/1 speed 100 duplex full spanning-tree portfast ! FastEthernet 0/22 port monitor fast0/1 speed 100 duplex full spanning-tree portfast Does anyone know of any specific limitations regarding this scenario? I would have left the config like this to test it, but it's a production box and didn't wanna take a chance on downing it but it took the command so I would think it's possible. TIA! Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31589&t=31589 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hardware BGP? [7:31529]
Don't know what you mean by BGP default routes unless you mean partial routes from a provider. I have done this a few times when provider A is, lets say, a 3M connection and providers B is a T1. You do BGP, learn default only via BGP from provider A and get partial routes from provider B, partial routes being routes that the provider originates. Dave "Hire, Ejay" wrote: > > Okay, I'll bite. > > Situation: If Joe Bob's WebHosting Has a frac ti to provider A and a Frac > t1 to Provider B. Both provider's are providing their own CPE's, and Joe > Bob has convinced them to run BGP with him. Both Isp's want him to peer to > one of there Distribution layer routers via ebgp muilthop. > > Assuming JoeBob only accepts the bgp default routes, why should he not use a > 160x in this situation? > > More realistic situation: JoeBob's company uses vpn services on a cisco > 17xx, the 160xs cousin. They implement bgp to their Isp's, because the VPN > connection needs to be there if one of the ISP's fail. Assuming JoeBob only > accepts the bgp default routes, why should he not use a 17xx in this > situation? > > I agree that every router is limited in what it can do and how much traffic > it can handle. I do not agree that we should arbitrarily dismiss certain > models of routers without considering the actual need. > > -ejay > > -Original Message- > From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Hardware BGP? [7:31529] > > 1600's IOS supports BGP Should you use 1600 with BGP, hell no... > > ""MADMAN"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I don't think 1600's support BGP. Actually BGP is supported in most > > all IOS of platforms that support BGP. If you just want to configure > > BGP for experience and not accept 100k+ routes I now you can use a 2500, > > 1700, 2600... > > > > Dave > > > > Shawn Xu wrote: > > > > > > Hi, All: > > > > > > Which Cisco router can run BGP? Cisco 1605 can do it? > > > > > > I never had BGP experience, and I think it depends on IOS version, not > > > hardware. > > > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > Shawn > > > > > > _ > > > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > -- > > David Madland > > Sr. Network Engineer > > CCIE# 2016 > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 612-664-3367 > > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31588&t=31529 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame relay map 0.0.0.0 question, please help! CCIE lab is [7:31587]
> You also need to consider to use the newer Cisco method which is "IP OSPF > NETWORK TYPE". Neighbor command is an old mehtod of doing it and not > recommended anymore. > Good point. You better be able to do it in every way that's available. What if your directions were "don't use neighbor commands", as a few of the lab preparation guides suggest? Also, be mindful that older versions of IOS (pre 12.0, I believe) did not have ospf network-type "point-to-point" Just in case you run into that in the real world. > Abbas > > -Original Message- > From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:28 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Frame relay map 0.0.0.0 question, please help! CCIE lab is > [7:31565] > > > Did you change the Hub router's ospf priority so It will become DR? And > change The spoke routers' ospf priority to 0 so it will never attempt to > become DR or bdr? > > -Original Message- > From: Wilson, Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Frame relay map 0.0.0.0 question, please help! CCIE lab is Feb > [7:31555] > > > I have a frame switch configured for full mesh connectivity over a 3 node > frame relay cloud. Router A and router B cannot use subinterfaces. Router > B and router C can only use thier dlci that connects them to Router A, not > the dlci that connects them to each other. Because the frame switch is set > up as a full mesh, I have disabled inverse arp on router A, B, and C and > have used frame relay map commands with the broadcast parameter on each > router. I am able to ping every router just fine using router A as a hub. > Then I need to enable ospf between all of them. I used the neighbor x.x.x.x > command to enable ospf, but the two spoke routers, B and C, only form adj > with router A, they can not form adj with each other. When I debug ip ospf > adj, I see that routers B and C are sending their poll-intervals? to > 0.0.0.0. When I issued a sh frame relay map command, I saw the following > entires: > > sh fram map > Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 503(0x1F7,0x7C70) > broadcast, > CISCO, status defined, inactive > Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 502(0x1F6,0x7C60) > broadcast, > CISCO, status defined, inactive > Serial0/0 (up): ip 140.4.1.2 dlci 503(0x1F7,0x7C70), static, > broadcast, > CISCO, status defined, inactive > Serial0/0 (up): ip 140.4.1.3 dlci 503(0x1F7,0x7C70), static, > broadcast, > CISCO, status defined, inactive > > I can not seem to loose the frame maps to 0.0.0.0. They do not show > themselves as being learned dynamically or statically. What do they mean? > How do I get rid of them? How did they get in there? I can not form adj, > please help!! _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31587&t=31587 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DHCP coonection on Cisco Router [7:31559]
Try under $600 if you are lucky. Most go for a little more though, so in the low $600's isn't unreasonable. More than that is. At that point, you can get two 2501's and a crossover v.35. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
My preference in this is to just scope the translation clearing to just the affected static, then quickly delete the static translation which I think sridder was saying. In particularly busy environments an inbound acl on the internal/external interfaces will keep traffic from triggering the static translation while you can delete it and then remove the additional acl denies. If you do it all carefully no other endpoints will have service distrupted and that should always be a goal. AMR wrote: > > You dont shut down the interface. Just remove the 'ip nat outside' or other > such necessary command from the interface. It's far less affecting to the > router to remove the nat command than it is to shut down an interface which > would possibly cause a change in the route table, forcing calculations, etc. > > ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Also shut down the local lan interface in case some lan client tries to go > > out to the internet while you are changing nat. Some busy sites this > > happens at. And include an * after the trans for all the translations. > > > > -- > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31584&t=31560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hardware BGP? [7:31529]
I think I used IOS 12.1(9) with IP/IPX/FW PLUS (I think). I know exactly what you mean since after the IOS upgrade, it worked in our lab environment as well. It is definitely your IOS issue. Try to upgrade to IP PLUS or if your memory and flash supports it, use the all feature one. Let me know how it works out. Ed -Original Message- From: Shawn Xu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Hardware BGP? [7:31529] Hi, Kim: Your email gives me a deep impression. 1605 router is one I am attempting to use for BGP,but when I tried "router bgp asnumber",it says "unknown routing protocol". If I tried "router rip" or "router ospf number", they are ok. By the way, IOS ver 12. Please help, thanks. Shawn >From: "Kim Edward B" >Reply-To: "Kim Edward B" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Hardware BGP? [7:31529] >Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:01:51 -0500 > >I got the BGP working on 1600s. >They work fine (in lab environment of course.) > >Ed > >-Original Message- >From: Ken Diliberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:26 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Hardware BGP? [7:31529] > >Dave, > >This was good for a chuckle. The second sentence is a riot!! > >Ken > > >>> "MADMAN" 01/10/02 10:24AM >>> >I don't think 1600's support BGP. Actually BGP is supported in most >all IOS of platforms that support BGP. If you just want to configure >BGP for experience and not accept 100k+ routes I now you can use a 2500, >1700, 2600... > > Dave > >[snip] >* >DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential >and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying >or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other >person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please >notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31585&t=31529 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
515UR Upgrade [7:31586]
Hi folks, Jus' checkin', I'm looking to upgrade my PIX 515UR w/failover from 5.3(1) wa up to the current 6.2. (Help me, I found myself *liking* the GUI of that PDM management interface!) Are there any war stories of note that might save the hapless administrator hours of time? Very best, G. "When you're wounded and left on Afghanistan's plains, And the women come out to cut up what remains, Jest roll to your rifle and blow out your brains An' go to your Gawd like a soldier." Kipling, on other wars with different soldiers. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31586&t=31586 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
Good point. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hardware BGP? [7:31529]
