Re: [newbie-it] help: invio email...

2003-03-21 Thread Luigi Pinna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Alle 10:37, martedì 18 marzo 2003, beo ha scritto:

 Io ho risolto utilizzando un SMTP fornito da un non provider
 così ricevo dove voglio e trasmetto sempre indifferentemente da chi
 garantisce la connessione. Adesso sono connesso tramite ADSL
 aziendale, ricevo su inwind e trasmetto da yahoo :-) ciao
 GPaolo

Lo puoi fare anche da Lycos, che a differenza di yahoo non dovrebbe far 
pagare niente (ma richiede autenticazione quindi kmail dal KDE 3.0 in  
poi)
- -- 
Le ballerine sono coraggiosissime!
Quante donne conoscete in grado di gettarsi tra le braccia di un 
omossessuale sperando che lui le afferri?

Rita Rüdner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+etnaTvJtVxCNwP4RAhGvAJ9tIaj3rWbsJDA2gdoRbSbywLUMUgCeMwFF
t7FwcPppZq7eVJrp1CDeBCg=
=Wd4h
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [newbie-it] help: invio email...

2003-03-21 Thread beo
Il Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:22:31 +0100
Luigi Pinna [EMAIL PROTECTED] ebbe a dire:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Alle 10:37, martedì 18 marzo 2003, beo ha scritto:
 
  Io ho risolto utilizzando un SMTP fornito da un non provider
  così ricevo dove voglio e trasmetto sempre indifferentemente da chi
  garantisce la connessione. Adesso sono connesso tramite ADSL
  aziendale, ricevo su inwind e trasmetto da yahoo :-) 
 
 Lo puoi fare anche da Lycos, che a differenza di yahoo non dovrebbe  far pagare 
 niente

yahoo.it di dà 5mb free

 (ma richiede autenticazione quindi kmail dal KDE 3.0 in  
 poi)

oppure il leggero  e multipiattaforma sylpheed ;-)

ciao
Gpaolo



Re: [newbie-it] kde e gnome

2003-03-21 Thread beo
Il Wed, 19 Mar 2003 19:32:04 +
Fabio Manunza [EMAIL PROTECTED] ebbe a dire:
 Per KDE esiste kappfinder.

Il Thu, 20 Mar 2003 14:36:53 +0100
Germano [EMAIL PROTECTED] ebbe a dire:

  ma come si fa a dire a kde/gnome di cercarsi i nuovi programmi installati?
 
 
 Intendi dire come si fa a farli apparire nel menu?

yess

 Se è cosi dipende dal programma installato e dal gestore dei menu.
 Di solito è mandrake che gestisce i menu di tutti i WM ma puoi fare in modo 
 che kde o gnome se li gestiscano da soli (sconsigliabile, perchè non vedono 
 tutti i programmi).
 Altrimenti ti vai a vedere che files descrittivi ci sono nel pacchetto e li 
 copi in /usr/share/applnk-mdk/ nel posto giusto.
 
 Se ho fatto tutto questo discorso inutilmente dimmelo e magari specifica più 
 esattamente il tipo di problema.

soprattutto per pacchetti non rpm per i quali bisogna individuare l'eseguibile e 
linkarlo sul desktop o sulla barra preferita.
ma non c'è un'applicazioncina che li cerca ad sola e aggiorna i vari menù? (pigro el 
toso eh?)
intanto provo kappfinder
grazie 
ciao 
Gpaolo
 



RE: [newbie] Configuring X-CD-Roast

2003-03-21 Thread Tsur, Oren
Hi Anne

What is K3b? I am not familiar with the abbreviations...

Oren 

-Original Message-
From: Anne Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 March 2003 13:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Configuring X-CD-Roast


On Friday 21 Mar 2003 10:33 am, Tsur, Oren wrote:
 Can't remember such a warning/suggestion/advice along the way.
 It is no big deal. When I 'list' the fstab it shows all my devices
 perfectly. I never had a problem accesing any of my drives. That is why I
 found it a bit strange that I couldn't see my DVD-ROM in X-CD-Roast.

 Oren Tsur

Hi, Oren.

XCDRoast can only work with scsi-emulated drives.  As I said before, K3b can

work with ide drives without the scsi-emulation, so you can keep the 
emulation on your burner (where you need it) but don't need to emulate on
the 
dvd.  HTH

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302




Email Disclaimer

This email has been sent from KPMG LLP, a UK limited
liability partnership, or from one of the companies within
its control (which include KPMG Audit Plc , KPMG United
Kingdom Plc and KPMG UK Limited). The information in
this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this
email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
 is prohibited and may be unlawful.  When addressed to
our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email
are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
governing KPMG client engagement letter.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


RE: [newbie] is this the last mandrake?

2003-03-21 Thread Albert Charron
XP stands for eXPerience... For myself, it stands for eXPen$ive...

 
Albert Charron 


-Original Message-
From: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 5:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] is this the last mandrake?


Stephen Kuhn wrote:
 On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 07:51, Frankie wrote:
 
normally never..

I have not seen new lindows though, apparently it has user accounts (not all
root) and fixit alot of stuff that people didn't like..
my main question is mdk's future..  I don't care really how they rate to
mags..  I care about if there is gonna be a mandrake 10
rgds

Frank
 
 
 I think there will be a Mandrake 11, mate...

I hope so. Just as long as they don't start giving releases silly names 
like Mandrake Millenium or Mandrake PX.

By the way, what does the XP in Windows XP stand for?  Where I come 
from, it means experience points, but that can't be it, because in any 
decent RPG, you don't get experience points for stabbing other party 
members in the back (Paranoia being a wonderful exception that really 
captures the atmosphere of the IT world).

And please don't answer that question by saying RTFM.  We ain' gon' 
read no steenking Weendows manuel.

Sir Robin


-- 
The raisins may be the best part of a cake, but that doesn't
mean that a bag of raisins is better than a cake.
- Wittgenstein

Robin Turner
IDMYO
Bilkent Univeritesi
Ankara 06533
Turkey

www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] can't eject cd after burning

2003-03-21 Thread Richard Urwin
On Friday 21 Mar 2003 1:29 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
 On Thursday March 20 2003 05:16 pm, Richard Urwin wrote:
  I have just had exactly the same problem. Wrote a CDRW in GCombust,
  finished OK, wouldn't eject the CD.
 
  lsof reported that nothing on the cd was open. ie lsof|grep
  cdrom2 and lsof|grep scd0 both reported nothing.
 
  Seeing that nothing was open I unmounted it with umount -l
  /mnt/cdrom2 and that at least gave me my cd back. Everything
  appeared fairly sane I think. The jury is still out as to whether I
  can burn another CD following this one, and I'm no expert about
  what I might have broken with that unmount.
 
  I did have supermount enabled.

  CDr's are not mounted for burning. So 'umount' isn't part of the
 equation.

I did open the CD in Konquerer immediately after the burn, just to make sure 
the data was there. This time through I closed GCombust first. (And closed 
konquerer before trying to eject, of course.)

