RE: remote backup
Title: Message i'd have to admit that is a good rule another quick question i have managed to finally get our backup server to see the exchange box, and is backing up the "Microsoft Exchange Directory" "Microsoft Exchange Information Store". i have also got the option to backup "Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes" have i made the correct selection or not? from what i can understand, Brick Level Backups are not the way to go, i am unsure how this relates to my selections. sorry to be a pain in the ass first thing on a monday morning :( exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6a, Backup Exec 8.6 cheers in advance John SparrowIT SupportComputer DepartmentTravco Ltd, Londonhttp://www.travco.co.uk -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 9:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup That's my rule too! We have a new office opening this weekend with a whole bunch of brand new servers. Guess what? They don't get to use them cuz the backup solution hasn't been approved. Too bad for them, I don't put machines in production with no backup solution... -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 2:34 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup My rule is that backups are in place and running well before anything goes live. No good backups, no live servers. -Original Message-From: John Sparrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:24 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup the logic in this place is really stupid i keep worrying out it, everytime i want to go and sort it, a bloody user phones me up witha dumbass question and then distracts me. i guess its my own damn fault :( John SparrowIT SupportComputer DepartmentTravco Ltd, Londonhttp://www.travco.co.uk -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 5:14 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup Will you have time when your server crashes and you have no backups? -Original Message-From: John Sparrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup i have a question too, do you also need the remote backup agent in addition to the exchange agent? i still havent got our exchange server backing up.DOH i just havent had the time to play with it, i guess alot of you can relate to that :) John SparrowIT SupportComputer DepartmentTravco Ltd, Londonhttp://www.travco.co.uk -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 5:09 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup the exchange server is also the wins\dns\dhcp and AD server for that site. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:06 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup Do you have the Exchange Agent for BE? This will allow you to do "online" backups of the directory and Information store which will be sufficient for disaster recovery. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:49 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup yes its a remote box that just runs backup exec. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:44 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup Ditto, I have abackup server who's only function in life is to do backups so I touch all my servers remotely to do backups, Exchange, File/Print, Oracle, Novell (yes I still have two Novell servers, I do get
RE: Changing legacyExchangeDN on a user account
Aww, How sweet! -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing legacyExchangeDN on a user account Take the high road, David, and don't validate those kind of posts by responding. :o) -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 2:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing legacyExchangeDN on a user account Very funny -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 6:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing legacyExchangeDN on a user account Dont forget to type unsubscribe in the message body before you do that. -Original Message- From: Precht, David N. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 5:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing legacyExchangeDN on a user account I was just about to hit send. -Original Message- From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 17:22 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing legacyExchangeDN on a user account XADM: Move Mailbox Informational Messages List the legacyExchangeDN Attribute of Source and Destination Information Store (Q264391) ... XADM: Move Mailbox Informational Messages List the legacyExchangeDN Attribute of Source and Destination Information Store. XADM: Move Mailbox ... XADM: How to Change the legacyExchangeDN Attribute in Native Mode with ADSI Edit (Q273863) If the legacyExchangeDN attribute of your original administrative group contains an OU value of anything except First Administrative Group, you must change the legacyExchangeDN values of several system objects on your recovery server before restored XADM: Cannot Publish Outlook Free and Busy Information Because Mailbox Reconnect Forces legacyExchangeDN Delimeters to Uppercase Letters (Q288564) ... Publish Outlook Free and Busy Information Because Mailbox Reconnect Forces legacyExchangeDN Delimeters to Uppercase Letters. XADM: Cannot Publish Outlook Free and ... XADM: You Cannot Generate an Offline Address List and an Event ID 9126 Error Message Is Logged (Q318237) ... find details, address, or display templates because of an incorrect legacyExchangeDN value. During an unsuccessful installation of or removal of Exchange ... XADM: Minimum Permissions Necessary to Perform Exchange 2000 Server-related Tasks (Q316792) ... attributes on the user object: autoReplyMessage adminDisplayName dLMemDefault homeMDB homeMTA legacyExchangeDN mail mailNickname mAPIRecipient mDBUseDefaults msExchADCGlobalNames msExchControllingZone msExchFBURL msExchHideFromAddressLists msExchHomeServerName msExchMailboxGuid ... XADM: How to Enable Disabled Accounts That the ADC Creates (Q316047) ... to match the mailbox with already has mail attributes. The legacyExchangeDN attribute of the user also does not match the Exchange ... XADM: InterOrg Replication Utility Does Not Replicate Free-and-Busy Information (Q316022) ... be identical. In addition, either the ExchangeDN attribute or the legacyExchangeDN attribute of the free-and-busy user must exist, and it must ... XADM: Mailboxes Do Not Replicate from Active Directory to Exchange Server 5.5 (Q313212) ... CN=,OU=,DC=,DC=com because it does not have a legacyExchangeDN for the site it belongs in.( Connection Agreement'' #1288) This ... XADM: ADClean Sets msExchMasterAccountSID Attribute on Enabled Users (Q309222) ... attempts to convert a Microsoft Windows NT Security Identifier( SID) to a legacyExchangeDN. Only disabled users should have the msExchMasterAccountSID attribute set. This ... XADM: Workarounds for Problems with Mbconn.exe (Q301585) This article describes workarounds for the following known problems in Mbconn version 6.0.4417: Mbconn sets uppercase legacyExchangeDN delimiters, which causes Outlook clients to be unable to publish their free/busy information. Mbconn suddenly quits HOWTO: Programmatically Create Offline Address Books in Exchange 2000 (Q300123) ... the first SetInfo call when you are creating the object): legacyExchangeDN- A single-valued distinguished name attribute that stores the legacyExchangeDN of the ... XADM: Mail to Offline Address Book Users Is Returned with a Non-Delivery Report (Q297471) ... again. server.domain.com #5.1.0 This issue can occur if the user 's legacyExchangeDN attribute is stored in all uppercase letters in Active Directory ... XADM: Requirements for Disabling the Recipient Update Service (Q296479) ... set the following attributes on all mail-enabled or mailbox-enabled objects: legacyExchangeDN proxyAddresses textEncodedORAddress mail mailNickname displayName The following is a brief explanation ... XADM: Windows 2000 Contacts and Users (Q233209) ... displayName: jdoe; 1 mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 1 givenName: John; 1
RE: remote backup
Title: Message While it is also in the FAQ's... Most of the professionals here shun BLB's... -Original Message-From: John Sparrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 4:08 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup i'd have to admit that is a good rule another quick question i have managed to finally get our backup server to see the exchange box, and is backing up the "Microsoft Exchange Directory" "Microsoft Exchange Information Store". i have also got the option to backup "Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes" have i made the correct selection or not? from what i can understand, Brick Level Backups are not the way to go, i am unsure how this relates to my selections. sorry to be a pain in the ass first thing on a monday morning :( exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6a, Backup Exec 8.6 cheers in advance John SparrowIT SupportComputer DepartmentTravco Ltd, Londonhttp://www.travco.co.uk -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 9:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup That's my rule too! We have a new office opening this weekend with a whole bunch of brand new servers. Guess what? They don't get to use them cuz the backup solution hasn't been approved. Too bad for them, I don't put machines in production with no backup solution... -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 2:34 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup My rule is that backups are in place and running well before anything goes live. No good backups, no live servers. -Original Message-From: John Sparrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:24 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup the logic in this place is really stupid i keep worrying out it, everytime i want to go and sort it, a bloody user phones me up witha dumbass question and then distracts me. i guess its my own damn fault :( John SparrowIT SupportComputer DepartmentTravco Ltd, Londonhttp://www.travco.co.uk -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 5:14 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup Will you have time when your server crashes and you have no backups? -Original Message-From: John Sparrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup i have a question too, do you also need the remote backup agent in addition to the exchange agent? i still havent got our exchange server backing up.DOH i just havent had the time to play with it, i guess alot of you can relate to that :) John SparrowIT SupportComputer DepartmentTravco Ltd, Londonhttp://www.travco.co.uk -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 5:09 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup the exchange server is also the wins\dns\dhcp and AD server for that site. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:06 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup Do you have the Exchange Agent for BE? This will allow you to do "online" backups of the directory and Information store which will be sufficient for disaster recovery. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:49 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup yes its a remote box that just runs backup exec.
Schema and Security Group Question
I have a situation where I need to extend the schema in exchange to add a field that will include the PIN number of users blackberries. However, I want this field to only be seen by certain folks - can this be done by restricting access to that field by creating a security group and adding folks to it who would be able to see that field? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Removing InnoculatIT for Exchange
Title: Message I'm removing Innoculate for Exchange 5.5tonight in order to install Antigen. It would make sense to me to stop the Info store before I attempt an un-install. There is no reference to this in any CA literature or support. Anyone care to voice an opinion? Thanks. Steve List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Removing InnoculatIT for Exchange
Title: Message Sounds like a good plan - and backups! -Original Message-From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 7:57 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Removing InnoculatIT for Exchange I'm removing Innoculate for Exchange 5.5tonight in order to install Antigen. It would make sense to me to stop the Info store before I attempt an un-install. There is no reference to this in any CA literature or support. Anyone care to voice an opinion? Thanks. SteveList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. ==
RE: Removing InnoculatIT for Exchange
Title: Message Won't hurt, but I don't think I had to. -Original Message-From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 9:01 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing InnoculatIT for Exchange Sounds like a good plan - and backups! -Original Message-From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 7:57 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Removing InnoculatIT for Exchange I'm removing Innoculate for Exchange 5.5tonight in order to install Antigen. It would make sense to me to stop the Info store before I attempt an un-install. There is no reference to this in any CA literature or support. Anyone care to voice an opinion? Thanks. SteveList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you.== List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Removing InnoculatIT for Exchange
Title: Message I don't think it is necessary (and a reboot may be required anyway). -Original Message-From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 4:57 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Removing InnoculatIT for Exchange I'm removing Innoculate for Exchange 5.5tonight in order to install Antigen. It would make sense to me to stop the Info store before I attempt an un-install. There is no reference to this in any CA literature or support. Anyone care to voice an opinion? Thanks. SteveList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Schema and Security Group Question
There is a great list to ask this question at www.activedir.org. Don't let the frightening FrontPage theme fool you. -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 5:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Schema and Security Group Question I have a situation where I need to extend the schema in exchange to add a field that will include the PIN number of users blackberries. However, I want this field to only be seen by certain folks - can this be done by restricting access to that field by creating a security group and adding folks to it who would be able to see that field? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Need help upgrading a server
Presently, the NT4.0 SBS is the primary DC for domain XX and the 2000 server is the DC for domain YY When I'm finished, the old 2000 server will remain the DC for domain YY and the new 2000 server with exchange 5.5 will be just another server in domain YY. For licensing and hardware limitation reasons, we will be staying at Exchange 5.5 for now. Hopefull for a hardware and software upgrade to Exch. 2k later in the year. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Need help upgrading a server First off, what role does the 2000 server play? If I had the freedom to make it as clean as possible I would ... Windows 2000 DC Exchange 2000 Exmerge Data from EX5.5 Setup Users in 2000 Domain Push data back into mailboxes via exmerge (one trick, you must send the user a message before the mailbox is created in e2k, least in my experience. Same with OWA, cant use it until threes a msg in the new mailbox) Another way Install exchange 2000 into the 5.5 org, re-home the users mailbox on the 2000 server, and then remove the 5.5/nt4.0 server. -Original Message- From: Mark S. Howell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 11:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Need help upgrading a server Here is the situation. I have an NT4.0 SBS running Exchange 5.5 and I need to upgrade it to Windows 2000 server. I have another server already at 2000. What is the best way to do this? Here is my thinking so far: 1. Install 5.5 on the existing 2000 server. 2. Stop services on NT4 box and 2000 server. 3. Copy all exchange databases over to 2000 server 4. Use edbutil to get database to working status on 2000 server and test that all mailboxes are there and still have all their mail 5. Do a fresh install of 2000 server on NT4 box 6. Install 5.5 on new 2000 server 7. Stop services on 2000 server and new 2000 server 8. Copy all exchange databases over to new 2000 server 9. Use edbutil to get databases to working status on new 2000 server and test 10. Uninstall exchange 5.5 on old 2000 server Am I nuts? Is there a better way? Is this an Ok way? Thanks in advanced. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Allowing access for....