I have seen just this situation, albeit with a 2501. I agree that the solution should match the problem, not necessarily the "feature" (BGP in this case). Mark > Okay, I'll bite. > > Situation: If Joe Bob's WebHosting Has a frac ti to provider A and a Frac > t1 to Provider B. Both provider's are providing their own CPE's, and Joe > Bob has convinced them to run BGP with him. Both Isp's want him to peer to > one of there Distribution layer routers via ebgp muilthop. > > Assuming JoeBob only accepts the bgp default routes, why should he not use a > 160x in this situation? > > More realistic situation: JoeBob's company uses vpn services on a cisco > 17xx, the 160xs cousin. They implement bgp to their Isp's, because the VPN > connection needs to be there if one of the ISP's fail. Assuming JoeBob only > accepts the bgp default routes, why should he not use a 17xx in this > situation? > > I agree that every router is limited in what it can do and how much traffic > it can handle. I do not agree that we should arbitrarily dismiss certain > models of routers without considering the actual need. > > -ejay > > -Original Message- > From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Hardware BGP? [7:31529] > > > 1600's IOS supports BGP Should you use 1600 with BGP, hell no... > > ""MADMAN"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I don't think 1600's support BGP. Actually BGP is supported in most > > all IOS of platforms that support BGP. If you just want to configure > > BGP for experience and not accept 100k+ routes I now you can use a 2500, > > 1700, 2600... > > > > Dave > > > > Shawn Xu wrote: > > > > > > Hi, All: > > > > > > Which Cisco router can run BGP? Cisco 1605 can do it? > > > > > > I never had BGP experience, and I think it depends on IOS version, not > > > hardware. > > > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > Shawn > > > > > > _ > > > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > -- > > David Madland > > Sr. Network Engineer > > CCIE# 2016 > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 612-664-3367 > > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31581&t=31529 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help Please! BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to [7:31580]
One thing may be that 100.0.0.0 is a class B network. You have it subnetted. try no auto-summary under BGP process on both routers - Original Message - From: "Kane, Christopher A." To: Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:46 PM Subject: RE: Help Please! BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to [7:31571] > Tom, > > I have config'd my Lab and it works: > Your router 9.9.9.9 is my rtrB: > rtrB#sh ip bgp 100.0.0.0 > BGP routing table entry for 100.0.0.0/24, version 2 > Paths: (1 available, best #1) > Advertised to non peer-group peers: > 10.0.0.33best, i - > internal > Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete > >Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path > *>i100.0.0.0/24 10.0.0.370100 0 i > *> 100.0.1.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i > > > My rtrC is the AS 100 router. Below, you can see that he's learning 2 > prefixes from both routers in AS 400. By looking at the ">" you can see > which route he's putting in his routing table. This is based on the MEDS > that rtrA (your 6.6.6.6) and rtrB (your 9.9.9.9) are sending him. > See below: > > rtrC#sh ip bgp n 10.0.0.18 rou > BGP table version is 16, local router ID is 10.0.0.17 > Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - > internal > Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete > >Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path > *> 100.0.0.0/24 10.0.0.185 0 400 i > * 100.0.1.0/24 10.0.0.18 10 0 400 i > > Total number of prefixes 2 > rtrC#sh ip bgp n 10.0.0.34 rou > BGP table version is 16, local router ID is 10.0.0.17 > Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - > internal > Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete > >Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path > * 100.0.0.0/24 10.0.0.34 10 0 400 i > *> 100.0.1.0/24 10.0.0.345 0 400 i > > Total number of prefixes 2 > > > > > > My configs are the same as yours with the exception of the route-map name. > My route-map name matches the route map that I am calling in my nei > statement to 10.0.0.33 on rtrB (9.9.9.9). > > HTH, > Chris > > > -Original Message- > From: Tom Pruneau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Help Please! BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to any > [7:31528] > > > BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to any peer" > > > Below is from an isolated lab configuration, appologies to the actual > owners of any addresses of AS numbers used. > > > > I have two routers connected together via a serial line. They are in AS400. > They are both connected to AS100 via another serial line. Both have a route > map affecting advertisements to AS100. They each have an ethernet with a > /24 on it. The /24 is getting into BGP via a network command. > > The two routers have the loopbacks 6.6.6.6 and 9.9.9.9 > > network 100.0.0.0 /24 is connected to the ethernet of router 6.6.6.6 > network 100.0.1.0 /24 is connected to the ethernet of router 9.9.9.9 > > When I am on router 6.6.6.6 and I look at the advertisement of network > 100.0.1.0 /24 is looks fine > When i am on router 9.9.9.9 and I look at the advertisement of network > 100.0.0.0 /24 it says "Not advertised to any peer" > > Any ideas why the difference Why can't 100.0.0.0 be avertised to any > peer? > > Both routers have been rebooted. The configs look almost identical. > > > router_#sho ip bgp 100.0.1.0 > BGP routing table entry for 100.0.1.0/24, version 2 > Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) > Advertised to non peer-group peers: 10.0.0.17 > Local > 10.0.0.38 from 10.0.0.38 (9.9.9.9) > Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best > > > > router_#show ip bgp 100.0.0.0 > BGP routing table entry for 100.0.0.0/24, version 9 > Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) > Not advertised to any peer Local > 10.0.0.37 from 10.0.0.37 (6.6.6.6) > Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best > > > > > router > > interface Loopback0 > ip address 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.255 > ! > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 100.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface Serial0 > ip address 10.0.0.18 255.255.255.252 > ! > interface Serial1 > ip address 10.0.0.37 255.255.255.252 > ! > router bgp 400 > no synchronization > bgp log-neighbor-changes > network 100.0.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0 > neighbor 10.0.0.17 remote-as 100 > neighbor 10.0.0.17 route-map set_meds out > neighbor 10.0.0.38 remote-as 400 > no auto-summary > ! > ip classless > ip route 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 10.0.0.38 > no ip http server > ! > access-list 20 permit 100.0.0.0 > access-list 21 permit 100.0.1.0 > route-map set_meds permit 10 > match ip address 20 > set metric 5 > ! > route-
Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
You dont shut down the interface. Just remove the 'ip nat outside' or other such necessary command from the interface. It's far less affecting to the router to remove the nat command than it is to shut down an interface which would possibly cause a change in the route table, forcing calculations, etc. ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Also shut down the local lan interface in case some lan client tries to go > out to the internet while you are changing nat. Some busy sites this > happens at. And include an * after the trans for all the translations. > > -- > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31579&t=31560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DHCP coonection on Cisco Router [7:31559]
I see its just what I'm looking for. What would you say would be a fair price for a used one. I don't wanna get ripped off. Thanks ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > 2514 supports 2 eth ints. > > or you may be able to get two cheap 2501's and string them together via > serial. > > I've always wanted to try secondary addressing on 1 interface. The main > would get it's IP via DHCP, and the secondary address would be the private > IP. Always wanted to know if this would work. > > -- > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31578&t=31559 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DHCP coonection on Cisco Router [7:31559]
If you need only 2 ethernet interfaces you can use a 1605R. - Original Message - From: "sam sneed" To: Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:51 PM Subject: DHCP coonection on Cisco Router [7:31559] > Quer ter seu prsprio enderego na Internet? > Garanta ja o seu e ainda ganhe cinco e-mails personalizados. > DommniosBOL - http://dominios.bol.com.br > > > > > > Hello group, > > I wanted to use a Cisco router to connect to my ISP via DSL or Cable modem. > What would be the least expensive router I could get used on e-bay that > could perform this. It obviously needs 2 ethernet interfaces and I'm not > sure if there is a model in the 2500 series that supports this. Thanks alot. > I'd like to use this setup for studying and internet connectivity. > > sam sneed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31577&t=31559 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DHCP coonection on Cisco Router [7:31559]
Regarding your secondary IP, if you use NAT, this will not work because you can't put both "ip nat inside" and "ip nat outside" under 1 ethernet interface. A cheaper router will be a 1605, I guess. Jim --- "Steven A. Ridder" wrote: > 2514 supports 2 eth ints. > > or you may be able to get two cheap 2501's and > string them together via > serial. > > I've always wanted to try secondary addressing on 1 > interface. The main > would get it's IP via DHCP, and the secondary > address would be the private > IP. Always wanted to know if this would work. > > -- > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31576&t=31559 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame relay map 0.0.0.0 question, please help! CCIE lab is [7:31575]
