RE: Whitespace Questions

[Missy Koslosky]

The 75GB limit is only for .edb files (not .stm), and does not take white space 
into account. You have less than 5 GB of space left.

The good news is that Exchange will use the white space for new data before it 
physically grows the .edb. So you should be safe for a while.

Missy

From: Chris Pohlschneider
Sent: 11/16/2011 12:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Whitespace Questions

Hello,


I have a customer that has Exchange 2003 SP2 Standard Edition. Their edb file 
is 70.7GB and the STM file is 19.1GB. The amount of whitespace that is being 
reported by Event ID1221 is saying there is 17.2GB of whitespace in the 
database. If I understand this correctly, you add the size of the edb file and 
stm file and subtract the whitespace and that gives you the actual size of the 
DB since whitespace is being taken into consideration. Just making sure this is 
the case since this is Exchange 2003 Standard Edition SP2 and they are subject 
to the 75GB limit.

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Whitespace Questions

[Missy Koslosky]

Teach me to respond to a question about a version I haven't touched in over 
five years. Thanks

From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 9:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Whitespace Questions

Sorry Missy, you are wrong on both counts.
The database limit is the total of both files and does count the whitespace as 
part of the 75gb limit.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa998066(EXCHG.65).aspx
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/828070


Simon.


--
Simon Butler
MVP: Exchange, MCSE
Sembee Ltd.

e: si...@sembee.co.ukmailto:si...@sembee.co.uk
w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/
w: http://exchange.sembee.info/
w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/

Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with the iPhone?
http://CertificatesForExchange.com/http://certificatesforexchange.com/ for 
certificates from just $26.99.
Need a domain for your certificate? 
http://DomainsForExchange.net/http://domainsforexchange.net/

Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/



From: Missy Koslosky 
[mailto:mi...@notsoclever.com]mailto:[mailto:mi...@notsoclever.com]
Sent: 21 November 2011 13:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Whitespace Questions

The 75GB limit is only for .edb files (not .stm), and does not take white space 
into account. You have less than 5 GB of space left.

The good news is that Exchange will use the white space for new data before it 
physically grows the .edb. So you should be safe for a while.

Missy

From: Chris Pohlschneider
Sent: 11/16/2011 12:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Whitespace Questions
Hello,


I have a customer that has Exchange 2003 SP2 Standard Edition. Their edb file 
is 70.7GB and the STM file is 19.1GB. The amount of whitespace that is being 
reported by Event ID1221 is saying there is 17.2GB of whitespace in the 
database. If I understand this correctly, you add the size of the edb file and 
stm file and subtract the whitespace and that gives you the actual size of the 
DB since whitespace is being taken into consideration. Just making sure this is 
the case since this is Exchange 2003 Standard Edition SP2 and they are subject 
to the 75GB limit.

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: DAG Question

[Missy Koslosky]

But of the WAN link goes down between site A and site B, and both sites can 
still talk to the fsw in site C, you could potentially end up with a split 
brain DAG, which is Very Bad Mojo.

Missy

On Oct 26, 2011, at 3:34 PM, Young, Philip 
philip.yo...@covance.commailto:philip.yo...@covance.com wrote:

Ok apologies to both you and John, I probably didn’t give enough info. My goal 
is to make sure what is planned works but I was not privy to early design 
meetings. The design is being proposed by a consultant/architect. I queried it 
and received the following reply

Plan is for 8 member DAG split 4/4 between sites a and b. FSW will be housed in 
site C. This way if there's a site outage, surviving side will be able to 
contact FSW.

If site a is down/unavailable and sites b and c are both up can quorum not be 
achieved that way.?

Regards

Phil


From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 26 October 2011 19:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question

The question doesn’t compute. :)

The issue, as I believe another poster pointed out, is that reaching quorum is 
impossible with an even number of live servers that don’t have access to the 
FSW. The cluster will go offline.

Warning: I don’t know your design goals.

Based on what little information I have, I would tend to suggest you have two 
DAGs, keeping the same server distribution. Site A has two servers for DAG-1, 
site B has two servers for DAG-1, the FSW for site A is in site A. Reverse that 
for DAG-2 being homed in site B.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Young, Philip [mailto:philip.yo...@covance.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question

Ok thanks Michael. One reason for posting my question was that I could not find 
anyone else who had done it this way.
I was told the reasoning behind this is that if even if we lost site A we would 
still have the 3 members in site B plus the fsw in Site C. is that logic flawed?
Can you be more specific about what quorum issues we might face?
BTW the intention is to have active mailboxes in both sites A and B. we are at 
the design/test phase so not written in stone yet.

Regards
Phil


From: Michael B. Smith 
[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]mailto:%5bmailto:mich...@smithcons.com%5d
Sent: 26 October 2011 14:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question

Yes. That could lead you to having quorum issues.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.comhttp://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Young, Philip 
[mailto:philip.yo...@covance.com]mailto:%5bmailto:philip.yo...@covance.com%5d
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 9:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: DAG Question

We are planning an Exchange 2010 rollout and plan an 8-node DAG with 4 members 
in Site A and 4 in Site B and the FSW in Site C. Are there any drawbacks with 
doing it this way? Anybody have any good reasons why we shouldn’t do this?
Thanks in advance.


Regards
Phil

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


-
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission
may contain confidential or legally privileged
information that is intended only for the individual
or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance
upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this e-mail transmission in error,
please reply to the sender, so that we can arrange
for proper delivery, and then please delete the message
from your inbox. Thank you.

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 

RE: DAG Question

[Missy Koslosky]

No, your situation isn’t really that different because of the odd number of 
servers. MSFT says that you should keep the FSW local to the primary datacenter 
for the DAG, and use an alternate FSW for the secondary datacenter. Also, 
you’ll want to enable DAC mode - 
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd979790.aspx

Missy

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 10:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question

I’m having real trouble getting my head around this. I’ve implemented – and 
tested – our DAG and it seems to work exactly as I want it to.

*3 nodes in each datacentre (10Gig link between them; call them DC1 and DC2)
* FSW in a third DC (another 10Gig link; DC3)

When I was testing this, we cut off all the Exchange servers in DC1 from the 
network. DC2 mounted its databases fine. When we brought DC1 “back online” they 
didn’t try to mount themselves again (which is what I believe split brain to 
be).

Is my situation quite different to the original poster’s, where I’ve got an odd 
number of nodes in each datacentre? I’m really curious about “misconception 
number 3” from Philip’s link below, as it makes no mention of a witness server 
being available. What if the DC with no connectivity to the primary site did 
have connectivity to the site where the witness server is, for example?)

Sorry – I know this all sounds really dumb ☺

Richard

From: 
bounce-9451031-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:bounce-9451031-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
 
[mailto:bounce-9451031-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]mailto:[mailto:bounce-9451031-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
 On Behalf Of Young, Philip
Sent: 27 October 2011 14:57
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question


Thanks Peter, found the Tech Ed 2010 presentation for this ... useful info.
Also found another link that described the exact scenario of 3rd datacenter and 
why not to do it here 
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2011/05/31/exchange-2010-high-availability-misconceptions-addressed.aspx

Thanks all I believe I now have all I need.

Regards
Phil

From: Peter Johnson [mailto:peter.john...@peterstow.com]
Sent: 27 October 2011 07:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question

Hi Philip

If you can find it online check out Scott Schnoll’s “Mailbox High Availability 
in Exchange 2010” deep dive. It explains it really well. The issue with a 
single DAG solution in this scenario is as someone mentioned “split brain”.

Regards

Peter Johnson
I.T Architect
United Kingdom: +44 1285 658542
South Africa: +27 11 252 1100
Swaziland: +268 2442 7000
Fax:+27 11 974 7130
Mobile: +2783 306 0019
peter.john...@peterstow.commailto:peter.john...@peterstow.com
www.peterstow.comhttp://www.peterstow.com

This email message (including attachments) contains information which may be 
confidential and/or legally privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient, 
you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information 
contained in the message or from any attachments that were sent with this 
email, and If you have received this email message in error, please advise the 
sender by email, and delete the message. Unauthorised disclosure and/or use of 
information contained in this email may result in civil and criminal liability. 
Everything in this e-mail and attachments relating to the official business of 
Peterstow Aquapower is proprietary to the company.

Caution should be observed in placing any reliance upon any information 
contained in this e-mail, which is not intended to be a representation or 
inducement to make any decision in relation to Peterstow Aquapower. Any 
decision taken based on the information provided in this e-mail, should only be 
made after consultation with appropriate legal, regulatory, tax, technical, 
business, investment, financial, and accounting advisors. Neither the sender of 
the e-mail, nor Peterstow Aquapower shall be liable to any party for any 
direct, indirect or consequential damages, including, without limitation, loss 
of profit, interruption of business or loss of information, data or software or 
otherwise.

The e-mail address of the sender may not be used, copied, sold, disclosed or 
incorporated into any database or mailing list for spamming and/or other 
marketing purposes without the prior consent of Peterstow Aquapower.

No warranties are created or implied that an employee of Peterstow Aquapower 
and/or a contractor of Peterstow Aquapower is authorised to create and send 
this e-mail.


From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 26 October 2011 08:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question

The question doesn’t compute. ☺

The issue, as I believe another poster pointed out, is that reaching quorum is 
impossible with an even number of live servers that don’t have access to the 
FSW. The cluster will go offline.

Re: Exchange Powershell Book

[Missy Koslosky]

I dig it.

On Oct 21, 2011, at 7:27 PM, Greg Olson 
gol...@markettools.commailto:gol...@markettools.com wrote:

Good book for pulling out when I need to look something up.


From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 6:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Powershell Book

I was asked to review it, but didn’t have time when I was asked. The intro 
reads well. That’s the only comment I can offer.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.comhttp://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Dave Vantine 
[mailto:dvant...@gmail.com]mailto:[mailto:dvant...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 9:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Powershell Book

Anyone look at your has had a chance to review/use this book.

Microsoft Exch 2010 PowerShell Cookbook by Mik Pfeiffer

Is it worthwhile to add to my library?
--
Thanks
Dave Vantine

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Backup of Exchange 2010

[Missy Koslosky]

You're silly. Michael looks exactly as he's meant to look!

-Original Message-
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] 
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 6:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup of Exchange 2010

Isn't it strange how a picture of someone always looks quite different to how 
you've always imagined them to be :)

-Original Message-
From: bounce-9426881-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
[mailto:bounce-9426881-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of John 
Cook
Sent: 28 September 2011 22:42
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Backup of Exchange 2010

I'll be there! Nice pic on the rotater
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families

- Original Message -
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 05:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Backup of Exchange 2010

Really, what's the chance you are going to detect that before your backups 
expire?

I'm giving a talk on this at Exchange Connections in Vegas at the end of 
October - please attend! (To Backup Or Not To Backup - That Is The Question! - 
that was my working title, they may have renamed it.)

As long as SingleItemRecovery is enabled, your Deleted Item Retention and 
Deleted Mailbox Retention are set to reasonable (for your company) values, and 
you have a DAG copy in a safe location - the need for backups (other than 
making you feel warm and fuzzy) is arguable. Dependent, of course, upon 
specific statutory needs not covered here.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 5:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup of Exchange 2010

And to cover your butt in the unlikely event of a corrupt database.

-Original Message-
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 3:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Backup of Exchange 2010

If I have my mailbox servers setup in a DAG, is the only reason to backup to 
disk/tape to cover the oops, where'd that message go? issues?

If you do backup to disk/tape, what type of retention do you have?  And, yes, I 
know the retention issue is extremely subjective, depending on legal 
requirements, etc.  Just curious.


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
need to.

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist




---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Backup of Exchange 2010

[Missy Koslosky]

Single item recovery doesn't affect the DAG, but it allows users to go back and 
retrieve items that were previously deleted. Think of it as the Exchange 2010 
equivalent of DumpsterAlwaysOn, but with steroids.

-Original Message-
From: Hurley, Leslie L CIV SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 58320 
[mailto:leslie.hur...@navy.mil] 
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 12:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup of Exchange 2010

Michael,

How does SingleItemRecovery effect the DAG? Or what we recovery from the DAG? 
I'm hearing from another MS person that it doesn't...

LH*

Leslie Hurley
Systems Engineer
SPAWAR Atlantic, Security+, Masters of Science CS-IA

Fight Harder, Dig Deeper, Last Longer


-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 17:39
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup of Exchange 2010

Really, what's the chance you are going to detect that before your backups 
expire?

I'm giving a talk on this at Exchange Connections in Vegas at the end of 
October - please attend! (To Backup Or Not To Backup - That Is The Question! - 
that was my working title, they may have renamed it.)

As long as SingleItemRecovery is enabled, your Deleted Item Retention and 
Deleted Mailbox Retention are set to reasonable (for your company) values, and 
you have a DAG copy in a safe location - the need for backups (other than 
making you feel warm and fuzzy) is arguable.
Dependent, of course, upon specific statutory needs not covered here.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 5:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup of Exchange 2010

And to cover your butt in the unlikely event of a corrupt database.

-Original Message-
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 3:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Backup of Exchange 2010

If I have my mailbox servers setup in a DAG, is the only reason to backup to 
disk/tape to cover the oops, where'd that message go?
issues?

If you do backup to disk/tape, what type of retention do you have?  And, yes, I 
know the retention issue is extremely subjective, depending on legal 
requirements, etc.  Just curious.


---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist




---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Steve Szabo

[Missy Koslosky]

This sucks. :(

From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 12:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Steve Szabo

From what I've found out, he thought he was fighting pneumonia back in 
April/May. He was diagnosed with aspergillus, a fungus that formed in the 
lungs and other O2 rich areas (blood for example). He had part of his lung 
removed and was put in a medically induced coma for quite awhile (100 days) 
for his recovery.
Unfortunately, the aspergillus was also covering another illness, which remains 
undisclosed. His wife posted yesterday in the aquarium groups saying that he 
was in good mind right up to his last days.

From: Candee [mailto:can...@gmail.com]mailto:[mailto:can...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 11:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Steve Szabo

Agreed.
:(
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr 
michealespin...@gmail.commailto:michealespin...@gmail.com wrote:
It does.  Sad day indeed...

--
Espi



On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Kim Longenbaugh 
k...@colonialsavings.commailto:k...@colonialsavings.com wrote:
There was no mention of that on the list that I recall.

I hope it's a case of mistaken identity, but that sounds like our Steve to 
me.  Sad day

From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.commailto:korl...@rogers.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 10:30 AM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Steve Szabo

Did I miss this on the list last week (I've been on vacation): 
http://www.foundandsons.com/obituaries/Stephen-Szabo/#/Obituary

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Horked permissions

[Missy Koslosky]

Gracias. That's what I was hoping you wouldn't say. ;)

On May 4, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:

 In Exchange, you re-run forestprep and domainprep (PrepareAD and 
 PrepareAllDomains for the newer setup.com). And yes, it is safe to do so. 
 Given the normal caveats, blah blah blah.
 
 That won't do it for the rest of AD tho. For AD, your three super smart AD 
 people were correct.
 
 Regards,
 
 Michael B. Smith
 Consultant and Exchange MVP
 http://TheEssentialExchange.com
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:mi...@notsoclever.com] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 3:14 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Horked permissions
 
 I have a customer whose permissions are completely horked (technical term) :)
 
 Basically, what I am seeing is that Enterprise Administrators and Domain 
 Admins have been given full permissions on every single thing from the root 
 of each naming context. I have re-added the explicit Deny entries within the 
 configuration NC, but am hesitant to make sweeping changes elsewhere. 
 
 Does anyone know how to reset the default permissions to their original 
 status? My google/bing-Fu is failing me.
 
 I had three super smart AD people respond separately with domain migration 
 at TEC. That is definitely not a response I want to convey to the customer. :)
 
 Exchange 2007, latest SP.
 
 Thanks,
 Missy
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Conference Presentation Suggestions

[Missy Koslosky]

Totally butting in here... Do you have a corrupt index you're fighting with? 
It's pretty easy to whack it and just let it rebuild. Works like a charm. :)

Missy

-Original Message-
From: Alice Goodman [mailto:ali...@mckinstry.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 3:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Conference Presentation Suggestions

Agree with that suggestion as EWS seems more difficult that it should. 

I am still trying to teach Help Desk about Mailbox Management. In addition, how 
much do I worry about corrupt indexes? 

I read my Event Logs daily and figure out what errors are worrisome and what I 
can ignore.  Some that I can ignore are really beastly looking and some that I 
need to not ignore are very understated.  Most of the time clicking on the 
click here for more information goes to a site that says that this 
information is coming soon and don't despair, read here (all of TechNet) and 
you will find the answer. 

Again, most of you who moved to 2007 are over this hump. But the rest of us who 
didn't are newbies and I am asking you to look back at the pain points from 
2007 and assume that those are our pain points as well. 

Alice


-Original Message-
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 5:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Conference Presentation Suggestions

How about something on EWS, geared toward admins and Powershell.

There's a lot of potential in that API, but the available documentation is kind 
of sparse, and mostly geared toward developers and compiled code.

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 2:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Conference Presentation Suggestions

Hello all -

The spring conference season is winding down (TechEd Atlanta being the only 
major show left, I think in NA). That means fall conference season is already 
ramping up, asking for proposals!

What would YOU like to see presented at a conference? (This being an Exchange 
forum, I'm asking primarily about Exchange!)

Note: conference chairs prefer to see new material. That means talking about 
DAGs by this time is old-hat and not likely to be accepted as a proposal - 
unless you have a new and interesting kink.

I'm interested in your ideas so I can figure out what to present this fall!

Any input appreciated.

Thanks.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com



---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,   
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
**



---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist




---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Conference Presentation Suggestions

[Missy Koslosky]

http://msexchangegeek.com/2009/09/09/how-to-manually-rebuild-the-full-text-index-catalog/
 outlines the steps. 

