Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-17 Thread James Sparenberg
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 13:49, Chuck Stuettgen wrote:
 On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 10:24, Jack Coates wrote:
 
  you make the fatal assumption that IE supports the standard. It doesn't.
  Standard code works on IE if it's really really simple, but frequently
  breaks in ugly ways.
  
  Transparent PNGs.
  PNGs at all (color is off).
  Advanced CSS features, like flow.
  Many advanced Javascript form functions.
 
 Especially, on the CSS support.  We have Java based (JSP) system we
 developed to create and issue insurance certificates for commercial
 insurance. 
 
 The completed certificate is displayed in two frames. A small horizontal
 frame, containing nothing more that a few navigation buttons and a
 background, over the main window in which the completed certificate is
 rendered in the Adobe Acrobat reader plug-in.
 
 Recently, we started getting complaints from our users that the system
 was very slow and that it would take a minute or more for a certificate
 to be displayed.   
 
 During troubleshooting we discovered that it could take up to 5 minutes
 to display the certificate from the time the user clicked the submit
 button if they used IE. However, if they used Netscape 4.78, or later,
 the certificate would be displayed in less than a second.  In most cases
 it was displayed, before the user could even move their hand. 
 
 Since we make this web based application available to our customers, it
 was imperative that we find the cause and resolve it.  
 
 After several days of troubleshooting and debugging our head Java
 programmer found the problem.
 
 
 A contract programmer, who is no longer employed, had coded a 6 line
 Cascading Style Sheet for the top frame.
 
 We removed the CSS and recoded to the page. Now it displays in less than
 a second using IE as well as Netscape, Mozilla, Opera. et all..


Chuck,

I think you've stated better than anyone I've ever heard why it's
important to view a site in 

1.  Every browser you can find.

2.  On every box within reach EXCEPT the developers box. 

3.  Oer a 56k modem with a crap connection.  


This last one doesn't apply as much if you live outside the US and the
3rd world.

James

 


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-17 Thread Franki
James Sparenberg wrote:

On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 13:49, Chuck Stuettgen wrote:
 

On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 10:24, Jack Coates wrote:

   

you make the fatal assumption that IE supports the standard. It doesn't.
Standard code works on IE if it's really really simple, but frequently
breaks in ugly ways.
Transparent PNGs.
PNGs at all (color is off).
Advanced CSS features, like flow.
Many advanced Javascript form functions.
 

Especially, on the CSS support.  We have Java based (JSP) system we
developed to create and issue insurance certificates for commercial
insurance. 

The completed certificate is displayed in two frames. A small horizontal
frame, containing nothing more that a few navigation buttons and a
background, over the main window in which the completed certificate is
rendered in the Adobe Acrobat reader plug-in.
Recently, we started getting complaints from our users that the system
was very slow and that it would take a minute or more for a certificate
to be displayed.   

During troubleshooting we discovered that it could take up to 5 minutes
to display the certificate from the time the user clicked the submit
button if they used IE. However, if they used Netscape 4.78, or later,
the certificate would be displayed in less than a second.  In most cases
it was displayed, before the user could even move their hand. 

Since we make this web based application available to our customers, it
was imperative that we find the cause and resolve it.  

After several days of troubleshooting and debugging our head Java
programmer found the problem.
A contract programmer, who is no longer employed, had coded a 6 line
Cascading Style Sheet for the top frame.
We removed the CSS and recoded to the page. Now it displays in less than
a second using IE as well as Netscape, Mozilla, Opera. et all..
   



Chuck,

   I think you've stated better than anyone I've ever heard why it's
important to view a site in 

1.  Every browser you can find.

2.  On every box within reach EXCEPT the developers box. 

3.  Oer a 56k modem with a crap connection.  

This last one doesn't apply as much if you live outside the US and the
3rd world.
James

 

Get real James,

I live in Australia, and broadband over here either isn't available in 
most areas, or is to expensive..
I have ADSL, but it costs me 85 a month and has only 256/64 and to get a 
static IP address required that they limit my bandwidth to 1 gig a month...

Now tell me again why only US should test with Dialup? in Australia 
Dialup still outnumbers broadband by a massive martgin.
Trust me, from the people I know over there, those that do have 
broadband, have MUCH better broadband then those of us in Australia.

rgds

Franki

--
Please sign our petition to encourage notebook manufactures to offer video card 
upgrades just like desktops.
http://www.petitiononline.com/inspiron/petition.html
For free scripts, online webmaster tools, HTML, XHTML, Perl  PHP tutorials and stuff, 
visit:
http://htmlfixit.com, Free web developer resources.








--
Please sign our petition to encourage notebook manufactures to offer video card 
upgrades just like desktops.
http://www.petitiononline.com/inspiron/petition.html
For free scripts, online webmaster tools, HTML, XHTML, Perl  PHP tutorials and stuff, 
visit:
http://htmlfixit.com, Free web developer resources.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-17 Thread James Sparenberg
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 03:01, Franki wrote:
 James Sparenberg wrote:
 
 On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 13:49, Chuck Stuettgen wrote:
   
 
 On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 10:24, Jack Coates wrote:
 
 
 
 you make the fatal assumption that IE supports the standard. It doesn't.
 Standard code works on IE if it's really really simple, but frequently
 breaks in ugly ways.
 
 Transparent PNGs.
 PNGs at all (color is off).
 Advanced CSS features, like flow.
 Many advanced Javascript form functions.
   
 
 Especially, on the CSS support.  We have Java based (JSP) system we
 developed to create and issue insurance certificates for commercial
 insurance. 
 
 The completed certificate is displayed in two frames. A small horizontal
 frame, containing nothing more that a few navigation buttons and a
 background, over the main window in which the completed certificate is
 rendered in the Adobe Acrobat reader plug-in.
 
 Recently, we started getting complaints from our users that the system
 was very slow and that it would take a minute or more for a certificate
 to be displayed.   
 
 During troubleshooting we discovered that it could take up to 5 minutes
 to display the certificate from the time the user clicked the submit
 button if they used IE. However, if they used Netscape 4.78, or later,
 the certificate would be displayed in less than a second.  In most cases
 it was displayed, before the user could even move their hand. 
 
 Since we make this web based application available to our customers, it
 was imperative that we find the cause and resolve it.  
 
 After several days of troubleshooting and debugging our head Java
 programmer found the problem.
 
 
 A contract programmer, who is no longer employed, had coded a 6 line
 Cascading Style Sheet for the top frame.
 
 We removed the CSS and recoded to the page. Now it displays in less than
 a second using IE as well as Netscape, Mozilla, Opera. et all..
 
 
 
 
 Chuck,
 
 I think you've stated better than anyone I've ever heard why it's
 important to view a site in 
 
 1.  Every browser you can find.
 
 2.  On every box within reach EXCEPT the developers box. 
 
 3.  Oer a 56k modem with a crap connection.  
 
 
 This last one doesn't apply as much if you live outside the US and the
 3rd world.
 
 James
 
   
 
 Get real James,
 
 I live in Australia, and broadband over here either isn't available in 
 most areas, or is to expensive..
 I have ADSL, but it costs me 85 a month and has only 256/64 and to get a 
 static IP address required that they limit my bandwidth to 1 gig a month...
 
 Now tell me again why only US should test with Dialup? in Australia 
 Dialup still outnumbers broadband by a massive martgin.
 Trust me, from the people I know over there, those that do have 
 broadband, have MUCH better broadband then those of us in Australia.

I'm stating not that only the US should test with a modem, but rather
stating that the sorry 19% of US internet users who have access to
broadband (This means home, work or school) is crap compared with even
our immediate neighbors.  (I've heard Canada is up to about 70 or 80%
for example and Mexico is at about 35% or better.) The jibe is against
the policies here.  Not stating that only the US is stuck on Modems, or
should test with them.  It was a political statement aimed at my own gov
(FCC) not what you took it to be.

James

 
 rgds
 
 Franki
 
 
 -- 
 Please sign our petition to encourage notebook manufactures to offer video card 
 upgrades just like desktops.
 http://www.petitiononline.com/inspiron/petition.html
 
 For free scripts, online webmaster tools, HTML, XHTML, Perl  PHP tutorials and 
 stuff, visit:
 http://htmlfixit.com, Free web developer resources.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-16 Thread Chuck Stuettgen
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 21:29, Carroll Grigsby wrote:

 
 Tim:
 Good for you. And good for the guy who runs your local Home Depot. He seems to 
 understand that every dollar spent at a competitive store is a buck that he 
 won't get. But the root cause -- the idiot webmaster -- still remains. Now 
 that you and the store manager are buddy-buddy, is there any chance of 
 learning either the e-mail or snail mail address of whoever it is that has 
 custody of the idiot? I'd be interesting in laying a few lines on him.
 -- cmg
 
 
 
 
 
 __

No snail-mail but here is info from their Contact Us page:


Web site support
1-800-430-3376 

   
  Customer Care
1-800-553-3199 
 

I find it interesting that it does not work for you as they are using
Java and JSP.

Good Luck!
-- 
Like the dinosaur, Windows on the desktop is destined to
become extinct...

Chuck Stuettgen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cfs-tech.homelinux.net


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-16 Thread Chuck Stuettgen
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 10:24, Jack Coates wrote:

 you make the fatal assumption that IE supports the standard. It doesn't.
 Standard code works on IE if it's really really simple, but frequently
 breaks in ugly ways.
 
 Transparent PNGs.
 PNGs at all (color is off).
 Advanced CSS features, like flow.
 Many advanced Javascript form functions.

Especially, on the CSS support.  We have Java based (JSP) system we
developed to create and issue insurance certificates for commercial
insurance. 

The completed certificate is displayed in two frames. A small horizontal
frame, containing nothing more that a few navigation buttons and a
background, over the main window in which the completed certificate is
rendered in the Adobe Acrobat reader plug-in.

Recently, we started getting complaints from our users that the system
was very slow and that it would take a minute or more for a certificate
to be displayed.   

During troubleshooting we discovered that it could take up to 5 minutes
to display the certificate from the time the user clicked the submit
button if they used IE. However, if they used Netscape 4.78, or later,
the certificate would be displayed in less than a second.  In most cases
it was displayed, before the user could even move their hand. 

Since we make this web based application available to our customers, it
was imperative that we find the cause and resolve it.  

After several days of troubleshooting and debugging our head Java
programmer found the problem.


A contract programmer, who is no longer employed, had coded a 6 line
Cascading Style Sheet for the top frame.

We removed the CSS and recoded to the page. Now it displays in less than
a second using IE as well as Netscape, Mozilla, Opera. et all..


-- 
Chuck Stuettgen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-16 Thread Carroll Grigsby
On Thursday 16 October 2003 03:46 pm, Chuck Stuettgen wrote:
 On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 21:29, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
  Tim:
  Good for you. And good for the guy who runs your local Home Depot. He
  seems to understand that every dollar spent at a competitive store is a
  buck that he won't get. But the root cause -- the idiot webmaster --
  still remains. Now that you and the store manager are buddy-buddy, is
  there any chance of learning either the e-mail or snail mail address of
  whoever it is that has custody of the idiot? I'd be interesting in laying
  a few lines on him. -- cmg
 

 No snail-mail but here is info from their Contact Us page:


 Web site support
 1-800-430-3376

   Customer Care
 1-800-553-3199

 I find it interesting that it does not work for you as they are using
 Java and JSP.

 Good Luck!

Chuck:
I went to Home Depot's corporate site, found an e-mail address 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]), and sent a letter explaining my difficulty. The 
next day I received a generic reply apologizing for any inconvenience, and 
stating that my comments would be passed on to their Internet Team. No 
discount certificates, though.

Maybe there is something goofy with my Java/JSP setup. I'm using Konq 3.1.0 
under 9.1, and I don't recall making any changes related to Java. I might let 
this slide until my 9.2 Pack gets here.

-- cmg


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-14 Thread ed tharp
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 23:42, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 08:24, Jack Coates wrote:
  On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 06:17, Bryan Phinney wrote:
  
  ...
   This really depends on what the web site or application is doing.  If you code 
   for Opera, then you can be 98% sure that it will work with other browsers 
   because Opera only supports W3 Consortium standards which are industry 
   standards.  Now, you may not be able to use that neato-cool proprietary 
   technology to do your work which might mean that the developers have to put 
   more effort into their coding, but you will be fairly certain of 
   compatibility.
  
  you make the fatal assumption that IE supports the standard. It doesn't.
  Standard code works on IE if it's really really simple, but frequently
  breaks in ugly ways.
  
  Transparent PNGs.
  PNGs at all (color is off).
  Advanced CSS features, like flow.
  Many advanced Javascript form functions.
 
 Ya gotta remember IE and in fact much of windows is 4 or 5 year old
 tech. (just new graphics in many cases.) With new modules added on.
 
 James
 
 
 you are older than you think, if you think much of windows is 4 or 5
 year old. G  
 __
 
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-- 
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-13 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I don't believe this to be a real problem though.  All they need to do is 
design basic javascript, if that is what they intend to use, that doesn't do 
anything wierd or os-specific/browser-specific.  The simple approach is to 
provide a warning to users that it has been detected that they are not using 
either mozilla or IE and that, as such, there is no gaurantee that their 
browser will work.  Give them the OPTION to try it anyway and, if it fails, 
they can then download the appropriate browser.  It is wrongheaded and flat 
wrong to a priori just assume that browsers other than a or b will not work, 
period.  They do not know this and are likely wrong.  

I don't have a problem, per se, with my credit union dumping me to a download 
window for mozilla or IE.  I have a problem with their automatic assumption 
that no other browser could possibly work on their crappy designed website 
and thus try to force users to use a particular browser.  No, you do not 
demand that customers use this or that, you serve your customers (not the 
other way around).  I simply want the option, in the form of a button, to go 
ahead and try to use their site through a non-mozilla/non-IE browser.  If it 
fails, I will report the problem to the developers of konqueror (or whatever) 
and use mozilla.  The world didn't end in trying to use my preferred browser 
(konqueror) no matter what happens.

praedor

On Monday 13 October 2003 12:18 am, Jack Coates wrote:
 On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 21:40, Eric Huff wrote:
   The more honest ones have admitted they can't justify
   developing for more than IE, given the huge REPORTED market share.
   With so many people using spoofing, it just makes the market share
   look even bigger than it is. We can't win for loosing.
 
  That's the silly part: we're not really even asking for development.
   We just want them to get rid of the rejection of non IE browsers.
  It would mean *less* work and less code if they didn't put it in to
  begin with.
 
  eric

 unless it didn't work in your browser, or did but didn't look good. Both
 cases come back to more work, only it's unplanned work.