> Did you change the Hub router's ospf priority so It will become DR? And > change The spoke routers' ospf priority to 0 so it will never attempt to > become DR or bdr? > And also, if you have NOT issued the command clear frame inarp (12.1 and above) or clear frame-inarp (12.0 and below), the map statements will remain until you reload the routers. That will need to be done on router B and router C. Routers B and C do not form adjacencies with each other in this topology *unless* you make use of the full mesh, which you've been instructed *not* to do. They both form adjacencies with Router A. That's why you add a map statement to each Router B and Router C to point them to each other via their respective DLCI's to Router A, unless you're explicitly told not to do that. (Which is whole different can of worms) My strategy is shut off inverse arp, clear frame inarp, get the map statements into the config, write the config, and reload. You may wish to reschedule your Feb lab date if you're at this point with OSPF and frame relay a month or so away from your lab. It only gets more complex than this, and this concept, while not elementary, is 'core' to your success in the lab exam. > -Original Message- > From: Wilson, Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Frame relay map 0.0.0.0 question, please help! CCIE lab is Feb > [7:31555] > > > I have a frame switch configured for full mesh connectivity over a 3 node > frame relay cloud. Router A and router B cannot use subinterfaces. Router > B and router C can only use thier dlci that connects them to Router A, not > the dlci that connects them to each other. Because the frame switch is set > up as a full mesh, I have disabled inverse arp on router A, B, and C and > have used frame relay map commands with the broadcast parameter on each > router. I am able to ping every router just fine using router A as a hub. > Then I need to enable ospf between all of them. I used the neighbor x.x.x.x > command to enable ospf, but the two spoke routers, B and C, only form adj > with router A, they can not form adj with each other. When I debug ip ospf > adj, I see that routers B and C are sending their poll-intervals? to > 0.0.0.0. When I issued a sh frame relay map command, I saw the following > entires: > > sh fram map > Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 503(0x1F7,0x7C70) > broadcast, > CISCO, status defined, inactive > Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 502(0x1F6,0x7C60) > broadcast, > CISCO, status defined, inactive > Serial0/0 (up): ip 140.4.1.2 dlci 503(0x1F7,0x7C70), static, > broadcast, > CISCO, status defined, inactive > Serial0/0 (up): ip 140.4.1.3 dlci 503(0x1F7,0x7C70), static, > broadcast, > CISCO, status defined, inactive > > I can not seem to loose the frame maps to 0.0.0.0. They do not show > themselves as being learned dynamically or statically. What do they mean? > How do I get rid of them? How did they get in there? I can not form adj, > please help!! _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31575&t=31575 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 1200 Catalyst switches [7:31548]
I use the console cable for 2500/2600 router access, but I use a straight cable instead of a rolled. Jeff ""Michael Damkot"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have recently been given two 1200 switches but cannot access them. I am > running Win2000 with Vandyke CRT3.4 and my co-worker is running win NT 4.0 > with Hyperterm, neither one of us can get any response from either switch. > Any suggestions?? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31574&t=31548 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame relay map 0.0.0.0 question, please help! CCIE lab is [7:31573]
You also need to consider to use the newer Cisco method which is "IP OSPF NETWORK TYPE". Neighbor command is an old mehtod of doing it and not recommended anymore. Abbas -Original Message- From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Frame relay map 0.0.0.0 question, please help! CCIE lab is [7:31565] Did you change the Hub router's ospf priority so It will become DR? And change The spoke routers' ospf priority to 0 so it will never attempt to become DR or bdr? -Original Message- From: Wilson, Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Frame relay map 0.0.0.0 question, please help! CCIE lab is Feb [7:31555] I have a frame switch configured for full mesh connectivity over a 3 node frame relay cloud. Router A and router B cannot use subinterfaces. Router B and router C can only use thier dlci that connects them to Router A, not the dlci that connects them to each other. Because the frame switch is set up as a full mesh, I have disabled inverse arp on router A, B, and C and have used frame relay map commands with the broadcast parameter on each router. I am able to ping every router just fine using router A as a hub. Then I need to enable ospf between all of them. I used the neighbor x.x.x.x command to enable ospf, but the two spoke routers, B and C, only form adj with router A, they can not form adj with each other. When I debug ip ospf adj, I see that routers B and C are sending their poll-intervals? to 0.0.0.0. When I issued a sh frame relay map command, I saw the following entires: sh fram map Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 503(0x1F7,0x7C70) broadcast, CISCO, status defined, inactive Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 502(0x1F6,0x7C60) broadcast, CISCO, status defined, inactive Serial0/0 (up): ip 140.4.1.2 dlci 503(0x1F7,0x7C70), static, broadcast, CISCO, status defined, inactive Serial0/0 (up): ip 140.4.1.3 dlci 503(0x1F7,0x7C70), static, broadcast, CISCO, status defined, inactive I can not seem to loose the frame maps to 0.0.0.0. They do not show themselves as being learned dynamically or statically. What do they mean? How do I get rid of them? How did they get in there? I can not form adj, please help!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31573&t=31573 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
Also shut down the local lan interface in case some lan client tries to go out to the internet while you are changing nat. Some busy sites this happens at. And include an * after the trans for all the translations. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help Please! BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to [7:31571]
Tom, I have config'd my Lab and it works: Your router 9.9.9.9 is my rtrB: rtrB#sh ip bgp 100.0.0.0 BGP routing table entry for 100.0.0.0/24, version 2 Paths: (1 available, best #1) Advertised to non peer-group peers: 10.0.0.33best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path *>i100.0.0.0/24 10.0.0.370100 0 i *> 100.0.1.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i My rtrC is the AS 100 router. Below, you can see that he's learning 2 prefixes from both routers in AS 400. By looking at the ">" you can see which route he's putting in his routing table. This is based on the MEDS that rtrA (your 6.6.6.6) and rtrB (your 9.9.9.9) are sending him. See below: rtrC#sh ip bgp n 10.0.0.18 rou BGP table version is 16, local router ID is 10.0.0.17 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path *> 100.0.0.0/24 10.0.0.185 0 400 i * 100.0.1.0/24 10.0.0.18 10 0 400 i Total number of prefixes 2 rtrC#sh ip bgp n 10.0.0.34 rou BGP table version is 16, local router ID is 10.0.0.17 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path * 100.0.0.0/24 10.0.0.34 10 0 400 i *> 100.0.1.0/24 10.0.0.345 0 400 i Total number of prefixes 2 My configs are the same as yours with the exception of the route-map name. My route-map name matches the route map that I am calling in my nei statement to 10.0.0.33 on rtrB (9.9.9.9). HTH, Chris -Original Message- From: Tom Pruneau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help Please! BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to any [7:31528] BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to any peer" Below is from an isolated lab configuration, appologies to the actual owners of any addresses of AS numbers used. I have two routers connected together via a serial line. They are in AS400. They are both connected to AS100 via another serial line. Both have a route map affecting advertisements to AS100. They each have an ethernet with a /24 on it. The /24 is getting into BGP via a network command. The two routers have the loopbacks 6.6.6.6 and 9.9.9.9 network 100.0.0.0 /24 is connected to the ethernet of router 6.6.6.6 network 100.0.1.0 /24 is connected to the ethernet of router 9.9.9.9 When I am on router 6.6.6.6 and I look at the advertisement of network 100.0.1.0 /24 is looks fine When i am on router 9.9.9.9 and I look at the advertisement of network 100.0.0.0 /24 it says "Not advertised to any peer" Any ideas why the difference Why can't 100.0.0.0 be avertised to any peer? Both routers have been rebooted. The configs look almost identical. router_#sho ip bgp 100.0.1.0 BGP routing table entry for 100.0.1.0/24, version 2 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Advertised to non peer-group peers: < 10.0.0.17 Local 10.0.0.38 from 10.0.0.38 (9.9.9.9) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best router_#show ip bgp 100.0.0.0 BGP routing table entry for 100.0.0.0/24, version 9 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer << Local 10.0.0.37 from 10.0.0.37 (6.6.6.6) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best router interface Loopback0 ip address 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 100.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial0 ip address 10.0.0.18 255.255.255.252 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.0.0.37 255.255.255.252 ! router bgp 400 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 100.0.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 10.0.0.17 remote-as 100 neighbor 10.0.0.17 route-map set_meds out neighbor 10.0.0.38 remote-as 400 no auto-summary ! ip classless ip route 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 10.0.0.38 no ip http server ! access-list 20 permit 100.0.0.0 access-list 21 permit 100.0.1.0 route-map set_meds permit 10 match ip address 20 set metric 5 ! route-map set_meds permit 20 match ip address 21 set metric 10 Router ! interface Loopback0 ip address 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 100.0.1.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Ethernet1 no ip address ! interface Serial0 ip address 10.0.0.38 255.255.255.252 no fair-queue clockrate 200 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.0.0.34 255.255.255.252 clockrate 200 ! router bgp 400 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 100.0.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 ne
RE: Hardware BGP? [7:31529]
Okay, I'll bite. Situation: If Joe Bob's WebHosting Has a frac ti to provider A and a Frac t1 to Provider B. Both provider's are providing their own CPE's, and Joe Bob has convinced them to run BGP with him. Both Isp's want him to peer to one of there Distribution layer routers via ebgp muilthop. Assuming JoeBob only accepts the bgp default routes, why should he not use a 160x in this situation? More realistic situation: JoeBob's company uses vpn services on a cisco 17xx, the 160xs cousin. They implement bgp to their Isp's, because the VPN connection needs to be there if one of the ISP's fail. Assuming JoeBob only accepts the bgp default routes, why should he not use a 17xx in this situation? I agree that every router is limited in what it can do and how much traffic it can handle. I do not agree that we should arbitrarily dismiss certain models of routers without considering the actual need. -ejay -Original Message- From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Hardware BGP? [7:31529] 1600's IOS supports BGP Should you use 1600 with BGP, hell no... ""MADMAN"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I don't think 1600's support BGP. Actually BGP is supported in most > all IOS of platforms that support BGP. If you just want to configure > BGP for experience and not accept 100k+ routes I now you can use a 2500, > 1700, 2600... > > Dave > > Shawn Xu wrote: > > > > Hi, All: > > > > Which Cisco router can run BGP? Cisco 1605 can do it? > > > > I never had BGP experience, and I think it depends on IOS version, not > > hardware. > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > Shawn > > > > _ > > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31570&t=31529 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DHCP coonection on Cisco Router [7:31559]