 It's likely just coincidental that by the time you ran that
 command, whatever has holding on to the burner had released it. Next
 time try 'eject /dev/scd0' (or scd? depending on which ? your burner
 is). 'Course if you're burning as root (you shouldn't be) you'll need
 to run the eject command as root.

$ eject /dev/scd0# Came out, went back in again
$ sudo umount -l /mnt/cdrom2
Password:
$ eject /dev/scd0# Came out, stayed out

While I grant that that sequence took thirty seconds or so, and things may 
have changed between the two ejects, that was a lot less time than I took 
fiddling with it last night.

It stands to reason that the burner must lock the drive closed while the burn 
is happening. I don't know how that happens. Even if it isn't a mount it 
might still have a similar effect on the top level mount/umount/eject 
functionality.

  Supermount has been vastly improved in 9.1. Specially if you use
 the premptable, low latency kernel found in contribs (2.4.21-0.16mm).
 OTOH, supermount isn't involved in this problem since CDr's are not
 mounted for burning anyway.

The reason I'm doing this is to archive off my files so when I load 9.1, 
hopefully next week, I can nuke and pave, and this time get the partitions 
right so I don't have to do it next time.

Not that a few backups now and then aren't a good thing ;-)

-- 
Richard Urwin

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[newbie] VMWare Installation Questions

2003-03-21 Thread Brian
Hello All,

I am installing VMWare 3.2 and I am being asked for some information 
that i do not know.  I am running a fairly out-of-the-box installation 
of Mandrake 9.0 and I am being asked the location of the C header files 
that match my running kernel.  Does anyone know where I would find these?

thanks,
Brian

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Configuring X-CD-Roast

2003-03-21 Thread Anne Wilson
On Friday 21 Mar 2003 2:16 pm, Tsur, Oren wrote:
 Hi Anne

 What is K3b? I am not familiar with the abbreviations...

 Oren

K3b is the name of the application.  It is on your Mandrake CDs.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] can't eject cd after burning

2003-03-21 Thread Anne Wilson
On Friday 21 Mar 2003 2:33 pm, Richard Urwin wrote:
 On Friday 21 Mar 2003 1:29 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
  On Thursday March 20 2003 05:16 pm, Richard Urwin wrote:

 I did open the CD in Konquerer immediately after the burn, just to make
 sure the data was there. This time through I closed GCombust first. (And
 closed konquerer before trying to eject, of course.)

I experience this open/fast close from time to time after browsing cds.   It 
is clear that you must make abosolutely certain that no Konqueror windows are 
open before  you try to eject.  I think it would also mean that you must not 
be browsing the directory in a shell, either.

Still there appear to be times when that isn't enough.  Sometimes it sorts 
itself out after a while, but if it gets stuck, I generally log out, then in 
again.

  It's likely just coincidental that by the time you ran that
  command, whatever has holding on to the burner had released it. Next
  time try 'eject /dev/scd0' (or scd? depending on which ? your burner
  is). 'Course if you're burning as root (you shouldn't be) you'll need
  to run the eject command as root.

 $ eject /dev/scd0# Came out, went back in again
 $ sudo umount -l /mnt/cdrom2
 Password:
 $ eject /dev/scd0# Came out, stayed out

 While I grant that that sequence took thirty seconds or so, and things may
 have changed between the two ejects, that was a lot less time than I took
 fiddling with it last night.

 It stands to reason that the burner must lock the drive closed while the
 burn is happening. I don't know how that happens. Even if it isn't a mount
 it might still have a similar effect on the top level mount/umount/eject
 functionality.

I don't burn from the command line.  Both XCDRoast and K3b have a setting to 
eject on completion, and I always use that.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Radeon All-in-Wonder 7500 video out

2003-03-21 Thread gikoreno

I have an S-video out that splits into composite out (which is the one I am using).
I don't have a specific driver for it, since I don't know which one to use.

gikoreno


 --- On Fri 03/21, John Richard Smith  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
From: John Richard Smith [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:44:46 +
Subject: Re: [newbie] Radeon All-in-Wonder 7500 video out

gikoreno wrote:brbrHey everyone:brbrI am trying to get the TV-out on a 
machine that's running Mandrake linux 9.0 to work.brbrWhat I would like to be 
able to do is to receive the TV signal through the coaxial cable and then use the 
S-video-out (using the provided s-video to composite converter) to output the signal 
on the actual TV.brbrThen I could also read DVDs from the PC and watch them on 
the TV screen.brbrIf I boot the computer with the s-video (or composite video) 
cable connected, it will boot to console mode no problem, and the console stuff will 
be visible on the TV too.brThe problem arises when trying to start the X server. I 
get the following message:brbr  (EE) RADEON(0): No valid mode found for this 
DFP/LCDbr  (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a useable 
configurationbrbrRunning XFdrake doesn't work, so I don't know what else I can 
do.brIf I disconnect the video-out cable and reboot, the Xserver will start like 
norm
 al, no problems will be encountered, but no output to TV will happen 
either...brbrHas anyone gotten this working, and could you provide me with the 
Xfree configuration file that works for the Radeon All-in-Wonder 7500?brbrThanks 
a lot. I've been looking everywhere on the net for this, but I only saw people having 
the same question, and no answers.brI am sure that there are lots of people who 
would be interested in knowing how to do that too.brbrThanks in 
advance,brbrgikorenobrbr  brbrI have a working tv-out  to tv, from my 
geforce3 card.brbrDo you have a working tv-out driver for your Radeon 
?brbrXwindows does not provide tv-out.brbrJohnbrbr-- brJohn Richard 
Smithbr[EMAIL PROTECTED] brbrbrbrWant to buy your Pack or Services from 
MandrakeSoft? brGo to http://www.mandrakestore.combr

___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Modem hanging on connection

2003-03-21 Thread Frans Ketelaars
On Friday 21 March 2003 15:11, Chris wrote:
 Hi All,

 I have recently joined the many fleeing from M$ to Linux and have chosen
 Mandrake 9.0 to try out.
 The install was simple and flawless and similar success to working my way
 around the desktop etc... I have come unstuck however on connecting to my
 local isp . The computer in question is the server ( for want of a better
 word ) for my home lan and also the only one with a modem attached to it
 ( Maestro Woomera 56k ext )
 The lan works fine with me being able to ping the other comps at home , the
 internet dial up seems to be more confusing than what I thought it should
 have been.
 I started with the Connect to Internet  section in the What i want to
 do and it brought up the kppp interface ... I was feeling pretty confident
 to getting this going as I had watched a mate set up his dial up with
 RedHat 7.3 ...Easy   ;-)
 After entering what i thought would be the relevant information the modem
 dials , connects and hangs... ( Not hangup - but hangs ) I can't access
 mail , web services or the like  Was there anything amazingly simple I
 missed ...( Hangs head )

 Any guidance in the right direction would be a great help.Thanks

 Chris

Have you selected 'show log window' to see where it hangs?

HTH,

-Frans

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] can't eject cd after burning

2003-03-21 Thread Richard Urwin
I've just gone through the process again.