Missy

On Apr 28, 2011, at 6:00 PM, Alice Goodman ali...@mckinstry.com wrote:

 Not sure what the errors were at this point.. will look for them.  Do you 
 have some steps you can share? 
 
 Thanks,
 Alice
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:mi...@notsoclever.com] 
 Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 9:38 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Conference Presentation Suggestions
 
 Totally butting in here... Do you have a corrupt index you're fighting with? 
 It's pretty easy to whack it and just let it rebuild. Works like a charm. :)
 
 Missy
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Alice Goodman [mailto:ali...@mckinstry.com] 
 Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 3:36 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Conference Presentation Suggestions
 
 Agree with that suggestion as EWS seems more difficult that it should. 
 
 I am still trying to teach Help Desk about Mailbox Management. In addition, 
 how much do I worry about corrupt indexes? 
 
 I read my Event Logs daily and figure out what errors are worrisome and what 
 I can ignore.  Some that I can ignore are really beastly looking and some 
 that I need to not ignore are very understated.  Most of the time clicking on 
 the click here for more information goes to a site that says that this 
 information is coming soon and don't despair, read here (all of TechNet) and 
 you will find the answer. 
 
 Again, most of you who moved to 2007 are over this hump. But the rest of us 
 who didn't are newbies and I am asking you to look back at the pain points 
 from 2007 and assume that those are our pain points as well. 
 
 Alice
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] 
 Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 5:48 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Conference Presentation Suggestions
 
 How about something on EWS, geared toward admins and Powershell.
 
 There's a lot of potential in that API, but the available documentation is 
 kind of sparse, and mostly geared toward developers and compiled code.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
 Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 2:01 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Conference Presentation Suggestions
 
 Hello all -
 
 The spring conference season is winding down (TechEd Atlanta being the only 
 major show left, I think in NA). That means fall conference season is already 
 ramping up, asking for proposals!
 
 What would YOU like to see presented at a conference? (This being an Exchange 
 forum, I'm asking primarily about Exchange!)
 
 Note: conference chairs prefer to see new material. That means talking about 
 DAGs by this time is old-hat and not likely to be accepted as a proposal - 
 unless you have a new and interesting kink.
 
 I'm interested in your ideas so I can figure out what to present this fall!
 
 Any input appreciated.
 
 Thanks.
 
 Regards,
 
 Michael B. Smith
 Consultant and Exchange MVP
 http://TheEssentialExchange.com
 
 
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 
 **
 Note: 
 The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
 and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the 
 intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
 message to  
 the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,   
 distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you 
 have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
 replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
 **
 
 
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 
 
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email

Re: Profile update?

[Missy Koslosky]

Check the footer of every message.

On Apr 27, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Castillo, Daniel (Directory Services) 
daniel.casti...@hp.commailto:daniel.casti...@hp.com wrote:

Anyone out there knows who to update my email address here?
I am changing job so I need to stop using this email address.
Thanks!


~d


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Exchange 2003 Database Backup

[Missy Koslosky]

That's not going to work. 

Missy

On Apr 11, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Chris Pohlschneider 
cpohlschnei...@smsprotech.com wrote:

 I mentioned the recovery storage group to the customer, however, for whatever 
 reason they want my company to test it out for them. We would be in a 
 completely separate forest and exchange organization and I was questioning 
 whether this would work or not. Plus we are running Exchange 2007 which does 
 not seem like the issue would be with that. I think the issue from what I am 
 reading is going to be that we are in a separate AD and Exchange Org and I 
 did not know if this is possible or not given those facts about the situation.
 
 
 From: Simon Butler [si...@sembee.co.uk]
 Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 6:37 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Database Backup
 
 Database portability is same version only.
 
 http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb123954(EXCHG.80).aspx
 
 If you just want to test recovering data, mount the database in a recovery 
 storage group on the same server. That is what it is designed for.
 Another server would only need to be used if you are doing DR.
 
 Simon.
 
 
 --
 Simon Butler
 MVP: Exchange, MCSE
 Sembee Ltd.
 
 e: si...@sembee.co.uk
 w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/
 w: http://www.amset.info/
 w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/
 
 Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with the iPhone?
 http://CertificatesForExchange.com/ for certificates from just $26.99.
 Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/
 
 Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
 Sent: 11 April 2011 11:25
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Database Backup
 
 Nah, Database Portability introduced in 2007 allows for any previous
 version to be mounted as far I know as long as the org name is similar.
 jlc
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 10:41 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 Database Backup
 
 Oh, yes. I believe you'll need to restore to the same version of Exchange..
 
 On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 19:15, Chris Pohlschneider
 cpohlschnei...@smsprotech.com wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I have a customer that has Exchange 2003 SP2 Standard Edition running on
 Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition SP2. They are using Windows Backup to
 backup their Exchange Database and logs. The customer would like me to take
 their backup file and then try to mount it on another Exchange Server to
 make sure that it mounts ok and that we can pull some data out of that
 backup if needed. My question is do I need to do this on a Windows Server
 2003 server with Exchange 2003 or will this work on a different version of
 Windows and Exchange (Server 2008 or Exchange 2007/2010)?
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Exchange 2003 Database Backup

[Missy Koslosky]

Works for me. I also am known for not clicking random URLs.  It's quite the 
legacy I'll leave. 

On Apr 11, 2011, at 11:32 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:

 Mistress of the minimum. :-)
 
 Regards,
 
 Michael B. Smith
 Consultant and Exchange MVP
 http://TheEssentialExchange.com
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:mi...@notsoclever.com] 
 Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 11:30 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 Database Backup
 
 That's not going to work. 
 
 Missy
 
 On Apr 11, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Chris Pohlschneider 
 cpohlschnei...@smsprotech.com wrote:
 
 I mentioned the recovery storage group to the customer, however, for 
 whatever reason they want my company to test it out for them. We would be in 
 a completely separate forest and exchange organization and I was questioning 
 whether this would work or not. Plus we are running Exchange 2007 which does 
 not seem like the issue would be with that. I think the issue from what I am 
 reading is going to be that we are in a separate AD and Exchange Org and I 
 did not know if this is possible or not given those facts about the 
 situation.
 
 
 From: Simon Butler [si...@sembee.co.uk]
 Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 6:37 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Database Backup
 
 Database portability is same version only.
 
 http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb123954(EXCHG.80).aspx
 
 If you just want to test recovering data, mount the database in a recovery 
 storage group on the same server. That is what it is designed for.
 Another server would only need to be used if you are doing DR.
 
 Simon.
 
 
 --
 Simon Butler
 MVP: Exchange, MCSE
 Sembee Ltd.
 
 e: si...@sembee.co.uk
 w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/
 w: http://www.amset.info/
 w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/
 
 Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with the iPhone?
 http://CertificatesForExchange.com/ for certificates from just $26.99.
 Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/
 
 Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
 Sent: 11 April 2011 11:25
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Database Backup
 
 Nah, Database Portability introduced in 2007 allows for any previous
 version to be mounted as far I know as long as the org name is similar.
 jlc
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 10:41 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 Database Backup
 
 Oh, yes. I believe you'll need to restore to the same version of Exchange..
 
 On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 19:15, Chris Pohlschneider
 cpohlschnei...@smsprotech.com wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I have a customer that has Exchange 2003 SP2 Standard Edition running on
 Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition SP2. They are using Windows Backup to
 backup their Exchange Database and logs. The customer would like me to take
 their backup file and then try to mount it on another Exchange Server to
 make sure that it mounts ok and that we can pull some data out of that
 backup if needed. My question is do I need to do this on a Windows Server
 2003 server with Exchange 2003 or will this work on a different version of
 Windows and Exchange (Server 2008 or Exchange 2007/2010)?
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 
 
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: OT:ish - I'm beginning to *really* hate OL2010

[Missy Koslosky]

I still miss alti|i on a near daily basis. I hate the damn mouse.

-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 7:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT:ish - I'm beginning to *really* hate OL2010


Really hate it.

Insert a signature OL2003: Alt/i/s/enter
Insert a signature OL2010: Alt/n/a/s/enter

Realio trulio? Change the keystroke sequence *and* make it longer?

It's nearly criminally stupid.

Kurt

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 16:21, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
 Yes, they have.

 And while I HATED the ribbon to start with, I have grown to love it (well, at 
 least to believe that it is a significantly easier paradigm to utilize than 
 the earlier one).

 Regards,

 Michael B. Smith
 Consultant and Exchange MVP
 http://TheEssentialExchange.com


 -Original Message-
 From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 7:12 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: OT:ish - I'm beginning to *really* hate OL2010

 Why should I have to open it? They've removed functionality that's
 been there for nearly 15 years!

 They've basically abandoned the CUA interface design, which is a
 decent UI architecture, in the interest of flash, with no increase in
 functionality.

 grumble...

 They have massively violated POLA:
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/freebsd-glossary.html#POLA-GLOSSARY

 Kurt

 On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 16:01, Don Ely don@gmail.com wrote:
 Why don't you want to open it?  If you're concerned about crap embedded,
 convert in to plain text.  The open the message, go to File and select
 properties...

 On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:

 Sorry, just had to say this...

 rant
 Aside from the fact that they changed (lengthened and obfuscated) the
 keystrokes that I used since, oh, at least OL97, now I can't find the
 headers in an email in my inbox.

 I've got an email that's sitting in my inbox, and I don't want to open
 it, but I want to find the headers.

 I used to be able to open the context menu for the message
 (right-mouse click, or use the Windows context key) and select
 Options, which revealed, among other things, the headers.

 I'm not finding that anywhere, and googling reveals that either I have
 to open the email, or do this:
 http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg622917.aspx

 I think it's long past time we visit the Redmond campus with
 pitchforks and torches.

 I have to build a C# addin to get this info now?

 Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, Over?

 Sheesh.
 /rant

 Kurt

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist




---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Exchange 2007 DR with no transaction logs

[Missy Koslosky]

And do whatever constitutes prayer in your world.

On Mar 26, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Michael B. Smith 
mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com wrote:

You would do an eseutil “repair”.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 12:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 DR with no transaction logs

I managed to get the server online enough to copy the logs off.

Still curious about the what if though..

From: 
bounce-9305943-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:bounce-9305943-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
 [mailto:bounce-9305943-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Sobey, 
Richard A
Sent: 26 March 2011 15:36
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 DR with no transaction logs


All,

In the very real sense that I suddenly find myself in this position, what is 
the best way (or the only way I guess) to recover from a situation where you 
have the EDB file (in dirty shutdown state) but no transaction logs to make it 
consistent?

Richard

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: MSExchange Assistants Events 9017, 9042 and 9025

[Missy Koslosky]

Can you still see the move request in EMC?

Missy

On Mar 22, 2011, at 9:25 PM, Richard Stovall 
rich...@gmail.commailto:rich...@gmail.com wrote:

Thanks.  That didn't seem to do anything.  The warning was still present in the 
Application Log, and the mailbox did not appear in the Disconnected Mailbox 
area of EMC.

When I upgraded the domain to 2008 R2 I enabled the AD Recycle bin, so I went 
and restored the user.  It now shows up under Mailbox in EMC with a Recipient 
Type of User Mailbox.  For grins, I tried to connect to OWA and got the same 
error as the other day.  You weren't able to sign in because the mailbox is 
being moved.  You won't be able to access it until the move is complete.

I'll leave this as is overnight and see tomorrow if the app log warning is 
still there and if the account can login to OWA.

Strange days...


On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Michael B. Smith 
mailto:mich...@smithcons.commich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com
 wrote:
Take a look at “clean-mailboxdatabase”.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.comhttp://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Richard Stovall 
[mailto:mailto:rich...@gmail.comrich...@gmail.commailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 6:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: MSExchange Assistants Events 9017, 9042 and 9025

I installed Exchange 2010 into our existing 2003 organization last weekend.  
I've got a strange error in the Application log that I don't know how to deal 
with.

When I first got 2010 up and running, I created several users with mailboxes on 
the 2003 server to have some accounts and mailboxes for testing.  The first 
mailbox I moved from the 2003 server to 2010 appeared to move OK, but I was 
never able to access the mailbox.  Outlook threw all kinds of errors and OWA 
would not access the mailbox and gave a message to the effect that it wasn't 
available because it was still being moved, which was inaccurate.  I fought 
with it for a while, but would up deleting the user and mailbox and working 
with another of the test users.  Everything has gone fine since the first one, 
and now I've got 2 production user mailboxes on 2010.

The warning in the App log I'm writing about refers back to the deleted 
user/mailbox, and is in event 9042.  The user is specified in 9025, the third 
of the events.  Here they are, in all their delicious glory.

1st - 9017 - Information
Service MSExchangeMailboxAssistants. Calendar Sync Assistant for database 
Mailbox Database 2019011809 (f47f1a87-8e13-4e83-a9a4-4f1a666fccad) is entering 
a work cycle. There are 1 mailboxes on this database.

2nd - 9042 - Warning
Service MSExchangeMailboxAssistants. Calendar Sync Assistant for database 
Mailbox Database 2019011809 (f47f1a87-8e13-4e83-a9a4-4f1a666fccad) is exiting a 
work cycle. No mailboxes were successfully processed. 1 mailboxes were skipped 
due to errors. There are 0 mailboxes in this database.

3rd - 9025 - Information
Service MSExchangeMailboxAssistants. Calendar Sync Assistant skipped 1 
mailboxes on database Mailbox Database 2019011809 
(f47f1a87-8e13-4e83-a9a4-4f1a666fccad). Mailboxes:
Test User(cbaa8fc4-0fb6-4863-8b06-5858c876523d)

Test User is the display name of the affected account.

I thought about creating a new DB, moving the live mailboxes, and deleting the 
current DB, but it seems like a lot of work when there is probably some cleanup 
mechanism available.  If it matters, I deleted the user/mailbox 3 days ago 
using the EMC GUI.

Any thoughts about how to fix this are appreciated.  (Any thoughts about the 
mailbox move weirdness are welcome too.)

Thanks,
RS



---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: MSExchange Assistants Events 9017, 9042 and 9025

[Missy Koslosky]

I would try moving the mailbox to a different database for giggles.

On Mar 23, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Richard Stovall 
rich...@gmail.commailto:rich...@gmail.com wrote:

Good morning,

Yes, the move request reappeared after I restored the account, and the status 
was completed.  I cleared the request last night, however, thinking that might 
help.  Perhaps I should have waited.

This morning the status is the same with both OWA and the 9042 warning in the 
application log.

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Missy Koslosky 
mailto:mi...@notsoclever.commi...@notsoclever.commailto:mi...@notsoclever.com
 wrote:
Can you still see the move request in EMC?

Missy


On Mar 22, 2011, at 9:25 PM, Richard Stovall 
mailto:rich...@gmail.comrich...@gmail.commailto:rich...@gmail.com wrote:

Thanks.  That didn't seem to do anything.  The warning was still present in the 
Application Log, and the mailbox did not appear in the Disconnected Mailbox 
area of EMC.

When I upgraded the domain to 2008 R2 I enabled the AD Recycle bin, so I went 
and restored the user.  It now shows up under Mailbox in EMC with a Recipient 
Type of User Mailbox.  For grins, I tried to connect to OWA and got the same 
error as the other day.  You weren't able to sign in because the mailbox is 
being moved.  You won't be able to access it until the move is complete.

I'll leave this as is overnight and see tomorrow if the app log warning is 
still there and if the account can login to OWA.

Strange days...


On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Michael B. Smith 
mailto:mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.commich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com
 wrote:
Take a look at “clean-mailboxdatabase”.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.comhttp://TheEssentialExchange.comhttp://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Richard Stovall 
[mailto:mailto:rich...@gmail.commailto:rich...@gmail.comrich...@gmail.commailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 6:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: MSExchange Assistants Events 9017, 9042 and 9025

I installed Exchange 2010 into our existing 2003 organization last weekend.  
I've got a strange error in the Application log that I don't know how to deal 
with.

When I first got 2010 up and running, I created several users with mailboxes on 
the 2003 server to have some accounts and mailboxes for testing.  The first 
mailbox I moved from the 2003 server to 2010 appeared to move OK, but I was 
never able to access the mailbox.  Outlook threw all kinds of errors and OWA 
would not access the mailbox and gave a message to the effect that it wasn't 
available because it was still being moved, which was inaccurate.  I fought 
with it for a while, but would up deleting the user and mailbox and working 
with another of the test users.  Everything has gone fine since the first one, 
and now I've got 2 production user mailboxes on 2010.

The warning in the App log I'm writing about refers back to the deleted 
user/mailbox, and is in event 9042.  The user is specified in 9025, the third 
of the events.  Here they are, in all their delicious glory.

1st - 9017 - Information
Service MSExchangeMailboxAssistants. Calendar Sync Assistant for database 
Mailbox Database 2019011809 (f47f1a87-8e13-4e83-a9a4-4f1a666fccad) is entering 
a work cycle. There are 1 mailboxes on this database.

2nd - 9042 - Warning
Service MSExchangeMailboxAssistants. Calendar Sync Assistant for database 
Mailbox Database 2019011809 (f47f1a87-8e13-4e83-a9a4-4f1a666fccad) is exiting a 
work cycle. No mailboxes were successfully processed. 1 mailboxes were skipped 
due to errors. There are 0 mailboxes in this database.

3rd - 9025 - Information
Service MSExchangeMailboxAssistants. Calendar Sync Assistant skipped 1 
mailboxes on database Mailbox Database 2019011809 
(f47f1a87-8e13-4e83-a9a4-4f1a666fccad). Mailboxes:
Test User(cbaa8fc4-0fb6-4863-8b06-5858c876523d)

Test User is the display name of the affected account.

I thought about creating a new DB, moving the live mailboxes, and deleting the 
current DB, but it seems like a lot of work when there is probably some cleanup 
mechanism available.  If it matters, I deleted the user/mailbox 3 days ago 
using the EMC GUI.

Any thoughts about how to fix this are appreciated.  (Any thoughts about the 
mailbox move weirdness are welcome too.)