2514 supports 2 eth ints. or you may be able to get two cheap 2501's and string them together via serial. I've always wanted to try secondary addressing on 1 interface. The main would get it's IP via DHCP, and the secondary address would be the private IP. Always wanted to know if this would work. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DHCP coonection on Cisco Router [7:31559]
The 2514 has 2 ethernet interfaces! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of sam sneed Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DHCP coonection on Cisco Router [7:31559] Hello group, I wanted to use a Cisco router to connect to my ISP via DSL or Cable modem. What would be the least expensive router I could get used on e-bay that could perform this. It obviously needs 2 ethernet interfaces and I'm not sure if there is a model in the 2500 series that supports this. Thanks alot. I'd like to use this setup for studying and internet connectivity. sam sneed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31568&t=31559 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hardware BGP? [7:31529]
A quick search verifies you are correct. In the bad old days the 1600 didn't even support OSPF but enough people screamed... Dave Jason wrote: > > 1600's IOS supports BGP Should you use 1600 with BGP, hell no... > > ""MADMAN"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I don't think 1600's support BGP. Actually BGP is supported in most > > all IOS of platforms that support BGP. If you just want to configure > > BGP for experience and not accept 100k+ routes I now you can use a 2500, > > 1700, 2600... > > > > Dave > > > > Shawn Xu wrote: > > > > > > Hi, All: > > > > > > Which Cisco router can run BGP? Cisco 1605 can do it? > > > > > > I never had BGP experience, and I think it depends on IOS version, not > > > hardware. > > > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > Shawn > > > > > > _ > > > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > -- > > David Madland > > Sr. Network Engineer > > CCIE# 2016 > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 612-664-3367 > > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31567&t=31529 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hardware BGP? [7:31529]
Gawwd, I should proof the garbage I send!! :-0 If I could only type what I'm thinking or start drinking coffee!!! Dave Ken Diliberto wrote: > > Dave, > > This was good for a chuckle. The second sentence is a riot!! > > Ken > > >>> "MADMAN" 01/10/02 10:24AM >>> > I don't think 1600's support BGP. Actually BGP is supported in most > all IOS of platforms that support BGP. If you just want to configure > BGP for experience and not accept 100k+ routes I now you can use a 2500, > 1700, 2600... > > Dave > > [snip] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31566&t=31529 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame relay map 0.0.0.0 question, please help! CCIE lab is [7:31565]
Did you change the Hub router's ospf priority so It will become DR? And change The spoke routers' ospf priority to 0 so it will never attempt to become DR or bdr? -Original Message- From: Wilson, Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Frame relay map 0.0.0.0 question, please help! CCIE lab is Feb [7:31555] I have a frame switch configured for full mesh connectivity over a 3 node frame relay cloud. Router A and router B cannot use subinterfaces. Router B and router C can only use thier dlci that connects them to Router A, not the dlci that connects them to each other. Because the frame switch is set up as a full mesh, I have disabled inverse arp on router A, B, and C and have used frame relay map commands with the broadcast parameter on each router. I am able to ping every router just fine using router A as a hub. Then I need to enable ospf between all of them. I used the neighbor x.x.x.x command to enable ospf, but the two spoke routers, B and C, only form adj with router A, they can not form adj with each other. When I debug ip ospf adj, I see that routers B and C are sending their poll-intervals? to 0.0.0.0. When I issued a sh frame relay map command, I saw the following entires: sh fram map Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 503(0x1F7,0x7C70) broadcast, CISCO, status defined, inactive Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 502(0x1F6,0x7C60) broadcast, CISCO, status defined, inactive Serial0/0 (up): ip 140.4.1.2 dlci 503(0x1F7,0x7C70), static, broadcast, CISCO, status defined, inactive Serial0/0 (up): ip 140.4.1.3 dlci 503(0x1F7,0x7C70), static, broadcast, CISCO, status defined, inactive I can not seem to loose the frame maps to 0.0.0.0. They do not show themselves as being learned dynamically or statically. What do they mean? How do I get rid of them? How did they get in there? I can not form adj, please help!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31565&t=31565 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I have rephrased the question [7:31564]
At 07:58 AM 1/10/02, Madisa Ramagoffu wrote: >I have rephrased the question I have removed the F.F >and put the "following" coz thats what I meant when I said FF. FF is >not the address pls read again see if you will understand.Pls understand >as I am not good in speaking English > >This question is the same as like sending an ip packet with no >destination port number or something like that > >In a token ring environment a sender send a packet to a destination >with the following in a packet > >Everything specified excerpt the dsap >DSAP >da specified >sa specified >SSAP specified > > > >The question . what will happen to the packet when it gets to the >destination if the DSAP is not specified >Is the packet going to be copied ? >Is the packet going to be dropped ? >Will it wait for the next packet or request a retransmit?? >What about the A C bit ? I answered the entire question in my previous message. Maybe you did not read past my comment on FF. The gist of my message was that the receiver is going to process the message serially, one byte at a time. If the Frame Control field says that this is an LLC frame (with upper-layer data as opposed to MAC overhead data), then the recipient will assume that the byte following the Source Address (or Routing Info, if present) is a DSAP, whether that's what the sender intended or not. There's no such thing as AC bits. I think you are thinking about the Address Recognized and Frame Copied bits. Those get set at the MAC layer. They have nothing to do with LLC which handles DSAPs. A recipient station sets the address recognized bits at the MAC layer if it recognizes the frame is for it. The station sets the Frame Copied bits if it is able to copy the frame, which it should be able to do unless it doesn't have enough buffer space. (You may want to look into how a bridge behaves when it forwards frames. Should it set these bits?) I think you are remembering the question wrong. It doesn't make a lot sense. It sounds like you're trying to pass the CCIE written test without first getting a good grounding in networking fundamentals. Please don't contact me offline. This is the second time I've asked you not to. Please send questions to the list. Thanks. You should search for the Token Ring paper by Lou Rossi. It has been recommended by many people. It might help. Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31564&t=31564 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hardware BGP? [7:31529]
I got the BGP working on 1600s. They work fine (in lab environment of course.) Ed -Original Message- From: Ken Diliberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Hardware BGP? [7:31529] Dave, This was good for a chuckle. The second sentence is a riot!! Ken >>> "MADMAN" 01/10/02 10:24AM >>> I don't think 1600's support BGP. Actually BGP is supported in most all IOS of platforms that support BGP. If you just want to configure BGP for experience and not accept 100k+ routes I now you can use a 2500, 1700, 2600... Dave [snip] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31563&t=31529 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
clear ip nat trans ""paul"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > can anyone tell me how i go about removing a static entry from the router ?i > am using nat (#ip nat inside source static ) , however > when i remove that entry i get : %static entry in use, cannot remove . > that host is no longer up and i am running out of solutions, any suggestions > are obviously welcome ;) > thanx. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31562&t=31560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco 1200 Catalyst switches [7:31548]
You might want to check the admin port pinouts. It may require a different cable from the one that you are using. See the following link. Watch the wrap. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/catalyst/cat12icg/78657. htm > -Original Message- > From: Michael Damkot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:02 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco 1200 Catalyst switches [7:31548] > > > I have recently been given two 1200 switches but cannot > access them. I am > running Win2000 with Vandyke CRT3.4 and my co-worker is > running win NT 4.0 > with Hyperterm, neither one of us can get any response from > either switch. > Any suggestions?? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31561&t=31548 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
Hi, can anyone tell me how i go about removing a static entry from the router ?i am using nat (#ip nat inside source static ) , however when i remove that entry i get : %static entry in use, cannot remove . that host is no longer up and i am running out of solutions, any suggestions are obviously welcome ;) thanx. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31560&t=31560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DHCP coonection on Cisco Router [7:31559]
Hello group, I wanted to use a Cisco router to connect to my ISP via DSL or Cable modem. What would be the least expensive router I could get used on e-bay that could perform this. It obviously needs 2 ethernet interfaces and I'm not sure if there is a model in the 2500 series that supports this. Thanks alot. I'd like to use this setup for studying and internet connectivity. sam sneed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31559&t=31559 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAT [7:31558]
