[appengine-java] Re: Stranger behaviour with query using AND
Instead of SELECT o FROM Player o WHERE o.age = ?2 AND o.name = ?1 have you tried SELECT FROM Player WHERE (age == ?2) (name == ?1) ? On Oct 6, 12:10 am, roberto_sc roberto.cal...@gmail.com wrote: The following query: Query jquery = em.createQuery(SELECT o FROM Player o WHERE o.name = \Zarolho\ AND o.age = 33); returns 1 result for me. But doing this: Query jquery = em.createQuery(SELECT o FROM Player o WHERE o.name = ?1 AND o.age = ?2); jquery.setParameter(2, 33); jquery.setParameter(1, Zarolho); returns nothing. And more strangely: Query jquery = em.createQuery(SELECT o FROM Player o WHERE o.age = ?2 AND o.name = ?1); jquery.setParameter(2, 33); jquery.setParameter(1, Zarolho); returns the instance! I just switch the positions for the fields and it works! Same string, same code, only the position has changed. Please help, I'm stucked on this for a long time. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: Wicket/JPA application works locally but fails when deployed on GAE
swapplace isn't a good example, it is too simple When you said don't use wicket + GAE!!! you will have lot of serialization problems did you mean to say don't use wicket + GAE for complex applications!!! you will have lot of serialization problems? You might care to explain what you mean by too simple. Anyway, I like GAE/J and I like Wicket. This combination is fine for me, including with my more complicated application under development. I presume that this might be true for John Patterson and others? On Oct 6, 2:02 am, nico nfmelen...@gmail.com wrote: swapplace isn't a good example, it is too simple NM On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Ian Marshall ianmarshall...@gmail.comwrote: Mmmm: my link has been Googlised. If interested, try http://www.SwapPlace.co.uk instead. On Oct 4, 9:11 am, Ian Marshall ianmarshall...@gmail.com wrote: I disagree. I use Wicket and JDO on GAE/J; it works fine for me, including no serialisation problems. As a working example, I am satisfied with my Wicket/JDO/GAE/J proof-of- concept web application at www.SwapPlace.co.uk. I am using the lessons learnt for my commercial web site development, which is coming along nicely too. On Oct 3, 9:43 pm, nico nfmelen...@gmail.com wrote: Hey! don't use wicket + GAE!!! you will have lot of serialization problems and your project will FAIL! you will lose time and money! bug:http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2500 Bye! NM -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- Nicolás Meléndez Java Software Developer Cell: +54 9 1157535454 1) Google App Engine works: 1.a)http://www.clasificad.com.ar (Local free classifieds for housing, sale, services, local community, curses,jobs, and events - GAE/J + Wicket + YUI) 1.b)http://www.chessk.com (Massive multiplayer chess online GAE/J + Applets + Wicket) 2) Linkedin:http://ar.linkedin.com/in/nicolasmelendez -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: Easy way to delete unowned (child) entities in same entity group ?
Hi Prashant, dependent entities are deleted when parent is: see http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/relationships.html#Dependent_Children_and_Cascading_Deletes didier On Oct 6, 11:23 am, Prashant nextprash...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Suppose, I have two types of Entities Test and TestChild. For all TestChild entities i have set key as child of some Test entity (because i want both entities in same entity group to support transaction) but i haven't mapped TestChild entity to any variable in Test entity. Now, i am wondering if there is any way, such that, if i delete Test entity then all corresponding child TestChild entitie(s) should also get deleted ? -- Prashantwww.claymus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: Easy way to delete unowned (child) entities in same entity group ?
You have a partial response at the end of the link: The JDO implementation does the work to delete dependent child objects, not the datastore. If you delete a parent entity using the low-level API or the Admin Console, the related child objects will not be deleted. So, I you play with entities outside of JDO (i.e directly through low- level API), no cascaded delete. regards didier On Oct 6, 4:37 pm, Prashant nextprash...@gmail.com wrote: Hi didier, I wanted to say that I don't want to make an owned relationship, i.e. I am not using any field to list TestChild entites in Test class as given in the example : @Persistent @Element(dependent = true) private List childs; The only thing I am doing is to set parent key in each TestChild entity so that both Test and TestEntity come into same entity group. The problem here is that cascade delete doesn't work now. On 6 October 2010 16:28, Didier Durand durand.did...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Prashant, dependent entities are deleted when parent is: see http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/relationships.ht... didier On Oct 6, 11:23 am, Prashant nextprash...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Suppose, I have two types of Entities Test and TestChild. For all TestChild entities i have set key as child of some Test entity (because i want both entities in same entity group to support transaction) but i haven't mapped TestChild entity to any variable in Test entity. Now, i am wondering if there is any way, such that, if i delete Test entity then all corresponding child TestChild entitie(s) should also get deleted ? -- Prashantwww.claymus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- Prashantwww.claymus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] I have updated new content but nothing changed
Hi I updated some static content, also updated the default Servlet code. Before uploading, the app version is also increased. But after I use Eclipse plugin to upload my app, nothing changed in browser. Did I miss something before update content to app engine? thanks a lot -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: I have updated new content but nothing changed
I got my problem, I have to choose the latest version in versions section. forgive me. On 10月7日, 上午12時31分, Matt Jiang matt.ji...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I updated some static content, also updated the default Servlet code. Before uploading, the app version is also increased. But after I use Eclipse plugin to upload my app, nothing changed in browser. Did I miss something before update content to app engine? thanks a lot -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: Web Hook - Asynchronous - Where is my response?
You fire the task and the task is retried until the operation is complete, you can see the tasks being retried in the admin console, but there is no hook to when its completed, considering that it may take a day or two to complete based on how many retries are required. On Oct 6, 1:10 pm, Andy hksduhk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have read the Task API for many times and am still confused about the web hook. If web hook is asynchronous, where do I get the signal (like Future) that my task is completed and where do I get the response of the web hook request? Thanks, Andy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: Web Hook - Asynchronous - Where is my response?
A datastore operation for when the task completes would prob be your best bet. On Oct 6, 3:23 pm, Andy hksduhk...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your quick reply Robert. So is there a way to check the task status by task ID or some sort? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Many to many relation ship
Hello,
I read that many to many relation ship must resolved by using sets of
Key.
But what I don't understand is how do I specify the type the Key is
referencing.
I mean that if I have a many to many relation ship between Car and
User, how jpa or jdo knows that Car is associated to User ?
public class Car {
@OneToMany
private SetKey users; //this relation ship is untyped
}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Many to many relation ship
Not sure why the datastore needs to know that a Car is associated with a
particular User.
There is no easy way for the datastore to handle cascading deletes in a
M-to-M relationship w/o reference counting.
Also setting the Fetch policy to load children with the parent load is not
an option due to them being in separate entity groups.
Regardless, you can use
*getObjectByIdhttp://db.apache.org/jdo/api23/apidocs/javax/jdo/PersistenceManager.html#getObjectById%28java.lang.Class,%20java.lang.Object%29
*(java.lang.ClassT cls, java.lang.Object key)
to verify the Key is referencing a particular class and an object exists.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:15 PM, hadf hadrien.for...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I read that many to many relation ship must resolved by using sets of
Key.
But what I don't understand is how do I specify the type the Key is
referencing.
I mean that if I have a many to many relation ship between Car and
User, how jpa or jdo knows that Car is associated to User ?
public class Car {
@OneToMany
private SetKey users; //this relation ship is untyped
}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Datastore, Java, JSP, JSON, AJAX, Web Page. Is it going to work?
Hi, I am new to GAE and I want to make a web application page on it. I was used to work with PHP for web applications but lately I am struggling to get in the thinking of a GAE web application. After reading tutorials and trying to do different things I came up with a thinking how I want my project to be and how to make the communication through the different layers. I will explain you my thinking and I would like to tell me if am I in the right way and if I am not I would like someone to put back into it. e.g. I thought to have a user @persistent class for storing the information of a user, such as name, email(as a primary key), registration date etc... (I will use the User class for logging in, but I want to keep some data also for every user) Then I need to create a java (dao) class that reads and inserts data to the datastore tables-objects. I thought to create a different one for each @persistent class Then Java files that execute the functions from the DAO classes and give information to the jsp files which through JSON give information to the Ajax functions in the HTML page (which I was thinking also to be the welcome-file in my web.xml) So here comes the questions. Is something like this right? Is it going to work? And if not what do you propose me to do. Any links or examples are very very welcome. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Datastore, Java, JSP, JSON, AJAX, Web Page. Is it going to work?