Sounds like an interesting program. Who makes it ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Allowing access for Hi guys, I've got an add-in program that removes duplicates from a folder. Only problem is that Outlook 2000 (SR2) only gives me the options of allowing this program access to the folder for one minute, two minutes, 5 minutes or 10 minutes. I would like to set this thing to run overnight, so I'd like, maybe, a 10 hour option? Is there any way of changing the value of these options? I checked the registry and the MSKB, but didn't find anything off the bat. Thanks, Evan List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Allowing access for....
Free utility called click yes will do this for you. You can find this and other utilities at Slipstick. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Allowing access for Hi guys, I've got an add-in program that removes duplicates from a folder. Only problem is that Outlook 2000 (SR2) only gives me the options of allowing this program access to the folder for one minute, two minutes, 5 minutes or 10 minutes. I would like to set this thing to run overnight, so I'd like, maybe, a 10 hour option? Is there any way of changing the value of these options? I checked the registry and the MSKB, but didn't find anything off the bat. Thanks, Evan List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Need help upgrading a server
Your right in that there are not many users (~ 20). The Exmerge sounds like the tool I need. Right now there are only 2 servers, in 2 DIFFERENT domains due to someones incompetence. The existing 2k server is a DC with Active directory. I am taking the 4.0 SBS to 2k server to be a member server (non-DC). All of the clients are Win98 (trying to get them to upgrade to 2k pro) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Need help upgrading a server If you are in SBS you do not have many users. I would consider using the Exmerge utility to create .pst files of each mailbox, then reinstall the server as you wish with Exchange5.5 on Windows2000 and reimport the .pst files into new mailboxes. I do not know anything about your domain structure. Would this 2000 server be a member of an NT domain or are you considering deployment of Active Directory as well? -Original Message- From: Mark S. Howell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 8:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Need help upgrading a server Here is the situation. I have an NT4.0 SBS running Exchange 5.5 and I need to upgrade it to Windows 2000 server. I have another server already at 2000. What is the best way to do this? Here is my thinking so far: 1. Install 5.5 on the existing 2000 server. 2. Stop services on NT4 box and 2000 server. 3. Copy all exchange databases over to 2000 server 4. Use edbutil to get database to working status on 2000 server and test that all mailboxes are there and still have all their mail 5. Do a fresh install of 2000 server on NT4 box 6. Install 5.5 on new 2000 server 7. Stop services on 2000 server and new 2000 server 8. Copy all exchange databases over to new 2000 server 9. Use edbutil to get databases to working status on new 2000 server and test 10. Uninstall exchange 5.5 on old 2000 server Am I nuts? Is there a better way? Is this an Ok way? Thanks in advanced. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Wanted: Plain text email client
Title: Message Pine Agent -Original Message-From: Rob Wilcox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 12:23To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Wanted: Plain text email client Yes something other than that, because I want to only be able to receive plain text. Where on his web site? I couldn't find anything reference "mail" or "email", and the search isn't working. -Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 June 2002 19:59To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Wanted: Plain text email client You mean something other than putting plain text only in outlook or express? check ASB's site he has a bunch of recommendations -Original Message-From: Rob Wilcox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 2:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Wanted: Plain text email client Hi folks, I just wondered if someone could recommend a really straight forward simple email client, which handles plain text emails. I don't want it to be able to do HTML mail, either sending or receiving. Thanks RobList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Schema and Security Group Question
I believe this is possible. This is specified on the Advanced Permissions page of the OU the users are in. You may have to specify it in multiple OU's depending on how you have your AD structured. -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 7:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Schema and Security Group Question I have a situation where I need to extend the schema in exchange to add a field that will include the PIN number of users blackberries. However, I want this field to only be seen by certain folks - can this be done by restricting access to that field by creating a security group and adding folks to it who would be able to see that field? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: User Profiles/Template
Title: Message First of all, it's "neither I nor Martey Boy "said"" You'd better work on your MCP for Huked on Fonics. Second of all, who is Martey. Emmanuel seems to be the person who started this thread. -Original Message-From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 5:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User Profiles/Template Neither I or Martey boy say we are an MCP. -Original Message-From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User Profiles/Template Scary? Isn't It. Can anyone say "I went to www.braindumps.com for my MCP"? -Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User Profiles/Template Once Again. YOU ARE AN MCP?!?!?!?!?!? Go to the book case, pull down the down book on NT 4 Server and the one called Network Essentials.you know the ones you passed to get your MCP..and read the damn things -Original Message-From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 8:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User Profiles/Template how is this High Importance ? -Original Message-From: Martey, Emmanuel E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 14:59To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: User Profiles/TemplateImportance: High Hi folks, I would like to limit what my users can see and do on their desktop like; No My Computer, Cannot Run, or cannot run Explorer and not see the network neigbourhood on their desktop. They would log on to an NT Server 4.0 PDC domain. I would be glad for any input on creating a template or profile for this purpose. Thanks. Emmanuel __ Disclaimer and confidentiality note Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official business of Standard Bank Group Limited is proprietary to the company. It is confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Standard Bank does not own and endorse any other content. Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly stated as being that of Standard Bank. The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please notify the sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not read, disclose or use the content in any way. Standard Bank can not assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. ___ List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Need help upgrading a server
Yeah go with the exmerge. It works with 5.5 or 2000 so it really doesn't matter, I thought you were upgrading to e2k. But exmerge is the safest way to do it. In Exmerge there's actually a one step process that you could try if you have admin permissions on both boxes and servers. Otherwise do the two step export, and import functions. Make sure you stick with the same mailbox naming convention, not just username. Get the mailbox name in the recipient tab (usually its alias, but make sure) otherwise when you goto import you will get errors because the names wont match and have to rename the pst. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Schema and Security Group Question
Couldn't it be defined as a universal security group and than propagated downward through the AD? Does that make sense? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:06 AM To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC; [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Subject: RE: Schema and Security Group Question I believe this is possible. This is specified on the Advanced Permissions page of the OU the users are in. You may have to specify it in multiple OU's depending on how you have your AD structured. -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 7:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Schema and Security Group Question I have a situation where I need to extend the schema in exchange to add a field that will include the PIN number of users blackberries. However, I want this field to only be seen by certain folks - can this be done by restricting access to that field by creating a security group and adding folks to it who would be able to see that field? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Wanted: Plain text email client
Title: Message pegasus maybe? www.pmail.com Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Rob Wilcox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 1:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Wanted: Plain text email client Hi folks, I just wondered if someone could recommend a really straight forward simple email client, which handles plain text emails. I don't want it to be able to do HTML mail, either sending or receiving. Thanks RobList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Schema and Security Group Question
I don't think so. It looks like the OU is the only place you can specify security on specific properties of the User object. You can use the SG to accumulate the users you want to grant the permission to, but I think granting permissions to that SG needs to be done in the OU. -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 9:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Schema and Security Group Question Couldn't it be defined as a universal security group and than propagated downward through the AD? Does that make sense? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:06 AM To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC; [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Subject: RE: Schema and Security Group Question I believe this is possible. This is specified on the Advanced Permissions page of the OU the users are in. You may have to specify it in multiple OU's depending on how you have your AD structured. -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 7:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Schema and Security Group Question I have a situation where I need to extend the schema in exchange to add a field that will include the PIN number of users blackberries. However, I want this field to only be seen by certain folks - can this be done by restricting access to that field by creating a security group and adding folks to it who would be able to see that field? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Schema and Security Group Question
After doing a little more checking, it looks like only specific properties of the User object are available even at the OU. You can specify security on all the properties at the individual user object level, but I don't think you want to do that. I suspect the properties that you can set securities on at the OU level will be those that are included in the Global Catalog for that object type. You should be able to specify this when you extend the Schema. -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 9:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Schema and Security Group Question Couldn't it be defined as a universal security group and than propagated downward through the AD? Does that make sense? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:06 AM To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC; [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Subject: RE: Schema and Security Group Question I believe this is possible. This is specified on the Advanced Permissions page of the OU the users are in. You may have to specify it in multiple OU's depending on how you have your AD structured. -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 7:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Schema and Security Group Question I have a situation where I need to extend the schema in exchange to add a field that will include the PIN number of users blackberries. However, I want this field to only be seen by certain folks - can this be done by restricting access to that field by creating a security group and adding folks to it who would be able to see that field? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exchange dilemma
Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Trail for mail popped and routed
Thanks for the insight.. Hmmm, professors, wanting to get their own way?!? Hmmm, it's a thought. -Original Message- From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:32 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed There is little difference between the MAC Outlook client and the PC Outlook client. Sounds like a typical excuse to get his own way... -Original Message- From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 5:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed Yeah, true 'nuff bout the B.S. but also true nuff that it's worth a try limiting to some more manageable number the kinds of clients. This guy's happens to be on a MAC, and doesn't like MAC Outlook. I don't actually know what the difference is, being a purely PC person myself. Oh well, gang. Have a GREAT weekend!! No PopPing Now!! -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 16:58 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed I hear ya. The B.S. in most educational institutions usually stands for Bull Sh!t. You can log POP3 under the diagnostics tab. You should give the supportable clients thing a fly and see who wants to take shots at it though. You'll never know if you can succeed until you try. Be flexible and support IMAP and MAPI clients, but tell them that POP3 just won't get supported. They can still access the resources they need, but have to do it in a compliant manner. After all, the students can access anything in the library, but they still have to sign the books out don't they? -Original Message- From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 4:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed Nice to be able to say, and it might fly at a .com but at .edus, sigh, all we hear about is 'academic freedom' and we wind up having to accommodate (and support) a HOST of junk. But i agree in principle. I also think i should have known the answer, or at least how to turn a trace on or something. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 16:44 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed Actually that is the best answer. If a person decides he wants to use your technology his own way, rather than the way you designed it, they should support that themselves. At the same time, you should educate him on the error of his ways. -Original Message- From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed Thanks, that's a big help. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 16:19 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed Turn off POP and tell him to use a real protocol. -Original Message- From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 3:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Trail for mail popped and routed Feel like I probably should know this, but I don't and can't seem to find the right search combination to discover the answer for myself. Exchange 5.5 sp4, NT4 sp6, have user (professor) who won't use native Outlook. Insists on Popping his mail from Exchange server, also using exchange for SMTP server with Outlook Express. He's having trouble with invalid syntax on outgoing email and thinks I should be able to see a trace of what got routed through the server. I don't see anything, not an NDR, nothing in his sent-items (of course, that's on his desktop). Is there a record of email sent using the exchange server as SMTP server with O.E ? Thanks for any pointers. Lynne Seamans Millersville University Millersville PA List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Change the rule to mark items read. Then delete -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Have this user install: http://www.microgarden.com/outlooktools/index.htm Then your redheaded stepchildren (whatever that means) won't know they are being neglected. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
