Re: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]
I love Cisco's free soda's and waters. It's got to be one of the best perks! ""McCallum, Robert"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Come on mate where's your sense of humour. > > BTW Jason is right the mouse new it was in for a hard time when it saw me so > it bolted. > > As for Brussels you do not see any equipment, you are just sat in a > classroom with keyboard, monitor, mouse (sometimes), pens, pencils, > sharpener , rubber (eraser for the Americans) and paper. You can wander off > at any time to get yourself a "free" can of coke or tea / coffee. I would > advise this > as you may as well bloat yourself with liquid as the lunch is a buffet > selection of continental type rolls. For us Brits sweet rolls with some > form of strange meat on them doesn't really appeal, in fact they were quite > rancid. I couldn't find a decent roll despite my 6 times of trying. Next > time > I'm going to bring in a packed lunch, with a Capri Sun just for luck. > > Cat5000,Cat3924,2600's,3600. > > -Original Message- > From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 30 January 2002 04:54 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > > I had asked for some honest advice as to what router models I needed to > 'simulate' the actual lab at home but alas...some people seem to have > wasted their time in replying some irrelevant answers. Sad.. > > >From: "Louie Belt" >Reply-To: "Louie Belt" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] >Date: Tue, 29 Jan > 2002 19:57:21 -0500 > >You'll go blind if you touch your flux capacitor > too much. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >c1sc0k1d >Sent: Tuesday, > January 29, 2002 6:35 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Recent > One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > >I saw my gear in RTP as well. Except > in RTP they said not to touch the flux >capacitor as the proctor already > calibrated it before the lab started. > > > > >""Hire, Ejay"" wrote in > message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'm surprised. > In san Jose, they are in big red/orange cabinets next to >the > > cubicle > you work in. You have to go over to the rack to check dial > > tone/ring > on your VoIp Phone... and to align the flux capacitor. > > > > -Ejay > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: McCallum, Robert > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:52 > PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab > Takers?? [7:33592] > > > > > > I never actually saw any equipment just a > monitor and keyboard. I could > > hazzard a guess though that most of the > equipment was Cisco. ;-> > > > > -Original Message- > > From: > Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 29 January 2002 19:29 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? > [7:33592] > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Has anyone is this group taken the > new one-day lab recently? Wanted to >know > > what kind of routers did > you see, I mean is it now more than 6 routers or > > still just 6? What > models? Is it 2 2513's or 2 2504's etc? And the switch, > > is it still > the Cat5? Just wanted to gather this info. to build a lab and > > work on > it..visualize that I am actually working on the real lab and > > > busting my brains. Thank you Cisco :-) > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > _ > > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > > http://www.hotmail.com > >_ >Do You > Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33674&t=33592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
You still did gts and not FRTS. You should specify frts out with CIR, mincir, bc, etc. For inbound interface, I still recommend CAR. ""Joseba Izaga"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > OK... I tested everything. > > I am using FRTS instead of GTS. > > The config i am using is > > ! > interface Serial1 > bandwidth 256 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation frame-relay IETF > no keepalive > no fair-queue > frame-relay traffic-shaping > ! > interface Serial1.1 multipoint > ip address 132.1.21.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > no arp frame-relay > frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.2 515 > ! > interface Serial1.2 point-to-point > bandwidth 64 > ip unnumbered FastEthernet0 > no ip directed-broadcast > no arp frame-relay > no cdp enable > frame-relay interface-dlci 516 > class t64 > ! > map-class frame-relay t64 > frame-relay traffic-rate 16000 64000 > frame-relay bc 64000 > ! > > > Router#sh int ser 1 > Serial1 is up, line protocol is up > Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial > Description: > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 256 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, > reliability 255/255, txload 40/255, rxload 6/255 > Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set > Keepalive not set > Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 20/0, interface broadcasts 2 > Last input 00:01:25, output 00:00:00, output hang never > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 3w4d > Queueing strategy: fifo > Output queue 0/40, 631 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops > 5 minute input rate 7000 bits/sec, 5 packets/sec > 5 minute output rate 12 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec > 6423620 packets input, 648992350 bytes, 0 no buffer > Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 96 giants, 0 throttles > 96 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort > 7910460 packets output, 3812516915 bytes, 0 underruns > 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > 0 carrier transitions > DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up > > Router#sh frame-relay pvc 516 > > PVC Statistics for interface Serial1 (Frame Relay DTE) > > DLCI = 516, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = STATIC, INTERFACE = Serial1.2 > > input pkts 5790202 output pkts 7230308 in bytes 543324449 > out bytes 3254580372 dropped pkts 0 in FECN pkts 0 > in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN pkts 0 > in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0 > out bcast pkts 5 out bcast bytes 380 > pvc create time 3w3d, last time pvc status changed 3w3d > cir 16000 bc 16000 be 48000 limit 6250 interval 125 > mincir 8000 byte increment 250 BECN response no > pkts 37256 bytes 5958824 pkts delayed 500 bytes delayed 181477 > shaping inactive > traffic shaping drops 0 > Serial1.2 dlci 516 is first come first serve default queueing > > Output queue 0/40, 0 drop, 500 dequeued > > Router#sh traffic-shape ser 1.2 > Access TargetByte Sustain ExcessInterval Increment > Adapt > I/F List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes) > Active > Se1.2 16000 6250 16000 48000 125 > 250 - > > This is all the statistics, and as you can see is just limiting the inbound > traffic, not the outbound. It is working as the GTS. > > I am using IOS ver 12.0(3)T. > > What else can I do? > > Regards, > > Joseba Izaga > > > > - Original Message - > From: > To: > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:19 PM > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > Well, unless I'm just suffering from Friday Afternoon Brain, the traffic > > figures still look weird to me. > > Can you look at the traffic figures from the other end of the PVC? If so, > > what do they say? > > > > I guess if the txload/rxload figures are for a 5-minute exponential > > average (which I believe they are) and the 5-minute input/output figures > > are a normal average (which I'm not sure of), those figures could make > > sense, but you'd have to have a pretty extreme traffic pattern (which I > > suppose you could if you've been testing throughput). > > > > What happens if you use FRTS instead of GTS? > > > > JMcL > > > > > > - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 18/01/2002 02:05 pm - > > > > > > "Joseba Izaga" > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 18/01/2002 11:54
Re: another OT: [7:33569]
I like the old Cisco better. It's easier to look at. ""paul"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > my apologies, > here is a better link > http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.cisco.com > - Original Message - > From: Jim Dixon > To: 'paul' > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:45 PM > Subject: RE: another OT: > > > Paul, > > I am confused. This is IENG's site. > What is Cisco4s? > > -Original Message- > From: paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 05:01 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: another OT: Cisco4s first web site? [7:33558] > > > > Sorry for the way OT content, > but i thought there should be at least someone interested in seeing Cisco4s > first site ;) > http://web.archive.org/web/19961106114149/http://ieng.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33572&t=33569 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame-Relay VoIP [7:32968]
I just tried it and I got the dual-fifo by applying the frf.12 to the interface. I just asked him again. I was mistaken. Enabling frame-relay traffic-shaping brings up PVC priority, not dual-fifo. ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I didn't get dual-fifo on my serial, with either a frf.12 nor frame-relay > traffic-shaping and I have 12.2.6a. I have seen dual-fifo though > > STeve > ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'll make it easy on you. :-) Take a look at this output: > > > > RNRTH#sho run int s0/0 > > Building configuration... > > > > Current configuration : 244 bytes > > ! > > interface Serial0/0 > > no ip address > > encapsulation frame-relay > > no ip mroute-cache > > tx-ring-limit 14 > > tx-queue-limit 14 > > no fair-queue > > frame-relay traffic-shaping > > end > > > > RNRTH#sho int s0/0 > > Serial0/0 is up, line protocol is up > > Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial > > Backup interface Async65, failure delay 10 sec, secondary disable > > delay 60 sec, > > kickin load not set, kickout load not set > > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, > > reliability 255/255, txload 21/255, rxload 22/255 > > Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, loopback not set > > Keepalive set (10 sec) > > LMI enq sent 25752, LMI stat recvd 25752, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI > > up > > LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 > > LMI DLCI 1023 LMI type is CISCO frame relay DTE > > Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 179841/0, interface > > broadcasts 166963 > > Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never > > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 2d23h > > Queueing strategy: fifo > > Output queue 0/40, 851 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops > > 5 minute input rate 137000 bits/sec, 124 packets/sec > > 5 minute output rate 133000 bits/sec, 125 packets/sec > > 21463756 packets input, 2759646235 bytes, 0 no buffer > > Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles > > 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort > > 21591969 packets output, 2815036977 bytes, 0 underruns > > 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets > > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > > 0 carrier transitions > > DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up > > > > RNRTH# > > > > > > This is with 12.2(3) code, as I mentioned before. During testing, if I > > turned on FRF, the Queueing strategy would change to dual FIFO. Without > > FRF, it remains as a single FIFO queue. > > > > John > > > > >>> "Steven A. Ridder" 1/28/02 3:23:32 PM > > >>> > > I had my weekly meeting with Cisco, and according to them, it does. > > Now I'm > > going to have to do it for myself to see. I'll let you know. > > ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > I don't think this is entirely true, but it might depend on the > > software > > > release. We're using 12.2(3) and you definitely have to turn on FRF > > to > > > get the dual FIFO queue; FRTS alone doesn't do it. We have several > > > routers using FRTS with no fragmentation and they only have a single > > > FIFO queue. When I did some testing with this, adding FRF created > > the > > > dual FIFO queue but then our voice calls sounded worse, even though > > we > > > weren't actually fragmenting packets! > > > > > > Weird. Oh well, we've canned our VoIP project anyway. At the > > moment > > > it just isn't feasible, and no, it doesn't have a feasible > > successor, > > > either. :-) > > > > > > John > > > > > > >>> "Steven A. Ridder" 1/28/02 2:20:01 PM > > > >>> > > > Fragmenting above a serialization problematic size doesn't create > > the > > > dual-FIFO queue as certain CCO pages say. It's the frame-relay > > > traffic-shaping command that does. > > > ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > It seems way off. You don't frag a packet above the MTU. As for > > &
Re: Frame-Relay VoIP [7:32968]
I didn't get dual-fifo on my serial, with either a frf.12 nor frame-relay traffic-shaping and I have 12.2.6a. I have seen dual-fifo though STeve ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'll make it easy on you. :-) Take a look at this output: > > RNRTH#sho run int s0/0 > Building configuration... > > Current configuration : 244 bytes > ! > interface Serial0/0 > no ip address > encapsulation frame-relay > no ip mroute-cache > tx-ring-limit 14 > tx-queue-limit 14 > no fair-queue > frame-relay traffic-shaping > end > > RNRTH#sho int s0/0 > Serial0/0 is up, line protocol is up > Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial > Backup interface Async65, failure delay 10 sec, secondary disable > delay 60 sec, > kickin load not set, kickout load not set > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, > reliability 255/255, txload 21/255, rxload 22/255 > Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, loopback not set > Keepalive set (10 sec) > LMI enq sent 25752, LMI stat recvd 25752, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI > up > LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 > LMI DLCI 1023 LMI type is CISCO frame relay DTE > Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 179841/0, interface > broadcasts 166963 > Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 2d23h > Queueing strategy: fifo > Output queue 0/40, 851 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops > 5 minute input rate 137000 bits/sec, 124 packets/sec > 5 minute output rate 133000 bits/sec, 125 packets/sec > 21463756 packets input, 2759646235 bytes, 0 no buffer > Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles > 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort > 21591969 packets output, 2815036977 bytes, 0 underruns > 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > 0 carrier transitions > DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up > > RNRTH# > > > This is with 12.2(3) code, as I mentioned before. During testing, if I > turned on FRF, the Queueing strategy would change to dual FIFO. Without > FRF, it remains as a single FIFO queue. > > John > > >>> "Steven A. Ridder" 1/28/02 3:23:32 PM > >>> > I had my weekly meeting with Cisco, and according to them, it does. > Now I'm > going to have to do it for myself to see. I'll let you know. > ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I don't think this is entirely true, but it might depend on the > software > > release. We're using 12.2(3) and you definitely have to turn on FRF > to > > get the dual FIFO queue; FRTS alone doesn't do it. We have several > > routers using FRTS with no fragmentation and they only have a single > > FIFO queue. When I did some testing with this, adding FRF created > the > > dual FIFO queue but then our voice calls sounded worse, even though > we > > weren't actually fragmenting packets! > > > > Weird. Oh well, we've canned our VoIP project anyway. At the > moment > > it just isn't feasible, and no, it doesn't have a feasible > successor, > > either. :-) > > > > John > > > > >>> "Steven A. Ridder" 1/28/02 2:20:01 PM > > >>> > > Fragmenting above a serialization problematic size doesn't create > the > > dual-FIFO queue as certain CCO pages say. It's the frame-relay > > traffic-shaping command that does. > > ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > It seems way off. You don't frag a packet above the MTU. As for > > the > > subnet > > > mask as an IP, I can't imagine the router taking it. Why can't he > > put the > > > real IP in there? It's been a while since I've seen a customer do > > FRF.11 > > C, > > > though. I'd do his config right and also add the map classes to > > both > > > routers. Furthermore, unless he has about 60 or so calls going > > across, > > I'd > > > reduce the reserved BW from 720K to a more reasonable number. > > > > > > > > > ""Erich Kuehn"" wrote in message > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > I have a customer that we provide frame-relay service to. He is > > trying > > to >