Patrick, I didn4t get IOS 11.3b because the ftp directory was empty and the server was not available... I logged in as CCO guest (http) and anonymous (ftp)... Should I have some special grant to get the software? Pedro Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31558&t=31558 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NPE300 in 7206VXR [7:31534]
MADMAN, no I didn't shut/no shut the interface, but that was definitely something I should have done. However, you are correct about the NPE not having ports. I was actually referring to the fe I/O controller on the front. Sorry for the confusion. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31557&t=31534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hardware BGP? [7:31529]
Dave, This was good for a chuckle. The second sentence is a riot!! Ken >>> "MADMAN" 01/10/02 10:24AM >>> I don't think 1600's support BGP. Actually BGP is supported in most all IOS of platforms that support BGP. If you just want to configure BGP for experience and not accept 100k+ routes I now you can use a 2500, 1700, 2600... Dave [snip] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31556&t=31529 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame relay map 0.0.0.0 question, please help! CCIE lab is Feb [7:31555]
I have a frame switch configured for full mesh connectivity over a 3 node frame relay cloud. Router A and router B cannot use subinterfaces. Router B and router C can only use thier dlci that connects them to Router A, not the dlci that connects them to each other. Because the frame switch is set up as a full mesh, I have disabled inverse arp on router A, B, and C and have used frame relay map commands with the broadcast parameter on each router. I am able to ping every router just fine using router A as a hub. Then I need to enable ospf between all of them. I used the neighbor x.x.x.x command to enable ospf, but the two spoke routers, B and C, only form adj with router A, they can not form adj with each other. When I debug ip ospf adj, I see that routers B and C are sending their poll-intervals? to 0.0.0.0. When I issued a sh frame relay map command, I saw the following entires: sh fram map Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 503(0x1F7,0x7C70) broadcast, CISCO, status defined, inactive Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 502(0x1F6,0x7C60) broadcast, CISCO, status defined, inactive Serial0/0 (up): ip 140.4.1.2 dlci 503(0x1F7,0x7C70), static, broadcast, CISCO, status defined, inactive Serial0/0 (up): ip 140.4.1.3 dlci 503(0x1F7,0x7C70), static, broadcast, CISCO, status defined, inactive I can not seem to loose the frame maps to 0.0.0.0. They do not show themselves as being learned dynamically or statically. What do they mean? How do I get rid of them? How did they get in there? I can not form adj, please help!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31555&t=31555 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NPE300 in 7206VXR [7:31534]
The NPE doesn't have a FE or any port. Do you have a single FE I/O card? These are pretty stable though you may want to do a bug search on the IOS your running. Also I wouldn't so quickly reload the router before trying to reset the interface, do a shut/no shut and grab a show tech and sh log. I have seen here and there on ethernet interface that were wedged, the input or output queue would be for example 75/75 or 40/40 which should never happen but when it does the interface says it's up but nothing works. my $.02 Dave travis marlow wrote: > > Hi everybody, longtime reader, first time poster. Was wondering if anybody > has had problems with the fastethernet port on the NPE300 for the 7206VXR > platform. Lastnight for some reason the box was not able to ping the other > router that it was connected to via this port. When doing a sh arp it > showed the ip I was trying to ping with a mac of INCOMPLETE. All other > interfaces to this router were up and passing traffic, after doing the magic > "reload", everything was fine. It's weird that this port would just freeze > up, it still said up and up on a sh int before the reload. After talking to > a buddy, he said that they had had issues with using the fastethernet port > on the NPE. I figured I would disseminate this problem to a larger group to > see if anybody else had seen this. Thanks. -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31551&t=31534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NPE300 in 7206VXR [7:31534]
Chris, Sorta similar probs going on here... I've been fighting [and so far loosing] with a 7206-npe200/128mb that keeps dropping ICMP packets from my FWs. The FA is on a PA-FE-TX, but I've also tried PA-2FEISL-TX...to no avail... like I said, so far I'm loosing... :-. It's a 2 armed router ATM on the left [Internet] and FA on the right. Running full BGP routes on the ATM, Running HSRP on the FA & this is what the CKPT-FW1s [running stonebeat] are pinging [the HSRP adder]. The FWs don't loose their pings _all the time_ just enough to cause them to go offline...say, 3x a week. Sniffed the wire, and sure enough the router just doesn't respond to some of them...router shows goose-eggs for drops/errors/runts/etc...replaced cables/PAs/IOSes [now on 12.1.5, 12.0.3, & 12.2.4T] to no avail... TAC has sent me a new chassis & NPE as the next guess...but I'm not expecting much outa that "swap out" let me know if you get anywhere...or thoughts :-) I'm almost ready to start whispering "Nortel...NortelNortel..." to the damn thing to see if I can use the fear factor to get him to act right... TroyC -Original Message- From: Kane, Christopher A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NPE300 in 7206VXR [7:31534] Travis, Curious, did you try clearing the int (cle int) before you tried the reload? Chris -Original Message- From: travis marlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NPE300 in 7206VXR [7:31534] Hi everybody, longtime reader, first time poster. Was wondering if anybody has had problems with the fastethernet port on the NPE300 for the 7206VXR platform. Lastnight for some reason the box was not able to ping the other router that it was connected to via this port. When doing a sh arp it showed the ip I was trying to ping with a mac of INCOMPLETE. All other interfaces to this router were up and passing traffic, after doing the magic "reload", everything was fine. It's weird that this port would just freeze up, it still said up and up on a sh int before the reload. After talking to a buddy, he said that they had had issues with using the fastethernet port on the NPE. I figured I would disseminate this problem to a larger group to see if anybody else had seen this. Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31554&t=31534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VOIP dial plan [7:31487]
I think this will cause confusion. One possible solution is to us 3 for your 288- block of DIDs, then use "num-exp" to map to 288- on the gateway. Roger -Original Message- From: Jim Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VOIP dial plan [7:31487] Hello, I've got a question on dial plan. We've got (208) 472- as DID numbers in our campus, I'd like to use the last 5 digits: 2 in our campus VOIP and 7 digits (no area code) in other offices. In our NY office, we have (845) 288- as regular DID numbers. Is it possible to make 288- goes to NY and 2 stays in our campus? Will the beginning number 2 create any conflict? Thanks in advance. Jim __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31553&t=31487 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: bcmsn [7:31537]
Hi Rick, I normally don't endorse or recommend books because everybody has different learning styles and experiences, but the Exam Cram Switching book was awesome for the bcmsn. ISBN: 1-57610-634-9 Scott -Original Message- From: Kaminski, Shawn G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: bcmsn [7:31537] This exam is probably the easiest of the CCNP exams. You may also want to pick up the Exam Cram Switching book from Richard Deal. It is inexpensive (I think $29.95 new, probably around $19.00 or less used at Amazon) I found this to be an excellent condensed book that covered quite a bit. Shawn K. -Original Message- From: D sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bcmsn [7:31537] I am in the process of studying for the Switching exam can anyone tell me what I should expect. I am using the Cisco Multilayered Switched networks book from Cisco Press. rick _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31552&t=31537 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hardware BGP? [7:31529]
1600's IOS supports BGP Should you use 1600 with BGP, hell no... ""MADMAN"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I don't think 1600's support BGP. Actually BGP is supported in most > all IOS of platforms that support BGP. If you just want to configure > BGP for experience and not accept 100k+ routes I now you can use a 2500, > 1700, 2600... > > Dave > > Shawn Xu wrote: > > > > Hi, All: > > > > Which Cisco router can run BGP? Cisco 1605 can do it? > > > > I never had BGP experience, and I think it depends on IOS version, not > > hardware. > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > Shawn > > > > _ > > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31550&t=31529 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Serial Line problems [7:31426]
This sounds like it may be a 'flag' on the line. Some of these old telco lines were originally only used for voice, and when a line is re-used the outside plant tech might just tap into a line leaving a long un-used flag or tail on the line. This was ok for voice, but for T1 or above it acts line a huge antannae and causes problems. One way to verify this is to always run the following BERT patterns before accepting a circuit for a minimum of 3 minutes each. (or require the telco to do it for you) all-ones 1:7 2 in 8 3 in 24 QRSS All-Zeroes (if B8ZS) Jeff Senior Telecom Tech CCNP ""Erich Kuehn"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I just finished testing with the lec (XO), while they could run clean to the > NIU, they had a problem running quazi to the csu. Finally I think they will > be taking some responsiblility for the issue. > > Thanks for everyones input, > > Im learing way more about Layer 1 than I care to, but then again isnt > knowledge, power!??? > > Thanks > > Erich > > -Original Message- > From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Serial Line problems [7:31426] > > > If it was a crossed pair somewhere, it wouln't come up at all. No carrier. > > It can very well be bad dmarc extensions, but so many all at once. Is it > all in one area of the state/city? Could still be bad telco wiring if in > same area of CO. > > I believe that the customer of yours receive timing on the CO, not your > frame-switch, even though your souce is supposed to be higher. Are you not > synced with the telco switch or the USNO? > > Maybe someone else can speak about the avail banwidth output, but I just > checked a T1 frame module, and I have the same output, so I don't think it's > that. I'll look that one up though. > > I'd still focus on the timing. > > -- > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31549&t=31426 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 1200 Catalyst switches [7:31548]
