[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-643034 ] IPSec: kernel lacks KLIPS
Support Requests item #643034, was opened at 2002-11-24 12:56 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=643034group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Graham Harris (equinus) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: IPSec: kernel lacks KLIPS Initial Comment: During boot, I get the messages: ipsec_setup: Starting FreeS/WAN IPsec 1.99... ipsec_setup: kernel appears to lack KLIPS ipsec_setup: OOPS, should have aborted. Broken shell. Help- what am I doing wrong? uname -a gives Linux Firewall 2.4.18 #1 Sun Nov 10 17:40:20 UTC 2002 i586 unknown. Hardware is a P75 (IBM 330) with 16Mb RAM. The system contains IDE CD and HDD and I have put the ide*.o files into initrd.lrp and /boot/etc/modules but I'm not yet using them for anything. I have created a 2-floppy Bering with all the *.lrp (other than initrd.lrp) on the second disk. Second disk also contains ipsec.lrp (not the ipsec509 version) found at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/packages/ and mawk.lrp found at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/cstein/Packages/mawk.htm It also has (in case it's significant) the sshd.lrp and libz.lrp found at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/. None of these additional packages are configured yet- their configs are factory. I'm presuming the above error makes it not worth trying yet... Hope someone can see my flaw, Graham -- Comment By: Graham Harris (equinus) Date: 2002-11-25 08:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=55076 Based on the most recent comment on this support request, it is our understanding that this matter has been addressed. Should you require further assistance from LEAF project members, please submit a new support request. Thank you, leaf-project.org support -- Comment By: Graham Harris (equinus) Date: 2002-11-25 08:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=55076 Thanks, I found ipsec.o, put it into /lib/modules, updated /boot/etc/modules, backed up initrd.lrp to the first disk and rebooted- it worked! Graham -- Comment By: Erich Titl (etitl) Date: 2002-11-24 21:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566838 You probably did not load the ipsec module. I mentioned this in an earlier post, the ipsec.lrp packages do not contain the ipsec.o module try lsmod to find out HTH Erich -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=643034group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-643034 ] IPSec: kernel lacks KLIPS
Support Requests item #643034, was opened at 2002-11-24 04:56 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=643034group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Graham Harris (equinus) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: IPSec: kernel lacks KLIPS Initial Comment: During boot, I get the messages: ipsec_setup: Starting FreeS/WAN IPsec 1.99... ipsec_setup: kernel appears to lack KLIPS ipsec_setup: OOPS, should have aborted. Broken shell. Help- what am I doing wrong? uname -a gives Linux Firewall 2.4.18 #1 Sun Nov 10 17:40:20 UTC 2002 i586 unknown. Hardware is a P75 (IBM 330) with 16Mb RAM. The system contains IDE CD and HDD and I have put the ide*.o files into initrd.lrp and /boot/etc/modules but I'm not yet using them for anything. I have created a 2-floppy Bering with all the *.lrp (other than initrd.lrp) on the second disk. Second disk also contains ipsec.lrp (not the ipsec509 version) found at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/packages/ and mawk.lrp found at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/cstein/Packages/mawk.htm It also has (in case it's significant) the sshd.lrp and libz.lrp found at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/. None of these additional packages are configured yet- their configs are factory. I'm presuming the above error makes it not worth trying yet... Hope someone can see my flaw, Graham -- Comment By: Graham Harris (equinus) Date: 2002-11-25 00:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=55076 Based on the most recent comment on this support request, it is our understanding that this matter has been addressed. Should you require further assistance from LEAF project members, please submit a new support request. Thank you, leaf-project.org support -- Comment By: Graham Harris (equinus) Date: 2002-11-25 00:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=55076 Thanks, I found ipsec.o, put it into /lib/modules, updated /boot/etc/modules, backed up initrd.lrp to the first disk and rebooted- it worked! Graham -- Comment By: Erich Titl (etitl) Date: 2002-11-24 13:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566838 You probably did not load the ipsec module. I mentioned this in an earlier post, the ipsec.lrp packages do not contain the ipsec.o module try lsmod to find out HTH Erich -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=643034group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-643034 ] IPSec: kernel lacks KLIPS
Support Requests item #643034, was opened at 2002-11-24 12:56 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=643034group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Graham Harris (equinus) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: IPSec: kernel lacks KLIPS Initial Comment: During boot, I get the messages: ipsec_setup: Starting FreeS/WAN IPsec 1.99... ipsec_setup: kernel appears to lack KLIPS ipsec_setup: OOPS, should have aborted. Broken shell. Help- what am I doing wrong? uname -a gives Linux Firewall 2.4.18 #1 Sun Nov 10 17:40:20 UTC 2002 i586 unknown. Hardware is a P75 (IBM 330) with 16Mb RAM. The system contains IDE CD and HDD and I have put the ide*.o files into initrd.lrp and /boot/etc/modules but I'm not yet using them for anything. I have created a 2-floppy Bering with all the *.lrp (other than initrd.lrp) on the second disk. Second disk also contains ipsec.lrp (not the ipsec509 version) found at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/packages/ and mawk.lrp found at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/cstein/Packages/mawk.htm It also has (in case it's significant) the sshd.lrp and libz.lrp found at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/. None of these additional packages are configured yet- their configs are factory. I'm presuming the above error makes it not worth trying yet... Hope someone can see my flaw, Graham -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=643034group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-643034 ] IPSec: kernel lacks KLIPS
Support Requests item #643034, was opened at 2002-11-24 13:56 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=643034group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Graham Harris (equinus) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: IPSec: kernel lacks KLIPS Initial Comment: During boot, I get the messages: ipsec_setup: Starting FreeS/WAN IPsec 1.99... ipsec_setup: kernel appears to lack KLIPS ipsec_setup: OOPS, should have aborted. Broken shell. Help- what am I doing wrong? uname -a gives Linux Firewall 2.4.18 #1 Sun Nov 10 17:40:20 UTC 2002 i586 unknown. Hardware is a P75 (IBM 330) with 16Mb RAM. The system contains IDE CD and HDD and I have put the ide*.o files into initrd.lrp and /boot/etc/modules but I'm not yet using them for anything. I have created a 2-floppy Bering with all the *.lrp (other than initrd.lrp) on the second disk. Second disk also contains ipsec.lrp (not the ipsec509 version) found at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/packages/ and mawk.lrp found at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/cstein/Packages/mawk.htm It also has (in case it's significant) the sshd.lrp and libz.lrp found at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/. None of these additional packages are configured yet- their configs are factory. I'm presuming the above error makes it not worth trying yet... Hope someone can see my flaw, Graham -- Comment By: Erich Titl (etitl) Date: 2002-11-24 22:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566838 You probably did not load the ipsec module. I mentioned this in an earlier post, the ipsec.lrp packages do not contain the ipsec.o module try lsmod to find out HTH Erich -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=643034group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-594097 ] Dachstein will not start on 486/100.....
Support Requests item #594097, was opened at 2002-08-13 03:57 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=594097group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dion Bird (dionb98) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Dachstein will not start on 486/100. Initial Comment: Dachstein will not start on my 486 DX4/100 with 32MB of RAM. Here is a summary of the boot process before it locks up. IP Filters: [IP Forwarding: DISABLED] flushed SIOCGIFFLAGS: Operation not supported by device Bind socket to interface: Operation not supported by device exiting Starting Network: [IP Always Defrag: ENABLED] IP filters: firewall [IP Forwarding: ENABLED] Loopback interface: lo Starting interface: Cannot find device eth1 SIOCGIFFLAGS: Operation not supported by device eth1 Hostname: firewall Static NS: 2 hosts At this point the cursor just sits and flashes. On my other systems the disk will boot completely, with the summary I have provided, same as what's written above. (Including the operation not supported by device stuff) Any insight on why it won't continue past this point on the 486? As I said before it is a 486 DX4/100 with 32MB RAM. I have stripped it down to just the PCI video card and the PCI NIC card. I've tried booting it with no NIC card, and 1 card and 2 cards. If I boot the system under Windows 98, it will detect the network cards so they appear to be functioning. I would appreciate any suggestions you have. Dion -- Comment By: magic freeman (kiwispaniol) Date: 2002-11-16 23:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=650015 hi Dion sorry for asking about other stuff does this Dachstein supports dial on demand (56k modem) today is the first time i read about it, i cant find more info about it. cheers mate freeman -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-08-15 02:30 Message: Logged In: NO Have you configured the NIC's with DOS?, What is the make and model of your NIC's Are you loading the right drivers? example: NE2000-pci = pciscan + 8390 + ne2k-pci modules to load. Is your BIOS set to PNP os? Peter -- Comment By: Lynn Avants (guitarlynn) Date: 2002-08-14 15:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=176069 Some old BIOS's do not detect the larger floppy format that the LEAF distro's use. A BIOS update may or may not allow for the larger format and I do not know of a definate fix that works for this problem. You may need to reduce your LEAF disk to fit on a 1.44M formatted disk or use a different machine. Unfortunately this is the best advice I can give on this one. I hope it helps, ~Lynn -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=594097group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-639240 ] internet sharing with 56k modem
Support Requests item #639240, was opened at 2002-11-16 17:38 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=639240group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Oxygen Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: magic freeman (kiwispaniol) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: internet sharing with 56k modem Initial Comment: Does LEAF (Oxygen) or others versions, supports internet sharing with Dialup (56kmodem) Cheers -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=639240group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-630851 ] Traffic shaping in Bering
Support Requests item #630851, was opened at 2002-10-29 21:28 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=630851group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ernest Fontes (ef11) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Traffic shaping in Bering Initial Comment: First let me express my amazement and gratitude to all the talented developers along the path to Bering 1.0-rc4. I love open source and the creativity it encourages. I've used Bering rc3 for several months now and love it. I've poured over the documentation and bootstrapped myself enough to add and remove packages and modules, etc. I've even added the lrpstat package to my router so I have mesmerizing stripcharts of traffic. A true lava lamp if I've ever seen one! The feature I now drool over is traffic shaping. I have a family of five and we're stuck sharing a dial-up modem. Sad, I know, but actually workable. To make it more workable I'd like to shape traffic so that I can start a long download, at low priority, so that it will yield whenever interactive traffic needs some space. I tried a tcstart file under shorewall in RC3 but dropped it after getting constant error messages. I was encouraged to see mention that the RC4 included a version of tc patched for htb (version 2) (section 12.11 in the Information on packages provided in the Bering...). So I dug right in and added tc.lrp to my router and then tried the first parts of T. Eastep's script. Still the same error messages: RTNETLINK: invalid argument I know I'm not giving much detail right now but before I spend more time on this I'd like to know if it can work and if I'm anywhere close to the correct path. Thanks in advance. Ernie -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=630851group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-630851 ] Traffic shaping in Bering
Support Requests item #630851, was opened at 2002-10-30 02:28 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=630851group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ernest Fontes (ef11) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Traffic shaping in Bering Initial Comment: First let me express my amazement and gratitude to all the talented developers along the path to Bering 1.0-rc4. I love open source and the creativity it encourages. I've used Bering rc3 for several months now and love it. I've poured over the documentation and bootstrapped myself enough to add and remove packages and modules, etc. I've even added the lrpstat package to my router so I have mesmerizing stripcharts of traffic. A true lava lamp if I've ever seen one! The feature I now drool over is traffic shaping. I have a family of five and we're stuck sharing a dial-up modem. Sad, I know, but actually workable. To make it more workable I'd like to shape traffic so that I can start a long download, at low priority, so that it will yield whenever interactive traffic needs some space. I tried a tcstart file under shorewall in RC3 but dropped it after getting constant error messages. I was encouraged to see mention that the RC4 included a version of tc patched for htb (version 2) (section 12.11 in the Information on packages provided in the Bering...). So I dug right in and added tc.lrp to my router and then tried the first parts of T. Eastep's script. Still the same error messages: RTNETLINK: invalid argument I know I'm not giving much detail right now but before I spend more time on this I'd like to know if it can work and if I'm anywhere close to the correct path. Thanks in advance. Ernie -- Comment By: Tom Eastep (teastep) Date: 2002-10-30 03:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6546 Are you loading the appropriate kernel modules? I don't know how Jacques is building his rc4 kernel but I can envision you needing to load both sch_sfq and sch_htb. You may need more modules if the basic QoS capability is also modularized. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=630851group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-624181 ] unable to insmod realtek module
Support Requests item #624181, was opened at 2002-10-16 16:17 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=624181group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: unable to insmod realtek module Initial Comment: I could not get the NIC with chipset rtl8139c to work under Linux LRP. It complained when I loaded the module 8139.o which I download from the LEAF site. Received following messages after invoking insmod rtl8139:- Using /lib/modules/rtl8139.o insmod: can't handle sections of type 1647181921 insmod: Could not load the module: No such file or directory The rtl8139.o does exist in /lib/modules. I have installed the RedHat 6.2 on the PC and it can recognize the realtek NIC. I will include their files for your viewing. Please email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is dougV V, not W -- Comment By: Li Tin Ove Weedle (litinoveweedle) Date: 2002-10-17 08:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=630836 You have to get rtl8139.o and place it to the /lib/modules There are two choices. First you will fing binary rtl8139.o compiled for your dachstein distribution (for proper kernel version) or you have to find rtl8139.c C source code file and kernel source files and compile module. You can succesfully use your RH to do this. like: You have to have kernel source codes for Dachstein or find out which version of kernel your dachstein LRP use and visit www.kernel.org to get same version kernel sources. Unpack to your RH to /usr/src/dachstein There should be source for rtl8139 (rtl8139.c) included in sources from kernel.org. (if you unpack it properly it should stay in /usr/src/dachstein/drivers/net ) If not visit www.scyld.com and search for net-drivers-3-1-1.gz unpack fing rtl8139.c and place it to /usr/src/dachstein/drivers/net . Then switch to that directory and compile modules by gcc -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -O6 -c rtl8139.c - I/usr/src/dachstein This produce rtl8139.o which you can test by INSMOD rtl8139.o (test on Dachstein) You can compile on any Linux distribution with gcc instaled, I did it on RH too Litin -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=624181group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to $1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v? http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-624181 ] unable to insmod realtek module
Support Requests item #624181, was opened at 2002-10-16 09:17 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=624181group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: unable to insmod realtek module Initial Comment: I could not get the NIC with chipset rtl8139c to work under Linux LRP. It complained when I loaded the module 8139.o which I download from the LEAF site. Received following messages after invoking insmod rtl8139:- Using /lib/modules/rtl8139.o insmod: can't handle sections of type 1647181921 insmod: Could not load the module: No such file or directory The rtl8139.o does exist in /lib/modules. I have installed the RedHat 6.2 on the PC and it can recognize the realtek NIC. I will include their files for your viewing. Please email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is dougV V, not W -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=624181group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to $1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v? http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-620235 ] CD image for WISP
Support Requests item #620235, was opened at 2002-10-08 06:54 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=620235group_id=13751 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: CD image for WISP Initial Comment: Is there a bootable CD image for the WISP branch? Where can I find info on how to make such an image? It would make it much easier to experiment with it on simple PC boxes... Thanks -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=620235group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-617946 ] Can't ping/connect to firewall
Support Requests item #617946, was opened at 2002-10-03 00:20 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=617946group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Can't ping/connect to firewall Initial Comment: Hi, I am new to Linux (six months), and am trying to setup a Linux Router using Bering_1.0- rc3_img_bering_1680.exe. I have followed the Bering Installation/Users Guide step-by-step to setup the router using mostly default settings where possible. My problem is that my local LAN (192.168.1.0/24) cannot ping and/or connect to the Bering/Shorewall firewall? The following is the configuration of my LAN at the moment: Win2000P Bering +---+ + + LAN2-| 192.168.72.74 | | eth0:65.95.176.193 |--- PPPoE/ADSL | | || | 192.168.1.10 |-xLink RJ45-| eth1:192.168.1.254 | | | || +---+ + + On the Bering LRP, I can ping (1) eth0, (2) eth1, and the Internet, except when I tried to ping loc:192.168.1.10, I receive the following message: PING 192.168.1.10 (192.168.1.10): 56 data bytes --- 192.168.1.10 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss I think it is something to do with either (1) iptables or (2) shorewall. But I don't have the necessary knowledge to fix it. Other information: uname -a: Linux firewall 2.4.18 #4 Sun Jun 9 09:46:15 CEST 2002 i486 unknown ip addr show: 1: lo: LOOPBACK,UP mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo 2: dummy0: BROADCAST,NOARP mtu 1500 qdisc noop link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 3: eth0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:80:c8:35:c6:7b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 4: eth1: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:80:c8:93:ba:3a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.1.254/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth1 5: ppp0: POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST,NOARP,UP mtu 1492 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 3 link/ppp inet 65.95.176.193 peer 65.95.176.1/32 scope global ppp0 ip route show: 65.95.176.1 dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src 65.95.176.193 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.254 default via 65.95.176.1 dev ppp0 iptables -L: Chain INPUT (policy DROP) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT ah -- anywhere anywhere ppp0_inah -- anywhere anywhere eth1_inah -- anywhere anywhere common ah -- anywhere anywhere LOGah -- anywhere anywhere LOG level info prefix `Shorewall:INPUT:REJECT:' reject ah -- anywhere anywhere Chain FORWARD (policy DROP) target prot opt source destination TCPMSS tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp flags:SYN,RST/SYN TCPMSS clamp to PMTU ppp0_fwd ah -- anywhere anywhere eth1_fwd ah -- anywhere anywhere common ah -- anywhere anywhere LOGah -- anywhere anywhere LOG level info prefix `Shorewall:FORWARD:REJECT:' reject ah -- anywhere anywhere Chain OUTPUT (policy DROP) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT ah -- anywhere anywhere DROP icmp -- anywhere anywhere state INVALID ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere anywhere fw2net ah -- anywhere anywhere all2allah -- anywhere anywhere common ah -- anywhere anywhere LOGah -- anywhere anywhere LOG level info prefix `Shorewall:OUTPUT:REJECT:' reject ah -- anywhere anywhere Chain all2all (3 references) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT ah -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED common ah -- anywhere anywhere LOGah -- anywhere anywhere LOG level info prefix `Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:' reject ah -- anywhere anywhere Chain common (5 references) target prot opt source destination icmpdeficmp --
