Catalyst 5500 Sup IIIF [7:73948]
Hey Peeps, Does anyone know the part number for a Sup IIIF card for a Cat5500?? I've searched around and can't find it! Thanks Stevo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73948&t=73948 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: CCIE Lab Setup [7:73612]
It is for R&S (ccie) Thanks >From: "Nakul Malik" >Reply-To: "Nakul Malik" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Setup [7:73612] >Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 16:00:46 GMT > >Which track are you studying for? > >If you need a PIX and like most of us cant afford to buy everything you >need >for your lab, i would suggest building your own. I dont know how this >stands >legally, but from a technical aspect it is possible to build your own PIX >clone. You can find detailed documentation on the net on how to do this. > >-Nakul > > >""David Power"" wrote in message >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hello, > > I have three 2500 routers (2x2503 and 1x2514) with the budget of 1000$ I >am > > planning to buy some more routers for my CCIE home lab. Which routers or > > switches I must have ( with in my $ limits or couple hundred more). > > Every suggestion will be appreciated > > David > > > > _ > > Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online > > http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 > > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > > http://shop.groupstudy.com > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: >http://shop.groupstudy.com >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73620&t=73612 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: hsrp and icmp redirects [7:73972]
Can u provide a simple ascii diagram for your topology including the WAN connection to reach the remote branches. >From: "Robert Kimble" > >Ok. > >I'll try to explain what happened as best as I can. > >We have two 6509's each with an msfc and until last night we were only using >the msfc on one of them. > >Last night I brought up the second msfc and set up hsrp between the two. > >everything worked great here in the office last night. However, this morning >our branch offices had no connectivity to us. > >My boss went in and turned off icmp redirects on the vlan interfaces on the >second msfc and everything was fine. > >1. I thought icmp redirects were disabled automatically when you configure >hsrp on an interface. > >2. How did turning off the redirects fix the problem? (I would ask my boss >but I probably look bad enough). > >Any way. > >Please let me know if you need GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: >http://shop.groupstudy.com >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73978&t=73972 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Cisco Safe Security Exam -->9E0-131 CSI or [7:73971]
What is the passing score for the SAFE test? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73976&t=73971 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
2501 VPN [7:73977]
I need assistance configuring VPN between a Cisco 2501 and a Cisco 827H. Both routers have IOS that supports VPN. The 2501 is connected to the ISP via a 768kb fractional T1 and the 827H has an ADSL connection to the same ISP. If anyone could please send sample configurations for either router, I would appreciate it. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73977&t=73977 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: PIM Mode question [7:73108]
Thanks for the info Doan Is this info from experience of large multicast deployment? What also I was trying to get at is the question of whether with the enhancement of auto-rp listener is the need for sparse-dense totally negated? This would be regardless of the overhead issues of using auto-rp in the first place, for instance in a LAN environment where the overhead is bearable. Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73973&t=73108 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: New Remote Access exam 642-821 vs the old current [7:73592]
I'm currently going through the new BCRAN course for this exam on Knowledgenet.com. There is NO X.25 in the entire course. You are correct, Cable and DSL are covered as is VPN. TACACS+ and AAA is definetly part of the course, also. Don Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73975&t=73592 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
hsrp icmp redirects NEVERMIND [7:73974]
Wow. It must've been a late night last night. I figured out the problem. It had nothing to do with icmp. Thank you! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73974&t=73974 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: multiple ospf processes & route insertion [7:73727]
Dear Fred "Wow, um, err, no offense, but you're a CCNP? And confused about the concept of a route table? " everyone could get confused about anything :). especially in some 2 or 3 am morning. first sorry about that. "There can't be the same route for BGP and a static in the active routing table concurrently. That is unless you do something weird like set the administrative distance of the static route equal to that of the BGP route, but I'm not even sure about that. " yes, i do saw two same routes ,one from EBGP ,one from static. both them are 192.168.0.0/17. one AD is 20 another is 110. best regards. Jason J. CCNP P.R.C **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73843&t=73727 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: traffic flow [7:73495]
That's what i said, use a ws with SNIFFER in between, INSTANT graphs. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Doan Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 7 augustus 2003 22:11 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: traffic flow [7:73495] Netlfow would be your best way of doing this but you will need a netflow server and I think that costs additional money. AFter that you would need to write scripts to parse out the netflow data, because it's not pretty to look at. ip accounting is a quick and intrusive way to do accounting of ip traffic but it is stresful to your router and would only give you the biggest IP pair talker. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73863&t=73495 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Cisco inspection fee for used gear?? [7:73788]
This is out right theft by the hardware venders You pad for the software when you bought you should be able to transfer it. We sould demand right to transfer or buycot these companies -Original Message- From: Colin Weiner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 6:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco inspection fee for used gear?? [7:73788] Interesting article about buying used network equipment (I buy all my lab stuff of ebay or other vendors) http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/08/08/31FEfair_1.html "I made the mistake of showing a visiting Cisco rep the 2611 router I'd purchased on eBay for $1,200," says Mark Payton, director of IT at the Vermont Academy, a school in Saxtons River, Vt. "Not only are they asking me to pay to relicense the software, but they are expecting me to get a one-year SmartNet maintenance agreement and to pay an inspection fee." Colin **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73885&t=73788 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: multiple ospf processes & route insertion [7:73727]
er.Sorry about that! I Think i make a mistake, I did no see two same routes from two different routing protocols. in fact, one is "61.168.0.0",another is" 161.168.0.0" . really sorry for put so much trouble on you. everything comes from my experiments's wrong result. the wrong result comes to the wrong conclusion. so ,really thanks a lot , Zomber and Fred. for pointing out my mistake, so i can get a chance to learn more. Jason.J CCNP P.R.C **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73818&t=73727 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: New CCNP 642-8x1 exams [7:73598]
After looking over the blueprints, there aren't a lot of differences between the old exams and the new exams that I can see. There are some newer topics, but I really don't see enough change between the old exams and the new exams to get nervous about. I noticed that Cisco likes to take a topic from an old blueprint and re-word it so that it looks different in a new blueprint, even though it's the same topic. Here's what I've noticed "most of the time" in the past when Cisco releases a new version of a particular exam: The core topics are always covered, regardless of whether you're taking an old exam or a new exam. Cisco likes to re-word questions taken from old exams and put them on new exams. However, they still cover the same topics. Know these core topics and you have 90% of the exam covered. The other 10% may be new questions covering new technologies, etc. Just my opinion. Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Alan Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: New CCNP 642-8x1 exams [7:73598] We all know that the existing CCNP (640-xxx) will no longer be available after Sept and will be replaced by the new 642-8x1 series. However there is no preparation materials (e.g. Cisco Press books) available as of today. Can someone let us know the differences between the current exams and the 642- series so that we can prepare to sit the new exams in Oct/Nov? I tried the Cisco Certification sites and print out the exam syllabus of both but cannot make out the difference as they are presented in different formats. Thank you Alan **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73675&t=73598 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
FW: cisco back to back cable [7:71992]
or maybe try alternating the dce/dte settings on the serial interfaces -Original Message- From: LINSEN Jurgen (BMB) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 August 2003 09:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: cisco back to back cable [7:71992] Sure you're using a cross cable? -Original Message- From: KW S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 6:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cisco back to back cable [7:71992] Dear All I have a 2501 and 2505 and I am trying to set up a homelab..These 2 routers come with a cable which is a DB60(DTE) and the other end is a DB60(DCE).This is wat that is label on the cable. Anyway, I try to connect this cable to the serial interface of the 2 routers...and both the routers are showing serial is down and line protocol is down. I guess I have used the wrong cable...or maybe I have missed out something. Please comment.. Regards, kws DISCLAIMER "This e-mail and any attachment thereto may contain information which is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights and are intended for the sole use of the recipient(s) named above. Any use of the information contained herein (including, but not limited to, total or partial reproduction, communication or distribution in any form) by other persons than the designated recipient(s) is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender either by telephone or by e-mail and delete the material from any computer". Thank you for your cooperation. For further information about Proximus mobile phone services please see our website at http://www.proximus.be or refer to any Proximus agent. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73711&t=71992 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: RE: PIX translation problem [7:72567]
changing the timeout value worked, so the problem is fixed Thanks all > > From: "Reimer, Fred" > Date: 2003/08/08 Fri AM 11:26:37 EDT > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: PIX translation problem [7:72567] > > Greg Owens 202-398-2552 [GroupStudy removed an attachment with a content-type header it could not parse.] [Content-Type: null; name="replyAll"] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73744&t=72567 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: CCNP and future CCIE lab setup [7:73696]
I think they're suggesting that you make a short cross-over male to female cable (instead of the standard male to male patch cable). The idea being that you could still use your standard patch cables and where a cross-over cable was required and simply connect the short cross-over to one end. Does this clear it up for you or are you more confused? ~~ R. Benjamin Kessler Network Engineer CCIE #8762, CISSP, CCSE Kessler Consulting Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kesslerconsulting.com Phone: 260-625-3273 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCNP and future CCIE lab setup [7:73696] I honestly do not know what you are referring to. A plug on one side and a jack on the other? I am probably missing something simple but nothing rings a bell!!! Of course, I am a girl from Thailand and maybe my "slang" English is not up to par. Hee hee Can you please explain what that is about? **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73762&t=73696 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: 642-801 [7:73509]
Hello, I also did the Beta, but I did not find QoS. One may also be aware that it is a lot easier to now fail this exam, because the passing score is 776. With the exam that broad, one has to actually be well prepared for this one:-) Plus, there is plenty of BGP, IS-IS and OSPF. Good Luck! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73584&t=73509 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
BGP and QOS Beta exams [7:73599]
Folks I have seen a few mentions of the BGP and QOS beta exams recently (also mentioning the results). My question is, am I the only person still waiting for results for these exams? My Vue exam history shows Tue February 18, 2003 02:30 PM 641-661: BGP Corefacts, Cambridge, GBR taken Thu March 27, 2003 02:00 PM 643-641: Quality of Service Corefacts, Cambridge, GBR taken and certmanager doesnt mention either. Is it time to start chasing vue/cisco? As an aside, I took the CCNP support beta last year and never actually received results at all, although it did show up in certmanager as a pass about 3 months after I had given up waiting and passed the non beta version. Thanks Peter Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73599&t=73599 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: multiple ospf processes & route insertion [7:73727]
Dear Zsombor: "You can't put the same interface into multiple OSPF processes but that doesn't mean that the two processes can't learn about the same network." if you can't learn put one interface into multiple OSPF processes, then except you redistribute the direct donnected and static, how could they learn the same address ,learn from each other? i think the same condition exist on other routes ,how could a network link's status be share with other ospf process without put the sme interface into multiple OSPF processes? best regards Jason J CCNP P.R.C Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73797&t=73727 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: 2620xm w/WIC-1DSU-T1 [7:73634]
Martijn- thanks for the url. This hit the topic squarely on point as I too had the same question. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73669&t=73634 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: multiple ospf processes & route insertion [7:73727]
The process with the lower administrative distance will install the prefix into the routing table. If the administrative distances are the same (and they are by default), then the process that "comes first" will install the route. In other words, it is not deterministic unless you change the default admin distance. What are you trying to achieve with these ~3 OSPF routing processes? Thanks, Zsombor p b wrote: > > > I'm considering a routing architecture where devices in the > network would run ~3 OSPF routing processes. > > I think each routing process will be handling the routing > of non-overlapping address blocks and thus the routes they > give to the forwarding table should be disjoint. > > However, I'd like to understand what happens if two processes > each were to provide the same prefix to the forwarding table. > Specifically, what are the rules to determine which prefix > is put into the routing table? > > Also be interested in any learnings folks might have had when > they've run multiple OSPF processes. > > Thanks > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73741&t=73727 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Multicasting [7:72403]
If you're using PIM Dense-Sparse mode you will need to designate an RP router because the DR needs to know where to send the (*,G) to join and the source DR needs to register the SA messages to the RP. What you can do for this case is R1-SP1---SP2-R2 make either R1 or R2 the RP. Assign a static RP-to-group mapping to the router that is not the RP to point to the one that is assigned the RP. If you're using static RP mapping then all you need on your tunnel interface is PIM-SM. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73687&t=72403 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Networkers 2002 PDFs [7:73522]