Thanks,
RS



---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read

Re: Exchange Connections, anyone?

[Missy Koslosky]

Waah, no. I am attending The Experts Conference in April, though. 

On Mar 23, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:

 I'll be attending and presenting three sessions at Exchange Connections in 
 Orlando next week. Will anyone else here be attending?
 
 Regards,
 
 Michael B. Smith
 Consultant and Exchange MVP
 http://TheEssentialExchange.com
 
 
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Exchange Connections, anyone?

[Missy Koslosky]

I was hoping you'd say you would be there. :) It's been way too long since 
we've gotten to hang out. Wish I could attend the pre-con workshop! I'll just 
have to ply you with drinks so you can tell me all the secrets I know nothing 
about!

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 5:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Connections, anyone?

Wonderful! I haven't seen you in years!

I'm also attending and presenting there. I'm doing a pre-conference workshop on 
When disaster strikes... talking about things I never post in mailing lists. 
That is: how to directly edit Active Directory to clean up when Exchange barfs.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:mi...@notsoclever.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 1:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange Connections, anyone?

Waah, no. I am attending The Experts Conference in April, though. 

On Mar 23, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:

 I'll be attending and presenting three sessions at Exchange Connections in 
 Orlando next week. Will anyone else here be attending?
 
 Regards,
 
 Michael B. Smith
 Consultant and Exchange MVP
 http://TheEssentialExchange.com
 
 
 
 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
 
 


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist




---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Exchange Connections, anyone?

[Missy Koslosky]

Not even. I await your secrets.

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 5:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Connections, anyone?

p. I'm sure you could teach the course as easily as I!

But thanks.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


From: Missy Koslosky [mi...@notsoclever.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 5:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Connections, anyone?

I was hoping you'd say you would be there. :) It's been way too long since 
we've gotten to hang out. Wish I could attend the pre-con workshop! I'll just 
have to ply you with drinks so you can tell me all the secrets I know nothing 
about!

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 5:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Connections, anyone?

Wonderful! I haven't seen you in years!

I'm also attending and presenting there. I'm doing a pre-conference workshop on 
When disaster strikes... talking about things I never post in mailing lists. 
That is: how to directly edit Active Directory to clean up when Exchange barfs.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:mi...@notsoclever.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 1:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange Connections, anyone?

Waah, no. I am attending The Experts Conference in April, though.

On Mar 23, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:

 I'll be attending and presenting three sessions at Exchange Connections in 
 Orlando next week. Will anyone else here be attending?

 Regards,

 Michael B. Smith
 Consultant and Exchange MVP
 http://TheEssentialExchange.com



 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here: 
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist




---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist




---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist




---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: EHLO Again! The Exchange Team Blog has a new home.

[Missy Koslosky]

They didn't ask me either. Probably because they know what the response would 
be.

On Mar 14, 2011, at 5:46 PM, Michael B. Smith 
mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com wrote:

I’m of two minds about this, but I wasn’t asked. :)

-

We’re happy to announce that the Exchange Team blog has moved to TechNet! The 
new URL: http://blogs.technet.com/exchange http://blogs.technet.com/exchange.


-  All posts and comments have been migrated from the old blog

-  DNS redirects will begin later today to redirect 
http://msexchangeteam.com http://msexchangeteam.com to 
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange, 
which can also be accessed using (a shorter URL) 
http://blogs.technet.com/exchange http://blogs.technet.com/exchange.

-  Links to old posts with 
msexchangeteam.comhttp://msexchangeteam.com url will continue to work and 
redirect to the correct post page on the new blog.

-  Old RSS feeds will automatically redirect and continue to work, but 
we’d rather you update your RSS readers with the new feed(s)

oPosts: http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/rss.aspx 
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/rss.aspx

oPosts (Atom): http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/atom.aspx 
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/atom.aspx

oComments: http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/rsscomments.aspx 
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/rsscomments.aspx

Our into post has some more details:
EHLO Again!
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2011/03/14/ehlo-again.aspxhttp://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2011/03/14/ehlo-again.aspx


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: Database sizing for Exchange 2010 migration

[Missy Koslosky]

Have you looked at your single instance storage ratio in perfmon? It will 
either help settle your fears or scare you. :)

On Mar 1, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Damien Solodow 
damien.solo...@harrison.edumailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu wrote:

The current database layout makes me cringe every time I look at it. Only two 
mailbox databases, and it’s about an 80/20 split of users. The “primary” one is 
about 3-4 times the size of the other, and I’m sure there are lots of huge 
attachments.

DAMIEN SOLODOW
Systems Engineer
317.447.6033 (office)
317.217.6851 (fax)
HARRISON COLLEGE

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 10:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database sizing for Exchange 2010 migration

Depends on your content. If you have few databases and lots of large 
attachments, it could grow quite a bit.

I generally use 20% as a planning figure. That being said, most people are also 
increasing mailbox size as part of their move to Exchange 2010, so even if it’s 
quite a bit more, it gets “lost in the wash”.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.comhttp://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 10:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Database sizing for Exchange 2010 migration

We’re getting going on migrating our  Exchange 2003 environment to Exchange 
2010 SP1.
The main thing left in the planning phase is sizing our mailbox server(s).

I’ve found some guidelines on it, and plan to try feeding the Exchange Sizing 
spreadsheet from MS to see what it spits out. Also planning to poke at Exchange 
Profiler to see what it gives me to help feed that data.

The one thing I haven’t seen much on so far is database growth as part of the 
migration. In other words, I know how much space is used by my current mailbox 
stores (and how much is whitespace) but I’m not sure how large that will 
translate to for Exchange 2010 databases. Since the information I’ve seen says 
that SIS is gone, I’d expect it to grow but not sure how to calculate or even 
guesstimate the new space.

Any handy calculators, magic numbers or the like?

DAMIEN SOLODOW
Systems Engineer
317.447.6033 (office)
317.217.6851 (fax)
HARRISON COLLEGE
500 North Meridian St
Suite 500
Indianapolis, IN 46204-1213
http://www.harrison.edu/www.harrison.eduhttp://www.harrison.edu


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: ActiveSync Question

[Missy Koslosky]

PEBKAC much?

On Feb 1, 2011, at 1:14 PM, Martin Blackstone 
mblackst...@gmail.commailto:mblackst...@gmail.com wrote:

Better than BES!

From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 10:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ActiveSync Question

I just disabled your account.  How's EAS working for you right now Martin?
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Martin Blackstone 
mailto:mblackst...@gmail.commblackst...@gmail.commailto:mblackst...@gmail.com
 wrote:
Exch 2010.
If I disable a users acct, does that disable their AS access as well? Or do I 
need to go into EMC and disable AS in there as well?


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Changing e-mail address in Exchange 2007

[Missy Koslosky]

Don,

Rebooting the Exchange server will not force the client (Outlook) to download a 
new copy of the OAB.

Missy

From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:dholst...@nbm.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 11:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Changing e-mail address in Exchange 2007

I have seen this too, but I re-booted the Exchange server early this morning. 
Still see the error. I'll take a look-see on a new computer I have to put out 
later today...

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 10:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Changing e-mail address in Exchange 2007

Great question, and if everyone is having the same problem is everyone running 
in cached mode? I recall address updates in cache mode take forever.

From: Chris [mailto:cmu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 10:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Changing e-mail address in Exchange 2007

So everyone that is internal is using the same wrong address or is it 1 
particular user?

Chris
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Kennedy, Jim 
kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote:
Or the user is running outlook in cached mode.

From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.commailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:58 AM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Changing e-mail address in Exchange 2007

cached in the offline address book maybe?
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Holstrom, Don 
dholst...@nbm.orgmailto:dholst...@nbm.org wrote:
It's not cached, AFAIK. When you click on To: in Outlook, go to her, and 
right-mouse click, the wrong address comes up...

From: Liby Philip Mathew 
[mailto:lmat...@path-solutions.commailto:lmat...@path-solutions.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:33 AM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Changing e-mail address in Exchange 2007

Could it be the cached address in the address picker?

Regards

Liby Philip Mathew

From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:dholst...@nbm.orgmailto:dholst...@nbm.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 5:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Changing e-mail address in Exchange 2007

On the Exchange server, in the SMTP listing under E-Mail Addresses in her 
profile, it lists her e-mail as it should be.

From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.orgmailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Changing e-mail address in Exchange 2007

Does the recipient have a .local smtp address in the profile? (if you use them 
at all)

 John W. Cook
System Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
5950 NW 1st Place
Gainesville, Fl 32607
Cell (352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4

From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:dholst...@nbm.orgmailto:dholst...@nbm.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Changing e-mail address in Exchange 2007

A temp put in a new user with a wrong e-mail. I thought I fixed the e-mail and 
e-mails from the outside go to the user properly. But those from within still 
go to the wrong address if they go to the user as listed, and not what they key 
in. I know I could add the wrong address as a second recipient, but I'd rather 
not. I'd also rather not have to totally re-set her up. What am I doing wrong? 
She has Outlook 2010.

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need 
to.

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. 
Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are 
present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or 
damage that 

RE: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda

[Missy Koslosky]

Are the devices overworked with outgoing email? If not, I would not worry about 
that.

From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda

That sounds likely, I just don't see anywhere within the GUI to control that 
behaivor.

- Sean
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Kennedy, Jim 
kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote:
Cuda's caching the dns lookup?

From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.commailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 12:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda

Good morning all,

I've got two Barracuda SPAM/Virus Firewalls that I'm trying to setup for load 
balancing outgoing mail. The Barracuda's forward mail to a smarthost, and since 
they're clustered, I can't specify separate smart hosts per device. Barracuda 
documentation indicates this is accomplished using MX records. I created an MX 
record named testmx.domain.comhttp://testmx.domain.com/ and two A records 
both named test.domain.comhttp://test.domain.com/, one for each of the 
downstream smart hosts. However, both of the barracuda's appear to favor only 
one of the smart hosts when delivering outgoing mail.

Repeated NSLookups against the MX record seem to alternate between the A 
records as expected. Any ideas on why this wouldn't work?

- Sean

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Emails in Outbox

[Missy Koslosky]

Have you tried having them restart Outlook?

From: Chris Blair [mailto:chris_bl...@identisys.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 1:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Emails in Outbox

Running Exchange 2007, Sp3 HF2. Have a few users getting emails stuck in the 
Outbox. I checked the logs, and the emails are being sent, but they are not 
moved into the Sent folder.

The Outlook profiles are all non-cached, and running 2007, with latest SP and 
updates.



---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Exchange 2007 backup

[Missy Koslosky]

What does Tivoli say they can do?

-Original Message-
From: ronald singh [mailto:ronald.si...@ccngroup.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 12:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 backup

Good Day,
I wanted to know if Tivoli 6.0 would be able to back up my Exchange 2007 
cluster and clear committed logs. I currently have SP3 installed and was told 
that the windows 2008 backup would damage the Database if done in the cluster 
environment.

Thank you
Ronald


The information in this e-mail (including attachments) is confidential and may 
be legally privleged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, 
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on the 
e-mail message, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
all parts of this e-mail from your computer(s) and eventual service provider 
computer(s).

One Caribbean Media Ltd. is neither liable for the proper and complete 
transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any 
delay in its receipt.


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist




---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Emails in Outbox

[Missy Koslosky]

I hate it when this kind of thing happens. :)

http://www.howto-outlook.com/Faq/messagestuckinoutbox.htm might lead you down a 
path that will help.

From: Chris Blair [mailto:chris_bl...@identisys.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 2:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Emails in Outbox

Yes. They remain in the Outbox. We can manually move them or delete them.



From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:mi...@notsoclever.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 12:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Emails in Outbox

Have you tried having them restart Outlook?

From: Chris Blair [mailto:chris_bl...@identisys.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 1:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Emails in Outbox

Running Exchange 2007, Sp3 HF2. Have a few users getting emails stuck in the 
Outbox. I checked the logs, and the emails are being sent, but they are not 
moved into the Sent folder.

The Outlook profiles are all non-cached, and running 2007, with latest SP and 
updates.



---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Completely Removing Exchange

[Missy Koslosky]

Just confirming that Greg is correct; once the schema is extended, it's 
extended and it ain't going back. Note that I've refrained from any unsavory 
allusions.

From: greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net [mailto:greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 12:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Completely Removing Exchange

I am assuming that you have performed all operations to ensure nothing is 
referring or needed on Exchange 2003 before removing of course.  RUS is not 
used in 2007 or 2010 anymore.

Removing Exchange 2003 will not affect the existing AD emails. Those are in the 
proxyaddress field which is what Google Sync uses I believe.   It should remove 
all references for the server for the purposes of Exchange, but as to how much 
and exactly what AD attributes for 2003 are removed I could not tell you that.

Schema extensions are usually one way.  Once done they don't get removed.  I am 
sure someone more knowledgeable can confirm or deny.

Greg Sweers
CEO
ACTS360.comhttp://www.acts360.com/
P.O. Box 1193
Brandon, FL  33509
813-657-0849 Office
813-758-6850 Cell
813-341-1270 Fax

From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 8:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Completely Removing Exchange

And after asking him, he hasn't tried the uninstall using the CD yet, just read 
that he had to move the RUS somewhere and knew he can't do that since it will 
be the last server.  Should he just throw the disk in and run it?  Maybe there 
is an option for removing the last Exchange server?  He is already evicting the 
passive node of the cluster, so it will be down to the one.

If an uninstall path does exist, does that get rid of all the Org info in AD, 
or just remove Exchange-related AD info for the one server?  He is documenting 
the org info just in case they ever need it again.

Mostly I think he wants to make sure that anything he does to remove the last 
Exchange server does not affect the existing e-mail address information on 
their AD accounts (which are no longer in Exchange, but I have no idea if they 
removed the attributes), which is being using with a directory sync to Google 
apps.

-B

From: Bonnie Miller [mailto:midnit...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 6:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Completely Removing Exchange

He was saying something about not being able to run the uninstaller because 
there is no server to move the RUS to.. not sure if he's tried it yet 
though--just doing a lot of reading first.  I do believe that is the same link 
he was looking at.  's been so long since I've looked at 2k3, and we were never 
trying to remove completely--did a swing to 2k7.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:04 PM, 
greg.swe...@actsconsulting.netmailto:greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net wrote:
Just perform an uninstall, it will want the CD in the drive and be done with it.

If there is a problem..

Refer...
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Remove-Exchange-server-entire-Exchange-organization.html


Greg Sweers
CEO
ACTS360.comhttp://www.acts360.com/
P.O. Box 1193
Brandon, FL  33509
813-657-0849 Office
813-758-6850 Cell
813-341-1270 Fax

From: Bonnie Miller [mailto:midnit...@gmail.commailto:midnit...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 7:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Completely Removing Exchange

Where my DH works, they have completed a migration of all mail from an old 
Exchange 2003 A/P cluster to Google Apps.  There are no more mailboxes on the 
server(s) and no mail services are using or otherwise routing through the 
Exchange server(s).  He is wondering if there could be any problems in the 
future if they just turn off the old server(s) at this point in time and leave 
the Org info in their AD?  For example, if 5 years down the road they change 
and go to Exchange 2016 or something, could this be an issue?  I guess there is 
a procedure to remove the org info from AD, but he's not sure if it's worth 
doing.

Thanks for any info or links.

-Bonnie

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe 

RE: Report on opened emails

[Missy Koslosky]

Nope.

From: Chris Blair [mailto:chris_bl...@identisys.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Report on opened emails

Looking to see if a user has opened a specific email or not. Beyond read 
receipts, is there a report that can be run on the server level?

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Exchange Work From Home

[Missy Koslosky]

I spent about 7 years working from home, so it's possible. I will say that
the WFH positions seem to be less available these days, which is a shame.

 

From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 2:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Exchange Work From Home

 

All-


Just a quick question to the community.  Is there a market for Exchange
Engineer jobs working from home?  Everytime I do a job search I come up with
nothing.  I have situation in my life that requires me to be at home, just
wondering if there is a market out there for this type of work.

 

TIA,

 

John Bowles 


 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Hosted Exchange Questions

[Missy Koslosky]

Remember that with Exchange 2010, federated services are available.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/ucedsg/archive/2010/04/22/how-does-federated-cale
ndar-sharing-work-in-exchange-2010.aspx and, more in-depth,
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd638083.aspx.

 

Missy

 

From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 4:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Hosted Exchange Questions

 

Do you schedule resources (conf rooms etc.) like we to?  And there goes the
ability for someone to see the hosted user's calendars and the reverse.  We
treat calendars as company data shared unless certain personal events are
marked as private - allows us to see if someone whose presence shows busy
has a scheduled meeting etc.

 

For us, the entire mixed mode would be disastrous. 

 

  _  

From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 8:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Hosted Exchange Questions

 

They both need to be on the hosted system. The trick is you can do the
calendar thing as long as both are hosted or neither are hosted. Assuming I
understand it correctly, you'd want to have the exec and their assistants
hosted.

 

At least that what USA.NET told us as we took them through the hosted
Exchange vetting process. It sounded like you can cross-share but that
requires a not cheap 3rd part intermediary piece.

 

Other can speak to this better than I, but yeah calendar sharing is
something to consider if you only want some hosted and others not.

 

Dave

 

From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 8:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Hosted Exchange Questions

 

Would an internal administrative assistant be able to access a hosted
manager's calendar at all?


Roger Wright
___

When it's GOOD there ain't nothin' like it, and when it's BAD there ain't
nothin' like it!



On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:27 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:

Yeah, shared calendars.

 

From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 8:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Hosted Exchange Questions

 

Is is possible/practical to move a handful of users to a hosted Exchange
solution?  

 

We have a few key individuals who have difficulty with our limited storage
space and hosting their mailboxes externally could alleviate this part of
the equation.  However, what would happen to collaborative calendars and
being able to input  view events for these users?

 

Any other concerns regarding a partial move to hosted Exchange?