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-615630 ] FTP on Bering
Support Requests item #615630, was opened at 2002-09-27 12:07 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=615630group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: FTP on Bering Initial Comment: I recive this message on syslog when I try to connect to a FTP-server on my subnet; Sep 27 21:00:21 firewall kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN=eth1 OUT= MAC=00:a0:24:4e:c5:e6:00:e0:18:53:6c:d8:08:00 SRC=192.168.1.3 DST=80.213.84.219 LEN=48 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x00 TTL=128 ID=26385 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=3964 DPT=21 WINDOW=16384 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Shorewall rules look like this; DNATnet loc:192.168.1.200:21 tcp 21 I used to have a limited access to my server; then i used this rule DNAT net;external ip-adress loc:192.168.1.200:21 tcp 21 so - all i did, was to remove the external ip to allow everybody to access my ftp-server...now, nobody gets through.any ideas?? PS! thanx for u're support tom -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=615630group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-615630 ] FTP on Bering
Support Requests item #615630, was opened at 2002-09-27 19:07 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=615630group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: FTP on Bering Initial Comment: I recive this message on syslog when I try to connect to a FTP-server on my subnet; Sep 27 21:00:21 firewall kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN=eth1 OUT= MAC=00:a0:24:4e:c5:e6:00:e0:18:53:6c:d8:08:00 SRC=192.168.1.3 DST=80.213.84.219 LEN=48 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x00 TTL=128 ID=26385 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=3964 DPT=21 WINDOW=16384 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Shorewall rules look like this; DNATnet loc:192.168.1.200:21 tcp 21 I used to have a limited access to my server; then i used this rule DNAT net;external ip-adress loc:192.168.1.200:21 tcp 21 so - all i did, was to remove the external ip to allow everybody to access my ftp-server...now, nobody gets through.any ideas?? PS! thanx for u're support tom -- Comment By: Tom Eastep (teastep) Date: 2002-09-27 19:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6546 Please read FAQ #2 - http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm#faq2 -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=615630group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-615630 ] FTP on Bering
Support Requests item #615630, was opened at 2002-09-27 12:07 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=615630group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: FTP on Bering Initial Comment: I recive this message on syslog when I try to connect to a FTP-server on my subnet; Sep 27 21:00:21 firewall kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN=eth1 OUT= MAC=00:a0:24:4e:c5:e6:00:e0:18:53:6c:d8:08:00 SRC=192.168.1.3 DST=80.213.84.219 LEN=48 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x00 TTL=128 ID=26385 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=3964 DPT=21 WINDOW=16384 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Shorewall rules look like this; DNATnet loc:192.168.1.200:21 tcp 21 I used to have a limited access to my server; then i used this rule DNAT net;external ip-adress loc:192.168.1.200:21 tcp 21 so - all i did, was to remove the external ip to allow everybody to access my ftp-server...now, nobody gets through.any ideas?? PS! thanx for u're support tom -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-27 12:54 Message: Logged In: NO OK - thanx! -- Comment By: Tom Eastep (teastep) Date: 2002-09-27 12:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6546 Please read FAQ #2 - http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm#faq2 -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=615630group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-606429 ] Problems whit SSH and FTP, using Bering
Support Requests item #606429, was opened at 2002-09-08 20:16 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=606429group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Harr Jakobsen (harjakob) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Problems whit SSH and FTP, using Bering Initial Comment: I have a router whith Bering, and now I try to get access to it throug SSH - but I do experience some problems -I can' t get through the Shorewall with FTP either - I follow the installation guide, and the Users guide, but it don't seem to work anyway - are ther any known issues around this? -- Comment By: Tom Harr Jakobsen (harjakob) Date: 2002-09-21 10:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=607432 thanx - that worked!!! -- Comment By: Matt Schalit (rogermatt) Date: 2002-09-20 19:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=144016 1. Check that sshd is running on the LEAF box, using the command ps from the command line. You should see something like 15392 root 4344 R/usr/sbin/sshd If sshd is not running, then type at the # prompt: # /usr/sbin/sshd If it returns to a command prompt with no messages, you're set. If it dies with an error like special user not found, read the docs that jnilo has in his sections for sshd. 2. vi /etc/shorewall/rules and add lines like these above the LAST LINE. # Accept DNS connections from the firewall to the network ACCEPT fw net tcp 53 ACCEPT fw net udp 53 # Accept SSH connections from the local network for administration ACCEPT loc fw tcp 22 # Accept DNS queries from local network to the firewall (dnscache/tinydns) ACCEPT loc fw tcp 53 ACCEPT loc fw udp 53 # Accept Web queries from local network to firewall (weblet) ACCEPT loc fw tcp 80 Either the process wasnt' running, or you were blocked. If you were blocked it would show up in your syslog. It should work now. Let us know so we can close this or get you some more help :) Matthew -- Comment By: Manfred Schuler (mschuler) Date: 2002-09-10 01:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=490757 It seems that sshd is not running. sshd is not enabled in inetd.conf and the file /etc/init.d/sshd contains this lines: #Comment out and edit /etc/inetd.conf to run as a stand alone server echo Secure Shell server via inetd: sshd exit 0 So sshd is not started. You have to decide, if you start sshd by inetd or by initscript. When started by inted, connecting to LEAF takes more time, because the session key must be generated by sshd before connecting. Starting by initscript consumes some memory, because sshd is always running, even when you are not logged in. You must either comment the echo and exit line in /etc/init.d/sshd or uncomment the #ssh line in /etc/inetd.conf. Manfred -- Comment By: Tom Harr Jakobsen (harjakob) Date: 2002-09-09 16:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=607432 I'm only trying to connect using ssh from a local machine on the network, using Putty...I only recive connection refused -- Comment By: Jacques Nilo (jnilo) Date: 2002-09-09 12:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=150195 Aren't you trying to ssh of ftp from the outside network by any chance ? If so you need to adjust Shorewall rules file and /etc/hosts.allow If not more info about the type of error you get would help... -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=606429group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-606429 ] Problems whit SSH and FTP, using Bering
Support Requests item #606429, was opened at 2002-09-08 13:16 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=606429group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Harr Jakobsen (harjakob) Assigned to: Matt Schalit (rogermatt) Summary: Problems whit SSH and FTP, using Bering Initial Comment: I have a router whith Bering, and now I try to get access to it throug SSH - but I do experience some problems -I can' t get through the Shorewall with FTP either - I follow the installation guide, and the Users guide, but it don't seem to work anyway - are ther any known issues around this? -- Comment By: Matt Schalit (rogermatt) Date: 2002-09-21 17:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=144016 Roger that. Sorry if it took a while, but you can usually get more speedy help via the leaf-user mailing list. Enjoy, matt. -- Comment By: Tom Harr Jakobsen (harjakob) Date: 2002-09-21 03:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=607432 thanx - that worked!!! -- Comment By: Matt Schalit (rogermatt) Date: 2002-09-20 12:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=144016 1. Check that sshd is running on the LEAF box, using the command ps from the command line. You should see something like 15392 root 4344 R/usr/sbin/sshd If sshd is not running, then type at the # prompt: # /usr/sbin/sshd If it returns to a command prompt with no messages, you're set. If it dies with an error like special user not found, read the docs that jnilo has in his sections for sshd. 2. vi /etc/shorewall/rules and add lines like these above the LAST LINE. # Accept DNS connections from the firewall to the network ACCEPT fw net tcp 53 ACCEPT fw net udp 53 # Accept SSH connections from the local network for administration ACCEPT loc fw tcp 22 # Accept DNS queries from local network to the firewall (dnscache/tinydns) ACCEPT loc fw tcp 53 ACCEPT loc fw udp 53 # Accept Web queries from local network to firewall (weblet) ACCEPT loc fw tcp 80 Either the process wasnt' running, or you were blocked. If you were blocked it would show up in your syslog. It should work now. Let us know so we can close this or get you some more help :) Matthew -- Comment By: Manfred Schuler (mschuler) Date: 2002-09-09 18:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=490757 It seems that sshd is not running. sshd is not enabled in inetd.conf and the file /etc/init.d/sshd contains this lines: #Comment out and edit /etc/inetd.conf to run as a stand alone server echo Secure Shell server via inetd: sshd exit 0 So sshd is not started. You have to decide, if you start sshd by inetd or by initscript. When started by inted, connecting to LEAF takes more time, because the session key must be generated by sshd before connecting. Starting by initscript consumes some memory, because sshd is always running, even when you are not logged in. You must either comment the echo and exit line in /etc/init.d/sshd or uncomment the #ssh line in /etc/inetd.conf. Manfred -- Comment By: Tom Harr Jakobsen (harjakob) Date: 2002-09-09 09:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=607432 I'm only trying to connect using ssh from a local machine on the network, using Putty...I only recive connection refused -- Comment By: Jacques Nilo (jnilo) Date: 2002-09-09 05:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=150195 Aren't you trying to ssh of ftp from the outside network by any chance ? If so you need to adjust Shorewall rules file and /etc/hosts.allow If not more info about the type of error you get would help... -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=606429group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-606429 ] Problems whit SSH and FTP, using Bering
Support Requests item #606429, was opened at 2002-09-08 13:16 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=606429group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Harr Jakobsen (harjakob) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Problems whit SSH and FTP, using Bering Initial Comment: I have a router whith Bering, and now I try to get access to it throug SSH - but I do experience some problems -I can' t get through the Shorewall with FTP either - I follow the installation guide, and the Users guide, but it don't seem to work anyway - are ther any known issues around this? -- Comment By: Matt Schalit (rogermatt) Date: 2002-09-20 12:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=144016 1. Check that sshd is running on the LEAF box, using the command ps from the command line. You should see something like 15392 root 4344 R/usr/sbin/sshd If sshd is not running, then type at the # prompt: # /usr/sbin/sshd If it returns to a command prompt with no messages, you're set. If it dies with an error like special user not found, read the docs that jnilo has in his sections for sshd. 2. vi /etc/shorewall/rules and add lines like these above the LAST LINE. # Accept DNS connections from the firewall to the network ACCEPT fw net tcp 53 ACCEPT fw net udp 53 # Accept SSH connections from the local network for administration ACCEPT loc fw tcp 22 # Accept DNS queries from local network to the firewall (dnscache/tinydns) ACCEPT loc fw tcp 53 ACCEPT loc fw udp 53 # Accept Web queries from local network to firewall (weblet) ACCEPT loc fw tcp 80 Either the process wasnt' running, or you were blocked. If you were blocked it would show up in your syslog. It should work now. Let us know so we can close this or get you some more help :) Matthew -- Comment By: Manfred Schuler (mschuler) Date: 2002-09-09 18:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=490757 It seems that sshd is not running. sshd is not enabled in inetd.conf and the file /etc/init.d/sshd contains this lines: #Comment out and edit /etc/inetd.conf to run as a stand alone server echo Secure Shell server via inetd: sshd exit 0 So sshd is not started. You have to decide, if you start sshd by inetd or by initscript. When started by inted, connecting to LEAF takes more time, because the session key must be generated by sshd before connecting. Starting by initscript consumes some memory, because sshd is always running, even when you are not logged in. You must either comment the echo and exit line in /etc/init.d/sshd or uncomment the #ssh line in /etc/inetd.conf. Manfred -- Comment By: Tom Harr Jakobsen (harjakob) Date: 2002-09-09 09:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=607432 I'm only trying to connect using ssh from a local machine on the network, using Putty...I only recive connection refused -- Comment By: Jacques Nilo (jnilo) Date: 2002-09-09 05:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=150195 Aren't you trying to ssh of ftp from the outside network by any chance ? If so you need to adjust Shorewall rules file and /etc/hosts.allow If not more info about the type of error you get would help... -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=606429group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-609807 ] unable to browse internet thru client
Support Requests item #609807, was opened at 2002-09-16 00:23 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=609807group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: unable to browse internet thru client Initial Comment: i tried to save the text file as suggested but it only created garbage folders..so unable to include the files.. eth0 = 202.187.248.3 (public ip) am able to ping to the web from the router pc.. eth1 = 196.9.200.1 am able to ping this ip from a client pc.. but when i browse the internet from the client pc i will get error 404 file not found.. -- Comment By: Matt Schalit (rogermatt) Date: 2002-09-20 12:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=144016 Try the commands: ip addr show /tmp/output echo /tmp/output ip route show /tmp/output mount -t msdos /dev/fd0u1680 /mnt cp /tmp/output /mnt umount /mnt Then remove the floppy and put it in a windows box that has access to the net, open the output file in wordpad and copy and paste the output into here so we can see your setup. Also tell us your LEAF flavor, version, if you're using the 196.9.200.0 network that belongs to Dimension Data in South Africa for a reason, what modifications you've done to your LEAF to make it work with that public network, and any relevant messages in your syslog. Regards, Matthew -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=609807group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-606429 ] Problems whit SSH and FTP, using Bering
Support Requests item #606429, was opened at 2002-09-08 22:16 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=606429group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Harr Jakobsen (harjakob) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Problems whit SSH and FTP, using Bering Initial Comment: I have a router whith Bering, and now I try to get access to it throug SSH - but I do experience some problems -I can' t get through the Shorewall with FTP either - I follow the installation guide, and the Users guide, but it don't seem to work anyway - are ther any known issues around this? -- Comment By: Jacques Nilo (jnilo) Date: 2002-09-09 14:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=150195 Aren't you trying to ssh of ftp from the outside network by any chance ? If so you need to adjust Shorewall rules file and /etc/hosts.allow If not more info about the type of error you get would help... -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=606429group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-606429 ] Problems whit SSH and FTP, using Bering
Support Requests item #606429, was opened at 2002-09-08 20:16 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=606429group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Harr Jakobsen (harjakob) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Problems whit SSH and FTP, using Bering Initial Comment: I have a router whith Bering, and now I try to get access to it throug SSH - but I do experience some problems -I can' t get through the Shorewall with FTP either - I follow the installation guide, and the Users guide, but it don't seem to work anyway - are ther any known issues around this? -- Comment By: Tom Harr Jakobsen (harjakob) Date: 2002-09-09 16:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=607432 I'm only trying to connect using ssh from a local machine on the network, using Putty...I only recive connection refused -- Comment By: Jacques Nilo (jnilo) Date: 2002-09-09 12:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=150195 Aren't you trying to ssh of ftp from the outside network by any chance ? If so you need to adjust Shorewall rules file and /etc/hosts.allow If not more info about the type of error you get would help... -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=606429group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-606429 ] Problems whit SSH and FTP, using Bering
Support Requests item #606429, was opened at 2002-09-08 20:16 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=606429group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Harr Jakobsen (harjakob) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Problems whit SSH and FTP, using Bering Initial Comment: I have a router whith Bering, and now I try to get access to it throug SSH - but I do experience some problems -I can' t get through the Shorewall with FTP either - I follow the installation guide, and the Users guide, but it don't seem to work anyway - are ther any known issues around this? -- Comment By: Manfred Schuler (mschuler) Date: 2002-09-10 01:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=490757 It seems that sshd is not running. sshd is not enabled in inetd.conf and the file /etc/init.d/sshd contains this lines: #Comment out and edit /etc/inetd.conf to run as a stand alone server echo Secure Shell server via inetd: sshd exit 0 So sshd is not started. You have to decide, if you start sshd by inetd or by initscript. When started by inted, connecting to LEAF takes more time, because the session key must be generated by sshd before connecting. Starting by initscript consumes some memory, because sshd is always running, even when you are not logged in. You must either comment the echo and exit line in /etc/init.d/sshd or uncomment the #ssh line in /etc/inetd.conf. Manfred -- Comment By: Tom Harr Jakobsen (harjakob) Date: 2002-09-09 16:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=607432 I'm only trying to connect using ssh from a local machine on the network, using Putty...I only recive connection refused -- Comment By: Jacques Nilo (jnilo) Date: 2002-09-09 12:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=150195 Aren't you trying to ssh of ftp from the outside network by any chance ? If so you need to adjust Shorewall rules file and /etc/hosts.allow If not more info about the type of error you get would help... -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=606429group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-606429 ] Problems whit SSH and FTP, using Bering
Support Requests item #606429, was opened at 2002-09-08 20:16 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=606429group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Harr Jakobsen (harjakob) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Problems whit SSH and FTP, using Bering Initial Comment: I have a router whith Bering, and now I try to get access to it throug SSH - but I do experience some problems -I can' t get through the Shorewall with FTP either - I follow the installation guide, and the Users guide, but it don't seem to work anyway - are ther any known issues around this? -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=606429group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-605926 ] Huh? no fd0u1680