O.K. How About This http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw03/post/presos.html Is That Better??? Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Networkers 2002 PDFs [7:73522] Fred, You've been bitten by the "URL in the first line" problem. If the first line in a post is a URL it sometimes gets munged. It's helpful to add some padding at the beginning to get the URL off of the first line. John >>> Reimer, Fred 8/5/03 12:23:39 PM >>> Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: YASSER ALY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Networkers 2002 PDFs [7:73522] Dear All, Anybody knows the URL to download Cisco networkers 2002 PDFs Are PDFs for 2003 available for download ? Regards, Yasser _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73554&t=73522 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613]
VPN client won't be possible for this project (no software installation, need vpn lan to lan). Pix can't be used due to managerial issues, doesn't like them :(. So the only remaining possibilities (beside stuff like D-Link I really wouldn't bet my security on) are routers or possibly a nokia fw-1 box. 400kb/s should probably be ok, otherwise a 831 will be more than enough I think. I'll discover soon if my testing budget gets approved, I'd hate to research and drool and then later hear "we'll outsource this" just when I hope to get hands-on experience on this stuff :(. Bye Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +39-041-5907073 ph -- +39-041-5907472 fax > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:30 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613] > > > Just let them go on performance, not on command set? > > I remember about 400Kb/s 3des for the 806/820's > the 830's should do 2Mb/s for 3des. > > 1700's VPN bundle carry a xtra crypto card. At least 2Mbit. > Watch for the > amount of VPN connections, too many access-lists's etc. (cpu power) > > A pix 501 or small vpn client could also do the job? > > Martijn > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: donderdag 7 augustus 2003 11:04 > Aan: Jansen, M; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: RE: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613] > > > No, it is unrelated - I just remembered the 1000 series being limited > (regarding at least NTP) and feared the 800 series, being the > replacement > for the 1000 series, could have the same limitations. > > Heiko > > -- > -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it > -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- +39-041-5907073 ph > -- +39-041-5907472 fax > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 10:51 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613] > > > > > > What about NTP? Should it read NAT? > > > > Martijn > > > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > > Van: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Verzonden: donderdag 7 augustus 2003 8:10 > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Onderwerp: RE: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613] > > > > > > Thanks! > > I just wanted to double check - some hears ago I got burnt in > > a similar > > situation, with a 1003 and (no) NTP if I remember correctly. > > Heiko > > > > -- > > -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it > > -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- +39-041-5907073 ph > > -- +39-041-5907472 fax > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 8:04 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613] > > > > > > > > > It does. It is IOS. Just do your CLI thing. > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > > > Van: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Verzonden: woensdag 6 augustus 2003 17:21 > > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Onderwerp: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613] > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > for some tests I need something cheap to play with, having 2 > > > eth, vpn and > > > (static) nat capability. Could anybody confirm if a 806 with > > > a "IP/FW PLUS > > > 3DES" image does support IPSEC and NAT at the same time ? > > > From the docs I'd say it does support both but can I have a > > > vpn tunnel, and > > > nat inside the local network, and nat outside the remote (on > > > the other end > > > of the tunnel) network ? > > > The other endpoint would be a pix or a fw-1 although that > > > shouldn't matter. > > > Couldn't find any configrmation of this in the docs :( > > > Thanks > > > Heiko > > > > > > -- > > > -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it > > > -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- +39-041-5907073 ph > > > -- +39-041-5907472 fax > > > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the > GroupStudy Store: > > > http://shop.groupstudy.com > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > > http://shop.groupstudy.com > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73655&t=73613 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: 3550 Policing [7:73627]
For TCP traffic you want to use: 1) 1518 bytes * (window size * 2) 2) rate / 8000 Whichever is HIGHER. The minimum is 8000 bytes on the 3550. You want to use this so that the policer does not take effect before TCP flow control kicks in. The formula uses 8000 because the policer uses a 0.125ms policing interval, so there are 8000 of these in one second, which is what your rate is measured in. So, for 3Mbps your burst would be 375 bytes, which is below the minimum configurable value of 8000. If you want to take TCP window size in consideration, then the burst would be 64512 (Windows XP, at least on my machine) * 2 * 1518 = 195,858,432 bytes. Sounds ridiculous. Even a 16K window size would be about 50MB. I don't get the 1518 * (window size * 2) formula, but that was the formula in one of the Networkers troubleshooting sessions. Then again, I went to all three troubleshooting sessions (2900/3500, 4500, and 6500) and in each and every one of them the presenters explained how to calculate the burst rate differently. The 3550 was the one with that formula though. The 6500 used rate / 4000, so I assume it's policing interval is 0.25ms instead of 0.125ms. Take a guess and go with it. ;-) Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: Erek Riccobuano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 3550 Policing [7:73627] I want to police traffic on a 3550 so that one port is set to 3Mbs another is 10Mbs and another is 1.5Mbs. How do I calculate the burst? The CCO give a formula like below but I can't make sense of it. Burstmin (bits) = Rate (bps) / 8000 (1/sec) My configs so far are below. Am I going about this the right way? All I want to do is limit each customer to the bandwidth agreed upon. access-list 100 permit ip any any class-map match-all customer1 match access-group 100 policy-map customer1 class customer1 police 300 exceed-action drop interface FastEthernet0/16 service-policy input customer1 Thank you, Erek **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73632&t=73627 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Access Internet via the corporate PIX [7:73563]
Build the tunnel first. Use HQ or RO dns. Make sure users cannot HTTP direct through firewall, enable direct HTTPS trough it if you want. MAybe also no ftp etc, no direct dns? I believe you need an inside next hop proxy-server. Until 6.2 atleast pix does not route ip between 2 ipsec tunnels. User's Get request forwarded to deamon through tunnel, fetched from cache or Inet, reply to browser through tunnel. Proxy will also do a nice job filtering mobile code and keeping surfing behaviour in line with policies. I'd say you should already should have it. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: johnman johnman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 5 augustus 2003 23:06 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Access Internet via the corporate PIX [7:73563] I am building a vpn tunnel PIX-to-PIX both connected to the internet. I would like theusers at the remote site to access the internet only via the the corporate PIX. Remote PIX 501: Inside net 192.168.2.0/24 outside x.x.x.x Corporate PIX 515: Inside net 192.168.1.0/24 outisde IP y.y.y.y How would I build the access-list to force the remote users behind the PIX 501 to access the internet via the PIX 515 at the corporate site ? _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73601&t=73563 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Access server 2511 Reverse Telnet [7:73656]
Hi Wallis. You have to use a crossover cable, not the normal straight through. If you have the one with octal cables, you can use a RJ45-RJ45 connector and then another crossover cable. Best regards, Oliver Wallis Short sagte: > HI All > > I was wondering if any of you guys have come across reverse telnet > problems > with the 2511 access server? > Basically I have 8 devices connected and when I reverse telnet to them all > is OK, but on when I try and connect to a 2900 XL switch I get this : > Termserver#telnet 192.168.1.1 2006 > Trying 192.168.1.1, 2006 ..Open > > And thats it, nothing else. No command prompt or anything comes up on the > screen > > I have configured telnet connections as exactly the same as all my other > devices, I have IOS 12.0(5.2). > > Any ideas ?? > Cheers > Wallis > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > -- Oliver Hensel telematis Netzwerke GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Siemensstrasse 23, D-76275 Ettlingen Tel: +49 (0) 7243-3448-0, Fax: -498 visit us: http://telematis.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73660&t=73656 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613]
No, it is unrelated - I just remembered the 1000 series being limited (regarding at least NTP) and feared the 800 series, being the replacement for the 1000 series, could have the same limitations. Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +39-041-5907073 ph -- +39-041-5907472 fax > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 10:51 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613] > > > What about NTP? Should it read NAT? > > Martijn > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: donderdag 7 augustus 2003 8:10 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: RE: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613] > > > Thanks! > I just wanted to double check - some hears ago I got burnt in > a similar > situation, with a 1003 and (no) NTP if I remember correctly. > Heiko > > -- > -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it > -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- +39-041-5907073 ph > -- +39-041-5907472 fax > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 8:04 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613] > > > > > > It does. It is IOS. Just do your CLI thing. > > > > Martijn > > > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > > Van: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Verzonden: woensdag 6 augustus 2003 17:21 > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Onderwerp: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613] > > > > > > Hi, > > > > for some tests I need something cheap to play with, having 2 > > eth, vpn and > > (static) nat capability. Could anybody confirm if a 806 with > > a "IP/FW PLUS > > 3DES" image does support IPSEC and NAT at the same time ? > > From the docs I'd say it does support both but can I have a > > vpn tunnel, and > > nat inside the local network, and nat outside the remote (on > > the other end > > of the tunnel) network ? > > The other endpoint would be a pix or a fw-1 although that > > shouldn't matter. > > Couldn't find any configrmation of this in the docs :( > > Thanks > > Heiko > > > > -- > > -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it > > -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- +39-041-5907073 ph > > -- +39-041-5907472 fax > > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > > http://shop.groupstudy.com > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73649&t=73613 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Gigabit Ethernet & Collisions [7:73555]
Is it really working at gigabit speed?, there are several interfaces which are able to work at 10/100/1000 speeds Neil Andersen wrote: > > What would cause show interface for a Gigabit interface to show > increasing collisions? My understanding is that Gigabit > Ehternet only runs in FULL DUPLEX. > > Thanks, > Neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73569&t=73555 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Loopback Interface [7:73305]
You've got it! They can be used for iBGP, DNS resolution, GRE tunnel endpoints, OSPF/BGP Router IDs, route summarization...the list goes on. >>> Robert Edmonds 8/5/03 3:26:35 PM >>> So, if I understand correctly, aside from OSPF router ID's and the like, just use a loopback interface when you want an always up/up interface. That's pretty simple. ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exactly right. Sometimes it's nice to have a virtual interface whose status > is not tied directly to a physical interface. We've mentioned several > configurations where this is the case. From the routers perspective it may > have a couple of special properties, since it's virtual, but it's still just > another interface, as Dave said. > > >>> MADMAN 8/5/03 1:25:25 PM >>> > I think your thinking way too hard about this;) A loobback is > nothing more than a logical interface as opposed to a physical > interface. As far as the routing process is concerned it's just another > interface. Don't know how to articulate it any further. > >Dave > > Robert Edmonds wrote: > > You gentlemen have pointed out some good uses for loopback interfaces. > > However, my dilema still remains that I have yet to have somebody solidly > > explain loopback interfaces in a way that my simple mind can understand. > I > > have also been unsuccessful in finding any website that accomplish this. > > Any takers? > > > > Robert > > > > ""p b"" wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>terminate iBGP sessions on > > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > > http://shop.groupstudy.com > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > > -- > David Madland > CCIE# 2016 > Sr. Network Engineer > Qwest Communications > 612-664-3367 > > "Government can do something for the people only in proportion as it > can do something to the people." -- Thomas Jefferson > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73566&t=73305 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Pix 506e, 1721 router [7:73521]
you said vpn pix-2-pix, so how does the router come into play? If he is just a transit device you need not do anything. -Original Message- From: zak spaniol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pix 506e, 1721 router [7:73521] I am going to be performing a VPN pix to pix configuration, the only part I am not sure of is how to configure router. Any suggestion? **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73547&t=73521 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
How to study..Self or Classes [7:73624]
Hello, I have a simple question. Has anyone used Knowledgenet for thee CCNP cert? I have put together the following lab and I am not sure I should go for the classes or just do the self pace thing. Also if I self pace I am not sure I will be able to get the new exam materal. Does anyone know if CISCo Press is going to put it out? I heard they where not. I guess there is SYBEX. Are they good? Lab and thing i have missed please let me know: 2 - Cisco 2610 Router, 64/16 2 - Cisco NM-1V 1-Slot Voice Network Module 2 - VIC-2FXS 2-Port Voice Interface Card 1 - WIC-1B-S/T 1-Port ISDN/BRI WAN Interface Card (for the 2610) 1 - WIC-1B-U 1-Port ISDN/BRI WAN Interface Card (for the 2610) 1 - Vconsole 4 port 2S/T-2U ISDN Simulator (all 4 can be used at once) 1 - 2511 16/16 1 - 2503 16/16 1 - 2507 16/16 2 - Cisco 4500M Router 2 - Cisco NP-1A One-Port OC3 ATM Module 2 - Cisco NP-4T Four-Port Serial Module 2 - Cisco NP-2E One-Port Ethernet Module 2 - AGS+ with 6 Ethernet, 4 serial, 2 token ring, 2 FDDI ports each (still trying to fiuge out the type of DCE DTE cables to use on the AGS+..Any Help?) 1 - Cisco WS-C1912 Switch 1 - 3550 1 - 2950 1 - 1201 7 - PII 400 256mb ram 10gb HDD systems. OS anything from Windows 2003 Adv Server to Linux. 1 - System config with Smoothwall as a firewall (3 Nics) Thanks, ~Paul~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73624&t=73624 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613]
It does. It is IOS. Just do your CLI thing. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 6 augustus 2003 17:21 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613] Hi, for some tests I need something cheap to play with, having 2 eth, vpn and (static) nat capability. Could anybody confirm if a 806 with a "IP/FW PLUS 3DES" image does support IPSEC and NAT at the same time ? >From the docs I'd say it does support both but can I have a vpn tunnel, and nat inside the local network, and nat outside the remote (on the other end of the tunnel) network ? The other endpoint would be a pix or a fw-1 although that shouldn't matter. Couldn't find any configrmation of this in the docs :( Thanks Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +39-041-5907073 ph -- +39-041-5907472 fax **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73642&t=73613 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613]
No sntp time source was available if I remember correctly, only novell
clients and servers, possibly a sco server several (isdn!) hops away.