Re: Multilinking more than two ISDN channels [7:33493]
How are the Bri's in a multilink group? ""MADMAN"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Here ya go, an example that I did some time ago, the 12.1 code was > buggy. The gist of it is you set up a dialer and attach the bri's via > the dialer pool. This may not be on CCO but it works. > > Dave > > > KM Reynolds wrote: > > > > No offence, I just thought I was missing something. I have read your > emails > > in the past, and I do know you know what you are talking about. > > > > I aslo know you can bind PRIs, I just haven't heard of multilinking BRIs. > I > > looked in the archives and tried searching the Cisco Web Site, but had no > > luck. So I thought it was a good question and posted it. > > > > KM > > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" > This config is an ISDN dial backup binding three BRIs together > > 9/2000 > ! > ! Last configuration change at 14:54:55 UTC Mon Sep 25 2000 > ! NVRAM config last updated at 14:55:07 UTC Mon Sep 25 2000 > ! > version 12.1 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log datetime localtime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname CL_Spokane > ! > logging buffered 4096 informational > enable password converge*clpriv > ! > username CL_Bristol password 0 converge*clpriv > ! > ip subnet-zero > ip cef > no ip domain-lookup > ip host routerA 10.1.254.254 > ! > ipx routing 0030.945d.35e1 > isdn switch-type basic-5ess > ! > !interface Loopback0 > ip address 10.1.253.253 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface Loopback100 > ip address 50.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface Serial2/0.21 point-to-point > description PVC to Bristol > ip address 172.31.254.1 255.255.255.0 > ipx network AAA > frame-relay interface-dlci 21 > ! > interface BRI3/0 > description ISDN CKT#__ ISDN backup to routera's BRI3/0 > bandwidth 128 > no ip address > ip load-sharing per-packet > encapsulation ppp > dialer pool-member 1 > isdn switch-type basic-ni > isdn spid1 x xxx > isdn spid2 x xxx > no fair-queue > ppp authentication chap > ! > interface BRI3/1 > description ISDN CKT#__ ISDN backup to Bristol's BRI3/1 > bandwidth 128 > no ip address > ip load-sharing per-packet > encapsulation ppp > dialer pool-member 1 > isdn switch-type basic-ni > isdn spid1 x xxx > isdn spid2 x xxx > no fair-queue > ppp authentication chap > ! > interface BRI3/2 > description ISDN CKT#__ ISDN backup to Bristol's BRI3/2 > bandwidth 128 > no ip address > ip load-sharing per-packet > encapsulation ppp > no ip mroute-cache > dialer pool-member 1 > isdn switch-type basic-ni > isdn spid1 xx xxx > isdn spid2 xx xxx > no fair-queue > ppp authentication chap > ! > interface BRI3/3 > no ip address > shutdown > isdn switch-type basic-ni > ! > interface Dialer1 > ip address 10.100.200.1 255.255.255.0 > ip load-sharing per-packet > encapsulation ppp > no ip mroute-cache > dialer remote-name Router12 > dialer pool 1 > dialer idle-timeout 60 > dialer string 158 > dialer string 159 > dialer string 156 > dialer string 157 > dialer string 154 > dialer string 155 > dialer load-threshold 3 either > dialer max-call 6 > dialer-group 1 > ipx network FBEEF > ppp authentication chap > ppp multilink > ! > router eigrp 100 > redistribute static > network 10.0.0.0 > network 172.16.0.0 > network 172.31.0.0 > no auto-summary > no eigrp log-neighbor-changes > ! > ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.31.254.2 > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 200 > ip route 20.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 Dialer1 > no ip http server > ! > access-list 101 deny eigrp any any > access-list 101 permit ip any any > dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 101 > ! > ! > ! > ! > line con 0 > transport input none > line aux 0 > exec-timeout 45 0 > password diverge*clterm > modem InOut > modem autoconfigure type usr_sportster > transport input all > speed 115200 > flowcontrol hardware > line vty 0 4 > exec-timeout 0 0 > password diverge*clterm > login > ! > end > > CL_Spokane# sho ver > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3640-DS-M), Version 12.1(3a), RELE
Re: Frame-Relay VoIP [7:32968]
I had my weekly meeting with Cisco, and according to them, it does. Now I'm going to have to do it for myself to see. I'll let you know. ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I don't think this is entirely true, but it might depend on the software > release. We're using 12.2(3) and you definitely have to turn on FRF to > get the dual FIFO queue; FRTS alone doesn't do it. We have several > routers using FRTS with no fragmentation and they only have a single > FIFO queue. When I did some testing with this, adding FRF created the > dual FIFO queue but then our voice calls sounded worse, even though we > weren't actually fragmenting packets! > > Weird. Oh well, we've canned our VoIP project anyway. At the moment > it just isn't feasible, and no, it doesn't have a feasible successor, > either. :-) > > John > > >>> "Steven A. Ridder" 1/28/02 2:20:01 PM > >>> > Fragmenting above a serialization problematic size doesn't create the > dual-FIFO queue as certain CCO pages say. It's the frame-relay > traffic-shaping command that does. > ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > It seems way off. You don't frag a packet above the MTU. As for > the > subnet > > mask as an IP, I can't imagine the router taking it. Why can't he > put the > > real IP in there? It's been a while since I've seen a customer do > FRF.11 > C, > > though. I'd do his config right and also add the map classes to > both > > routers. Furthermore, unless he has about 60 or so calls going > across, > I'd > > reduce the reserved BW from 720K to a more reasonable number. > > > > > > ""Erich Kuehn"" wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > I have a customer that we provide frame-relay service to. He is > trying > to > > do > > > VoIP over Frame-Relay, while I have quite a bit of experience with > IP > and > > > Frame-Relay, once you put voice into it I get lost. > > > > > > His problem is that if his circuit goes down at location A, Once > Loc B > > comes > > > back up (to my frame-relay switch) Loc A will not come back up. The > only > > way > > > to force Loc A back up is to shut the interface on the frame-switch > to > > which > > > Loc A connect and then open it back up. Strange I know. He is > running > > > similar routers at both locations (3660's on 12.2xt code) and the > config > > are > > > nearly identical. With exception > > > > > > At Loc B under the serial subinterface he has > > > > > > frame-relay inte.5 255.255.255.252 > > > > > > Never seen this can anyone explain??? > > > > > > He also has this in his config at both Loc A and B > > > > > > Map-class Frame-relay VoIP_FR > > > frame-relay fragment 1600 > > > frame-relay ip rtp priotity 16384 16383 720 > > > no frame-relay adaptive-shaping > > > frame-relay fair-queue > > > > > > At Loc A he makes reference to the map-class under the serial subif > at > Loc > > B > > > he does not. > > > > > > Anyone with some input?? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > Erich Kuehn > > > Network Engineer > > > Backbone Communications Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33509&t=32968 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame-Relay VoIP [7:32968]
Fragmenting above a serialization problematic size doesn't create the dual-FIFO queue as certain CCO pages say. It's the frame-relay traffic-shaping command that does. ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > It seems way off. You don't frag a packet above the MTU. As for the subnet > mask as an IP, I can't imagine the router taking it. Why can't he put the > real IP in there? It's been a while since I've seen a customer do FRF.11 C, > though. I'd do his config right and also add the map classes to both > routers. Furthermore, unless he has about 60 or so calls going across, I'd > reduce the reserved BW from 720K to a more reasonable number. > > > ""Erich Kuehn"" wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I have a customer that we provide frame-relay service to. He is trying to > do > > VoIP over Frame-Relay, while I have quite a bit of experience with IP and > > Frame-Relay, once you put voice into it I get lost. > > > > His problem is that if his circuit goes down at location A, Once Loc B > comes > > back up (to my frame-relay switch) Loc A will not come back up. The only > way > > to force Loc A back up is to shut the interface on the frame-switch to > which > > Loc A connect and then open it back up. Strange I know. He is running > > similar routers at both locations (3660's on 12.2xt code) and the config > are > > nearly identical. With exception > > > > At Loc B under the serial subinterface he has > > > > frame-relay inte.5 255.255.255.252 > > > > Never seen this can anyone explain??? > > > > He also has this in his config at both Loc A and B > > > > Map-class Frame-relay VoIP_FR > > frame-relay fragment 1600 > > frame-relay ip rtp priotity 16384 16383 720 > > no frame-relay adaptive-shaping > > frame-relay fair-queue > > > > At Loc A he makes reference to the map-class under the serial subif at Loc > B > > he does not. > > > > Anyone with some input?? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Erich Kuehn > > Network Engineer > > Backbone Communications Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33504&t=32968 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Totally OT : Was there a man on the moon ? [7:33465]
Tell your friends it called faith. It's a belief in something without being able to prove or disprove it. And if they don't believe it, then that's their prerogative. (Although, with the correct amount of cash, you can get there and see for yourself, unlike proving the existence of a greater being/deity). Ole Drews Jensen is right, why do they even believe the moon exists. Or that the earth is round or that we revolve around the sun and not vice-versa. The best bet in getting a telescope to see the stuff on the moon is to get a satellite to orbit the moon, like the ones we have in orbit in earth that can take 1 m pictures. It's do-able and reasonably cheap in term of space exploration. ""sam sneed"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Or are you really someone that didn't believe the hippy down the steet when > he told you not to mix acid with the mushrooms he sold you > > ""Ole Drews Jensen"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Is the moon really there, or is it an optical illusion created by former > > pyramid residents now living on the planet Fryslak waiting to transmogrify > > our world into a big bowl of risepudding? > > > > Am I really here, or am I a lonely router misconfigured with an A.I. > image? > > > > Ole > > > > ~~~ > > Ole Drews Jensen > > Systems Network Manager > > CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I > > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ~~~ > > http://www.RouterChief.com > > ~~~ > > NEED A JOB ??? > > http://www.oledrews.com/job > > ~~~ > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:09 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Totally OT : Was there a man on the moon ? [7:33465] > > > > > > Is the flag really there. > > > > hhh Inquiring minds want to know! > > > > >>> "Ole Drews Jensen" 01/28/02 01:45PM >>> > > Just a thought... > > > > If they did not land on the moon - who placed the american flag there? > > > > Ole > > > > ~~~ > > Ole Drews Jensen > > Systems Network Manager > > CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I > > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ~~~ > > http://www.RouterChief.com > > ~~~ > > NEED A JOB ??? > > http://www.oledrews.com/job > > ~~~ > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Phil Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 12:15 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Totally OT : Was there a man on the moon ? [7:33465] > > > > > > Sorry for this waste of b/w but I have two discening > > friends who keep insisting that man never went to the > > moon, instead it was a big stage act. The shadows are > > in the wrong place blah, blah, blah. Unfortunately > > they cannot expand on the shadow theory since they > > don't understand it themselves. They just Want to > > believe in an American etc conspiracy. G. > > > > My initial defence that Man has landed on the moon was > > based on the fact that Russia didn't make any > > complaints which I'm sure they would have done. This > > has been unfortunately dismissed by the same argument > > i.e propaganda, America etc would not allow the > > reporting of such info-. > > > > Okay, now I need Physics to help. > > My hunch is that the radio signal of the famous speech > > by Neil Armstrong would be sent on a certain frequency > > which could only be picked up by a receiver set to the > > same frequency, and it would be possible to calculate > > the distance from Neil to Earth. Not done physics for > > 20 years so I'm struggling here. > > > > OR could this be simulated in a LAB to make the > > distance of Neil to Stage appear to be the distance to > > the moon ? > > > > Any other possibilities more than welcome to shut > > these muppets up. > > > > Phil. > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Everything you'll ever need on one web page > > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts > > http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33491&t=33465 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: aux port issue [7:33466]