- -- 
I think a case can be made that faith is one of the world's great 
evils, comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate. 
Faith, being belief that isn't based on evidence, is the principal 
vice of any religion.
- --Richard Dawkins
Key fingerprint = D6F9 8682 2257 2871 10C6  DB92 6F50 8BBA B100 EB15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/iqIcb1CLurEA6xURAm9MAJ9lKXr2RFO1PMPl5tFcmYGxKSiFUgCfTmPI
hTIXdf6OfPRNRljufndorMA=
=4s+0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-13 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Monday 13 October 2003 01:13 am, rikona wrote:
 Hello Eric,

 Sunday, October 12, 2003, 9:40:03 PM, you wrote:

 EH That's the silly part: we're not really even asking for
 EH development.  We just want them to get rid of the rejection of non
 EH IE browsers.  It would mean *less* work and less code if they
 EH didn't put it in to begin with.

 I think it would be more work. They'd have to test it with other
 browsers, and since different ones DO act differently, they'd have to
 develop code to work in all of them. It seems to be easier (= cheaper)
 to just put in a check and ask users to use IE.

This really depends on what the web site or application is doing.  If you code 
for Opera, then you can be 98% sure that it will work with other browsers 
because Opera only supports W3 Consortium standards which are industry 
standards.  Now, you may not be able to use that neato-cool proprietary 
technology to do your work which might mean that the developers have to put 
more effort into their coding, but you will be fairly certain of 
compatibility.

-- 
Bryan Phinney
Software Test Engineer


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-13 Thread Pierre Fortin
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 21:34:39 -0700 rikona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello Praedor,
 
 Sunday, October 12, 2003, 7:41:58 PM, you wrote:
 
 PA It seems patently indefensible and unfair to out-and-out ban
 PA opera, safari, konqueror, etc, as a matter of  policy.  It most
 PA certainly isn't a security problem as IE certainly isn't  more
 PA secure than opera, etc.
 
 I've gone round and round with several companies on this issue (I use
 Opera), and the problem seems to be management: (1) the budget is
 VERY tight, and (2) it better look good, or you're toast. The more
 honest ones have admitted they can't justify developing for more than
 IE, given the huge REPORTED market share. With so many people using
 spoofing, it just makes the market share look even bigger than it is.
 We can't win for loosing.
 
 IMHO, only a very large number of complaints everywhere will begin to
 put a dent in this.

OR...  just one complaint in the _right place_ -- using a real example,
here's what I typically do...

Last Feb, while I was paying bills online -- all was fine until I got to
my satellite TV bill -- when paying those bills over my DSL line
previously, I didn't notice any problems; BUT... when I tried paying them
over a dial-up, it was virtually impossible because the site was poorly
designed for slow links -- everything was done with images (with no
alt=Descriptive text) forcing me to wait for the complete page to see
what I could do on the site...  

I thought about it and concluded that webmasters are generally proud of
their efforts and are resistant to change...  and they certainly don't
like their baby criticized...

So...  what's one to do?  Easy it turned out...  I crafted a message to
that company's President with comments like:

| Subject: Can it be any more painful?

| I'm sure that sending this to your webmaster(s) would get little, or no
| attention; so...
[snip stuff about my setup and DSL v. dial-up]
| Your webmaster(s) may think the pages
| look cool; but... have the pages ever been viewed the way many users
see
| them...?
|
| Today, I'm trying to pay via a SLOW dialup since I'm away from home.
|
| Trying to make a payment over a slow link, in a word, SUCKS!!
|
| To understand the problems, I strongly suggest you sit your webmaster(s)
| in front of a 20-30kb modem attached computer and have them try to make
a
| payment...
[should have his $$$ attention now... snip loads more details on how to
make it better]

This got me a same day response:
| Thank you for your email and the constructive criticism... I will in
fact
| take your suggestion and view our web page and payment process 
[snip]
| i find we learn best from our customers experiences.
[snip]

Less than 2 weeks later (YUP!  Less than TWO weeks), I wrote him back:
| Looks like you really shook up your webmasters...  THANKS!
| Looks MUCH better...
|
[snip details about improvements -- then compliment the staff which will
surely find its way to the webmasters...]
| but I am impressed with the speed at which you and your staff
| accomplished the changes.
|
| I'm detecting a definitely a more customer oriented approach at
| company than in the days I complained about transmission problems...

My point is that there is no law against contacting the President/CEO of
any company directly, putting the issues in business terms that s/he will
understand -- don't get technical here; just enough so the s/he
understands your pain in dealing with her company...  many will deflect to
a filter group; but some will address it personally.  Any President/CEO
who is overly filtering is not doing a good job anyway, IMO.

Don't forget the follow-up compliments if you get the desired changes...

HTH

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-13 Thread Pierre Fortin
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 08:01:05 -0500 Praedor Atrebates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 I simply want the option, in the form of a button, to go 
 ahead and try to use their site through a non-mozilla/non-IE browser.

I have many complaints with my credit card provider; but at least they do
just as you suggest...  http://capitalone.com  -- maybe showing this to
your credit union might help...

See also my other post on going to the top of the organization...

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-13 Thread Jack Coates
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 06:17, Bryan Phinney wrote:

...
 This really depends on what the web site or application is doing.  If you code 
 for Opera, then you can be 98% sure that it will work with other browsers 
 because Opera only supports W3 Consortium standards which are industry 
 standards.  Now, you may not be able to use that neato-cool proprietary 
 technology to do your work which might mean that the developers have to put 
 more effort into their coding, but you will be fairly certain of 
 compatibility.

you make the fatal assumption that IE supports the standard. It doesn't.
Standard code works on IE if it's really really simple, but frequently
breaks in ugly ways.

Transparent PNGs.
PNGs at all (color is off).
Advanced CSS features, like flow.
Many advanced Javascript form functions.
-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-13 Thread Brant Fitzsimmons
Jack Coates wrote:
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 06:48, Praedor Atrebates wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A little checking and I see that my credit union isn't what I would call 
linux-unfriendly, just konqueror unfriendly.  The login system using java or 
javascript (*.jsp...is that java or javascript?).  One error message I 


Java server pages, served from a Java application platform (Tomcat in
this case). Try looking at the source of the pages that give you trouble
though, there might be JavaScript embedded or referenced which could
include browser detection code.

received when trying to bypass their filters for Netscape or IE indicated 
that they are using Apache Tomcat, hence they are not a doze shop (good for 
them).  At this point, I either assume that konqueror is STILL broken with 
regards to javascript (KDE 3.1.3) or they are simply specifically looking for 
either mozilla or IE and if detecting neither, produce the download page for 
either.

I tried to reset my password/user ID on the site using konqueror and got this:
- ---
Apache Tomcat/4.0.6 - HTTP Status 404 - /portal/jsp/portal.jsp
description The requested resource (/portal/jsp/portal.jsp) is not available.
- ---
praedor

On Sunday 12 October 2003 02:44 am, James Sparenberg wrote:

On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 15:08, Eric Huff wrote:

I am DETERMINED to get past their nonsense and access my account
information USING KONQUEROR DAMNIT!  So there.  It does still
happen, this nonsense, and spoofing a browser doesn't always
work.
praedor
oops forgot an example page

http://supportwizard.com
This works fine with firebird.
yep and mozilla and links (graphical) and browsex
but not in Konqueror. Oh and I did send a mistake. This one is
perl cgi not asp.  I lost my asp link.
James


eric
You may want to purge any cookies for that site that may be telling on you.

You may also want to clean your cache which may be causing problems due 
to the fact that Konqueror doesn't like to let go of cached pages. 
That's what gives it the illusion of speed (same with Opera).  Try 
developing web pages and checking them in those browsers and you'll know 
what I mean.

It's a shot in the dark, and may not totally solve your problems, but it 
may help.

--
Brant Fitzsimmons
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Linux user #322847 | Linux machine #207465 | http://counter.li.org/
 AMD Duron 1.3GHz | Mandrake Linux 9.1 | Kernel 2.4.21-0.16mm-mdk
  Reiserfs and XFS | KDE 3.1.3 | Mozilla 1.4 Mail Client
Uptime:
 13:20:00 up 13 days, 13:50,  6 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.07, 0.08
---
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being
self-evident.
-Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-13 Thread Brant Fitzsimmons
Bryan Phinney wrote:
On Monday 13 October 2003 11:24 am, Jack Coates wrote:

On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 06:17, Bryan Phinney wrote:

...


This really depends on what the web site or application is doing.  If you
code for Opera, then you can be 98% sure that it will work with other
browsers because Opera only supports W3 Consortium standards which are
industry standards.  Now, you may not be able to use that neato-cool
proprietary technology to do your work which might mean that the
developers have to put more effort into their coding, but you will be
fairly certain of compatibility.
you make the fatal assumption that IE supports the standard. It doesn't.
Standard code works on IE if it's really really simple, but frequently
breaks in ugly ways.
Transparent PNGs.
PNGs at all (color is off).
Advanced CSS features, like flow.
Many advanced Javascript form functions.


W3C is constantly publishing new standards and it often takes time to 
implement those in new products.  Until I become aware of any software 
developer purposefully deviating from a published standard, I do not plan to 
deal with it.  Not every technology currently available works with IE, nor 
Netscape, nor Opera or any other particular browser.  I don't think that IE 
is particularly different in this regard than any other browser.  If you want 
maximum interoperability, you have to code for the lowest common denominator.  
So, CSS1, not CSS2 features unless you know that they are all supported, etc.
Here's an interesting little page I've found.  The rest of the site is 
very informative if you're trying to learn CSS.
http://www.westciv.com/style_master/academy/browser_support/page_layout.html

--
Brant Fitzsimmons
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Linux user #322847 | Linux machine #207465 | http://counter.li.org/
 AMD Duron 1.3GHz | Mandrake Linux 9.1 | Kernel 2.4.21-0.16mm-mdk
  Reiserfs and XFS | KDE 3.1.3 | Mozilla 1.4 Mail Client
Uptime:
 13:25:00 up 13 days, 13:55,  6 users,  load average: 0.19, 0.16, 0.11
---
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being
self-evident.
-Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-13 Thread James Sparenberg
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 08:24, Jack Coates wrote:
 On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 06:17, Bryan Phinney wrote:
 
 ...
  This really depends on what the web site or application is doing.  If you code 
  for Opera, then you can be 98% sure that it will work with other browsers 
  because Opera only supports W3 Consortium standards which are industry 
  standards.  Now, you may not be able to use that neato-cool proprietary 
  technology to do your work which might mean that the developers have to put 
  more effort into their coding, but you will be fairly certain of 
  compatibility.
 
 you make the fatal assumption that IE supports the standard. It doesn't.
 Standard code works on IE if it's really really simple, but frequently
 breaks in ugly ways.
 
 Transparent PNGs.
 PNGs at all (color is off).
 Advanced CSS features, like flow.
 Many advanced Javascript form functions.

Ya gotta remember IE and in fact much of windows is 4 or 5 year old
tech. (just new graphics in many cases.) With new modules added on.

James


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-13 Thread James Sparenberg
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 08:40, Bryan Phinney wrote:
 On Monday 13 October 2003 11:24 am, Jack Coates wrote:
  On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 06:17, Bryan Phinney wrote:
 
  ...
 
   This really depends on what the web site or application is doing.  If you
   code for Opera, then you can be 98% sure that it will work with other
   browsers because Opera only supports W3 Consortium standards which are
   industry standards.  Now, you may not be able to use that neato-cool
   proprietary technology to do your work which might mean that the
   developers have to put more effort into their coding, but you will be
   fairly certain of compatibility.
 
  you make the fatal assumption that IE supports the standard. It doesn't.
  Standard code works on IE if it's really really simple, but frequently
  breaks in ugly ways.
 
  Transparent PNGs.
  PNGs at all (color is off).
  Advanced CSS features, like flow.
  Many advanced Javascript form functions.
 
 W3C is constantly publishing new standards and it often takes time to 
 implement those in new products.  Until I become aware of any software 
 developer purposefully deviating from a published standard, I do not plan to 
 deal with it.  Not every technology currently available works with IE, nor 
 Netscape, nor Opera or any other particular browser.  I don't think that IE 
 is particularly different in this regard than any other browser.  If you want 
 maximum interoperability, you have to code for the lowest common denominator.  
 So, CSS1, not CSS2 features unless you know that they are all supported, etc.

Also you need to ask yourself.  Am I doing this because it improves the
customer experience?, Makes me look cool?, or gives me a new line on my
resume?   How often it seems to me to be the second or third reason. 
Funny too, how many corporate pages I run into that look like geocities
rejects, or are so difficult to find things on it isn't funny.  If you
want a great example of WTF go to jameco.com, and check out their way
for finding the right powersupply.. 

James



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-12 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 15:08, Eric Huff wrote:
   I am DETERMINED to get past their nonsense and access my account
   information USING KONQUEROR DAMNIT!  So there.  It does still
   happen, this nonsense, and spoofing a browser doesn't always
   work.
   
   praedor
  
  oops forgot an example page
  
  http://supportwizard.com
 
 This works fine with firebird. 

yep and mozilla and links (graphical) and browsex
but not in Konqueror. Oh and I did send a mistake. This one is 
perl cgi not asp.  I lost my asp link.

James
 
  
 
 eric
 
 
 __
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-12 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 18:44, Tim Sawchuck wrote:
 On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:16:01 -0400
 Carroll Grigsby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  A recent experience:
  During dinner a week or so back, SheThatIs decreed that the purchase and 
  installation of a new mailbox and post was essential to my continued 
  happiness. There are two major sources for such purchases in this neck of
  the woods -- Lowe's and Home Depot. Wanting to eliminate schlepping
  between the two stores, I decided to visit to each company's web site to
  compare their offerings. Fired up Konq, went to Lowe's, and saw what they
  had. Next stop, Home Depot. Oops! Some nitwit has decided that since I
  would not be able to enjoy the full benefits of their site because I was
  not running either Netscape 4.0 or IE 4.0; further access was denied.
  
  The next morning I dropped about $150 at Lowe's for the mailbox, mailbox
  post, and some other stuff.
  
  Yes, I could reconfigure to Konq to get past Home Depot's barrier, but why
  the hell should I? They are the ones trying to sell something to me.
  
  And yes, I thought about sending them a nastygram, but that was not in the
  
  list of options. (Remember when every website had a Contact Webmaster
  link?) Then too, would anyone who considers Netscape 4.0 and IE 4.0 to be
  the latest and greatest understand my complaint? The idiot must still
  think it's 1997.
 