Roger Wright
___

When it's GOOD there ain't nothin' like it, and when it's BAD there ain't
nothin' like it!

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: The Compound Case of the Outlook Hangs

[Missy Koslosky]

Loved this, thanks Michael!

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 7:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: The Compound Case of the Outlook Hangs

http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2010/08/24/3351213.aspx

An interesting read!

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com








---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Help with unsolicited mail

[Missy Koslosky]

Oh, let's.

-Original Message-
From: Bill Egan william.e...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 10:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Help with unsolicited mail


Let's not forget Cthulu Jones.

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Neil Hobson nhob...@gmail.com wrote:
 Someone mentioned swinc a few posts ago, but presumably they meant Swynk
 which I can remember as Peter Bowyer's list when I joined in late '96.  Then
 you'd also include Daniel Chenault, Ed Woodrick, et al.  That's a long time
 in software years!  :)

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
 Sent: 06 August 2010 15:28
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

 You were on the old list?

 And of course, I left off Chris, with his cutting wit.

 Regards,

 Michael B. Smith
 Consultant and Exchange MVP
 http://TheEssentialExchange.com


 -Original Message-
 From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
 Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 10:15 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

 I now feel like chopped liversigh

 The obviously unimportant Andy

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
 Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 7:11 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

 We'd need Andy, Andy, Ed, and Cameron.

 Regards,

 Michael B. Smith
 Consultant and Exchange MVP
 http://TheEssentialExchange.com


 -Original Message-
 From: pramatow...@mediageneral.com [mailto:pramatow...@mediageneral.com]
 Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 7:08 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

 ::swinc flashback::

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 5:02 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

 That's how I roll

 -Original Message-
 From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:mi...@notsoclever.com]
 Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:52 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

 I just re-joined today. Blackstone made me do it.

 -Original Message-
 From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
 Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 4:24 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: Help with unsolicited mail

 We never knew you were lurking!
 John W. Cook
 Systems Administrator
 Partnership for Strong Families

 - Original Message -
 From: Missy Koslosky mi...@notsoclever.com
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
 Sent: Thu Aug 05 16:09:29 2010
 Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

 ;) Miss me?

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
 Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 3:35 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

 Missy? On THIS mailing list? Wow.

 Regards,

 Michael B. Smith
 Consultant and Exchange MVP
 http://TheEssentialExchange.com


 -Original Message-
 From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:mi...@notsoclever.com]
 Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 3:32 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

 I can't be the only one who finds it ironic that a former employee of
 Partnership for Strong Families is a whack job.

 -Original Message-
 From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
 Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:20 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

 It was a C level employee who was terminated by the BOD, he has no job other
 than to do this to try and get his job back, methinks waiting him out won't
 work.

 -Original Message-
 From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
 Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:46 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

 How about just letting it go for a bit and see if he gets tired of this.
 I'd be a little nervous about what else he might do, if you frustrate this.

 CFee

 -Original Message-
 From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
 Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 12:01 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Help with unsolicited mail

 We have an ex employee that is sending messages to essentially the whole
 company. These messages are causing some moral issues and need to stop. We
 have a transport rule (E2K7) to reroute them but have been advised this
 person is going to open a new account to continue. Does anyone have any
 info, Legal or other, that we can use to put a halt to this?
 TIA
 John W. Cook
 Systems Administrator
 Partnership for Strong Families

RE: Help with unsolicited mail

[Missy Koslosky]

I can't be the only one who finds it ironic that a former employee of
Partnership for Strong Families is a whack job.

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] 
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

It was a C level employee who was terminated by the BOD, he has no job other
than to do this to try and get his job back, methinks waiting him out won't
work.

-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

How about just letting it go for a bit and see if he gets tired of this.
I'd be a little nervous about what else he might do, if you frustrate this.

CFee

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 12:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Help with unsolicited mail

We have an ex employee that is sending messages to essentially the whole
company. These messages are causing some moral issues and need to stop. We
have a transport rule (E2K7) to reroute them but have been advised this
person is going to open a new account to continue. Does anyone have any
info, Legal or other, that we can use to put a halt to this?
TIA
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil
and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really
need to.





CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil
and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really
need to.

RE: Help with unsolicited mail

[Missy Koslosky]

;) Miss me?

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 3:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

Missy? On THIS mailing list? Wow.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:mi...@notsoclever.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 3:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

I can't be the only one who finds it ironic that a former employee of
Partnership for Strong Families is a whack job.

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

It was a C level employee who was terminated by the BOD, he has no job other
than to do this to try and get his job back, methinks waiting him out won't
work.

-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

How about just letting it go for a bit and see if he gets tired of this.
I'd be a little nervous about what else he might do, if you frustrate this.

CFee

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 12:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Help with unsolicited mail

We have an ex employee that is sending messages to essentially the whole
company. These messages are causing some moral issues and need to stop. We
have a transport rule (E2K7) to reroute them but have been advised this
person is going to open a new account to continue. Does anyone have any
info, Legal or other, that we can use to put a halt to this?
TIA
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil
and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really
need to.





CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil
and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really
need to.

RE: Help with unsolicited mail

[Missy Koslosky]

LOL

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] 
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 3:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Help with unsolicited mail

Have you ever met a social worker?
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families

- Original Message -
From: Missy Koslosky mi...@notsoclever.com
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Thu Aug 05 15:31:45 2010
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

I can't be the only one who finds it ironic that a former employee of
Partnership for Strong Families is a whack job.

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

It was a C level employee who was terminated by the BOD, he has no job other
than to do this to try and get his job back, methinks waiting him out won't
work.

-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

How about just letting it go for a bit and see if he gets tired of this.
I'd be a little nervous about what else he might do, if you frustrate this.

CFee

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 12:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Help with unsolicited mail

We have an ex employee that is sending messages to essentially the whole
company. These messages are causing some moral issues and need to stop. We
have a transport rule (E2K7) to reroute them but have been advised this
person is going to open a new account to continue. Does anyone have any
info, Legal or other, that we can use to put a halt to this?
TIA
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil
and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really
need to.





CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil
and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really
need to.







CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil
and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really
need to.

RE: Help with unsolicited mail

[Missy Koslosky]

That was me. My bad.

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] 
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 4:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Help with unsolicited mail

Besides, you guys\gals made the ass-umption he was a wack job!
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families

- Original Message -
From: Campbell, Rob rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Thu Aug 05 16:05:04 2010
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

Encountered, yes.  Met, no.

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Help with unsolicited mail

Have you ever met a social worker?
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families

- Original Message -
From: Missy Koslosky mi...@notsoclever.com
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Thu Aug 05 15:31:45 2010
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

I can't be the only one who finds it ironic that a former employee of
Partnership for Strong Families is a whack job.

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

It was a C level employee who was terminated by the BOD, he has no job other
than to do this to try and get his job back, methinks waiting him out won't
work.

-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

How about just letting it go for a bit and see if he gets tired of this.
I'd be a little nervous about what else he might do, if you frustrate this.

CFee

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 12:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Help with unsolicited mail

We have an ex employee that is sending messages to essentially the whole
company. These messages are causing some moral issues and need to stop. We
have a transport rule (E2K7) to reroute them but have been advised this
person is going to open a new account to continue. Does anyone have any
info, Legal or other, that we can use to put a halt to this?
TIA
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil
and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really
need to.





CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil
and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really
need to.







CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil
and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e

RE: Help with unsolicited mail

[Missy Koslosky]

I just re-joined today. Blackstone made me do it.

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] 
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 4:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Help with unsolicited mail

We never knew you were lurking!
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families

- Original Message -
From: Missy Koslosky mi...@notsoclever.com
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Thu Aug 05 16:09:29 2010
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

;) Miss me?

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 3:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

Missy? On THIS mailing list? Wow.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:mi...@notsoclever.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 3:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

I can't be the only one who finds it ironic that a former employee of
Partnership for Strong Families is a whack job.

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

It was a C level employee who was terminated by the BOD, he has no job other
than to do this to try and get his job back, methinks waiting him out won't
work.

-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

How about just letting it go for a bit and see if he gets tired of this.
I'd be a little nervous about what else he might do, if you frustrate this.

CFee

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 12:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Help with unsolicited mail

We have an ex employee that is sending messages to essentially the whole
company. These messages are causing some moral issues and need to stop. We
have a transport rule (E2K7) to reroute them but have been advised this
person is going to open a new account to continue. Does anyone have any
info, Legal or other, that we can use to put a halt to this?
TIA
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil
and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really
need to.





CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil
and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really
need to.













CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil
and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you

Re: Public Folder: Unread message indicator

[Missy Koslosky]

Add the PF to the Outlook bar.  You may need to add it to favorites first,
it's been a while...  Simple.
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Bodnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 1:23 PM
Subject: Public Folder: Unread message indicator


Management would like to see the number of unread messages in a Public
Folder. The same way that Inbox folders indicate the number of unread
messages:

Inbox (14)
Sales (12)
Marketing (9)

I have run across Q292484 and the PostToNote program from IvaSoft which
references this problem. Neither of which specifically mention the ability
to see the number of unread messages.

As is mentioned by the KB article, the solution would be to write an Event
Sink.



Any thoughts?



Chris Bodnar
Network Engineer
Essent Corporation
610-559- X:24


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Exchange SP4

[Missy Koslosky]

Service packs are regression tested (but MS cannot duplicate every
environment, and a few of 'em have just plain sucked).  Hot fixes should
never ever ever be applied without a really really good reason.

And we all test all patches in our labs, right?
- Original Message -
From: Randal, Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 9:48 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange SP4


I think we basically agree here.  But if some brave souls
don't test the hotfixes they'll probably end up in
next service pack unchanged.

Cheers,

Phil

-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK

 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 July 2002 14:40
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange SP4


 Apples and Oranges.
 Adding Security fixes, critical updates etc are different than simply
 applying any ol hotfix that comes your way.


 -Original Message-
 From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 6:57 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange SP4


 And then when your server crashes because you haven't
 applied the hotfix which prevents the crash?

 H.

 Swings and roundabouts, I know.

 Phil
 -
 Phil Randal
 Network Engineer
 Herefordshire Council
 Hereford, UK


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Exchange SP4

[Missy Koslosky]

I've often used old desktops.  They're better than nothing.
- Original Message - 
From: Randal, Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 10:08 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange SP4


At this precise moment I have an Exchange 5.5 server in the lab,
but it won't be there this time next week :-(

I guess loads of us don't have the budget or resources to have
test environments for everything.

I wish we did!

Phil

-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK 

 -Original Message-
 From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 July 2002 15:04
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: Exchange SP4
 
 
 Service packs are regression tested (but MS cannot duplicate every
 environment, and a few of 'em have just plain sucked).  Hot 
 fixes should
 never ever ever be applied without a really really good reason.
 
 And we all test all patches in our labs, right?
 - Original Message -
 From: Randal, Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 9:48 AM
 Subject: RE: Exchange SP4
 
 
 I think we basically agree here.  But if some brave souls
 don't test the hotfixes they'll probably end up in
 next service pack unchanged.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Phil
 
 -
 Phil Randal
 Network Engineer
 Herefordshire Council
 Hereford, UK
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 26 July 2002 14:40
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: Exchange SP4
 
 
  Apples and Oranges.
  Adding Security fixes, critical updates etc are different 
 than simply
  applying any ol hotfix that comes your way.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 6:57 AM
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: Exchange SP4
 
 
  And then when your server crashes because you haven't
  applied the hotfix which prevents the crash?
 
  H.
 
  Swings and roundabouts, I know.
 
  Phil
  -
  Phil Randal
  Network Engineer
  Herefordshire Council
  Hereford, UK
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Spam Software for Exch 5.5 NT4.0

[Missy Koslosky]

Archives? FAQ?

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Joe 
  Friess 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 2:49 
  PM
  Subject: Spam Software for Exch 5.5  
  NT4.0
  
  Any 
  recommendations for Spam blocking software for Exch 5.5  
  NT4.0
  
  Regards, 
  Joseph Friess, MCSE Allied Construction Products, LLC3900 Kelley Ave Cleveland, OH 
  44114 
  Phone: 216-373-0234 FAX: 216-431-2603 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site: www.alliedcp.com
  List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: For Kevin Miller

[Missy Koslosky]

Remember that a lot of those jobs will be from redundancies - Admin, HR,
etc. will get hit the hardest, then manufacturing (for products that are
being phased out).

- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:34 AM
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller


Wait til HP lays off the 10-15,000.

-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller


He's right, that is the market today. Which, if you are an IT individual
really sucks. I have talked with recruiters and they salaries overall
are down 25%. I don't think the market will really ever pick back up to
the point that it was. It is now too flooded with IT wannabes with
dollar signs in their eyes.

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller

Not that I've seen.  Right now, they want certs, and they want
experience, and they want to pay as little as possible.  And
they'll be
able to find that person.  I've talked to a couple of recruiters
who are
seeing resumes from IT folks formerly making $70-$80k applying
for $40k
jobs.  DHL announced they were opening an IT center out here,
and
supposedly got about 5 thousand resumes for about 50 positions.
Yesterday I heard from someone that had over 700 resumes for a
position.
Some company that is apparently doing a very large w2k migration
has
been rejecting experienced NT4-w2k migration people with certs
because
they hadn't worked on large enough migrations.

Someday, the economy will come back, and all the underpaid folks
will
jump to better paying jobs.

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller


Do hiring people still talk about the T shape candidate. This
doesn't
refer to their physical shape although I guess it might. It
refers to
the fact that mostly recruiters want a guy with a broad
experience of
different technologies with in-depth knowledge of one or maybe
two
technologies.

Just wundrin' coz it was all the rage when I left college (but
that was
some time ago now!).

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 June 2002 14:35
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller


Definitely agree on the market plays a factor, no question...but
overall
a kid coming out of school expecting to make that amount is a
bit
ridiculous

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller

Earlier someone mentioned a story about a kid saying
that 60-90K
was too low for OCPs, and he thought the kid was naive. Although
I do
agree that many kids go in with much higher $$ thoughts these
days,
instead of the love of protocols (JK), I don't think that 60-90K
is all
that high either. It all depends on your market, experience, and
abilities. Market is a huge factor. I was offered a job that
paid 3
times what I make here, simply due to market differences. Keep
in mind
that I make about $4.25/hour here on the Tex-Mex border
though...jk
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller


He was an IBM Global Services guy and knew Cobol
like he
wrote the language. During Y2K, they would pay anyone who could
write
code some serious cake. The reason that the CIO's and CTO's make
the
$300k - $600k kind of money is due to all the medical care they
need to
have after having the lobotomy and spine removal surgeries.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller


Well, where are these high paying jobs
at.
I'm
underpaid!  I want some of that cheese!  :o)
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002
5:08
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller


Like I said. I've seen contracts
for
a
whole
hell of a lot more than that. I think the largest I've seen was
$525 an
hour plus expenses. If you were talking salary then 150hr x
hours x 52
weeks = $312,000.00. Add in about 45% for benefits and taxes =
$452,400.00 in salary costs. Not worth that. No offense to Don
or anyone
else.
-Original Message-
From: Mal Sasalu
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002
4:53
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller


I am not cheap. I wasn't talking
about
Don's
worth. I was talking about your authority to hire him or
somebody like
him.

-Original 

Re: For Kevin Miller

[Missy Koslosky]

Play nicely.

Missy Koslosky
hp Services
- Original Message -
From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller


Point

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller

I thought you were talking about HP??? ;-)

-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 June 2002 15:33
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller


Yep, you'll have some highly skilled people taking those 40K jobs

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller

Wait til HP lays off the 10-15,000.

-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller


He's right, that is the market today. Which, if you are an
IT
individual
really sucks. I have talked with recruiters and they
salaries
overall
are down 25%. I don't think the market will really ever pick
back up
to
the point that it was. It is now too flooded with IT
wannabes with
dollar signs in their eyes.

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller

Not that I've seen.  Right now, they want certs, and
they
want
experience, and they want to pay as little as
possible.  And
they'll be
able to find that person.  I've talked to a couple
of
recruiters
who are
seeing resumes from IT folks formerly making
$70-$80k
applying
for $40k
jobs.  DHL announced they were opening an IT center
out
here,
and
supposedly got about 5 thousand resumes for about 50
positions.
Yesterday I heard from someone that had over 700
resumes for
a
position.
Some company that is apparently doing a very large
w2k
migration
has
been rejecting experienced NT4-w2k migration people
with
certs
because
they hadn't worked on large enough migrations.

Someday, the economy will come back, and all the
underpaid
folks
will
jump to better paying jobs.

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller


Do hiring people still talk about the T shape
candidate.
This
doesn't
refer to their physical shape although I guess it
might. It
refers to
the fact that mostly recruiters want a guy with a
broad
experience of
different technologies with in-depth knowledge of
one or
maybe
two
technologies.

Just wundrin' coz it was all the rage when I left
college
(but
that was
some time ago now!).

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 June 2002 14:35
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller


Definitely agree on the market plays a factor, no
question...but
overall
a kid coming out of school expecting to make that
amount is
a
bit
ridiculous

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller

Earlier someone mentioned a story about a
kid saying
that 60-90K
was too low for OCPs, and he thought the kid was
naive.
Although
I do
agree that many kids go in with much higher $$
thoughts
these
days,
instead of the love of protocols (JK), I don't think
that
60-90K
is all
that high either. It all depends on your market,
experience,
and
abilities. Market is a huge factor. I was offered a
job that
paid 3
times what I make here, simply due to market
differences.
Keep
in mind
that I make about $4.25/hour here on the Tex-Mex
border
though...jk
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:20
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller


He was an IBM Global Services guy
and knew
Cobol
like he
wrote the language. During Y2K, they would pay
anyone who
could
write
code some serious cake. The reason that the CIO's
and CTO's
make
the
$300k - $600k kind of money is due to all the
medical care
they
need to
have after having the lobotomy and spine removal
surgeries.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05,
2002 9:56
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin
Miller


Well, where are these high
paying
jobs
at.
I'm
underpaid!  I want some of that cheese!  :o)
-Original
Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
June 05,
2002
5:08
PM
To: MS-Exchange
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For
Kevin
Miller


Like I said. I've
seen
contracts
for
a
whole
hell of a lot more than that. I think the largest
I've seen
was
$525 an
hour plus expenses. If you

Re: Backups

[Missy Koslosky]

Then burn the mailbox contents to PST before whacking the mailbox.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 3:55 PM
Subject: RE: Backups


Excellent point, however we have managers who make a habit out of asking
for
mailboxes from 2 years ago. I don't delete mailboxes right away but I do
after time since I am not running enterprise.