Details are hazy now and I don't have access to the notes anymore since I
switched work some years ago, but I remember we had to live with an unsynced
clock and use the old "now the router says it's x o'clock so that log is
really from y o'clock" differential timing :(.
I think at that time on the remote network were only old netboot msdos
novell clients and we could not bring up the isdn line in order to sync the
clock or something like that. Hmm can't be, it would have synced happily
with sntp at least whenever the line was up, there must have been some other
reason. Possibly incompetence on our side :)
Heiko
--
-- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it
-- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- +39-041-5907073 ph
-- +39-041-5907472 fax
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613]
>
>
> Use SNTP?
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios12
> 1/121cgcr/fun_
> r/frprt3/frd3003.htm#1020770
>
>
> sntp server
> To configure a Cisco 1003, Cisco 1004, Cisco 1005, Cisco
> 1600, Cisco 1720,
> Cisco 1750, or Cisco 800 router to use the Simple Network
> Time Protocol
> (SNTP) to request and accept Network Time Protocol (NTP)
> traffic from a
> stratum 1 time server, use the sntp server global
> configuration command. The
> no form of the command removes a server from the list of NTP servers.
>
> sntp server {address | hostname} [version number]
> no sntp server {address | hostname}
> Syntax Description
>
> address
> IP address of the time server.
>
> hostname
> Host name of the time server.
>
> version number
> (Optional) Version of NTP to use. The default is 1.
>
>
>
> Defaults
>
> The router does not accept SNTP traffic from a time server.
>
> Command Modes
>
> Global configuration
>
> Command History
>
> Release Modification
> 11.2
> This command was introduced.
>
>
>
> Usage Guidelines
>
> SNTP is a compact, client-only version of the NTP. SNMP can
> only receive the
> time from NTP servers; it cannot be used to provide time
> services to other
> systems.
>
> SNTP typically provides time within 100 milliseconds of the
> accurate time,
> but it does not provide the complex filtering and statistical
> mechanisms of
> NTP. In addition, SNTP does not authenticate traffic, although you can
> configure extended access lists to provide some protection.
>
> Enter this command once for each NTP server.
>
> You must configure the router with either this command or the
> sntp broadcast
> client command in order enable SNTP.
>
> SNTP time servers should operate only at the root (stratum 1)
> of the subnet,
> and then only in configurations where no other source of
> synchronization
> other than a reliable radio or modem time service is
> available. A stratum 2
> server cannot be used as an SNTP time server. The use of SNTP
> rather than
> NTP in primary servers should be carefully considered.
>
> Examples
>
> The following example enables the router to request and
> accept NTP packets
> from the server at 172.21.118.9 and shows sample show sntp
> command output:
>
> Router(config)# sntp server 172.21.118.9
> Router(config)# end
> Router#
> %SYS-5-CONFIG: Configured from console by console
> Router# show sntp
> SNTP server Stratum Version Last Receive
> 172.21.118.9 5 3 00:01:02Synced
> Related Commands
>
> Command Description
> show sntp
> Shows information about the SNTP on a Cisco 1003, Cisco
> 1004, Cisco 1005,
> Cisco 1600, Cisco 1720, or Cisco 1750 router.
>
> sntp broadcast client
> Configures a Cisco 1003, Cisco 1004, Cisco 1005, Cisco 1600,
> Cisco 1720, or
> Cisco 1750 router to use the SNTP to accept NTP traffic from
> any broadcast
> server.
>
>
>
>
> Martijn
>
>
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Verzonden: donderdag 7 augustus 2003 11:04
> Aan: Jansen, M; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: RE: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613]
>
>
> No, it is unrelated - I just remembered the 1000 series being limited
> (regarding at least NTP) and feared the 800 series, being the
> replacement
> for the 1000 series, could have the same limitations.
>
> Heiko
>
> --
> -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it
> -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -- +39-041-5907073 ph
> -- +39-041-5907472 fax
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 10:51 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613]
> >
> >
> > What about NTP? Should it read NAT?
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > Van: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Verzonden: do
RE: Timer for RIP [7:73774]
Hi, as far as i can see: there are two kinds of possible reasons that corrupt the communication between R3 and R5, physical and logical. if it is physical , R3 can detect it immediately, at the time ,maybe it will get a route from R2 telling a route to R5, so , R3 step into holddown, R2 can not get any update about Route to R5 from R3,until time's up for its Invalid timer, so R2 will come to holddown status,then finnaly R3 can get correct route information to R5,in fact it's none! . the same conditon will comes to R1 and R2 . it's same for a logical corrupt.. Jason.J CCNP P.R.C Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73779&t=73774 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Gigabit Ethernet & Collisions [7:73555]
What would cause show interface for a Gigabit interface to show increasing collisions? My understanding is that Gigabit Ehternet only runs in FULL DUPLEX. Thanks, Neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73555&t=73555 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Port redirection on a PIX [7:73065]
What about changing INTERFACE OUTSIDE to your NATed outside IP address? ""NetEng"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I get the error "Invalid global IP address OUTSIDE". I also tried it w/o > 'interface'. If you can offfer any more help I would appreciate it as I > really need to get this fixed. Thanks. > > > ""Robert Edmonds"" wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > With regards to these two lines: > > > > > static (inside,outside) tcp interface ftp 192.168.0.1 ftp netmask > > > 255.255.255.255 0 0 > > > static (inside,outside) tcp interface www 192.168.0.1 www netmask > > > 255.255.255.255 0 0 > > > > I believe they should read: > > > > static (inside, outside) tcp interface OUTSIDE ftp 192.168.0.1 ftp netmask > > 255.255.255.255 > > static (inside, outside) tcp interface OUTSIDE ftp 192.168.0.1 ftp netmask > > 255.255.255.255 > > > > If I am wrong, I'm sure I will be severely reprimanded...I mean corrected. > > > > > > ""NetEng"" wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I am still not able to connect to my web and ftp services. I have pasted > > the > > > relative info below. Am I missing something or do is my config wrong? > > > : > > > PIX Version 6.1(3) > > > nameif ethernet0 outside security0 > > > nameif ethernet1 inside security100 > > > access-list 101 permit icmp any any unreachable > > > access-list 101 permit icmp any any time-exceeded > > > access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo-reply > > > access-list 102 permit tcp any any eq ftp > > > access-list 102 permit tcp any any eq www > > > pager lines 24 > > > interface ethernet0 10baset > > > interface ethernet1 10full > > > mtu outside 1500 > > > mtu inside 1500 > > > ip address outside dhcp setroute > > > ip address inside 192.168.0.100 255.255.255.0 > > > global (outside) 1 interface > > > nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 > > > static (inside,outside) tcp interface ftp 192.168.0.1 ftp netmask > > > 255.255.255.255 0 0 > > > static (inside,outside) tcp interface www 192.168.0.1 www netmask > > > 255.255.255.255 0 0 > > > access-group 102 in interface outside > > > > > > Thanks for the help so far > > > > > > > > > ""Scott"" wrote in message > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > static (inside,outside) tcp interface ftp 10.1.1.3 ftp netmask > > > > 255.255.255.255 0 0 > > > > > > > > Scott > > > > ""NetEng"" wrote in message > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > I'm trying to do port redirection on my PIX and here's the example > > from > > > > > Cisco. My problem is my outside interface is set for DHCP. How do I > > > change > > > > > the command to reflect a dynamic outside address? > > > > > > > > > > static (inside,outside) tcp 172.18.124.99 ftp 10.1.1.3 ftp netmask > > > > > 255.255.255.255 0 0 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73537&t=73065 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: multiple ospf processes & route insertion [7:73727]
sorry , i think what i've said is totally wrong!.god damn. i'am a little dizzy. confused about the concept of route table. i'am just doing experiments on routers. dizzy. since the same routes from different protocols can not be present on the route table , but why do i saw there are the same route from BGP and Static?? :( Jason J CCNP P.R.C Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73786&t=73727 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Cisco BGP Exam [7:73516]
Hmm...that's interesting. I found Halabit to be very easy to understand, but that was after reading Stewart. Stewart's book is incredibly easy to understand, especially considering how short it is. Quite concise, yet readable. I have Doyle Vol. II but I stopped studying for attempt #2 before I got to the BGP section. I should read through it as a refresher and to compare it to Halabi. But Dre? Despise?? :-) That's pretty harsh! However, I guess I can understand your point. BGP can be pretty easy to understand when it's explained correctly, and can be very difficult to understand when explained poorly. John ""Pintens, Koen"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I agree with Dre > I also got both books and Jeff Doyle's is so much easier to read and > understand then Halabi's > > Koen Pinten > Network Engineer > > CCNP CCDP MCSE MCSA MCDBA > > > -Original Message- > > From: dre [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:55 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Cisco BGP Exam [7:73516] > > > > ""juniper"" wrote in message ... > > > Can anyone recommend a good book for the BGP exam > > > > I personally despise Halabi's "authortative, the BGP-bible" IRA > > book. It is awful. It is the sole reason nobody understands BGP. > > It's confusing, boring, and downright awful to read and understand > > such simple concepts. > > > > I passed the Cisco BGP exam (took the beta), and I did not even > > open Halabi or Stewart (I do like Stewart, but for this exam, his > > information is not really on-topic). > > > > Normally, I'd say read the RFC's, but they are also not going to > > help you on this exam. > > > > I used > > a) the outline provided by Cisco > > b) Jeff Doyle's TCP/IP Routing Volume II (first 318 pages) > > > > Jeff Doyle is the master of routing protocols...this misconception > > that Volume II was not as good as Volume I reminds me of 14 > > year old pimply-faced kids arguing about Star Wars vs. Empire > > or Matrix 1 vs. Matrix: Reloaded. These are all good movies... > > however, Star Wars: Episode I and II are more remniscient of > > HalabiIMO. > > > > -dre > > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > > http://shop.groupstudy.com > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > ** > This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential. If > you receive it in error: (i) you must not use, disclose, copy or retain > it; (ii) please contact the sender immediately by reply email and then > delete the emails. Views expressed in this email may not be those of the > Airways Corporation of New Zealand Limited > ** > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73577&t=73516 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
OT: Friday Funnies [7:73717]
A ventriloquist is touring the clubs and stops to entertain at a bar in a small town. He's going through his usual run of "dumb blonde" jokes, when a blonde woman in the 4th row stands on her chair and says: "I've heard just about enough of your stupid blonde jokes, you creep! What makes you think you can stereotype women that way? What does a person's hair colour have to do with them as a human being? It's guys like you who keep women like me from being respected at work and in my community and from reaching our full potential... because you and your kind continue to perpetuate negative images against not only blondes, but women in general, all in the name of humour." Flustered, the ventriloquist begins to apologise, when the blonde yells, "You stay out of this Mister! I'm talking to that little B*d on your knee!" Best regards, Dom Stocqueler SysDom Technologies Visit our website - www.sysdom.org === IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s)named above and may contain information that is confidential privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is not authorised (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social faux pas. Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its correct context somewhere other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or grammatical use and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the transmission of this email, although the poodle next door is living on borrowed time, let me tell you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear of the unknown will be gratified to learn that there is no hidden message revealed by reading this warning backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice from Microsoft. However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets. If you have received this email in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites and place it in a warm oven for 40 minutes. Whisk briefly and let it stand for 2 hours before icing. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73717&t=73717 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Access server 2511 Reverse Telnet [7:73656]
HI All I was wondering if any of you guys have come across reverse telnet problems with the 2511 access server? Basically I have 8 devices connected and when I reverse telnet to them all is OK, but on when I try and connect to a 2900 XL switch I get this : Termserver#telnet 192.168.1.1 2006 Trying 192.168.1.1, 2006 ..Open And thats it, nothing else. No command prompt or anything comes up on the screen I have configured telnet connections as exactly the same as all my other devices, I have IOS 12.0(5.2). Any ideas ?? Cheers Wallis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73656&t=73656 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: 3550 Policing [7:73627]
Traffic policing allows you to control the maximum rate. Traffic shaping is used to avoid congestion. a good site that explains this http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos_c/fqcprt4/qcfpolsh.htm#22120 alaerte Vidali wrote: > > If you specify maximum burst you can have a behavior that > remembers Shaping. Am I wrong? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73703&t=73627 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: IOS image.... [7:73481]
Buy online cco when you're partner/subscribe http://shop.cisco.com Subscribtions should have latest. Maybe ebay? Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Shab Hanon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 6 augustus 2003 21:47 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: IOS image [7:73481] Ya this is good link . Thanks :) Cheers, Shab wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Buy online cco when you're partner/subscribe or > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/index.htm > > > Martijn > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: alaerte Vidali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: dinsdag 5 augustus 2003 17:05 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: RE: IOS image [7:73481] > > > Any recommendation in how to get the doc CD with 12.2 features? > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73646&t=73481 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Bad mask /24 for address ???? [7:73801]
Thank you guys for your help!!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73850&t=73801 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: OSPF DR and BDR elections [7:73504]