 I have done that three times (I'm old enough to blame the fact that I forget
 about Home Depot and Konq), each time I send a postcard addressed to the
 manager of the local store about the situation.
 
 Third time I got a reply back apologizing, explaining that it was handled by
 corporate, AND a nice juicy discount coupon (that I may or may not use). 
 I'd be interested to hear his explanation about why he was offering 50% off
 for an old senile linux geek.  ;-)
 
 Tim

Tim just for fun I ran Mozilla and IE6 against the site.  They are half
right.  They don't work with IE6 ... but they work fine with Mozilla
*grin* Guess they are a Linux site after all.  And I may have a reason. 
It's running Netscape server on hp-ux.  

James



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-12 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

A little checking and I see that my credit union isn't what I would call 
linux-unfriendly, just konqueror unfriendly.  The login system using java or 
javascript (*.jsp...is that java or javascript?).  One error message I 
received when trying to bypass their filters for Netscape or IE indicated 
that they are using Apache Tomcat, hence they are not a doze shop (good for 
them).  At this point, I either assume that konqueror is STILL broken with 
regards to javascript (KDE 3.1.3) or they are simply specifically looking for 
either mozilla or IE and if detecting neither, produce the download page for 
either.

I tried to reset my password/user ID on the site using konqueror and got this:
- ---
Apache Tomcat/4.0.6 - HTTP Status 404 - /portal/jsp/portal.jsp

description The requested resource (/portal/jsp/portal.jsp) is not available.
- ---

praedor

On Sunday 12 October 2003 02:44 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 15:08, Eric Huff wrote:
I am DETERMINED to get past their nonsense and access my account
information USING KONQUEROR DAMNIT!  So there.  It does still
happen, this nonsense, and spoofing a browser doesn't always
work.
   
praedor
  
   oops forgot an example page
  
   http://supportwizard.com
 
  This works fine with firebird.

 yep and mozilla and links (graphical) and browsex
 but not in Konqueror. Oh and I did send a mistake. This one is
 perl cgi not asp.  I lost my asp link.

 James

  eric
 
 
  __
  Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
  Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

- -- 
I think a case can be made that faith is one of the world's great evils, 
compara
ble to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate. Faith, being belief that 
isn'
t based on evidence, is the principal vice of any religion.
- --Richard Dawkins
Key fingerprint = D6F9 8682 2257 2871 10C6  DB92 6F50 8BBA B100 EB15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/iVvQb1CLurEA6xURAvTEAKCo1fwknYvi01BIXzH5XE0D6hOt3wCfUBNz
PeWz6Ezjv2UbYnfoYGKzCjc=
=s8of
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-12 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

More messing around.  I have used mozilla to identify all the key javascript 
pages and entered them into the user agent box for konqueror, instructing 
konqueror to identify itself as mozilla 4.76 or 5.5.  I can now briefly get 
to the pages but shortly after they load, normally and without problems I 
might add, I get bumped over to the download page for IE or Netscape again.  
Progress, but still they are getting past my user agent ID in the end and 
kicking me out.  

I want to beat them.  Any pointers?

praedor

On Sunday 12 October 2003 08:48 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
 A little checking and I see that my credit union isn't what I would call
 linux-unfriendly, just konqueror unfriendly.  The login system using java
 or javascript (*.jsp...is that java or javascript?).  One error message I
 received when trying to bypass their filters for Netscape or IE indicated
 that they are using Apache Tomcat, hence they are not a doze shop (good for
 them).  At this point, I either assume that konqueror is STILL broken with
 regards to javascript (KDE 3.1.3) or they are simply specifically looking
 for either mozilla or IE and if detecting neither, produce the download
 page for either.

 I tried to reset my password/user ID on the site using konqueror and got
 this: ---
 Apache Tomcat/4.0.6 - HTTP Status 404 - /portal/jsp/portal.jsp

 description The requested resource (/portal/jsp/portal.jsp) is not
 available. ---

 praedor

 On Sunday 12 October 2003 02:44 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
  On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 15:08, Eric Huff wrote:
 I am DETERMINED to get past their nonsense and access my account
 information USING KONQUEROR DAMNIT!  So there.  It does still
 happen, this nonsense, and spoofing a browser doesn't always
 work.

 praedor
   
oops forgot an example page
   
http://supportwizard.com
  
   This works fine with firebird.
 
  yep and mozilla and links (graphical) and browsex
  but not in Konqueror. Oh and I did send a mistake. This one is
  perl cgi not asp.  I lost my asp link.
 
  James
 
   eric
  
  
   __
   Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
   Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

- -- 
I think a case can be made that faith is one of the world's great evils, 
compara
ble to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate. Faith, being belief that 
isn'
t based on evidence, is the principal vice of any religion.
- --Richard Dawkins
Key fingerprint = D6F9 8682 2257 2871 10C6  DB92 6F50 8BBA B100 EB15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/iV5gb1CLurEA6xURAgXPAJ42FsSo7ZKYt+nO+reJ7iMc1KX+fgCgpEHO
U+uS5kiBaB3UGf6EQGNmuec=
=ys6N
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-12 Thread Jack Coates
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 06:48, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 A little checking and I see that my credit union isn't what I would call 
 linux-unfriendly, just konqueror unfriendly.  The login system using java or 
 javascript (*.jsp...is that java or javascript?).  One error message I 

Java server pages, served from a Java application platform (Tomcat in
this case). Try looking at the source of the pages that give you trouble
though, there might be JavaScript embedded or referenced which could
include browser detection code.

 received when trying to bypass their filters for Netscape or IE indicated 
 that they are using Apache Tomcat, hence they are not a doze shop (good for 
 them).  At this point, I either assume that konqueror is STILL broken with 
 regards to javascript (KDE 3.1.3) or they are simply specifically looking for 
 either mozilla or IE and if detecting neither, produce the download page for 
 either.
 
 I tried to reset my password/user ID on the site using konqueror and got this:
 - ---
 Apache Tomcat/4.0.6 - HTTP Status 404 - /portal/jsp/portal.jsp
 
 description The requested resource (/portal/jsp/portal.jsp) is not available.
 - ---
 
 praedor
 
 On Sunday 12 October 2003 02:44 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
  On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 15:08, Eric Huff wrote:
 I am DETERMINED to get past their nonsense and access my account
 information USING KONQUEROR DAMNIT!  So there.  It does still
 happen, this nonsense, and spoofing a browser doesn't always
 work.

 praedor
   
oops forgot an example page
   
http://supportwizard.com
  
   This works fine with firebird.
 
  yep and mozilla and links (graphical) and browsex
  but not in Konqueror. Oh and I did send a mistake. This one is
  perl cgi not asp.  I lost my asp link.
 
  James
 
   eric
  
  
   __
   Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
   Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 
 - -- 
 I think a case can be made that faith is one of the world's great evils, 
 compara
 ble to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate. Faith, being belief that 
 isn'
 t based on evidence, is the principal vice of any religion.
 - --Richard Dawkins
 Key fingerprint = D6F9 8682 2257 2871 10C6  DB92 6F50 8BBA B100 EB15
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iD8DBQE/iVvQb1CLurEA6xURAvTEAKCo1fwknYvi01BIXzH5XE0D6hOt3wCfUBNz
 PeWz6Ezjv2UbYnfoYGKzCjc=
 =s8of
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
 __
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-12 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

There is a ref to a browser check script but I am not certain where its root 
lies, so I am not sure what webpage to pass a mozilla user agent id to:

meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1

script language=javascript src=../../js/browsercheck.js/script
script language=javascript
  doBrowserCheck();
/script

I have tried simply added the previous root URL and subdirectory to the 
browsercheck.js line (replacing the ../../) but it doesn't work.  I am 
assuming I am adding the wrong root or that this wouldn't work in any case 
because of the way it is called.

praedor

On Sunday 12 October 2003 09:27 am, Jack Coates wrote:
 On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 06:48, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  A little checking and I see that my credit union isn't what I would call
  linux-unfriendly, just konqueror unfriendly.  The login system using java
  or javascript (*.jsp...is that java or javascript?).  One error message I

 Java server pages, served from a Java application platform (Tomcat in
 this case). Try looking at the source of the pages that give you trouble
 though, there might be JavaScript embedded or referenced which could
 include browser detection code.

- -- 
I think a case can be made that faith is one of the world's great evils, 
compara
ble to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate. Faith, being belief that 
isn'
t based on evidence, is the principal vice of any religion.
- --Richard Dawkins
Key fingerprint = D6F9 8682 2257 2871 10C6  DB92 6F50 8BBA B100 EB15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/iWaRb1CLurEA6xURAkHBAJ0dmFbiCSg3FH//k88QPo6NiqaTgwCfYf65
YZWNtQedtRdBex0JCk6CYPc=
=uj78
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-12 Thread Jack Coates
Bad form, bad form... tsk. You might get lucky with google: try
searching for

browsercheck.js site:your.credit.union

If you can get the browsercheck, I'll help you show them how to make it
only match IE vs. Other. It's probably two hundred lines long and
testing for Netscape 3 and other anachronistic crap.

Jack

On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 07:34, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 There is a ref to a browser check script but I am not certain where its root 
 lies, so I am not sure what webpage to pass a mozilla user agent id to:
 
 meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
 
 script language=javascript src=../../js/browsercheck.js/script
 script language=javascript
   doBrowserCheck();
 /script
 
 I have tried simply added the previous root URL and subdirectory to the 
 browsercheck.js line (replacing the ../../) but it doesn't work.  I am 
 assuming I am adding the wrong root or that this wouldn't work in any case 
 because of the way it is called.
 
 praedor
 
 On Sunday 12 October 2003 09:27 am, Jack Coates wrote:
  On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 06:48, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
   -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
   Hash: SHA1
  
   A little checking and I see that my credit union isn't what I would call
   linux-unfriendly, just konqueror unfriendly.  The login system using java
   or javascript (*.jsp...is that java or javascript?).  One error message I
 
  Java server pages, served from a Java application platform (Tomcat in
  this case). Try looking at the source of the pages that give you trouble
  though, there might be JavaScript embedded or referenced which could
  include browser detection code.
 
 - -- 
 I think a case can be made that faith is one of the world's great evils, 
 compara
 ble to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate. Faith, being belief that 
 isn'
 t based on evidence, is the principal vice of any religion.
 - --Richard Dawkins
 Key fingerprint = D6F9 8682 2257 2871 10C6  DB92 6F50 8BBA B100 EB15
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iD8DBQE/iWaRb1CLurEA6xURAkHBAJ0dmFbiCSg3FH//k88QPo6NiqaTgwCfYf65
 YZWNtQedtRdBex0JCk6CYPc=
 =uj78
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
 __
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-12 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Thanks, but that didn't work.  I did manage to download their browsercheck.js 
file however.  Google couldn't find it and I couldn't load it in konqueror.  
I ended up simply trying to load 
https://homebanking.purdueefcu.com/homebanking/js/browsercheck.js and 
konqueror came back with the dialog box asking if I wanted to save it or open 
it.  Saving it I now have their javascript file on hand.  I have attached it 
for general perusal and comment.


On Sunday 12 October 2003 10:50 am, Jack Coates wrote:
 Bad form, bad form... tsk. You might get lucky with google: try
 searching for

 browsercheck.js site:your.credit.union

 If you can get the browsercheck, I'll help you show them how to make it
 only match IE vs. Other. It's probably two hundred lines long and
 testing for Netscape 3 and other anachronistic crap.

 Jack

 On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 07:34, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  There is a ref to a browser check script but I am not certain where its
  root lies, so I am not sure what webpage to pass a mozilla user agent id
  to:
 
  meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
 
  script language=javascript src=../../js/browsercheck.js/script
  script language=javascript
doBrowserCheck();
  /script
 
  I have tried simply added the previous root URL and subdirectory to the
  browsercheck.js line (replacing the ../../) but it doesn't work.  I am
  assuming I am adding the wrong root or that this wouldn't work in any
  case because of the way it is called.
 
  praedor
 
  On Sunday 12 October 2003 09:27 am, Jack Coates wrote:
   On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 06:48, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
   
A little checking and I see that my credit union isn't what I would
call linux-unfriendly, just konqueror unfriendly.  The login system
using java or javascript (*.jsp...is that java or javascript?).  One
error message I
  
   Java server pages, served from a Java application platform (Tomcat in
   this case). Try looking at the source of the pages that give you
   trouble though, there might be JavaScript embedded or referenced which
   could include browser detection code.
 
  - --
  I think a case can be made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
  compara
  ble to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate. Faith, being belief
  that isn'
  t based on evidence, is the principal vice of any religion.
  - --Richard Dawkins
  Key fingerprint = D6F9 8682 2257 2871 10C6  DB92 6F50 8BBA B100 EB15
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
  Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
 
  iD8DBQE/iWaRb1CLurEA6xURAkHBAJ0dmFbiCSg3FH//k88QPo6NiqaTgwCfYf65
  YZWNtQedtRdBex0JCk6CYPc=
  =uj78
  -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
  __
  Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
  Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

- -- 
I think a case can be made that faith is one of the world's great 
evils, comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate. 
Faith, being belief that isn't based on evidence, is the principal 
vice of any religion.
- --Richard Dawkins
Key fingerprint = D6F9 8682 2257 2871 10C6  DB92 6F50 8BBA B100 EB15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/ibMnb1CLurEA6xURAl4gAKCexjeEjyX/WQ8cMrMCIkMPRIAONACeNUTc
l9FZNtVNYp27I4wH4symdr8=
=O8Qg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
//!--
// Ultimate client-side JavaScript client sniff. Version 3.03
// (C) Netscape Communications 1999-2001.  Permission granted to reuse and distribute.
// Revised 17 May 99 to add is_nav5up and is_ie5up (see below).
// Revised 20 Dec 00 to add is_gecko and change is_nav5up to is_nav6up
//  also added support for IE5.5 Opera45 HotJava3 AOLTV
// Revised 22 Feb 01 to correct Javascript Detection for IE 5.x, Opera 4,
//  correct Opera 5 detection
//  add support for winME and win2k
//  synch with browser-type-oo.js
// Revised 26 Mar 01 to correct Opera detection
// Revised 02 Oct 01 to add IE6 detection

// Everything you always wanted to know about your JavaScript client
// but were afraid to ask. Creates is_ variables indicating:
// (1) browser vendor:
// is_nav, is_ie, is_opera, is_hotjava, is_webtv, is_TVNavigator, is_AOLTV
// (2) browser version number:
// is_major (integer indicating major version number: 2, 3, 4 ...)
// is_minor (float   indicating full  version number: 2.02, 3.01, 4.04 ...)
// (3) browser vendor AND major version number
// is_nav2, is_nav3, is_nav4, is_nav4up, is_nav6, is_nav6up, is_gecko, is_ie3,
// is_ie4, is_ie4up, is_ie5, is_ie5up, is_ie5_5, is_ie5_5up, is_ie6, is_ie6up, is_hotjava3, is_hotjava3up,
// is_opera2, is_opera3, is_opera4, is_opera5, is_opera5up
// (4) JavaScript version number:
// is_js (float indicating full JavaScript version 

Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-12 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Sorry...I suppose I shouldn't have attached anything.  

