traffic engineering exercises [7:42504]
From the GMPLS/CCAMP TE draft: Thus we have a more general notion of a TE link. A TE link is a logical link that has TE properties. The link is logical in a sense that it represents a way to group/map the information about certain physical resources (and their properties) into the information that is used by Constrained SPF for the purpose of path computation, and by GMPLS signaling. This grouping/mapping must be done consistently at both ends of the link. LMP [LMP] could be used to check/verify this consistency. Has anyone written exercises that will work on affordable CCIE/CCNP labs? -- TT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42504t=42504 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco 3640-8AM ---urgent! [7:42211]
What your problems? HATO From: yonghai zhang Reply-To: yonghai zhang To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco 3640-8AM ---urgent! [7:42211] Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 01:42:03 -0400 hi,anyboby if you have some experience with 3640 8AM Module,can i share with you? thanks. _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42505t=42211 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secret Clearance [7:42499]
I'm sure someone will respond with a much detailed response, but in the meantime, know that secret clearance is a very expensive, time consuming process at the very least. Don't think it's like a Cisco cert that you can just study or apply for. Usually people already have it from past jobs, military experience, etc. Sponsorship by your employer is generally required to attain TS. If a job description asks for TS clearance and you don't have it, don't waste your time applying. Sean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of nilesh bothra Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Secret Clearance [7:42499] how does one go about getting a secret clearance. is there a website with this info what are the requirements nilesh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42506t=42499 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco 3640-8AM ---urgent! [7:42211]
thanks for your reply! pls refer first past which is my question. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42507t=42211 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX Connected to ComCast Network... [7:42509]
Has anybody out there dealt with one of these scenarios?!?! ComCast customer wanting to hook up their PIX 501 to their CableModem, and use either DHCP, or a Static address on the outside interface; NAT and Dynamic VPN configuration to connect back to HQ PIX also is in this picture. I spent several hours trying to get the PIX to work, but got intermittent failure in Ping tests, traceroutes from inside workstation, and extremely slow and mostly failed http requests from same said workstation's browser. Called ComCast Tech support, they argued that the client account had to be a Comcast Pro account to allow such a scenario (the VPNs from the customer firewall), but did not specify what their definition of Firewall was until quite later... which was Windows XP workstations running its firewall capability. This ComCast Pro acct. was supposed to yield 5 static addresses, but this was later defined as 5 addresses randomly chosen from a 255.255.252.0-masked 68.60.x.x network and given extended lease parameters. Tech support found something wrong with the config of the CableModem, did a reset of all systems and still got no joy on the PIX...but the cable-modem jacked directly into the workstation would work. :( Just as a checklist for the obvious question Yes, I had already defined Unreachables, Echo-Reply, and Time-Exceeded to be allowed in from the outside. I then even simply changed the rule to allow ICMP Any Any (applied to the outside interface). I tried initially setting the PIX to try obtaining its IP via DHCP, but got nothing and the Tech Engineer didn't report seeing anything coming from the PIX over the CableModem in terms of BootP/DHCP requests. Hard-Coding the IP of what was learned from the DHCP successful assignment to the Workstation when it was connected directly to the CableModem yeilded the spotty results. If anyone has any tips or tricks on how to make this work, either via DHCP or Hard-coding the IP from the ISP, I'd be eternally greatful. The region of the ComCast Network that this is being attempted on is in Rome, Georgia. Thanks, Mark Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42509t=42509 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Power Session 2000 WAS RE: Networkers in San Diego [7:42508]
Are there any discounts for the CCIE power session aside from education/gov.'t? My company isn't paying for it, and I'd heavily prefer not to pay $450 (the $295 discount price is ok). - Sean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Cotts Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Power Session 2000 WAS RE: Networkers in San Diego [7:42474] Here's the URL for the CCIE Power Session for the 2000 Networkers. See if it is useful for you. padding padding http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw00/pres/3304/3304.htm -Original Message- From: Logan, Harold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 4:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Networkers in San Diego [7:42402] I'm trying to take the Monday one too. I don't know if I'll be able to though, because there are pseudo-mandatory networking academy events going on monday. Two of our other instructors are going though, so I'm going to try and get them to take one for the team while I do the CCIE power session. There's a second power session on friday, but it looks like I'm going to have to leave Thursday night. As for whether or not they're helpful, I've never been to networkers before. My only source of feedback from networkers is one of our instructors went last year, but he didn't do any of the power sessions. For the breakout sessions I'm going to try and take at least one that's on something I'm not even remotely knowledgeable of (probably MPLS) and I'll attend others on topics I'm weak on that are more likely to show up on the lab, as my lab date is in july. For those who went last year, did they have the CCIE power session then, and would you recommend it? Hal Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42508t=42508 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: wr mem ?( uploading a config) [7:42491]
Hi Jerry, As i suppose, after a copy tftp start the uploaded config is already stored in your startup config. What basically a wr mem does is to copy your running config into your startup config. I.e. after doing a wr mem, your just before copied file should be overwritten by your current running config. Any intended changes by the copied file will disappear. Peter Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42510t=42491 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
books for CCNP [7:42513]
Hi All, Can any one pls recommeneded books for CCNP for all the four exams:- 1)routing 2) switching 3)Remote access amp; 4) support. awaiting ur replies. Thanks in advance, Smart Student Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com Buy Music, Video, CD-ROM, Audio-Books and Music Accessories from http://www.planetm.co.in Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42513t=42513 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPN Solution [7:42514]
Hi Group Can anybody help me get links (samples) in cisco site, or has anybody implemented this solution can throw some light, for configuring a ios router with ipsec 56 feature pack (cisco1720) and vpn client 3.x with windows 2000 IAS Radius authentication, I searched and got only for Configuring PIX with vpn client 3.x and windows 2000 IAS Radius authentication. thanks in advance. Fahim CCNA, CCDA, CSS1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42514t=42514 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secret Clearance [7:42499]
What is this secret Clearance ? Kind Regards /Thangavel 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall . -- Nelson Mandela Stanford WongTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax to: Sent by: Subject: RE: Secret Clearance [7:42499] nobody@groups tudy.com 25/04/2002 06:46 Please respond to Stanford Wong The company or organization that will hirer you will take care of the paperwork. ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42515t=42499 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN MICA Modems [7:42516]
We are currently using a 3640 with PRI and MICA modems (all dial in users are authenticated via a TACACS server). For each user who dials in using an ISDN modem we configure a dialer interface with the users name in the dialer remote-name command. Is there anyway of avoiding this configuration task as more and more users are wanting to use ISDN modems as opposed to analogue modems? Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42516t=42516 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN Solution [7:42514]
Here ya go... Tim CCIE 9015 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/ios_usr_rad.html http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/ipsec_radius_config.html http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/ios-unity.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of fahim Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 4:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VPN Solution [7:42514] Hi Group Can anybody help me get links (samples) in cisco site, or has anybody implemented this solution can throw some light, for configuring a ios router with ipsec 56 feature pack (cisco1720) and vpn client 3.x with windows 2000 IAS Radius authentication, I searched and got only for Configuring PIX with vpn client 3.x and windows 2000 IAS Radius authentication. thanks in advance. Fahim CCNA, CCDA, CSS1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42517t=42514 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MRTG - Catalyst Switch CPU [7:42434]
u might the following sites useful : www.somix.org www.snmplink.org From: Patrick Kirk Reply-To: Patrick Kirk To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MRTG - Catalyst Switch CPU [7:42434] Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:46:38 -0400 Anybody know the OID for the CPU utilization for Catalyst switches? I'm trying to monitor them via MRTG and I can't find any OID's that will work. I've found 2 different values for the cmpCPUTotal5sec and cmpCPUTotal1min...neither of which seem to be working.. Anybody doing this w/ MRTG now that has a valid config file ? Thanks in advance. Patrick Kirk Network Engineer VSP http://www.vsp.com _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42518t=42434 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Udptn config [7:42519]
Hi guys has anybody done udptn config (especially to connect printer ) server-router---router-printer I m trying to print the data from server Any idea would be great. Bu mesaj ve mesaja eklenmis olan dosyalar, gvnderilen kisiye vzeldir. Eger mesaj bir hata sonucu size ulasmissa ve mesajin gvnderilmek istendigi kisi degilseniz, mesaji derhal siliniz ve l|tfen gvnderen kisiye olusan yanlisligi bildiriniz. Mesaj}n gvnderildipi ki~i siz depilseniz, mesaji ya da eklerini kopyalayamaz, ba~kas}na gvnderemez ve ba~kalar}na ag}klayamazs}n}z. Internet iletisiminde g|venlik ve hatasiz gvnderim garanti edilemeyeceginden, mesajin yerine ulasmamasi, geg ulasmasi,igeriginin bozulmasi yada mesajin virus tasimasi gibi problemler olusabilir. Gvnderen taraf, bu tip sorunlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. Bu mesajdaki ifadelerin t|m| mesaji gvnderen kisiye aittir. HSBC Bank A.S. mesajin gvnderiminden veya igeriginden sorumlu tutulamaz. This message and any attachments are confidential to the ordinary user of the e-mail address to which it was addressed and may also be privileged. If you are not the addressee, you may not copy, forward, disclose or use any part of this message or its attachments in any way. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete it from your system. Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, arrive late or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the context of this message which arise as a result of Internet transmission.Any opinions contained in this message are those of the author and are not given or endorsed by the HSBC Group company or office through which this message is sent. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42519t=42519 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EIGRP routing issue. [7:42479]
Im am not sure why this is happening but I'ill take a stab at it. If a router that is running EIGRP borders 2 major network (i.e. 209.53.131.0 Router-208.181.160.0) and auto-summary is turned on within the EIGRP config, it will advertise the 208.181.160.0/24 to the network. It will also add the 208.181.160.0/24 to the route table and point it to Null 0. (Im not sure why it does this but I bet its to prevent a routing loop) You can try to turn the auto-summ off on that router. Again I am not sure whats going on here but that is my guess. Hope this helps :) Karim Gueye Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42520t=42479 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secret Clearance [7:42499]
There was a huge thread on this not too long ago. If you search the archives you can probably find all the information you need to know on this subject! Shawn K. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 5:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Secret Clearance [7:42499] What is this secret Clearance ? Kind Regards /Thangavel 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall . -- Nelson Mandela Stanford WongTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax to: Sent by: Subject: RE: Secret Clearance [7:42499] nobody@groups tudy.com 25/04/2002 06:46 Please respond to Stanford Wong The company or organization that will hirer you will take care of the paperwork. ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42522t=42499 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secret Clearance [7:42499]
One'a them cut'n'paste link things are gonna follow. http://www.dss.mil/psi/ Kaminski, Shawn G 04/25/02 07:52AM There was a huge thread on this not too long ago. If you search the archives you can probably find all the information you need to know on this subject! Shawn K. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 5:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Secret Clearance [7:42499] What is this secret Clearance ? Kind Regards /Thangavel 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall . -- Nelson Mandela Stanford WongTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax to: Sent by: Subject: RE: Secret Clearance [7:42499] nobody@groups tudy.com 25/04/2002 06:46 Please respond to Stanford Wong The company or organization that will hirer you will take care of the paperwork. ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Confidentiality Disclaimer This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc. (WellStar) and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42523t=42499 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: books for CCNP [7:42513]
Hi, I used to work with the four-book Cisco CCNP Certification Library by CiscoPress. There is one book per exam, a CD with CBT software per exam is included. It's very helpful although there are some bugs in the CBT (it asks for multiple answers but offers only radio buttons with one answer possibility only) Peter Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42524t=42513 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7507 subinterface [7:42525]
i have a 7507 that i created a subinterface on (int fa4/0/0.1) and I no longer need it. I did a no int fa4/0/0.1 and it took it ok. It does not show up in the show run but when I do a sh ip int brief it shows up but as deleted. Even though it is not in use or affecting anything, will it still always show up in sh ip int brief? Is there a way to get it out of the sh ip int brief? Jeremy Wright Network Analyst Archer Daniels Midland [EMAIL PROTECTED] (217)451-4063 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42525t=42525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: books for CCNP [7:42513]
I used the Cisco Press books. But with the tests I am not if they are going to release new books or not. Don - Original Message - From: Smart Student To: Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 3:39 AM Subject: books for CCNP [7:42513] Hi All, Can any one pls recommeneded books for CCNP for all the four exams:- 1)routing 2) switching 3)Remote access amp; 4) support. awaiting ur replies. Thanks in advance, Smart Student Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com Buy Music, Video, CD-ROM, Audio-Books and Music Accessories from http://www.planetm.co.in Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42526t=42513 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trunk across Cisco Wireless bridge [7:42528]
I have inherited a new network and see something that is causing a bad feeling. There are two buildings (about a mile apart). They are currently using wireless across them. (Primary is the Cisco 100mb wireless solution, backup is the 11mb version). They are trunking across the wireless to another Cisco switch. The 100mb portion of this isnt the problem for me. The problem is that across this link they have another wireless setup (11 mb version) that trunks to another building a few 100 feet up the road. Why do I see this as a problem? The third building mentions is on the VTP domain controlled by the switch at the first building. ie its default interface is on the Catalyst 6509 in the first building. All traffic is going across the 11mb wireless link, across another 100mb wireless link, to the catalyst 6509. Do you agree with my assessment? Are there any white papers that can assist me in my point? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42528t=42528 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7507 subinterface [7:42525]