Have you checked the dip switch settings on the modem? We use 2,3,4,5,6,7 UP. I've also used 1,5,6,7 UP. It may depend on the age of the modem, not sure. -Original Message- From: Vincent Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: aux port issue [7:33466] I am trying to guide a customer through an aux port setup. so far, we have the following in the router: line aux 0 password cisco login modem InOut transport input all speed 115200 flowcontrol hardware HOwever,when anyone calls the dial to number, the modem answers, but nothing appears on the screen except a blinking cursor. The terminal session shows a status of connected. I believe the attached modem is a USR 56k v.34 capable. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33480&t=33466 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Totally OT : Was there a man on the moon ? [7:33465]
Wait till moon tourist season begins in a decade or so, then look at the plaque, flag and tire tracks/foot prints left by our previous visit. Til then, build a powerful telescope/camera to look at above items. :) ""Phil Barker"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Sorry for this waste of b/w but I have two discening > friends who keep insisting that man never went to the > moon, instead it was a big stage act. The shadows are > in the wrong place blah, blah, blah. Unfortunately > they cannot expand on the shadow theory since they > don't understand it themselves. They just Want to > believe in an American etc conspiracy. G. > > My initial defence that Man has landed on the moon was > based on the fact that Russia didn't make any > complaints which I'm sure they would have done. This > has been unfortunately dismissed by the same argument > i.e propaganda, America etc would not allow the > reporting of such info-. > > Okay, now I need Physics to help. > My hunch is that the radio signal of the famous speech > by Neil Armstrong would be sent on a certain frequency > which could only be picked up by a receiver set to the > same frequency, and it would be possible to calculate > the distance from Neil to Earth. Not done physics for > 20 years so I'm struggling here. > > OR could this be simulated in a LAB to make the > distance of Neil to Stage appear to be the distance to > the moon ? > > Any other possibilities more than welcome to shut > these muppets up. > > Phil. > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Everything you'll ever need on one web page > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts > http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33469&t=33465 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easier way to upgrade the IOS on a 2500 [7:33455]
"copy tftp flash" will work nicely. ""s vermill"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > TFTP server will do nicely. You can search on CCO but the essence is > > ‘copy tftp start’ > > and follow the prompts. > > > > McHugh Randy wrote: > > > > Can anyone please tell me if there is an eisier less disruptive > > way to upgrade the IOS on Cisco 2500 than this URL explains > > without changing the config register and going into RX boot mode. > > Here is the procedure I found on the TAC: > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/130/sw_upgrade_proc_flash.shtml#first > > > > This is a 2524 running only 11.1 and I am going to upgrade the > > flash from 8mg to 16mg and try to upgrade to some version or > > revision of 12.x . > > > > Thank you, > > Randy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33459&t=33455 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: GO PAT'S (EOM) [7:33379]
-- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Limit access to serial link to four users [7:33306]
Is it H.323 media? Then you could set up a gatekeeper, and limit to 4 connections. Or, if you know the size of the bandwidth stream, you could create a PQ in LLQ that will only let enough bw for 4 users, then the rest wouldn't go through. ""Gaz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > I'm after some ideas if you'd be so kind :-) > > A 2Mb link being used mainly for streaming media has about 15 potential > users. The task is to limit the number of users at any one time to four, so > they have half a Mb each (ish). > > My initial idea, which I must admit, I dont think is such a good one is to > set up a NAT pool of four addresses, and drag the translation timeout down > to about a minute (yet to be tested), so that the first four users to pass > traffic will be translated and allowed through, but after that, they'll have > to wait. > > I'm off to look at something like TACACS to see if I can control network > authorization by number of users (shot in the dark). > > No equipment in place yet, so we have a clean drawing board. > > Anybody have any neat ideas please!! > > > Thanks, > > Gaz Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33316&t=33306 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Limiting the number of VoIP calls on a per GATEWAY Basis [7:33269]
h.323 gatekeeper. Or callmanager. ""Hamid Ali Asgari"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi group, > I have a VoIP environment with 10 gateways. The calls are being > routed between these gatewats and evrything is working fine. The > problem is that I want to limit the number of calls on per gateway > basis, that is for example gateway A should only have only 10 active > calls from gateway B, leaving the remaining lines for the other > gateways. > > Any idea how this could be done? > Thanks, > Hamid > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! > http://auctions.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33269&t=33269 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: default-metric 64 vs 2.....why?? [7:33231]
I thought redistribution into any other protocol besides OSPF would have a metric of 0. 0 is not understood by EIGRP, IGRP or RIP and therefore won't work. Redistribution into OSPF always assumes 20 unless you specify otherwise. Charles, could you site your source? I'm concerned that I may not understand redistribution as well as I thought if your numbers are right and mine are wrong. Are you giving the "unreachable" numbers because the redistribution won't work or do you have something that specifically states those numbers (16 and -1)? Thanks, Chris -Original Message- From: Charles Manafa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 4:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: default-metric 64 vs 2.why?? [7:33231] When metric is not supplied, and there is no default metric, then routes redistributed into RIP will have a metric of 16 (unreachable), routes redistributed into IGRP will have a metric of -1 (unreachable), and routes redistributed into OSPF will have a metric of 20. CM - Original Message - From: "Lupi, Guy" To: Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 7:50 PM Subject: RE: default-metric 64 vs 2.why?? [7:33231] > It was a little confusing to me also while reading the new practical studies > book, he does state that without a default metric or metric specified in the > redistribution statement the redistribution won't work, and while this is > true with most protocols, I have never had to specify one, default or > otherwise with OSPF. I would be interested to see if anyone has an > explanation for this, is it something due to link state versus distance > vector? I haven't done much ISIS, I would be curious to see if you need to > specify a metric for that, since you don't with OSPF. > > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 2:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: default-metric 64 vs 2.why?? [7:33231] > > > Remember, the metric on ospf is cost, the metric on rip is hops. > You always need a seed metric when redistributing, I can't explain why the > ospf continues to run, but thats what rip wo't work. Its the same with > EigrpIGRP, no metric, no work. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33252&t=33231 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2924XL and Blue Screen of Death: Resolved [7:33203]
I meant 3c905b's are nice. I think the 509's are old ISA cards. ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Those DELL's with the 3com nic's have so many problems! There's a thread > over in comp.dcom.sys.cisco with someone else having problems with the same > PC's and NIC's. > > Usually the 3c509's are OK. I remember the 3C509B's as being rock-solid. > How fast are the PC's booting to beat portfast? Or are the NIC's some sort > of boot on lan client, where the NIC get's taken over before the OS even > loads. Maybe someone can disable the wake on lan feature if those DELL's > have it, because otherwise I can't imagine a NIC caring about network > connectivity before the OS kernel wakes up and takes over the NIC anyways. > > > ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Well, sort of resolved. This turned out to be a known issue with Dell > > machines, specifically machines using a 3COM 3C905C NIC. They expect > > the network to be available almost immediately upon bootup and can't > > handle the delay caused by spanning tree. In some cases, even portfast > > did not reduce the time sufficiently. > > > > So, watch out for those 3COM NICs! > > > > John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33206&t=33203 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2924XL and Blue Screen of Death: Resolved [7:33203]
Those DELL's with the 3com nic's have so many problems! There's a thread over in comp.dcom.sys.cisco with someone else having problems with the same PC's and NIC's. Usually the 3c509's are OK. I remember the 3C509B's as being rock-solid. How fast are the PC's booting to beat portfast? Or are the NIC's some sort of boot on lan client, where the NIC get's taken over before the OS even loads. Maybe someone can disable the wake on lan feature if those DELL's have it, because otherwise I can't imagine a NIC caring about network connectivity before the OS kernel wakes up and takes over the NIC anyways. ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Well, sort of resolved. This turned out to be a known issue with Dell > machines, specifically machines using a 3COM 3C905C NIC. They expect > the network to be available almost immediately upon bootup and can't > handle the delay caused by spanning tree. In some cases, even portfast > did not reduce the time sufficiently. > > So, watch out for those 3COM NICs! > > John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33205&t=33203 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EtherChannel alternatives(??) [7:33187]
If the customer is rich and has $$ to burn, by all means go get some more gig blades, gbics and run fiber. Otherwise, EtherChannel is still the way to go, and cheapest. Tell the tech/manager who wrote the no VLAN policy that it doesn't apply to EtherChannel. I hate layer 8 of the OSI.. ""John McCartney"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I forgot to add that we are not using the 6509 CAT IOS we are using the box > as a big router (IOS) with many F/E ports. We do have a Gig-E card that we > just placed in one but not the other and the customer is concerned about > redundancy. I told him we could add the Gig-E to the other one but they > would have to work that out with our Sales depart. I think the price for one > of those babies is about $30K right, then to pull the fiber to the cabinet > cost about $1300 - at least thats what the last one costs us. I appreciated > any ideas as I've never implemented EtherChannel and was thinking it may be > an alternative. > > Good luck with the Steelers Steven... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33196&t=33187 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EtherChannel alternatives(??) [7:33187]
You don't need VLAN's for EtherChannel, so I don't understand the policy. Anyways, can you upgrade to Gig Ethernet? Or, use 802.3ad if your switch supports it. GO PATS!!! ""John McCartney"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > I have a question regarding EtherChannel. Is there an alternative to > EtherChannel that will give aggregation speeds that can be implemented on > 6509's. The reason I can't use EtherChannel is that our corp policy forbids > VLAN's so hence no EtherChannel. > > I have a customer who is currently on one 100MB F/E port and soon to be 3 > (all using redundancy --HSPR) and they wanted to know if there is a way to > aggregate the ports? The first thing I thought of was EtherChannel > > Any help is appreciated. > > Have a great weekend and GO EAGLES! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33188&t=33187 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Latency from US to APNIC? [7:33180]
Any wirii over there? Maybe the link is flooded with MS worms. ""Hotmail 2"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Is anyone aware of increased latency from Korean networks into the US or v/v > lately? > My users in Korea are complaining of slow page loads.Traces from Chicago, IL > US to Korea show a speed bump between the last hop in the US and the next hop > in Korea.(65ms to Palo Alto CA. - 244ms from Palo Alto to Korea). > > I suspect this has always been the case and the customer is doing something > different but any input on this is much appreciated. > Tx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33181&t=33180 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: UDP port for VoIP [7:33153]
16384 thru 32767. ""David Arianto"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > Does anyone know what UDP port number that VoIP use? > > thanks, > David Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33154&t=33153 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Router is not installing the better route [7:33102]
""Ali, Abbas"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The branch router is 2600 with built in T1 module. My configurtion is: > > routere(config)int s0/0 > service-module T1 timeslots 1-6 speed 64 along with linecode and framing > just to let you know. I did not specifically assign bandwidth parameter at > the interface level. I assumed that that the timeslot configuration should > be able to take care of a Serial link bandwidth which defaults to T1 1.544M > and change it to 384. But looks like the default serial link bandwidth > takes precedence regardless of timeslots configuration unless I manually > specify the bandwidth 384 command on physical serial link itself. Correct > me if I am wrong. No the bandwidth stays the same, 1554, even of you change timeslots. So you'd have to change it to 384, cause the router only thinks it's 1 t1's hop away at the moment. Do a sh int s0/0 to see the bandwidth command. > > Regards, > > AA > > -Original Message- > From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Router is not installing the better route [7:33102] > > > what does the bandwidth on the interface to the FR cloud say it is, T1 > or384? Is the real T1 link to the site even a FS? > > -- > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33107&t=33102 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Router is not installing the better route [7:33102]
what does the bandwidth on the interface to the FR cloud say it is, T1 or384? Is the real T1 link to the site even a FS? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Data and Voice PRI [7:32997]