I have recently been given two 1200 switches but cannot access them. I am running Win2000 with Vandyke CRT3.4 and my co-worker is running win NT 4.0 with Hyperterm, neither one of us can get any response from either switch. Any suggestions?? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31548&t=31548 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NPE300 in 7206VXR [7:31534]
I did clear the interface, but I thought that that only had to do with the counters. Does it server some other function? It didn't help in this case. Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31547&t=31534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: bcmsn [7:31537]
This exam is probably the easiest of the CCNP exams. You may also want to pick up the Exam Cram Switching book from Richard Deal. It is inexpensive (I think $29.95 new, probably around $19.00 or less used at Amazon) I found this to be an excellent condensed book that covered quite a bit. Shawn K. -Original Message- From: D sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bcmsn [7:31537] I am in the process of studying for the Switching exam can anyone tell me what I should expect. I am using the Cisco Multilayered Switched networks book from Cisco Press. rick _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31546&t=31537 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NPE300 in 7206VXR [7:31534]
Travis, Curious, did you try clearing the int (cle int) before you tried the reload? Chris -Original Message- From: travis marlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NPE300 in 7206VXR [7:31534] Hi everybody, longtime reader, first time poster. Was wondering if anybody has had problems with the fastethernet port on the NPE300 for the 7206VXR platform. Lastnight for some reason the box was not able to ping the other router that it was connected to via this port. When doing a sh arp it showed the ip I was trying to ping with a mac of INCOMPLETE. All other interfaces to this router were up and passing traffic, after doing the magic "reload", everything was fine. It's weird that this port would just freeze up, it still said up and up on a sh int before the reload. After talking to a buddy, he said that they had had issues with using the fastethernet port on the NPE. I figured I would disseminate this problem to a larger group to see if anybody else had seen this. Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31545&t=31534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hardware BGP? [7:31529]
I don't think 1600's support BGP. Actually BGP is supported in most all IOS of platforms that support BGP. If you just want to configure BGP for experience and not accept 100k+ routes I now you can use a 2500, 1700, 2600... Dave Shawn Xu wrote: > > Hi, All: > > Which Cisco router can run BGP? Cisco 1605 can do it? > > I never had BGP experience, and I think it depends on IOS version, not > hardware. > > Please help. Thanks. > > Shawn > > _ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31543&t=31529 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2610 router and Video Conf. [7:31544]
I am looking for some help in configuring my 2610 router for video conferencing and to set it up as an gateway/gatekeeper for multiple video conferences. I am presently researching on my own but would love to have experience from others. Thank you Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31544&t=31544 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hardware BGP? [7:31529]
Well the hardware matters if you want to receive a full Internet routing table. The mem requirement there is 128 megs minimum, and the 1605 won't support that. Brian - Original Message - From: "Shawn Xu" To: Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:33 AM Subject: Hardware BGP? [7:31529] > Hi, All: > > Which Cisco router can run BGP? Cisco 1605 can do it? > > I never had BGP experience, and I think it depends on IOS version, not > hardware. > > Please help. Thanks. > > Shawn > > > > > > _ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31542&t=31529 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help Please! BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to [7:31541]
Tom, May have found your problem. I do see one error in your route-map statement. See below: 6.6.6.6 neighbor 10.0.0.17 route-map set_meds out route-map set_meds permit 10 match ip address 20 set metric 5 ! route-map set_meds permit 20 match ip address 21 set metric 10 9.9.9.9 neighbor 10.0.0.33 route-map set_meds out route-map set_med permit 10 match ip address 21 set metric 5 ! route-map set_med permit 20 match ip address 20 set metric 10 Notice for 9.9.9.9 your neighbor statement is calling a route-map named set_meds. But, the route-map you have defined is set_med. Fix it and see if that solves the problem. Chris -Original Message- From: Tom Pruneau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help Please! BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to any [7:31528] BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to any peer" Below is from an isolated lab configuration, appologies to the actual owners of any addresses of AS numbers used. I have two routers connected together via a serial line. They are in AS400. They are both connected to AS100 via another serial line. Both have a route map affecting advertisements to AS100. They each have an ethernet with a /24 on it. The /24 is getting into BGP via a network command. The two routers have the loopbacks 6.6.6.6 and 9.9.9.9 network 100.0.0.0 /24 is connected to the ethernet of router 6.6.6.6 network 100.0.1.0 /24 is connected to the ethernet of router 9.9.9.9 When I am on router 6.6.6.6 and I look at the advertisement of network 100.0.1.0 /24 is looks fine When i am on router 9.9.9.9 and I look at the advertisement of network 100.0.0.0 /24 it says "Not advertised to any peer" Any ideas why the difference Why can't 100.0.0.0 be avertised to any peer? Both routers have been rebooted. The configs look almost identical. router_#sho ip bgp 100.0.1.0 BGP routing table entry for 100.0.1.0/24, version 2 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Advertised to non peer-group peers: < 10.0.0.17 Local 10.0.0.38 from 10.0.0.38 (9.9.9.9) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best router_#show ip bgp 100.0.0.0 BGP routing table entry for 100.0.0.0/24, version 9 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer << Local 10.0.0.37 from 10.0.0.37 (6.6.6.6) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best router interface Loopback0 ip address 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 100.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial0 ip address 10.0.0.18 255.255.255.252 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.0.0.37 255.255.255.252 ! router bgp 400 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 100.0.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 10.0.0.17 remote-as 100 neighbor 10.0.0.17 route-map set_meds out neighbor 10.0.0.38 remote-as 400 no auto-summary ! ip classless ip route 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 10.0.0.38 no ip http server ! access-list 20 permit 100.0.0.0 access-list 21 permit 100.0.1.0 route-map set_meds permit 10 match ip address 20 set metric 5 ! route-map set_meds permit 20 match ip address 21 set metric 10 Router ! interface Loopback0 ip address 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 100.0.1.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Ethernet1 no ip address ! interface Serial0 ip address 10.0.0.38 255.255.255.252 no fair-queue clockrate 200 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.0.0.34 255.255.255.252 clockrate 200 ! router bgp 400 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 100.0.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 10.0.0.33 remote-as 100 neighbor 10.0.0.33 route-map set_meds out neighbor 10.0.0.37 remote-as 400 no auto-summary ! ip classless ip route 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.255 10.0.0.37 no ip http server ! access-list 20 permit 100.0.0.0 access-list 21 permit 100.0.1.0 route-map set_med permit 10 match ip address 21 set metric 5 ! route-map set_med permit 20 match ip address 20 set metric 10 Tom Pruneau Technical Trainer Network Operations GENUITY 225 Presidential Way Woburn Ma. 01888 --- This email is composed of 82% post consumer recycled data bits --- "Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31541&t=31541 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
640-905 Multicast +QoS [7:31540]
Hi, Does anyone have any tips on this test they could share? I took the beta but missed by a point. Thanks Mike --- Mike Bernico [EMAIL PROTECTED] Illinois Century Network http://www.illinois.net (217) 557-6555 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31540&t=31540 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help Please! BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to [7:31539]