a reboot clear this this happens quite a bit with various sub interfaces and dlci's not used on a frame circuit. -Patrick Wright, Jeremy 04/25/02 08:47AM i have a 7507 that i created a subinterface on (int fa4/0/0.1) and I no longer need it. I did a no int fa4/0/0.1 and it took it ok. It does not show up in the show run but when I do a sh ip int brief it shows up but as deleted. Even though it is not in use or affecting anything, will it still always show up in sh ip int brief? Is there a way to get it out of the sh ip int brief? Jeremy Wright Network Analyst Archer Daniels Midland [EMAIL PROTECTED] (217)451-4063 Confidentiality Disclaimer This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc. (WellStar) and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42529t=42525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP Load Balancing Question [7:42469]
I am experiencing a similar problem, using one provider with two T1s. Utilization appears to significantly favor one interface over the other. I realize there will be some variation, but considering its a discrepancy of 75% vs. 3% (these are numbers from our provider) I've talked to the provider; each time I receive a different configuration. Is there a command that would better show the load balancing/utilization rates. I'm trying to become more familiar with BGP through my CCNP studies, but haven't gotten that far yet Thanks in advance for the help! I'm not sure I understand what you are describing. Are you saying that the BGP routes you receive from your provider are mainly coming over one link rather than the other? Or, are you saying that your inbound/outbound loads are uneven? Can you be a little more specific, perhaps, even show some snapshots of the interfaces? And your BGP neigh stats? My first suspicion, (if you are talking about inbound/outbound traffic loads) would be that caching has caused this load disparity. Do you know if CEF was implemented? -chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42530t=42469 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 7507 subinterface [7:42525]
thats what i thought..but of course its a production router and i wont be able to reboot it anytime soon. thanks for the help. -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 7:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 7507 subinterface [7:42525] a reboot clear this this happens quite a bit with various sub interfaces and dlci's not used on a frame circuit. -Patrick Wright, Jeremy 04/25/02 08:47AM i have a 7507 that i created a subinterface on (int fa4/0/0.1) and I no longer need it. I did a no int fa4/0/0.1 and it took it ok. It does not show up in the show run but when I do a sh ip int brief it shows up but as deleted. Even though it is not in use or affecting anything, will it still always show up in sh ip int brief? Is there a way to get it out of the sh ip int brief? Jeremy Wright Network Analyst Archer Daniels Midland [EMAIL PROTECTED] (217)451-4063 Confidentiality Disclaimer This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc. (WellStar) and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42531t=42525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF over ISDN demand circuit [7:42348]
Why not just deny the OSPF traffic in the dialer list, thereby declaring it uninteresting to bring up the link, but okay to pass over the link once the call has been established. Or, how about the no peer neighbor-route statement?Thoughts? From CCO: Under the BRI interface that is running demand circuit, configure no peer neighbor-route. This prevents the /32 mask from being installed. You can use the configuration shown below on Router 1 only, but we recommend configuring this command on both sides for consistency. R1#configure terminal R1(config)#interface BRI1/1 R1(config-if)#no peer neighbor-route -Jeremy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erick B. Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OSPF over ISDN demand circuit [7:42348] Hi, Having passive for the ISDN int would stop OSPF multicast hellos from going across the ISDN interface. You could still do a neighbor statement though which is unicast however. If the ISDN is bouncing, it's probably due to a route-redistribution problem or some form of IP traffic going out the ISDN interface. Do you have other routing protocols sending updates out ISDN (use passive interface for those routing protocols). Check your redistribution, do you have filters to not allow the ISDN/dialer interface IP subnet to be redistributed into OSPF again? To see whats triggering the ISDN/dialer int do: show dialer (should have a reason) debug interface bri/dialer debug ip pack (see note below) Debug ip pack generates a lot of output and might/will crash the router so be careful with it. If you use the debug interface (interface) condition then the debug output will only show traffic in/out of the interface specified which will narrow down the output. --- timothy thielen wrote: If one wishes for routing updates to bring up the link, can one not just use the passive-interface command on the ISDN interface? If it is a backup link, passive interface will keep routing updates will keep the link from coming up for updates. Then a couple of floating static routes on either end should bring it up if the primary (dynamic)link goes down as long as the administrative distance for the floaters are greater then that of OSPF. --Tim Ruihai An wrote: Hi, Group, On an ISDN circuit running ospf , if I want to use ip ospf demand-circuit to keep it from being brought up by ospf update, do I need to define 224.0.0.5 as non-interesting traffic in dialer-list? I have configured ip ospf demand-circuit on one side of the ISDN, but routing update to 224.0.0.5 keeps activating the circuit? What is the problem? Thanks Ruihai [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42532t=42348 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Secret Clearance [7:42499]
I shouldn't respond to a OT thread, but FYI, I had my persoanl interview by a DSS agent back in Decemberstill waiting. Oh, the process began in May 2000. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42534t=42499 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 7507 subinterface [7:42533]
thanks everyone for the help. -Original Message- From: Abidin Kahraman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 8:16 AM To: Wright, Jeremy; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: 7507 subinterface Reload it. Abidin. -Original Message- From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 3:48 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: 7507 subinterface i have a 7507 that i created a subinterface on (int fa4/0/0.1) and I no longer need it. I did a no int fa4/0/0.1 and it took it ok. It does not show up in the show run but when I do a sh ip int brief it shows up but as deleted. Even though it is not in use or affecting anything, will it still always show up in sh ip int brief? Is there a way to get it out of the sh ip int brief? Jeremy Wright Network Analyst Archer Daniels Midland [EMAIL PROTECTED] (217)451-4063 _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. *** Bu e-posta mesaji ve ekleri sadece gonderildigi kisi veya kuruma ozeldir. Eger dogru kisiye ulasmadigini dusunuyorsaniz, bu mesajin gizlenmesi, yonlendirilmesi, kopyalanmasi veya herhangi bir sekilde kullanilmasi yasaktir. Mesaj iceriginde bulunan fikir ve yorumlar, Superonline'a degil sadece gondericiye aittir. Bu mesaj bilinen tum viruslere karsi test edilmistir. *** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, forwarding, copying or use of any of the information is prohibited. The opinions expressed in this message belong to sender alone. There is no implied endorsement by SUPERONLINE. This e-mail has been scanned for all known computer viruses. *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42533t=42533 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 7507 subinterface [7:42535]
Till you reload the router even a year it'll be there without any effects :) -Original Message- From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 Nisan 2002 Per:embe 15:48 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: 7507 subinterface i have a 7507 that i created a subinterface on (int fa4/0/0.1) and I no longer need it. I did a no int fa4/0/0.1 and it took it ok. It does not show up in the show run but when I do a sh ip int brief it shows up but as deleted. Even though it is not in use or affecting anything, will it still always show up in sh ip int brief? Is there a way to get it out of the sh ip int brief? Jeremy Wright Network Analyst Archer Daniels Midland [EMAIL PROTECTED] (217)451-4063 _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. *** Bu e-posta mesaji ve ekleri sadece gonderildigi kisi veya kuruma ozeldir. Eger dogru kisiye ulasmadigini dusunuyorsaniz, bu mesajin gizlenmesi, yonlendirilmesi, kopyalanmasi veya herhangi bir sekilde kullanilmasi yasaktir. Mesaj iceriginde bulunan fikir ve yorumlar, Superonline'a degil sadece gondericiye aittir. Bu mesaj bilinen tum viruslere karsi test edilmistir. *** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, forwarding, copying or use of any of the information is prohibited. The opinions expressed in this message belong to sender alone. There is no implied endorsement by SUPERONLINE. This e-mail has been scanned for all known computer viruses. *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42535t=42535 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheap terminal server? [7:42536]
Can anyone recommend a cheap terminal server, used only for reverse telnet remote management? I only need three lines and I don't want to spend the cash on a 2509. Anyone like the STS10x? Any other suggestions? Thanks, Craig Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42536t=42536 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: traffic engineering exercises [7:42504]
Tom Scott wrote: From the GMPLS/CCAMP TE draft: Thus we have a more general notion of a TE link. A TE link is a logical link that has TE properties. The link is logical in a sense that it represents a way to group/map the information about certain physical resources (and their properties) into the information that is used by Constrained SPF for the purpose of path computation, and by GMPLS signaling. This grouping/mapping must be done consistently at both ends of the link. LMP [LMP] could be used to check/verify this consistency. Has anyone written exercises that will work on affordable CCIE/CCNP labs? In addition to TE, there's also the evolution toward a simplified stack for those who like to stay close to the wire. An easy-read intro to GMPLS and the simplified stack, Will GMPLS replace ATM and SONET/SDH in the next few years?: http://198.11.21.25/capstoneTest/Students/Papers/docs/FinalPaper_Proceeding310218.pdf See figure 1 (p. 2): IP ATM IP IP SONET/SDHATM SONET/SDH IP/GMPLS Optical/DWDM Optical/DWDM Optical/DWDM Optical/GMPLS As Cisco was a prime move in the CCAMP/GMPLS WG, I hope we'll see support in IOS and hardware soon, if not already, for labs related to minimal-stack optical transport. I understand that the intended application would be high-bandwidth cores at OC-192, OC-768 and into the terabit range. But it still should be possible to find affordable modules/interfaces that support, say, just a few lambdas, maybe using VCSELs instead of the more expensive lasers? Anybody building those gadgets in your basement? -- TT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42537t=42504 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP routing issue. [7:42479]
auto summary, which is default, does that to/for you Dave Keith Woodworth wrote: We had a /24 that was not being used in one part of our network any longer. It was routed through 2 RSM's on a Cat5500 switch. As well the network was in an EIGRP AS that we do for IGP routing on both RSM's. So the network was removed from the EIGRP system, a new static route was put in on our gateway router for said network. Everything works on the new network except for getting to some internal sites...The interesting part is when doing a sh ip route on the RSM's I see this: D208.181.160.0/24 is a summary, 1w4d, Null0 Now why did the RSM's suddenly route that network to null0? My workstation is connected to the RSM's and I cannot ping any IP's on that subnet since that network is now being routed to null. That network is definately gone from the EIGRP statement. Here is the output of sho ip proto for the eigrp AS: Routing Protocol is eigrp 100 Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set Default networks flagged in outgoing updates Default networks accepted from incoming updates EIGRP metric weight K1=1, K2=0, K3=1, K4=0, K5=0 EIGRP maximum hopcount 100 EIGRP maximum metric variance 1 Redistributing: connected, eigrp 100 Automatic network summarization is not in effect Routing for Networks: 209.53.131.0 209.53.132.0 209.53.133.0 209.53.134.0 209.53.135.0 208.181.161.0 64.0.0.0 === Cut -== so what do I do about getting the RSMs to take out the routing statement for that network? Would EIGRP have just a done an update when the network statement was removed? Thanks for any input on this... Keith -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42538t=42479 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wanted!! Cisco CallManager 3.1 or 3.2 S/W for H/lab [7:42539]
Please reply directed. I am interested in purchasing a proper CCM CDs preferably with the installation books. Will pay for shipment and I am UK based. George. P.S. Anybody sat the 3.2 exams? Your views please. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42539t=42539 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE 350-001 [7:42344]
there is no shortcut or cramming!, it is a time compression! --- Shahid Muhammad Shafi wrote: one line for u Khalid There is no shortcut to success Objectives are 90 percent same for both tests then why worry. I think u r worried all those shortcuts or Cramming wont work. If u r prepared give the new one and save mnoney plus accept the challenge!!! I am sitting for it on May 6th, u can also book it. Why afraid dude, just do it and forget about shortcuts. --- khalid ameen wrote: what about the old one, still the topics is the same and the questions database still the same cause we heared about the changing in the CCNP exams is that also about CCIE old exam 350-001 --- Kris Keen wrote: I enquired about this with the CCIE Team. They explained the beta runs to May 7th, after that time it will take serveral weeks to evaluate the exam and results. I'd say the new exam will take effect in about 6-8 weeks. I will be sitting the old one [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Shahid Muhammad Shafi Every man dies; not every man really lives Please help feed hungry people worldwide http://www.hungersite.com/ A small thing each of us can do to help others less fortunate than ourselves __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42540t=42344 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP Load Balancing Question [7:42469]
The Ts are connected to two different routers at different locations The IP space is the providers What do you mean full vs. default/partial routes (Pardon my ignorance; I wish LAN/WAN communications was the only thing to work on)? Thanks for the quick response! -Original Message- From: Lupi, Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BGP Load Balancing Question [7:42469] Are the t1's connected to different routers in the providers POP, or to geographically diverse POP's? Is the IP space your own ARIN assigned space or the providers? Do you take full bgp routes or just a default or partial routes? Any answer would depend on the answers to these questions. As far as seeing the real load balancing, use MRTG to graph the interfaces, that will give you a good idea of how your bandwidth is being utilized. ~-Original Message- ~From: Jablonski, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ~Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:49 PM ~To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~Subject: BGP Load Balancing Question [7:42469] ~ ~ ~I am experiencing a similar problem, using one provider with two T1s. ~Utilization appears to significantly favor one interface over ~the other. I ~realize there will be some variation, but considering its a ~discrepancy of ~75% vs. 3% (these are numbers from our provider) I've ~talked to the ~provider; each time I receive a different configuration. ~ ~Is there a command that would better show the load ~balancing/utilization ~rates. I'm trying to become more familiar with BGP through my ~CCNP studies, ~but haven't gotten that far yet Thanks in advance for the help! ~ ~ ~ ~Michael Jablonski ~ABN AMRO Asset Management Holdings, Inc. ~161 North Clark St. ~9th Flr ~Chicago, IL 60601-2468 ~PH: 312.884.2996 ~FAX: 312.278.5550 ~ This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (including its group companies) shall not be responsible nor liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (or its group companies) does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42541t=42469 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cheap terminal server? [7:42536]
here comes the link http://www.lantronix.com/ there goes the link -Patrick Craig Columbus 04/25/02 09:37AM Can anyone recommend a cheap terminal server, used only for reverse telnet remote management? I only need three lines and I don't want to spend the cash on a 2509. Anyone like the STS10x? Any other suggestions? Thanks, Craig Confidentiality Disclaimer This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc. (WellStar) and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42543t=42536 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cheap terminal server? [7:42536]