At 8:08 PM + 8/6/03, Marko Milivojevic wrote: > > > I wonder what the logic for that is. >> >> I wonder, too. :) > > The reason could be as simple as the possibility to reuse the code (or >function-call). For that brief moment when there is BDR, but no DR, exactly >the same code base can be used as if router has realized that DR just failed >miserably :-). > > I just realized that my logic above actually makes sense. Of course, >someone will correct me if I'm horribly wrong. > That's the exact reason it's done that way. I think it's documented in the code in Moy's second book on implementation, but it might be the first. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73636&t=73504 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Largest CA Keylength on VPN 3000 [7:73409]
Well, the manuals are wrong ;-) The key size on the latest version of software is 2048 bits max. It was not an allocation issue. One pointer though, if you have to recreate your CA on a Microsoft platform you may as well reformat the hard drive and start from scratch, as there is no de-install for the SCEP add-on to IIS so you have to de-install the CA, de-install IIS!, re-install IIS and the CA, then re-install SCEP, and even then your CA is going to be all F'd up. Somehow, I got to the point where you could only request "user" and "efs" certs, not "web server" or "server" certs like you can on another CA we have installed same version of everything), plus you can't specify the OU, so you can't match that to a group name. We are using OpenSSL just fine, even on a Windows box with cygwin. I hate Windows. Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 5:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Largest CA Keylength on VPN 3000 [7:73409] Is it a size or allocation issue? CSCdv48299 If fewer than three spots remain in the CA certificate store of a VPN 3000 Concentrator, and an attempt is made to install a CA certificate with associated RAs, then the RA or RAs are installed (filling the store) and the root certificate is not installed. This is incorrect behavior. Instead, the software should check to see if there is enough room in the store before installing a partial CA certificate. Partial certificates should not be installed. If the RAs and the Root certificate cannot be installed, the software should install nothing. Or just RTFM below? Martijn Key Size - man Yes scep Yes The algorithm for generating the public-key/private-key pair, and the key size. If you are requesting an SSL certificate, of if you are requesting an identity certificate using SCEP, only the RSA options are available. RSA 512 bits = Generate 512-bit keys using the RSA (Rivest, Shamir, Adelman) algorithm. This key size provides sufficient security and is the default selection. It is the most common, and requires the least processing. RSA 768 bits = Generate 768-bit keys using the RSA algorithm. This key size provides normal security. It requires approximately 2 to 4 times more processing than the 512-bit key. RSA 1024 bits = Generate 1024-bit keys using the RSA algorithm. This key size provides high security, and it requires approximately 4 to 8 times more processing than the 512-bit key. man Yes csep No DSA 512 bits = Generate 512-bit keys using DSA (Digital Signature Algorithm). DSA 768 bits = Generate 768-bit keys using the DSA algorithm. DSA 1024 bits = Generate 1024-bit keys using the DSA algorithm. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Reimer, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: zaterdag 2 augustus 2003 14:49 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Largest CA Keylength on VPN 3000 [7:73409] Let's see if anyone here can answer faster than Cisco TAC. What is the largest CA root key length supported by the Cisco VPN Concentrator 3000 series hardware? I have a 4096 bit key and it won't accept the root key because it can't "validate" it. Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73604&t=73409 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://w
what are ip directed-broadcast and ip mroute-cache [7:73800]
Can someone explain me what this is for and what is does? ip directed-broadcast ip mroute-cache Thank You Iwan **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73847&t=73800 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Access server 2511 Reverse Telnet [7:73656]
I had a similar problem with a PIX-501. My solution was to add 'modem cts-required' under the line configuration of the termainl server connected to the PIX. I dont think it is a cable issue... troubleshoot physical layer up. If you can use a computer with a rollover cable and it works, you should be able to use an octal cable with no problems. If you dont get a response, try the same line of the octal cable on anohter device. Now we know it's not the device we are connecting to, and it's not the octal cable... Boils down to protocol or handshaking on the line. Ed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73724&t=73656 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: CCNP and future CCIE lab setup [7:73696]
"May I suggest making some very short ones with a plug on one end and a jack on the other." Make it at least 1 meter if you want to be in spec... Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 11:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCNP and future CCIE lab setup [7:73696] You have a great start. Let's consider what you have. The 2500s are great. In time, you will want to load an Enterprise version of IOS. That requires 16 MB Flash and 16 MB DRAM. There are many sources of third party DRAM and Flash - check the archives. You didn't say if the 2600s had any WIC cards. Two WIC-1Ts in each would be great. I recently bought several at an average price of $50 each. Just be patient. Again, verify how much Flash and DRAM you need for all your routers to run the images you want. Back-to-back serial cables. Again several sources. I have purchased from Bob Lowery, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Good prices and great service. Length depends on how you group your routers. Three foot (one meter) is handy if the routers are close together. Six foot or ten foot might also be useful. Ethernet cables. You'll want some crossover cables. May I suggest making some very short ones with a plug on one end and a jack on the other. Then add a regular patch cord of the desired length to meet your needs. Consider racking your equipment. Besides the full height racks you may have at work, there are short portable racks made for musicians. The rack is part of a shipping container. The discussions about these on groupstudy indicated they were quite reasonably priced. If you start with Routing, I would think that you have everything you need. I'll assume, without checking, that the 8 A/S module has DB-60 interfaces. Later when you do Remote Access an ISDN simulator would be a great addition. CCO has many resources. There are many great books. Consider some of those mentioned often on the list. Doyle "Routing TCP/IP" Vols I and II, "Cisco LAN Switching" by Clark and Hamilton, the Cisco Press books for the Networking Academy courses, etc. Good luck and have fun. > -Original Message- > From: Natchaya Radhikulkaralak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 6:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: CCNP and future CCIE lab setup [7:73696] > > > Like the other person previously... I am trying to build a lab. > > I am personally starting my Cisco track but I have recieved > some routers > from my work. > > I personally have 2-2501, 3-2503, 1-2504, 1-as2511-rj(which I > dont know how > to use), 1-2611, 1-2612, 1-3640 w/ 8 a/s module: 2ME-2W > module: 4-port ISDN > Bri module (dont know module name), 2-2912, 1-2950. > > Can you also give me any suggestions? Larus has mentioned a > backbone router > but isnt the 3640 sufficient? Overall... is there anything > else that i need > to improve this other than 3550 switches which are way out of > my budget!!!? **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73740&t=73696 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
can ciscoview version before 5.0 support 2950&3550 [7:73854]
there's no device package for catalyst 2950&3550 in the ciscoview version 4.0,4.1,4.2(before 5.0) so ciscoview (version before 5.0)can't support catalyst 2950&3550? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73854&t=73854 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: How to study..Self or Classes [7:73624]
Thanks! You have said the exact reason I am going with Knowledgenet. After
work it can be hard to stay focused in a book but if I have interaction
along with the book I feel I can keep my mind on it. Also I am getting some
help from work also with the funds sowhy not.
~Paul~
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Mwalie W
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: How to study..Self or Classes [7:73624]
>
> Hello,
>
> Knowledgenet courses are okay, but I feel they are by far expensive. You
> can
> use the money to get equipment.
>
> The material at knowledgenet (for the Cisco courses like BSCI) is exactly
> what is in the Cisco course book that costs $60.00. The reason I like
> knowledgenet is that being interactive, I can study even when tired at
> night, just when reading a book is nearly impossible.
>
> I think I have come to like knowledgenet; fortunately, I have not been
> paying for the courses.
>
> Good Luck!
>
> Mwalie
> CCDP
> **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
---
{This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus/McAfee}
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73658&t=73624
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Back to Back Routers [7:73897]
I have a 1601 router and a 2509 to practice with. I've connected them with a DCE/DTE cable off the s0 ports on each router and set a clock rate on the DCE end, the 1601. On Sundays I can use a fiber connection with this setup. I have this coming in the e0 on the 1601. The E0 on the 2509 is crossover cabled to a PC. 10Mbps in at switch(10.140.240.1/30) --- (10.140.240.2/30) e0-1601 / s0-1601(172.16.96.1/30) --- (172.16.96.2/30)s0-2509 / e0-2509(10.140.240.161/27) (10.140.240.162/27)PC 10.140.240.160 is my inside network My problem seems to be a lack of bandwidth to the PC end. At speed test sites on the net I'm only getting about 1.6 Mbps. I think I may be bottlenecked somewhere in the router back to back setup. The configs are close to what they were originally set up as to keep my boss happy in case he needs one in a hurry. I've changed the addresses to similar types of networks but private numbers. The ethernet ports are ARPA and the serial ports HDLC. I've set bandwidth to 1Kbps at each port. I originally had the clock rate at 64000 but didn't know if that was a bottleneck. -- Router1601#sh run Current configuration: ! version 11.2(not enough memory to upgrade) service timestamps debug datetime msec localtime show-timezone service timestamps log datetime msec localtime show-timezone service password-encryption no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname 1601 ! boot system flash enable secret 5 enable password 7 ! ip subnet-zero clock timezone PST -8 clock summer-time pdt recurring ! interface Ethernet0 description E0 10Mbps connection to Fiber ip address 10.140.240.2 255.255.255.252 media-type 10BaseT no cdp enable ! interface Serial0 description S0 to 2509 S0 ip address 172.16.96.1 255.255.255.252 bandwidth 1 clockrate 400 ! no ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 64.240.140.1 ip route 10.140.240.160 255.255.255.224 172.16.96.2 logging buffered 4096 debugging snmp-server community RO ! snip Banner stuff ! end Router2509#sh run Current configuration : 2227 bytes ! version 12.1 no service single-slot-reload-enable service timestamps debug datetime msec localtime show-timezone service timestamps log datetime msec localtime show-timezone service password-encryption service udp-small-servers service tcp-small-servers ! hostname Router2509 ! boot system flash enable password 7 ! ! clock timezone PST -8 clock summer-time pdt recurring ip subnet-zero ! interface Ethernet0 description to LAN ip address 10.140.240.161 255.255.255.224 ! interface Serial0 bandwidth 1 ip address 172.16.96.2 255.255.255.252 no fair-queue ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! no ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.96.1 ip route 10.140.240.160 255.255.255.224 10.140.240.162 no ip http server ! end Any ideas? ... ... PC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73897&t=73897 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Len Lee/CHI/NTRS is out of the office. [7:73712]
I will be out of the office starting August 8, 2003 and will not return until August 18, 2003. I will not be checking my messages periodically . If this is a firecall, please reference the firecall list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73712&t=73712 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: what are ip directed-broadcast and ip mroute-cache [7:73808]
IP Directed Broadcast - used to send a directed broadcast packet, or a packet to a whole remote subnet. For instance, say you have your workstation management software on subnet 10.1.1.0/24, and you have three remote subnets 10.1.2.0/24, 10.1.3.0/24, and 10.1.4.0/24. The workstations have client software on them, so that the management software can poll for configuration changes, push registry entries, etc. You could have all of the clients poll the server, but you may want to "push" a change also. How could you do this? Well, you could ping all ~ 768 IP addresses to find each client, or you could send a directed broadcast to each of the three subnets, 10.1.2.255, 10.1.3.255, and 10.1.4.255, and all workstations would receive it (and hopefully reply). IP mroute cache - well, that would be the multicast routing table cache, just like the ip-route-cache unicast cache. Kind of like fast switching for multicast traffic... HTH, Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: Iwan Hoogendoorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 9:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: what are ip directed-broadcast and ip mroute-cache [7:73800] Can someone explain me what this is for and what is does? ip directed-broadcast ip mroute-cache Thank You Iwan **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73808&t=73808 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Loopback Interface [7:73305]
Dom wrote: > OK Let me have a go at this - > > A router by definition has at least two interfaces, in most cases it has > many more. > > How do we define the ip address of the router? > > Is it an Ethernet (LAN facing) interface or a (for example) Serial, HSSI > or other WAN facing interface? > > If any of these interfaces goes down (fails) then we cannot get to the > router. > > This is why we set a loopback interface address - nothing to do with > routing or metrics etc, just making sure that we can reach the router You won't "get to" the router no matter how many loopbacks you have if your phyical connection/s fail!!! :) Dave > > Best regards, > > Dom Stocqueler > SysDom Technologies > Visit our website - www.sysdom.org > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > MADMAN > Sent: 05 August 2003 19:47 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Loopback Interface [7:73305] > > > I think your thinking way too hard about this;) A loobback is > nothing more than a logical interface as opposed to a physical > interface. As far as the routing process is concerned it's just another > > interface. Don't know how to articulate it any further. > >Dave > > Robert Edmonds wrote: > >>You gentlemen have pointed out some good uses for loopback interfaces. > > >>However, my dilema still remains that I have yet to have somebody >>solidly explain loopback interfaces in a way that my simple mind can >>understand. I have also been unsuccessful in finding any website that > > >>accomplish this. Any takers? >> >>Robert >> >>""p b"" wrote in message >>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >>>terminate iBGP sessions on >> >>**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: >>http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 "Government can do something for the people only in proportion as it can do something to the people." -- Thomas Jefferson Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73562&t=73305 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Networkers 2002 PDFs [7:73522] (LINKS READY FOR DOWNLOAD!) [7:73596]
