line protocol down
I have this problem with my 2503. The line protocol goes down consistently. If I reset the modem (CSU/DSU) or reload the router, the line protocol comes up. And then it goes down after few minutes/hours and history repeats. I couldn't nail down the problem. Any clues? Thanks, Rayappa. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the materialfrom any computer. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
line protocol down
hi , I have problems with my frame-relay serial link attatched is the router configuration physical layer confirmed is ok as carrier is up but my serial interface still showing interface up line protocol down Any inputs will be greatly appreciated thanks Jason cncnepal.384.128.k2pop#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 11.2 no service password-encryption no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname cncnepal.384.128.k2pop ! ! ip subnet-zero ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address ! interface Serial0 ip address 192.168.1.9 255.255.255.252 no fair-queue ! interface Serial1 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay IETF --More-- frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial1.1 point-to-point ip address 202.161.128.158 255.255.255.252 frame-relay interface-dlci 659 ! router bgp 64519 network 202.51.65.0 network 202.51.66.0 ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 202.161.128.157 ! line con 0 line 1 16 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password router login ! end cncnepal.384.128.k2pop#sh int s1 Serial1 is up, line protocol is down Hardware is HD64570 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 168/255, load 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 60, LMI stat recvd 0, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI down LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 0 LMI type is ANSI Annex D frame relay DTE Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 1/0, interface broadcasts 0 Last input never, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters never Input queue: 0/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/1/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 12363 input errors, 38 CRC, 0 frame, 36 overrun, 739 ignored, 38 abort 62 packets output, 1162 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 21 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out --More-- 0 carrier transitions DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up cncnepal.384.128.k2pop#sh log Syslog logging: enabled (0 messages dropped, 0 flushes, 0 overruns) Console logging: level debugging, 13 messages logged Monitor logging: level debugging, 0 messages logged Trap logging: level informational, 17 message lines logged Buffer logging: level debugging, 13 messages logged --More-- Log Buffer (4096 bytes): %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial0, changed state to down %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial1, changed state to up %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to down %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to down %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial1, changed state to up %FR-5-DLCICHANGE: Interface Serial1 - DLCI 659 state changed to ACTIVE %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from memory by console %SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted -- Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-I-L), Version 11.2(18), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Mon 05-Apr-99 19:52 by jaturner %FR-5-DLCICHANGE: Interface Serial1 - DLCI 659 state changed to INACTIVE %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial1.1, changed state to down %FR-5-DLCICHANGE: Interface Serial1 - DLCI 659 state changed to DELETED %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial1, changed state to down cncnepal.384.128.k2pop#
RE: line protocol down
Jason, it is OK not to understand something , and ask questions, but you have no clue, and expect others who are not getting paid to do YOUR job to do it for you. Why should we help you fix the problems YOU are getting paid to fix. Get some training, and study, help yourself. If you want my help the price is $100.00 per hour at a minimum. My .02 EF -Original Message- From: Yee, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 1:56 AM To: cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail) Subject: line protocol down hi , I have problems with my frame-relay serial link attatched is the router configuration physical layer confirmed is ok as carrier is up but my serial interface still showing interface up line protocol down Any inputs will be greatly appreciated thanks Jason **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: line protocol down
Edgar, Don't you see everybody here is trying to help? That's what the purpose of this group, not only people ask questions, but we all watch and learn from them. I think you own an apology to Jason. You can always ignore the messages if you do not like it and keep your mouth shut. ""Feliz, Edgar"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02">news:A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02...> Jason,> > it is OK not to understand something , and ask questions, but you have no> clue, and expect others who are not getting paid to do YOUR job to do it for> you. Why should we help you fix the problems YOU are getting paid to fix.> Get some training, and study, help yourself. If you want my help the price> is $100.00 per hour at a minimum.> > My .02> > EF > > -Original Message-> From: Yee, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 1:56 AM> To: cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail)> Subject: line protocol down> > > > hi , > > I have problems with my frame-relay serial link attatched is the router> configuration> > physical layer confirmed is ok as carrier is up but my serial interface> still showing interface up line protocol down> > Any inputs will be greatly appreciated> > > thanks> > Jason> > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html> _> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RE: line protocol down
I do not think I owe him an apology, and I have the right to speak my mind. Follow your own advice and ignore the message if you do not like it, and keep your trap shut. EF -Original Message- From: CNN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 6:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: line protocol down Edgar, Don't you see everybody here is trying to help? That's what the purpose of this group, not only people ask questions, but we all watch and learn from them. I think you own an apology to Jason. You can always ignore the messages if you do not like it and keep your mouth shut. ""Feliz, Edgar"" < <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02">news:A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02> A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02">news:A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02... > Jason, > > it is OK not to understand something , and ask questions, but you have no > clue, and expect others who are not getting paid to do YOUR job to do it for > you. Why should we help you fix the problems YOU are getting paid to fix. > Get some training, and study, help yourself. If you want my help the price > is $100.00 per hour at a minimum. > > My .02 > > EF > > -Original Message- > From: Yee, Jason [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 1:56 AM > To: cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail) > Subject: line protocol down > > > > hi , > > I have problems with my frame-relay serial link attatched is the router > configuration > > physical layer confirmed is ok as carrier is up but my serial interface > still showing interface up line protocol down > > Any inputs will be greatly appreciated > > > thanks > > Jason > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: <http://www.groupstudy.com> http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: line protocol down
hi all , With regard to my problem.I was troubleshooting this morning and the problem is still with their receive. I first disabled LMI and had him do the same on his router along with no keepalives. The PVC came back up from the perspective of the frame relay switch (with LMI enabled it was down). I send 100 packets to him, he doesn't receive them on the router PVC stats. I show the packets traversing our frame relay network with zero discards or errors. He sends me 100 packets, I show 100 packets coming into our network. any comments Jason -Original Message- From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 2:47 PM To: Yee, Jason; cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail) Subject: Re: line protocol down Hi, First of all, your serial interface has input errors and CRC errors. You have sent LMI but haven't received any LMI probably due to these input errors and CRC's. I would check the circuit and CSU config. Once you get the line issues sorted out, heres how to troubleshoot frame based on the output you gave. Your DLCI 659 is DELETED which is assigned to your sub interface. Note, it was active when the interface was first brought up for a short time. This is normal on Cisco routers. The DLCIs are marked as active when interface is first brought up until LMI is received or not. Do a 'show frame pvc' and see what DLCIs your learning from the provider's frame switch if you are. Your LMI type is ANSI, is this correct? You can do a 'debug frame lmi' to see LMI packets. LMI is the management protocol where your DLCIs are learned, status of them, etc. It has to match that of switch. In the debug output, you will get at least 2-3 lines for each LMI poll (plus one more for each PVC, DLCI). The PVC/DLCI lines in 'debug frame lmi' begin with PVC ... and in middle will have dlci ##. If you don't see PVC lines in debug output your not learning any DLCIs and theres a issue w/the configuration of the providers switch/frame mapping to you, LMI mis-match, or a line problem. You can switch the LMI-type see if anything changes as well (while your waiting for provider to callback). If debug frame lmi looks good, then do a 'show frame map' to see what inverse-arp is picking for remote address's since your not staticly mapping them with a frame map statement. What does 'show frame lmi' show for input/output (bottom 2 lines of output). HTH, Erick B. --- "Yee, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi , > > I have problems with my frame-relay serial link > attatched is the router > configuration > > physical layer confirmed is ok as carrier is up but > my serial interface > still showing interface up line protocol down > > Any inputs will be greatly appreciated > > > thanks > > Jason > > > cncnepal.384.128.k2pop#sh run > Building configuration... > > Current configuration: > ! > version 11.2 > no service password-encryption > no service udp-small-servers > no service tcp-small-servers > ! > hostname cncnepal.384.128.k2pop > ! > ! > ip subnet-zero > ! > interface Ethernet0 > no ip address > ! > interface Serial0 > ip address 192.168.1.9 255.255.255.252 > no fair-queue > ! > interface Serial1 > no ip address > encapsulation frame-relay IETF > --More-- > frame-relay lmi-type ansi > ! > interface Serial1.1 point-to-point > ip address 202.161.128.158 255.255.255.252 > frame-relay interface-dlci 659 > ! > router bgp 64519 > network 202.51.65.0 > network 202.51.66.0 > ! > ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 202.161.128.157 > ! > line con 0 > line 1 16 > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > password router > login > ! > end > > cncnepal.384.128.k2pop#sh int s1 > Serial1 is up, line protocol is down > Hardware is HD64570 > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely > 168/255, load 1/255 > Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set, > keepalive set (10 sec) > LMI enq sent 60, LMI stat recvd 0, LMI upd recvd > 0, DTE LMI down > LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 > LMI DLCI 0 LMI type is ANSI Annex D frame relay > DTE > Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 1/0, > interface broadcasts 0 > Last input never, output 00:00:00, output hang > never > Last clearing of "show interface" counters never > Input queue: 0/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output > drops: 0 > Queueing strategy: weighted fair > Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max > total/threshold/drops) > Conversations 0/1/256 (active/max active/max > total) > Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max > allocated) > 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets
Re: line protocol down(???)
Jay, Are you sure it's not his configuration??? Your config looks ok...??? I know this was probably asked but is your line going out to a telco provider? If so it looks like this could be a routing issue. If he can get to you but you cant get to him then it looks like there's something wrong with his side, or blocking you somehow. Did this just all of a sudden happen out of nowhere or is this something that you just set up??? His DLCI mapping commands may be a little screwy...just a though, well...a couple ;) Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA, CCDA, 1/4-NP [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Destiny is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved." ~William Jennings Bryan~ **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: line protocol down(???)