Support Requests item #605926, was opened at 2002-09-06 22:51 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=605926group_id=13751 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Huh? no fd0u1680 Initial Comment: I am using mandrake 8.2. There are no entries in /dev for floppies greater than 1440. Directions for LRP distros say I need /dev/fd0u1680, but this doesn't work. What should I do? I've been to the FAQ. ALSO, is there a FORUM anywhere that I can post questions and see other's questions and answers, or is there just the mailing list? Thanks much for any help. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-08 16:25 Message: Logged In: NO No luck. 1) First post below, about mknod, creates a fd0u1680 that when formated says read only file system and won't format. 2) From the second post, the mandrake fdutils package installed a bunch of floppy in dev, including a fd0u1760, but no fd0u1680. I'm trying to use LRP . MORE INFO / GOAL I need a linux boot floppy that will boot a shell linux system, that can run a DHCP client to connect to my network and run a small command line program, setiathome. The network cards I have available are built into the MB and are not PXE boot compatible. I do have LTSP running on my server, but it needs PXE to boot the clients. Thanks for any help. -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-08 16:24 Message: Logged In: NO No luck. 1) First post below, about mknod, creates a fd0u1680 that when formated says read only file system and won't format. 2) From the second post, the mandrake fdutils package installed a bunch of floppy in dev, including a fd0u1760, but no fd0u1680. I'm trying to use LRP . MORE INFO / GOAL I need a linux boot floppy that will boot a shell linux system, that can run a DHCP client to connect to my network and run a small command line program, setiathome. The network cards I have available are built into the MB and are not PXE boot compatible. I do have LTSP running on my server, but it needs PXE to boot the clients. Thanks for any help. -- Comment By: Ewald Wasscher (ewaldw) Date: 2002-09-07 02:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=173891 Install the fdutils package (Mandrake has an rpm for it) and run as root: /usr/bin/MAKEFLOPPIES This should create the appropriate /dev files. -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-07 00:58 Message: Logged In: NO The answer you are looking for would be in the Mandrake FAQ, not the LEAF FAQ. Try this as root: cd /dev ; ./MAKEDEV -v fd0 If that doesn't do it, try: cd /dev ; mknod /dev/fd0u1680 b 2 44 There is no forum, just the mailing list. I can't speak for everyone hear, but it's *much* easier for me to field questions via email (especially across multiple subject groups) than to struggle with web-based forums. (Sorry, venting a bit there.) There are at least three archives of the mailing list traffic. The mail-archive interface provides the best search support. It's at: http://www.mail-archive.com/leaf-user%40lists.sourceforge.net/ There's also a geocrawler archive and sourceforge archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/7325/0/ http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=12page_id=5 (The direct SF link doesn't seem to be working right now.) Questions submitted to the mailing list directly seem to get more replies. If you have further questions and want the widest audience, mail to leaf-user (after reading the support request FAQ at http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ) might be the best avenue. --Brad -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=605926group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-605926 ] Huh? no fd0u1680
Support Requests item #605926, was opened at 2002-09-06 22:51 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=605926group_id=13751 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Huh? no fd0u1680 Initial Comment: I am using mandrake 8.2. There are no entries in /dev for floppies greater than 1440. Directions for LRP distros say I need /dev/fd0u1680, but this doesn't work. What should I do? I've been to the FAQ. ALSO, is there a FORUM anywhere that I can post questions and see other's questions and answers, or is there just the mailing list? Thanks much for any help. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-08 16:24 Message: Logged In: NO No luck. 1) First post below, about mknod, creates a fd0u1680 that when formated says read only file system and won't format. 2) From the second post, the mandrake fdutils package installed a bunch of floppy in dev, including a fd0u1760, but no fd0u1680. I'm trying to use LRP . MORE INFO / GOAL I need a linux boot floppy that will boot a shell linux system, that can run a DHCP client to connect to my network and run a small command line program, setiathome. The network cards I have available are built into the MB and are not PXE boot compatible. I do have LTSP running on my server, but it needs PXE to boot the clients. Thanks for any help. -- Comment By: Ewald Wasscher (ewaldw) Date: 2002-09-07 02:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=173891 Install the fdutils package (Mandrake has an rpm for it) and run as root: /usr/bin/MAKEFLOPPIES This should create the appropriate /dev files. -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-07 00:58 Message: Logged In: NO The answer you are looking for would be in the Mandrake FAQ, not the LEAF FAQ. Try this as root: cd /dev ; ./MAKEDEV -v fd0 If that doesn't do it, try: cd /dev ; mknod /dev/fd0u1680 b 2 44 There is no forum, just the mailing list. I can't speak for everyone hear, but it's *much* easier for me to field questions via email (especially across multiple subject groups) than to struggle with web-based forums. (Sorry, venting a bit there.) There are at least three archives of the mailing list traffic. The mail-archive interface provides the best search support. It's at: http://www.mail-archive.com/leaf-user%40lists.sourceforge.net/ There's also a geocrawler archive and sourceforge archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/7325/0/ http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=12page_id=5 (The direct SF link doesn't seem to be working right now.) Questions submitted to the mailing list directly seem to get more replies. If you have further questions and want the widest audience, mail to leaf-user (after reading the support request FAQ at http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ) might be the best avenue. --Brad -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=605926group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-605926 ] Huh? no fd0u1680
Support Requests item #605926, was opened at 2002-09-06 22:51 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=605926group_id=13751 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Huh? no fd0u1680 Initial Comment: I am using mandrake 8.2. There are no entries in /dev for floppies greater than 1440. Directions for LRP distros say I need /dev/fd0u1680, but this doesn't work. What should I do? I've been to the FAQ. ALSO, is there a FORUM anywhere that I can post questions and see other's questions and answers, or is there just the mailing list? Thanks much for any help. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Comment By: Jack Coates (stinkingpig) Date: 2002-09-08 16:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=18550 mknod /dev/fd0u1680 b 2 44 -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-08 16:25 Message: Logged In: NO No luck. 1) First post below, about mknod, creates a fd0u1680 that when formated says read only file system and won't format. 2) From the second post, the mandrake fdutils package installed a bunch of floppy in dev, including a fd0u1760, but no fd0u1680. I'm trying to use LRP . MORE INFO / GOAL I need a linux boot floppy that will boot a shell linux system, that can run a DHCP client to connect to my network and run a small command line program, setiathome. The network cards I have available are built into the MB and are not PXE boot compatible. I do have LTSP running on my server, but it needs PXE to boot the clients. Thanks for any help. -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-08 16:24 Message: Logged In: NO No luck. 1) First post below, about mknod, creates a fd0u1680 that when formated says read only file system and won't format. 2) From the second post, the mandrake fdutils package installed a bunch of floppy in dev, including a fd0u1760, but no fd0u1680. I'm trying to use LRP . MORE INFO / GOAL I need a linux boot floppy that will boot a shell linux system, that can run a DHCP client to connect to my network and run a small command line program, setiathome. The network cards I have available are built into the MB and are not PXE boot compatible. I do have LTSP running on my server, but it needs PXE to boot the clients. Thanks for any help. -- Comment By: Ewald Wasscher (ewaldw) Date: 2002-09-07 02:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=173891 Install the fdutils package (Mandrake has an rpm for it) and run as root: /usr/bin/MAKEFLOPPIES This should create the appropriate /dev files. -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-07 00:58 Message: Logged In: NO The answer you are looking for would be in the Mandrake FAQ, not the LEAF FAQ. Try this as root: cd /dev ; ./MAKEDEV -v fd0 If that doesn't do it, try: cd /dev ; mknod /dev/fd0u1680 b 2 44 There is no forum, just the mailing list. I can't speak for everyone hear, but it's *much* easier for me to field questions via email (especially across multiple subject groups) than to struggle with web-based forums. (Sorry, venting a bit there.) There are at least three archives of the mailing list traffic. The mail-archive interface provides the best search support. It's at: http://www.mail-archive.com/leaf-user%40lists.sourceforge.net/ There's also a geocrawler archive and sourceforge archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/7325/0/ http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=12page_id=5 (The direct SF link doesn't seem to be working right now.) Questions submitted to the mailing list directly seem to get more replies. If you have further questions and want the widest audience, mail to leaf-user (after reading the support request FAQ at http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ) might be the best avenue. --Brad -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=605926group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-605926 ] Huh? no fd0u1680
Support Requests item #605926, was opened at 2002-09-07 00:51 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=605926group_id=13751 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Huh? no fd0u1680 Initial Comment: I am using mandrake 8.2. There are no entries in /dev for floppies greater than 1440. Directions for LRP distros say I need /dev/fd0u1680, but this doesn't work. What should I do? I've been to the FAQ. ALSO, is there a FORUM anywhere that I can post questions and see other's questions and answers, or is there just the mailing list? Thanks much for any help. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Comment By: Brad Fritz (bradfritz) Date: 2002-09-08 20:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=299284 I think you were half way their when you used the mknod command and got the read only file system message. Do you have write permission to the /dev/fd0u1680 device? Have you verified that your floppy is not write protected? If you're still having problems, post the output of ls -l /dev/fd0u1680 ; whoami ; groups --Brad -- Comment By: Jack Coates (stinkingpig) Date: 2002-09-08 18:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=18550 mknod /dev/fd0u1680 b 2 44 -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-08 18:25 Message: Logged In: NO No luck. 1) First post below, about mknod, creates a fd0u1680 that when formated says read only file system and won't format. 2) From the second post, the mandrake fdutils package installed a bunch of floppy in dev, including a fd0u1760, but no fd0u1680. I'm trying to use LRP . MORE INFO / GOAL I need a linux boot floppy that will boot a shell linux system, that can run a DHCP client to connect to my network and run a small command line program, setiathome. The network cards I have available are built into the MB and are not PXE boot compatible. I do have LTSP running on my server, but it needs PXE to boot the clients. Thanks for any help. -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-08 18:24 Message: Logged In: NO No luck. 1) First post below, about mknod, creates a fd0u1680 that when formated says read only file system and won't format. 2) From the second post, the mandrake fdutils package installed a bunch of floppy in dev, including a fd0u1760, but no fd0u1680. I'm trying to use LRP . MORE INFO / GOAL I need a linux boot floppy that will boot a shell linux system, that can run a DHCP client to connect to my network and run a small command line program, setiathome. The network cards I have available are built into the MB and are not PXE boot compatible. I do have LTSP running on my server, but it needs PXE to boot the clients. Thanks for any help. -- Comment By: Ewald Wasscher (ewaldw) Date: 2002-09-07 04:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=173891 Install the fdutils package (Mandrake has an rpm for it) and run as root: /usr/bin/MAKEFLOPPIES This should create the appropriate /dev files. -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-07 02:58 Message: Logged In: NO The answer you are looking for would be in the Mandrake FAQ, not the LEAF FAQ. Try this as root: cd /dev ; ./MAKEDEV -v fd0 If that doesn't do it, try: cd /dev ; mknod /dev/fd0u1680 b 2 44 There is no forum, just the mailing list. I can't speak for everyone hear, but it's *much* easier for me to field questions via email (especially across multiple subject groups) than to struggle with web-based forums. (Sorry, venting a bit there.) There are at least three archives of the mailing list traffic. The mail-archive interface provides the best search support. It's at: http://www.mail-archive.com/leaf-user%40lists.sourceforge.net/ There's also a geocrawler archive and sourceforge archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/7325/0/ http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=12page_id=5 (The direct SF link doesn't seem to be working right now.) Questions submitted to the mailing list directly seem to get more replies. If you have further questions and want the widest audience, mail to leaf-user (after reading the support request FAQ at http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ) might be the best avenue. --Brad -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=605926group_id=13751
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-605926 ] Huh? no fd0u1680
Support Requests item #605926, was opened at 2002-09-06 22:51 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=605926group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Huh? no fd0u1680 Initial Comment: I am using mandrake 8.2. There are no entries in /dev for floppies greater than 1440. Directions for LRP distros say I need /dev/fd0u1680, but this doesn't work. What should I do? I've been to the FAQ. ALSO, is there a FORUM anywhere that I can post questions and see other's questions and answers, or is there just the mailing list? Thanks much for any help. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-07 00:58 Message: Logged In: NO The answer you are looking for would be in the Mandrake FAQ, not the LEAF FAQ. Try this as root: cd /dev ; ./MAKEDEV -v fd0 If that doesn't do it, try: cd /dev ; mknod /dev/fd0u1680 b 2 44 There is no forum, just the mailing list. I can't speak for everyone hear, but it's *much* easier for me to field questions via email (especially across multiple subject groups) than to struggle with web-based forums. (Sorry, venting a bit there.) There are at least three archives of the mailing list traffic. The mail-archive interface provides the best search support. It's at: http://www.mail-archive.com/leaf-user%40lists.sourceforge.net/ There's also a geocrawler archive and sourceforge archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/7325/0/ http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=12page_id=5 (The direct SF link doesn't seem to be working right now.) Questions submitted to the mailing list directly seem to get more replies. If you have further questions and want the widest audience, mail to leaf-user (after reading the support request FAQ at http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ) might be the best avenue. --Brad -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=605926group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-605926 ] Huh? no fd0u1680
Support Requests item #605926, was opened at 2002-09-07 05:51 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=605926group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Huh? no fd0u1680 Initial Comment: I am using mandrake 8.2. There are no entries in /dev for floppies greater than 1440. Directions for LRP distros say I need /dev/fd0u1680, but this doesn't work. What should I do? I've been to the FAQ. ALSO, is there a FORUM anywhere that I can post questions and see other's questions and answers, or is there just the mailing list? Thanks much for any help. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Comment By: Ewald Wasscher (ewaldw) Date: 2002-09-07 09:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=173891 Install the fdutils package (Mandrake has an rpm for it) and run as root: /usr/bin/MAKEFLOPPIES This should create the appropriate /dev files. -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-07 07:58 Message: Logged In: NO The answer you are looking for would be in the Mandrake FAQ, not the LEAF FAQ. Try this as root: cd /dev ; ./MAKEDEV -v fd0 If that doesn't do it, try: cd /dev ; mknod /dev/fd0u1680 b 2 44 There is no forum, just the mailing list. I can't speak for everyone hear, but it's *much* easier for me to field questions via email (especially across multiple subject groups) than to struggle with web-based forums. (Sorry, venting a bit there.) There are at least three archives of the mailing list traffic. The mail-archive interface provides the best search support. It's at: http://www.mail-archive.com/leaf-user%40lists.sourceforge.net/ There's also a geocrawler archive and sourceforge archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/7325/0/ http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=12page_id=5 (The direct SF link doesn't seem to be working right now.) Questions submitted to the mailing list directly seem to get more replies. If you have further questions and want the widest audience, mail to leaf-user (after reading the support request FAQ at http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ) might be the best avenue. --Brad -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=605926group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-605926 ] Huh? no fd0u1680
Support Requests item #605926, was opened at 2002-09-07 05:51 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=605926group_id=13751 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Huh? no fd0u1680 Initial Comment: I am using mandrake 8.2. There are no entries in /dev for floppies greater than 1440. Directions for LRP distros say I need /dev/fd0u1680, but this doesn't work. What should I do? I've been to the FAQ. ALSO, is there a FORUM anywhere that I can post questions and see other's questions and answers, or is there just the mailing list? Thanks much for any help. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Comment By: Ewald Wasscher (ewaldw) Date: 2002-09-07 09:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=173891 Install the fdutils package (Mandrake has an rpm for it) and run as root: /usr/bin/MAKEFLOPPIES This should create the appropriate /dev files. -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-07 07:58 Message: Logged In: NO The answer you are looking for would be in the Mandrake FAQ, not the LEAF FAQ. Try this as root: cd /dev ; ./MAKEDEV -v fd0 If that doesn't do it, try: cd /dev ; mknod /dev/fd0u1680 b 2 44 There is no forum, just the mailing list. I can't speak for everyone hear, but it's *much* easier for me to field questions via email (especially across multiple subject groups) than to struggle with web-based forums. (Sorry, venting a bit there.) There are at least three archives of the mailing list traffic. The mail-archive interface provides the best search support. It's at: http://www.mail-archive.com/leaf-user%40lists.sourceforge.net/ There's also a geocrawler archive and sourceforge archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/7325/0/ http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=12page_id=5 (The direct SF link doesn't seem to be working right now.) Questions submitted to the mailing list directly seem to get more replies. If you have further questions and want the widest audience, mail to leaf-user (after reading the support request FAQ at http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ) might be the best avenue. --Brad -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=605926group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-605926 ] Huh? no fd0u1680
Support Requests item #605926, was opened at 2002-09-06 22:51 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=605926group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Huh? no fd0u1680 Initial Comment: I am using mandrake 8.2. There are no entries in /dev for floppies greater than 1440. Directions for LRP distros say I need /dev/fd0u1680, but this doesn't work. What should I do? I've been to the FAQ. ALSO, is there a FORUM anywhere that I can post questions and see other's questions and answers, or is there just the mailing list? Thanks much for any help. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=605926group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-596917 ] Can not forward port 21
Support Requests item #596917, was opened at 2002-08-18 16:05 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=596917group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Can not forward port 21 Initial Comment: I am running a simple setup. Just one IP address in the and one out to the ftp box. I can not get passed the firewall. I keep getting: Aug 18 06:06:03 firewall kernel: Shorewall:net2all:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:10:4b:98:14:ab:00:02:3b:01:c9:a9:08:00 SRC=151.164.1.7 DST=64.123.80.250 LEN=79 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=250 ID=2532 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=24863 DPT=53 LEN=59 I have the correct rule in place but it is not going to my internal box. DNAT net dmz:192.168.1.50 tcp 21 -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-08-19 04:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Based on the most recent comment on this support request, it is our understanding that this matter has been addressed. Should you require further assistance from the LEAF project members, please submit a new support request. Thank you, leaf-project.org support -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-08-18 20:40 Message: Logged In: NO Tom helped me with this problem. Everything is working now. Thanks -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=596917group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-568227 ] eth1, 64MB CompactFLASH IDE problem?