Hi, I am new to GAE and I want to make a web application page on it. I was used to work with PHP for web applications but lately I am struggling to get in the thinking of a GAE web application. After reading tutorials and trying to do different things I came up with a thinking how I want my project to be and how to make the communication through the different layers. I will explain you my thinking and I would like to tell me if am I in the right way and if I am not I would like someone to put back into it. e.g. I thought to have a user @persistent class for storing the information of a user, such as name, email(as a primary key), registration date etc... (I will use the User class for logging in, but I want to keep some data also for every user) Then I need to create a java (dao) class that reads and inserts data to the datastore tables-objects. I thought to create a different one for each @persistent class Then Java files that execute the functions from the DAO classes and give information to the jsp files which through JSON give information to the Ajax functions in the HTML page (which I was thinking also to be the welcome-file in my web.xml) So here comes the questions. Is something like this right? Is it going to work? And if not what do you propose me to do. Any links or examples are very very welcome. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Web Hook - Asynchronous - Where is my response?
Hi, I have read the Task API for many times and am still confused about the web hook. If web hook is asynchronous, where do I get the signal (like Future) that my task is completed and where do I get the response of the web hook request? Thanks, Andy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Spring MVC on GAE: Slow Load Time
Hello All! I recently deployed a Spring MVC application to google app engine, and the intial load time is about 7sec. Once the application is loaded, the app is quite responsive. But, if the app is idle for more than 1 minute (there isn't ANY traffic to it) the app needs to be again reloaded by GAE, which, takes about 7sec as well. For a PRD-level application this is unacceptable. (The app is empty -- I'm not even using JPA, Sitemesh, Spring Security, etc yet. It just loads a jsp page with some text.) The only best practice to fix the 'load time' I've seen so far is to set up a cron job that hits the url every minute, therefore keeping the app 'loaded'. Obviously this is a terrible solution. So here are the questions: Are there any best practices for Spring on GAE in terms of responsiveness? Since google and spring are working on developing better integration between the two of them, has there been any news/progress on this problem? I can't find anything concrete, that's why I'm asking it here Thanks! Vladimir -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Google Plugin for Eclipse: Deprecating Support for Eclipse 3.3
Hello Google Plugin for Eclipse users, According to our usage statistics, less than 2% of our user base uses Eclipse 3.3 with the Google Plugin for Eclipse. Supporting Eclipse 3.3 limits the set of features offered by Eclipse that we can leverage and increases our maintenance burden. So, we have decided to deprecate support for Eclipse 3.3 by December 1st, 2010. While future versions of the plugin will be available only for Eclipse 3.4+, we will keep previous versions of GPE available that support Eclipse 3.3. Please let us know if you have any questions or concerns. Alex Humesky Software Engineer, GPE Team Google Inc. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] new book by Ikai
Are you publishing this book? Professional Google App Engine Programming With Java I did see it mentioned on Amazon but it seems to have vanished! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: Web Hook - Asynchronous - Where is my response?
Thanks for your quick reply Robert. So is there a way to check the task status by task ID or some sort? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] new book by Ikai
No, I won't be publishing this. I hope to be publishing the more unique content on my blog: http://ikaisays.com/ This book is written by Dan Sanderson, a former member of the App Engine team: http://www.amazon.com/Programming-Google-App-Engine-Infrastructure/dp/059652272X There are a few other ones you may be interested in. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:13 AM, gadya rebre...@gmail.com wrote: Are you publishing this book? Professional Google App Engine Programming With Java I did see it mentioned on Amazon but it seems to have vanished! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Datastore, Java, JSP, JSON, AJAX, Web Page. Is it going to work?
Hi x_maras, re: using email as a primary key http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/users/overview.html The User object exposes a unique user ID that is guaranteed to be stable for the lifetime of the user's account, even if the email address is changed. You can use this value in a datastore entity key or property value. re: Datastore, Java, JSP, JSON, AJAX, Web Page Writing a RESTful service that can respond to AJAX requests with JSON payloads is very much a mainstream way to do things on app-engine. Be careful to keep the processing response times really short. The max response time is 30 seconds, the sweet spot is to average about 1 second response time. Happy Coding, --Stevko On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:34 PM, x_maras dinost...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am new to GAE and I want to make a web application page on it. I was used to work with PHP for web applications but lately I am struggling to get in the thinking of a GAE web application. After reading tutorials and trying to do different things I came up with a thinking how I want my project to be and how to make the communication through the different layers. I will explain you my thinking and I would like to tell me if am I in the right way and if I am not I would like someone to put back into it. e.g. I thought to have a user @persistent class for storing the information of a user, such as name, email(as a primary key), registration date etc... (I will use the User class for logging in, but I want to keep some data also for every user) Then I need to create a java (dao) class that reads and inserts data to the datastore tables-objects. I thought to create a different one for each @persistent class Then Java files that execute the functions from the DAO classes and give information to the jsp files which through JSON give information to the Ajax functions in the HTML page (which I was thinking also to be the welcome-file in my web.xml) So here comes the questions. Is something like this right? Is it going to work? And if not what do you propose me to do. Any links or examples are very very welcome. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
You will need to watch that libraries/modules or code that uses things like with (context managers ...) include the from __future__ import with_statement otherwise these will blow up when you run in production. Also 2.6 has advanced string formatting .format method of str and unicode which isn't present in 2.5 2.6 has a future feature of using print as a function. Here is a complete list http://docs.python.org/whatsnew/2.6.html So the bottom line is you whilst 2.6 will work in dev, you could end up with code that will not run in production. Chances are you are unlikely to use these features in your own code but a thirdparty library could. So user beware and test in live appengine (get your self a test instance) before you unleash you new code on the masses ;-) Personally I wouldn't bother using 2.6 until it is officially supported by google in production. The little extra pain you might have in dev setting it up will be a lot less than the production pain if you miss something and have to go and install 2.5 anyway ;-) Rgds Tim On Oct 6, 11:17 am, Peter Petrov onest...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.comikai.l%2bgro...@google.com wrote: - Fixed an issue with task queue tasks not running on the dev_appserver when using Python 2.6. Does this mean that Python 2.6 is now (more or less) supported for the dev_appserver? Are there any significant issues remaining when not using Python 2.5? I'm asking because it's quite a pain having to setup an old Python version on modern Linux distros. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Latency related follow up
Sounds like a cold start problem. I don't have experience on this but there are some advices in the forum. If your app grows to have sustained traffic it will improve for sure, but when starting or for low-traffic sites the problem remains. I see that there's a feature on the App Engine Roadmap to help address this: Ability to reserve instances to reduce application loading overhead. On Oct 5, 12:47 pm, Kangesh Gunaseelan kang...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your suggestion. I will take a look at the appstats one more time. What I am noticing though is api_cpu under 500ms (and many much below that) but sometimes overall cpu overshoots 700 ms. More over, for request aborted error messages, it doesn't really look like the service is even called - overall cpu in those instances is over 1 ms but api_cpu is 0 ms. Am I interpreting this right? I have seen old posts where users recommended a cron and I tried that out today with surprisingly positive results. Other than this potentially causing few instances to stay alive, I can't think of any other explanations. Any one why that is better? In any case, I wonder if that is going to really help if concurrent requests increase and demand more active instances. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Exceeded soft memory limit
No, i dont use global variables or just variables with a constants values You know why exactely signifie this message? On Oct 5, 8:47 pm, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote: Are you using global variables to cache stuff at the module level or something similar? Robert On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 13:25, sahid sahid.ferdja...@gmail.com wrote: up On Oct 3, 10:06 pm, sahid sahid.ferdja...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have a little problem with my application, i have a lot of Exceeded soft memory limit exception. But i know why. My application is a daiting website. All users has a possibility to make a search with many criteria So i have a model with a lot of criteria, i use the filter system of the datastore to get a part of the result (like gender, and has_picture, country) but with the result (limited has 200 and ordered by last_presence) i use python to filter it. I have many exceptions, but i dont know how i can do better... Already, the result is limited to 200 and it's really small, i need about 500. Exceeded soft memory limit with 299.676 MB after servicing 8724 requests total Exceeded soft memory limit with 299.145 MB after servicing 1182 requests total Exceeded soft memory limit with 206.145 MB after servicing 636 requests total Exceeded soft memory limit with 299.145 MB after servicing 371 requests total Exceeded soft memory limit with 287.895 MB after servicing 2843 requests total Exceeded soft memory limit with 299.594 MB after servicing 7138 requests total APPID: devel-inchallah Cordialy, Sahid -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Easy way to delete unowned (child) entities in same entity group ?