Only this once all level 2-3 READY FOR DOWNLOAD! Use them as flashcards in the subway.. RST-221 Router Architecture and Operation L2 Phillip Harris 2.8 MB RST-222 Catalyst Switch Architecture and Operation L2 Jeff Raymond 1.1 MB RST-231 Deploying IPv6 Networks L2 Raj Gulani 885 KB RST-241 Deploying OSPF L2 Ian Foo, Bill Parkhurst 1.8 MB RST-242 Deploying EIGRP L2 Russ White 2.5 MB RST-243 Deploying BGP-4 L2 Alvaro Retana 709 KB RST-251 Deploying MPLS Traffic Engineering L2 Eric Osborne 552 KB RST-252 Deploying L2 Transport and Tunneling Technologies L2 Eric Matkovich 1.5 MB RST-253 Deploying MPLS VPNs L2 Eric Osborne, Ajay Simha 1.5 MB RST-260 Deploying IP Multicast L2 Beau Williamson 687 KB RST-261 Deploying Inter-Domain IP Multicast L2 Michael McBride 1.4 MB RST-271 Deploying Campus Networks L2 Chetan Sharan 805 KB RST-321 Troubleshooting Router IOS Operation L3 Russ White, David Cook 3.3 MB RST-322 Troubleshooting Catalyst Switches L3 Todd Hollmann, Tom Settle 449 KB RST-341 Troubleshooting OSPF L3 Cliff Potts, Faraz Shamim 594 KB RST-342 Troubleshooting EIGRP L3 Don Slice 627 KB RST-343 Troubleshooting the Deployment of BGP-4 L3 Daniel Walton 1.4 MB RST-360 Troubleshooting IP Multicast L3 Bryan McLaughlin 1.1 MB RST-440 Advanced Routing Concepts and Developments L4 Alvaro Retana 1.0 MB RST-450 Advanced Concepts and Developments in MPLS L4 Bruce Davie 1.1 MB http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-221.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-222.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-232.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-241.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-242.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-243.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-251.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-252.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-253.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-260.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-261.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-271.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-321.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-322.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-341.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-342.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-343.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-360.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-440.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-450.pdf Cheers Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jens Petter Eikeland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 6 augustus 2003 7:06 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: Networkers 2002 PDFs [7:73522] Hi , Here are the complet url... http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/pres_routing.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of YASSER ALY Sent: 5. august 2003 16:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Networkers 2002 PDFs [7:73522] Dear All, Anybody knows the URL to download Cisco networkers 2002 PDFs Are PDFs for 2003 available for download ? Regards, Yasser _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73596&t=73596 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Nice to meet all of you. [7:73672]
and if you do happen upon a few neteng positions with Home Depot, be sure to let me know. I am assuming that would be based outta the HQ in Atlanta and would love to move there. I know you know absolutely nothing about me, but I promise I'm a great guy, and totally qualified, and modest and all that stuff... Thanks Charles D Hammonds, CCNP CCSA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rob Wideman Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Nice to meet all of you. [7:73672] Hello everybody! My name is Rob Wideman and I am a product of the Cisco Networking Academy as presented by Davenport University in Midland Michigan. I passed my CCNA and CCNP tests while working for a national big box retail store. Unfortunately, I am still working for Home Depot while looking for work in our field of choice. ( I am also A+ and Network+, thought I'd backfill a little to help get a position). My problem is that with very little actual OTJ experience, I have found that I am almost unhireable because I am overqualified and yet underqualified as well. Any suggestions? Rob Wideman CCNP, CCNA, A+, Network + [EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. I love the theoretical problems that are occasionally posted. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73697&t=73672 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: OSPF summary address with Null 0 [7:73500]
Can you please give us the link to the CCIE power session. Cheers. ""Reimer, Fred"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > From the CCIE Power Session: > > "Unless a question says so, you are not permitted to use**: > > Static routes (of any kind) > > Default routes > > **Dynamic routes to null are permitted" > > Floating statics are also allowed: > > "ip route 2.2.2.0 255.255.255.0 1.1.1.2 240 > > * Uses a higher administrative distance so that dynamic protocols will take > precedence > > * Use only if explicitly allowed in a test question > > * Make sure the dynamic route actually exists when DDR is not active" > > HTH, > > Fred Reimer - CCNA > > > Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 > Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 > > > NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which > may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). > If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please > notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named > recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print > or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. > > > -Original Message- > From: Shab Hanon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 5:30 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: OSPF summary address with Null 0 [7:73500] > > Hi everybody > The case .. OSPF summary address with Null 0 > > In all the case studies for CCIE R & S we told don't use static routes! **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
ip helper address [7:73533]
Assume that you have a two routers between your host and dhcp server. This means that you have a 4 interfaces you cna put "ip helper-address" on. On which interface(s) you will put the above command. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73533&t=73533 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: cisco back to back cable [7:71992] ENGLISH version, so to [7:73714]
url do a no shut on serial intf clock dce say 64000 then sh controllers ser x Look at the DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up you have a working cable, interface 2x http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fint er_r/irfshoap.htm#1019003 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk713/tk507/technologies_configuration_examp le09186a0080094504.shtml LET OP DE ONDERSTE REGEL DAN IS IE UP! spicey#show interfaces serial 1 Serial1 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is HD64570 Internet address is 5.0.2.2/24 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation PPP, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) LCP Open Open: IPCP Last input 00:00:01, output 00:00:01, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:09:27 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/1/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 130 packets input, 3392 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort 129 packets output, 3378 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 0 carrier transitions DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jansen, M Verzonden: vrijdag 8 augustus 2003 12:36 Aan: 'LINSEN Jurgen (BMB)'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: cisco back to back cable [7:71992] In dutch, to keep things easy. Denk dat je eerst even de zaken moet proberen. controle kabel checken met commando sh controller serial, zie je een interface type staan, dus die dce/dte sh interface serial x Router# show interfaces serial Serial 0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is MCI Serial Internet address is 131.136.190.203, subnet mask is 255.255.255.0 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255 Encapsulation HDLC, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) Last input 0:00:07, output 0:00:00, output hang never Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops Five minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec Five minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 16263 packets input, 1347238 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 13983 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants 2 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 2 abort 1 carrier transitions 22146 packets output, 2383680 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 2 interface resets, 0 restarts check onderaan dte/dce/rts/cts signalen moeten werken configuratie standaard configuratie de ene is dce (moet commando clockrate bv 64000 bij) ander is dte geen clockrate Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: LINSEN Jurgen (BMB) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vrijdag 8 augustus 2003 9:37 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: cisco back to back cable [7:71992] Sure you're using a cross cable? -Original Message- From: KW S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 6:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cisco back to back cable [7:71992] Dear All I have a 2501 and 2505 and I am trying to set up a homelab..These 2 routers come with a cable which is a DB60(DTE) and the other end is a DB60(DCE).This is wat that is label on the cable. Anyway, I try to connect this cable to the serial interface of the 2 routers...and both the routers are showing serial is down and line protocol is down. I guess I have used the wrong cable...or maybe I have missed out something. Please comment.. Regards, kws DISCLAIMER "This e-mail and any attachment thereto may contain information which is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights and are intended for the sole use of the recipient(s) named above. Any use of the information contained herein (including, but not limited to, total or partial reproduction, communication or distribution in any form) by other persons than the designated recipient(s) is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender either by telephone or by e-mail and delete the material from any computer". Thank you for your cooperation. For further information about Proximus mobile phone services please see our website at http://www.proximus.be or refer to any Proximus agent. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73714&t=73714 -
RE: a token ring question [7:73908]
According to cco cat 3900/5000 can switch multicast on TR. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fipr mc_r/mult/1rfmult2.htm#1078651 ip multicast use-functional To enable the mapping of IP multicast addresses to the Token Ring functional address 0xc000.0004., use the ip multicast use-functional command in interface configuration mode. To disable the function, use the no form of this command. ip multicast use-functional no ip multicast use-functional Syntax Description This command has no arguments or keywords. Defaults IP multicast address are mapped to the MAC-layer address 0x... Usage Guidelines This command is accepted only on a Token Ring interface. Neighboring devices on the Token Ring on which this feature is used should also use the same functional address for IP multicast traffic. Because there are a limited number of Token Ring functional addresses, other protocols may be assigned to the Token Ring functional address 0xc000.0004.. Therefore, not every frame sent to the functional address is necessarily an IP multicast frame. Examples The following example configures any IP multicast packets going out Token Ring interface 0 to be mapped to MAC address 0xc000.0004.: interface token 0 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip pim dense-mode ip multicast use-functional Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: wj chou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 12 augustus 2003 7:55 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: a token ring question [7:73908] Hi, Can token ring carry multicast traffic? And what's the ip address to mac address mapping if it does? Thanks! **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73909&t=73908 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Cisco BGP Exam [7:73516]
""Jose Linero Welcker"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Internet Routing Architechtures - Second Edition - Sam Halabi > > This is a complete BGP guide, and tat is enough to the BGP exam interesting. have not taken the exam yet, so I can't comment. But I strognly recommend Bill Parkhurst's "Cisco BGP 4 Command and Configuration Reference" for CCIE Lab prep and anything to do with Cisco BGP studies. It can't hurt. > > Regards, > > Jose > > > >From: "juniper" > >Reply-To: "juniper" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Cisco BGP Exam [7:73516] > >Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 14:00:03 GMT > > > >Hi, > >Can anyone recommend a good book for the BGP exam > >Mark > >**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > >http://shop.groupstudy.com > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > _ > Charla con tus amigos en lmnea mediante MSN Messenger: > http://messenger.yupimsn.com/ > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73630&t=73516 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
E&M Back-to-Back Cable [7:73954]
Hello I want to connect E&M ports on Cisco routers back-to-back, but wandering how it can be achieved. Seems Type 2 and 5 of E&M are symmetrical, so theorically it seems possible, but pratically is it true? If it is possible what kind of cable should I use ? Some kind of roll-over or cross-over cable might be needed, but what kind of pin connections ? Regrds, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73954&t=73954 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Bad mask /24 for address ???? [7:73801]
I was trying to assign an IP address with an subnetmask to the interface E0 and i got this strange message: Bad mask /24 for address 10.0.0.10 here is what i did: RouterA(config)#int e0 RouterA(config-if)#ip add 10.0.0.10 255.255.255.0 Bad mask /24 for address 10.0.0.10 Can someone tell me what i did wron ...this is suposing to work right? Thank You Iwan **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73848&t=73801 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Bad mask /24 for address ???? [7:73801]
Hy Iwan, > Bad mask /24 for address 10.0.0.10 you need the command : ip subnet-zero on your router here. Regards, Marco [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73803&t=73801 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793]