An old 486, a handful of serial cards and linux Craig Columbus Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 25/04/2002 14:37 Please respond to Craig Columbus To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Cheap terminal server? [7:42536] Can anyone recommend a cheap terminal server, used only for reverse telnet remote management? I only need three lines and I don't want to spend the cash on a 2509. Anyone like the STS10x? Any other suggestions? Thanks, Craig Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42542t=42536 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please confirm (conf#fa1265b7ef286b596b026270a5ea7bb0) [7:42544]
cofirmed - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 7:24 PM Subject: Please confirm (conf#fa1265b7ef286b596b026270a5ea7bb0) Hi, You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. Because the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED. By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. 3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. 5. The message is NOT inflammatory. 6. The message is NOT a test message. To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. Welcome to GroupStudy.com! --ORIGINAL MESSAGE- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 25 09:54:20 2002 Received: from hotmail.com (oe65.law3.hotmail.com [209.185.240.81]) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA09274 GroupStudy Mailer; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:54:20 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:54:52 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [203.199.179.99] From: Brahmam To: Subject: IOS- DHCP Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:30:02 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2002 13:54:52.0697 (UTC) FILETIME=[C60EF890:01C1EC60] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I configured IOS-Dhcp on cisco 1751 with 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.128 = network. And i have another Dhcp server running on windows 2000 server = with ip pool 192.168.1.100-200=20 All clients are dhcp enabled and they are getting ip's from 192.168.1.x = not from 192.168.2.x.=20 configuration as follows ip dhcp pool 0 network 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.128 domain-name livetech dns-server 202.54.30.1 netbios-node-type h-node default-router 192.168.2.15=20 kindly give me some idea. Thanx Brahmam. --=_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable charset=3Diso-8859-1 Hi, nbsp; I configured IOS-Dhcp on cisco 1751 = with=20 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.128 network. And i have another Dhcp server = running on=20 windows 2000 server with ip pool 192.168.1.100-200 All clients are dhcp enabled and they = are getting=20 ip's from 192.168.1.x not from 192.168.2.x. nbsp; configuration as follows nbsp; ip dhcp pool 0 network 192.168.2.0 = 255.255.255.128 domain-name livetech dns-server 202.54.30.1 netbios-node-type h-node default-router 192.168.2.15 = nbsp; kindly give me some idea. nbsp; Thanx Brahmam. nbsp; --=_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320-- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42544t=42544 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: Please confirm (conf#fa1265b7ef286b596b026270a5ea7bb0) [7:42545]
- Original Message - From: Brahmam To: Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 8:18 PM Subject: Re: Please confirm (conf#fa1265b7ef286b596b026270a5ea7bb0) cofirmed - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 7:24 PM Subject: Please confirm (conf#fa1265b7ef286b596b026270a5ea7bb0) Hi, You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. Because the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED. By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. 3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. 5. The message is NOT inflammatory. 6. The message is NOT a test message. To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. Welcome to GroupStudy.com! --ORIGINAL MESSAGE- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 25 09:54:20 2002 Received: from hotmail.com (oe65.law3.hotmail.com [209.185.240.81]) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA09274 GroupStudy Mailer; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:54:20 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:54:52 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [203.199.179.99] From: Brahmam To: Subject: IOS- DHCP Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:30:02 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2002 13:54:52.0697 (UTC) FILETIME=[C60EF890:01C1EC60] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I configured IOS-Dhcp on cisco 1751 with 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.128 = network. And i have another Dhcp server running on windows 2000 server = with ip pool 192.168.1.100-200=20 All clients are dhcp enabled and they are getting ip's from 192.168.1.x = not from 192.168.2.x.=20 configuration as follows ip dhcp pool 0 network 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.128 domain-name livetech dns-server 202.54.30.1 netbios-node-type h-node default-router 192.168.2.15=20 kindly give me some idea. Thanx Brahmam. --=_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable charset=3Diso-8859-1 Hi, nbsp; I configured IOS-Dhcp on cisco 1751 = with=20 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.128 network. And i have another Dhcp server = running on=20 windows 2000 server with ip pool 192.168.1.100-200 All clients are dhcp enabled and they = are getting=20 ip's from 192.168.1.x not from 192.168.2.x. nbsp; configuration as follows nbsp; ip dhcp pool 0 network 192.168.2.0 = 255.255.255.128 domain-name livetech dns-server 202.54.30.1 netbios-node-type h-node default-router 192.168.2.15 = nbsp; kindly give me some idea. nbsp; Thanx Brahmam. nbsp; --=_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320-- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42545t=42545 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: Please confirm (conf#fa1265b7ef286b596b026270a5ea7bb0) [7:42546]
- Original Message - From: Brahmam To: Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 8:18 PM Subject: Re: Please confirm (conf#fa1265b7ef286b596b026270a5ea7bb0) cofirmed - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 7:24 PM Subject: Please confirm (conf#fa1265b7ef286b596b026270a5ea7bb0) Hi, You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. Because the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED. By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. 3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. 5. The message is NOT inflammatory. 6. The message is NOT a test message. To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. Welcome to GroupStudy.com! --ORIGINAL MESSAGE- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 25 09:54:20 2002 Received: from hotmail.com (oe65.law3.hotmail.com [209.185.240.81]) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA09274 GroupStudy Mailer; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:54:20 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:54:52 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [203.199.179.99] From: Brahmam To: Subject: IOS- DHCP Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:30:02 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2002 13:54:52.0697 (UTC) FILETIME=[C60EF890:01C1EC60] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I configured IOS-Dhcp on cisco 1751 with 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.128 = network. And i have another Dhcp server running on windows 2000 server = with ip pool 192.168.1.100-200=20 All clients are dhcp enabled and they are getting ip's from 192.168.1.x = not from 192.168.2.x.=20 configuration as follows ip dhcp pool 0 network 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.128 domain-name livetech dns-server 202.54.30.1 netbios-node-type h-node default-router 192.168.2.15=20 kindly give me some idea. Thanx Brahmam. --=_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable charset=3Diso-8859-1 Hi, nbsp; I configured IOS-Dhcp on cisco 1751 = with=20 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.128 network. And i have another Dhcp server = running on=20 windows 2000 server with ip pool 192.168.1.100-200 All clients are dhcp enabled and they = are getting=20 ip's from 192.168.1.x not from 192.168.2.x. nbsp; configuration as follows nbsp; ip dhcp pool 0 network 192.168.2.0 = 255.255.255.128 domain-name livetech dns-server 202.54.30.1 netbios-node-type h-node default-router 192.168.2.15 = nbsp; kindly give me some idea. nbsp; Thanx Brahmam. nbsp; --=_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320-- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42546t=42546 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please confirm (conf#c738bac846755a28c2b915c47c196db0) [7:42549]
MHotMailBE915786004D400432563F68324B12AE0; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:02:46 -0700 Received: (from mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA07292;Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:48:02 -0400 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:03:30 -0700 Message-Id: X-AskVersion: 1.2a (http://www.paganini.net/ask) Hi, You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. Because the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED. By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. 3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. 5. The message is NOT inflammatory. 6. The message is NOT a test message. To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. Welcome to GroupStudy.com! --ORIGINAL MESSAGE- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 25 09:48:01 2002 Received: from hotmail.com (oe39.law3.hotmail.com [209.185.240.207]) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA07268 GroupStudy Mailer; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:48:01 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:48:33 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [203.199.179.99] From: Brahmam To: Subject: NAT configuration for web server with local ip Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:23:35 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_00B8_01C1EC8E.B1AEAB10 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2002 13:48:33.0511 (UTC) FILETIME=[E40BC770:01C1EC5F] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_00B8_01C1EC8E.B1AEAB10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable HI, I configured NAT overload for providing browsing facility to internal = clients on LAN. When i try with static nat for a webserver its not = working. Any idea. I used # ip nat inside source static 203.199.179.109 192.168.1.6=20 it doesnt work. Kindly help me. Thanks Brahmam. --=_NextPart_000_00B8_01C1EC8E.B1AEAB10 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable charset=3Diso-8859-1 HI, nbsp; I configured NAT overload for providing = browsing=20 facility to internal clients on LAN. When i try with static nat for a = webserver=20 its not working. Any idea. nbsp; I used # ip nat inside source static=20 203.199.179.109 192.168.1.6 nbsp; it doesnt work. nbsp; Kindly help me. nbsp; Thanks Brahmam. nbsp; --=_NextPart_000_00B8_01C1EC8E.B1AEAB10-- _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42549t=42549 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please confirm (conf#fa1265b7ef286b596b026270a5ea7bb0) [7:42550]
MHotMailBE91562C007B4136E8213F68324B10EA0; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:57:00 -0700 Received: (from mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA09299;Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:54:21 -0400 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:57:49 -0700 Message-Id: X-AskVersion: 1.2a (http://www.paganini.net/ask) Hi, You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. Because the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED. By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. 3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. 5. The message is NOT inflammatory. 6. The message is NOT a test message. To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. Welcome to GroupStudy.com! --ORIGINAL MESSAGE- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 25 09:54:20 2002 Received: from hotmail.com (oe65.law3.hotmail.com [209.185.240.81]) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA09274 GroupStudy Mailer; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:54:20 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:54:52 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [203.199.179.99] From: Brahmam To: Subject: IOS- DHCP Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:30:02 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2002 13:54:52.0697 (UTC) FILETIME=[C60EF890:01C1EC60] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I configured IOS-Dhcp on cisco 1751 with 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.128 = network. And i have another Dhcp server running on windows 2000 server = with ip pool 192.168.1.100-200=20 All clients are dhcp enabled and they are getting ip's from 192.168.1.x = not from 192.168.2.x.=20 configuration as follows ip dhcp pool 0 network 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.128 domain-name livetech dns-server 202.54.30.1 netbios-node-type h-node default-router 192.168.2.15=20 kindly give me some idea. Thanx Brahmam. --=_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable charset=3Diso-8859-1 Hi, nbsp; I configured IOS-Dhcp on cisco 1751 = with=20 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.128 network. And i have another Dhcp server = running on=20 windows 2000 server with ip pool 192.168.1.100-200 All clients are dhcp enabled and they = are getting=20 ip's from 192.168.1.x not from 192.168.2.x. nbsp; configuration as follows nbsp; ip dhcp pool 0 network 192.168.2.0 = 255.255.255.128 domain-name livetech dns-server 202.54.30.1 netbios-node-type h-node default-router 192.168.2.15 = nbsp; kindly give me some idea. nbsp; Thanx Brahmam. nbsp; --=_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320-- _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42550t=42550 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: All-In-One CCIE Study Guide - Second Edition [7:42292]
Type rossi pdf token ring in google and select one of the options On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Oxman, Steve wrote: | Koen | You refer to the Rossi paper for token ring, do you know where I can get | a copy of this? | Regards | Steve | | -Original Message- | From: Koen Zeilstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: Wednesday, 24 April 2002 6:08 AM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: RE: All-In-One CCIE Study Guide - Second Edition [7:42292] | | | Are we talking about the same book? | I am referring to this one. (watch for wrap) | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0072127600/qid=1019592419/sr=8-3/ | ref=sr_8_7_3/104-8586207-1795929 | | Not sure though if that's the one you mean. | | On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Pierre-Alex GUANEL wrote: | | | Good luck to you, .. one more question. Are the mistakes in the second | | edition of Giles in the multiple choice questions or in the text | itself? | | | | Pierre-Alex | | | | | | | | -Original Message- | | From: Koen Zeilstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Koen Zeilstra | | Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:10 AM | | To: Pierre-Alex GUANEL | | Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Subject: Re: All-In-One CCIE Study Guide - Second Edition [7:42292] | | | | | | Pierre, | | | | I am reading the second edition at the moment. Will go for the written | | tomorrow. Until so far I like the book very much, although it still | | contains errors. | | | | K. | | | | Koen Zeilstra | | Legian | | --- | | Trying to define yourself is like trying to bite your own teeth. | | -- Alan Watts | | | | On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Pierre-Alex GUANEL wrote: | | | | | Is the second edition of Giles' book a reliable study source. | | | | | | I read that the first edition was crippled with mistakes and I would | like | | to | | | know if all of them got fixed in the Second Edition. | | | | | | | | | Thank you! | | | | | | Pierre-Alex | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42548t=42292 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DSL traffic monitoring [7:42551]
Group Does anyone know of any software that can confirm the speed at which my DSL connection is set to. Thanks = Please confirm receipt of message by phone/fax ++44 (0)7092152779 or email or Yahoo! messenger: ogunbanjol __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42551t=42551 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: how to share 1 Ethernet interface. possible? [7:42487]