thanks for your reply , ok I will check the DLCI command . Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 11:36 AM To: Yee, Jason; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: line protocol down(???) Jay, Are you sure it's not his configuration??? Your config looks ok...??? I know this was probably asked but is your line going out to a telco provider? If so it looks like this could be a routing issue. If he can get to you but you cant get to him then it looks like there's something wrong with his side, or blocking you somehow. Did this just all of a sudden happen out of nowhere or is this something that you just set up??? His DLCI mapping commands may be a little screwy...just a though, well...a couple ;) Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA, CCDA, 1/4-NP [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Destiny is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved." ~William Jennings Bryan~ **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: line protocol down
I totally agree with you , thanks pal!! ""CNN"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8pou25$fp1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8pou25$fp1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Edgar, Don't you see everybody here is trying to help? That's what the purpose of this group, not only people ask questions, but we all watch and learn from them. I think you own an apology to Jason. You can always ignore the messages if you do not like it and keep your mouth shut. ""Feliz, Edgar"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02">news:A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02...> Jason,> > it is OK not to understand something , and ask questions, but you have no> clue, and expect others who are not getting paid to do YOUR job to do it for> you. Why should we help you fix the problems YOU are getting paid to fix.> Get some training, and study, help yourself. If you want my help the price> is $100.00 per hour at a minimum.> > My .02> > EF > > -Original Message-> From: Yee, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 1:56 AM> To: cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail)> Subject: line protocol down> > > > hi , > > I have problems with my frame-relay serial link attatched is the router> configuration> > physical layer confirmed is ok as carrier is up but my serial interface> still showing interface up line protocol down> > Any inputs will be greatly appreciated> > > thanks> > Jason> > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html> _> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: line protocol down
What a cool guy! ""Feliz, Edgar"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FB26@SNYC1NT02">news:A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FB26@SNYC1NT02... > I do not think I owe him an apology, and I have the right to speak my mind. > Follow your own advice and ignore the message if you do not like it, and > keep your trap shut. > > EF > > -Original Message- > From: CNN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 6:09 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: line protocol down > > > Edgar, > > Don't you see everybody here is trying to help? That's what the purpose of > this group, not only people ask questions, but we all watch and learn from > them. > > I think you own an apology to Jason. You can always ignore the messages if > you do not like it and keep your mouth shut. > > > > ""Feliz, Edgar"" < <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote in message <A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02">news:A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02> > A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02">news:A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02... > > Jason, > > > > it is OK not to understand something , and ask questions, but you have no > > clue, and expect others who are not getting paid to do YOUR job to do it > for > > you. Why should we help you fix the problems YOU are getting paid to fix. > > Get some training, and study, help yourself. If you want my help the price > > is $100.00 per hour at a minimum. > > > > My .02 > > > > EF > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Yee, Jason [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 1:56 AM > > To: cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail) > > Subject: line protocol down > > > > > > > > hi , > > > > I have problems with my frame-relay serial link attatched is the router > > configuration > > > > physical layer confirmed is ok as carrier is up but my serial interface > > still showing interface up line protocol down > > > > Any inputs will be greatly appreciated > > > > > > thanks > > > > Jason > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > > <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > > _ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: <http://www.groupstudy.com> > http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: line protocol down
Plenty of ego being thrown around this list lately Richard A. Holland Voice/Data Integrator Telec, Inc. http://www.telecinc.com CCDA,CCNP,MCSE,CSE -Original Message- From: Templecombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, September 14, 2000 8:18 PM Subject: Re: line protocol down >What a cool guy! > >""Feliz, Edgar"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FB26@SNYC1NT02">news:A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FB26@SNYC1NT02... >> I do not think I owe him an apology, and I have the right to speak my >mind. >> Follow your own advice and ignore the message if you do not like it, and >> keep your trap shut. >> >> EF >> >> -Original Message- >> From: CNN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 6:09 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: line protocol down >> >> >> Edgar, >> >> Don't you see everybody here is trying to help? That's what the purpose of >> this group, not only people ask questions, but we all watch and learn from >> them. >> >> I think you own an apology to Jason. You can always ignore the messages if >> you do not like it and keep your mouth shut. >> >> >> >> ""Feliz, Edgar"" < <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote in message <A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02">news:A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02> >> A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02">news:A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02... >> > Jason, >> > >> > it is OK not to understand something , and ask questions, but you have >no >> > clue, and expect others who are not getting paid to do YOUR job to do it >> for >> > you. Why should we help you fix the problems YOU are getting paid to >fix. >> > Get some training, and study, help yourself. If you want my help the >price >> > is $100.00 per hour at a minimum. >> > >> > My .02 >> > >> > EF >> > >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Yee, Jason [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 1:56 AM >> > To: cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail) >> > Subject: line protocol down >> > >> > >> > >> > hi , >> > >> > I have problems with my frame-relay serial link attatched is the router >> > configuration >> > >> > physical layer confirmed is ok as carrier is up but my serial interface >> > still showing interface up line protocol down >> > >> > Any inputs will be greatly appreciated >> > >> > >> > thanks >> > >> > Jason >> > >> > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >> > <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html >> > _ >> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: <http://www.groupstudy.com> >> http://www.groupstudy.com >> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> >> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html >> _ >> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html >_ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: line protocol down
I think turfing your mail before its delivered is a better option. Thats my usual fix for cowards and primadonnas. Thanks for reminding me why I do that. Keep your trap shut...you are a brave little fellow. You are also in the wrong place. Darth -Original Message- From: Feliz, Edgar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 3:41 PM To: CNN; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: line protocol down I do not think I owe him an apology, and I have the right to speak my mind. Follow your own advice and ignore the message if you do not like it, and keep your trap shut. EF -Original Message- From: CNN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 6:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: line protocol down Edgar, Don't you see everybody here is trying to help? That's what the purpose of this group, not only people ask questions, but we all watch and learn from them. I think you own an apology to Jason. You can always ignore the messages if you do not like it and keep your mouth shut. ""Feliz, Edgar"" < <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02">news:A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02> A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02">news:A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02... > Jason, > > it is OK not to understand something , and ask questions, but you have no > clue, and expect others who are not getting paid to do YOUR job to do it for > you. Why should we help you fix the problems YOU are getting paid to fix. > Get some training, and study, help yourself. If you want my help the price > is $100.00 per hour at a minimum. > > My .02 > > EF > > -Original Message- > From: Yee, Jason [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 1:56 AM > To: cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail) > Subject: line protocol down > > > > hi , > > I have problems with my frame-relay serial link attatched is the router > configuration > > physical layer confirmed is ok as carrier is up but my serial interface > still showing interface up line protocol down > > Any inputs will be greatly appreciated > > > thanks > > Jason > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: <http://www.groupstudy.com> http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: line protocol down
What the hell is turfing? Maybe I am stupid but I have never heard this term before. I am a firm believer in everyone having the right to say whatever he or she pleases. One cannot please everyone and anything someone says that is slightly controversial is bound to offend a bunch of people on this list. Too bad is what I say. If you don't like what someone has to say waaah waaah tough crap. John - Original Message - From: Traister, Blake (SBCI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'Feliz, Edgar' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; CNN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 4:45 PM Subject: RE: line protocol down > I think turfing your mail before its delivered is a better option. Thats my > usual fix for cowards and primadonnas. Thanks for reminding me why I do > that. Keep your trap shut...you are a brave little fellow. You are also in > the wrong place. > > Darth > > -Original Message- > From: Feliz, Edgar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 3:41 PM > To: CNN; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: line protocol down > > > I do not think I owe him an apology, and I have the right to speak my mind. > Follow your own advice and ignore the message if you do not like it, and > keep your trap shut. > > EF > > -Original Message- > From: CNN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 6:09 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: line protocol down > > > Edgar, > > Don't you see everybody here is trying to help? That's what the purpose of > this group, not only people ask questions, but we all watch and learn from > them. > > I think you own an apology to Jason. You can always ignore the messages if > you do not like it and keep your mouth shut. > > > > ""Feliz, Edgar"" < <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote in message <A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02">news:A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02> > A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02">news:A1951EBFDB75D31188E200805F6FEE71B7FACF@SNYC1NT02... > > Jason, > > > > it is OK not to understand something , and ask questions, but you have no > > clue, and expect others who are not getting paid to do YOUR job to do it > for > > you. Why should we help you fix the problems YOU are getting paid to fix. > > Get some training, and study, help yourself. If you want my help the price > > is $100.00 per hour at a minimum. > > > > My .02 > > > > EF > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Yee, Jason [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 1:56 AM > > To: cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail) > > Subject: line protocol down > > > > > > > > hi , > > > > I have problems with my frame-relay serial link attatched is the router > > configuration > > > > physical layer confirmed is ok as carrier is up but my serial interface > > still showing interface up line protocol down > > > > Any inputs will be greatly appreciated > > > > > > thanks > > > > Jason > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > > <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > > _ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: <http://www.groupstudy.com> > http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Line protocol down (looped)
Groupstudy list Gurus I am having some serious trouble setting up my 2522 router as a frame switch. I am using the frame relay hub and spoke example Lab #13 from the All-in-one CCIE lab study guide. I am entering the commands just like in the book, but I one of the spoke interfaces comes up for a short time, and then goes down. When I show int I get Serial0 is up, line protocol is down (looped). What's that about? the frame switch sho run gives <-edited-> interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no fair-queue clockrate 64000 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 200 interface Serial1 200 ! interface Serial1 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 200 interface Serial0 200 frame-relay route 210 interface Serial2 210 ! interface Serial2 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 210 interface Serial1 210 and the bad spoke sho run gives <-edited-> ! interface Serial0 ip address 192.1.1.4 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay no fair-queue frame-relay lmi-type ansi I hope I have been descriptive enough, and thanks in advance. Boris NetZero Free Internet Access and Email_ Download Now http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html Request a CDROM 1-800-333-3633 ___ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: line protocol down