-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 3:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backups

I start off by not deleting it...

Then, I have my DR server handy to practice DR on when the need
arises and
get my mailbox back that way...

E2K makes BLB's even more worthless since there is a mailbox restore
option
now...

-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 3:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backups


Hmmm, well how do you recover a mailbox?


-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 3:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backups

Just backing up the IS, and not the mailboxes as well.

John

-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 2:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backups


So how are you doing your backups now?

-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 2:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backups

I was doing brick level backups for quite a while.
Never had
a
problem with
them, Never really had to use them, but I had the
tape
space, so
figured
what the hell?

Well about two weeks ago after doing them for three
years
with out a
hitch,
suddenly they stopped working. Couldn't back up a
one of
them.

Just for grins, I tried to restore a mailbox from a
recently
fired
employee,
and guess what it didn't work. I have done this on a
regualar basis
as part
of my DR planning, and never had a problem.

I made no changes to the server in weeks if not
months, but
suddenly
nothing
works. Before subscribing to this list I would have
been in
a big
panic, but
now I just turned them off. I think this shows just
how
unreliable a
BLB
backup is.

John Majetic

-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 2:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Backups


Why do brick level backups = BAD?

List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Backups

[Missy Koslosky]

Disaster recovery.  It's good practice.

And how often do you need to recover whole mailboxes that were
accidentally deleted?

M
- Original Message -
From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 3:17 PM
Subject: RE: Backups


Hmmm, well how do you recover a mailbox?


-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 3:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backups

Just backing up the IS, and not the mailboxes as well.

John

-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 2:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backups


So how are you doing your backups now?

-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 2:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backups

I was doing brick level backups for quite a while. Never had
a
problem with
them, Never really had to use them, but I had the tape
space, so
figured
what the hell?

Well about two weeks ago after doing them for three years
with out a
hitch,
suddenly they stopped working. Couldn't back up a one of
them.

Just for grins, I tried to restore a mailbox from a recently
fired
employee,
and guess what it didn't work. I have done this on a
regualar basis
as part
of my DR planning, and never had a problem.

I made no changes to the server in weeks if not months, but
suddenly
nothing
works. Before subscribing to this list I would have been in
a big
panic, but
now I just turned them off. I think this shows just how
unreliable a
BLB
backup is.

John Majetic

-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 2:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Backups


Why do brick level backups = BAD?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: For Kevin Miller

[Missy Koslosky]

English?
- Original Message -
From: Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:18 PM
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller


Folks, I might to have to put an action phrase on this...

Regards,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller


Right on Thanks..


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Auto Archive

[Missy Koslosky]

IIRC, the actual field checked is based upon the last modified, not
received.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: Brien Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM
Subject: RE: Auto Archive


Yes I set up auto Archive but also I go to file/archive  choose to
archive mail older than 2 days  after it runs mail older than 2 days is
still in that folder

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Auto Archive


Do you mean autoarchiving in Outlook?

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Auto Archive


I have  the items are not archived! Why?

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Auto Archive


You have to select the folders that you want to archive.

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Auto Archive


Hi All
I'm fairly new to Exchange 2000.Well Exchange period, we have been using
sendmail  are currently in the process of converting to Exchange 2000.
The problem I'm having is that we are creating an archive folder for the
user  moving all old mail into it. (I know a pst folder what a head
ach. I lost that battle. I said no pst but the VP's said pst)Anyways
after I archive all the old mail I set Exchange to auto archive every 2
months. It doesn't work it appears to work  says its archiving but
doesn't. What am I missing, is this a permission problem? It works fine
on my PC but not on a users PC. Any help would be great Thanks

Brien Mayer
Senior Network Administrator
Merchant's Tire
(703)393-4416
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Off Topic: Why can any user add a computer into Win2K Domain

[Missy Koslosky]

Which OS? WTF? 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Precht, David 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:52 
  AM
  Subject: RE: Off Topic: Why can any user 
  add a computer into Win2K Domain
  
  which OS ?
  What 
  groups do the users belong to?
  
-Original Message-From: Michael Morisoli 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:18 
To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Off Topic: Why 
can any user add a computer into Win2K Domain

I know this is off topic, but 
since AD and Exchange are so intertwined I thought I would ask this 
anyway.

For some reason, I have had 
three separate occasions where normal non-admin users have been able to add 
the computers into my AD Domain.

I checked the Group Policy 
Object under;
Computer 
Settings
 
Windows Settings
 
Security Settings
 
Local Policy
 
User Rights Assignment
 
Add workstation to domain
It shows that only domain admins 
can add computers to the domain. If this is correct, how is it that 
non-admins have been able to add computers to the domain.

Thank you for any 
help.

Mike
List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Auto Archive

[Missy Koslosky]

So I don't need to call you on it?  :)
- Original Message -
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:47 PM
Subject: RE: Auto Archive


Of course, I was lying!


I don't believe there is such a field for a message.

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 June 2002 16:33
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Auto Archive


IIRC, the actual field checked is based upon the last modified, not
received.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: Brien Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM
Subject: RE: Auto Archive


Yes I set up auto Archive but also I go to file/archive  choose to
archive mail older than 2 days  after it runs mail older than 2 days is
still in that folder

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Auto Archive


Do you mean autoarchiving in Outlook?

-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Auto Archive


I have  the items are not archived! Why?

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Auto Archive


You have to select the folders that you want to archive.

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Auto Archive


Hi All
I'm fairly new to Exchange 2000.Well Exchange period, we have been using
sendmail  are currently in the process of converting to Exchange 2000.
The problem I'm having is that we are creating an archive folder for the
user  moving all old mail into it. (I know a pst folder what a head
ach. I lost that battle. I said no pst but the VP's said pst)Anyways
after I archive all the old mail I set Exchange to auto archive every 2
months. It doesn't work it appears to work  says its archiving but
doesn't. What am I missing, is this a permission problem? It works fine
on my PC but not on a users PC. Any help would be great Thanks

Brien Mayer
Senior Network Administrator
Merchant's Tire
(703)393-4416
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Off Topic: Why can any user add a computer into Win2K Domain

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: Message



yeah, but when you're talking about AD, and the 
subject line says "W2K", I mean...

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Erik Sojka 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:53 
  PM
  Subject: RE: Off Topic: Why can any user 
  add a computer into Win2K Domain
  
  At 
  least he didn't ash about SP level. A minor step in the right 
  direction.
  

-Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 
1:46 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Off 
Topic: Why can any user add a computer into Win2K 
Domain
Well, you know, auto responders and all that... 
;o)

  
  -Original Message-From: Missy 
  Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 
  12:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Off 
  Topic: Why can any user add a computer into Win2K 
  Domain
  Which OS? WTF? 
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Precht, David 
To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 
11:52 AM
Subject: RE: Off Topic: Why can any 
user add a computer into Win2K Domain

which OS ?
What groups do the users belong to?

  -Original Message-From: Michael Morisoli 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 
  11:18 To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Off 
  Topic: Why can any user add a computer into Win2K 
  Domain
  
  I know this is off topic, 
  but since AD and Exchange are so intertwined I thought I would ask 
  this anyway.
  
  For some reason, I have 
  had three separate occasions where normal non-admin users have been 
  able to add the computers into my AD Domain.
  
  I checked the Group Policy 
  Object under;
  Computer 
  Settings
   
  Windows Settings
   
  Security Settings
   
  Local Policy
   
  User Rights Assignment
   
  Add workstation to domain
  It shows that only domain 
  admins can add computers to the domain. If this is correct, how 
  is it that non-admins have been able to add computers to the 
  domain.
  
  Thank you for any 
  help.
  
  Mike
  List Charter and 
  FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Outlook profile resolves changed alias

[Missy Koslosky]

Ding ding ding.  Distinguished name!
- Original Message -
From: Sargent, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:23 PM
Subject: RE: Outlook profile resolves changed alias


Ok ... thanks William and Martin ... but sorry for my ignorance:  what
does
MAPI use to resolve it? When you create a profile, doesn't it use
the
alias name to find the correct mailbox ... but I guess it then must use
the
distinguished name or the directory name after that??

Rob

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook profile resolves changed alias


The profile speaks to Directory Services on the Exchange server over
MAPI.

William

-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook profile resolves changed alias


Hi.   We're running Exch 5.5 SP4 and Outlook 2000 clients. I don't
understand why the following scenario works, so please enlighten me:

When an alias name is changed on a mailbox, an Outlook profile
that pre-existed can resolve the new alias name and open the right
mailbox. How does it do that?


Thanks!!

Rob Sargent

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Outlook 2002 Sync Error

[Missy Koslosky]

Outlook.
- Original Message -
From: Corgiat, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:56 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 Sync Error


On NAV?
Rick

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 9:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 Sync Error

Change the mode to MAPI only.

-Original Message-
From: Corgiat, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 1:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 Sync Error

yes

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 Sync Error


Are you by chance running NAV CE on your Exchange box?

-Original Message-
From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 7:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 Sync Error

Have you tried using the Offline Folders Repair Tool?  (Scanost.exe)

Peter Dahl.

-Original Message-
From: Corgiat, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 5:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2002 Sync Error


I am getting this error message when syncing a users new dell laptop:

16:09:48 Synchronizing Mailbox 'User, Name'
16:09:48 Synchronizing Hierarchy
16:09:48 Synchronizing Favorites
16:09:48 Synchronizing Folder 'Deleted Items'
16:10:12 Error synchronizing folder
16:10:12 [80004005-501-50A-550]
16:10:12 The client operation failed.
16:10:12 Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
16:10:12 For more information on this failure, click the
URL
below:
16:10:12
http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=800
0400
5-501-50a-550
16:10:12 Synchronizing Views
16:10:13 Done
16:10:14 Microsoft Exchange offline address book
16:10:14 Download successful

The os is WinXP and Outlook 2002 is the app.
I looked at the website in the error message, but I have done what it
says and still get this error...

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Rick
This electronic transmission, including any attachments may contain
information which is confidential and/or proprietary and is intended for
review solely by the party(s) to whom it is addressed.  If you have
received this transmission in error please either immediately return the
transmission to the sender or delete the transmission.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If
you
are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to
others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please
delete
this communication from your system.  Failure to follow this process may
be
unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
This electronic transmission, including any attachments may contain
information which is confidential and/or proprietary and is intended for
review solely by the party(s) to whom it is addressed.  If you have
received
this transmission in error please either immediately return the
transmission
to the sender or delete the transmission.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
This electronic transmission, including any attachments may contain
information which is confidential and/or proprietary and is intended for
review solely by the party(s) to whom it is addressed.  If you have
received
this transmission in error please either immediately return the
transmission
to the sender or delete the transmission.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: How much Bandwidth?

[Missy Koslosky]

As much as they need.

Seriously, that's like asking how long is a piece of string.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: Ambrose, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 9:43 AM
Subject: How much Bandwidth?


Hello Exchange Experts!

Can you tell me how much bandwidth the Outlook - Exchange RPC
connections
uses?

Exch 5.5 sp4
Outlook 97 sr-2 / Outlook 2000


Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
P: 001-212-339-0443
F: 001-212-836-3802
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: How much Bandwidth?

[Missy Koslosky]

Shiminy.  Each packet is 32kb.
- Original Message -
From: Ambrose, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:49 AM
Subject: RE: How much Bandwidth?


OK.

How about a minimum number then?


Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
P: 001-212-339-0443
F: 001-212-836-3802
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org

 -Original Message-
From: Ambrose, Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 9:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: How much Bandwidth?

Hello Exchange Experts!

Can you tell me how much bandwidth the Outlook - Exchange RPC
connections
uses?

Exch 5.5 sp4
Outlook 97 sr-2 / Outlook 2000


Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
P: 001-212-339-0443
F: 001-212-836-3802
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: How much Bandwidth?

[Missy Koslosky]

Much better explanation...

You probably won't.  How much of that bandwidth is available?  As a rule
of thumb, you need between 3 and 5 MB available per user.  For 20 users,
you should be just fine.

Sorry...
- Original Message -
From: Ambrose, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:18 AM
Subject: RE: How much Bandwidth?


Simply put

We have an office in Brussels that has a network connected to us by a
VPN.

Their Exchange server is on our site. All mail flows fine between them.
(
IMC is on this side of the pond) this configuration is FINE THE WAY IT
IS.

My boss wants to move all their servers over here.

They have a 512K link. We have a T1.

I told him that 20 people connecting to Exchange over a VPN would not
work
well with the bandwidth they have.

I'm trying to find the information to support that statement.




Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
P: 001-212-339-0443
F: 001-212-836-3802
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org

 -Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How much Bandwidth?

As much as it can. The packets are 32k. Let me ask you, why do you need
this information?

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: Ambrose, Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 6:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: How much Bandwidth?


Hello Exchange Experts!

Can you tell me how much bandwidth the Outlook - Exchange RPC
connections uses?

Exch 5.5 sp4
Outlook 97 sr-2 / Outlook 2000


Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
P: 001-212-339-0443
F: 001-212-836-3802
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: How much Bandwidth?

[Missy Koslosky]

Yeah.  Too little coffee here.  Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:27 AM
Subject: RE: How much Bandwidth?


3 and 5 mb? Did you mean K?

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 8:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: How much Bandwidth?


Much better explanation...

You probably won't.  How much of that bandwidth is available?  As a rule
of thumb, you need between 3 and 5 MB available per user.  For 20 users,
you should be just fine.

Sorry...
- Original Message -
From: Ambrose, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:18 AM
Subject: RE: How much Bandwidth?


Simply put

We have an office in Brussels that has a network connected to us by a
VPN.

Their Exchange server is on our site. All mail flows fine between them.
( IMC is on this side of the pond) this configuration is FINE THE WAY IT
IS.

My boss wants to move all their servers over here.

They have a 512K link. We have a T1.

I told him that 20 people connecting to Exchange over a VPN would not
work well with the bandwidth they have.

I'm trying to find the information to support that statement.




Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
P: 001-212-339-0443
F: 001-212-836-3802
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org

 -Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How much Bandwidth?

As much as it can. The packets are 32k. Let me ask you, why do you need

this information?

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: Ambrose, Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 6:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: How much Bandwidth?


Hello Exchange Experts!

Can you tell me how much bandwidth the Outlook - Exchange RPC
connections uses?

Exch 5.5 sp4
Outlook 97 sr-2 / Outlook 2000


Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
P: 001-212-339-0443
F: 001-212-836-3802
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: How much Bandwidth?

[Missy Koslosky]

You got that I meant 3 and 5 k per user, not M, right?
- Original Message -
From: Ambrose, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:42 AM
Subject: RE: How much Bandwidth?


No problem Missy, I got what I needed. Thanks!



Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
P: 001-212-339-0443
F: 001-212-836-3802
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org

 -Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: How much Bandwidth?

Much better explanation...

You probably won't.  How much of that bandwidth is available?  As a rule
of thumb, you need between 3 and 5 MB available per user.  For 20 users,
you should be just fine.

Sorry...
- Original Message -
From: Ambrose, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:18 AM
Subject: RE: How much Bandwidth?


Simply put

We have an office in Brussels that has a network connected to us by a
VPN.

Their Exchange server is on our site. All mail flows fine between them.
(
IMC is on this side of the pond) this configuration is FINE THE WAY IT
IS.

My boss wants to move all their servers over here.

They have a 512K link. We have a T1.

I told him that 20 people connecting to Exchange over a VPN would not
work
well with the bandwidth they have.

I'm trying to find the information to support that statement.




Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
P: 001-212-339-0443
F: 001-212-836-3802
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org

 -Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How much Bandwidth?

As much as it can. The packets are 32k. Let me ask you, why do you need
this information?

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: Ambrose, Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 6:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: How much Bandwidth?


Hello Exchange Experts!

Can you tell me how much bandwidth the Outlook - Exchange RPC
connections uses?

Exch 5.5 sp4
Outlook 97 sr-2 / Outlook 2000


Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
P: 001-212-339-0443
F: 001-212-836-3802
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000

[Missy Koslosky]

This isn't corrupt information.  It's crappy backup methodology.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:58 AM
Subject: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000


Hello All,

I am having an interesting problem with Exchange 2000  BackupExec 8.6.
Over the past few weeks, I have been getting errors within BackupExec8.6
when it backs up indivdual mailboxes in Exchange 2000. There are two
mailboxes where it finds messages that it can't access so therefore it
skips it. One of the messages is as follows:
Unable to open the item Howard Perl [howardp]?Top of Information
Store?Inbox?read?oldham?LEXINGTON PO#57016699 - skipped.
Access denied to file ?Howard Perl [howardp]?Top of Information
Store?Inbox?read?oldham?LEXINGTON PO#57016699.

This happens on a dozen or so emails within two mailboxes but none of
the others. Both of these mailboxes belong to users of RIM Blackberry's.
This is the only thing that I can see that can be causing the problem.
Anyway, when I got into the mailbox and drill down to the exact message
that it is skiiping, I can't even open it within Outlook (this is both
as the user and as Administrator).