Just to further clarify, (because I asked to make sure) order a Voice PRI. If you need a PRI for voice for DID, or other services, the 24 th channel must be used for voice signaling. Since the other 23 channels are clear anyways, the data has a clear, no robbed-bit, channel. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: serial # on routers [7:33035]
That doesn't give you the chassis SN which you use with smartnet. We always put the SN in a description in the config. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVoice exam practice questions [7:33039]
Purchase number 2 if you do. Number 1 is too easy. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SOME ITEMS THAT YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN OR BE ABLE TO [7:33021]
Is the spam getting worse or is it just me? ""kriss rolo"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > These are the items that iam interested in selling.. > Could you help me with some details on the goods, history, origin etc. > are these worth anything and if so who would i contact with regards to > selling them? and the best way to sell them ie auction etc > > APOLOGISE IF YOU HAVE ALREADY RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL > > JPEGS ARE AVAILABLE AT YOUR REQUEST > > MANY THANX > > kriss rolo > tel: > 0044 182760393 office (uk) > 0044 1216864211 home (uk) > 0044 7814294018 mobile (uk) > > return e-mail address [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > UK ONLY VEHICLE REGISTRATION NUMBER N64 CON > NINTENDO 64 CONSOLE > > item 1 > > > hand carved round table with metal chain link in the middle > > > > > > item 2 > > magnum laurent perrier vintage 1988 champagne > > > > > > item 3 > > miniture football on stand from euro96 signed by pele and bobby charlton > > > > item 4 > is a bit more interesting. its a protana minifon attache, as u will see > ive enclosed notes from a web site regarding this and you will see back in > the 50's it cost $340.00 so i could imagine this to be worth a bit. it > also has an original tape inside i do not know what is on this tape, but > judging by who made it and the cost of the machine, the tape could have > some important information on it. heres the note. > > > > The Minifon, developed in the early 1950s by Monske GMBH of Hanover(or by > Protona GMBH- I'm not certain), was an ultra-miniaturized, battery > operated magnetic recording device. It could not (initially at least) > record the full range of sounds and was thus limited to voice recording, > but it did offer easy portability in a very small package. The idea of > offering a pocket dictating machine was novel, since dictation had > previously been done in the office. However, it was thought that people > like salesmen could take the machine "on the road" with them. Once on the > market, the Minifon's promoters discovered that many people took advantage > of the recorder's small size to make secret recordings to be used as > evidence, as in court. > > The "legitimate" use of the Minifon, as a dictating machine, was somewhat > problematical. Recordings made on regular dictating equipment were usually > letters, and thus were normally sent almost immediately to a typist. The > Minifon offered no obvious advantages over standard dictation equipment > for office use, but its developers hoped to cultivate new uses for > dictation equipment, such as stock taking in warehouses, or the use of the > machine as a substitute for note-taking by reporters, insurance adjusters, > salesmen, and others. > > In its original form, the Minifon was a wire recorder, using a type of > wire medium developed by the Armour Research Foundation of Chicago and > employed in many similar devices since the late 1940s. The machine at its > introduction in 1952 had a recording time of one hour, which was > remarkably long, and weighed only about 3 pounds at a time when a typical > office dictating machine weighed upwards of 10 pounds. It accomplished > this small size and light weight in part through the use of miniature > tubes and clever mechanical design. The basic machine cost $289.50-- a > price that sounds high today but was very much in line with competing > office dictating machines. > > The parent company attempted to set up distribution, sales and service > networks in the United States. It established a business office called the > Minifon Export Corp in New York, and an existing company, Harvey Radio in > New York City became the main distributor. Although smaller tape recorders > appeared at about the same time, the main competition in the voice > recording field was from an American company, Mohawk, which made a small, > battery-operated cartridge tape recorder called the Migetape. Both > products sold less than 10,000 units per year in the U.S. > > After a few years, the Minifon was modified to use transistors and > magnetic tape, further lowering its weight and cost. By 1962 the basic > machine weighed in at only 1.5 pounds. Competition by this time had helped > bring the cost down to $249.50. > > The Minifon after about 1962 was distributed by the international > conglomerate ITT through its subsidiary in the U.S., Federal Electric > Corp. A little later, distribution was taken over by the ITT Distributor > Products Division in Lodi, New Jersey. (I don't know whether these were > the same company with different names) > > By the time ITT beca
Re: Static or dynamic VLANs [7:33014]
I've worked in some large, Fortune 500 company networks and they've all been ststic VLAN's so far. Maybe other people have seen dynamic, but I haven't yet. ""Kane, Christopher A."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The role I currently serve offers me little chance to configure/manage LAN > switches. I was wondering if everyone can provide feedback as to whether > they use static or dynamic VLANs. I'm curious to know which one is more > prevalent. For those of you that manage campus type networks, I'm interested > in knowing who deploys which. I'd like to hear real world scenarios to add > to my reading. > > Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33019&t=33014 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Static or dynamic VLANs [7:33014]
The role I currently serve offers me little chance to configure/manage LAN switches. I was wondering if everyone can provide feedback as to whether they use static or dynamic VLANs. I'm curious to know which one is more prevalent. For those of you that manage campus type networks, I'm interested in knowing who deploys which. I'd like to hear real world scenarios to add to my reading. Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33014&t=33014 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame-Relay VoIP [7:32968]
You explanation makes sense. I posted the solution to the frame-relay fragmentation, tried it and it works now. Check earlier archives. ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The large fragmentation size is used when you want to turn on the > Dual-FIFO queue but not actually fragment any packets. You need the > Dual-FIFO queue for prioritization at this level to work correctly. > However, I've had nothing but problems with FRF so I turned it off, > sacrificing the dual queue. > > John > > >>> "Steven A. Ridder" 1/23/02 1:38:18 PM > >>> > It seems way off. You don't frag a packet above the MTU. As for the > subnet > mask as an IP, I can't imagine the router taking it. Why can't he put > the > real IP in there? It's been a while since I've seen a customer do > FRF.11 C, > though. I'd do his config right and also add the map classes to both > routers. Furthermore, unless he has about 60 or so calls going across, > I'd > reduce the reserved BW from 720K to a more reasonable number. > > > ""Erich Kuehn"" wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I have a customer that we provide frame-relay service to. He is > trying to > do > > VoIP over Frame-Relay, while I have quite a bit of experience with IP > and > > Frame-Relay, once you put voice into it I get lost. > > > > His problem is that if his circuit goes down at location A, Once Loc > B > comes > > back up (to my frame-relay switch) Loc A will not come back up. The > only > way > > to force Loc A back up is to shut the interface on the frame-switch > to > which > > Loc A connect and then open it back up. Strange I know. He is > running > > similar routers at both locations (3660's on 12.2xt code) and the > config > are > > nearly identical. With exception > > > > At Loc B under the serial subinterface he has > > > > frame-relay inte.5 255.255.255.252 > > > > Never seen this can anyone explain??? > > > > He also has this in his config at both Loc A and B > > > > Map-class Frame-relay VoIP_FR > > frame-relay fragment 1600 > > frame-relay ip rtp priotity 16384 16383 720 > > no frame-relay adaptive-shaping > > frame-relay fair-queue > > > > At Loc A he makes reference to the map-class under the serial subif > at Loc > B > > he does not. > > > > Anyone with some input?? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Erich Kuehn > > Network Engineer > > Backbone Communications Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33006&t=32968 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed CCIE Written [7:32928]
Congrats! ""Kwame"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Passed 350-001 yesterday by a whisker (74%). Yeah it was that close. Typical > of ciscoese, lots of the questions lacked clarity so watch out. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33004&t=32928 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Data and Voice PRI [7:32997]
There's a difference. There are channel spitters out there and the provider can give you one for free. Ask the vendor which type of T1 to get, matbe they don't even need PRI if no special voice services are needed. ""Jim Bond"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, > > One of my customers want to link their 2 offices > together (They don't have data connection between 2 > offices now) and they are thinking using the same PRI > line for both voice and data. My question is: Is there > a difference between voice PRI and data PRI? If so, do > I need to tell provider which one I want? Or there is > some kind of multiplexer? > > Thanks in advance. > > Jim > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! > http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33003&t=32997 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame-Relay VoIP [7:32968]
It seems way off. You don't frag a packet above the MTU. As for the subnet mask as an IP, I can't imagine the router taking it. Why can't he put the real IP in there? It's been a while since I've seen a customer do FRF.11 C, though. I'd do his config right and also add the map classes to both routers. Furthermore, unless he has about 60 or so calls going across, I'd reduce the reserved BW from 720K to a more reasonable number. ""Erich Kuehn"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have a customer that we provide frame-relay service to. He is trying to do > VoIP over Frame-Relay, while I have quite a bit of experience with IP and > Frame-Relay, once you put voice into it I get lost. > > His problem is that if his circuit goes down at location A, Once Loc B comes > back up (to my frame-relay switch) Loc A will not come back up. The only way > to force Loc A back up is to shut the interface on the frame-switch to which > Loc A connect and then open it back up. Strange I know. He is running > similar routers at both locations (3660's on 12.2xt code) and the config are > nearly identical. With exception > > At Loc B under the serial subinterface he has > > frame-relay inte.5 255.255.255.252 > > Never seen this can anyone explain??? > > He also has this in his config at both Loc A and B > > Map-class Frame-relay VoIP_FR > frame-relay fragment 1600 > frame-relay ip rtp priotity 16384 16383 720 > no frame-relay adaptive-shaping > frame-relay fair-queue > > At Loc A he makes reference to the map-class under the serial subif at Loc B > he does not. > > Anyone with some input?? > > Thanks > > > Erich Kuehn > Network Engineer > Backbone Communications Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33002&t=32968 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CIR [7:32747]
My last post was about how when I reply to a message, sometimes the previous comments never show through. Somehow, neither the comments nor mine showed up. I believe this server has a bug in it when using newsgroups. Anyways... Drew said: I'm not sure, but I think that Steven ment that he had never had the AUTO LMI working, but that the 10/100 AUTO SENSE worked better in his opinion. Ole And I said correct. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32834&t=32747 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CIR [7:32747]
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CIR [7:32747]
I've never had it work. Even if I reboot. I always type it in. 10/100 autosensing works better in my opinion. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 1720 and VoIP [7:32807]
I don't believe so. I believe you need a 1750 which has the DSP's. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch for home lab [7:32797]
I would only focus on the 5K or, as I just learned, a 1200, as you need to know the set's, show's and clear's for the big test. The other switches are just annoying with all the different commands. Get the 1200, or 5k. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: invalid config reg [7:32673]
set the hyperterm speed to 9600 then. ""Amii Papa"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thanks for your prompt help. > > The thing is that the router's conf-reg setting was > previously 0x3920. This was to allow faster xmodem > speeds. In resetting back to 0x2102, a totally invalid > number was entered. > > As a result one is not able to see anything on > hyperterminal anymore. > --- Taco Hettema wrote: > > Follow the first part of the password recovery > > procedure to set it back to 2102 > > > > see: > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/pswdrec_3600.shtml > > > > Taco. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Amii Papa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:59 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: invalid config reg [7:32673] > > > > > > hi all, > > does anyone know how to recover from an invalid > > config-reg value that was entered on the rommon > > prompt > > of a 3660 > > > > > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! > > http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! > http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32761&t=32673 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE written [7:32733]
no -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Catalyst 5000 vs. Catalyst 1201 for CCNP home [7:32606]
Why do they call a 1201 a L3 switch? What L3 functions can it do besides RIP? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Urgent :Problem with Flash memory on a 3661 [7:32707]
I believe the command is partition flash 1 (that's what it is for a 2500) -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE 350-001 [7:32692]