Is this happening in times of heavy usage? What have you figured out so far? Brian On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Rayappa Mayakunthala wrote: > I have this problem with my 2503. The line protocol goes down consistently. > If I reset the modem (CSU/DSU) or reload the router, the line protocol comes > up. And then it goes down after few minutes/hours and history repeats. I > couldn't nail down the problem. Any clues? > > Thanks, > Rayappa. > > > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which > it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. > Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any > action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the >intended recipient is prohibited. > If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the materialfrom >any computer. > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: line protocol down
Hi, I believe keepalive is on, if it is turn if off ( say no keepalive ) & also send the show command output of flapping interface. Thanks Rahul. - Original Message - From: "Rayappa Mayakunthala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 11:18 AM Subject: line protocol down > I have this problem with my 2503. The line protocol goes down consistently. > If I reset the modem (CSU/DSU) or reload the router, the line protocol comes > up. And then it goes down after few minutes/hours and history repeats. I > couldn't nail down the problem. Any clues? > > Thanks, > Rayappa. > > -- -- > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which > it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. > Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any > action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. > If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the materialfrom any computer. > -- -- > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: line protocol down
Also, check how much memory you have in the router. Jon Jon Kuhn IGNYTE Technology, Inc. 3226 scott boulevard santa clara, california 95054 phone 408.350.2600 ext. 335 fax 408.350.2601 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ignyte.com -Original Message- From: Rahul Kachalia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 4:04 PM To: Rayappa Mayakunthala; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: line protocol down Hi, I believe keepalive is on, if it is turn if off ( say no keepalive ) & also send the show command output of flapping interface. Thanks Rahul. - Original Message - From: "Rayappa Mayakunthala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 11:18 AM Subject: line protocol down > I have this problem with my 2503. The line protocol goes down consistently. > If I reset the modem (CSU/DSU) or reload the router, the line protocol comes > up. And then it goes down after few minutes/hours and history repeats. I > couldn't nail down the problem. Any clues? > > Thanks, > Rayappa. > > -- -- > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which > it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. > Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any > action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. > If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the materialfrom any computer. > -- -- > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: line protocol down
Seems to be problem with Clocking .Checking the clock settings on Modem (internal or external Clock) may help to solve the problem . Regards Anand Sudula -Original Message- From: Jon Kuhn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 4:50 AM To: 'Rahul Kachalia'; Rayappa Mayakunthala; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: line protocol down Also, check how much memory you have in the router. Jon Jon Kuhn IGNYTE Technology, Inc. 3226 scott boulevard santa clara, california 95054 phone 408.350.2600 ext. 335 fax 408.350.2601 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ignyte.com -Original Message- From: Rahul Kachalia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 4:04 PM To: Rayappa Mayakunthala; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: line protocol down Hi, I believe keepalive is on, if it is turn if off ( say no keepalive ) & also send the show command output of flapping interface. Thanks Rahul. - Original Message - From: "Rayappa Mayakunthala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 11:18 AM Subject: line protocol down > I have this problem with my 2503. The line protocol goes down consistently. > If I reset the modem (CSU/DSU) or reload the router, the line protocol comes > up. And then it goes down after few minutes/hours and history repeats. I > couldn't nail down the problem. Any clues? > > Thanks, > Rayappa. > > -- -- > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which > it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. > Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any > action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. > If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the materialfrom any computer. > -- -- > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: line protocol down
I faced this problem in my router and can't get solution for that. - Original Message - From: Anand Sudula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 9:49 AM Subject: RE: line protocol down > Seems to be problem with Clocking .Checking the clock settings on Modem > (internal or external Clock) may help to solve the problem . > Regards > Anand Sudula > > -Original Message- > From: Jon Kuhn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 4:50 AM > To: 'Rahul Kachalia'; Rayappa Mayakunthala; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: line protocol down > > Also, check how much memory you have in the router. > > Jon > > > > > > Jon Kuhn > IGNYTE Technology, Inc. > 3226 scott boulevard > santa clara, california 95054 > phone 408.350.2600 ext. 335 > fax 408.350.2601 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.ignyte.com > > -Original Message- > From: Rahul Kachalia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 4:04 PM > To: Rayappa Mayakunthala; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: line protocol down > > Hi, > > I believe keepalive is on, if it is turn if off ( say no keepalive ) & > also send the show command output of flapping interface. > > Thanks > Rahul. > > ----- Original Message - > From: "Rayappa Mayakunthala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 11:18 AM > Subject: line protocol down > > > > I have this problem with my 2503. The line protocol goes down > consistently. > > If I reset the modem (CSU/DSU) or reload the router, the line protocol > comes > > up. And then it goes down after few minutes/hours and history repeats. I > > couldn't nail down the problem. Any clues? > > > > Thanks, > > Rayappa. > > > > -- > -- > > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to > which > > it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. > > Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of > any > > action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other > than the intended recipient is prohibited. > > If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the > materialfrom any computer. > > -- > -- > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: line protocol down
Not many clues given though but from what you say it seems logical that you should check the status of your serial interface see if there are many input errors or crc errors if there are check the clock rate of your modem otherwise check the status of the other party that you are connected to to see if they were down however you can also confirm that your interface port is ok but putting keepalives equal to 0 to see that the status is up up suaveguru --- Rayappa Mayakunthala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have this problem with my 2503. The line protocol > goes down consistently. > If I reset the modem (CSU/DSU) or reload the router, > the line protocol comes > up. And then it goes down after few minutes/hours > and history repeats. I > couldn't nail down the problem. Any clues? > > Thanks, > Rayappa. > > > The information transmitted is intended only for the > person or entity to which > it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or > privileged material. > Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other > use of, or taking of any > action in reliance upon, this information by persons > or entities other than the intended recipient is > prohibited. > If you received this in error, please contact the > sender and delete the materialfrom any computer. > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: line protocol down
Which make of csu/dsu(modem) u r using for this ?? most of the times the line protocol will not come up due to clocking problem on the modem or tooo many errors on the line ... I had this problem when connecting two of our offices with 2 wire modem(RAD Make) . and we found there are lots of errors on line provided by local telco . It was fixed by telco by using different pairs then line protocol came up . so I suggest u first check the line ( test with Bert Tester)and then modem settings . Hope this helps Anand Sudula Systems Administrator NT/Exchange IT Department Baan Info Systems India Pvt. Ltd. Tel. +91 (0)40-3607299 Extn:1509 Fax.+91(0)40-3607366 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: jason yee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 2:27 AM To: Rayappa Mayakunthala; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: line protocol down Not many clues given though but from what you say it seems logical that you should check the status of your serial interface see if there are many input errors or crc errors if there are check the clock rate of your modem otherwise check the status of the other party that you are connected to to see if they were down however you can also confirm that your interface port is ok but putting keepalives equal to 0 to see that the status is up up suaveguru --- Rayappa Mayakunthala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have this problem with my 2503. The line protocol > goes down consistently. > If I reset the modem (CSU/DSU) or reload the router, > the line protocol comes > up. And then it goes down after few minutes/hours > and history repeats. I > couldn't nail down the problem. Any clues? > > Thanks, > Rayappa. > > > The information transmitted is intended only for the > person or entity to which > it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or > privileged material. > Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other > use of, or taking of any > action in reliance upon, this information by persons > or entities other than the intended recipient is > prohibited. > If you received this in error, please contact the > sender and delete the materialfrom any computer. > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: line protocol down
is this frame-relay? and is this a new connection? - Original Message - From: "Anand Sudula" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Rayappa Mayakunthala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 12:42 AM Subject: RE: line protocol down > Which make of csu/dsu(modem) u r using for this ?? most of the times the > line protocol will not come up due to clocking problem on the modem or tooo > many errors on the line ... I had this problem when connecting two of our > offices with 2 wire modem(RAD Make) . and we found there are lots of errors > on line provided by local telco . It was fixed by telco by using different > pairs then line protocol came up . so I suggest u first check the line ( > test with Bert Tester)and then modem settings . > Hope this helps > Anand Sudula > Systems Administrator NT/Exchange > IT Department > Baan Info Systems India Pvt. Ltd. > Tel. +91 (0)40-3607299 Extn:1509 > Fax.+91(0)40-3607366 > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -Original Message- > From: jason yee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 2:27 AM > To: Rayappa Mayakunthala; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: line protocol down > > Not many clues given though > > but from what you say it seems logical that you should > check the status of your serial interface see if there > are many input errors or crc errors if there are check > the clock rate of your modem > > otherwise check the status of the other party that you > are connected to to see if they were down > > however you can also confirm that your interface port > is ok but putting keepalives equal to 0 to see that > the status is up up > > suaveguru > --- Rayappa Mayakunthala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I have this problem with my 2503. The line protocol > > goes down consistently. > > If I reset the modem (CSU/DSU) or reload the router, > > the line protocol comes > > up. And then it goes down after few minutes/hours > > and history repeats. I > > couldn't nail down the problem. Any clues? > > > > Thanks, > > Rayappa. > > > > > -- -- > > > The information transmitted is intended only for the > > person or entity to which > > it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or > > privileged material. > > Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other > > use of, or taking of any > > action in reliance upon, this information by persons > > or entities other than the intended recipient is > > prohibited. > > If you received this in error, please contact the > > sender and delete the materialfrom any computer. > > > -- -- > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. > http://im.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: line protocol down