Support Requests item #568227, was opened at 2002-06-12 14:01 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=568227group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: eth1, 64MB CompactFLASH IDE problem? Initial Comment: I am trying to install DachStien on a 64MB CompactFLASH IDE drive, but I must use eth1 as my connection to the Internet. Where do I make the proper changes from eth0 to eth1? Thank you for your time and efforts. Regards, Don Carrico -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-08-19 04:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 I'm closing this support request due to a lack of response from the person that opened it. -- Comment By: Lynn Avants (guitarlynn) Date: 2002-08-05 15:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=176069 This will be a *major* hurdle to accomplish with Dachstein because of the default scripting in network.conf and ipfilter.conf. It can be done, but this would be *much* easier to accomplish with Bering. Bering can be put on IDE/CF disks as well. Check the Bering Users Manual at: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=568227group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-571927 ] bug #521382 should be re opened
Support Requests item #571927, was opened at 2002-06-20 19:20 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=571927group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Oxygen Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: David Douthitt (ddouthitt) Summary: bug #521382 should be re opened Initial Comment: bug #521382 needs to be re opened.. I went to go and update my disks with the latest oxygen but i still see the same problem with ipmask script inside of root.lrp its missing a critical mask i will manualy fix my versions but this should be fixed in the current distribution so it does not need patching every time.. -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-08-19 04:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Based on the most recent comment on this support request, it is our understanding that this matter has been addressed. Should you require further assistance from the LEAF project members, please submit a new support request. Thank you, leaf-project.org support -- Comment By: David Douthitt (ddouthitt) Date: 2002-06-20 20:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=81521 I forgot to explain... ipmask in older versions of Oxygen was a shell function in a script. Newer versions contain a binary program /bin/ipmask which does the same thing but so much more. ipmask will return all sorts of data from an IP address for use by scripts. -- Comment By: David Douthitt (ddouthitt) Date: 2002-06-20 20:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=81521 # ipmask 172.16.3.4 -m 255.255.255.240 IP Address: 172.16.3.4 Official name: adcserv.cuna.com Network range: 172.16.3.1 - 172.16.3.14 Broadcast address: 172.16.3.15 Broadcast address (BSD): 172.16.3.0 CIDR: 172.16.3.0/28 Subnet mask: 255.255.255.240 Cisco wildcard mask: 0.0.0.15 Network: 172.16.3.0 Hexadecimal: AC100304 (reversed: 040310AC) Decimal Address: 2886730500 # ipmask ipmask version 0.33, Copyright (C) 2001 David Douthitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] ipmask comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details see the COPYING file that accompained this distribution. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under the terms of GNU PUBLIC LICENSE. Usage: ipmask [ -BbCcinrsxNmopR ] ip [ -m netmask ] ip may be a hex IP address, dotted-quad (n.n.n.n), or a CIDR spec (n.n.n.n/x) Display Options: -B Display only broadcast address (BSD - obsolete) -b Display only broadcast address -C Display only Cisco wildcard mask -c Display only CIDR -i Display only IP -n Display only network address -d Display only decimal address -r Display only range of valid addresses -s Display subnet mask only -x Display only hexadecimal IP Modifiers: -N No name lookups -m Use this net mask -o Official name (do a name lookup) -p Pretty formatted display of all results -R Hexadecimal IP address is in reversed order -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=571927group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-581150 ] How to SAVE changes on a boot floppy
Support Requests item #581150, was opened at 2002-07-13 15:54 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=581150group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: How to SAVE changes on a boot floppy Initial Comment: The instructions for configuring the config files ALWAYS state to Backup at certain points. (after changing config files) The warning at the beginning of the instructions says NOT to backup onto the boot floppy. Backing up to an alternate floppy results in errors. Rebooting loads default config values (not our network) How and/or where do I backup the config using a single boot disk? -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-08-19 05:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 I'm closing this support request due to a lack of response from the person that opened it. -- Comment By: Lynn Avants (guitarlynn) Date: 2002-08-05 15:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=176069 You should save the changes to the boot floppy. If you let us know where the documentation indicates that this is a bad idea, we can fix this statement. Also the image and version number you are using will be needed to do this correctly. Thanks! -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=581150group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-587696 ] Why am I connecting to these ports??
Support Requests item #587696, was opened at 2002-07-28 07:10 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=587696group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Why am I connecting to these ports?? Initial Comment: This was in my Masqueraded Connections section of my LEAF weblet interface (I added port info I found): tcp 235:58.66 192.168.1.1 66.187.232.21 2355 - 21 (61000) David Weinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] psdbserver 2355/tcp psdbserver tcp 236:13.22 192.168.1.1 152.2.210.81 2362 - 21 (61005) Charles Scott Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED] digiman 2362/tcp digiman digiman 2362/udp digiman tcp 236:08.95 192.168.1.1 18.29.1.67 2359 - 21 (61003) Peter Frankenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] flukeserver 2359/tcp FlukeServer flukeserver 2359/udp FlukeServer Any reason for concern?? Any feedback would be greatly appreciated! [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-08-19 05:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Based on the most recent comment on this support request, it is our understanding that this matter has been addressed. Should you require further assistance from the LEAF project members, please submit a new support request. Thank you, leaf-project.org support -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-08-06 00:28 Message: Logged In: NO You are connect to ftp sites not telnet. telnet = 23 ftp =21. The ports you have looked up appear to be source ports and are not really relevant in this case. The first address is ftp.redhat.com The second one is ibiblio.org. The third one is a mirror of rpmfind.net So I would say no no reason for concern, someone is connecting to three ftp servers thats all. Kim Oppalfens -- Comment By: Lynn Avants (guitarlynn) Date: 2002-08-05 15:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=176069 Your LAN computer @192.168.1.1 is connecting to the telnet port of the remote ip addresses listed in the last column. Why this is happening depends on what is going on with you LAN computer. YOU are initiating this connection, not the remote host. I hope this helps, -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=587696group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-593730 ] wisp-dist hard drive
Support Requests item #593730, was opened at 2002-08-11 11:49 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=593730group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Vladimir Ivaschenko (hzdrus) Summary: wisp-dist hard drive Initial Comment: Can't I install wisp-dist on a regular hard drive? When I try to I get an init not found kernel panic. Try passing init= . I would like to add more features to the system and try it out before going through the steps of a flashdisk. Thank you, Tom Johnson -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-08-19 05:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Based on the most recent comment on this support request, it is our understanding that this matter has been addressed. Should you require further assistance from the LEAF project members, please submit a new support request. Thank you, leaf-project.org support -- Comment By: Vladimir Ivaschenko (hzdrus) Date: 2002-08-12 03:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=558953 Yes, just follow procedures for manual partitioning and installation as documented on the LEAF website's WISP-Dist section. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=593730group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-597193 ] Commercial Support
Support Requests item #597193, was opened at 2002-08-19 08:15 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=597193group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Commercial Support Initial Comment: What is the commercial support that the features document stated? (Noted below) Support Vast resources, and HOWTO's. Active mailing list. Commercial software support and hardware solutions available. Bobby -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=597193group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-597193 ] Commercial Support
Support Requests item #597193, was opened at 2002-08-19 08:15 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=597193group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Commercial Support Initial Comment: What is the commercial support that the features document stated? (Noted below) Support Vast resources, and HOWTO's. Active mailing list. Commercial software support and hardware solutions available. Bobby -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-08-19 08:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Interesting. We may want to remove the last sentence from docid 1397. However, we have links to hardware vendors, and some of our members offer consulting services. Maybe this change would be appropriate: Hardware solutions and consulting services are available. Opinions or suggestions are welcome. ref. docid 1379 http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/doc/docmanager/ hardware vendors http://leaf-project.org/links.php?op=viewlinkcid=8 -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=597193group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-596917 ] Can not forward port 21
Support Requests item #596917, was opened at 2002-08-18 16:05 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=596917group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Can not forward port 21 Initial Comment: I am running a simple setup. Just one IP address in the and one out to the ftp box. I can not get passed the firewall. I keep getting: Aug 18 06:06:03 firewall kernel: Shorewall:net2all:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:10:4b:98:14:ab:00:02:3b:01:c9:a9:08:00 SRC=151.164.1.7 DST=64.123.80.250 LEN=79 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=250 ID=2532 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=24863 DPT=53 LEN=59 I have the correct rule in place but it is not going to my internal box. DNAT net dmz:192.168.1.50 tcp 21 -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=596917group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-596917 ] Can not forward port 21
Support Requests item #596917, was opened at 2002-08-18 16:05 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=596917group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Can not forward port 21 Initial Comment: I am running a simple setup. Just one IP address in the and one out to the ftp box. I can not get passed the firewall. I keep getting: Aug 18 06:06:03 firewall kernel: Shorewall:net2all:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:10:4b:98:14:ab:00:02:3b:01:c9:a9:08:00 SRC=151.164.1.7 DST=64.123.80.250 LEN=79 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=250 ID=2532 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=24863 DPT=53 LEN=59 I have the correct rule in place but it is not going to my internal box. DNAT net dmz:192.168.1.50 tcp 21 -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-08-18 20:40 Message: Logged In: NO Tom helped me with this problem. Everything is working now. Thanks -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=596917group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-539562 ] port forwarding
Support Requests item #539562, was opened at 2002-04-04 18:16 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539562group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: port forwarding Initial Comment: I am running the dachstein firewall router and want to enable port forwarding of the IRLP. The ports to be enabled 2074 2075 15425 15426 15427 and 22. As set up I can log on 192.168.1.1 on the internal network but cannot do it through a external connection. Any info appreciated. IRLP is the Internet Repeater Linking Project. Thanks -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-08-14 08:15 Message: Logged In: NO I am also a ham radio operator with some interest in IRLP, and some experience with Dachstein. Perhaps I could help, or at the very least I'd like to see how your IRLP adventure has been going and if your node is live. -- Comment By: Lynn Avants (guitarlynn) Date: 2002-08-13 20:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=176069 It has been quite a while without comment and I am assuming the problem has been resolved. This request is being closed, so you will need to start a new one if further help is desired. ~Lynn -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-05-17 07:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Would someone with port forwarding knowledge please address this support request? Thanks. -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-04-07 04:50 Message: Logged In: NO This text from correspondence with IRLP group. Subject: Re: firewall If your node is behind a firewall, the following TCP and UDP ports must be forwarded to it. TCP 23 (if you are running telnet) 22 (if you are running SSH) (PREFERRED) 15425 (IRLP control port) 15426 (IRLP control port) 15427 (IRLP control port) UDP 2074 (IRLP Audio) 2075 (IRLP Audio) The version of Dachstein is using sys linux 1.62 2001-04-24 and root version v4.0.6 From log: Apr 6 21:30:49 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=16177 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:30:52 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=16433 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:30:58 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=16689 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:31:11 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=16945 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:31:35 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=17457 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:31:38 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=17713 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:31:44 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=17969 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Other correspondence: If you're running Red Hat 6.x on the router box, you will need to download and install ipmasqadm, to enable the port forwarding. This is a basic script and should give you the bare minimum to forward ports to the IRLP box.. You can add extra code to improve security or pass more protocols (read the IP Masquerade How To for more info). Note, you need to set the $INETIP and $IRLPIP variables to the correct values in your script, or when your connection comes up (if using PPP, DHCP or PPPoE). $INETIP is the public IP address of your firewall, and $IRLPIP is the internal IP address of the IRLP box itself. #!/bin/sh # setup IP Masquerade echo Enabling IP forwarding... echo '1' /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward echo 'Setting up firewall...' /sbin/ipchains -A input -j ACCEPT -i eth0 -s 0/0 67 -d 0/0 68 -p udp /sbin/ipchains -P forward DENY /sbin/ipchains -A forward -i eth0 -s 192.168.0.0/24 -j MASQ /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -f /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P udp -L $INETIP 2074 -R $IRLPIP 2074 /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P udp -L $INETIP 2075 -R $IRLPIP 2075 /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L $INETIP 15425 -R $IRLPIP 15425 /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L $INETIP 15426 -R $IRLPIP 15426 /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L $INETIP 15427 -R $IRLPIP 15427 # Add this line if you want to be able to SSH direct to the IRLP box (and are not using SSH on the router) /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L $INETIP 22 -R $IRLPIP 22 -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-539562 ] port forwarding
Support Requests item #539562, was opened at 2002-04-04 18:16 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539562group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: port forwarding Initial Comment: I am running the dachstein firewall router and want to enable port forwarding of the IRLP. The ports to be enabled 2074 2075 15425 15426 15427 and 22. As set up I can log on 192.168.1.1 on the internal network but cannot do it through a external connection. Any info appreciated. IRLP is the Internet Repeater Linking Project. Thanks -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-08-14 08:20 Message: Logged In: NO I guess it helps if I include my contact information--sorry for the extra traffic on the mailing list. George Luft, AB1AG email address available on QRZ.com -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-08-14 08:15 Message: Logged In: NO I am also a ham radio operator with some interest in IRLP, and some experience with Dachstein. Perhaps I could help, or at the very least I'd like to see how your IRLP adventure has been going and if your node is live. -- Comment By: Lynn Avants (guitarlynn) Date: 2002-08-13 20:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=176069 It has been quite a while without comment and I am assuming the problem has been resolved. This request is being closed, so you will need to start a new one if further help is desired. ~Lynn -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-05-17 07:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Would someone with port forwarding knowledge please address this support request? Thanks. -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-04-07 04:50 Message: Logged In: NO This text from correspondence with IRLP group. Subject: Re: firewall If your node is behind a firewall, the following TCP and UDP ports must be forwarded to it. TCP 23 (if you are running telnet) 22 (if you are running SSH) (PREFERRED) 15425 (IRLP control port) 15426 (IRLP control port) 15427 (IRLP control port) UDP 2074 (IRLP Audio) 2075 (IRLP Audio) The version of Dachstein is using sys linux 1.62 2001-04-24 and root version v4.0.6 From log: Apr 6 21:30:49 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=16177 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:30:52 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=16433 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:30:58 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=16689 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:31:11 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=16945 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:31:35 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=17457 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:31:38 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=17713 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:31:44 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=17969 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Other correspondence: If you're running Red Hat 6.x on the router box, you will need to download and install ipmasqadm, to enable the port forwarding. This is a basic script and should give you the bare minimum to forward ports to the IRLP box.. You can add extra code to improve security or pass more protocols (read the IP Masquerade How To for more info). Note, you need to set the $INETIP and $IRLPIP variables to the correct values in your script, or when your connection comes up (if using PPP, DHCP or PPPoE). $INETIP is the public IP address of your firewall, and $IRLPIP is the internal IP address of the IRLP box itself. #!/bin/sh # setup IP Masquerade echo Enabling IP forwarding... echo '1' /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward echo 'Setting up firewall...' /sbin/ipchains -A input -j ACCEPT -i eth0 -s 0/0 67 -d 0/0 68 -p udp /sbin/ipchains -P forward DENY /sbin/ipchains -A forward -i eth0 -s 192.168.0.0/24 -j MASQ /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -f /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P udp -L $INETIP 2074 -R $IRLPIP 2074 /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P udp -L $INETIP 2075 -R $IRLPIP 2075 /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L $INETIP 15425 -R $IRLPIP 15425 /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L $INETIP 15426 -R $IRLPIP 15426 /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-594097 ] Dachstein will not start on 486/100.....
Support Requests item #594097, was opened at 2002-08-12 10:57 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=594097group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dion Bird (dionb98) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Dachstein will not start on 486/100. Initial Comment: Dachstein will not start on my 486 DX4/100 with 32MB of RAM. Here is a summary of the boot process before it locks up. IP Filters: [IP Forwarding: DISABLED] flushed SIOCGIFFLAGS: Operation not supported by device Bind socket to interface: Operation not supported by device exiting Starting Network: [IP Always Defrag: ENABLED] IP filters: firewall [IP Forwarding: ENABLED] Loopback interface: lo Starting interface: Cannot find device eth1 SIOCGIFFLAGS: Operation not supported by device eth1 Hostname: firewall Static NS: 2 hosts At this point the cursor just sits and flashes. On my other systems the disk will boot completely, with the summary I have provided, same as what's written above. (Including the operation not supported by device stuff) Any insight on why it won't continue past this point on the 486? As I said before it is a 486 DX4/100 with 32MB RAM. I have stripped it down to just the PCI video card and the PCI NIC card. I've tried booting it with no NIC card, and 1 card and 2 cards. If I boot the system under Windows 98, it will detect the network cards so they appear to be functioning. I would appreciate any suggestions you have. Dion -- Comment By: Lynn Avants (guitarlynn) Date: 2002-08-13 22:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=176069 Some old BIOS's do not detect the larger floppy format that the LEAF distro's use. A BIOS update may or may not allow for the larger format and I do not know of a definate fix that works for this problem. You may need to reduce your LEAF disk to fit on a 1.44M formatted disk or use a different machine. Unfortunately this is the best advice I can give on this one. I hope it helps, ~Lynn -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=594097group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-539562 ] port forwarding
Support Requests item #539562, was opened at 2002-04-04 20:16 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539562group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: port forwarding Initial Comment: I am running the dachstein firewall router and want to enable port forwarding of the IRLP. The ports to be enabled 2074 2075 15425 15426 15427 and 22. As set up I can log on 192.168.1.1 on the internal network but cannot do it through a external connection. Any info appreciated. IRLP is the Internet Repeater Linking Project. Thanks -- Comment By: Lynn Avants (guitarlynn) Date: 2002-08-13 22:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=176069 It has been quite a while without comment and I am assuming the problem has been resolved. This request is being closed, so you will need to start a new one if further help is desired. ~Lynn -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-05-17 09:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Would someone with port forwarding knowledge please address this support request? Thanks. -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-04-07 06:50 Message: Logged In: NO This text from correspondence with IRLP group. Subject: Re: firewall If your node is behind a firewall, the following TCP and UDP ports must be forwarded to it. TCP 23 (if you are running telnet) 22 (if you are running SSH) (PREFERRED) 15425 (IRLP control port) 15426 (IRLP control port) 15427 (IRLP control port) UDP 2074 (IRLP Audio) 2075 (IRLP Audio) The version of Dachstein is using sys linux 1.62 2001-04-24 and root version v4.0.6 From log: Apr 6 21:30:49 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=16177 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:30:52 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=16433 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:30:58 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=16689 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:31:11 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=16945 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:31:35 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=17457 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:31:38 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=17713 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:31:44 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=17969 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Other correspondence: If you're running Red Hat 6.x on the router box, you will need to download and install ipmasqadm, to enable the port forwarding. This is a basic script and should give you the bare minimum to forward ports to the IRLP box.. You can add extra code to improve security or pass more protocols (read the IP Masquerade How To for more info). Note, you need to set the $INETIP and $IRLPIP variables to the correct values in your script, or when your connection comes up (if using PPP, DHCP or PPPoE). $INETIP is the public IP address of your firewall, and $IRLPIP is the internal IP address of the IRLP box itself. #!/bin/sh # setup IP Masquerade echo Enabling IP forwarding... echo '1' /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward echo 'Setting up firewall...' /sbin/ipchains -A input -j ACCEPT -i eth0 -s 0/0 67 -d 0/0 68 -p udp /sbin/ipchains -P forward DENY /sbin/ipchains -A forward -i eth0 -s 192.168.0.0/24 -j MASQ /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -f /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P udp -L $INETIP 2074 -R $IRLPIP 2074 /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P udp -L $INETIP 2075 -R $IRLPIP 2075 /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L $INETIP 15425 -R $IRLPIP 15425 /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L $INETIP 15426 -R $IRLPIP 15426 /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L $INETIP 15427 -R $IRLPIP 15427 # Add this line if you want to be able to SSH direct to the IRLP box (and are not using SSH on the router) /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L $INETIP 22 -R $IRLPIP 22 -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-04-06 16:01 Message: Logged In: NO I went to the IRLP site and it does not seem to document the port numbers with protocols. This is a VOIP system which doubtless uses a udp stream for the audio. If you can let us know which protocol each of the ports uses - the implementation of the port fowarding is trivial. Some of those ports will be udp and some will
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-593730 ] wisp-dist hard drive
Support Requests item #593730, was opened at 2002-08-11 18:49 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=593730group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: wisp-dist hard drive Initial Comment: Can't I install wisp-dist on a regular hard drive? When I try to I get an init not found kernel panic. Try passing init= . I would like to add more features to the system and try it out before going through the steps of a flashdisk. Thank you, Tom Johnson -- Comment By: Vladimir Ivaschenko (hzdrus) Date: 2002-08-12 10:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=558953 Yes, just follow procedures for manual partitioning and installation as documented on the LEAF website's WISP-Dist section. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=593730group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-594097 ] Dachstein will not start on 486/100.....