Yes! that's exactly my case! Connect to the ISP via DHCP-assigned IP address, and needs another IP for the Internet interface - both occur on the same interface! However, my case differ from the example in which I can only assign the Ethernet interface a real IP using DHCP, and My 2610 won't allow DHCP+secondary IP either. Thanks anyway for your input. I also quite feel that it is impossible. hktco - Original Message - From: Lupi, Guy To: 'hktco' ; Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 9:37 AM Subject: RE: how to share 1 Ethernet interface. possible? [7:42487] There is a way to do this, but it is shady. I didn't think I would ever see a reason to use this, but your situation is described exactly in this document. If you are like most cable/dsl customers you have a bridge in your house, and your address probably doesn't change all that often. I believe a friend said his only changes once every 3 months. You would have to modify your config when your address changed, but this would work. Your probably better off buying a Linksys for 100 dollars. Unfortunately I don't believe you can assign a secondary address when you have specified that the interface uses dhcp, at least not on any of my routers. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/nat-on-stick.html ~-Original Message- ~From: hktco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ~Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:46 PM ~To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~Subject: how to share 1 Ethernet interface. possible? [7:42487] ~ ~ ~I have only ***one*** ethernet interface on 2610 and it needs to be ~both a dhcp client and assigned a static IP. i.e. something like: ~ ~int e0/0 ~ ip address dhcp ~ ip add 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0 ~ ~but in practice, it is NOT allowed. Also I tried to use subinterfaces, ~and again, it won't let me to achieve the above implementation. ~ ~ ~The reason I am doing this is that I am trying to share my broadband ~connection through the Cisco ~router. That's why it must be a DHCP client so that it can ~grab an IP from ~the ~ISP. ~ ~Then I'll need another ethernet interface to connect to my inside LAN! ~but pathetically, I have only 1 physical ethernet interface!!! ~ ~Could there be any workaround? Thanks ~ ~hktco Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42552t=42487 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cheap terminal server? [7:42536]
Where did you find an STS10!?!?!? I would like on for my little museum, I have a couple AGS's, CGS's and MGS's, haven't seen an STS in 10 years!! Dave Craig Columbus wrote: Can anyone recommend a cheap terminal server, used only for reverse telnet remote management? I only need three lines and I don't want to spend the cash on a 2509. Anyone like the STS10x? Any other suggestions? Thanks, Craig -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42553t=42536 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP Load Balancing Question [7:42469]
Inbound/Outbound loads are out of wack what part of the BGP neigh stats do you want to see? Serial0/0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is QUICC with integrated T1 CSU/DSU Description: To provider1 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1536 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 255/255, load 5/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 77766, LMI stat recvd 77766, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 0 LMI type is ANSI Annex D frame relay DTE Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 12963/0, interface broadcasts 3 Last input 00:00:04, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters never Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue 0/40, 5642 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops 5 minute input rate 181000 bits/sec, 35 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 31000 bits/sec, 8 packets/sec 14791247 packets input, 3209509245 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 1 giants, 0 throttles 15143 input errors, 593 CRC, 8555 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 5994 abort 6400415 packets output, 2339275311 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 8 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 3 carrier transitions DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up Serial0/1 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is QUICC with integrated T1 CSU/DSU Description: To provider2 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1536 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 255/255, load 6/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 77769, LMI stat recvd 77768, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 0 LMI type is ANSI Annex D frame relay DTE Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 12964/0, interface broadcasts 3 Last input 00:00:05, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters never Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue 0/40, 9587 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 38000 bits/sec, 13 packets/sec 183425 packets input, 8800740 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 2893 input errors, 628 CRC, 2175 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 90 abort 6083912 packets output, 2163859526 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 7 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 3 carrier transitions DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up -Original Message- From: Kane, Christopher A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 7:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BGP Load Balancing Question [7:42469] I'm not sure I understand what you are describing. Are you saying that the BGP routes you receive from your provider are mainly coming over one link rather than the other? Or, are you saying that your inbound/outbound loads are uneven? Can you be a little more specific, perhaps, even show some snapshots of the interfaces? And your BGP neigh stats? My first suspicion, (if you are talking about inbound/outbound traffic loads) would be that caching has caused this load disparity. Do you know if CEF was implemented? -chris This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (including its group companies) shall not be responsible nor liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (or its group companies) does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42554t=42469 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP RTP Priority command [7:42555]
I'm wanting to use the IP RTP Priority command but I'm running into a couple of situations that aren't covered by any documentation I can find and wanted to see if anyone else knew or had used this and could offer some suggestions: BTW, I'm doing this on a 4700M+ with IOS 12.1(9) with a OC-3 ATM module and two FastEthernet modules. 1) When using the 'ip rtp priority' command you must configure a range of UDP ports (no problem) but then you *must* specify a bandwidth restriction, and the range is from 0-2000 Kbps... No where in the docs does it specify that 2000 Kbps is the maximum you can use, but it seems I'm limited. 2) It appears you can only configure this command on a physical interface, not a subinterface. Example. When trying to use this command on an ATM PVC (subinterface) it lets you enter the command, but then I get the following error: Router(config-subif)#ip rtp priority 2300 63 2000 IP RTP: Not enough bandwidth: available 0 needed 2000 This ATM subinterface is configured with a 'bandwidth 4', so I can't figure out why is says 'available 0'. It does the same on the FastEthernet subinterfaces (for an ISL trunk). If this is the case, then this sux azz because in our WAN core we have an OC-12, and from the looks of it, I can only give up to 2Mbps priority to RTP traffic (to the actual OC-12 interface). Since we're looking at running (the equivalent) of 10 T1 voice trunks through our core, we would want up to 15Mbps reserved for RTP (not including overhead). The only solution I can think of is to use the G.729a/b compression to reduce the voice traffic 8:1 so that 10 voice trunks would only require 1.5Mbps, which isn't a bad solution, but I can't believe Cisco would be so shortsighted as to only allow you to reserve 2Mbps of bandwidth for RTP traffic no matter what the bandwidth of the interface (i.e. OC-3 or OC-12). Otherwise, it looks like I'll have to go with PQ or something. Does using LLQ (which is really just a single Priority queue on top of CBWFQ) have a similar restriction? My goal in using IP RTP Priority was that I could configure all interfaces in the voice path with a single command instead of configuring Priority queues or Classes (with CBWFQ in LLQ) on every router/interface. As a side question: When configuring subinterfaces, can you only apply a queueing method to the physical interface or can you apply different queueing methods to subinterfaces? Does the queueing method on the physical interface override the queueing configured on the subinterfaces? AHH!!! Any input or suggestions? TIA, Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42555t=42555 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: books for CCNP [7:42513]
I also used the Cisco Press books along with Boson exams. Worked for me =) Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42556t=42513 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DSL traffic monitoring [7:42551]
www.dslreports.com or more precisely here http://www.dslreports.com/tools Nilesh Larry Ogunbanjo wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Group Does anyone know of any software that can confirm the speed at which my DSL connection is set to. Thanks = Please confirm receipt of message by phone/fax ++44 (0)7092152779 or email or Yahoo! messenger: ogunbanjol __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42557t=42551 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP routing issue. [7:42479]
I was doing some more indepth reading in EIGRP and thats what I had come to as well, but we had no auto-summary in the eigrp config. I ended solving it by putting in a static route. Packets were getting in but not getting out. Keith On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, MADMAN wrote: |- |- auto summary, which is default, does that to/for you |- |- Dave |- |-Keith Woodworth wrote: |- |- We had a /24 that was not being used in one part of our network any |- longer. It was routed through 2 RSM's on a Cat5500 switch. |- |- As well the network was in an EIGRP AS that we do for IGP routing on both |- RSM's. So the network was removed from the EIGRP system, a new static |- route was put in on our gateway router for said network. |- |- Everything works on the new network except for getting to some internal |- sites...The interesting part is when doing a sh ip route on the RSM's I |- see this: |- |- D208.181.160.0/24 is a summary, 1w4d, Null0 |- |- Now why did the RSM's suddenly route that network to null0? My workstation |- is connected to the RSM's and I cannot ping any IP's on that subnet since |- that network is now being routed to null. |- |- That network is definately gone from the EIGRP statement. Here is the |- output of sho ip proto for the eigrp AS: |- |- Routing Protocol is eigrp 100 |- Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set |- Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set |- Default networks flagged in outgoing updates |- Default networks accepted from incoming updates |- EIGRP metric weight K1=1, K2=0, K3=1, K4=0, K5=0 |- EIGRP maximum hopcount 100 |- EIGRP maximum metric variance 1 |- Redistributing: connected, eigrp 100 |- Automatic network summarization is not in effect |- Routing for Networks: |- 209.53.131.0 |- 209.53.132.0 |- 209.53.133.0 |- 209.53.134.0 |- 209.53.135.0 |- 208.181.161.0 |- 64.0.0.0 |- |- === Cut -== |- |- so what do I do about getting the RSMs to take out the routing statement |- for that network? Would EIGRP have just a done an update when the network |- statement was removed? |- |- Thanks for any input on this... |- Keith |- |- |--- |-David Madland |-Sr. Network Engineer |-CCIE# 2016 |-Qwest Communications Int. Inc. |-[EMAIL PROTECTED] |-612-664-3367 |- |-Emotion should reflect reason not guide it |- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42559t=42479 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DSL traffic monitoring [7:42551]
I have DSL site to site links, and qcheck works well. http://www.netiq.com/qcheck/complementarytools.asp -Original Message- From: Larry Ogunbanjo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DSL traffic monitoring [7:42551] Group Does anyone know of any software that can confirm the speed at which my DSL connection is set to. Thanks = Please confirm receipt of message by phone/fax ++44 (0)7092152779 or email or Yahoo! messenger: ogunbanjol __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42560t=42551 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: is the following pap callin cfg viable? [7:42475]
the config was compiled based on a DISCUSSION a pdf, no testing 'cause i'm looking for a cheap simulator! -Original Message- From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:26 PM To: Mirza, Timur; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: is the following pap callin cfg viable? [7:42475] The config is good for the pieces you posted. Is it working or? If it's not, perhaps theres a extra space after one of the passwords. --- Mirza, Timur wrote: PAP Using Different Passwords On Two Different Routers on r1: username r2 password 0 timur ! int BRI0 ppp authentication pap ppp pap sent-username r1 password 0 milton on r2: username r1 password 0 milton ! int BRI0 ppp authentication pap callin ppp pap sent-username r2 password 0 timur !callin keyword on r2 means that r2 will only authenticate r1 if r1 initiated the call Timur Mirza Principal Network Engineer Network Planning Engineering, West Region 15505-B Sand Canyon Avenue Irvine, California 92618 Verizon Wireless 949.286.6623 (o) 949.697.7964 (c) __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42561t=42475 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP Load Balancing Question [7:42469]
Do the addresses come from one of the providers and if so is the other provider annoucing this network? If so is this other provider announcing a longer match thereby being prefered? I'm guessing your not getting full routes, partial routes are a providers own networks and those of it's customers. I can't see what you could possibly do to your router config to affect the incoming packets since you don't own the network as path prepending won;t help. Dave Jablonski, Michael wrote: The Ts are connected to two different routers at different locations The IP space is the providers What do you mean full vs. default/partial routes (Pardon my ignorance; I wish LAN/WAN communications was the only thing to work on)? Thanks for the quick response! -Original Message- From: Lupi, Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BGP Load Balancing Question [7:42469] Are the t1's connected to different routers in the providers POP, or to geographically diverse POP's? Is the IP space your own ARIN assigned space or the providers? Do you take full bgp routes or just a default or partial routes? Any answer would depend on the answers to these questions. As far as seeing the real load balancing, use MRTG to graph the interfaces, that will give you a good idea of how your bandwidth is being utilized. ~-Original Message- ~From: Jablonski, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ~Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:49 PM ~To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~Subject: BGP Load Balancing Question [7:42469] ~ ~ ~I am experiencing a similar problem, using one provider with two T1s. ~Utilization appears to significantly favor one interface over ~the other. I ~realize there will be some variation, but considering its a ~discrepancy of ~75% vs. 3% (these are numbers from our provider) I've ~talked to the ~provider; each time I receive a different configuration. ~ ~Is there a command that would better show the load ~balancing/utilization ~rates. I'm trying to become more familiar with BGP through my ~CCNP studies, ~but haven't gotten that far yet Thanks in advance for the help! ~ ~ ~ ~Michael Jablonski ~ABN AMRO Asset Management Holdings, Inc. ~161 North Clark St. ~9th Flr ~Chicago, IL 60601-2468 ~PH: 312.884.2996 ~FAX: 312.278.5550 ~ This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (including its group companies) shall not be responsible nor liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (or its group companies) does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42562t=42469 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF Virtual-links [7:42565]
My question is regarding OSPF and virtual links. As you can see, I have created an area 23 between R2 and R3 such that R3 will need a virtual link defined in order to have a connection to Area 0. My question is, does R3 have to peer with an interface in R2 that is a member of area 0? I have noticed that if I put R2's loopback interface (which R3 is peering to) in area 23, it fails, whereas, if I move the interface to area 0, the virtual link comes up. Please take a look at the crude diagram below, or the attached visio for clarification. Please let me know your thoughts on this. Thanks again for all of your informed help (and I apologize if this appears to be a less-than-CCIE-caliber question). Topology map (excuse the crude map, if you have visio, check out the enclosed diagram: R5---R1 / \ / \ R4R2--R3 Router2: router ospf 10 area 23 virtual-link 130.10.23.3 network 130.10.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 (Loopback Interface) network 130.10.23.2 0.0.0.0 area 23 (Link to R3 Serial Interface (S1)) network 130.10.245.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 (Link to R5 Frame-Relay Interface (S0) [DR=R5]) Router3: router ospf 10 area 23 virtual-link 130.10.2.2 (Virtual link peering to Loopback on R2 (in area 0, does it have to be?) network 130.10.23.3 0.0.0.0 area 23 (link to R3 Serial Interface (S0)) Router4: router ospf 10 network 130.10.4.4 0.0.0.0 area 4 (Loopback Interface) network 130.10.245.4 0.0.0.0 area 0 (Link to R5 Frame-Relay Interface (S0) [DR=R5]) Router5: router ospf 10 network 130.10.5.5 0.0.0.0 area 5 network 130.10.245.5 0.0.0.0 area 0 neighbor 130.10.245.2 neighbor 130.10.245.4 BTW, anyone else taking the exam on April 30th? I am...heheh... [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/vnd] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42565t=42565 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best sites to buy new routers [7:42564]