One of the things your carrier may require is the type after your DLCI number. Contact your carrier and they will tell you what it should be. Do you have external CSU's or using internal on the router? For example: interface Serial1.1 point-to-point frame-relay interface-dlci 659 IETF Your bgp config isn't going to work either. It's missing a few lines. Are you planning on running BGP? If so, let me know and we can work on that problem next. John - Original Message - From: Yee, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 10:55 PM Subject: line protocol down > > hi , > > I have problems with my frame-relay serial link attatched is the router > configuration > > physical layer confirmed is ok as carrier is up but my serial interface > still showing interface up line protocol down > > Any inputs will be greatly appreciated > > > thanks > > Jason > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: line protocol down
Hi, First of all, your serial interface has input errors and CRC errors. You have sent LMI but haven't received any LMI probably due to these input errors and CRC's. I would check the circuit and CSU config. Once you get the line issues sorted out, heres how to troubleshoot frame based on the output you gave. Your DLCI 659 is DELETED which is assigned to your sub interface. Note, it was active when the interface was first brought up for a short time. This is normal on Cisco routers. The DLCIs are marked as active when interface is first brought up until LMI is received or not. Do a 'show frame pvc' and see what DLCIs your learning from the provider's frame switch if you are. Your LMI type is ANSI, is this correct? You can do a 'debug frame lmi' to see LMI packets. LMI is the management protocol where your DLCIs are learned, status of them, etc. It has to match that of switch. In the debug output, you will get at least 2-3 lines for each LMI poll (plus one more for each PVC, DLCI). The PVC/DLCI lines in 'debug frame lmi' begin with PVC ... and in middle will have dlci ##. If you don't see PVC lines in debug output your not learning any DLCIs and theres a issue w/the configuration of the providers switch/frame mapping to you, LMI mis-match, or a line problem. You can switch the LMI-type see if anything changes as well (while your waiting for provider to callback). If debug frame lmi looks good, then do a 'show frame map' to see what inverse-arp is picking for remote address's since your not staticly mapping them with a frame map statement. What does 'show frame lmi' show for input/output (bottom 2 lines of output). HTH, Erick B. --- "Yee, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi , > > I have problems with my frame-relay serial link > attatched is the router > configuration > > physical layer confirmed is ok as carrier is up but > my serial interface > still showing interface up line protocol down > > Any inputs will be greatly appreciated > > > thanks > > Jason > > > cncnepal.384.128.k2pop#sh run > Building configuration... > > Current configuration: > ! > version 11.2 > no service password-encryption > no service udp-small-servers > no service tcp-small-servers > ! > hostname cncnepal.384.128.k2pop > ! > ! > ip subnet-zero > ! > interface Ethernet0 > no ip address > ! > interface Serial0 > ip address 192.168.1.9 255.255.255.252 > no fair-queue > ! > interface Serial1 > no ip address > encapsulation frame-relay IETF > --More-- > frame-relay lmi-type ansi > ! > interface Serial1.1 point-to-point > ip address 202.161.128.158 255.255.255.252 > frame-relay interface-dlci 659 > ! > router bgp 64519 > network 202.51.65.0 > network 202.51.66.0 > ! > ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 202.161.128.157 > ! > line con 0 > line 1 16 > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > password router > login > ! > end > > cncnepal.384.128.k2pop#sh int s1 > Serial1 is up, line protocol is down > Hardware is HD64570 > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely > 168/255, load 1/255 > Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set, > keepalive set (10 sec) > LMI enq sent 60, LMI stat recvd 0, LMI upd recvd > 0, DTE LMI down > LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 > LMI DLCI 0 LMI type is ANSI Annex D frame relay > DTE > Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 1/0, > interface broadcasts 0 > Last input never, output 00:00:00, output hang > never > Last clearing of "show interface" counters never > Input queue: 0/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output > drops: 0 > Queueing strategy: weighted fair > Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max > total/threshold/drops) > Conversations 0/1/256 (active/max active/max > total) > Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max > allocated) > 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > 0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer > Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 > throttles > 12363 input errors, 38 CRC, 0 frame, 36 > overrun, 739 ignored, 38 abort > 62 packets output, 1162 bytes, 0 underruns > 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 21 interface > resets > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers > swapped out > --More-- > 0 carrier transitions > DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up > cncnepal.384.128.k2pop#sh log > Syslog logging: enabled (0 messages dropped, 0 > flushes, 0 overruns) > Console logging: level debugging, 13 messages > logged > Monitor logging: level
Re: line protocol down
I would also suggest clearing the counters. Often times when new circuits are brought up there is a burst of errors. John Good comments btw Erick. - Original Message - From: Erick B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Yee, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 11:46 PM Subject: Re: line protocol down > Hi, > > First of all, your serial interface has input errors > and CRC errors. You have sent LMI but haven't received > any LMI probably due to these input errors and CRC's. > I would check the circuit and CSU config. > > Once you get the line issues sorted out, heres how to > troubleshoot frame based on the output you gave. > > Your DLCI 659 is DELETED which is assigned to your sub > interface. Note, it was active when the interface was > first brought up for a short time. This is normal on > Cisco routers. The DLCIs are marked as active when > interface is first brought up until LMI is received or > not. > > Do a 'show frame pvc' and see what DLCIs your learning > from the provider's frame switch if you are. Your LMI > type is ANSI, is this correct? You can do a 'debug > frame lmi' to see LMI packets. LMI is the management > protocol where your DLCIs are learned, status of them, > etc. It has to match that of switch. > > In the debug output, you will get at least 2-3 lines > for each LMI poll (plus one more for each PVC, DLCI). > The PVC/DLCI lines in 'debug frame lmi' begin with PVC > ... and in middle will have dlci ##. If you don't see > PVC lines in debug output your not learning any DLCIs > and theres a issue w/the configuration of the > providers switch/frame mapping to you, LMI mis-match, > or a line problem. You can switch the LMI-type see if > anything changes as well (while your waiting for > provider to callback). > > If debug frame lmi looks good, then do a 'show frame > map' to see what inverse-arp is picking for remote > address's since your not staticly mapping them with a > frame map statement. > > What does 'show frame lmi' show for input/output > (bottom 2 lines of output). > > HTH, Erick B. > > --- "Yee, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > hi , > > > > I have problems with my frame-relay serial link > > attatched is the router > > configuration > > > > physical layer confirmed is ok as carrier is up but > > my serial interface > > still showing interface up line protocol down > > > > Any inputs will be greatly appreciated > > > > > > thanks > > > > Jason > > > > > cncnepal.384.128.k2pop#sh run > > Building configuration... > > > > Current configuration: > > ! > > version 11.2 > > no service password-encryption > > no service udp-small-servers > > no service tcp-small-servers > > ! > > hostname cncnepal.384.128.k2pop > > ! > > ! > > ip subnet-zero > > ! > > interface Ethernet0 > > no ip address > > ! > > interface Serial0 > > ip address 192.168.1.9 255.255.255.252 > > no fair-queue > > ! > > interface Serial1 > > no ip address > > encapsulation frame-relay IETF > > --More-- > > frame-relay lmi-type ansi > > ! > > interface Serial1.1 point-to-point > > ip address 202.161.128.158 255.255.255.252 > > frame-relay interface-dlci 659 > > ! > > router bgp 64519 > > network 202.51.65.0 > > network 202.51.66.0 > > ! > > ip classless > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 202.161.128.157 > > ! > > line con 0 > > line 1 16 > > line aux 0 > > line vty 0 4 > > password router > > login > > ! > > end > > > > cncnepal.384.128.k2pop#sh int s1 > > Serial1 is up, line protocol is down > > Hardware is HD64570 > > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely > > 168/255, load 1/255 > > Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set, > > keepalive set (10 sec) > > LMI enq sent 60, LMI stat recvd 0, LMI upd recvd > > 0, DTE LMI down > > LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 > > LMI DLCI 0 LMI type is ANSI Annex D frame relay > > DTE > > Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 1/0, > > interface broadcasts 0 > > Last input never, output 00:00:00, output hang > > never > > Last clearing of "show interface" counters never > > Input queue: 0/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output > > drops: 0 > > Queueing strategy: we
RE: line protocol down
Well, I took a real quick glance but here are a few questions for you that may help you out: 1) Why have you selected the IETF encapuslation type? Are you dealing with Cisco and some other vendor? 2) As far as the Up-Down situation, have you verified the source of network clocking? What type of router-csu/dsu combination is in place? I would check the source of clocking again verify whether or not there is an issue with the settings on your csu/dsu. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Yee, Jason > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 12:56 AM > To: cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail) > Subject: line protocol down > > > > hi , > > I have problems with my frame-relay serial link attatched is the router > configuration > > physical layer confirmed is ok as carrier is up but my serial interface > still showing interface up line protocol down > > Any inputs will be greatly appreciated > > > thanks > > Jason > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: line protocol down
Are you using a frame relay simulator, or is this a connection to the telco? If this is a frame lab you have at home post the config of the router at the other end of this link. The details of the frame switch would be helpful too. >From: "Yee, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Yee, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: line protocol down >Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 00:55:57 -0500 > > >hi , > >I have problems with my frame-relay serial link attatched is the router >configuration > >physical layer confirmed is ok as carrier is up but my serial interface >still showing interface up line protocol down > >Any inputs will be greatly appreciated > > >thanks > >Jason > ><< routerconf.txt >> _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Line Protocol Down Status
Sadguna Kumar Dasari wrote in message news:... > Hi Folks: > > This is self-study lab kind of deal. I have an AGS+ router with 6 serial > ports and three 2500 series routers. I connected Serial 0 int on each of > these 2500 routers to Serial 2, 3, and 4 of AGS+. DCE in each case is on > AGS. Clock rate set. The Interface is up on all these interfaces but line > protocol is down. It is pretty simple config as I am just setting this up. I > can't figure out what the problem is. > > As a general question what causes the Interface to up and the line protocol > to be down. I tried to ping the ip number given to these interfaces from the > same router and I didn't get any response back. Is this because the line > protocol is down. In the int config mode of these interfaces I added > loopback command and pinged the int again but no answer. What could be the > problem? > > Unfortunately, I don't exactly remember which serial int on AGS connects to > which Serial 0 on which 2500 routers. But since it is straight forward > connection, I switched the ip numbers on the interfaces around to see where > the connection would be made. For example i configure s0 on the r1 (first > 2500 rourter) with 192.1.3.1/24 and try 192.1.3.2/24 on s2, s3, and s4 > respectively on AGS+. But none of them would work. All 2500 runnig 11.3(x) > version of IOS and AGS is 11.0(22). Encapsulation on both ends is the > default hdlc. > > I attached the command output as a seperate txt file. Can some body help me > figure out the problem? Any help is appreciated. > > Cheers > Kumar Dasari > > > > > > > > ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vlan line protocol down [7:39409]
Hi, I just got a 2950 switch yesterday and start to play with it. After sometime, I set the ip and going to ping it, but no respond. Check the ip interface, the line protocol is down: Vlan1 is up, line protocol is down Internet address is 172.28.32.107/25 Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255 Address determined by setup command MTU is 1500 bytes . I checked the IOS: IOS (tm) C2950 Software (C2950-I6Q4L2-M), Version 12.1(6)EA2a, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) The configuration is SIMPLE as below, can anyone give me some idea what's wrong and how can I fix it? Many thanks! Sammy. == Current configuration : 854 bytes ! version 12.1 no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname Switch_11 ! enable secret 5 $1$33S1$CT6ICwPPc6f01xb27Elu30 ! no ip subnet-zero no ip finger no ip domain-lookup ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/1 ! interface FastEthernet0/2 interface FastEthernet0/12 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/2 ! interface Vlan1 ip address 172.28.32.107 255.255.255.128 no ip route-cache ! no ip http server ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 transport input none line vty 0 4 no login line vty 5 15 no login ! end == Switch_11#sh vlan VLAN Name StatusPorts - --- 1default activeFa0/1, Fa0/2, Fa0/3, Fa0/4 Fa0/5, Fa0/6, Fa0/7, Fa0/8 Fa0/9, Fa0/10, Fa0/11, Fa0/12 Gi0/1, Gi0/2 1002 fddi-default active 1003 token-ring-default active 1004 fddinet-default active 1005 trnet-defaultactive VLAN Type SAID MTU Parent RingNo BridgeNo Stp BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2 - -- - -- -- -- -- 1enet 11 1500 - - ---1002 1003 1002 fddi 101002 1500 - - ---1 1003 1003 tr101003 1500 1005 0 --srb 1 1002 1004 fdnet 101004 1500 - - 1ibm -0 0 1005 trnet 101005 1500 - - 1ibm -0 0 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39409&t=39409 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: vlan line protocol down [7:39409]