Support Requests item #594097, was opened at 2002-08-12 15:57 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=594097group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dion Bird (dionb98) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Dachstein will not start on 486/100. Initial Comment: Dachstein will not start on my 486 DX4/100 with 32MB of RAM. Here is a summary of the boot process before it locks up. IP Filters: [IP Forwarding: DISABLED] flushed SIOCGIFFLAGS: Operation not supported by device Bind socket to interface: Operation not supported by device exiting Starting Network: [IP Always Defrag: ENABLED] IP filters: firewall [IP Forwarding: ENABLED] Loopback interface: lo Starting interface: Cannot find device eth1 SIOCGIFFLAGS: Operation not supported by device eth1 Hostname: firewall Static NS: 2 hosts At this point the cursor just sits and flashes. On my other systems the disk will boot completely, with the summary I have provided, same as what's written above. (Including the operation not supported by device stuff) Any insight on why it won't continue past this point on the 486? As I said before it is a 486 DX4/100 with 32MB RAM. I have stripped it down to just the PCI video card and the PCI NIC card. I've tried booting it with no NIC card, and 1 card and 2 cards. If I boot the system under Windows 98, it will detect the network cards so they appear to be functioning. I would appreciate any suggestions you have. Dion -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=594097group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-593730 ] wisp-dist hard drive
Support Requests item #593730, was opened at 2002-08-11 11:49 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=593730group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: wisp-dist hard drive Initial Comment: Can't I install wisp-dist on a regular hard drive? When I try to I get an init not found kernel panic. Try passing init= . I would like to add more features to the system and try it out before going through the steps of a flashdisk. Thank you, Tom Johnson -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=593730group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-587696 ] Why am I connecting to these ports??
Support Requests item #587696, was opened at 2002-07-28 07:10 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=587696group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Why am I connecting to these ports?? Initial Comment: This was in my Masqueraded Connections section of my LEAF weblet interface (I added port info I found): tcp 235:58.66 192.168.1.1 66.187.232.21 2355 - 21 (61000) David Weinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] psdbserver 2355/tcp psdbserver tcp 236:13.22 192.168.1.1 152.2.210.81 2362 - 21 (61005) Charles Scott Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED] digiman 2362/tcp digiman digiman 2362/udp digiman tcp 236:08.95 192.168.1.1 18.29.1.67 2359 - 21 (61003) Peter Frankenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] flukeserver 2359/tcp FlukeServer flukeserver 2359/udp FlukeServer Any reason for concern?? Any feedback would be greatly appreciated! [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=587696group_id=13751 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-571927 ] bug #521382 should be re opened
Support Requests item #571927, was opened at 2002-06-20 19:20 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=571927group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Oxygen Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: bug #521382 should be re opened Initial Comment: bug #521382 needs to be re opened.. I went to go and update my disks with the latest oxygen but i still see the same problem with ipmask script inside of root.lrp its missing a critical mask i will manualy fix my versions but this should be fixed in the current distribution so it does not need patching every time.. -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=571927group_id=13751 --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-571927 ] bug #521382 should be re opened
Support Requests item #571927, was opened at 2002-06-20 21:20 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=571927group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Oxygen Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: David Douthitt (ddouthitt) Summary: bug #521382 should be re opened Initial Comment: bug #521382 needs to be re opened.. I went to go and update my disks with the latest oxygen but i still see the same problem with ipmask script inside of root.lrp its missing a critical mask i will manualy fix my versions but this should be fixed in the current distribution so it does not need patching every time.. -- Comment By: David Douthitt (ddouthitt) Date: 2002-06-20 22:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=81521 # ipmask 172.16.3.4 -m 255.255.255.240 IP Address: 172.16.3.4 Official name: adcserv.cuna.com Network range: 172.16.3.1 - 172.16.3.14 Broadcast address: 172.16.3.15 Broadcast address (BSD): 172.16.3.0 CIDR: 172.16.3.0/28 Subnet mask: 255.255.255.240 Cisco wildcard mask: 0.0.0.15 Network: 172.16.3.0 Hexadecimal: AC100304 (reversed: 040310AC) Decimal Address: 2886730500 # ipmask ipmask version 0.33, Copyright (C) 2001 David Douthitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] ipmask comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details see the COPYING file that accompained this distribution. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under the terms of GNU PUBLIC LICENSE. Usage: ipmask [ -BbCcinrsxNmopR ] ip [ -m netmask ] ip may be a hex IP address, dotted-quad (n.n.n.n), or a CIDR spec (n.n.n.n/x) Display Options: -B Display only broadcast address (BSD - obsolete) -b Display only broadcast address -C Display only Cisco wildcard mask -c Display only CIDR -i Display only IP -n Display only network address -d Display only decimal address -r Display only range of valid addresses -s Display subnet mask only -x Display only hexadecimal IP Modifiers: -N No name lookups -m Use this net mask -o Official name (do a name lookup) -p Pretty formatted display of all results -R Hexadecimal IP address is in reversed order -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=571927group_id=13751 --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-571927 ] bug #521382 should be re opened
Support Requests item #571927, was opened at 2002-06-20 21:20 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=571927group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Oxygen Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: David Douthitt (ddouthitt) Summary: bug #521382 should be re opened Initial Comment: bug #521382 needs to be re opened.. I went to go and update my disks with the latest oxygen but i still see the same problem with ipmask script inside of root.lrp its missing a critical mask i will manualy fix my versions but this should be fixed in the current distribution so it does not need patching every time.. -- Comment By: David Douthitt (ddouthitt) Date: 2002-06-20 22:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=81521 I forgot to explain... ipmask in older versions of Oxygen was a shell function in a script. Newer versions contain a binary program /bin/ipmask which does the same thing but so much more. ipmask will return all sorts of data from an IP address for use by scripts. -- Comment By: David Douthitt (ddouthitt) Date: 2002-06-20 22:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=81521 # ipmask 172.16.3.4 -m 255.255.255.240 IP Address: 172.16.3.4 Official name: adcserv.cuna.com Network range: 172.16.3.1 - 172.16.3.14 Broadcast address: 172.16.3.15 Broadcast address (BSD): 172.16.3.0 CIDR: 172.16.3.0/28 Subnet mask: 255.255.255.240 Cisco wildcard mask: 0.0.0.15 Network: 172.16.3.0 Hexadecimal: AC100304 (reversed: 040310AC) Decimal Address: 2886730500 # ipmask ipmask version 0.33, Copyright (C) 2001 David Douthitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] ipmask comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details see the COPYING file that accompained this distribution. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under the terms of GNU PUBLIC LICENSE. Usage: ipmask [ -BbCcinrsxNmopR ] ip [ -m netmask ] ip may be a hex IP address, dotted-quad (n.n.n.n), or a CIDR spec (n.n.n.n/x) Display Options: -B Display only broadcast address (BSD - obsolete) -b Display only broadcast address -C Display only Cisco wildcard mask -c Display only CIDR -i Display only IP -n Display only network address -d Display only decimal address -r Display only range of valid addresses -s Display subnet mask only -x Display only hexadecimal IP Modifiers: -N No name lookups -m Use this net mask -o Official name (do a name lookup) -p Pretty formatted display of all results -R Hexadecimal IP address is in reversed order -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=571927group_id=13751 --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-568227 ] eth1, 64MB CompactFLASH IDE problem?
Support Requests item #568227, was opened at 2002-06-12 14:01 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=568227group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: eth1, 64MB CompactFLASH IDE problem? Initial Comment: I am trying to install DachStien on a 64MB CompactFLASH IDE drive, but I must use eth1 as my connection to the Internet. Where do I make the proper changes from eth0 to eth1? Thank you for your time and efforts. Regards, Don Carrico -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=568227group_id=13751 ___ Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-561116 ] Logo use on RDP
Support Requests item #561116, was opened at 2002-05-27 08:43 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=561116group_id=13751 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Logo use on RDP Initial Comment: Hello, I would like to use your logo on our website http://www.routerdesign.com We will use your logo along with LEAF related news when posting news updates on the new website. A preview of the logo to be used on the website is available @ http://www.routerdesign.com/pictemp/leaf.jpg If use of your logo is unacceptable and/or against copyright policies then please notify us immediately so we can refrain from using it. If your logo is copyrighted and you wish to allow use of it on our website, then please give us proper permission to do so (but only if you have the proper authority!). Please note that if you do not allow us to use your logo, we might no longer post news regarding your software and/or company! It may be in your best interest to allow use of your logo, as traffic is increasing on our site and we have many viewers who use your software and enjoy visiting our site regularly. If you fail to respond, I will assume you have no problem with the use of your logo for our website. Thank you for you time.. -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=561116group_id=13751 ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-561116 ] Logo use on RDP
Support Requests item #561116, was opened at 2002-05-27 08:43 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=561116group_id=13751 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Logo use on RDP Initial Comment: Hello, I would like to use your logo on our website http://www.routerdesign.com We will use your logo along with LEAF related news when posting news updates on the new website. A preview of the logo to be used on the website is available @ http://www.routerdesign.com/pictemp/leaf.jpg If use of your logo is unacceptable and/or against copyright policies then please notify us immediately so we can refrain from using it. If your logo is copyrighted and you wish to allow use of it on our website, then please give us proper permission to do so (but only if you have the proper authority!). Please note that if you do not allow us to use your logo, we might no longer post news regarding your software and/or company! It may be in your best interest to allow use of your logo, as traffic is increasing on our site and we have many viewers who use your software and enjoy visiting our site regularly. If you fail to respond, I will assume you have no problem with the use of your logo for our website. Thank you for you time.. -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-05-27 09:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 You may use our logo on your site, and thanks for posting LEAF news on your site. :-) -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=561116group_id=13751 ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-536605 ] Oxygen installation: howto location
Support Requests item #536605, was opened at 2002-03-28 20:22 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=536605group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Oxygen Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Oxygen installation: howto location Initial Comment: I have downloaded the three version 1.8 Oxygen .bin files from LEAF. As I am new to Linux, and cannot locate the necessary HOWTO, can someone please help with the instruction on how to install Oxygen?. The three Oxygen files have been downloaded to a Windows system, and are to be installed to a seperate PC (that meets the minimum specified requirements). My hope is to create a bootable CD. I would appreciate any help. Many Thanks Greg G -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-05-17 07:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 I'm closing this support request due to a lack of response from the person that opened it. -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-04-23 06:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 This page may help you get started. http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=90001page_id=16 -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=536605group_id=13751 ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-539562 ] port forwarding
Support Requests item #539562, was opened at 2002-04-04 18:16 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539562group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: port forwarding Initial Comment: I am running the dachstein firewall router and want to enable port forwarding of the IRLP. The ports to be enabled 2074 2075 15425 15426 15427 and 22. As set up I can log on 192.168.1.1 on the internal network but cannot do it through a external connection. Any info appreciated. IRLP is the Internet Repeater Linking Project. Thanks -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-05-17 07:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Would someone with port forwarding knowledge please address this support request? Thanks. -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-04-07 04:50 Message: Logged In: NO This text from correspondence with IRLP group. Subject: Re: firewall If your node is behind a firewall, the following TCP and UDP ports must be forwarded to it. TCP 23 (if you are running telnet) 22 (if you are running SSH) (PREFERRED) 15425 (IRLP control port) 15426 (IRLP control port) 15427 (IRLP control port) UDP 2074 (IRLP Audio) 2075 (IRLP Audio) The version of Dachstein is using sys linux 1.62 2001-04-24 and root version v4.0.6 From log: Apr 6 21:30:49 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=16177 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:30:52 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=16433 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:30:58 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=16689 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:31:11 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=16945 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:31:35 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=17457 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:31:38 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=17713 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Apr 6 21:31:44 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6 142.163.19.66:1145 209.128.53.112:22 L=48 S=0x00 I=17969 F=0x4000 T=124 SYN (#42) Other correspondence: If you're running Red Hat 6.x on the router box, you will need to download and install ipmasqadm, to enable the port forwarding. This is a basic script and should give you the bare minimum to forward ports to the IRLP box.. You can add extra code to improve security or pass more protocols (read the IP Masquerade How To for more info). Note, you need to set the $INETIP and $IRLPIP variables to the correct values in your script, or when your connection comes up (if using PPP, DHCP or PPPoE). $INETIP is the public IP address of your firewall, and $IRLPIP is the internal IP address of the IRLP box itself. #!/bin/sh # setup IP Masquerade echo Enabling IP forwarding... echo '1' /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward echo 'Setting up firewall...' /sbin/ipchains -A input -j ACCEPT -i eth0 -s 0/0 67 -d 0/0 68 -p udp /sbin/ipchains -P forward DENY /sbin/ipchains -A forward -i eth0 -s 192.168.0.0/24 -j MASQ /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -f /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P udp -L $INETIP 2074 -R $IRLPIP 2074 /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P udp -L $INETIP 2075 -R $IRLPIP 2075 /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L $INETIP 15425 -R $IRLPIP 15425 /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L $INETIP 15426 -R $IRLPIP 15426 /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L $INETIP 15427 -R $IRLPIP 15427 # Add this line if you want to be able to SSH direct to the IRLP box (and are not using SSH on the router) /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L $INETIP 22 -R $IRLPIP 22 -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-04-06 14:01 Message: Logged In: NO I went to the IRLP site and it does not seem to document the port numbers with protocols. This is a VOIP system which doubtless uses a udp stream for the audio. If you can let us know which protocol each of the ports uses - the implementation of the port fowarding is trivial. Some of those ports will be udp and some will be tcp. Port 22 is ssh and I think I read somewhere that it does encryption for authenticaltion of the HAM users. Please provide more info. IRLP seems to have a better interface than I-LINK which does much the same thing under Windows. IRLP only runs on a Redhat box. -- Comment By:
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-547477 ] Log messages. Customize
Support Requests item #547477, was opened at 2002-04-23 02:30 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547477group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Log messages. Customize Initial Comment: Hi I am using Bering firewall and I've blocked traffic from my routers port 520. I'm asking what do I have to modify that that 520 port deny's are not logged to messages, cause it only floods that log? Please I've tried to gather that information but not successed. -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-05-17 07:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Have you looked at our FAQs? Specifically: FAQs sec09: Security Firewall Questions Answered Why am I getting floods of SYN/ACK packets to my DNS server? http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=4715group_id=13751 Let me know if this information helps. -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547477group_id=13751 ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-547477 ] Log messages. Customize
Support Requests item #547477, was opened at 2002-04-23 11:30 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547477group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Log messages. Customize Initial Comment: Hi I am using Bering firewall and I've blocked traffic from my routers port 520. I'm asking what do I have to modify that that 520 port deny's are not logged to messages, cause it only floods that log? Please I've tried to gather that information but not successed. -- Comment By: Eric Wolzak (ericw) Date: 2002-05-17 20:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=15026 Hi, perhaps you made an typeing error. In Bering iptables is used. traffic is not denied ( as with ipchains) but dropped (DROP) or rejected (REJECT) You have to insert a line in the shorewall rules file in wicht you DROP or REJECT all traffic to port 520. If you don't give the log options ( :with loglevel) than this package will not be logged. It leaves the walking tree before the logging automatically occurs at the end. If the post is not opened by default, and you made a typo by writing this rule ( DENY) than the rest of the rules is checked, nothing aplies and you and up with an net2all:DROP or all2all:DROP logentry. Hope this answers your questions Info at http://shorewall.net/Documentation.htm#Rules Eriw Wolzak member of the Bering Crew. member of the bering crew -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-05-17 16:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Have you looked at our FAQs? Specifically: FAQs sec09: Security Firewall Questions Answered Why am I getting floods of SYN/ACK packets to my DNS server? http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=4715group_id=13751 Let me know if this information helps. -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547477group_id=13751 ___ Hundreds of nodes, one monster rendering program. Now thatÂ’s a super model! Visit http://clustering.foundries.sf.net/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-547477 ] Log messages. Customize