On Friday 21 Mar 2003 3:28 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
 On Friday 21 Mar 2003 2:33 pm, Richard Urwin wrote:
  On Friday 21 Mar 2003 1:29 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
   On Thursday March 20 2003 05:16 pm, Richard Urwin wrote:
 
  I did open the CD in Konquerer immediately after the burn, just to make
  sure the data was there. This time through I closed GCombust first. (And
  closed konquerer before trying to eject, of course.)

 I experience this open/fast close from time to time after browsing cds.  
 It is clear that you must make abosolutely certain that no Konqueror
 windows are open before  you try to eject.  I think it would also mean that
 you must not be browsing the directory in a shell, either.

 Still there appear to be times when that isn't enough.  Sometimes it sorts
 itself out after a while, but if it gets stuck, I generally log out, then
 in again.

This time I closed GCombust and ejected the CD before opening konquerer. Once 
from the button on the drive, once using eject. Both worked perfectly. Then I 
opened the CD using konquerer. No files. I then mounted the CD by hand (sudo 
mount /mnt/cdrom2.) The files appeared. Then I tried to eject the CD. No 
dice, the button is ignored and eject does the now-you-see-it-now-you-dont 
routine. I unmounted the CD by hand. The first time it refused device is 
busy. But it had only just retracted, and the drive was probably reading the 
index. I waited a second or two and the second umount worked. This time I got 
everything working without the -l flag to umount, so that is probably a red 
herring. My guess is that a standard umount will work, so long as you give it 
a while after a failed eject.

Supermount was enabled at all times.

Conclusion: Burning CDs can confuse supermount. Expect to mount/umount by 
hand. Wait for the drive to finish following a failed eject.

I have finished my backups for now. I'll leave it to others to determine if 
ejecting and reinserting the disk after burning but before trying to read it 
reduces problems.

   It's likely just coincidental that by the time you ran that
   command, whatever has holding on to the burner had released it. Next
   time try 'eject /dev/scd0' (or scd? depending on which ? your burner
   is). 'Course if you're burning as root (you shouldn't be) you'll need
   to run the eject command as root.
 
  $ eject /dev/scd0# Came out, went back in again
  $ sudo umount -l /mnt/cdrom2
  Password:
  $ eject /dev/scd0# Came out, stayed out
 
  While I grant that that sequence took thirty seconds or so, and things
  may have changed between the two ejects, that was a lot less time than I
  took fiddling with it last night.
 
  It stands to reason that the burner must lock the drive closed while the
  burn is happening. I don't know how that happens. Even if it isn't a
  mount it might still have a similar effect on the top level
  mount/umount/eject functionality.

 I don't burn from the command line.  Both XCDRoast and K3b have a setting
 to eject on completion, and I always use that.

GCombust is GUI, and was installed with MDK9.0
XCDRoast did not seem to be able to construct a CD, just to copy one. I may be 
wrong.


 Anne

-- 
Richard Urwin

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Modem hanging on connection

2003-03-21 Thread Leonardo Diciolla
Hi Chris,
it sounds like you havent set automatic IP adressing
along with the gateway on the remote server. Be also
sure that your resolv.conf is writabe by who executes
kppp (or set suid flag on pppd) and that on connection
it gets filled with the remote DNS address.
Remember to set CR/LF on your connection.

Hope this helps.
Bye
Leonardo Diciolla

 --- Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:  Hi
All,
 
 I have recently joined the many fleeing from M$ to
 Linux and have chosen
 Mandrake 9.0 to try out.
 The install was simple and flawless and similar
 success to working my way
 around the desktop etc... I have come unstuck
 however on connecting to my
 local isp . The computer in question is the server (
 for want of a better
 word ) for my home lan and also the only one with a
 modem attached to it
 ( Maestro Woomera 56k ext )
 The lan works fine with me being able to ping the
 other comps at home , the
 internet dial up seems to be more confusing than
 what I thought it should
 have been.
 I started with the Connect to Internet  section in
 the What i want to do
 and it brought up the kppp interface ... I was
 feeling pretty confident to
 getting this going as I had watched a mate set up
 his dial up with RedHat
 7.3 ...Easy   ;-)
 After entering what i thought would be the relevant
 information the modem
 dials , connects and hangs... ( Not hangup - but
 hangs ) I can't access mail
 , web services or the like  Was there anything
 amazingly simple I missed
 ...( Hangs head )
 
 Any guidance in the right direction would be a great
 help.Thanks
 
 Chris
 
 
  Want to buy your Pack or Services from
MandrakeSoft?
 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
  

__
Yahoo! Cellulari: loghi, suonerie, picture message per il tuo telefonino
http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/?http://it.mobile.yahoo.com/index2002.html

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Configuring X-CD-Roast

2003-03-21 Thread Miark
In /etc/lilo.conf as root, add hdX=ide-scsi to the append line, where X
is the proper device letter. Mine is on the fourth IDE channel, so my
append line looks like this:

 append=quiet devfs=mount hdc=ide-scsi hdd=ide-scsi

The last item is my DVD drive. Then, also as root, type lilo on the
commandline to activate the change. Reboot. That should do it.

Miark



On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:34:49 -
Tsur, Oren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Miark
 
 How do you emu-scsi your DVD-ROM drive?
 
 Thanks, Oren 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Richard Urwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 20 March 2003 20:59
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [newbie] Configuring X-CD-Roast
 
 
 On Thursday 20 Mar 2003 8:55 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
  On Thursday 20 Mar 2003 6:42 pm, Miark wrote:
   On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 17:11:05 +
  
   Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 20 Mar 2003 4:55 pm, Miark wrote:
 Anne,

 What problems? I scsi-emu my DVD drive and I've never had a hiccup
 reading data CDs, music CDs, or with copying.

 Miark
   
I seem to remember that if you did the install from that drive, there
would be problems in that the software installer would not be looking
at the right place to find the disks.  I'd have to check back to see
exactly what was said about this, but I think it was so.
  
   Maybe I missed the point. If you install Linux from the DVD drive, and
   then later switch from IDE to SCSI emulation, that would confule urmpi.
   Is that what you mean?
  
It's worth remembering that just about anything he wants to do can be
done on that disk without scsi-emulation, so why risk problems?
  
   I think using K3b is _more_ dangerous because of the changes it makes
   directly to fstab (if you let it).
  
   Damned if you do, damned if you don't, eh?
 
  I forgot that some people had run foul of that one.  I played cautious and
  said no, since I hadn't a clue what it would try to do.  Turned out that
  was exactly the right answer g
 
  So be warned, Oren.  If you install K3b it will ask if it can change your
  fstab.  Say 'No'!
 
  Anne
 
 Fascinated Newbie in learn mode:
 What changes does it try to make?
 
 -- 
 Richard Urwin
 
 
 
   Email Disclaimer
 
 This email has been sent from KPMG LLP, a UK limited
 liability partnership, or from one of the companies within
 its control (which include KPMG Audit Plc , KPMG United
 Kingdom Plc and KPMG UK Limited). The information in
 this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
 It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this
 email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the
 intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
 or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
  is prohibited and may be unlawful.  When addressed to
 our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email
 are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
 governing KPMG client engagement letter.
 