Without any experience with this Switch, I can only guess at this possibility: Did you program the VLAN config from a console port?? If so, Do you have anything plugged into ANY of the FastEthernet ports?? If not, try plugging a workstation, laptop, or whatever type of node that suits your fancy, and then go back to your terminal program to see if you get anything. Better yet, if you're programming IP addresses on a VLAN specifically, perhaps you should first connect the switch to a router and configure trunking to support Sub-interface VLAN routing. I bet that this is actually what your issue is. If you want to assign an IP address to the switch to ping it or telnet to it, try assigning the IP address to one of the Ethernet Interfaces. that is... Switch_11#config terminal Switch_11#(config)int fa0/1 Switch_11#(config-if)ip address 172.28.32.107 255.255.255.128 Switch_11#(config-if)end Switch_11#ping 172.28.32.107 and see if you get: ! If all else fails, look up Basic Configuration of Cisco 2950 Switch on www.cisco.com , and I'll bet you'll find out the answers to your questions. Good luck. Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sammy Kwong Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 2:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: vlan line protocol down [7:39409] Hi, I just got a 2950 switch yesterday and start to play with it. After sometime, I set the ip and going to ping it, but no respond. Check the ip interface, the line protocol is down: Vlan1 is up, line protocol is down Internet address is 172.28.32.107/25 Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255 Address determined by setup command MTU is 1500 bytes . I checked the IOS: IOS (tm) C2950 Software (C2950-I6Q4L2-M), Version 12.1(6)EA2a, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) The configuration is SIMPLE as below, can anyone give me some idea what's wrong and how can I fix it? Many thanks! Sammy. == Current configuration : 854 bytes ! version 12.1 no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname Switch_11 ! enable secret 5 $1$33S1$CT6ICwPPc6f01xb27Elu30 ! no ip subnet-zero no ip finger no ip domain-lookup ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/1 ! interface FastEthernet0/2 interface FastEthernet0/12 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/2 ! interface Vlan1 ip address 172.28.32.107 255.255.255.128 no ip route-cache ! no ip http server ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 transport input none line vty 0 4 no login line vty 5 15 no login ! end == Switch_11#sh vlan VLAN Name StatusPorts - --- 1default activeFa0/1, Fa0/2, Fa0/3, Fa0/4 Fa0/5, Fa0/6, Fa0/7, Fa0/8 Fa0/9, Fa0/10, Fa0/11, Fa0/12 Gi0/1, Gi0/2 1002 fddi-default active 1003 token-ring-default active 1004 fddinet-default active 1005 trnet-defaultactive VLAN Type SAID MTU Parent RingNo BridgeNo Stp BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2 - -- - -- -- --- - 1enet 11 1500 - - ---1002 1003 1002 fddi 101002 1500 - - ---1 1003 1003 tr101003 1500 1005 0 --srb 1 1002 1004 fdnet 101004 1500 - - 1ibm -0 0 1005 trnet 101005 1500 - - 1ibm -0 0 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39411&t=39409 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: vlan line protocol down [7:39409]
Dear Mark, Thanks so much! Your solution works: >If not, try plugging a workstation, laptop, or whatever type of node that >suits your fancy, and then go back to your terminal program to see if you >get anything. The problem is that I need to plug-in a work station to a port with that vlan assigned. After plugin, I can ping myself from the console. I never think of such a design on 2950 since I have another band new 3548XL, without plug-in any workstation, it can ping itself. Thanks again for your help and quick respond~ Sammy. (Does it mentioned in CCNA? If so, I may need to re-exam my CCNA.) -Original Message- From: Mark Odette II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 5:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: vlan line protocol down [7:39409] Without any experience with this Switch, I can only guess at this possibility: Did you program the VLAN config from a console port?? If so, Do you have anything plugged into ANY of the FastEthernet ports?? If not, try plugging a workstation, laptop, or whatever type of node that suits your fancy, and then go back to your terminal program to see if you get anything. Better yet, if you're programming IP addresses on a VLAN specifically, perhaps you should first connect the switch to a router and configure trunking to support Sub-interface VLAN routing. I bet that this is actually what your issue is. If you want to assign an IP address to the switch to ping it or telnet to it, try assigning the IP address to one of the Ethernet Interfaces. that is... Switch_11#config terminal Switch_11#(config)int fa0/1 Switch_11#(config-if)ip address 172.28.32.107 255.255.255.128 Switch_11#(config-if)end Switch_11#ping 172.28.32.107 and see if you get: ! If all else fails, look up Basic Configuration of Cisco 2950 Switch on www.cisco.com , and I'll bet you'll find out the answers to your questions. Good luck. Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sammy Kwong Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 2:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: vlan line protocol down [7:39409] Hi, I just got a 2950 switch yesterday and start to play with it. After sometime, I set the ip and going to ping it, but no respond. Check the ip interface, the line protocol is down: Vlan1 is up, line protocol is down Internet address is 172.28.32.107/25 Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255 Address determined by setup command MTU is 1500 bytes . I checked the IOS: IOS (tm) C2950 Software (C2950-I6Q4L2-M), Version 12.1(6)EA2a, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) The configuration is SIMPLE as below, can anyone give me some idea what's wrong and how can I fix it? Many thanks! Sammy. == Current configuration : 854 bytes ! version 12.1 no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname Switch_11 ! enable secret 5 $1$33S1$CT6ICwPPc6f01xb27Elu30 ! no ip subnet-zero no ip finger no ip domain-lookup ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/1 ! interface FastEthernet0/2 interface FastEthernet0/12 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/2 ! interface Vlan1 ip address 172.28.32.107 255.255.255.128 no ip route-cache ! no ip http server ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 transport input none line vty 0 4 no login line vty 5 15 no login ! end == Switch_11#sh vlan VLAN Name StatusPorts - --- 1default activeFa0/1, Fa0/2, Fa0/3, Fa0/4 Fa0/5, Fa0/6, Fa0/7, Fa0/8 Fa0/9, Fa0/10, Fa0/11, Fa0/12 Gi0/1, Gi0/2 1002 fddi-default active 1003 token-ring-default active 1004 fddinet-default active 1005 trnet-defaultactive VLAN Type SAID MTU Parent RingNo BridgeNo Stp BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2 - -- - -- -- --- - 1enet 11 1500 - - ---1002 1003 1002 fddi 101002 1500 - - ---1 1003 1003 tr101003 1500 1005 0 --srb 1 1002 1004 fdnet 101004 1500 - - 1ibm -0 0 1005 trnet 101005 1500 - - 1ibm -0 0 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39412&t=39409 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Serial down line protocol down [7:45957]
Hi, I am facing problem in our new commissioned DXX link . line protocol and serial are down but output of show controller shows v.35 TX RX clock detected. Please advice. __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45957&t=45957 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
hi all, got one question regarding FastEthernet on Cisco 2620.. why the status showed FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down although the cable was pulled out from the port...in what cases the port will down..any help appreciated tq Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=1828&t=1828 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
1) I guess you enable the fastethernet port in the running configuration. You have to shutdown the port, so the port will administrative shut down and line protocol down. 2)Line protocol will up if there is any phyiscal connection attached to Fastethernet. Becasue the port in your router will detect keepalive signal, when it detected, it will up.You can type no keepalive under interface configuration, the ethernet interface will keep up even no physical connection. You have to enable the interface, of courese. Hope this help Vincent Chong ""md. nazri"" hi all, > got one question regarding FastEthernet on Cisco 2620.. > why the status showed FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down although the > cable was pulled out from the port...in what cases the port will down..any > help appreciated > > tq > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=1829&t=1828 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
thanks for the answer... i understand that LP will down if no connection attach, but why FE still up, does it up forever until we shut it down? Does it apply the same to Ethernet..? - Original Message - From: "Vincent Chong" To: Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:48 PM Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > 1) I guess you enable the fastethernet port in the running > configuration. You have to > shutdown the port, so the port will administrative shut down and line > protocol down. > > 2)Line protocol will up if there is any phyiscal connection attached to > Fastethernet. > Becasue the port in your router will detect keepalive signal, when it > detected, it will > up.You can type no keepalive under interface configuration, the > ethernet interface > will keep up even no physical connection. You have to enable the > interface, of courese. > > Hope this help > Vincent Chong > > > > ""md. nazri"" hi all, > > got one question regarding FastEthernet on Cisco 2620.. > > why the status showed FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down although the > > cable was pulled out from the port...in what cases the port will down..any > > help appreciated > > > > tq > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=1997&t=1828 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
I don't think it's just Fast Ethernet. I've seen "Slow" Ethernet report that the interface is up, down when nothing was attached. It seems to just be an indication that the interface passed a hardware check. Priscilla At 08:21 PM 4/25/01, md. nazri wrote: >thanks for the answer... >i understand that LP will down if no connection attach, but why FE still up, >does it up forever until we shut it down? Does it apply the same to >Ethernet..? >- Original Message - >From: "Vincent Chong" >To: >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:48 PM >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > > > > 1) I guess you enable the fastethernet port in the running > > configuration. You have to > > shutdown the port, so the port will administrative shut down and line > > protocol down. > > > > 2)Line protocol will up if there is any phyiscal connection attached >to > > Fastethernet. > > Becasue the port in your router will detect keepalive signal, when it > > detected, it will > > up.You can type no keepalive under interface configuration, the > > ethernet interface > > will keep up even no physical connection. You have to enable the > > interface, of courese. > > > > Hope this help > > Vincent Chong > > > > > > > > ""md. nazri"" hi all, > > > got one question regarding FastEthernet on Cisco 2620.. > > > why the status showed FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down although >the > > > cable was pulled out from the port...in what cases the port will >down..any > > > help appreciated > > > > > > tq > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2007&t=1828 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
if it's true..that's a good indicator for hardware health checkup. another Q, if we set the FE to be full-duplex, does it mean we get 100meg for tx and 100meg for rx, so total 200meg for a connection...? - Original Message - From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" To: Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 9:07 AM Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > I don't think it's just Fast Ethernet. I've seen "Slow" Ethernet report > that the interface is up, down when nothing was attached. It seems to just > be an indication that the interface passed a hardware check. > > Priscilla > > At 08:21 PM 4/25/01, md. nazri wrote: > >thanks for the answer... > >i understand that LP will down if no connection attach, but why FE still up, > >does it up forever until we shut it down? Does it apply the same to > >Ethernet..? > >- Original Message - > >From: "Vincent Chong" > >To: > >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:48 PM > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > > > > > > > 1) I guess you enable the fastethernet port in the running > > > configuration. You have to > > > shutdown the port, so the port will administrative shut down and line > > > protocol down. > > > > > > 2)Line protocol will up if there is any phyiscal connection attached > >to > > > Fastethernet. > > > Becasue the port in your router will detect keepalive signal, when it > > > detected, it will > > > up.You can type no keepalive under interface configuration, the > > > ethernet interface > > > will keep up even no physical connection. You have to enable the > > > interface, of courese. > > > > > > Hope this help > > > Vincent Chong > > > > > > > > > > > > ""md. nazri"" hi all, > > > > got one question regarding FastEthernet on Cisco 2620.. > > > > why the status showed FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down although > >the > > > > cable was pulled out from the port...in what cases the port will > >down..any > > > > help appreciated > > > > > > > > tq > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2043&t=1828 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