The first time to problem came up, I just deleted the messages that
Outlook said couldn't access or was corrupt and the problem went away
for a few days but now its back. I search on Technet for corrupt
messages and find nothing but articles on corrupt stores and mta, etc.
Has anybody seen this happen before and found a solution? I called
Veritas tech Support and the basically say that if outlook can't open
the message then it has to do with Exchange2k and not backupexec. The
Exchange server is running W2KSP2 and E2KSP2, it is also running Trend
Scanmail and Norton AntiVirus Corp Edition. BackupExec is on another
server and the remote agent is installed on the mail server. Any
ideas?!?!?
.+
 A z[ jo ˅z


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000

[Missy Koslosky]

Please keep conversations on-list.

I take it  you're unfamiliar with the Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com?

- Original Message -
From: Paul Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000


What do you mean by crappy backup methodology? I dont rely on individual
mailbox backups for the server, only just in case a message or folder
needs to be restored instead of rebuilding the whole server!

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 5/31/2002 12:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc:
Subject: Re: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000



This isn't corrupt information.  It's crappy backup methodology.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:58 AM
Subject: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000


Hello All,

I am having an interesting problem with Exchange 2000  BackupExec 8.6.
Over the past few weeks, I have been getting errors within BackupExec8.6
when it backs up indivdual mailboxes in Exchange 2000. There are two
mailboxes where it finds messages that it can't access so therefore it
skips it. One of the messages is as follows:
Unable to open the item Howard Perl [howardp]?Top of Information
Store?Inbox?read?oldham?LEXINGTON PO#57016699 - skipped.
Access denied to file ?Howard Perl [howardp]?Top of Information
Store?Inbox?read?oldham?LEXINGTON PO#57016699.

This happens on a dozen or so emails within two mailboxes but none of
the others. Both of these mailboxes belong to users of RIM Blackberry's.
This is the only thing that I can see that can be causing the problem.
Anyway, when I got into the mailbox and drill down to the exact message
that it is skiiping, I can't even open it within Outlook (this is both
as the user and as Administrator).

The first time to problem came up, I just deleted the messages that
Outlook said couldn't access or was corrupt and the problem went away
for a few days but now its back. I search on Technet for corrupt
messages and find nothing but articles on corrupt stores and mta, etc.
Has anybody seen this happen before and found a solution? I called
Veritas tech Support and the basically say that if outlook can't open
the message then it has to do with Exchange2k and not backupexec. The
Exchange server is running W2KSP2 and E2KSP2, it is also running Trend
Scanmail and Norton AntiVirus Corp Edition. BackupExec is on another
server and the remote agent is installed on the mail server. Any
ideas?!?!?
.+
A z[ jo ˅z


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm






List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000

[Missy Koslosky]

ooohhh...  stop, you're hurting my feelings.

It's certainly a known issue.  Brick level backups fire errors all of
the time.  It's the nature of the beast.   There are other, better ways
to recover from mistakenly deleted items.  Especially in E2K.

- Original Message -
From: Joe Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:33 PM
Subject: RE: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000


now there's an intelligent, well-thought out response.

It sounds to me like you might want to call Veritas and see if they can
help with the source of the error. it's probably a known issue.

Thanks,

Joe Irvine
Director of Information Technology
The Business Office, Inc.
(609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860
www.tbopayroll.com


-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000
Importance: Low


This isn't corrupt information.  It's crappy backup methodology.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:58 AM
Subject: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000


Hello All,

I am having an interesting problem with Exchange 2000  BackupExec 8.6.
Over the past few weeks, I have been getting errors within BackupExec8.6
when it backs up indivdual mailboxes in Exchange 2000. There are two
mailboxes where it finds messages that it can't access so therefore it
skips it. One of the messages is as follows:
Unable to open the item Howard Perl [howardp]?Top of Information
Store?Inbox?read?oldham?LEXINGTON PO#57016699 - skipped.
Access denied to file ?Howard Perl [howardp]?Top of Information
Store?Inbox?read?oldham?LEXINGTON PO#57016699.

This happens on a dozen or so emails within two mailboxes but none of
the others. Both of these mailboxes belong to users of RIM Blackberry's.
This is the only thing that I can see that can be causing the problem.
Anyway, when I got into the mailbox and drill down to the exact message
that it is skiiping, I can't even open it within Outlook (this is both
as the user and as Administrator).

The first time to problem came up, I just deleted the messages that
Outlook said couldn't access or was corrupt and the problem went away
for a few days but now its back. I search on Technet for corrupt
messages and find nothing but articles on corrupt stores and mta, etc.
Has anybody seen this happen before and found a solution? I called
Veritas tech Support and the basically say that if outlook can't open
the message then it has to do with Exchange2k and not backupexec. The
Exchange server is running W2KSP2 and E2KSP2, it is also running Trend
Scanmail and Norton AntiVirus Corp Edition. BackupExec is on another
server and the remote agent is installed on the mail server. Any
ideas?!?!?
.+
 A z[ jo ˅z


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

.+
 A z[ jo ˅z


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000

[Missy Koslosky]

I'm so confused.  If you know all this, why are you wasting our time
asking about it?
- Original Message -
From: Paul Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 1:03 PM
Subject: RE: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000


Personally,  I dont care about using Brick Level Backup and I know what
you mean about BE being extremely sensitive. BackupExec can skip a file
and it will say your backup failed. Unless you look at the log and see
that it was one error that wasnt important which caused the backup to
fail but in actuality it backed up everything. The problem is the setup
is at a place I consult at, so I am not there all the time. So the
person who changes the tapes, see backup failed, and calls me whining
My Backup's not working, WAAHAHH!!!. So I tell him to check the log
before calling me and see if it was critical or not. But ofcourse he's
lazy and doesn't care he just doesn't want to see anything negative. So
instead of fighting it, I will disable the brick level and rely on the
file  mail rentention option within E2K. I swaer some users are babies
and expect everything to work perfectly all of the time!

-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 5/31/2002 12:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc:
Subject: RE: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000



I've seen the same thing with Backup Exec 8.6 on an Exchange 5.5 server
doing mailbox backups.  Personally I think it's just one of those
features of BE 8.6.  On regular data backups, even with Remote Agent 
Open Files Options Agent installed I've seen the backup hit an open
file, report that it is corrupt, back it up or not, and report the
backup job as failed, although everything thing else backed up
successfully.

-Original Message-
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000


Yeah, I am familiar with the list and it basically says that Brick
Level= BAD. The reasoning behind this is because it takes up more space
on the backup tape and makes your backup window larger.But if it doesn't
matter that the brick level backup is taking up more tape space and the
backup window isn't an issue then its not so bad at all.


Like I said before, I don't rely on Brick Level as a restore method for
the server but if the Big Boss accidently (stupidly) deletes a message
or folder within his mailbox and wants it back and the only way to
recover it is with a recent Brick Level backup, I dont he wants to hear
that we disabled it because it took to much time. When tape space and
backup windows become an issue this will be the first option to be
disabled witin the backups. Also, Im not too worried about relying on
the Brick Level Backup because I have the deleted item  mailbox
retention set both to 30 days since the backup rotation is for 30 days,
so I am covered. Oh well, thanks for the help!

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 5/31/2002 12:23 PM
To: Paul Armstrong; MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc:
Subject: Re: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000



Please keep conversations on-list.

I take it  you're unfamiliar with the Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com?

- Original Message -
From: Paul Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000


What do you mean by crappy backup methodology? I dont rely on
individual
mailbox backups for the server, only just in case a message or
folder
needs to be restored instead of rebuilding the whole server!

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 5/31/2002 12:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc:
Subject: Re: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000



This isn't corrupt information.  It's crappy backup methodology.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:58 AM
Subject: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000


Hello All,

I am having an interesting problem with Exchange 2000 
BackupExec 8.6.
Over the past few weeks, I have been getting errors within
BackupExec8.6
when it backs up indivdual mailboxes in Exchange 2000. There are
two
mailboxes where it finds messages that it can't access so
therefore it
skips it. One of the messages is as follows:
Unable to open the item Howard Perl [howardp]?Top of Information
Store?Inbox?read?oldham?LEXINGTON PO#57016699 - skipped.
Access denied to file ?Howard Perl [howardp]?Top of Information
Store?Inbox?read?oldham

Re: How much Bandwidth?

[Missy Koslosky]

I don't remember, and I don't feel like sniffing a connection to find
out again.  :)
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:16 PM
Subject: RE: How much Bandwidth?


How many packets are needed for a MAPI logon?

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 7:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: How much Bandwidth?


Shiminy.  Each packet is 32kb.
- Original Message -
From: Ambrose, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:49 AM
Subject: RE: How much Bandwidth?


OK.

How about a minimum number then?


Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
P: 001-212-339-0443
F: 001-212-836-3802
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org

 -Original Message-
From: Ambrose, Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 9:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: How much Bandwidth?

Hello Exchange Experts!

Can you tell me how much bandwidth the Outlook - Exchange RPC
connections uses?

Exch 5.5 sp4
Outlook 97 sr-2 / Outlook 2000


Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
P: 001-212-339-0443
F: 001-212-836-3802
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: filtering spam

[Missy Koslosky]

Wowza. How about teaching your users all 
about the delete key instead?

And thinking about content filtering 
software.

And web sites? You mean domain names, 
right?

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  JFadigan 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 3:25 
PM
  Subject: filtering spam
  
  
  I am setting up filtering(to filter out spam) on my exchange server. I am 
  at the moment putting in each web site manually, which I have several 
  thousand. Is there any tool or feature that can do this for 
  me.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Out of Off. Assistant

[Missy Koslosky]

What sends mail to the Internet?
- Original Message -
From: Chris Farrugia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:45 AM
Subject: Re: Out of Off. Assistant


Thanks Missy!

Can't say I haven't tried.

Can I humbly ask for some hints/clues?

TIA

 OOF is disabled to the internet.  Finding the configuration setting is
 left as an exercise for the reader.

 Missy
 - Original Message -
 From: Chris Farrugia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 6:39 AM
 Subject: Out of Off. Assistant


 Hi all!

 I need to set up an Out-of-office reply using Outlook XP clients and
E2k
 server.

 Outlook XP was setup using the 'assistant'.
 E2k - Internet Message Format - Allow out of off. replies ticked W2k
 DC -
 Exchange Advanced - Send out-of-off. messages to originator

 The out of off. works for internal messages, but not for external,
i.e.
 the external originators never get the out of off. message.

 Have I missed something?

 TIA
 Chris





 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Exch ASP

[Missy Koslosky]

Actually, it's not the amount of $$ they want to spend - we had lots of
cool ideas about expanding services and HA.  Clients just wanted email,
dagnabbit.  And cheap email at that!  Had we not been fighting against
other ASP's that were selling hosted Exchange (but POP or IMAP
only...), life would have been much easier.  Throw MAPI in the mix, and
things get more expensive, you know?

M
- Original Message -
From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 9:27 AM
Subject: RE: Exch ASP


I'll have to go with Missy on this one as well (duh) but for a slightly
different reason. E-mail tends to very different at different companies.
How
things are done, varies and changes seemingly weekly. ASP aren't really
geared for that type of detail that most of us give to our systems. They
work on the economies of scale and need to get as much the same as they
can.
Couple that with Missy's comment on how much money they want to spend
and
you get the idea. Unless you only want very basic e-mail services...

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 1:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exch ASP


Better not to go there in front of all these folks.  A google on my name
would turn up previous postings by me stating that an ASP would be the
way to go, with relevant sig file.  Let's say that I learned a lot and
have changed my mind, especially in today's environment.

I wish things had turned out differently, but they didn't.  Lessons
learned and all that.   There are a few hosting options I consider
viable, but most ASP's are forced to work on a shoestring budget, as
most clients are looking for cheaper, not better.  And cheap ain't
better, ya know?

Missy
- Original Message -
From: Clark, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 1:30 PM
Subject: RE: Exch ASP


And the name would be 

Would you refer them?

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information
and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the
prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 1:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exch ASP

I worked for one.
- Original Message -
From: Clark, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:25 PM
Subject: Exch ASP


Anybody have a tried and tested Exchange ASP vendor?

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information
and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the
prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Out of Off. Assistant

[Missy Koslosky]

Q258696.
- Original Message - 
From: "Chris Farrugia" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:24 AM
Subject: RE: Out of Off. 
Assistant
The tab I figure could make a difference in the SMTP connector 
'ContentRestrictions' has the System Messages and Non-System Messages ticked 
(forallow).Any other places I should look, besides the ones I 
mentioned earlier on? Its on the SMTP connector if I recall .. One 
of those tabs  -Original Message- From: Chris 
Farrugia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]  Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 
1:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Out of Off. 
Assistant   Thanks Missy!  Can't say I 
haven't tried.  Can I humbly ask for some hints/clues? 
 TIA   OOF is disabled to the internet. 
Finding the configuration setting is   left as an exercise 
for the reader.Missy  - Original 
Message -  From: "Chris Farrugia" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 6:39 AM  
Subject: Out of Off. Assistant  Hi 
all!I need to set up an Out-of-office reply using 
Outlook XP clients and   E2k server.
Outlook XP was setup using the 'assistant'.  E2k - Internet Message 
Format - Allow out of off. replies ticked W2k   DC - Exchange 
Advanced - Send out-of-off. messages to originator
The out of off. works for internal messages, but not for external,   
i.e. the external originators never get the out of off. message.  
  Have I missed something?TIA 
 Chris  
  List Charter and FAQ at:   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Out of Off. Assistant

[Missy Koslosky]

OOF is disabled to the internet.  Finding the configuration setting is
left as an exercise for the reader.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: Chris Farrugia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 6:39 AM
Subject: Out of Off. Assistant


Hi all!

I need to set up an Out-of-office reply using Outlook XP clients and E2k
server.

Outlook XP was setup using the 'assistant'.
E2k - Internet Message Format - Allow out of off. replies ticked W2k
DC -
Exchange Advanced - Send out-of-off. messages to originator

The out of off. works for internal messages, but not for external, i.e.
the external originators never get the out of off. message.

Have I missed something?

TIA
Chris





List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Sendmail and E2k

[Missy Koslosky]

Sendmail and E2kQ293800 should answer your question...

Missy
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin Zachary
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 6:03 PM
Subject: Sendmail and E2k




Hey guys, we have two servers on location one with sendmail and one with
Win2k/E2k. We only have one MX record pointing for both domains and
would like to run the exchange 2000 server forward all mail for the
domain to the sendmail box. I know we can make second MX records but we
are running out of Ips and are more doing it for testing and redundancy
plans, albeit who knows where we will use it.
I was poking around mskb and some other areas and didn't see anything
off hand..
Sendmail - domainB.com
E2k - domainA.com all to domainB.com fwd to sendmail box
Thx
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Exch ASP

[Missy Koslosky]

I worked for one.
- Original Message -
From: Clark, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:25 PM
Subject: Exch ASP


Anybody have a tried and tested Exchange ASP vendor?

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information
and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the
prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Exch ASP

[Missy Koslosky]

Better not to go there in front of all these folks.  A google on my name
would turn up previous postings by me stating that an ASP would be the
way to go, with relevant sig file.  Let's say that I learned a lot and
have changed my mind, especially in today's environment.

I wish things had turned out differently, but they didn't.  Lessons
learned and all that.   There are a few hosting options I consider
viable, but most ASP's are forced to work on a shoestring budget, as
most clients are looking for cheaper, not better.  And cheap ain't
better, ya know?

Missy
- Original Message -
From: Clark, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 1:30 PM
Subject: RE: Exch ASP


And the name would be 

Would you refer them?

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information
and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the
prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 1:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exch ASP

I worked for one.
- Original Message -
From: Clark, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:25 PM
Subject: Exch ASP


Anybody have a tried and tested Exchange ASP vendor?

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information
and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the
prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Outlook Pack Rats

[Missy Koslosky]

I'd look at K-vault if I were in your position.
- Original Message -
From: lars andersson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:28 PM
Subject: Outlook Pack Rats


Our company requires 100% email retention of all pertainant emails.  Our
inboxes are growing pretty big, around 1gb after a few years.
Synchronization is an issue and I know OL wasnt designed to work as a
data
warehouse for email pack rats.  I was wondering how other people deal
with
this issue and what kinds of tools are available to ensure proper
retention.

Thanks !

Lars

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Can someone settle this....(part 2)

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: Message



You are correct.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Garland 
  Mac Neill 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 4:45 
PM
  Subject: RE: Can someone settle 
  this(part 2)
  
  
  Ok, 
  that makes lots of sense
  
  Now the argument has 
  moved to synchriozation. Like when does it occur. 
  