It sounds like maybe you are using an Outlook rule to forward his email. How about instead created a Special Recipient of his external address on your exchange server, and then in the exchange server administrator entry for this guy, on the Delivery Options tag, make the Special Recipient the Alternate Recipient. That's how we do off-campus forwarding. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:34 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma 1. Why is it forwarded? 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds... Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the rules where I can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution. The forwarding story is too long to type here. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma 1. Why is it forwarded? 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds... Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: remote backup
Title: Message It depends on your resources pal. Do you have the space on your Exchange server to have Deleted Item Retention turned on? If you do have it turned on, then BLB's are really not necessary. If you cannot have DIRT turned on, then BLB's will give you an option to restore a mailbox, even one message from a mailbox without having to do a restore to a test server, exmerge it to recover it. Personally, I am currently having to do BLB's, but when my new Exchange server that was supposed to be here last week, does finally get here and is up running, I will not be doing BLB's, but will be relying on DIRT to do message recovery from. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 7:40 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup While it is also in the FAQ's... Most of the professionals here shun BLB's... -Original Message-From: John Sparrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 4:08 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup i'd have to admit that is a good rule another quick question i have managed to finally get our backup server to see the exchange box, and is backing up the "Microsoft Exchange Directory" "Microsoft Exchange Information Store". i have also got the option to backup "Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes" have i made the correct selection or not? from what i can understand, Brick Level Backups are not the way to go, i am unsure how this relates to my selections. sorry to be a pain in the ass first thing on a monday morning :( exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6a, Backup Exec 8.6 cheers in advance John SparrowIT SupportComputer DepartmentTravco Ltd, Londonhttp://www.travco.co.uk -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 9:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup That's my rule too! We have a new office opening this weekend with a whole bunch of brand new servers. Guess what? They don't get to use them cuz the backup solution hasn't been approved. Too bad for them, I don't put machines in production with no backup solution... -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 2:34 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup My rule is that backups are in place and running well before anything goes live. No good backups, no live servers. -Original Message-From: John Sparrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:24 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup the logic in this place is really stupid i keep worrying out it, everytime i want to go and sort it, a bloody user phones me up witha dumbass question and then distracts me. i guess its my own damn fault :( John SparrowIT SupportComputer DepartmentTravco Ltd, Londonhttp://www.travco.co.uk -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 5:14 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup Will you have time when your server crashes and you have no backups? -Original Message-From: John Sparrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup i have a question too, do you also need the remote backup agent in addition to the exchange agent? i still havent got our exchange server backing up.DOH i just havent had the time to play with it, i guess alot of you can relate to that :) John SparrowIT SupportComputer DepartmentTravco Ltd, Londonhttp://www.travco.co.uk -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 5:09 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup the exchange server is also the wins\dns\dhcp and AD server for that site.
Re: Exchange dilemma
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma They will not get this if this user is the alternate recipient and do not have it go to the mailbox. I am curious as to why you would have all mail go off-domain. That sounds dangerous - Original Message - From: Abercrombie, Sherry To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:46 AM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma 1. Why is it forwarded? 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds... Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: remote backup
Title: Message That's why I said "Most Professionals" :P -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup It depends on your resources pal. Do you have the space on your Exchange server to have Deleted Item Retention turned on? If you do have it turned on, then BLB's are really not necessary. If you cannot have DIRT turned on, then BLB's will give you an option to restore a mailbox, even one message from a mailbox without having to do a restore to a test server, exmerge it to recover it. Personally, I am currently having to do BLB's, but when my new Exchange server that was supposed to be here last week, does finally get here and is up running, I will not be doing BLB's, but will be relying on DIRT to do message recovery from. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 7:40 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup While it is also in the FAQ's... Most of the professionals here shun BLB's... -Original Message-From: John Sparrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 4:08 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup i'd have to admit that is a good rule another quick question i have managed to finally get our backup server to see the exchange box, and is backing up the "Microsoft Exchange Directory" "Microsoft Exchange Information Store". i have also got the option to backup "Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes" have i made the correct selection or not? from what i can understand, Brick Level Backups are not the way to go, i am unsure how this relates to my selections. sorry to be a pain in the ass first thing on a monday morning :( exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6a, Backup Exec 8.6 cheers in advance John SparrowIT SupportComputer DepartmentTravco Ltd, Londonhttp://www.travco.co.uk -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 9:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup That's my rule too! We have a new office opening this weekend with a whole bunch of brand new servers. Guess what? They don't get to use them cuz the backup solution hasn't been approved. Too bad for them, I don't put machines in production with no backup solution... -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 2:34 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup My rule is that backups are in place and running well before anything goes live. No good backups, no live servers. -Original Message-From: John Sparrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:24 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup the logic in this place is really stupid i keep worrying out it, everytime i want to go and sort it, a bloody user phones me up witha dumbass question and then distracts me. i guess its my own damn fault :( John SparrowIT SupportComputer DepartmentTravco Ltd, Londonhttp://www.travco.co.uk -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 5:14 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup Will you have time when your server crashes and you have no backups? -Original Message-From: John Sparrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup i have a question too, do you also need the remote backup agent in addition to the exchange agent? i still havent got our exchange server backing up.DOH i just havent had the time to play with it, i guess alot of you can relate to that :) John SparrowIT SupportComputer
Exchange 5.5 and AD
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma I now have Exchange 5.5 on a 2000 server.When I upgrade the domain to 2000, will there be any issues with this exchange setup. Will Exchange 5.5 interact/effect/monkey wrench any thing in the 2000 Active Directory? Thanks, Nick List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Trail for mail popped and routed
Actually, there are several big differences: 1. Mac Outlook cannot search LDAP directories. 2. Mac Outlook cannot do POP3/IMAP. 3. Mac Outlook cannot drag and drop items between folders. 4. Mac Outlook cannot assign tasks. ! -Original Message- ! From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! Sent: July 01, 2002 08:32 ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! ! There is little difference between the MAC Outlook client ! and the PC Outlook client. Sounds like a typical excuse to ! get his own way... ! ! ! -Original Message- ! From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 5:02 PM ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! Yeah, true 'nuff bout the B.S. but also true nuff that it's ! worth a try ! limiting to some more manageable number the kinds of clients. ! ! This guy's happens to be on a MAC, and doesn't like MAC ! Outlook. I don't ! actually know what the difference is, being a purely PC person myself. ! ! Oh well, gang. Have a GREAT weekend!! No PopPing Now!! ! ! -Original Message- ! From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 16:58 ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! I hear ya. The B.S. in most educational institutions usually ! stands for Bull ! Sh!t. You can log POP3 under the diagnostics tab. ! ! You should give the supportable clients thing a fly and see ! who wants to ! take shots at it though. You'll never know if you can succeed ! until you try. ! Be flexible and support IMAP and MAPI clients, but tell them ! that POP3 just ! won't get supported. They can still access the resources they ! need, but have ! to do it in a compliant manner. After all, the students can ! access anything ! in the library, but they still have to sign the books out don't they? ! ! -Original Message- ! From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 4:47 PM ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! Nice to be able to say, and it might fly at a .com ! but at .edus, sigh, all we hear about is 'academic freedom' ! and we wind up ! having to accommodate (and support) a HOST of junk. ! ! But i agree in principle. I also think i should have known ! the answer, or ! at least how to turn a trace on or something. ! ! -Original Message- ! From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 16:44 ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! Actually that is the best answer. ! If a person decides he wants to use your technology his own ! way, rather than ! the way you designed it, they should support that themselves. ! At the same time, you should educate him on the error of his ways. ! ! -Original Message- ! From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 1:27 PM ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! Thanks, that's a big help. ! ! -Original Message- ! From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 16:19 ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! Turn off POP and tell him to use a real protocol. ! ! -Original Message- ! From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 3:37 PM ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! Subject: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! Feel like I probably should know this, but I don't and ! can't seem to ! find the right search combination to discover the answer ! for myself. ! ! Exchange 5.5 sp4, NT4 sp6, have user (professor) who won't ! use native ! Outlook. Insists on Popping his mail from Exchange server, ! also using ! exchange for SMTP server with Outlook Express. ! ! He's having trouble with invalid syntax on outgoing email ! and thinks ! I should be able to see a trace of what got routed through the ! server. I ! don't see anything, not an NDR, nothing in his sent-items (of ! course, that's ! on his desktop). Is there a record of email sent using the ! exchange server ! as SMTP server with O.E ? ! ! Thanks for any pointers. ! ! Lynne Seamans ! Millersville University ! Millersville PA ! ! List Charter and FAQ at: ! http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ! ! List Charter and FAQ at: ! http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ! ! ! List Charter and FAQ at: ! http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ! ! List Charter and FAQ at: ! http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ! ! ! List Charter and FAQ at: ! http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ! ! List Charter and FAQ at: ! http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ! ! ! List Charter and FAQ at: !