There is no official book for the written test. There is a recommended reading list for the test on www.cisco.com though. Good luck. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: PATS RULE! (EOM) [7:32614]
-- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Slightly OT: 2924XL and Blue Screen of Death [7:32536]
True, I used to be a server guy, so I have a gut feeling about this. But you are right, anything is possible. The best way to test is to just turn off STP. ""Kevin Cullimore"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Your conclusion may be quite correct, but it's dangerous to make > generalizations concerning the behavior of microsoft client software, > especially given their last 2 operating system offerings (2000 & XP). > Whether or not a PC should or should not "care" about traffic traditionally > destined for other sorts of devices constitutes an insufficient basis for > drawing inferences about the behavior of microsoft network clients. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Steven A. Ridder" > To: > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 6:10 PM > Subject: Re: Slightly OT: 2924XL and Blue Screen of Death [7:32536] > > > > ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > We're having an interesting issue that just appeared recently. We have > > > some Dell PCs running Netware 6 and new client software. We're not sure > > > why, but if one of these machines is connected to a 2924XL switch, it > > > regularly experiences a blue screen of death either at login or within 5 > > > minutes of login. > > > > > > We have identical machines that operate fine if they're connected to > > > our Bay switches or Cisco 1900 switches. > > > > > > Have any of you seen anything like this?? That makes no sense to me. > > > The only difference I've been able to determine is that Spanning Tree is > > > turned off on those particular Bay switches and 1900 switches, yet it is > > > turned on on the 2924XL switches. So, perhaps these PCs are reacting > > > badly to STP BPDU. > > > > A PC wouldn't care about a bpdu. I say it's the client for netware. > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? Our LAN people are doing some testing with different NIC > > > software and Novell client software and I'll post back to the list if we > > > determine the actual cause of the issue. But can you think of why it > > > would only happen if they're connect to a 2924? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32548&t=32536 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Slightly OT: 2924XL and Blue Screen of Death [7:32536]
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > We're having an interesting issue that just appeared recently. We have > some Dell PCs running Netware 6 and new client software. We're not sure > why, but if one of these machines is connected to a 2924XL switch, it > regularly experiences a blue screen of death either at login or within 5 > minutes of login. > > We have identical machines that operate fine if they're connected to > our Bay switches or Cisco 1900 switches. > > Have any of you seen anything like this?? That makes no sense to me. > The only difference I've been able to determine is that Spanning Tree is > turned off on those particular Bay switches and 1900 switches, yet it is > turned on on the 2924XL switches. So, perhaps these PCs are reacting > badly to STP BPDU. A PC wouldn't care about a bpdu. I say it's the client for netware. > > Any thoughts? Our LAN people are doing some testing with different NIC > software and Novell client software and I'll post back to the list if we > determine the actual cause of the issue. But can you think of why it > would only happen if they're connect to a 2924? > > Thanks, > John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32542&t=32536 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch/router dhcp debug [7:32506]
if it shows the mac, look at the arp table to see if the IP is in there. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Make money all day long with your computer [7:32396]
Paul, You said this is a very large list. I'm curious, how many do we have? As far as the spams go, there really haven't been that many. Thanks for the work. Chris -Original Message- From: Paul Borghese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 11:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Make money all day long with your computer [7:32396] Yea I have some ideas in the works. Frankly it has not been a problem on this list and the current anti-spam measures I have put in place seem to be working. But occasionally we get one or two through. This is a very large list and regular techniques do not always work. On smaller list you can simply block messages from those that are not registered for the mailing list. But this list is not simply a mailing list. What about the people that use the newsfeed? Or Website? So what I plan to do is require first-time posters to authenticate first. Once they authenticate, the message will be delivered normally. Any additional messages will be delivered without authentication. So the spammer will need to use a valid From: address and take the time to authenticate. Which most do not. Paul - Original Message - From: "Kazan, Naim" To: Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:14 AM Subject: RE: Make money all day long with your computer [7:32396] > I would think with all of the Cisco gurus in this, we would find some way to > block junk emails. Just venting, now I feel better. > > -Original Message- > From: Buri, Heather L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:35 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Make money all day long with your computer [7:32396] > > > How do these dillholes find our list??? > > Heather > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:00 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Make money all day long with your computer [7:32396] > > > Make It Happen Online Today!! > 5 Cash Generating Websites!! > > Full resell rights! > You keep 100% of the Money!! > 100% money back guarantee! > > > Check it out at > http://196.40.67.198/money18/ > > > > > If you would like to be removed from this opportunities mailing, simply > reply to this > message with remove in your subject line. You will be removed > automatically > by our system. > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32494&t=32396 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multilink interface vs virtual-template [7:32479]
What's the difference between a multilink interface vs. a virtual-template interface with multilink applied to it? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE #8642 [7:32411]
> In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... > > I took my lab exam on Tuesday in San Jose, it was my first attempt and I > was > > ..oh, that's great :-) > > Can you write down your way to prepare for the test? I have my lab on > 01/04/2002. I think you missed yout lab! > Gerd Thuemmler > Berlin, Germany > > > -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dose PBX has a E1 interface? [7:32404]
He's right. It all depends on the model and size of the system, but a PBX for europe and elsewhere will probably have an e1 interface. A ksu won't have one (or a t1 in america) and a hybrid may or may not, depending on the size of the system. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE #8642 [7:32411]
Congratulations William! How long have you been doing networking? How long did it take you to study? I'm just curoius. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
Normally traffic-shaping is limiting outbound traffic and you police traffic inbound. Clear your counters and try again. I can't imagine why it's not working. Are you sure there's no traffic on s1.1? If you do frts (frame-relay traffic shaping) with map classes and no burst (so mincir and cir are the same), there's no way it won't work. Try that. I like frts better than gts anyways. ""Joseba Izaga"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Nopthere is no traffic over s1.1 > > Ok, is GTS limiting inbound and outbound traffic?, or just limit outbound > traffic? > > Joseba > > - Original Message - > From: "Steven A. Ridder" > To: > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:20 PM > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > Is s1.1 adding to that traffic? Could you be getting the 128k with s1.2 > and > > 1.3, plus whatever 1.1 is sending? > > > > > > ""Joseba Izaga"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "steve skinner" > > > To: > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:33 AM > > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > > > steve, > > > > > > Remember that I have limited each sub-int to 64kbps using the command > > > > > > traffic-shape rate 64000 12000 24000 > > > > > > (as steven recommend) > > > > > > but if I see the Serial statistics, I see more traffic than it suppose > to > > > be. It should be a 128kbps max. For that reason I said that it is not > > > function. > > > > > > Router#show int s 1 > > > Serial1 is up, line protocol is up > > > Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial > > > Description: WII > > > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 256 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, > > > reliability 255/255, txload 64/255, rxload 2/255 > > > Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set > > > Keepalive not set > > > Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 20/0, interface > broadcasts > > > 20 > > > Last input 00:00:05, output 00:00:00, output hang never > > > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 1w6d > > > Queueing strategy: fifo > > > Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops > > > 5 minute input rate 43000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec > > > 5 minute output rate 235000 bits/sec, 7 packets/sec > > > 3060238 packets input, 295363575 bytes, 0 no buffer > > > Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles > > > 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort > > > 4012231 packets output, 4121859399 bytes, 0 underruns > > > 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets > > > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > > > 0 carrier transitions > > > DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up > > > > > > Joseba > > > > > > > hi > > > > > > > > it seems ok to me as there is packets on the "stats" command but, > > > > > > > > i need to ask thissorry. > > > > > > > > you said before that it is not working ,but how do you know it`s not > > > working > > > > ???...i feel i am bieng a bit thick and missing something... > > > > > > > > cheers > > > > > > > > steve > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Joseba Izaga" > > > > >To: "steve skinner" , > > > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > >Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:07:23 -0800 > > > > > > > > > >Steve, > > > > > > > > > >This is what I got > > > > > > > > > >Router#show traffic-shape statistics > > > > > Access Queue Packets Bytes Packets > > > > >Bytes Shaping > > > > >I/F List Depth Delayed > > > Delayed > > > > >Active > > > > >Se1.20 289 45537 0 > > > > >0 no > > > > >Se1.30 36573 5751328 114 > > > > >63246 no > > > > >Router# > > > > > > > > > >Als
Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
Is s1.1 adding to that traffic? Could you be getting the 128k with s1.2 and 1.3, plus whatever 1.1 is sending? ""Joseba Izaga"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > - Original Message - > From: "steve skinner" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:33 AM > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > steve, > > Remember that I have limited each sub-int to 64kbps using the command > > traffic-shape rate 64000 12000 24000 > > (as steven recommend) > > but if I see the Serial statistics, I see more traffic than it suppose to > be. It should be a 128kbps max. For that reason I said that it is not > function. > > Router#show int s 1 > Serial1 is up, line protocol is up > Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial > Description: WII > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 256 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, > reliability 255/255, txload 64/255, rxload 2/255 > Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set > Keepalive not set > Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 20/0, interface broadcasts > 20 > Last input 00:00:05, output 00:00:00, output hang never > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 1w6d > Queueing strategy: fifo > Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops > 5 minute input rate 43000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec > 5 minute output rate 235000 bits/sec, 7 packets/sec > 3060238 packets input, 295363575 bytes, 0 no buffer > Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles > 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort > 4012231 packets output, 4121859399 bytes, 0 underruns > 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > 0 carrier transitions > DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up > > Joseba > > > hi > > > > it seems ok to me as there is packets on the "stats" command but, > > > > i need to ask thissorry. > > > > you said before that it is not working ,but how do you know it`s not > working > > ???...i feel i am bieng a bit thick and missing something... > > > > cheers > > > > steve > > > > > > >From: "Joseba Izaga" > > >To: "steve skinner" , > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > >Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:07:23 -0800 > > > > > >Steve, > > > > > >This is what I got > > > > > >Router#show traffic-shape statistics > > > Access Queue Packets Bytes Packets > > >Bytes Shaping > > >I/F List Depth Delayed > Delayed > > >Active > > >Se1.20 289 45537 0 > > >0 no > > >Se1.30 36573 5751328 114 > > >63246 no > > >Router# > > > > > >Also, > > > > > >Router#sh traffic-shape serial 1.2 > > > AccessTarget Byte Sustain Excess > > >Interval Increment Adapt > > >I/F List RateLimit bits/int bits/int > > >(ms) (bytes) Active > > >Se1.264000 2000 80008000125 > > >1000 - > > > > > >Router#sh traffic-shape serial 1.3 > > > AccessTarget Byte Sustain Excess > > >Interval Increment Adapt > > >I/F List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int > > >(ms) (bytes) Active > > >Se1.3320002000 80008000250 > > >1000 - > > > > > >So, what do you think? > > > > > >Joseba Izaga > > > > > >- Original Message - > > >From: "steve skinner" > > >To: > > >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:17 AM > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > > > > > > > hi ... > > > > > > > > if you do a "show traffic-shape" what does the "byte limit" count say > > >for > > > > each VC > > > > > > > > also what does > > > > > > > > show traffic-shape stats ...say > > > > > > > > hth > > > > > > > > steve > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: &qu
Re: cisco partner e-learning impressions [7:32329]
I tried to reboot the routers just to see if they were real. I was also doing test crash's a few weeks ago to see if they had any servers that would get any alarms. They were real routers. I didn't get to play with their rommon, cause I thought it would have been to mean. (You connect through an access server). Other than that, there wasn't anything anyone studying for the CCIE would need. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bandwith [7:32264]