 
 

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] can't eject cd after burning

2003-03-21 Thread Anne Wilson
On Friday 21 Mar 2003 3:53 pm, Richard Urwin wrote:
 I've just gone through the process again.

 On Friday 21 Mar 2003 3:28 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
  On Friday 21 Mar 2003 2:33 pm, Richard Urwin wrote:
   On Friday 21 Mar 2003 1:29 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday March 20 2003 05:16 pm, Richard Urwin wrote:

 This time I closed GCombust and ejected the CD before opening konquerer.

Wise, I think.

 Once from the button on the drive, once using eject. Both worked perfectly.
 Then I opened the CD using konquerer. No files. I then mounted the CD by
 hand (sudo mount /mnt/cdrom2.) The files appeared. Then I tried to eject
 the CD. No dice, the button is ignored and eject does the
 now-you-see-it-now-you-dont routine. I unmounted the CD by hand. The first
 time it refused device is busy. But it had only just retracted, and the
 drive was probably reading the index. I waited a second or two and the
 second umount worked. This time I got everything working without the -l
 flag to umount, so that is probably a red herring. My guess is that a
 standard umount will work, so long as you give it a while after a failed
 eject.

Part of the problem is probably the longish spin-up spin-down time with modern 
faster drives.

 Supermount was enabled at all times.

 Conclusion: Burning CDs can confuse supermount. Expect to mount/umount by
 hand. Wait for the drive to finish following a failed eject.

Which fits with my experience that it sometimes clears itself if left along.

 I have finished my backups for now. I'll leave it to others to determine if
 ejecting and reinserting the disk after burning but before trying to read
 it reduces problems.

 GCombust is GUI, and was installed with MDK9.0

OK - I haven't used it.

 XCDRoast did not seem to be able to construct a CD, just to copy one. I may
 be wrong.

I use it all the time for backing up files.  If you want to either post to 
list or direct to me, I will make some notes and give you a HOW-TO.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] can't eject cd after burning

2003-03-21 Thread Richard Urwin
On Friday 21 Mar 2003 4:02 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
 I use it all the time for backing up files.  If you want to either post to
 list or direct to me, I will make some notes and give you a HOW-TO.

 Anne

Ahh! Master Tracks. Now I see. How un-intuitive.

-- 
Richard Urwin

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] can't eject cd after burning

2003-03-21 Thread Anne Wilson
On Friday 21 Mar 2003 4:12 pm, Richard Urwin wrote:
 On Friday 21 Mar 2003 4:02 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
  I use it all the time for backing up files.  If you want to either post
  to list or direct to me, I will make some notes and give you a HOW-TO.
 
  Anne

 Ahh! Master Tracks. Now I see. How un-intuitive.

'Tis, a bit g  That said, I find it very easy to use.  I like the ability to 
add a directory, check the size of the burn, exclude inessentials for a later 
burn if it's too big, and so on.  I have K3b installed, and it's pretty, but 
somehow I can't use it with the same ease.  That's great, though, for tasks 
such as burning an iso, so there advantages in having both.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


RE: [newbie] Configuring X-CD-Roast

2003-03-21 Thread Tsur, Oren
That is brilliant. Many thanks Miark

Oren 

-Original Message-
From: Miark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 March 2003 15:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Configuring X-CD-Roast


In /etc/lilo.conf as root, add hdX=ide-scsi to the append line, where X
is the proper device letter. Mine is on the fourth IDE channel, so my
append line looks like this:

 append=quiet devfs=mount hdc=ide-scsi hdd=ide-scsi

The last item is my DVD drive. Then, also as root, type lilo on the
commandline to activate the change. Reboot. That should do it.

Miark



On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:34:49 -
Tsur, Oren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Miark
 
 How do you emu-scsi your DVD-ROM drive?
 
 Thanks, Oren 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Richard Urwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 20 March 2003 20:59
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [newbie] Configuring X-CD-Roast
 
 
 On Thursday 20 Mar 2003 8:55 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
  On Thursday 20 Mar 2003 6:42 pm, Miark wrote:
   On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 17:11:05 +
  
   Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 20 Mar 2003 4:55 pm, Miark wrote:
 Anne,

 What problems? I scsi-emu my DVD drive and I've never had a hiccup
 reading data CDs, music CDs, or with copying.

 Miark
   
I seem to remember that if you did the install from that drive,
there
would be problems in that the software installer would not be
looking
at the right place to find the disks.  I'd have to check back to see
exactly what was said about this, but I think it was so.
  
   Maybe I missed the point. If you install Linux from the DVD drive, and
   then later switch from IDE to SCSI emulation, that would confule
urmpi.
   Is that what you mean?
  
It's worth remembering that just about anything he wants to do can
be
done on that disk without scsi-emulation, so why risk problems?
  
   I think using K3b is _more_ dangerous because of the changes it makes
   directly to fstab (if you let it).
  
   Damned if you do, damned if you don't, eh?
 
  I forgot that some people had run foul of that one.  I played cautious
and
  said no, since I hadn't a clue what it would try to do.  Turned out that
  was exactly the right answer g
 
  So be warned, Oren.  If you install K3b it will ask if it can change
your
  fstab.  Say 'No'!
 
  Anne
 
 Fascinated Newbie in learn mode:
 What changes does it try to make?
 
 -- 
 Richard Urwin
 
 
 
   Email Disclaimer
 
 This email has been sent from KPMG LLP, a UK limited
 liability partnership, or from one of the companies within
 its control (which include KPMG Audit Plc , KPMG United
 Kingdom Plc and KPMG UK Limited). The information in
 this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
 It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this
 email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the
 intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
 or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
  is prohibited and may be unlawful.  When addressed to
 our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email
 are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
 governing KPMG client engagement letter.
 
 
 



Email Disclaimer

This email has been sent from KPMG LLP, a UK limited
liability partnership, or from one of the companies within
its control (which include KPMG Audit Plc , KPMG United
Kingdom Plc and KPMG UK Limited). The information in
this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this
email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
 is prohibited and may be unlawful.  When addressed to
our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email
are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
governing KPMG client engagement letter.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] can't eject cd after burning

2003-03-21 Thread Richard Urwin
On Friday 21 Mar 2003 4:18 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
... I find it very easy to use.  I like the ability
 to add a directory, check the size of the burn, exclude inessentials for a
 later burn if it's too big, and so on.  I have K3b installed, and it's
 pretty, but somehow I can't use it with the same ease.  That's great,
 though, for tasks such as burning an iso, so there advantages in having
 both.

 Anne

GCombust has a button that suggests which directories to remove to shrink the 
image down below the size of the CD while wasting the minimum amount of 
space.

What would be useful is if you could mark those directories as not in the 
current image, but have them hang around until you did the next burn, so you 
don't forget which ones you've done, or more likely, haven't.

