Re: Static route load balancing? [7:31715]
So you are actually saying that some packets will be lost. Can we avoid this with policy-maps or something else? Best regards, ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > doesn't matter. > > Serial1/0 100.100.100.1 YES manual up > up > > Serial1/1 100.100.13.1YES manual up > up > > r1#ping 10.1.1.1 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > .!.!. > Success rate is 40 percent (2/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 20/20/20 ms > r1#ping 10.1.1.1 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > !.!.! > Success rate is 60 percent (3/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 20/20/20 ms > r1# > > as long as your side of the link is up, this is what happens > > can't do further testing, as my frame setup would take too long to change. I > presume, though, that if your side of the link is down then all packets > would go out the one interface that is still up. > > Chuck > > > ""Brian Whalen"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Doesnt that depend on whether you route to the local interface or the > > remote ip? > > > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > > > > On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Bill Carter wrote: > > > > > If the static routes have the save metric, the router will load balance > > > traffic it sends out according to the routes. I don't like this option > > > because if one path goes down every other packet will fail. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > Cisco Breaker > > > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 6:05 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Static route loacd balancing? [7:31715] > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > My customer wants load balancing solution to a branch office. He heard > that > > > it can be done with static routes, but as I know load balancing can't be > > > done by deploying static routes. Any help about this? Can it be done or > how > > > effective will it be? > > > > > > Best regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31828&t=31715 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hike In CCNP Exam Fee ????? [7:31827]
Hello Guys, I am preparing for Cisco Exams I heard that the exam Fees for Cisco CCNP exam is going to rise. Can I know whether w.e.f when isit going to rise and how much ? Currently it is Rs. 7000/- Approx. Since I am from India ,I would like to know whether will it be applicable in India ? Looking for a job? Visit Yahoo! India Careers Visit http://in.careers.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31827&t=31827 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Gawd I hate my life ;-> [7:31817]
At 11:39 PM 1/13/2002 -0500, you wrote: sigh. have not run into this before, not in two trips through the lab, not on any number of routers and IOS versions, both at home and in customer installations. Anyone got any clue what show IP protocol-discovery does? Google has a cached page on this: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:adIy4mIe-I0C:www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos_c/fqcprt1/qcfnbar.htm+show+IP+protocol-discovery&hl=en Mind the wrap. But the closest they get to that command is: Router# show ip nbar protocol-discovery Displays the statistics for all interfaces on which Protocol Discovery is enabled. I don't know if this helps, but there ya go. BTW - For the life of me, I couldn't figure out why you hated your wife because of this issue. I really need to read the subject lines better. Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31826&t=31817 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gawd I hate my life ;-> [7:31817]
You could always call TAC. Maybe they can find out for you. Either that, or tell you "I don't know". :-) Ken >>> "Tony Medeiros" 01/13/02 11:44PM >>> My router has that command too. Can't get to show any output or find anything to turn it on with..And no reference to it all, even in 12.2. Must be one of the "features" that never made it Tony - Original Message - From: "Chuck Larrieu" To: Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 8:39 PM Subject: OT: Gawd I hate my life ;-> [7:31817] > OK, so I've been doing rack testing for some people who are going to be > going public Real Soon Now. > > Got some things mocked up. Some of which relate to topics discussed on this > forum yesterday and today. I need to check something and issue the command > "show ip prot" enter. > > r2#sh ip prot > % Ambiguous command: "sh ip prot" > r2# > > well, now... > > r2#show ip prot? > protocol-discovery protocols > > r2#show ip prot > > so what is "show ip protocol-discovery? > > r2#sh ip protocol-discovery ? > interface Show for a specific interface > protocol Show stats about a pariticula protocol > stats Show Stats > top-n Show Top-N protocols by bytes > | Output modifiers > > > OK. so a command I've been using since 11.2 is no longer valid. except that > it is on other routers. > > but look - still good on other routers: > > r3#sh ip prot? > protocols > > r3#sh ip prot > > > OK, check CCO, no record of any such command as show ip protocol-discovery > in any command reference I check. A search of CCO for the phrase reveals > nothing. > > now what? > > the IOS version in question is: > > r2#sh ver > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3620-JS56I-M), Version 12.1(5)T10, RELEASE > SOFTWARE (f > c2) > > sigh. have not run into this before, not in two trips through the lab, not > on any number of routers and IOS versions, both at home and in customer > installations. > > Anyone got any clue what show IP protocol-discovery does? > > sheesh.. another good shortcut down the tubes. > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31825&t=31817 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP 'default network' Rehash [7:31799]
Following is some info from Cisco's site: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/eigrp8.html Default Routing There are two ways to inject a default route into EIGRP: redistribute a static route or summarize to 0.0.0.0/0. Use the first method when you want to draw all traffic to unknown destinations to a default route at the core of the network. This method is effective for advertising connections to the Internet. For example: ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x (next hop to the internet) ! router eigrp 100 redistribute static default-metric 1 1 255 1 1500 The static route that is redistributed into EIGRP does not have to be to network 0.0.0.0. If you use another network, you must use the ip default-network command to mark the network as a default network. Please refer to Configuring a Gateway of Last Resort for further information. Summarizing to a default route is effective only when you want to provide remote sites with a default route. Since summaries are configured per interface, you don't need to worry about using distribute-lists or other mechanisms to prevent the default route from being propagated toward the core of your network. Note that a summary to 0.0.0.0/0 overrides a default route learned from any other routing protocol. The only way to configure a default route on a router using this method is to configure a static route to 0.0.0.0/0. (Beginning in Cisco IOS Software 12.0(4)T, you can also configure an administrative distance on the end of the summary-address command, so the local summary doesn't override the 0.0.0.0/0 route). router eigrp 100 network 10.0.0.0 ! interface serial 0 encapsulation frame-relay no ip address ! interface serial 0.1 point-to-point ip address 10.1.1.1 frame-relay interface-dlci 10 ip summary-address eigrp 100 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Regards, Murtaza - Original Message - From: "s vermill" To: Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 4:33 PM Subject: EIGRP 'default network' Rehash [7:31799] > Sorry to bring this up again but apparently, for at least some of us, it > needs to be. I chimed in the other day and offered a way to get EIGRP to > distribute a default route. That basically amounted to simply defining a > static to 0.0.0.0 and redistributing static into EIGRP (whoever corrected me > by pointing out that the 'network 0.0.0.0' command isn't necessary, I thank > you (it was in BSCN)). > > Wayne jumped in and explained some problems with EIGRP and the 'ip > default-network' command. I thought it all sounded quite reasonable. So I > tried this in the lab for several hours today (no "get a life" remarks > please). I must be really dense, because nothing I try works quite the way > (that I thought) it was described. It seems that the only way to > sucessfully use the default-network is to configure it on every single > router in the AS (I tried this with RIP just as a sanity check and it worked > just fine). > > If that is the case, can a good argument be made in favor of this approach > over redistributing static? Or summarizing to 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 on an > interface? Both of those, at least, propogate throughout the AS after > configuration on just one router. > > Thanks in advance, > > Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31824&t=31799 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gawd I hate my life ;-> [7:31817]
My router has that command too. Can't get to show any output or find anything to turn it on with..And no reference to it all, even in 12.2. Must be one of the "features" that never made it Tony - Original Message - From: "Chuck Larrieu" To: Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 8:39 PM Subject: OT: Gawd I hate my life ;-> [7:31817] > OK, so I've been doing rack testing for some people who are going to be > going public Real Soon Now. > > Got some things mocked up. Some of which relate to topics discussed on this > forum yesterday and today. I need to check something and issue the command > "show ip prot" enter. > > r2#sh ip prot > % Ambiguous command: "sh ip prot" > r2# > > well, now... > > r2#show ip prot? > protocol-discovery protocols > > r2#show ip prot > > so what is "show ip protocol-discovery? > > r2#sh ip protocol-discovery ? > interface Show for a specific interface > protocol Show stats about a pariticula protocol > stats Show Stats > top-n Show Top-N protocols by bytes > | Output modifiers > > > OK. so a command I've been using since 11.2 is no longer valid. except that > it is on other routers. > > but look - still good on other routers: > > r3#sh ip prot? > protocols > > r3#sh ip prot > > > OK, check CCO, no record of any such command as show ip protocol-discovery > in any command reference I check. A search of CCO for the phrase reveals > nothing. > > now what? > > the IOS version in question is: > > r2#sh ver > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3620-JS56I-M), Version 12.1(5)T10, RELEASE > SOFTWARE (f > c2) > > sigh. have not run into this before, not in two trips through the lab, not > on any number of routers and IOS versions, both at home and in customer > installations. > > Anyone got any clue what show IP protocol-discovery does? > > sheesh.. another good shortcut down the tubes. > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31823&t=31817 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gawd I hate my life ;-> [7:31817]