Support Requests item #547477, was opened at 2002-04-23 11:30 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547477group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Log messages. Customize Initial Comment: Hi I am using Bering firewall and I've blocked traffic from my routers port 520. I'm asking what do I have to modify that that 520 port deny's are not logged to messages, cause it only floods that log? Please I've tried to gather that information but not successed. -- Comment By: Eric Wolzak (ericw) Date: 2002-05-17 20:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=15026 Hi, perhaps you made an typeing error. In Bering iptables is used. traffic is not denied ( as with ipchains) but dropped (DROP) or rejected (REJECT) You have to insert a line in the shorewall rules file in wicht you DROP or REJECT all traffic to port 520. If you don't give the log options ( :with loglevel) than this package will not be logged. It leaves the walking tree before the logging automatically occurs at the end. If the post is not opened by default, and you made a typo by writing this rule ( DENY) than the rest of the rules is checked, nothing aplies and you and up with an net2all:DROP or all2all:DROP logentry. Hope this answers your questions Info at http://shorewall.net/Documentation.htm#Rules Eriw Wolzak member of the Bering Crew. member of the bering crew -- Comment By: Eric Wolzak (ericw) Date: 2002-05-17 20:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=15026 Hi, perhaps you made an typeing error. In Bering iptables is used. traffic is not denied ( as with ipchains) but dropped (DROP) or rejected (REJECT) You have to insert a line in the shorewall rules file in wicht you DROP or REJECT all traffic to port 520. If you don't give the log options ( :with loglevel) than this package will not be logged. It leaves the walking tree before the logging automatically occurs at the end. If the post is not opened by default, and you made a typo by writing this rule ( DENY) than the rest of the rules is checked, nothing aplies and you and up with an net2all:DROP or all2all:DROP logentry. Hope this answers your questions Info at http://shorewall.net/Documentation.htm#Rules Eriw Wolzak member of the Bering Crew. member of the bering crew -- Comment By: Eric Wolzak (ericw) Date: 2002-05-17 20:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=15026 Hi, perhaps you made an typeing error. In Bering iptables is used. traffic is not denied ( as with ipchains) but dropped (DROP) or rejected (REJECT) You have to insert a line in the shorewall rules file in wicht you DROP or REJECT all traffic to port 520. If you don't give the log options ( :with loglevel) than this package will not be logged. It leaves the walking tree before the logging automatically occurs at the end. If the post is not opened by default, and you made a typo by writing this rule ( DENY) than the rest of the rules is checked, nothing aplies and you and up with an net2all:DROP or all2all:DROP logentry. Hope this answers your questions Info at http://shorewall.net/Documentation.htm#Rules Eriw Wolzak member of the Bering Crew. member of the bering crew -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-05-17 16:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Have you looked at our FAQs? Specifically: FAQs sec09: Security Firewall Questions Answered Why am I getting floods of SYN/ACK packets to my DNS server? http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=4715group_id=13751 Let me know if this information helps. -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547477group_id=13751 ___ Hundreds of nodes, one monster rendering program. Now thatÂ’s a super model! Visit http://clustering.foundries.sf.net/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-547477 ] Log messages. Customize
Support Requests item #547477, was opened at 2002-04-23 11:30 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547477group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Log messages. Customize Initial Comment: Hi I am using Bering firewall and I've blocked traffic from my routers port 520. I'm asking what do I have to modify that that 520 port deny's are not logged to messages, cause it only floods that log? Please I've tried to gather that information but not successed. -- Comment By: Eric Wolzak (ericw) Date: 2002-05-17 20:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=15026 Hi, perhaps you made an typeing error. In Bering iptables is used. traffic is not denied ( as with ipchains) but dropped (DROP) or rejected (REJECT) You have to insert a line in the shorewall rules file in wicht you DROP or REJECT all traffic to port 520. If you don't give the log options ( :with loglevel) than this package will not be logged. It leaves the walking tree before the logging automatically occurs at the end. If the post is not opened by default, and you made a typo by writing this rule ( DENY) than the rest of the rules is checked, nothing aplies and you and up with an net2all:DROP or all2all:DROP logentry. Hope this answers your questions Info at http://shorewall.net/Documentation.htm#Rules Eriw Wolzak member of the Bering Crew. member of the bering crew -- Comment By: Eric Wolzak (ericw) Date: 2002-05-17 20:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=15026 Hi, perhaps you made an typeing error. In Bering iptables is used. traffic is not denied ( as with ipchains) but dropped (DROP) or rejected (REJECT) You have to insert a line in the shorewall rules file in wicht you DROP or REJECT all traffic to port 520. If you don't give the log options ( :with loglevel) than this package will not be logged. It leaves the walking tree before the logging automatically occurs at the end. If the post is not opened by default, and you made a typo by writing this rule ( DENY) than the rest of the rules is checked, nothing aplies and you and up with an net2all:DROP or all2all:DROP logentry. Hope this answers your questions Info at http://shorewall.net/Documentation.htm#Rules Eriw Wolzak member of the Bering Crew. member of the bering crew -- Comment By: Eric Wolzak (ericw) Date: 2002-05-17 20:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=15026 Hi, perhaps you made an typeing error. In Bering iptables is used. traffic is not denied ( as with ipchains) but dropped (DROP) or rejected (REJECT) You have to insert a line in the shorewall rules file in wicht you DROP or REJECT all traffic to port 520. If you don't give the log options ( :with loglevel) than this package will not be logged. It leaves the walking tree before the logging automatically occurs at the end. If the post is not opened by default, and you made a typo by writing this rule ( DENY) than the rest of the rules is checked, nothing aplies and you and up with an net2all:DROP or all2all:DROP logentry. Hope this answers your questions Info at http://shorewall.net/Documentation.htm#Rules Eriw Wolzak member of the Bering Crew. member of the bering crew -- Comment By: Eric Wolzak (ericw) Date: 2002-05-17 20:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=15026 Hi, perhaps you made an typeing error. In Bering iptables is used. traffic is not denied ( as with ipchains) but dropped (DROP) or rejected (REJECT) You have to insert a line in the shorewall rules file in wicht you DROP or REJECT all traffic to port 520. If you don't give the log options ( :with loglevel) than this package will not be logged. It leaves the walking tree before the logging automatically occurs at the end. If the post is not opened by default, and you made a typo by writing this rule ( DENY) than the rest of the rules is checked, nothing aplies and you and up with an net2all:DROP or all2all:DROP logentry. Hope this answers your questions Info at http://shorewall.net/Documentation.htm#Rules Eriw Wolzak member of the Bering Crew. member of the bering crew -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-05-17 16:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Have you looked at our FAQs? Specifically: FAQs sec09: Security Firewall Questions Answered Why am I getting floods of SYN/ACK packets to my DNS server? http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=4715group_id=13751 Let me know if this information helps.
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-552613 ] initrd - increase rootfs size
Support Requests item #552613, was opened at 2002-05-05 11:31 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=552613group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: initrd - increase rootfs size Initial Comment: While loading additional packages (ipsec, sshd) from second floppy the root filesystem is going out of space. Moving the /lib + /usr folder into an alternate ramdisk filesystem has no success. I installed the Bering_1.0-rc2 2.4.18 distribution. At startup it mounts a ramdisk with a size of 6144K for root. How I inrcease the size of the root filesystem? I tried the syslinux.cfg parameter: ramdisk_size = 10240 and then default linux initrd=initrd.lrp ... root_size=09M temp_size=10M log_size=02M ... without success. The rootfs has still a size of 6M. -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=552613group_id=13751 ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-552613 ] initrd - increase rootfs size
Support Requests item #552613, was opened at 2002-05-05 20:31 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=552613group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: initrd - increase rootfs size Initial Comment: While loading additional packages (ipsec, sshd) from second floppy the root filesystem is going out of space. Moving the /lib + /usr folder into an alternate ramdisk filesystem has no success. I installed the Bering_1.0-rc2 2.4.18 distribution. At startup it mounts a ramdisk with a size of 6144K for root. How I inrcease the size of the root filesystem? I tried the syslinux.cfg parameter: ramdisk_size = 10240 and then default linux initrd=initrd.lrp ... root_size=09M temp_size=10M log_size=02M ... without success. The rootfs has still a size of 6M. -- Comment By: Eric Wolzak (ericw) Date: 2002-05-05 20:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=15026 In Linuxrc the system size can be changed manually by editing set SYSTSIZE=XXXM for the root partition a better solution is to use the following variables on the command line syst_size=xxxM for the System size = root partition tmp_size=xxxM for the size of /tmp log_size=xxxM for the size of /var/log good luck Eric Wolzak -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=552613group_id=13751 ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-552613 ] initrd - increase rootfs size
Support Requests item #552613, was opened at 2002-05-05 11:31 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=552613group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: initrd - increase rootfs size Initial Comment: While loading additional packages (ipsec, sshd) from second floppy the root filesystem is going out of space. Moving the /lib + /usr folder into an alternate ramdisk filesystem has no success. I installed the Bering_1.0-rc2 2.4.18 distribution. At startup it mounts a ramdisk with a size of 6144K for root. How I inrcease the size of the root filesystem? I tried the syslinux.cfg parameter: ramdisk_size = 10240 and then default linux initrd=initrd.lrp ... root_size=09M temp_size=10M log_size=02M ... without success. The rootfs has still a size of 6M. -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-05-05 12:04 Message: Logged In: NO Thanks ericv, I just found it in the archive: the correct parameter in syslinux.cfg for increasing the rootfs is syst_size=xxM root_size was wrong! and it is working! Johannes Koenigsmann, Hannover -- Comment By: Eric Wolzak (ericw) Date: 2002-05-05 11:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=15026 In Linuxrc the system size can be changed manually by editing set SYSTSIZE=XXXM for the root partition a better solution is to use the following variables on the command line syst_size=xxxM for the System size = root partition tmp_size=xxxM for the size of /tmp log_size=xxxM for the size of /var/log good luck Eric Wolzak -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=552613group_id=13751 ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-552613 ] initrd - increase rootfs size
Support Requests item #552613, was opened at 2002-05-05 11:31 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=552613group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: initrd - increase rootfs size Initial Comment: While loading additional packages (ipsec, sshd) from second floppy the root filesystem is going out of space. Moving the /lib + /usr folder into an alternate ramdisk filesystem has no success. I installed the Bering_1.0-rc2 2.4.18 distribution. At startup it mounts a ramdisk with a size of 6144K for root. How I inrcease the size of the root filesystem? I tried the syslinux.cfg parameter: ramdisk_size = 10240 and then default linux initrd=initrd.lrp ... root_size=09M temp_size=10M log_size=02M ... without success. The rootfs has still a size of 6M. -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-05-05 12:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Based on the most recent comment on this support request, it is our understanding that this matter has been addressed. Should you require further assistance from the LEAF project members, please submit a new support request. Thank you, leaf-project.org support -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-05-05 12:04 Message: Logged In: NO Thanks ericv, I just found it in the archive: the correct parameter in syslinux.cfg for increasing the rootfs is syst_size=xxM root_size was wrong! and it is working! Johannes Koenigsmann, Hannover -- Comment By: Eric Wolzak (ericw) Date: 2002-05-05 11:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=15026 In Linuxrc the system size can be changed manually by editing set SYSTSIZE=XXXM for the root partition a better solution is to use the following variables on the command line syst_size=xxxM for the System size = root partition tmp_size=xxxM for the size of /tmp log_size=xxxM for the size of /var/log good luck Eric Wolzak -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=552613group_id=13751 ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-547455 ] Log messages. Customize
Support Requests item #547455, was opened at 2002-04-23 01:09 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547455group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Log messages. Customize Initial Comment: Hi I am using Bering firewall and I've blocked traffic from my routers port 520. I'm asking what do I have to modify that that 520 port deny's are not logged to messages, cause it only floods that log? Please I've tried to gather that information but not successed. -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547455group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-547477 ] Log messages. Customize
Support Requests item #547477, was opened at 2002-04-23 02:30 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547477group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Log messages. Customize Initial Comment: Hi I am using Bering firewall and I've blocked traffic from my routers port 520. I'm asking what do I have to modify that that 520 port deny's are not logged to messages, cause it only floods that log? Please I've tried to gather that information but not successed. -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547477group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-547455 ] Log messages. Customize
Support Requests item #547455, was opened at 2002-04-23 01:09 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547455group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Deleted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Log messages. Customize Initial Comment: Hi I am using Bering firewall and I've blocked traffic from my routers port 520. I'm asking what do I have to modify that that 520 port deny's are not logged to messages, cause it only floods that log? Please I've tried to gather that information but not successed. -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-04-23 05:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Duplicate SR: [ 547477 ] Log messages. Customize https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=547477group_id=13751atid=213751 -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547455group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-512515 ] Buggy Alcatel adsl modem's dhcp server
Support Requests item #512515, was opened at 2002-02-03 15:01
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=512515group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Summary: Buggy Alcatel adsl modem's dhcp server
Initial Comment:
Hello,
I'm trying to get my dachstein router working in
combination with my Alcatel Speedtouch ADSL modem.
It has an option for DHCP spoofing, so theorethically
al I need to do is setup DHCP on my external interface
and that's it.
Sadly, alcatel has made a buggy DHCP server-
implementation on their modems which has the feature
of only giving the last 3 bytes of the ip-adress
instead of the subnet mask.
The current dhclient doesn't really like this...
Could anyone provide a patched dhclient package which
resolves this issue or a modified dhcpclient-script
that hardcodes the subnetmask to 255.255.255.255 (i
think that should also do the trick).
I already found a patched version of client.c which
someone else wrote for pathing his RedHat install,
maybe it's useful for adressing this problem under LRP
Thanks in advance,
Thijs
*** client.c.orig Sun Aug 5 12:14:21 2001
--- client.c Sun Aug 5 12:22:12 2001
***
*** 469,476
memcpy(p-sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[subnetMask],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFNETMASK,ifr) == -1 ) /*
setting netmask */
{
! syslog(LOG_ERR,dhcpConfig: ioctl SIOCSIFNETMASK: %
m );
! return -1;
}
memcpy(p-sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[broadcastAddr],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFBRDADDR,ifr) == -1 ) /*
setting broadcast address */
--- 469,480
memcpy(p-sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[subnetMask],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFNETMASK,ifr) == -1 ) /*
setting netmask */
{
! p-sin_addr.s_addr = 0x; /* try
255.255.255.255 */
! if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFNETMASK,ifr) == -1 )
! {
! syslog(LOG_ERR,dhcpConfig: ioctl SIOCSIFNETMASK: %
m );
! return -1;
! }
}
memcpy(p-sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[broadcastAddr],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFBRDADDR,ifr) == -1 ) /*
setting broadcast address */
--
Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Date: 2002-04-23 06:02
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=39521
No reply in over one month, so I'm closing this support request.
If you still have problems, please open a new support request.
--
Comment By: Lynn Avants (guitarlynn)
Date: 2002-03-18 17:26
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=176069
Well, the source won't help much since it is in C and we
shell-script the dhcp scripts with LEAF. You could change
the netmask in all instances of ip addr, ip
route...,and ip link ., but this would involve
going through roughly 300+ lines of code.
If you have a static option with the modem, it would be
consideably easier. LEAF firewalls all do ip spoofing by
default, so you are not gaining anything by using this
option with your modem.
Is this possible???
--
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=512515group_id=13751
___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-536605 ] Oxygen installation: howto location
Support Requests item #536605, was opened at 2002-03-28 20:22 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=536605group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Oxygen Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Oxygen installation: howto location Initial Comment: I have downloaded the three version 1.8 Oxygen .bin files from LEAF. As I am new to Linux, and cannot locate the necessary HOWTO, can someone please help with the instruction on how to install Oxygen?. The three Oxygen files have been downloaded to a Windows system, and are to be installed to a seperate PC (that meets the minimum specified requirements). My hope is to create a bootable CD. I would appreciate any help. Many Thanks Greg G -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-04-23 06:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 This page may help you get started. http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=90001page_id=16 -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=536605group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-542543 ] Bering development: kernel compression?
Support Requests item #542543, was opened at 2002-04-11 08:39 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=542543group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Bering development: kernel compression? Initial Comment: i am working with the bering distro and building a custom kernel. i started with the bering.config that is on the ftp server and added ntfs write (yes, i know but i have to prove it). The compiled kernel that i got was 597k. i doubt that the ntfs write is responsible for all of that difference in size (124k). Did you do anything to compress the kernel that ships on the diskette image? thanks, dean -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-04-23 06:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Dean, Bering uses UPX to compress the kernel. http://freshmeat.net/projects/upx/ -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=542543group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-542543 ] Bering development: kernel compression?
Support Requests item #542543, was opened at 2002-04-11 08:39 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=542543group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Bering development: kernel compression? Initial Comment: i am working with the bering distro and building a custom kernel. i started with the bering.config that is on the ftp server and added ntfs write (yes, i know but i have to prove it). The compiled kernel that i got was 597k. i doubt that the ntfs write is responsible for all of that difference in size (124k). Did you do anything to compress the kernel that ships on the diskette image? thanks, dean -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-04-23 06:49 Message: Logged In: NO that's what i thought. thanks, dean -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-04-23 06:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Dean, Bering uses UPX to compress the kernel. http://freshmeat.net/projects/upx/ -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=542543group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-542543 ] Bering development: kernel compression?
Support Requests item #542543, was opened at 2002-04-11 08:39 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=542543group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Bering development: kernel compression? Initial Comment: i am working with the bering distro and building a custom kernel. i started with the bering.config that is on the ftp server and added ntfs write (yes, i know but i have to prove it). The compiled kernel that i got was 597k. i doubt that the ntfs write is responsible for all of that difference in size (124k). Did you do anything to compress the kernel that ships on the diskette image? thanks, dean -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-04-23 07:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Based on the most recent comment on this support request, it is our understanding that this matter has been addressed. Should you require further assistance from the LEAF project members, please submit a new support request. Thank you, leaf-project.org support -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-04-23 06:49 Message: Logged In: NO that's what i thought. thanks, dean -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-04-23 06:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Dean, Bering uses UPX to compress the kernel. http://freshmeat.net/projects/upx/ -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=542543group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-542543 ] kernel compression?