-- 
Richard Urwin

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] can't eject cd after burning

2003-03-21 Thread Anne Wilson
On Friday 21 Mar 2003 4:30 pm, Richard Urwin wrote:
 On Friday 21 Mar 2003 4:18 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
 ... I find it very easy to use.  I like the ability
  to add a directory, check the size of the burn, exclude inessentials for
  a later burn if it's too big, and so on.  I have K3b installed, and it's
  pretty, but somehow I can't use it with the same ease.  That's great,
  though, for tasks such as burning an iso, so there advantages in having
  both.
 
  Anne

 GCombust has a button that suggests which directories to remove to shrink
 the image down below the size of the CD while wasting the minimum amount of
 space.

That sounds useful

 What would be useful is if you could mark those directories as not in the
 current image, but have them hang around until you did the next burn, so
 you don't forget which ones you've done, or more likely, haven't.

Excluded files/subdirectories are clearly marked with a red arrow in the 
selection page, which can be returned to when you've finished.  (Since it can 
eject at the end of the burn, you can just keep the program open.)  I then 
note down those excluded ones, clear the list, and start by putting those at 
the head of the list.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] can't eject cd after burning

2003-03-21 Thread Richard Urwin
On Friday 21 Mar 2003 4:33 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
 On Friday 21 Mar 2003 4:30 pm, Richard Urwin wrote:
  On Friday 21 Mar 2003 4:18 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
  ... I find it very easy to use.  I like the ability
   to add a directory, check the size of the burn, exclude inessentials
   for a later burn if it's too big, and so on.  I have K3b installed, and
   it's pretty, but somehow I can't use it with the same ease.  That's
   great, though, for tasks such as burning an iso, so there advantages in
   having both.
  
   Anne
 
  GCombust has a button that suggests which directories to remove to shrink
  the image down below the size of the CD while wasting the minimum amount
  of space.

 That sounds useful

  What would be useful is if you could mark those directories as not in the
  current image, but have them hang around until you did the next burn, so
  you don't forget which ones you've done, or more likely, haven't.

 Excluded files/subdirectories are clearly marked with a red arrow in the
 selection page, which can be returned to when you've finished.  (Since it
 can eject at the end of the burn, you can just keep the program open.)  I
 then note down those excluded ones, clear the list, and start by putting
 those at the head of the list.

 Anne

Almost perfect! But why not a clear all but excluded files button.

GCombust can only delete them out of the image, and since they're 
automatically chosen I'd imagine that they'd be scattered throughout the 
image - so a lot of writing. It can save the current file list, but not the 
marked subset of it, or invert the selection. Either of those would have been 
enough. I suppose it's open source. If I wanted it badly enough I'd add it.

-- 
Richard Urwin

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] can't eject cd after burning

2003-03-21 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Friday March 21 2003 08:33 am, Richard Urwin wrote:
 $ eject /dev/scd0# Came out, went back in
 again $ sudo umount -l /mnt/cdrom2
 Password:
 $ eject /dev/scd0# Came out, stayed out

 Here again, I don't think it was the 'umount' that did the trick.
Konqueror's hold on the device had probly expired by then. IME, even 
tho you had already closed Konqueror, it still takes some time to 
release.  A CDr can't be mounted, since you can only mount 
filesystems. There ain't one on blank CDr's (or images like audio 
CD's) ;)  After you burned it, and then checked with a file manager, 
supermount did mount it, and it was probly Konq that took it's sweet 
damn time lettin it go.


 While I grant that that sequence took thirty seconds or so, and
 things may have changed between the two ejects, that was a lot less
 time than I took fiddling with it last night.

I don't know about GUI's, but all my CL solutions (biso, bacd, 
bdcd) contain 'eject'.  ie,
alias bdcd='cdrecord -v -eject speed=4 dev=0,0,0  -data'
So the CDr is immediately ejected right after fixating is 
finished.  Then to check the CD, I push the drawer back in and bring 
it up in a terminal and do a 'ls' on it, or use a file manager like 
Konqueror. Then I either wait a while, or if I'm impatient, use 
'eject /dev/scd0' to retrieve it.

   'man eject' says If the device is currently mounted, it is 
unmounted before ejecting.  Maybe in your case it's havin trouble 
over riding Konq's hold?  Doesn't happen to me, I suspect it could be 
permissions. What's your msec level?  I run at msec 2 just so my 
system doesn't argue with me about what I wanna do ;  To tell the 
truth, 'bout the only time my burner won't give up a CD is after doin 
'md5sum /dev/scd0' to check the integrity of burned iso's. 'eject' 
always gets it for me tho ;)

-- 
Tom Brinkman  Corpus Christi, Texas

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] can't eject cd after burning

2003-03-21 Thread Richard Urwin
On Friday 21 Mar 2003 5:11 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
 I don't know about GUI's, but all my CL solutions (biso, bacd,
 bdcd) contain 'eject'.  ie,
 alias bdcd='cdrecord -v -eject speed=4 dev=0,0,0  -data'
 So the CDr is immediately ejected right after fixating is
 finished.  Then to check the CD, I push the drawer back in and bring
 it up in a terminal and do a 'ls' on it, or use a file manager like
 Konqueror. Then I either wait a while, or if I'm impatient, use
 'eject /dev/scd0' to retrieve it.

'man eject' says If the device is currently mounted, it is
 unmounted before ejecting.  Maybe in your case it's havin trouble
 over riding Konq's hold?  Doesn't happen to me, I suspect it could be
 permissions. What's your msec level?  I run at msec 2 just so my
 system doesn't argue with me about what I wanna do ;  To tell the
 truth, 'bout the only time my burner won't give up a CD is after doin
 'md5sum /dev/scd0' to check the integrity of burned iso's. 'eject'
 always gets it for me tho ;)

msec is 3.
The eject option is probably the way to go. The disk is reinserted as a valid 
filesystem rather than suddenly turning into one.
-- 
Richard Urwin

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] can't eject cd after burning

2003-03-21 Thread A V Flinsch
On Friday 21 March 2003 10:53 am, Richard Urwin wrote:


 Supermount was enabled at all times.

 Conclusion: Burning CDs can confuse supermount. Expect to mount/umount
 by hand. Wait for the drive to finish following a failed eject.


What is happining is the following
cd is finished burning (but not mounted)
supermount sees that a valid cd is in the drive, and then mounts it
cd is now mounted.

This is one of the main reasons that i do not use supermount.


-- 
Alex / KC2IVL 
ft100 software for Linux http://www.qsl.net/kc2ivl
Good judgment comes from experience, 
  and a lot of that comes from bad judgment


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[newbie] USB ports

2003-03-21 Thread Teilhard Knight
Hello. First time I post here. I find it rather to our disadvantage that we 
newbies are kept packed together. Sometimes we have problems which need the 
intervention of an experienced user. But anyway, I'll try to keep my 
questions not too complicated.

Problem is, my Mandrake doesn't recognize my USB ports. When I installed, they 
were disabled in the BIOS. I do not have the slightest idea of how they got 
disabled. Now, I have a USB printer, and I want to have it local, so I need 
those ports. Any suggestions on how to solve this?