Does anyone know any good reliable websites where I can buy new Cisco equipment? All I know of is CDW and a search on google doesn't return anything useful. I am looking for a good price on a Cisco 2621. Thanks. sam sneed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42564t=42564 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: books for CCNP [7:42513]
I used the Cisco Certification Library, that comes with the Test Exams CDs. That by itself was enough :) - Original Message - From: Michael Williams To: Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 12:37 PM Subject: Re: books for CCNP [7:42513] I also used the Cisco Press books along with Boson exams. Worked for me =) Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42563t=42513 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EIGRP routing issue. [7:42479]
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Kage Roc wrote: |-Im am not sure why this is happening but I'ill take a stab at it. |- |-If a router that is running EIGRP borders 2 major network (i.e. 209.53.131.0 |-Router-208.181.160.0) and auto-summary is turned on within the EIGRP |-config, it will advertise the 208.181.160.0/24 to the network. It will also |-add the 208.181.160.0/24 to the route table and point it to Null 0. (Im not |-sure why it does this but I bet its to prevent a routing loop) You can try |-to turn the auto-summ off on that router. Again I am not sure whats going |-on here but that is my guess. Hope this helps :) From my reading it does have to do with auto-summary and we have no auto-sum in the eigrp config. I guess what happened is once the network was removed from the eigrp config, the RSM said hey wait a minute, Ive got no knowledge of this network and no where to route it to so I'll just put in a null0 route for it. I dont know if that is the behaviour of eigrp. I'll setup the lab here and see if I can duplicate it. But I ended up just adding a static route for that network and all is fine. Thanks, Keith Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42566t=42479 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX Inside Interface - Secondary IP? [7:42567]
Is it possible to create a secondary IP address for the inside interface on a PIX? Audy Bautista Network Engineer, IT Services Hold Brothers On-Line Investment Services, Inc. (201) 499-8764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] A job worth doing is a job worth doing well Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42567t=42567 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please confirm (conf#fa1265b7ef286b596b026270a5ea7bb0) [7:42570]
Dude, what the hell are you doing??? JR -- Johnny Routin The Routin One Lv Brahmam wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... MHotMailBE91562C007B4136E8213F68324B10EA0; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:57:00 -0700 Received: (from mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA09299;Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:54:21 -0400 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:57:49 -0700 Message-Id: X-AskVersion: 1.2a (http://www.paganini.net/ask) Hi, You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. Because the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED. By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. 3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. 5. The message is NOT inflammatory. 6. The message is NOT a test message. To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. Welcome to GroupStudy.com! --ORIGINAL MESSAGE- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 25 09:54:20 2002 Received: from hotmail.com (oe65.law3.hotmail.com [209.185.240.81]) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA09274 GroupStudy Mailer; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:54:20 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:54:52 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [203.199.179.99] From: Brahmam To: Subject: IOS- DHCP Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:30:02 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2002 13:54:52.0697 (UTC) FILETIME=[C60EF890:01C1EC60] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I configured IOS-Dhcp on cisco 1751 with 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.128 = network. And i have another Dhcp server running on windows 2000 server = with ip pool 192.168.1.100-200=20 All clients are dhcp enabled and they are getting ip's from 192.168.1.x = not from 192.168.2.x.=20 configuration as follows ip dhcp pool 0 network 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.128 domain-name livetech dns-server 202.54.30.1 netbios-node-type h-node default-router 192.168.2.15=20 kindly give me some idea. Thanx Brahmam. --=_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable charset=3Diso-8859-1 Hi, nbsp; I configured IOS-Dhcp on cisco 1751 = with=20 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.128 network. And i have another Dhcp server = running on=20 windows 2000 server with ip pool 192.168.1.100-200 All clients are dhcp enabled and they = are getting=20 ip's from 192.168.1.x not from 192.168.2.x. nbsp; configuration as follows nbsp; ip dhcp pool 0 network 192.168.2.0 = 255.255.255.128 domain-name livetech dns-server 202.54.30.1 netbios-node-type h-node default-router 192.168.2.15 = nbsp; kindly give me some idea. nbsp; Thanx Brahmam. nbsp; --=_NextPart_000_00C2_01C1EC8F.9840B320-- _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42570t=42570 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX Connected to ComCast Network... [7:42509]
I have exact same setup at home (Comast to PIX 501) and I haven't had any problems. I have a plain vanilla residential cable modem connection, nothing special, and my PIX picks up the IP through DHCP with no problems at all, and I get pretty good performance out of this connection. I have several servers (e-mail, web, terminal services,etc.) in my inside network with the PIX doing port redirection. I really didn't do anything special to get it to work with the Comcast cable modem. I just put in the following statement: ip address outside dhcp Mark Odette II wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Has anybody out there dealt with one of these scenarios?!?! ComCast customer wanting to hook up their PIX 501 to their CableModem, and use either DHCP, or a Static address on the outside interface; NAT and Dynamic VPN configuration to connect back to HQ PIX also is in this picture. I spent several hours trying to get the PIX to work, but got intermittent failure in Ping tests, traceroutes from inside workstation, and extremely slow and mostly failed http requests from same said workstation's browser. Called ComCast Tech support, they argued that the client account had to be a Comcast Pro account to allow such a scenario (the VPNs from the customer firewall), but did not specify what their definition of Firewall was until quite later... which was Windows XP workstations running its firewall capability. This ComCast Pro acct. was supposed to yield 5 static addresses, but this was later defined as 5 addresses randomly chosen from a 255.255.252.0-masked 68.60.x.x network and given extended lease parameters. Tech support found something wrong with the config of the CableModem, did a reset of all systems and still got no joy on the PIX...but the cable-modem jacked directly into the workstation would work. :( Just as a checklist for the obvious question Yes, I had already defined Unreachables, Echo-Reply, and Time-Exceeded to be allowed in from the outside. I then even simply changed the rule to allow ICMP Any Any (applied to the outside interface). I tried initially setting the PIX to try obtaining its IP via DHCP, but got nothing and the Tech Engineer didn't report seeing anything coming from the PIX over the CableModem in terms of BootP/DHCP requests. Hard-Coding the IP of what was learned from the DHCP successful assignment to the Workstation when it was connected directly to the CableModem yeilded the spotty results. If anyone has any tips or tricks on how to make this work, either via DHCP or Hard-coding the IP from the ISP, I'd be eternally greatful. The region of the ComCast Network that this is being attempted on is in Rome, Georgia. Thanks, Mark Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42571t=42509 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF Virtual-links [7:42565]
I think the VL must be defined on both routers using each others RID not just any arbitraray interface) In your case maybe the time it worked just happened to be when you defined the link with the RID. Anthony Pace Jeremy wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... My question is regarding OSPF and virtual links. As you can see, I have created an area 23 between R2 and R3 such that R3 will need a virtual link defined in order to have a connection to Area 0. My question is, does R3 have to peer with an interface in R2 that is a member of area 0? I have noticed that if I put R2's loopback interface (which R3 is peering to) in area 23, it fails, whereas, if I move the interface to area 0, the virtual link comes up. Please take a look at the crude diagram below, or the attached visio for clarification. Please let me know your thoughts on this. Thanks again for all of your informed help (and I apologize if this appears to be a less-than-CCIE-caliber question). Topology map (excuse the crude map, if you have visio, check out the enclosed diagram: R5---R1 / \ /\ R4R2--R3 Router2: router ospf 10 area 23 virtual-link 130.10.23.3 network 130.10.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 (Loopback Interface) network 130.10.23.2 0.0.0.0 area 23 (Link to R3 Serial Interface (S1)) network 130.10.245.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 (Link to R5 Frame-Relay Interface (S0) [DR=R5]) Router3: router ospf 10 area 23 virtual-link 130.10.2.2 (Virtual link peering to Loopback on R2 (in area 0, does it have to be?) network 130.10.23.3 0.0.0.0 area 23 (link to R3 Serial Interface (S0)) Router4: router ospf 10 network 130.10.4.4 0.0.0.0 area 4 (Loopback Interface) network 130.10.245.4 0.0.0.0 area 0 (Link to R5 Frame-Relay Interface (S0) [DR=R5]) Router5: router ospf 10 network 130.10.5.5 0.0.0.0 area 5 network 130.10.245.5 0.0.0.0 area 0 neighbor 130.10.245.2 neighbor 130.10.245.4 BTW, anyone else taking the exam on April 30th? I am...heheh... [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/vnd] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42572t=42565 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fundamental VoIP question regarding serialization delay [7:42569]
on slower speed WAN links, does one have to fragment all large data packets if the serialization delay introduced by the WAN link exceeds the VoIP codec packet update interval? As an example, a 1500 byte data packet has roughly about a 23 msec serialization delay thru a 512 kbits/sec WAN link. If my Voice codec is sending VoIP packets at 10 or at 20msec intervals, am I forced to fragment all large data packets over the WAN link? What if my Voice codec is sending VoIP packets at 30msec intervals; am I fundamentally OK over a 512 kbits/sec WAN link assuming queuing is set correctly for properly marked qos VoIP packets?? Thanks for the quick feedback dj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42569t=42569 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP routing issue. [7:42479]
Ive come to figure that out but we had no auto-summ in the eigrp network config so dont know what happens there. I'm going to work on the lab tonite and see if I can replicate it or see what other things come up with auto summary. Thanks, Keith On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, MADMAN wrote: |-auto summary, which is default, does that to/for you |- |- Dave |- |-Keith Woodworth wrote: |- |- We had a /24 that was not being used in one part of our network any |- longer. It was routed through 2 RSM's on a Cat5500 switch. |- |- As well the network was in an EIGRP AS that we do for IGP routing on both |- RSM's. So the network was removed from the EIGRP system, a new static |- route was put in on our gateway router for said network. |- |- Everything works on the new network except for getting to some internal |- sites...The interesting part is when doing a sh ip route on the RSM's I |- see this: |- |- D208.181.160.0/24 is a summary, 1w4d, Null0 |- |- Now why did the RSM's suddenly route that network to null0? My workstation |- is connected to the RSM's and I cannot ping any IP's on that subnet since |- that network is now being routed to null. |- |- That network is definately gone from the EIGRP statement. Here is the |- output of sho ip proto for the eigrp AS: |- |- Routing Protocol is eigrp 100 |- Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set |- Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set |- Default networks flagged in outgoing updates |- Default networks accepted from incoming updates |- EIGRP metric weight K1=1, K2=0, K3=1, K4=0, K5=0 |- EIGRP maximum hopcount 100 |- EIGRP maximum metric variance 1 |- Redistributing: connected, eigrp 100 |- Automatic network summarization is not in effect |- Routing for Networks: |- 209.53.131.0 |- 209.53.132.0 |- 209.53.133.0 |- 209.53.134.0 |- 209.53.135.0 |- 208.181.161.0 |- 64.0.0.0 |- |- === Cut -== |- |- so what do I do about getting the RSMs to take out the routing statement |- for that network? Would EIGRP have just a done an update when the network |- statement was removed? |- |- Thanks for any input on this... |- Keith |--- |-David Madland |-Sr. Network Engineer |-CCIE# 2016 |-Qwest Communications Int. Inc. |-[EMAIL PROTECTED] |-612-664-3367 |- |-Emotion should reflect reason not guide it |- |- |- |- |- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42568t=42479 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Best sites to buy new routers [7:42564]
Sam, I always go to CNET first and search for the Cisco device. It then gives me a list of prices and how many stars they have received. Most of the times, lanblvd.com has turned out to be a good place, and I have not had any problems with the service or products from them. Hth, Ole ~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~ Need a Job? http://www.OleDrews.com/job ~ -Original Message- From: sam sneed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Best sites to buy new routers [7:42564] Does anyone know any good reliable websites where I can buy new Cisco equipment? All I know of is CDW and a search on google doesn't return anything useful. I am looking for a good price on a Cisco 2621. Thanks. sam sneed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42574t=42564 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Best sites to buy new routers [7:42564]
Check out http://www.provantage.com. Our experience with them has been great, and their prices are fairly competitive. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of sam sneed Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 12:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Best sites to buy new routers [7:42564] Does anyone know any good reliable websites where I can buy new Cisco equipment? All I know of is CDW and a search on google doesn't return anything useful. I am looking for a good price on a Cisco 2621. Thanks. sam sneed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42575t=42564 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cheap terminal server? [7:42536]
Craig, I use the STS10 at home and it works great. I got it off ebay for $70 about 2 years ago and the only problem I had was getting the pinouts right. (it's not the traditional rollover) Unfortunately, those boxes are EOL and seem hard to come by. You might want to look at xyplex, they have some decent term servers and based on a quick review on ebay they seem to come pretty cheap. The Cisco 516-cs's seem to be more prevelant than the STS10's, but the prices are generally around $300 bucks which is probably overkill for what you need. HTH, Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Columbus Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 6:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cheap terminal server? [7:42536] Can anyone recommend a cheap terminal server, used only for reverse telnet remote management? I only need three lines and I don't want to spend the cash on a 2509. Anyone like the STS10x? Any other suggestions? Thanks, Craig Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42547t=42536 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cheap terminal server? [7:42536]
Another option is a CS-508. It is an old model Cisco terminal server with 8 lines. I have a CS-516 and it works fine as a terminal server. You can find them on ebay in the $200 range for the 8 port. From: Patrick Ramsey Reply-To: Patrick Ramsey To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cheap terminal server? [7:42536] Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:29:13 -0400 here comes the link http://www.lantronix.com/ there goes the link -Patrick Craig Columbus 04/25/02 09:37AM Can anyone recommend a cheap terminal server, used only for reverse telnet remote management? I only need three lines and I don't want to spend the cash on a 2509. Anyone like the STS10x? Any other suggestions? Thanks, Craig Confidentiality Disclaimer This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc. (WellStar) and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42558t=42536 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP boot camps [7:42427]