On Sunday 12 October 2003 03:01 pm, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
 Thanks, but that didn't work.  I did manage to download their
 browsercheck.js file however.  Google couldn't find it and I couldn't
 load it in konqueror. I ended up simply trying to load
 https://homebanking.purdueefcu.com/homebanking/js/browsercheck.js and
 konqueror came back with the dialog box asking if I wanted to save it or
 open it.  Saving it I now have their javascript file on hand.  I have
 attached it for general perusal and comment.
[...]
- -- 
I think a case can be made that faith is one of the world's great 
evils, comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate. 
Faith, being belief that isn't based on evidence, is the principal 
vice of any religion.
- --Richard Dawkins
Key fingerprint = D6F9 8682 2257 2871 10C6  DB92 6F50 8BBA B100 EB15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/ibT/b1CLurEA6xURAtceAKCM4s8Je/QRE+1hZOdkWxFhuzcBTACcCov0
79ptNNLrqzDKy7YRAIvHLJ0=
=8Ko4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-12 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 06:48, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 A little checking and I see that my credit union isn't what I would call 
 linux-unfriendly, just konqueror unfriendly.  The login system using java or 
 javascript (*.jsp...is that java or javascript?). 

 a convoluted attempt to make java do php *grin*

  One error message I 
 received when trying to bypass their filters for Netscape or IE indicated 
 that they are using Apache Tomcat,

Yep needed for jsp.

  hence they are not a doze shop (good for 
 them).  At this point, I either assume that konqueror is STILL broken with 
 regards to javascript (KDE 3.1.3) or they are simply specifically looking for 
 either mozilla or IE and if detecting neither, produce the download page for 
 either.

Konq still isn't perfect in jscript.  
 
 I tried to reset my password/user ID on the site using konqueror and got this:
 - ---
 Apache Tomcat/4.0.6 - HTTP Status 404 - /portal/jsp/portal.jsp
 
 description The requested resource (/portal/jsp/portal.jsp) is not available.
 - ---
 
 praedor
 
 On Sunday 12 October 2003 02:44 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
  On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 15:08, Eric Huff wrote:
 I am DETERMINED to get past their nonsense and access my account
 information USING KONQUEROR DAMNIT!  So there.  It does still
 happen, this nonsense, and spoofing a browser doesn't always
 work.

 praedor
   
oops forgot an example page
   
http://supportwizard.com
  
   This works fine with firebird.
 
  yep and mozilla and links (graphical) and browsex
  but not in Konqueror. Oh and I did send a mistake. This one is
  perl cgi not asp.  I lost my asp link.
 
  James
 
   eric
  
  
   __
   Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
   Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 
 - -- 
 I think a case can be made that faith is one of the world's great evils, 
 compara
 ble to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate. Faith, being belief that 
 isn'
 t based on evidence, is the principal vice of any religion.
 - --Richard Dawkins
 Key fingerprint = D6F9 8682 2257 2871 10C6  DB92 6F50 8BBA B100 EB15
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iD8DBQE/iVvQb1CLurEA6xURAvTEAKCo1fwknYvi01BIXzH5XE0D6hOt3wCfUBNz
 PeWz6Ezjv2UbYnfoYGKzCjc=
 =s8of
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
 __
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-12 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I don't really know javascript but my perusal of the code suggests that it is 
specifically setup to ignore browser spoofing and thus eliminate opera and 
any other browser that is doing a spoof.  Thing is, I kept getting closer and 
closer to getting in with konqueror, to the point that the login page would 
appear perfectly fine, as would other protected pages like their 
password/login change page but shortly after it loaded, boop!, the 
browsercheck.js script would catch me out and dump me to the download page.

The script is somewhat stock with comments indicating that it is a simple 
comment out procedure to allow for spoofed browsers.  In any case, it is 
pointless and ridiculous.  All the need to do if they are so concerned about 
it is to add a bypass button and allow the client to make a go at it 
regardless.  It will either work or it wont, then they may need to 
download/use mozilla or IE...but not before.  It seems patently indefensible 
and unfair to out-and-out ban opera, safari, konqueror, etc, as a matter of 
policy.  It most certainly isn't a security problem as IE certainly isn't 
more secure than opera, etc.  

Now that I know a little more about their check, I can try to ask that they 
allow spoofing.  It's not like they have to recode the whole script.

praedor

On Sunday 12 October 2003 03:09 pm, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
 Sorry...I suppose I shouldn't have attached anything.

 On Sunday 12 October 2003 03:01 pm, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
  Thanks, but that didn't work.  I did manage to download their
  browsercheck.js file however.  Google couldn't find it and I couldn't
  load it in konqueror. I ended up simply trying to load
  https://homebanking.purdueefcu.com/homebanking/js/browsercheck.js and
  konqueror came back with the dialog box asking if I wanted to save it or
  open it.  Saving it I now have their javascript file on hand.  I have
  attached it for general perusal and comment.

 [...]

- -- 
I think a case can be made that faith is one of the world's great 
evils, comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate. 
Faith, being belief that isn't based on evidence, is the principal 
vice of any religion.
- --Richard Dawkins
Key fingerprint = D6F9 8682 2257 2871 10C6  DB92 6F50 8BBA B100 EB15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/ihD/b1CLurEA6xURAhs2AJ9mMlQeRuG2R28x79QXppO9QVYNzwCgilPn
GruWkLFWOaHsDflYAXz0TBw=
=lnSW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Saturday 11 October 2003 06:01, James Sparenberg wrote:
I Ah  but it can be removed!  check out

 http://www.litepc.com/

I know that, you know thatthey don't! They just acquire an unbootable 
Winders and have it re-installed, with the local M$ wizard telling 'em: Yeah 
that's what you get when you start messing with this open source stuff!

Good luck,
HarM 
-- 
Mandrake HowTo's  more: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread HaywireMac
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:12:36 +0200
H.J.Bathoorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:

 
 I know that, you know thatthey don't! They just acquire an
 unbootable Winders and have it re-installed, with the local M$ wizard
 telling 'em: Yeah that's what you get when you start messing with
 this open source stuff!

I don't think I'm encouraging anyone to actually remove IE, but maybe
I'll make a note on that on my ie_reject page just in case...

You do *not* need to remove IE, just don't use it while you are
exploring all the web has to offer you in terms of Open Source
Software...

-- 
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
++
If your happiness depends on what somebody else does, I guess you do
have a problem.
-- Richard Bach, Illusions

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread HaywireMac
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:56:51 -0700
James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:

 Ya might want to link out to this site.  
 
 http://reactor-core.org  
 
 or at least some of the stuff he has.  

Wow, great site, thanks! Now I can become even *more* paranoid ;-)
-- 
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
++
Arrakis teaches the attitude of the knife - chopping off what's
incomplete and saying: Now it's complete because it's ended here.
-- Muad'dib, Dune

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread HaywireMac
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:47:05 -0700
James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:

 I like the idea of just confusing them.. Run a javascript that pops up
 a message that says.  You are not standards compatible When it sees
 IE and an OK button.  Has no affect on them but confuses the heck out
 of them. *evil grin*

Ya, imagine IE being called not standards compatible. Oh, wait, it
violates every RFC in existence...

Not such a bad idea, at least for the humour aspect.

-- 
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
++
Your picture of the world often changes just before you get it into
focus.

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread HaywireMac
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:54:27 -0700
James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:

 
 Ok easiest way is via javascript check out the redirection scripts
 here.
 http://www.scriptsearch.com/JavaScript/Scripts/Redirection/

Doesn't XP come *without* Java now? Or is Java executed on the server
like PHP?

-- 
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
++
He who knows, does not speak.  He who speaks, does not know.
-- Lao Tsu

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread Jack Coates
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 04:40, HaywireMac wrote:
 On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:54:27 -0700
 James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
 
  
  Ok easiest way is via javascript check out the redirection scripts
  here.
  http://www.scriptsearch.com/JavaScript/Scripts/Redirection/
 
 Doesn't XP come *without* Java now? Or is Java executed on the server
 like PHP?

Java != JavaScript.

Java is a C++ like object oriented language designed to write once, run
anywhere via virtual machines.

JavaScript is a scripting language for web browsers written by Netscape,
which happened to come out at a time when Netscape was desparate to get
some of the hype surrounding Java pointed their way. Its formal name is
ECMAScript, but no one uses that name. JavaScript is good for automating
stuff, writing calculators, filling in forms c, but there's no disk or
network access (in theory).
-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread HaywireMac
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 07:36:06 -0700
Jack Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:

  Doesn't XP come *without* Java now? Or is Java executed on the
  server like PHP?
 
 Java != JavaScript.
 
 Java is a C++ like object oriented language designed to write once,
 run anywhere via virtual machines.
 
 JavaScript is a scripting language for web browsers written by
 Netscape, which happened to come out at a time when Netscape was
 desparate to get some of the hype surrounding Java pointed their way.
 Its formal name is ECMAScript, but no one uses that name. JavaScript
 is good for automating stuff, writing calculators, filling in forms
 c, but there's no disk or network access (in theory).

So a Javascript then would not require the browser to have the Java VM
installed? It runs on the server side like PHP?

Just wanna make sure I get the concept... ;-)

-- 
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
++
Only that in you which is me can hear what I'm saying.
-- Baba Ram Dass

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread Richard Urwin
On Saturday 11 Oct 2003 2:38 pm, HaywireMac wrote:
 On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 07:36:06 -0700

 Jack Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
   Doesn't XP come *without* Java now? Or is Java executed on the
   server like PHP?
 
  Java != JavaScript.
 
  Java is a C++ like object oriented language designed to write once,
  run anywhere via virtual machines.
 
  JavaScript is a scripting language for web browsers written by
  Netscape, which happened to come out at a time when Netscape was
  desparate to get some of the hype surrounding Java pointed their way.
  Its formal name is ECMAScript, but no one uses that name. JavaScript
  is good for automating stuff, writing calculators, filling in forms
  c, but there's no disk or network access (in theory).

 So a Javascript then would not require the browser to have the Java VM
 installed? It runs on the server side like PHP?

 Just wanna make sure I get the concept... ;-)

No, it executes on the client side, but it is supported by just about every 
browser. Check out www.soronlin.org.uk/geekquiz.html for an example.

-- 
Richard Urwin

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread James Sparenberg
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 14:24, HaywireMac wrote:
 On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:41:46 -0700
 Jack Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
 
  It comes up right next to the Apache button if MSIE is used to visit
  any of my web pages. This looks to me like the best balance of
  advocacy without limiting choice.
 
 Wow. I actually maybe kinda somehow in a small way started something.
 
 There's two people.
 
 Any more?
 
 BTW, I like the BLINK, it's just annoying enough to work! ;-)
 
 here's mine:
 
 www.orderinchaos.org/ie_reject.php

Clean design.  Considering the box it's coming off of and the line
bandwidth you have... snappy too.

James



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 04:40, HaywireMac wrote:
 On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:54:27 -0700
 James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
 
  
  Ok easiest way is via javascript check out the redirection scripts
  here.
  http://www.scriptsearch.com/JavaScript/Scripts/Redirection/
 
 Doesn't XP come *without* Java now? Or is Java executed on the server
 like PHP?

javascript != java.  Javascript is a client side scripting language
executed in and by the users browser.  In fact javascript (a netscape
creation) pre-dates java.

James



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 04:36, HaywireMac wrote:
 On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:56:51 -0700
 James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
 
  Ya might want to link out to this site.  
  
  http://reactor-core.org  
  
  or at least some of the stuff he has.  
 
 Wow, great site, thanks! Now I can become even *more* paranoid ;-)

Just cause your paranoid doesn't mean they aren't there. *grin*


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread HaywireMac
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 11:35:50 -0700
James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:

 
 Clean design.  Considering the box it's coming off of and the line
 bandwidth you have... snappy too.

That box is downloading Apocalypse Now at about 25 KB/s as we speak too!

Good ol' IBM, that thing just never quits...

-- 
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
++
Nasrudin walked into a teahouse and declaimed, The moon is more useful
than the sun.
Why?, he was asked.
Because at night we need the light more.

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread ed tharp
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 17:24, HaywireMac wrote:
 On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:41:46 -0700
 Jack Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
 
  It comes up right next to the Apache button if MSIE is used to visit
  any of my web pages. This looks to me like the best balance of
  advocacy without limiting choice.
 
 Wow. I actually maybe kinda somehow in a small way started something.
 
 There's two people.
 
 Any more?
 
 BTW, I like the BLINK, it's just annoying enough to work! ;-)
 
 here's mine:
 
 www.orderinchaos.org/ie_reject.php

IIRC, IE doesn't support 'blink'... it's wasted


-- 
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

In spite of repeated (nice) complaints from myself, my credit union still 
dorks me over whenever I try to access MY account information via the web 
using konqueror.

I set it to identify itself as netscape OR explorer but it doesn't work, they 
redirect me to a download page and expect me to either download netscape or 
IE.  I don't (yet) know by what means they are detecting that my browser 
isn't mozilla or IE but it pisses me off no end.  I prefer konqueror.  
Konqueror is a GOOD browser capable of handling any and all _proper_ web 
protocols.  I have tried suggesting to them that they provide a button to go 
on anyway without downloading either browser if they insist on forcing people 
to this page but they just wont do this one simple thing.  

I am DETERMINED to get past their nonsense and access my account information 
USING KONQUEROR DAMNIT!  So there.  It does still happen, this nonsense, and 
spoofing a browser doesn't always work.

praedor

On Saturday 11 October 2003 09:24 am, Eric Huff wrote:
  Honestly, maybe I don't hang out in the right places or something,
  but my wife and I do almost everything online using Mozilla and
  Galeon and hardly ever run into this problem. It's been at least a
  year since the last time I had to show her how to spoof a browser
  ID with Konqueror.