Teilhard Knight
The Extraterrestrial

Who ate my sandwich?

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] VMWare Installation Questions

2003-03-21 Thread Bart Salien
Op Friday 21 March 2003 16:03, schreef Brian:

Brian ,

I 've got VMware working after installing glibc-devel-2.2.5-16mdk.i586.rpm .

goto  http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/index.html for this rpm .

greets ,

Bart.


 Hello All,

 I am installing VMWare 3.2 and I am being asked for some information
 that i do not know.  I am running a fairly out-of-the-box installation
 of Mandrake 9.0 and I am being asked the location of the C header files
 that match my running kernel.  Does anyone know where I would find these?

 thanks,
 Brian


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[newbie] USB ports

2003-03-21 Thread Teilhard Knight
Hello. First time I post here. I find it rather to our disadvantage that we 
newbies are kept packed together. Sometimes we have problems which need the 
intervention of an experienced user. But anyway, I'll try to keep my 
questions not too complicated.

Problem is, my Mandrake doesn't recognize my USB ports. When I installed, they 
were disabled in the BIOS. I do not have the slightest idea of how they got 
disabled. Now, I have a USB printer, and I want to have it local, so I need 
those ports. Any suggestions on how to solve this?


Teilhard Knight
The Extraterrestrial

Who ate my sandwich?


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] USB ports

2003-03-21 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Friday 21 March 2003 20:54, Teilhard Knight wrote:
 Hello. First time I post here. I find it rather to our disadvantage that we
 newbies are kept packed together. Sometimes we have problems which need the
 intervention of an experienced user. But anyway, I'll try to keep my
 questions not too complicated.

Don't let the name fool youthis list is frequented by some very honourable  
linux veterans as well as extremely savvy newbies:o)

I'ts more a description of the kind of topics to be expected here.
  
 Problem is, my Mandrake doesn't recognize my USB ports. When I installed,
 they were disabled in the BIOS. I do not have the slightest idea of how
 they got disabled. Now, I have a USB printer, and I want to have it local,
 so I need those ports. Any suggestions on how to solve this?

Just enable them there and Mdk should see the ports just fine and you'll be 
able to configure your printer.

Good luck,
HarM




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] can't eject cd after burning

2003-03-21 Thread Miark
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 13:05:22 -0500
A V Flinsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 What is happining is the following
 cd is finished burning (but not mounted)
 supermount sees that a valid cd is in the drive, and then mounts it
 cd is now mounted.
 
 This is one of the main reasons that i do not use supermount.


This is not a global problem, though. I've always used supermount with
Mandrake and never had a problem with locked trays (or anything else,
for that matter).

Miark

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Configuring X-CD-Roast

2003-03-21 Thread Pilaga
El Jue 20 Mar 2003 08:05, Tsur, Oren escribió:
 Hi All

 Before I start, I am using KDE under MDK 9.0 -

 1) How do I get X-CD-Roast to see my DVD-ROM drive? I want to use it as
 primary or secondary reading device. When I go into
 set up it shows my cd-rw as the recording device (which is fineda)
 but in the reading device I can only see the recorder drive again.
 Many thanks, Oren

Oren: From www.xcdroast.org, download the last version (0.98alpha13), and you 
don't need SCSI emulate your DVD reader.

Suerte.

pilagá
--
Taken from FAQ:

/28. That new ATAPI mode causes problems! Should I use it?/

That new ATAPI mode is enabled by default in X-CD-Roast on linux.
It requires a kernel 2.4.x and is able to access ATAPI devices directly
through the IDE driver, without the help of SCSI emulation.
However, that mode is still experimental and causes some problems.
Using a CD writer in that mode is not recommended - please use always
SCSI emulation here. The ATAPI mode on a writer will cause great delays
in all X-CD-Roast operations, because communication with a device takes
much more time. You will also notice a lot of driver errors in your
system log files. This seems to be normal.

You can tell X-CD-Roast to ignore the ATAPI mode when you start it with the
-a option.

There is also no DMA transfer supported at all though the ATAPI interface.

On some not correctly installed machines X-CD-Roast will find your devices
both via SCSI emulation and via ATAPI - they are displayed double in the
setup. Things could work nevertheless, but use the scsi-emulated devices
only then. (The devices without the ATAPI:-marking)

Conclusion: Use your writer only with SCSI emulation, but a normal CD/DVD-ROM
  drive as read only device will work fine in ATAPI mode. This is also the
  default setup for many Linux distributions.

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Starting MySQL at boot time

2003-03-21 Thread Joan Tur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Es Divendres 21 Març 2003 05:45, en Joeb va escriure:
 This is in 9.1, but I think it holds true for 9.0, also.  Go to the
 Mandrake Control Center, and go to the System option.  From there, there
 should be an option called DrakServices.  Select it and it gives you all
 the various services installed.  Select the one for MySQL and tell it to
 start at boot.
That doesn't work in 9.0: it is selected but mysql service is stopped after 
reboot...

- -- 
  Joan Tur. Eivissa-Spain
 AOL quini2k,  ICQ 11407395
www.ClubIbosim.org
Linux: usuari registrat 190.783
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+e4Ycok8j9RhtetwRAqd1AKCoXkFMBqZjA63rNNHjkkn81viu0gCggQA3
4eVaCEbYn/BAkXdGsE75AMo=
=k3v5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[newbie] supermount

2003-03-21 Thread R.L.M.
Both my CDROM and Floppy are set to supermount.  CDROM works fine, but
my Floppy is giving me errors... input/output error, you do not have
permission, etc.  Any idea why my floppy isn't working (I just got a new
one thinking it was the floppy itself..)?

Rachel


On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 16:24, Miark wrote:
 On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 13:05:22 -0500
 A V Flinsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  What is happining is the following
  cd is finished burning (but not mounted)
  supermount sees that a valid cd is in the drive, and then mounts it
  cd is now mounted.
  
  This is one of the main reasons that i do not use supermount.
 
 
 This is not a global problem, though. I've always used supermount with
 Mandrake and never had a problem with locked trays (or anything else,
 for that matter).
 
 Miark
 
 
 

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-- 
-- Rachel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) of RachelDesigns.com --
-
Are you a Christian Mother?  Please come and join us at..
--- www.Christian-Mommies.com ---



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Starting MySQL at boot time

2003-03-21 Thread Adolfo Bello
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 17:37, Joan Tur wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Es Divendres 21 Març 2003 05:45, en Joeb va escriure:
  This is in 9.1, but I think it holds true for 9.0, also.  Go to the
  Mandrake Control Center, and go to the System option.  From there, there
  should be an option called DrakServices.  Select it and it gives you all
  the various services installed.  Select the one for MySQL and tell it to
  start at boot.
 That doesn't work in 9.0: it is selected but mysql service is stopped after 
 reboot...
It didn't work for me either.

My first solution was to insert the line:
service mysql start
at the end of /etc/rc.d/rc.local

It worked.

