Re: [gentoo-user] dev-lang/perl upgrade failure

2022-05-10 Thread Bob Dunlop
Hi,

On Tue, May 10 at 09:11, Matt Connell wrote:
> I can't figure out why a perl update isn't building.  This is only
> happening on one single machine out of the half dozen Gentoo systems I
> have running.  I've never had issues building perl itself either. 
> Modules sure, but never the main perl package.
> 
> My search-fu is failing me as well, apparently, so I turn to y'all. 
> Can someone point me in the right direction?

You might want to check out
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-8680082.html

The solution suggested is to clear out obsolete and unmaintained
packages which may be causing your build to hit the error check
with.

  emerge -av --depclean
  perl-cleaner --all

Always a good idea to do a regular cleanup with depclean and I
suggest running perl-cleaner with the -p "pretend" option first.

HTH
-- 
Bob Dunlop



Re: [gentoo-user] which lenovo or huawei laptop?

2022-04-08 Thread Bob Dunlop
Hi,

On Wed, Apr 06 at 09:05, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 06/04/2022 19:53, n952162 wrote:
> > I bought a bottom of the line HP laptop and had only problems with 
> > unsupported chips.  I'd like to buy a lenovo or huawei now. Has anyone 
> > had bad experiences porting /gentoo/ to either?
> > 
> If you're prepared to pay decent money (there's no such thing as a 
> "bottom of the line" here), try these people
> 
> https://junocomputers.com/product-category/laptops/

For UK buyers I'd recommend PC Specialist #1, I brought a 14" Lafite
laptop from them in January 2019.  What attracted me was a warantee that
wasn't broken by opening the case or installing your own components.
Also when I asked pre-sales support they where very open about the fact
it was a rebadged Clevo N130BU, gave me the URL for the service manual
and confirmed stock Ubuntu should run out the box.  Linux Mint did
when I tried it, not had an issue with it since.

Now none of this is of much interest to the original poster who I think
had a .de address apart for the idea of looking for a local supplier of
rebadged Clevo devices.  Lots of people do, I think at least some of
Juno's stock is Clevo and know System76 used to albeit with modified
firmware.


#1 https://www.pcspecialist.co.uk/

-- 
Bob Dunlop



Re: [gentoo-user] Is "-flto" supported by Gentoo?

2017-03-22 Thread Bob Wya
On 22 March 2017 at 02:20, P Levine  wrote:

> A while back I decided to try my hand at including " -flto" in my
> C{XX}FLAGS and do `emerge -e @world`.  Needless to say, by the end of it my
> "/etc/portage/package.env" was filled with a list of packages that had to
> disable the flag either because it failed to build or broke other builds.
> I never reported them as bugs because I always assumed the flag was unsafe
> and unsupported by Gentoo.
>
> Lately, I have been trying to fix some GCC-6 related bugs and have come
> across some bug reports that seem possibly more "-flto" related than GCC-6
> related.  Doing a search for "-flto", Gentoo bugtracker, a number of open
> bugreports clearly show them to be "-flto" bugs in their titles.
>
> Does Gentoo support the "-flto" flag and are "-flto" related bugreports
> valid?
>

See this Gentoo forum thread on the subject that I've read/followed with
interest ... https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1052716.html
I haven't tried any LTO building since gcc 4.9.x - it was a bit of pain in
the bum as I recall :-)

Bob


Re: [gentoo-user] Diagnosing file corruption

2015-08-06 Thread Bob Wya
On 6 August 2015 at 01:34, Bryan Gardiner  wrote:

> Hello list,
>
> 
>
> This is the disk:
>
>   *-disk
> description: ATA Disk
> product: ST1000LM024 HN-M
> vendor: Seagate
> physical id: 0.0.0
> bus info: scsi@4:0.0.0
> logical name: /dev/sda
> version: 0001
> size: 931GiB (1TB)
> capabilities: gpt-1.00 partitioned partitioned:gpt
> configuration: ansiversion=5
> guid=---- sectorsize=4096
>
> Thanks for any help you can provide,
> Bryan
>

Complex question. Simple answer... Spinrite :-)

-- 

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] Searching for Overlays

2015-08-06 Thread Bob Wya
On 6 August 2015 at 09:50, Alan McKinnon  wrote:

> On 06/08/2015 03:27, James wrote:
> > OK so yes I know overlays in the wild can be disastrous.
> > Reading the devmanual while parsing through various ebuilds
> > both portage and in the wild, does make for some interesting
> > reading:: ymmv.
> >
> > I'm not sure my overlay (kung_fu) is complete.
> >
> >
> > 'layman -L'  lists reasonably qualified overlay sites; but you
> > have to add them to search out their content directly.
> >
> > 'eix -R  ' will search far and wide for a given
> > overlay; like the distributed database 'cassandra.
> >
> > Some googling suggest that zugaina contains a master list of overlays?
> > (not sure how true this is).
> >
> > I'm not sure if 'eix -R' or 'browsing zugaina' provides the widest
> possible
> >  list of (mostly safe) overlay sites.
> >
> > Last, googling for the name + ebuild  or overlay can find packages,
> > but if the archive (git etc) is not listed with a layman -L:: be
> > very cautious audit the details of the overlay.
> >
> > Specifically, on dev-db/cassandara I find 2.1.3 and 2.12
> > ([5] "spike-community-overlay" layman/spike-community-overlay)
> >
> > but the cassandra.apache.org site shows 2.1.8 and 2.20 as the
> > stable and testing downloads currently available. So is it safe
> > to use the "spike-community" overlay as a basis to update the cassandra
> > ebuild I have available?
> >
> > In general, is there a list (even a private list) of know good/bad
> > actors on these overlay sites?
> >
> >
> > Any further tidbits on searching out and qualifying overlays (yes
> > I know only a full code audit is actually safe) that folks use
> > or would suggest would be keen. I did see some gentoo wiki pages on the
> > subject but they seem terse or dated.
>
>
> To find Joe Random Hacker's overlay and see what's in it, I tend to
> browse zugaina. Coverage is decent and most stuff from most folks active
> in the Gentoo ecosystem is there.
>
> If an overlay is not listed on zugaina, these days it tends to be on
> github or similar. I usually just do a git checkout and cast my own
> eyeballs over the ebuilds. If I'm happy, import into layman (I think
> it's -o) with the xml file that should be provided
>
> Thus far I've had good success. As with everything else in Gentoo it's
> buyer beware, and train your eyeballs and brain beforehand. There does
> not seem to be an easy shortcuts.
>
>
> --
> Alan McKinnon
> alan.mckin...@gmail.com
>
>
>
I would concur with Alan. The zugaina site is a very valuable resource.

I happen to have an overlay in Layman and I have contacted Ycarus (who runs
the zugaina site) when
one of my packages wasn't sync'd with Layman. Apparently his site pulls in
the overlays on an automated basis
(cron job style). It is pretty quick to update/stay in sync though.

I tend to look out for "quality" (or lack of) 3rd-party ebuilds by running
repoman over them. "Stale Overlays" are pretty
easy to spot as well... :-)

--

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] some keyboard lag

2015-06-13 Thread Bob Wya
On Mon, 8 Jun 2015 19:57 Stefan G. Weichinger  wrote:

Am 2015-06-08 um 20:25 schrieb J. Roeleveld:

> There was a similar thread here before about USB and suspend. Check
> that for specifics if in a hurry. Not at computer now to find the
> earlier email.

didn't find it yet .. but no hurry at all.

> Apart from kernel level USB suspend. There are settings in /sys/
> where you can disable USB suspend on a per-device level.

.. as mentioned in:

https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/USB_Power_Saving

?

> I would assume Fedora disables that for keyboards and mice (think
> previous thread was about mice getting forgotten) when detected as
> such.

I browsed their udev rules and found some rules pointing in that
direction but none specifically matching the PCI ID of my keyboard and
the wildcards ... I am not sure.

But they seem to do it specifically, yes ->

# cat /sys/module/usbcore/parameters/autosuspend
2

# my keyboard
# cat /sys/bus/usb/devices/3-1.6/power/control
on

I assume it won't hurt much if I disable USB autosuspend in general for
now? Power savings should be minimal, right? (desktop here, AC etc)


Doesn't the powertop utility have a facility to do this per-device and to
see what the current power-save settings are per-device? Surely a bit
easier to use than directly messing about with udev rules?


Re: [gentoo-user] Tips for fresh install with GRUB2+RAID1+LVM2

2015-05-20 Thread Bob Wya
On Wed, 20 May 2015 16:09 Peter Humphrey  wrote:


 I followed the instructions in https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GRUB2_Migration
,
after copying my grub.conf as you suggested, but when I rebooted, the GRUB2
menu text was minuscule, it only included one of the five kernel lines it
should have, and when it ran it didn't start my RAID devices.

As I said before, maybe later. I need to find out far more about GRUB2
before i
dive in, and that's not for today.

--
Rgds
Peter


 Personally I feel the Grub 2 OS detection script sucks really badly. So
much so that I completely re-wrote it so I got proper entries for my
various Windows installs (version accurately detected using chntpw) and
multiple Linux distros (sorted/detailed listings for all available kernel
versions). OCD probably - but much easier to navigate! One day I might try
and open a dialogue with Upstream... ;-)

Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] Easy (cough) way to build earlier gentoo-sources 3.18.x kernel?

2015-04-01 Thread Bob Wya
Sorry folks - I guess I've made a right "dogs dinner" of this whole thread...
I'll make more efforts not to be "that noob" next time :-)

But I've got the information I needed about how to build old
gentoo-sources kernels. So thanks!

I've done my tests and the outcome is:

3.8.8 (gentoo-sources - manually built)
= NO nfs suspend issue

3.8.9 (gentoo-sources - manually built - nfs specific patches, removed
from 1008_linux-3.18.9.patch)
= NO nfs suspend issue

3.8.9 (gentoo-sources, stock)
= boot hangs with pNFS block error

3.8.10 (gentoo-sources, stock)
= nfs suspend issue

Anyway that's pretty much what the ML thread was kicked off to achieve
- so thanks all! Plus I've written a
little script for ordered patch application - so that might come in
useful at some point :-)

Just wondering in passing what the motivation is for kernel eclass
dropping support for automated
building of, what many would consider, very recent kernel revisions?

Could support not be retained (for renaming kernel versions to build
older revisions)
- but say masking off these versions as not security patched / maintained?

Personally I was quite surprised I couldn't just rename the stock
gentoo-sources ebuild to say
gentoo-sources-3.18.8.ebuild to pull that kernel revision with
automated patching...
But perhaps I'm just showing my inexperience / naivety in this matter?

-- 

All the best & thanks,
Robert



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Easy (cough) way to build earlier gentoo-sources 3.18.x kernel?

2015-04-01 Thread Bob Wya
On 31 March 2015 at 23:10, Nicolas Sebrecht 
wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:17:27AM +0100, Bob Wya wrote:
> >@Nicolas,
> >I think I'm getting it now. The patchsets are cumulative and I just
> >need the base patchset - right?
>
> base, extras and experimental are all applied.
>
>
>
> --
> Nicolas Sebrecht
>
>

@Nicolas,

The experimental patchset is only applied if the experimental USE flag is
enabled surely??
See I'm learning stuff now! :-)

-- 

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: online browsable ebuilds by arch?

2015-03-31 Thread Bob Wya
On 31 March 2015 at 08:31, Neil Bothwick  wrote:

> On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 05:21:13 + (UTC), James wrote:
>
> > > It's not quite what you are asking for, but packages.g.o lets you
> > > filter by arch, and view the contents of ebuilds.
> >
> > Yea, I have seen that often when I google. Correct but is not
> > comprehensive but chronologically organized. I'm looking for something
> > organized by what your see, when you 'cd' into the /usr/portage dir
> > comprehensive by category but filters so only those packages available
> > for that specified arch are visible.
>
> Yes, the old p.g.o let you browse categories, but the current incarnation
> does not appear to.
>
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick
>
> And if you say "No", I shall be forced to shoot you.
>

Ycarus responds really to quickly to issues with the gpo site...
Perhaps a feature request could be put in for a new "arch" tab - to be
added a future date?

-- 

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] Easy (cough) way to build earlier gentoo-sources 3.18.x kernel?

2015-03-31 Thread Bob Wya
Neil,

(a) Should I download the vanilla 3.18.1 kernel sources and apply all the
gentoo-sources tar-ball patches in numerical order??

(b) I tried downloading the vanilla 3.18.8 kernel. But of course the
earlier gentoo-sources 3.18.1 - 3.18.6 patches don't apply cleanly... Will
I get to the same place if I ignore these?? Or should I go with option (a)
:-)

Thanks

On 31 March 2015 at 12:00, Neil Bothwick  wrote:

> On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:51:11 +0100, Bob Wya wrote:
>
> lease don't top-post, it is frowned upon on this list, and for good
> reason.
>
> > Simply changing the ebuild version to 3.18.1 doesn't work. The kernel-2
> > eclass simply won't allow one to build a gentoo-sources 3.18.x kernel
> > lower than / before 3.18.9 now. (Try it if you don't believe me...)
> > That was the first thing I tried. :-)
>
> I wasn't suggesting renaming the ebuild but downloading the older
> version. However, on checking the content I see it still uses the
> kernel-2 eclass. You can deal with this by downloading the older version
> of the eclass from CVS and putting it in an overlay, but it's probably
> easier to just apply the patches manually in this case.
>
> gentoo-sources uses both the base and extra patchsets from genpatches.
>
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick
>
> Fragile. Do not turn umop ap1sdn!
>



-- 

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Easy (cough) way to build earlier gentoo-sources 3.18.x kernel?

2015-03-31 Thread Bob Wya
@Nicolas,

I think I'm getting it now. The patchsets are cumulative and I just need
the base patchset - right? I'm still a little unclear as to what kernel
source I should apply the base patchset to. I want to rebuild the 3.18.8
kernel to double check it's free of the bug...

I can see some nfs suspend patches here... So that could be culprit!
http://dev.gentoo.org/~mpagano/genpatches/trunk/3.18/1008_linux-3.18.9.patch




On 31 March 2015 at 10:00, Bob Wya  wrote:

> @Nicolas
> This is the first place I went to. But I don't understand what all the
> different tar balls of gentoo kernel patch-sets actually mean. It would
> nice if the site had a little a bit of Wiki love to make it clearer. For
> example I can't figure out what steps are needed to apply the patchsets, to
> a vanilla kernel, to get a gentoo-sources kernel.
>
> On 31 March 2015 at 00:16, Nicolas Sebrecht 
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 06:45:40PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>> > You can use git. I believe gentoo patches are only for config options
>> so if you
>> > configure it with make oldconfig it *should* be the same as using
>> gentoo-
>> > sources.
>>
>> Actually no, gentoo-sources aren't vanilla kernel while efforts are made
>> to avoid including intrusive patches.
>>
>>   http://dev.gentoo.org/~mpagano/genpatches/about.htm
>>   http://dev.gentoo.org/~mpagano/genpatches
>>
>> ,-)
>>
>> --
>> Nicolas Sebrecht
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> All the best,
> Robert
>
>


-- 

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Easy (cough) way to build earlier gentoo-sources 3.18.x kernel?

2015-03-31 Thread Bob Wya
@Nicolas
This is the first place I went to. But I don't understand what all the
different tar balls of gentoo kernel patch-sets actually mean. It would
nice if the site had a little a bit of Wiki love to make it clearer. For
example I can't figure out what steps are needed to apply the patchsets, to
a vanilla kernel, to get a gentoo-sources kernel.

On 31 March 2015 at 00:16, Nicolas Sebrecht 
wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 06:45:40PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > You can use git. I believe gentoo patches are only for config options so
> if you
> > configure it with make oldconfig it *should* be the same as using gentoo-
> > sources.
>
> Actually no, gentoo-sources aren't vanilla kernel while efforts are made
> to avoid including intrusive patches.
>
>   http://dev.gentoo.org/~mpagano/genpatches/about.htm
>   http://dev.gentoo.org/~mpagano/genpatches
>
> ,-)
>
> --
> Nicolas Sebrecht
>
>


-- 

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] Easy (cough) way to build earlier gentoo-sources 3.18.x kernel?

2015-03-31 Thread Bob Wya
Neil,

Simply changing the ebuild version to 3.18.1 doesn't work. The kernel-2
eclass simply won't allow one to build a gentoo-sources 3.18.x kernel lower
than / before 3.18.9 now. (Try it if you don't believe me...) That was the
first thing I tried. :-)

On 31 March 2015 at 00:05, Neil Bothwick  wrote:

> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:22:58 +0100, Bob Wya wrote:
>
> > I'm getting a bit bogged down trying to build an early release of the
> > 3.18 kernel. Since I can't automatically go back before 3.18.9 now
> > (using portage anyway)...
>
>
> https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources/?hideattic=0
>
> Pick the versions you want and copy the ebuilds to a local overlay.
>
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick
>
> In a classified ad: "Tired of cleaning yourself? Let me do it."
>



-- 

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Easy (cough) way to build earlier gentoo-sources 3.18.x kernel?

2015-03-31 Thread Bob Wya
@Holger, that's my symptoms to tee... :-)

Strangely it doesn't effect Arch Linux - running on the same box - with a
newer 3.19.2 kernel. So they must have a patch for the issue (but I can't
figure out what). Perhaps I'll check through the (stock) kernel
configuration as well - to check it matches mine.

Thanks

On 31 March 2015 at 01:29, Holger Hoffstätte <
holger.hoffstae...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:22:58 +0100, Bob Wya wrote:
>
> > I'm getting a bit bogged down trying to build an early release of the
> 3.18
> > kernel. Since I can't automatically go back before 3.18.9 now (using
> > portage anyway)...
> >
> > Basically I trying to check if a suspend/resume issue I've got was
> > introduced after the 3.18 kernel was released (or was in the base
> release).
> > I've got a reproduce-able failure to suspend-to-ram with >=3.18.x gentoo
> > kernel sources. However this issue is not present with the gentoo kernel
> > sources <=3.17.x. (A systemd nfs client mount problem - which blocks the
> > suspend-to-ram process.)
>
> You are probably looking at this bug:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/69717
>
> This was introduced in 3.18.9 (as you found out), so simply using vanilla
> 3.18.8 should fix it; I don't remember seeing it before.
> I never bothered to try and now just stop NFS before suspend. 3.19.x gained
> the same problem.
>
> -h
>
>
>


[gentoo-user] Easy (cough) way to build earlier gentoo-sources 3.18.x kernel?