RE: Trail for mail popped and routed
the specific difference my user is complaining about was the inability to import contacts. Is that different in mac and PC outlook ? -Original Message- From: Hemang C. Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:12 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed Actually, there are several big differences: 1. Mac Outlook cannot search LDAP directories. 2. Mac Outlook cannot do POP3/IMAP. 3. Mac Outlook cannot drag and drop items between folders. 4. Mac Outlook cannot assign tasks. ! -Original Message- ! From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! Sent: July 01, 2002 08:32 ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! ! There is little difference between the MAC Outlook client ! and the PC Outlook client. Sounds like a typical excuse to ! get his own way... ! ! ! -Original Message- ! From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 5:02 PM ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! Yeah, true 'nuff bout the B.S. but also true nuff that it's ! worth a try ! limiting to some more manageable number the kinds of clients. ! ! This guy's happens to be on a MAC, and doesn't like MAC ! Outlook. I don't ! actually know what the difference is, being a purely PC person myself. ! ! Oh well, gang. Have a GREAT weekend!! No PopPing Now!! ! ! -Original Message- ! From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 16:58 ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! I hear ya. The B.S. in most educational institutions usually ! stands for Bull ! Sh!t. You can log POP3 under the diagnostics tab. ! ! You should give the supportable clients thing a fly and see ! who wants to ! take shots at it though. You'll never know if you can succeed ! until you try. ! Be flexible and support IMAP and MAPI clients, but tell them ! that POP3 just ! won't get supported. They can still access the resources they ! need, but have ! to do it in a compliant manner. After all, the students can ! access anything ! in the library, but they still have to sign the books out don't they? ! ! -Original Message- ! From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 4:47 PM ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! Nice to be able to say, and it might fly at a .com ! but at .edus, sigh, all we hear about is 'academic freedom' ! and we wind up ! having to accommodate (and support) a HOST of junk. ! ! But i agree in principle. I also think i should have known ! the answer, or ! at least how to turn a trace on or something. ! ! -Original Message- ! From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 16:44 ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! Actually that is the best answer. ! If a person decides he wants to use your technology his own ! way, rather than ! the way you designed it, they should support that themselves. ! At the same time, you should educate him on the error of his ways. ! ! -Original Message- ! From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 1:27 PM ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! Thanks, that's a big help. ! ! -Original Message- ! From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 16:19 ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! Turn off POP and tell him to use a real protocol. ! ! -Original Message- ! From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 3:37 PM ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! Subject: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! Feel like I probably should know this, but I don't and ! can't seem to ! find the right search combination to discover the answer ! for myself. ! ! Exchange 5.5 sp4, NT4 sp6, have user (professor) who won't ! use native ! Outlook. Insists on Popping his mail from Exchange server, ! also using ! exchange for SMTP server with Outlook Express. ! ! He's having trouble with invalid syntax on outgoing email ! and thinks ! I should be able to see a trace of what got routed through the ! server. I ! don't see anything, not an NDR, nothing in his sent-items (of ! course, that's ! on his desktop). Is there a record of email sent using the ! exchange server ! as SMTP server with O.E ? ! ! Thanks for any pointers. ! ! Lynne Seamans ! Millersville University ! Millersville PA ! ! List Charter and FAQ at: ! http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ! ! List Charter and FAQ at: ! http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ! ! ! List Charter and FAQ at: !
RE: Exchange dilemma
Why not just create a Custom Recipient? No mailbox, no e-mail to delete. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Trail for mail popped and routed
Importing into Mac Outlook is pretty limited. You can import from a .pab, Schedule+ or a .csv. That's it. ! -Original Message- ! From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! Sent: July 01, 2002 09:21 ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! the specific difference my user is complaining about was the ! inability to ! import contacts. ! ! Is that different in mac and PC outlook ? ! ! -Original Message- ! From: Hemang C. Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:12 ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! Actually, there are several big differences: ! ! 1. Mac Outlook cannot search LDAP directories. ! ! 2. Mac Outlook cannot do POP3/IMAP. ! ! 3. Mac Outlook cannot drag and drop items between folders. ! ! 4. Mac Outlook cannot assign tasks. ! ! ! -Original Message- ! ! From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! ! Sent: July 01, 2002 08:32 ! ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! There is little difference between the MAC Outlook client ! ! and the PC Outlook client. Sounds like a typical excuse to ! ! get his own way... ! ! ! ! ! ! -Original Message- ! ! From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 5:02 PM ! ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! ! ! ! Yeah, true 'nuff bout the B.S. but also true nuff that it's ! ! worth a try ! ! limiting to some more manageable number the kinds of clients. ! ! ! ! This guy's happens to be on a MAC, and doesn't like MAC ! ! Outlook. I don't ! ! actually know what the difference is, being a purely PC ! person myself. ! ! ! ! Oh well, gang. Have a GREAT weekend!! No PopPing Now!! ! ! ! ! -Original Message- ! ! From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 16:58 ! ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! ! ! ! I hear ya. The B.S. in most educational institutions usually ! ! stands for Bull ! ! Sh!t. You can log POP3 under the diagnostics tab. ! ! ! ! You should give the supportable clients thing a fly and see ! ! who wants to ! ! take shots at it though. You'll never know if you can succeed ! ! until you try. ! ! Be flexible and support IMAP and MAPI clients, but tell them ! ! that POP3 just ! ! won't get supported. They can still access the resources they ! ! need, but have ! ! to do it in a compliant manner. After all, the students can ! ! access anything ! ! in the library, but they still have to sign the books out ! don't they? ! ! ! ! -Original Message- ! ! From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 4:47 PM ! ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! ! ! ! Nice to be able to say, and it might fly at a .com ! ! but at .edus, sigh, all we hear about is 'academic freedom' ! ! and we wind up ! ! having to accommodate (and support) a HOST of junk. ! ! ! ! But i agree in principle. I also think i should have known ! ! the answer, or ! ! at least how to turn a trace on or something. ! ! ! ! -Original Message- ! ! From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 16:44 ! ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! ! ! ! Actually that is the best answer. ! ! If a person decides he wants to use your technology his own ! ! way, rather than ! ! the way you designed it, they should support that themselves. ! ! At the same time, you should educate him on the error of ! his ways. ! ! ! ! -Original Message- ! ! From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 1:27 PM ! ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! ! ! ! Thanks, that's a big help. ! ! ! ! -Original Message- ! ! From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 16:19 ! ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! ! Subject: RE: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! ! ! ! Turn off POP and tell him to use a real protocol. ! ! ! ! -Original Message- ! ! From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ! ! Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 3:37 PM ! ! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues ! ! Subject: Trail for mail popped and routed ! ! ! ! ! ! Feel like I probably should know this, but I don't and ! ! can't seem to ! ! find the right search combination to discover the answer ! ! for myself. ! ! ! ! Exchange 5.5 sp4, NT4 sp6, have user (professor) who won't ! ! use native ! ! Outlook. Insists on Popping his mail from Exchange server, ! ! also using ! ! exchange for SMTP server with Outlook Express. ! ! ! ! He's having trouble with invalid syntax on outgoing email ! ! and thinks ! ! I should be able to see a trace
RE: Exchange dilemma
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate forwarding mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and then it's the proverbial kicking screaming digging my heels into the floor scenario before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through Exchange Admin, or mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the rules where I can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution. The forwarding story is too long to type here. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma 1. Why is it forwarded? 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds... Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: remote backup
Title: Message I'll be in that category next week.I better be there by next week, or I'll be an Exchange Admin who's server has quit due to reaching the 5.5 standard 16GB limit on her priv.edb. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup That's why I said "Most Professionals" :P -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup It depends on your resources pal. Do you have the space on your Exchange server to have Deleted Item Retention turned on? If you do have it turned on, then BLB's are really not necessary. If you cannot have DIRT turned on, then BLB's will give you an option to restore a mailbox, even one message from a mailbox without having to do a restore to a test server, exmerge it to recover it. Personally, I am currently having to do BLB's, but when my new Exchange server that was supposed to be here last week, does finally get here and is up running, I will not be doing BLB's, but will be relying on DIRT to do message recovery from. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 7:40 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup While it is also in the FAQ's... Most of the professionals here shun BLB's... -Original Message-From: John Sparrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 4:08 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup i'd have to admit that is a good rule another quick question i have managed to finally get our backup server to see the exchange box, and is backing up the "Microsoft Exchange Directory" "Microsoft Exchange Information Store". i have also got the option to backup "Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes" have i made the correct selection or not? from what i can understand, Brick Level Backups are not the way to go, i am unsure how this relates to my selections. sorry to be a pain in the ass first thing on a monday morning :( exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6a, Backup Exec 8.6 cheers in advance John SparrowIT SupportComputer DepartmentTravco Ltd, Londonhttp://www.travco.co.uk -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 9:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup That's my rule too! We have a new office opening this weekend with a whole bunch of brand new servers. Guess what? They don't get to use them cuz the backup solution hasn't been approved. Too bad for them, I don't put machines in production with no backup solution... -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 2:34 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup My rule is that backups are in place and running well before anything goes live. No good backups, no live servers. -Original Message-From: John Sparrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:24 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup the logic in this place is really stupid i keep worrying out it, everytime i want to go and sort it, a bloody user phones me up witha dumbass question and then distracts me. i guess its my own damn fault :( John SparrowIT SupportComputer DepartmentTravco Ltd, Londonhttp://www.travco.co.uk -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 5:14 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup Will you have time when your server crashes and you have no backups?