That is adsl over isdn. Thought to only COMMON flavours were adsl async up/down and sdsl sync up/down freq ranges. SEEMS YOU CAN USE A BRI WIC!!! > Developed by Ascend Communications (acquired by Lucent Technologies), ISDN Digital Subscriber Line (IDSL) transmits data digitally across existing ISDN lines, at a rate of 128 Kbps. The benefits of IDSL over ISDN are that the former service offers always-on connections, transmits data via a data network rather than the phone companybs voice network, and avoids per-call fees by being billed at a flat-rate. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk175/tk349/technologies_q_and_a_ite m09186a00800946d3.shtml Q. What is IDSL? IDSL is a cross between ISDN and xDSL. As with ISDN, it uses a single wire pair to transmit full-duplex data at 128 Kbps and at distances of up to the Revised Resistance Distance range of 15,000 to 18,000 feet. IDSL also uses a 2B1Q line code to enable transparent operation through the ISDN "U" interface. IDSL is essentially a leased line ISDN Basic Rate Interface (BRI), or an ISDN BRI that is not switched and does not contain signaling (a D channel). IDSL and ISDN BRI use the same 2B1Q line modulation. On the router, this equates to putting the BRI interface in a leased line configuration. The line can be configured for a speed of 64 Kbps, 128 Kbps, or 144 Kbps. The frames that are going across the wire are standard High-Level Data Link Control (HDLC) frames. IDSL can be configured with Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) or Frame Relay encapsulation for the leased line BRI interface. The easiest way to think about it is as if the BRI interface was a slow speed synchronous serial port. Also, existing Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) (ISDN BRI terminal adapters, bridges, and routers) can be used to connect to the central office. IDSL Frequently Asked Questions Downloads IDSL Frequently Asked Questions Questions What is IDSL? Does the Cisco 2500 series router support IDSL? Does the Cisco 2600 support IDSL? What routers support IDSL? Is PPP over Frame Relay supported on IDSL? Does a SPID or phone number need to be defined to configure IDSL? Do I need the ISDN switch type command on the CPE when I configure IDSL? Is the Cisco 804 IDSL router compatible with CopperMountain CE200? Does the Cisco 804 IDSL router support PPP over Frame Relay? Does the Cisco DSLAM chassis have IDSL modules? What is the distance limitation for IDSL? Does IDSL support voice? How do I configure a basic IDSL interface? Related Information Q. What is IDSL? IDSL is a cross between ISDN and xDSL. As with ISDN, it uses a single wire pair to transmit full-duplex data at 128 Kbps and at distances of up to the Revised Resistance Distance range of 15,000 to 18,000 feet. IDSL also uses a 2B1Q line code to enable transparent operation through the ISDN "U" interface. IDSL is essentially a leased line ISDN Basic Rate Interface (BRI), or an ISDN BRI that is not switched and does not contain signaling (a D channel). IDSL and ISDN BRI use the same 2B1Q line modulation. On the router, this equates to putting the BRI interface in a leased line configuration. The line can be configured for a speed of 64 Kbps, 128 Kbps, or 144 Kbps. The frames that are going across the wire are standard High-Level Data Link Control (HDLC) frames. IDSL can be configured with Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) or Frame Relay encapsulation for the leased line BRI interface. The easiest way to think about it is as if the BRI interface was a slow speed synchronous serial port. Also, existing Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) (ISDN BRI terminal adapters, bridges, and routers) can be used to connect to the central office. Q. Does the Cisco 2500 series router support IDSL? No. The Cisco 2500 series does not support IDSL because its BRI hardware does not support channel aggregation. Q. Does the Cisco 2600 support IDSL? Yes. IDSL is currently supported with the ISDN WAN Interface Cards (WICs) and network modules when they are configured in leased line mode. Q. What routers support IDSL? The following routers support IDSL: 800 b Cisco 801-805 ISDN, Serial, and IDSL Routers 1600 b Cisco 1600 Series Routers and WAN Interface Cards 1720 b Cisco 1720 Modular Access Router 1750 b Cisco 1750 Modular Access Router 2600 b Connecting WAN and Voice Interface Cards to a Network Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 13 augustus 2003 7:53 Aan: Jansen, M; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793] That is a ADSL WIC or am I missing something? We are looking to use IDSL but can not find a router that supports 3DES and IDSL Ryan -Original Message- Fro
RE: Access server 2511 Cable Tricks [7:73671]
Thanks for helping a new Cisco gurl out! I truly appreciate it. I tried it on my as2511 and it had a few hitches but I understand what i need to change. Thanx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73767&t=73671 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Loopback Interface [7:73305]
Rusty, was there a URL here that was truncated? If so, I would very much like to see it. n_guide_chapter09186a0080087da4.html#3302 ""Wilmes, Rusty"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > n_guide_chapter09186a0080087da4.html#3302 > > -Original Message- > From: Robert Edmonds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:47 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Loopback Interface [7:73305] > > > You gentlemen have pointed out some good uses for loopback interfaces. > However, my dilema still remains that I have yet to have somebody solidly > explain loopback interfaces in a way that my simple mind can understand. I > have also been unsuccessful in finding any website that accomplish this. > Any takers? > > Robert > > ""p b"" wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > terminate iBGP sessions on > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73635&t=73305 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: OSPF DR and BDR elections [7:73504]
The DR is not chosen from the "remaining list." The DR is chosen from the list of routers that declared themselves designated routers (this is why a high-priority router that comes up late won't take over the DR role from an existing DR), or if no router declared itself DR, then the BDR will become DR (this is why a high-priority router that came up late won't necessarily become DR even if the existing DR dies). See RFC2328, Page 75 for more details. Thanks, Zsombor DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote: > > I am reading the CCNP/CCIP BSCI Study Guide by Todd Lammle > from Sybex. In > the OSPF section under the discussion of DR and BDR (page 171) > he says that > the BDR is chosen first and that the DR is chosen from the > reaming list. > That seems illogical and backwards. Can someone please confirm > or deny and > explain it. Thanks > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73524&t=73504 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: traffic flow [7:73495]
Before applying a service policy, enable NetFlow to see source and destination addresses and port numbers. Best regards, Dom Stocqueler SysDom Technologies Visit our website - www.sysdom.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Brandis Sent: 05 August 2003 07:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: traffic flow [7:73495] Hey All, Got a question about traffic flow into and out of a branch office. I have a branch office with only a handful of users, but with high demands on the WAN. This particular office has a 256k/32k frame connection into me (the HQ) but a crying out for greater bandwidth and pipe access. What my problem is, is understanding how these users are using up all there network bandwidth. I have no access list in place between me and them (however I will be going down this road). Whats I want to do, is have a look at the traffic and determine what type of traffic it is. I bet we have people in that office just watching video of the CEO from the HQ. I have enabled IP NBAR on the serial and Ethernet interfaces and have noticed that 70% of the traffic, is unclassified. How can I view this data to just get then router to tell me the IP source and the port number associated with this traffic? I also would like to put down a quality of service map for known business applications, and grant them priority over any other traffic. Has any one done this and if so can you send snippets of your config or link to doco's Thanks all for your help John Sydney Australia ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.solution6.com ** **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73499&t=73495 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793]
I would certainly hope that the remotes wouldn't use different platforms. I don't know the business model, but it sounds to me like it's some kind of service offering or something. Maybe they have a 2000 site Frame Relay network used to offer a service or something, and they want to switch to something more economical. Instead of paying monthly circuit fees, pay a one-time hardware cost (assuming they don't own the FR routers at the customer end) and use the customer's Internet connection. Why in the world would you want different hardware at each customer site in that situation? Standardize on one hardware platform, and build the cost of that hardware into the business model... If that's the case then the cost of a 3005 can be justified in a small number of months, depending on your FR cost. Certainly you would recoup your cost and start making more money, due to less operating cost, relatively quickly. Now, if this is something else, like a company with 2000 offices throughout the world, then I can see your point and you may end up with different requirements. But, that's not how it sounds so far. Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 6:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793] Despite all hw issues, you really need to - describe the business req's first - translate to technical req's (you are talking 2000+ sites) And you will see that you'll need more than one platform for de Remotes. Dependig on your hierarchy concerning - messaging - authentication - client-server - webapps - desktop/register maintenance/management - security man You will need to or may want to build an hierarchical design. Keep in mind that differen platfroms use different (HQ) fail-over or 2nd ip techniques. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: zondag 10 augustus 2003 4:36 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793] I need to setup VPNs to about 2000 sites. Each site will have an IDSL line installed that will be used to connect to monitor network devices and servers. Some of the remote networks will be using the same network block. I am looking to know what the best hardware to use on each end is. On my end, would it be better to use a PIX or a 3030? On the remote end, I was looking at a PIX 501, SOHO 91 or the 831? Thank you Ryan **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73876&t=73793 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: 3500XL - duplicate IP and Windows NT/2000 server [7:73868]
Firesox wrote: > I have a bunch of 3500XL switches thruout my customer's lan. > They are having a problem with unknown mac keep appearing and disappearing > from the network. > > I can trace the mac-address of the unknown station by "show mac" from the > swtich CLI. > What's strange is that it appears at one switch, but a minute later it > appears in the different switch. > > what's even more strange is that all NT/2000 servers log shows there is an > IP conflict with this mac address. > Of course, the servers IP function stops due to this duplicate IP, but comes > back in a few minutes. > All the servers report the duplicate IP comes from the same mac address. > > Has anyone seen this problem? > > Thanks > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > I know that the NT team where I work had a batch of new HP netservers delivered last year with the built in NICs with all the same mac addresses. They had to perform a bios upgrade I think to fix the problem. You should probably try to find out where what port(s) the duplicate mac and IP appear. Cheers Pat Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73873&t=73868 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Nice to meet all of you. [7:73672]
Hello everybody! My name is Rob Wideman and I am a product of the Cisco Networking Academy as presented by Davenport University in Midland Michigan. I passed my CCNA and CCNP tests while working for a national big box retail store. Unfortunately, I am still working for Home Depot while looking for work in our field of choice. ( I am also A+ and Network+, thought I'd backfill a little to help get a position). My problem is that with very little actual OTJ experience, I have found that I am almost unhireable because I am overqualified and yet underqualified as well. Any suggestions? Rob Wideman CCNP, CCNA, A+, Network + [EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. I love the theoretical problems that are occasionally posted. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73672&t=73672 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Cisco Safe Security Exam -->9E0-131 CSI or 642-541 CSI [7:73971]
I can understand Andrew , i had missed mine by 3 percent as well in the first attempt , then cleared it on the second go . -- Navin Parwal MCSE,MCT,CCNP , CCDP, CCSP, CCIE (R/S) # 12026 Technosys ""Andrew Larkins"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi, > > From what I read on CCO regarding this cert is as follows: > > 1. Your CSS1 is valid for 2 years from the date you got it. > 2. You have until 30 Sept 2003 to covert to CCSP otherwise when your CSS1 > expires (in 2 years) you have to rewrite all the exams again. > 3. 9E0-131 is the exam to do before 30 Sept 03. > > I have my CSS1 and need to upgrade now. I tried the SAFE exam in April and > missed by 1%. Been a little lazy since then, so now I have to write before > end Sept 03. > > Regards > > Andrew > > -Original Message- > From: Godswill Oletu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 August 2003 05:54 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco Safe Security Exam -->9E0-131 CSI or 642-541 CSI > [7:73795] > > > Hi, > > I will appreciate comments from anyone who have recently written the Cisco > SAFE exam. Since the 9E0-131 will be retired on 9/30/03, am thinking of > taking > the 642-541 exam. All I have is the 7 safe white papers. > > However, I think its only one of the white papers that deals with the exam > topics, I will need inputs from people who are studying for the exam or had > written the exam already. Do one need to read all 7 white papers? Comments > about the relevancy of the white papers to the exam would be appreciated as > well. > > I have put off this exam till this last minute, one have started studying > for > this exam, especially since one have just less than 2 months to upgrade from > CSS1 to CCSP else one will loss his CSS1 designation. > > Thanks. > Godswill > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73971&t=73971 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
2x2610 vs 2600 + 3640: WAS Re: CCIE Lab Setup [7:73612]
""Vijay Ramcharan"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Not exactly related to this but... > Are there any drawbacks to using (2) 2610s for a lab instead of a 2600 > and a 3640 router? JMHO, what you should be looking for is sufficient ports to run complex practice scenarios and routers capable of running the IOS version that is current in the Lab. \specific models may or may not be of importance. ( as an aside, I laugh my ass off every time I read a post from someone expressing worry about the announced changes in IOS and addition of a 3725 to the Lab. At least when the 3550 switch was introduced there was reason for some apprehension, ans nono of the rental racks had a 3550 in them ). after all, a router is a router, and the routing protocol commands will work exactly the same on a 25xx, 26xx, 36xx, etc. I'm currently focusing on 12.2.something.Tsomething 12.2.15(T5) maybe -everything is off at the moment. I don't know about the 2610, but the 2611 is capable of running dot1q and ISL trunks, plus if you use the enterprise basic image you can do IS-IS, BGP, and MPLS. > > > Vijay Ramcharan > > > -Original Message- > From: Natchaya Radhikulkaralak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 7:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Setup [7:73612] > > > Doesnt the vConsole ISDN simulator able to use SPIDs? Even though it is > 525 dollars... I thought it did use spids. When you state to use a > "backbone" router... what do you mean? > > Thomas Larus wrote: > > > > With $1,000 dollars, I would first buy a 4 port frame switch router, > > perhaps a 2520. I say 2520, not 2521 (Token ring), because the > > ethernet port on the > > 2520 allows it to serve as an additional router-- perhaps a > > "backbone" > > router that you would connect to using ethernet. $200-$300, if > > you are > > lucky. > > > > A 4500 with a NP-4T might be even better (but loud!!) This will take > > perhaps 300 dollars or so. You could add another 4 serial ints > > and/or a > > bunch of ethernet ints, and this could definitely serve as a > > full-fledged > > lab router as well as a frame switch. > > > > If you can find a cheap ISDN simulator (vConsole or Euro ISDN PBX > > gizmo that only does Basic-Net3 and no spids) for $400-500, you > > probably ought to buy > > it, since you already have two ISDN capable routers. Then a > > 1900 or 2820 > > switch for $100 to $200 so you have a VLAN-capable switch. If > > you have > > enough money left over, you could pick up one more 2501. > > (Always buy a 2503 > > or 2514 if you can get it for a little more than a 2501, of > > course.) > > > > It's not a first-rate lab, but it is enough of you to learn a lot of > > the most difficult lessons. You could go for more routers and no > > ISDN sim, but > > ISDN can be such a tricky technology it is worth spending a lot > > of time on. > > This is a close call, though. > > > > Tom Larus, CCIE #10,014 > > > > > > ""David Power"" wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Hello, > > > I have three 2500 routers (2x2503 and 1x2514) with the budget > > of 1000$ I > > am > > > planning to buy some more routers for my CCIE home lab. Which > > routers or > > > switches I must have ( with in my $ limits or couple hundred > > more). > > > Every suggestion will be appreciated > > > David > > > > > > > > _ > > > Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online > > > http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 > > > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy > > Store: > > > http://shop.groupstudy.com > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73855&t=73612 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