Then, reading this list, I learned of chkconfig. Enter:
chkconfig --level 35 mysql on

My recommendation is to use chkconfig and forget about adding lines to
rc.local. Anyway, they both work.

HTH
-- 
__   
   / \\   @   __ __@   Adolfo Bello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  /  //  // /\   / \\   // \  //   Bello Ingenieria S.A, ICQ: 65910258
 /  \\  // / \\ /  //  //  / //celular: +58 416 609-6213
/___// // / _/ \__\\ //__/ // fax: +58 212 952-6797
www.bisapi.com   //pager  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] supermount

2003-03-21 Thread Miark
On 21 Mar 2003 16:41:25 -0500
R.L.M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Both my CDROM and Floppy are set to supermount.  CDROM works fine, but
 my Floppy is giving me errors... input/output error, you do not have
 permission, etc.  Any idea why my floppy isn't working (I just got a new
 one thinking it was the floppy itself..)?

Are you able to manually mount it (after turning off supermount) ?

Miark 

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[newbie] Windows more secure than Linux

2003-03-21 Thread Kaj Haulrich
Hi all...

For the last 7 years or so I thought that Windows had no 
security at all. Until today.

But first things first : I don't have Windows on my box. In 
no way, manner, shape or form. Only Mandrake 9.0.

Well, a modification is needed here :

My box is set up with 4 users : My ever-beloved wife, my two 
daughters and the man himself. (Our two cats use it as 
well, but only because it's a nice, warm place to take a 
nap).

We respect each others privacy. Accordingly the 
security-level is set to *high*. We can't peep into each 
others stuff. Fine. But we have a lot in common. We have 
various family-related stuff, letters, and the family 
photo-album.

Now, the last time the *sysadmin* (me) installed Mandrake he 
wanted to show off : creating a *common* partition on the 
80 GB drive. In fact, besides the usual / , swap and /home 
partitions - all ReiserFS - he created a fourth : a FAT32 
partition (/dev/hda4). The reason for FAT32 (VFAT) was 
simple : a Windows-FS. No permission issues, no security at 
all, free access to everyone, everything in public, 
belly-up.

Surprise, surprise. Initially everything was perfect, but 
after a few weeks the FAT32 partition seems to close its 
*Gates*. - Normally it would have *dwrxrwxrwx* permissions, 
meaning that it was showing off nude in public. But maybe 
it's getting shy : now the permission are *dwrxr-xr-x*, 
meaning that only root (me again) can write to it.

That - of course - triggered my filthy phantasy. I tried to 
become root and change the permissions by issuing the 
command : chmod 777 * .

Guess what ?  : No effect at all ! 

Then : chmod u+w * .. : Operation not permitted 

And so on and so forth.

Conclusion : Bill Gates finally found a way to defeat even a 
linux - ROOT. 

At least on my box.

Kaj Haulrich.
-- 
Registered Linux user  # 214073 at http://counter.li.org
Powered by Linux  -  Mandrake 9.0 - kernel 2.4.19.24
Brought to you from my 100 % Micro$oft-free computer. 

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] supermount

2003-03-21 Thread Benjamin Jeeves
Hi Rachel

I have had that problem to with my floppy but found it to be the disk. Ones 
that I have used on a windows system are the main problem but found that if I 
format them on the Linux box it works fine. If it had info I need then I 
would try a different computer that work for me too.

On Friday 21 Mar 2003 9:41 pm, R.L.M. wrote:
 Both my CDROM and Floppy are set to supermount.  CDROM works fine, but
 my Floppy is giving me errors... input/output error, you do not have
 permission, etc.  Any idea why my floppy isn't working (I just got a new
 one thinking it was the floppy itself..)?

 Rachel

 On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 16:24, Miark wrote:
  On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 13:05:22 -0500
 
  A V Flinsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   What is happining is the following
   cd is finished burning (but not mounted)
   supermount sees that a valid cd is in the drive, and then mounts it
   cd is now mounted.
  
   This is one of the main reasons that i do not use supermount.
 
  This is not a global problem, though. I've always used supermount with
  Mandrake and never had a problem with locked trays (or anything else,
  for that matter).
 
  Miark
 
  
 
 
  Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
  Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

-- 
Thank You



Benjamin Jeeves

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Windows more secure than Linux

2003-03-21 Thread Francisco Alcaraz Ariza

Kaj, 

Try to pass an scandisk to your windows partition, I had a similar problem 
long times ago due to disk-error; mandrake couldn't write in the partition 
but after pass an scandisk windows detected several errors and repaired it. 
Until that moment mandrake could again write on the windows partition.

So, windows was writing on a partition with problems, mandrake didn't that.


 Guess what ?  : No effect at all !

 Then : chmod u+w * .. : Operation not permitted 

 And so on and so forth.

 Conclusion : Bill Gates finally found a way to defeat even a
 linux - ROOT.

 At least on my box.

 Kaj Haulrich.

-- 
Francisco Alcaraz Ariza
Departamento de Biología Vegetal
Universidad de Murcia
E-30100 Murcia
España (Spain)

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Fw: [newbie] Linux+ certification???

2003-03-21 Thread Christopher Steimer

- Original Message - 
From: T E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Christopher Steimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Linux+ certification???


 I too have this question.  I like certifications
 becuase they give you a goal to strive for and also
 teach you much along the way =)
 
 Chris, I've heard the LPI exam is pretty good too. 
 But like you, I've been thinking of the Linux+ as
 well.  Don't know if I'd recommend the RHCE tho...
 
 Does anyone know of other Linux certs out there? And
 can any of you recommend them??
 
 TIA
 
 
 --- Christopher Steimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I was wondering if anyone had any advice or opinions
  about the Linux+ certification.  I am new to Linux
  and just graduated from Penn State and while I'm
  trying to find a job, I have decided to tackle
  Linux.  All suggestions and comments would be
  greatly appreciated (job offers are accepted as
  well...HAHA)
  
  Thank you
 
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
 http://platinum.yahoo.com
 

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Windows more secure than Linux

2003-03-21 Thread Miark
Kaj,

You can't change permisions on VFAT filesystems from the commandline. You
have to specify it at mount time. Make sure your fstab entries have 
umask=0 0 0.

Miark




On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:08:02 +0100
Kaj Haulrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all...
 
 For the last 7 years or so I thought that Windows had no 
 security at all. Until today.
 
 But first things first : I don't have Windows on my box. In 
 no way, manner, shape or form. Only Mandrake 9.0.
 
 Well, a modification is needed here :
 
 My box is set up with 4 users : My ever-beloved wife, my two 
 daughters and the man himself. (Our two cats use it as 
 well, but only because it's a nice, warm place to take a 
 nap).
 
 We respect each others privacy. Accordingly the 
 security-level is set to *high*. We can't peep into each 
 others stuff. Fine. But we have a lot in common. We have 
 various family-related stuff, letters, and the family 
 photo-album.
 