2015-03-30 Thread Bob Wya
I'm getting a bit bogged down trying to build an early release of the 3.18
kernel. Since I can't automatically go back before 3.18.9 now (using
portage anyway)...

Basically I trying to check if a suspend/resume issue I've got was
introduced after the 3.18 kernel was released (or was in the base release).
I've got a reproduce-able failure to suspend-to-ram with >=3.18.x gentoo
kernel sources. However this issue is not present with the gentoo kernel
sources <=3.17.x. (A systemd nfs client mount problem - which blocks the
suspend-to-ram process.)

I had a look at the kernel-2 eclass and my head started to hurt... Do I
need to wade into the weeds or is there a "short-cut" I can take to go back
to the earliest gentoo-sources 3.18 kernel build :-)

-- 

Thanks,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: http://gitweb.gentoo.org/user/

2015-03-25 Thread Bob Wya
It's a neat idea - but the process could be a little speedier... Took me
about 3 months to get my Overlay registered with Layman...


On 26 March 2015 at 01:53, James  wrote:

> Mike Gilbert  gentoo.org> writes:
>
>
> > > It says /user/ so are these just ordinary users?
> > As far as I know, any gentoo user can create a repository there, so
> > long as they are going to use it for something Gentoo-related.
>
> Ah. excellent.
>
>
> > Just file a bug under the Gentoo Overlays component.
> >
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Gentoo%20
> Infrastructure&component=Gentoo%20Overlays
>
> > See also this blog entry:
>
> > https://blog.hartwork.org/?p=843
>
> I guess this compliments project sunrise.
> Pretty cool...
>
> thx,
> James
>
>
>
>


-- 

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] openrc->systemd command comparison

2015-03-17 Thread Bob Wya
I've not seen any that are OpenRC specific... But this one is pretty decent
for SysVInit vs. systemd...
http://linoxide.com/linux-command/systemd-vs-sysvinit-cheatsheet/




On 17 March 2015 at 01:58, Canek Peláez Valdés  wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Daniel Frey  wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I've now converted two systems to systemd and so far haven't had too
> > much issues with systemd itself, other than me constantly forgetting
> > commands.
> >
> > Is there a nice table or chart somewhere that lists openrc commands with
> > equivalent systemd commands? That would really help me from bashing my
> > head and then wandering through man pages for a while trying to figure
> > out what I want to do. I'll eventually remember but it would be nice to
> > have something to help me along. My memory sure isn't what it used to be.
>
> I remember seeing a table like that in the wiki a long time ago, but I
> can't find it now. Anyway, the translatable commands are obvious:
>
> /etc/init.d/service start → systemctl start service
> /etc/init.d/service stop → systemctl stop service
>
> and the rest are usually are not translatable. There is nothing like
> "systemctl mask service" in OpenRC, AFAIK, and there is no equivalent for
> "/etc/init.d/service zap" in systemd (the whole idea of systemd is that an
> ugly hack like zap will never be necessary).
>
> Not sure if this will help you.
>
> Regards.
> --
> Canek Peláez Valdés
> Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias
> Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
>



-- 

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} offline backups

2015-03-03 Thread Bob Wya
I own a BluRay writer. A few years ago I had a serious attempt at BluRay
archival storage. It works - but it's slow (very slow) and expensive. Then
there is the cost / GB - that remains high due to the low volume of BD-RE
media sales...

Now factor in the super high volume of MLC NAND flash SSDs prevalent on
today's mass market. A good SSD will last far longer than the slowly
degrading dye on a BD-RE disc. Just dust off an Intel SSD every 5 years and
to run a level 2 Spinrite scan on it and it could potentially hold data for
decades... No optical media could match that...

All the best,
Robert
On 3 Mar 2015 18:00,  wrote:

> Am Dienstag, 03.03.2015 um 07:51
> schrieb Grant :
>
> > I have several encrypted backup repositories online and I'd like to
> > somehow mirror that offline.  I currently have about 20G of data to
> > back up.  Any ideas?  Rewritable Blu-Ray?
>
> I never had a Blu-Ray writer, so I don't know how reliable these medias
> are. But I avoid CDs and DVDs since many years because I made the
> experience that optical medias are faulty when you really need them.
>
> I use harddisks for my backups and I always use RAID. Harddisks are
> much more reliable (as long as you avoid concussions etc.) and also
> much faster.
>
> Greetings
> wabe
>
>


Re: [gentoo-user] the new ssd, is it happy?

2015-02-26 Thread Bob Wya
So it probably is Samsung's dodgy firmware not working with the SATA-3.0
extensions (aka SATA 3.1).

Like I mentioned I can't even run my Samsung SSD's @6Gbit because none of
the models I own support deterministic trim - which is a much bigger
problem than yours! I assumed the 850 Pro would support deterministic trim
- as the 840 Pro models supported it - but hell no!

I wouldn't rely on any firmware updates from Samsung to fix any of this
stuff... It has to be really, really bad - like the 840 issues - before
they'll pull their finger out.

I'll certainly be raising a support issue, over the lack of
non-deterministic trim support in the 850 Pro firmware, but I expect that
will get as far as my LSI Support issue did... :-(


On 26 February 2015 at 10:16, Stefan G. Weichinger  wrote:

> On 25.02.2015 17:16, Bob Wya wrote:
>
> > For my Samsung 830 / 850 Pro SSDs I don't see any similar NCQ queuing
> > error(s) in my boot logs (they are hooked up to the Intel Controller just
> > now - since I can't connect them to my 6Gbit LSI Controller - arrrggg!!)
> >
> > Perhaps this issue is confined to the Samsung EVO lines?
>
> It seems like.
>
> Maybe I had that with the 840 EVO already, I never looked so close ...
> but now as I put the 840 into the thinkpad I see that behavior there as
> well!
>
> And the 840 had some firmware updates already while there are no updates
> yet for the 850.
>
>


-- 

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] the new ssd, is it happy?

2015-02-25 Thread Bob Wya
Ahhh,

Quoting from the Intel 6 Series Chipset pdf...

>> The PCH supports the Serial ATA Specification, Revision 3.0. The PCH
also supports
>> several optional sections of the Serial ATA II: Extensions to Serial ATA
1.0 Specification,
>> Revision 1.0 (AHCI support is required for some elements). Please see
Section 1.3 for
>> details on SKU feature availability.

So your (newer) Intel Chipset supports the SATA-3 specification. That's
probably why you are seeing the issue and I'm not...


On 25 February 2015 at 16:16, Bob Wya  wrote:

> So this is for my motherboard's (Nehalem - so only one generation before
> yours) onboard Intel Host Controller... Only a SATA-2 3Gbit capable device.
>
> 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) SATA
> AHCI Controller (prog-if 01 [AHCI 1.0])
> Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P5Q Deluxe Motherboard
> Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
> ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
> Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
> SERR-  Latency: 0
> Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 27
> Region 0: I/O ports at 8c00 [size=8]
> Region 1: I/O ports at 8880 [size=4]
> Region 2: I/O ports at 8800 [size=8]
> Region 3: I/O ports at 8480 [size=4]
> Region 4: I/O ports at 8400 [size=32]
> Region 5: Memory at f7efc000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=2K]
> Capabilities: [80] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/16 Maskable- 64bit-
> Address: fee0  Data: 4082
> Capabilities: [70] Power Management version 3
> Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA
> PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold-)
> Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
> Capabilities: [a8] SATA HBA v1.0 BAR4 Offset=0004
> Capabilities: [b0] PCI Advanced Features
> AFCap: TP+ FLR+
> AFCtrl: FLR-
> AFStatus: TP-
> Kernel driver in use: ahci
>
> uname -r
> 3.19.0-gentoo
>
> For my Samsung 830 / 850 Pro SSDs I don't see any similar NCQ queuing
> error(s) in my boot logs (they are hooked up to the Intel Controller just
> now - since I can't connect them to my 6Gbit LSI Controller - arrrggg!!)
>
> Perhaps this issue is confined to the Samsung EVO lines?
>
>
> On 25 February 2015 at 15:02, Stefan G. Weichinger  wrote:
>
>> On 25.02.2015 14:18, Bob Wya wrote:
>>
>> > Just out of interest what make is the Host Controller on your
>> > motherboard... Is it a Intel one? Or some crappy addon chipset? Perhaps
>> you
>> > could post the output of lscpi (with lots of - flags - just the Host
>> > Controller bit)?
>>
>>
>> 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset
>> Family SATA AHCI Controller (rev 05) (prog-if 01 [AHCI 1.0])
>> Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset
>> Family
>> SATA AHCI Controller
>> Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
>> ParErr-
>> Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
>> Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
>> SERR- > Latency: 0
>> Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 26
>> Region 0: I/O ports at f070 [size=8]
>> Region 1: I/O ports at f060 [size=4]
>> Region 2: I/O ports at f050 [size=8]
>> Region 3: I/O ports at f040 [size=4]
>> Region 4: I/O ports at f020 [size=32]
>> Region 5: Memory at fb205000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=2K]
>> Capabilities: [80] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-
>> Address: feeff00c  Data: 41d1
>> Capabilities: [70] Power Management version 3
>> Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA
>> PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold-)
>> Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
>> Capabilities: [a8] SATA HBA v1.0 BAR4 Offset=0004
>> Capabilities: [b0] PCI Advanced Features
>> AFCap: TP+ FLR+
>> AFCtrl: FLR-
>> AFStatus: TP-
>> Kernel driver in use: ahci
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> All the best,
> Robert
>
>


-- 

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] the new ssd, is it happy?

2015-02-25 Thread Bob Wya
So this is for my motherboard's (Nehalem - so only one generation before
yours) onboard Intel Host Controller... Only a SATA-2 3Gbit capable device.

00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) SATA AHCI
Controller (prog-if 01 [AHCI 1.0])
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P5Q Deluxe Motherboard
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
SERR-  wrote:

> On 25.02.2015 14:18, Bob Wya wrote:
>
> > Just out of interest what make is the Host Controller on your
> > motherboard... Is it a Intel one? Or some crappy addon chipset? Perhaps
> you
> > could post the output of lscpi (with lots of - flags - just the Host
> > Controller bit)?
>
>
> 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset
> Family SATA AHCI Controller (rev 05) (prog-if 01 [AHCI 1.0])
> Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset
> Family
> SATA AHCI Controller
> Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
> Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
> Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
> SERR-  Latency: 0
> Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 26
> Region 0: I/O ports at f070 [size=8]
> Region 1: I/O ports at f060 [size=4]
> Region 2: I/O ports at f050 [size=8]
> Region 3: I/O ports at f040 [size=4]
> Region 4: I/O ports at f020 [size=32]
> Region 5: Memory at fb205000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=2K]
> Capabilities: [80] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-
> Address: feeff00c  Data: 41d1
> Capabilities: [70] Power Management version 3
> Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA
> PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold-)
> Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
> Capabilities: [a8] SATA HBA v1.0 BAR4 Offset=0004
> Capabilities: [b0] PCI Advanced Features
> AFCap: TP+ FLR+
> AFCtrl: FLR-
> AFStatus: TP-
> Kernel driver in use: ahci
>
>
>
>
>


-- 

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] the new ssd, is it happy?

2015-02-25 Thread Bob Wya
This made me recall having to download and alter a Windows SATA Host
Controller driver. For some reason I had to get hold of an 6Gbyte
development .iso to do this (that's Microsoft for you)... Now that was fun
and games!! Basically because the SATA controller driver tried to enable
NCQ (I can't remember which now!!) for some old Hitachi IDE drives - I had
hooked these up via a SATA-PATA bridge - "the bridge said NCQ - YES!! - the
drive said NCQ - NO!!". The drives would lock up Windows when I hooked them
up to the controller and start "twanging" constantly as they were reset,
over and over again...

I read through that bug report - interesting. It shouldn't be too hard for
you add a User patch for your Gentoo kernel - to force-ably disable the
attempt to negotiate SATA 3.1 and T13 ATA ACS-3 support - for the SATA
connection. Since (I guess) you are building the kernel from source anyway!

Basically your 850 EVO returns "RECEIVE/SEND FPDMA QUEUED supported" when
initially queried
Then when the (Linux) kernel tries to actually queue these commands - the
850 EVO firmware says "Uhhhmm, duh - no I don't know how to do that one"!!

Just out of interest what make is the Host Controller on your
motherboard... Is it a Intel one? Or some crappy addon chipset? Perhaps you
could post the output of lscpi (with lots of - flags - just the Host
Controller bit)?

I'm starting get the feeling that Samsung take some very caliver shortcuts
with the QC on their SSDs. I've recently bought a Samsung 850 Pro - sucker
- as I have already experienced poor after-sales support with some Samsung
830 SSD "issues". Now I've found out that the 850 Pro also doesn't support
non-deterministic trim - so I can't use it with *any* Host Controllers with
LSI-based firmware (or whatever they are called now) - because trim support
will be completely disabled!!

Sure we all want V-NAND - but perhaps I should have waited a year or two
for Intel to catch up...

To quote from the bug report (referring to the crappy Samsung 840 EVO
firmware):
>> I tried to contact Samsung support, but they answered that "for the
support of this product, you should contact the reseller".
>> In other words, they don't want to answer.

>>We are dealing with a drive that claims (during identification) to have a
capability that it doesn't actually have.
:-(



On 25 February 2015 at 12:45, Stefan G. Weichinger  wrote:

> On 25.02.2015 10:23, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> > good hint, thanks! I will report back if I find something.
>
> Swapped the cable and also the SATA-socket on the board.
>
> It always gives the same result ...
>
> What is interesting: the HDDs negotiate their NCQ fine:
>
>
> [2.254804] ata2.00: ATA-8: Hitachi HDS721010CLA632, JP4OA41A, max
> UDMA/133
> [2.254809] ata2.00: 1953525168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth
> 31/32), AA
>
> [2.254842] ata5.00: ATA-8: ST31000524AS, JC4B, max UDMA/133
> [2.254846] ata5.00: 1953525168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth
> 31/32)
>
> and that with those cheap cables ...
>
> I googled that and found
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72341
>
> digging through that now :-)
>
>
>


-- 

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] the new ssd, is it happy?

2015-02-24 Thread Bob Wya
Super obvious question... but can you enable AHCI mode for your SATA
Controller - in the BIOS.

Are you using HP supplied SATA cables - because these may be sucky crap. If
so I would try replacing them - especially if they don't have latches on
the plugs.

I think this is the specification for your motherboard chipset:
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/chipsets/mainstream-chipsets/h67-express-chipset.html
So you probably need the decent SATA 3G (6Gbit) cables to get the best
support for your SSD.

I've had some issues with 6Gbit SATA... Basically you are looking at really
high switching speeds - where connector quality makes a huge difference. It
might even be worth cleaning out your SATA connectors with isopropyl
alcohol (99%).




On 24 February 2015 at 20:49, Stefan G. Weichinger  wrote:

>
> ordered myself a new and shiny ssd last week.
>
> one thinkpad still had that 60GB OCZ Vertex3 and that was a bit tight
> now and then.
>
> So I ordered a Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB for my desktop and planned to
> move the former 840 EVO 250GB to the thinkpad.
>
> Done today.
>
> Moving was rather *boring* ->
>
> partition ssd, add new partition to btrfs filesystem, remove old
> partition from btrfs filesystem, wait ~15 minutes, in the meantime copy
> over the UEFI ESP to the new disk, install gummiboot there ...
>
> it booted up at first time ... oh my, what has happened to good old gentoo?
>
> :-P
>
> (resized stuff, yes ... but no big blockers anywhere)
>
> What I would like to discuss now:
>
> # dmesg  | grep ata1
> [1.930869] ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xfb205000 port
> 0xfb205100 irq 26
> [2.235852] ata1: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
> [2.237378] ata1.00: supports DRM functions and may not be fully
> accessible
> [2.237506] ata1.00: failed to get NCQ Send/Recv Log Emask 0x1
> [2.237509] ata1.00: ATA-9: Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, EMT01B6Q, max
> UDMA/133
> [2.237521] ata1.00: 976773168 sectors, multi 1: LBA48 NCQ (depth
> 31/32), AA
> [2.237979] ata1.00: supports DRM functions and may not be fully
> accessible
> [2.238071] ata1.00: failed to get NCQ Send/Recv Log Emask 0x1
> [2.238166] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
> [20207.916327] ata1: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
> [20207.916528] ata1.00: supports DRM functions and may not be fully
> accessible
> [20207.916598] ata1.00: failed to get NCQ Send/Recv Log Emask 0x1
> [20207.918249] ata1.00: supports DRM functions and may not be fully
> accessible
> [20207.918325] ata1.00: failed to get NCQ Send/Recv Log Emask 0x1
> [20207.918419] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
>
>
> Are these "failed" lines ok?
>
> The box itself is a bit older, a
>
> Hewlett-Packard HP Elite 7300 Series MT/2AB5, BIOS 7.12
>
> (I never found a BIOS update! btw ...)
>
> so maybe the chipset lacks features the SSD might be able to use.
>
> Everything works fine so far, I would just like to understand if things
> are OK with this new piece of hardware.
>
> additional:
>
> Device Model: Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB
> Firmware Version: EMT01B6Q
>
> I did not find any firmware update online, do you agree?
>
> Thanks, regards, Stefan
>
>


-- 

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] Report: Experience with f2fs

2015-02-24 Thread Bob Wya
I would always recommend a secure erase of an SSD - if you want a "fresh
start". That will mark all the NAND cells as clear of data. That will
benefit the longevity of your device / wear levelling.

I've been messing about with native exfat over the past few months. I found
this to be a pretty decent shared partition file system - for use with MS
Windows. The read performance will saturate a 3Gbit SATA link - but write
performance is only in the order of 100Mbytes/second.