RE: Schema and Security Group Question
Ok, that helps. Thanks for clearing this up for me. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:56 AM To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC; [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Subject: RE: Schema and Security Group Question I don't think so. It looks like the OU is the only place you can specify security on specific properties of the User object. You can use the SG to accumulate the users you want to grant the permission to, but I think granting permissions to that SG needs to be done in the OU. -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 9:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Schema and Security Group Question Couldn't it be defined as a universal security group and than propagated downward through the AD? Does that make sense? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:06 AM To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC; [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Subject: RE: Schema and Security Group Question I believe this is possible. This is specified on the Advanced Permissions page of the OU the users are in. You may have to specify it in multiple OU's depending on how you have your AD structured. -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 7:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Schema and Security Group Question I have a situation where I need to extend the schema in exchange to add a field that will include the PIN number of users blackberries. However, I want this field to only be seen by certain folks - can this be done by restricting access to that field by creating a security group and adding folks to it who would be able to see that field? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate forwarding mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and then it's the proverbial kicking screaming digging my heels into the floor scenario before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through Exchange Admin, or mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the rules where I can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution. The forwarding story is too long to type here. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma 1. Why is it forwarded? 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds... Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example when someone goes on sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to their office. If their primary e-mail account is on another server then I just use a Custom Recipient. Ken --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate forwarding mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and then it's the proverbial kicking screaming digging my heels into the floor scenario before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through Exchange Admin, or mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the rules where I can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution. The forwarding story is too long to type here. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma 1. Why is it forwarded? 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds... Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
No OWA? -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example when someone goes on sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to their office. If their primary e-mail account is on another server then I just use a Custom Recipient. Ken --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate forwarding mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and then it's the proverbial kicking screaming digging my heels into the floor scenario before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through Exchange Admin, or mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the rules where I can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution. The forwarding story is too long to type here. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma 1. Why is it forwarded? 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds... Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Agreed but we have a need for someone (clerical) to monitor this person's calendar so all messages other than calendar items get forwarded and deleted. All calendar items go into their mailbox here so that the person(clerical) here can make appts, etc. -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example when someone goes on sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to their office. If their primary e-mail account is on another server then I just use a Custom Recipient. Ken --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate forwarding mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and then it's the proverbial kicking screaming digging my heels into the floor scenario before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through Exchange Admin, or mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the rules where I can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution. The forwarding story is too long to type here. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma 1. Why is it forwarded? 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds... Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ
RE: Exchange dilemma
Yea, that too but a lot of people don't like OWA on Exchange 5.5. I'm hoping OWA on Exchange 2000 will take care of that. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma No OWA? -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example when someone goes on sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to their office. If their primary e-mail account is on another server then I just use a Custom Recipient. Ken --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate forwarding mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and then it's the proverbial kicking screaming digging my heels into the floor scenario before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through Exchange Admin, or mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the rules where I can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution. The forwarding story is too long to type here. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma 1. Why is it forwarded? 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds... Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ
RE: Exchange dilemma
OK, I'm confused. They are using an outside mailbox but using internal Calendar? Too weird. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Agreed but we have a need for someone (clerical) to monitor this person's calendar so all messages other than calendar items get forwarded and deleted. All calendar items go into their mailbox here so that the person(clerical) here can make appts, etc. -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example when someone goes on sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to their office. If their primary e-mail account is on another server then I just use a Custom Recipient. Ken --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate forwarding mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and then it's the proverbial kicking screaming digging my heels into the floor scenario before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through Exchange Admin, or mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the rules where I can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution. The forwarding story is too long to type here. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma 1. Why is it forwarded? 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds... Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at:
OWA Apology
I wanted to apologize to all those who were on the OWA SSL thread a few weeks ago. My contribution was that you can force SSL without a cert, but I discovered today that I was wrong. I used to run OWA on my web server, which has a cert, although not exclusively for OWA. When I installed my new Exchange server this weekend and moved OWA, I realized that I could not use SSL.yet. I just wanted to express my sincere apologies for siding with the wrong answer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Exchange dilemma
Exactly, you big fat* weirdo Bill! * this in no way related to the physical state of being fat or gordo. I have no way of knowing whether you are actually obese, nor do I care. - Original Message - From: Ken Leyba [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:34 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma OK, I'm confused. They are using an outside mailbox but using internal Calendar? Too weird. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Agreed but we have a need for someone (clerical) to monitor this person's calendar so all messages other than calendar items get forwarded and deleted. All calendar items go into their mailbox here so that the person(clerical) here can make appts, etc. -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example when someone goes on sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to their office. If their primary e-mail account is on another server then I just use a Custom Recipient. Ken --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate forwarding mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and then it's the proverbial kicking screaming digging my heels into the floor scenario before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through Exchange Admin, or mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the rules where I can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution. The forwarding story is too long to type here. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma 1. Why is it forwarded? 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds... Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:
RE: OWA Apology
Are you going to the MEC? If you are, that's a lot of beer you're buying. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Apology I wanted to apologize to all those who were on the OWA SSL thread a few weeks ago. My contribution was that you can force SSL without a cert, but I discovered today that I was wrong. I used to run OWA on my web server, which has a cert, although not exclusively for OWA. When I installed my new Exchange server this weekend and moved OWA, I realized that I could not use SSL.yet. I just wanted to express my sincere apologies for siding with the wrong answer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 and AD
You shouldn't have any issues after an initial upgrade, as long as everything stays Exchange 5.5. If you don't use the registry hack to force the PDC to emulate an NT4 domain, you'll need to reboot the server after the upgrade to get it's Kerberos authentication set up properly. If you don't it won't be able to renew it's account in the domain when it's password expires. -Original Message- From: Nickolaos Fotopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 and AD I now have Exchange 5.5 on a 2000 server. When I upgrade the domain to 2000, will there be any issues with this exchange setup. Will Exchange 5.5 interact/effect/monkey wrench any thing in the 2000 Active Directory? Thanks, Nick List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA Apology
Luckily, you prefer Coors Lite, so it wont cost him that much. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Apology Are you going to the MEC? If you are, that's a lot of beer you're buying. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Apology I wanted to apologize to all those who were on the OWA SSL thread a few weeks ago. My contribution was that you can force SSL without a cert, but I discovered today that I was wrong. I used to run OWA on my web server, which has a cert, although not exclusively for OWA. When I installed my new Exchange server this weekend and moved OWA, I realized that I could not use SSL.yet. I just wanted to express my sincere apologies for siding with the wrong answer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Long story -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma OK, I'm confused. They are using an outside mailbox but using internal Calendar? Too weird. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Agreed but we have a need for someone (clerical) to monitor this person's calendar so all messages other than calendar items get forwarded and deleted. All calendar items go into their mailbox here so that the person(clerical) here can make appts, etc. -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example when someone goes on sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to their office. If their primary e-mail account is on another server then I just use a Custom Recipient. Ken --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate forwarding mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and then it's the proverbial kicking screaming digging my heels into the floor scenario before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through Exchange Admin, or mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the rules where I can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution. The forwarding story is too long to type here. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma 1. Why is it forwarded? 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds... Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill
RE: OWA Apology
Don't you owe me like 30 of those things now? Why not combine that into a 12 pack of Sam Adams or Shiner Bock and get it over with. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Apology Luckily, you prefer Coors Lite, so it wont cost him that much. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Apology Are you going to the MEC? If you are, that's a lot of beer you're buying. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Apology I wanted to apologize to all those who were on the OWA SSL thread a few weeks ago. My contribution was that you can force SSL without a cert, but I discovered today that I was wrong. I used to run OWA on my web server, which has a cert, although not exclusively for OWA. When I installed my new Exchange server this weekend and moved OWA, I realized that I could not use SSL.yet. I just wanted to express my sincere apologies for siding with the wrong answer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
You know if it weren't for [l]users and half-wit psuedo sysadmins* this job wouldn't be half bad. *I'm talking about here not anyone on this list. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Long story -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma OK, I'm confused. They are using an outside mailbox but using internal Calendar? Too weird. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Agreed but we have a need for someone (clerical) to monitor this person's calendar so all messages other than calendar items get forwarded and deleted. All calendar items go into their mailbox here so that the person(clerical) here can make appts, etc. -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example when someone goes on sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to their office. If their primary e-mail account is on another server then I just use a Custom Recipient. Ken --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate forwarding mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and then it's the proverbial kicking screaming digging my heels into the floor scenario before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through Exchange Admin, or mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the rules where I can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution. The forwarding story is too long to type here. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma 1. Why is it forwarded? 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds... Sherry
RE: OWA Apology
Heck, I owe beer and apologies to just about everybody on this list and the others. How about I buy you a six-quack and we call it even? -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Apology Don't you owe me like 30 of those things now? Why not combine that into a 12 pack of Sam Adams or Shiner Bock and get it over with. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Apology Luckily, you prefer Coors Lite, so it wont cost him that much. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Apology Are you going to the MEC? If you are, that's a lot of beer you're buying. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Apology I wanted to apologize to all those who were on the OWA SSL thread a few weeks ago. My contribution was that you can force SSL without a cert, but I discovered today that I was wrong. I used to run OWA on my web server, which has a cert, although not exclusively for OWA. When I installed my new Exchange server this weekend and moved OWA, I realized that I could not use SSL.yet. I just wanted to express my sincere apologies for siding with the wrong answer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Not a sysadmin* * Just in case that was a reference -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma You know if it weren't for [l]users and half-wit psuedo sysadmins* this job wouldn't be half bad. *I'm talking about here not anyone on this list. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Long story -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma OK, I'm confused. They are using an outside mailbox but using internal Calendar? Too weird. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Agreed but we have a need for someone (clerical) to monitor this person's calendar so all messages other than calendar items get forwarded and deleted. All calendar items go into their mailbox here so that the person(clerical) here can make appts, etc. -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example when someone goes on sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to their office. If their primary e-mail account is on another server then I just use a Custom Recipient. Ken --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate forwarding mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and then it's the proverbial kicking screaming digging my heels into the floor scenario before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through Exchange Admin, or mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA Apology
Actually, I am not even sure who you are, so you get jack!! *wink I was a contributer to that thread, not the creator, so my apology was not to whoever was right, but the poor soul I may have confused. - Original Message - From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:48 PM Subject: RE: OWA Apology Don't you owe me like 30 of those things now? Why not combine that into a 12 pack of Sam Adams or Shiner Bock and get it over with. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Apology Luckily, you prefer Coors Lite, so it wont cost him that much. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Apology Are you going to the MEC? If you are, that's a lot of beer you're buying. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Apology I wanted to apologize to all those who were on the OWA SSL thread a few weeks ago. My contribution was that you can force SSL without a cert, but I discovered today that I was wrong. I used to run OWA on my web server, which has a cert, although not exclusively for OWA. When I installed my new Exchange server this weekend and moved OWA, I realized that I could not use SSL.yet. I just wanted to express my sincere apologies for siding with the wrong answer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Exchange dilemma
me either* * Just in case that was a reference - Original Message - From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:51 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Not a sysadmin* * Just in case that was a reference -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma You know if it weren't for [l]users and half-wit psuedo sysadmins* this job wouldn't be half bad. *I'm talking about here not anyone on this list. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Long story -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma OK, I'm confused. They are using an outside mailbox but using internal Calendar? Too weird. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Agreed but we have a need for someone (clerical) to monitor this person's calendar so all messages other than calendar items get forwarded and deleted. All calendar items go into their mailbox here so that the person(clerical) here can make appts, etc. -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example when someone goes on sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to their office. If their primary e-mail account is on another server then I just use a Custom Recipient. Ken --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate forwarding mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and then it's the proverbial kicking screaming digging my heels into the floor scenario before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through Exchange Admin, or mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the rules where I can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution. The forwarding story is too long to type here. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma 1. Why is it forwarded? 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds... Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail
RE: Exchange dilemma
Nope, talking about where I'm at. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Not a sysadmin* * Just in case that was a reference -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma You know if it weren't for [l]users and half-wit psuedo sysadmins* this job wouldn't be half bad. *I'm talking about here not anyone on this list. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Long story -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma OK, I'm confused. They are using an outside mailbox but using internal Calendar? Too weird. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Agreed but we have a need for someone (clerical) to monitor this person's calendar so all messages other than calendar items get forwarded and deleted. All calendar items go into their mailbox here so that the person(clerical) here can make appts, etc. -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example when someone goes on sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to their office. If their primary e-mail account is on another server then I just use a Custom Recipient. Ken --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate forwarding mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and then it's the proverbial kicking screaming digging my heels into the floor scenario before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through Exchange Admin, or mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.