hey! somebody gets it! Thanks Priscilla: It always bothers me that full-duplex is refereed to as 200 meg. The server folks always think that all their performance issues will go away when they go to "full-duplex". Sure, no collision, but considering the unbalanced nature of client/server traffic it doesn't make that big of a throughput difference. I'm surprised that my T1's are not referred to as 3 mbps links. They are full-duplex too :-> DaveC Oppenheimer wrote: > > At 12:23 AM 4/26/01, md. nazri wrote: > >if it's true..that's a good indicator for hardware health checkup. > >another Q, if we set the FE to be full-duplex, does it mean we get 100meg > >for tx and 100meg for rx, so total 200meg for a connection...? > > Each of the two stations on a point-to-point FE full-duplex link get > dedicated 100 Mbps bandwidth for transmitting. One station's transmit > medium is the other's receive medium. Some people call this 200 Mbps. In > actuality most traffic types don't take advantage of this. > > >- Original Message - > >From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" > >To: > >Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 9:07 AM > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > > > > > > > I don't think it's just Fast Ethernet. I've seen "Slow" Ethernet report > > > that the interface is up, down when nothing was attached. It seems to > just > > > be an indication that the interface passed a hardware check. > > > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > At 08:21 PM 4/25/01, md. nazri wrote: > > > >thanks for the answer... > > > >i understand that LP will down if no connection attach, but why FE still > >up, > > > >does it up forever until we shut it down? Does it apply the same to > > > >Ethernet..? > > > >- Original Message - > > > >From: "Vincent Chong" > > > >To: > > > >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:48 PM > > > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) I guess you enable the fastethernet port in the running > > > > > configuration. You have to > > > > > shutdown the port, so the port will administrative shut down and > >line > > > > > protocol down. > > > > > > > > > > 2)Line protocol will up if there is any phyiscal connection > >attached > > > >to > > > > > Fastethernet. > > > > > Becasue the port in your router will detect keepalive signal, > when > >it > > > > > detected, it will > > > > > up.You can type no keepalive under interface configuration, > >the > > > > > ethernet interface > > > > > will keep up even no physical connection. You have to enable the > > > > > interface, of courese. > > > > > > > > > > Hope this help > > > > > Vincent Chong > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""md. nazri"" hi all, > > > > > > got one question regarding FastEthernet on Cisco 2620.. > > > > > > why the status showed FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down > >although > > > >the > > > > > > cable was pulled out from the port...in what cases the port will > > > >down..any > > > > > > help appreciated > > > > > > > > > > > > tq > > > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > > http://www.priscilla.com > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2161&t=1828 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
I tried to do some more research on this and couldn't get a good answer. Does anyone know exactly in which cases the router reports the interface up, down even if there is no cable attached? Looking at show interface ethernet, Router reports up, down with no cable for AUI. How about RJ45? How about MII? GMII? Others? Thanks Priscilla > > Priscilla > > > > At 08:21 PM 4/25/01, md. nazri wrote: > > >thanks for the answer... > > >i understand that LP will down if no connection attach, but why FE still >up, > > >does it up forever until we shut it down? Does it apply the same to > > >Ethernet..? > > >- Original Message - > > >From: "Vincent Chong" > > >To: > > >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:48 PM > > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > > > > > > > > > > 1) I guess you enable the fastethernet port in the running > > > > configuration. You have to > > > > shutdown the port, so the port will administrative shut down and >line > > > > protocol down. > > > > > > > > 2)Line protocol will up if there is any phyiscal connection >attached > > >to > > > > Fastethernet. > > > > Becasue the port in your router will detect keepalive signal, when >it > > > > detected, it will > > > > up.You can type no keepalive under interface configuration, >the > > > > ethernet interface > > > > will keep up even no physical connection. You have to enable the > > > > interface, of courese. > > > > > > > > Hope this help > > > > Vincent Chong > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""md. nazri"" hi all, > > > > > got one question regarding FastEthernet on Cisco 2620.. > > > > > why the status showed FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down >although > > >the > > > > > cable was pulled out from the port...in what cases the port will > > >down..any > > > > > help appreciated > > > > > > > > > > tq > > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > http://www.priscilla.com > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2183&t=1828 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
Found some info: Interface is UP: means the routers ethernet hardware has been activated. Line Protocol Down: The router never sees any of the keepalives that it sends out. YES: you'll get the same thing with RJ45... http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1904.htm Search for: "show interfaces ethernet Field Descriptions" it'll explain in a little more detail. DaveC Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > I tried to do some more research on this and couldn't get a good answer. > > Does anyone know exactly in which cases the router reports the interface > up, down even if there is no cable attached? Looking at show interface > ethernet, > > Router reports up, down with no cable for AUI. > > How about RJ45? > > How about MII? > > GMII? > > Others? > > Thanks > > Priscilla > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > At 08:21 PM 4/25/01, md. nazri wrote: > > > >thanks for the answer... > > > >i understand that LP will down if no connection attach, but why FE still > >up, > > > >does it up forever until we shut it down? Does it apply the same to > > > >Ethernet..? > > > >- Original Message - > > > >From: "Vincent Chong" > > > >To: > > > >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:48 PM > > > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) I guess you enable the fastethernet port in the running > > > > > configuration. You have to > > > > > shutdown the port, so the port will administrative shut down and > >line > > > > > protocol down. > > > > > > > > > > 2)Line protocol will up if there is any phyiscal connection > >attached > > > >to > > > > > Fastethernet. > > > > > Becasue the port in your router will detect keepalive signal, > when > >it > > > > > detected, it will > > > > > up.You can type no keepalive under interface configuration, > >the > > > > > ethernet interface > > > > > will keep up even no physical connection. You have to enable the > > > > > interface, of courese. > > > > > > > > > > Hope this help > > > > > Vincent Chong > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""md. nazri"" hi all, > > > > > > got one question regarding FastEthernet on Cisco 2620.. > > > > > > why the status showed FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down > >although > > > >the > > > > > > cable was pulled out from the port...in what cases the port will > > > >down..any > > > > > > help appreciated > > > > > > > > > > > > tq > > > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > > http://www.priscilla.com > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2189&t=1828 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
Hi, True!! Only 100Meg in and 100Meg out but on a 100Meg Half duplex connection at best you get less than 50Meg. You must listen to your own signal anything over 50% in one direction is pure rubbish. In reality over 30% of the specified bandwidth you are probably already retransmitting heaps. I therefore disagree that there is no significant difference in network performance. However, the ability of the server and or the network cards ability to pull data off the network and deliver it to the server is a different matter. A good example is from back in the old days with an 8bit 10Meg Half duplex card into a I386 a real speed of 280K was more the reality. Just some thoughts. Teunis, Hobart, Tasmania Australia On Thursday, April 26, 2001 at 03:14:50 PM, David Chandler wrote: > hey! somebody gets it! Thanks Priscilla: > > It always bothers me that full-duplex is refereed to as 200 meg. The > server folks always think that all their performance issues will go away > when they go to "full-duplex". Sure, no collision, but considering the > unbalanced nature of client/server traffic it doesn't make that big of a > throughput difference. > > I'm surprised that my T1's are not referred to as 3 mbps links. They are > full-duplex too :-> > > DaveC > > Oppenheimer wrote: > > > > At 12:23 AM 4/26/01, md. nazri wrote: > > >if it's true..that's a good indicator for hardware health checkup. > > >another Q, if we set the FE to be full-duplex, does it mean we get 100meg > > >for tx and 100meg for rx, so total 200meg for a connection...? > > > > Each of the two stations on a point-to-point FE full-duplex link get > > dedicated 100 Mbps bandwidth for transmitting. One station's transmit > > medium is the other's receive medium. Some people call this 200 Mbps. In > > actuality most traffic types don't take advantage of this. > > > > >- Original Message - > > >From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" > > >To: > > >Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 9:07 AM > > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > > > > > > > > > > I don't think it's just Fast Ethernet. I've seen "Slow" Ethernet report > > > > that the interface is up, down when nothing was attached. It seems to > > just > > > > be an indication that the interface passed a hardware check. > > > > > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > > > At 08:21 PM 4/25/01, md. nazri wrote: > > > > >thanks for the answer... > > > > >i understand that LP will down if no connection attach, but why FE > still > > >up, > > > > >does it up forever until we shut it down? Does it apply the same to > > > > >Ethernet..? > > > > >- Original Message - > > > > >From: "Vincent Chong" > > > > >To: > > > > >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:48 PM > > > > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) I guess you enable the fastethernet port in the running > > > > > > configuration. You have to > > > > > > shutdown the port, so the port will administrative shut down > and > > >line > > > > > > protocol down. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2)Line protocol will up if there is any phyiscal connection > > >attached > > > > >to > > > > > > Fastethernet. > > > > > > Becasue the port in your router will detect keepalive signal, > > when > > >it > > > > > > detected, it will > > > > > > up.You can type no keepalive under interface configuration, > > >the > > > > > > ethernet interface > > > > > > will keep up even no physical connection. You have to enable > the > > > > > > interface, of courese. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope this help > > > > > > Vincent Chong > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""md. nazri"" hi all, > > > > > > > got one question regarding FastEthernet on Cisco 2620.. > > > > > > > why the status showed FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down > > >although > > > > >the > > > > > > > cable was pulled
Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
Hi, On an ethernet the router will say it is admin up and connection down when nothing is seen at the end. This is common on most devices Cisco and non Cisco. Most SNMP managed devices show this. It is a way of knowing the service is avalable for use. In the Hub (repeater) days it was possible to turn ports on and off even as a security arrangement (run different configs for different times) This saves a lot of errors on SNMP as you can tell the difference in the states easily. Just some thoughts. (I think the up down is always the case if the link is not there) Teunis, Hobart, Tasmania Australia On Thursday, April 26, 2001 at 05:47:34 PM, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > I tried to do some more research on this and couldn't get a good answer. > > Does anyone know exactly in which cases the router reports the interface > up, down even if there is no cable attached? Looking at show interface > ethernet, > > Router reports up, down with no cable for AUI. > > How about RJ45? > > How about MII? > > GMII? > > Others? > > Thanks > > Priscilla > > > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > At 08:21 PM 4/25/01, md. nazri wrote: > > > >thanks for the answer... > > > >i understand that LP will down if no connection attach, but why FE still > >up, > > > >does it up forever until we shut it down? Does it apply the same to > > > >Ethernet..? > > > >- Original Message - > > > >From: "Vincent Chong" > > > >To: > > > >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:48 PM > > > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) I guess you enable the fastethernet port in the running > > > > > configuration. You have to > > > > > shutdown the port, so the port will administrative shut down and > >line > > > > > protocol down. > > > > > > > > > > 2)Line protocol will up if there is any phyiscal connection > >attached > > > >to > > > > > Fastethernet. > > > > > Becasue the port in your router will detect keepalive signal, > when > >it > > > > > detected, it will > > > > > up.You can type no keepalive under interface configuration, > >the > > > > > ethernet interface > > > > > will keep up even no physical connection. You have to enable the > > > > > interface, of courese. > > > > > > > > > > Hope this help > > > > > Vincent Chong > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""md. nazri"" hi all, > > > > > > got one question regarding FastEthernet on Cisco 2620.. > > > > > > why the status showed FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down > >although > > > >the > > > > > > cable was pulled out from the port...in what cases the port will > > > >down..any > > > > > > help appreciated > > > > > > > > > > > > tq > > > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > > http://www.priscilla.com > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- www.tasmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2195&t=1828 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
I'm looking for a real answer from experience, not documentation. That page you sent me was something I helped write ;-) Priscilla At 06:53 PM 4/26/01, David Chandler wrote: >Found some info: > >Interface is UP: means the routers ethernet hardware has been activated. >Line Protocol Down: The router never sees any of the keepalives that it >sends out. > >YES: you'll get the same thing with RJ45... > > >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1904.htm > >Search for: "show interfaces ethernet Field Descriptions" it'll explain >in a little more detail. > >DaveC > >Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > > > I tried to do some more research on this and couldn't get a good answer. > > > > Does anyone know exactly in which cases the router reports the interface > > up, down even if there is no cable attached? Looking at show interface > > ethernet, > > > > Router reports up, down with no cable for AUI. > > > > How about RJ45? > > > > How about MII? > > > > GMII? > > > > Others? > > > > Thanks > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > > > At 08:21 PM 4/25/01, md. nazri wrote: > > > > >thanks for the answer... > > > > >i understand that LP will down if no connection attach, but why FE >still > > >up, > > > > >does it up forever until we shut it down? Does it apply the same to > > > > >Ethernet..? > > > > >- Original Message - > > > > >From: "Vincent Chong" > > > > >To: > > > > >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:48 PM > > > > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) I guess you enable the fastethernet port in the running > > > > > > configuration. You have to > > > > > > shutdown the port, so the port will administrative shut down >and > > >line > > > > > > protocol down. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2)Line protocol will up if there is any phyiscal connection > > >attached > > > > >to > > > > > > Fastethernet. > > > > > > Becasue the port in your router will detect keepalive signal, > > when > > >it > > > > > > detected, it will > > > > > > up.You can type no keepalive under interface configuration, > > >the > > > > > > ethernet interface > > > > > > will keep up even no physical connection. You have to enable >the > > > > > > interface, of courese. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope this help > > > > > > Vincent Chong > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""md. nazri"" hi all, > > > > > > > got one question regarding FastEthernet on Cisco 2620.. > > > > > > > why the status showed FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down > > >although > > > > >the > > > > > > > cable was pulled out from the port...in what cases the port will > > > > >down..any > > > > > > > help appreciated > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tq > > > > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > > > http://www.priscilla.com > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > http://www.priscilla.com > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2208&t=1828 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
At 07:08 PM 4/26/01, Tony van Ree wrote: >Hi, > >True!! Only 100Meg in and 100Meg out but on a 100Meg Half duplex connection >at best you get less than 50Meg. You must listen to your own signal >anything over 50% in one direction is pure rubbish. In reality over 30% of >the specified bandwidth you are probably already retransmitting heaps. And that is pure rubbish. See this URL: http://www.research.digital.com/wrl/publications/abstracts/88.4.html >I therefore disagree that there is no significant difference in network >performance. However, the ability of the server and or the network cards >ability to pull data off the network and deliver it to the server is a >different matter. A good example is from back in the old days with an 8bit >10Meg Half duplex card into a I386 a real speed of 280K was more the reality. > >Just some thoughts. > >Teunis, >Hobart, Tasmania >Australia >On Thursday, April 26, 2001 at 03:14:50 PM, David Chandler wrote: > > > hey! somebody gets it! Thanks Priscilla: > > > > It always bothers me that full-duplex is refereed to as 200 meg. The > > server folks always think that all their performance issues will go away > > when they go to "full-duplex". Sure, no collision, but considering the > > unbalanced nature of client/server traffic it doesn't make that big of a > > throughput difference. > > > > I'm surprised that my T1's are not referred to as 3 mbps links. They are > > full-duplex too :-> > > > > DaveC > > > > Oppenheimer wrote: > > > > > > At 12:23 AM 4/26/01, md. nazri wrote: > > > >if it's true..that's a good indicator for hardware health checkup. > > > >another Q, if we set the FE to be full-duplex, does it mean we get >100meg > > > >for tx and 100meg for rx, so total 200meg for a connection...? > > > > > > Each of the two stations on a point-to-point FE full-duplex link get > > > dedicated 100 Mbps bandwidth for transmitting. One station's transmit > > > medium is the other's receive medium. Some people call this 200 Mbps. In > > > actuality most traffic types don't take advantage of this. > > > > > > >- Original Message - > > > >From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" > > > >To: > > > >Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 9:07 AM > > > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think it's just Fast Ethernet. I've seen "Slow" Ethernet >report > > > > > that the interface is up, down when nothing was attached. It seems to > > > just > > > > > be an indication that the interface passed a hardware check. > > > > > > > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > > > > > At 08:21 PM 4/25/01, md. nazri wrote: > > > > > >thanks for the answer... > > > > > >i understand that LP will down if no connection attach, but why FE > > still > > > >up, > > > > > >does it up forever until we shut it down? Does it apply the same to > > > > > >Ethernet..? > > > > > >- Original Message - > > > > > >From: "Vincent Chong" > > > > > >To: > > > > > >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:48 PM > > > > > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) I guess you enable the fastethernet port in the running > > > > > > > configuration. You have to > > > > > > > shutdown the port, so the port will administrative shut down > > and > > > >line > > > > > > > protocol down. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2)Line protocol will up if there is any phyiscal connection > > > >attached > > > > > >to > > > > > > > Fastethernet. > > > > > > > Becasue the port in your router will detect keepalive signal, > > > when > > > >it > > > > > > > detected, it will > > > > > > > up.You can type no keepalive under interface >configuration, > > > >the > > > > > > > ethernet interface > > > > > > > will keep up even no physical connection. You have to enable > > the > > > > > &g
Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
Priscilla, that's a fascinating report - I don't suppose you know of any more recent work along the same lines? I was interested to note that maximum throughput happens with two hosts. Gee whiz! A switch connection :-) JMcL -- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 27/04/2001 04:12 pm --- "Priscilla Oppenheimer" @groupstudy.com on 27/04/2001 11:18:45 am Please respond to "Priscilla Oppenheimer" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] At 07:08 PM 4/26/01, Tony van Ree wrote: >Hi, > >True!! Only 100Meg in and 100Meg out but on a 100Meg Half duplex connection >at best you get less than 50Meg. You must listen to your own signal >anything over 50% in one direction is pure rubbish. In reality over 30% of >the specified bandwidth you are probably already retransmitting heaps. And that is pure rubbish. See this URL: http://www.research.digital.com/wrl/publications/abstracts/88.4.html >I therefore disagree that there is no significant difference in network >performance. However, the ability of the server and or the network cards >ability to pull data off the network and deliver it to the server is a >different matter. A good example is from back in the old days with an 8bit >10Meg Half duplex card into a I386 a real speed of 280K was more the reality. > >Just some thoughts. > >Teunis, >Hobart, Tasmania >Australia >On Thursday, April 26, 2001 at 03:14:50 PM, David Chandler wrote: > > > hey! somebody gets it! Thanks Priscilla: > > > > It always bothers me that full-duplex is refereed to as 200 meg. The > > server folks always think that all their performance issues will go away > > when they go to "full-duplex". Sure, no collision, but considering the > > unbalanced nature of client/server traffic it doesn't make that big of a > > throughput difference. > > > > I'm surprised that my T1's are not referred to as 3 mbps links. They are > > full-duplex too :-> > > > > DaveC > > > > Oppenheimer wrote: > > > > > > At 12:23 AM 4/26/01, md. nazri wrote: > > > >if it's true..that's a good indicator for hardware health checkup. > > > >another Q, if we set the FE to be full-duplex, does it mean we get >100meg > > > >for tx and 100meg for rx, so total 200meg for a connection...? > > > > > > Each of the two stations on a point-to-point FE full-duplex link get > > > dedicated 100 Mbps bandwidth for transmitting. One station's transmit > > > medium is the other's receive medium. Some people call this 200 Mbps. In > > > actuality most traffic types don't take advantage of this. > > > [snipped] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2224&t=1828 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
Sorry if it sounded like I was guessing.. :-} Played with issue again last night. Every time that I have seen UP/Down the cable was detached etc. We install/move/remove a lot of equipment and it is always up/down... The line protocol is dependent on the keepalives. Just try a "no keep" on the interface and UP/UP it will go. Ran tests on: 2500 AUI 2600 10M RJ45 (half & full duplex) 3600 10M RJ45 (half & full duplex) 4500 100M RJ45 & MII(half & full duplex) 7200 10M RJ45 (half & full duplex) 7200 100M RJ45 (half & full duplex) 7200 100M MII (Believe I did this too but can not remember) unfortunately the 7500s with Gig & FE MMF ports are being used for spare parts @tt. In all cases if keepalives are disabled, the line protocol is up. If not up/down. Sniffer shows the keepalive frames as having the same source and destination mac address. Ethernet type 9000 "LOOP" frame. I would like to attach the interfaces to the switch, and filter keepalives out. Maybe [set port protocol slot/mod group off]. I doubt if that will work, but will try and find out. PS: it is a nice document & so is the digital research paper. DaveC Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > I'm looking for a real answer from experience, not documentation. That page > you sent me was something I helped write ;-) > > Priscilla > > At 06:53 PM 4/26/01, David Chandler wrote: > >Found some info: > > > >Interface is UP: means the routers ethernet hardware has been activated. > >Line Protocol Down: The router never sees any of the keepalives that it > >sends out. > > > >YES: you'll get the same thing with RJ45... > > > > > >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1904.htm > > > >Search for: "show interfaces ethernet Field Descriptions" it'll explain > >in a little more detail. > > > >DaveC > > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > > > > > I tried to do some more research on this and couldn't get a good answer. > > > > > > Does anyone know exactly in which cases the router reports the interface > > > up, down even if there is no cable attached? Looking at show interface > > > ethernet, > > > > > > Router reports up, down with no cable for AUI. > > > > > > How about RJ45? > > > > > > How about MII? > > > > > > GMII? > > > > > > Others? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > > > > > At 08:21 PM 4/25/01, md. nazri wrote: > > > > > >thanks for the answer... > > > > > >i understand that LP will down if no connection attach, but why FE > >still > > > >up, > > > > > >does it up forever until we shut it down? Does it apply the same to > > > > > >Ethernet..? > > > > > >- Original Message - > > > > > >From: "Vincent Chong" > > > > > >To: > > > > > >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:48 PM > > > > > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) I guess you enable the fastethernet port in the running > > > > > > > configuration. You have to > > > > > > > shutdown the port, so the port will administrative shut down > >and > > > >line > > > > > > > protocol down. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Line protocol will up if there is any phyiscal connection > > > >attached > > > > > >to > > > > > > > Fastethernet. > > > > > > > Becasue the port in your router will detect keepalive signal, > > > when > > > >it > > > > > > > detected, it will > > > > > > > up.You can type no keepalive under interface > configuration, > > > >the > > > > > > > ethernet interface > > > > > > > will keep up even no physical connection. You have to enable > >the > > > > > > > interface, of courese. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope this help > > > > > > > Vincent Chong > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
At 02:30 PM 4/27/01, you wrote: >I know of one instance Priscilla, >"no keepalives" configured on the interface will do an Up, Down. I little >trick I learned doing labs. >Tony M >#6172 What I'm trying to find out is in what cases Cisco says that the interface is up even though there is no cable attached. I'm not concerned about the line protocol. I'm not asking about the second result or keepalives. My routers have an AUI interface. Cisco says the interface is up even when there is no cable attached. I don't have a router with an RJ-45 interface, MII, GMII, etc. (lame, I know! ;-) Do you? Could you check? Does it say up even if there is no cable attached? The original poster said that his FE says up, down with no cable attached. Which kind of interface was it? Just trying to document this with more exact details than Cisco documentation. It seems to me that with some types of interfaces, it should or could be smarter. Perhaps it's consistent across interfaces and that's why I haven't gotten an answer, but I am still searching. Not getting a real answer is making me down, down. Priscilla >-Original Message- >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Thursday, April 26, 2001 6:27 PM >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > > > >I'm looking for a real answer from experience, not documentation. That page > >you sent me was something I helped write ;-) > > > >Priscilla > > > >At 06:53 PM 4/26/01, David Chandler wrote: > >>Found some info: > >> > >>Interface is UP: means the routers ethernet hardware has been activated. > >>Line Protocol Down: The router never sees any of the keepalives that it > >>sends out. > >> > >>YES: you'll get the same thing with RJ45... > >> > >> > >>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1904.htm > >> > >>Search for: "show interfaces ethernet Field Descriptions" it'll explain > >>in a little more detail. > >> > >>DaveC > >> > >>Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > >> > > >> > I tried to do some more research on this and couldn't get a good >answer. > >> > > >> > Does anyone know exactly in which cases the router reports the >interface > >> > up, down even if there is no cable attached? Looking at show interface > >> > ethernet, > >> > > >> > Router reports up, down with no cable for AUI. > >> > > >> > How about RJ45? > >> > > >> > How about MII? > >> > > >> > GMII? > >> > > >> > Others? > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > > >> > Priscilla > >> > > >> > > > Priscilla > >> > > > > >> > > > At 08:21 PM 4/25/01, md. nazri wrote: > >> > > > >thanks for the answer... > >> > > > >i understand that LP will down if no connection attach, but why FE > >>still > >> > >up, > >> > > > >does it up forever until we shut it down? Does it apply the same >to > >> > > > >Ethernet..? > >> > > > >- Original Message - > >> > > > >From: "Vincent Chong" > >> > > > >To: > >> > > > >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:48 PM > >> > > > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > 1) I guess you enable the fastethernet port in the running > >> > > > > > configuration. You have to > >> > > > > > shutdown the port, so the port will administrative shut >down > >>and > >> > >line > >> > > > > > protocol down. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > 2)Line protocol will up if there is any phyiscal connection > >> > >attached > >> > > > >to > >> > > > > > Fastethernet. > >> > > > > > Becasue the port in your router will detect keepalive >signal, > >> > when > >> > >it > >> > > > > > detected, it will > >> > > > > > up.You can type no keepalive under interface > >configuration, > >> > >the > >> > > > > > ethernet interface
Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
THANKS! Please ignore my other message that said I was down, down because I didn't have a real answer yet. You are terrific! Priscilla At 10:10 AM 4/27/01, you wrote: >Sorry if it sounded like I was guessing.. :-} > >Played with issue again last night. Every time that I have seen UP/Down >the cable was detached etc. We install/move/remove a lot of equipment >and it is always up/down... > >The line protocol is dependent on the keepalives. Just try a "no keep" >on the interface and UP/UP it will go. > >Ran tests on: >2500 AUI >2600 10M RJ45 (half & full duplex) >3600 10M RJ45 (half & full duplex) >4500 100M RJ45 & MII(half & full duplex) >7200 10M RJ45 (half & full duplex) >7200 100M RJ45 (half & full duplex) >7200 100M MII (Believe I did this too but can not remember) >unfortunately the 7500s with Gig & FE MMF ports are being used for spare >parts @tt. > >In all cases if keepalives are disabled, the line protocol is up. If >not up/down. > >Sniffer shows the keepalive frames as having the same source and >destination mac address. Ethernet type 9000 "LOOP" frame. > >I would like to attach the interfaces to the switch, and filter >keepalives out. Maybe [set port protocol slot/mod group off]. I doubt >if that will work, but will try and find out. > >PS: it is a nice document & so is the digital research paper. > >DaveC > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > > > I'm looking for a real answer from experience, not documentation. That page > > you sent me was something I helped write!!!! ;-) > > > > Priscilla > > > > At 06:53 PM 4/26/01, David Chandler wrote: > > >Found some info: > > > > > >Interface is UP: means the routers ethernet hardware has been activated. > > >Line Protocol Down: The router never sees any of the keepalives that it > > >sends out. > > > > > >YES: you'll get the same thing with RJ45... > > > > > > > > >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1904.htm > > > > > >Search for: "show interfaces ethernet Field Descriptions" it'll explain > > >in a little more detail. > > > > > >DaveC > > > > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > > > > > > > I tried to do some more research on this and couldn't get a good >answer. > > > > > > > > Does anyone know exactly in which cases the router reports the >interface > > > > up, down even if there is no cable attached? Looking at show interface > > > > ethernet, > > > > > > > > Router reports up, down with no cable for AUI. > > > > > > > > How about RJ45? > > > > > > > > How about MII? > > > > > > > > GMII? > > > > > > > > Others? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > > > > > > > At 08:21 PM 4/25/01, md. nazri wrote: > > > > > > >thanks for the answer... > > > > > > >i understand that LP will down if no connection attach, but why FE > > >still > > > > >up, > > > > > > >does it up forever until we shut it down? Does it apply the same >to > > > > > > >Ethernet..? > > > > > > >- Original Message - > > > > > > >From: "Vincent Chong" > > > > > > >To: > > > > > > >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:48 PM > > > > > > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) I guess you enable the fastethernet port in the running > > > > > > > > configuration. You have to > > > > > > > > shutdown the port, so the port will administrative shut >down > > >and > > > > >line > > > > > > > > protocol down. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2)Line protocol will up if there is any phyiscal connection > > > > >attached > > > > > > >to > > > > > > > > Fastethernet. > > > > > > > > Becasue the port in your router will detect keepalive >signal, > > > > when > >
RE: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
unsubscribe Quinton Clark Internet Systems Engineer Exodus Internet Tel : 0808 100 3963 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 5:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] THANKS! Please ignore my other message that said I was down, down because I didn't have a real answer yet. You are terrific! Priscilla At 10:10 AM 4/27/01, you wrote: >Sorry if it sounded like I was guessing.. :-} > >Played with issue again last night. Every time that I have seen UP/Down >the cable was detached etc. We install/move/remove a lot of equipment >and it is always up/down... > >The line protocol is dependent on the keepalives. Just try a "no keep" >on the interface and UP/UP it will go. > >Ran tests on: >2500 AUI >2600 10M RJ45 (half & full duplex) >3600 10M RJ45 (half & full duplex) >4500 100M RJ45 & MII(half & full duplex) >7200 10M RJ45 (half & full duplex) >7200 100M RJ45 (half & full duplex) >7200 100M MII (Believe I did this too but can not remember) >unfortunately the 7500s with Gig & FE MMF ports are being used for spare >parts @tt. > >In all cases if keepalives are disabled, the line protocol is up. If >not up/down. > >Sniffer shows the keepalive frames as having the same source and >destination mac address. Ethernet type 9000 "LOOP" frame. > >I would like to attach the interfaces to the switch, and filter >keepalives out. Maybe [set port protocol slot/mod group off]. I doubt >if that will work, but will try and find out. > >PS: it is a nice document & so is the digital research paper. > >DaveC > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > > > I'm looking for a real answer from experience, not documentation. That page > > you sent me was something I helped write!!!! ;-) > > > > Priscilla > > > > At 06:53 PM 4/26/01, David Chandler wrote: > > >Found some info: > > > > > >Interface is UP: means the routers ethernet hardware has been activated. > > >Line Protocol Down: The router never sees any of the keepalives that it > > >sends out. > > > > > >YES: you'll get the same thing with RJ45... > > > > > > > > >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1904.htm > > > > > >Search for: "show interfaces ethernet Field Descriptions" it'll explain > > >in a little more detail. > > > > > >DaveC > > > > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > > > > > > > I tried to do some more research on this and couldn't get a good >answer. > > > > > > > > Does anyone know exactly in which cases the router reports the >interface > > > > up, down even if there is no cable attached? Looking at show interface > > > > ethernet, > > > > > > > > Router reports up, down with no cable for AUI. > > > > > > > > How about RJ45? > > > > > > > > How about MII? > > > > > > > > GMII? > > > > > > > > Others? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > > > > > > > At 08:21 PM 4/25/01, md. nazri wrote: > > > > > > >thanks for the answer... > > > > > > >i understand that LP will down if no connection attach, but why FE > > >still > > > > >up, > > > > > > >does it up forever until we shut it down? Does it apply the same >to > > > > > > >Ethernet..? > > > > > > >- Original Message - > > > > > > >From: "Vincent Chong" > > > > > > >To: > > > > > > >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:48 PM > > > > > > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) I guess you enable the fastethernet port in the running > > > > > > > > configuration. You have to > > > > > > > > shutdown the port, so the port will administrative shut >down > > >and > > > > >line > > > > > > > > protocol down. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2)Line protocol w
Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
At 12:23 AM 4/26/01, md. nazri wrote: >if it's true..that's a good indicator for hardware health checkup. >another Q, if we set the FE to be full-duplex, does it mean we get 100meg >for tx and 100meg for rx, so total 200meg for a connection...? Each of the two stations on a point-to-point FE full-duplex link get dedicated 100 Mbps bandwidth for transmitting. One station's transmit medium is the other's receive medium. Some people call this 200 Mbps. In actuality most traffic types don't take advantage of this. >- Original Message - >From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" >To: >Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 9:07 AM >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > > > > I don't think it's just Fast Ethernet. I've seen "Slow" Ethernet report > > that the interface is up, down when nothing was attached. It seems to just > > be an indication that the interface passed a hardware check. > > > > Priscilla > > > > At 08:21 PM 4/25/01, md. nazri wrote: > > >thanks for the answer... > > >i understand that LP will down if no connection attach, but why FE still >up, > > >does it up forever until we shut it down? Does it apply the same to > > >Ethernet..? > > >- Original Message - > > >From: "Vincent Chong" > > >To: > > >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:48 PM > > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828] > > > > > > > > > > 1) I guess you enable the fastethernet port in the running > > > > configuration. You have to > > > > shutdown the port, so the port will administrative shut down and >line > > > > protocol down. > > > > > > > > 2)Line protocol will up if there is any phyiscal connection >attached > > >to > > > > Fastethernet. > > > > Becasue the port in your router will detect keepalive signal, when >it > > > > detected, it will > > > > up.You can type no keepalive under interface configuration, >the > > > > ethernet interface > > > > will keep up even no physical connection. You have to enable the > > > > interface, of courese. > > > > > > > > Hope this help > > > > Vincent Chong > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""md. nazri"" hi all, > > > > > got one question regarding FastEthernet on Cisco 2620.. > > > > > why the status showed FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down >although > > >the > > > > > cable was pulled out from the port...in what cases the port will > > >down..any > > > > > help appreciated > > > > > > > > > > tq > > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > http://www.priscilla.com > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2130&t=1828 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the Archives (was to be-E0 line protocol down)
Thank you for the archives. I was just playing with my new 2501 and was having a problem with the line protocol being down. Looked through my books, looked on Cisco's site, couldn't find the answer (I'm sure it's on Cisco's site I just couldn't find it). Wrote a message asking for help, but before sending, I remembered the archives. Can't ask for help without trying there, can I? Searched on 'line protocol down' and found my answer in about the fourth message I viewed. 'no keepalives'. Doh! So this message is just a thank you and a reminder to check the archives before posting for help, the answer may already be in there. Matt Wehland _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