DECsever 700 [7:73910]
Morning I am busy setting up a lab at the moment and will be accessing all devices by going through a DECserver 700 (16 RJ45 ports). Could anyone please point me to a configuration manual for this particular dec server as well as the correct cable specs for dec to cisco console port connection. Any advice would be much appreciated. Thanks Gavin This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged and/or confidential. If you have received this email in error you may not copy, forward or use the contents, attachments or information in any way. Please destroy it and contact the sender via our switchboard on +44(0) 20 7475 6600 or via return email. Any unauthorised use or disclosure may be unlawful. Kleinwort Benson Private Bank give no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of this email after it is sent over the Internet and accept no responsibility for change made after it was sent. Any opinions expressed in this email may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of Dresdner Bank or its affiliates. They may also be subject to change without notice. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73910&t=73910 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Distribution Router and OSPF [7:73933]
R1 is a ABR router; it connects to the backbone area and to area 50. R2 is a distribution router connected to router R1 through area 50. R2 connects to 4 other routers in area 50. I am wondering if there are concerns about R2 being a distribution router without connecting to area 0. area 0 (R1)--area 50 ---(R2)--area 50(R3,R4,R5,R6) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73933&t=73933 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
redundant Ip circuits [7:73710]
Hi all, Does anyone have a list of carriers that provide redundant IP circuits for backup or load-balancing ? rgds, U. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73710&t=73710 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
c4224 problems [7:73517]
I know these are discontinued and I would do well not to use them, but The company I work for has 3 of them laying around and they want me to build a test network using them. I've been playing around with one and I can't seem to save the running config?! I've read the software config documents on cisco.com and tried both copy run start and write mem. Both say they are building the config and then [ok]. c4224#copy run start Destination filename [startup-config]? Building configuration... [OK] c4224# (then just for the heck of it): c4224#write mem Building configuration... [OK] c4224# Now if I reload or power cycle the c4224 it doesn't save the config. It just askes me if I want the initial config dialog and the prompt goes back to "gateway". Also, when I create vlans they don't show up in the "show vlan" command. But that's another issue I guess. Any way, has anyone else had problems saving their configs on a c4224? -Bobby Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73517&t=73517 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: c4224 problems [7:73517]
D'oh! You're right. I had to recover the password when I first got the switch and I forgot to set the conf reg back to 0x2102. My mistake. Thanks for the help! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73532&t=73517 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: 3500XL - duplicate IP and Windows NT/2000 server [7:73868]
You may be able to track the MAC address to a specific manufacturer. That should narrow down the source (unless it is a softcoded MAC). Here is a link to the the ieee OUI company_id address assignments. http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/oui/oui.txt Jeremy Porter, CCNP, CCDP -Original Message- From: Firesox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 7:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3500XL - duplicate IP and Windows NT/2000 server [7:73868] The log on NT says Duplicate IP found with the mac address xx.xx.xx.xx.xx.xx All NT servers say the same thing with same exact mac addrss, but I cannot find the mac address at all. The log on the switches show nothing interesting. Thanks wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Searching CCO, connot find a thing. Do you have logging enabled, if yes what > do the switches say? Try a protocol sniffer(receive span a problem server > port), sometimes it is nice to see ip handle things. And learn a lot... > > What did the NT system log say? > > Tried newer IOS? (long shot) > > Martijn > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: Firesox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: maandag 11 augustus 2003 14:19 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: 3500XL - duplicate IP and Windows NT/2000 server [7:73868] > > > I have a bunch of 3500XL switches thruout my customer's lan. > They are having a problem with unknown mac keep appearing and disappearing > from the network. > > I can trace the mac-address of the unknown station by "show mac" from the > swtich CLI. > What's strange is that it appears at one switch, but a minute later it > appears in the different switch. > > what's even more strange is that all NT/2000 servers log shows there is an > IP conflict with this mac address. > Of course, the servers IP function stops due to this duplicate IP, but comes > back in a few minutes. > All the servers report the duplicate IP comes from the same mac address. > > Has anyone seen this problem? > > Thanks > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73920&t=73868 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: OSPF summary address with Null 0 [7:73500]
Can any one tell us how to block a default route? it is easy to block other routes by using ACL with distribution-list But how to remove the default route which is being advertised by " default-information originate always " command. ""Reimer, Fred"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > From the CCIE Power Session: > > "Unless a question says so, you are not permitted to use**: > > Static routes (of any kind) > > Default routes > > **Dynamic routes to null are permitted" > > Floating statics are also allowed: > > "ip route 2.2.2.0 255.255.255.0 1.1.1.2 240 > > * Uses a higher administrative distance so that dynamic protocols will take > precedence > > * Use only if explicitly allowed in a test question > > * Make sure the dynamic route actually exists when DDR is not active" > > HTH, > > Fred Reimer - CCNA > > > Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 > Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 > > > NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which > may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). > If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please > notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named > recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print > or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. > > > -Original Message- > From: Shab Hanon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 5:30 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: OSPF summary address with Null 0 [7:73500] > > Hi everybody > The case .. OSPF summary address with Null 0 > > In all the case studies for CCIE R & S we told don't use static routes! **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
what are ip directed-broadcast and ip mroute-cache [7:73800]
Can someone explain me what this is for and what is does? ip directed-broadcast ip mroute-cache Thank You Iwan **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73815&t=73800 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793]
You mean? newest: DSL WAN Interface Cards WIC-1ADSL-I-DG 1-port ADSLoISDN WAN Interface Card cco partner login: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/routers/ps221/products_data_s heet09186a0080088713.html Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 13 augustus 2003 3:57 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793] You are right it is a service offering. Right now, we are using ISDN dial-up and would like to move to a full time connection. We would not be using the customerbs connection but will be installing a 144K IDSL or 192K SDSL line. What I am going to do on Friday in the lab ( If we get the lines from Covad on time) is use a 7200 at the head end and a 1700 on the other end run the IPSec and NAT on the 1700 and see how that goes. The only problem is I cannot find an IDSL WIC on CCO I only see an ADSL and SDSL. Ryan Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Reimer, Fred Sent: Mon 8/11/2003 10:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793] I would certainly hope that the remotes wouldn't use different platforms. I don't know the business model, but it sounds to me like it's some kind of service offering or something. Maybe they have a 2000 site Frame Relay network used to offer a service or something, and they want to switch to something more economical. Instead of paying monthly circuit fees, pay a one-time hardware cost (assuming they don't own the FR routers at the customer end) and use the customer's Internet connection. Why in the world would you want different hardware at each customer site in that situation? Standardize on one hardware platform, and build the cost of that hardware into the business model... If that's the case then the cost of a 3005 can be justified in a small number of months, depending on your FR cost. Certainly you would recoup your cost and start making more money, due to less operating cost, relatively quickly. Now, if this is something else, like a company with 2000 offices throughout the world, then I can see your point and you may end up with different requirements. But, that's not how it sounds so far. Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 6:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793] Despite all hw issues, you really need to - describe the business req's first - translate to technical req's (you are talking 2000+ sites) And you will see that you'll need more than one platform for de Remotes. Dependig on your hierarchy concerning - messaging - authentication - client-server - webapps - desktop/register maintenance/management - security man You will need to or may want to build an hierarchical design. Keep in mind that differen platfroms use different (HQ) fail-over or 2nd ip techniques. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: zondag 10 augustus 2003 4:36 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793] I need to setup VPNs to about 2000 sites. Each site will have an IDSL line installed that will be used to connect to monitor network devices and servers. Some of the remote networks will be using the same network block. I am looking to know what the best hardware to use on each end is. On my end, would it be better to use a PIX or a 3030? On the remote end, I was looking at a PIX 501, SOHO 91 or the 831? Thank you Ryan **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from t
Re: tcp [7:73518]
On Tuesday, August 5, 2003, at 10:14 AM, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: > > >> 2.Can receiver send ack before whole window comes in? > > Not for the window it's receiving, but for a previous window. > Unless you're Microsoft. http://grotto11.com/blog/slash.html?+1039831658 This isn't to make this a MS-bashing thread. More for information purposes that there are implementations out there that don't follow RFCs exactly, and there are some that practically throw them out the window. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73542&t=73518 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: GuideLine book for CCIE Written [7:73925]
Just because someone has something nice to say doesn't mean it was self-generated... :-) Thank you for the kind words Doug; I hope you do well on the exam... --- Dennis Laganiere - Original Message - From: "Kaminski, Shawn G" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:57 PM Subject: RE: GuideLine book for CCIE Written [7:73925] > Who's Doug? Dennis' clone? :-) > > Shawn K. > > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Larus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:51 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: GuideLine book for CCIE Written [7:73925] > > Look into Dennis Laganiere's and Brad Ellis' Study Guide for the CCIE > written. I got a deal on it through Amazon.com. "Laganiere" makes a good > search term. > > Check out Dennis Laganiere's website, too. www.laganiere.net I am amazed > how much advice he gives away. As someone who is almost finished with a > book of advice and learning labs, I can say that the amount of advice he > gives away for free convinced me that I could not write a little book with > just advice about preparing for the CCIE. Thus, the advice is a small part > of my book, and the scenarios and explanations of the scenarios are the > major part. > > Thanks, Doug, for making me work harder. > > Tom Larus, CCIE #10,014 > > > ""Piedrahita Orlando"" wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi all my name is Orlando, and i am starting to peruse the CCIE written, I > > am aware that there is no magic book to prepare you for the test, i am > > however looking for a book to be used as an "OUTLINE" to study. Currently > i > > have bought the TCP IP Vol1 TCP IP Vol2 by Jeff Doyle and Lan switching > from > > CCIE Development by Kennedy Clark, Kevin Hamilton > > Any recomendations, thank you! > > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > > http://shop.groupstudy.com > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73957&t=73925 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: 7206 T1 Interface Cards [7:73739]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quick question, does anyone know off the top of their head if you can hot > swap cards in a 7206? Has anyone done it? Yes and yes. Regards, Marco. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73742&t=73739 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
VLAN Access maps and bridge ACLs [7:73844]
Does anybody have any good links for VLAN Access maps and bridge ACLs? I've gone through my Cisco library and the CCO, and haven't found much... Thanks in advance for any help... --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73844&t=73844 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Loopback Interface [7:73305]
n_guide_chapter09186a0080087da4.html#3302 -Original Message- From: Robert Edmonds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Loopback Interface [7:73305] You gentlemen have pointed out some good uses for loopback interfaces. However, my dilema still remains that I have yet to have somebody solidly explain loopback interfaces in a way that my simple mind can understand. I have also been unsuccessful in finding any website that accomplish this. Any takers? Robert ""p b"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > terminate iBGP sessions on **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73568&t=73305 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: PIX translation problem [7:72567]