RE: OWA Apology
You can keep your ducks up in NY. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Apology Heck, I owe beer and apologies to just about everybody on this list and the others. How about I buy you a six-quack and we call it even? -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Apology Don't you owe me like 30 of those things now? Why not combine that into a 12 pack of Sam Adams or Shiner Bock and get it over with. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Apology Luckily, you prefer Coors Lite, so it wont cost him that much. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Apology Are you going to the MEC? If you are, that's a lot of beer you're buying. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Apology I wanted to apologize to all those who were on the OWA SSL thread a few weeks ago. My contribution was that you can force SSL without a cert, but I discovered today that I was wrong. I used to run OWA on my web server, which has a cert, although not exclusively for OWA. When I installed my new Exchange server this weekend and moved OWA, I realized that I could not use SSL.yet. I just wanted to express my sincere apologies for siding with the wrong answer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA Apology
OK. I'll settle for a bottle of Jack Daniels. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OWA Apology Actually, I am not even sure who you are, so you get jack!! *wink I was a contributer to that thread, not the creator, so my apology was not to whoever was right, but the poor soul I may have confused. - Original Message - From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:48 PM Subject: RE: OWA Apology Don't you owe me like 30 of those things now? Why not combine that into a 12 pack of Sam Adams or Shiner Bock and get it over with. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Apology Luckily, you prefer Coors Lite, so it wont cost him that much. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Apology Are you going to the MEC? If you are, that's a lot of beer you're buying. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Apology I wanted to apologize to all those who were on the OWA SSL thread a few weeks ago. My contribution was that you can force SSL without a cert, but I discovered today that I was wrong. I used to run OWA on my web server, which has a cert, although not exclusively for OWA. When I installed my new Exchange server this weekend and moved OWA, I realized that I could not use SSL.yet. I just wanted to express my sincere apologies for siding with the wrong answer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA Apology
Title: RE: OWA Apology I'm the poor soul that started the thread and I was confused to begin with. Apology accepted (though not needed). I appreciated everyone's help. Now, if I had known there was a possibility of free beer... Steve -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OWA Apology Actually, I am not even sure who you are, so you get jack!! *wink I was a contributer to that thread, not the creator, so my apology was not to whoever was right, but the poor soul I may have confused. - Original Message - From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:48 PM Subject: RE: OWA Apology Don't you owe me like 30 of those things now? Why not combine that into a 12 pack of Sam Adams or Shiner Bock and get it over with. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Apology Luckily, you prefer Coors Lite, so it wont cost him that much. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Apology Are you going to the MEC? If you are, that's a lot of beer you're buying. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Apology I wanted to apologize to all those who were on the OWA SSL thread a few weeks ago. My contribution was that you can force SSL without a cert, but I discovered today that I was wrong. I used to run OWA on my web server, which has a cert, although not exclusively for OWA. When I installed my new Exchange server this weekend and moved OWA, I realized that I could not use SSL.yet. I just wanted to express my sincere apologies for siding with the wrong answer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Changing legacyExchangeDN on a user account
Funny? I thought it was hilarious! Aside from forgetting to type unsubscribe, did you have anything useful in your email that you were about to hit send on? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 5:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing legacyExchangeDN on a user account Very funny -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 6:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing legacyExchangeDN on a user account Dont forget to type unsubscribe in the message body before you do that. -Original Message- From: Precht, David N. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 5:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing legacyExchangeDN on a user account I was just about to hit send. -Original Message- From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 17:22 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing legacyExchangeDN on a user account XADM: Move Mailbox Informational Messages List the legacyExchangeDN Attribute of Source and Destination Information Store (Q264391) ... XADM: Move Mailbox Informational Messages List the legacyExchangeDN Attribute of Source and Destination Information Store. XADM: Move Mailbox ... XADM: How to Change the legacyExchangeDN Attribute in Native Mode with ADSI Edit (Q273863) If the legacyExchangeDN attribute of your original administrative group contains an OU value of anything except First Administrative Group, you must change the legacyExchangeDN values of several system objects on your recovery server before restored XADM: Cannot Publish Outlook Free and Busy Information Because Mailbox Reconnect Forces legacyExchangeDN Delimeters to Uppercase Letters (Q288564) ... Publish Outlook Free and Busy Information Because Mailbox Reconnect Forces legacyExchangeDN Delimeters to Uppercase Letters. XADM: Cannot Publish Outlook Free and ... XADM: You Cannot Generate an Offline Address List and an Event ID 9126 Error Message Is Logged (Q318237) ... find details, address, or display templates because of an incorrect legacyExchangeDN value. During an unsuccessful installation of or removal of Exchange ... XADM: Minimum Permissions Necessary to Perform Exchange 2000 Server-related Tasks (Q316792) ... attributes on the user object: autoReplyMessage adminDisplayName dLMemDefault homeMDB homeMTA legacyExchangeDN mail mailNickname mAPIRecipient mDBUseDefaults msExchADCGlobalNames msExchControllingZone msExchFBURL msExchHideFromAddressLists msExchHomeServerName msExchMailboxGuid ... XADM: How to Enable Disabled Accounts That the ADC Creates (Q316047) ... to match the mailbox with already has mail attributes. The legacyExchangeDN attribute of the user also does not match the Exchange ... XADM: InterOrg Replication Utility Does Not Replicate Free-and-Busy Information (Q316022) ... be identical. In addition, either the ExchangeDN attribute or the legacyExchangeDN attribute of the free-and-busy user must exist, and it must ... XADM: Mailboxes Do Not Replicate from Active Directory to Exchange Server 5.5 (Q313212) ... CN=,OU=,DC=,DC=com because it does not have a legacyExchangeDN for the site it belongs in.( Connection Agreement'' #1288) This ... XADM: ADClean Sets msExchMasterAccountSID Attribute on Enabled Users (Q309222) ... attempts to convert a Microsoft Windows NT Security Identifier( SID) to a legacyExchangeDN. Only disabled users should have the msExchMasterAccountSID attribute set. This ... XADM: Workarounds for Problems with Mbconn.exe (Q301585) This article describes workarounds for the following known problems in Mbconn version 6.0.4417: Mbconn sets uppercase legacyExchangeDN delimiters, which causes Outlook clients to be unable to publish their free/busy information. Mbconn suddenly quits HOWTO: Programmatically Create Offline Address Books in Exchange 2000 (Q300123) ... the first SetInfo call when you are creating the object): legacyExchangeDN- A single-valued distinguished name attribute that stores the legacyExchangeDN of the ... XADM: Mail to Offline Address Book Users Is Returned with a Non-Delivery Report (Q297471) ... again. server.domain.com #5.1.0 This issue can occur if the user 's legacyExchangeDN attribute is stored in all uppercase letters in Active Directory ... XADM: Requirements for Disabling the Recipient Update Service (Q296479) ... set the following attributes on all mail-enabled or mailbox-enabled objects: legacyExchangeDN proxyAddresses textEncodedORAddress mail mailNickname displayName The following is a brief explanation ... XADM: Windows 2000 Contacts and Users (Q233209) ... displayName: jdoe; 1 mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 1 givenName: John; 1 instanceType: 4; 1 lastLogoff: 0; 1 lastLogon: 0; 1 legacyExchangeDN: /o=or1/ou=first administrative group/cn=Recipients/cn=jdoe; 1 logonCount ...