Support Requests item #542543, was opened at 2002-04-11 08:39 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=542543group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: kernel compression? Initial Comment: i am working with the bering distro and building a custom kernel. i started with the bering.config that is on the ftp server and added ntfs write (yes, i know but i have to prove it). The compiled kernel that i got was 597k. i doubt that the ntfs write is responsible for all of that difference in size (124k). Did you do anything to compress the kernel that ships on the diskette image? thanks, dean -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=542543group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-539331 ] nic cards
Support Requests item #539331, was opened at 2002-04-04 10:53 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539331group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: nic cards Initial Comment: Hi, been using lrp for over 6 mo. now...really great learning experience...but have had some problems in the past in as far as the router will just stop routing. I have access to a number of different nic cards...tulip, rtl8139,natsemi, 3c509. Oddities like an eth2 showing up in the logs (I only have 2 nics) with the tulip drivers. Have tried different combinations of each with the dachstein and bering releases, but allways the same thing, will route for a day or 2 at best then for no paticular reason stop. I have settled on an 8139 generic card for eth1 and a 3c509 10M card for eth0...it runs 'til I shut it down with no quirks...I guess what I am getting at is how much does compatibility between the electronics figure into the scheme of this (i have a toshiba cable modem) and I dont even think about the router anymore, I have every confidence in it! Is there any substance to this observation? Anyone have any thoughts on the subject or does it sound like a bunch of superstitious hooey? Thanks for reading. -- Comment By: mabaker (itzame) Date: 2002-04-06 07:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=507648 Hi Mr Noyes, Could be logs and we use dhcp here...I have a dx4 100 with 64M ram on a no name board that looks to be an aopen or acer I make the ramdisk for the logs 8M...and i do get the usual junk in there being on a vlan (RR DNS GRRR)...at any rate it performs well now, I was really just curious if anyone has had a paticular card perform better or worse on their systems. -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-04-05 00:37 Message: Logged In: NO It may be that the log files are filling up and taking up all your memory. You may want to add more memory or disable the log files. I don't know how to disable them but I can find out then get back with you later. -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-04-04 20:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 There could be. We need more information. Are you using DHCP? Were the NICs tested in the same machine? What ISP are you using? What is your LAN configuration? etc. Suggestions for information that will help us help you are in: http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1891group_id=13751 -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539331group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-539562 ] port forwarding
Support Requests item #539562, was opened at 2002-04-04 18:16 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539562group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: port forwarding Initial Comment: I am running the dachstein firewall router and want to enable port forwarding of the IRLP. The ports to be enabled 2074 2075 15425 15426 15427 and 22. As set up I can log on 192.168.1.1 on the internal network but cannot do it through a external connection. Any info appreciated. IRLP is the Internet Repeater Linking Project. Thanks -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-04-06 07:03 Message: Logged In: NO After checking information in reply i still cannot log in externally. When I check messages in firewall warning I can see the connect requests but all are being denied. I know I have not configured everything correctly but what have I not turned on?? Using ssh on internal server works fine with login and access to the IRLP computer showing all files etc. I do have information as to correct parameters to go in ipchains with ip and ports. Thanks. -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-04-04 18:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Let me know if this FAQ helps. FAQs sec07: Solutions to Routing Problems * Port-Forwarding with Dachstein https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=10418group_id=13751 -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539562group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-539562 ] port forwarding
Support Requests item #539562, was opened at 2002-04-04 18:16 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539562group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: port forwarding Initial Comment: I am running the dachstein firewall router and want to enable port forwarding of the IRLP. The ports to be enabled 2074 2075 15425 15426 15427 and 22. As set up I can log on 192.168.1.1 on the internal network but cannot do it through a external connection. Any info appreciated. IRLP is the Internet Repeater Linking Project. Thanks -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-04-06 14:01 Message: Logged In: NO I went to the IRLP site and it does not seem to document the port numbers with protocols. This is a VOIP system which doubtless uses a udp stream for the audio. If you can let us know which protocol each of the ports uses - the implementation of the port fowarding is trivial. Some of those ports will be udp and some will be tcp. Port 22 is ssh and I think I read somewhere that it does encryption for authenticaltion of the HAM users. Please provide more info. IRLP seems to have a better interface than I-LINK which does much the same thing under Windows. IRLP only runs on a Redhat box. -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-04-06 07:03 Message: Logged In: NO After checking information in reply i still cannot log in externally. When I check messages in firewall warning I can see the connect requests but all are being denied. I know I have not configured everything correctly but what have I not turned on?? Using ssh on internal server works fine with login and access to the IRLP computer showing all files etc. I do have information as to correct parameters to go in ipchains with ip and ports. Thanks. -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-04-04 18:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Let me know if this FAQ helps. FAQs sec07: Solutions to Routing Problems * Port-Forwarding with Dachstein https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=10418group_id=13751 -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539562group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-539562 ] port forwarding
Support Requests item #539562, was opened at 2002-04-04 18:16 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539562group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: port forwarding Initial Comment: I am running the dachstein firewall router and want to enable port forwarding of the IRLP. The ports to be enabled 2074 2075 15425 15426 15427 and 22. As set up I can log on 192.168.1.1 on the internal network but cannot do it through a external connection. Any info appreciated. IRLP is the Internet Repeater Linking Project. Thanks -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539562group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-539562 ] port forwarding
Support Requests item #539562, was opened at 2002-04-04 18:16 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539562group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: port forwarding Initial Comment: I am running the dachstein firewall router and want to enable port forwarding of the IRLP. The ports to be enabled 2074 2075 15425 15426 15427 and 22. As set up I can log on 192.168.1.1 on the internal network but cannot do it through a external connection. Any info appreciated. IRLP is the Internet Repeater Linking Project. Thanks -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-04-04 18:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Let me know if this FAQ helps. FAQs sec07: Solutions to Routing Problems * Port-Forwarding with Dachstein https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=10418group_id=13751 -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539562group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-539331 ] nic cards
Support Requests item #539331, was opened at 2002-04-04 08:53 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539331group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: nic cards Initial Comment: Hi, been using lrp for over 6 mo. now...really great learning experience...but have had some problems in the past in as far as the router will just stop routing. I have access to a number of different nic cards...tulip, rtl8139,natsemi, 3c509. Oddities like an eth2 showing up in the logs (I only have 2 nics) with the tulip drivers. Have tried different combinations of each with the dachstein and bering releases, but allways the same thing, will route for a day or 2 at best then for no paticular reason stop. I have settled on an 8139 generic card for eth1 and a 3c509 10M card for eth0...it runs 'til I shut it down with no quirks...I guess what I am getting at is how much does compatibility between the electronics figure into the scheme of this (i have a toshiba cable modem) and I dont even think about the router anymore, I have every confidence in it! Is there any substance to this observation? Anyone have any thoughts on the subject or does it sound like a bunch of superstitious hooey? Thanks for reading. -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-04-04 18:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 There could be. We need more information. Are you using DHCP? Were the NICs tested in the same machine? What ISP are you using? What is your LAN configuration? etc. Suggestions for information that will help us help you are in: http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1891group_id=13751 -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539331group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-539615 ] Adding sshd.lrp to Bering floppy - brief
Support Requests item #539615, was opened at 2002-04-04 22:33 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539615group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: Adding sshd.lrp to Bering floppy - brief Initial Comment: This document assumes that you already created your Bering LRP floppy and that it works. However, like me, now you wanna put the router aside with only the power cord and the two RJ45 cables connected, and occasionally you wanna remote into it to check on it's configuration and log files, etc... This document assumes that you are not trying to access it from the outside just from within your network. Download winimage from www.winimage.com Download sshd.lrp from ftp://ftp.linuxrouter.org/linux- router/dists/2.9.8/packages You may want to look at the following file for how to access your router remotely: with ssh. http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php? docid=1427group_id=13751 I was not able to ssh into my Bering router. The sshd.lrp is about 161KB and it does not fit on a 1.66 winimaged floppy. So this is what I did. Started my router which is now confired and working, except ssh. Downloaded sshd.lrp with my Windows 98 PC. Formatted Created a 1.77MB floppy with Winimage and copied sshd.lrp to it. Downloaded and ran Syslinux a: Copied all files on my Bering working floppy to an empty folder. Copied to floppy linux.lrp, etc.lrp, initrd.lrp, local.lrp, root.lrp, syslinux.cfg, syslinux.dpy, sshd.lrp, linux (kernel). Also downloaded libnsl.so.1 and copied to floppy. Under Windows 98 you need to name libnsl.so.1 to libnsl because of the 8 character problem with the floppy. Booted floppy and copied libnsl.so.1 to /lib. Ran cd /etc/ssh/ ; ./mk... Unmarked #exit(0) and backed up /etc Created extra.lrp for the libnsl.so.1 library by doing the following: Created /temp/lib folder and copied libnsl.so.1 from the mounted 1.77 floppy. cd /temp tar -cvf extra * gzip -9 extra mv extra.gz extra.lrp Copied extra.lrp to floppy. Added the rest of the lrp's; dhcpd.lrp, dnscache.lrp, modules.lrp, ppp.lrp, pppoe.lrp, shorwall.lrp, weblet.lrp. Added extra to the LRP= in syslinux.cfg Restart and try ssh with PUTTY.EXE under Windows. Make sure you backup your floppy with an image from Winimage. This document is very brief. I will be adding full details shortly. For any further questions you can eMail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Please no SPAM). Thanks. Ram -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539615group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-539331 ] nic cards
Support Requests item #539331, was opened at 2002-04-04 08:53 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539331group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: nic cards Initial Comment: Hi, been using lrp for over 6 mo. now...really great learning experience...but have had some problems in the past in as far as the router will just stop routing. I have access to a number of different nic cards...tulip, rtl8139,natsemi, 3c509. Oddities like an eth2 showing up in the logs (I only have 2 nics) with the tulip drivers. Have tried different combinations of each with the dachstein and bering releases, but allways the same thing, will route for a day or 2 at best then for no paticular reason stop. I have settled on an 8139 generic card for eth1 and a 3c509 10M card for eth0...it runs 'til I shut it down with no quirks...I guess what I am getting at is how much does compatibility between the electronics figure into the scheme of this (i have a toshiba cable modem) and I dont even think about the router anymore, I have every confidence in it! Is there any substance to this observation? Anyone have any thoughts on the subject or does it sound like a bunch of superstitious hooey? Thanks for reading. -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-04-04 22:37 Message: Logged In: NO It may be that the log files are filling up and taking up all your memory. You may want to add more memory or disable the log files. I don't know how to disable them but I can find out then get back with you later. -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-04-04 18:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 There could be. We need more information. Are you using DHCP? Were the NICs tested in the same machine? What ISP are you using? What is your LAN configuration? etc. Suggestions for information that will help us help you are in: http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1891group_id=13751 -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=539331group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-536605 ] New Installation HELP
Support Requests item #536605, was opened at 2002-03-28 20:22 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=536605group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Oxygen Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: New Installation HELP Initial Comment: I have downloaded the three version 1.8 Oxygen .bin files from LEAF. As I am new to Linux, and cannot locate the necessary HOWTO, can someone please help with the instruction on how to install Oxygen?. The three Oxygen files have been downloaded to a Windows system, and are to be installed to a seperate PC (that meets the minimum specified requirements). My hope is to create a bootable CD. I would appreciate any help. Many Thanks Greg G -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=536605group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-528127 ] bering /sbin/getty problem
Support Requests item #528127, was opened at 2002-03-10 06:58 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=528127group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: bering /sbin/getty problem Initial Comment: Hello, I have been playing with the bering LEAF distribution. Its very nice and I like it so far however I am having a little problem I was hoping someone on your end could help me with. I am trying to get the firewall to run on a laptop for power concern reasons and have got the distribution disk working and configured like I want with the modules and packages I think I need. The disk boots and runs fine in several laptops I have tried however the target laptop shows a problem. The boot disk gets all the way through the installation, says finished and then goes into this loop of : cannot execute /sbin/getty add infinitum. Then it says something about respawning to quickly and freezes up on me. I have traced around on another PC to the getty call I think, in INIT. I dunno could you offer some suggestions I am kind of stuck. Thanks ED -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-03-19 12:39 Message: Logged In: NO I guess your laptop has only one serial port You will have to edit /etc/inittab and to comment this line: 2:23:respawn:/sbin/getty 38400 tty2 Manfred -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-03-18 14:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Based on the most recent comment on this support request, it is our understanding that this matter has been addressed. Should you require further assistance from LEAF project members, please submit a new support request. Thank you, leaf-project.org support -- Comment By: Jacques Nilo (jnilo) Date: 2002-03-11 12:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=150195 Just an obvious check: are you able to run Dachstein or any other floppy based linux distro on your laptop ? http://www.toms.net/rb/ For example ? -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-03-10 18:39 Message: Logged In: NO OK Thanks for the quick reply I really didn't want to bother you, after all the great documentation on your site and the great package and all. I just figured the getty thing might ring a bell. I cant't make a fresh image until I get back to the library, my home computer has a really hard time making the disk images. Even the library was like about one in 6. The disk I have works fine however I have booted up on 3 machines and many several of times played with it, update the modules and packages, no problem. I don't suspect the disk but who knows! Texas Instruments Extensa 605CD CPU 120 MHZ pentium Coprocessor installed System Ram 640kb Extended Ram 7168 KB Shadow RAM 384 KB no Cache RaM no internal drive internal cd rom Bios date 09/11/96 video bios version V1.1.8 R132.10 Chips and Technologies, INC. Phonex Bios version 4.05 System and Video Bios Shadowed UMB upper limit segment address:F226 Again the more exact message from Bering= INIT: Entering runlevel: 2 INIT: cannot exeute /sbin/getty [repeat this many times down the screen] INIT: Id 1 respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes INIT: cannot execute :/sbin/getty [repeat several more times] INIT: Id 2 respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes INIT: no more processes left in this runlevel Then nothing more Thanks for the HELP! -- Comment By: Jacques Nilo (jnilo) Date: 2002-03-10 09:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=150195 If the disk boots OK on several laptop and not on the target laptop it's really sounds like an hardware problem. 1/ Retry with a new fresh disk image to see if it fixes the pb 2/ If not send detailed info about the laptop you are trying to use Jacques -- Comment By: Jacques Nilo (jnilo) Date: 2002-03-10 09:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=150195 If the disk boots OK on several laptop and not on the target laptop it's really sounds like an hardware problem. 1/ Retry with a new fresh disk image to see if it fixes the pb 2/ If not send detailed info about the laptop you are trying to use Jacques -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=528127group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-512515 ] Buggy Alcatel adsl modem's dhcp server
Support Requests item #512515, was opened at 2002-02-03 15:01
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=512515group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Summary: Buggy Alcatel adsl modem's dhcp server
Initial Comment:
Hello,
I'm trying to get my dachstein router working in
combination with my Alcatel Speedtouch ADSL modem.
It has an option for DHCP spoofing, so theorethically
al I need to do is setup DHCP on my external interface
and that's it.
Sadly, alcatel has made a buggy DHCP server-
implementation on their modems which has the feature
of only giving the last 3 bytes of the ip-adress
instead of the subnet mask.
The current dhclient doesn't really like this...
Could anyone provide a patched dhclient package which
resolves this issue or a modified dhcpclient-script
that hardcodes the subnetmask to 255.255.255.255 (i
think that should also do the trick).