  The example being 
  that you open Outlook, you receive an attachment, you 
  open attachmentwhere are you opening it from? I say the server because 
  Outlook does not Synch until you either tell it to or close out, saying you 
  have the switch turned on
  
  Am I 
  wrong?
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:36 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Can 
  someone settle this
  
  Taken right from the outlook 2002 white 
  paper:Cancelable Server RequestOutlook has a new dialog box that shows 
  the user when Outlook is waiting on a response from the Microsoft Exchange 
  Server or Active Directory Global Catalog server. This dialog has a Cancel 
  request button so users can cancel the request and continue to use 
  Outlook.Users who do not want the dialog box to be displayed on screen can 
  use the check box to minimize it. This dialog does not necessarily indicate a 
  problem condition - just that the server has failed to respond to a request by 
  Outlook in a specified amount of time.Change the Timeout of the 
  Cancelable RPC 
  DialogIf the Cancelable RPC dialog appears too 
  often on a slow link and interferes with the user's ability to work, change 
  the default timeout value so that the dialog does not appear as often. 
  Changing the amount of time until the server communication times out is done 
  by altering the Exchange Server Settings. Exchange Server Settings are altered 
  in the same way described in the Choose the Connection Type at Start Up 
  section.Microsoft tried to remove as many RPC's as they could to 
  increase performance of the application.They couldn't actually remove 
  them, so they changed it so the RPC's only show up when called upon.. On slow 
  links you see this message box more.-Original 
  Message-From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:27 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Can someone settle 
  thisYea, the popup box is just an interface for a highly 
  complex backend thatsifts through bad RPCs 
  ;)-Original Message-From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:12 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Can someone settle 
  thisWhat?It's not a "cheat". It's an 
  informational message. And RPC's are most certainly not 
  "removed".- Original Message -From: MHR(Michael Ross)To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:17 PMSubject: 
  RE: Can someone settle thisActually Ill tell ya what is goin 
  on.That status bar is new to XP.That status bar was MS' way of 
  removing RPC's that slow the client down.If you were using Outlook XP 
  on your lan, and your lan was slow, or were on a 10 MB switched environment, 
  you would see that bar come up again. Its a cheat on MS' side to try and speed 
  up your client. -Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:08 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Can someone settle 
  thisExchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP6Outlook XP and Outlook 
  2000.My coworker and I are trying to determine how Outlook really 
  works. We have noticed that when we are dialed up on our laptops and connected 
  to our network via an IPSEC VPN connection (same with PPTP), when we connect 
  to Exchange via Outlook XP there are times we get a message that it is 
  requesting information from the server and has a status bar. Under Outlook 
  2000 there was no information box like that.My argument is that under 
  XP, it is telling you that is requesting information and this is normal 
  operation, given that it's working on a dialup. I should clarify, that we get 
  this box when we are trying to open email or change folders. He says this is 
  some kind of error that needs to be resolved.Can some one shed some 
  light on this. If you need more information please let me know.Garland 
  Mac NeillSystems 
  AdministratorSolbourne[EMAIL PROTECTED]List Charter and 
  FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm--The 
  information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
  information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it 
  is addressed. If the reader of this message

Re: Access denied to log on outlook after exchange mailbox move

[Missy Koslosky]

There should be no need to do that if they're using the native Move
Mailbox, as the MAPI profile will be automagically updated as long as
the old server is online.

- Original Message -
From: Garland Mac Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:16 AM
Subject: RE: Access denied to log on outlook after exchange mailbox move


Have you changed the name of the Exchange server in Outlook?


-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 7:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Access denied to log on outlook after exchange mailbox move

Hello, I have a bit of a problem that I cannot seem to understand what
the
issue is.  We are now hosting exchange 5.5 and exchange 2000 on an
exchange 5.5 site.  We are migrating using the move-mailbox method which
moves all mailboxes of individual users to the new exchange 2000 server.
Everything works when doing the exchange tasks and move the mailbox
option.  The problem afterwards is that the user can no longer log on to
his/her mailbox after the move.  It says you do not have permission to
log
on.  What could be the problem?  Btw,  I called microsoft to help me
setup
exchange 2000 to work with exchange 5.5 site.  Thanks.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Microsoft Newsgroup

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: Microsoft Newsgroup



What the heck does that have to do with this, 
David?

MS NG's cannot be pulled to an Exchange server; 
they do not allow this.

Missy

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Precht, David 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:51 AM
  Subject: RE: Microsoft Newsgroup
  
  what 
  version of Exchange
  What 
  OS ?
  
  More 
  Details please
  
-Original Message-From: PANCHAL, PRAVEEN 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:44 
To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Microsoft 
Newsgroup
I want to setup Microsoft's Newsgroup on Exchange 
server. Can someone give me steps please. 
Thanks 
- 
Praveen Panchal List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Mailbox folder names

[Missy Koslosky]

The language settings of the *first* client that touches the mailbox
will be the default language settings for that mailbox.

Make sense?

Missy
- Original Message -
From: Volf Miroslav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:38 AM
Subject: Mailbox folder names


How can I set language in which mailbox folders ( inbox, outbox, deleted
items, sent items) appear in outlook 2000.
Server is 5.5 SP4.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

---
Odchozí zpráva neobsahuje viry.
Zkontrolováno antivirovým systémem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz).
Verze: 6.0.361 / Virová báze: 199 - datum vydání: 7.5.2002


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Print message without mailbox name

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: Message



Heck, just change the mailbox's display 
name.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Dahl, Peter 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:29 PM
  Subject: RE: Print message without 
  mailbox name
  
  This 
  was mentioned by someone earlier, but if you create a new profile with a 
  generic name it will not have your name on the message.
  

-Original Message-From: Jeremiah 
Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 
2:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Print 
message without mailbox name
Hmmm, Isn't Email the First Generation? So When you Print 
it, that becomes the Second Generation, Does that make it still 
valid?

Seriously, though, why not Highlight the Entire Email Copy and 
Paste it into word? Wouldn't it maintain 90-100% of the Formatting 
that it had in the email?


  -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 
  2:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Print message without mailbox name
  Nope; then it's still suspect, since it's a copy of a mutilated 
  evidence. It'll look like a copy of a cut-off piece of paper. If it was 
  really that easy to get around, do you think the courts would bother 
  insisting on first-generation medical notes? :-)
  
  It may be different for non-medical cases, 
  however.
  
  --
  
  Michael Leone, Systems 
  Administrator
  Philadelphia Contributionship
  210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia, PA 
  19106
  mailto: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  V: 215-627-1752 x1282
  F: 215-627-5354
  
-Original Message-From: Jeremiah Watson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 
1:15 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Print message without mailbox name
Shoot, Cut it Off, Throw it on the Copier BAM You're back 
to 8.5X11 and Nobody's the Wiser.

  -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 
  2002 1:09 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Print message without mailbox name
  Cutting it would make it invalid, wouldn't it? If such a piece 
  of evidence was presented in a trial against me, I'd hope my lawyer 
  would scream about "mutilated evidence", and how no one could be sure 
  exactly what was cut off. That's why medical records have to be 
  pristine - you can't annotate them later, you have to use the 
  original, unalterated source.
  
  --
  
  Michael Leone, Systems 
  Administrator
  Philadelphia 
Contributionship
  210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia, PA 
  19106
  mailto: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  V: 215-627-1752 x1282
  F: 215-627-5354
  
-Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 
10, 2002 12:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Print message without mailbox 
name
The attorney actually suggested 
the scissors option. :-) Not that you think like a lawyer...or 
thatit would be a bad thing if you did.

  -Original Message-From: Lynn 
  Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 
  10, 2002 12:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Print message without mailbox 
  name
  A pair of scissors to cut it off ... or 
  are sharp implements not allowed?
  
  Or create a mailbox and profile with a 
  "neutral" name e.g MS Exchange 5.5/2000 or something similar and 
  print from there.
  
  Karen
  
-Original Message-From: 
Hotchkiss, Peter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 10 May 
2002 17:02To: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Print message without mailbox 
name
The email may be presented 
as evidence in courtand should not have someone's name at 
the top who is not connected to the message.

  -Original Message-From: 
  Precht, David 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 
  10, 2002 11:53 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Print message without mailbox 
  name
  Do they have an 

Re: Microsoft Newsgroup

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: Message



Down boy.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Martin Blackstone 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 3:42 PM
  Subject: RE: Microsoft Newsgroup
  
  Mmmm up on 
  Missy
  

-Original Message-From: Andy David 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 
12:38 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Microsoft Newsgroup


Q304477
Before 
you try to one-up Missy, please read the entire post.


  
  -Original Message-From: Fred 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 3:29 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Microsoft 
  Newsgroup
  http://www.ntfaq.com/articles/index.cfm?articleID=13673searchstring=newsfeed
  
-Original Message-From: Missy Koslosky 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:50 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: 
Microsoft Newsgroup
What the heck does that have to do with 
this, David?

MS NG's cannot be pulled to an Exchange 
server; they do not allow this.

Missy

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Precht, David 
  To: MS-Exchange 
  Admin Issues 
  Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:51 
  AM
  Subject: RE: Microsoft 
  Newsgroup
  
  what version of Exchange
  What OS ?
  
  More Details please
  
-Original Message-From: PANCHAL, PRAVEEN 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 10, 
2002 10:44 To: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: Microsoft Newsgroup
I want to setup Microsoft's Newsgroup on 
Exchange server. Can someone give me steps please. 
Thanks 
- 
Praveen Panchal 
List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
--The 
information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it 
is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this 
message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, 
please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone 
(212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and 
delete the message. Thank 
you.==List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Can someone settle this....

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: Message



What?

It's not a "cheat". It's an informational 
message. And RPC's are most certainly not "removed".

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) 
  
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:17 
PM
  Subject: RE: Can someone settle 
  this
  
  Actually Ill tell ya what is goin on.
  
  That 
  status bar is new to XP.
  That 
  status bar was MS' way of removing RPC's that slow the client 
  down.
  
  If 
  you were using Outlook XP on your lan, and your lan was slow, or were on a 10 
  MB switched environment, you would see that bar come up 
  again.
  Its 
  a cheat on MS' side to try and speed up your client.
  

-Original Message-From: Garland Mac 
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 
2002 12:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Can 
someone settle this

Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4 
SP6
Outlook XP and Outlook 
2000.

My coworker and I are trying to 
determine how Outlook really works. We have noticed that when we are dialed 
up on our laptops and connected to our network via an IPSEC VPN connection 
(same with PPTP), when we connect to Exchange via Outlook XP there are times 
we get a message that it is requesting information from the server and has a 
status bar. Under Outlook 2000 there was no information box like that. 


My argument is that under XP, it 
is telling you that is requesting information and this is normal operation, 
given that it's working on a dialup. I should clarify, that we get this box 
when we are trying to open email or change folders. He says this is some 
kind of error that needs to be resolved.

Can some one shed some light on 
this. If you need more information please let me 
know. 

Garland Mac 
Neill
Systems 
Administrator
Solbourne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Can someone settle this....

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: Message



Since MAPI uses RPC, you're kind of correct. 
I am unaware of MS;s wish to remove this functionality.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) 
  
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:42 
PM
  Subject: RE: Can someone settle 
  this
  
  I 
  may have used the word Cheat in the wrong way. 
  I 
  mean cheat by saying that MS couldnt get around removing the RPCs they wanted 
  to.
  

-Original Message-From: Andy David 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 
2:40 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Can 
someone settle this
And this is a cheat?


  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 
  3:36 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Can 
  someone settle this
  Taken right from the outlook 2002 white 
  paper:Cancelable Server RequestOutlook has a new dialog box that 
  shows the user when Outlook is waiting on a response from the Microsoft 
  Exchange Server or Active Directory Global Catalog server. This dialog has 
  a Cancel request button so users can cancel the request and continue to 
  use Outlook.Users who do not want the dialog box to be displayed on 
  screen can use the check box to minimize it. This dialog does not 
  necessarily indicate a problem condition - just that the server has failed 
  to respond to a request by Outlook in a specified amount of 
  time.Change the Timeout of the Cancelable RPC 
  DialogIf the Cancelable RPC dialog appears too often on 
  a slow link and interferes with the user's ability to work, change the 
  default timeout value so that the dialog does not appear as often. 
  Changing the amount of time until the server communication times out is 
  done by altering the Exchange Server Settings. Exchange Server Settings 
  are altered in the same way described in the Choose the Connection Type at 
  Start Up section.Microsoft tried to remove as many RPC's as they 
  could to increase performance of the application.They couldn't 
  actually remove them, so they changed it so the RPC's only show up when 
  called upon.. On slow links you see this message box 
  more.-Original Message-From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Can someone settle thisYea, the popup box is just an 
  interface for a highly complex backend thatsifts through bad 
  RPCs ;)-Original Message-From: Missy 
  Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 
  May 09, 2002 3:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Can 
  someone settle thisWhat?It's not a "cheat". 
  It's an informational message. And RPC's are most certainly not 
  "removed".- Original Message -From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross)To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:17 
  PMSubject: RE: Can someone settle thisActually Ill 
  tell ya what is goin on.That status bar is new to XP.That 
  status bar was MS' way of removing RPC's that slow the client 
  down.If you were using Outlook XP on your lan, and your lan was 
  slow, or were on a 10 MB switched environment, you would see that bar come 
  up again. Its a cheat on MS' side to try and speed up your client. 
  -Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Can someone settle thisExchange 5.5 SP4 
  on NT4 SP6Outlook XP and Outlook 2000.My coworker and I are 
  trying to determine how Outlook really works. We have noticed that when we 
  are dialed up on our laptops and connected to our network via an IPSEC VPN 
  connection (same with PPTP), when we connect to Exchange via Outlook XP 
  there are times we get a message that it is requesting information from 
  the server and has a status bar. Under Outlook 2000 there was no 
  information box like that.My argument is that under XP, it is 
  telling you that is requesting information and this is normal operation, 
  given that it's working on a dialup. I should clarify, that we get this 
  box when we are trying to open email or change folders. He says this is 
  some kind of error that needs to be resolved.Can some one shed 
  some light on this. If you need more information please let me 
  know.Garland Mac NeillSystems 
  AdministratorSolbourne[EMAIL PROTECTED]List Charter 
  and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/excha

Re: Can someone settle this....

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: Message



And it certainly doesn't "remove" RPC's. It 
can cancel a call if you click the "cancel" button, but that's it.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Andy 
  David 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:40 
PM
  Subject: RE: Can someone settle 
  this
  
  And 
  this is a cheat?
  
  

-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:36 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Can someone 
settle this
Taken right from the outlook 2002 white paper:Cancelable 
Server RequestOutlook has a new dialog box that shows the user when 
Outlook is waiting on a response from the Microsoft Exchange Server or 
Active Directory Global Catalog server. This dialog has a Cancel request 
button so users can cancel the request and continue to use Outlook.Users 
who do not want the dialog box to be displayed on screen can use the check 
box to minimize it. This dialog does not necessarily indicate a problem 
condition - just that the server has failed to respond to a request by 
Outlook in a specified amount of time.Change the Timeout of the 
Cancelable RPC DialogIf the Cancelable RPC 
dialog appears too often on a slow link and interferes with the user's 
ability to work, change the default timeout value so that the dialog does 
not appear as often. Changing the amount of time until the server 
communication times out is done by altering the Exchange Server Settings. 
Exchange Server Settings are altered in the same way described in the Choose 
the Connection Type at Start Up section.Microsoft tried to remove as 
many RPC's as they could to increase performance of the application.They 
couldn't actually remove them, so they changed it so the RPC's only show up 
when called upon.. On slow links you see this message box 
more.-Original Message-From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Can someone settle thisYea, the popup box is just an 
interface for a highly complex backend thatsifts through bad 
RPCs ;)-Original Message-----From: Missy 
Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 
09, 2002 3:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Can someone 
settle thisWhat?It's not a "cheat". It's an 
informational message. And RPC's are most certainly not 
"removed".- Original Message -From: MHR(Michael Ross)To: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:17 PMSubject: 
RE: Can someone settle thisActually Ill tell ya what is goin 
on.That status bar is new to XP.That status bar was MS' way of 
removing RPC's that slow the client down.If you were using Outlook 
XP on your lan, and your lan was slow, or were on a 10 MB switched 
environment, you would see that bar come up again. Its a cheat on MS' side 
to try and speed up your client. -Original Message-From: Garland 
Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
Can someone settle thisExchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4 
SP6Outlook XP and Outlook 2000.My coworker and I are trying to 
determine how Outlook really works. We have noticed that when we are dialed 
up on our laptops and connected to our network via an IPSEC VPN connection 
(same with PPTP), when we connect to Exchange via Outlook XP there are times 
we get a message that it is requesting information from the server and has a 
status bar. Under Outlook 2000 there was no information box like 
that.My argument is that under XP, it is telling you that is 
requesting information and this is normal operation, given that it's working 
on a dialup. I should clarify, that we get this box when we are trying to 
open email or change folders. He says this is some kind of error that needs 
to be resolved.Can some one shed some light on this. If you need 
more information please let me know.Garland Mac NeillSystems 
AdministratorSolbourne[EMAIL PROTECTED]List Charter 
and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm--The 
information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it 
is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have r

Re: settle this

[Missy Koslosky]

Yes.  Dang it.
- Original Message -
From: Neil Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:38 AM
Subject: RE: settle this


And couldn't you move servers between admin groups in beta3?!

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 03 May 2002 10:37
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: settle this
Subject: RE: settle this


I get it screwed up too because it was more in beta!

-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: settle this


Yes.[1]

[1] Yeah, a bit late, but so?

Les Bessant MCSE[1] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager, Sanderson Townend  Gilbert
Acting in a personal capacity
http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! [1]
Really![2] [2] Sigs get their own footnote sequence

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 April 2002 15:24
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: settle this


Are you sure??

--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/
For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: settle this


It's 4 storage groups, each containing a maximum of 5 databases!  Doh!

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 23 April 2002 22:07
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: settle this
Subject: RE: settle this


I knew it was 20. Some how I had it backwards. 5 stores 4 groups..
Thanks for clearing me up on that one Ben. --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS,
UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign,
GO here!

-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: settle this


Yes, WHO is wording it wrongly.  Certainly not Kevin - he is correct on
all accounts.  E2K Entp can indeed have multiple databases.  IIRC, you
can have up to 4 Mailbox Stores (aka databases) per Storage Group, and
up to 5 Storage Groups per Server.  This gives you a grand total of up
to 20 different databases per server.  Does that help?

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: settle this

Yes, you are wording it wrongly

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: settle this

2k In standard you get 1. in enterprise you can have more then one
Private information store.

In exchange2k you database is made up of a few more files then just the
EDB.


--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/
For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 1:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: settle this
I have a dispute going.
Exchange 5.5 has a single information store that consists of the
priv.edb and the pub.edb Exchange 2000 has the same priv.edb, pub.edb,
but can have more than one information store. These stores are mailbox
and\or public folder stores which are in each storage group. I am
correct in stating that each Exchange 2000 Server can have more than one
information store, correct? Or am I just wording it wrongly?