you can tr on any interface now. ts is fr. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NAT Question [7:32305]
round robin -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bandwith [7:32264]
The actual formula to allow bursting is = rate(BITS)/8*1.5 to get the burst in BYTES. the double that to get the second variable, also in BYTES -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6509 cards hot swapable? [7:32288]
You can hot swap them. Even mgmt ones. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: First Impressions - CCIE Practical Studies [7:32237]
I got my CCIE Practical Studies book via half.com yeaterday and I had the same shipping problem. I saved about $25 on the price of the book, but the delivery took over 3 1/2 weeks! I don't think there was even a stamp or postmark on the media mail package, so I have no idea how it arrived I'd just as soon pay Amazon's price and get normal shipping (plus my company re-imburses me for all books I buy anyways). The book looks pretty good, but some people have told me that the book is still simple compared to the lab iteslf. But all in all, it does give you a blueprint of topics to study, then you can branch off in each subject for more in-depth studies in other books, etc. ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Just got my copy. > > Reading the "About the Authors" section alone is impressive. All those > associated with the book are CCIE's. I look forward to discovering if there > are any errors in the book. One would hope not, given the credentials of the > writers and reviewers, one of whom was the Halifax Lab Proctor for several > years. > > So far I have browsed all of the first chapter "The Key Components for > Modeling an Internetwork" > > This chapter covers in good detail all those basic questions - the config > register, configuring a router as a frame switch, password recovery, show > and debug ( called "the big show" and "the big d" respectively, throughout > the book. ) building a terminal server, and much much more. This alone tells > me that this book might be a good investment for those just starting out, as > well as those prepping for the CCIE Lab. Sure, all of this information is > available elsewhere, but with this book, it is in one place, easily located, > and clearly explained. > > There is even a section about configuring networking on windoze computers. > Considering the number of raw beginners who are coming into the > certification process, this is helpful. > > I'll have more comments after I have had a chance to look at the "good" > stuff. > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32240&t=32237 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
Try these parameters. I just met with a Cisco DE today and after exhaustive testing, you have to have this formula: be= cir (bits) /8*1.5 to get the burst in bytes. the double that to get the second variable so try 64000 12000 24000 Steve ""Joseba Izaga"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > I have a 1720 with 2 WIC-1T. I have 2 frame-relay radiomodem connected to > each > port. Each port has 2 sub-interfaces. > > What I need is to limit the bandwidth on the sub-interface to 64k. > > Right now I am using the command traffic-rate shape 64000 on a CISCO 2620 and > it is working good, but not on the 1720. > > The 1720 has 12.0 IOS version. > > So, why the 1720 is not limiting the bandwitdh? > > Or, there is another way to limit the bandwitdh? > > Regards, > > Joseba Izaga Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32231&t=32072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MC3810 [7:32128]
What were you trying to do, configure a certain command? I may have seen that when trying to chabe the timeslots on the t1 controller. ""Jason"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Never mind.. Thanks... LOL > > ""Jason"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Anybody encounter a similar error on MC3810 and managed to fix it > > Nothing is configured on the 3810 as yet > > > > SLR6-3810#show running > > > > 00:40:23: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 262144 bytes failed from > > 0x1F1 > > 4D8, pool Processor, alignment 0 > > -Process= "Exec", ipl= 0, pid= 19 > > -Traceback= 26FC88 271980 1F14DC 2181E0 2182A8 20EB10 21AF38 290138 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32140&t=32128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: show buffers?? clearing totals........ [7:32103]
I did as search as weel, and everyone comes to the same conclusion. reload. I even searched all the hidden command sites. ""R. Benjamin Kessler"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I think you may have to reload the router to reset these counters. I've > never seen a command to reset these counters and given what you're doing a > reload might be called for anyway to avoid problems (i.e. memory > fragmentation, etc.). > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Scott Nawalaniec > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: show buffers?? clearing totals [7:32103] > > > Hello everyone, > > I have been looking on Cisco's site for the last hour trying to find a > command to clear the counters on the show buffers command. Does anyone know > how to clear the totals for the hits, misses, trims, created and so forth? > > Background Info: I modified the small and middle buffers permanent and min > fields to reduce failures which equals dropped packets. I found a few good > articles on Cisco's site for explanations and possible causes. First time > actually modifying the buffers. =) > > [OUTPUT] > Admin_3662#sho buff > Buffer elements: > 499 in free list (500 max allowed) > 293099375 hits, 0 misses, 0 created > > Public buffer pools: > Small buffers, 104 bytes (total 100, permanent 100): > 96 in free list (30 min, 150 max allowed) > 314004167 hits, 11608 misses, 13038 trims, 13038 created > 1671 failures (0 no memory) > Middle buffers, 600 bytes (total 50, permanent 50): > 48 in free list (20 min, 150 max allowed) > 31006372 hits, 304 misses, 350 trims, 350 created > 52 failures (0 no memory) > Big buffers, 1524 bytes (total 50, permanent 50): > 50 in free list (5 min, 150 max allowed) > 1071944 hits, 0 misses, 0 trims, 0 created > 0 failures (0 no memory) > VeryBig buffers, 4520 bytes (total 10, permanent 10): > 10 in free list (0 min, 100 max allowed) > 0 hits, 0 misses, 0 trims, 0 created > 0 failures (0 no memory) > Large buffers, 5024 bytes (total 0, permanent 0): > 0 in free list (0 min, 10 max allowed) > 0 hits, 0 misses, 0 trims, 0 created > > Thank you for any help. > > Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32118&t=32103 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: conditional static route [7:32108]
route maps. ""Joy Wang"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Guys, > > Is there a way to setup a static route on a cisco router so that packets > going to the same target get forwarded to different interfaces/addresses > according to the source addresses? > > Your help is greatly appriciated. > Joy Wang Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32110&t=32108 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP neighbor limitations [7:32058]
There is no physical limitation to the number of neighbors in either protocol. Cisco does recommend 50, but you can do 60 or higher. the limit is your router's performance. ""tu do"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Douglas, > I donot have books with me now, sorry cannot tell you the pages# to search. > I took switching exam at begining of this month and remember about it. The > limitation (50) is for the protocol characteristics, not for the interface > or the router. > Cheer, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32109&t=32058 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE pracitcal Studies vs actual CCIE lab [7:32085]
For anyone who has seen, both, the CCIE practical studies book, and attempted the lab, how realistic are the labs in the back of the book? The stuff dosen't look impossible (I'm not saying it's easy) but it looks like the problem will be time. Is this true? Are the labs tougher than the book? Please refrain from any wise-ass comments (although they *are* ammusing). I'm not asking anyone to break the NDA. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is this ?? [7:32005]
is it a dhcp request? Not sure that it would come up during an icmp debug though. ""Joaquim Lopes"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > After I type debup ip icmp I've got this.Why is the source address 0.0.0.0 ? > 1w0d: IP: s=0.0.0.0 (FastEthernet0/0), d=255.255.255.255, len 328, rcvd 2 > > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32079&t=32005 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
Try upgrading the IOS or do CBWFQ or frame-relay traffic shaping and limit with CIR. Create a map class and add map class to subinterface. ""Joseba Izaga"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > I have a 1720 with 2 WIC-1T. I have 2 frame-relay radiomodem connected to > each > port. Each port has 2 sub-interfaces. > > What I need is to limit the bandwidth on the sub-interface to 64k. > > Right now I am using the command traffic-rate shape 64000 on a CISCO 2620 and > it is working good, but not on the 1720. > > The 1720 has 12.0 IOS version. > > So, why the 1720 is not limiting the bandwitdh? > > Or, there is another way to limit the bandwitdh? > > Regards, > > Joseba Izaga Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32078&t=32072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Copying Config to router via snmp [7:32027]
that's the tool! -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Copying Config to router via snmp [7:32027]
I believe it is. I did it once with a tool that downloaded the config as long as you had the correct RW community string, made the changes and sent it back up. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 7960 ip phones... [7:32006]
Echo on a digital phone (analog for that matter as well) is usually intentionally created, but it shouldn't be noticeable. It's called comfort noise, so that you can hear yourself talking in the earpiece. Tests have shown that people who can't hear themselves in the earpiece think it's broken. I'd say this probably isn't your problem. My first guess is the gain on the analog trunk lines are too high. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Router Serial# [7:31959]
I do know of an exception when it comes to the 12000 series GSRs. You can use the: show gsr chassis-info It lists the Chassis type, Chassis Serial Number, Hardware revision and even the Backplane Serial Number. I'm not sure what other platforms support this command if any. Chris -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Router Serial# [7:31959] By default there is no way to get the actual router serial number from the command line. There are ways to display certain serial numbers associated with that device, but it is not the chassis serial number you're seeing. One solution--which doesn't help you now--is to set the snmp chassis-ID in the router when you initially configure it. From that point on you can see the serial number from the command line or via SNMP. John >>> "Washington Rico" 1/14/02 10:38:36 PM >>> I would appreciate any information you have. I need to find the serial number of some routers which are located on a remote site. I know that with a show version on Cat6000 the serial number shows up. What about with routers. Show version did not show a serial#. Is there a CLI command? Again apppreciate any info you may have. _ MSN http://photos.msn.co.jp/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32010&t=31959 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Encapsulation Failed [7:31916]
Priscilla, My apologies for the inaccuracy. Indeed, on a Serial link (point-to-point) the neighbor state does advance to FULL. Not stopping at 2-way as I had suggested. I config'd my lab quickly this morning for point-to-point, below are some snapshots: Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface 144.223.8.1 1 FULL/ -00:00:3910.0.0.37 Serial1 rtrB#debug ip ospf adj OSPF adjacency events debugging is on rtrB# 4d22h: OSPF: Rcv hello from 144.223.8.1 area 0 from Serial1 10.0.0.37 4d22h: OSPF: End of hello processing 4d22h: OSPF: Rcv hello from 144.223.8.1 area 0 from Serial1 10.0.0.37 4d22h: OSPF: End of hello processing rtrB#debug ip ospf packet 4d22h: OSPF: rcv. v:2 t:1 l:48 rid:144.223.8.1 aid:0.0.0.0 chk:50AC aut:0 auk: from Serial1 4d22h: OSPF: rcv. v:2 t:1 l:48 rid:144.223.8.1 aid:0.0.0.0 chk:50AC aut:0 auk: from Serial1 4d22h: OSPF: rcv. v:2 t:1 l:48 rid:144.223.8.1 The debug ip ospf packet is interesting. In this case, you get to see the pieces of the hello protocol broken up. v = VERSION t = TYPE (1 identifies this as an Hello packet) rid = ROUTER ID (I have a Loopback 0 and 1, 1's address is 144.223.8.1) aid = AREA ID (Area 0) chk = CHECKSUM aut = AUTHENTICATION (I don't have authentication configured so it's 0, null) auk = AUTHENTICATION KEY. Unfortunately I can't find a debug to tell that my Hellos are multicast rather than unicast. I guess I'll have to wait until Priscilla ponies up the $ for a WAN sniffer. :) Chris -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Encapsulation Failed [7:31916] At 10:04 PM 1/14/02, Kane, Christopher A. wrote: >Yes, OSPF sends hellos on Serial interfaces. In point-to-point networks >OSPF's hello is multicast. There is no DR/BDR so it's my understanding that >it simply becomes a Master/Slave relationship. During the database description exchange state, the routers are in a master/slave relation. For the rest of the time, the adjacent neighbors are just friendly peers, wouldn't you say? >Mindful that in OSPF a Neighbor is not the same as an Adjacency. All routers >become neighbors (assuming all aspects of the Hello protocol are agreed >upon) They only become Adjacent with the respective DR and BDR of the >network in the case of a network on a broadcast medium. We're talking about non-broadcast WAN networks.. >I'm pretty sure you >only see "2-way" as a neighbor state on point-to-point links rather than I should try it, but I thought 2-way was an intermediate state, regardless of the type of network. >seeing "Full" as on a broadcast medium. > >I'd need someone else to chime in on point-to-multipoint as I haven't >configured that lately. > >Chris > >-Original Message- >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:40 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Encapsulation Failed [7:31916] > > >At 07:57 PM 1/14/02, s vermill wrote: > >Priscilla, > > > >May I ask what led you to believe that bridging was involved as opposed to > >just assuming that the source address was the Cisco router itself? > >Good question. The IBM 6611 does bridging for one thing. The other hint was >that it was attempting to send an OSPF Hello on a serial interface. Does >OSPF do that? How does it establish adjacency to a neighbor router on a >WAN? On a point-to-point network, I figured it just knew who its neighbor >was. > >On a non-broadcast, multiple-access network, such as Frame Relay, you >normally configured the neighbor command. > >I've only seen the OSPF multicast Hellos on LANs, (but I can't afford a WAN >Sniffer anymore! ;-) > >Gurus? Help? Thanks. > >Priscilla > >P.S. Anyone seeing this may be confused because you didn't include the >original message. PLEASE, people, reply with the body of the message in the >reply. We work in connectionless, stateless mode. How do you expect anyone >to easily connect this to the discussion about a router failing to forward >a packet on a PPP link to an IBM 6611. Hello? > > > >Just as an opportunity to learn something. > > > >Regards, > > > >Scott > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer >http://www.priscilla.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32008&t=31916 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gateway of last resort [7:31997]