 It still happens.  There are a couple sites (which i can't remember
 now) i need that does, and people on newbie mention it every so
 often.  I always send them a letter asking to remove such a useless
 requirement...

 eric

- -- 
Key fingerprint = D6F9 8682 2257 2871 10C6  DB92 6F50 8BBA B100 EB15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/iGlGb1CLurEA6xURAjhqAJ9knwPlp9Y70CvoieuqgN3aaG+uWgCfVRCZ
IBBaHv3zjmACzP24G0AahA0=
=6+ED
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread Steffen Barszus
Am Samstag, 11. Oktober 2003 21:20 schrieb ed tharp:

 IIRC, IE doesn't support 'blink'... it's wasted

AFAIK its an IE only tag, so it should work on IE at least. 


Ooops, no it was a proprietary netscape thing. marquee was IE only. 

Steffen

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 13:34, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 In spite of repeated (nice) complaints from myself, my credit union still 
 dorks me over whenever I try to access MY account information via the web 
 using konqueror.
 
 I set it to identify itself as netscape OR explorer but it doesn't work, they 
 redirect me to a download page and expect me to either download netscape or 
 IE.  I don't (yet) know by what means they are detecting that my browser 
 isn't mozilla or IE but it pisses me off no end.  I prefer konqueror.  
 Konqueror is a GOOD browser capable of handling any and all _proper_ web 
 protocols.  I have tried suggesting to them that they provide a button to go 
 on anyway without downloading either browser if they insist on forcing people 
 to this page but they just wont do this one simple thing.  
 
 I am DETERMINED to get past their nonsense and access my account information 
 USING KONQUEROR DAMNIT!  So there.  It does still happen, this nonsense, and 
 spoofing a browser doesn't always work.
 
 praedor

praedor,  do they use asp?  I've seen a number of asp generated pages
that barely work in Moz and IE let alone Konq.  

James

 
 On Saturday 11 October 2003 09:24 am, Eric Huff wrote:
   Honestly, maybe I don't hang out in the right places or something,
   but my wife and I do almost everything online using Mozilla and
   Galeon and hardly ever run into this problem. It's been at least a
   year since the last time I had to show her how to spoof a browser
   ID with Konqueror.
 
  It still happens.  There are a couple sites (which i can't remember
  now) i need that does, and people on newbie mention it every so
  often.  I always send them a letter asking to remove such a useless
  requirement...
 
  eric
 
 - -- 
 Key fingerprint = D6F9 8682 2257 2871 10C6  DB92 6F50 8BBA B100 EB15
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iD8DBQE/iGlGb1CLurEA6xURAjhqAJ9knwPlp9Y70CvoieuqgN3aaG+uWgCfVRCZ
 IBBaHv3zjmACzP24G0AahA0=
 =6+ED
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
 __
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 13:34, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 In spite of repeated (nice) complaints from myself, my credit union still 
 dorks me over whenever I try to access MY account information via the web 
 using konqueror.
 
 I set it to identify itself as netscape OR explorer but it doesn't work, they 
 redirect me to a download page and expect me to either download netscape or 
 IE.  I don't (yet) know by what means they are detecting that my browser 
 isn't mozilla or IE but it pisses me off no end.  I prefer konqueror.  
 Konqueror is a GOOD browser capable of handling any and all _proper_ web 
 protocols.  I have tried suggesting to them that they provide a button to go 
 on anyway without downloading either browser if they insist on forcing people 
 to this page but they just wont do this one simple thing.  
 
 I am DETERMINED to get past their nonsense and access my account information 
 USING KONQUEROR DAMNIT!  So there.  It does still happen, this nonsense, and 
 spoofing a browser doesn't always work.
 
 praedor

oops forgot an example page

http://supportwizard.com

James

 
 On Saturday 11 October 2003 09:24 am, Eric Huff wrote:
   Honestly, maybe I don't hang out in the right places or something,
   but my wife and I do almost everything online using Mozilla and
   Galeon and hardly ever run into this problem. It's been at least a
   year since the last time I had to show her how to spoof a browser
   ID with Konqueror.
 
  It still happens.  There are a couple sites (which i can't remember
  now) i need that does, and people on newbie mention it every so
  often.  I always send them a letter asking to remove such a useless
  requirement...
 
  eric
 
 - -- 
 Key fingerprint = D6F9 8682 2257 2871 10C6  DB92 6F50 8BBA B100 EB15
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iD8DBQE/iGlGb1CLurEA6xURAjhqAJ9knwPlp9Y70CvoieuqgN3aaG+uWgCfVRCZ
 IBBaHv3zjmACzP24G0AahA0=
 =6+ED
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
 __
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread Eric Huff
  I am DETERMINED to get past their nonsense and access my account
  information USING KONQUEROR DAMNIT!  So there.  It does still
  happen, this nonsense, and spoofing a browser doesn't always
  work.
  
  praedor
 
 oops forgot an example page
 
 http://supportwizard.com

This works fine with firebird.

eric

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread Carroll Grigsby
On Saturday 11 October 2003 10:24 am, Eric Huff wrote:
  Honestly, maybe I don't hang out in the right places or something,
  but my wife and I do almost everything online using Mozilla and
  Galeon and hardly ever run into this problem. It's been at least a
  year since the last time I had to show her how to spoof a browser
  ID with Konqueror.

 It still happens.  There are a couple sites (which i can't remember
 now) i need that does, and people on newbie mention it every so
 often.  I always send them a letter asking to remove such a useless
 requirement...

 eric

A recent experience:
During dinner a week or so back, SheThatIs decreed that the purchase and 
installation of a new mailbox and post was essential to my continued 
happiness. There are two major sources for such purchases in this neck of the 
woods -- Lowe's and Home Depot. Wanting to eliminate schlepping between the 
two stores, I decided to visit to each company's web site to compare their 
offerings. Fired up Konq, went to Lowe's, and saw what they had. Next stop, 
Home Depot. Oops! Some nitwit has decided that since I would not be able to 
enjoy the full benefits of their site because I was not running either 
Netscape 4.0 or IE 4.0; further access was denied.

The next morning I dropped about $150 at Lowe's for the mailbox, mailbox post, 
and some other stuff.

Yes, I could reconfigure to Konq to get past Home Depot's barrier, but why the 
hell should I? They are the ones trying to sell something to me.

And yes, I thought about sending them a nastygram, but that was not in the 
list of options. (Remember when every website had a Contact Webmaster link?) 
Then too, would anyone who considers Netscape 4.0 and IE 4.0 to be the latest 
and greatest understand my complaint? The idiot must still think it's 1997.

-- cmg


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread Tim Sawchuck
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:16:01 -0400
Carroll Grigsby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 A recent experience:
 During dinner a week or so back, SheThatIs decreed that the purchase and 
 installation of a new mailbox and post was essential to my continued 
 happiness. There are two major sources for such purchases in this neck of
 the woods -- Lowe's and Home Depot. Wanting to eliminate schlepping
 between the two stores, I decided to visit to each company's web site to
 compare their offerings. Fired up Konq, went to Lowe's, and saw what they
 had. Next stop, Home Depot. Oops! Some nitwit has decided that since I
 would not be able to enjoy the full benefits of their site because I was
 not running either Netscape 4.0 or IE 4.0; further access was denied.
 
 The next morning I dropped about $150 at Lowe's for the mailbox, mailbox
 post, and some other stuff.
 
 Yes, I could reconfigure to Konq to get past Home Depot's barrier, but why
 the hell should I? They are the ones trying to sell something to me.
 
 And yes, I thought about sending them a nastygram, but that was not in the
 
 list of options. (Remember when every website had a Contact Webmaster
 link?) Then too, would anyone who considers Netscape 4.0 and IE 4.0 to be
 the latest and greatest understand my complaint? The idiot must still
 think it's 1997.

I have done that three times (I'm old enough to blame the fact that I forget
about Home Depot and Konq), each time I send a postcard addressed to the
manager of the local store about the situation.

Third time I got a reply back apologizing, explaining that it was handled by
corporate, AND a nice juicy discount coupon (that I may or may not use). 
I'd be interested to hear his explanation about why he was offering 50% off
for an old senile linux geek.  ;-)

Tim

-- 
( ) ASCII ribbon campaign against HTML e-mail
 x registered Linux user # 329428
/ \ GnuPG KeyID 6B5A70DF www.keyserver.net

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread Carroll Grigsby
On Saturday 11 October 2003 09:44 pm, Tim Sawchuck wrote:
 On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:16:01 -0400

 Carroll Grigsby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 snipped long rant about trying to access Home Depot website from Konq


 I have done that three times (I'm old enough to blame the fact that I
 forget about Home Depot and Konq), each time I send a postcard addressed to
 the manager of the local store about the situation.

 Third time I got a reply back apologizing, explaining that it was handled
 by corporate, AND a nice juicy discount coupon (that I may or may not use).
 I'd be interested to hear his explanation about why he was offering 50% off
 for an old senile linux geek.  ;-)

 Tim

Tim:
Good for you. And good for the guy who runs your local Home Depot. He seems to 
understand that every dollar spent at a competitive store is a buck that he 
won't get. But the root cause -- the idiot webmaster -- still remains. Now 
that you and the store manager are buddy-buddy, is there any chance of 
learning either the e-mail or snail mail address of whoever it is that has 
custody of the idiot? I'd be interesting in laying a few lines on him.
-- cmg




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

October 11, 2003 07:16 pm, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
 On Saturday 11 October 2003 10:24 am, Eric Huff wrote:
   Honestly, maybe I don't hang out in the right places or something,
   but my wife and I do almost everything online using Mozilla and
   Galeon and hardly ever run into this problem. It's been at least a
   year since the last time I had to show her how to spoof a browser
   ID with Konqueror.
 
  It still happens.  There are a couple sites (which i can't remember
  now) i need that does, and people on newbie mention it every so
  often.  I always send them a letter asking to remove such a useless
  requirement...
 
  eric

 A recent experience:
 During dinner a week or so back, SheThatIs decreed that the purchase and
 installation of a new mailbox and post was essential to my continued
 happiness. There are two major sources for such purchases in this neck of
 the woods -- Lowe's and Home Depot. Wanting to eliminate schlepping between
 the two stores, I decided to visit to each company's web site to compare
 their offerings. Fired up Konq, went to Lowe's, and saw what they had. Next
 stop, Home Depot. Oops! Some nitwit has decided that since I would not be
 able to enjoy the full benefits of their site because I was not running
 either Netscape 4.0 or IE 4.0; further access was denied.

 The next morning I dropped about $150 at Lowe's for the mailbox, mailbox
 post, and some other stuff.

 Yes, I could reconfigure to Konq to get past Home Depot's barrier, but why
 the hell should I? They are the ones trying to sell something to me.

 And yes, I thought about sending them a nastygram, but that was not in the
 list of options. (Remember when every website had a Contact Webmaster
 link?) Then too, would anyone who considers Netscape 4.0 and IE 4.0 to be
 the latest and greatest understand my complaint? The idiot must still think
 it's 1997.

 -- cmg

I find that rather astonishing since, according to friends that work at a 
local branch of Home Depot, their servers are all running HP Ux. At least it 
ain't W2k3 or another MS Virus Transport System. 

I also thought I read recently that they were converting the whole operation 
to GNU/Linux. Or just investigating the possibility maybe.

Netcraft doesn't say anything about GNU/Linux though:

http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/?host=homedepot.com

They should just string up their webmasters.

Please ignore the Fortune. This computer is as weird as its owner. g

Charlie
- -- 
Edmonton,AB,Canada User 244963 at http://counter.li.org
Cooker on kernel 2.4.22-10mdk
21:12:56 up 21 days, 10:35, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.29, 0.47
Laughing at you is like drop kicking a wounded humming bird.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/iMmbG11CaRuZZSIRAlI9AJ9uOmHU7iKaNO6+kcKB8g954LDFngCfSu5U
+keiJg6MJIAbvX8VwQNLy4k=
=uuqy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread Tim Sawchuck
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 22:29:09 -0400
Carroll Grigsby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Saturday 11 October 2003 09:44 pm, Tim Sawchuck wrote:
  On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:16:01 -0400
 
  Carroll Grigsby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  snipped long rant about trying to access Home Depot website from Konq
 
 
  I have done that three times (I'm old enough to blame the fact that I
  forget about Home Depot and Konq), each time I send a postcard addressed
  to the manager of the local store about the situation.
 
  Third time I got a reply back apologizing, explaining that it was
  handled by corporate, AND a nice juicy discount coupon (that I may or
  may not use). I'd be interested to hear his explanation about why he was
  offering 50% off for an old senile linux geek.  ;-)
 
  Tim
 
 Tim:
 Good for you. And good for the guy who runs your local Home Depot. He
 seems to understand that every dollar spent at a competitive store is a
 buck that he won't get. But the root cause -- the idiot webmaster -- still
 remains. Now that you and the store manager are buddy-buddy, is there any
 chance of learning either the e-mail or snail mail address of whoever it
 is that has custody of the idiot? I'd be interesting in laying a few lines
 on him.-- cmg

He stated that his district manager knew of numerous complaints (?)
throughout the area and that they were getting the word up the chain to
corporate and whoever made the choice, or was just lazy and followed the
Microsoft instruction book(yah, right).

Tim

-- 
( ) ASCII ribbon campaign against HTML e-mail
 x registered Linux user # 329428
/ \ GnuPG KeyID 6B5A70DF www.keyserver.net

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread Jack Coates
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 18:16, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
...
 And yes, I thought about sending them a nastygram, but that was not in the 
 list of options. (Remember when every website had a Contact Webmaster link?) 
 Then too, would anyone who considers Netscape 4.0 and IE 4.0 to be the latest 
 and greatest understand my complaint? The idiot must still think it's 1997.
...

entirely too many of these etiquette-less morons about trying to run
websites these days. I've had a long drawn-out experience with a
long-distance company whose MS-SQL server was always down when I tried
to pay my bill. Consequently, they didn't get their bill paid until they
got around to fixing it, which took three months because they didn't
know it had broken. I and any number of others could have told them, if
they hadn't disabled all the standard *master@ addresses. They now have
prominent Contact Us links all over the place :-P

I imagine, given the three month time frame, that no one had any idea
there was a problem until some automated system attempted to hand two
thirds of the membership over to collections.
-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread Greg Meyer
On Friday 10 October 2003 08:46 am, HaywireMac wrote:
 
 How would one configure Apache so that anyone using IE would be met with
 a nice friendly message that they are not welcome?
 
 Considering the effects of compromised home computers running XP on the
 'net, I would like to start a campaign to essentially lock out IE from
 accessing websites.
 
 Of course, one would still be able to use Windows, but have to use an
 alternate browser such as Mozilla.
 
Do what the sites that allow only IE do.  Test the browser string and present 
a warning page to users of IE and the real page to everybody else.
-- 
/g

Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read -Groucho Marx

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Friday 10 October 2003 08:46 am, HaywireMac wrote:
 How would one configure Apache so that anyone using IE would be met with
 a nice friendly message that they are not welcome?