NO. Never go to a boot camp. Take the normal 1 week courses for each - which is still better than bootcamps. Learning is so much better that way. Dejan Ristovski wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, I was wondering what you falks think about CCNP boot camps. Are they worth the money, is it possible to get CCNP certified in 2 weeks? Thanks, Dejan Ristovski Cisco Technical Support, CCNA EKONET Authorized Cisco Distributor Address: Partizanski odredi 101, 1000 Skopje Macedonia Tel./Fax: ++389 2 361284 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42497t=42427 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP boot camps [7:42511]
Hi all, I was wondering what you guys think about CCNP boot camps? Are they worth the money? Any experience with them? Thank you, Dejan Ristovski Cisco Technical Support, CCNA EKONET Authorized Cisco Distributor Address: Partizanski odredi 101, 1000 Skopje Macedonia Tel./Fax: ++389 2 361284 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42511t=42511 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP boot camps [7:42427]
Are they worth the money? Can't say, never used one. Is it possible to get CCNP certified in 2 weeks? Probably. Would I trust a 2 week CCNP to touch any of my production switches/routers? Not on your life. I often get into the experience -vs- certifications debate with people, and I am one of those that sees the value of both. Back when I was a green CCNP, I worked along side an engineer of 5 years that was surprised one day when he did a sniffer capture and saw multicast traffic. I said We're running EIGRP, right? (which we were). And he said Yeah... but where's this multicast coming from?. I just turned and walked away. In that case, even the smallest amount book reading gave me an advantage over this guys experience. However, there are many times where all of the book reading in the world won't give you certain insights and knowledge the even 6 months experience can (troubleshooting memory problems in routers, etc). But either way, IMHO, there's no way you can learn all of the material covered in CCNP well enough in 2 weeks to truly understand the tests you must pass (which is totally possible, but is the goal to pass the test or to understand what you're doing?). Even some of the brightest people I know took the books for CCNP, and passed an exam every two weeks. And two months later could remember 1/3 of everything they'd studied.. I'd be lying if I said that sometimes, a couple of days before an exam, I didn't cram a topic (just sheer memorization) that I was weak in just to be sure to pass an exam. However, when I set out to get into the networking field and take the CCNA (and later the CCNP exams), my goal was to become someone who understood the technologies, methods, concepts and commands well enough to be able to think on my feet or at least know how to find the answers to that I needed (via searching Cisco's website, etc...). And I believe that's what I've done. Personally, I'd say to spend the money on some books, even a couple of routers and a switch, take more time, and make your goal understanding what your learning, not just passing a test. My 2 cents. Mike W. Dejan Ristovski wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, I was wondering what you falks think about CCNP boot camps. Are they worth the money, is it possible to get CCNP certified in 2 weeks? Thanks, Dejan Ristovski Cisco Technical Support, CCNA EKONET Authorized Cisco Distributor Address: Partizanski odredi 101, 1000 Skopje Macedonia Tel./Fax: ++389 2 361284 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42481t=42427 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MPLS for the man on the street (without ATM) [7:42214]
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: I'm serious. Is there any reason why MPLS cannot be transported directly on fiber, perhaps even in time slots? Have the GMPLS and IPO WGs addressed this issue? -- TT That's exactly what those two working groups are doing, and other groups in the IETF sub-IP area are doing for other media such as cable TV. Complementing this is the IEEE 802.17 (IIRC) work on resilient packet rings as an alternative to SONET. Thanks for the reference. I subscribed to the 802.17 list. It's always good to know what's happening in the sub-IP areas even if I'm not working with it daily. N.B. That's duct tape, not scotch tape. The author knew his stuff, both white and black. Mr. Waitzman's care in selecting the more robust concatenation method is appreciated even to this day. I always wonder if he had generalized to amphibious avian carriers, would it instead have been duck tape? IIRC the RFC does not specifically address the application of the avian transport system to aquatic environments. However, one could safely extrapolate to an affirmative answer to your question. I've had lengthy discussions with individuals in the construction trades who claim that the original designation of that type of tape was derived from the sound, which resembles the audible signaling of family Anatidae, produced when the tape is rapidly separated from the storage medium (spooling device). In any case, the RFC illustrates the virtually unlimited adaptability of the Internet and helps us place it in the larger historical context. There is a logical progression of transport technologies from avian to electrical to optical. Furthermore, if it is true that history repeats itself, the RFC has explained not only the past but also the future of telecommunication. -- TT There are even more logical progressions and relationship. In the Star Wars universe, the Force has a light side, a dark side, and holds the universe together. This is descriptive of duct tape's role in our universe. It is well to consider, given the calendar, the impact of the upcoming Star Wars Day, as little as it is known. Many of us, of course, know about Cinco de Mayo...but how many know may the Fourth be with you Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42489t=42214 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
canonical to non-canonical [7:42576]
Is there any formula to transform a hexadec pair of number from canonical to non-canonical format beides the chart presented on Caslow's book? (SR/TLB) Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42576t=42576 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question about IOS software [7:42577]
All, I have an oldish CiscoPro 2200 (clone Catalyst 2901) running IOS version 2.1(4). I want to upgrade this to a recent IOS, and have a 4.5 version to put on it. I was told that I'll need to do this upgrade in steps and I see on the Cisco site that I must first upgrade to 2.4(5) and then ugrade again from there. My problem is, I can't find 2.4(5) for the Supervisor module anywhere! Any clues from the masses? Help? -Ds Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42577t=42577 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: canonical to non-canonical [7:42576]
084C2A6E195D3B7F can be written and another row above it with the HEX numbers in order 0-F. Anthony Pace Persio Pucci wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Is there any formula to transform a hexadec pair of number from canonical to non-canonical format beides the chart presented on Caslow's book? (SR/TLB) Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42579t=42576 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP Load Balancing Question [7:42469]
Inbound/Outbound loads are out of wack what part of the BGP neigh stats do you want to see? I'm referring to simply 'sh ip bgp sum', as this will show the amount of prefixes that you receive on each connection. So if I've read all of the threads correctly, you have 2 T1's at 2 physically separate locations but the same provider. I still have more questions than answers at this point. Are you advertising any routes or the same routes via both connections? (i.e. mail server, ftp server, dns server, etc...) Is there any routing happening on the 'back side', in other words can one router choose to go to the other router rather than out to the net? Looking at your stats from below, you don't have much traffic at all, in either direction. Your loads are low and per packet count (on 5 min moving average) is low. The questions about what routes you are receiving are relevant. Often you have 3 or so options: 1. Receive full-routes (100,000 plus routes) 2. Receive partial routes (i.e. routes for customers that belong to same AS that you get service from) 3. Default route-only. Sorry if it seems I'm dragging you along, but there are several factors to consider when you are attempting to get load-sharing. Especially if you are connected to 2 separate routers on your provider's backbone. -chris Serial0/0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is QUICC with integrated T1 CSU/DSU Description: To provider1 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1536 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 255/255, load 5/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 77766, LMI stat recvd 77766, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 0 LMI type is ANSI Annex D frame relay DTE Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 12963/0, interface broadcasts 3 Last input 00:00:04, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters never Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue 0/40, 5642 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops 5 minute input rate 181000 bits/sec, 35 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 31000 bits/sec, 8 packets/sec 14791247 packets input, 3209509245 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 1 giants, 0 throttles 15143 input errors, 593 CRC, 8555 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 5994 abort 6400415 packets output, 2339275311 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 8 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 3 carrier transitions DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up Serial0/1 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is QUICC with integrated T1 CSU/DSU Description: To provider2 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1536 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 255/255, load 6/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 77769, LMI stat recvd 77768, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 0 LMI type is ANSI Annex D frame relay DTE Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 12964/0, interface broadcasts 3 Last input 00:00:05, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters never Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue 0/40, 9587 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 38000 bits/sec, 13 packets/sec 183425 packets input, 8800740 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 2893 input errors, 628 CRC, 2175 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 90 abort 6083912 packets output, 2163859526 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 7 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 3 carrier transitions DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up -Original Message- From: Kane, Christopher A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 7:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BGP Load Balancing Question [7:42469] I'm not sure I understand what you are describing. Are you saying that the BGP routes you receive from your provider are mainly coming over one link rather than the other? Or, are you saying that your inbound/outbound loads are uneven? Can you be a little more specific, perhaps, even show some snapshots of the interfaces? And your BGP neigh stats? My first suspicion, (if you are talking about inbound/outbound traffic loads) would be that caching has caused this load disparity. Do you know if CEF was implemented? -chris This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are
Configuring EOBC [7:42581]
Is there a way to change the default MAC address of the Ethernet Out of Band Controller on a router? We did a network discovery of all the routers (6500 MSFC) and the MAC is the same for all the EOBCs. The software we are using flagged the duplicate MACs throughout the network as it discovered all the interfaces on all the devices. If I can change the mac address to something unique for our network, it would be helpful. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks!! Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. Cell 717-805-5536 Office 717-737-8586 FAX 717-737-0290 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42581t=42581 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help! SDSL ignorance. [7:42580]
My experience is limited to ADSL. Does Cisco make a card like the WIC-1ADSL that supports SDSL? Suggestions for how I can attach a 1700/2600 router to a SDSL connection? I've looked through CCO and haven't found anything useful. Because I need the SDSL router to run DES, the Cisco 673 doesn't fit the bill. I need something with more horsepower. Thanks, Craig Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42580t=42580 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: fundamental VoIP question regarding serialization [7:42569]
I would have to say you're ok. If you queueing is setup to give strict priority to the voice packets, and the serialization is less than your codec interval, I can' see why you wouldn't be alright without LFI. Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42582t=42569 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What are the first thing you do...?? [7:42276]
Every workstation is forced at 10/100/half, depending on the physical lines. we have to force half duplex at the workstation and server because our datacenter hosts our oracle DB for the teller and customer accounts, so we need the error correction/detection with full duplex. our server is a compaq proliant dual pIII 1333mhz with 3 10k 30 gig scsi running in raid 5. im not entirely convinced that our server is getting hit too hard. it supports about 100 users. it is however running NW 5.1, which i am not too largely a fan of. i will run sniffer for a while and see what i get. im not tfamiliar with packet sniffing. i can do it, im just not too sure what im looking at! and sniffer always seems to get the frame type wrong. we're using 802.2 and it always says 802.3 frames! anyway... thanks for any suggestions, i guess i just wanted to make sure the switches were configured properly, but it seems that compared to routers, they're pieces of cake when you're not even worrying about vlans! Thanks again Luis Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You did the most important thing, enabling portfast. That will speed up performance on startup. Also check for a duplex mismatch problem on every port. You may want to hard code everything as full duplex, (assuming the ports just connect a single device). Don't rely on auto-negotiation since it doesn't work a lot of the time. (On the other hand, there are cases where auto-negotiation works better than hard-coding, so do some testing first.) Keeping STP enabled shouldn't be a problem. It's the safest thing to do unless you are absolutely sure nobody is going to add any switches to the network in a redundant way. It's hard to ensure that. These days if you order a hub from some vendors, you get a switch anyway. End users could order a hub to add devices somewhere in the network and actually get a switch and possibly cause problems. STP won't affect the routers unless they are configured as bridges, which they probably aren't. STP does send BPDU packets every two seconds, which some people could consider a performance issue. These packets go to a multicast address. A good network interface card (in end devices or routers) will ignore those multicasts and not interrupt the CPU. Unfortunately, not all PC NICs are that good. Regarding testing the performance, do you have any before and after stats? How was the performance before you swapped out the hubs and put in switches? Maybe it was never so hot to start with. On the other hand, it is possible that the servers actually liked being in a shared Ethernet environment and are overwhelmed by a switched environment. In a shared environment, contention for the medium would slow down the requests to the server. Now the server may be getting requests much more quickly than before. What is the CPU on the servers? What protocols are you running? TCP/IP or IPX/NCP or NWLink (Novell's NetBIOS?) With TCP and NetBIOS you can often prove that the problem isn't with the network if you have a Sniffer. You can show that the server ACKs quickly but then takes a long time to process requests. If ACKs are getting through quickly, then the network is OK. Priscilla At 11:57 AM 4/23/02, Luis Wiedemann wrote: Well...the branches dont have more than 24 hosts, including the server. all branches with the exception of the main branch only consist of one novell 5.1 server, one 24 port wc-2950-24, and a 1720 router that connects the branches to our main branch, which then go to the datacenter through a 2620. we have nothing to do with the routers as the data center suppllies the support and config for the routers. the main branch has 10 switches. mainly 2950-24's but we also have 2 2950-48g's and a 3508 to connect a few switches via fiber gigbit. i did port fast all of the client ports on all of the switches. im also hearing bad things about STP. A co-worker has been saying that in his experience with intel? and hp? switches that STP was a horrible thing to have on. of course cisco says to keep it on. we dont have redundant links in our network so how important is it? our datacenter says that it may also be affecting the routers? So far this group has been awesome with some very useful info. i hope one day i can help as much as you guys/gals do! thanks again Luis Luis Wiedemann wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... hey all, im new to the newsgroup, nad pretty new to real workd cisco. my experience comes mainly from reading cisco press and sybex books along with a few virtual labs. now im consulting for a small bank that just implemented a swicthed network from thier old stacked hubs. everything is going OK but i still feel that the network may be a bit laggy. not sure if its the switches or what, so my real question is what are the first things you do when confuring a new