I understand the gateway of last resort to be the destination of where the traffic should be forwarded. Hence gateway, not "local interface of last resort" :) It really dosen't matter if on a point-to-point network, because you'd forward the traffic out the interface and the other side would pick it up. I'd imagine that on a multi-access netowrk such as ethernet where you had three or more routers, if you just blasted the default traffic out the interface, no one would pick it up if it wasn't destined to them. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Encapsulation Failed [7:31916]
Yes, OSPF sends hellos on Serial interfaces. In point-to-point networks OSPF's hello is multicast. There is no DR/BDR so it's my understanding that it simply becomes a Master/Slave relationship. Mindful that in OSPF a Neighbor is not the same as an Adjacency. All routers become neighbors (assuming all aspects of the Hello protocol are agreed upon) They only become Adjacent with the respective DR and BDR of the network in the case of a network on a broadcast medium. I'm pretty sure you only see "2-way" as a neighbor state on point-to-point links rather than seeing "Full" as on a broadcast medium. I'd need someone else to chime in on point-to-multipoint as I haven't configured that lately. Chris -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Encapsulation Failed [7:31916] At 07:57 PM 1/14/02, s vermill wrote: >Priscilla, > >May I ask what led you to believe that bridging was involved as opposed to >just assuming that the source address was the Cisco router itself? Good question. The IBM 6611 does bridging for one thing. The other hint was that it was attempting to send an OSPF Hello on a serial interface. Does OSPF do that? How does it establish adjacency to a neighbor router on a WAN? On a point-to-point network, I figured it just knew who its neighbor was. On a non-broadcast, multiple-access network, such as Frame Relay, you normally configured the neighbor command. I've only seen the OSPF multicast Hellos on LANs, (but I can't afford a WAN Sniffer anymore! ;-) Gurus? Help? Thanks. Priscilla P.S. Anyone seeing this may be confused because you didn't include the original message. PLEASE, people, reply with the body of the message in the reply. We work in connectionless, stateless mode. How do you expect anyone to easily connect this to the discussion about a router failing to forward a packet on a PPP link to an IBM 6611. Hello? >Just as an opportunity to learn something. > >Regards, > >Scott Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31944&t=31916 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help I get this when I try to flash: %dev_open: System [7:31932]
just do a copy tftp flash it will erase it for you. ""RNall"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > This is my problem: > > Router2524(boot)#erase flash > > System flash directory: > No files in System flash > [0 bytes used, 8388608 available, 8388608 total] > > Erase flash device? [confirm] > Are you sure? [yes/no]: yes > %dev_open: System flash not writable > Router2524(boot)# > > I am unable to erase an 8meg flash module to upload a new image. > > here is the show version: > Router2524 uptime is 2 minutes > System restarted by reload > Running default software > > cisco 2524 (68030) processor (revision B) with 16384K/2048K bytes of memory. > Processor board ID 04592503, with hardware revision > X.25 software, Version 2.0, NET2, BFE and GOSIP compliant. > Basic Rate ISDN software, Version 1.0. > 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface. > 2 Serial network interfaces. > 1 ISDN Basic Rate interface. > Integrated NT1 for ISDN Basic Rate interface > No module installed for Serial Interface 0 > No module installed for Serial Interface 1 > 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. > 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Device not programmable) > > Configuration register is 0x2101 > > Router2524(boot)# > > > as you see i am in rom mode and i see the flash is "not programmable", is the > a sign of bad memory? > > TIA > > Robert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31932&t=31932 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cli clear ? [7:31881]
control + C is my little secret -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gawd I hate my life ;-> [7:31817]
NBAR. It's new. ""Ken Diliberto"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > You could always call TAC. Maybe they can find out for you. Either that, > or tell you "I don't know". > > :-) > > Ken > > >>> "Tony Medeiros" 01/13/02 11:44PM >>> > My router has that command too. > Can't get to show any output or find anything to turn it on > with..And no reference to it all, even in 12.2. > Must be one of the "features" that never made it > Tony > > - Original Message - > From: "Chuck Larrieu" > To: > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 8:39 PM > Subject: OT: Gawd I hate my life ;-> [7:31817] > > > > OK, so I've been doing rack testing for some people who are going to be > > going public Real Soon Now. > > > > Got some things mocked up. Some of which relate to topics discussed on > this > > forum yesterday and today. I need to check something and issue the command > > "show ip prot" enter. > > > > r2#sh ip prot > > % Ambiguous command: "sh ip prot" > > r2# > > > > well, now... > > > > r2#show ip prot? > > protocol-discovery protocols > > > > r2#show ip prot > > > > so what is "show ip protocol-discovery? > > > > r2#sh ip protocol-discovery ? > > interface Show for a specific interface > > protocol Show stats about a pariticula protocol > > stats Show Stats > > top-n Show Top-N protocols by bytes > > | Output modifiers > > > > > > OK. so a command I've been using since 11.2 is no longer valid. except > that > > it is on other routers. > > > > but look - still good on other routers: > > > > r3#sh ip prot? > > protocols > > > > r3#sh ip prot > > > > > > OK, check CCO, no record of any such command as show ip protocol-discovery > > in any command reference I check. A search of CCO for the phrase reveals > > nothing. > > > > now what? > > > > the IOS version in question is: > > > > r2#sh ver > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > > IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3620-JS56I-M), Version 12.1(5)T10, RELEASE > > SOFTWARE (f > > c2) > > > > sigh. have not run into this before, not in two trips through the lab, not > > on any number of routers and IOS versions, both at home and in customer > > installations. > > > > Anyone got any clue what show IP protocol-discovery does? > > > > sheesh.. another good shortcut down the tubes. > > > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31836&t=31817 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: copyright config [7:31774]
I was listening to an NPR newscast on something to do with copywriting when I thought of it. Patents too. What if you claim to come up with a novel way of figuring out a routing problem within the IOS, I wonder if you could patent it? I've seen business-practices patented (priceline.com, Amazon's 1-click shopping, etc., even patents for RFC's! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 2:32 PM To: "Steven A. Ridder" Subject: Re: copyright config [7:31774] you know, you have a good point there. it is something you technically create. you bring up an interesting idea. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] used Cisco gear: www.optsys.net CCIE Labs, racks, and classes: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/quicklinks.html Voice: 248-299-7789 eFAX: 509-271-9288 - Original Message - From: ""Steven A. Ridder"" Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 1:11 PM Subject: copyright config [7:31774] > Can you copyright a config? Has anyone ever heard of it? > > -- > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31780&t=31774 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
copyright config [7:31774]
Can you copyright a config? Has anyone ever heard of it? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GigEthernet (was:full-duplex Ethernet cable?) [7:31643]
Dosen't seem right to me, but what do I know? I did the 125 times/s *8 bits and got 1000. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clustering 3500XL switches [7:31668]
I guess just "simple" management for 1 virtual device. The web browser interface sucks. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: full-duplex Ethernet cable? [7:31643]
AFAIK, Ethernet would need 1,2 for transmit and 3,6 for receive (and CSMA\CD if half-duplex). Cable dosen't make a station full or half-duplex, it's the hardware. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DHCP coonection on Cisco Router [7:31559]
Try under $600 if you are lucky. Most go for a little more though, so in the low $600's isn't unreasonable. More than that is. At that point, you can get two 2501's and a crossover v.35. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
Good point. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]
Also shut down the local lan interface in case some lan client tries to go out to the internet while you are changing nat. Some busy sites this happens at. And include an * after the trans for all the translations. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help Please! BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to [7:31571]
Tom, I have config'd my Lab and it works: Your router 9.9.9.9 is my rtrB: rtrB#sh ip bgp 100.0.0.0 BGP routing table entry for 100.0.0.0/24, version 2 Paths: (1 available, best #1) Advertised to non peer-group peers: 10.0.0.33best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path *>i100.0.0.0/24 10.0.0.370100 0 i *> 100.0.1.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i My rtrC is the AS 100 router. Below, you can see that he's learning 2 prefixes from both routers in AS 400. By looking at the ">" you can see which route he's putting in his routing table. This is based on the MEDS that rtrA (your 6.6.6.6) and rtrB (your 9.9.9.9) are sending him. See below: rtrC#sh ip bgp n 10.0.0.18 rou BGP table version is 16, local router ID is 10.0.0.17 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path *> 100.0.0.0/24 10.0.0.185 0 400 i * 100.0.1.0/24 10.0.0.18 10 0 400 i Total number of prefixes 2 rtrC#sh ip bgp n 10.0.0.34 rou BGP table version is 16, local router ID is 10.0.0.17 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path * 100.0.0.0/24 10.0.0.34 10 0 400 i *> 100.0.1.0/24 10.0.0.345 0 400 i Total number of prefixes 2 My configs are the same as yours with the exception of the route-map name. My route-map name matches the route map that I am calling in my nei statement to 10.0.0.33 on rtrB (9.9.9.9). HTH, Chris -Original Message- From: Tom Pruneau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help Please! BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to any [7:31528] BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to any peer" Below is from an isolated lab configuration, appologies to the actual owners of any addresses of AS numbers used. I have two routers connected together via a serial line. They are in AS400. They are both connected to AS100 via another serial line. Both have a route map affecting advertisements to AS100. They each have an ethernet with a /24 on it. The /24 is getting into BGP via a network command. The two routers have the loopbacks 6.6.6.6 and 9.9.9.9 network 100.0.0.0 /24 is connected to the ethernet of router 6.6.6.6 network 100.0.1.0 /24 is connected to the ethernet of router 9.9.9.9 When I am on router 6.6.6.6 and I look at the advertisement of network 100.0.1.0 /24 is looks fine When i am on router 9.9.9.9 and I look at the advertisement of network 100.0.0.0 /24 it says "Not advertised to any peer" Any ideas why the difference Why can't 100.0.0.0 be avertised to any peer? Both routers have been rebooted. The configs look almost identical. router_#sho ip bgp 100.0.1.0 BGP routing table entry for 100.0.1.0/24, version 2 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Advertised to non peer-group peers: <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< 10.0.0.17 Local 10.0.0.38 from 10.0.0.38 (9.9.9.9) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best router_#show ip bgp 100.0.0.0 BGP routing table entry for 100.0.0.0/24, version 9 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Local 10.0.0.37 from 10.0.0.37 (6.6.6.6) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best router interface Loopback0 ip address 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 100.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial0 ip address 10.0.0.18 255.255.255.252 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.0.0.37 255.255.255.252 ! router bgp 400 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 100.0.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 10.0.0.17 remote-as 100 neighbor 10.0.0.17 route-map set_meds out neighbor 10.0.0.38 remote-as 400 no auto-summary ! ip classless ip route 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 10.0.0.38 no ip http server ! access-list 20 permit 100.0.0.0 access-list 21 permit 100.0.1.0 route-map set_meds permit 10 match ip address 20 set metric 5 ! route-map set_meds permit 20 match ip address 21 set metric 10 Router ! interface Loopback0 ip address 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 100.0.1.1 255.255.255.0 ! int
Re: DHCP coonection on Cisco Router [7:31559]
2514 supports 2 eth ints. or you may be able to get two cheap 2501's and string them together via serial. I've always wanted to try secondary addressing on 1 interface. The main would get it's IP via DHCP, and the secondary address would be the private IP. Always wanted to know if this would work. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NPE300 in 7206VXR [7:31534]
Travis, Curious, did you try clearing the int (cle int) before you tried the reload? Chris -Original Message- From: travis marlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NPE300 in 7206VXR [7:31534] Hi everybody, longtime reader, first time poster. Was wondering if anybody has had problems with the fastethernet port on the NPE300 for the 7206VXR platform. Lastnight for some reason the box was not able to ping the other router that it was connected to via this port. When doing a sh arp it showed the ip I was trying to ping with a mac of INCOMPLETE. All other interfaces to this router were up and passing traffic, after doing the magic "reload", everything was fine. It's weird that this port would just freeze up, it still said up and up on a sh int before the reload. After talking to a buddy, he said that they had had issues with using the fastethernet port on the NPE. I figured I would disseminate this problem to a larger group to see if anybody else had seen this. Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31545&t=31534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help Please! BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to [7:31541]