Hi, Suppose, I have two types of Entities Test and TestChild. For all TestChild entities i have set key as child of some Test entity (because i want both entities in same entity group to support transaction) but i haven't mapped TestChild entity to any variable in Test entity. Now, i am wondering if there is any way, such that, if i delete Test entity then all corresponding child TestChild entitie(s) should also get deleted ? -- Prashant www.claymus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. Why expose ALL users to risk (and open Google to lawsuits) for the sake of a few inexperienced developers? Star this post if you agree. I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. Greg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
+1 On Oct 6, 11:48 am, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. Why expose ALL users to risk (and open Google to lawsuits) for the sake of a few inexperienced developers? Star this post if you agree. I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. Greg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
+1 On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:54, Stefano Ciccarelli stef...@indacosoftware.itwrote: +1 On Oct 6, 11:48 am, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.comikai.l%2bgro...@google.com wrote: - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. Why expose ALL users to risk (and open Google to lawsuits) for the sake of a few inexperienced developers? Star this post if you agree. I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. Greg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
+1 for download optional, and it can't be changed without re-reploying (app.yaml config) T On Oct 6, 5:48 pm, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. Why expose ALL users to risk (and open Google to lawsuits) for the sake of a few inexperienced developers? Star this post if you agree. I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. Greg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Easy way to delete unowned (child) entities in same entity group ?
No. You need to do a (kindless) ancestor query and delete all entities found before you delete the parent Test. If you know the child is only of one type you can do a normal ancestor query. You could subclass the delete() method of the Test class to do this, but I don't know if it will work if you use db.delete( list of keys or instances ) 2010/10/6 Prashant nextprash...@gmail.com: Hi, Suppose, I have two types of Entities Test and TestChild. For all TestChild entities i have set key as child of some Test entity (because i want both entities in same entity group to support transaction) but i haven't mapped TestChild entity to any variable in Test entity. Now, i am wondering if there is any way, such that, if i delete Test entity then all corresponding child TestChild entitie(s) should also get deleted ? -- Prashant www.claymus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
+1 2010/10/6 Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com: On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. Why expose ALL users to risk (and open Google to lawsuits) for the sake of a few inexperienced developers? Star this post if you agree. I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. Greg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Could I recover the application that all associated developers account has deleted ?
Enabling billing is one way to guard against this I think - as the developer with associated billing details can't be removed. On Oct 4, 8:05 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: My earlier email was incorrect - if all developers are removed, the application will serve for one month before it is permanently deleted, since this is the recovery period. I've reenabled the application. This application has not gone through the irreversible stage yet, so it's a good thing we recovered it now. I can readd you as a developer, but can you verify that you own the account? Email me the auth domain you are using (it's a very strange looking one) and I'll add this Gmail address you're using back to the list of developers. When you delete user accounts, there should be a warning in the domain dashboard about data/apps being deleted. How can we better warn developers of this behavior? We can't email the developers, since their accounts were deleted, and if you delete a developer account, you can't log into the admin console. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.comikai.l%2bgro...@google.com wrote: What's the application ID? I'll look into this for you to see if it's recoverable. Is the application deleted, or are just the developers deleted? More likely than not we garbage collect apps, so that might explain the delay. As far as I know, this shouldn't have been the case. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Masatoshi Iwasaki mstshiwas...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Recently I became an administrator for Google Apps for our domain. Yesterday an application hosted on GAE for Google Apps of our domain suddenly got 404 error. I asked former administarator to tell me developer's account for the application, but he had already deleted developers' accounts from our domain about a month ago because of developers had left from the orgnization. My questions are: i) Could I recover our application? When I access the url, It shows only 404 error. I have tried to recreate an developer's account with the same name of the deleted developer's account, but I couldn't get access to app engine admin console. ii) If this is caused by deleting accounts, why did it take more than one month to stop the application? If it immediately stops the application, we would have noticed this problem earlier. Any suggestions are welcome. Regards, Masatoshi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2Bunsubscrib e...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: cannot log into dashboard
Hi, I have the same problem. When logging in to: https://appengine.google.com/ I only get the introduction (https://appengine.google.com/start), I have 2-3 apps running, and can't adminster them at the moment. Ideas ? Thanks Marcus On Oct 5, 10:56 pm, Ron ronsterc...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Having problems signing into a new account I opened today. When I try to log into an app i get kicked into the start page each time, the one that asks you to create an application. I mange two other accounts and they are working fine. I don't know if it is something to do with it being the same email I use to manage the google apps domain. It worked for a while earlier on. I was able to create the app and install the application, even linked it to the domain. It now works onwww.audiogo.co.uk. But I now can no longer go into the console or the dashboard. Any ideas? Thanks Ron -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: cannot log into dashboard
Sorry, my bad. Solved by using: appengine.google.com/a/yourdomain.xyz. thanks Marcus On Oct 6, 1:53 pm, Marcus mar...@alexit.se wrote: Hi, I have the same problem. When logging in to: https://appengine.google.com/ I only get the introduction (https://appengine.google.com/start), I have 2-3 apps running, and can't adminster them at the moment. Ideas ? Thanks Marcus On Oct 5, 10:56 pm, Ron ronsterc...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Having problems signing into a new account I opened today. When I try to log into an app i get kicked into the start page each time, the one that asks you to create an application. I mange two other accounts and they are working fine. I don't know if it is something to do with it being the same email I use to manage the google apps domain. It worked for a while earlier on. I was able to create the app and install the application, even linked it to the domain. It now works onwww.audiogo.co.uk. But I now can no longer go into the console or the dashboard. Any ideas? Thanks Ron -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
+1 2010/10/6 Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.comikai.l%2bgro...@google.com wrote: - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. Why expose ALL users to risk (and open Google to lawsuits) for the sake of a few inexperienced developers? Star this post if you agree. I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. Greg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Exceeded soft memory limit
just an extract of my log http://goo.gl/226V On Oct 6, 10:48 am, sahid sahid.ferdja...@gmail.com wrote: No, i dont use global variables or just variables with a constants values You know why exactely signifie this message? On Oct 5, 8:47 pm, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote: Are you using global variables to cache stuff at the module level or something similar? Robert On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 13:25, sahid sahid.ferdja...@gmail.com wrote: up On Oct 3, 10:06 pm, sahid sahid.ferdja...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have a little problem with my application, i have a lot of Exceeded soft memory limit exception. But i know why. My application is a daiting website. All users has a possibility to make a search with many criteria So i have a model with a lot of criteria, i use the filter system of the datastore to get a part of the result (like gender, and has_picture, country) but with the result (limited has 200 and ordered by last_presence) i use python to filter it. I have many exceptions, but i dont know how i can do better... Already, the result is limited to 200 and it's really small, i need about 500. Exceeded soft memory limit with 299.676 MB after servicing 8724 requests total Exceeded soft memory limit with 299.145 MB after servicing 1182 requests total Exceeded soft memory limit with 206.145 MB after servicing 636 requests total Exceeded soft memory limit with 299.145 MB after servicing 371 requests total Exceeded soft memory limit with 287.895 MB after servicing 2843 requests total Exceeded soft memory limit with 299.594 MB after servicing 7138 requests total APPID: devel-inchallah Cordialy, Sahid -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
+1 Indeed, quite disconcerting. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Tom Wu service.g2...@gmail.com wrote: +1 2010/10/6 Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.comikai.l%2bgro...@google.com wrote: - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. Why expose ALL users to risk (and open Google to lawsuits) for the sake of a few inexperienced developers? Star this post if you agree. I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. Greg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] App engine stats page
Is there a tutorial where i can read about the App engine stats page ? (call traces + api call times, etc) Or at least where i can find more information on how to interpret those graphics exactly. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
+1 On Oct 6, 2:05 pm, Jeff Schwartz jefftschwa...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Indeed, quite disconcerting. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Tom Wu service.g2...@gmail.com wrote: +1 2010/10/6 Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.comikai.l%2bgro...@google.com wrote: - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. Why expose ALL users to risk (and open Google to lawsuits) for the sake of a few inexperienced developers? Star this post if you agree. I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. Greg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2Bunsubscrib e...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2Bunsubscrib e...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Easy way to delete unowned (child) entities in same entity group ?