Differences: Group-Async1 and Dialer and DialerRotary [7:42584]
Also Virtual-Template? Is there a good explanation of their different applications? Does the Group-Async alow you to defing a template for analog calls landing on a PRI? Anthony Pace Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42584t=42584 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AGS+ Router Question [7:38726]
Sorry I am late to post on this. AGS+ is going to be alot more inexpensive than a 2522/2523. However, personally, I would go with a 4500M, which is a *very* fast router for lab use, and later on can support fastethernet and atm modules as well. 4500M with 4-port serial (NP-4T), and 1-port ethernet (NP-1E) is $500 $600 and I will include 4 dte/dce cables for hooking up your routers. I have a small book I am writing that I will be publishing on the net for free and it gives lots of tips on equipment selection, look for it. Brian On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Jeff Barr wrote: I was thinking of buying an AGS+ router for a frame relay/x.25 switch for my lab. Are there any reasons I would want to buy a 2500 series(2522 or 2523) over one of these? Also, the IOS on the one im looking at is pretty old (like 9.x if im right?). Will this cause any problems? Im not going to use it for anything else other than to simulate the frame realy/x.25 cloud. TIA, Jeff I'm buying / selling used CISCO gear!! email me for a quote Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036 Netjam, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netjam.net VISA/MC/AMEX/COD phone: 318-212-0245 30 day warranty fax: 318-212-0246 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42585t=38726 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question about IOS software [7:42577]
If you have a CCO logon, on Software Center go to LAN Switching, then Cat5000, then archived Sup images. You will find 2.4(5) and 3.2(4) among others. Let's hope that was enough padding: http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/cat5000-suparch -Original Message- From: Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 2:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question about IOS software [7:42577] All, I have an oldish CiscoPro 2200 (clone Catalyst 2901) running IOS version 2.1(4). I want to upgrade this to a recent IOS, and have a 4.5 version to put on it. I was told that I'll need to do this upgrade in steps and I see on the Cisco site that I must first upgrade to 2.4(5) and then ugrade again from there. My problem is, I can't find 2.4(5) for the Supervisor module anywhere! Any clues from the masses? Help? -Ds Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42586t=42577 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX Inside Interface - Secondary IP? [7:42567]
No, you'll need to use a router if you need this capability -Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Audy Bautista Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX Inside Interface - Secondary IP? [7:42567] Is it possible to create a secondary IP address for the inside interface on a PIX? Audy Bautista Network Engineer, IT Services Hold Brothers On-Line Investment Services, Inc. (201) 499-8764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] A job worth doing is a job worth doing well Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42587t=42567 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: riverstone [7:40245]
The riverstone stuff is excellent. Brian On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Kevin Campbell wrote: i was curious if anyone is familiar with riverstone and what your opinions are. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] I'm buying / selling used CISCO gear!! email me for a quote Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036 Netjam, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netjam.net VISA/MC/AMEX/COD phone: 318-212-0245 30 day warranty fax: 318-212-0246 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42588t=40245 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: frame-relay [7:42350]
I had this same problem on a connection and what I found was the other end was set at 56 and my side was default at 64. Went I set the line speed to match all was well. interface serial 0 service-module t1 timeslots 1-24 speed 64 or service-module t1 timeslots 1-24 speed 56 http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/471/61.html#command Naafi Matovu wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all I've been configuring a cisco 2600 dual wic with three subinterfaces on serial 0/1. If i leave the the keepalive to 10 sec, the line protocol on the serial 0/1 keeps coming up but going down after a couple of seconds. The only way i can keep the line protocol up is (no keepalive) on seial 0/1. Iam not sure whether this is the best way of sorting out this problem.Here is the current config on this serial port Serial0/1 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set Keepalive not set Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 96/227, interface broadcasts 96 Last input 00:00:17, output 00:00:12, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters 01:26:53 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/2/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 11467 packets input, 876671 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 33 input errors, 0 CRC, 33 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort 11125 packets output, 799491 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 45 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 2 carrier transitions DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42589t=42350 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why does IOS only allow ICMP granularity on destination in an [7:42590]
for instance : access-list 101 permit icmp any host 207.122.1.5 echo access-list 101 permit icmp host 207.122.2.3 any echo-reply but not access-list 101 permit icmp any echo-reply any Anthony Pace Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42590t=42590 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Added HSRP cant surf [7:42591]
When adding hsrp does my default gateway become what is now my virtual gateway? Since implenting it in my test environment I can not resovle DNS and surf. I am using 1 cat 6509 each with an MFSC here is a sample of my test conf MFSC #1 interface Vlan1 ip address 10.8.1.2 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast standby 1 priority 110 stnadby 1 preempt standby 1 ip 10.8.1.1 ! interface Vlan2 ip address 10.8.2.2 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast standby 2 priority 110 standby 2 preempt standby 2 ip 10.8.2.1 MFSC #2 interface Vlan1 ip address 10.8.1.3 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast standby 1 priority 109 stnadby 1 preempt standby 1 ip 10.8.1.1 ! interface Vlan2 ip address 10.8.2.3 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast standby 2 priority 109 standby 2 preempt standby 2 ip 10.8.2.1 The IP for the 6509 is 10.8.1.4/24 I have set everything up with a default gateway of 10.8.1.1/24 Thanks al Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42591t=42591 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Added HSRP can't surf or Resolve DNS [7:42592]
When adding hsrp does my default gateway become what is now my virtual gateway? Since implenting it in my test environment I can not resovle DNS and surf. I am using 1 cat 6509 each with an MFSC here is a sample of my test conf MFSC #1 interface Vlan1 ip address 10.8.1.2 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast standby 1 priority 110 stnadby 1 preempt standby 1 ip 10.8.1.1 ! interface Vlan2 ip address 10.8.2.2 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast standby 2 priority 110 standby 2 preempt standby 2 ip 10.8.2.1 MFSC #2 interface Vlan1 ip address 10.8.1.3 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast standby 1 priority 109 stnadby 1 preempt standby 1 ip 10.8.1.1 ! interface Vlan2 ip address 10.8.2.3 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast standby 2 priority 109 standby 2 preempt standby 2 ip 10.8.2.1 The IP for the 6509 is 10.8.1.4/24 I have set everything up with a default gateway of 10.8.1.1/24 Thanks all Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42592t=42592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP Load Balancing Question [7:42469]
Same routes via both connections. this is our border router, no other routing on the inside.. We're probably receiving default routes. BGP router identifier 65.196.X.X, local AS number 7046 BGP table version is 3, main routing table version 3 2 network entries and 2 paths using 242 bytes of memory 1 BGP path attribute entries using 92 bytes of memory BGP activity 2/0 prefixes, 2/0 paths NeighborVAS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 63.122.163.89 4 701 13251 13282300 06:06:320 63.122.163.93 4 701 13251 13278300 1w1d0 I really apprecaite the help I'm getting from everyone! I only hope that I get more exposure, to make studying for the CCNP worth it -Original Message- From: Kane, Christopher A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 2:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BGP Load Balancing Question [7:42469] Inbound/Outbound loads are out of wack what part of the BGP neigh stats do you want to see? I'm referring to simply 'sh ip bgp sum', as this will show the amount of prefixes that you receive on each connection. So if I've read all of the threads correctly, you have 2 T1's at 2 physically separate locations but the same provider. I still have more questions than answers at this point. Are you advertising any routes or the same routes via both connections? (i.e. mail server, ftp server, dns server, etc...) Is there any routing happening on the 'back side', in other words can one router choose to go to the other router rather than out to the net? Looking at your stats from below, you don't have much traffic at all, in either direction. Your loads are low and per packet count (on 5 min moving average) is low. The questions about what routes you are receiving are relevant. Often you have 3 or so options: 1. Receive full-routes (100,000 plus routes) 2. Receive partial routes (i.e. routes for customers that belong to same AS that you get service from) 3. Default route-only. Sorry if it seems I'm dragging you along, but there are several factors to consider when you are attempting to get load-sharing. Especially if you are connected to 2 separate routers on your provider's backbone. -chris This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (including its group companies) shall not be responsible nor liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (or its group companies) does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42593t=42469 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fundamental VoIP question regarding serialization delay [7:42594]
At 01:35 PM 4/25/02, dj wrote: on slower speed WAN links, does one have to fragment all large data packets if the serialization delay introduced by the WAN link exceeds the VoIP codec packet update interval? As an example, a 1500 byte data packet has roughly about a 23 msec serialization delay thru a 512 kbits/sec WAN link. If my Voice codec is sending VoIP packets at 10 or at 20msec intervals, am I forced to fragment all large data packets over the WAN link? You should check with Cisco, but I think in this case you are safe not fragmenting. I hate to introduce another variable, but you should consider that the recipient has a dejitter buffer. The dejitter buffer is probably big enough to handle the 23 millisecond delay caused by a 1500-byte frame, and that would be approximately your worst case. You must make sure that your queuing is set up to always send a voice packet when one is available. Your worst case, then, is just a single 1500-byte serialization delay. Sure, if your CODEC sends every 10 milliseconds instead of every 30 milliseconds, more voice packets may get queued, but this isn't a big deal if voice packets are always prioritized. Basically you are combining constant-bit rate voice traffic with variable-bit rate data traffic. The voice traffic arrives in a predictable, synchronous fashion. The data traffic arrives asynchronously, in a unpredictable fashion. Consider the case where your CODEC sends a voice packet at a constant rate of every 23 milliseconds. There could be some unpredictable jitter because of the asynchronous nature of data traffic, but because of your queuing, even the worst case is not a major problem: 1) The interface sends a voice packet. Another one won't arrive for 23 milliseconds. 2) 22 milliseconds go by. A data packet arrives! 3) The queuing algorithm allows the data packet to get transmitted, because no voice packet has arrived. It will take 23 milliseconds to send the data packet. 4) The voice packet arrives. It must wait. But that's the worst that can happen. The voice packet is delayed by 22 milliseconds. The recipient must be able to handle this. The receivers have dejitter buffers that are at least this big. Now let's say that voice packets arrive every 30 milliseconds. 29 milliseconds go by and a data packet sneaks in. It's still just 23 milliseconds of delay. So you're cool. Now let's say that voice packets arrive every 10 milliseconds. The worst case would be that 9 milliseconds go by and a data packet sneaks in. It's still just 23 milliseconds of delay. But in that time three voice packets would have gotten queued up. But they will go out right away after the data packet is done because of your queuing algorithm that always prioritizes voice, so you're probably still OK. Now, let's say you don't really have a 512-Kbps link, but a 256-Kbps link, in which case the time to output a 1500 byte packet is 46 milliseconds. Now you have more of a problem due to the longer time being more noticeable to the human ear (depending on the size of the recipient's dejitter buffer) and the fact that more voice packets can get queued up during that time. Queuing delay isn't nearly as much of an issue as serialization delay, but at some point it can become relevant. ARGH. It's making my brain hurt. I think you better ask Cisco. They have brilliant engineers who work this kind of stuff out better than I can. But I hope my brainstorming helped some. ;-) And once again, in the particular case that you bring up, I think you are OK not to fragment as long as the data packets aren't bigger than 1500 bytes. Priscilla What if my Voice codec is sending VoIP packets at 30msec intervals; am I fundamentally OK over a 512 kbits/sec WAN link assuming queuing is set correctly for properly marked qos VoIP packets?? Thanks for the quick feedback dj Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42594t=42594 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Secret Clearance [7:42499]
Was this for Secret or TS? thanks, Paul EMW_Tech wrote: I shouldn't respond to a OT thread, but FYI, I had my persoanl interview by a DSS agent back in Decemberstill waiting. Oh, the process began in May 2000. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42595t=42499 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fundamental VoIP question regarding serialization delay [7:42596]