I already found a patched version of client.c which
someone else wrote for pathing his RedHat install,
maybe it's useful for adressing this problem under LRP
Thanks in advance,
Thijs
*** client.c.orig Sun Aug 5 12:14:21 2001
--- client.c Sun Aug 5 12:22:12 2001
***
*** 469,476
memcpy(p-sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[subnetMask],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFNETMASK,ifr) == -1 ) /*
setting netmask */
{
! syslog(LOG_ERR,dhcpConfig: ioctl SIOCSIFNETMASK: %
m );
! return -1;
}
memcpy(p-sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[broadcastAddr],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFBRDADDR,ifr) == -1 ) /*
setting broadcast address */
--- 469,480
memcpy(p-sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[subnetMask],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFNETMASK,ifr) == -1 ) /*
setting netmask */
{
! p-sin_addr.s_addr = 0x; /* try
255.255.255.255 */
! if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFNETMASK,ifr) == -1 )
! {
! syslog(LOG_ERR,dhcpConfig: ioctl SIOCSIFNETMASK: %
m );
! return -1;
! }
}
memcpy(p-sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[broadcastAddr],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFBRDADDR,ifr) == -1 ) /*
setting broadcast address */
--
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=512515group_id=13751
___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-524646 ] trouble loading module for nic
Support Requests item #524646, was opened at 2002-03-01 18:05 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=524646group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: trouble loading module for nic Initial Comment: Hi, I have read all of the docs for my distib of leaf (Dachstein) and am still having some trouble. I downloaded the RTL8139.o module for my nic cards and placed them in /lib/modules and added it to the /etc/modules config file. The docs for this driver say that pci-scan must also be installed, so i did that. I then backed everything up and rebooted. The nic cards are not found or working. Lsmod shows the other modules that have loaded but not the one I added (yes they are in the /lib/modules and the config file). When I try to insmod the module it says 'process busy' Please help!!! Thanks.. Jeff p.s. have learned alot and keep up the good work. -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=524646group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-523277 ] IP Port Forwarding on Dachstein
Support Requests item #523277, was opened at 2002-02-26 22:08 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=523277group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: IP Port Forwarding on Dachstein Initial Comment: I'm running the Dachstein LRP on a pentium 133 box with 3com and Network Anywhere network cards, and am connected to the internet via DSL. The router works great, but I am now trying to forward port 80 for www over to a Mandrake 8.1 box running Apache (don't be fooled, I'm a Linux newbie). I've determined so far that the ipmasqadm portfw command has to be used instead of the old ipportfw. I'm relatively certain that I've got the usage of that correct, and it seems to think that it is forwarding the appropriate ports and IPs (and I've tried every possible iteration of the command and IPs). I've also done some minor things like move the weblet to port 8000 so it isn't in the way. I've been at this on and off for a few weeks so I can't recall every last thing I've done, but I've looked through the documentation I could find and still don't have it working. Basically when you try to connect to the website from outside it acts like it is opening the page then suddenly jumps to a page not found message, which indicates it is not actually forwarding the port. I'm still not sure exactly how/where to include the port forwarding in the modules so that it does that on startup. If anybody has some advice or some documentation that I haven't found I would really appreciate it! -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=523277group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-528127 ] bering /sbin/getty problem
Support Requests item #528127, was opened at 2002-03-10 06:58 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=528127group_id=13751 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: bering /sbin/getty problem Initial Comment: Hello, I have been playing with the bering LEAF distribution. Its very nice and I like it so far however I am having a little problem I was hoping someone on your end could help me with. I am trying to get the firewall to run on a laptop for power concern reasons and have got the distribution disk working and configured like I want with the modules and packages I think I need. The disk boots and runs fine in several laptops I have tried however the target laptop shows a problem. The boot disk gets all the way through the installation, says finished and then goes into this loop of : cannot execute /sbin/getty add infinitum. Then it says something about respawning to quickly and freezes up on me. I have traced around on another PC to the getty call I think, in INIT. I dunno could you offer some suggestions I am kind of stuck. Thanks ED -- Comment By: Jacques Nilo (jnilo) Date: 2002-03-11 12:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=150195 Just an obvious check: are you able to run Dachstein or any other floppy based linux distro on your laptop ? http://www.toms.net/rb/ For example ? -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-03-10 18:39 Message: Logged In: NO OK Thanks for the quick reply I really didn't want to bother you, after all the great documentation on your site and the great package and all. I just figured the getty thing might ring a bell. I cant't make a fresh image until I get back to the library, my home computer has a really hard time making the disk images. Even the library was like about one in 6. The disk I have works fine however I have booted up on 3 machines and many several of times played with it, update the modules and packages, no problem. I don't suspect the disk but who knows! Texas Instruments Extensa 605CD CPU 120 MHZ pentium Coprocessor installed System Ram 640kb Extended Ram 7168 KB Shadow RAM 384 KB no Cache RaM no internal drive internal cd rom Bios date 09/11/96 video bios version V1.1.8 R132.10 Chips and Technologies, INC. Phonex Bios version 4.05 System and Video Bios Shadowed UMB upper limit segment address:F226 Again the more exact message from Bering= INIT: Entering runlevel: 2 INIT: cannot exeute /sbin/getty [repeat this many times down the screen] INIT: Id 1 respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes INIT: cannot execute :/sbin/getty [repeat several more times] INIT: Id 2 respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes INIT: no more processes left in this runlevel Then nothing more Thanks for the HELP! -- Comment By: Jacques Nilo (jnilo) Date: 2002-03-10 09:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=150195 If the disk boots OK on several laptop and not on the target laptop it's really sounds like an hardware problem. 1/ Retry with a new fresh disk image to see if it fixes the pb 2/ If not send detailed info about the laptop you are trying to use Jacques -- Comment By: Jacques Nilo (jnilo) Date: 2002-03-10 09:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=150195 If the disk boots OK on several laptop and not on the target laptop it's really sounds like an hardware problem. 1/ Retry with a new fresh disk image to see if it fixes the pb 2/ If not send detailed info about the laptop you are trying to use Jacques -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=528127group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-523277 ] IP Port Forwarding on Dachstein
Support Requests item #523277, was opened at 2002-02-26 22:08 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=523277group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: IP Port Forwarding on Dachstein Initial Comment: I'm running the Dachstein LRP on a pentium 133 box with 3com and Network Anywhere network cards, and am connected to the internet via DSL. The router works great, but I am now trying to forward port 80 for www over to a Mandrake 8.1 box running Apache (don't be fooled, I'm a Linux newbie). I've determined so far that the ipmasqadm portfw command has to be used instead of the old ipportfw. I'm relatively certain that I've got the usage of that correct, and it seems to think that it is forwarding the appropriate ports and IPs (and I've tried every possible iteration of the command and IPs). I've also done some minor things like move the weblet to port 8000 so it isn't in the way. I've been at this on and off for a few weeks so I can't recall every last thing I've done, but I've looked through the documentation I could find and still don't have it working. Basically when you try to connect to the website from outside it acts like it is opening the page then suddenly jumps to a page not found message, which indicates it is not actually forwarding the port. I'm still not sure exactly how/where to include the port forwarding in the modules so that it does that on startup. If anybody has some advice or some documentation that I haven't found I would really appreciate it! -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-03-18 12:12 Message: Logged In: NO I put my Ipmasq portfw rules in the port forwarding section of the network.conf right under the INTERN_XXX_SERVERS section and remember to open the www tcp port just above in the EXTERN_TCP_PORTS=0/0_www variable. I hope this is right... Newbie also.. if not, hopefully someone will let us both know... Gary -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=523277group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-524646 ] trouble loading module for nic
Support Requests item #524646, was opened at 2002-03-01 18:05 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=524646group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: trouble loading module for nic Initial Comment: Hi, I have read all of the docs for my distib of leaf (Dachstein) and am still having some trouble. I downloaded the RTL8139.o module for my nic cards and placed them in /lib/modules and added it to the /etc/modules config file. The docs for this driver say that pci-scan must also be installed, so i did that. I then backed everything up and rebooted. The nic cards are not found or working. Lsmod shows the other modules that have loaded but not the one I added (yes they are in the /lib/modules and the config file). When I try to insmod the module it says 'process busy' Please help!!! Thanks.. Jeff p.s. have learned alot and keep up the good work. -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-03-18 14:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Please read How DoI make LEAF see my Ethernet cards. http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1418group_id=13751 Should you require further assistance from LEAF project members, please submit a new support request. Thank you, leaf-project.org support -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=524646group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-528127 ] bering /sbin/getty problem
Support Requests item #528127, was opened at 2002-03-10 06:58 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=528127group_id=13751 Category: Release/Branch: Bering Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Summary: bering /sbin/getty problem Initial Comment: Hello, I have been playing with the bering LEAF distribution. Its very nice and I like it so far however I am having a little problem I was hoping someone on your end could help me with. I am trying to get the firewall to run on a laptop for power concern reasons and have got the distribution disk working and configured like I want with the modules and packages I think I need. The disk boots and runs fine in several laptops I have tried however the target laptop shows a problem. The boot disk gets all the way through the installation, says finished and then goes into this loop of : cannot execute /sbin/getty add infinitum. Then it says something about respawning to quickly and freezes up on me. I have traced around on another PC to the getty call I think, in INIT. I dunno could you offer some suggestions I am kind of stuck. Thanks ED -- Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes) Date: 2002-03-18 14:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39521 Based on the most recent comment on this support request, it is our understanding that this matter has been addressed. Should you require further assistance from LEAF project members, please submit a new support request. Thank you, leaf-project.org support -- Comment By: Jacques Nilo (jnilo) Date: 2002-03-11 12:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=150195 Just an obvious check: are you able to run Dachstein or any other floppy based linux distro on your laptop ? http://www.toms.net/rb/ For example ? -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-03-10 18:39 Message: Logged In: NO OK Thanks for the quick reply I really didn't want to bother you, after all the great documentation on your site and the great package and all. I just figured the getty thing might ring a bell. I cant't make a fresh image until I get back to the library, my home computer has a really hard time making the disk images. Even the library was like about one in 6. The disk I have works fine however I have booted up on 3 machines and many several of times played with it, update the modules and packages, no problem. I don't suspect the disk but who knows! Texas Instruments Extensa 605CD CPU 120 MHZ pentium Coprocessor installed System Ram 640kb Extended Ram 7168 KB Shadow RAM 384 KB no Cache RaM no internal drive internal cd rom Bios date 09/11/96 video bios version V1.1.8 R132.10 Chips and Technologies, INC. Phonex Bios version 4.05 System and Video Bios Shadowed UMB upper limit segment address:F226 Again the more exact message from Bering= INIT: Entering runlevel: 2 INIT: cannot exeute /sbin/getty [repeat this many times down the screen] INIT: Id 1 respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes INIT: cannot execute :/sbin/getty [repeat several more times] INIT: Id 2 respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes INIT: no more processes left in this runlevel Then nothing more Thanks for the HELP! -- Comment By: Jacques Nilo (jnilo) Date: 2002-03-10 09:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=150195 If the disk boots OK on several laptop and not on the target laptop it's really sounds like an hardware problem. 1/ Retry with a new fresh disk image to see if it fixes the pb 2/ If not send detailed info about the laptop you are trying to use Jacques -- Comment By: Jacques Nilo (jnilo) Date: 2002-03-10 09:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=150195 If the disk boots OK on several laptop and not on the target laptop it's really sounds like an hardware problem. 1/ Retry with a new fresh disk image to see if it fixes the pb 2/ If not send detailed info about the laptop you are trying to use Jacques -- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=528127group_id=13751 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-523277 ] IP Port Forwarding on Dachstein
Support Requests item #523277, was opened at 2002-02-27 00:08
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=523277group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Summary: IP Port Forwarding on Dachstein
Initial Comment:
I'm running the Dachstein LRP on a pentium 133 box
with 3com and Network Anywhere network cards, and am
connected to the internet via DSL. The router works
great, but I am now trying to forward port 80 for www
over to a Mandrake 8.1 box running Apache (don't be
fooled, I'm a Linux newbie). I've determined so far
that the ipmasqadm portfw command has to be used
instead of the old ipportfw. I'm relatively certain
that I've got the usage of that correct, and it seems
to think that it is forwarding the appropriate ports
and IPs (and I've tried every possible iteration of
the command and IPs). I've also done some minor
things like move the weblet to port 8000 so it isn't
in the way. I've been at this on and off for a few
weeks so I can't recall every last thing I've done,
but I've looked through the documentation I could find
and still don't have it working. Basically when you
try to connect to the website from outside it acts
like it is opening the page then suddenly jumps to a
page not found message, which indicates it is not
actually forwarding the port. I'm still not sure
exactly how/where to include the port forwarding in
the modules so that it does that on startup. If
anybody has some advice or some documentation that I
haven't found I would really appreciate it!
--
Comment By: Lynn Avants (guitarlynn)
Date: 2002-03-18 19:16
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=176069
The preferred (less-confusing) way of the actual port
forward with Dachstein would be this line:
INTERN_SERVERS=tcp_${EXTERN_IP}_80_192.168.1.1_80
You will also need to open the port in the firewall with
the line:
EXTERN_TCP_PORTS=0/0_www 0/0_80
The module you will need to load is ip_masq_portfw.
You may need to download this module from Charles'
site in the dachstein-small/modules branch (in the
/modules/ip_masq directory if you are using the floppy
version. You simply copy this module to a floppy, then
copy it from the floppy to the /lib/modules directory
of the Dachstein machine (make sure the name is correct
after copying it).
You will need to save the etc and modules packages
then reboot the firewall to have all changes take effect.
I hope this helps,
~Guitarlynn
Lynn Avants
--
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2002-03-18 14:12
Message:
Logged In: NO
I put my Ipmasq portfw rules in the port forwarding section
of the network.conf right under the INTERN_XXX_SERVERS
section and remember to open the www tcp port just
above in the EXTERN_TCP_PORTS=0/0_www variable.
I hope this is right... Newbie also..
if not, hopefully someone will let us both know...
Gary
--
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=523277group_id=13751
___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-523277 ] IP Port Forwarding on Dachstein
Support Requests item #523277, was opened at 2002-02-27 00:08
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=523277group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Summary: IP Port Forwarding on Dachstein
Initial Comment:
I'm running the Dachstein LRP on a pentium 133 box
with 3com and Network Anywhere network cards, and am
connected to the internet via DSL. The router works
great, but I am now trying to forward port 80 for www
over to a Mandrake 8.1 box running Apache (don't be
fooled, I'm a Linux newbie). I've determined so far
that the ipmasqadm portfw command has to be used
instead of the old ipportfw. I'm relatively certain
that I've got the usage of that correct, and it seems
to think that it is forwarding the appropriate ports
and IPs (and I've tried every possible iteration of
the command and IPs). I've also done some minor
things like move the weblet to port 8000 so it isn't
in the way. I've been at this on and off for a few
weeks so I can't recall every last thing I've done,
but I've looked through the documentation I could find
and still don't have it working. Basically when you
try to connect to the website from outside it acts
like it is opening the page then suddenly jumps to a
page not found message, which indicates it is not
actually forwarding the port. I'm still not sure
exactly how/where to include the port forwarding in
the modules so that it does that on startup. If
anybody has some advice or some documentation that I
haven't found I would really appreciate it!
--
Comment By: Lynn Avants (guitarlynn)
Date: 2002-03-18 19:16
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=176069
The preferred (less-confusing) way of the actual port
forward with Dachstein would be this line:
INTERN_SERVERS=tcp_${EXTERN_IP}_80_192.168.1.1_80
You will also need to open the port in the firewall with
the line:
EXTERN_TCP_PORTS=0/0_www 0/0_80
The module you will need to load is ip_masq_portfw.
You may need to download this module from Charles'
site in the dachstein-small/modules branch (in the
/modules/ip_masq directory if you are using the floppy
version. You simply copy this module to a floppy, then
copy it from the floppy to the /lib/modules directory
of the Dachstein machine (make sure the name is correct
after copying it).
You will need to save the etc and modules packages
then reboot the firewall to have all changes take effect.
I hope this helps,
~Guitarlynn
Lynn Avants
--
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2002-03-18 14:12
Message:
Logged In: NO
I put my Ipmasq portfw rules in the port forwarding section
of the network.conf right under the INTERN_XXX_SERVERS
section and remember to open the www tcp port just
above in the EXTERN_TCP_PORTS=0/0_www variable.
I hope this is right... Newbie also..
if not, hopefully someone will let us both know...
Gary
--
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=523277group_id=13751
___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-512515 ] Buggy Alcatel adsl modem's dhcp server
Support Requests item #512515, was opened at 2002-02-03 17:01
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=512515group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Summary: Buggy Alcatel adsl modem's dhcp server
Initial Comment:
Hello,
I'm trying to get my dachstein router working in
combination with my Alcatel Speedtouch ADSL modem.
It has an option for DHCP spoofing, so theorethically
al I need to do is setup DHCP on my external interface
and that's it.
Sadly, alcatel has made a buggy DHCP server-
implementation on their modems which has the feature
of only giving the last 3 bytes of the ip-adress
instead of the subnet mask.
The current dhclient doesn't really like this...
Could anyone provide a patched dhclient package which
resolves this issue or a modified dhcpclient-script
that hardcodes the subnetmask to 255.255.255.255 (i
think that should also do the trick).
I already found a patched version of client.c which
someone else wrote for pathing his RedHat install,
maybe it's useful for adressing this problem under LRP
Thanks in advance,
Thijs
*** client.c.orig Sun Aug 5 12:14:21 2001
--- client.c Sun Aug 5 12:22:12 2001
***
*** 469,476
memcpy(p-sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[subnetMask],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFNETMASK,ifr) == -1 ) /*
setting netmask */
{
! syslog(LOG_ERR,dhcpConfig: ioctl SIOCSIFNETMASK: %
m );
! return -1;
}
memcpy(p-sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[broadcastAddr],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFBRDADDR,ifr) == -1 ) /*
setting broadcast address */
--- 469,480
memcpy(p-sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[subnetMask],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFNETMASK,ifr) == -1 ) /*
setting netmask */
{
! p-sin_addr.s_addr = 0x; /* try
255.255.255.255 */
! if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFNETMASK,ifr) == -1 )
! {
! syslog(LOG_ERR,dhcpConfig: ioctl SIOCSIFNETMASK: %
m );
! return -1;
! }
}
memcpy(p-sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[broadcastAddr],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFBRDADDR,ifr) == -1 ) /*
setting broadcast address */
--
Comment By: Lynn Avants (guitarlynn)
Date: 2002-03-18 19:26
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=176069
Well, the source won't help much since it is in C and we
shell-script the dhcp scripts with LEAF. You could change
the netmask in all instances of ip addr, ip
route...,and ip link ., but this would involve
going through roughly 300+ lines of code.
If you have a static option with the modem, it would be
consideably easier. LEAF firewalls all do ip spoofing by
default, so you are not gaining anything by using this
option with your modem.
Is this possible???
--
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=512515group_id=13751
___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-523277 ] IP Port Forwarding on Dachstein
Support Requests item #523277, was opened at 2002-02-26 22:08
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=523277group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Summary: IP Port Forwarding on Dachstein
Initial Comment:
I'm running the Dachstein LRP on a pentium 133 box
with 3com and Network Anywhere network cards, and am
connected to the internet via DSL. The router works
great, but I am now trying to forward port 80 for www
over to a Mandrake 8.1 box running Apache (don't be
fooled, I'm a Linux newbie). I've determined so far
that the ipmasqadm portfw command has to be used
instead of the old ipportfw. I'm relatively certain
that I've got the usage of that correct, and it seems
to think that it is forwarding the appropriate ports
and IPs (and I've tried every possible iteration of
the command and IPs). I've also done some minor
things like move the weblet to port 8000 so it isn't
in the way. I've been at this on and off for a few
weeks so I can't recall every last thing I've done,
but I've looked through the documentation I could find
and still don't have it working. Basically when you
try to connect to the website from outside it acts
like it is opening the page then suddenly jumps to a
page not found message, which indicates it is not
actually forwarding the port. I'm still not sure
exactly how/where to include the port forwarding in
the modules so that it does that on startup. If
anybody has some advice or some documentation that I
haven't found I would really appreciate it!
--
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2002-03-18 22:06
Message:
Logged In: NO
your statement that you get a page not found message
suggests to me that the portforwarding is working
and the server doesn't like the URL it is being asked to
respond to.
You can confirm that the portforwarding is working by
starting from your external (dialup?) ip and telnetting
into port 80 and entering something like GET / HTTP1.0
followed by pressing enter twice. A normal browser
would include a header line after the GET that told the
server what host it thought it was talking to, which could
bother Apache if Apache is not configured right.
See your Apache documentation for further information.
Good luck!
--
Comment By: Lynn Avants (guitarlynn)
Date: 2002-03-18 17:16
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=176069
The preferred (less-confusing) way of the actual port
forward with Dachstein would be this line:
INTERN_SERVERS=tcp_${EXTERN_IP}_80_192.168.1.1_80
You will also need to open the port in the firewall with
the line:
EXTERN_TCP_PORTS=0/0_www 0/0_80
The module you will need to load is ip_masq_portfw.
You may need to download this module from Charles'
site in the dachstein-small/modules branch (in the
/modules/ip_masq directory if you are using the floppy
version. You simply copy this module to a floppy, then
copy it from the floppy to the /lib/modules directory
of the Dachstein machine (make sure the name is correct
after copying it).
You will need to save the etc and modules packages
then reboot the firewall to have all changes take effect.
I hope this helps,
~Guitarlynn
Lynn Avants
--
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2002-03-18 12:12
Message:
Logged In: NO
I put my Ipmasq portfw rules in the port forwarding section
of the network.conf right under the INTERN_XXX_SERVERS
section and remember to open the www tcp port just
above in the EXTERN_TCP_PORTS=0/0_www variable.
I hope this is right... Newbie also..
if not, hopefully someone will let us both know...
Gary
--
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=523277group_id=13751
___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