Silly question, is your BGP session up between 9.9.9.9 and the router in AS 100? Can you show me: sh ip bgp sum sh ip bgp n x.x.x.x rou sh ip bgp n x.x.x.x adv sh ip bgp n x.x.x.x Would you mind running these on all 3 routers and showing us the output? I'm interested in finding out what the problem is. If I don't see anything with the results you give us, I'll lab it up real quick. Chris -Original Message- From: Tom Pruneau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help Please! BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to any [7:31528] BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to any peer" Below is from an isolated lab configuration, appologies to the actual owners of any addresses of AS numbers used. I have two routers connected together via a serial line. They are in AS400. They are both connected to AS100 via another serial line. Both have a route map affecting advertisements to AS100. They each have an ethernet with a /24 on it. The /24 is getting into BGP via a network command. The two routers have the loopbacks 6.6.6.6 and 9.9.9.9 network 100.0.0.0 /24 is connected to the ethernet of router 6.6.6.6 network 100.0.1.0 /24 is connected to the ethernet of router 9.9.9.9 When I am on router 6.6.6.6 and I look at the advertisement of network 100.0.1.0 /24 is looks fine When i am on router 9.9.9.9 and I look at the advertisement of network 100.0.0.0 /24 it says "Not advertised to any peer" Any ideas why the difference Why can't 100.0.0.0 be avertised to any peer? Both routers have been rebooted. The configs look almost identical. router_#sho ip bgp 100.0.1.0 BGP routing table entry for 100.0.1.0/24, version 2 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Advertised to non peer-group peers: < 10.0.0.17 Local 10.0.0.38 from 10.0.0.38 (9.9.9.9) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best router_#show ip bgp 100.0.0.0 BGP routing table entry for 100.0.0.0/24, version 9 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer << Local 10.0.0.37 from 10.0.0.37 (6.6.6.6) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best router interface Loopback0 ip address 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 100.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial0 ip address 10.0.0.18 255.255.255.252 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.0.0.37 255.255.255.252 ! router bgp 400 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 100.0.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 10.0.0.17 remote-as 100 neighbor 10.0.0.17 route-map set_meds out neighbor 10.0.0.38 remote-as 400 no auto-summary ! ip classless ip route 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 10.0.0.38 no ip http server ! access-list 20 permit 100.0.0.0 access-list 21 permit 100.0.1.0 route-map set_meds permit 10 match ip address 20 set metric 5 ! route-map set_meds permit 20 match ip address 21 set metric 10 Router ! interface Loopback0 ip address 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 100.0.1.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Ethernet1 no ip address ! interface Serial0 ip address 10.0.0.38 255.255.255.252 no fair-queue clockrate 200 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.0.0.34 255.255.255.252 clockrate 200 ! router bgp 400 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 100.0.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 10.0.0.33 remote-as 100 neighbor 10.0.0.33 route-map set_meds out neighbor 10.0.0.37 remote-as 400 no auto-summary ! ip classless ip route 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.255 10.0.0.37 no ip http server ! access-list 20 permit 100.0.0.0 access-list 21 permit 100.0.1.0 route-map set_med permit 10 match ip address 21 set metric 5 ! route-map set_med permit 20 match ip address 20 set metric 10 Tom Pruneau Technical Trainer Network Operations GENUITY 225 Presidential Way Woburn Ma. 01888 --- This email is composed of 82% post consumer recycled data bits --- "Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31539&t=31539 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bcmsn [7:31538]
I am in the process of studying for the Switching exam can anyone tell me what I should expect. I am using the Cisco Multilayered Switched networks book from Cisco Press. rick _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31538&t=31538 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bcmsn [7:31537]
I am in the process of studying for the Switching exam can anyone tell me what I should expect. I am using the Cisco Multilayered Switched networks book from Cisco Press. rick _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31537&t=31537 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AS 5300 [7:31394]
Yes, You can terminate 2e1 pri's into an AS5300. Additionally, if it has MICA modem cards installed, you will be able to answer/negotiate analog and digital calls. -Original Message- From: Amit Bhasin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AS 5300 [7:31394] Hi all, i need to know whether we can configure Even PRI on Cisco AS 5300 RAS and use it for ISDN and analog Dial-Up users simentaniously.If yes can anyone tell me what will be the configartion commands for as such. Regards, Amit Bhasin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31536&t=31394 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCxx Copyright Infringement [7:31391]
hmmm, sure does not get paid a lot for being such a great consultant, and to make it relate to the list, he does not have a CCNA. >>> "Steven A. Ridder" 01/09/02 12:45PM >>> Speaking of fools: http://petemoss.com/spamflames/ShifmanIsAMoronSpammer.html This spammer sent ot spam, so someone reported the incident to the ISP. Not only did the spammer cuss out the reporter, he threatned to sue him! It's a halarious link. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31535&t=31391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NPE300 in 7206VXR [7:31534]
Hi everybody, longtime reader, first time poster. Was wondering if anybody has had problems with the fastethernet port on the NPE300 for the 7206VXR platform. Lastnight for some reason the box was not able to ping the other router that it was connected to via this port. When doing a sh arp it showed the ip I was trying to ping with a mac of INCOMPLETE. All other interfaces to this router were up and passing traffic, after doing the magic "reload", everything was fine. It's weird that this port would just freeze up, it still said up and up on a sh int before the reload. After talking to a buddy, he said that they had had issues with using the fastethernet port on the NPE. I figured I would disseminate this problem to a larger group to see if anybody else had seen this. Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31534&t=31534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NAT [7:31531] additional link [7:31533]
for some reason the first link didn't get posted... http://www.google.com/search?q=configure+nat+2501 >>> "Patrick Ramsey" 01/10/02 10:04AM >>> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=upgrade+ios+2501 -Patrick >>> "Pedro do Valle" 01/10/02 09:55AM >>> Hi, I have a Cisco 2501 with IOS 11.2 and I have to configure NAT on it. How could I do this? If I have to do IOS upgrade how could I do it? Thanks. Pedro Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31533&t=31533 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NAT [7:31531]
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=upgrade+ios+2501 -Patrick >>> "Pedro do Valle" 01/10/02 09:55AM >>> Hi, I have a Cisco 2501 with IOS 11.2 and I have to configure NAT on it. How could I do this? If I have to do IOS upgrade how could I do it? Thanks. Pedro Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31532&t=31531 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAT [7:31531]
Hi, I have a Cisco 2501 with IOS 11.2 and I have to configure NAT on it. How could I do this? If I have to do IOS upgrade how could I do it? Thanks. Pedro Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31531&t=31531 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AS 5300 [7:31394]
I haven't got any experience with ISDN "card" though I'm sure there are some nuances. Dave Jim Bond wrote: > > Dave, > > How about ISDN users using ISDN cards? Any difference > between ISDN router and ISDN card? > > Thanks in advance. > > Jim > > --- MADMAN wrote: > > Absolutely, there are plenty of examples on CCO but > > for a small bribe I > > can give you a working config ;) > > > > Dave > > > > Amit Bhasin wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > i need to know whether we can configure Even PRI > > on Cisco AS 5300 RAS and > > use > > > it for ISDN and analog Dial-Up users > > simentaniously.If yes can anyone tell > > me > > > what will be the configartion commands for as > > such. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Amit Bhasin > > -- > > David Madland > > Sr. Network Engineer > > CCIE# 2016 > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 612-664-3367 > > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! > http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31530&t=31394 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help Please! BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to any [7:31528]
BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to any peer" Below is from an isolated lab configuration, appologies to the actual owners of any addresses of AS numbers used. I have two routers connected together via a serial line. They are in AS400. They are both connected to AS100 via another serial line. Both have a route map affecting advertisements to AS100. They each have an ethernet with a /24 on it. The /24 is getting into BGP via a network command. The two routers have the loopbacks 6.6.6.6 and 9.9.9.9 network 100.0.0.0 /24 is connected to the ethernet of router 6.6.6.6 network 100.0.1.0 /24 is connected to the ethernet of router 9.9.9.9 When I am on router 6.6.6.6 and I look at the advertisement of network 100.0.1.0 /24 is looks fine When i am on router 9.9.9.9 and I look at the advertisement of network 100.0.0.0 /24 it says "Not advertised to any peer" Any ideas why the difference Why can't 100.0.0.0 be avertised to any peer? Both routers have been rebooted. The configs look almost identical. router_#sho ip bgp 100.0.1.0 BGP routing table entry for 100.0.1.0/24, version 2 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Advertised to non peer-group peers: < 10.0.0.17 Local 10.0.0.38 from 10.0.0.38 (9.9.9.9) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best router_#show ip bgp 100.0.0.0 BGP routing table entry for 100.0.0.0/24, version 9 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer << Local 10.0.0.37 from 10.0.0.37 (6.6.6.6) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best router interface Loopback0 ip address 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 100.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial0 ip address 10.0.0.18 255.255.255.252 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.0.0.37 255.255.255.252 ! router bgp 400 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 100.0.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 10.0.0.17 remote-as 100 neighbor 10.0.0.17 route-map set_meds out neighbor 10.0.0.38 remote-as 400 no auto-summary ! ip classless ip route 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 10.0.0.38 no ip http server ! access-list 20 permit 100.0.0.0 access-list 21 permit 100.0.1.0 route-map set_meds permit 10 match ip address 20 set metric 5 ! route-map set_meds permit 20 match ip address 21 set metric 10 Router ! interface Loopback0 ip address 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 100.0.1.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Ethernet1 no ip address ! interface Serial0 ip address 10.0.0.38 255.255.255.252 no fair-queue clockrate 200 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.0.0.34 255.255.255.252 clockrate 200 ! router bgp 400 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 100.0.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 10.0.0.33 remote-as 100 neighbor 10.0.0.33 route-map set_meds out neighbor 10.0.0.37 remote-as 400 no auto-summary ! ip classless ip route 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.255 10.0.0.37 no ip http server ! access-list 20 permit 100.0.0.0 access-list 21 permit 100.0.1.0 route-map set_med permit 10 match ip address 21 set metric 5 ! route-map set_med permit 20 match ip address 20 set metric 10 Tom Pruneau Technical Trainer Network Operations GENUITY 225 Presidential Way Woburn Ma. 01888 --- This email is composed of 82% post consumer recycled data bits --- "Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31528&t=31528 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hardware BGP? [7:31529]