Thanks Priscilla for the clear and excellent presentation. The answer to my question (Do I fragment large data packets or not?), lies in the implementation of the dejitter buffer at the receiving end. You pointed me in the right direction. dj Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: At 01:35 PM 4/25/02, dj wrote: on slower speed WAN links, does one have to fragment all large data packets if the serialization delay introduced by the WAN link exceeds the VoIP codec packet update interval? As an example, a 1500 byte data packet has roughly about a 23 msec serialization delay thru a 512 kbits/sec WAN link. If my Voice codec is sending VoIP packets at 10 or at 20msec intervals, am I forced to fragment all large data packets over the WAN link? You should check with Cisco, but I think in this case you are safe not fragmenting. I hate to introduce another variable, but you should consider that the recipient has a dejitter buffer. The dejitter buffer is probably big enough to handle the 23 millisecond delay caused by a 1500-byte frame, and that would be approximately your worst case. You must make sure that your queuing is set up to always send a voice packet when one is available. Your worst case, then, is just a single 1500-byte serialization delay. Sure, if your CODEC sends every 10 milliseconds instead of every 30 milliseconds, more voice packets may get queued, but this isn't a big deal if voice packets are always prioritized. Basically you are combining constant-bit rate voice traffic with variable-bit rate data traffic. The voice traffic arrives in a predictable, synchronous fashion. The data traffic arrives asynchronously, in a unpredictable fashion. Consider the case where your CODEC sends a voice packet at a constant rate of every 23 milliseconds. There could be some unpredictable jitter because of the asynchronous nature of data traffic, but because of your queuing, even the worst case is not a major problem: 1) The interface sends a voice packet. Another one won't arrive for 23 milliseconds. 2) 22 milliseconds go by. A data packet arrives! 3) The queuing algorithm allows the data packet to get transmitted, because no voice packet has arrived. It will take 23 milliseconds to send the data packet. 4) The voice packet arrives. It must wait. But that's the worst that can happen. The voice packet is delayed by 22 milliseconds. The recipient must be able to handle this. The receivers have dejitter buffers that are at least this big. Now let's say that voice packets arrive every 30 milliseconds. 29 milliseconds go by and a data packet sneaks in. It's still just 23 milliseconds of delay. So you're cool. Now let's say that voice packets arrive every 10 milliseconds. The worst case would be that 9 milliseconds go by and a data packet sneaks in. It's still just 23 milliseconds of delay. But in that time three voice packets would have gotten queued up. But they will go out right away after the data packet is done because of your queuing algorithm that always prioritizes voice, so you're probably still OK. Now, let's say you don't really have a 512-Kbps link, but a 256-Kbps link, in which case the time to output a 1500 byte packet is 46 milliseconds. Now you have more of a problem due to the longer time being more noticeable to the human ear (depending on the size of the recipient's dejitter buffer) and the fact that more voice packets can get queued up during that time. Queuing delay isn't nearly as much of an issue as serialization delay, but at some point it can become relevant. ARGH. It's making my brain hurt. I think you better ask Cisco. They have brilliant engineers who work this kind of stuff out better than I can. But I hope my brainstorming helped some. ;-) And once again, in the particular case that you bring up, I think you are OK not to fragment as long as the data packets aren't bigger than 1500 bytes. Priscilla What if my Voice codec is sending VoIP packets at 30msec intervals; am I fundamentally OK over a 512 kbits/sec WAN link assuming queuing is set correctly for properly marked qos VoIP packets?? Thanks for the quick feedback dj Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42596t=42596 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What are the first thing you do...?? [7:42276]
It sure sounds like your servers have enough power to handle 100 users (dual 1333 MHz processors). But if you are really concerned about performance, you'll want to do more investigation. The software could be slow. As I mentioned, with a sniffer you can often pinpoint the probable cause of slowness. Sometimes, it's a layer 8 problem (whiny users ;-) I wanted to comment on this statement you made: Sniffer always seems to get the frame type wrong. we're using 802.2 and it always says 802.3 frames! A sniffer just tells you what it sees. Unless you're using some truly awful analyzer software (not Network Associates), it's not lying. You may want to verify the configuration of frame types on all servers, routers, clients. Maybe you're just misunderstanding what the sniffer is saying, though. A standard IEEE 802.3 frame has an 802.3 and 802.2 header. Network Associates calls this an 802.3 frame. (Look inside these packets to see if there's also an 802.2 header present.) Novell calls this an ETHERNET_802.2 frame. Cisco calls is a SAP frame. WildPackets EtherPeek calls is an IEEE 802.3 LSAP frame! Most of the world, though, just considered it an typical 802.3 frame. Be wary of Novell terminology. A Novell raw frame has just an IEEE 802.3 header, with no 802.2 header. Network Associates calls this a Novell Proprietary frame. Novell calls it a ETHERNET_802.3 frame. Cisco calls is a novell-ether frame. WildPackets calls is an IEEE 802.3 IPX frame! This frame type is only used on older Novell implementations and only Novell would call it an 802.3 frame. The rest of the world knows that IEEE requires an 802.2 header to follow an 802.3 header. Cisco has some pictures of frames here, if this has confused you. In this document they call the Novell raw format 802.3-Only Encapsulation. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/encheat.html Priscilla At 03:47 PM 4/25/02, Luis Wiedemann wrote: Every workstation is forced at 10/100/half, depending on the physical lines. we have to force half duplex at the workstation and server because our datacenter hosts our oracle DB for the teller and customer accounts, so we need the error correction/detection with full duplex. our server is a compaq proliant dual pIII 1333mhz with 3 10k 30 gig scsi running in raid 5. im not entirely convinced that our server is getting hit too hard. it supports about 100 users. it is however running NW 5.1, which i am not too largely a fan of. i will run sniffer for a while and see what i get. im not tfamiliar with packet sniffing. i can do it, im just not too sure what im looking at! and sniffer always seems to get the frame type wrong. we're using 802.2 and it always says 802.3 frames! anyway... thanks for any suggestions, i guess i just wanted to make sure the switches were configured properly, but it seems that compared to routers, they're pieces of cake when you're not even worrying about vlans! Thanks again Luis Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You did the most important thing, enabling portfast. That will speed up performance on startup. Also check for a duplex mismatch problem on every port. You may want to hard code everything as full duplex, (assuming the ports just connect a single device). Don't rely on auto-negotiation since it doesn't work a lot of the time. (On the other hand, there are cases where auto-negotiation works better than hard-coding, so do some testing first.) Keeping STP enabled shouldn't be a problem. It's the safest thing to do unless you are absolutely sure nobody is going to add any switches to the network in a redundant way. It's hard to ensure that. These days if you order a hub from some vendors, you get a switch anyway. End users could order a hub to add devices somewhere in the network and actually get a switch and possibly cause problems. STP won't affect the routers unless they are configured as bridges, which they probably aren't. STP does send BPDU packets every two seconds, which some people could consider a performance issue. These packets go to a multicast address. A good network interface card (in end devices or routers) will ignore those multicasts and not interrupt the CPU. Unfortunately, not all PC NICs are that good. Regarding testing the performance, do you have any before and after stats? How was the performance before you swapped out the hubs and put in switches? Maybe it was never so hot to start with. On the other hand, it is possible that the servers actually liked being in a shared Ethernet environment and are overwhelmed by a switched environment. In a shared environment, contention for the medium would slow down the requests to the server. Now the server may be getting requests much more quickly than before. What is the CPU on the servers? What protocols are you running? TCP/IP or IPX/NCP or NWLink (Novell's NetBIOS?) With TCP and NetBIOS you can
RE: Why does IOS only allow ICMP granularity on destination [7:42598]
access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo-reply access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo Daniel Ladrach CCNA, CCNP WorldCom -Original Message- From: Anthony Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 4:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Why does IOS only allow ICMP granularity on destination in an [7:42590] for instance : access-list 101 permit icmp any host 207.122.1.5 echo access-list 101 permit icmp host 207.122.2.3 any echo-reply but not access-list 101 permit icmp any echo-reply any Anthony Pace Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42598t=42598 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Secret Clearance [7:42499]
The policies seem more lax in the US than in UK. I'm of the understanding that it is frowned upon to advertise the fact that you have any specific level of security clearance, particularly TS to avoid being targetted for any reason. I'm just guessing obviously, but seems like common sense. Can you tell me any more about yourself ;-) Gaz Paul Jin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Was this for Secret or TS? thanks, Paul EMW_Tech wrote: I shouldn't respond to a OT thread, but FYI, I had my persoanl interview by a DSS agent back in Decemberstill waiting. Oh, the process began in May 2000. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42599t=42499 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Terminal server required for CCNP/CCIE lab? [7:42600]
Hello, Can someone tell me if a terminal server (2509-2512) is required for a CCNP/CCIE lab? I'm continuing to build up my lab and was thinking of buying one soon. I read somewhere that the CCIE lab does not use reverse telnetting anymore. Is this true or not? Right now I'm swapping the console cable among all my routers and switches for configuration purposes. Should I buy a terminal server or not? I'm working towards a CCNP for now. Thanks, Frank Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42600t=42600 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Why does IOS only allow ICMP granularity on destination [7:42601]
I don't think you will see the source as echo reply. By that, I mean that the echo reply will only be evident in the destination. The source could be any port. Remember ICMP is the odd protocol, which has to be allowed both ways through a firewall, because the reply is a totally separate session. If you telnet from A to B. The destination port is 23. In the reply from B to A 'source' port is 23. If you use ping though for example, from A to B. The destination will be echo. In the reply from B to A, the source will not be 'echo' it could be anything. The important part will be the destination port which is 'echo-reply'. Hope I haven't confused. Hope even more that I haven't errored. Gaz Anthony Pace wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... for instance : access-list 101 permit icmp any host 207.122.1.5 echo access-list 101 permit icmp host 207.122.2.3 any echo-reply but not access-list 101 permit icmp any echo-reply any Anthony Pace Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42601t=42601 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Added HSRP can't surf or Resolve DNS [7:42592]
What did you set the default gateway for hosts on vlan2? Are you having issues from both vlans or just vlan2? Daniel Ladrach CCNA, CCNP WorldCom -Original Message- From: Joel Panetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 4:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Added HSRP can't surf or Resolve DNS [7:42592] When adding hsrp does my default gateway become what is now my virtual gateway? Since implenting it in my test environment I can not resovle DNS and surf. I am using 1 cat 6509 each with an MFSC here is a sample of my test conf MFSC #1 interface Vlan1 ip address 10.8.1.2 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast standby 1 priority 110 stnadby 1 preempt standby 1 ip 10.8.1.1 ! interface Vlan2 ip address 10.8.2.2 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast standby 2 priority 110 standby 2 preempt standby 2 ip 10.8.2.1 MFSC #2 interface Vlan1 ip address 10.8.1.3 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast standby 1 priority 109 stnadby 1 preempt standby 1 ip 10.8.1.1 ! interface Vlan2 ip address 10.8.2.3 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast standby 2 priority 109 standby 2 preempt standby 2 ip 10.8.2.1 The IP for the 6509 is 10.8.1.4/24 I have set everything up with a default gateway of 10.8.1.1/24 Thanks all Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42602t=42592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What are the first thing you do...?? [7:42276]
Youre most lkely correct when y ou say that its an 802.3 with 802.2 headers. i didn;t think of that and i wondered when id ever use that info again! lol. anyway, im using Sniferr Pro and trying to fumble my through some x.25 and ipx packets. all of our teller systems or still on X.25 traffic until we convert to an all ip based teller system. our internal network will still be ipx as we a few legacy novell 3.1 server that dont do ip yet. all of our server are configured correctly for frame types. we did have a problem with sap and type 20 propagation amongst the branches but that has been since fixed. i think ineed to join a novell group as well, i think i still a win2k AD network instead of a netware network. just me i guess :) Luis Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... It sure sounds like your servers have enough power to handle 100 users (dual 1333 MHz processors). But if you are really concerned about performance, you'll want to do more investigation. The software could be slow. As I mentioned, with a sniffer you can often pinpoint the probable cause of slowness. Sometimes, it's a layer 8 problem (whiny users ;-) I wanted to comment on this statement you made: Sniffer always seems to get the frame type wrong. we're using 802.2 and it always says 802.3 frames! A sniffer just tells you what it sees. Unless you're using some truly awful analyzer software (not Network Associates), it's not lying. You may want to verify the configuration of frame types on all servers, routers, clients. Maybe you're just misunderstanding what the sniffer is saying, though. A standard IEEE 802.3 frame has an 802.3 and 802.2 header. Network Associates calls this an 802.3 frame. (Look inside these packets to see if there's also an 802.2 header present.) Novell calls this an ETHERNET_802.2 frame. Cisco calls is a SAP frame. WildPackets EtherPeek calls is an IEEE 802.3 LSAP frame! Most of the world, though, just considered it an typical 802.3 frame. Be wary of Novell terminology. A Novell raw frame has just an IEEE 802.3 header, with no 802.2 header. Network Associates calls this a Novell Proprietary frame. Novell calls it a ETHERNET_802.3 frame. Cisco calls is a novell-ether frame. WildPackets calls is an IEEE 802.3 IPX frame! This frame type is only used on older Novell implementations and only Novell would call it an 802.3 frame. The rest of the world knows that IEEE requires an 802.2 header to follow an 802.3 header. Cisco has some pictures of frames here, if this has confused you. In this document they call the Novell raw format 802.3-Only Encapsulation. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/encheat.html Priscilla At 03:47 PM 4/25/02, Luis Wiedemann wrote: Every workstation is forced at 10/100/half, depending on the physical lines. we have to force half duplex at the workstation and server because our datacenter hosts our oracle DB for the teller and customer accounts, so we need the error correction/detection with full duplex. our server is a compaq proliant dual pIII 1333mhz with 3 10k 30 gig scsi running in raid 5. im not entirely convinced that our server is getting hit too hard. it supports about 100 users. it is however running NW 5.1, which i am not too largely a fan of. i will run sniffer for a while and see what i get. im not tfamiliar with packet sniffing. i can do it, im just not too sure what im looking at! and sniffer always seems to get the frame type wrong. we're using 802.2 and it always says 802.3 frames! anyway... thanks for any suggestions, i guess i just wanted to make sure the switches were configured properly, but it seems that compared to routers, they're pieces of cake when you're not even worrying about vlans! Thanks again Luis Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You did the most important thing, enabling portfast. That will speed up performance on startup. Also check for a duplex mismatch problem on every port. You may want to hard code everything as full duplex, (assuming the ports just connect a single device). Don't rely on auto-negotiation since it doesn't work a lot of the time. (On the other hand, there are cases where auto-negotiation works better than hard-coding, so do some testing first.) Keeping STP enabled shouldn't be a problem. It's the safest thing to do unless you are absolutely sure nobody is going to add any switches to the network in a redundant way. It's hard to ensure that. These days if you order a hub from some vendors, you get a switch anyway. End users could order a hub to add devices somewhere in the network and actually get a switch and possibly cause problems. STP won't affect the routers unless they are configured as bridges, which they probably aren't. STP does send BPDU packets every two seconds, which some people could consider a performance issue. These
Alternatives to Cisco VPN client [7:42604]
Let me preface this by saying that all of my VPN experience has been either peer-peer or client to peer with the Cisco VPN client 1.x or 3.x. Please ignore my ignorance if I've missed something obvious. I've got a major complaint with the Cisco VPN client. It's not smart enough to differentiate local traffic/Internet traffic from VPN traffic. Therefore, you can't browse the Internet and your VPN network at the same time. I'm looking for alternative software clients that are smart enough to say Ok. Any traffic destined for 10.x.x.x (or whatever you define VPN traffic to be) goes to the tunnel. If the traffic has any destination other than 10.x.x.x, it's treated as if the tunnel weren't even present. This would allow my client machine to easily browse the Internet and the VPN remote network at the same time. I've done some preliminary searches for third-party clients, but don't want to waste time trying 50 clients that may not be any good. I've found some for Mac OS X that'll do what I want, but I haven't found one for Win 9x/ME/NT/2K/XP. There's got to be a decent client that does this. Sorry for rambling :-) It's been a long day. As usual, thanks in advance to everyone. Craig Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42604t=42604 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