Personally having been burned by btrfs I would not try one of these
"experimental" file systems again... That was the same sort of pattern as
your experience. I carefully followed the Arch Wiki (large partition size -
due to COW issues, etc.) - was using it on my home brew NAS running
OpenSUSE as root /. One day it just "blew up" and was really screwed for
recovery (I did manage to get the few small bits of data I needed with some
Googling) - as none of the btrfs tools for this actually work! Back to ext4
for root / - now running Arch on that box... Ironically the native ZFS port
has always been stable on that box (with a very large storage array)!

Just my $0.02!!

On 24 February 2015 at 00:46, Peter Humphrey  wrote:

> Some list members might be interested in how I've got on with f2fs
> (flash-friendly file system).
>
> According to genlop I first installed f2fs on my Atom mini-server box on
> 1/11/14 (that's November, for the benefit of transpondians), but I'm
> pretty sure it must have been several months before that. I installed a
> SanDisk SDSSDP-064G-G25 in late February last year and my admittedly
> fallible memory says I changed to f2fs not many months after that, as
> soon as I discovered it.
>
> Until two or three weeks ago I had no problems at all. Then while doing
> a routine backup tar started complaining about files having been moved
> before it could copy them. It seems I had a copy of an /etc directory
> from somewhere (perhaps a previous installation) under /root and some
> files when listed showed question marks in all fields except their
> names. I couldn't delete them, so I re-created the root partition and
> restored from a backup.
>
> So far so good, but then I started getting strange errors last week. For
> instance, dovecot started throwing symbol-not-found errors. Finally,
> after remerging whatever packages failed for a few days,
> /var/log/messages suddenly appeared as a binary file again, and I'm
> pretty sure that bug's been fixed.
>
> Time to ditch f2fs, I thought, so I created all partitions as ext4 and
> restored the oldest backup I still had, then ran emerge -e world and
> resumed normal operations. I didn't zero out the partitions with dd;
> perhaps I should have.
>
> I'll watch what happens, but unless the SSD has failed after only a year
> I shouldn't have any problems.
>
> An interesting experience. Why should f2fs work faultlessly for several
> months, then suffer repeated failures with no clear pattern?
>
> --
> Rgds
> Peter.
>
>


-- 

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] portage alternatives

2015-02-02 Thread Bob Wya
Michael,

I tried out paludis a few months ago. I do find Portage can be a bit slow.
So I thought great - a "C++ version of Portage"!

However cave does do much stricter checking and has much more verbose
output than emerge (way too much - like eix I guess). I really gave it my
best shot to migrate over fully - but had to bale after a couple of weeks
of trying to get one clean upgrade cycle. Speed wise - cave was slower than
emerge (with no backtracking). So regular day-to-day installs would be
quite slow (with the package tree being churned over multiple times).

I'm sure I'll give it another go at some point... Maybe I was simply using
it wrong... But boy it felt like it was for geeks who think "Portage is way
too easy - give me something much harder"!!

Robert



On 2 February 2015 at 10:26, Michael Vetter 
wrote:

> Hello list,
>
> just for fun I am reading about alternatives to portage. So far the most
> interesting I found are: paludis and pkgsrc.
>
> paludis mostly because it seems to come from some gentoo-like enviroment
> and pkgsrc because of the nice thought to have the same pkg files for
> multiple OSes.
>
> Is anybody of you using one of them and can tell me about pros and cons?
>
> regards
>
> --
> Michael
>
>


-- 

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] REQUIRED_USE on dev-db/mariadb-10.0 confuses me

2015-01-25 Thread Bob Wya
Mick,

In these instances I find it easier to look directly at the ebuild file for
the package I'm installing... Sadly this highlights the fact that the
output from Portage is remarkably obtuse...


On 25 January 2015 at 20:56, Mick  wrote:

> On Sunday 25 Jan 2015 19:41:58 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 19:17:00 +, Mick wrote:
> > > Calculating dependencies... done!
> > >
> > >   The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied:
> > > xml? ( extraengine )
> > >
> > > Can you please remind me what the above message means?  What is the
> > > meaning of the question mark after xml?  I remember this has been
> > > answered before (at least by Alan) but I can't seem to find the thread
> > > just now.
> >
> > The question mark is a test, what this means is
> >
> > if USE contains "xml":
> >   USE most also contain extraengone
> >
> > Add extraengine to package.use and all should be well. At least until the
> > next time emerge decides to puke all over your terminal in an attempt to
> > hide the cause of the error :(
>
> Thanks Neil, I clearly failed the test.  :p
>
> I had added extraengine to package.use and the message went away, but
> couldn't
> understand why xml *needs* extraengine.  So, I stopped and asked here, in
> case
> I emerge things I don't really need.
> --
> Regards,
> Mick
>



-- 

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] SMART drive test results, 2.0 for same drive as before.

2015-01-25 Thread Bob Wya
It would be far better to use Spinrite (like I mentioned before) - to allow
a really low level access to the drive. While Spinrite is running the HDD
will not be able to automatically relocate sectors. I've been blown away
how effective this piece of software is - even when run with (apparently)
very knackered Maxtor drives!! It was like they were brought back from the
dead...




On 25 January 2015 at 13:41, Mick  wrote:

> On Saturday 24 Jan 2015 18:18:36 Dale wrote:
>
> > Since I already replaced this drive, nothing lost.  We did learn
> > something tho.  Just because it claims to have fixed itself doesn't mean
> > it will be a long term solution.  ;-)
> >
> > Dale
> >
> > :-)  :-)
>
> Your repeated dd action probably relocated some bad blocks.
>
> I would also run a long test overnight to see where and how it fails.  I
> recently had a drive which went sideways on me.  Running dd was successful
> in
> relocating some problematic sectors.  However, repeating the smart tests
> revealed that more and more sectors were going bad.  I recall a warning
> that a
> catastrophic drive failure was imminent, when reading the output of
> 'smartctl
> -a'.
>
> Instead of dd'ing the whole drive, just dd the suspect sector and repeat
> the
> smart tests to see how things move around.  I concur with other posters
> that
> this drive should only be used for experimentation, rather than production
> or
> back ups.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Mick
>



-- 

All the best,
Robert


Re: [gentoo-user] SMART drive test results, 2.0 for same drive as before.

2015-01-21 Thread Bob Wya
Dale,

As a double check I always like to test "failing" drives with Spinrite:
https://www.grc.com/sr/spinrite.htm

If that software can't recover/access any bits of the drive - it's pretty
much a toaster in my book!

Robert

On 20 January 2015 at 17:58, Dale  wrote:

> Howdy,
>
> This is concerning a hard drive I had issues with a while back.  I been
> using it to do backups with as a test if nothing else.  Anyway, it seems
> to have issues once again.
>
> root@fireball / # smartctl -l selftest /dev/sdd
> smartctl 6.3 2014-07-26 r3976 [x86_64-linux-3.16.3-gentoo] (local build)
> Copyright (C) 2002-14, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke,
> www.smartmontools.org
>
> === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
> SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
> Num  Test_DescriptionStatus  Remaining
> LifeTime(hours)  LBA_of_first_error
> # 1  Extended offlineCompleted: read failure   40%
> 21406 4032272464
> # 2  Short offline   Completed without error   00%
> 21387 -
> # 3  Short offline   Completed without error   00%
> 21363 -
> # 4  Extended offlineCompleted: read failure   40%
> 21343 4032272464
> # 5  Short offline   Completed without error   00%
> 21315 -
> # 6  Short offline   Completed without error   00%
> 21291 -
> # 7  Short offline   Completed without error   00%
> 21267 -
> # 8  Short offline   Completed without error   00%
> 21243 -
> # 9  Short offline   Completed without error   00%
> 21219 -
> #10  Short offline   Completed without error   00%
> 21195 -
> #11  Extended offlineCompleted: read failure   40%
> 21174 4032272464
> #12  Short offline   Completed without error   00%
> 21147 -
> #13  Short offline   Completed without error   00%
> 21123 -
> #14  Short offline   Completed without error   00%
> 21099 -
> #15  Short offline   Completed without error   00%
> 21075 -
> #16  Short offline   Completed without error   00%
> 21051 -
> #17  Short offline   Completed without error   00%
> 21026 -
> #18  Extended offlineCompleted: read failure   40%
> 21005 4032267424
> #19  Short offline   Completed without error   00%
> 20978 -
> #20  Short offline   Completed without error   00%
> 20954 -
> #21  Short offline   Completed without error   00%
> 20930 -
>
> root@fireball / #
>
> More info:
>
> ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME  FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE
> UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
>   1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f   116   099   006Pre-fail
> Always   -   114620384
>   3 Spin_Up_Time0x0003   092   092   000Pre-fail
> Always   -   0
>   4 Start_Stop_Count0x0032   100   100   020Old_age
> Always   -   39
>   5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   053   051   036Pre-fail
> Always   -   62752
>   7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f   080   060   030Pre-fail
> Always   -   102219639
>   9 Power_On_Hours  0x0032   076   076   000Old_age
> Always   -   21403
>  10 Spin_Retry_Count0x0013   100   100   097Pre-fail
> Always   -   0
>  12 Power_Cycle_Count   0x0032   100   100   020Old_age
> Always   -   40
> 183 Runtime_Bad_Block   0x0032   100   100   000Old_age
> Always   -   0
> 184 End-to-End_Error0x0032   100   100   099Old_age
> Always   -   0
> 187 Reported_Uncorrect  0x0032   100   100   000Old_age
> Always   -   0
> 188 Command_Timeout 0x0032   100   100   000Old_age
> Always   -   0 0 0
> 189 High_Fly_Writes 0x003a   100   100   000Old_age
> Always   -   0
> 190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel 0x0022   068   063   045Old_age
> Always   -   32 (Min/Max 23/36)
> 191 G-Sense_Error_Rate  0x0032   100   100   000Old_age
> Always   -   0
> 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032   100   100   000Old_age
> Always   -   11
> 193 Load_Cycle_Count0x0032   001   001   000Old_age
> Always   -   276725
> 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022   032   040   000Old_age
> Always   -   32 (0 17 0 0 0)
> 197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0012   088   088   000Old_age
> Always   -   1984
> 198 Offline_Uncorrectable   0x0010   088   088   000Old_age
> Offline  -   1984
> 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count0x003e   200   200   000Old_age
> Always   -   0
> 240 Head_Flying_Hours   0x   100   253   000Old_age
> Offline  -   18810h+14m+31.520s
> 241 Total_LBAs_Written  0x   100   253   000Old_age
> Offline  -   110684232213092
> 242 Total_LBAs_Read 0x   100   253   000Old_age
> Offline  -   92603114597547
>
>

[gentoo-user] totem-gstreamer: poor performance with all video

2008-09-13 Thread Bob

Hi,

All sorts of videos work fine with mplayer, xine and vlc, but gnome seems hell 
bent on using totem for everything with only the gstreamer backend.

As is, I get unwatchable performance using the totem-gstreamer combo, video is 
choppy and even short videos take a good number of seconds to load.

In the past I have used totem-xine and it was perfect, all I needed really, but 
there is not the option to use the xine backend anymore :(

- I have tried setting the video out options in gstreamer-properties to all 
sorts with no change in results.
- I have tried both the open source ati driver and the proprietary fglrx one.
- I even tried installing Ubuntu but get exactly the same results there.

Nothing seems to change the situation, and am not sure where to go from here.

Does anyone else have similar problems? I can't help but think gstreamer has it 
in for me...

Any advice or sympathy would be appreciated.

Cheers

p.s. sorry for the dupe post if you got both, first time I've posted here.



[gentoo-user] totem-gstreamer: poor performance with all video

2008-09-13 Thread Bob

Hi,

All sorts of videos work fine with mplayer, xine and vlc, but gnome seems hell 
bent on using totem for everything with only the gstreamer backend.

As is, I get unwatchable performance using the totem-gstreamer combo, video is 
choppy and even short videos take a good number of seconds to load.

In the past I have used totem-xine and it was perfect, all I needed really, but 
there is not the option to use the xine backend anymore :(

- I have tried setting the video out options in gstreamer-properties to all 
sorts with no change in results.
- I have tried both the open source ati driver and the proprietary fglrx one.
- I even tried installing Ubuntu but get exactly the same results there.

Nothing seems to change the situation, and am not sure where to go from here.

Does anyone else have similar problems? I can't help but think gstreamer has it 
in for me...

Any advice or sympathy would be appreciated.

Cheers



[gentoo-user] xrandr: Intel G965 and HDTV woes

2008-06-25 Thread Bob

I've bought a shiny new htpc that I was hoping would just work with
Linux.

Sadly it doesn't.

Before I post a long and rambling diatribe, does anyone know how to
run xrandr remotely (since I just get a blank screen on the hdtv)?

I tried over tunnelled ssh and just got the local (my laptop's) X server's 
settings,
and then tried using the -display flag like so:


# /etc/init.d/xdm start
* Setting up gdm ...
* Detaching to start `/usr/bin/gdm' ...  
# xrandr -display :0

Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server
Xlib: No protocol specified

Can't open display :0


I'm guessing this requires me to somehow open access to the X server.

I set 'DisallowTCP=false' in /etc/X11/gdm/custom.conf in the [security] section 
and restarted gdm but that didn't seem to do anything.

What else can I try to get xrandr to let me change the resolution for a xserver 
that can't be seen?

Thanks.

--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Ati or Nvida

2008-06-18 Thread Bob Young


-Original Message-
From: Enrico Weigelt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:05 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Ati or Nvida


>Hi,
>
>
>I've made the big mistake of bying an notebook w/ geforce go 6100.
>
>The proprietary drivers *never* worked for me - the binary kernel
>modules crashed the whole kernel (complete lockup) after a several
>seconds (doesnt even need X to come up for that).
>

Somehow you later statements make me distrust your opening one...

> I've analyzed their module a bit and seen really bad things. 

Really...You've "analyzed" a closed source module. Care to share 
the details of how you performed this "analysis" ?

>Looks it's a hand-written bunch of assembler code with massive 
>code obfuscation, 
>

U...perfectly good C/C++ code that's been even moderately 
Optimized by any reasonably sane compiler will look like that
when it's disassembled...now how was it you did this "analysis"
on a *closed source* module again...? 

>IMHO, if someone spends so much work into machine code obfuscation,
>he *really* has something to hide. 
>

It's closed source driver, neither you nor anybody else who hasn't 
seen the source code has any basis whatsoever to justify such an 
"opinion" without making themselves look like a total dimwit. 

> Not just some "intellectual
> property" (which is outdated alfter a few months).

Uhhh...if the intellectual property is so "outdated", why is it so 
difficult to duplicate? So far no one advocating open source, can 
manage to duplicate even the functionality of the 3D driver, much 
less the performance?


> Of course, opensource 3D support is (almost) not existing, 
> (2D works very fine), and NVidia repeatedly states that they
> will NOT do the slightest attempt to improve the situation. 
>

Why should they, their providing for Linux, the same thing they 
provide for Windows, i.e. a binary driver that drives their GPU
and performs quite well in the experience of a lot of users. From 
their point of view the situation doesn't need improving

>So I strongly suggest, NOT to buy NV cards.
>

You've never written graphics drivers have you?

>(BTW: a few month ago, I managed to stop a customer from buying
>several hundreds of NV cards - yes, consulting jobs sometimes
>make really fun this way ;-P)

Maybe that was the correct decision, maybe not, depends on the
circumstances. Regardless, your clients are not well served by your
uninformed bias.

-- 
Regards,
Bob Young



-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Multiple error messages for each keystroke in nano

2008-05-17 Thread Bob Young


>-Original Message-
>From: Alex Schuster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 2:20 AM
>To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
>Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Multiple error messages for each keystroke in
>nano
>
>Bob Young writes:
>
>> Currently I'm emerging xorg, but after that finishes, I'll first try
>> flipping the debug and spell use flags back and see what that does.
>>
>
>It will work. I just emerged nano with debug use flag, and get the same 
>errors as you.
>
>Should someone file a bug about this? Or is this expected behaviour for the

>debug use flag?
>
>   Wonko

Yes it did, I re-emerged nano with "-debug" and the problem went away. Now I
have the same question, is this a bug or not? 

Regards,
Bob Young



--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Multiple error messages for each keystroke in nano

2008-05-17 Thread Bob Young


-Original Message-
From: Ian Hilt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:03 PM
To: Gentoo-user List
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Multiple error messages for each keystroke in
nano

>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 at 7:07pm -0700, Bob Young wrote:

>> I'm installing a new Gentoo box, and have the basic system installed (
>> without X ). The problem began after I completed a successful "emerge 
>> -DuN world" The symptom is: when I start nano, (just nano by itself, 
>> not editing a file), several hundred lines similar to the following 
>> are spewed to the console:

> [...]

>> BTW, if I edit with vi.everything works fine, and of course typing at the
>> console works okay as well.

> What's the output of "emerge -vp nano"?


[ebuild R ] app-editors/nano-2.1.1 USE="debug ncurses nls spell 
 unicode -justify -minimal -slang" 0kb

But your question made me wonder about the -DuN world, and in looking at the
build log, it appears during the update world, nano was in deed updated from
nano-2.0.2 to nano-2.1.1, and, the debug and spell USE flags were flipped.

Currently I'm emerging xorg, but after that finishes, I'll first try
flipping the debug and spell use flags back and see what that does.

Regards,
Bob Young

--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Multiple error messages for each keystroke in nano

2008-05-17 Thread Bob Young


-Original Message-
From: Francesco Talamona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 10:46 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Multiple error messages for each keystroke in
nano

On Saturday 17 May 2008, Bob Young wrote:
> Can anybody explain what's going on here, and tell me how I can fix
> it?
>
>  
>
> BTW, if I edit with vi.everything works fine, and of course typing at
> the console works okay as well.

Just a guess... Did you run etc-update?