Hi, All: Which Cisco router can run BGP? Cisco 1605 can do it? I never had BGP experience, and I think it depends on IOS version, not hardware. Please help. Thanks. Shawn _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31529&t=31529 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Emergency: PIX 515 password recovery [7:31514]
The answer is a very simple one. What you want to do is to us the npxx.bin file to erase both the telnet and enable password in the pix. After that, reboot the pix. While the pix is rebooting, physically remove the cable on the interface of the pix that the TACACS uses to talk to the PIX. Now, because the pix can NOT communicate with TACACS server, it stills prompts for username and password. This time your username will be "pix" and password for EXEC mode will be "cisco". After successfully logging into the pix, the enable mode to get into privilege is just a simple return. It's as easy as 123 - Original Message - From: "Engelhard M. Labiro" To: Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:20 AM Subject: Re: Emergency: PIX 515 password recovery [7:31514] > How about setup a temporary AAA server with an > user&password and login with that username? > You can use sniffer for the IP address of AAA server > going out the PIX interface. > > > for my case, once I use default password" cisco " to enter it... > > > > the aaa configuration take effect, and it prompt out > > Username: > > passsword:immediately > > > > How can I use "write erase" command. > > > > My situation is that the original AAA configuaration is still active, it > > will make a great difficulties in passowrd recovery... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31527&t=31514 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: REALLY old ios upgrade [7:31520]
Steve, Sounds like an old boot ROM monitor. Simply set the config register to 0x101 and reboot the router. This will allow you to boot from the ROMs and have access to the flash memory for writing. Commands are: o/r 0x101 and: i(to re-initialize) Hope this helps! Paul ""steve skinner"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Chaps, > > i am trying to upgrade a router`s ios but am having some problems... > > it is version 10.2.5 .. > > when it boot`s i do the control break and i get into r-mon mode (i > think)but the commands are different to the usuall... > > there is simply an "L" for load but don`t boot > "B" for load from tftp and boot... > > but nothing about setting an ip address accesing the flash or anything..!! > > when i follow the on-screen i.e "L c2500_l_d-112.bin 10.1.1.1" i get timed > out.. > > ANY IDEA`S ANYONE!! > > > cheers in advance > > steve > > > _ > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31526&t=31520 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Emergency: PIX 515 password recovery [7:31514]
ha ha~~~ already use this method to retrived the password... Thank you for all people ~~ ""Engelhard M. Labiro"" How about setup a temporary AAA server with an > user&password and login with that username? > You can use sniffer for the IP address of AAA server > going out the PIX interface. > > > for my case, once I use default password" cisco " to enter it... > > > > the aaa configuration take effect, and it prompt out > > Username: > > passsword:immediately > > > > How can I use "write erase" command. > > > > My situation is that the original AAA configuaration is still active, it > > will make a great difficulties in passowrd recovery... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31525&t=31514 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Emergency: PIX 515 password recovery [7:31514]
How about setup a temporary AAA server with an user&password and login with that username? You can use sniffer for the IP address of AAA server going out the PIX interface. > for my case, once I use default password" cisco " to enter it... > > the aaa configuration take effect, and it prompt out > Username: > passsword:immediately > > How can I use "write erase" command. > > My situation is that the original AAA configuaration is still active, it > will make a great difficulties in passowrd recovery... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31524&t=31514 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Emergency: PIX 515 password recovery [7:31514]
for my case, once I use default password" cisco " to enter it... the aaa configuration take effect, and it prompt out Username: passsword:immediately How can I use "write erase" command. My situation is that the original AAA configuaration is still active, it will make a great difficulties in passowrd recovery... ""fahim"" Hi > Use "write erase" command. this will erase your confiuration then do a > "reload" command to reboot your pix. > > fahim > ccna, ccda, css1 > ""Ranma"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > HI, > > > > any one know how to completely erase the whole configuration file of the > > PIX515 firewall. > > > > I had follow the password recovery procedure of Cisco Web page. > > This method only can clear the TELNET and ENABLE password. > > > > For my router, it had previously configured to use AAA-Authentication > > server. > > So it always prompt out > > > > Username: > > password: > > > > I am now finding a method to completely erase the flash configuration > file. > > > > > > Thank you for your help! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31523&t=31514 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VOIP dial plan [7:31487]
No, not if you specify how many digits will follow the 2. Check this link for some general voip stuff http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120 t/120t3/voip5300/voip53_1.htm cheers Pat ""Jim Bond"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, > > I've got a question on dial plan. We've got (208) > 472- as DID numbers in our campus, I'd like to use > the last 5 digits: 2 in our campus VOIP and 7 > digits (no area code) in other offices. In our NY > office, we have (845) 288- as regular DID numbers. > Is it possible to make 288- goes to NY and 2 > stays in our campus? Will the beginning number 2 > create any conflict? > > Thanks in advance. > > Jim > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! > http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31522&t=31487 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MSFC [7:30668]
The choice of running your MSFCs depends on your COMPANY'S POLICIES. You will need to test the different standby settings for your MSFCs. With our tests, we noted that both standby techniques had some nesciences. We decided to stick with running with the MSFC's independent of each other. ADVANTAGES of separate MSFCs in one 6509 : Predictable workings of MSFCs, isolated. DISADVANTAGES of other Methods : Temporary rooting loops(while updates were sent from 1 MSFC to the other), loss of configuration, loss of config changes. Etc. Generally, we could not predict at which state the MSFCs would be at a particular point in time. We used EIGRP as the routing protocol of choice. It works well, with the 2 MSFCs in the 6509, providing redundancy between the 2 MSFCs Hope this helps, AKI -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woods, Randall, SOBUS Sent: ?a?as?e??, 4 ?a???a 2002 5:12 55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MSFC [7:30668] As soon as you turn on single-router-mode, it will sync up the redundant MFSC on that switch automatically. Of course this will need to be performed on every switch that has redundant MFSC's installed. There are also a few things that have to be checked first i.e. both MSFC's are running Cisco IOS release 12.1(8a)E2 or later, stuff like that. That link I sent earlier explains what needs to take place pretty well. Woody -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:41 AM To: Woods, Randall, SOBUS Subject: RE: MSFC [7:30668] Well I does have two switches. And they both have two MSFC's. So my question was should the MSFC's have the same config or will it be copy automaticaly. On Fri, 04 January 2002, "Woods, Randall, SOBUS" wrote: > > Scottie, > This is another option you can try. Single Router Mode (SRM). It > will migrate the configs of the primary MSFC to the back-up just like > the Supervisor Module does when it fails. We are in the process of > testing this feature out at my company. > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/sw_6_3/confg > _gd/redund.htm#xtocid1228929 > > hope this helps > Woody > > -Original Message- > From: Scottie @ PacBell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:53 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: MSFC [7:30668] > > > Depending on your topology. If you have only one Cat, I would > definitely > configure it as two separate routers. However if you have two Cats each > with dual MSFCs then I would configure them as Active and Standby. With > the > first scenario mentioned above it gives you redundant routing > capabilities > immediately whereas the second option takes a few seconds to kick in. > - Original Message - > From: > To: > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 5:51 AM > Subject: MSFC [7:30668] > > > > I have a 6509 switch with 2 MSFC's. I would like to know if I can or > should > > I have the same config on both MSFC's. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31521&t=30668 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
REALLY old ios upgrade [7:31520]
Chaps, i am trying to upgrade a router`s ios but am having some problems... it is version 10.2.5 .. when it boot`s i do the control break and i get into r-mon mode (i think)but the commands are different to the usuall... there is simply an "L" for load but don`t boot "B" for load from tftp and boot... but nothing about setting an ip address accesing the flash or anything..!! when i follow the on-screen i.e "L c2500_l_d-112.bin 10.1.1.1" i get timed out.. ANY IDEA`S ANYONE!! cheers in advance steve _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31520&t=31520 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