 Considering the effects of compromised home computers running XP on the
 'net, I would like to start a campaign to essentially lock out IE from
 accessing websites.

 Of course, one would still be able to use Windows, but have to use an
 alternate browser such as Mozilla.

You can test for an explicit browser string but the code must be added to 
every virtual server run from Apache.  You can't just add it to a 
configuration setting, it has to be in the page or application code.

Also, if someone has a page under the actual index bookmarked, they can still 
bypass the detection string.  I use that all the time to bypass detection and 
enforcement of IE only.

-- 
Bryan Phinney
Software Test Engineer


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread HaywireMac
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:19:28 -0400
Greg Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:

 Do what the sites that allow only IE do.  Test the browser string and
 present a warning page to users of IE and the real page to everybody
 else.

Right, I understand the basic concept, but I cannot see in my
httpd2.conf where or how this is done.

I found this example on the Apache site:

The BrowserMatch is a special cases of the SetEnvIf directive that sets
environment variables conditional on the User-Agent HTTP request header.

Some additional examples:

BrowserMatch ^Mozilla forms jpeg=yes browser=netscape
BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/[2-3] tables agif frames javascript
BrowserMatch MSIE !javascript

The last one looks promising, I suppose I could put:

BrowserMatch MSIE go somewhere else, but I can't find how to write
that in terms Apache will understand...

Thanks!

-- 
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
++
Waste not fresh tears over old griefs.
-- Euripides

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread HaywireMac
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:34:38 -0400
Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:

  Considering the effects of compromised home computers running XP on
  the'net, I would like to start a campaign to essentially lock out
  IE from accessing websites.
 
  Of course, one would still be able to use Windows, but have to use
  an alternate browser such as Mozilla.
 
 You can test for an explicit browser string but the code must be added
 to every virtual server run from Apache.  You can't just add it to a 
 configuration setting, it has to be in the page or application code.

I haven't even got Virtual Servers to work yet, even after following the
multitude of examples on this and the Newb list, I'll be happy if I can
just get some momentum going on this.

So what you are saying is the the Apache config is useless? On their
docs page they seem to say otherwise...

 Also, if someone has a page under the actual index bookmarked, they
 can still bypass the detection string.  I use that all the time to
 bypass detection and enforcement of IE only.

I don't have many pages to edit, so adding it to each and every page
would be a simple matter of copy and paste.

Good to know tho, thanks!
-- 
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
++
If little green men land in your back yard, hide any little green women
you've got in the house.
-- Mike Harding, The Armchair Anarchist's Almanac

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread J.C. Woods
Greg Meyer wrote:

On Friday 10 October 2003 08:46 am, HaywireMac wrote:
 

How would one configure Apache so that anyone using IE would be met with
a nice friendly message that they are not welcome?
Considering the effects of compromised home computers running XP on the
'net, I would like to start a campaign to essentially lock out IE from
accessing websites.
Of course, one would still be able to use Windows, but have to use an
alternate browser such as Mozilla.
   

Do what the sites that allow only IE do.  Test the browser string and present 
a warning page to users of IE and the real page to everybody else.
 

Hey HeywireMac,

Google is your friend, a very *good* friend at that. Just look at what 
google gave me with one run of blocking IE on Apache webserver:

http://www.devin.com/ieblock_howto.shtml

Happy blocking, and, BTW, I like your thinking on this one.

drjung

--
J. Craig Woods
UNIX Network/System Engineer
http://www.trismegistus.net/resume.htm
Let him that would move the world, first move himself.
--Socrates


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread Kwan Lowe
 I don't have many pages to edit, so adding it to each and every page
 would be a simple matter of copy and paste.

Just a suggestion: If you're editing multiple pages, even just a dozen,
you might consider making the pages PHP based. You can enable .html as a
PHP script in apache then just insert include directives in your HTML
code to point to more HTML or PHP script.

-- 
The Digital Hermit  Unix and Linux Solutions
http://www.digitalhermit.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread HaywireMac
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:50:00 -0500
J.C. Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:

 Hey HeywireMac,
 
 Google is your friend, a very *good* friend at that. Just look at what

ya, I was so engrossed in the Apache docs, I forgot my own similar
observations on that point.

 google gave me with one run of blocking IE on Apache webserver:
 
  http://www.devin.com/ieblock_howto.shtml
 
 Happy blocking, and, BTW, I like your thinking on this one.

Thanks! I'm thinking of using Stephen's 404 page as the redirect...

-- 
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
++
Don't take life seriously, you'll never get out alive.

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread Miark
This may be just me, but locking out anybody based on their browser is
not a tactic that is compatible or consistent with the Open Source way. 

In fact I think it's below us. We should be taking the high road and
setting an example cuz 1) that's the quality of people we want to be. 2)
We don't want Linux users developing a reputation of warring against M$.
We about being pro-Linux, not anti-M$. 3) It punishes computer users who
are too inexperienced to know how to change their browser. And 4) which
is perhaps the most important, our way is of freedom--including the
freedom to use the software we want. It would be the height of hypocrisy
for legions of Linux webmasters to laud freedom while compelling
visitors to use or not use software of their choice. It just ain't us.

Miark



On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:46:18 -0400, HaywireMac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 How would one configure Apache so that anyone using IE would be met with
 a nice friendly message that they are not welcome?...I would like to 
 start a campaign to essentially lock out IE from accessing websites.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread rikona
Hello HaywireMac,

Friday, October 10, 2003, 5:46:18 AM, you wrote:


H Considering the effects of compromised home computers running XP on
H the 'net, I would like to start a campaign to essentially lock
H out IE from accessing websites.

H Of course, one would still be able to use Windows, but have to use an
H alternate browser such as Mozilla.

This might not go well with the people who DO use an alternate
browser, but have it set to ID as IE. This gets MANY pages to work
that would not work otherwise because of the kind of message you want
to put up. MANY people do this, and it is, in part, how M$ seems to
get such huge market share numbers.

I understand that there is code that does more extensive testing to
see if it really is IE, independent of what the ID says. M$ apparently
helped in the development. You might try to get this and use it
instead, thus allowing alternate browsers who ID as IE to still work.
Us alternate browser users would sure appreciate that. :-)

-- 

 rikonamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread HaywireMac
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:14:11 -0400
Miark [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:

 3) It punishes computer users who
 are too inexperienced to know how to change their browser.

This is exactly what I intend to do. The page which is served to IE
users will explain *why* (info on MS and it's record on security
issues), and *how* (links to alternative browsers and info on how they
can contact MS to demand better protection).

You are correct about one thing, this is about choice. For me, this
means *choosing* not to deal with MS wherever possible, until they get
their act together.

Unfortunately, MS will not listen until users of their software start
complaining that not only are they subject to egregious violations of
their privacy and security, but that out of that, the 'net is becoming a
*very* unfriendly place for MS software.

Hell, my site don't get enough hits to even make a *blip* on MS's radar,
but as far as I'm concerned, enough is enough. MS needs to be told in
no-uncertain-terms that they are not welcome on the 'net in their
current state.

What is so different about this type of action than putting filters on
HTML mail, which is a standard practice for many lists and individual
users? What is so different about this than banning certain IP's that
run unsecured open-relays, often without their knowledge? What is so
different about this than ISP's giving individual users the boot when
they won't accept that the software they are running is causing
problems?

Why be dishonest and hide the fact that we are *against* MS and their
shenanigans, while at the same time offering an alternative? It is
indeed hypocrisy to accept the ill-conceived and hair-raisingly insecure
MS garbage that's out there, all the while subverting them by promoting
our alternative. No one is going to seek out that alternative unless
they are given concrete and inescapable reasons for doing so.

-- 
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
++
Fain would I climb, yet fear I to fall.
-- Sir Walter Raleigh

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Friday 10 October 2003 10:14 am, Miark wrote:
 This may be just me, but locking out anybody based on their browser is
 not a tactic that is compatible or consistent with the Open Source way.

 In fact I think it's below us. We should be taking the high road and
 setting an example cuz 1) that's the quality of people we want to be. 2)
 We don't want Linux users developing a reputation of warring against M$.
 We about being pro-Linux, not anti-M$. 3) It punishes computer users who
 are too inexperienced to know how to change their browser. And 4) which
 is perhaps the most important, our way is of freedom--including the
 freedom to use the software we want. It would be the height of hypocrisy
 for legions of Linux webmasters to laud freedom while compelling
 visitors to use or not use software of their choice. It just ain't us.

 Miark

I would tend to agree with Miark - they are bad enough about locking us out if 
we are not using IE, do we have to resort to these tactics as well?

Don't get me wrong, Haywiremac - I understand where you are coming from but 
maybe a better solution would be to redirect an IE identified browser to a 
page that explains the point(s) that you are trying to get across then, 
returns to the your site (either via a return button or a timing limit to 
ensure that they do read it).

Wouldn't that be a better alternative? Just a random-universe thought. :-)

-- 
  
  /\  
DarkLord 
  \/  


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread J.C. Woods
Miark wrote:

This may be just me, but locking out anybody based on their browser is
not a tactic that is compatible or consistent with the Open Source way. 

In fact I think it's below us. We should be taking the high road and
setting an example cuz 1) that's the quality of people we want to be. 2)
We don't want Linux users developing a reputation of warring against M$.
We about being pro-Linux, not anti-M$. 3) It punishes computer users who
are too inexperienced to know how to change their browser. And 4) which
is perhaps the most important, our way is of freedom--including the
freedom to use the software we want. It would be the height of hypocrisy
for legions of Linux webmasters to laud freedom while compelling
visitors to use or not use software of their choice. It just ain't us.
Miark

polite insertrant

Your missing the point, Miark. This is not what HMac is doing (and do 
jump in if I have you wrong, HMac). He is not concerned with hostile 
attitudes against those that use IE: he is against the Corporation that 
has shown very little regard for your security, and they are costing you 
money right now! Don't take my word for it, just fire up some sniffer of 
your own choosing, i.e. ethereal, and have a look at the cluster-fuck 
out there. I pay good money for my dsl, and, because of a plethora of 
bogus, virus-oriented traffic due to M$, i.e. rpc exploits (port 135), 
netbios exploits (port 138 and port 139), SMB exploits (port 445), IIS 
exploits (all http and https ports), and all the other email virus that 
bottlenecks the internet (I think the list could go on ad infinitum), I 
pay by not having but maybe, at best, 80 percent of my pipe.

What it seems like to me, is that HaywireMac is on an educational 
crusade, and I, for one, laud him on this endeavor. The re-direct page 
can be done in a really well thought out fashion. Wording can be 
included that will help others get the hell off of anything to do with 
M$. That kind of effort will certainly have Billy re-tooling his 
thinking. It is time for us all to make a stand.
/polite insert/rant

Go for it, WildMan

drjung

--
J. Craig Woods
UNIX Network/System Engineer
http://www.trismegistus.net/resume.htm
Let him that would move the world, first move himself.
--Socrates


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread HaywireMac
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:57:37 -0400
Ronald J. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:

 Don't get me wrong, Haywiremac - I understand where you are coming
 from but maybe a better solution would be to redirect an IE identified
 browser to a page that explains the point(s) that you are trying to
 get across then, returns to the your site (either via a return button
 or a timing limit to ensure that they do read it).
 
 Wouldn't that be a better alternative? Just a random-universe thought.

I think that is the direction, at least partially, I'm leaning. All
joking aside about Stephen's infamous 404 page, I certainly don't wish
to paint all *nix users as ill-tempered ideologues, but at the same time
what is the point of a quick redirect that people will simply ignore
anyway?

You've got to make it impossible to ignore, or else it's pointless.

Non-violent protest and civil-disobedience have a long and effective
tradition of effecting change, and I see this as somewhat akin to a
strike, the most effective means of such. Ghandi used it, MLK used it,
it is certainly nothing new. If the goons that are polluting the
internet won't listen to reason...

I'm going to stay away from insulting anyone, though it's tempting for
me as you can well imagine ;-)

-- 
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
++
Nasrudin walked into a teahouse and declaimed, The moon is more useful
than the sun.
Why?, he was asked.
Because at night we need the light more.

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread HaywireMac
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:15:56 -0500
J.C. Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:

 
  Your missing the point, Miark. This is not what HMac is doing (and do
  
 jump in if I have you wrong, HMac).

No, you've got it just right, I will heed the advice to make this as
polite and well-mannered as possible...like I said before, I would like
to have links to information and resources that would be of use to IE
users, like Mozilla or it's like, which don't spread and/or accept
malicious code with such abandon. Or links like Billy Gates e-mail
address, maybe ;-)

 He is not concerned with hostile attitudes against those that use IE:
 he is against the Corporation that has shown very little regard for
 your security, and they are costing you money right now! Don't take my
 word for it, just fire up some sniffer of your own choosing, i.e.
 ethereal, and have a look at the cluster-fuck out there. I pay good
 money for my dsl, and, because of a plethora of bogus, virus-oriented
 traffic due to M$, i.e. rpc exploits (port 135), netbios exploits
 (port 138 and port 139), SMB exploits (port 445), IIS exploits (all
 http and https ports), and all the other email virus that bottlenecks
 the internet (I think the list could go on ad infinitum), I pay by not
 having but maybe, at best, 80 percent of my pipe.
 
 What it seems like to me, is that HaywireMac is on an educational 
 crusade, and I, for one, laud him on this endeavor. The re-direct page
 can be done in a really well thought out fashion. Wording can be 
 included that will help others get the hell off of anything to do with
 M$. That kind of effort will certainly have Billy re-tooling his 
 thinking. It is time for us all to make a stand

Damn straight! Thanks!

-- 
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
++
Push where it gives and scratch where it itches.

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread JM5379

I think that is the direction, at least partially, I'm leaning. All
joking aside about Stephen's infamous 404 page, I certainly
don't wish
to paint all *nix users as ill-tempered ideologues, but at the
same time
what is the point of a quick redirect that people will simply ignore
anyway?

You've got to make it impossible to ignore, or else it's pointless.

Non-violent protest and civil-disobedience have a long and effective
tradition of effecting change, and I see this as somewhat akin to a
strike, the most effective means of such. Ghandi used it, MLK
used it,
it is certainly nothing new. If the goons that are polluting the
internet won't listen to reason...