Hi djidjadji, can you tell me, with an example, how to write a kind-less/normal ancestor query? thanks in advance :) On 6 October 2010 16:02, djidjadji djidja...@gmail.com wrote: No. You need to do a (kindless) ancestor query and delete all entities found before you delete the parent Test. If you know the child is only of one type you can do a normal ancestor query. You could subclass the delete() method of the Test class to do this, but I don't know if it will work if you use db.delete( list of keys or instances ) 2010/10/6 Prashant nextprash...@gmail.com: Hi, Suppose, I have two types of Entities Test and TestChild. For all TestChild entities i have set key as child of some Test entity (because i want both entities in same entity group to support transaction) but i haven't mapped TestChild entity to any variable in Test entity. Now, i am wondering if there is any way, such that, if i delete Test entity then all corresponding child TestChild entitie(s) should also get deleted ? -- Prashant www.claymus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Prashant www.claymus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Allocating id's after import to another app
I've imported data from one app id to another and now I'm getting spurious messages of duplicate id's, apparently because the id's are not automatically allocated. What would be the best strategy to allocate these id's again so that sequence generation will not attempt to use the existing id's? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Cost of a Google Engine App
I'm developing an App for a specific group of Google Apps users in a company. Do I have to pay 8 dollar a month for each Google Apps user in the domain, or can I specify a group. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
+1 On Oct 6, 10:48 am, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. Why expose ALL users to risk (and open Google to lawsuits) for the sake of a few inexperienced developers? Star this post if you agree. I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. Greg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
+1 On Oct 6, 9:59 am, mscwd01 mscw...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Oct 6, 10:48 am, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. Why expose ALL users to risk (and open Google to lawsuits) for the sake of a few inexperienced developers? Star this post if you agree. I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. Greg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
+1 On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Mike Wesner mike.wes...@webfilings.com wrote: +1 On Oct 6, 9:59 am, mscwd01 mscw...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Oct 6, 10:48 am, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. Why expose ALL users to risk (and open Google to lawsuits) for the sake of a few inexperienced developers? Star this post if you agree. I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. Greg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
+1000 The download feature should be optional, and off by default. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.comikai.l%2bgro...@google.com wrote: - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. Why expose ALL users to risk (and open Google to lawsuits) for the sake of a few inexperienced developers? Star this post if you agree. I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. Greg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
On Oct 6, 6:48 am, Greg wrote: I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. +1 I always considered not being able to download the code a feature. Making it optional would probably be ideal. -- rodrigo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
+1. Make it optional - default to on is ok. As long as it can be disabled. On 6 October 2010 16:29, Rodrigo Moraes rodrigo.mor...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 6:48 am, Greg wrote: I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. +1 I always considered not being able to download the code a feature. Making it optional would probably be ideal. -- rodrigo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: app engine dashboard two step verification
I hope this is something we can disable. I don't want to have to mess with some phone app every time I need to log in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
+1 On Oct 6, 8:56 am, Barry Hunter barrybhun...@gmail.com wrote: +1. Make it optional - default to on is ok. As long as it can be disabled. On 6 October 2010 16:29, Rodrigo Moraes rodrigo.mor...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 6:48 am, Greg wrote: I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. +1 I always considered not being able to download the code a feature. Making it optional would probably be ideal. -- rodrigo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] force login to myapp on GAE
Hi, Is there a way to require/force a user to login before they get access to an application running on GAE? Currently it seems access is available to anyone with the URL. I don't wish to run this on a Google Apps Domain as I require a SSL connection. It is probably possible that it could be done programmatically onModeuleLoad() if users were previously added to DB? This would be more of a hack though Any suggestions? Thanks, Will -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Access to Calendar
Dear all, I am new using Google App Engine, I would like to create an application using this environment that allows to use for each user his Google Calendar and the user can create Special Events (with a Form designed for me). These events trigger Alerts via mail,... I don't know if it possible using Google App Engine and what is the best option for do it (Python or Java). Thanks in advance. Kind Regards. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Problems (cache-related?) since enabling billing
I have an app that sits behind a reverse proxy serving requests for multiple domains using the X-Forwarded-For header. This has been working very well for many months. Yesterday, after enabling billing for the app, I started seeing dynamic requests that were getting served the wrong content (content for the wrong domain). In troubleshooting the issue, I noticed that many of the problem requests are served in only a couple of milliseconds, and the logs don't contain the normal logging messages that my code should produce, and don't show up in appstats. I'm assuming this means that the caching I've read about but never seen to work is now serving requests (since the Cache-Control header is set), and is not keeping cached pages separate based on the X-Forwarded-For header, but just the path. Is there any way to confirm whether this is what is happening? If so, is there a way to disable this functionality (going back to the way it worked before we enabled billing), without removing the Cache-Control header and losing it's benefits? -Mike -=- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
+1 On Oct 6, 5:48 am, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. Why expose ALL users to risk (and open Google to lawsuits) for the sake of a few inexperienced developers? Star this post if you agree. I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. Greg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: appcfg.py download_data [INFO] Authentication Failed
I've had a problem getting the download working as I want, but interestingly, I've got two accounts. The one that I originanlly used to setup the site (which is a business account), from which I invited myself (my personal account) in the permissions section. When uploading, I can use either account, when downloading I can only use my personal account, not the account that I used to setup the site. This makes no sense at all to me, but hope it helps you get the download working. I am able to get a sqllite dump from the database, using either appcfg.py or bulkloader.py, but I haven't yet been able to download in the format that I would like which is annoying and frustrating. A On Sep 26, 11:20 pm, Vladimir Prudnikov pru...@gmail.com wrote: The same problem for me. I'm trying to download data. Authentication failed each time. I tried 10 times or more. I'm sure too that I enter correct email and password (in another tab I deploy to the same app with the same credentials at the same time). Version 1.3.7 (1.3.7.891) On Sep 1, 12:46 am, morphium_hidrochloricum trone...@gmail.com wrote: Nothing changed after I upgraded to 1.3.7. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
Thanks for the feedback. We'll discuss the code download feature in more detail. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 AM, tcg tomgu...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Oct 6, 5:48 am, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.comikai.l%2bgro...@google.com wrote: - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. Why expose ALL users to risk (and open Google to lawsuits) for the sake of a few inexperienced developers? Star this post if you agree. I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. Greg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Getting Python to Read Dashboard Metrics
I don't think there is any way to do this, but i believe you can watch for specific over quota exceptions and then adjust your execution path based on that. http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/quotas.html#When_a_Resource_is_Depleted On Oct 5, 4:41 am, jdownie jdow...@gmail.com wrote: I'd like to build into my application different behaviour when it hits, say 80% of the daily quote for CPU. Is that possible? The only api call I could see was one that allowed me to measure the load of each individual query. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
+1 No download was a feature. AND it helped people with poor practices learn the value of version control. :) On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 08:04, tcg tomgu...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Oct 6, 5:48 am, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. Why expose ALL users to risk (and open Google to lawsuits) for the sake of a few inexperienced developers? Star this post if you agree. I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. Greg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Cost of a Google Engine App
Unless you need some of the unique features of App Engine for Business, you don't have to use it - and can instead use normal App Engine. Depending on the usage, might fit into free quota. You can set App Engine to authenticate against a Apps Domain. And choose to limit it to a group of users if you wish. On 6 October 2010 15:47, b...@dutchtape.com b...@dutchtape.com wrote: I'm developing an App for a specific group of Google Apps users in a company. Do I have to pay 8 dollar a month for each Google Apps user in the domain, or can I specify a group. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: app engine dashboard two step verification