Ciao
Francesco

Yes I have run etc-update, there were 32 config files to be processed, and
afterward, the problem remains the same

Regards,
Bob Young

--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Multiple error messages for each keystroke in nano

2008-05-16 Thread Bob Young
on: Delete, menus 1

Shortcut "kdel", function: Delete, menus 1

Shortcut "^H", function: Backspace, menus 1

 





And then once I'm in nano and ready to edit, typing "test" results in the
following:

 

 

 

tget_key_buffer(): key_buffer_len = 1

pparse_kbinput(): 

kbinput = 101, 

meta_key = FALSE, 

func_key = FALSE, 

escapes = 0, 

byte_digits = 0, 

retval = 101

gget_shortcut(): 

kbinput = 101, 

meta_key = FALSE, 

func_key = FALSE

mmatched nothing btw meta was 0

   

 

eget_key_buffer(): 

key_buffer_len = 1

parse_kbinput(): 

kbinput = 115, 

meta_key = FALSE, 

func_key = FALSE, 

escapes = 0, 

byte_digits = 0, 

retval = 115

get_shortcut(): 

kbinput = 115, 

meta_key = FALSE, 

func_key = FALSE 

matched nothing btw meta was 0

  

 

sget_key_buffer(): 

key_buffer_len = 1

parse_kbinput(): 

kbinput = 116, 

meta_key = FALSE, 

func_key = FALSE, 

escapes = 0, 

byte_digits = 0, 

retval = 116

get_shortcut(): 

kbinput = 116, 

meta_key = FALSE, 

func_key = FALSE

matched nothing btw meta was 0

 

t

 





 

Can anybody explain what's going on here, and tell me how I can fix it?

 

BTW, if I edit with vi.everything works fine, and of course typing at the
console works okay as well.

 

Thanks for listening,

Bob Young



RE: [gentoo-user] Wireshark won't run except as root (Solved but Why is this)

2008-05-01 Thread Bob Young


-Original Message-
>From: Bob Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 10:03 AM
>To: Gentoo-user List
>Subject: [gentoo-user] Wireshark won't run except as root


> I've emerged wireshark, and made myself a member of both the wireshark
> group, and the tcpdump group, but still wireshark refuses to capture 
> packets if executed as a non root user. The error message is: "Couldn't
> run dumpcap as a child process: Permission denied." 
>
> A little research indicated that dumpcap should be installed suid root and
> It appears that it is, but I still can't execute it as a non-root user:
>
> I'm sure it's probably something simple that I'm unaware of or not seeing
> for some reason. Can anybody point out what I'm doing wrong.
>
> Thanks,
> Bob Young
> San Jose, CA.

Well a little more experimentation proved that world has to have execute
permission:

[ 18:16:56 ]  Thu May 01  /home/Cyor $ : su
Password:
[ 18:25:38 ]  Thu May 01  /home/Cyor $ : cd /usr/bin/
[ 18:28:52 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : ls /usr/bin/dumpcap
52 -rwxr-x--- 1 root wireshark 50876 Apr 27 15:49 /usr/bin/dumpcap
[ 18:28:58 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : chmod u+s  ./dumpcap
[ 18:29:26 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : ls /usr/bin/dumpcap
52 -rwsr-x--- 1 root wireshark 50876 Apr 27 15:49 /usr/bin/dumpcap
[ 18:29:30 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : exit
exit
[ 18:29:44 ]  Thu May 01  /home/Cyor $ : whoami
Cyor
[ 18:30:11 ]  Thu May 01  /home/Cyor $ : cd /usr/bin/
[ 18:30:21 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : ./dumpcap
bash: ./dumpcap: Permission denied
[ 18:30:24 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : su
Password:
[ 18:31:18 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : whoami
root
[ 18:32:03 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : ls /usr/bin/dumpcap
52 -rwsr-x--- 1 root wireshark 50876 Apr 27 15:49 /usr/bin/dumpcap
[ 18:32:14 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : chmod o+x  ./dumpcap
[ 18:32:29 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : ls /usr/bin/dumpcap
52 -rwsr-x--x 1 root wireshark 50876 Apr 27 15:49 /usr/bin/dumpcap
[ 18:32:34 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : exit
exit
[ 18:32:41 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : whoami
Cyor
[ 18:32:49 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : ./dumpcap
File: /tmp/ether1wMVki
^CPackets dropped: 0

My question is: If the wireshark GROUP has execute permission to dumpcap,
and user Cyor is a member of the wireshark group, why can't Cyor execute
dumpcap without the execute bit for everyone being set? 

Doesn't this mean that the entire world world (member of wireshark group or
not) can execute an an SUID root program?

If that's the case what's the purpose of having the wireshark group?

Note: Cyor is a member of wireshark group:

[ 18:32:55 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : cat /etc/group

root::0:root
.
.
.[snip]

wheel::10:root,BYoung,Cyor
wireshark:x:446:BYoung,Cyor
ntp:x:123:
tcpdump:x:447:Byoung,Cyor
+::


Thanks,
Bob Young
San Jose, CA


--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Wireshark won't run except as root

2008-05-01 Thread Bob Young

I've emerged wireshark, and made myself a member of both the wireshark
group, and the tcpdump group, but still wireshark refuses to capture packets
if executed as a non root user. The error message is: "Couldn't run dumpcap
as a child process: Permission denied." 

A little research indicated that dumpcap should be installed suid root and
It appears that it is, but I still can't execute it as a non-root user:


[ 23:16:38 ]  Wed Apr 30  /usr/bin $ : ./dumpcap
bash: ./dumpcap: Permission denied
[ 09:29:50 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : ls /usr/bin/dump*
52 -r-sr-s--- 1 root wireshark 50876 Apr 27 15:49 /usr/bin/dumpcap
[ 09:29:52 ]  Wed Apr 30  /usr/bin $ : su
Password:
[ 09:29:55 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : ./dumpcap
File: /tmp/etherJ8STmt
Packets: 7 Packets dropped: 0
[ 09:32:15 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : chown root:root ./dumpcap
[ 09:32:19 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : chmod g+s ./dumpcap
[ 09:32:29 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : chmod u+s ./dumpcap
[ 09:32:38 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : ls /usr/bin/dump*
52 -r-sr-s--- 1 root root 50876 Apr 27 15:49 /usr/bin/dumpcap
[ 09:32:47 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : exit
exit
[ 09:33:01 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : whoami
Cyor
[ 09:33:06 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ : ./dumpcap
bash: ./dumpcap: Permission denied
[ 09:33:10 ]  Thu May 01  /usr/bin $ :  

I'm sure it's probably something simple that I'm unaware of or not seeing
for some reason. Can anybody point out what I'm doing wrong.

Thanks,
Bob Young
San Jose, CA.

--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] How Bad Is This...?

2008-04-23 Thread Bob Young


-Original Message-
From: Volker Armin Hemmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 8:22 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Bob Young
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] How Bad Is This...?

>On Mittwoch, 16. April 2008, Bob Young wrote:
>> I'm in the process of installing a new box, last night before going to 
>> bed I started installing xorg server. This morning, I found the 82nd
>> build(out of 162) had failed with the following error:
>>

[snip]

>the best alternative is to check what went wrong, but since Seagates are
>known to die in the first couple of days - or almost never, this gentleman
>here would bet on a defective harddisk.
>
>Btw, you might want to read up on 'bathtub curve'. Stuff breaks early, or 
>late.

Just wanted to let you know, it appears you were right, it was the HD itself
that was bad. I substituted in the other brand new Seagate, and reinstalled.

Luckily I was able to read all config files from the semi-bad drive. At this
point I'm finished installing xorg-server, and have begun installing KDE.

P.S. Next time I'll post the output of dmesg...

Thanks for responding
Bob Young
San Jose, CA.


--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] How Bad Is This...?

2008-04-16 Thread Bob Young
 NormalUser Domain Admins   144 Apr 12 11:21 home
 4 drwxr-xr-x  8 NormalUser Domain Admins  4048 Apr 12 14:31 lib
 0 drwxr-xr-x  4 NormalUser Domain Admins80 Apr 12 05:19 log
 0 drwxr-xr-x  6 NormalUser Domain Admins   168 Apr 11 21:44 mnt
 0 drwxr-xr-x  2 NormalUser Domain Admins72 Apr 19  2007 opt
 ? ??  ? ?  ? ??
portage-20080407.tar.bz2
 4 -rw-r--r--  1 NormalUser Domain Admins59 Apr  9 07:42
portage-20080407.tar.bz2.md5sum
 0 dr-xr-xr-x 67 NormalUser Domain Admins 0 Apr 15 14:21 proc
 0 drwx--  3 NormalUser Domain Admins   216 Apr 12 14:12 root
 4 drwxr-xr-x  2 NormalUser Domain Admins  3856 Apr 12 15:18 sbin
105491 -rw-r--r--  1 NormalUser Domain Admins 107915722 Apr  8 22:35
stage3-i686-2007.0.tar.bz2
 ? ??  ? ?  ? ??
stage3-i686-2007.0.tar.bz2.DIGESTS
 0 drwxr-xr-x 12 NormalUser Domain Admins 0 Apr 15 14:21 sys
 0 drwxrwxrwt  4 NormalUser Domain Admins   112 Apr 16 00:32 tmp
 0 drwxr-xr-x 13 NormalUser Domain Admins   368 Apr 10 09:52 usr
 0 drwxr-xr-x 15 NormalUser Domain Admins   408 Apr 16 00:14 var
[ 06:45:14 ]  Wed Apr 16  / $ reboot
bash: /sbin/reboot: Input/output error
[ 06:45:32 ]  Wed Apr 16  / $ cd sbin/
[ 06:46:04 ]  Wed Apr 16  /sbin $ ls
ls: cannot access grub: Permission denied
ls: cannot access grub-md5-crypt: Permission denied
ls: cannot access grub-terminfo: Permission denied
ls: cannot access reiserfstune: Permission denied
ls: cannot access grub-install: Permission denied
ls: cannot access debugreiserfs: Permission denied
ls: cannot access grub-set-default: Permission denied
ls: cannot access resize_reiserfs: Permission denied
total 5314
  4 drwxr-xr-x  2 NormalUser Domain Admins   3856 Apr 12 15:18 .
  1 drwxr-xr-x 21 NormalUser Domain Admins736 Apr 12 12:02 ..
 52 -rwxr-xr-x  1 NormalUser Domain Admins  51168 Apr 19  2007 MAKEDEV
 16 -rwxr-xr-x  1 NormalUser Domain Admins  14748 Apr 19  2007 agetty
  4 -rwxr-xr-x  1 NormalUser Domain Admins   3928 Apr 19  2007 ctrlaltdel
.
.
.
 68 -rwxr-xr-x  1 NormalUser Domain Admins  66096 Apr 19  2007 debugfs
  ? ??  ? ?  ?  ?? debugreiserfs
 36 -rwxr-xr-x  1 NormalUser Domain Admins  35232 Apr 19  2007 depmod
.
.
.
 12 -rwxr-xr-x  1 NormalUser Domain Admins   9493 Apr 19  2007
generate-modprobe.conf
 36 -rwxr-xr-x  1 NormalUser Domain Admins  36364 Apr 19  2007 genksyms
  ? ??  ? ?  ?  ?? grub
  ? ??  ? ?  ?  ?? grub-install
  ? ??  ? ?  ?  ??
grub-md5-crypt
  ? ??  ? ?  ?  ??
grub-set-default
  ? ??  ? ?  ?  ?? grub-terminfo
 12 -rwxr-xr-x  1 NormalUser Domain Admins  10376 Apr 19  2007 halt
 56 -rwxr-xr-x  1 NormalUser Domain Admins  56212 Apr 19  2007 hdparm
  8 -rwxr-xr-x  1 NormalUser Domain Admins   5546 Apr 19  2007 rc-update
  0 lrwxrwxrwx  1 NormalUser Domain Admins  4 Apr  9 07:45 reboot ->
halt
288 -rwxr-xr-x  1 NormalUser Domain Admins 293800 Apr 11 22:25 reiserfsck
  ? ??  ? ?  ?  ?? reiserfstune
 28 -rwxr-xr-x  1 NormalUser Domain Admins  28484 Apr 19  2007 resize2fs
  ? ??  ? ?  ?  ??
resize_reiserfs
 12 -rwxr-xr-x  1 NormalUser Domain Admins   9556 Apr 19  2007 rmmod
  0 lrwxrwxrwx  1 NormalUser Domain Admins 10 Apr  9 07:45 rmmod.old ->
insmod.old
20 -rwxr-xr-x  1 NormalUser Domain Admins  18580 Apr 19  2007 udevtrigger
  0 lrwxrwxrwx  1 NormalUser Domain Admins 14 Apr  9 07:45
update-modules -> modules-update
[ 06:46:07 ]  Wed Apr 16  /sbin $ ./halt -r now
bash: ./halt: Input/output error
[ 06:48:33 ]  Wed Apr 16  /sbin $ ./reboot 
bash: ./reboot: Input/output error


BTW, the user:group  "NormalUser : Domain Admins" in normal and correct that
is 0:0, it comes from the W2K3 domain controller that is the NIS server, and
NIS is listed first in nsswitch.conf.

Also worthy of note is the reason for installing this new box, the previous
install developed severe hard disk corruption. Because of that, this install
is located on a brand new 250G Seagate with a five year warranty, so while
not impossible, I tend to doubt that the hard disk it self is the true root
cause.

Okay, so my question is how bad is it? 

Is there anyway to shutdown cleanly? 

I do have a second brand new 250G Seagate, is another clean install, with a
*second* brand new drive the best alternative, or is some even lower level
hardware (i.e. disk controller) the more likely culprit at this point? 

Thanks for listening
Bob Young
San Jose, CA.

--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild command doesn't fix broken libs it finds

2008-03-02 Thread Bob Young


> -Original Message-
> From: Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 12:18 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild command doesn't fix broken libs 
> it finds

> Bob Young wrote:


>> How do I determine if this is a case of "orphaned file, deep dependency,
>> binary package or specially evaluated library" and, if it is one of
>those,
>> how do I determine which one, and then how do I fix this...?
>>
>> Thanks for listening,
>> Bob Young
>> San Jose, CA
>>
   

This may help:  http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125728  I'm not 
sure what changed but mine does not do this any more.  I'm using 
app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.3-r1 at the moment.

Dale

:-)  :-) 


Thanks Dale,

After a little thought and some investigation I'd already come up with the
symlink solution on my own. However I do find it a little disturbing that
this is exactly the same, as a bug that has a creation date of: 2006-03-10,
nearly two years ago. I also know that I didn't have this problem until a
recent new "stable" version of gcc was merged. That means somebody is
re-introducing bugs that have already been fixed. Making such easily
avoidable mistakes does not bode well...

Thanks Again,
Bob Young
San Jose, CA.



--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild command doesn't fix broken libs it finds

2008-03-02 Thread Bob Young

After a recent emerge -DuN world, messages for one of the packages stated
that it was necessary to run revdep-rebuild after emerging the package, so I
did. The revdep-rebuild ended up merging six packages, with one of them
being gcc. Emerging all six packages took several hours, and I noticed that
gcc by itself took a significant amount of time.

The final message stated that I could re-run revdep-rebuild to verify that
all inconsistencies had been resolved, unfortunately, I did not add a -p to
the command and to my surprise it spent the next couple of hours or so
emerging gcc again.

After that finished, I again ran revdep-rebuild although this time with a -p
and below is the output: 
__

Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild

Checking reverse dependencies...

Packages containing binaries and libraries broken by a package update
will be emerged.

Collecting system binaries and libraries... done.
  (/root/.revdep-rebuild.1_files)

Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH... done.
  (/root/.revdep-rebuild.2_ldpath)

Checking dynamic linking consistency...
  broken /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/libgcjawt.la (requires
/usr/lib/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.la)
  broken /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/libgij.la (requires
/usr/lib/libgcj.la)
 done.
  (/root/.revdep-rebuild.3_rebuild)

Assigning files to ebuilds... done.
  (/root/.revdep-rebuild.4_ebuilds)

Evaluating package order... done.
  (/root/.revdep-rebuild.5_order)

All prepared. Starting rebuild...
emerge --oneshot -p =sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild   R   ] sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2
Now you can remove -p (or --pretend) from arguments and re-run
revdep-rebuild.
__

It wants to build gcc again. I don't want to have to build gcc every time I
need to use revdep-rebuild. The final message from revdep-rebuild is: 


Build finished correctly. Removing temporary files...
You can re-run revdep-rebuild to verify that all libraries and binaries
are fixed. If some inconsistency remains, it can be orphaned file, deep
dependency, binary package or specially evaluated library.  


How do I determine if this is a case of "orphaned file, deep dependency,
binary package or specially evaluated library" and, if it is one of those,
how do I determine which one, and then how do I fix this...?

Thanks for listening,
Bob Young
San Jose, CA

--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] mDNSResponder fails to compile

2008-01-15 Thread Bob Young
I'm back to building a Gentoo box after my previous Gentoo box died a
hardware death about six months ago. It's mostly installed and functioning
but I wanted to bring up KDE, I was surprised to find that the kde-meta
emerge, failed 43 packages into the 300 or so that is kde-meta. 

 

It dies on building mDNSResponder, below is the error, if anybody is
interested. It seems to be the same bug reported in Nov 2007:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196349 I don't see any resolution
posted for this bug, so it appears that mDNSResponder is currently broken,
and it doesen't appear that anybody IS terribly interested. 

 

I'm not sure what USE flag I have included that brings in mDNSResponder,
after reading the package summary, I thought it might be "zeroconf," but
after adding "-zeroconf" to /etc/make.conf, "emerge -pn kde-meta" or "emerge
-pn kde" still shows that mDNSResponder is going to be merged. I've tried
adding "net-misc/mDNSResponder ~x86" to package keywords in hopes of getting
a later version, but it appears there isn't a later version.

 

So here I am, asking for any kind of solution anybody can provide, since it
doesn't look like mDNSResponder is going to be fixed anytime soon I guess
the preferred method is to remove whatever USE flag(s) are bringing it in if
that's possible, but I don't know how to determine that information and
would be grateful for some assistance.