Well, it depends on how big your global pool is. Most people likely don't have more than a Class C public address space from their ISP, so it's likely less than 250 (because of static mappings for DMZ hosts). If you use NAT, then there is a one-to-one mapping from an internal host to an external IP address in the pool. If you use PAT, then you map many internal hosts to one external IP address (up to 64,000, but more like 4,000 in practice). Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: Lynne Padgett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 11:15 AM To: Reimer, Fred; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX translation problem [7:72567] What is the maximum number of translations in a global pool on a PIX? I didn't realize there was a cap. I was under the impression that the number of translations was directly related to the PIX user/connection license. -Original Message- From: Reimer, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 5:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX translation problem [7:72567] No, but I know what it means. What kind of NAT are you doing? A global pool, or a single address doing PAT? If it's a pool, then you can define a single address (or interface) to do PAT when the global pool runs out. Or, if you already have PAT and that is being exhausted, then you can define a backup PAT address in case the first PAT address is exhausted. Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: Greg Owens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX translation problem [7:72567] have anybody seen this message. 07-15-2003 13:55:38Local4.Error192.168.1.1 Jul 15 2003 09:53:35: %PIX-3-202001: Out of address translation slots! I told the customer to change the translation time-out Greg Owens 202-398-2552 [GroupStudy removed an attachment with a content-type header it could not parse.] [Content-Type: null; name="replyAll"] **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73733&t=72567 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: CCNP and future CCIE lab setup [7:73696]
You have a great start. Let's consider what you have. The 2500s are great. In time, you will want to load an Enterprise version of IOS. That requires 16 MB Flash and 16 MB DRAM. There are many sources of third party DRAM and Flash - check the archives. You didn't say if the 2600s had any WIC cards. Two WIC-1Ts in each would be great. I recently bought several at an average price of $50 each. Just be patient. Again, verify how much Flash and DRAM you need for all your routers to run the images you want. Back-to-back serial cables. Again several sources. I have purchased from Bob Lowery, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Good prices and great service. Length depends on how you group your routers. Three foot (one meter) is handy if the routers are close together. Six foot or ten foot might also be useful. Ethernet cables. You'll want some crossover cables. May I suggest making some very short ones with a plug on one end and a jack on the other. Then add a regular patch cord of the desired length to meet your needs. Consider racking your equipment. Besides the full height racks you may have at work, there are short portable racks made for musicians. The rack is part of a shipping container. The discussions about these on groupstudy indicated they were quite reasonably priced. If you start with Routing, I would think that you have everything you need. I'll assume, without checking, that the 8 A/S module has DB-60 interfaces. Later when you do Remote Access an ISDN simulator would be a great addition. CCO has many resources. There are many great books. Consider some of those mentioned often on the list. Doyle "Routing TCP/IP" Vols I and II, "Cisco LAN Switching" by Clark and Hamilton, the Cisco Press books for the Networking Academy courses, etc. Good luck and have fun. > -Original Message- > From: Natchaya Radhikulkaralak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 6:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: CCNP and future CCIE lab setup [7:73696] > > > Like the other person previously... I am trying to build a lab. > > I am personally starting my Cisco track but I have recieved > some routers > from my work. > > I personally have 2-2501, 3-2503, 1-2504, 1-as2511-rj(which I > dont know how > to use), 1-2611, 1-2612, 1-3640 w/ 8 a/s module: 2ME-2W > module: 4-port ISDN > Bri module (dont know module name), 2-2912, 1-2950. > > Can you also give me any suggestions? Larus has mentioned a > backbone router > but isnt the 3640 sufficient? Overall... is there anything > else that i need > to improve this other than 3550 switches which are way out of > my budget!!!? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73734&t=73696 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Access server 2511 Reverse Telnet [7:73656]
Hi Oliver Many thanks for your reply. Just to clarify, I am using the Octal cable to connect to the console of the switch. Are you saying I should connect a crossover cable to the end of the octal cable and then connect the cross over into the console port of the switch ?? Cheers Wallis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73663&t=73656 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: what are ip directed-broadcast and ip mroute-cache [7:73842]
A quick explanation- please add on... Mroute is for the multicast routing table... Ip directed-boradcast allows a host to direct a physical broadcast to a specific subnet it only effects broadcast medium... -Original Message- From: Iwan Hoogendoorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 9:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: what are ip directed-broadcast and ip mroute-cache [7:73800] Can someone explain me what this is for and what is does? ip directed-broadcast ip mroute-cache Thank You Iwan **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html For more information about Barclays Capital, please visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Barclays Group. Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73842&t=73842 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Bad mask /24 for address ???? [7:73801]
In the old classful world, 10. addresses had a class a 255.0.0.0 mask, you tried ip classless in your config? Brian - Original Message - From: "Iwan Hoogendoorn" To: Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 6:27 AM Subject: Bad mask /24 for address [7:73801] > I was trying to assign an IP address with an subnetmask to the interface E0 > and i got this strange message: > > Bad mask /24 for address 10.0.0.10 > > > here is what i did: > > RouterA(config)#int e0 > RouterA(config-if)#ip add 10.0.0.10 255.255.255.0 > Bad mask /24 for address 10.0.0.10 > > > Can someone tell me what i did wron ...this is suposing to work right? > > Thank You > > Iwan > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73822&t=73801 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Distribution Router and OSPF [7:73933]
Why would there be? Not unless R3-R6 are in a different area, in which case they would need to create a Virtual Link to R1. Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: alaerte Vidali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Distribution Router and OSPF [7:73933] R1 is a ABR router; it connects to the backbone area and to area 50. R2 is a distribution router connected to router R1 through area 50. R2 connects to 4 other routers in area 50. I am wondering if there are concerns about R2 being a distribution router without connecting to area 0. area 0 (R1)--area 50 ---(R2)--area 50(R3,R4,R5,R6) **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73941&t=73933 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: VPN Conncetion from Windows Client to nt domain [7:73720]
Go in the client and choose Options | Windows Logon Properties and make sure the "Enable start before logon" checkbox is checked. Download the latest client. Enjoy. Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: Kai Bovermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 8:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VPN Conncetion from Windows Client to nt domain [7:73720] Dear all We have a cisco vpn concentrator 3000 series for vpn connection. What we want to do is to establish a vpn conncetion from a windows client(W2k or WinXP Pro) to the concentrator and then log on to our domain and then get the shares connected to the pc. I created a vpn connection and it works proberbly. Only the log on to the domain will not work. It should go like this way that the user is logged on to the pc and then if it is needed establish the vpn connection and get also logged on to the domain and get the shares connected to the pc. How can I do this ? Thanks a lot Kai **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73728&t=73720 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: mrtg [7:73702]
I have a word document I wrote a number of years ago describing how to do this. Please email me if you require a copy. It is too long to paste in this email. Best regards, Dom Stocqueler SysDom Technologies Visit our website - www.sysdom.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Metheny Sent: 08 August 2003 06:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mrtg [7:73702] This is actually quite simple - all you need to do is have all of your individual node .cfg data go to the same file (mrtg.cfg) instead of individual ones. As you go along, the data will simply append to the end of your existing mrtg.cfg file. In my most recent job (aka I am now looking!) I had about 30 routers configured in a single mrtg.cfg file. As a side note, MRTG integrates really well into What's Up Gold, creating a nice "clickable" map that somewhat resembles HP OpenView's Network Node Manager. Dan Metheny --- John Brandis wrote: > Hey All, > > Still going with my traffic analysis. God a small > problem with MRTG. > Does any one here know how to integrate the output > of multiple nodes > through the instance of a single mrtg.cfg file? At > the moment, I am > using multiple mrtg.cfg. fles and have a hard tme > navigating between all > the different nodes.. > > John > > > > > > ** > This email and any files transmitted with it are > confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or > entity to whom they > are addressed. If you have received this email in > error please notify > the system manager. > > This footnote also confirms that this email message > has been swept by > MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.solution6.com > ** > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the > GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73718&t=73702 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: 3500XL - duplicate IP and Windows NT/2000 server [7:73868]
As far as the duplicate MACs go, it sounds like you have a layer-2 loop. Especially considering that all of your servers are experiencing the problem. When they ARP to verify that no other station has their IP, they see their own ARP and assume that another station is doing the same thing. Layer-2 Loops will also cause MACs to appear to be sourced from different switches in the network. Is STP enabled everywhere? Mismatched channelling will also cause the same behavior. Firesox wrote: > I have a bunch of 3500XL switches thruout my customer's lan. > They are having a problem with unknown mac keep appearing and disappearing > from the network. > > I can trace the mac-address of the unknown station by "show mac" from the > swtich CLI. > What's strange is that it appears at one switch, but a minute later it > appears in the different switch. > > what's even more strange is that all NT/2000 servers log shows there is an > IP conflict with this mac address. > Of course, the servers IP function stops due to this duplicate IP, but comes > back in a few minutes. > All the servers report the duplicate IP comes from the same mac address. > > Has anyone seen this problem? > > Thanks > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73892&t=73868 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Cisco BGP Exam [7:73516]
Here is what I think is the trick to understand Halabi: It is NOT for entry level people nor is it for people who use it as a study book for any exam. That is why the book is called "Internet Routing Architectures" not "BGP cram session book for the CCXX exams"..The word Architectures should mean something, right? I have found out that the book really makes sense after you work with BGP in your job on a day-to-day basis. Atleast, it did for me and now I have read it many times and still refer to it once in a while, when I try to help some customers with their BGP configs and issues. Initially, I found it hard to comprehend so I do feel other's pain :-( Yes, please do not be so harsh about any author. Where in the book does it say that it should be used a study guide for any exam, even the CCIE is NOT mentioned. So how can you be so harsh about it. It is indeed called the Bible for a reason. And same of his OSPF design guide. I have used Caslow, Stewart, Halabi, Doyle and Parkhurst and best of all Cisco's BGP case studies. They are all good books/materials and should be used accordingly. As I always tell people, BGP is NOT for the faint-hearted :-) And, yes, the BGP beta exam was one of the most difficult exams that I took but managed to get a 857. Peace. No flames please !! Just my 2 cents!! CN >From: "John Neiberger" >Reply-To: "John Neiberger" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Cisco BGP Exam [7:73516] >Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 01:59:34 GMT > >Hmm...that's interesting. I found Halabit to be very easy to understand, but >that was after reading Stewart. Stewart's book is incredibly easy to >understand, especially considering how short it is. Quite concise, yet >readable. > >I have Doyle Vol. II but I stopped studying for attempt #2 before I got to >the BGP section. I should read through it as a refresher and to compare it >to Halabi. > >But Dre? Despise?? :-) That's pretty harsh! However, I guess I can >understand your point. BGP can be pretty easy to understand when it's >explained correctly, and can be very difficult to understand when explained >poorly. > >John > >""Pintens, Koen"" wrote in message >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I agree with Dre > > I also got both books and Jeff Doyle's is so much easier to read and > > understand then Halabi's > > > > Koen Pinten > > Network Engineer > > > > CCNP CCDP MCSE MCSA MCDBA > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: dre [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:55 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: Cisco BGP Exam [7:73516] > > > > > > ""juniper"" wrote in message ... > > > > Can anyone recommend a good book for the BGP exam > > > > > > I personally despise Halabi's "authortative, the BGP-bible" IRA > > > book. It is awful. It is the sole reason nobody understands BGP. > > > It's confusing, boring, and downright awful to read and understand > > > such simple concepts. > > > > > > I passed the Cisco BGP exam (took the beta), and I did not even > > > open Halabi or Stewart (I do like Stewart, but for this exam, his > > > information is not really on-topic). > > > > > > Normally, I'd say read the RFC's, but they are also not going to > > > help you on this exam. > > > > > > I used > > > a) the outline provided by Cisco > > > b) Jeff Doyle's TCP/IP Routing Volume II (first 318 pages) > > > > > > Jeff Doyle is the master of routing protocols...this misconception > > > that Volume II was not as good as Volume I reminds me of 14 > > > year old pimply-faced kids arguing about Star Wars vs. Empire > > > or Matrix 1 vs. Matrix: Reloaded. These are all good movies... > > > however, Star Wars: Episode I and II are more remniscient of > > > HalabiIMO. > > > > > > -dre > > > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > > > http://shop.groupstudy.com > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > > > ** > > This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential. If > > you receive it in error: (i) you must not use, disclose, copy or retain > > it; (ii) please contact the sender immediately by reply email and then > > delete the emails. Views expressed in this email may not be those of the > > Airways Corporation of New Zealand Limited > > ** > > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > > http://shop.groupstudy.com > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > >Message Posted at: >http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73577&t=73516 >-- >**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: >http://shop.groupstudy.com >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Thank you m.m.jansen02@kpn.com [7:73657]
Martijn, Your response to the 2620XM WIC-1DSU-T1 cable pinout was very helpful. Thank you, JoeT MCSE, CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73657&t=73657 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