2FA is optional and by default off for Google Apps. As not everybody has a device it will stay like that. Even when 2FA is on you will be required to use OTP eithe every time or once in a month. On Oct 6, 6:11 pm, Darien Caldwell darien.caldw...@gmail.com wrote: I hope this is something we can disable. I don't want to have to mess with some phone app every time I need to log in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Access to Calendar
You can use the gdata API's to access calendar information. http://code.google.com/apis/calendar/data/1.0/developers_guide_python.html Sending mail from AE is pretty easy too. http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/mail/overview.html If you know Java use Java, if you are familiar with Python use Python. If you are new to programming I would (personally) suggest Python. Robert On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 07:56, Juanmi jmdur...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, I am new using Google App Engine, I would like to create an application using this environment that allows to use for each user his Google Calendar and the user can create Special Events (with a Form designed for me). These events trigger Alerts via mail,... I don't know if it possible using Google App Engine and what is the best option for do it (Python or Java). Thanks in advance. Kind Regards. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
Thanks Tim, of course I'm talking about Python2.5-compatible code only. There are tools which can help you keep compatibility with 2.5 even if actually using a newer version - e.g. Eclipse PyDev has a grammar checker with configurable target version. Common sense also helps. Having this in mind, dev_appserver compatibility with later Python versions can certainly be useful. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Tim Hoffman zutes...@gmail.com wrote: You will need to watch that libraries/modules or code that uses things like with (context managers ...) include the from __future__ import with_statement otherwise these will blow up when you run in production. Also 2.6 has advanced string formatting .format method of str and unicode which isn't present in 2.5 2.6 has a future feature of using print as a function. Here is a complete list http://docs.python.org/whatsnew/2.6.html So the bottom line is you whilst 2.6 will work in dev, you could end up with code that will not run in production. Chances are you are unlikely to use these features in your own code but a thirdparty library could. So user beware and test in live appengine (get your self a test instance) before you unleash you new code on the masses ;-) Personally I wouldn't bother using 2.6 until it is officially supported by google in production. The little extra pain you might have in dev setting it up will be a lot less than the production pain if you miss something and have to go and install 2.5 anyway ;-) Rgds Tim On Oct 6, 11:17 am, Peter Petrov onest...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com ikai.l%2bgro...@google.com ikai.l%2bgro...@google.com ikai.l%252bgro...@google.com wrote: - Fixed an issue with task queue tasks not running on the dev_appserver when using Python 2.6. Does this mean that Python 2.6 is now (more or less) supported for the dev_appserver? Are there any significant issues remaining when not using Python 2.5? I'm asking because it's quite a pain having to setup an old Python version on modern Linux distros. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] force login to myapp on GAE
For Python: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/config/appconfig.html#Requiring_Login_or_Administrator_Status For Java (YAML): http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/configyaml/appconfig_yaml.html#required For Java (XML): http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/config/webxml.html#Security_and_Authentication Robert On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 06:27, Will shatner.will...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is there a way to require/force a user to login before they get access to an application running on GAE? Currently it seems access is available to anyone with the URL. I don't wish to run this on a Google Apps Domain as I require a SSL connection. It is probably possible that it could be done programmatically onModeuleLoad() if users were previously added to DB? This would be more of a hack though Any suggestions? Thanks, Will -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Better support for linux
Hello, Currently I am giving classes of Google App Engine and I am clearly seeing how linux students are moving to windows. The reason is simply that it is more time consuming for them to start new projects, given the fact that they don't have an App Engine Launcher. I would love to see GAE giving a better support for some linux platforms. At least for Ubuntu. Thank you, and apart from that, good job with all the new features. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Better support for linux
You could always suggest they switch to a Mac instead of Windows. There is a launcher, and at least it is not Windows. :) On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 14:35, RSan ufreeurs...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Currently I am giving classes of Google App Engine and I am clearly seeing how linux students are moving to windows. The reason is simply that it is more time consuming for them to start new projects, given the fact that they don't have an App Engine Launcher. I would love to see GAE giving a better support for some linux platforms. At least for Ubuntu. Thank you, and apart from that, good job with all the new features. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Still getting errors sending mail
As another follow up, I just sent out ~700 emails and received this error 29 times. The interesting part is that it appears even when this exception is raised, the email can still be sent. Thus 29 of my emails were sent twice. Anybody have any information on this situation ? On Oct 5, 5:04 pm, Jamie H ja...@mhztech.com wrote: Sorry to reply to my own message, but I wanted to add that I am about to start an email campaign for a client, so it is very important that my emails are successfully sent... if not, and invitations are not delivered, nobody will show up for several events around the country, and alot of people will be very upset and embarassed to say the least... I have seen another poster on the group mention that recently his emails were not delivered, with no exceptions thrown... I was really hoping to get some response, say.. yes there is an issue, you can do x y and z to avoid it, or, yes the mail api should be functioning properly On Oct 5, 4:55 pm, Jamie H ja...@mhztech.com wrote: Just moments ago I sent 21 emails, and received 4 of the following error: 10-05 02:32PM 26.045 The API call mail.Send() took too long to respond and was cancelled. ... DeadlineExceededError: The API call mail.Send() took too long to respond and was cancelled. Now, I have learned over time so I send all emails via a task, so, eventually all emails were sent, but can somebody from Google comment on this error? I have seen some discussion in the group about it but never seen any resolution. It seems like I didn't get it very often, say, a month ago app-id: moto-tmobile -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Better support for linux
Thank you Robert. Yes, those that have Mac use Mac. But still I think that support for Linux is necessary. Mac is popular between companies and people with money, windows too. But in education Linux is the King. I spent all my years of college using Linux and we should keep supporting our open OSes. In my university all the good teachers use Linux :) I am going to open a New Issue in google code. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Still getting errors sending mail
We're testing a fix, but it's not ready yet. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Jamie H ja...@mhztech.com wrote: As another follow up, I just sent out ~700 emails and received this error 29 times. The interesting part is that it appears even when this exception is raised, the email can still be sent. Thus 29 of my emails were sent twice. Anybody have any information on this situation ? On Oct 5, 5:04 pm, Jamie H ja...@mhztech.com wrote: Sorry to reply to my own message, but I wanted to add that I am about to start an email campaign for a client, so it is very important that my emails are successfully sent... if not, and invitations are not delivered, nobody will show up for several events around the country, and alot of people will be very upset and embarassed to say the least... I have seen another poster on the group mention that recently his emails were not delivered, with no exceptions thrown... I was really hoping to get some response, say.. yes there is an issue, you can do x y and z to avoid it, or, yes the mail api should be functioning properly On Oct 5, 4:55 pm, Jamie H ja...@mhztech.com wrote: Just moments ago I sent 21 emails, and received 4 of the following error: 10-05 02:32PM 26.045 The API call mail.Send() took too long to respond and was cancelled. ... DeadlineExceededError: The API call mail.Send() took too long to respond and was cancelled. Now, I have learned over time so I send all emails via a task, so, eventually all emails were sent, but can somebody from Google comment on this error? I have seen some discussion in the group about it but never seen any resolution. It seems like I didn't get it very often, say, a month ago app-id: moto-tmobile -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] App engine stats page
You could try the information here http://thoughts.inphina.com/2010/09/04/performance-tuning-java-application-in-google-app-engine/ On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Ice13ill andrei.fifi...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a tutorial where i can read about the App engine stats page ? (call traces + api call times, etc) Or at least where i can find more information on how to interpret those graphics exactly. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
On Oct 6, 5:48 am, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. If you have unscrupulous competitors with your Google Account password, I'd think the fact that they might download your source is the least of your problems. They could just deploy malicious code to your site instead. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
+1 only can download code administrator who pay bill On Oct 6, 9:19 pm, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 5:48 am, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. If you have unscrupulous competitors with your Google Account password, I'd think the fact that they might download your source is the least of your problems. They could just deploy malicious code to your site instead. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
+1 On Oct 6, 12:48 pm, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. Why expose ALL users to risk (and open Google to lawsuits) for the sake of a few inexperienced developers? Star this post if you agree. I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. Greg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: fast bounding-box geo queries?
Hi Josh, The GeoModel bounding-box performance depends on the zoom level the query is running. As the box get smaller in size (closer bound coordinates) the performance is better, this is because you query on less squares (see Geohash http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geohash for more info) It also depends on if you are using a sub-query, doing more data fetching and more... The best thing is to make a mock-up for your needs, and see if it's right for you. Happy geo-coding On Oct 5, 11:48 pm, Josh Haberman jhaber...@gmail.com wrote: I was looking at GeoModel, which has nice functionality for bounding- box geo queries:http://code.google.com/apis/maps/articles/geospatial.htmlhttp://code.google.com/p/geomodel/ Unfortunately, the demo application is quite slow. Queries often take 2-4 seconds to return ~10 results.http://geomodel-demo.appspot.comhttp://geomodel-demo.appspot.com/speedtest I also see an open bug filed against GeoModel that proximity queries are slow:http://code.google.com/p/geomodel/issues/detail?id=20 Any ideas why this is slow? Glancing at the source, I notice it uses IN queries (eg. location_geocells IN list of cells) -- perhaps this is less efficient than range queries? But still, 2-4 seconds seems excessive to return 10 results. Hopefully the next gen queries which will apparently support space- filling curves will provide better performance for queries like these?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofhEyDBpngM Josh -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
I would like to say thanks for the App Engine Team for all the hard work :) On Oct 6, 2:28 am, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: Hey everyone, Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out for early evaluation. Note that many features that require server side changes will not be available in production, so for all intents and purposes these new features will only work locally. You can download the SDKs here: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/downloads/list 1.3.8 Release Notes Python --- - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. You can use this to download both Python and Java application code. - Builtin app.yaml handlers are available for common application functions, such as appstats. - The Admin Console now provides tools to delete all entities in the datastore or all entities of a given type. This is available only if enabled using the datastore_admin builtin. Deleting entities will count against application quota. - You can run task queue tasks immediately from the Admin Console. - You can now specify the quality of JPEG images via the Image API's execute_transforms function. Available in production only. - Support for login of multiple Google accounts within an app, and longer login sessions. For more information see: http://www.google.com/support/accounts/bin/answer.py?answer=181599 - In queue.yaml, the maximum allowed bucket size is now 100. - Precompilation is now enabled by default. To disable, use the --no_precompilation flag when updating your app. - BlobInfo now has an open() method that returns a BlobReader. - BlobReader now accepts a BlobInfo. - Removed limits on zigzag merge-join queries. Therefore the error The built-in indices are not efficient enough for this query and your data. Please add a composite index for this query. will no longer be thrown in many cases, enabling more types of exploratory queries without indexes. - Fixed an issue with task queue tasks not running on the dev_appserver when using Python 2.6. - Fixed an issue on the dev_appserver where auto task running wasn't working for BulkAdd. - Fixed an issue reserving App Ids by owners of similarly-named mails accounts containing periods, multiple cases, and googlemail.com address. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1196 - Fixed an issue with OpenId over SSL. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3393 - Fixed an issue on the development server where PNGs were being returned as JPEGs. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3661 Java - You can run task queue tasks immediately from the admin console. - Added an OutputSettings class to the Images API to specify the JPEG encoding quality when running in production. - Support for login of multiple Google accounts within an app, and longer login sessions. For more information see: http://www.google.com/support/accounts/bin/answer.py?answer=181599 - In queue.xml, the maximum allowed bucket size is now 100. - Removed limits on zigzag merge-join queries. Therefore the error The built-in indices are not efficient enough for this query and your data. Please add a composite index for this query. will no longer be thrown in many cases, enabling more types of exploratory queries without indexes. - The whitelist has been updated to include java.net.InetAddress and some interfaces and abstract classes in javax.xml.soap, including javax.xml.soap.SOAPMessage. - Fixed an issue reserving App Ids by owners of emails containing periods, multiple cases, and googlemail.com address. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1196 - Fixed an issue where TaskOptions had no public getters, making testing impossible. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3243 - Fixed an issue with OpenId over SSL. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3393 - Fixed an issue on the development server where PNGs were being returned as JPEGs. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3661 -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Retrieving image from a Blob
Dear Both,
Thanks a lot for your time.
I have been away for a couple of weeks and did not have the time to
follow up until today.
I'll have a serious look at your info and will let you know if I
manage to crack this nut.
Thanks again
-R
On Sep 15, 2:29 am, John McLaughlin johnmclaugh...@massanimation.com
wrote:
@Robert. Right you are. I checked the docs and db.get is a magic get
anything function. Sorry for the noise.
So I'm going for door #2 now. In ServePhoto photo must be the
correctly returned key. Otherwise accessing photo.photo would give
an error. So photo.photo must truly be a false value. This means to
me that although photo is a valid object, the photo.photo property
never got set properly. This takes us back to UploadPhoto. It's
unlikely that photo.put() failed. And it's likely that db.Blob
created a valid db.Blob object. However accessing photo.photo
doesn't return the db.Blob object, but rather the underlying data that
came into it. Therefore I think your original hunch that the incoming
data for db.Blob is an empty string is correct. I've struggled with
multi-part posts so I'm not 100% sure about the html. One thing that
looks suspicious is the hard coding of the hostname:port in the post
action. Are you sure you don't want simply /uploadphoto? That
could send the uploads to the wrong place, for example different ports
use different datastores on the Dev Server.
On Sep 14, 9:17 am, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
db.get() will grab an entity of _any_ kind. Model.get checks that the
key is for the correct kind of entity before fetching it. Either will
work. When I use db.get I usually include a check to make sure the
keys are the correct kind.
The key he posted in his initial thread is a Photo.
Robert
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:34, John McLaughlin
johnmclaugh...@massanimation.com wrote:
The one thing that looked off to me is that the line in ServePhoto
photo = db.get(self.request.get(photo_id))
might want to be
photo = Photo.get(self.request.get(photo_id))
I think db.get is a datastore method, not an inherited method from
db.Model
On Sep 13, 8:09 pm, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
I glanced over your code, nothing really major jumped out at me. If
you are not getting an exception in ServePhoto then the model is
clearly getting created and successfully fetched.
So, here are my first thoughts:
Have you tried logging some debug info in the UploadPhoto and
ServePhoto handlers? Specifically are you sure data is actually in
the photo property and it is not just an empty string or something?
Maybe you could try logging len(photo.photo) right before saving it,
then again right after fetching it.
What happens when you remove the if and simply return photo.photo?
Robert
class ServePhoto (webapp.RequestHandler):
def get(self):
photo = db.get(self.request.get(photo_id))
if photo.photo:
self.response.headers['Content-Type'] = image/jpg
self.response.out.write(photo.photo)
else:
self.error(404)
--
Robert Kluin
Ezox Systems, LLC
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 22:03, Raymond
raymond.othenin-gir...@raydropin.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have been trying to understand how to upload and download images
from to a Blobstore and have hit a wall.
I have essentially made a modified version of the Guestbook example
provided by google and modified it to suit my needs, I have tested the
guestbook app as is and got it working, somehow somewhere I am making
a simple mistake that frustrate every attempt at getting it working in
my own code.
I have stripped down my code to the essential in the hope of
understanding what is wrong, but I am still stuck.
What am I attempting to do ?
Upload in a blobstore an image and display it in a web page.
What is my code ?
1) My upload form served from a static page
...
form action=http://192.168.0.196:8083/uploadphoto;
enctype=multipart/form-data method=post
divlabelAttempt at uploading a picture using a
form/label/
deiv
divinput type=file name=photo //div
divinput type=submit value=Upload Photo //div
/form
...
2) My db model :
class Photo(db.Model):
photo = db.BlobProperty()
date = db.DateTimeProperty(auto_now_add=True)
3) The code uploading the photo and saving it in the blobstore
class UploadPhoto(webapp.RequestHandler):
def post(self):
photo = Photo()
img = self.request.get('photo')
photo.photo = db.Blob(img)
photo.put()
4) The code creating the web page displaying the images :
class PhotoPage(webapp.RequestHandler):
def get(self):
Re: [google-appengine] Easy way to delete unowned (child) entities in same entity group ?
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/queriesandindexes.html#Kindless_Ancestor_Queries a normal ancestor query uses an ancestor() filter for GQL have a look at its manual page 2010/10/6 Prashant nextprash...@gmail.com: Hi djidjadji, can you tell me, with an example, how to write a kind-less/normal ancestor query? thanks in advance :) On 6 October 2010 16:02, djidjadji djidja...@gmail.com wrote: No. You need to do a (kindless) ancestor query and delete all entities found before you delete the parent Test. If you know the child is only of one type you can do a normal ancestor query. You could subclass the delete() method of the Test class to do this, but I don't know if it will work if you use db.delete( list of keys or instances ) 2010/10/6 Prashant nextprash...@gmail.com: Hi, Suppose, I have two types of Entities Test and TestChild. For all TestChild entities i have set key as child of some Test entity (because i want both entities in same entity group to support transaction) but i haven't mapped TestChild entity to any variable in Test entity. Now, i am wondering if there is any way, such that, if i delete Test entity then all corresponding child TestChild entitie(s) should also get deleted ? -- Prashant www.claymus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Prashant www.claymus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
Not a good choice because the one that pays the bill is not the one that writes the source code. I'm not paying for the storage requirement and bandwidth of my client who has bought a use right of my software. I'm an advocate of NO Download allowed. But in case it will be allowed make it OFF by default. You MUST turn it ON in your app.yaml. This way the behavior is compatible with previous versions. And there is no action needed by the people who don't want it. There is always a gap between the time you roll it out and you announce the availability of a new release on the production servers. During this time it would be possible to download the source code if you tried regularly. And I could be away at the moment of the announcement and leave a door wide open for quite some time. 2010/10/6 alf alberto@gmail.com: +1 only can download code administrator who pay bill -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
One issue with the download code option is how it works in the context of an app store. If I license an application thru a store, can I then download the code, modify it, and redeploy? Also - if I have sensitive information (like Authorize.net keys) coded into my application, the information was basically inaccessible prior to this feature. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:48 PM, djidjadji djidja...@gmail.com wrote: Not a good choice because the one that pays the bill is not the one that writes the source code. I'm not paying for the storage requirement and bandwidth of my client who has bought a use right of my software. I'm an advocate of NO Download allowed. But in case it will be allowed make it OFF by default. You MUST turn it ON in your app.yaml. This way the behavior is compatible with previous versions. And there is no action needed by the people who don't want it. There is always a gap between the time you roll it out and you announce the availability of a new release on the production servers. During this time it would be possible to download the source code if you tried regularly. And I could be away at the moment of the announcement and leave a door wide open for quite some time. 2010/10/6 alf alberto@gmail.com: +1 only can download code administrator who pay bill -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Still getting errors sending mail
Thanks for the reply! Glad to hear the team is on it. If it helps at all it appears I only get it when doing alot of mail.send()'s at a time... my task is firing them off at 5/sec ... when doing one at a times I don't see it happening. On Oct 6, 2:00 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: We're testing a fix, but it's not ready yet. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Jamie H ja...@mhztech.com wrote: As another follow up, I just sent out ~700 emails and received this error 29 times. The interesting part is that it appears even when this exception is raised, the email can still be sent. Thus 29 of my emails were sent twice. Anybody have any information on this situation ? On Oct 5, 5:04 pm, Jamie H ja...@mhztech.com wrote: Sorry to reply to my own message, but I wanted to add that I am about to start an email campaign for a client, so it is very important that my emails are successfully sent... if not, and invitations are not delivered, nobody will show up for several events around the country, and alot of people will be very upset and embarassed to say the least... I have seen another poster on the group mention that recently his emails were not delivered, with no exceptions thrown... I was really hoping to get some response, say.. yes there is an issue, you can do x y and z to avoid it, or, yes the mail api should be functioning properly On Oct 5, 4:55 pm, Jamie H ja...@mhztech.com wrote: Just moments ago I sent 21 emails, and received 4 of the following error: 10-05 02:32PM 26.045 The API call mail.Send() took too long to respond and was cancelled. ... DeadlineExceededError: The API call mail.Send() took too long to respond and was cancelled. Now, I have learned over time so I send all emails via a task, so, eventually all emails were sent, but can somebody from Google comment on this error? I have seen some discussion in the group about it but never seen any resolution. It seems like I didn't get it very often, say, a month ago app-id: moto-tmobile -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
Well, there were always workarounds to download the code. That being said, I'm glad we discussed this during the prerelease SDK stage, especially since many of the voices in this thread are the most active and knowledgeable members of the community speaking up. We're looking at alternatives, but what will likely happen is that we will delay this feature for an upcoming release when we've implemented something that takes everyone's feedback into account. Stay tuned - I'll update this thread with more details. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:27 PM, andy stevko andy.ste...@gmail.com wrote: One issue with the download code option is how it works in the context of an app store. If I license an application thru a store, can I then download the code, modify it, and redeploy? Also - if I have sensitive information (like Authorize.net keys) coded into my application, the information was basically inaccessible prior to this feature. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:48 PM, djidjadji djidja...@gmail.com wrote: Not a good choice because the one that pays the bill is not the one that writes the source code. I'm not paying for the storage requirement and bandwidth of my client who has bought a use right of my software. I'm an advocate of NO Download allowed. But in case it will be allowed make it OFF by default. You MUST turn it ON in your app.yaml. This way the behavior is compatible with previous versions. And there is no action needed by the people who don't want it. There is always a gap between the time you roll it out and you announce the availability of a new release on the production servers. During this time it would be possible to download the source code if you tried regularly. And I could be away at the moment of the announcement and leave a door wide open for quite some time. 2010/10/6 alf alberto@gmail.com: +1 only can download code administrator who pay bill -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
Thank you, Ikai. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.comikai.l%2bgro...@google.com wrote: Well, there were always workarounds to download the code. That being said, I'm glad we discussed this during the prerelease SDK stage, especially since many of the voices in this thread are the most active and knowledgeable members of the community speaking up. We're looking at alternatives, but what will likely happen is that we will delay this feature for an upcoming release when we've implemented something that takes everyone's feedback into account. Stay tuned - I'll update this thread with more details. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:27 PM, andy stevko andy.ste...@gmail.com wrote: One issue with the download code option is how it works in the context of an app store. If I license an application thru a store, can I then download the code, modify it, and redeploy? Also - if I have sensitive information (like Authorize.net keys) coded into my application, the information was basically inaccessible prior to this feature. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:48 PM, djidjadji djidja...@gmail.com wrote: Not a good choice because the one that pays the bill is not the one that writes the source code. I'm not paying for the storage requirement and bandwidth of my client who has bought a use right of my software. I'm an advocate of NO Download allowed. But in case it will be allowed make it OFF by default. You MUST turn it ON in your app.yaml. This way the behavior is compatible with previous versions. And there is no action needed by the people who don't want it. There is always a gap between the time you roll it out and you announce the availability of a new release on the production servers. During this time it would be possible to download the source code if you tried regularly. And I could be away at the moment of the announcement and leave a door wide open for quite some time. 2010/10/6 alf alberto@gmail.com: +1 only can download code administrator who pay bill -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Better support for linux
Hi What value do you see in the launcher other than starting the SDK ? Its harder to invoke the debugger inside the launcher, and in fact you need to use the debugger then you have to run from the command line... Its harder to watch the logs If your students are serious about development isn't teaching them to use the debugger and important part of the development process? Rgds Tim On Oct 7, 2:35 am, RSan ufreeurs...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Currently I am giving classes of Google App Engine and I am clearly seeing how linux students are moving to windows. The reason is simply that it is more time consuming for them to start new projects, given the fact that they don't have an App Engine Launcher. I would love to see GAE giving a better support for some linux platforms. At least for Ubuntu. Thank you, and apart from that, good job with all the new features. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] a query log?
I'm somewhat new to App Engine, and attempting to streamline my app's datastore load. With a LAMP app, I'm usually able to access or generate a database query log to assist in this process -- a list of all queries run on the database for a given http request, along with how long each took and other helpful metadata. Is there a good way to access or create something similar for App Engine queries? The closest I've found is Appstats -- but while Appstats will provide information sorted by http-request, I haven't found a way to make it display a database query log. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, =Tim= -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
what Robert Kluin said. version control is a must. sources shouldn't even have to be uploaded in the first place (or is this py only?). On 6 Okt., 19:28, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote: +1 No download was a feature. AND it helped people with poor practices learn the value of version control. :) On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 08:04, tcg tomgu...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Oct 6, 5:48 am, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. Why expose ALL users to risk (and open Google to lawsuits) for the sake of a few inexperienced developers? Star this post if you agree. I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. Greg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Eclipse IDE showing JDK configuration Error
I created a New Wep Application Project using Eclipse IDE. My IDE is already setup to run GAE Development Mode. But when I started creating index.jsp file on may war folder. It displays Your project must be configured to use a JDK in order to use JSPs My Library includes - App Engine SDK [App Engine - 1.3.7] - GWT SDK [GWT - 2.0.4] - JRE System Library [jre6] I think I already made the right configuration. Because when I Run the Web App it works fine. But the Red thing is annoying. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
This is Python only. If you download a Java app you will download the JAR files. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Remigius remigius.stal...@gmail.comwrote: what Robert Kluin said. version control is a must. sources shouldn't even have to be uploaded in the first place (or is this py only?). On 6 Okt., 19:28, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote: +1 No download was a feature. AND it helped people with poor practices learn the value of version control. :) On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 08:04, tcg tomgu...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Oct 6, 5:48 am, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 1:28 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.comikai.l%2bgro...@google.com wrote: - The developer who uploaded an app version can download that version's code using the appcfg.py download_app command. I'm not at all happy about this. I know how frequent plaintive I lost my code how can I get it back? messages are in this group, but the write-only nature of appengine gave me a lot of confidence that our source code is safe. Now a single password is all that stands between our competitors and our IP. Why expose ALL users to risk (and open Google to lawsuits) for the sake of a few inexperienced developers? Star this post if you agree. I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because uploading a new version would destroy the existing code. Greg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Better support for linux
Thank you Tim, I understand what you are saying, on the other hand, if the launcher is so useless why is there a launcher for Mac? Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Better support for linux
Because people on macs and windows like to click buttons ;-) Seriously the same applies.. you don't have direct console access and so even on mac you need to use the command line if you want to use pdb. I am just running up the launcher on Linux to see how it looks. It is just wx based. Rgds T On Oct 7, 8:10 am, RSan ufreeurs...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Tim, I understand what you are saying, on the other hand, if the launcher is so useless why is there a launcher for Mac? Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Better support for linux
Hi Just run it up under linux, need to do a tiny bit of setup, need wxPython 2.8 installed. To be honest in my opinion the the launcher is pretty useless. It just sets up a template app, and runs it. allows you to look at the log and do a basic deploy. and thats about it. If you need to use the debugger you have to use the command line. If you need to use any of the features of appcfg, (just updating indexes, vacumm indexes, change versions update cron, backup/restore) you have to use the command line. This is the same for windows, mac or linux. Launcher is really only for complete newbies just to get started, beyond that they will have to get used to the command line if they are at all interested in building a serious application. Regards Tim On Oct 7, 8:10 am, RSan ufreeurs...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Tim, I understand what you are saying, on the other hand, if the launcher is so useless why is there a launcher for Mac? Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Better support for linux
Thank you Tim, Yes, I agree with you in that sense. You completely need to use the command line if you want to be serious and create a big app. I think that Google engineers know that and facilitated only the most basic commands in the launcher. And I don't expect to have a button to be able to do a rollback. If all the possible options for dev_appserver.py and appcfg.py where supported on the launcher, it will probably cost me more to figure out where are situated all the commands in the launcher, than to go to the documentation and look for them and type them on my terminal. On the other side, I am sure that most of the web developers want to start their project easily, just press one button and start codding their apps with their favorite text editor that is all they care about. Also, you said that you had to do some setup. I know that there are many kind of Linux users. Some like it because they don't care about buttons as you said, but I am seeing that it is growing the number of users that like Linux (and are using mostly Ubuntu) because of the philosophy behind open OSes, but they still like buttons. So I keep thinking that is a good idea to support at least Ubuntu in the same way than Mac is supported. An app-get install appengine would help to attract some developers. In any case, I appreciate you comments and agree with you in many aspects Tim. Regards. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Better support for linux
If someone else supports this idea just go to: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3830 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Better support for linux
Hi I use unbuntu, and all I had to do to run it up is install wx2.8 and wxversion. With a tiny bit of packaging you could easily use the launcher in linux. T On Oct 7, 9:06 am, RSan ufreeurs...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Tim, Yes, I agree with you in that sense. You completely need to use the command line if you want to be serious and create a big app. I think that Google engineers know that and facilitated only the most basic commands in the launcher. And I don't expect to have a button to be able to do a rollback. If all the possible options for dev_appserver.py and appcfg.py where supported on the launcher, it will probably cost me more to figure out where are situated all the commands in the launcher, than to go to the documentation and look for them and type them on my terminal. On the other side, I am sure that most of the web developers want to start their project easily, just press one button and start codding their apps with their favorite text editor that is all they care about. Also, you said that you had to do some setup. I know that there are many kind of Linux users. Some like it because they don't care about buttons as you said, but I am seeing that it is growing the number of users that like Linux (and are using mostly Ubuntu) because of the philosophy behind open OSes, but they still like buttons. So I keep thinking that is a good idea to support at least Ubuntu in the same way than Mac is supported. An app-get install appengine would help to attract some developers. In any case, I appreciate you comments and agree with you in many aspects Tim. Regards. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Better support for linux
Still, for Mac users it is direct. Not workarounds needed. For Windows users it is the same. Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Better support for linux
Except being sure that python2.5 is installed. Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Exceeded soft memory limit
The message just means your app has used too much memory. I just re-read your first email, you indicate that you need about 500MB of memory... so I guess you are aware of what you are doing that uses the memory. You probably have three choices: 1) Try submitting a production issue request to Google. 2) Change your design so that it requires less memory. 3) Just ignore the error. Robert On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 08:02, sahid sahid.ferdja...@gmail.com wrote: just an extract of my log http://goo.gl/226V On Oct 6, 10:48 am, sahid sahid.ferdja...@gmail.com wrote: No, i dont use global variables or just variables with a constants values You know why exactely signifie this message? On Oct 5, 8:47 pm, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote: Are you using global variables to cache stuff at the module level or something similar? Robert On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 13:25, sahid sahid.ferdja...@gmail.com wrote: up On Oct 3, 10:06 pm, sahid sahid.ferdja...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have a little problem with my application, i have a lot of Exceeded soft memory limit exception. But i know why. My application is a daiting website. All users has a possibility to make a search with many criteria So i have a model with a lot of criteria, i use the filter system of the datastore to get a part of the result (like gender, and has_picture, country) but with the result (limited has 200 and ordered by last_presence) i use python to filter it. I have many exceptions, but i dont know how i can do better... Already, the result is limited to 200 and it's really small, i need about 500. Exceeded soft memory limit with 299.676 MB after servicing 8724 requests total Exceeded soft memory limit with 299.145 MB after servicing 1182 requests total Exceeded soft memory limit with 206.145 MB after servicing 636 requests total Exceeded soft memory limit with 299.145 MB after servicing 371 requests total Exceeded soft memory limit with 287.895 MB after servicing 2843 requests total Exceeded soft memory limit with 299.594 MB after servicing 7138 requests total APPID: devel-inchallah Cordialy, Sahid -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Better support for linux
Submitting an issue is a good start. In the mean time, you could always do as Tim suggested and either have a 15 minute setup up your development environment session for the would-be Linux users _or_ just make a binary for them for now. http://wiki.wxpython.org/CreatingStandaloneExecutables This is a mildly interesting discussion though. On my Mac I do use the launcher, but usually in conjunction with a screen session in Terminal. I have actually never used the Linux GUI; in fact I do not think I ever thought about using the launcher GUI on Linux. Of course most of your Linux would-be users probably aren't using Slackware either. Robert On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 21:42, RSan ufreeurs...@gmail.com wrote: Except being sure that python2.5 is installed. Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: appcfg.py download_data [INFO] Authentication Failed
Romage, It's not straightforward but if you create a config file using Automatic Configuration you'll be able to specify a format for the downloaded data: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/uploadingdata.html#Configuring_the_Bulk_Loader On Oct 6, 11:26 pm, romage arome...@gmail.com wrote: I am able to get a sqllite dump from the database, using either appcfg.py or bulkloader.py, but I haven't yet been able to download in the format that I would like which is annoying and frustrating. A -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Better support for linux
Just one other small (off-topic) note, I am glad to see someone teaching course who is so passionate about supporting Linux Equality. It is also cool that you are teaching App Engine courses. Robert On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 21:42, RSan ufreeurs...@gmail.com wrote: Except being sure that python2.5 is installed. Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Better support for linux
Yep couldn't agree more with that sentiment T On Oct 7, 10:15 am, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote: Just one other small (off-topic) note, I am glad to see someone teaching course who is so passionate about supporting Linux Equality. It is also cool that you are teaching App Engine courses. Robert On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 21:42, RSan ufreeurs...@gmail.com wrote: Except being sure that python2.5 is installed. Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
On Oct 6, 6:27 pm, andy stevko andy.ste...@gmail.com wrote: One issue with the download code option is how it works in the context of an app store. If I license an application thru a store, can I then download the code, modify it, and redeploy? Also - if I have sensitive information (like Authorize.net keys) coded into my application, the information was basically inaccessible prior to this feature. The item in the release notes says that it would be downloadable by the developer who uploaded the version. If you are that developer, you already have (or had) the source code. If you're not, you wouldn't be able to get it, even if you're an administrator of the app. To me it looks like the App Engine team got the balance right, and I'm wondering if all of the +1 people piling on really get what's being described. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Prerelease SDK 1.3.8 is out!
Geoffry Are you certain it's limited to the developer who uploaded or all developers ? Rgds T On Oct 7, 10:37 am, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 6:27 pm, andy stevko andy.ste...@gmail.com wrote: One issue with the download code option is how it works in the context of an app store. If I license an application thru a store, can I then download the code, modify it, and redeploy? Also - if I have sensitive information (like Authorize.net keys) coded into my application, the information was basically inaccessible prior to this feature. The item in the release notes says that it would be downloadable by the developer who uploaded the version. If you are that developer, you already have (or had) the source code. If you're not, you wouldn't be able to get it, even if you're an administrator of the app. To me it looks like the App Engine team got the balance right, and I'm wondering if all of the +1 people piling on really get what's being described. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Better support for linux
Hello Robert, You are right, that's the main reason why I started the post, to ask for equality and support for the Linux community. Google can do it and has benefited for some years now from the open source community, I believe that most of their servers run on Linux. And I do know that their developers and the company in general support Linux with passion too. Yet, I often see more support for windows and mac as in this case. As Tim said, it is completely necessary to use the terminal for most features, I am just saying that at least Windows and Mac users have the option to chose. A couple of students had appengine up and running in Ubuntu, we looked at how to run the commands and I spent some time after class helping them out to familiarize with the environment and still they opted to move to windows. It is true that we only have 6 classes of appengine and all they care about is doing their project as fast as they can. Before, they had 6 classes of Amazon Web Services and after appengine, 4 classes of Heroku. I am new in the field of teaching, but I can see things from the other side and realize a little bit more about how important it is to give some extra support to the open source community. Thank you both of you for your comments, Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