 

Thanks,

Bob Young

San Jose CA.

 

 

 

 

Responder daemon done

i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -I. -I../mDNSCore -I../mDNSShared -W -Wall
-DPID_FILE=\"/var/run/mdnsd.pid\" -DMDNS_UDS_SERVERPATH=\"/var/run/mdnsd\"
-DNOT_HAVE_SA_LEN -DUSES_NETLINK -DHAVE_LINUX -g -DMDNS_DEBUGMSGS=2  -O2
-march=i6$

i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -I. -I../mDNSCore -I../mDNSShared -W -Wall
-DPID_FILE=\"/var/run/mdnsd.pid\" -DMDNS_UDS_SERVERPATH=\"/var/run/mdnsd\"
-DNOT_HAVE_SA_LEN -DUSES_NETLINK -DHAVE_LINUX -g -DMDNS_DEBUGMSGS=2  -O2
-march=i6$

i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -I. -I../mDNSCore -I../mDNSShared -W -Wall
-DPID_FILE=\"/var/run/mdnsd.pid\" -DMDNS_UDS_SERVERPATH=\"/var/run/mdnsd\"
-DNOT_HAVE_SA_LEN -DUSES_NETLINK -DHAVE_LINUX -g -DMDNS_DEBUGMSGS=2  -O2
-march=i6$

build/debug/libdns_sd.so

Client library done

make[1]: Entering directory
`/var/tmp/portage/net-misc/mDNSResponder-107.6-r5/work/mDNSResponder-107.6/C
lients'

mkdir build

cc dns-sd.c -L../mDNSPosix/build/prod/ -ldns_sd -I../mDNSShared -o
build/dns-sd 

/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
cannot find -ldns_sd

collect2: ld returned 1 exit status  

make[1]: *** [build/dns-sd] Error 1

make[1]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/net-misc/mDNSResponder-107.6-r5/work/mDNSResponder-107.6/C
lients'

make: *** [../Clients/build/dns-sd] Error 2  

* 

* ERROR: net-misc/mDNSResponder-107.6-r5 failed.

* Call stack: 

* ebuild.sh, line 1701:  Called dyn_compile

* ebuild.sh, line 1039:  Called qa_call 'src_compile'

* ebuild.sh, line   44:  Called src_compile

* mDNSResponder-107.6-r5.ebuild, line   51:  Called die

* The specific snippet of code:

* mdnsmake || die "make failed"

* The die message:

* make failed

* 

* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if
relevant.

* A complete build log is located at
'/var/tmp/portage/net-misc/mDNSResponder-107.6-r5/temp/build.log'.

* 

!!! When you file a bug report, please include the following information:

GENTOO_VM=sun-jdk-1.6  CLASSPATH="" JAVA_HOME="/opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0.03"

JAVACFLAGS="-source 1.4 -target 1.4" COMPILER=""

and of course, the output of emerge --info

 



RE: [gentoo-user] dhcpcd is too noisy in syslog

2007-04-22 Thread Bob Young


-Original Message-
From: William Kenworthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 5:42 AM
To: gentoo-user List
Subject: [gentoo-user] dhcpcd is too noisy in syslog

Since a recent update to dhpcd, my logs are filling up with these
messages (every 30 seconds).  The previous version wasnt so verbose, but
I cant see where to modify the behaviour of the newer version - there
seems like there is no quiet flag.  Any suggestions?

Apr 22 20:34:22 moriah dhcpcd[19738]: eth0: renewing lease of
203.59.216.218 
Apr 22 20:34:22 moriah dhcpcd[19738]: eth0: leased xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx for
60 seconds 
Apr 22 20:34:22 moriah dhcpcd[19738]: eth0: adding IP address
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/24 
Apr 22 20:34:22 moriah dhcpcd[19738]: eth0: adding default route via
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx metric 0



Maybe there is something I'm missing but the first line says that dhcpcd is
*renewing* the lease on eth0. If that's in fact what is happening every
30-60 seconds, then there is something wrong with what dhcpcd
received/interpreted the lease duration to be. The second line seems to
confirm this in that dhcpcd believes it leased the received address for 60
seconds. It looks like either the dhcp server's lease duration is badly
misconfigured, or dhcpcd is not interpreting the data it receives from the
dhcp server correctly wrt lease duration.

Regards,
Bob Young

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] .bashrc/.bash_profile not "sourced" upon login fo NIS authenticated users

2007-03-27 Thread Bob Young
Probably a PEBSAC

If so, that's ok I'm willing to learn. Like the title says, if I log in as
root /root/.bashrc and /root/.bash_profile are sourced. However if I login
as BYoung and am authenticated by the NIS server (SFU on aWindows Domain
Controller), then /home/BYoung/.bash_profile and /home/BYoung/.bashrc are
not sourced. As workaround, I've added: "source ~/.bash_profile"  as the
last line of /etc/profile, and that works, but of course .bash_profile and
.bashrc get executed twice when I log in as root. 

I'd like to fix this the right way, pointers and/or advice greatly
appreciated, and if I'm just doing something stupid, let me know.

TIA
Bob Young
San Jose, CA

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] A DNS question.

2007-03-03 Thread Bob Young
I appreciate all the replies, and yes Michael you're correct the original
question was in regards to a system having different "base" (host) names for
different NICs. IOW the Windows Domain Controller that eth0 is connected to
records eth0 in it's DNS table as gentoo.windowsdoman.local. In addition in
/etc/make.conf the the following is declared:
eth0_dns_domainname="windowsdomain.local" and
eth0_nis_domainname="windowsdomain" no nis or dns domainname is declared for
eth1 or eth2 as that causes problems. I'll probably also configure BIND to
act as a secondary DNS for the domain controller listing on eth0 and eth1.

Now with regards to eth1, it is my intent to configure eth1 as with the
machines only public IP address (69.12.134.79), and configure BIND to listen
on eth1 as a secondary domain name server, the primary domain name server
would have an "A Record" for 69.12.134.79 and it would be named
ns.somedomainname.com. IOW it would have a different "base" name (ns) than
eth0 (gentoo). My question is whether or not this is valid/"legal"/okay,
i.e. is it likely to cause any problems?

I did see Ruben's comment about named "views" and it looks like that may be
something to investigate.

Any further comments/suggestions welcome.

Thanks,
Bob Young
San Jose, CA



-Original Message-
From: Michal 'vorner' Vaner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 2:17 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A DNS question.

On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 03:21:52PM -0600, Dan Farrell wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 22:04:59 +0100
> "Michal 'vorner' Vaner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:17:52AM -0800, Bob Young wrote:
> > > Obviously on a given system each NIC is usually connected to a
> > > different domain, my question is, whether or not it
> > > is /legal/possible/okay to use different *hostnames* on different
> > > NICs? 
> > 
> > AFAIK, you can have multiple names for one IP and multiple IPs for one
> > name (there are more ways to do that). So, I see no reason why anyone
> > would ever forgive you to have different name for each of IP addresses
> > your computer has. The other question is if you really want to do
> > that, because there might be applications not expecting your computer
> > is "schizophrenic" in such way and go nutty.
> > 
> > With regards
> > 
> on the contrary, there are good reasons to have more than one name for
> a single computer.  For example, say I have a server 'zeus.mydomain'
> that also does mail.  If I name the mailserver 'mail.mydomain' then I
> can CNAME that to zeus.mydomain via DNS, or I can just set
> mail.mydomain to the ip address of the second interface.  Result - I
> can redirect my mail to mail.mydomain and it can go to whatever
> computer I desire, whether or not it has different names.  'zeus' is
> still listening under that name for other requests.  If i use 'zeus'
> for heavy filesharing, I can still get good access over a non-saturated
> ethernet device on 'mail'.  

Well, this is something else - the computer knows itself as zeus and has
"nicknames". However, if I got what the question was about - to be name1
for one card and name2 for the second - and do not appear as name2 on
the first at all.

IMO machine should have the same "base" name to any domain it shows in -
the one that it shows in bash command prompt. Then you can have
additional names for the services and they can differ.

But the name showed on the bash should probable be reachable (if
possible) from any network it appears on. The situation shown here is
probably odd (the names here are the only ones there, no additional ones
or base ones).

[ X ] C1  C2 [ X ] C1  C2 [ X ].

The [ X ] is a machine,  is a network and those C? are names of the
machine on the net. Now, ping C1 on the middle machine. Should it ping
itself on the right interface or look for the left computer? You should
at last have something like:

[ Name1 ] C1  C2 [ Name2 ] C1  C2 [ Name3 ]

(even if Name2 could not be resolved by the DNS on the right network for
example).

And you can "nickname" Name2 as mail or ntp if it suits you.

I hope I made myself clear and I apologize for the previous
misunderstanding.

Have a nice day

-- 
Anyone who goes to a psychiatrist ought to have his head examined.
-- Samuel Goldwyn

Michal 'vorner' Vaner

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] A DNS question.

2007-03-03 Thread Bob Young
This isn't strictly a Gentoo question, but I'm setting up Gentoo box to be
used as a secondary DNS server, plus some other duties, and I'm hoping there
is a DNS wizard reading who can authoritatively answer my question.

First off the machine has three network cards, one with a (DHCP) private IP
(10.10.32.1) for talking to the local (Windows Domain) LAN. A second NIC
with a (Manually configured) IP address (69.12.134.79) that is publicly
registered (ns.debug1.com) as a secondary DNS for several domains. And the
third NIC has a (Manually configured) private IP address (192.168.0.1) that
will be used to "sniff" all traffic that crosses the DSL modem. 

Obviously on a given system each NIC is usually connected to a different
domain, my question is, whether or not it is /legal/possible/okay to use
different *hostnames* on different NICs? 

For example, in the scenario described above, assume the windows domain is
named "mydomain.lan," can I have 69.12.134.79 (NIC #2) resolve to
ns.debug1.com as that is it's publicly registered name, while IP address
10.10.32.1 (NIC #1) resolves to gentoo.mydomain.lan?

TIA
Bob Young
San Jose, CA.


--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] doc USE flag causes "circular dependencies" error

2007-02-25 Thread Bob Young

I'm bringing up a new Gentoo box, and last night I successfully merged
xorg-x11, this morning when I tried to merge KDE, I got a circular
dependencies error. As a first troubleshooting step I trimmed my USE flags
down to a minimum and found the error went away. After several rounds of
adding/removing lines/individual USE flags I found that the "doc" flag was
the source of the error:


USE="kde X qt4 doc" emerge -pv kde-meta 

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies  . . .. done!
!!! Error: circular dependencies:

('ebuild', '/', 'kde-base/libkpimexchange-3.5.5', 'merge') depends on
   ('ebuild', '/', 'x11-libs/qt-3.3.6-r4', 'merge') (hard)
   ('ebuild', '/', 'kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.5-r8', 'merge') (hard)
   ('ebuild', '/', 'kde-base/libkcal-3.5.5', 'merge') (hard)
('ebuild', '/', 'kde-base/klettres-3.5.5', 'merge') depends on
   ('ebuild', '/', 'x11-libs/qt-3.3.6-r4', 'merge') (hard)
   ('ebuild', '/', 'kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.5-r8', 'merge') (hard)
('ebuild', '/', 'kde-base/libkonq-3.5.5', 'merge') depends on
   ('ebuild', '/', 'x11-libs/qt-3.3.6-r4', 'merge') (hard)
   ('ebuild', '/', 'kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.5-r8', 'merge') (hard)
.
.
.
('ebuild', '/', 'kde-base/kblackbox-3.5.5', 'merge') depends on
   ('ebuild', '/', 'x11-libs/qt-3.3.6-r4', 'merge') (hard)
   ('ebuild', '/', 'kde-base/libkdegames-3.5.5', 'merge') (hard)
   ('ebuild', '/', 'kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.5-r8', 'merge') (hard)




USE="kde X qt4" emerge -pv kde-meta 

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies  . . . done!
[ebuild  N] virtual/xft-7.0  0 kB 
[ebuild  N] app-text/libpaper-1.1.20  322 kB 
[ebuild  N] app-crypt/opencdk-0.5.5  USE="-doc" 323 kB 
[ebuild  N] dev-lang/nasm-0.98.39-r3  USE="-build -doc" 532 kB 
[ebuild  N] dev-libs/libtasn1-0.3.5  USE="-doc" 1,223 kB 
[ebuild  N] app-text/poppler-0.5.4-r1  USE="zlib -cjk -jpeg" 1,038 kB 
[ebuild  N] x11-apps/xprop-1.0.1  USE="-debug" 91 kB 
[ebuild  N] media-fonts/gnu-gs-fonts-std-8.11  3,665 kB
.
.
.
[ebuild  N] kde-base/karm-3.5.5  USE="-arts -debug -kdeenablefinal
-xinerama" 0 kB 
[ebuild  N] kde-base/kdeaddons-meta-3.5.5  USE="-arts" 0 kB 
[ebuild  N] kde-base/kontact-specialdates-3.5.5  USE="-arts -debug
-kdeenablefinal -xinerama" 0 kB 
[ebuild  N] kde-base/kdepim-meta-3.5.5  USE="-pda" 0 kB 
[ebuild  N] kde-base/kde-meta-3.5.5  USE="nls -accessibility" 0 kB 

Total: 288 packages (288 new), Size of downloads: 473,412 kB

**


Am I doing something wrong? 

Is this a known issue? 

Is there an alternative other than disabling the doc USE flag?

TIA
Bob Young
San Jose, CA




-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Why you use Gentoo

2006-09-08 Thread Bob Young


-Original Message-
From: Colleen Beamer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 4:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why you use Gentoo

Chris White wrote:
> So, wondering why people use Gentoo.  Put [dev] or something if you're
an 
> actual gentoo dev and [user] if you're a user.  Doesn't need to be
fancy, you 
> can put "community" or something if that's all you want.  All
responses off 
> list please.  Thanks.

[user]

I'm not, but I *could* be a grandmother, so I guess I'm not the average
user.  I was first exposed to Gentoo when someone I know was touting the
control that it gave you.  I *hate* Gnome (sorry, don't mean to insult
any Gnome users - it's just a personal opinion).  The bloat of having to
have two desktops on my system drove me nuts when I was using Redhat and
then, Fedora.  So, like others, control is a *big* plus - I can install
only what I want!

Nothing I can really disagree with. I *am* a grandfather, and have been
a hardware/firmware engineer for 15 years.

I've tried RedHat, SuSe, never could get past old Debian annoying text
scripts that just got in the way of what was really important, long live
Linux. Gentoo gets down to the technical details of actually installing
a new OS as anything in the Linux World...period.

Cheers.

-- 

BYoung_AT_Debug1.Com Dual 2.0GHz AMD Opteron...cheers (dual boot 32bit
Windows, 64bit Gentoo)

** Quote:  ***


Portage - in my opinion, it is the best package manager in Linux, bar
none.

Documentation - Bar none, Gentoo has the best and most easily understood
online documentation

This list - I've always been able to turn to the list when I needed
help, (Thanks guys!)

Sorry, I know this is long, but there are just too many reasons why I
use Gentoo and why I will stick with it!  :-)

Take care,

Colleen


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Adaptec 29160 Setup

2006-06-28 Thread Bob Sanders
Hi Sean,


On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:22:51 -0400
sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


>   Thought you might be interested on how things went. Sorry for the
> delay, I am recovering from an injury I suffered a little over a week ago.
> 
> Anyway, due to not being able to troubleshoot the SCSI cd-rom problem
> for a while, and some other things I had half done, I decided to
> reinstall Gentoo from scratch. It was a new build so not like I had
> anything to loose.
> 
> Once the build was completed, and made sure I included your options you
> suggested for troubleshooting with the initial build of the kernel I booted.
> 
> Still could not access the scsi cd-rom. At least it was being assigned
> again, but unable to access. One thing I noticed in dmesg is that my
> sata dvd unit was showing up with the same identification, which they
> both are plextor brands, but that is where it ends, one is a scsi cdrw
> and the other a sata dvd burner.
> 
> sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 40x/40x writer cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray
> sr 0:0:1:0: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0
> sr1: scsi3-mmc drive: 40x/40x writer cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray
> 

Ah, but the problem is that it only thinks there is one type of drive.
One of the above drives should show as a DVD capable drive.  Not just
as a CD-ROM/ writer.  

> Tried mounting the dvd unit, worked fine. Tried the cdrw, no luck,
> stated no medium present.
> 

So what it seems to be doing is the first drive it finds - SATA shows up
first, becomes the only drive it cares about.  But, again, why?

> With the above info, decided to disconnect the sata dvd. After system
> restarted, the scsi cdrw fired up perfectly.
> 

Makes sense.

> Brought system down, reconnected the sata dvd unit and after power up,
> both units are now working. In fact the dmesg statements are from the
> working config, though it was the same when it was not working.
>

I wonder if the SCSI cable was not quite seated or had oxidized pins?
 
> At this time all I have done is tried mounting the units and was able to
>  view the contents, have not tried burning anything at this time. Still
> putting system together.
> 
> Anyway I do not have a cause for the problem. Some how my sata unit and
> scsi unit were conflicting with each other it would appear.
> My scsi kernel settings have the suggestions you made, and all else that
> is there by default.
> I am reluctant to mess with the scsi kernel settings after things are
> finally working.
>

I hope they continue to work.
 
> Previously when I played with the settings one of my to units
> disappeared and I was unable to get it back.
> 
>   Thanks for your help,
>   Sean
>


Take care,

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] ATI XPress 200m - direct rendering don't work

2006-06-25 Thread Bob Sanders
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 11:26:48 +
Rudson Ribeiro Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> The X start with DRI, but gl programs and X halt the system in the exit.
> 
> This is the and of this tunnel?
> 

Not anything I can recommend from here.  If GL is causing a halt and the bad
memory location is present, perhaps a bad memory module.  Or a bad controller
on the cpu.  I did have that happen to me once.  But it only occured when
compiling nvidia drivers.  Replaced the cpu and everything was fine.

As to the ATI drivers, they continue to cause numerous people grief.

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] ATI XPress 200m - direct rendering don't work

2006-06-24 Thread Bob Sanders
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 03:17:36 +
Rudson Ribeiro Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi list,
> 
> I was wanting install ati-drivers with DRI suport on my notebook zv6000
> (AMD 64bit Linux  Gentoo system), but the module fglrx don't load
> 
> ~ # modprobe fglrx
> FATAL: Error inserting fglrx
> (/lib/modules/2.6.16-gentoo-r9-ati-3/video/fglrx.ko): Unknown symbol in
> module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg)
> 
> ~ # dmesg
> ...
> fglrx: Unknown symbol inter_module_unregister
> fglrx: Unknown symbol inter_module_get_request
> fglrx: Unknown symbol pm_register
> fglrx: Unknown symbol inter_module_put
> fglrx: Unknown symbol pm_unregister_all
> fglrx: Unknown symbol inter_module_register
> fglrx: Unknown symbol inter_module_unregister
> fglrx: Unknown symbol inter_module_get_request
> fglrx: Unknown symbol pm_register
> fglrx: Unknown symbol inter_module_put
> fglrx: Unknown symbol pm_unregister_all
> fglrx: Unknown symbol inter_module_register


You need to set the depreciated option in the kernel.

Power Management --> Legacy Power Management

Bob

> The /var/log/Xorg.0.log show:
> ...
> (II) Loading extension ATIFGLRXDRI
> (II) fglrx(0): doing DRIScreenInit
> drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (Unknown error 999)
> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (Unknown error 999)
> drmOpenDevice: Open failed
> drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (Unknown error 999)
> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (Unknown error 999)
> drmOpenDevice: Open failed
> [drm] failed to load kernel module "fglrx"
> (II) fglrx(0): [drm] drmOpen failed
> (EE) fglrx(0): DRIScreenInit failed!
> (WW) fglrx(0): ***
> (WW) fglrx(0): * DRI initialization failed!  *
> (WW) fglrx(0): * (maybe driver kernel module missing or bad) *
> (WW) fglrx(0): * 2D acceleraton available (MMIO) *
> (WW) fglrx(0): * no 3D acceleration available*
> (WW) fglrx(0): * *
> ...
> 
> My kernel is 2.6.16-gentoo-r9 with AGP suport seting:
> ...
> CONFIG_AGP=y
> CONFIG_AGP_AMD64=y
> # CONFIG_AGP_INTEL is not set
> # CONFIG_DRM is not set
> ...
> 
> Ati-drivers is 8.18.8-r2. The emerge of ati-drivers show several warning
> messages of undefined symbols.
> 
> Thanks, Alves
> 
>   
> ___ 
> Novidade no Yahoo! Mail: receba alertas de novas mensagens no seu celular. 
> Registre seu aparelho agora! 
> http://br.mobile.yahoo.com/mailalertas/ 
>  
> 
> -- 
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
> 


-- 
-  
Are you living in the real world?
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] What to do when you can't loggin

2006-06-21 Thread Bob Sanders
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:41:56 +0100
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> Those of you that only use x86 based system don't know how lucky you are
> to have two decent bootloaders. If you took the worst aspect of LILO and
> GRUB and added some extra user-hostility for luck, you'd still have
> something a hundred times better than yaboot, the PPC bootloader :(
>

Actually you'd have ELILO, well after adding in MS-DOS and making EFI the
default partitioning.  /boot becomes a DOS filesystem.  But not limited to
8.3 character set. 

Bob   
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Adaptec 29160 Setup

2006-06-19 Thread Bob Sanders
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:07:42 -0400
sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> I am able to see the scsi cdrw and the jaz drive.
> Tried mounting the jaz drive but as expected it failed, the format of
> the unit cartridge is UFS. But it at least saw it, assigned it, and
> tried to mount when I manually tried.
> 

Under - File Systems --> Miscellaneous filesystems --> enable UFS

> However the scsi cdrw is still not working.
> Again, as you can see it dmesg shows the device. However it is not
> assigning it a dev.

Could be a udev issue?

But, just for grins, under Device Drivers --> Block devices, enable Packet
writing on CD/DVD media.  The defaults should be ok for that selection.

Also, I note I neglected to have you select Device Drivers --> SCSI device -->
SCSI generic support, but it seems to be in the kernel.

And under File Systems --> CD-ROM/DVD filesystems --> ISO 9660 CDROM system
support is selected?  Probably have to be if sr0: works, of course add UDF
file system if it's no selected.

By chance have you done an etc-update/dispatch-conf since the last udev
update that occured this week?

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Adaptec 29160 Setup

2006-06-18 Thread Bob Sanders
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:13:44 -0400
sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>   I am trying to get my recently built system to recognize my Adaptec
> 29160 configured on the system.
> I have SCSI built into the kernel, here is the dmesg statement,
> SCSI subsystem initialized,

Do you have SCSI Transport Attributes ---> Parallel SCSI (SPI) Transport 
Attributes
turned on as either a module or loaded?

> I can see my sata drive, which from what I read, scsi needs to be
> working for sata access,

SATA doesn't need specific attributes unless it's really a SAS interface.


> but there is nothing in dmesg about my scsi
> card coming to life, and so I cannot see my cd burner and iomega jaz
> drive that hang off it.
> 

Should only need, under SCSI devices support --> SCSI disk, SCSI CDROM,
the previously mentioned parallel Transport, under low-level drivers -->
Adaptec AIC7xxx (aka New driver), SATA support, and the SATA chipset driver.
The rest is pretty much wasted space.

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] supported mp3 players (hardware)

2006-06-17 Thread Bob Sanders
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 19:48:37 -0400
"Samuel Baldwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Anyone know if iRiver's support ogg? I use that exclusively and transcoding
> everything to mp3 would not be pleasant.
>

My iFP-999 supports ogg.  I use it on Linux - Gentoo with ifp-manager
(which is not in Portage) and it works fine.  Plug it into the aux
jacks in my truck to listen to something other than the radio.

Bob 
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1

2006-06-16 Thread Bob Young


> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas T. Veldhouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 10:25 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1

> You didn't pay attention to what he wrote.  I hope perhaps my post made
> it more clear.
>
> Tom Veldhouse

The only thing your post made clear is that you don't bother to read all of
a thread before replying to it. Maybe this will help:


The following reply was sent by me on Thur 6/8/2006 7:57 AM
*


> -Original Message-
> From: Bo Ørsted Andresen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 7:29 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1
>
>
> Thursday 08 June 2006 16:00 skrev Bob Young:
> > Show me some documentation for this "staging" you refer to.
>
> If you unpack the gcc sources you will find it in
> gcc-*/INSTALL/build.html as
> already mentioned by Richard. But you can also see it at [1].
>
> [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html
>

Okay, I stand corrected.

Regards,
Bob Young

*



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1

2006-06-12 Thread Bob Young


> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry McBride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 7:10 PM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1
>
>
> On Wednesday 07 June 2006 21:50, Bob Young wrote:
> Note that the
> > article does in the end, do a double emerge -e system, so the
> the value of
> > updating a toolchain subset is questionable for the article's purposes.
> >
> > In short:
> >
> > emerge gcc-config glibc binutils libstdc++-v3 gcc
> > emerge gcc-config glibc binutils libstdc++-v3 gcc
> > emerge -e world
> >
> > To be clear, in order to make sure absolutely everything is
> updated and the
> > libraries that are linked against are also updated prior to use, the two
> > emerge -e system commands, are the definitive solution. For
> those who don't
> > want to spend many extra hours of compile time, in order to gain a 0.5%
> > increase in performance, the above is offered for consideration.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bob Young
>
> Wow! I said the same thing a week or so ago and got the same rebuttal.
> However, it's what I do none the less. And it works.
>

I've been thinking about this over the last week or so. In particular the
fact that gcc always uses itself to build itself, does elminate the need for
building gcc twice. That being the case, emerging the new gcc then selecting
it as the default system compiler followed by a single emerge -e world
should be all that is necessary. I suppose it's possible that a few apps or
utilities that use static linking *could* possibly end up linking against
libraries that have not been rebuilt with the new compiler yet due to build
order issues. However since the number of apps and utilities that actually
use static linking is very small, it doesn't seem that a double emerge -e
world or system is justified.

That being said, seems these two articles appear to be giving out bad
information:

http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=282474&highlight=

http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-345229.html


If I've mis-characterisized the issue in the above description I'd
appreciate it if someone would correct any mis-statements. Lastly, since the
Gentoo handbook no longer describes a stage one install, is there any
"official" documentation that describes the *correct* way to do a stage3
install and end up with the same level of optimization and customization
that used to be provided by a stage1 install?

--
Regards,
Bob Young


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] An alternative to http-replicator

2006-06-10 Thread Bob Sanders
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 22:43:03 -0400
"Walter Dnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


>   My approach requires 2 emerges (boa and rsyncd) and their config files
> on the server plus inserting the server as the preferred mirror in 2
> lines in /etc/make.conf on the client(s).
> 

That's close to what I do at work.  Only I run a full Gentoo mirror because
I need multiple architectures - x86, amd64, ia64, mips.  Also, there are
multiple users, and it's necessary to insure the LiveCDs and snapshots get
transfered automatically.

At home, http-replicator work fine for the small set of systems.  No NFS
required for either setup.

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] An alternative to http-replicator

2006-06-10 Thread Bob Sanders
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 10:25:25 +
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> What's the pros/cons of mounting portage over NFS Vs http-replicator?


If you only have one architecture and one system type or one system that
can be a superset of the others, nfs will serve you fine.

If you have multiple architectures, the packages release at different
times and sometimes different revs.  For this http-replicator is a 
better choice.

For example - I run x86, amd64, and power pc.  Thus, need a broader
spectrum of packages.

Or if you run desktops and servers (different sets of software) and don't
have a common set of USE flags - use say, lighttpd, php, and mysql on the
server but not on the desktop.  Or more likely, use postfix, sasl, tinydns,
and procmail on the server, but not the desktop (assumes the desktop uses
LDAP or POP).  Then http-replicator would be a better choice.

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Evolution icons missing under KDE but nut under Gnome

2006-06-10 Thread Bob Young

This is how Evolution displays if I log in under KDE or Gnome:

http://www.debug1.com/

Why the difference, and how can I get it to display correctly under KDE?

TIA
Bob Young

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1

2006-06-08 Thread Bob Young


> -Original Message-
> From: Bo Ørsted Andresen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 7:29 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1
>
>
> Thursday 08 June 2006 16:00 skrev Bob Young:
> > Show me some documentation for this "staging" you refer to.
>
> If you unpack the gcc sources you will find it in
> gcc-*/INSTALL/build.html as
> already mentioned by Richard. But you can also see it at [1].
>
> [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html
>

Okay, I stand corrected.

Regards,
Bob Young


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1

2006-06-08 Thread Bob Young


> -Original Message-
> From: Hans-Werner Hilse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 6:32 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1
>
> You haven't understood a word from the posting you're replying to.
>
> > It does have to be emerged twice in order for it to be built with
> > itself, anybody who thinks otherwise doesn't understand the basic
> > principles of compiling and linking.
>
> Try to understand what you are replying to. GCC's internal build logic
> does the staging. That's got nothing to do with what your system calls
> when you issue "gcc", and only at that point the slotting of GCC
> versions comes into play.


Show me some documentation for this "staging" you refer to. When you "emerge
gcc" it is built with the current compiler, if the current compiler is gcc
3.4.6, and you emerge gcc 4.1.1, that means that while gcc 4.1.1 is being
emerged it is built with gcc 3.4.6. gcc 4.1.1 can't be built with 4.1.1
because it hasn't been emerged yet, and as far as the system knows it
doesn't actually exist yet. Can you clearly and concisely explain to me how
something that is in the process of being emerged can be used to emerge
itself? Doesn't make sense.

Regards,
Bob Young



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1

2006-06-08 Thread Bob Young


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Richard Fish
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 9:24 PM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1
>
>
> On 6/7/06, Bob Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > chain. At the end of the first emerge -e system you may have a
> new compiler,
> > but that new compiler was built with the old compiler.
>
> This is false.  Gcc uses itself to build itself.  It uses the system
> compiler to build an initial version of itself, and then uses that
> version to build itself.  And then for good measure, it uses that
> version to build the final version.  It's called a 3-stage bootstrap,
> and is documented in the file INSTALL/build.html in the gcc sources.
> You can also look at /usr/portage/eclass/toolchain.eclass to determine
> that Gentoo uses the "bootstrap-lean" target by default.

No, sorry that's just wrong. gcc is slotted, if the above were true there
would be no need for gcc-config in order to select a default compiler. When
a new compiler is emerged, it does *not* automatically become the default
system compiler, it must be selected, and that can only happen after it has
successfully been emerged. The first time a new gcc compiler is emerged, it
is indeed built with the previous version of the compiler that is currently
istalled as the system default.


> Frankly, anybody who claims that gcc needs to be merged twice so it
> can be built with itself and produce better object code does not have
> a clue what they are talking about and you should simply disregard
> anything else they have to say about what is necessary/useful when
> upgrading gcc.

It does have to be emerged twice in order for it to be built with itself,
anybody who thinks otherwise doesn't understand the basic principles of
compiling and linking.

> > happen before glibc is rebuilt are linked against a glibc that was built
> > with the old compiler.
>
> And guess what difference this makes to the end result.  None.
> Nada.  Nothing.
>
> Because for basically every program on your system, they are
> *dynamically linked* against glibc.

Are you absolutely 100% sure that every single system utility and
application is *dynamically* linked, and that no apps or utilities anywhere
in the system specifies *static* linking?

> There are a few statically linked programs that will include glibc
> internally.  These are used only for system recovery purposes...there
> is no need to worry about them at all.

Really, so people who intentionally and specifically want to upgrade
absolutely *everything* should not worry about what gets left out because
Richard says it's unimportant?

The issue is about upgrading gcc and even the gcc upgrade howto recommends
an emerge -e world. It's clear that gcc it self at least has to be emerged
twice in order to build the new gcc *with* the new gcc. Whether this is
strictly necessary or not is certaintly debatable, but since it executes
fairly quickly, and seems a prudent step, I'd argue that it's a reasonable
course. Of course a selecting the new gcc as the default with gcc-config is
also required in between, but that's self evident. Adding gcc-config, glibc,
binutils, libstdc++-v3, quickly covers the most important parts of the basic
tool chain, and covers most utilities or apps that might specify static
linking, and executes much much faster than an emerge -e system.

> There is no value to having glibc or libstdc++-v3 in the first line.
> There is no value at all to doing that twice.

Twice is the only way to build the new gcc *with* the new gcc. I should have
added the gcc-config select command in between, but I thought that was
pretty clearly necessary.

> Also, libstdc++-v3 is only needed by a few binary-only programs on
> Gentoo.  Moreover, it is simply a build of gcc-3.3.6, which as I
> already said uses itself to build itself,  so I cannot see any point in
> ever re-merging libstdc++-v3 due to a gcc upgrade

I know you said it, but that doesn't mean you were correct. The fact is that
anything emerged is built with the currently selected system compiler, the
first time a new compiler is emerged it is built with the current (old)
compiler (duh). *After* it is successfuly emerged, it can be selected as the
default system compiler, then re-emergeing gcc will result in the new
compiler being built with the new compiler.

The same holds true for libstdc++-v3 orginally it was built with the default
system compiler, it makes sense to have it rebuilt with the new compiler.

Regards,
Bob Young


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1

2006-06-07 Thread Bob Young

> On 6/7/06, Roy Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You might want to read:
> >
> > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=282474&highlight=
> >
> > which basically recommends:
> >
> >   emerge -s
> >   emerge -s
> >   emerge -e
> >   emerge -e
>
>
> Ugh, this is completely pointless.  A single "emerge -e world" is
> sufficient.
>

Depends on what you consider sufficient. Although what the page recommends
was misquoted, it actually suggests:

emerge -e system
emerge -e system
emerge -e world
emerge -e world

That's probably is a little bit excessive, but the reason for doing the two
emerge -e systems is so that the new tool chain is built with the new tool
chain. At the end of the first emerge -e system you may have a new compiler,
but that new compiler was built with the old compiler. What you actually
want is a gcc-4.1.1 that was built with gcc-4.1.1. You could emerge the
compiler twice before doing the emerge -e system, but the the emerges that
happen before glibc is rebuilt are linked against a glibc that was built
with the old compiler. Same with the rest of the tool chain and libraries.

That being said "emerge -e system" is probably overkill just for a new
toolchain. Updating a subset of all possible toolchain related things and
then following that by a single emerge -e world would probably be sufficient
for most people. This page: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-345229.html
is about doing an install, but it shows how to update a subset of the entire
tool chain. Note that the article does in the end, do a double emerge -e
system, so the the value of updating a toolchain subset is questionable for
the article's purposes.

In short:

emerge gcc-config glibc binutils libstdc++-v3 gcc
emerge gcc-config glibc binutils libstdc++-v3 gcc
emerge -e world

To be clear, in order to make sure absolutely everything is updated and the
libraries that are linked against are also updated prior to use, the two
emerge -e system commands, are the definitive solution. For those who don't
want to spend many extra hours of compile time, in order to gain a 0.5%
increase in performance, the above is offered for consideration.

Regards,
Bob Young


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Aparrent confcache issue - Solved,but.....

2006-06-03 Thread Bob Young
.3
built and installed without error.

The description for confcache says: "GNU autoconf is a bottleneck for
compiling packages - especially on multi-processor boxes, confcache had
been considered as a way to lower the cost of repeatedly running
autoconf-generated configure scripts." Since this is a dual Opteron box
I'd like to use confcache, seems that it might save some time while
building the 450 or so packages that I now need to start over on
rebuilding. Of course if confcache had worked correctly I wouldn't need
to start over.

I've looked in the man pages and searched the web for confcache
information, but haven't found much. 

1. Should I have known that I needed to do something to confcache after
upgrading gcc, is that "common knowledge" that I missed somehow?

2. Can I safely re-enable confcache before restarting the emerge -e
world?

   I did find this http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133902, and
the comments in the "master" confcache bug seem to indicate that the
"error" is in an ebuild previous to the one that failed. If I had
not deleted /var/tmp/confcache/config.cache I'd have sent in the
requested information to help resolve this bug. I can't tell from the
comments whether or not it's safe to re-enable confcache with a new
fresh database, or if there are just some ebuilds that break when it's
enabled.

3. Is there any info regarding refreshing, updating, maintaining,
confcache's cache, specifically how, when, and what to do?


TIA
Bob Young
San Jose, CA.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Help on gentoo 2.6

2006-06-01 Thread Bob Bao





Hi guys.
I installed 2.6.16-gentoo-r7 on a x86 desk top computer.
After reboot, I fond two problems.
The net work connection lost. I run the /etc/init.d/net.eth0 start, get a 
eth0 does not exist error message. Is there any one can help me fix it. I need 
to download more tools for the basic operating system. 
Another problem is when I run "rc -update" there is an error message " 
runlevel update is not existed" . 
Thanks.
Bob Bao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[gentoo-user] Gentoo net work connection problem

2006-06-01 Thread Bob Bao
 
 Hi guys.

I installed 2.6.16-gentoo-r7 on a x86 desk top computer.

After reboot, I fond two problems.

The net work connection lost. I run the /etc/init.d/net.eth0 start, get
a eth0 does not exist error message. Is there any one can help me fix
it. I need to download more tools for the basic operating system. 

Another problem is when I run "rc -update" there is an error message "
runlevel update is not existed" . 

Thanks.

Bob Bao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Build error in threads.c, maybe related to nptlonly use flag.

2006-05-12 Thread Bob Young


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Richard Fish
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 10:48 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Build error in threads.c, maybe related to
> nptlonly use flag.
> 
> Not an nptl issue, looks like a bug in the configure to me.
> 
> The configure is finding that glibc has the
> pthread_mutexattr_setrobust_np function, so in threads.c it is
> activating this piece of code:
 
Thanks for the detailed explaination and the solution, much appreciated.

Regards,
Bob Young

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Build error in threads.c, maybe related to nptlonly use flag.

2006-05-12 Thread Bob Young
reported only once
threads.c:145: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[2]: *** [threads.so] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/mit-krb5-1.4.3/work/krb5-1.4.3/src/util/support'
make[1]: *** [all-recurse] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/mit-krb5-1.4.3/work/krb5-1.4.3/src/util'
make: *** [all-recurse] Error 1

!!! ERROR: app-crypt/mit-krb5-1.4.3 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 53, Exitcode 2
!!! (no error message)
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status
message.

>>> original instance of package unmerged safely.
>>> sys-apps/tcp-wrappers-7.6-r8 merged.

>>> clean: No packages selected for removal.

>>> emerge (143 of 189) app-crypt/mit-krb5-1.4.3 to /
>>> md5 files   ;-) mit-krb5-1.4.1-r2.ebuild


* make.conf **

CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-march=opteron -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -ftracer"
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"


USE="amd64 a52 acl acpi adns alsa arts audiofile avi bash-completion berkdb
bonobo bzip2 caps
  cdparanoia cdr crypt cscope ctype curl curlwrappers cups dbus dbx dio
directfb divx4linux doc
  dvd dvdr dvdread emacs emacs-w3 emul-linux-x86 encode ethereal evo
examples exif fam fastcgi
  fbcon ffmpeg fftw flash foomaticdb fortran ftp gb gdbm gif glx -gnome
gnutls glut gmp gphoto2
  gpm gstreamer gpm -gtk -gtk2 gtkhtml hal idn ieee1394 imlib
imagemagick jack java jbig javascript
  jikes joystick jpeg junit -kde -kdeenablefinal kerberos -krb4 -ldap
libwww mad maildir mbox mikmod
  mime ming mng mono mozilla mp3 mpeg mpi multilib mysql ncurses nis
nocardbus nptl nptlonly
  offensive ogg oggvorbis opengl pcntl pcre pdflib perl php png posix
python -qt quicktime readline
  samba sasl session simplexml slp snmp sndfile sockets source spell spl
ssl svga tcpd tidy tiff truetype
  truetype-fonts type1-fonts usb verbose videos wmf wxwindows -X xml
xml2 xmms xpm xv xvid zlib"


***

I think the "nptl nptlonly " use flags are relevant to this, but am not
sure. I know the "kerberos" flag is related, but since the box will be
interacting with an Active Directory domain controler kerberos seems
appropiate to have.

I'd prefer not to give up nptlonly flag to solve this, but if that's the
only way to avoid this error, I guess I'll have no choice, but most of all I
would like to understand exactly what and where the problem is. If it's
something moderately simple, like threads.c not "paying attention to a
define" or something similar, I might try and fix it, but either way I'd
like to understand it more than I currently do.

Output that seems particularly interesting:

Output: "threads.c:145: error: `pthread_mutexattr_setrobust_np' undeclared
(first use in this function)"

Comment: Okay that's the error pthread_mutexattr_setrobust_np is undeclared.

Output "checking for pthread_mutexattr_setrobust_np... no" (<- From
configure)

Comment: HmmmConfigure knows it's not available in the "normal" way.

Output: "-DHAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEXATTR_SETROBUST_NP_IN_THREAD_LIB=1"   (<- From
gcc )

Comment: What is this supposed to signify?

Output: checking for pthread_mutexattr_setrobust_np in -lc... yes   (<- From
configure)

Comment: Okay...It's available in "-lc" what does that mean? and if it's
available why is it causing a build error?
Comment: What does "-lc" mean? Would declaring
pthread_mutexattr_setrobust_np as "external" on the condition of some define
solve the problem?

Again sorry for the long post, TIA to anyone who can share some insight.

Regards,
Bob Young




-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] New USE flags???

2006-05-09 Thread Bob Sanders
On Tue, 9 May 2006 20:06:53 -0600
"Justin Findlay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Not even the most dogged user is going to read through every flag and
> decide if he wants it set or not. 

I do and set specific sets of flags for each machine I run.  It does take
about 30 min.  and I do have to check for changes - USE flags going away,
new ones, every six months or so, but a review is always a good thing.
 
> So, for example, Joe Hacker, who has a laptop and a server can
> explicitly unset all multimedia and office/desktop flags in ufed for
> his server while explicitly enabling just the server flags he needs
> while on his laptop he can enable all development flags and pick the
> desktop flags he wants in a matter of seconds rather than minutes
> because the desktop flags are all in the same catergory.
> 
> You could also allow users even greater specificity over their flags
> with ufed by giving them the option to set flags on a per package
> basis, although this may be more effort than it's worth.
> 

You might want to peruse this GLEP - 

http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0029.html

It was withdrawn, but perhaps that was because other tasks
took a higher priority and this needed to wait for them to complete.

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Why is lynx a dependency?

2006-05-06 Thread Bob Sanders
On Sat, 06 May 2006 13:13:19 +
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> The mind boggles!  It seems that I'll have to emerge elinks or lynx whether
> I want it or not.

You'll be mighty happy you have it for  that one time X won't start and you 
need to download
a fix or find one from the command line using elinks or lynx.

I've been there way too often to not have a backup text based web browser 
installed, for
the once or twice each year this may occur.  But then I run several systems, 
some have no
graphics console, so I see the need more than most.

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Install help

2006-04-20 Thread Bob Bao
 
Hi.
 
I am a new gentoo user here. I downloaded gentoo 2.6 liveCD from gentoo
website. After couple time trying, finally I successfully complete the
installing. But,  after log in, I only get a xterm window and a session
window. I think suppose I should get a graphic user interface like boot
Thanks.
 
Bob Bao

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Modular Xorg 7 won't start with nVidia GeForce4 440 Go

2006-04-10 Thread Bob Sanders
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:48:36 -0700
"Daevid Vincent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> 
> I'm using the latest 8756 version of the nvidia driver.
>

Try this - 

emerge -C nvidia-kernel nvidia-glx
emerge -av =nvidia-kernel-1.0.8178-r3 =nvidia-glx-1.0.8178-r1

Set the /etc/X11/xorg.conf driver def to nvidia and re-try starting X.

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] dhcp server

2006-03-28 Thread Bob Sanders
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:09:21 +0530
"Hiren Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
 ^ shouldn't that be a "2"?

Bob
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] AMD64 on board video

2006-03-21 Thread Bob Sanders
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:32:41 -0500
JimD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> Well I have been married a little over 5 years.  I "let" my wife manage
> the finances starting a few years ago.  She knows how much money is in
> the bank down to a dime.  If I tap-mac and get cash, I get the
> 3rd-degree of what was the money for, especially if I take out $100+ : )
> 

Well, you could cut back on eating and save, say half your lunch money each
day and stash it.  Or switch to tea from *$ Lattes - Only $1.00 vs $3.50.  It 
adds
up pretty quick.

> I am afraid I am going to have to go the wuss route and ask the
> wifey-poo :)
>

Don't do it.  Trust me.  You'll pay big time.  That $100 will turn into $400 to
$1,000 for her, plus a summer of chick flicks.

Bob 
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] AMD64 on board video

2006-03-21 Thread Bob Sanders
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:46:01 -0500
JimD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Did I leave anything out that is needed for nvidia on an amd64?  Or 
> should I not expect anything more from the on board NVIDIA GeForce 6100 
> even though it is running over PCI-e?
> 

Onboard video uses system memory.  So the bandwidth to memory is limited by
PCIe, HT,  and two hops to the memory and back.  Figure memory bandwidth around
800 MB/s to 1 GB/s tops, if nothing else is going on on the bus.

Even an inexpensive 6200 with onboard memory has 4 GB/s or more.  If you need
the performance, get either a 6600 or wait a bit for the newer 7600.

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Recommended amd64 box for Gentoo

2006-03-18 Thread Bob Sanders
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 03:06:42 -0500
"Walter Dnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>   My main worries would be proprietary stuff like RealPlayer and the
> win32codecs portion of mplayer.
>

Both work for me within reason.  The win32codecs I use with
mplayer-bin.  And Realplayer works.

But if you are one that wants seamless integration with a browser or gui,
then you'll be disappointed and unhappy.

I've not had any issue with streaming audio.  Some issues with streaming
video - video.google.com doesn't work.  But for anything that's downloadable,
mostly no problems playing.  Some problems with video from those using
very new versions of Micrsoft's video formats.

fwiw - I use both Firefox and  Opera, but not firefox-bin.

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Recommended amd64 box for Gentoo

2006-03-17 Thread Bob Sanders
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:07:46 -0800
Bob Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:04:58 -0600
> "Michael Madden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Could someone recommend an amd64 box to use with Gentoo 2006.0?
> > I had considered one of the following workstations;  has anyone had
> > good or bad experience with these workstations and Gentoo for amd64?
> > 
> > HP xw9300
> > Sun Ultra 40
> > IBM IntelliStation A Pro
> > Alienware MJ-12 7550a
> > 

Thinking about it my reply should have been - Gentoo will run fine
on any box the vendor sells with a Linux as an option to on it.

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Recommended amd64 box for Gentoo

2006-03-16 Thread Bob Sanders
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:04:58 -0600
"Michael Madden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Could someone recommend an amd64 box to use with Gentoo 2006.0?
> I had considered one of the following workstations;  has anyone had
> good or bad experience with these workstations and Gentoo for amd64?
> 
> HP xw9300
> Sun Ultra 40
> IBM IntelliStation A Pro
> Alienware MJ-12 7550a
> 

No.

Shuttle XPC SN95G5 V3 - typing this email now
Nvidia 6600GT Gfx card, though it's seen several others.  This
system was built early 2005. 

Penguin Computing 1U server - been running since 2004, 2P Opteron

Self-built 2P Opteron Tyan K8W S2885 motherboard, running since 2004.
Nvidia 6600GT gfx card.  Started out with an Nvidia 5900XT.  It
lost one cpu - memory controller went bad last year.  Upgraded both
cpus and now have powernowd running doing dynamic frequency control.

Self-built 2P Opteron MSI motherboard, built 2004, motherboard lost memory
traces in 2005.  Now dead.

All have run Gentoo, though the Penguin Computing server started out with SLES 
8,
that basically sucked.  SLES 9 and SLES 10 are better, but it's a critical lab 
server and
I won't run software we test on something critical like that.

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] kernel 2.6.15-gentoo-r7 and dhcpcd

2006-03-16 Thread Bob Sanders
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:52:48 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Since I switched to kernel 2.6.15-gentoo-r7 (from r5), with an identical 
> .config
> file, dhcpcd doesn't stay alive as a daemon:
> - it starts okay at boot time and eth1 gets its address from IAF, then it dies
> - when the lease time's over, I don't have internet access anymore until I
> rebbot.
> What gives ? Anyone got the same problem ?

I can't actually say.  However, if it's the dhcpcd that comes with net-misc/dhcp
then that client has a persistence problem and the standalone client - 
net-misc/dhcpcd
is a better choice.

Or perhaps - net-misc/pump, might be a better choice?

Yes, I didn't answer your question as I don't have a working knowledge of the 
kernel
and the client other than the persistence issue seen on another Linux on an 
ia64 platform.

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] antivirus

2006-03-15 Thread Bob Young

Every few months or so I'll load Norton AntiVirus, grab the latest latest
virus definitions, and do a full scan of the entire system, nothing is ever
found. After the scan is complete I uninstall it.

The importance of Antivirus software is waaay over exagarated. For people
who aren't willing to adopt the few simple practices that would keep them
safe, AntiVirus software may have some value. However, for anyone willing to
adhere to a few basic rules, AV software is mostly the modern day equevelent
of Snake Oil, it's a waste of money and CPU cycles.

Regards
Bob Young

> -Original Message-
> From: Midnight Toker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 1:57 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] antivirus
>
>
> If you've been running without Anti Virus software for years now, how
> do you know the machines are clean of virus's?
>
>
> On 8 Mar 2006, at 20:24, Bob Young wrote:
>
> > Here, here. It's really not about the OS, or what "protection"
> > software is
> > or isn't installed, it's about the habits and practices of the
> > user. Any
> > computer can (and probably will) be compromised if the user is
> > careless or
> > naive about what they do and where they go on the Net. Like you,
> > I've run
> > different versions of DOS, Windows (NT derivatives only), OS/2, &
> > Linux. I
> > did get a virus once in the early days when running DOS, but since
> > then I've
> > never had a Windows or Linux box compromised by a virus or malware,
> > and
> > that's without running any anti-virus software of any kind on any
> > of the
> > Windows boxes.
> >
> >  FWIW one of those Windows boxes is currently a web/email/DNS/FTP
> > server
> > with seven public IPs serving between four and seven domains. There
> > is also
> > a Gentoo Linux box doing secondary DNS for the domains, the windows
> > box has
> > a firewall but no AV software at all, both servers (one Windows & one
> > Gentoo), have remained clean and stable for several years now, as
> > do all of
> > my various Windows and Gentoo workstations, none of which run any
> > antivirus
> > software.
> >
> > In short if a user is getting infected a lot using Windows,
> > switching to
> > Linux is not curing the root cause. The basic problem is the user
> > needs to
> > understand what s/he is doing that's allowing malicious code to
> > execute on
> > their system and stop doing it. In the vast majority of Windows cases,
> > simply *not* routinely logging on with admin privileges would
> > probably stop
> > 99% plus of the infections.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bob Young
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> >
>
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] stock tracker

2006-03-11 Thread Bob Sanders
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 07:55:39 -0600
Qv6 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> Hello:
> 
> I'm looking for a scrolling stock ticker/tracker for Kde or Gnome. Any 
> good one out there?
> 

I've used tclticker for ages.  It's not desktop specific.

http://www.nyx.net/~tpoindex/tcl.html

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] antivirus

2006-03-10 Thread Bob Young


> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Kintzios [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:12 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] antivirus
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bob Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 08 March 2006 21:05
> > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> > Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] antivirus
> >
> [snip]
> > As to  not running without Admin
> > rights, most of those
> > cases can be taken care of with RunAs. It's better to run a
> > single App with
> > Admin privledges rather than have all apps including email
> > and browsers
> > running with Admin rights.
>
> Actually, it would be better to troubleshoot the particular application
> and allow it write/execute or modify rights *only* to the files it needs
> to access for the particular plain user (typically some files or a
> folder under C:\Program Files).

In most cases it's not blocked file writes that cause these apps to fail,
it's blocked access to registry keys. In many cases, I'm convinced it's
simply a matter of the app incorrectly specifying read/write access to a
value or key that it really only needs read access to. It would be
inappropiate and dangerous to grant registry write permissions to regular
users, even just for certain keys or subsections, just to fix one or two
badly designed apps.

If it were just a matter of writing to files under the "Program Files"
directory, then the apps would work under a PowerUser account, and yet there
are indeed badly designed apps that fail to run as a PowerUser, but work
fine when executed with Admin rights.


> It may take some time to set up access rights for all such badly written
> apps, but it'll keep your M$Windoze box as safe as it will ever be.  If
> in addition you shut down all the open by default Windoze ports
> (135-139, 445, 500, 1900, 4000 + remote admin) and disable

I agree that a properly configured firewall is important to system security
on any machine with a public IP address, that's true regardless of what
operating system is running on it.

> unnecessary/dangerous services and also stop using OE and IE (or at
> least stop using them with their default settings) you should be safe
> enough going about your normal business.

I've never used OE under Windows, I consider it a throw away app, I find the
full version of Outlook much more capable. As to the defaults for it and IE,
I'd agree that it's possible to choose more "lockedown" settings. I'm less
concerned about this if they are running under a non Admin account and are
behind a decently configured firewall. Personally I find html email much
more readable and expressive than bland ASCII text, that being said, neither
I nor my wife open unknown/untrusted attachments. WRT IE, I enable/disable
scripting/ActiveX depending on what I'm doing and what I know about my
destination(s).

Regards,
Bob Young





-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] antivirus

2006-03-09 Thread Bob Young


> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Igoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:36 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] antivirus
> 
> A windows `Power User` is too privileged for most uses. 

What rights/privledges does a powerUser have that you believe are "too 
privledged?"

I've run my Windows systems as a PowerUser for years and they've always 
remained clean and stable, even without using antivirus software.


> Ideally Windows
> would be great if it followed the Linux way of working more - install as
> Admin (thats fine imo) but run as a completely unprivileged (guest or
> standard) user.

I disagree, I'd much rather have more than two different types of users, (God 
and everyone else). I prefer "Guest" to have different privledges than a 
"regular" user, and an anonymous internet visitor to have a different set from 
either of those, while more technicaly savy and trusted users might be given a 
PowerUser account.


> I've had problems with windows machines not running software as
> unprivileged users before now. Causes too many problems due to the
> access and thus viruses / malware that get installed.

Yes, there are some poorly designed programs that insist on Admin rights, but 
I'm not aware of any such cases that won't function properly when executed with 
RunAs. I think it's way better to have one or two applications running with 
Admin privledges than everything including browsers and email executing with 
Admin rights. 

Beyond that, just a PowerUser account having write access to some files under 
the system folder does not automatically mean that external malicious forces, 
i.e. malware authors, can actually successfuly modify them. It's still required 
that the user do something to cause some untrusted script or code to execute. 
If scripting isn't enabled in the browser, and the user doesn't open 
unknown/unexpected/untrusted attachments, there isn't really any viable way for 
malware to be installed.

I'm sorry to be arguing positively for Windows on a Gentoo list, I do use 
Gentoo and it is my favorite Linux distro, I've just never been able to muster 
up blind dislike for any computer operating system. I try to look at the pros 
and cons of a particular feature's implementation, and judge it objectively. I 
don't always come down in favor of Windows, or Linux, it just depends on the 
particular functionality being discussed.

Regards,
Bob Young



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] antivirus

2006-03-09 Thread Bob Young


-Original Message-
From: Jarry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 8:50 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] antivirus

Bob Young wrote:

> PowerUser is different from Admin, Admin is the equevelent of root in the
> Linux/Unix world, PowerUser is not. The primary and most important
> difference is the ability to *write* to the registry, It's perfectly safe
to
> routinely log on as a PowerUser, as PowerUsers can *not* write to registry
> keys that affect the entire system, while Admin users can write to *any*
> registry key.

I'm not sure if this is true. Anyway, PowerUser has the ability
to install sw (even system patches!),


No, PowerUsers can *NOT* install software, installing software (in most
cases) requires writing to registry keys outside of the HKEY_CURRENT_USER
hive, which is something a PowerUser cannot do. Windows update will
definitely fail without admin privileges; I know this for a fact. I've on a
number of occasions tried to run WindowsUpdate from my normal PowerUser
account; it will display a dialog box specifically stating that Admin
privileges are required.


alter executables and system
files! PowerUser can write to C:\ProgramFiles, or C:\Windows, and
that is exactly, what a virus need to spread itself.


As to the ability of writing to the Program Files or the Windows directory
that may be true, and in theory I suppose it probably represents a small
degree of risk. In several years of actual practice however I can say it
hasn't caused a problem for me personally. In addition, if someone is really
concerned about the issue, removing write and/or modify permissions for
PowerUsers on those directories is a fairly trivial task. Since I've not
tried this I can't say for sure what side effects it might have with some
applications, so I'm not advocating it, though I don't see any obvious
reasons why it should cause major problems ( Still... !Do a Backup first!).


 Not many viruses
can hide their code in registry (that is just equivalent to /etc in
unix-world), mostly they attach themselves to some exe/sys file,
or overwrite them...


I wasn't suggesting that viruses "hide their code" in the registry, that's
not what the registry is for or how it's used. I was suggesting that any
modification that affects the system as a whole or impacts more than just
the current user is going to require modifying registry keys that cannot be
written without Admin privileges.


So, if you start a virus-infected program as a PowerUser, there
are perfect conditions for spreading infection. If there were
some virus for linux, and you start it as a normal user, it can
not alter executables in /usr or /sbin, because user does not have
write access to them. Such a virus could infect only *your* files.


In practice it just doesn't happen that way. In addition it should be noted
that by default even PowerUsers don't have write/modify permission on some
sensitive directories C:\Windows\System32\drivers for example. This
directory contains device drivers (code that runs in ring0 with unlimited
privileges). For PowerUsers this directory is "Read & Execute" "List
Contents" and  "Read" that's all the permission a PowerUser has. So while a
PowerUser might be able to modify some application level code in the Windows
directory, actually compromising system security is a matter.


I'd say PowerUser is something between a restricted user, and admin.


True. I've used both Linux and Windows over the years, and they each have
their strengths and weaknesses. Finer grained user permissions/privileges is
one of the areas where Windows has an edge.

Regards,
Bob Young






-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] antivirus

2006-03-08 Thread Bob Young


-Original Message-
From: Jarry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 1:04 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] antivirus

Bob Young wrote:

> In the vast majority of Windows cases, simply *not* routinely logging on
> with admin privileges would probably stop 99% plus of the infections.

True, but unfortunatelly, there are too many win-applications (even
serious ones), which does not work correctly (or at all) without user
having admin (power-user) privileges...


PowerUser is different from Admin, Admin is the equevelent of root in the
Linux/Unix world, PowerUser is not. The primary and most important
difference is the ability to *write* to the registry, It's perfectly safe to
routinely log on as a PowerUser, as PowerUsers can *not* write to registry
keys that affect the entire system, while Admin users can write to *any*
registry key.

Most applications will run just fine as PowerUser, apps that truly *require*
Admin rights are frankly, poorly designed. Even so, routinely logging on
with Admin rights just because you need/want to run one or two badly
designed apps is still a very bad idea. For the very very few aps that
actually do require Admin rights RunAs is a much better and safer solution.

Regards,
Bob Young


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] antivirus

2006-03-08 Thread Bob Young


-Original Message-
From: John Jolet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 12:36 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] antivirus

>
> In short if a user is getting infected a lot using Windows,
> switching to
> Linux is not curing the root cause. The basic problem is the user
> needs to
> understand what s/he is doing that's allowing malicious code to
> execute on
> their system and stop doing it. In the vast majority of Windows cases,
> simply *not* routinely logging on with admin privileges would
> probably stop
> 99% plus of the infections.


that's an interesting commentwindows xp is the first version that
even gives you that option.  and most of the games my kids play on
the computer simply won't run unless you have admin rights.


I agree that the default of not creating a non admin account is a bad
choice, but be that as it may, it's still true that not routinely logging on
with admin rights will stop the vast vast majority of malware dead in it's
tracks. If someone chooses to routinely log on with admin rights after they
know it's dangerous, but do so just because it's the default, then I would
have to question whether or not they are honestly interested in keping the
system clean, or whether there is some other agenda being catered to.

As to  not running without Admin rights, most of those
cases can be taken care of with RunAs. It's better to run a single App with
Admin privledges rather than have all apps including email and browsers
running with Admin rights.

Regards,
Bob Young


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] antivirus

2006-03-08 Thread Bob Young


-Original Message-
From: neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:23 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] antivirus

Jarry wrote:

> I got viruses many times.

Over the past 20-odd years, I have had machines running many versions of
DOS, all versions of Windows since Windows 286, all versions of OS/2
since 1.3 and several distributions of Linux. I have never, ever seen a
virus. I have to wonder what you are doing to be so "unfortunate".


Here, here. It's really not about the OS, or what "protection" software is
or isn't installed, it's about the habits and practices of the user. Any
computer can (and probably will) be compromised if the user is careless or
naive about what they do and where they go on the Net. Like you, I've run
different versions of DOS, Windows (NT derivatives only), OS/2, & Linux. I
did get a virus once in the early days when running DOS, but since then I've
never had a Windows or Linux box compromised by a virus or malware, and
that's without running any anti-virus software of any kind on any of the
Windows boxes.

 FWIW one of those Windows boxes is currently a web/email/DNS/FTP server
with seven public IPs serving between four and seven domains. There is also
a Gentoo Linux box doing secondary DNS for the domains, the windows box has
a firewall but no AV software at all, both servers (one Windows & one
Gentoo), have remained clean and stable for several years now, as do all of
my various Windows and Gentoo workstations, none of which run any antivirus
software.

In short if a user is getting infected a lot using Windows, switching to
Linux is not curing the root cause. The basic problem is the user needs to
understand what s/he is doing that's allowing malicious code to execute on
their system and stop doing it. In the vast majority of Windows cases,
simply *not* routinely logging on with admin privileges would probably stop
99% plus of the infections.

Regards,
Bob Young



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] 3d rendering with dri radeon

2006-03-01 Thread Bob Sanders
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 10:30:48 -0600
Bruce Burden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:36:05PM +0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote:

>   My real issue is that fglrx worked under Suse 9.2, 
> and not under Gentoo. But, no, I am NOT going back. Try
> installing xfishtank under Suse...
> 

By chance have you insured that - 

/usr/lib/libGL.la is symlinked to /usr/lib/opengl/ati/lib/libGL.la?

Just asking as neither opengl-update nor eselect opengl set will create the
link.

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo kixtstart/jumpstart equivalent

2006-02-18 Thread Bob Sanders
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:54:04 -0800
gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
>

> Also, one inherent flaw with your suggestion is the requirement of a
> livecd.  I know you mentioned floppy, but these are SPARC boxen and I
> doubt I could fit all the drivers/commands/etc. on a floppy, and one
> doesn't even have a floppy.  Thus the necessity for a network boot
> situation.
>

Why not setup a diskless boot via dhcp/tftp?  And boot the liveCD over the net?
It pretty much runs in memory.  Once the kernel in running, the rest could be 
nfs
mounted.  You might have to tweak a startup/initrd script, but that should be
about it all.

See -

http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/diskless-howto.xml
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/altinstall.xml#doc_chap5

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] 4/8 CPU Gentoo server

2006-02-09 Thread Bob Sanders
On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:27:25 -0800
gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> I'm getting this box from a vendor, and I thought they had limited
> options.  We've always gone Intel before, and I'm relatively new to
> this organization.  I'm going to poke around for some benchmarks.  I
> would be interested in seeing them, both from the perspective of my
> home P4/HT box, as well as this one.
> 

Anandtech has a series of Xeon/Opteron comparison articles at -

http://www.anandtech.com/it/

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] 4/8 CPU Gentoo server

2006-02-08 Thread Bob Sanders
On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:52:01 -0800
gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Just wondering if anyone here has any experience with gentoo on a 4/8
> CPU server.  

I've been running it for years on a 4P PIII Xeon and my take is I won't run more
than 2 Intel processors on their Front Side Bus - The bus saturates very 
quickly.
The cpus stall out waiting for memory.

If you are going to run more than 2 cpus, go for an Opteron solution.  It scales
much better and the dual-core limits the FSB to 2 cpus per connect. 

Also, if you look around at places like - 2cpu.com, you'll see at 4 cpus, the 
Opteron's
massive memory bandwidth leaves the Xeon way behind on most benchmarks.  
Finally,
outside of very, very specific tasks, Intel's HT actually slows down 
performance.  Again
check the web sites for specific benchmarks.  If your application doesn't fall 
into the
use area where HT actually helps, it's best to turn it off.

As to Linux scaling, I've run Linux, not Gentoo, on a few different 8P, 16P, 
20P, 32P, and
64P systems, and on one 512P system.  The 512P was kind of fun - kicking off 
and stopping
512 setiathome instances, all at the same time.

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] AMD 64 bit system selections

2006-02-01 Thread Bob Sanders

> For video data, use a linear stripe across two controllers.  And at least 
> three controllers
> for HD video.  But HD video requires SCSI or SAS, stripped across multiple 
> controllers and
> 15Krpm drives in the arrays.


I should be a bit more detailed.  For -

Uncompressed SD video - 60 MB/s sustained. 3 to 4 IDE drives striped 
will do.
Uncompressed HD video, up to 1080i - 270 MB/s sustained - 3 disk 
controllers,
3 disk arrays, 15 Krpm drives.
Uncompressed HD video 1080p or 4:4:4:4 or dual-link - 360 MB/s 
sustained - 4
disk controllers, 4 disk arrays, 15 Krpm drives.

Compressed SD video - mpeg2, 480P, DVpro - 20 MB/s sustained - 1 disk 
controller,
7200 rpm drives, single array.  2 streams requires Uncompressed 
SD bandwidth.

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] AMD 64 bit system selections

2006-01-31 Thread Bob Sanders
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:58:53 + (UTC)
James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> What's the best 64 bit processor choice for performance for Gentoo? 
> Dual-core?

Perhaps you should ask what the best price performance/watt in the cpu
range?  Generally it's best to figure out your needs and then calculate the
cost for each step up in cpu power to meet those needs.

> Complimentary ram specs?
> 

Personally, I prefer 2-2-2 or 2-3-2.5 ram, but it's expensive and not all
applications benefit.

> Mobo recommendations (lm_sensors and acpi support) in a 19 inch rack?
> 

Tyan or Super Micro tend to be better choices.

> N+1 redundant power supply recommendations?
>

Vendors change every year.  If you've got big bucks and can find someone that 
will
sell single units - Delta.  Otherwise, whomever can meet the current demands.
 
> 10/100/1000 Ethernet support?
>

On the motherboard - best is typically Broadcom or Intel.  The rest are pretty 
good.
 
> What's the friendliest  high end video card for displaying video
> (fast motion) that has open source drivers? Multiple displays?
>

Doesn't exist.  But Nvidia is the better bet as their drivers tend to work more 
often.
 
> Which Sata-2 drives give good performance and size (400 G or more)?
> 
> What's the best Raid level to run for storing, searching and manipulating
> tons of video, and should I get a Gentoo friendly controller or use 
> software raid?
> 

For video data, use a linear stripe across two controllers.  And at least three 
controllers
for HD video.  But HD video requires SCSI or SAS, stripped across multiple 
controllers and
15Krpm drives in the arrays.

> Finally which file system would one recommed for this video server
> with the best, stable performance.
>

XFS.

Bob 
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] 3dlabs Wildcat Realizm

2006-01-22 Thread Bob Sanders
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:04:53 +0100 (CET)
Álvaro Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> So, any one uses Wildcat Realizm?
>

No, but I did use a VP970 for awhile.  The problem you;ll
have is that Gentoo moves much faster than 3DLabs, and
much faster than Xig, which used to supply the Linux driver
for the older 3DLabs card (technically, the Xserver as well).

3DLabs, somewhat like ATI is more concerned with their WinXX
customers - the big OEMS, big dmedia customers, and others where
they can make the most of Marketing messages, and sell numerous cards.

Nvidia is like this as well, but internally, has a large base of Linux using
developers - not Linux specific developers, but devs that won't use other
operating systems.  Thus tended to get through the Linux ramp-up for drivers
really fast as it had a large self-interest.

So expect to have to stay on the same kernel/Xorg for a really long time.  Best
to switch over to just updating for GLSA issues and running a really stable
system.  And then when you do upgrade, expect to have to deal with the issue
again.  Most of 3DLabs' base will buy a set of systems and cards for a specific
project, and after the 3 yrs or so the project runs, move on to the next 
project, at
which time they will update the software and probably hardware as well.

Bob
-  

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Hardware Testing a PC

2006-01-20 Thread Bob Sanders
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:26:23 +
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> Try searching Freshmeat for "stress test", there are several programs to
> put network, CPU, I/O etc. through their paces. There's also StressLinux,
> a live CD containing a number of these programs.
>

emerge -uDNav stress

Generally, it's best to add -

emerge -uDNav rss-glx

The start up one or more of the screensavers via the commandline - 
/usr/lib/misc/xscreensaver/skyrocket

which will test both openGL and sound.  Add stress on the command line and
that takes care of most things except 2D dma.  But because desktops, like KDE,
Gnome, e17, all use a layer over the X root window, one can't see the test 
happen.

Assuming e16, flux, openbox, etc.  a script would be created that does the 
following -

Sets up odd and even forefground and background with solid colors like blue, 
green,
red, yellow.  Sets the bitmap path to /usr/include/X11/bitmaps and then create 
a loop
that takes the bitmaps, one by one, found in the previous path and rotates each 
one 
though xsetroot - xsetroot -bitmap $bgpath/$bg -fg $oddfg -bg $oddbg
Then sleep for a few sec, and get the next combo.  Then do all the even 
background
combos.

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] How many people use KDE?

2006-01-20 Thread Bob Sanders
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:44:19 +1000
"Alan E. Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> May I ask others' experiences with e17?  I just wasted my holiday
> installing e17 on two of three machines.  It is smaller than Kde, but
> background is 20% of cpu .  Buggy.  Beautiful.  A PITA to configure,
> and menus suck. I don't think I'll be there long.   I liked
> enlightenment .16 except I guess I really do need icons to remind me
> of what I've got on the system, and good menus.
> 

I used it a bit.  Reminded me too much of WinXX/KDE/Gnome do I went
back to e16.7.

Icons can be added with Rox and Rox-session.  Menu editing is easy with
e16menuedit and key editing with e16keyedit.

> I still haven't decided to dump e17 for real, but in looking back, I
> did note how heavy KDE 3.5 is.  Gnome: my employers already treat me
> like a child; I need options and flexibility.
>

It's also possible to use engage with e16.7.  giving a task bar at the bottom 
of the
screen.


> But one glaring deficiency keeps hitting me in the face---you can't do
> links with them.  Noone has figured out how to make links user
> friendly?  It's too complicated for the end user? 

Rox filer lets me make links.

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] emerge world?

2006-01-14 Thread Bob Sanders
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:58:07 +0100
Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> [blocks B ] media-libs/libungif (is blocking media-libs/giflib-4.1.4)
> [blocks B ]  app-text/poppler-0.4.3-r4)
> [empty/missing/bad digest]: sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.12-r6
> [blocks B ] =x11-libs/openmotif-2.2.3-r3 (is blocking 
> x11-libs/motif-config-0.9) 
> 
> 
> I get these blocks when trying to emerge world. I can't seem to figure 
> out why for any of them. Can someone shed some light?

emerge -C libungif xpdf
emerge -uDNav world
emerge -uDNav xpdf

Bob
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  1   2   3   >