Michael Ross
Panduit Corp.
17301 Ridgeland Ave
Tinley Park, IL 60477
MCSE
MS Exchange Administrator

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Domain name change

[Missy Koslosky]

http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxk.htm
- Original Message -
From: Dawson, Valencia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:03 PM
Subject: Domain name change


We will soon be changing domain names.
If any of you have recently undergone this please advise me of the steps
to
take.
We are using WindowsNT/Exchange 5.5 with Outlook 98/200/XP.
What changes do I make on the Exchange server to reflect this change?
How do I make an easy transition so people can get mail from both the
new
and the old at least for a while?
How do I make the change so the email addresses at least going out will
reflect the new name.
Any help in the right direction will be appreciated.
Thank you



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Domain name change

[Missy Koslosky]

Oh.  Duh.

Add the new addresses to your GAL.  You'll need to:

1)  Export your current GAL to a CSV.
2) Create a new header called secondary-proxy addresses.
3)  Copy all current domain SMTP addresses to the new field.  Format
MUST be smtp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - note lower case smtp.
4)  Create new SMTP addresses for all users (if your localpart is
remaining the same, simply replace the old name with the new in the
e-mail addresses column).
5)  Import your changes.

Q155414 should help if you're unfamiliar with import  export processes.

And add an MX record in DNS for the new domain.

Better?
- Original Message -
From: Dawson, Valencia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:37 PM
Subject: RE: Domain name change


The domain name is what is changing- email address etc. I am not moving
the
server to a new domain.

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Domain name change


http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxk.htm
- Original Message -
From: Dawson, Valencia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:03 PM
Subject: Domain name change


We will soon be changing domain names.
If any of you have recently undergone this please advise me of the steps
to
take.
We are using WindowsNT/Exchange 5.5 with Outlook 98/200/XP.
What changes do I make on the Exchange server to reflect this change?
How do I make an easy transition so people can get mail from both the
new
and the old at least for a while?
How do I make the change so the email addresses at least going out will
reflect the new name.
Any help in the right direction will be appreciated.
Thank you



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: PST Bad - why?

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: RE: PST Bad - why?



http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxf.htmtells 
all you need to know on the subject...

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Lesaca, Wally 
  R. 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:48 
AM
  Subject: RE: PST Bad - why?
  
  Please elaborate more on the issue. 
  I'm also in a dilemma. My users are hard headed when it comes to mailbox 
  size. One way is to go .PST. 
  My disk space is now only 560k. 
  TIA. 
  
-Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? 
PST=BAD is a bad equation. It should be 
PST=Usually Bad. Sometimes, you don't 
have any choice. For instance, when doing migrations or moving 
mailboxes. However, generally you shouldn't use 
them for permanent storage. They are 
actually very similar to the old MSMail format for storing mail 
which was also prone to failure. 
Kevin 
-Original Message- From: Yurchuk, Michael W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 01 May 2002 17:36 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PST Bad - why? 
Hello all sorry to ask a stupid question, but my 
pointy haired boss is looking at 
implementing PST's here and I know many people say pst's are not 
good, could you guys give me some ammo to argue 
why PST's aren't a good option and what 
problems will end up occurring if it is implemented. 
Thanks in advance. 
Michael Yurchuk, MCSE Systems Administrator direcTEL Saskatoon, SK 
306-384-8600 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Congestion

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: Message



Well, we'd love to help you sort this out, but 
there simply isn't enough information to run with here.

Missy

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Steve Hart 
  
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:59 
  PM
  Subject: Congestion
  
  I 
  have 3 exchange 5.5 SP4 NT4.0 SP6a servers, each in it's own 
  site.
  
  Two 
  servers are working fine, all internet connectors seem to be 
  fine.
  
  One 
  server will not send or recieve mail from the others due to congestion. 
  (Sorry, I haven't seen the actual error message.)
  
  Ideas?
  
  Steve
  
  List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Congestion

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: Message



One would hope that was done before the list was 
ever asked about the question. 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Rickenbacher Beat 
  
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:23 
AM
  Subject: AW: Congestion
  
  There you're very right...
  
  But 
  meanwhile he can search for "exchange congestion" and will receive some Q's in 
  return...
  
  Ricki
  
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Missy Koslosky 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2002 
15:14An: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesBetreff: Re: 
Congestion
Well, we'd love to help you sort this out, but 
there simply isn't enough information to run with here.

Missy

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Steve 
  Hart 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:59 
  PM
  Subject: Congestion
  
  I have 3 exchange 5.5 SP4 NT4.0 SP6a servers, each in it's own 
  site.
  
  Two servers are working fine, all internet connectors seem to be 
  fine.
  
  One server will not send or recieve mail from the others due to 
  congestion. (Sorry, I haven't seen the actual error 
  message.)
  
  Ideas?
  
  Steve
  
  List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: print detail on gal

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: RE: print detail on gal



They show as having logged on when they check 
public folders and other resources.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Eldridge, 
  Dave 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:48 
PM
  Subject: RE: print detail on gal
  
  Why 
  does it show people twice. Not everyone but most.
  dave
  
-Original Message-From: Sweetman, John 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:04 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: print 
detail on gal

No. Just the last time they physically 
logged into the Exchange server.

If you want to look 
at the last access time, go to Logons and check the column Last Access 
Time.




-Original 
Message-From: 
Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:47 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: print 
detail on gal


Same 
place i used " save window contents" 
duh!!

So is 
the last column Last logon time the last time that person opened their 
mailbox?



dave

  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:00 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: print 
  detail on gal
  you dont want to share with us ? 
  
  -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, May 02, 
  2002 13:25 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Subject: RE: print detail 
  on gal 
  
  never mind i found it. 
  
  dave 
  -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, May 02, 
  2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Subject: print detail on 
  gal 
  
  I am trying to export my gal to a file . How can I 
  include the last logon to the mailbox in the .csv file? When I go into 
  Servers,Server,Priv,Mailbox Resources it show that detail. The only way to get 
  this info is to screen print it. Is there a way to capture this 
  info. 
  dave 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Need Feed Back Please

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: RE: Need Feed Back Please



ummm... are you lost? OST's are so easy 
it's laughable. If they aren't working, you can blow them away and 
recreate them by re-synching. PST's are so not in the same category. 


Missy
- Original Message - 

  From: 
  Abercrombie, 
  Sherry 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:52 
  AM
  Subject: RE: Need Feed Back Please
  
  IMHO .pst = Bad idea, but a necessary 
  evil (unfortunately) .ost = Very Very Bad idea, causes 
  many problems, don't use them, they can cause users to lose mail if not setup 
  properly.
  -Original Message- From: 
  Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Need 
  Feed Back Please 
  "like a .pst but better" - NO! They are exactly the same 
  structure and are as prone to problems as .psts. However, with .psts you have 
  a choice (i.e. you don't have to use them) but with .osts you don't. Many 
  people that use .osts will tell you that they are sometimes as much of a PITA 
  as .psts.
  My company converts .osts to .psts and we do a lot of 
  it! 
  Kevin 
  -Original Message- From: TIM 
  CARFREY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: 01 May 2002 13:27 To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Need Feed Back 
  Please 
  I understand the you WERE using .pst in the past because you 
  were using a POP3 server. (Yuk). Now you are switching from the Darkside, 
  Think outside the box and use .ost's. They are offline file, like a .pst but 
  better. You don't have to back them up and if they get trashed you just 
  recreate them. They are great because mobile users can still read there email 
  from the road. I know Exchange is a POP3 server also but why not use it 
  correctly.
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Need Feed Back Please

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: Message



A deleted message is a deleted message, whether 
it's gone from the OST or the mailbox - either way, it's gone.

I don't see how this can cause confusion unless 
your users are way beyond hope.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Abercrombie, 
  Sherry 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:27 
  AM
  Subject: RE: Need Feed Back Please
  
  Key 
  words, USERs,  SETUP CORRECTLY  I should add know how to 
  use. Never could seem to get it across to those guys how to do it 
  correctlyof course this was several years ago, on Outlook 97. 
  Haven't tried it since then. They would delete mail in mailbox while in 
  office, then connect from home and delete the same emails from their offline 
  folder, then call Help Desk because they didn't have their email..we 
  finally made it a "corporate" decision not to let them use .ost's  have 
  never revisited that thought.
  

-Original Message-From: William 
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 
01, 2002 9:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Need Feed Back Please
How does an .ost cause users to lose email? 
It is a slave copy to the mailbox on the server. It can and does 
corrupt as a .pst might. You just blow it away and create a new one 
from the 'master' mailbox.

William

  
  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, 
  Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 
  6:53 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Need 
  Feed Back Please
  IMHO .pst = Bad idea, but a 
  necessary evil (unfortunately) .ost = Very Very 
  Bad idea, causes many problems, don't use them, they can cause users to 
  lose mail if not setup properly.
  -Original Message- From: 
  Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:32 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Need Feed Back Please 
  "like a .pst but better" - NO! They are exactly the same 
  structure and are as prone to problems as .psts. However, with .psts you 
  have a choice (i.e. you don't have to use them) but with .osts you don't. 
  Many people that use .osts will tell you that they are sometimes as much 
  of a PITA as .psts.
  My company converts .osts to .psts and we do a lot of 
  it! 
  Kevin 
  -Original Message- From: 
  TIM CARFREY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: 01 May 2002 13:27 To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Need Feed 
  Back Please 
  I understand the you WERE using .pst in the past because 
  you were using a POP3 server. (Yuk). Now you are switching from the 
  Darkside, Think outside the box and use .ost's. They are offline file, 
  like a .pst but better. You don't have to back them up and if they get 
  trashed you just recreate them. They are great because mobile users can 
  still read there email from the road. I know Exchange is a POP3 server 
  also but why not use it correctly.
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: 16 GB Limit?

[Missy Koslosky]

It's 16 GB *per* database, not total.

And the limit is only on the Standard version of Exchange 5.5 (and E2K).
There is no real limit on the Enterprise version of Exchange.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:50 AM
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?


William,

I am not sure how we reach the 16GB total.  I have always just looked at
the
size of the Priv and Pub and added them together , and if they were
under
16GB then no sweat.  My question as I was reading the thread was am I
looking in the right place.  You responded that it was in the
application
event log but I didn't see it.  I was looking at the Source and the
Category for filtering purposes.  I was sort of hoping you would
confirm
or correct my guess.  Sorry if I wasn't clear.

Dan Munley

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?


I'm not sure what you are asking, Dan.

There is a hardcoded 16GB database limit to each of the private
information store and public information store in the Exchange Standard
version.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?


MSExchangeIS Private?  Storage Limits?

Dan Munley



-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?


GB, not MB.

There is a separate 16GB limit on each of the priv.edb and pub.edb.

The online maintenance that runs each night will report the database
information to the application event log.

William

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?


It is agreed that the limit is 16MB.  How is that determined?  Through
the aggregate size of the mailboxes and private folders? Or the size of
the Priv and Pub?

Dan Munley



-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 16 GB Limit?


Ok everyone here is talking about the 16GB limit on regular 5.5, but all
the docs I can find from Microsoft don't seem to differencate between
5.5 and 5.5 enterprise. I was always under the impression that regualar
5.5 had the 16GB limit, and Eneterprise got rid of it.

Am I right?
If not what is the limit in regualr 5.5?


John Majetic

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Emai Archive Management and Email Content Management

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: Emai Archive Management and Email Content Management



K-Vault rocks for archival (www.kvault.com)

I hear that mimesweeper is good for content 
management, but I've never played with it as I have phiolsophical difficulties 
with being known as the email nazi.

Missy

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Sweetman, 
  John 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:02 
  PM
  Subject: Emai Archive Management and 
  Email Content Management
  
  Our company is going to be looking at some 
  Email archive management and Email content management applications for 
  Exchange.
  Anyone had any good or bad experiences with this? What 
  vendors are you using?
  We are running Exchnage 5.5 SP4 and will be upgrading to 
  Exchange 2K before the end of this year.
  Thanks in advance for ay info.
  List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Outlook 2000 hangs

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: Outlook 2000 hangs



How much mail is in her mailbox?

What happens if you re-create her 
profile?

Missy

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  HOLLIDAY, Eric 
  
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:38 
  PM
  Subject: Outlook 2000 hangs
  
  Hello all, 
  Environment: Exchange 5.5 (sp3) Enterprise, server OS: 
  Win2000; client OS Win2000 Pro 
  Here's my situation. I have a user who starts up her 
  OL2K client normally (CW mode)  after a few seconds, the app 
  hangs.
  I get the same result on my system, logging into her 
  account. It seems to happen faster if I click on any component 
  (Contacts, Tasks, etc.). 
  Suggestions, ideas? 
  TIA, Eric Holliday Exchange Administrator Corporate Information 
  Systems Logistics Management Institute 
   voice: 703.917.7117 
  fax: 703.917.7596 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  - 
  There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD 
  and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence. List Charter 
  and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Ethernet cable

[Missy Koslosky]

Run with it.
- Original Message -
From: John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:32 PM
Subject: Ethernet cable


We need to do some work on the Ethernet wires that connect to Exchange.
Should there be an issue with simply unplugging the cable, rerunning it
and plugging it back in without shutting down the services?  I realize
that the users will not be able to connect while it is unplugged but
downtime is much less with just unplug and replug than shutdown and
restart.  I want to make sure that I do not cause an issue with Exchange
itself.  NT 4.0 Exchange 5.5 (with IMS)
Thank you,
John

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Outlook 2000 hangs

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: Message



Of get her to archive some of the MP3's she's 
holding onto!

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  HOLLIDAY, Eric 
  
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:36 
  PM
  Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 hangs
  
  She's got about 290Mb in her mailbox. Same prob with a new 
  profile. I must mention, however, that I have created a profile on my PC 
  (Same Org, same site, different server) and have run into the same 
  error. I am going to try the exmerge route, as Steve Clark suggested (on 
  another list).
  
  Eric
  

-Original Message-From: Missy Koslosky 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:25 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Outlook 
2000 hangs
How much mail is in her mailbox?

What happens if you re-create her 
profile?

Missy

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  HOLLIDAY, 
  Eric 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:38 
  PM
  Subject: Outlook 2000 hangs
  
  Hello all, 
  Environment: Exchange 5.5 (sp3) Enterprise, server 
  OS: Win2000; client OS Win2000 Pro 
  Here's my situation. I have a user who starts up her 
  OL2K client normally (CW mode)  after a few seconds, the app 
  hangs.
  I get the same result on my system, logging into her 
  account. It seems to happen faster if I click on any component 
  (Contacts, Tasks, etc.). 
  Suggestions, ideas? 
  TIA, Eric Holliday 
  Exchange Administrator Corporate 
  Information Systems Logistics Management 
  Institute  voice: 
  703.917.7117 fax: 703.917.7596 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  - 
  There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: 
  LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence. List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Outlook 2000 hangs

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: Message



Or get her to archive some of the MP3's she's 
holding onto!

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  HOLLIDAY, Eric 
  
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:36 
  PM
  Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 hangs
  
  She's got about 290Mb in her mailbox. Same prob with a new 
  profile. I must mention, however, that I have created a profile on my PC 
  (Same Org, same site, different server) and have run into the same 
  error. I am going to try the exmerge route, as Steve Clark suggested (on 
  another list).
  
  Eric
  

-Original Message-From: Missy Koslosky 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:25 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Outlook 
2000 hangs
How much mail is in her mailbox?

What happens if you re-create her 
profile?

Missy

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  HOLLIDAY, 
  Eric 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:38 
  PM
  Subject: Outlook 2000 hangs
  
  Hello all, 
  Environment: Exchange 5.5 (sp3) Enterprise, server 
  OS: Win2000; client OS Win2000 Pro 
  Here's my situation. I have a user who starts up her 
  OL2K client normally (CW mode)  after a few seconds, the app 
  hangs.
  I get the same result on my system, logging into her 
  account. It seems to happen faster if I click on any component 
  (Contacts, Tasks, etc.). 
  Suggestions, ideas? 
  TIA, Eric Holliday 
  Exchange Administrator Corporate 
  Information Systems Logistics Management 
  Institute  voice: 
  703.917.7117 fax: 703.917.7596 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  - 
  There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: 
  LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence. List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Ethernet cable

[Missy Koslosky]

LOL.  I think that's probably not going to work. Kevin's in the Pacific
NW!
- Original Message -
From: Clark, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:52 PM
Subject: RE: Ethernet cable


Mental note, send invoice for $100 per call to:

Kevin Miller
Techsanctuary
7335 N. Irvington Ave.
Indianapolis, IN
46250


Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information
and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the
prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ethernet cable

changing voice mail to

  Hello this is Kevin sorry we are having some email problems, they are
out of my control right now. please call 301-610-9584 and ask for Steve
he is working on a solution and would love hear your input. As always,
keep in mind I check this once a month so email me if it is something
urgent.

Off to lunch..

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ethernet cable


No - go for long lunch.

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information
and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the
prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ethernet cable

I just did it.. Got 5 phone calls. Should I plug it back in yet??

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ethernet cable


I do it randomly for fun just to fsck with the users.

 -Original Message-
 From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:31 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Ethernet cable


 We do this all the time with our 5.5 server.  No issues yet.


 -Original Message-
 From: John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:33 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Ethernet cable


 We need to do some work on the Ethernet wires that connect to
 Exchange. Should there be an issue with simply unplugging the cable,
 rerunning it
 and plugging it back in without shutting down the services?  I realize
 that the users will not be able to connect while it is unplugged but
 downtime is much less with just unplug and replug than shutdown and
 restart.  I want to make sure that I do not cause an issue
 with Exchange
 itself.  NT 4.0 Exchange 5.5 (with IMS)
 Thank you,
 John

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Swynk FAQ

[Missy Koslosky]

http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

Wrong swinc.
- Original Message -
From: Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 3:17 PM
Subject: Swynk FAQ


OK, I can't seem to find my bookmark for the Swynk.com Exchange 5.5 FAQ.
I
start out at http://www.swynk.com/exchange/
http://www.swynk.com/exchange/
and cannot find the FAQ for the life of me.  Can someone provide me:

a) The clicks I need to perform to find this FAQ without searching
really hard
b) The URL to the FAQ  :-)


Thanks a lot,
Allen


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm