[FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It has nothing to do with rules per se but those activities that 
will  
 support enlightened activity and realization. The vows are there 
for  
 a reason, they are not just arbitrary. We might not like the 
gaudy  
 sign that says don't touch, high voltage, but it is there for a  
 reason. I mean ultimately if you cannot perceive your consort as 
pure  
 vision, i.e. as the Deity, the result is NOT going to be  
 enlightenment. If you are a monk and cause others to fall from 
their  
 path, that can have negative consequences as well.
 
 Welcome to high voltage cause--effect. :-)

And welcome to being limited by what you choose to believe.  :-)








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and intentions
 may help one be more sesnsitive. For example, thinking, It sounds
 like he MAY be mad at something. Just in case, I will be careful not 
 to use ambiguous language, or jokes that might be misinterprested.

It sounds like the person who wrote this is attached
to being interpreted the way he wants to be interpreted. :-)








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 I'll try again, briefly.  To laugh *at* someone is,
 virtually by definition, an attack.  Confirming that
 one is laughing *at* somebody is therefore equivalent
 to stating one's intention, so no minds need to be
 read.
 
 Please note that in this instance neither Lawson
 nor myself was the target of the attack; we were 
 commenting on the hypocrisy of the attacker
 claiming it *wasn't* an attack on the person being
 attacked.
 
 (The attacker, needless to say, went on to attack
 both of us, not even under the guise of laughing
 at us; and among other absurdities, pretended that
 we were somehow threatened when we hadn't been
 the targets in the first place.)

And all of this because I found something 
that Anon said so funny that I laughed out
loud about it, and said so.  What I found
so funny was the glorification of the 
intellect by someone stuck in the intellect.  

And so, as it turned out, who on FFL chose to 
turn my laughter into a big battle?  The other 
members of FFL who are classically stuck in the
intellect, so much so that they consistently
attempt to present being stuck in the intellect
as a pathway to enlightenment, that's who.  The 
whole scene really *IS* pretty funny, IMO.  :-)

I don't know about anyone else, but the 
thing that *I* have learned from all of 
this is that for some people the idea of
being laughed at is so painful and so scary 
that it *always* feels like an attack to 
them.  That's essentially very, very sad,
because it implies that for these people,
laughing at one's *self* is probably equally
scary.  Because being able to laugh at one's
self is, in my experience, essential to the
process of discarding it (realizing the Self), 
I have come to the conclusion that the people 
who consistently act like this have made a 
conscious choice to *not* realize enlightenment 
in this lifetime.  They're that afraid of 
losing the self.

And because anyone who *has* glimpsed the Self
and spent some time free from self realizes how
silly this fear is, they will laugh at the people
who fear losing the self even more, which in turn
will make them even crazier than they are now. 

It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.

The laughter is going to win.  The clinging 
to self is going to lose.  That's just the 
way the world works.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  But, why bother with what often/usually is perceived as an 
  attack, and then criticize for saying that's an attack?
 
 I don't believe I have. 
 
 Others have been involved in the laugh-attack debate. I have 
 not said anyone was attacking. Including barry. 
 
 I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'

Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself 
for once.  What you *meant* by Let's focus on
substance was Let's all talk about what *I* want
to talk about, in the pseudointellectual way I like
to talk about such things. Anything else is off-topic.
It's your whole act here.









 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Repulsive gravito-photons!?

2006-01-13 Thread cardemaister

http://www.uibk.ac.at/c/cb/cb26/heim/theorie_raumfahrt/hqtforspacepropph
ysicsaip2005.pdf





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
Spare egg writes:
Of course, Barry has never denied his intent to laugh AT people. 
Rather he has embraced and defended it. Seems a not very difficult 
job of mind-reading to assume something, comment on that assumption, 
and get CONFIRMATION of that assumption and therefore to continue to 
assume that one's original assumption was correct.

TOm T:
Of course one needs to be aware of the true definition of Assume. As I
remember the statement goes, When we use that word it makes an ass out
of me. Thanks for another old forgotten joke. Ha Tom T






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/Wit

2006-01-13 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
TorquiseB writes: snipped
It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.

The laughter is going to win.  The clinging 
to self is going to lose.  That's just the 
way the world works.

Tom T:
Of course and that is the real joke. No laughing at them, laughing at
the clinging to the idea that can not be upheld. Like trying to hang
on to a teflon coated pig. Ain't going to happen. Tom T





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'

TorquiseB writes:
Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself 
for once.  What you *meant* by Let's focus on
substance was Let's all talk about what *I* want
to talk about, in the pseudointellectual way I like
to talk about such things. Anything else is off-topic.
It's your whole act here.

Tom T:
That is why he is so careful in his self appointed role as the
Dogma/thought patrol. Wouldn't want anyone here to have any
substantive opportunity to discuss and share experiences. Must clear
it with the Dogma patrol and get the blessing of substance that only
the intellect can understand. Anyone who deviates from that script and
role playing must certainly be OTP and subject to intense scrutiny on
a word by word basis for error and wrong thinking. Must keep that
thinking in a very narrow path. Must Must Must. Should should should.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread Vaj


On Jan 12, 2006, at 9:50 PM, Patrick Gillam wrote: I mean ultimately if you cannot perceive your consort as pure   vision, i.e. as the Deity, the result is NOT going to be   enlightenment.   Vaj, I'm going to have to ask you to elaborate on  this a bit. I can see how seeing one's lover as  the Deity would indicate a lofty level of awareness,  but I don't see how having sex without that vision  would affect one's awakening either way. Without breaking any vows I think it's safe to say that since you need to perfect the generation stage before perfecting a completion stage practice, like consort practice. One should have perfected their generation stage practice which means the seed, the bija, has become the tree and one can see the world as emptiness-as-form: pure appearance. If you cannot or do not, both of you, what are you discriminating in the practice? The idea is to discriminate the finest Clear Light: Wisdom discriminating Emptiness in a way virutally impossible to discriminate in any other manner. That will bring you to full Buddhahood very quickly. So what if, as you suggest, it is done from the POV of non-Wisdom trying to look at emptiness? You would have a different result which would not be Buddhahood.Some people are suggesting that in order for a monk to do this practice, s/he should be a Stream Enterer, that is s/he should be established in the first permanent realization stage--that way there can be no "fall". It does appear one of the lamas who responded to GMR's rather public announcement mentioned the criteria for the practice and it was mentioned that such a student would be asked by his guru to perform certain specific siddhis, e.g. a magical display, to demonstrate that the stage is actually present.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread Vaj


On Jan 13, 2006, at 3:15 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  It has nothing to do with rules per se but those activities that  will   support enlightened activity and realization. The vows are there  for   a reason, they are not just arbitrary. We might not like the  gaudy   sign that says "don't touch, high voltage", but it is there for a   reason. I mean ultimately if you cannot perceive your consort as  pure   vision, i.e. as the Deity, the result is NOT going to be   enlightenment. If you are a monk and cause others to fall from  their   path, that can have negative consequences as well.  Welcome to high voltage cause--effect. :-)  And welcome to being limited by what you choose to believe.  :-) IME the vows represent a transcendental morality, that is they reflect important elements that can help or hinder realization which are not obvious "on the surface". That's the only reason they are of any value. They really are specific to the practice we're talking about and if one has questions, one should ask their teacher. They'd be glad to explain why this is so and give examples.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/Wit

2006-01-13 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 TorquiseB writes: snipped
 It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.
 
 The laughter is going to win.  The clinging 
 to self is going to lose.  That's just the 
 way the world works.
 
 Tom T:
 Of course and that is the real joke. No laughing at them, 
 laughing at the clinging to the idea that can not be upheld. 

That's it, exactly. 

 Like trying to hang
 on to a teflon coated pig. Ain't going to happen. Tom T

But they keep trying, don't they. Sometimes reading
the machinations of those on this forum who are 
desperately trying to cling to self is like watching
the greased-pig contest at a county fair. Part of 
you wonders why anyone would ever *do* that sorta
thing, but at the same time another part cannot help
but find it hilarious and laugh at it. And then the
laughing makes the contestants in the greased pig
contest feel even more...uh...oinxious and uptight and
threatened, and their uptightness over such a silly
thing that makes the whole greased pig contest even 
*more* hilarious, so you laugh at it even more. It's 
tough to break out of the cycle of laughter/uptight-
ness/laughter unless one or more of the laughees 
actually makes a breakthrough and starts to laugh 
along *with* the laughers...








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Welcome to high voltage cause--effect. :-)
 
  And welcome to being limited by what you choose to believe.  :-)
 
 IME the vows represent a transcendental morality, that is they  
 reflect important elements that can help or hinder realization 
 which are not obvious on the surface. That's the only reason 
 they are of any value. They really are specific to the practice 
 we're talking about and if one has questions, one should ask 
 their teacher. They'd be glad to explain why this is so and 
 give examples.

In other words, they'd be happy to reinforce the beliefs
that they implanted in the students in the first place.  :-)









 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread Vaj


On Jan 13, 2006, at 8:02 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Welcome to high voltage cause--effect. :-)  And welcome to being limited by what you choose to believe.  :-)  IME the vows represent a transcendental morality, that is they   reflect important elements that can help or hinder realization  which are not obvious "on the surface". That's the only reason  they are of any value. They really are specific to the practice  we're talking about and if one has questions, one should ask  their teacher. They'd be glad to explain why this is so and  give examples.  In other words, they'd be happy to reinforce the beliefs that they implanted in the students in the first place.  :-) At a certain point, the reasons they're there become obvious. Thus the tantric saying " to ascend with the Conduct while descending with the View".





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








[FairfieldLife] Vedic Creationists

2006-01-13 Thread Vaj


Unattributed. From another list.WHAT are the Vedic creationists saying? They deny that different species of living beings, including humans, have evolved, or risen up, from simpler organisms, as Darwin claims. Instead, they claim that all species, including humans, have "devolved", or come down, from a highly evolved, super-intelligent being, which is pure consciousness itself. Different species of plants and animals are simply material forms adopted by pure consciousness, or Atman, as it transmigrates in endless cycles of births and rebirths over billions and billions of years. Spiritual growth is the driving force of evolution: higher species emerge when Atman trapped in all matter takes on a higher (more "subtle" and sattvic) life-form as a result of good karma, and lower species result when Atman "forgets" its purity and indulges in "gross desires". Vedic creationists claim to derive this picture from the "Vedas", in which they include the Puranas as well, especially the Bhagvat Purana. Here it must be added that theories of spiritual or "integral" evolution have been proposed before, notably by Sri Aurobindo and Madame Blavatsky, the founder of theosophy. But the Hare Krishnas are the first to support their theory with "scientific" data - if data from psychics and UFO sightings can be called scientific. Like all fundamentalists, Vedic creationists take the Bhagvat Purana, along with the Bhagvad Gita, the Mahabharata and the Ramayana, to be literally true. They then proceed to use the "facts" described in these sacred texts to condemn Darwin and all of materialist science. For example, Cremo and Thompson accept the notion of the "day of Brahma" lasting some 4.32 billion years as literally true. They also accept as fact the idea that the "current day of Brahma" began two billion (2,000, 000, 000) years ago. A literal reading of the Ramayana convinces them that humans and monkey-like hominoid creatures coexisted. Putting the two ideas together, they come up with the fantastic notion that the ancestors of modern human beings have existed for two billion years. They want us to believe that human beings walked the earth at a time when fossil records show that only bacteria existed on the earth. This completely contradicts the best scientific evidence from fossil records and radiocarbon dating that show that the ancestors of modern human beings only appeared around 200,000 to 100,000 years ago: that is, after the appearance of fish, amphibians, and reptiles and other mammals and hominoid species, from which humans have evolved. Vedic creationists set aside all this evidence as a mere social construct of Western archaeologists and palaeontologists who, they say, have been brainwashed by an atheistic, materialistic worldview. Once you remove the "knowledge filter" of Western-Christian materialism, they tell us, "spiritual sciences" will become dominant again, just as they used to be before the "reductionist" science of the West banished the gods from nature. ON the face of it, Vedic creationism with its longer time spans looks more "scientific" than the old-fashioned Bible literalists who insist that the earth is only 6,000 years old. But what the two creationists share is the belief - entirely unfounded on verifiable facts - that human beings have been around since the beginning of life, and that they have not descended from the apes. (In fact, A.C. Prabhupada, the founder of ISKCON, used to describe Darwinians as "rascals" and "fools" for believing in such "nonsense" as the evolution of humans from apes. Prabhupada's spirit lives on in Vedic creationism.) The shared ground extends into the more "advanced" I.D. as well. Proponents of I.D. bring in a Designer God to explain the existence of "irreducible complexity" of life, which they think cannot be explained by natural causes alone. Proponents of Vedic creationism likewise, bring in Atman because they think that the existence of consciousness cannot be explained by natural causes alone. Just like the ID-ers completely ignore the mass of studies showing how complex structures such as eyes can arise out of natural causes, Vedic creationists completely ignore the mass of studies showing that the phenomenon of consciousness can be explained by purely natural causes. In both cases, there is the same wilful neglect of scientific method and scientific evidence in order to defend a religious conception of natural order. Vedic creationism as an "ism", as a "scientific" challenge to Darwin, has been more influential in America than it is in India. But the ideas of Vedic creationism - the enormous time spans, the cyclical yugas, the day and night of Brahma, the creation of new species as a result of transmigration of the Atman - are obviously better known in India than in America. Indeed, most of what the Vedic creationists are talking about is part and parcel of a common perception held by a majority of Indians. Even well educated, scientifically trained Indians 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Vedic Creationists

2006-01-13 Thread Vaj


Full story at:http://www.flonnet.com/fl2301/stories/20060127003309700.htmOn Jan 13, 2006, at 8:20 AM, Vaj wrote: Unattributed. From another list.WHAT are the Vedic creationists saying? They deny that different species of living beings, including humans, have evolved, or risen up, from simpler organisms, as Darwin claims. Instead, they claim that all species, including humans, have "devolved", or come down, from a highly evolved, super-intelligent being, which is pure consciousness itself. Different species of plants and animals are simply material forms adopted by pure consciousness, or Atman, as it transmigrates in endless cycles of births and rebirths over billions and billions of years. Spiritual growth is the driving force of evolution: higher species emerge when Atman trapped in all matter takes on a higher (more "subtle" and sattvic) life-form as a result of good karma, and lower species result when Atman "forgets" its purity and indulges in "gross desires". Vedic creationists claim to derive this picture from the "Vedas", in which they include the Puranas as well, especially the Bhagvat Purana. Here it must be added that theories of spiritual or "integral" evolution have been proposed before, notably by Sri Aurobindo and Madame Blavatsky, the founder of theosophy. But the Hare Krishnas are the first to support their theory with "scientific" data - if data from psychics and UFO sightings can be called scientific. Like all fundamentalists, Vedic creationists take the Bhagvat Purana, along with the Bhagvad Gita, the Mahabharata and the Ramayana, to be literally true. They then proceed to use the "facts" described in these sacred texts to condemn Darwin and all of materialist science. For example, Cremo and Thompson accept the notion of the "day of Brahma" lasting some 4.32 billion years as literally true. They also accept as fact the idea that the "current day of Brahma" began two billion (2,000, 000, 000) years ago. A literal reading of the Ramayana convinces them that humans and monkey-like hominoid creatures coexisted. Putting the two ideas together, they come up with the fantastic notion that the ancestors of modern human beings have existed for two billion years. They want us to believe that human beings walked the earth at a time when fossil records show that only bacteria existed on the earth. This completely contradicts the best scientific evidence from fossil records and radiocarbon dating that show that the ancestors of modern human beings only appeared around 200,000 to 100,000 years ago: that is, after the appearance of fish, amphibians, and reptiles and other mammals and hominoid species, from which humans have evolved. Vedic creationists set aside all this evidence as a mere social construct of Western archaeologists and palaeontologists who, they say, have been brainwashed by an atheistic, materialistic worldview. Once you remove the "knowledge filter" of Western-Christian materialism, they tell us, "spiritual sciences" will become dominant again, just as they used to be before the "reductionist" science of the West banished the gods from nature. ON the face of it, Vedic creationism with its longer time spans looks more "scientific" than the old-fashioned Bible literalists who insist that the earth is only 6,000 years old. But what the two creationists share is the belief - entirely unfounded on verifiable facts - that human beings have been around since the beginning of life, and that they have not descended from the apes. (In fact, A.C. Prabhupada, the founder of ISKCON, used to describe Darwinians as "rascals" and "fools" for believing in such "nonsense" as the evolution of humans from apes. Prabhupada's spirit lives on in Vedic creationism.) The shared ground extends into the more "advanced" I.D. as well. Proponents of I.D. bring in a Designer God to explain the existence of "irreducible complexity" of life, which they think cannot be explained by natural causes alone. Proponents of Vedic creationism likewise, bring in Atman because they think that the existence of consciousness cannot be explained by natural causes alone. Just like the ID-ers completely ignore the mass of studies showing how complex structures such as eyes can arise out of natural causes, Vedic creationists completely ignore the mass of studies showing that the phenomenon of consciousness can be explained by purely natural causes. In both cases, there is the same wilful neglect of scientific method and scientific evidence in order to defend a religious conception of natural order. Vedic creationism as an "ism", as a "scientific" challenge to Darwin, has been more influential in America than it is in India. But the ideas of Vedic creationism - the enormous time spans, the cyclical yugas, the day and night of Brahma, the creation of new species as a result of transmigration of the Atman - are obviously better known in India than in America. Indeed, most of what the Vedic creationists are talking about is part and 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread Patrick Gillam
--- Vaj wrote:
 
  Vaj wrote:
  I mean ultimately if you cannot perceive your consort as pure
  vision, i.e. as the Deity, the result is NOT going to be
  enlightenment.
 
 
 Without breaking any vows I think it's safe to say that since you  
 need to perfect the generation stage before perfecting a completion  
 stage practice, like consort practice. 

Oh, I think I understand. I had missed the notion that 
this fellow had taken a consort as part of his spiritual 
path -- that the sex was for awakening, as opposed 
to being for all the other joys of sex. I can see how 
such a path may entail some prerequisites.

So, is the controversy centered on the monk's claims to a 
certain level of spiritual development? I had taken it as more 
of an old-fashioned teacher-consorting-with-student 
controversy.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] This explains so much (was Re: Ego in Enlightenment)

2006-01-13 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
  
   2. Is having an ellipsis hurled at you an attack?
  
  No, but having a closed parenthesis followed by an asterisk followed
  by an open parenthesis is.
 
 
 You must read a great deal into such a thing...

Do I have to?





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread Vaj


On Jan 13, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:--- Vaj wrote:  Vaj wrote: I mean ultimately if you cannot perceive your consort as pure vision, i.e. as the Deity, the result is NOT going to be enlightenment.   Without breaking any vows I think it's safe to say that since you   need to perfect the generation stage before perfecting a completion   stage practice, like consort practice.   Oh, I think I understand. I had missed the notion that  this fellow had taken a consort as part of his spiritual  path -- that the sex was for awakening, as opposed  to being for all the other joys of sex. I can see how  such a path may entail some prerequisites.  So, is the controversy centered on the monk's claims to a  certain level of spiritual development? I had taken it as more  of an old-fashioned teacher-consorting-with-student  controversy. That's definitely part of it because typically you would not make such a public announcement. He also announced that those receiving transmission from him should receive transmission from his four "ladies" (dakinis or shaktis).Here's a recent account from a student at Diamond Mountain, please remember this is just one opinion (from another POV his actions could be historically significant and incredibly important), the whole thread is quite interesting and can be found at:http://www.lioncity.net/buddhism/index.php?s=e8ff8de44938123438680c315a60e937showtopic=9832Barry might find the oblique comments on Zen Master Rama interesting.:Geshe Michael Roach doesn't seem to be content with only one consort. He has now surrounded himself with four... Lady Ora, Lady Christie, Lady Pelma and Lady Trisangma. The title "Lady" was granted by Geshe Michael himself, and in his world means "Dakini". One might be forgiven for finding it suspicious that if Geshe Michael is to surround himself with four close students who share in teaching Tantra at Diamond Mountain, that all four are women. In fact, we find it a little too much to take seriously... we mean.. what are the odds!It is also rumoured that at least some of these ladies have fallen prey to Geshe Michael's personal body parts when he has given them actual "Consort Initiation" as part of the Tantric aspect which he now roleplays.Not only this, but during the current Tantra course, in a very untraditional move, Geshe Michael insisted that any student who takes initiation from him must in fact take initiation from all four ladies as well.. even if those ladies were not his students.So, it's raining Dakinis in Geshe Michaels world, one has to question the ethicacy of the entire situation. In a closed room, during the De Lam course at Diamond Mountain in the winter of 2004, Geshe Michael again performed theatrics when he asked for all recording devices to be turned off, and the lights turned out. Then, to the 80 students present, Geshe Michael proceded to tell of his own qualifications to teach Tantra.You see, at an early age, around his 23rd year, Geshe Michael believes he realised emptiness, one of the highest spiritual attainments according to Buddhism. Geshe Michael also claims that he has met directly with, and takes teachings and initiations from Vajra Yogini, a female Buddhist deity, in person. It is Vajra Yogini who directly gives him his guidance. He claims to have first met the Goddess in his late teans or early twenties.These claims are almost never made in public by the Lamas of our lineage, for very good reasons, and the fact that they are made by Geshe Michael must make anyone slightly suspicious. During this talk, he also claimed that some of the young students present, whom he had been in retreat with, are also his Lamas. The danger of Geshe Michael's behaviour has since become apparent, as it is believed that Geshe Micheal has taken to giving actual consort initiation (involving placing his penis inside their bodies) to some of his young female students.One explanation is a serious case of spirit harm, as it is said that spirits can appear to human beings in different forms and mislead them, or perhaps the Geshe has simply lost it, and is suffering from severe mental delusion. The fact is that his teachings and outward behaviour do not coincide with that of other respected Buddhist teachers and do not fit with the Gelugpa tradition which he claims to uphold. This can only be harmful to Buddhism in general and his students in particular.It is the opinion of every Buddhist scholar to whom I have spoken, that Geshe Michael is not only inconsistent in his teachings, but the manner in which he presents one of the two major Mahayana Budddhist pholosophies, known as "emptiness", is not correct according to the generally held Prasangika Madhyamika viewpoint.The other point of contention, is that Geshe Micheal almost never teaches the other of the two major Mahayana Buddhist pholosophies, known as "Bodhicitta". This is an issue that he brushes upon occassionally, however never dwells on and does not teach in detail. It is said that 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Intellect and Inquiry

2006-01-13 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   wrote:
   
That the simple statment, the intellect is a quite useful*
tool in the attainment of higher states was found so 
incorrect by some readers as to be hilarious, at least
can't help but raise a smile. 

   That's a topic I participated in, but it was Barry who viciously
   attacked you with his laughter. I only disagreed in a respectful 
  tone.
   
So much talk on this list, particularly by neo-advaitans
or pseudo-advaitans, is about the great value of
self-inquiry. What exactly is used in self-inquiry, ones
big toe?
   
   What's really funny for me right now is how everything is flipped
   upside down and inside out. I have zero formal training in
   self-inquiry, and asking myself who am I used to result in 
 nothing
   but frustration and an immediate shift of attention to anything 
  else.
   Recently, I've been asking myself the same question, and it 
  literally
   shuts down my intellect, every time. I ask the question and I
   immediately zone out into awareness. So, what's being used? I 
 don't
   know! It seems like it starts with intellect, but the answer is
   utterly beyond it. 
   
   Similarly, for the past 10-12 years, I couldn't tolerate more 
 than 
  3-5
   minutes of TM at a time. But, the other morning, I woke up at 
 3:30am
   and sat up to meditate. No mantra came to me, and I just sat 
 there,
   silently witnessing the breath, which became very faint. And, 20
   minutes went by in a flash. In all my years of doing TM, I 
 *never* 
  had
   as profoundly deep a meditation as that. I was all like, No no 
 no!
   You don't meditate to awaken! You awaken so you can meditate! 
  LOL!!!

   Alex
  
  
  Even the thought ABOUT the mantra is the mantra...
 
 
 Also, kill that Buddha dude. 

Look, I'm not a chubby chaser, but just because that Buddha dude is
packing on some extra pounds is no reason to kill him.

 Who cares if the meditation was deep or not?

Hell, I don't even care whether I meditate or not!






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: new MAPI catalog: Raam Raj Production

2006-01-13 Thread markmeredith2002
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  I just received a catalog in the mail from MAPI.  It sells organic 
 cotton clothing and 
  bedding and the brand is called Raam Raj clothing.  In large 
 letters onthe front cover it 
  says: Raam Raj Production. There are no pictures of MMY anywhere, 
 although the return 
  address on the back lists Maharishi Ayurveda Products International 
 in Colorado Springs.  
  This different than the usual MAPI catalog with the herbs and 
 vitamins and Amrit.  The 
  prices seem typical for organic cotton items, maybe a bit high - 
 $64 for a woman's cable 
  knit organic cotton sweater, $46 for men's pajama set, and $56 for 
 a man' s button down 
  poplin shirt. Everything was made in India, but the designs are 
 simple, solid colors like a 
  conservative, simple Land's end product.
 
 
 Far as i know, its legit, at least in the sense of being a TMO-
 affiliated thing.

The clothing line has been sold in all the MAPI stores for some time.
 I'm curious why is this an issue?








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Megabuck Homepage?

2006-01-13 Thread uns_tressor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  http://www.milliondollarhomepage.com/
 
 Yeah, this got written up in Wired and other places.
 It's just a Web page with a million pixels, and the
 owners try to convince advertisers to buy a minimum
 of (I think) 10 pixels clumped together in a group
 as ad space.  The idea is that potential consumers 
 go there and mouseover ads and wind up clicking on 
 them and buying the product or service.
 
 Sounds like wishful thinking on the level of some 
 of the TMO's schemes to me, but several people (the
 promoters of the Web pages) have already made hundreds 
 of thousand bucks by doing this.  Just mouseover the
 page you provided an URL to and see how many people
 already invested in this one.  Go figure.

It seems like a variant on the old chain letter
scam. It works at first, but then you find that
the server has no bandwidth, and the advertisers
can't be bothered to sue for $1. He cannot deliver.

But he'll stay rich if nobody takes him to task.
Uns.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
 I believe that Barry has indicated that he believes that laughing
 AT is good for the person being laughed at, or something along 
 those lines. He's even implied that he WAS attacking, but won't 
 quite own up to it explicitly.

No, it went like this: Barry attacked anon for
having (as he saw it) reacted to being laughed
at (by Barry) as if it were an attack, denying
that laughing at a person was an attack.

You and I noted that laughing *at* someone was
ipso facto an attack; then Barry attacked us for
saying this; *then* he made his post about laughing
at people being good for them.

Far from implying that he was attacking by laughing
at someone, he's denied it vigorously (again, while
attacking those who said laughing at was attacking).






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  I'll try again, briefly.  To laugh *at* someone is,
  virtually by definition, an attack.  Confirming that
  one is laughing *at* somebody is therefore equivalent
  to stating one's intention, so no minds need to be
  read.
  
  Please note that in this instance neither Lawson
  nor myself was the target of the attack; we were 
  commenting on the hypocrisy of the attacker
  claiming it *wasn't* an attack on the person being
  attacked.
  
  (The attacker, needless to say, went on to attack
  both of us, not even under the guise of laughing
  at us; and among other absurdities, pretended that
  we were somehow threatened when we hadn't been
  the targets in the first place.)
 
 And all of this because I found something 
 that Anon said so funny that I laughed out
 loud about it, and said so.  What I found
 so funny was the glorification of the 
 intellect by someone stuck in the intellect.  

Right, you attacked anon, just as we said.

 And so, as it turned out, who on FFL chose to 
 turn my laughter into a big battle?

Actually, you did, if you'll recall.  All I did
was point out that laughing at someone constituted
an attack.  Then you attacked me, at considerable
length, for saying so, and went on to attack Lawson
for agreeing with me, then posted a long diatribe
in which you suggested laughing at someone was a
teaching method.

  The other 
 members of FFL who are classically stuck in the
 intellect, so much so that they consistently
 attempt to present being stuck in the intellect
 as a pathway to enlightenment, that's who.

Since neither Lawson (as far as I can recall)
nor I have ever suggested being stuck in the
intellect is a pathway to enlightenment, it's
not clear who you're referring to here.  In fact,
I can't think of *anyone* on this forum who has
ever made such a suggestion.

  The 
 whole scene really *IS* pretty funny, IMO.  :-)
 
 I don't know about anyone else, but the 
 thing that *I* have learned from all of 
 this is that for some people the idea of
 being laughed at is so painful and so scary 
 that it *always* feels like an attack to 
 them.

Laughing at someone is always an attack,
virtually by definition.  As I've noted
several times, however, that doesn't mean
that the person laughed at *feels* attacked.
You're conflating the perspective of the
attacker with the perspective of the target
of the attack.  It's entirely possible to
recognize that someone has attacked you
without feeling victimized by the attack,
you see.








  That's essentially very, very sad,
 because it implies that for these people,
 laughing at one's *self* is probably equally
 scary.  Because being able to laugh at one's
 self is, in my experience, essential to the
 process of discarding it (realizing the Self), 
 I have come to the conclusion that the people 
 who consistently act like this have made a 
 conscious choice to *not* realize enlightenment 
 in this lifetime.  They're that afraid of 
 losing the self.
 
 And because anyone who *has* glimpsed the Self
 and spent some time free from self realizes how
 silly this fear is, they will laugh at the people
 who fear losing the self even more, which in turn
 will make them even crazier than they are now. 
 
 It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.
 
 The laughter is going to win.  The clinging 
 to self is going to lose.  That's just the 
 way the world works.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
 IME the vows represent a transcendental morality,

What's a transcendental morality?  Seems like a
contradiction in terms, the transcendent being
beyond all distinctions, at least by any definition
I've ever encountered.

 that is they  
 reflect important elements that can help or hinder realization which  
 are not obvious on the surface. That's the only reason they are of  
 any value. They really are specific to the practice we're talking  
 about and if one has questions, one should ask their teacher. They'd  
 be glad to explain why this is so and give examples.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/Wit

2006-01-13 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In 
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  TorquiseB writes: snipped
  It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.
  
  The laughter is going to win.  The clinging 
  to self is going to lose.  That's just the 
  way the world works.
  
  Tom T:
  Of course and that is the real joke. No laughing at them, 
  laughing at the clinging to the idea that can not be upheld. 
 
 That's it, exactly. 
 
  Like trying to hang
  on to a teflon coated pig. Ain't going to happen. Tom T
 
 But they keep trying, don't they. Sometimes reading
 the machinations of those on this forum who are 
 desperately trying to cling to self is like watching
 the greased-pig contest at a county fair. Part of 
 you wonders why anyone would ever *do* that sorta
 thing, but at the same time another part cannot help
 but find it hilarious and laugh at it. And then the
 laughing makes the contestants in the greased pig
 contest feel even more...uh...oinxious and uptight and
 threatened, and their uptightness over such a silly
 thing that makes the whole greased pig contest even 
 *more* hilarious, so you laugh at it even more. It's 
 tough to break out of the cycle of laughter/uptight-
 ness/laughter unless one or more of the laughees 
 actually makes a breakthrough and starts to laugh 
 along *with* the laughers...

Of course, the laughees may be quietly laughing at
the laughers all along, without feeling the need
to make their laughter public.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Laughing at someone is always an attack,
 virtually by definition.  As I've noted
 several times, however, that doesn't mean
 that the person laughed at *feels* attacked.
 You're conflating the perspective of the
 attacker with the perspective of the target
 of the attack.  It's entirely possible to
 recognize that someone has attacked you
 without feeling victimized by the attack,
 you see.

I love it.  Judy wants to play the victim and
claim that she is one while at the same time
claiming that she doesn't feel like a victim.

It's really difficult NOT to laugh at her...  :-)







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread Vaj


On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:03 AM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip IME the vows represent a transcendental morality,  What's a "transcendental morality"?  Seems like a contradiction in terms, the transcendent being beyond all distinctions, at least by any definition I've ever encountered. A set of insights into cause-effect, often defined as rules, that emerge from transcendental or enlightened insight of reality as to causes that attenuate progress towards enlightenment or curtail establishment thereof.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 
  Laughing at someone is always an attack,
  virtually by definition.  As I've noted
  several times, however, that doesn't mean
  that the person laughed at *feels* attacked.
  You're conflating the perspective of the
  attacker with the perspective of the target
  of the attack.  It's entirely possible to
  recognize that someone has attacked you
  without feeling victimized by the attack,
  you see.
 
 I love it.  Judy wants to play the victim and
 claim that she is one

Hmm, where have I claimed that I was a victim?


 while at the same time
 claiming that she doesn't feel like a victim.
 
 It's really difficult NOT to laugh at her...  :-)







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:03 AM, authfriend wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  snip
 
  IME the vows represent a transcendental morality,
 
 
  What's a transcendental morality?  Seems like a
  contradiction in terms, the transcendent being
  beyond all distinctions, at least by any definition
  I've ever encountered.
 
 A set of insights into cause-effect, often defined as rules, that  
 emerge from transcendental or enlightened insight of reality as to  
 causes that attenuate progress towards enlightenment or curtail  
 establishment thereof.

But the insights and the morality themselves are not
transcendental, right?  Once anything has emerged
from the transcendent, it's no longer transcendental,
in other words.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and intentions
  may help one be more sesnsitive. For example, thinking, It sounds
  like he MAY be mad at something. Just in case, I will be careful not 
  to use ambiguous language, or jokes that might be misinterprested.
 
 It sounds like the person who wrote this is attached
 to being interpreted the way he wants to be interpreted. :-)

Congratulations Barry. The point of the post was trying to guess or
speculate about intentions of a poster is pointless. So right out of
the chute, you speculate on intentions. Incorrectly. Without basis.
Thats our Barry!







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread Vaj


On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:14 AM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:03 AM, authfriend wrote:  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip  IME the vows represent a transcendental morality,   What's a "transcendental morality"?  Seems like a contradiction in terms, the transcendent being beyond all distinctions, at least by any definition I've ever encountered.  A set of insights into cause-effect, often defined as rules, that   emerge from transcendental or enlightened insight of reality as to   causes that attenuate progress towards enlightenment or curtail   establishment thereof.  But the insights and the morality themselves are not transcendental, right?  Once anything has "emerged" from the transcendent, it's no longer transcendental, in other words. The insights are. The change in behavior (the activity implied by the "rules") supports attainment of higher states of consciousness.The higher you go, the finer the behavior--as the yogis say 'as fine as barley flour'.All religions have these. They are all based on the law of karma: actions produce results--from a Buddhist perspective until you become a "stream enterer" you are still effected by behavior.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  I'll try again, briefly.  To laugh *at* someone is,
  virtually by definition, an attack.  Confirming that
  one is laughing *at* somebody is therefore equivalent
  to stating one's intention, so no minds need to be
  read.
  
  Please note that in this instance neither Lawson
  nor myself was the target of the attack; we were 
  commenting on the hypocrisy of the attacker
  claiming it *wasn't* an attack on the person being
  attacked.
  
  (The attacker, needless to say, went on to attack
  both of us, not even under the guise of laughing
  at us; and among other absurdities, pretended that
  we were somehow threatened when we hadn't been
  the targets in the first place.)
 
 And all of this because I found something 
 that Anon said so funny that I laughed out
 loud about it, and said so.  What I found
 so funny was the glorification of the 
 intellect by someone stuck in the intellect.  
 
 And so, as it turned out, who on FFL chose to 
 turn my laughter into a big battle?  The other 
 members of FFL who are classically stuck in the
 intellect, so much so that they consistently
 attempt to present being stuck in the intellect
 as a pathway to enlightenment, that's who.  The 
 whole scene really *IS* pretty funny, IMO.  :-)
 
 I don't know about anyone else, but the 
 thing that *I* have learned from all of 
 this is that for some people the idea of
 being laughed at is so painful and so scary 
 that it *always* feels like an attack to 
 them.  That's essentially very, very sad,
 because it implies that for these people,
 laughing at one's *self* is probably equally
 scary.  Because being able to laugh at one's
 self is, in my experience, essential to the
 process of discarding it (realizing the Self), 
 I have come to the conclusion that the people 
 who consistently act like this have made a 
 conscious choice to *not* realize enlightenment 
 in this lifetime.  They're that afraid of 
 losing the self.
 
 And because anyone who *has* glimpsed the Self
 and spent some time free from self realizes how
 silly this fear is, they will laugh at the people
 who fear losing the self even more, which in turn
 will make them even crazier than they are now. 
 
 It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.
 
 The laughter is going to win.  The clinging 
 to self is going to lose.  That's just the 
 way the world works.


Barry, Evern more baseless speculation on intentions and a posters
inner world from you. You  are becoming a master of vaccuous, baseless
posts. I would  speculate that may correspond to whats inside your
head, but that would be idle specualtion.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Take a long walk off a short dock or suck eggs (you pissing skunks)

2006-01-13 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
snip
 I think it its a bogus term and concept. I have no desire to become
 enlightened. (Think about it, desiring enlightenment is a
 contradiction of terms.)
snip

OK, well thanks for clearing that up. 

And as to your statements that I am making cognitive errors, that 
would presume that 1) my senses are faulty, or 2) my intellect is 
muddled, or 3) my heart is darkened. 

Any of the three would cause an incorrect perception of what you have 
expressed around this topic. Sorry chap, but if 1, 2, or 3 were the 
case, I wouldn't be able to fully be my Self, and like it or not, I 
am. 





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: new MAPI catalog: Raam Raj Production

2006-01-13 Thread wayback71
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
  
   I just received a catalog in the mail from MAPI.  It sells organic 
  cotton clothing and 
   bedding and the brand is called Raam Raj clothing.  In large 
  letters onthe front cover it 
   says: Raam Raj Production. There are no pictures of MMY anywhere, 
  although the return 
   address on the back lists Maharishi Ayurveda Products International 
  in Colorado Springs.  
   This different than the usual MAPI catalog with the herbs and 
  vitamins and Amrit.  The 
   prices seem typical for organic cotton items, maybe a bit high - 
  $64 for a woman's cable 
   knit organic cotton sweater, $46 for men's pajama set, and $56 for 
  a man' s button down 
   poplin shirt. Everything was made in India, but the designs are 
  simple, solid colors like a 
   conservative, simple Land's end product.
  
  
  Far as i know, its legit, at least in the sense of being a TMO-
  affiliated thing.
 
 The clothing line has been sold in all the MAPI stores for some time.
  I'm curious why is this an issue?

I was just surprised to see a TM-related item without pictures of MMY.  Perhaps 
MAPI has 
been selling things without the photos for some time, but I never noticed if 
they have.  
Except for a small print return address spelling out Maharishi Ayurveda 
Products 
International, this catalog had no references to anything having to do with TM 
or any of 
the jargon, photos or gold embellishment that go with it.   It is mainstream.








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
 
 TorquiseB writes:
 Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself 
 for once.  What you *meant* by Let's focus on
 substance was Let's all talk about what *I* want
 to talk about, in the pseudointellectual way I like
 to talk about such things. Anything else is off-topic.
 It's your whole act here.
 
 Tom T:
 That is why he is so careful in his self appointed role as the
 Dogma/thought patrol. Wouldn't want anyone here to have any
 substantive opportunity to discuss and share experiences. Must clear
 it with the Dogma patrol and get the blessing of substance that only
 the intellect can understand. Anyone who deviates from that script and
 role playing must certainly be OTP and subject to intense scrutiny on
 a word by word basis for error and wrong thinking. Must keep that
 thinking in a very narrow path. Must Must Must. Should should should.

Wow, even more baseless speculation on intentions and a posters
inner world not only from barry, but now from Tom. And Tom just posted
that such is  futile and baseless. A paradox of Brahman no doubt.









 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/Wit

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In 
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  TorquiseB writes: snipped
  It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.
  
  The laughter is going to win.  The clinging 
  to self is going to lose.  That's just the 
  way the world works.
  
  Tom T:
  Of course and that is the real joke. No laughing at them, 
  laughing at the clinging to the idea that can not be upheld. 
 
 That's it, exactly. 
 
  Like trying to hang
  on to a teflon coated pig. Ain't going to happen. Tom T
 
 But they keep trying, don't they. Sometimes reading
 the machinations of those on this forum who are 
 desperately trying to cling to self is like watching
 the greased-pig contest at a county fair. Part of 
 you wonders why anyone would ever *do* that sorta
 thing, but at the same time another part cannot help
 but find it hilarious and laugh at it. And then the
 laughing makes the contestants in the greased pig
 contest feel even more...uh...oinxious and uptight and
 threatened, and their uptightness over such a silly
 thing that makes the whole greased pig contest even 
 *more* hilarious, so you laugh at it even more. It's 
 tough to break out of the cycle of laughter/uptight-
 ness/laughter unless one or more of the laughees 
 actually makes a breakthrough and starts to laugh 
 along *with* the laughers...


Wow, even more baseless speculation on intentions and a posters
inner world. Is this a contest to see how baseless you can get? 







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread TurquoiseB
   OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and 
   intentions may help one be more sesnsitive. For example, 
   thinking, It sounds like he MAY be mad at something. Just 
   in case, I will be careful not to use ambiguous language, 
   in case, I will be careful not or jokes that might be 
   misinterprested.
  
  It sounds like the person who wrote this is attached
  to being interpreted the way he wants to be interpreted. :-)
 
 Congratulations Barry. The point of the post was trying to guess or
 speculate about intentions of a poster is pointless. So right out of
 the chute, you speculate on intentions. Incorrectly. Without basis.
 Thats our Barry!

Sorry, no cigar. :-)

To use the word 'misinterpreted' implies that something
could possibly *be* misinterpreted, which implies that
the person who is concerned about being misinterpreted
(you, in the original post) believes that there is only
one *valid* interpretation.  That, to me, implies a lot
of attachment.

A less attached person could just say shit and allow
others to interpret it however they wanted.

To reiterate, more slowly and in all caps, since you 
don't seem to grasp the concept:

ONLY SOMEONE WHO BELIEVES HE HAS THE ONE, TRUE,
VALID INTERPRETATION OF SOMETHING WOULD BE 
CONCERNED ABOUT BEING MISINTERPRETED. RIGHT?

:-)








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:14 AM, authfriend wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
  IME the vows represent a transcendental morality,
 
  What's a transcendental morality?  Seems like a
  contradiction in terms, the transcendent being
  beyond all distinctions, at least by any definition
  I've ever encountered.
 
  A set of insights into cause-effect, often defined as rules, that
  emerge from transcendental or enlightened insight of reality as 
  to causes that attenuate progress towards enlightenment or 
  curtail establishment thereof.
 
  But the insights and the morality themselves are not
  transcendental, right?  Once anything has emerged
  from the transcendent, it's no longer transcendental,
  in other words.
 
 The insights are. The change in behavior (the activity implied by
 the rules) supports attainment of higher states of consciousness.
 
 The higher you go, the finer the behavior--as the yogis say 'as 
 fine as barley flour'.
 
 All religions have these. They are all based on the law of karma:  
 actions produce results--from a Buddhist perspective until you 
 become a stream enterer you are still effected by behavior.

I don't believe you addressed my question.

Distinctions, no matter how fine, cannot be
transcendental, by definition--unless you're
using a very different definition of the
transcendent than any I've ever seen.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Take a long walk off a short dock or suck eggs (you pissing skunks)

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 snip
  I think it its a bogus term and concept. I have no desire to become
  enlightened. (Think about it, desiring enlightenment is a
  contradiction of terms.)
 snip
 
 OK, well thanks for clearing that up. 
 
 And as to your statements that I am making cognitive errors, that 
 would presume that 1) my senses are faulty, or 2) my intellect is 
 muddled, or 3) my heart is darkened. 

Good self-diagnosis. Thats what it appears from your posts. Full of
cognitive errors.  

 
 Any of the three would cause an incorrect perception of what you have 
 expressed around this topic. Sorry chap, but if 1, 2, or 3 were the 
 case, I wouldn't be able to fully be my Self, and like it or not, I 
 am.


HAHAHAHAHAHA.  Delude on dude.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and 
intentions may help one be more sesnsitive. For example, 
thinking, It sounds like he MAY be mad at something. Just 
in case, I will be careful not to use ambiguous language, 
in case, I will be careful not or jokes that might be 
misinterprested.
   
   It sounds like the person who wrote this is attached
   to being interpreted the way he wants to be interpreted. :-)
  
  Congratulations Barry. The point of the post was trying to guess or
  speculate about intentions of a poster is pointless. So right out of
  the chute, you speculate on intentions. Incorrectly. Without basis.
  Thats our Barry!
 
 Sorry, no cigar. :-)
 
 To use the word 'misinterpreted' implies that something
 could possibly *be* misinterpreted, which implies that
 the person who is concerned about being misinterpreted
 (you, in the original post) believes that there is only
 one *valid* interpretation.  That, to me, implies a lot
 of attachment.
 
 A less attached person could just say shit and allow
 others to interpret it however they wanted.
 
 To reiterate, more slowly and in all caps, since you 
 don't seem to grasp the concept:
 
 ONLY SOMEONE WHO BELIEVES HE HAS THE ONE, TRUE,
 VALID INTERPRETATION OF SOMETHING WOULD BE 
 CONCERNED ABOUT BEING MISINTERPRETED. RIGHT?
 
 :-)


As you say, oh baseless one.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and 
intentions may help one be more sesnsitive. For example, 
thinking, It sounds like he MAY be mad at something. Just 
in case, I will be careful not to use ambiguous language, 
in case, I will be careful not or jokes that might be 
misinterprested.
   
   It sounds like the person who wrote this is attached
   to being interpreted the way he wants to be interpreted. :-)
  
  Congratulations Barry. The point of the post was trying 
to guess or
  speculate about intentions of a poster is pointless. So right out 
of
  the chute, you speculate on intentions. Incorrectly. Without 
basis.
  Thats our Barry!
 
 Sorry, no cigar. :-)
 
 To use the word 'misinterpreted' implies that something
 could possibly *be* misinterpreted, which implies that
 the person who is concerned about being misinterpreted
 (you, in the original post) believes that there is only
 one *valid* interpretation.  That, to me, implies a lot
 of attachment.

Or, perhaps, insisting on one's own interpretation of
something somebody else has said, even after being told
that is not what they meant, represents an attachment
to being able to interpret anything and everything as
one pleases.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Intellect and Inquiry

2006-01-13 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 What's really funny for me right now is how everything is flipped
 upside down and inside out. I have zero formal training in
 self-inquiry, and asking myself who am I used to result in 
nothing
 but frustration and an immediate shift of attention to anything 
else.
 Recently, I've been asking myself the same question, and it 
literally
 shuts down my intellect, every time. I ask the question and I
 immediately zone out into awareness. So, what's being used? I don't
 know! It seems like it starts with intellect, but the answer is
 utterly beyond it.

Very Cool! I really enjoy reading about these experiences of yours. 
Real and true freedom.
 
 
 Similarly, for the past 10-12 years, I couldn't tolerate more than 
3-5
 minutes of TM at a time. But, the other morning, I woke up at 
3:30am
 and sat up to meditate. No mantra came to me, and I just sat there,
 silently witnessing the breath, which became very faint. And, 20
 minutes went by in a flash. In all my years of doing TM, I *never* 
had
 as profoundly deep a meditation as that. I was all like, No no no!
 You don't meditate to awaken! You awaken so you can meditate! 
LOL!!!
  
Great.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Take a long walk off a short dock or suck eggs (you pissing skunks)

2006-01-13 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
  snip
   I think it its a bogus term and concept. I have no desire to 
become
   enlightened. (Think about it, desiring enlightenment is a
   contradiction of terms.)
  snip
  
  OK, well thanks for clearing that up. 
  
  And as to your statements that I am making cognitive errors, 
that 
  would presume that 1) my senses are faulty, or 2) my intellect 
is 
  muddled, or 3) my heart is darkened. 
 
 Good self-diagnosis. Thats what it appears from your posts. Full of
 cognitive errors.  
 
  
  Any of the three would cause an incorrect perception of what you 
have 
  expressed around this topic. Sorry chap, but if 1, 2, or 3 were 
the 
  case, I wouldn't be able to fully be my Self, and like it or 
not, I 
  am.
 
 
 HAHAHAHAHAHA.  Delude on dude.

Cool! Thanks for that






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
 
 TorquiseB writes:
 Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself 
 for once.  What you *meant* by Let's focus on
 substance was Let's all talk about what *I* want
 to talk about, in the pseudointellectual way I like
 to talk about such things. Anything else is off-topic.
 It's your whole act here.
 
 Tom T:
 That is why he is so careful in his self appointed role as the
 Dogma/thought patrol. Wouldn't want anyone here to have any
 substantive opportunity to discuss and share experiences. Must 
clear
 it with the Dogma patrol and get the blessing of substance that 
only
 the intellect can understand. Anyone who deviates from that script 
and
 role playing must certainly be OTP and subject to intense scrutiny 
on
 a word by word basis for error and wrong thinking. Must keep that
 thinking in a very narrow path. Must Must Must. Should should 
should.


The cool thing about akashanon's constant parrying and challenging 
is that it strengthens the Awakening experience of those who are 
challenged. 

Its like this dude I encountered in the post office the other day, 
where I'm plunking endless amounts of change into the one 
functioning stamp machine, and the machine is rejecting about every 
third coin, and given that, along with the price of a book of twenty 
stamps these days, it is taking a long time to buy my stamps. 

So I'm putting in coins, and putting in coins, and then I hear from 
behind me, an annoyed and persistent voice, Buy the stamps! C'mon 
buy the stamps!. I ignore it, not really catching the connection, 
and keep plunking my change in, and several seconds later, Buy the 
stamps! Buy the stamps!. At this point I turn around, and see that 
it is this guy in line, addressing me. So I stop what I am doing and 
begin calmly explaining what I am doing, and why it is taking so 
long.

This doesn't satisfy him, and he interrupts with, Well, then just 
push the button! Buy some stamps with what you have!. So I explain 
that the machine only offers 20 stamp books and I haven't put enough 
stamps in. He isn't satisfied by my explanation, because he has 
apparently made up his mind that I am wrong, and dammit, I'm not 
conforming to that view of his. Anyway, he got frustrated and left, 
and I got my stamps.

Afterwards, I realized how much such an experience had validated and 
reinforced the silence which now permeates my Being, is an 
everpresent constituent of me, and how such experiences stretch and 
test our true Nature.

So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who have 
Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether it 
helps him or not, though... 






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread Vaj


On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:35 AM, authfriend wrote:I don't believe you addressed my question.I have.  Distinctions, no matter how fine, cannot be "transcendental," by definition--unless you're using a very different definition of the transcendent than any I've ever seen. Jnana is transcendental.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








[FairfieldLife] Re: Purusha Sad Sacks...

2006-01-13 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 1/9/06 7:29:33 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 This guy  needs to get back on his medication.
 
 Sal
 
 
 On Jan 8, 2006, at  9:21 PM, dhamiltony2k5 wrote:
 
  FWD:
paste
   Dear friends in the world,
 
You can't see 3/4 of the universe, yet without it, the 1/4 you  can
   see, would disappear.
 
   You can't see  us, but without us, you would disappear.
 
   No wonder  Maharishi calls Purusha the body of Brahman.
   No wonder  Maharishi calls Purusha is the best thing he's ever  done.
 
   You heros in the world need Purusha and we need  you, NOW, more than
   ever.
 
   Helping us will  help you in everything you want to do.
 
   A dozen of us  have only a few days left to raise our monthly
   donations and  stay on Purusha.
 
   Please go to   www.Purusha.org  and give yourself and the world a
boost.
   And please mention me as the person who inspired your  donation.
 
   Thank you and all the best to you in 2006 and  beyond.
 
   Jai Guru  Dev,
 
 
 
 
 
 Oral Roberts had a better fund raising technique when he said  I
think the 
 Lord is going to call me home if we don't raise enough  money.


  Actually the letter clearly indicates that the money is more
important than the people on the purusha program. 

Read carefully, 
JohnY





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Maharishi 1

2006-01-13 Thread Peter
When the TMO first started selling auyer vedic
products about 20 years ago, the first product they
sold was a rasayana called, Maharishi 1. Does
anybody know what it was made of? I know it contained
amalaki, but it also had other herbs in it. I found it
to to be very powerful. You used to mix it with ghee
and, I believe, sugar. It used to produce (stupid)
bliss in my stomach! I'd love to get a hold of some of
it. 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi 1

2006-01-13 Thread Vaj


MAPI phone people may be able to answer your question, because we'd have to know what they renamed it. Was that the liquid one with sugar in it? If so, I'm certain they still make that.Anyone who attended the original physicians course with Chopra will have the original lists (where many of the rasayanas and herbs were all assigned numbers).On Jan 13, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Peter wrote:When the TMO first started selling auyer vedic products about 20 years ago, the first product they sold was a rasayana called, "Maharishi 1". Does anybody know what it was made of? I know it contained amalaki, but it also had other herbs in it. I found it to to be very powerful. You used to mix it with ghee and, I believe, sugar. It used to produce (stupid) bliss in my stomach! I'd love to get a hold of some of it.  





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 snip great rap
 
 So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who  
 have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether
 it helps him or not, though...

I suspect it has the opposite effect, but I agree with you.
When I watch one of the clingers to self acting out their
I'm in ignorance and proud of it but I'm willing to tell
you all about enlightenment anyway thang here on FFL, I 
have several simultaneous reactions. The first is that I am
*immensely* grateful that, unlike them, I have had my own 
experiences of enlightenment and don't have to try to fake 
knowledge of enlightenment based on the intellectual
bullshit we've all been told *about* it over the years.

Second, I often find myself laughing, often out loud, 
because the intellectual posturing and trying to sound 
knowledgeable about something they've never experienced 
really *IS* laughable.  (Sorry, but it is...if you guys are
going to continue to do this shit, *somebody* should tell
you the truth.)  Third, *even as I'm laughing*, I tend to 
feel sorry for the person doing the intellectual posturing 
about enlightenment, remembering that if I hadn't been 
lucky enough to have a few experiences of awakening myself 
that I'd probably be posturing the same way and spouting 
the same intellectual bullshit.  And fourth, I try to 
remind myself *never* to try to explain the subjective 
experience of enlightenment to anyone who hasn't already
experienced it, because then I'd be just as laughable.

All in all, it's a real multidimensinoal learning experience...







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Unstressing?

2006-01-13 Thread L B Shriver
Sent recently by a Japanese friend:

Report: Yoga Stir Tempers in Norway Prison 
- 
Wednesday, August 3, 2005 

(08-03) 13:07 PDT OSLO, Norway (AP) --

A Norwegian prison has stopped giving yoga sessions to inmates after finding 
that some 
of the prisoners became more aggressive and agitated, a newspaper reported 
Wednesday.

The yoga classes were introduced on at trial basis earlier this year at 
Ringerike prison, 
which holds some of Norway's most dangerous criminals.

Prison officials had hoped meditation and breathing exercises would help 
inmates contain 
their anger, but it appeared to have the opposite effect.

Some inmates became more agitated and aggressive, while others developed 
sleeping 
problems as a result of the yoga sessions, prison warden Sigbjoern Hagen told 
newspaper 
Ringerikes Blad. Hagen said that deep breathing exercises could make the 
inmates more 
dangerous, by unblocking their psychological barriers.


URL: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/n/a/2005/08/03/international/
i081302D42.DTL

©2006 Associated Press





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In 
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
  
  TorquiseB writes:
  Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself 
  for once.  What you *meant* by Let's focus on
  substance was Let's all talk about what *I* want
  to talk about, in the pseudointellectual way I like
  to talk about such things. Anything else is off-topic.
  It's your whole act here.
  
  Tom T:
  That is why he is so careful in his self appointed role as the
  Dogma/thought patrol. Wouldn't want anyone here to have any
  substantive opportunity to discuss and share experiences. Must 
 clear
  it with the Dogma patrol and get the blessing of substance that 
 only
  the intellect can understand. Anyone who deviates from that script 
 and
  role playing must certainly be OTP and subject to intense scrutiny 
 on
  a word by word basis for error and wrong thinking. Must keep that
  thinking in a very narrow path. Must Must Must. Should should 
 should.
 
 
 The cool thing about akashanon's constant parrying and challenging 
 is that it strengthens the Awakening experience of those who are 
 challenged. 
 
 Its like this dude I encountered in the post office the other day, 
 where I'm plunking endless amounts of change into the one 
 functioning stamp machine, and the machine is rejecting about every 
 third coin, and given that, along with the price of a book of twenty 
 stamps these days, it is taking a long time to buy my stamps. 
 
 So I'm putting in coins, and putting in coins, and then I hear from 
 behind me, an annoyed and persistent voice, Buy the stamps! C'mon 
 buy the stamps!. I ignore it, not really catching the connection, 
 and keep plunking my change in, and several seconds later, Buy the 
 stamps! Buy the stamps!. At this point I turn around, and see that 
 it is this guy in line, addressing me. So I stop what I am doing and 
 begin calmly explaining what I am doing, and why it is taking so 
 long.
 
 This doesn't satisfy him, and he interrupts with, Well, then just 
 push the button! Buy some stamps with what you have!. So I explain 
 that the machine only offers 20 stamp books and I haven't put enough 
 stamps in. He isn't satisfied by my explanation, because he has 
 apparently made up his mind that I am wrong, and dammit, I'm not 
 conforming to that view of his. Anyway, he got frustrated and left, 
 and I got my stamps.
 
 Afterwards, I realized how much such an experience had validated and 
 reinforced the silence which now permeates my Being, is an 
 everpresent constituent of me, and how such experiences stretch and 
 test our true Nature.
 
 So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who have 
 Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether it 
 helps him or not, though...

I am glad it helps. If my posts help reduce the contradictions,
cognitive errors, dogma and baseless assumptions, then discussions of
substance  will be clearer and deeper.

I get value in seeing how oddly ones words can be read. Its helps
writing skills -- a challenge to try to make ones writing clear even
to those who respond primarily to voices in their heads and not whats
on the page. 

And I get huge a huge source of laughter seeing the contradictions,
cognitive errors, dogma and baseless assumptions that some posters
make everyday. Including you. Thanks for that. Its a great gift.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: new MAPI catalog: Raam Raj Production

2006-01-13 Thread markmeredith2002
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 I was just surprised to see a TM-related item without pictures of
MMY.  Perhaps MAPI has 
 been selling things without the photos for some time, but I never
noticed if they have.  
 Except for a small print return address spelling out Maharishi
Ayurveda Products 
 International, this catalog had no references to anything having to
do with TM or any of 
 the jargon, photos or gold embellishment that go with it.   It is
mainstream.

MAPI is run quite sanely - though the prices are still tmoish - too high.








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  snip great rap
  
  So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who  
  have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether
  it helps him or not, though...
 
 acting out their
 I'm in ignorance and proud of it but I'm willing to tell
 you all about enlightenment anyway thang here on FFL, 

HAHAHAH. If this is not projection, what is!!

You acknowledge you are not enlightened, yet expound on it
constantly. I'm in ignorance and proud of it but I'm willing to tell
you all about enlightenment anyway thang here on FFL, describes you
perfectly. Good job.

And more cognitive errors, which is to be expected with posts from
Barry (and Jim, Tom, etc.) For example, when have I ever said let me
tell you all about enlightenment? Read my posts. I think E is NOT a
useful term, label or concept.  When you read posts, try actually
looking whats on the page and not whats in your head.

And maybe take Tom's advice of facing near impossibility of discerning  
a posters intentions, moods, or states.

 
I 
 have several simultaneous reactions. 

For each personality? :)

The first is that I am
 *immensely* grateful that, unlike them, 

Oh, I thought Tom said we are all one. Are you contradicting him? Or
just not walking your talk?

 I have had my own 
 experiences of enlightenment 

well you ARE special (unlikethem.)

 and don't have to try to f ake 
 knowledge of enlightenment based on the intellectual
 bullshit we've all been told *about* it over the years.

Well, glad you are not referring to me, since I don't talk about
enlightenment -- other than to point out the mutiple mutually
exclusive defintions and reports of experience by others.   
 






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] THANKS for 5the Cd's it shelped as well as the Amm Yagia etc

2006-01-13 Thread WLeed3



Mom, Myra Shimp Leedis stronger-- Happier etc.but its just now a short time remaining we believe however the cd's have helped . THANKS for bringing them  there purchase for me us. .. I note I had the Amma group do thing for Mom as well just before  she rapidly became physicly better. THANKS Tom Cindy.-Original Message-From: tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@traynor.comTo: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.comSent: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:39:05 -Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With


Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'

TorquiseB writes:
Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself 
for once.  What you *meant* by "Let's focus on
substance" was "Let's all talk about what *I* want
to talk about, in the pseudointellectual way I like
to talk about such things. Anything else is off-topic."
It's your whole act here.

Tom T:
That is why he is so careful in his self appointed role as the
Dogma/thought patrol. Wouldn't want anyone here to have any
substantive opportunity to discuss and share experiences. Must clear
it with the Dogma patrol and get the blessing of substance that only
the intellect can understand. Anyone who deviates from that script and
role playing must certainly be OTP and subject to intense scrutiny on
a word by word basis for error and wrong thinking. Must keep that
thinking in a very narrow path. Must Must Must. Should should should.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
FONT COLOR="#99"Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor 
with hope and healing
/FONTA HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM"BClick 
Here!/B/A
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FairfieldLife-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Stem cell experts seek rabbit-human embryo

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,3605,1685534,00.html

Whats up doc?








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:35 AM, authfriend wrote:
 
  I don't believe you addressed my question.
 
 I have.
 
 
  Distinctions, no matter how fine, cannot be
  transcendental, by definition--unless you're
  using a very different definition of the
  transcendent than any I've ever seen.
 
 Jnana is transcendental.

Let me say it another way:

Distinctions, no matter how fine, cannot be
transcendental, by definition--unless you're
using a very different definition of the
transcendent than any I've ever seen.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
snip  So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we 
who have 
  Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether it 
  helps him or not, though...
 
 I am glad it helps. 

You should've stopped here- quit while you're ahead.

If my posts help reduce the contradictions,
 cognitive errors, dogma and baseless assumptions, then discussions 
of
 substance  will be clearer and deeper.

They don't, but are a help nonetheless, despite yourself...The help 
is not in who you are or think you are, but in what you represent ;)
 
 I get value in seeing how oddly ones words can be read. Its helps
 writing skills -- 

Ah, so there is the trade-off; our discourse deepens my Awakening, 
yet it improves your writing skills...

a challenge to try to make ones writing clear even
 to those who respond primarily to voices in their heads and not 
whats
 on the page. 
 
 And I get huge a huge source of laughter seeing the contradictions,
 cognitive errors, dogma and baseless assumptions that some posters
 make everyday. Including you. Thanks for that. Its a great gift.

That sounds frankly like a real big load of the smelly stuff..






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Another SBAL paraphrase

2006-01-13 Thread cardemaister

I seem to recall in SBAL(?) Maharishi commented on 
psycho-analysis saying something like:
It's criminal to remind a man of his past.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi 1

2006-01-13 Thread Peter
I think Maharishi 2 was the liquid one. Not as good as
Maha 1. I don't think they still sell Maharishi 1, but
I'll give MAPI a call.

--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 MAPI phone people may be able to answer your
 question, because we'd  
 have to know what they renamed it. Was that the
 liquid one with sugar  
 in it? If so, I'm certain they still make that.
 
 Anyone who attended the original physicians course
 with Chopra will  
 have the original lists (where many of the rasayanas
 and herbs were  
 all assigned numbers).
 
 On Jan 13, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Peter wrote:
 
  When the TMO first started selling auyer vedic
  products about 20 years ago, the first product
 they
  sold was a rasayana called, Maharishi 1. Does
  anybody know what it was made of? I know it
 contained
  amalaki, but it also had other herbs in it. I
 found it
  to to be very powerful. You used to mix it with
 ghee
  and, I believe, sugar. It used to produce (stupid)
  bliss in my stomach! I'd love to get a hold of
 some of
  it.
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
 snip  So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we 
 who have 
   Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether it 
   helps him or not, though...
  
  I am glad it helps. 
 
 You should've stopped here- quit while you're ahead.
 
 If my posts help reduce the contradictions,
  cognitive errors, dogma and baseless assumptions, then discussions 
 of
  substance  will be clearer and deeper.
 
 They don't, but are a help nonetheless, despite yourself...The help 
 is not in who you are or think you are, but in what you represent ;)
  
  I get value in seeing how oddly ones words can be read. Its helps
  writing skills -- 
 
 Ah, so there is the trade-off; our discourse deepens my Awakening, 
 yet it improves your writing skills...
 
 a challenge to try to make ones writing clear even
  to those who respond primarily to voices in their heads and not 
 whats
  on the page. 
  
  And I get huge a huge source of laughter seeing the contradictions,
  cognitive errors, dogma and baseless assumptions that some posters
  make everyday. Including you. Thanks for that. Its a great gift.
 
 That sounds frankly like a real big load of the smelly stuff..


Why is that Jim? 

oh well, the world is as we are, right jim? I see clarity and you see
shit.








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread Vaj


On Jan 13, 2006, at 12:03 PM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:35 AM, authfriend wrote:  I don't believe you addressed my question.  I have.   Distinctions, no matter how fine, cannot be "transcendental," by definition--unless you're using a very different definition of the transcendent than any I've ever seen.  Jnana is transcendental.  Let me say it another way:  Distinctions, no matter how fine, cannot be "transcendental," by definition--unless you're using a very different definition of the transcendent than any I've ever seen. What is the status of thought in Unity Consciousness? You may want to review the four levels of speech in Maharishi Vedic Science to help you. Or read the Nasadiya sukta of Rig Veda, preferably with a friend who understands Sanskrit. Yuganaddha, two-in-one, is a paradox that's difficult to describe in linear words. There will automatically be a disconnect between written descriptions and the experience itself. It cannot be adequately described by words in written or spoken speech.The only "distinction" is that linear speech requires a distinction made up of a string of words to describe jnana.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   wrote:
  snip  So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges 
what we 
  who have 
Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether 
it 
helps him or not, though...
   
   I am glad it helps. 
  
  You should've stopped here- quit while you're ahead.
  
  If my posts help reduce the contradictions,
   cognitive errors, dogma and baseless assumptions, then 
discussions 
  of
   substance  will be clearer and deeper.
  
  They don't, but are a help nonetheless, despite yourself...The 
help 
  is not in who you are or think you are, but in what you 
represent ;)
   
   I get value in seeing how oddly ones words can be read. Its 
helps
   writing skills -- 
  
  Ah, so there is the trade-off; our discourse deepens my 
Awakening, 
  yet it improves your writing skills...
  
  a challenge to try to make ones writing clear even
   to those who respond primarily to voices in their heads and 
not 
  whats
   on the page. 
   
   And I get huge a huge source of laughter seeing the 
contradictions,
   cognitive errors, dogma and baseless assumptions that some 
posters
   make everyday. Including you. Thanks for that. Its a great 
gift.
  
  That sounds frankly like a real big load of the smelly stuff..
 
 
 Why is that Jim? 
 
 oh well, the world is as we are, right jim? I see clarity and you 
see
 shit.

Right.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread TurquoiseB
 Oh, I thought Tom said we are all one. Are you contradicting 
 him? Or just not walking your talk?

What makes you think that one person's experiences,
even the experiences of enlightenment, have anything 
to do with anyone else's?  I make no such assumption.
Tom has had his own experiences, and has his own way
of describing them and interpreting them.  I find that
many of them don't map to my own experiences.  Yet at
the same time what he says is perfectly valid, and
reflects a perfectly valid set of experiences with
and interpretations of enlightenment.

If you find all that contradictory, that's just because
you haven't been there, done that.  

But you will, sooner or later.  Until then, I reserve
the right to laugh at your posturing.  How you feel 
about that is probably related to how you feel about 
Judy and her relationship to God.  *She* obviously 
feels that when she says that laughing at someone is
an 'attack,' that's essentially the same as if God
had said it.  If you agree with her, you may consider 
my ongoing laughing at you as an attack.  Or you can
consider it anything you want; it doesn't really affect
me at all.  I'm just stuck with laughing at you, because
you're so doggoned laughable.  Make of it what you will...








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  snip great rap
  
  So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who  
  have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether
  it helps him or not, though...
 
 I suspect it has the opposite effect, but I agree with you.
 When I watch one of the clingers to self acting out their
 I'm in ignorance and proud of it but I'm willing to tell
 you all about enlightenment anyway thang here on FFL, I 
 have several simultaneous reactions. The first is that I am
 *immensely* grateful that, unlike them, I have had my own 
 experiences of enlightenment and don't have to try to fake 
 knowledge of enlightenment based on the intellectual
 bullshit we've all been told *about* it over the years.
 
 Second, I often find myself laughing, often out loud, 
 because the intellectual posturing and trying to sound 
 knowledgeable about something they've never experienced 
 really *IS* laughable.  (Sorry, but it is...if you guys are
 going to continue to do this shit, *somebody* should tell
 you the truth.)  Third, *even as I'm laughing*, I tend to 
 feel sorry for the person doing the intellectual posturing 
 about enlightenment, remembering that if I hadn't been 
 lucky enough to have a few experiences of awakening myself 
 that I'd probably be posturing the same way and spouting 
 the same intellectual bullshit.  And fourth, I try to 
 remind myself *never* to try to explain the subjective 
 experience of enlightenment to anyone who hasn't already
 experienced it, because then I'd be just as laughable.
 
 All in all, it's a real multidimensinoal learning experience...

Yep, I agree with all that you are saying. To the last 
point, 'explaining...', this forum is quite a unique place in which 
to attempt that, in that as far as I can tell, all are meditators of 
some form or stripe, and it is within this context that I feel 
comfortable sharing my experiences, both to clarify them through 
this forum, and to help dispel this notion and very damaging myth 
from the Christian tradition I suspect, that, try-as-we-might-we-
never-get-there, oh-us-humble-sinners and on and on and on and on...





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
  
   snip great rap
   
   So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we 
who  
   have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know 
whether
   it helps him or not, though...
  
  acting out their
  I'm in ignorance and proud of it but I'm willing to tell
  you all about enlightenment anyway thang here on FFL, 
 
 HAHAHAH. If this is not projection, what is!!
 
 You acknowledge you are not enlightened, yet expound on it
 constantly. I'm in ignorance and proud of it but I'm willing to 
tell
 you all about enlightenment anyway thang here on FFL, describes 
you
 perfectly. Good job.
 
 And more cognitive errors, which is to be expected with posts from
 Barry (and Jim, Tom, etc.) For example, when have I ever said let 
me
 tell you all about enlightenment? Read my posts. I think E is NOT 
a
 useful term, label or concept.  snip

Akashanon thinks that if he can challenge and equivocate, or 
rationalize, every experience he and others report, and keep from 
acknowledging that real progress can be made, and that there are 
clear milestones for such, he can avoid his painful realization that 
all of his seeking has for him come to nought. (of course it hasn't, 
but he *thinks* it has...).

That is why he now proclaims that liberation, enlightenment, 
Brahman, identifying with the Self, Awakening, etc. are not useful 
terms, labels or concepts. Every attempt to have him state what he 
*does* believe in just results in his challenging the perception of 
the person asking.

OK akashanon, you, unlike all of the spiritual teachers in the 
world, have declared the very concept of Awakening as invalid; that 
there can be no legitimate transition between ignorance and 
Awakening, that all we can apparently hope for is some small, 
incremental experiences of expanding our awareness, maybe, and that 
no phase transition occurs between one state, ignorance, and 
liberation, enlightenment, Brahman, identifying with the Self, 
Awakening, etc.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
Jim Flanegin:
So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who have 
Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether it 
helps him or not, though... 

Tom T:
Darn Jim you weren't supposed to tell him. He is such a perfect mirror
of how it used to be that is not hard to remember how it used to be.
Oh Well! Maybe he will continue to play the game even if he knows the
truth about it. Or on the other hand he may choose not. 
Tom T the guy who embraces the A word but definitely not the E word. Amen





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
 
 TorquiseB writes:
 Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself 
 for once.  What you *meant* by Let's focus on
 substance was Let's all talk about what *I* want
 to talk about, in the pseudointellectual way I like
 to talk about such things. Anything else is off-topic.
 It's your whole act here.
 
 Tom T:
 That is why he is so careful in his self appointed role as the
 Dogma/thought patrol. Wouldn't want anyone here to have any
 substantive opportunity to discuss and share experiences. Must clear
 it with the Dogma patrol and get the blessing of substance that only
 the intellect can understand. Anyone who deviates from that script and
 role playing must certainly be OTP and subject to intense scrutiny on
 a word by word basis for error and wrong thinking. Must keep that
 thinking in a very narrow path. Must Must Must. Should should should.


Actually Tom, if you actually read the words on the page of my posts,
instead of repeatedly adding in all the cognitive distortions that
appear from your head, imputing a lot of agendas. intentions, 
motives,etc (something you advise against -- another example of 
you not walking your talk), you would know a regular theme of my 
posts is about ways to create and enhance substantive opportunity to
discuss and share experiences. Not labels, not dogma, not irrational
contradictions between speech and action,  not cognitive errors, but
real eperiences. 

And you would know that my primary interest with regards to intellect
is not what it can understand, not describing or analyzing the
undescribable, but rather to discern what is not. What is your view
on the role of self-inquiry? Is the intellect used in that? If so, why
are you so against and perhaps afraid of the intellect?

Anyone who deviates from that script and
role playing must certainly be OTP --What program is that? Unlike
you, I am not part, much less the leader of any program or dogma. You
appear to  be the one one with, and promoting, a program -- and a
pretty set rap that goes along with that program.

 intense scrutiny on a word by word basis for error and wrong
thinking.error and wrong thinking

As you know cognitive errors something, I do comment on, are not
content focussed. They are, among other things, about the divergence
of what is objectively there -- like words on a page, and the
distortions people add from their heads alone-- from biases,
pre-judgments, logical fallacies, etc.


 Must keep that thinking in a very narrow path. Must Must Must.
Should should should.

I agree those words do describe some of your posts, but you may be
being a bit harsh on yourself.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Oh, I thought Tom said we are all one. Are you contradicting 
  him? Or just not walking your talk?
 
 What makes you think that one person's experiences,
 even the experiences of enlightenment, have anything 
 to do with anyone else's?  I make no such assumption.
 Tom has had his own experiences, and has his own way
 of describing them and interpreting them.  I find that
 many of them don't map to my own experiences.  Yet at
 the same time what he says is perfectly valid, and
 reflects a perfectly valid set of experiences with
 and interpretations of enlightenment.

OK. Good. Just asking.
 
 But you will, sooner or later.  Until then, I reserve
 the right to laugh at your posturing.  

They take reservations? :)

Laugh away at whatever is, and also all the filters and overlays in
your head. You should be quite amused for some time.

 How you feel 
 about that is probably related to how you feel about 
 Judy and her relationship to God.  *She* obviously 
 feels that when she says that laughing at someone is
 an 'attack,' that's essentially the same as if God
 had said it.  If you agree with her, 

Gee, you really don't read posts carefully at all do you. 

Read my lips: i) I do not take laughter as an attack. i) I don't hold
you as having any power or substance to attack, iii) for real
attackers -- ofsubstance, I don't buy into  being a victim -- which
is the only way one can be bloodied by a so-called attack.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 
 The cool thing about akashanon's constant parrying and challenging 
 is that it strengthens the Awakening experience of those who are 
 challenged. 
 
 Its like this dude I encountered in the post office the other day, 
 where I'm plunking endless amounts of change into the one 
 functioning stamp machine, and the machine is rejecting about every 
 third coin, and given that, along with the price of a book of twenty 
 stamps these days, it is taking a long time to buy my stamps. 
 
 So I'm putting in coins, and putting in coins, and then I hear from 
 behind me, an annoyed and persistent voice, Buy the stamps! C'mon 
 buy the stamps!. I ignore it, not really catching the connection, 
 and keep plunking my change in, and several seconds later, Buy the 
 stamps! Buy the stamps!. At this point I turn around, and see that 
 it is this guy in line, addressing me. So I stop what I am doing and 
 begin calmly explaining what I am doing, and why it is taking so 
 long.
 
 This doesn't satisfy him, and he interrupts with, Well, then just 
 push the button! Buy some stamps with what you have!. So I explain 
 that the machine only offers 20 stamp books and I haven't put enough 
 stamps in. He isn't satisfied by my explanation, because he has 
 apparently made up his mind that I am wrong, and dammit, I'm not 
 conforming to that view of his. Anyway, he got frustrated and left, 
 and I got my stamps.
 
 Afterwards, I realized how much such an experience had validated and 
 reinforced the silence which now permeates my Being, is an 
 everpresent constituent of me, and how such experiences stretch and 
 test our true Nature.
 
 So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who have 
 Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether it 
 helps him or not, though...

Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Jim Flanegin:
 So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who have 
 Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether it 
 helps him or not, though... 
 
 Tom T:
 Darn Jim you weren't supposed to tell him. He is such a perfect 
mirror
 of how it used to be that is not hard to remember how it used to be.
 Oh Well! Maybe he will continue to play the game even if he knows the
 truth about it. Or on the other hand he may choose not. 
 Tom T the guy who embraces the A word but definitely not the E word. 
Amen


Yeah, I just wanted to clearly get everyone's cards on the table, and 
not continue to inadvertently confuse others who may be listening in...

I appreciate what you said about remembering what it used to be like. 
Boy did that suck!







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread Vaj


On Jan 13, 2006, at 11:08 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:So, the same with akashanon. He actually prefers "Akashic Moose".





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   wrote:
   
snip great rap

So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we 
 who  
have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know 
 whether
it helps him or not, though...
   
   acting out their
   I'm in ignorance and proud of it but I'm willing to tell
   you all about enlightenment anyway thang here on FFL, 
  
  HAHAHAH. If this is not projection, what is!!
  
  You acknowledge you are not enlightened, yet expound on it
  constantly. I'm in ignorance and proud of it but I'm willing to 
 tell
  you all about enlightenment anyway thang here on FFL, describes 
 you
  perfectly. Good job.
  
  And more cognitive errors, which is to be expected with posts from
  Barry (and Jim, Tom, etc.) For example, when have I ever said let 
 me
  tell you all about enlightenment? Read my posts. I think E is NOT 
 a
  useful term, label or concept.  snip
 
 Akashanon thinks that if he can challenge and equivocate, or 
 rationalize, every experience he and others report, and keep from 
 acknowledging that real progress can be made, and that there are 
 clear milestones for such, he can avoid his painful realization that 
 all of his seeking has for him come to nought. (of course it hasn't, 
 but he *thinks* it has...). 

Wow Jim. You delusions are increasing at light speed. Which of the
following is causing your massive cognitive errors this time: 1)you
faulty senses, or 2) your muddled intellect or 3) my darkened heart

(those being the reasons you listed previously)

Just try to find examples of each of these in any of my posts. 

i) challenge and equivocate, or rationalize, every experience he and
others report, 

what I challenge are: meaningless labels, cognitve errors,
contradictions betweens words and actions. I encourage reporting and
discussion of experiences.
and keep from 

ii) acknowledging that real progress can't be made,

Never said this.

iii) and that there are not 
 clear milestones for such,

Never said this.


he can avoid his painful realization that  
 all of his seeking has for him come to nought. (of course it hasn't, 
 but he *thinks* it has...

HAHAHAHA. This precious. Projections? I gave up seeking sometime ago.
Seeking is a huge vassana. Sooner or later all need to deal with it.

 
 That is why 

You are omnicient now too???

 That is why he now proclaims that liberation, enlightenment, 
 Brahman, identifying with the Self, Awakening, etc. are not useful 
 terms, labels or concepts. 

I believe I said that about enlightenment. You are hallucinating the
rest. Flashbacks?

Every attempt to have him state what he 
 *does* believe in just results in his challenging the perception of 
 the person asking.

Read my posts. I have stated many things I believe in. The distrotions
in your head are scary jim.

 
 OK akashanon, you, unlike all of the spiritual teachers in the 
 world, 

Wow, now you are hallucinating me as a spiritual teacher. 

 that 
 there can be no legitimate transition between ignorance and 
 Awakening, 

$100 if you cite a post where i say that hallucinating jim.


 that all we can apparently hope for is some small, 
 incremental experiences of expanding our awareness, maybe, and that 
 no phase transition occurs between one state, ignorance, and 
 liberation, enlightenment, Brahman, identifying with the Self, 
 Awakening, etc.

$200 if you cite a post where i say that hallucinating jim. 

So jim, I hope these and your recent posts, are enough examples  of
your delusions, halucinations, and large cognitive errors that   

i) you seek some third party psych appraisal

ii) you understand that if you interpret what  
on the page in black and  white with such distortions, that some might
be reasonable skeptical of your reports of your interpretations of
your experiences.








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
 mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.

Mahafuckyas.  Now THAT cracked me right up!







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we
 who  have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know
 whether it helps him or not, though... acting out their
   I'm in ignorance and proud of it but I'm willing to tell
   you all about enlightenment anyway thang here on FFL,
 
  HAHAHAH. If this is not projection, what is!! You acknowledge you
are not enlightened, yet expound on it constantly. I'm in ignorance
and proud of it but I'm willing to tell
  you all about enlightenment anyway thang here on FFL, describes
 you  perfectly. Good job.

 
  And more cognitive errors, which is to be expected with posts from
  Barry (and Jim, Tom, etc.) For example, when have I ever said let
 me tell you all about enlightenment? Read my posts. I think E is
NOT a  useful term, label or concept. snip

 Akashanon thinks that if he can challenge and equivocate, or
 rationalize, every experience he and others report, and keep from
 acknowledging that real progress can be made, and that there are
 clear milestones for such, he can avoid his painful realization that
 all of his seeking has for him come to nought. (of course it hasn't,
 but he *thinks* it has...).

Wow Jim. You delusions are increasing at light speed. Which of the
following is causing your massive cognitive errors this time: 1)your
faulty senses, or 2) your muddled intellect or 3) your darkened heart
--- (those being the reasons you listed previously)

Just try to find any examples of of these in any of my posts.

i) challenge and equivocate, or rationalize, every experience he and
others report,

what I challenge are: meaningless labels, cognitve errors,
contradictions betweens words and actions. I encourage reporting and
discussion of experiences.
and keep from

ii) acknowledging that real progress can't be made,

Never said this.

iii) and that there are not
 clear milestones for such,

Never said this.


he can avoid his painful realization that
 all of his seeking has for him come to nought. (of course it hasn't,
 but he *thinks* it has...

HAHAHAHA. This precious. Projections? I gave up seeking sometime ago.
Seeking is a huge vassana. Sooner or later all need to deal with it.


 That is why

You are omnicient now too???

 That is why he now proclaims that liberation, enlightenment,
 Brahman, identifying with the Self, Awakening, etc. are not useful
 terms, labels or concepts.

I believe I said that about enlightenment. You are hallucinating the
rest. Flashbacks?

Every attempt to have him state what he
 *does* believe in just results in his challenging the perception of
 the person asking.

Read my posts. I have stated many things I believe in. The distrotions
in your head are scary jim.


 OK akashanon, you, unlike all of the spiritual teachers in the
 world,

Wow, now you are hallucinating me as a spiritual teacher.

 that
 there can be no legitimate transition between ignorance and
 Awakening,

$100 if you cite a post where i say that hallucinating jim.


 that all we can apparently hope for is some small,
 incremental experiences of expanding our awareness, maybe, and that
 no phase transition occurs between one state, ignorance, and
 liberation, enlightenment, Brahman, identifying with the Self,
 Awakening, etc.

$200 if you cite a post where i say that hallucinating jim.

So jim, I hope these and your recent posts, are enough examples of
your delusions, halucinations, and large cognitive errors that

i) you seek some third party psych appraisal

ii) you understand that if you interpret what
on the page in black and white with such distortions, that some might
be reasonable skeptical of your reports of your interpretations of
your experiences.









 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
 The first is that I am
 *immensely* grateful that, unlike them, I have had my own 
 experiences of enlightenment

But apparently not the There is no me-versus-them,
we-are-all one-experience...






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Jan 13, 2006, at 12:03 PM, authfriend wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
  On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:35 AM, authfriend wrote:
 
 
  I don't believe you addressed my question.
 
 
  I have.
 
 
 
  Distinctions, no matter how fine, cannot be
  transcendental, by definition--unless you're
  using a very different definition of the
  transcendent than any I've ever seen.
 
 
  Jnana is transcendental.
 
 
  Let me say it another way:
 
  Distinctions, no matter how fine, cannot be
  transcendental, by definition--unless you're
  using a very different definition of the
  transcendent than any I've ever seen.
 
 What is the status of thought in Unity Consciousness?

We were talking about the Transcendent, not
Unity consciousness.







 You may want to  
 review the four levels of speech in Maharishi Vedic Science to 
help  
 you. Or read the Nasadiya sukta of Rig Veda, preferably with a 
friend  
 who understands Sanskrit. Yuganaddha, two-in-one, is a paradox 
that's  
 difficult to describe in linear words. There will automatically be 
a  
 disconnect between written descriptions and the experience itself. 
It  
 cannot be adequately described by words in written or spoken speech.
 
 The only distinction is that linear speech requires a 
distinction  
 made up of a string of words to describe jnana.








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 snip
  The first is that I am
  *immensely* grateful that, unlike them, I have had my own 
  experiences of enlightenment
 
 But apparently not the There is no me-versus-them,
 we-are-all one-experience...

Or the no-EGO experience.
HAHAHAHAHAHA.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

  Oh, I thought Tom said we are all one. Are you contradicting 
  him? Or just not walking your talk?
 
 What makes you think that one person's experiences,
 even the experiences of enlightenment, have anything 
 to do with anyone else's?

What makes you think that's what he thinks?

He was *asking* you.

  I make no such assumption.
 Tom has had his own experiences, and has his own way
 of describing them and interpreting them.  I find that
 many of them don't map to my own experiences.  Yet at
 the same time what he says is perfectly valid, and
 reflects a perfectly valid set of experiences with
 and interpretations of enlightenment.
 
 If you find all that contradictory, that's just because
 you haven't been there, done that.  
 
 But you will, sooner or later.  Until then, I reserve
 the right to laugh at your posturing.  How you feel 
 about that is probably related to how you feel about 
 Judy and her relationship to God.  *She* obviously 
 feels that when she says that laughing at someone is
 an 'attack,' that's essentially the same as if God
 had said it.

Wow, talk about *projection*!



  If you agree with her, you may consider 
 my ongoing laughing at you as an attack.  Or you can
 consider it anything you want; it doesn't really affect
 me at all.  I'm just stuck with laughing at you, because
 you're so doggoned laughable.  Make of it what you will...







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   wrote:
   
snip great rap

So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we 
 who  
have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know 
 whether
it helps him or not, though...
   
   acting out their
   I'm in ignorance and proud of it but I'm willing to tell
   you all about enlightenment anyway thang here on FFL, 
  
  HAHAHAH. If this is not projection, what is!!
  
  You acknowledge you are not enlightened, yet expound on it
  constantly. I'm in ignorance and proud of it but I'm willing to 
 tell
  you all about enlightenment anyway thang here on FFL, describes 
 you
  perfectly. Good job.
  
  And more cognitive errors, which is to be expected with posts from
  Barry (and Jim, Tom, etc.) For example, when have I ever 
said let 
 me
  tell you all about enlightenment? Read my posts. I think E is 
NOT 
 a
  useful term, label or concept.  snip
 
 Akashanon thinks that if he can challenge and equivocate, or 
 rationalize, every experience he and others report, and keep from 
 acknowledging that real progress can be made, and that there are 
 clear milestones for such, he can avoid his painful realization 
that 
 all of his seeking has for him come to nought. (of course it 
hasn't, 
 but he *thinks* it has...).
 
 That is why he now proclaims that liberation, enlightenment, 
 Brahman, identifying with the Self, Awakening, etc. are not useful 
 terms, labels or concepts. Every attempt to have him state what he 
 *does* believe in just results in his challenging the perception of 
 the person asking.

Is Awakening something to be believed in?  Does what
you believe in have anything to do with becoming
enlightened?

 OK akashanon, you, unlike all of the spiritual teachers in the 
 world, have declared the very concept of Awakening as invalid; that 
 there can be no legitimate transition between ignorance and 
 Awakening, that all we can apparently hope for is some small, 
 incremental experiences of expanding our awareness, maybe, and that 
 no phase transition occurs between one state, ignorance, and 
 liberation, enlightenment, Brahman, identifying with the Self, 
 Awakening, etc.

Boy, that isn't what I understand him to be saying.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 snip
  The first is that I am
  *immensely* grateful that, unlike them, I have had my own 
  experiences of enlightenment
 
 But apparently not the There is no me-versus-them,
 we-are-all one-experience...

Actually, even though it's being asked by the Judybot,
I'll deal with this one.  :-)

That is correct.  I have had quite a few experiences
that map to what TMers might call 'CC.' I have had 
other experiences that don't map to anything that has
*ever* been mentioned in a TM context, but were pretty
neat.  But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
I ever sought, any experience that could in any way be
descried as there is no me-vs-them, we are all one.  

I suspect that this description has almost nothing to 
do with real experiences of the direct perception of Unity.
In other words, what I think Judy is describing is a
guess, *from the point of view of someone who hasn't 
even experienced CC*, of what Unity might be like.  
Me, I consider her description NewAgeSpeak at its
worst, so admit with some *pride* to never having 
experienced anything like it.

Carry on...  :-)







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread Vaj


On Jan 13, 2006, at 1:29 PM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 13, 2006, at 12:03 PM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:35 AM, authfriend wrote: I don't believe you addressed my question. I have. Distinctions, no matter how fine, cannot be"transcendental," by definition--unless you'reusing a very different definition of thetranscendent than any I've ever seen. Jnana is transcendental. Let me say it another way:Distinctions, no matter how fine, cannot be"transcendental," by definition--unless you'reusing a very different definition of thetranscendent than any I've ever seen. What is the status of thought in Unity Consciousness? We were talking about the Transcendent, notUnity consciousness. No you were talking about the transcendent. I was talking about transcendental morality.Where do you think transcendental morality comes from? It comes from a different state than waking.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
 I ever sought, any experience that could in any way be
 descried as there is no me-vs-them, we are all one.  
 
 I suspect that this description has almost nothing to 
 do with real experiences of the direct perception of Unity.
 In other words, what I think Judy is describing is a
 guess, *from the point of view of someone who hasn't 
 even experienced CC*, of what Unity might be like.  
 Me, I consider her description NewAgeSpeak at its
 worst, 

Tom T:
As Neil DOnald Walsh once wrote, there is only one of US. Once
awakening occurs that is one of the basic understandings that is
unadvoidable. Given that an awake person gets or groks THAT, then
there is no differrence between being laughed at or with. As a matter
of fact it just becomes another opportunity to just laugh at the
craziness inside the monkey house and out. Laughter is just laughter.
No Attack. No Attacker. Just me and the other me rolling on the floor
whooping it up. TOm T

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/85017

Interesting hypothesis Barry. Maybe Tom Traynor is someone who hasn't 
 even experienced CC*, of what Unity might be like.

Tom?   







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
  mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
 
 Mahafuckyas.  Now THAT cracked me right up!


All Glory to Sri Sri Tom T for that one.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
   mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
  
  Mahafuckyas.  Now THAT cracked me right up!
 
 
 All Glory to Sri Sri Tom T for that one.


Raja of the Mahafuckyas?







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
  I ever sought, any experience that could in any way be
  descried as there is no me-vs-them, we are all one.  
  
  I suspect that this description has almost nothing to 
  do with real experiences of the direct perception of Unity.
  In other words, what I think Judy is describing is a
  guess, *from the point of view of someone who hasn't 
  even experienced CC*, of what Unity might be like.  
  Me, I consider her description NewAgeSpeak at its
  worst, 
 
 Tom T:
 As Neil DOnald Walsh once wrote, there is only one of US. Once
 awakening occurs that is one of the basic understandings that is
 unadvoidable. Given that an awake person gets or groks THAT, 
 then there is no differrence between being laughed at or with. 
 As a matter of fact it just becomes another opportunity to just 
 laugh at the craziness inside the monkey house and out. Laughter 
 is just laughter. No Attack. No Attacker. Just me and the other 
 me rolling on the floor whooping it up. TOm T
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/85017
 
 Interesting hypothesis Barry. Maybe Tom Traynor is someone who 
 hasn't even experienced CC*, of what Unity might be like.

Or, he has his way of expressing things, Neil Donald 
Walsh has his, and I have mine, and *none* of them
has anything whatsoever to do with Judy's NewAgeSpeak.  :-)

I'm not responsible for how Tom describes his exper-
iences and interprets them, I'm not responsible for
how this Walsh guy does it, and I'm not responsible
for how you react when you hear any of them.  All I'm
responsible for, if I'm silly enough to try to 
describe experiences that I *know* can *NEVER* be
expressed in words, is doing the best I can at *that*
inachievable task.

In other words, what you're trying to do is claim
that if any two people say that they've experienced
awakening or enlightenment or *whatever* one chooses
to call it, and they don't AGREE with each other,
something is not right.  Did I get your basic thesis?

Well, I'm suggesting that your basic thesis is a 
rather dimwitted, simplistic view of a far more 
complicated reality, and that you choose to believe 
the dimwitted view because your time with Maharishi 
has made you intellectually lazy and taught you to 
settle for consistent, easy answers.

And if settling for consistent, easy answers makes 
you happy, I say more power to you.  Good deal.  I 
wish you the best of luck with that.

Me, I'd rather have experiences than spout theories 
about them, and it's a Friday night, so I'm off to 
have a few experiences right now.  I leave you to 
talk about them.  :-)







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
  snip
   The first is that I am
   *immensely* grateful that, unlike them, I have had my own 
   experiences of enlightenment
  
  But apparently not the There is no me-versus-them,
  we-are-all one-experience...
 
 Actually, even though it's being asked by the Judybot,
 I'll deal with this one.  :-)
 
 That is correct.  I have had quite a few experiences
 that map to what TMers might call 'CC.' I have had 
 other experiences that don't map to anything that has
 *ever* been mentioned in a TM context, but were pretty
 neat.  But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
 I ever sought, any experience that could in any way be
 descried as there is no me-vs-them, we are all one.  
 
 I suspect that this description has almost nothing to 
 do with real experiences of the direct perception of Unity.
 In other words, what I think Judy is describing is a
 guess, *from the point of view of someone who hasn't 
 even experienced CC*, of what Unity might be like.

Actually not.  Not only is it a frequently reported
experience on this forum (odd that you've somehow
managed to miss it) and elsewhere, but I've had it
myself on occasion.  I don't know whether it's a
direct perception of Unity, but then I didn't claim
it was.  It *is* an experience of perceiving the Self
in others.

 Me, I consider her description NewAgeSpeak at its
 worst, so admit with some *pride* to never having 
 experienced anything like it.

Actually, I'm pretty sure that with a bit of
searching, I could find posts of yours in which
you've said something very much like this.




 
 Carry on...  :-)







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Jan 13, 2006, at 1:29 PM, authfriend wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
  On Jan 13, 2006, at 12:03 PM, authfriend wrote:
 
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 
 
 
 
  On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:35 AM, authfriend wrote:
 
 
 
  I don't believe you addressed my question.
 
 
 
  I have.
 
 
 
 
  Distinctions, no matter how fine, cannot be
  transcendental, by definition--unless you're
  using a very different definition of the
  transcendent than any I've ever seen.
 
 
 
  Jnana is transcendental.
 
 
 
  Let me say it another way:
 
  Distinctions, no matter how fine, cannot be
  transcendental, by definition--unless you're
  using a very different definition of the
  transcendent than any I've ever seen.
 
  What is the status of thought in Unity Consciousness?
 
  We were talking about the Transcendent, not
  Unity consciousness.
 
 No you were talking about the transcendent. I was talking about  
 transcendental morality.
 
 Where do you think transcendental morality comes from?

Well, that's what I was asking about, actually.

 It comes from a different state than waking.

No doubt.  But if it involves distinctions, to call it
transcendental is oxymoronic.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment University

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

oxymoronic

eight morons? I have just counted five so far. :)






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
   But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
   I ever sought, any experience that could in any way be
   descried as there is no me-vs-them, we are all one.  
   
   I suspect that this description has almost nothing to 
   do with real experiences of the direct perception of Unity.
   In other words, what I think Judy is describing is a
   guess, *from the point of view of someone who hasn't 
   even experienced CC*, of what Unity might be like.  
   Me, I consider her description NewAgeSpeak at its
   worst, 
  
  Tom T:
  As Neil DOnald Walsh once wrote, there is only one of US. Once
  awakening occurs that is one of the basic understandings that is
  unadvoidable. Given that an awake person gets or groks THAT, 
  then there is no differrence between being laughed at or with. 
  As a matter of fact it just becomes another opportunity to just 
  laugh at the craziness inside the monkey house and out. Laughter 
  is just laughter. No Attack. No Attacker. Just me and the other 
  me rolling on the floor whooping it up. TOm T
  
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/85017
  
  Interesting hypothesis Barry. Maybe Tom Traynor is someone who 
  hasn't even experienced CC*, of what Unity might be like.
 
 Or, he has his way of expressing things, Neil Donald 
 Walsh has his, and I have mine, and *none* of them
 has anything whatsoever to do with Judy's NewAgeSpeak.  :-)

Well, yes, it does, actually.  I was thinking 
specifically of what Tom had just said, quoted
above.  There is only one of US seems to me
pretty similar to my paraphrase There is no
me-vs.-them, we are all one.

 I'm not responsible for how Tom describes his exper-
 iences and interprets them, I'm not responsible for
 how this Walsh guy does it, and I'm not responsible
 for how you react when you hear any of them.  All I'm
 responsible for, if I'm silly enough to try to 
 describe experiences that I *know* can *NEVER* be
 expressed in words, is doing the best I can at *that*
 inachievable task.

But you do appear to consider yourself responsible
for inferring what experiences others have and have
not had, as well as where they got their descriptions
from, and for proudly insisting that you have never
had such experiences, as if they were somehow
beneath you.

 In other words, what you're trying to do is claim
 that if any two people say that they've experienced
 awakening or enlightenment or *whatever* one chooses
 to call it, and they don't AGREE with each other,
 something is not right.  Did I get your basic thesis?

I suspect what he's pointing out, and you're avoiding
dealing with, is that by rejecting the There is only
one of US experience as simply someone's idea of what
Unity might be like, you're implying that Tom (and the
others who have reported this experience) has no 
experiential knowledge of CC and certainly not of Unity.

 Well, I'm suggesting that your basic thesis is a 
 rather dimwitted, simplistic view of a far more 
 complicated reality, and that you choose to believe 
 the dimwitted view because your time with Maharishi 
 has made you intellectually lazy and taught you to 
 settle for consistent, easy answers.

In fact, as anyone who has read Anon's posts with
any attention realizes, settling for consistent,
easy answers is about as far from what he's doing
as it's possible to be.  That's exactly what he's
inveighing *against*.


 
 And if settling for consistent, easy answers makes 
 you happy, I say more power to you.  Good deal.  I 
 wish you the best of luck with that.
 
 Me, I'd rather have experiences than spout theories 
 about them, and it's a Friday night, so I'm off to 
 have a few experiences right now.  I leave you to 
 talk about them.  :-)







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
   But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
   I ever sought, any experience that could in any way be
   descried as there is no me-vs-them, we are all one.  
   
   I suspect that this description has almost nothing to 
   do with real experiences of the direct perception of Unity.
   In other words, what I think Judy is describing is a
   guess, *from the point of view of someone who hasn't 
   even experienced CC*, of what Unity might be like.  
   Me, I consider her description NewAgeSpeak at its
   worst, 
  
  Tom T:
  As Neil DOnald Walsh once wrote, there is only one of US. Once
  awakening occurs that is one of the basic understandings that is
  unadvoidable. Given that an awake person gets or groks THAT, 
  then there is no differrence between being laughed at or with. 
  As a matter of fact it just becomes another opportunity to just 
  laugh at the craziness inside the monkey house and out. Laughter 
  is just laughter. No Attack. No Attacker. Just me and the other 
  me rolling on the floor whooping it up. TOm T
  
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/85017
  
  Interesting hypothesis Barry. Maybe Tom Traynor is someone who 
  hasn't even experienced CC*, of what Unity might be like.

 
 In other words, what you're trying to do is claim
 that if any two people say that they've experienced
 awakening or enlightenment or *whatever* one chooses
 to call it, and they don't AGREE with each other,
 something is not right.  Did I get your basic thesis?

um, if they  describe mutually exclusive attributes of enlightenment,
and describe mutually exclusive experiences of E., yes, I am skeptical
that they are talking about the same thing. You don't?  

Also when I see self-proclaimed E. steeped cognitive errors and
hallucination, one even claiming that NOT making cognitive errors is a
characteristic of E, I get a bit skeptical that they are not making
cognitive errors in interpreting their experiences.

And because of the above, I doubt the value of the label of
enlightenment? 

 Well, I'm suggesting that your basic thesis is a 
 rather dimwitted, simplistic view of a far more 
 complicated reality, 

Well, I grant you that I hold you quite well qualified to know what
dimwittedness is all about.  :) An expert witness.

 and that you choose to believe  
 the dimwitted view because your time 
 has made you intellectually lazy and taught you to 
 settle for consistent, easy answers. 

But in your time with him, you were immune? And you know my
educatioanal, work and life experience in the almost 30 years since I
  saw MMY. And you know this had no effect on my so-called mmy
induced dimwittedness?

HAHAHAHAHAHA. Keep it up Barry. I don't mind the bloody fist from
pounding the floor in laughter. You are such a trip!


 
 And if settling for consistent, easy answers makes 
 you happy, I say more power to you.  Good deal.  I 
 wish you the best of luck with that.

And where did I say I sought that? You are making more cognitive
errors, barry. Still having that flashback problem?

 Me, I'd rather have experiences than spout theories 
 about them, 

ME TOO! We finally have something in common!.

But who is that voice in your head that says I like to spout theories.
Fire him. He is way drunk.








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Jan 13, 2006, at 11:08 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:
 
  So, the same with akashanon.
 
 He actually prefers Akashic Moose.

for dessert?





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
 mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.

A couple of question for you: 
1. what is the natural dynamic being expressed as the result of the 
above?
2. what is the value of doing this?

PS This isn't some bizarre test, just honestly curious about your 
thinking on this...






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Again India does it

2006-01-13 Thread Jason Spock



 South-African Model Gang-Raped in Mumbai, India NDTV Correspondent  Mumbai, December
 31A 27-year-old South African model, who had come to India’s glamour capital in September to make a career in Bollywood, was allegedly gangraped by two people in a city hotel.   Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) Shashikant Shinde today said a case of rape under section 376/34 of IPC has been registered against two people he declined to identify.  However, sources in the Vile Parle police station said the South African national identified the accused as Rahul and Aditya.  The complainant said the accused laced her drink with some drug when she went to the toilet in Hotel Bawa International, adding when she became groggy they took her in a car to an isolated location and gangraped her on Wednesday.  Mr Shinde said police have collected vital information about the two accused from the hotel staff and the owner and they would be arrested soon.  Daughter of a South African business tycoon, the woman, who had come to India in September this year, was staying at an apartment in Lokhandwala in Andheri (West).   Date rape?  The model says two men she befriended at the hotel's pub drugged her.   The woman claims she was taken to another hotel where she was assaulted with a belt and raped.   The owner of Bawa International Hotel is allegedly involved in the incident, but argues that all such allegations are baseless since the rape did not take place on the premises of the hotel.  "The FIR does not mention that anyone
 from the hotel management is in any way involved in the gangrape," said Karan Bawar, Owner, Bawa International.  The model had reportedly been in search of work ever since she came to India in September 2005. She is reported to have met her alleged rapists at the party.  The men, after raping her, dropped her at her Lokhandwala residence, police sources said.  Medical tests on the woman have confirmed rape, the sources added. — UNI 
		Yahoo! Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover 
Photo Books. You design it and we’ll bind it!





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
  mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
 
 A couple of question for you: 
 1. what is the natural dynamic being expressed as the result of the 
 above?

The ridiculous pseudo-Vedic terminology was burning a hole in my brain
and needed to be released.

 2. what is the value of doing this?
 
For the pure silliness of it.

 PS This isn't some bizarre test,

I dunno... seemed pretty bizarre to me.

 just honestly curious about your thinking on this...

Well, there ya have it. How'd I score?





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
   mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
  
  A couple of question for you: 
  1. what is the natural dynamic being expressed as the result of the 
  above?
 
 The ridiculous pseudo-Vedic terminology was burning a hole in my brain
 and needed to be released.
 
  2. what is the value of doing this?
  
 For the pure silliness of it.
 
  PS This isn't some bizarre test,

108?
 
 I dunno... seemed pretty bizarre to me.
 
  just honestly curious about your thinking on this...
 
 Well, there ya have it. How'd I score?







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
   mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
  
  A couple of question for you: 
  1. what is the natural dynamic being expressed as the result of 
the 
  above?
 
 The ridiculous pseudo-Vedic terminology was burning a hole in my 
brain
 and needed to be released.
 
  2. what is the value of doing this?
  
 For the pure silliness of it.
 
  PS This isn't some bizarre test,
 
 I dunno... seemed pretty bizarre to me.
 
  just honestly curious about your thinking on this...
 
 Well, there ya have it. How'd I score?

A-plus! Hope you have a great weekend!!





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Again India does it

2006-01-13 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:



 
 
   South-African Model Gang-Raped in Mumbai, India

Dude, in the future, please keep this shit to yourself. Thanks.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's new(?) title

2006-01-13 Thread Bhairitu
TurquoiseB wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  

Râja Nader Râm, Jan 12th 2006:

His Divine Holiness Maharishi Mahesh Yogi



Wow. In both of those titles, only one word (the 
family name, Nader or Mahesh) is not made up. 
What is it about human beings that convinces them
that if they add more honorifics to a person's
name, the person becomes more honorable?

  

Titles are usually conferred by the guru not the followers.  Did they 
hold a seance?



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Laughing With, At and At/With

2006-01-13 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
snip
 Is Awakening something to be believed in?  Does what
 you believe in have anything to do with becoming
 enlightened?

Yes, you must absolutely believe in the fact that you can and will 
gain enlightenment, no matter what happens. Be one pointed on the 
Goal.
 
  OK akashanon, you, unlike all of the spiritual teachers in the 
  world, have declared the very concept of Awakening as invalid; 
that 
  there can be no legitimate transition between ignorance and 
  Awakening, that all we can apparently hope for is some small, 
  incremental experiences of expanding our awareness, maybe, and 
that 
  no phase transition occurs between one state, ignorance, and 
  liberation, enlightenment, Brahman, identifying with the Self, 
  Awakening, etc.
 
 Boy, that isn't what I understand him to be saying.

Si? Que?





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Again India does it

2006-01-13 Thread Rick Archer
on 1/13/06 4:11 PM, jim_flanegin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

   South-African Model Gang-Raped in Mumbai, India

 Dude, in the future, please keep this shit to yourself. Thanks.

Jason, in case you're not aware, there are bad people in every country. Good
ones too. India has it's fair share of each. None of us is laboring under
the illusion that India is a holy land free from evildoers.




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




  1   2   >