Tom, May have found your problem. I do see one error in your route-map statement. See below: 6.6.6.6 neighbor 10.0.0.17 route-map set_meds out route-map set_meds permit 10 match ip address 20 set metric 5 ! route-map set_meds permit 20 match ip address 21 set metric 10 9.9.9.9 neighbor 10.0.0.33 route-map set_meds out route-map set_med permit 10 match ip address 21 set metric 5 ! route-map set_med permit 20 match ip address 20 set metric 10 Notice for 9.9.9.9 your neighbor statement is calling a route-map named set_meds. But, the route-map you have defined is set_med. Fix it and see if that solves the problem. Chris -Original Message- From: Tom Pruneau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help Please! BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to any [7:31528] BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to any peer" Below is from an isolated lab configuration, appologies to the actual owners of any addresses of AS numbers used. I have two routers connected together via a serial line. They are in AS400. They are both connected to AS100 via another serial line. Both have a route map affecting advertisements to AS100. They each have an ethernet with a /24 on it. The /24 is getting into BGP via a network command. The two routers have the loopbacks 6.6.6.6 and 9.9.9.9 network 100.0.0.0 /24 is connected to the ethernet of router 6.6.6.6 network 100.0.1.0 /24 is connected to the ethernet of router 9.9.9.9 When I am on router 6.6.6.6 and I look at the advertisement of network 100.0.1.0 /24 is looks fine When i am on router 9.9.9.9 and I look at the advertisement of network 100.0.0.0 /24 it says "Not advertised to any peer" Any ideas why the difference Why can't 100.0.0.0 be avertised to any peer? Both routers have been rebooted. The configs look almost identical. router_#sho ip bgp 100.0.1.0 BGP routing table entry for 100.0.1.0/24, version 2 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Advertised to non peer-group peers: <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< 10.0.0.17 Local 10.0.0.38 from 10.0.0.38 (9.9.9.9) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best router_#show ip bgp 100.0.0.0 BGP routing table entry for 100.0.0.0/24, version 9 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Local 10.0.0.37 from 10.0.0.37 (6.6.6.6) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best router interface Loopback0 ip address 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 100.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial0 ip address 10.0.0.18 255.255.255.252 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.0.0.37 255.255.255.252 ! router bgp 400 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 100.0.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 10.0.0.17 remote-as 100 neighbor 10.0.0.17 route-map set_meds out neighbor 10.0.0.38 remote-as 400 no auto-summary ! ip classless ip route 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 10.0.0.38 no ip http server ! access-list 20 permit 100.0.0.0 access-list 21 permit 100.0.1.0 route-map set_meds permit 10 match ip address 20 set metric 5 ! route-map set_meds permit 20 match ip address 21 set metric 10 Router ! interface Loopback0 ip address 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 100.0.1.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Ethernet1 no ip address ! interface Serial0 ip address 10.0.0.38 255.255.255.252 no fair-queue clockrate 200 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.0.0.34 255.255.255.252 clockrate 200 ! router bgp 400 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 100.0.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 10.0.0.33 remote-as 100 neighbor 10.0.0.33 route-map set_meds out neighbor 10.0.0.37 remote-as 400 no auto-summary ! ip classless ip route 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.255 10.0.0.37 no ip http server ! access-list 20 permit 100.0.0.0 access-list 21 permit 100.0.1.0 route-map set_med permit 10 match ip address 21 set metric 5 ! route-map set_med permit 20 match ip address 20 set metric 10 Tom Pruneau Technical Trainer Network Operations GENUITY 225 Presidential Way Woburn Ma. 01888 --- This email is composed of 82% post consumer recycled data bits --- "Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31541&t=31541 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help Please! BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to [7:31539]
Silly question, is your BGP session up between 9.9.9.9 and the router in AS 100? Can you show me: sh ip bgp sum sh ip bgp n x.x.x.x rou sh ip bgp n x.x.x.x adv sh ip bgp n x.x.x.x Would you mind running these on all 3 routers and showing us the output? I'm interested in finding out what the problem is. If I don't see anything with the results you give us, I'll lab it up real quick. Chris -Original Message- From: Tom Pruneau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help Please! BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to any [7:31528] BGP question, why do I get "Not advertised to any peer" Below is from an isolated lab configuration, appologies to the actual owners of any addresses of AS numbers used. I have two routers connected together via a serial line. They are in AS400. They are both connected to AS100 via another serial line. Both have a route map affecting advertisements to AS100. They each have an ethernet with a /24 on it. The /24 is getting into BGP via a network command. The two routers have the loopbacks 6.6.6.6 and 9.9.9.9 network 100.0.0.0 /24 is connected to the ethernet of router 6.6.6.6 network 100.0.1.0 /24 is connected to the ethernet of router 9.9.9.9 When I am on router 6.6.6.6 and I look at the advertisement of network 100.0.1.0 /24 is looks fine When i am on router 9.9.9.9 and I look at the advertisement of network 100.0.0.0 /24 it says "Not advertised to any peer" Any ideas why the difference Why can't 100.0.0.0 be avertised to any peer? Both routers have been rebooted. The configs look almost identical. router_#sho ip bgp 100.0.1.0 BGP routing table entry for 100.0.1.0/24, version 2 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Advertised to non peer-group peers: <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< 10.0.0.17 Local 10.0.0.38 from 10.0.0.38 (9.9.9.9) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best router_#show ip bgp 100.0.0.0 BGP routing table entry for 100.0.0.0/24, version 9 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Local 10.0.0.37 from 10.0.0.37 (6.6.6.6) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best router interface Loopback0 ip address 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 100.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial0 ip address 10.0.0.18 255.255.255.252 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.0.0.37 255.255.255.252 ! router bgp 400 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 100.0.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 10.0.0.17 remote-as 100 neighbor 10.0.0.17 route-map set_meds out neighbor 10.0.0.38 remote-as 400 no auto-summary ! ip classless ip route 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 10.0.0.38 no ip http server ! access-list 20 permit 100.0.0.0 access-list 21 permit 100.0.1.0 route-map set_meds permit 10 match ip address 20 set metric 5 ! route-map set_meds permit 20 match ip address 21 set metric 10 Router ! interface Loopback0 ip address 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 100.0.1.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Ethernet1 no ip address ! interface Serial0 ip address 10.0.0.38 255.255.255.252 no fair-queue clockrate 200 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.0.0.34 255.255.255.252 clockrate 200 ! router bgp 400 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 100.0.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 10.0.0.33 remote-as 100 neighbor 10.0.0.33 route-map set_meds out neighbor 10.0.0.37 remote-as 400 no auto-summary ! ip classless ip route 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.255 10.0.0.37 no ip http server ! access-list 20 permit 100.0.0.0 access-list 21 permit 100.0.1.0 route-map set_med permit 10 match ip address 21 set metric 5 ! route-map set_med permit 20 match ip address 20 set metric 10 Tom Pruneau Technical Trainer Network Operations GENUITY 225 Presidential Way Woburn Ma. 01888 --- This email is composed of 82% post consumer recycled data bits --- "Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31539&t=31539 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab [7:31476]
12.1 it says on Cisco. ""Edward Chuchaisri"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Just a quick question. What IOS images do they use in the CCIE Lab? I am > particularly intersted in the images they use in 2500 and 2600. > > Thanks, > > Ed > > www.router4u.com > Affordable Router Lab Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31481&t=31476 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Serial Line problems [7:31426]
Erich Wrote... >I have checked the timing and from the CPE it appears to be correct. Our >frame switch (CBX500) is providing the timing to him. I supposed our timing >on the frame-switch could be off, but then more than a few customers would >be affected. Im wondering if it isnt a crossed pair on the demarc, or a bad >demarc extension. It is strange that the Show int S0 says >Available Bandwidth 1152 kilobits/sec >When in fact all 24 channels of this T1 are allocated to him Notice the Available Bandwidth command below in Erich's serial interface output. He thought that this may have been the problem, and I couldn't remember what avail. bandwidth was, but I said I didn't think so. I did a search on CCO and although the meaning didn't come up, I saw QOS on one of the results, and it reminded me on what it was. When you have any queueing on an interface, the router reserves 25% of a link/queue for routing protocols, overhead and keepalives, etc. So, for example, if you are doing LLQ and have a T1, then automatically when assigning bandwidth for queues, you are stripped of 25% of the 1.554Mb, leaving you with 1.152Mb to assign to the various classes. So if you wanted to give 768k to web traffic and 768k to e-mail traffic, the router would come up with an error message. Another example, RSVP, if it tries to make a call, and all the 75% bandwidth that the router left you, is assigned (even if it's not used) to the various classes, the router assumes there are no resources to provide RSVP, and tells it to take a hike. You can change the default 75% you have to work with with the max-bandwidth-reserved (#%) command. So as I typed earlier, if you wanted to keep just 10% for the routing protocols, you'd do max-reserved-bandwidth 90. I believe this all came out in 12.1.5T, or maybe al ittle before. His output Serial0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is PQUICC with Fractional T1 CSU/DSU MTU 4000 bytes, BW 1536 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 171/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 112, LMI stat recvd 91, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 0 LMI type is ANSI Annex D frame relay DTE FR SVC disabled, LAPF state down Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 21/0, interface broadcasts 0 Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:18:42 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/3/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) -> Available Bandwidth 1152 kilobits/secwrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > At 02:14 PM 1/9/02, Steven A. Ridder wrote: > >I can't find anything real quick. I did a serach and I saw QOS in with the > >avail bandwidth search results. So I'm pretty sure it's what the line has > >left over after the router reserves the 25% for routing protocols and line > > What is what the line has left over? What is this in answer to? Please copy > the question (and discussion) with your answer. Assume that we work in > connectionless, stateless mode. I get hundreds of e-mails. I can't remember > what this one goes with. It sure seem like an interesting conversation, > though. > > Thanks. > > Priscilla > > >maintenance. You can chage it by the max-reserved bandwidth (#) command. > >So if you wanted to keep just 10% for the routing protocols, you'd do > >max-reserved-bandwidth 90. By default the router keeps 25%. It's for RSVP, > >and all the other queueing techniques. > > > > > > > >-- > >RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31479&t=31426 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCxx Copyright Infringement [7:31391]
Speaking of fools: http://petemoss.com/spamflames/ShifmanIsAMoronSpammer.html This spammer sent ot spam, so someone reported the incident to the ISP. Not only did the spammer cuss out the reporter, he threatned to sue him! It's a halarious link. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Online Technical Training: [7:31363]
You have to get there through PEC on Cisco's web site for their free training , so don't log onto logilent.com Go to http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/pec/peclogin.html and click on the logilent box on the left with logilents info in it. They're real routers to play with. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Serial Line problems [7:31426]
I can't find anything real quick. I did a serach and I saw QOS in with the avail bandwidth search results. So I'm pretty sure it's what the line has left over after the router reserves the 25% for routing protocols and line maintenance. You can chage it by the max-reserved bandwidth (#) command. So if you wanted to keep just 10% for the routing protocols, you'd do max-reserved-bandwidth 90. By default the router keeps 25%. It's for RSVP, and all the other queueing techniques. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Online Technical Training: [7:31363]
also log into logilent.com -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE preparation [7:31305]
Can you use the CCO CD in the LAB?! -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Serial Line problems [7:31426]
If it was a crossed pair somewhere, it wouln't come up at all. No carrier. It can very well be bad dmarc extensions, but so many all at once. Is it all in one area of the state/city? Could still be bad telco wiring if in same area of CO. I believe that the customer of yours receive timing on the CO, not your frame-switch, even though your souce is supposed to be higher. Are you not synced with the telco switch or the USNO? Maybe someone else can speak about the avail banwidth output, but I just checked a T1 frame module, and I have the same output, so I don't think it's that. I'll look that one up though. I'd still focus on the timing. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