I'm going to stay away from insulting anyone, though it's
tempting for
me as you can well imagine ;-)

perhaps an additional consideration... on the redirect, put a
list of links to the websites for as many alternative browsers as
you would like to suggest, perhaps even to their download pages
(though that may need to be semi-constantly monitored for changes
more than the homepages would).  this would allow even the
newbie-est to find and install whatever flavor tickles their
tastebuds with a minimum of effort or understnding on their part.

but i do love the reversal of fortunes this initiates *g*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Friday 10 October 2003 18:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 this would allow even the
 newbie-est to find and install whatever flavor tickles their
 tastebuds with a minimum of effort or understnding on their part.

Right up to the point where they uninstall explorer, thinking they won't be 
needing it anymore. That way it's dead certain they'll never touch 
free-software again for a long time to come!

Educating people is no easy chore, 'specially if they don't want to be.

Good luck,
harM



 but i do love the reversal of fortunes this initiates *g*

-- 
Mandrake HowTo's  more: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread JM5379

--- Original Message ---
From: H.J.Bathoorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

On Friday 10 October 2003 18:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 this would allow even the
 newbie-est to find and install whatever flavor tickles their
 tastebuds with a minimum of effort or understnding on their part.

Right up to the point where they uninstall explorer, thinking
they won't be 
needing it anymore. That way it's dead certain they'll never touch 
free-software again for a long time to come!

Educating people is no easy chore, 'specially if they don't want
to be.

Good luck,
harM


no matter how idiot-proof you make it, they'll always come up
with a more persistent idiot.  besides, i don't think you
actually can uninstall ie now that it's such an integral part:
of the ms experience.  but if you can, it's still a dedicated
decision requiring more than a single click to actually delete it
completely.  but with that possibility in mind, perhaps a
disclaimer that ie should NOT be uninstalled because of those
lesser sites who still insist on requiring it.

every action has consequences, even no action at all.  the
ultimate decision is which is the lesser evil?


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Friday 10 October 2003 09:36 am, HaywireMac wrote:
 On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:34:38 -0400

 Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
   Considering the effects of compromised home computers running XP on
   the'net, I would like to start a campaign to essentially lock out
   IE from accessing websites.
  
   Of course, one would still be able to use Windows, but have to use
   an alternate browser such as Mozilla.
 
  You can test for an explicit browser string but the code must be added
  to every virtual server run from Apache.  You can't just add it to a
  configuration setting, it has to be in the page or application code.

 I haven't even got Virtual Servers to work yet, even after following the
 multitude of examples on this and the Newb list, I'll be happy if I can
 just get some momentum going on this.

 So what you are saying is the the Apache config is useless? On their
 docs page they seem to say otherwise...

I do not know of any method of detecting the browser and altering the default 
page displayed based on that browser that does not entail creating code on 
the default display page and possibly subsequent pages of the site.  I also 
do not know of any method of doing this that I would be unable to bypass in 
some manner.  Figuring out what happens when you bypass the detection code is 
part of QA and I have yet to see any site that is capable of locking me out 
based on my browser.  I have been working in software QA for about 8 years, 
the last 4-5 has been spent almost entirely on web-based applications.  I 
would consider myself somewhat knowledgable in that area.  YMMV.

  Also, if someone has a page under the actual index bookmarked, they
  can still bypass the detection string.  I use that all the time to
  bypass detection and enforcement of IE only.

 I don't have many pages to edit, so adding it to each and every page
 would be a simple matter of copy and paste.

That depends on your pages.  If you use a CGI method, each page that can be 
reached via URL must be CGI based.  If you use a PHP method, the same holds 
true.  If you mix html, dhtml, CGI, etc. it is not a simple cut and paste 
function.  The fact is that if I can load a page without loading the specific 
redirect code that you created, I can bypass the detection.  Also, if I use a 
proxy server that doesn't pass a browser id header, I can bypass the 
redirect.  If you are trying to lock out a specific browser, it is easier to 
bypass than if you only accepted a particular one.  Without a browser header, 
the default behavior is probably to display the normal page.  With most 
detection mechanisms, the default is to not display unless the browser 
identifies itself as a certain type.  Even that can be spoofed, although not 
trivially with IE.

-- 
Bryan Phinney
Software Test Engineer


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread HaywireMac
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:55:54 -0400
Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:

 I do not know of any method of detecting the browser and altering the
 default page displayed based on that browser that does not entail
 creating code on the default display page and possibly subsequent
 pages of the site.  I also do not know of any method of doing this
 that I would be unable to bypass in some manner.  Figuring out what
 happens when you bypass the detection code is part of QA and I have
 yet to see any site that is capable of locking me out based on my
 browser.  I have been working in software QA for about 8 years, the
 last 4-5 has been spent almost entirely on web-based applications.  I 
 would consider myself somewhat knowledgable in that area.  YMMV.

Monsieur Woods already linked me to a solution that confirms what you
say, it appears it must be done in the page code:

http://www.devin.com/ieblock_howto.shtml
 
   Also, if someone has a page under the actual index bookmarked,
   they can still bypass the detection string.  I use that all the
   time to bypass detection and enforcement of IE only.
 
  I don't have many pages to edit, so adding it to each and every page
  would be a simple matter of copy and paste.
 
 That depends on your pages.  If you use a CGI method, each page that
 can be reached via URL must be CGI based.  If you use a PHP method,
 the same holds true.  If you mix html, dhtml, CGI, etc. it is not a
 simple cut and paste function.

Well there, the site linked above seems to differ with you. The claim is
that it is impossible to bypass (unless you spoof the browser ID or go
through a proxy, etc.)

Quote:

 It has the added advantage that it doesn't require CGI execution or
redirection, and can't be circumvented by knowing the URL for the real
page. It's pretty simple, actually. Place this code at or near the top
of your code, before any output has occurred.

All of my pages are .php, so this is the method I'll try. Anyhow, we'll
see how it goes, I have Wine installed and IE so I can test it.

 The fact is that if I can load a page without loading the specific
 redirect code that you created, I can bypass the detection.  Also, if
 I use a proxy server that doesn't pass a browser id header, I can
 bypass the redirect.  If you are trying to lock out a specific
 browser, it is easier to bypass than if you only accepted a particular
 one.  Without a browser header, the default behavior is probably to
 display the normal page.  With most detection mechanisms, the default
 is to not display unless the browser identifies itself as a certain
 type.  Even that can be spoofed, although not trivially with IE.

I'm not lookin' fer a 100% blockade, I'll be happy if even 1 or 2 people
get the message, esp. considering the pathetic level of traffic my site
generates. 

Even if just a few people did this kind of thing, it could catch on and
generate quite a stir, IMHO. Not so much, as I say, to make it
*impossible*, but very difficult to ignore, knowwhatimsayin'?

-- 
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
++
In spite of everything, I still believe that people are good at heart.
-- Ann Frank

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread HaywireMac
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:50:00 -0500
J.C. Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:

 Happy blocking, and, BTW, I like your thinking on this one.

Wt! It works!

Thank you thank you thank you!

Of course, as Brian P. said, anyone with half a brain can prolly bypass
it, but it's easy to do, and if more people do it, it could be a great
form of protest, IMVHO...

-- 
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
++
Life can be so tragic -- you're here today and here tomorrow.

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread J.C. Woods
Bryan Phinney wrote:

On Friday 10 October 2003 09:36 am, HaywireMac wrote:
 

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:34:38 -0400

Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
   

Considering the effects of compromised home computers running XP on
the'net, I would like to start a campaign to essentially lock out
IE from accessing websites.
Of course, one would still be able to use Windows, but have to use
an alternate browser such as Mozilla.
   

You can test for an explicit browser string but the code must be added
to every virtual server run from Apache.  You can't just add it to a
configuration setting, it has to be in the page or application code.
 

I haven't even got Virtual Servers to work yet, even after following the
multitude of examples on this and the Newb list, I'll be happy if I can
just get some momentum going on this.
So what you are saying is the the Apache config is useless? On their
docs page they seem to say otherwise...
   

I do not know of any method of detecting the browser and altering the default 
page displayed based on that browser that does not entail creating code on 
the default display page and possibly subsequent pages of the site.  I also 
do not know of any method of doing this that I would be unable to bypass in 
some manner.  Figuring out what happens when you bypass the detection code is 
part of QA and I have yet to see any site that is capable of locking me out 
based on my browser.  I have been working in software QA for about 8 years, 
the last 4-5 has been spent almost entirely on web-based applications.  I 
would consider myself somewhat knowledgable in that area.  YMMV.

 

Also, if someone has a page under the actual index bookmarked, they
can still bypass the detection string.  I use that all the time to
bypass detection and enforcement of IE only.
 

I don't have many pages to edit, so adding it to each and every page
would be a simple matter of copy and paste.
   

That depends on your pages.  If you use a CGI method, each page that can be 
reached via URL must be CGI based.  If you use a PHP method, the same holds 
true.  If you mix html, dhtml, CGI, etc. it is not a simple cut and paste 
function.  The fact is that if I can load a page without loading the specific 
redirect code that you created, I can bypass the detection.  Also, if I use a 
proxy server that doesn't pass a browser id header, I can bypass the 
redirect.  If you are trying to lock out a specific browser, it is easier to 
bypass than if you only accepted a particular one.  Without a browser header, 
the default behavior is probably to display the normal page.  With most 
detection mechanisms, the default is to not display unless the browser 
identifies itself as a certain type.  Even that can be spoofed, although not 
trivially with IE.

LOL,

14+ years dealing with network issues, and, quess what, I still learn 
something new each day. Check out the web page. Some of the   
methodologies are pretty damn effective. Computer science, like any 
other science, is not exact, and not without it exceptions.

http://www.devin.com/ieblock_howto.shtml

drjung

--
J. Craig Woods
UNIX Network/System Engineer
http://www.trismegistus.net/resume.htm
Let him that would move the world, first move himself.
--Socrates


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread Jack Coates
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 11:39, HaywireMac wrote:
so I thought about both sides while I was walking to work this morning,
and decided to do this in my standard_html_footer in Zope:
TD
dtml-if _.string.find(HTTP_USER_AGENT, 'MSIE') 0
H2BLINKA HREF=http://www.mozilla.org/;USE MOZILLA/A/BLINKH2
/dtml-if
/TD

It comes up right next to the Apache button if MSIE is used to visit any
of my web pages. This looks to me like the best balance of advocacy
without limiting choice.
-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Friday 10 October 2003 02:23 pm, HaywireMac wrote:

  That depends on your pages.  If you use a CGI method, each page that
  can be reached via URL must be CGI based.  If you use a PHP method,
  the same holds true.  If you mix html, dhtml, CGI, etc. it is not a
  simple cut and paste function.

 Well there, the site linked above seems to differ with you. The claim is
 that it is impossible to bypass (unless you spoof the browser ID or go
 through a proxy, etc.)

 Quote:

  It has the added advantage that it doesn't require CGI execution or
 redirection, and can't be circumvented by knowing the URL for the real
 page. It's pretty simple, actually. Place this code at or near the top
 of your code, before any output has occurred.

No, actually, I suspect that they are confirming what I said.  They assume 
that all of your pages are PHP and that you include the detection mechanism 
on all pages.  If you were running something like post-nuke or nuke, or 
another PHP type of content management system, you could simply add the code 
to a template and it would automatically be placed on every page that was 
pulled from that template.  Since all pages are created from the same 
template and generated dynamically, the code would be on all pages.

If you had both HTML as well as PHP pages and I had the URL to one of the HTML 
pages, I could bypass the code, correct?

 All of my pages are .php, so this is the method I'll try. Anyhow, we'll
 see how it goes, I have Wine installed and IE so I can test it.

  The fact is that if I can load a page without loading the specific
  redirect code that you created, I can bypass the detection.  Also, if
  I use a proxy server that doesn't pass a browser id header, I can
  bypass the redirect.  If you are trying to lock out a specific
  browser, it is easier to bypass than if you only accepted a particular
  one.  Without a browser header, the default behavior is probably to
  display the normal page.  With most detection mechanisms, the default
  is to not display unless the browser identifies itself as a certain
  type.  Even that can be spoofed, although not trivially with IE.

 I'm not lookin' fer a 100% blockade, I'll be happy if even 1 or 2 people
 get the message, esp. considering the pathetic level of traffic my site
 generates.

 Even if just a few people did this kind of thing, it could catch on and
 generate quite a stir, IMHO. Not so much, as I say, to make it
 *impossible*, but very difficult to ignore, knowwhatimsayin'?

Well, I probably disagree with what you are doing having the result you 
intend.  There is no point in attempting to get anyone to abandon IE at this 
point.  MS has already announced that 6.0 will be the last standalone version 
of IE.  All future versions will only be available as an integrated part of 
the Windows OS.  So, within a few years, we will see people moving away from 
IE if they want to continue to move forward with technology but still keep 
running their old OS, be it windows or otherwise.  People who move to the new 
versions of Windows are likely not to have any choice since MS plans to close 
down the OS to outside development as soon as the Palladium stuff gets going.

I suspect that third-party applications will only be approved if they do not 
directly compete with internal MS applications and browsers do.  Given that, 
it is inevitable that Opera, Mozilla and others will be the de-facto 
standards for browsers and IE will only maintain what marketshare they get 
from the OS itself.

-- 
Bryan Phinney
Software Test Engineer


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread Steffen Barszus
Am Freitag, 10. Oktober 2003 16:28 schrieb HaywireMac:

 Why be dishonest and hide the fact that we are *against* MS and their
 shenanigans, while at the same time offering an alternative? It is
 indeed hypocrisy to accept the ill-conceived and hair-raisingly
 insecure MS garbage that's out there, all the while subverting them
 by promoting our alternative. No one is going to seek out that
 alternative unless they are given concrete and inescapable reasons
 for doing so.

Absolutly agree. I would love to configure a reply mail to every OE user 
that sends me a mail. I just get some MB Swen each day and thanks to 
that worm i have a filter on 100kbyte on my mails to block it. I offer 
people my help to install and configure Mozilla even on win. Its not 
hate for the hate, but hate because of the results of buggy ugly ill 
software. I like the idea of redirecting IE People. Would be cool to 
collect solutions for this purpose and publish a small article on 
slashdot ;)

Steffen

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread HaywireMac
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 17:47:31 -0400
Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:

 
 No, actually, I suspect that they are confirming what I said.  They
 assume that all of your pages are PHP and that you include the
 detection mechanism on all pages.  If you were running something like
 post-nuke or nuke, or another PHP type of content management system,
 you could simply add the code to a template and it would automatically
 be placed on every page that was pulled from that template.  Since all
 pages are created from the same template and generated dynamically,
 the code would be on all pages.
 
 If you had both HTML as well as PHP pages and I had the URL to one of
 the HTML pages, I could bypass the code, correct?