RE: Changing legacyExchangeDN on a user account
The High Road??? Which road is that? I like to take the road less and most traveled myself... Which do you prefer? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing legacyExchangeDN on a user account Take the high road, David, and don't validate those kind of posts by responding. :o) -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 2:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing legacyExchangeDN on a user account Very funny -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 6:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing legacyExchangeDN on a user account Dont forget to type unsubscribe in the message body before you do that. -Original Message- From: Precht, David N. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 5:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing legacyExchangeDN on a user account I was just about to hit send. -Original Message- From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 17:22 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Changing legacyExchangeDN on a user account XADM: Move Mailbox Informational Messages List the legacyExchangeDN Attribute of Source and Destination Information Store (Q264391) ... XADM: Move Mailbox Informational Messages List the legacyExchangeDN Attribute of Source and Destination Information Store. XADM: Move Mailbox ... XADM: How to Change the legacyExchangeDN Attribute in Native Mode with ADSI Edit (Q273863) If the legacyExchangeDN attribute of your original administrative group contains an OU value of anything except First Administrative Group, you must change the legacyExchangeDN values of several system objects on your recovery server before restored XADM: Cannot Publish Outlook Free and Busy Information Because Mailbox Reconnect Forces legacyExchangeDN Delimeters to Uppercase Letters (Q288564) ... Publish Outlook Free and Busy Information Because Mailbox Reconnect Forces legacyExchangeDN Delimeters to Uppercase Letters. XADM: Cannot Publish Outlook Free and ... XADM: You Cannot Generate an Offline Address List and an Event ID 9126 Error Message Is Logged (Q318237) ... find details, address, or display templates because of an incorrect legacyExchangeDN value. During an unsuccessful installation of or removal of Exchange ... XADM: Minimum Permissions Necessary to Perform Exchange 2000 Server-related Tasks (Q316792) ... attributes on the user object: autoReplyMessage adminDisplayName dLMemDefault homeMDB homeMTA legacyExchangeDN mail mailNickname mAPIRecipient mDBUseDefaults msExchADCGlobalNames msExchControllingZone msExchFBURL msExchHideFromAddressLists msExchHomeServerName msExchMailboxGuid ... XADM: How to Enable Disabled Accounts That the ADC Creates (Q316047) ... to match the mailbox with already has mail attributes. The legacyExchangeDN attribute of the user also does not match the Exchange ... XADM: InterOrg Replication Utility Does Not Replicate Free-and-Busy Information (Q316022) ... be identical. In addition, either the ExchangeDN attribute or the legacyExchangeDN attribute of the free-and-busy user must exist, and it must ... XADM: Mailboxes Do Not Replicate from Active Directory to Exchange Server 5.5 (Q313212) ... CN=,OU=,DC=,DC=com because it does not have a legacyExchangeDN for the site it belongs in.( Connection Agreement'' #1288) This ... XADM: ADClean Sets msExchMasterAccountSID Attribute on Enabled Users (Q309222) ... attempts to convert a Microsoft Windows NT Security Identifier( SID) to a legacyExchangeDN. Only disabled users should have the msExchMasterAccountSID attribute set. This ... XADM: Workarounds for Problems with Mbconn.exe (Q301585) This article describes workarounds for the following known problems in Mbconn version 6.0.4417: Mbconn sets uppercase legacyExchangeDN delimiters, which causes Outlook clients to be unable to publish their free/busy information. Mbconn suddenly quits HOWTO: Programmatically Create Offline Address Books in Exchange 2000 (Q300123) ... the first SetInfo call when you are creating the object): legacyExchangeDN- A single-valued distinguished name attribute that stores the legacyExchangeDN of the ... XADM: Mail to Offline Address Book Users Is Returned with a Non-Delivery Report (Q297471) ... again. server.domain.com #5.1.0 This issue can occur if the user 's legacyExchangeDN attribute is stored in all uppercase letters in Active Directory ... XADM: Requirements for Disabling the Recipient Update Service (Q296479) ... set the following attributes on all mail-enabled or mailbox-enabled objects: legacyExchangeDN proxyAddresses textEncodedORAddress mail mailNickname displayName The following is a brief explanation ... XADM: Windows 2000
RE: Exchange dilemma
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 and AD
Title: Message You will need to move ldap in ex55 from 389 to another port. Using the ADC to auto populate will help you manage mailboxes from AD Users -Original Message-From: Nickolaos Fotopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 5.5 and AD I now have Exchange 5.5 on a 2000 server.When I upgrade the domain to 2000, will there be any issues with this exchange setup. Will Exchange 5.5 interact/effect/monkey wrench any thing in the 2000 Active Directory? Thanks, NickList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Klez article
Title: RE: OWA Apology I write a monthly column for our company newsletter on computer issues. We're not a computer company and our user base is a bit uneducated, so I try to write in basic, naive user terms. This month's column will cover Klez. Since Klez seems to be as much a social issue as a computer problem, I find I'm always explaining the crazy thing. If any of you have a use forthe column,I posted it at http://www.wrightbg.com/private/klez.htm Steve List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Exchange dilemma
I personally prefer Ball Peen - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:25 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Yeah I like ball peen as well. Ok actually I just like saying Ball peen. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Re: Exchange dilemma I personally prefer Ball Peen - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:25 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Klez article
Title: RE: OWA Apology Your users actually read things that you write that is more than 5 lines, is in Times New Roman, and is not HTML based? I send these emails out to try and educate my users and I can not get them to read them!! In an effort to better serve the employees of SARMA, ISD will begin sending out little tips now and then to try to make your work a little easier. These will be small blurbs about shortcuts, easy navigation, and other helpful everyday items. We hope that you find them useful. TODAY'S TIP: EMAIL Did you know?? If you want to send an email to another employee of SARMA, all you need to do is type in their name? You do NOT need to enter the email address! For example, to send BillyHammerhead an email, you do NOT need to type [EMAIL PROTECTED]! All you need to type is: Billy. Yep, that is it!! The server will do the rest for you when you hit send. This even works for your Contacts! You can use this tip in the web mail application (http://mail.sarma.com) and in Outlook too. Try it! NOTE: The Contacts portion does NOT work in web mail (http://mail.sarma.com) but SARMA names do work. - Original Message - From: Steve Hart To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:38 PM Subject: Klez article I write a monthly column for our company newsletter on computer issues. We're not a computer company and our user base is a bit uneducated, so I try to write in basic, naive user terms. This month's column will cover Klez. Since Klez seems to be as much a social issue as a computer problem, I find I'm always explaining the crazy thing. If any of you have a use forthe column,I posted it at http://www.wrightbg.com/private/klez.htm Steve List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Exchange dilemma
Heh, yeah that is a cool word...heh heh - Original Message - From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:39 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Yeah I like ball peen as well. Ok actually I just like saying Ball peen. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange dilemma I personally prefer Ball Peen - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:25 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma Plan for sysamdin/exchadmin stress relief after dealing with HMUs to comply with official OSHA stress relief standards: 1. Take piece of foam that is approx 6x5 and at least 3 inches thick (Note, the thicker the foam the better the results will be) 2. Take 4 pieces of velcro/duct tape/scotch tape, any kind of adhesive will do 3. Tape foam from #1 and adhesive from #2 and attach foam to wall at forehead height level. (Note, may need to have multiple pieces of foam a various heights for the range in height of admins who will be using stress relief ) 4. Stand stressed admin in front of foam and have him/her beat head against wall. 5. No need for psychiatrist bill 6. Make management happy by saving on HMO medical costs 7. Make stressed admin a little happier 8. This stress relief method replaces the afore mentioned hammer/sledge hammer vs HMU's method of stress relief 9. Have a nice day! Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
10 pound tweaking tool. The DEC engineers used to carry around a rubber mallet weighted with sand that was their tweaking tool. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Ahh yes, otherwise known as the persuader. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma 10 pound tweaking tool. The DEC engineers used to carry around a rubber mallet weighted with sand that was their tweaking tool. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Exchange dilemma
Jim, you only weigh 10 pounds? Wow, I thought Spudd Webb retired - Original Message - From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Ahh yes, otherwise known as the persuader. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma 10 pound tweaking tool. The DEC engineers used to carry around a rubber mallet weighted with sand that was their tweaking tool. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
FW: Klez article
Title: RE: OWA Apology I concur with your sentiments... I really like your format, it's a shame people don't take the time to read... I send Virus Warnings, even to employees home addresses that I know, I try to setup short training sessions on specific topics I get "dumb-user" questions about all the time, etc. etc. etc. Normally I find my messages, Unread in people's Deleted Items when I'm trying to help them figure out why they're out of the allotted space for each mailbox on the server. It can be frustrating. Thanks for listening Desiree -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:45 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Klez article Your users actually read things that you write that is more than 5 lines, is in Times New Roman, and is not HTML based? I send these emails out to try and educate my users and I can not get them to read them!! - Original Message - From: Steve Hart To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:38 PM Subject: Klez article I write a monthly column for our company newsletter on computer issues. We're not a computer company and our user base is a bit uneducated, so I try to write in basic, naive user terms. This month's column will cover Klez. Since Klez seems to be as much a social issue as a computer problem, I find I'm always explaining the crazy thing. If any of you have a use forthe column,I posted it at http://www.wrightbg.com/private/klez.htm Steve List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Only certain parts of me weigh ten pounds... -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange dilemma Jim, you only weigh 10 pounds? Wow, I thought Spudd Webb retired - Original Message - From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Ahh yes, otherwise known as the persuader. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma 10 pound tweaking tool. The DEC engineers used to carry around a rubber mallet weighted with sand that was their tweaking tool. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Lucky for you there is only one of them. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 3:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Only certain parts of me weigh ten pounds... -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange dilemma Jim, you only weigh 10 pounds? Wow, I thought Spudd Webb retired - Original Message - From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Ahh yes, otherwise known as the persuader. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma 10 pound tweaking tool. The DEC engineers used to carry around a rubber mallet weighted with sand that was their tweaking tool. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Klez article
Title: RE: OWA Apology Thanks Matthew. I just sent out an email to my users with your column attached. I get emails asking me about it and why they are getting it. So this is really helpful. Thanks you! paul green seattle -Original Message-From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Posted At: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:55 AMPosted To: Exchange 2000 ServerConversation: Klez articleSubject: FW: Klez article I concur with your sentiments... I really like your format, it's a shame people don't take the time to read... I send Virus Warnings, even to employees home addresses that I know, I try to setup short training sessions on specific topics I get "dumb-user" questions about all the time, etc. etc. etc. Normally I find my messages, Unread in people's Deleted Items when I'm trying to help them figure out why they're out of the allotted space for each mailbox on the server. It can be frustrating. Thanks for listening Desiree -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:45 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Klez article Your users actually read things that you write that is more than 5 lines, is in Times New Roman, and is not HTML based? I send these emails out to try and educate my users and I can not get them to read them!! - Original Message - From: Steve Hart To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:38 PM Subject: Klez article I write a monthly column for our company newsletter on computer issues. We're not a computer company and our user base is a bit uneducated, so I try to write in basic, naive user terms. This month's column will cover Klez. Since Klez seems to be as much a social issue as a computer problem, I find I'm always explaining the crazy thing. If any of you have a use forthe column,I posted it at http://www.wrightbg.com/private/klez.htm Steve List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ---Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.372 / Virus Database: 207 - Release Date: 6/20/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.372 / Virus Database: 207 - Release Date: 6/20/2002
RE: Exchange dilemma