Hopefully the following is of some help: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos _r/qrfcmd3.htm#xtocid1 Quality of Service Commands ip nbar protocol-discovery QR-62 Cisco IOS Quality of Service Solutions Command Reference ip nbar protocol-discovery To configure Networked-Based Application Recognition (NBAR) to discover traffic for all protocols known to NBAR on a particular interface, use the ip nbar protocol-discovery interface configuration command. To disable traffic discovery, use the no form of this command. ip nbar protocol-discovery no ip nbar protocol-discovery Syntax Description This command has no arguments or keywords. Defaults This command has no default behavior or values. Command Modes Interface configuration Command History Usage Guidelines Use the ip nbar protocol-discovery command to configure NBAR to keep traffic statistics for all protocols known to NBAR. Protocol discovery provides an easy way to discover application protocols transiting an interface so that QoS policies can be developed and applied. The Protocol Discovery feature discovers any protocol traffic supported by NBAR. Protocol discovery can be used to monitor both input and output traffic and may be applied with or without a service policy enabled. Examples The following example configures protocol discovery on an Ethernet interface: interface ethernet 1/3 ip nbar protocol-discovery Related Commands Release Modification 12.0(5)XE2 This command was introduced. 12.1(5)T This command was integrated into Cisco IOS Release 12.1(5)T. Command Description show ip nbar protocol-discovery Displays the statistics gathered by the NBAR Protocol Discovery feature. Regards, Murtaza - Original Message - From: "Chuck Larrieu" To: Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 8:39 PM Subject: OT: Gawd I hate my life ;-> [7:31817] > OK, so I've been doing rack testing for some people who are going to be > going public Real Soon Now. > > Got some things mocked up. Some of which relate to topics discussed on this > forum yesterday and today. I need to check something and issue the command > "show ip prot" enter. > > r2#sh ip prot > % Ambiguous command: "sh ip prot" > r2# > > well, now... > > r2#show ip prot? > protocol-discovery protocols > > r2#show ip prot > > so what is "show ip protocol-discovery? > > r2#sh ip protocol-discovery ? > interface Show for a specific interface > protocol Show stats about a pariticula protocol > stats Show Stats > top-n Show Top-N protocols by bytes > | Output modifiers > > > OK. so a command I've been using since 11.2 is no longer valid. except that > it is on other routers. > > but look - still good on other routers: > > r3#sh ip prot? > protocols > > r3#sh ip prot > > > OK, check CCO, no record of any such command as show ip protocol-discovery > in any command reference I check. A search of CCO for the phrase reveals > nothing. > > now what? > > the IOS version in question is: > > r2#sh ver > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3620-JS56I-M), Version 12.1(5)T10, RELEASE > SOFTWARE (f > c2) > > sigh. have not run into this before, not in two trips through the lab, not > on any number of routers and IOS versions, both at home and in customer > installations. > > Anyone got any clue what show IP protocol-discovery does? > > sheesh.. another good shortcut down the tubes. > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31822&t=31817 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gawd I hate my life ;-> [7:31817]
Hopefully the following is of some help: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos _r/qrfcmd3.htm#xtocid1 Quality of Service Commands ip nbar protocol-discovery QR-62 Cisco IOS Quality of Service Solutions Command Reference ip nbar protocol-discovery To configure Networked-Based Application Recognition (NBAR) to discover traffic for all protocols known to NBAR on a particular interface, use the ip nbar protocol-discovery interface configuration command. To disable traffic discovery, use the no form of this command. ip nbar protocol-discovery no ip nbar protocol-discovery Syntax Description This command has no arguments or keywords. Defaults This command has no default behavior or values. Command Modes Interface configuration Command History Usage Guidelines Use the ip nbar protocol-discovery command to configure NBAR to keep traffic statistics for all protocols known to NBAR. Protocol discovery provides an easy way to discover application protocols transiting an interface so that QoS policies can be developed and applied. The Protocol Discovery feature discovers any protocol traffic supported by NBAR. Protocol discovery can be used to monitor both input and output traffic and may be applied with or without a service policy enabled. Examples The following example configures protocol discovery on an Ethernet interface: interface ethernet 1/3 ip nbar protocol-discovery Related Commands Release Modification 12.0(5)XE2 This command was introduced. 12.1(5)T This command was integrated into Cisco IOS Release 12.1(5)T. Command Description show ip nbar protocol-discovery Displays the statistics gathered by the NBAR Protocol Discovery feature. Regards, Murtaza - Original Message - From: "Chuck Larrieu" To: Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 8:39 PM Subject: OT: Gawd I hate my life ;-> [7:31817] > OK, so I've been doing rack testing for some people who are going to be > going public Real Soon Now. > > Got some things mocked up. Some of which relate to topics discussed on this > forum yesterday and today. I need to check something and issue the command > "show ip prot" enter. > > r2#sh ip prot > % Ambiguous command: "sh ip prot" > r2# > > well, now... > > r2#show ip prot? > protocol-discovery protocols > > r2#show ip prot > > so what is "show ip protocol-discovery? > > r2#sh ip protocol-discovery ? > interface Show for a specific interface > protocol Show stats about a pariticula protocol > stats Show Stats > top-n Show Top-N protocols by bytes > | Output modifiers > > > OK. so a command I've been using since 11.2 is no longer valid. except that > it is on other routers. > > but look - still good on other routers: > > r3#sh ip prot? > protocols > > r3#sh ip prot > > > OK, check CCO, no record of any such command as show ip protocol-discovery > in any command reference I check. A search of CCO for the phrase reveals > nothing. > > now what? > > the IOS version in question is: > > r2#sh ver > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3620-JS56I-M), Version 12.1(5)T10, RELEASE > SOFTWARE (f > c2) > > sigh. have not run into this before, not in two trips through the lab, not > on any number of routers and IOS versions, both at home and in customer > installations. > > Anyone got any clue what show IP protocol-discovery does? > > sheesh.. another good shortcut down the tubes. > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31821&t=31817 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Gawd I hate my life ;-> [7:31817]
Chuck, If it helps, I have read about that command at one point. It seems to me that it has something to do with NBAR or CBAC. ;- ) At least it has something to do with some technology that is a four letter acronym. heh heh... John Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Chuck Larrieu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > OK, so I've been doing rack testing for some people who are going to be > going public Real Soon Now. > > Got some things mocked up. Some of which relate to topics discussed on > this > forum yesterday and today. I need to check something and issue the > command > "show ip prot" enter. > > r2#sh ip prot > % Ambiguous command: "sh ip prot" > r2# > > well, now... > > r2#show ip prot? > protocol-discovery protocols > > r2#show ip prot > > so what is "show ip protocol-discovery? > > r2#sh ip protocol-discovery ? > interface Show for a specific interface > protocol Show stats about a pariticula protocol > stats Show Stats > top-n Show Top-N protocols by bytes > | Output modifiers > > > OK. so a command I've been using since 11.2 is no longer valid. except > that > it is on other routers. > > but look - still good on other routers: > > r3#sh ip prot? > protocols > > r3#sh ip prot > > > OK, check CCO, no record of any such command as show ip > protocol-discovery > in any command reference I check. A search of CCO for the phrase reveals > nothing. > > now what? > > the IOS version in question is: > > r2#sh ver > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3620-JS56I-M), Version 12.1(5)T10, RELEASE > SOFTWARE (f > c2) > > sigh. have not run into this before, not in two trips through the lab, > not > on any number of routers and IOS versions, both at home and in customer > installations. > > Anyone got any clue what show IP protocol-discovery does? > > sheesh.. another good shortcut down the tubes. > > Chuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31820&t=31817 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help with access server [7:31801]
Yes, my octal cable has RJG-45 ens, with each end numbered. I connected end #1 to RouterA, end #2 to RouterB and so forth. When I do "sh sessions" on the access server, I get "No connections open". When I try to connect to any of the routers through the access server, it says, "Trying RouterXA (172.16.1.1, 2001)... Open" and it hangs there indefinitely, even when I press "enter". It never connects to RouterX. 2509# RouterA Trying RouterA (172.16.1.1, 2001)... Open Do you have any idea what the problem could be? Thanks, Stephane On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Daniel Cotts wrote: > Config look ok. > Your octal cable has RJ-45 ends? Is each end numbered? > Is end #1 going to the console port of RouterA, end#2 going to RouterB, etc? > Do a "show sessions". If you are not connected to any router you should get: > 2509#sh sess > % No connections open > If you do have open sessions then disconnect them one at a time: > 2509#disc 1 > Closing connection to RouterA [confirm] > 2509#disc 2 > Closing connection to RouterB [confirm] > Another way to check for busy lines is to do a "show line" > If you see asterisks in front of the lines - then do a disconnect line #. > When you type in "RouterA" what sort of response do you get? > 2509#RouterA > Trying RouterA (172.16.1.1, 2001)... Open > If you get the above then hit "enter" once or twice. > That should get you to the prompt of the console port of RouterA. > Let us know if this doesn't work. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Stephane Wantou Siantou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 7:13 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Help with access server [7:31801] > > > > > > Hi everybody, > > I am trying to configure a Cisco 2509 access server to access > > my 3 routers > > RouterA, RouterB,and RouterC so that I don't have to use the > > console cable > > to access each > > router. But it doesn't > > w work. I am using an octal cable. 3 cables from the octal cable are > > connected to RouterA, RouterB, and RouterC and the terminal server is > > accessed with a console cable. What am I doing wrong can > > anyone help? Do > > I need to configure anything on RouterA, RouterB, and RouterC to be > > accessed from the access server? This is the configuration of the > > access server. > > Thanks, > > Stephane > > > > Current configuration: > > ! > > version 12.0 > > service timestamps debug uptime > > service timestamps log uptime > > no service password-encryption > > ! > > hostname terminal_server > > ! > > ! > > ip subnet-zero > > ip host RouterA 2001 172.16.1.1 > > ip host RouterB 2002 172.16.1.1 > > ip host RouterC 2003 172.16.1.1 > > ! > > ! > > ! > > interface Loopback0 > > ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.255 > > no ip directed-broadcast > > ! > > ip classless > > ! > > line con 0 > > transport input none > > line 1 8 > > no exec > > transport input all > > line aux 0 > > line vty 0 4 > > login > > ! > > end Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31819&t=31801 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLAN info [7:31816]
There's a huge difference between the two. In fact, they are unrelated. Every switch has its own IP address for management purposes, which obviously must reside in some VLAN. By default, the management VLAN is VLAN1. In your first example, you made VLAN4 the management VLAN, which is why VLAN1 shutdown. You can only have one active *management* VLAN interface. In your second example, you are simply creating a local VLAN. Big difference! HTH, John Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, NKP ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi All , >I was just working around on my Cisco Catalyst 2512XL switch , I > was > going thru the VLAN commands , I wanted to know the difference between > creating the VLAN thru these two commands : > > Switch(config)#int vlan4 > Switch(config-subif)#management > Switch(config-subif)#^Z > > the second way is by going to the vlan database mode and giving the > command > > (vlan)#vlan 201 name cisco > > both of them create vlan on the switch , as I understand that the first > coammand makes vlan4 as the active vlan and vlan 1 shuts down , in the > second mode , we can assign the name to the vlan as well , is there any > other differnce betwen them , please guide me . > > thanks , > > Navin Parwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31818&t=31816 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Gawd I hate my life ;-> [7:31817]
OK, so I've been doing rack testing for some people who are going to be going public Real Soon Now. Got some things mocked up. Some of which relate to topics discussed on this forum yesterday and today. I need to check something and issue the command "show ip prot" enter. r2#sh ip prot % Ambiguous command: "sh ip prot" r2# well, now... r2#show ip prot? protocol-discovery protocols r2#show ip prot so what is "show ip protocol-discovery? r2#sh ip protocol-discovery ? interface Show for a specific interface protocol Show stats about a pariticula protocol stats Show Stats top-n Show Top-N protocols by bytes | Output modifiers OK. so a command I've been using since 11.2 is no longer valid. except that it is on other routers. but look - still good on other routers: r3#sh ip prot? protocols r3#sh ip prot OK, check CCO, no record of any such command as show ip protocol-discovery in any command reference I check. A search of CCO for the phrase reveals nothing. now what? the IOS version in question is: r2#sh ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3620-JS56I-M), Version 12.1(5)T10, RELEASE SOFTWARE (f c2) sigh. have not run into this before, not in two trips through the lab, not on any number of routers and IOS versions, both at home and in customer installations. Anyone got any clue what show IP protocol-discovery does? sheesh.. another good shortcut down the tubes. Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31817&t=31817 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VLAN info [7:31816]
Hi All , I was just working around on my Cisco Catalyst 2512XL switch , I was going thru the VLAN commands , I wanted to know the difference between creating the VLAN thru these two commands : Switch(config)#int vlan4 Switch(config-subif)#management Switch(config-subif)#^Z the second way is by going to the vlan database mode and giving the command (vlan)#vlan 201 name cisco both of them create vlan on the switch , as I understand that the first coammand makes vlan4 as the active vlan and vlan 1 shuts down , in the second mode , we can assign the name to the vlan as well , is there any other differnce betwen them , please guide me . thanks , Navin Parwal Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31816&t=31816 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quick Eagle Products [7:31815]
I'm looking for anyone with experience with Quick Eagle or Digital Isle DL5400 MUX products. If anyone has anything good or bad to say, or information on using their Fast Forward feature, please contact me off-list. Thanks, Andras Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31815&t=31815 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP 'default network' Rehash [7:31799]
without knowing your configs, I can't say for sure, but in fooling with this a bit after reading this post, I believe you may have run into a classful issue on the default-network. in a simple linear setup R5R1-R3 observe the R3 routing table: * 100.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets D 100.1.25.0 [90/304128] via 172.10.15.5, 00:09:32, TokenRing0/0 172.10.0.0/29 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 172.10.15.0 is directly connected, TokenRing0/0 D* 199.1.1.0/24 [90/304128] via 172.10.15.5, 00:09:32, TokenRing0/0 181.37.0.0/27 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 181.37.13.0 is directly connected, Serial1/1 r1# note that the 100.0.0.0 classfull network is flagged as a candidate default, as is the classful 199.1.1.1 network. but the EIGRP route that has been learned is a subnet of the 100 net - 100.1.25.0/24 to be precise. now check the R3 routing table: 100.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets D 100.1.25.0 [90/20656128] via 181.37.13.1, 00:10:45, Serial1/1 172.10.0.0/29 is subnetted, 1 subnets D 172.10.15.0 [90/20528128] via 181.37.13.1, 00:10:45, Serial1/1 D* 199.1.1.0/24 [90/20656128] via 181.37.13.1, 00:10:45, Serial1/1 181.37.0.0/27 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 181.37.13.0 is directly connected, Serial1/1 note that the 100 network is not flagged, but the 199.1.1.0/24 network is. as a sanity check, I added another router into the line, set up two loopbacks - one using 135.35.1.1/24 and the other using 155.55.1.1/16 not from the following that there are two candidate defaults on R2: ( plus the 199 advertised from the other end of the line. note the similar issue with the classful versus non classfull breakdown of the two candidates. 100.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets D 100.1.25.0 [90/21168128] via 192.200.23.3, 00:02:09, Serial1/1 C* 155.55.0.0/16 is directly connected, Loopback102 172.10.0.0/29 is subnetted, 1 subnets D 172.10.15.0 [90/21040128] via 192.200.23.3, 00:02:09, Serial1/1 D* 199.1.1.0/24 [90/21168128] via 192.200.23.3, 00:02:09, Serial1/1 C192.200.23.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1/1 181.37.0.0/27 is subnetted, 1 subnets D 181.37.13.0 [90/21024000] via 192.200.23.3, 00:02:09, Serial1/1 * 135.35.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 135.35.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback101 r2# now check the R3 table again - note that the classful default only shows up: 100.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets D 100.1.25.0 [90/20656128] via 181.37.13.1, 00:42:38, Serial1/1 D* 155.55.0.0/16 [90/2064] via 192.200.23.2, 00:03:40, Serial1/2 172.10.0.0/29 is subnetted, 1 subnets D 172.10.15.0 [90/20528128] via 181.37.13.1, 00:42:38, Serial1/1 D* 199.1.1.0/24 [90/20656128] via 181.37.13.1, 00:42:38, Serial1/1 C192.200.23.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1/2 181.37.0.0/27 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 181.37.13.0 is directly connected, Serial1/1 135.35.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets D 135.35.1.0 [90/2064] via 192.200.23.2, 00:04:05, Serial1/2 r3# So to summarize ( so to speak ) EIGRP does indeed advertise the default network throughout the domain. But there are still things to be aware of. Chuck ""s vermill"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Sorry to bring this up again but apparently, for at least some of us, it > needs to be. I chimed in the other day and offered a way to get EIGRP to > distribute a default route. That basically amounted to simply defining a > static to 0.0.0.0 and redistributing static into EIGRP (whoever corrected me > by pointing out that the 'network 0.0.0.0' command isn't necessary, I thank > you (it was in BSCN)). > > Wayne jumped in and explained some problems with EIGRP and the 'ip > default-network' command. I thought it all sounded quite reasonable. So I > tried this in the lab for several hours today (no "get a life" remarks > please). I must be really dense, because nothing I try works quite the way > (that I thought) it was described. It seems that the only way to > sucessfully use the default-network is to configure it on every single > router in the AS (I tried this with RIP just as a sanity check and it worked > just fine). > > If that is the case, can a good argument be made in favor of this approach > over redistributing static? Or summarizing to 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 on an > interface? Both of those, at least, propogate throughout the AS after > configuration on just one router. > > Thanks in advance, > > Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31814&t=31799 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN dialer watch VS floating static routes [7:31609]
Thanks for the advice Benjamin and Jenny. It sounds like you have to be careful when implementing dialer watch. (Especially, if you only want to bring up the link for 'interesting traffic'. I guess since 'dialer watch' is fairly new most people have 'floating static routes' in place. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31813&t=31609 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help with access server [7:31801]
Config look ok. Your octal cable has RJ-45 ends? Is each end numbered? Is end #1 going to the console port of RouterA, end#2 going to RouterB, etc? Do a "show sessions". If you are not connected to any router you should get: 2509#sh sess % No connections open If you do have open sessions then disconnect them one at a time: 2509#disc 1 Closing connection to RouterA [confirm] 2509#disc 2 Closing connection to RouterB [confirm] Another way to check for busy lines is to do a "show line" If you see asterisks in front of the lines - then do a disconnect line #. When you type in "RouterA" what sort of response do you get? 2509#RouterA Trying RouterA (172.16.1.1, 2001)... Open If you get the above then hit "enter" once or twice. That should get you to the prompt of the console port of RouterA. Let us know if this doesn't work. > -Original Message- > From: Stephane Wantou Siantou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 7:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Help with access server [7:31801] > > > Hi everybody, > I am trying to configure a Cisco 2509 access server to access > my 3 routers > RouterA, RouterB,and RouterC so that I don't have to use the > console cable > to access each > router. But it doesn't > w work. I am using an octal cable. 3 cables from the octal cable are > connected to RouterA, RouterB, and RouterC and the terminal server is > accessed with a console cable. What am I doing wrong can > anyone help? Do > I need to configure anything on RouterA, RouterB, and RouterC to be > accessed from the access server? This is the configuration of the > access server. > Thanks, > Stephane > > Current configuration: > ! > version 12.0 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname terminal_server > ! > ! > ip subnet-zero > ip host RouterA 2001 172.16.1.1 > ip host RouterB 2002 172.16.1.1 > ip host RouterC 2003 172.16.1.1 > ! > ! > ! > interface Loopback0 > ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.255 > no ip directed-broadcast > ! > ip classless > ! > line con 0 > transport input none > line 1 8 > no exec > transport input all > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > login > ! > end Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31812&t=31801 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: router cannot see host [7:31800]
enable "debug ip packet detail" on the router to see if the router is even making an attempt to send the packet out. Also, Do you have more than one NIC on your workstation? ""LaRoy Slaughter"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I know this is a RTFM type question but for the life of me I cannot > figure out why the router cannot ping the work station, but the > workstation can ping and telnet to the router Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31811&t=31800 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help with access server [7:31801]
When you say that "it doesn't work", what exactly are the symptoms? ""Stephane Wantou Siantou"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi everybody, > I am trying to configure a Cisco 2509 access server to access my 3 routers > RouterA, RouterB,and RouterC so that I don't have to use the console cable > to access each > router. But it doesn't > w work. I am using an octal cable. 3 cables from the octal cable are > connected to RouterA, RouterB, and RouterC and the terminal server is > accessed with a console cable. What am I doing wrong can anyone help? Do > I need to configure anything on RouterA, RouterB, and RouterC to be > accessed from the access server? This is the configuration of the > access server. > Thanks, > Stephane > > Current configuration: > ! > version 12.0 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname terminal_server > ! > ! > ip subnet-zero > ip host RouterA 2001 172.16.1.1 > ip host RouterB 2002 172.16.1.1 > ip host RouterC 2003 172.16.1.1 > ! > ! > ! > interface Loopback0 > ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.255 > no ip directed-broadcast > ! > ip classless > ! > line con 0 > transport input none > line 1 8 > no exec > transport input all > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > login > ! > end Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31810&t=31801 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN dialer watch VS floating static routes [7:31609]
I agree with Jenny's comments. I've also used floating-statics for quite some time to backup frame links. I was playing around with dialer watch in the lab this weekend and it does some 'interesting' things... For one, it seems to do away with the "interesting traffic" requirement. If the main link goes down and any of the routes in the watch list disappear, the backup link will be brought on-line. I can think of a couple of reasons why this would be attractive but by the same token, it could get rather expensive especially if you have large blocks of time where nothing is going across the line - nights/weekends - but it's still up. With the floating static method, you can utilize time-based ACLs to specify your interesting traffic thus minimizing the impact of a circuit outage over a weekend for example. Definitely try them both out in a lab though; I intend to kick the tires of dialer watch a bit more myself. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 6:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ISDN dialer watch VS floating static routes [7:31609] I have always used floating statics to back up a frame relay network. Why? Easy - we're only just migrating to IOS 12.1. And anyway, this particular network has been using floating static routes for the last several years (since *long* before dialer watch was available) - they are flexible, suit the network topology and design, and they work. And our support mob are familiar with them, which is also a useful reason to keep using them. I'd look more closely at dialer watch for a brand new network or major redesign, but right now I personally have no good reasons for changing. YMMV. JMcL "Charlie Wehner" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISDN dialer watch VS floating static Sent by: routes [7:31609] nobody@groups tudy.com 11/01/2002 12:49 pm Please respond to "Charlie Wehner" When configuring an ISDN backup for a frame relay circuit do most people typically use "dialer watch" or "floating static routes". In my scenerio, it's for an eigrp network and a single router. I've seen the following article on Cisco's website: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/123/backup-main.html However, all things being equal, which one would you use? Thanks in advance, Charlie Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31809&t=31609 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: exams needed for the CCDP [7:31795]
While both these exams are required for the CCDP, and it is usually sensible to do them in the order given by Gaz, you do not need to have done the DCN before sitting the CID. You can do them in either order. But you won't be a CCDP until you do both. JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 14/01/2002 02:04 pm - "Gaz" cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: exams needed for the CCDP nobody@groups [7:31795] tudy.com 14/01/2002 10:44 am Please respond to "Gaz" 640-441 DCN to make you a CCDA (pre-requisite for CCDP) then, 640-025 CID Gaz ""ko haag"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have passed the CCNP and was wondering what exam are needed to get the > CCDP? Anyone know? > > Ko Haag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31808&t=31795 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: router cannot see host [7:31800]
when I do a sh arp I can see a layer 2 connection > The router sees the host both as a MaC and by IP. when I do a sh ip route it identifies the path to the host Craig Columbus wrote: > I think we need more info. In the meantime, here's a possibility: > > When pinging from the workstation to the router, you're hitting a locally > attached interface on the router (one on the same subnet). > When pinging from the router to the workstation, the ping is originating > from an interface other than the one that is local to the workstation. > Try an extended ping from the router, specifying the locally attached > interface as the source and see if the pings succeed. > If so, verify that both the subnet mask and the default gateway on the > workstation are set correctly. > > Craig > > At 07:43 PM 1/13/2002 -0500, you wrote: > >I know this is a RTFM type question but for the life of me I cannot > >figure out why the router cannot ping the work station, but the > >workstation can ping and telnet to the router Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31807&t=31800 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: router cannot see host [7:31800]
the sh arp comes back with the mac and ip of the workstation Zeke Gibson wrote: > Are you running some type of software firewall on the workstation? > > What does the ARP cache on the router look like? > > -Zeke > > On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, LaRoy Slaughter wrote: > > > I know this is a RTFM type question but for the life of me I cannot > > figure out why the router cannot ping the work station, but the > > workstation can ping and telnet to the router Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31806&t=31800 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help with access server [7:31801]
Stephane, I would start by adding 'modem inout' on lines 1 - 8. As for the octal cable, that may be a problem too. You might need a rollover in the mix? Not sure off hand. Regards, Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31805&t=31801 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: router cannot see host [7:31800]
Are you running some type of software firewall on the workstation? What does the ARP cache on the router look like? -Zeke On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, LaRoy Slaughter wrote: > I know this is a RTFM type question but for the life of me I cannot > figure out why the router cannot ping the work station, but the > workstation can ping and telnet to the router Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31804&t=31800 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: router cannot see host [7:31800]
I think we need more info. In the meantime, here's a possibility: When pinging from the workstation to the router, you're hitting a locally attached interface on the router (one on the same subnet). When pinging from the router to the workstation, the ping is originating from an interface other than the one that is local to the workstation. Try an extended ping from the router, specifying the locally attached interface as the source and see if the pings succeed. If so, verify that both the subnet mask and the default gateway on the workstation are set correctly. Craig At 07:43 PM 1/13/2002 -0500, you wrote: >I know this is a RTFM type question but for the life of me I cannot >figure out why the router cannot ping the work station, but the >workstation can ping and telnet to the router Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31803&t=31800 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exams needed for the CCDP [7:31795]
Ko, You need to take the CCDA and then the CID...take it in that order it will help... Good luck. JB -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ko haag Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 6:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: exams needed for the CCDP [7:31795] I have passed the CCNP and was wondering what exam are needed to get the CCDP? Anyone know? Ko Haag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31802&t=31795 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help with access server [7:31801]
Hi everybody, I am trying to configure a Cisco 2509 access server to access my 3 routers RouterA, RouterB,and RouterC so that I don't have to use the console cable to access each router. But it doesn't w work. I am using an octal cable. 3 cables from the octal cable are connected to RouterA, RouterB, and RouterC and the terminal server is accessed with a console cable. What am I doing wrong can anyone help? Do I need to configure anything on RouterA, RouterB, and RouterC to be accessed from the access server? This is the configuration of the access server. Thanks, Stephane Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname terminal_server ! ! ip subnet-zero ip host RouterA 2001 172.16.1.1 ip host RouterB 2002 172.16.1.1 ip host RouterC 2003 172.16.1.1 ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.255 no ip directed-broadcast ! ip classless ! line con 0 transport input none line 1 8 no exec transport input all line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31801&t=31801 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
router cannot see host [7:31800]
I know this is a RTFM type question but for the life of me I cannot figure out why the router cannot ping the work station, but the workstation can ping and telnet to the router Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31800&t=31800 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EIGRP 'default network' Rehash [7:31799]
Sorry to bring this up again but apparently, for at least some of us, it needs to be. I chimed in the other day and offered a way to get EIGRP to distribute a default route. That basically amounted to simply defining a static to 0.0.0.0 and redistributing static into EIGRP (whoever corrected me by pointing out that the 'network 0.0.0.0' command isn't necessary, I thank you (it was in BSCN)). Wayne jumped in and explained some problems with EIGRP and the 'ip default-network' command. I thought it all sounded quite reasonable. So I tried this in the lab for several hours today (no "get a life" remarks please). I must be really dense, because nothing I try works quite the way (that I thought) it was described. It seems that the only way to sucessfully use the default-network is to configure it on every single router in the AS (I tried this with RIP just as a sanity check and it worked just fine). If that is the case, can a good argument be made in favor of this approach over redistributing static? Or summarizing to 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 on an interface? Both of those, at least, propogate throughout the AS after configuration on just one router. Thanks in advance, Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31799&t=31799 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN dialer watch VS floating static routes [7:31609]
I have always used floating statics to back up a frame relay network. Why? Easy - we're only just migrating to IOS 12.1. And anyway, this particular network has been using floating static routes for the last several years (since *long* before dialer watch was available) - they are flexible, suit the network topology and design, and they work. And our support mob are familiar with them, which is also a useful reason to keep using them. I'd look more closely at dialer watch for a brand new network or major redesign, but right now I personally have no good reasons for changing. YMMV. JMcL "Charlie Wehner" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISDN dialer watch VS floating static Sent by: routes [7:31609] nobody@groups tudy.com 11/01/2002 12:49 pm Please respond to "Charlie Wehner" When configuring an ISDN backup for a frame relay circuit do most people typically use "dialer watch" or "floating static routes". In my scenerio, it's for an eigrp network and a single router. I've seen the following article on Cisco's website: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/123/backup-main.html However, all things being equal, which one would you use? Thanks in advance, Charlie Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31798&t=31609 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Practice Labs [7:31721]
The Lab that is designed for Time Zones Rack start times 1-15th of each month 7 am EST 16-31st of each month 7 am GMT 1st and 15th of each month the 7pm-7am will not be available for the other time zone due to time zone change. We will accormodate next day rack rentals on different time zones if availabe. This will be available unless no users are schueduled the next day. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31797&t=31721 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: exams needed for the CCDP [7:31795]
640-441 DCN to make you a CCDA (pre-requisite for CCDP) then, 640-025 CID Gaz ""ko haag"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have passed the CCNP and was wondering what exam are needed to get the > CCDP? Anyone know? > > Ko Haag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31796&t=31795 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: you bad boys and girls... [7:31777]
And I'm sitting here working on a ccbootcamp lab. Since the Broncos aren't in the playoffs I just don't feel like watching. :-) On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Kaminski, Shawn G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Chuck, > > I wish! I'm configuring MPLS in the EDS lab today for a project that is > due > tomorrow. > > Shawn K. > > -Original Message- > From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 2:25 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: OT: you bad boys and girls... [7:31777] > > > to judge from the lack of traffic on the list, I gather you bad boys and > girls are watching football instead of studying. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31786&t=31777 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: copyright config [7:31774]
I was listening to an NPR newscast on something to do with copywriting when I thought of it. Patents too. What if you claim to come up with a novel way of figuring out a routing problem within the IOS, I wonder if you could patent it? I've seen business-practices patented (priceline.com, Amazon's 1-click shopping, etc., even patents for RFC's! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 2:32 PM To: "Steven A. Ridder" Subject: Re: copyright config [7:31774] you know, you have a good point there. it is something you technically create. you bring up an interesting idea. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] used Cisco gear: www.optsys.net CCIE Labs, racks, and classes: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/quicklinks.html Voice: 248-299-7789 eFAX: 509-271-9288 - Original Message - From: ""Steven A. Ridder"" Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 1:11 PM Subject: copyright config [7:31774] > Can you copyright a config? Has anyone ever heard of it? > > -- > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31780&t=31774 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can Cisco manuals from CIT class legally sold? [7:31788]
It happens all the time. Check out Ebay. As long as they are the original copy that should not be a problem. -- "Through Complexity there is Simplicity, Through Simplicity there is Complexity" David L. Blair - CCNP, CCNA, MCSE, CBE, A+, 3Wizard ""DL"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone know if the manuals from the authorized CIT class can > legally be sold? Please note, these are the original manuals (Lab > manual and work books). Would this violate any rules of the CCNP > agreement? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31792&t=31788 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
exams needed for the CCDP [7:31795]
I have passed the CCNP and was wondering what exam are needed to get the CCDP? Anyone know? Ko Haag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31795&t=31795 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE: OSPF and The Disappearing Neighbor Statement [7:31656]
That's it! Wow, very cool. That's really been bugging me. I posted it to the TAC Open Q&A Forum, so we'll see if they come up with the right answer! :-) Thanks for letting me know about that, I appreciate it. John On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Stefan Dozier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > John, I've been following your thread and think I found a possible > answer > to your question on why the neighbor statement gets ignored when entered > on spoke routers! > > In the OSPF Desig Guide "Section 1" under "Adjacencies on Non- Broadcast > Multi-Access (NBMA) Networks" the next to last statement in the > paragraph > gives us a clue. > > "The neighbor command applies to routers with a potential of being DRs > or > BDRs > (interface priority not equal to 0)." > > So to test that theory, I changed the priority on one of my spokes to 1 > from 0 and viola, it takes the neighbor statement just fine. Prior to > changing the interface priority I could enter the neighbor statement > under > the OSPF process, but it didn't show up in the config. > > Spoke Router: > > interface Serial0 > ip address 192.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation frame-relay IETF > logging event subif-link-status > logging event dlci-status-change > frame-relay map ip 192.1.1.2 100 broadcast > frame-relay map ip 192.1.1.3 100 broadcast > frame-relay lmi-type ansi > ! > router ospf 64 > network 192.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > neighbor 192.1.1.2 > > Hub Router: > > interface Serial0 > ip address 192.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > encapsulation frame-relay IETF > frame-relay map ip 192.1.1.1 100 broadcast > frame-relay map ip 192.1.1.3 200 broadcast > frame-relay lmi-type ansi > ! > router ospf 64 > log-adjacency-changes > network 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 > network 192.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > neighbor 192.1.1.3 > neighbor 192.1.1.1 priority 1 I thought you only need the neighbor > statement on one side of > the > > connection? > > > > Once a router accepts the hello, adjacencies are formed with > information > > from the hello via unicast communication from that point > forward. > > > > Sort of like if I shout over a hill, "Hey Routerman are you > there, this > > is > > Jim." Then you would respond back to me by name. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Router Man [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 10:28 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: OSPF and The Disappearing Neighbor Statement > [7:31656] > > > > > > I was able to reproduce your exact scenario. I had a hub > with two > > spokes > > and the neighbor statements only appeared on the hub. This is > very > > interesting and I'm not sure what the reason behind it is. I > am glad > > that > > this was brought up, because I would love to get to the > bottom of this > > situation. I'll keep you posted ""John Neiberger"" wrote in > message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > The network statement definitely was there, but the > neighbor > > > statements would only appear on the hub router. > Interestingly, I just > > > > > saw a sample configuration similar to this on CCO and they > only had > > > the neighbor statement on one router, not both. I think as > long as > > > one router has a neighbor statement configured, the > adjacency will > > > form assuming all other things being equal (network type, > etc.) > > > > > > The adjacencies formed but I had to cycle the interfaces to > get things > > > started. Even if the neighbor statement is only required > on one > > side, > > > I still don't understand why the router wouldn't let me add > it. The > > > adjacencies would eventually form, however, and routing > occurred > > > exactly as I expected it. > > > > > > I did notice a minor issue with the neighbor statements on > the hub. I > > > > > had three of them, and one of them inserted 'priority 1' at > the end, > > > yet the other two remained as I entered them. > > > > > > >>> "Router Man" 1/11/02 3:08:03 PM >>> > > > The only time that the "neighbor" statement will not show > up in the > > > running-config, is if you do not have a "network" statement > under the > > > "router ospf" process. I am doubting that the neighbors > formed an > > > adjacency without the neigbor or network statements showing > up under > > > the ospf config. > > > If the adjacency was actually formed, then it must be a bug. > > > > > > Another thing that I have noticed is than when trying to > use the > > > neighbor statement to set the priority, "neighbor 1.1.1.1 > priority > > > 255" the priority > > > will change to something other than what I set it too. It > took me a > > > while > > > to figure this one out. The problem is that I have to > have matching > > > "ip > > > ospf priority 255" statements under the interfaces running > ospf . > > > ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > It was hot, too hot. Our detective had been
RE: RE: OSPF and The Disappearing Neighbor Statement [7:31656]
John, I've been following your thread and think I found a possible answer to your question on why the neighbor statement gets ignored when entered on spoke routers! In the OSPF Desig Guide "Section 1" under "Adjacencies on Non-Broadcast Multi-Access (NBMA) Networks" the next to last statement in the paragraph gives us a clue. "The neighbor command applies to routers with a potential of being DRs or BDRs (interface priority not equal to 0)." So to test that theory, I changed the priority on one of my spokes to 1 from 0 and viola, it takes the neighbor statement just fine. Prior to changing the interface priority I could enter the neighbor statement under the OSPF process, but it didn't show up in the config. Spoke Router: interface Serial0 ip address 192.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation frame-relay IETF logging event subif-link-status logging event dlci-status-change frame-relay map ip 192.1.1.2 100 broadcast frame-relay map ip 192.1.1.3 100 broadcast frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! router ospf 64 network 192.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 neighbor 192.1.1.2 Hub Router: interface Serial0 ip address 192.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay IETF frame-relay map ip 192.1.1.1 100 broadcast frame-relay map ip 192.1.1.3 200 broadcast frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! router ospf 64 log-adjacency-changes network 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 192.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 neighbor 192.1.1.3 neighbor 192.1.1.1 priority 1 I thought you only need the neighbor statement on one side of the > connection? > > Once a router accepts the hello, adjacencies are formed with information > from the hello via unicast communication from that point forward. > > Sort of like if I shout over a hill, "Hey Routerman are you there, this > is > Jim." Then you would respond back to me by name. > > -Original Message- > From: Router Man [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 10:28 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: OSPF and The Disappearing Neighbor Statement [7:31656] > > > I was able to reproduce your exact scenario. I had a hub with two > spokes > and the neighbor statements only appeared on the hub. This is very > interesting and I'm not sure what the reason behind it is. I am glad > that > this was brought up, because I would love to get to the bottom of this > situation. I'll keep you posted ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > The network statement definitely was there, but the neighbor > > statements would only appear on the hub router. Interestingly, I just > > > saw a sample configuration similar to this on CCO and they only had > > the neighbor statement on one router, not both. I think as long as > > one router has a neighbor statement configured, the adjacency will > > form assuming all other things being equal (network type, etc.) > > > > The adjacencies formed but I had to cycle the interfaces to get things > > started. Even if the neighbor statement is only required on one > side, > > I still don't understand why the router wouldn't let me add it. The > > adjacencies would eventually form, however, and routing occurred > > exactly as I expected it. > > > > I did notice a minor issue with the neighbor statements on the hub. I > > > had three of them, and one of them inserted 'priority 1' at the end, > > yet the other two remained as I entered them. > > > > >>> "Router Man" 1/11/02 3:08:03 PM >>> > > The only time that the "neighbor" statement will not show up in the > > running-config, is if you do not have a "network" statement under the > > "router ospf" process. I am doubting that the neighbors formed an > > adjacency without the neigbor or network statements showing up under > > the ospf config. > > If the adjacency was actually formed, then it must be a bug. > > > > Another thing that I have noticed is than when trying to use the > > neighbor statement to set the priority, "neighbor 1.1.1.1 priority > > 255" the priority > > will change to something other than what I set it too. It took me a > > while > > to figure this one out. The problem is that I have to have matching > > "ip > > ospf priority 255" statements under the interfaces running ospf . > > ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > It was hot, too hot. Our detective had been working feverishly to > > > configure OSPF over NBMA without the use of ip ospf network > > statements. > > > He knew that to do this he must explicitly add neighbor statements > > or > > > adjacencies would not form. > > > > > > He logs into the hub router and types in his three neighbor > > statements. > > > All seems well. It's still too hot, but it's a dry heat. > > > > > > He now logs into one of the spoke routers and types in his neighbor > > > statement. He pauses momentarily and then checks the OSPF > > adjacencies. > > > Something seems to be wrong, he thinks to himself. This ought to
RE: OT: you bad boys and girls... [7:31777]
Whats football? the other half is the football nut. Me? I was down at the hardware store digging up some clips and screws for my new rack I bought yesterday :) MikeS www.packetattack.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31791&t=31777 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: you bad boys and girls... [7:31777]
Football?? Not a chance. Cricket! JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 14/01/2002 08:39 am - "Chuck Larrieu" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: you bad boys and girls... Sent by: [7:31777] nobody@groups tudy.com 14/01/2002 06:24 am Please respond to "Chuck Larrieu" to judge from the lack of traffic on the list, I gather you bad boys and girls are watching football instead of studying. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31790&t=31777 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: you bad boys and girls... [7:31777]
Well, I admit I was watching football there and wasted my 3 precious hours on a brutal sport. The result, however, didn't come up to be what I wanted though... Oh well... Back to studying.. Ed A Big Red & Gold Fan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31789&t=31777 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can Cisco manuals from CIT class legally sold? [7:31788]
Does anyone know if the manuals from the authorized CIT class can legally be sold? Please note, these are the original manuals (Lab manual and work books). Would this violate any rules of the CCNP agreement? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31788&t=31788 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Summarization [7:31766]
I've done it with about 100 interfaces on 7513's and didn't see this problem. It may be a limitation of the code on the box, memory (as you indicated), or something else. Have you been able to rule-out as many "something elses" as possible? What does the network topology look like? Do you have redundancy in place - e.g. spoke routers connected to two different hub routers? Are you getting a lot of SIAs? Routes flapping, etc.? How's the CPU on your RSP's looking? Free memory? Buffer misses? There's a common view that EIGRP works fine and can scale infinitely big without going through all of the steps that you'd have to go through for a large-scale OSPF installation. Obviously, this thought is very wrong. I'm guessing that you need to do manual summarization on 200 interfaces per box is because you don't have clearly-defined summarization points in the network - that's the situation I was in when I had to do it on ~100 interfaces. For good or ill, EIGRP will work with a bad network design (I'm speaking from an ideal perspective - please don't be offended, we all have to things at one time or another that are considered "bad") up until a point. Beyond that point, it gets really ugly - quickly. In the network I was working on we had 140 sites connected without problems. We started adding more offices and by the time we hit 170 the network was totally unstable. After several weeks of P1/CAP cases we met with the guys who write the code and found out what we were doing wrong - they have since published several CiscoPress books on EIGRP; none existed four years ago :) You can "band-aid" a broken network by using a lot of the EIGRP features (manual summarization, distribute-lists, etc.). In my case that's exactly what we did, unfortunately, I was not given the opportunity to correct the mistakes that required the band-aids. I have since moved on to new challenges but that network is still in the same state - four years later. Anyhow, if you can offer more specifics, I'm sure those of us on the list would be happy to comment and offer suggestions. I think that if we can solve the reason you need to manually summarize on 200 interfaces you'll be better off down the road. Ben -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 5:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Summarization [7:31766] Hello folks, I'm working in a EIGRP enviroment, and I have some questions for you: Has anyone tried to do a manual route sumarization per interface with more or less 200 interfaces in a 7500? I've tried but I'm having a few problems, the summary routes aren't advertised sufficiently fast to the routers in branch offices. The summary routes are sometimes marked as "possibly down" in the routers of branch offices, sometimes are up and sometimes are down. Do you know any relationship between memory or cpu (or whatever) of the 7500 and number of interfaces in which you can perform manual summarization? David Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31787&t=31766 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: GBIC ??? [7:31770]
Actually, both are "fabric-enabled." In the main 65xx box you have the 32Gb/s backplane (BUS) and now you can also take advantage of the "Switch Fabric" to bump your capacity up to 256Gb/s. Regarding the different 16-port GBIC cards you have three options: 6416 - BUS-only (32Gb/s) - SUP handles all packet forwarding 6516 - BUS and fabric (single fabric attachment) (up to 256Gb/s*) - SUP handles forwarding by default but an optional daughter card can be added to upgrade to dCEF. 6816 - fabric only (dual fabric attachments) (256Gb/s) - dCEF only; integrated daughter card. Here's a link that talks more about the different options: http://cco.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca6000/prodlit/c60ge_ds.htm Obviously, to take advantage of the switch fabric you need SFMs (Switch Fabric Modules) in the chassis (two to be redundant). * I seem to recall when these products were introduced to me by our local Cisco team someone said that the 6500-series cards (for the 6500-series chassis, it's a bit confusing - you'd think they could use another number) - e.g. 6516 listed above - were only capable of doing 128Gb/s because they were only attached to a single switch fabric and that to do the full 256Gb/s you'd need the fabric-only cards (the 6800-series modules). Just looking really quick, I don't see any docs on CCO that substantiate my memory so if it matters to you, you might want to ask Cisco - perhaps my memory is incorrect or I was given bum scoop from our Cisco reps. Have fun. Ben -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of kenairs Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 9:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: GBIC ??? [7:31770] Hi Group , >From the cisco cd , WS-X6816-GBIC 16-port fabric-enabled Gigabit Ethernet switching module. The module has integrated distributed forwarding and has dual serial connections to the switch fabric module. The module requires GBICs. GBICs are available in three models (SX, LX/LH, and ZX) and have an SC-type connector for use with either MMF and SMF. What is mean by the " fabric-enable Gigabit Ethernet switching module " ?? Tks WS-X6516-GBIC 16-port Gigabit Ethernet switching module. The module requires GBICs. GBICs are available in three models (SX, LX/LH, and ZX) and have an SC-type connector for use with either MMF and SMF. What is the difference between " WS-X6816-GBIC ( fabric-enable ) and WS-X6516-GBIC ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31785&t=31770 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PPTP - Conduit - Protocol 47 [7:31748]
Usually you can easily convince TAC that they should provide you with an image which is no longer publicly listed, but which is the logical next step for you to minimize the amount of changes to your already stable device. However in the face of significant bugs such as PSIRTs or what not your request may(fairly legitimately) be turned down. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > I found out that version 4.1(7) supports GRE > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_v41/pixrn417.h > tm#xtocid1224219 > > Unfortunately, the image is no longer on CC0 (too old). > > Pierre-Alex > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Paul Lalonde > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 9:51 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: PPTP - Conduit - Protocol 47 [7:31748] > > Pierre-Alex, > > You might have an issue with that version of PIX OS. On a PIX OS of 4.2 or > later, you can do: > > conduit permit gre host any > conduit permit tcp host eq 1723 any > > Not sure about 4.0.7... are you not able to update this to at least 4.4 or > something better? > > Paul > > ""Pierre-Alex J. Guanel"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > How do you configure a conduit to let this go through: > > > > Source 0.0.0.0 to Protocol Other Protocol Number 47 > > > > I need to this in order to do PPTP through the firewall to a Windows 2000 > > machine.I am running version 4.0.7 on the PIX and the conduit only have > > option for tcp or udp. See below from the Cisco documentation: > > > > conduit global_ip port[-port] udp|tcp ip_address [netmask] > > > > Thank you > > > > Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31784&t=31748 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: OSPF and The Disappearing Neighbor Statement [7:31656]
I think you're correct about that. What I don't get is why some of the routers flat out ignore the neighbor statement. Even if it's not absolutely necessary, why--in some cases-would they ignore it? I posted this on the TAC Q&A Forum. I'm hoping someone will have an answer there. John Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Jim Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I thought you only need the neighbor statement on one side of the > connection? > > Once a router accepts the hello, adjacencies are formed with information > from the hello via unicast communication from that point forward. > > Sort of like if I shout over a hill, "Hey Routerman are you there, this > is > Jim." Then you would respond back to me by name. > > -Original Message- > From: Router Man [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 10:28 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: OSPF and The Disappearing Neighbor Statement [7:31656] > > > I was able to reproduce your exact scenario. I had a hub with two > spokes > and the neighbor statements only appeared on the hub. This is very > interesting and I'm not sure what the reason behind it is. I am glad > that > this was brought up, because I would love to get to the bottom of this > situation. I'll keep you posted ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > The network statement definitely was there, but the neighbor > > statements would only appear on the hub router. Interestingly, I just > > > saw a sample configuration similar to this on CCO and they only had > > the neighbor statement on one router, not both. I think as long as > > one router has a neighbor statement configured, the adjacency will > > form assuming all other things being equal (network type, etc.) > > > > The adjacencies formed but I had to cycle the interfaces to get things > > started. Even if the neighbor statement is only required on one > side, > > I still don't understand why the router wouldn't let me add it. The > > adjacencies would eventually form, however, and routing occurred > > exactly as I expected it. > > > > I did notice a minor issue with the neighbor statements on the hub. I > > > had three of them, and one of them inserted 'priority 1' at the end, > > yet the other two remained as I entered them. > > > > >>> "Router Man" 1/11/02 3:08:03 PM >>> > > The only time that the "neighbor" statement will not show up in the > > running-config, is if you do not have a "network" statement under the > > "router ospf" process. I am doubting that the neighbors formed an > > adjacency without the neigbor or network statements showing up under > > the ospf config. > > If the adjacency was actually formed, then it must be a bug. > > > > Another thing that I have noticed is than when trying to use the > > neighbor statement to set the priority, "neighbor 1.1.1.1 priority > > 255" the priority > > will change to something other than what I set it too. It took me a > > while > > to figure this one out. The problem is that I have to have matching > > "ip > > ospf priority 255" statements under the interfaces running ospf . > > ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > It was hot, too hot. Our detective had been working feverishly to > > > configure OSPF over NBMA without the use of ip ospf network > > statements. > > > He knew that to do this he must explicitly add neighbor statements > > or > > > adjacencies would not form. > > > > > > He logs into the hub router and types in his three neighbor > > statements. > > > All seems well. It's still too hot, but it's a dry heat. > > > > > > He now logs into one of the spoke routers and types in his neighbor > > > statement. He pauses momentarily and then checks the OSPF > > adjacencies. > > > Something seems to be wrong, he thinks to himself. This ought to be > > > > working, but it isn't. Why not? He looks through the running > > > config > > to > > > look for any errors and notices the the neighbor statement that he > > just > > > entered is missing! > > > > > > He slowly and deliberately types it in again making sure there are > > no > > > mistakes but yet it still does not show up in the running > > configuration. > > > Is this an IOS issue? Operator error? Some rift in the space-time > > > > continuum? > > > > > > He jumps to another spoke router running a different IOS and tries > > the > > > same thing with the same result. He is frantic now, beads of sweat > > > pouring down his face. What if this were the real CCIE lab exam? > > Could > > > this be a fatal stumbling block? > > > > > > He finally notices that adjacencies do eventually form after > > clearing > > > the relevant interfaces. This must be because the hub
RE: you bad boys and girls... [7:31777]
Chuck, I wish! I'm configuring MPLS in the EDS lab today for a project that is due tomorrow. Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 2:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: you bad boys and girls... [7:31777] to judge from the lack of traffic on the list, I gather you bad boys and girls are watching football instead of studying. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31782&t=31777 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
multiple radius server [7:31781]
I want to send accounting packets to multiple radius servers simultaneously when i add them in sequence it sends to them in a failover order Mohamed Saro Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31781&t=31781 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Free Router Lab Untill Noon PST. [7:31714]
Thanks! Your setup is very similar to the lab I've setup at home. It appears that your problematic 2502 has no IOS loaded. I did a "Show Flash" and didn't see anything there. ---Richard ""Ed Chuchaisri"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Guys, > > I planned to turn it off at 12pm today but what the heck I'll leave it > on for for a few more days. First come first serve though. :) > > Thanks for all the inputs you guys gave me. It's very valuable. And yes, > the ISDN isn't there yet but definitely coming soon.. Now, I am wondering > how important is the 3920 switch. Let me know what you guys think of it. > > And another question I got is what kind of ISDN switch-type do they test on > CCIE lab? Thanks... > > Enjoy, > > Ed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31779&t=31714 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Re: you bad boys and girls... [7:31777]
Chuck, I think you have officially lost it. BTW: What's your new email address? I was trying to email you the other day and it was getting returned. (did you filter me? i didnt think I was harassing you that bad) :) thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] used Cisco gear: www.optsys.net CCIE Labs, racks, and classes: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/quicklinks.html ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > to judge from the lack of traffic on the list, I gather you bad boys and > girls are watching football instead of studying. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31778&t=31777 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: you bad boys and girls... [7:31777]
to judge from the lack of traffic on the list, I gather you bad boys and girls are watching football instead of studying. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31777&t=31777 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF and The Disappearing Neighbor Statement [7:31656]
I thought you only need the neighbor statement on one side of the connection? Once a router accepts the hello, adjacencies are formed with information from the hello via unicast communication from that point forward. Sort of like if I shout over a hill, "Hey Routerman are you there, this is Jim." Then you would respond back to me by name. -Original Message- From: Router Man [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 10:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OSPF and The Disappearing Neighbor Statement [7:31656] I was able to reproduce your exact scenario. I had a hub with two spokes and the neighbor statements only appeared on the hub. This is very interesting and I'm not sure what the reason behind it is. I am glad that this was brought up, because I would love to get to the bottom of this situation. I'll keep you posted ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The network statement definitely was there, but the neighbor > statements would only appear on the hub router. Interestingly, I just > saw a sample configuration similar to this on CCO and they only had > the neighbor statement on one router, not both. I think as long as > one router has a neighbor statement configured, the adjacency will > form assuming all other things being equal (network type, etc.) > > The adjacencies formed but I had to cycle the interfaces to get things > started. Even if the neighbor statement is only required on one side, > I still don't understand why the router wouldn't let me add it. The > adjacencies would eventually form, however, and routing occurred > exactly as I expected it. > > I did notice a minor issue with the neighbor statements on the hub. I > had three of them, and one of them inserted 'priority 1' at the end, > yet the other two remained as I entered them. > > >>> "Router Man" 1/11/02 3:08:03 PM >>> > The only time that the "neighbor" statement will not show up in the > running-config, is if you do not have a "network" statement under the > "router ospf" process. I am doubting that the neighbors formed an > adjacency without the neigbor or network statements showing up under > the ospf config. > If the adjacency was actually formed, then it must be a bug. > > Another thing that I have noticed is than when trying to use the > neighbor statement to set the priority, "neighbor 1.1.1.1 priority > 255" the priority > will change to something other than what I set it too. It took me a > while > to figure this one out. The problem is that I have to have matching > "ip > ospf priority 255" statements under the interfaces running ospf . > ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > It was hot, too hot. Our detective had been working feverishly to > > configure OSPF over NBMA without the use of ip ospf network > statements. > > He knew that to do this he must explicitly add neighbor statements > or > > adjacencies would not form. > > > > He logs into the hub router and types in his three neighbor > statements. > > All seems well. It's still too hot, but it's a dry heat. > > > > He now logs into one of the spoke routers and types in his neighbor > > statement. He pauses momentarily and then checks the OSPF > adjacencies. > > Something seems to be wrong, he thinks to himself. This ought to be > > working, but it isn't. Why not? He looks through the running > > config > to > > look for any errors and notices the the neighbor statement that he > just > > entered is missing! > > > > He slowly and deliberately types it in again making sure there are > no > > mistakes but yet it still does not show up in the running > configuration. > > Is this an IOS issue? Operator error? Some rift in the space-time > > continuum? > > > > He jumps to another spoke router running a different IOS and tries > the > > same thing with the same result. He is frantic now, beads of sweat > > pouring down his face. What if this were the real CCIE lab exam? > Could > > this be a fatal stumbling block? > > > > He finally notices that adjacencies do eventually form after > clearing > > the relevant interfaces. This must be because the hub router > accepted > > the neighbor statements. But what if it hadn't, he ponders. He > thinks > > forward into the future when--a day after taking the lab exam--he > > receives the dreaded email that says, "We're sorry, it is apparent > that > > you have no clue." > > > > Back to the real world > > > > What was the cause of the missing neighbor statements? Have any of > you > > run into this before? I've never bothered to explicitly use > neighbor > > statements as I'm in the habit of using the ip ospf network command > to > > make them unnecessary. > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > Thanks, > > John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31776&t=31656 -- FAQ, list arch
Re: copyright config [7:31774]
Hi, In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... > Can you copyright a config? Has anyone ever heard of it? ..oh no, i hope there is no way for that =8-| Gerd Thuemmler Berlin, Germany Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31775&t=31774 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
copyright config [7:31774]
Can you copyright a config? Has anyone ever heard of it? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF and The Disappearing Neighbor Statement [7:31656]
I was able to reproduce your exact scenario. I had a hub with two spokes and the neighbor statements only appeared on the hub. This is very interesting and I'm not sure what the reason behind it is. I am glad that this was brought up, because I would love to get to the bottom of this situation. I'll keep you posted ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The network statement definitely was there, but the neighbor statements > would only appear on the hub router. Interestingly, I just saw a sample > configuration similar to this on CCO and they only had the neighbor > statement on one router, not both. I think as long as one router has a > neighbor statement configured, the adjacency will form assuming all > other things being equal (network type, etc.) > > The adjacencies formed but I had to cycle the interfaces to get things > started. Even if the neighbor statement is only required on one side, > I still don't understand why the router wouldn't let me add it. The > adjacencies would eventually form, however, and routing occurred exactly > as I expected it. > > I did notice a minor issue with the neighbor statements on the hub. I > had three of them, and one of them inserted 'priority 1' at the end, yet > the other two remained as I entered them. > > >>> "Router Man" 1/11/02 3:08:03 PM >>> > The only time that the "neighbor" statement will not show up in the > running-config, is if you do not have a "network" statement under the > "router ospf" process. I am doubting that the neighbors formed an > adjacency > without the neigbor or network statements showing up under the ospf > config. > If the adjacency was actually formed, then it must be a bug. > > Another thing that I have noticed is than when trying to use the > neighbor > statement to set the priority, "neighbor 1.1.1.1 priority 255" the > priority > will change to something other than what I set it too. It took me a > while > to figure this one out. The problem is that I have to have matching > "ip > ospf priority 255" statements under the interfaces running ospf . > ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > It was hot, too hot. Our detective had been working feverishly to > > configure OSPF over NBMA without the use of ip ospf network > statements. > > He knew that to do this he must explicitly add neighbor statements > or > > adjacencies would not form. > > > > He logs into the hub router and types in his three neighbor > statements. > > All seems well. It's still too hot, but it's a dry heat. > > > > He now logs into one of the spoke routers and types in his neighbor > > statement. He pauses momentarily and then checks the OSPF > adjacencies. > > Something seems to be wrong, he thinks to himself. This ought to be > > working, but it isn't. Why not? He looks through the running config > to > > look for any errors and notices the the neighbor statement that he > just > > entered is missing! > > > > He slowly and deliberately types it in again making sure there are > no > > mistakes but yet it still does not show up in the running > configuration. > > Is this an IOS issue? Operator error? Some rift in the space-time > > continuum? > > > > He jumps to another spoke router running a different IOS and tries > the > > same thing with the same result. He is frantic now, beads of sweat > > pouring down his face. What if this were the real CCIE lab exam? > Could > > this be a fatal stumbling block? > > > > He finally notices that adjacencies do eventually form after > clearing > > the relevant interfaces. This must be because the hub router > accepted > > the neighbor statements. But what if it hadn't, he ponders. He > thinks > > forward into the future when--a day after taking the lab exam--he > > receives the dreaded email that says, "We're sorry, it is apparent > that > > you have no clue." > > > > Back to the real world > > > > What was the cause of the missing neighbor statements? Have any of > you > > run into this before? I've never bothered to explicitly use > neighbor > > statements as I'm in the habit of using the ip ospf network command > to > > make them unnecessary. > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > Thanks, > > John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31772&t=31656 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Compresses Cisco IOS to fit onto a smaller fla [7:31729]
I was told the case would not close, due to the way Cisco has positioned the outlet forward of the motherboard. .02 Phil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Borghese Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 1:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Compresses Cisco IOS to fit onto a smaller fla [7:31729] Hey as a side note. Does anyone know what that PCMCIA slot inside the 25xx routers are used for? It looks as if you can add Flash via a PCMCIA card. It is not worth it as Flash is so inexpensive, but it would be neat to try. Paul - Original Message - From: "Brad Ellis" To: Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 11:31 AM Subject: Re: Compresses Cisco IOS to fit onto a smaller fla [7:31729] > I would highly recommend AGAINST using it. We used to use it and had all > sorts of strange problems with the newly created compressed IOS. You also > have to have an extra amount of DRAM available for the created image to be > decompressed into RAM. > > Flash and DRAM are soo cheap these days, you'd be better off upgrading the > memory. Also, MZMaker is only applicable with uncompressed run-from-flash > IOS (ie, 2500 series routers and the old 1600 series routers). Again, I'd > highly recommend against it. > > thanks, > -Brad Ellis > CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) > Network Learning Inc > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > used Cisco gear: www.optsys.net > CCIE Labs, racks, and classes: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/quicklinks.html > ""Circusnuts"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Yes- the program is called MZMaker and can only be applied to IOS that > > is run from RAM only. > > > > All the best !!! > > Phil > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Richard > > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 2:57 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Compresses Cisco IOS to fit onto a smaller flash size. > > [7:31710] > > > > I wonder if anyone has tried to compress a larger Cisco IOS to fit onto > > a > > router with a smaller flash. If so, I'd appreciated for some pointers. > > > > > > Thanks > > _ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31769&t=31729 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Compresses Cisco IOS to fit onto a smaller fla [7:31729]
It is an alternate method for performing code upgrades. You used to be able to order a single use card that would upgrade the code on a single router and then self-destruct. (Not Explode, just self-disable) -ejay. -Original Message- From: Paul Borghese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 1:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Compresses Cisco IOS to fit onto a smaller fla [7:31729] Hey as a side note. Does anyone know what that PCMCIA slot inside the 25xx routers are used for? It looks as if you can add Flash via a PCMCIA card. It is not worth it as Flash is so inexpensive, but it would be neat to try. Paul - Original Message - From: "Brad Ellis" To: Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 11:31 AM Subject: Re: Compresses Cisco IOS to fit onto a smaller fla [7:31729] > I would highly recommend AGAINST using it. We used to use it and had all > sorts of strange problems with the newly created compressed IOS. You also > have to have an extra amount of DRAM available for the created image to be > decompressed into RAM. > > Flash and DRAM are soo cheap these days, you'd be better off upgrading the > memory. Also, MZMaker is only applicable with uncompressed run-from-flash > IOS (ie, 2500 series routers and the old 1600 series routers). Again, I'd > highly recommend against it. > > thanks, > -Brad Ellis > CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) > Network Learning Inc > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > used Cisco gear: www.optsys.net > CCIE Labs, racks, and classes: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/quicklinks.html > ""Circusnuts"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Yes- the program is called MZMaker and can only be applied to IOS that > > is run from RAM only. > > > > All the best !!! > > Phil > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Richard > > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 2:57 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Compresses Cisco IOS to fit onto a smaller flash size. > > [7:31710] > > > > I wonder if anyone has tried to compress a larger Cisco IOS to fit onto > > a > > router with a smaller flash. If so, I'd appreciated for some pointers. > > > > > > Thanks > > _ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31753&t=31729 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GBIC ??? [7:31770]
there will probably be a ton of posts, but why not? I'm waiting for a download to complete. The 65xx series switches come of the shelf with a 32 gig backplane. If you anticipate needing a bigger backplane, you must purchase a switch fabric module ( SFM ) which then increases your backplane to 128 gig. Ah, but here's the deal. In order take advantage of this increased backplane, your line cards must be "fabric enabled". Otherwise they will be able to use only the default 32 gig crossbar. Cisco is the only major vendor that does it this way that I can figure. Extreme and Foundry certainly don't. so get our your wallet and get ready to shell out if you require a bigger backplane on the 65xx product. ""kenairs"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Group , > From the cisco cd , > > WS-X6816-GBIC >16-port fabric-enabled Gigabit Ethernet switching > module. The module has integrated distributed >forwarding and has dual serial connections to the > switch fabric module. The module requires GBICs. GBICs >are available in three models (SX, LX/LH, and ZX) and > have an SC-type connector for use with either MMF >and SMF. > > What is mean by the " fabric-enable Gigabit Ethernet switching module " ?? > Tks > > WS-X6516-GBIC >16-port Gigabit Ethernet switching module. The module > requires GBICs. GBICs are available in three models >(SX, LX/LH, and ZX) and have an SC-type connector for > use with either MMF and SMF. > > > What is the difference between " WS-X6816-GBIC ( fabric-enable ) and > WS-X6516-GBIC ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31771&t=31770 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GBIC ??? [7:31770]
Hi Group , >From the cisco cd , WS-X6816-GBIC 16-port fabric-enabled Gigabit Ethernet switching module. The module has integrated distributed forwarding and has dual serial connections to the switch fabric module. The module requires GBICs. GBICs are available in three models (SX, LX/LH, and ZX) and have an SC-type connector for use with either MMF and SMF. What is mean by the " fabric-enable Gigabit Ethernet switching module " ?? Tks WS-X6516-GBIC 16-port Gigabit Ethernet switching module. The module requires GBICs. GBICs are available in three models (SX, LX/LH, and ZX) and have an SC-type connector for use with either MMF and SMF. What is the difference between " WS-X6816-GBIC ( fabric-enable ) and WS-X6516-GBIC ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31770&t=31770 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PPTP - Conduit - Protocol 47 [7:31748]
I found out that version 4.1(7) supports GRE http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_v41/pixrn417.h tm#xtocid1224219 Unfortunately, the image is no longer on CC0 (too old). Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Lalonde Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 9:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PPTP - Conduit - Protocol 47 [7:31748] Pierre-Alex, You might have an issue with that version of PIX OS. On a PIX OS of 4.2 or later, you can do: conduit permit gre host any conduit permit tcp host eq 1723 any Not sure about 4.0.7... are you not able to update this to at least 4.4 or something better? Paul ""Pierre-Alex J. Guanel"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > How do you configure a conduit to let this go through: > > Source 0.0.0.0 to Protocol Other Protocol Number 47 > > I need to this in order to do PPTP through the firewall to a Windows 2000 > machine.I am running version 4.0.7 on the PIX and the conduit only have > option for tcp or udp. See below from the Cisco documentation: > > conduit global_ip port[-port] udp|tcp ip_address [netmask] > > Thank you > > Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31768&t=31748 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE 350-001 passed [7:31767]
Hi, i have passed the test :-), and now i working for my lab-test on 04/19/2002 in bruessels. IMO is the test not so hard. I have learn the CISCO courses SNAM, BCRAN, BSCN, CIT, CVOICE and CATM. The book "CCIE 350-001: Routing and Switching Prep Kit" from Bear Wolf was helpful for the latest Test preparation. My other books: Doyle: TCP/IP Routing vol. I and II Clark/Hamilton: Cisco Lan Switching For the lab prep i will by the "Review of CCIE Practical Studies Volume 1" from Carl Solie Gerd Thuemmler Berlin, Germany Sorry for my bad english, but is so long that learn it in scool ;-) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31767&t=31767 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Summarization [7:31766]
Hello folks, I'm working in a EIGRP enviroment, and I have some questions for you: Has anyone tried to do a manual route sumarization per interface with more or less 200 interfaces in a 7500? I've tried but I'm having a few problems, the summary routes aren't advertised sufficiently fast to the routers in branch offices. The summary routes are sometimes marked as "possibly down" in the routers of branch offices, sometimes are up and sometimes are down. Do you know any relationship between memory or cpu (or whatever) of the 7500 and number of interfaces in which you can perform manual summarization? David Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31766&t=31766 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PPTP - Conduit - Protocol 47 [7:31748]
Thank you! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Lalonde Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 9:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PPTP - Conduit - Protocol 47 [7:31748] Pierre-Alex, You might have an issue with that version of PIX OS. On a PIX OS of 4.2 or later, you can do: conduit permit gre host any conduit permit tcp host eq 1723 any Not sure about 4.0.7... are you not able to update this to at least 4.4 or something better? Paul ""Pierre-Alex J. Guanel"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > How do you configure a conduit to let this go through: > > Source 0.0.0.0 to Protocol Other Protocol Number 47 > > I need to this in order to do PPTP through the firewall to a Windows 2000 > machine.I am running version 4.0.7 on the PIX and the conduit only have > option for tcp or udp. See below from the Cisco documentation: > > conduit global_ip port[-port] udp|tcp ip_address [netmask] > > Thank you > > Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31765&t=31748 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