Correct. I only have 5 pages so, and they're all .php, so, no problemo.
 
 Well, I probably disagree with what you are doing having the result
 you intend.  There is no point in attempting to get anyone to abandon
 IE at this point.  MS has already announced that 6.0 will be the last
 standalone version of IE.  All future versions will only be available
 as an integrated part of the Windows OS.  So, within a few years, we
 will see people moving away from IE if they want to continue to move
 forward with technology but still keep running their old OS, be it
 windows or otherwise.  People who move to the new versions of Windows
 are likely not to have any choice since MS plans to close down the OS
 to outside development as soon as the Palladium stuff gets going.
 
 I suspect that third-party applications will only be approved if they
 do not directly compete with internal MS applications and browsers do.
  Given that, 
 it is inevitable that Opera, Mozilla and others will be the de-facto 
 standards for browsers and IE will only maintain what marketshare they
 get from the OS itself.

Again, this is just a small gesture, and not just aimed at IE. It's
intended to expose Windows users to alternatives to not just IE, but to
Windows itself, which is why I point to documentation which highlights
the inherant problems with using Windows in general. Even if people
don't take this info as a reason to switch from Win to Lin, it just
might make them think of putting some pressure on MS to make a better
effort at security, or change the direction MS is taking.

I plan on expanding the offensive to include the objects you mention,
such as Palladium, and the idea of even further integrating, and
therefore exposing to vulnerabilities, Windows OS components.

MS is going in the wrong direction. I hope I can do my part, however
small, to make people see this, if there's any recommendations you or
anyone else can contribute, I'm certainly open to that.

Thanks!

-- 
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
++
If you can survive death, you can probably survive anything.

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Friday 10 October 2003 06:21 pm, HaywireMac wrote:

 Again, this is just a small gesture, and not just aimed at IE. It's
 intended to expose Windows users to alternatives to not just IE, but to
 Windows itself, which is why I point to documentation which highlights
 the inherant problems with using Windows in general. Even if people
 don't take this info as a reason to switch from Win to Lin, it just
 might make them think of putting some pressure on MS to make a better
 effort at security, or change the direction MS is taking.

 I plan on expanding the offensive to include the objects you mention,
 such as Palladium, and the idea of even further integrating, and
 therefore exposing to vulnerabilities, Windows OS components.

 MS is going in the wrong direction. I hope I can do my part, however
 small, to make people see this, if there's any recommendations you or
 anyone else can contribute, I'm certainly open to that.

Well, there is a favorite link that I like to send people to when I want to 
give them a few reasons to consider switching to Linux from Windows.

http://aaxnet.com/editor/edit029.html

The write-up is rather long but very comprehensive and it explains without a 
doubt why personal users and small businesses need to start creating a plan 
to migrate away from Windows in the next few years.

If you are interested in being able to give someone some concrete reasons, he 
pretty much covers the bases.

-- 
Bryan Phinney
Software Test Engineer


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread HaywireMac
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:06:58 -0400
Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:

 Well, there is a favorite link that I like to send people to when I
 want to give them a few reasons to consider switching to Linux from
 Windows.
 
 http://aaxnet.com/editor/edit029.html
 
 The write-up is rather long but very comprehensive and it explains
 without a doubt why personal users and small businesses need to start
 creating a plan to migrate away from Windows in the next few years.
 
 If you are interested in being able to give someone some concrete
 reasons, he pretty much covers the bases.

Covers the bases?! That's downright *scary*.

It's perfect ;-)

Thanks.
-- 
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
++
Your picture of the world often changes just before you get it into
focus.

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread James Sparenberg
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 05:46, HaywireMac wrote:
 How would one configure Apache so that anyone using IE would be met with
 a nice friendly message that they are not welcome?
 
 Considering the effects of compromised home computers running XP on the
 'net, I would like to start a campaign to essentially lock out IE from
 accessing websites.
 
 Of course, one would still be able to use Windows, but have to use an
 alternate browser such as Mozilla.

HaywireMac,

   If I were going to do this I'd go to one of the javascript sites grab
a browser detection script and use it to re-direct the IE users.  

James



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread HaywireMac
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 18:14:30 -0700
James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:

 HaywireMac,
 
If I were going to do this I'd go to one of the javascript sites
grab
 a browser detection script and use it to re-direct the IE users.  

Already done using PHP, try loading my site using IE and you'll see,
many thanks to J.C. Woods for this link:

http://www.devin.com/ieblock_howto.shtml

Still gotta do some writin', but I think it's coming together,
especially with a link to some great info on MS's nefarious plans for
the future courtesy of Bryan.

It's a crusade! but without any mass slaughtering and all that
nastiness.

-- 
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
++
Faith goes out through the window when beauty comes in at the door.

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread Michael Holt
HaywireMac mused:

 How would one configure Apache so that anyone using IE would be
 met with
 a nice friendly message that they are not welcome?

This is REALLY easy.  Here´s a link to read all about:

http://www.devin.com/ieblock_howto.shtml

Server side includes are probably the easiest way to do it; no
need to even mess with apache (other than setting up the ability
to use ssi´s.  It´s been a common practice ever since the browser
plugin wars.  You write one page for the rest of the world and
then a specific page for ie.  You have to save your pages as
.shtml and then make apache aware that you´re using shtml.

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com

¨There are 10 kinds of people in the world -
those that understand binary, and those that don´t¨

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread HaywireMac
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:41:46 -0700
Jack Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:

 It comes up right next to the Apache button if MSIE is used to visit
 any of my web pages. This looks to me like the best balance of
 advocacy without limiting choice.

Wow. I actually maybe kinda somehow in a small way started something.

There's two people.

Any more?

BTW, I like the BLINK, it's just annoying enough to work! ;-)

here's mine:

www.orderinchaos.org/ie_reject.php

-- 
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's  More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
++
That, that is, is.
That, that is not, is not.
That, that is, is not that, that is not.
That, that is not, is not that, that is.

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread James Sparenberg
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 07:14, Miark wrote:
 This may be just me, but locking out anybody based on their browser is
 not a tactic that is compatible or consistent with the Open Source way. 
 
 In fact I think it's below us. We should be taking the high road and
 setting an example cuz 1) that's the quality of people we want to be. 2)
 We don't want Linux users developing a reputation of warring against M$.
 We about being pro-Linux, not anti-M$. 3) It punishes computer users who
 are too inexperienced to know how to change their browser. And 4) which
 is perhaps the most important, our way is of freedom--including the
 freedom to use the software we want. It would be the height of hypocrisy
 for legions of Linux webmasters to laud freedom while compelling
 visitors to use or not use software of their choice. It just ain't us.
 
 Miark

I like the idea of just confusing them.. Run a javascript that pops up a
message that says.  You are not standards compatible When it sees IE
and an OK button.  Has no affect on them but confuses the heck out of
them. *evil grin*

James
 
 
 
 
 On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:46:18 -0400, HaywireMac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  How would one configure Apache so that anyone using IE would be met with
  a nice friendly message that they are not welcome?...I would like to 
  start a campaign to essentially lock out IE from accessing websites.
 
 
 
 
 __
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread James Sparenberg
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 08:15, J.C. Woods wrote:
 Miark wrote:
 
 This may be just me, but locking out anybody based on their browser is
 not a tactic that is compatible or consistent with the Open Source way. 
 
 In fact I think it's below us. We should be taking the high road and
 setting an example cuz 1) that's the quality of people we want to be. 2)
 We don't want Linux users developing a reputation of warring against M$.
 We about being pro-Linux, not anti-M$. 3) It punishes computer users who
 are too inexperienced to know how to change their browser. And 4) which
 is perhaps the most important, our way is of freedom--including the
 freedom to use the software we want. It would be the height of hypocrisy
 for legions of Linux webmasters to laud freedom while compelling
 visitors to use or not use software of their choice. It just ain't us.
 
 Miark
 
 polite insertrant
 
  Your missing the point, Miark. This is not what HMac is doing (and do 
 jump in if I have you wrong, HMac). He is not concerned with hostile 
 attitudes against those that use IE: he is against the Corporation that 
 has shown very little regard for your security, and they are costing you 
 money right now! Don't take my word for it, just fire up some sniffer of 
 your own choosing, i.e. ethereal, and have a look at the cluster-fuck 
 out there. I pay good money for my dsl, and, because of a plethora of 
 bogus, virus-oriented traffic due to M$, i.e. rpc exploits (port 135), 
 netbios exploits (port 138 and port 139), SMB exploits (port 445), IIS 
 exploits (all http and https ports), and all the other email virus that 
 bottlenecks the internet (I think the list could go on ad infinitum), I 
 pay by not having but maybe, at best, 80 percent of my pipe.
 
 What it seems like to me, is that HaywireMac is on an educational 
 crusade, and I, for one, laud him on this endeavor. The re-direct page 
 can be done in a really well thought out fashion. Wording can be 
 included that will help others get the hell off of anything to do with 
 M$. That kind of effort will certainly have Billy re-tooling his 
 thinking. It is time for us all to make a stand.
 /polite insert/rant
 
 Go for it, WildMan
 
 drjung
\

Ok easiest way is via javascript check out the redirection scripts
here.
http://www.scriptsearch.com/JavaScript/Scripts/Redirection/

James



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread James Sparenberg
bOn Fri, 2003-10-10 at 18:26, HaywireMac wrote:
 On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 18:14:30 -0700
 James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
 
  HaywireMac,
  
 If I were going to do this I'd go to one of the javascript sites
 grab
  a browser detection script and use it to re-direct the IE users.  
 
 Already done using PHP, try loading my site using IE and you'll see,
 many thanks to J.C. Woods for this link:
 
 http://www.devin.com/ieblock_howto.shtml
 
 Still gotta do some writin', but I think it's coming together,
 especially with a link to some great info on MS's nefarious plans for
 the future courtesy of Bryan.
 
 It's a crusade! but without any mass slaughtering and all that
 nastiness.

Ya might want to link out to this site.  

http://reactor-core.org  

or at least some of the stuff he has.  

James



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread James Sparenberg
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 08:41, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
 On Friday 10 October 2003 18:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  this would allow even the
  newbie-est to find and install whatever flavor tickles their
  tastebuds with a minimum of effort or understnding on their part.
 
 Right up to the point where they uninstall explorer, thinking they won't be 
 needing it anymore. That way it's dead certain they'll never touch 
 free-software again for a long time to come!

Ah  but it can be removed!  check out

http://www.litepc.com/

or 

http://members.shaw.ca/dteyn/ie-free/

It is possible to remove winterwet exploder even from 2000 and XP if you
do it right.

James

 
 Educating people is no easy chore, 'specially if they don't want to be.
 
 Good luck,
 harM
 
 
 
  but i do love the reversal of fortunes this initiates *g*


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread Jack Coates
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 14:24, HaywireMac wrote:
 On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:41:46 -0700
 Jack Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
 
  It comes up right next to the Apache button if MSIE is used to visit
  any of my web pages. This looks to me like the best balance of
  advocacy without limiting choice.
 
 Wow. I actually maybe kinda somehow in a small way started something.
 
 There's two people.
 
 Any more?
 
 BTW, I like the BLINK, it's just annoying enough to work! ;-)
 

Unfortunately, it seems not to work in IE6/W2K under VMWare. I'll just
have to write a blink function in JavaScript instead, Muhwhahaha!! or a
popup!!!

Interestingly enough, I got curious and checked out my webalizer stats
for October, web spiders filtered out. Granted, monkeynoodle.org is
chock-full of Linux info and gathers a certain crowd, but look at this:

 8.69%
MSIE6
XP

 7.77%
Gecko
X
 6.97%
MSIE6
XP.NET

 3.63%
Konq
X
 6.51%
MSIE6
2K

 2.49%
Gecko
XP
 5.49%
MSIE6
2K.NET

 2.00%
Gecko
X
 1.89%
MSIE6
W98

 1.38%
Gecko
X




 1.31%
Gecko
XP




 1.28%
Gecko
W98




 1.26%
Gecko
X




 1.21%
Gecko
2K







29.55%



22.33%


winders linux (no other unices)

maybe times are already changing... here's the same stats from November
of last year (a lot less traffic back then, too):

 7.65%
MSIE6
XP

 8.11%
Gecko
X
 5.58%
MSIE5
W98

 2.68%
Gecko
X
 4.48%
MSIE6
2K

 2.43%
Gecko
X
 3.41%
MSIE5
2K

 1.87%
Konq
X
 2.19%
MSIE6
2K.NET

 1.75%
Gecko
X
 2.16%
MSIE6
XP.NET




 1.68%
MSIE6
W98











27.15%



16.84%


winders linux (no other unices)

look at how little the growth is for XP, .NET extensions, all that hype.
Win98 is being abandoned, but for Linux and Win2000. And look at the
huge increase in Mozilla on Windows.

-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread Jack Coates
argh... I knew that would be mangled, but I didn't know how badly:

 8.69% MSIE6 XP   7.77% Gecko X
 6.97% MSIE6 XP.NET   3.63% Konq  X
 6.51% MSIE6 2K   2.49% Gecko XP
 5.49% MSIE6 2K.NET   2.00% Gecko X
 1.89% MSIE6 W98  1.38% Gecko X
  1.31% Gecko XP
  1.28% Gecko W98
  1.26% Gecko X
  1.21% Gecko 2K

29.55%22.33%
winders linux (no other unices)

 maybe times are already changing... here's the same stats from November
 of last year (a lot less traffic back then, too):
 
 7.65% MSIE6 XP  8.11% Gecko X
 5.58% MSIE5 W98 2.68% Gecko X
 4.48% MSIE6 2K  2.43% Gecko X
 3.41% MSIE5 2K  1.87% Konq  X
 2.19% MSIE6 2K.NET  1.75% Gecko X
 2.16% MSIE6 XP.NET  
 1.68% MSIE6 W98
27.15%   16.84%
winders linux (no other unices)

 look at how little the growth is for XP, .NET extensions, all that hype.
 Win98 is being abandoned, but for Linux and Win2000. And look at the
 huge increase in Mozilla on Windows.
-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread Michael Holt
Jack Coates mused:

[snip]

 look at how little the growth is for XP, .NET extensions, all that
 hype.
 Win98 is being abandoned, but for Linux and Win2000. And look at
 the
 huge increase in Mozilla on Windows.

That´s pretty cool!  Maybe a trend?  It´s amazing how many people
I run into nowadays who´ve at least tried linux compared to a
couple of years ago when no one knew what it was.

Just about 5 years ago I was an m$ advocate and balked at mozilla
- times sure change :)

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com

¨There are 10 kinds of people in the world -
those that understand binary, and those that don´t¨

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com