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma I concur, this is exactly what I do, and I don't think I've seen it so just so you don't irritate anyone with outside addresses coming up in your Global Address List, in the Advanced Tab of the Mailbox Properties Hide the Custom Recipient you create from the Address List. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Only when they have absorbed alcohol. And I'd tell you that my ego is much larger than that, but modesty is one of my best qualities. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 3:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hmm, egos can weight that much? -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 3:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Only certain parts of me weigh ten pounds... -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange dilemma Jim, you only weigh 10 pounds? Wow, I thought Spudd Webb retired - Original Message - From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Ahh yes, otherwise known as the persuader. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma 10 pound tweaking tool. The DEC engineers used to carry around a rubber mallet weighted with sand that was their tweaking tool. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Use the Schwartz, Luke. Spaceballs - 1987 - Mel Brooks -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Only certain parts of me weigh ten pounds... -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange dilemma Jim, you only weigh 10 pounds? Wow, I thought Spudd Webb retired - Original Message - From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Ahh yes, otherwise known as the persuader. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma 10 pound tweaking tool. The DEC engineers used to carry around a rubber mallet weighted with sand that was their tweaking tool. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Klez article
Title: RE: OWA Apology You stripped my company info right? - Original Message - From: Paul Green To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:03 PM Subject: RE: Klez article Thanks Matthew. I just sent out an email to my users with your column attached. I get emails asking me about it and why they are getting it. So this is really helpful. Thanks you! paul green seattle -Original Message-From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Posted At: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:55 AMPosted To: Exchange 2000 ServerConversation: Klez articleSubject: FW: Klez article I concur with your sentiments... I really like your format, it's a shame people don't take the time to read... I send Virus Warnings, even to employees home addresses that I know, I try to setup short training sessions on specific topics I get "dumb-user" questions about all the time, etc. etc. etc. Normally I find my messages, Unread in people's Deleted Items when I'm trying to help them figure out why they're out of the allotted space for each mailbox on the server. It can be frustrating. Thanks for listening Desiree -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:45 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Klez article Your users actually read things that you write that is more than 5 lines, is in Times New Roman, and is not HTML based? I send these emails out to try and educate my users and I can not get them to read them!! - Original Message - From: Steve Hart To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:38 PM Subject: Klez article I write a monthly column for our company newsletter on computer issues. We're not a computer company and our user base is a bit uneducated, so I try to write in basic, naive user terms. This month's column will cover Klez. Since Klez seems to be as much a social issue as a computer problem, I find I'm always explaining the crazy thing. If any of you have a use forthe column,I posted it at http://www.wrightbg.com/private/klez.htm Steve List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ---Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.372 / Virus Database: 207 - Release Date: 6/20/2002List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.372 / Virus Database: 207 - Release Date: 6/20/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Wanted: Plain text email client
Title: Message Or check out: http://www.williamlogan.org/FreewareIndex/EMailClients.html or http://www.tinyapps.org/internet.html -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 4:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Wanted: Plain text email client pegasus maybe? www.pmail.com Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Rob Wilcox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 1:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Wanted: Plain text email client Hi folks, I just wondered if someone could recommend a really straight forward simple email client, which handles plain text emails. I don't want it to be able to do HTML mail, either sending or receiving. Thanks RobList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Title: Message Oh yeah, I always hide the custom recipient. Thanks for bringing that point up Desiree. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange dilemma I concur, this is exactly what I do, and I don't think I've seen it so just so you don't irritate anyone with outside addresses coming up in your Global Address List, in the Advanced Tab of the Mailbox Properties Hide the Custom Recipient you create from the Address List. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Title: Message Hey, just want to apologize for calling it "Special Recipient" a few zillion posts ago, hope I didn't confuse anyone, and yes, it is good to hide it. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 15:26To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange dilemma Oh yeah, I always hide the custom recipient. Thanks for bringing that point up Desiree. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange dilemma I concur, this is exactly what I do, and I don't think I've seen it so just so you don't irritate anyone with outside addresses coming up in your Global Address List, in the Advanced Tab of the Mailbox Properties Hide the Custom Recipient you create from the Address List. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Klez article
Thank you! - Mark W. Harrison Support Specialist Genesistems, Inc. - Computer and Telephone Systems Celebrating Our 25th Year of Custom Systems Integration (585) 475-9180 x 210 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Steve Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 02:38 PM Subject: Klez article I write a monthly column for our company newsletter on computer issues. We're not a computer company and our user base is a bit uneducated, so I try to write in basic, naive user terms. This month's column will cover Klez. Since Klez seems to be as much a social issue as a computer problem, I find I'm always explaining the crazy thing. If any of you have a use for the column, I posted it at http://www.wrightbg.com/private/klez.htm http://www.wrightbg.com/private/klez.htm Steve List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Grrrrrrrrr I know we have gone over this
but the archives are a bit overgrown to weed right now. I have about 5 mailboxes that I still need to move to my new server. Every one of them gets stuck when I do a move mailbox. I tried exmerge, and it gets stuck too. To get this resolved, I was considering recreating the mailboxes on the new server and restoring from tape (the old piece of crap did BLBs). Is that a valid solution gurus? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Grrrrrrrrr I know we have gone over this
what about just opening the mailbox up in outlook, then backing it up to PST rather than using exmerge? then just import than back to the new server... does that work? or does the entire pst creating process (no matter which method) crap the bed all the time? Paul -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:15 PM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: Gr I know we have gone over this Subject: Gr I know we have gone over this but the archives are a bit overgrown to weed right now. I have about 5 mailboxes that I still need to move to my new server. Every one of them gets stuck when I do a move mailbox. I tried exmerge, and it gets stuck too. To get this resolved, I was considering recreating the mailboxes on the new server and restoring from tape (the old piece of crap did BLBs). Is that a valid solution gurus? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.372 / Virus Database: 207 - Release Date: 6/20/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.372 / Virus Database: 207 - Release Date: 6/20/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Grrrrrrrrr I know we have gone over this
Turn off the antivirus? W -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Gr I know we have gone over this but the archives are a bit overgrown to weed right now. I have about 5 mailboxes that I still need to move to my new server. Every one of them gets stuck when I do a move mailbox. I tried exmerge, and it gets stuck too. To get this resolved, I was considering recreating the mailboxes on the new server and restoring from tape (the old piece of crap did BLBs). Is that a valid solution gurus? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Reoccurring meetings broken after migration?
Background: We recently split off as a new company. The old company used Exchange 5.5. We created a new Exchange 2000 org (different org name) and migrated everyone over a weekend using MailMig and Exmerge when necessary. Problem: People with reoccurring meetings do not have access as meeting organizers to change or delete them. The organizer shows as their old X400 address (/o=org...) from before the migration. How do I give them access to their meetings? -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Trail for mail popped and routed
Apologies for the thread hijack - I forgot to rename the subject. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Trail for mail popped and routed
Background: We recently split off as a new company. The old company used Exchange 5.5. We created a new Exchange 2000 org (different org name) and migrated everyone over a weekend using MailMig and Exmerge when necessary. Problem: People with reoccurring meetings do not have access as meeting organizers to change or delete them. The organizer shows as their old X400 address (/o=org...) from before the migration. How do I give them access to their meetings? -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: GRRRRRRRRRR Update
It is FINALLY taking a Move Mailbox on some of these guys I had left. I rebooted 3 times, and verified that all MS Exch services started up (some just stopped starting on startup) and verified that AV was off. I have moved 2 so far, but it is freaking slow. I am not sure what is going on, but I will be glad when this freak is laid to rest. Event log has nothing in it but a few network connection errors, which is rather odd. I am not sure what is causing this evil thing, but I am moving these boxes and jumping ship! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
OWA Default page can not be dispalyed.
Configuration: Windows 2000 Server SP2 Exchange 2000 SP2 Certificate installed. If a user tries to see the OWA default page they get the page cannot be displayed message, this is something that started to happen a couple days ago, usually they are able to go to this unsecured page and then when they click to login they get the login to access the SSL site. For example: I go to http://mysite.com and I get the page cannot be displayed message. If I type https://mysite.com I get to the page with no problems. I know that regular http connections are made over port 80 and SSL connections use port 443 I spoke to the person in charge of the firewalland they told me that nothing has been changed. I am also able to access the default page with no problems within our intranet. Does anyone know what could be causing this problem? Thank you, Juan Rosas List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: OWA Default page can not be dispalyed.
Looks like someone changed the IIS settings to force SSL. They should be using SSL anyway. There is not a problem from what I can see. You do not want them accessing mail over port 80. If it is really a problem, I would add a redirector such as meta http-equiv="REFRESH" content="0; URL=https://www.hoobeejoobee.com/exchange" so that users do not complain about the "error page". GL - Original Message - From: Juan Rosas To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 4:26 PM Subject: OWA Default page can not be dispalyed. Configuration: Windows 2000 Server SP2 Exchange 2000 SP2 Certificate installed. If a user tries to see the OWA default page they get the page cannot be displayed message, this is something that started to happen a couple days ago, usually they are able to go to this unsecured page and then when they click to login they get the login to access the SSL site. For example: I go to http://mysite.com and I get the page cannot be displayed message. If I type https://mysite.com I get to the page with no problems. I know that regular http connections are made over port 80 and SSL connections use port 443 I spoke to the person in charge of the firewalland they told me that nothing has been changed. I am also able to access the default page with no problems within our intranet. Does anyone know what could be causing this problem? Thank you, Juan Rosas List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: GRRRRRRRRRR Update
Matthew... did you check your bandwitch/throughput rates? Are the NICS on the server set to auto-negotiate on CISCO switches? We've had massive problems in the past with auto-neg. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 5:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: GRR Update It is FINALLY taking a Move Mailbox on some of these guys I had left. I rebooted 3 times, and verified that all MS Exch services started up (some just stopped starting on startup) and verified that AV was off. I have moved 2 so far, but it is freaking slow. I am not sure what is going on, but I will be glad when this freak is laid to rest. Event log has nothing in it but a few network connection errors, which is rather odd. I am not sure what is causing this evil thing, but I am moving these boxes and jumping ship! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Allowing access for....
This is made by www.sperrysoftware.com. Seems to work well except that it only works for 10 minutes at a time (which will remove, say, 200 duplicates from a folder that has tens of thousands) because of this Outlook restriction. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 9:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Allowing access for Sounds like an interesting program. Who makes it ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Allowing access for Hi guys, I've got an add-in program that removes duplicates from a folder. Only problem is that Outlook 2000 (SR2) only gives me the options of allowing this program access to the folder for one minute, two minutes, 5 minutes or 10 minutes. I would like to set this thing to run overnight, so I'd like, maybe, a 10 hour option? Is there any way of changing the value of these options? I checked the registry and the MSKB, but didn't find anything off the bat. Thanks, Evan List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Allowing access for....
Hi Steve, Thanks for the reply. I'm taking a look for this at slipstick... Thanks, Evan -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Allowing access for Free utility called click yes will do this for you. You can find this and other utilities at Slipstick. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Allowing access for Hi guys, I've got an add-in program that removes duplicates from a folder. Only problem is that Outlook 2000 (SR2) only gives me the options of allowing this program access to the folder for one minute, two minutes, 5 minutes or 10 minutes. I would like to set this thing to run overnight, so I'd like, maybe, a 10 hour option? Is there any way of changing the value of these options? I checked the registry and the MSKB, but didn't find anything off the bat. Thanks, Evan List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