 Now, the last time the *sysadmin* (me) installed Mandrake he 
 wanted to show off : creating a *common* partition on the 
 80 GB drive. In fact, besides the usual / , swap and /home 
 partitions - all ReiserFS - he created a fourth : a FAT32 
 partition (/dev/hda4). The reason for FAT32 (VFAT) was 
 simple : a Windows-FS. No permission issues, no security at 
 all, free access to everyone, everything in public, 
 belly-up.
 
 Surprise, surprise. Initially everything was perfect, but 
 after a few weeks the FAT32 partition seems to close its 
 *Gates*. - Normally it would have *dwrxrwxrwx* permissions, 
 meaning that it was showing off nude in public. But maybe 
 it's getting shy : now the permission are *dwrxr-xr-x*, 
 meaning that only root (me again) can write to it.
 
 That - of course - triggered my filthy phantasy. I tried to 
 become root and change the permissions by issuing the 
 command : chmod 777 * .
 
 Guess what ?  : No effect at all ! 
 
 Then : chmod u+w * .. : Operation not permitted 
 
 And so on and so forth.
 
 Conclusion : Bill Gates finally found a way to defeat even a 
 linux - ROOT. 
 
 At least on my box.
 
 Kaj Haulrich.
 -- 
 Registered Linux user  # 214073 at http://counter.li.org
 Powered by Linux  -  Mandrake 9.0 - kernel 2.4.19.24
 Brought to you from my 100 % Micro$oft-free computer. 
 
 

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] USB ports

2003-03-21 Thread Derek Jennings
On Friday 21 Mar 2003 7:41 pm, Teilhard Knight wrote:
 Hello. First time I post here. I find it rather to our disadvantage that we
 newbies are kept packed together. Sometimes we have problems which need the
 intervention of an experienced user. But anyway, I'll try to keep my
 questions not too complicated.

 Problem is, my Mandrake doesn't recognize my USB ports. When I installed,
 they were disabled in the BIOS. I do not have the slightest idea of how
 they got disabled. Now, I have a USB printer, and I want to have it local,
 so I need those ports. Any suggestions on how to solve this?


 Teilhard Knight
 The Extraterrestrial

 Who ate my sandwich?

Well assuming you have now enabled the ports in BIOS, edit the file 
/etc/modules.conf and add a line

probeall usb-interface uhci

If that does not work replace uhci with ohci to use the 'other' usb driver

Then just go through the printer wizard in Mandrake Control Centre and it will 
install your printer for you.

HTH

derek
-- 
--
www.jennings.homelinux.net

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Windows more secure than Linux

2003-03-21 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Friday 21 March 2003 11:38 pm, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza 
wrote:
 Kaj,

 Try to pass an scandisk to your windows partition, I had
 a similar problem long times ago due to disk-error;
 mandrake couldn't write in the partition but after pass
 an scandisk windows detected several errors and repaired
 it. Until that moment mandrake could again write on the
 windows partition.


Well Francisco, thanks. But I don't have Windows or 
Scandisk. I don't think that's the issue. What I mean is : 
a FAT32 filesystem (windows) is not supposed to have any 
security at all. The problem - if you can call it that - is 
within the Mandrake security system :

Normally a *root* account can do anything, including 
destroying everything. However, Mandrake has added some 
restrictions to protect you from yourself. One of those is 
the msec package. Another is Shorewall. 

Obviously it is a Mandrake problem. Of course a FAT32 
filesystem can't be secure. But I think the Mandrake-team 
figured that Windows-refugees needed some protection 
against themselves : not loosing their *precious* ( sorry, 
Tolkien-addicted) files.

So, my guess is that Mandrake took some - overly - 
precautions not to alter Windows file systems. I I can't - 
for the  of me - figure out how they did it ?

But it works : I can't do my root-jobs on a 
Windows-partition !

Kaj Haulrich.
-- 
Registered Linux user  # 214073 at http://counter.li.org
Powered by Linux  -  Mandrake 9.0 - kernel 2.4.19.24
Brought to you from my 100 % Micro$oft-free computer. 

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Windows more secure than Linux

2003-03-21 Thread et
On Friday 21 March 2003 05:08 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
 Hi all...

 For the last 7 years or so I thought that Windows had no
 security at all. Until today.

 But first things first : I don't have Windows on my box. In
 no way, manner, shape or form. Only Mandrake 9.0.

 Well, a modification is needed here :

 My box is set up with 4 users : My ever-beloved wife, my two
 daughters and the man himself. (Our two cats use it as
 well, but only because it's a nice, warm place to take a
 nap).

 We respect each others privacy. Accordingly the
 security-level is set to *high*. We can't peep into each
 others stuff. Fine. But we have a lot in common. We have
 various family-related stuff, letters, and the family
 photo-album.

 Now, the last time the *sysadmin* (me) installed Mandrake he
 wanted to show off : creating a *common* partition on the
 80 GB drive. In fact, besides the usual / , swap and /home
 partitions - all ReiserFS - he created a fourth : a FAT32
 partition (/dev/hda4). The reason for FAT32 (VFAT) was
 simple : a Windows-FS. No permission issues, no security at
 all, free access to everyone, everything in public,
 belly-up.

 Surprise, surprise. Initially everything was perfect, but
 after a few weeks the FAT32 partition seems to close its
 *Gates*. - Normally it would have *dwrxrwxrwx* permissions,
 meaning that it was showing off nude in public. But maybe
 it's getting shy : now the permission are *dwrxr-xr-x*,
 meaning that only root (me again) can write to it.

 That - of course - triggered my filthy phantasy. I tried to
 become root and change the permissions by issuing the
 command : chmod 777 * .

 Guess what ?  : No effect at all !

 Then : chmod u+w * .. : Operation not permitted 

 And so on and so forth.

 Conclusion : Bill Gates finally found a way to defeat even a
 linux - ROOT.

 At least on my box.

 Kaj Haulrich.
were you changing permissions on the fils? try changing the mount points (ie. 
chmod 777 /mnt/fatpartitionnamegoeshere
-- 
Linux counter number 167806

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Windows more secure than Linux

2003-03-21 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Saturday 22 March 2003 12:09 am, Miark wrote:
 Kaj,

 You can't change permisions on VFAT filesystems from the
 commandline. You have to specify it at mount time. Make
 sure your fstab entries have umask=0 0 0.

 Miark


Thanks Miark - that did the trick !

Kaj Haulrich.
-- 
Registered Linux user  # 214073 at http://counter.li.org
Powered by Linux  -  Mandrake 9.0 - kernel 2.4.19.24
Brought to you from my 100 % Micro$oft-free computer. 

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Windows more secure than Linux

2003-03-21 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Saturday 22 March 2003 12:44 am, et wrote:
 On Friday 21 March 2003 05:08 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
  Hi all...
 
  For the last 7 years or so I thought that Windows had
  no security at all. Until today.
 
  But first things first : I don't have Windows on my
  box. In no way, manner, shape or form. Only Mandrake
  9.0.
 
  Well, a modification is needed here :
 
  My box is set up with 4 users : My ever-beloved wife,
  my two daughters and the man himself. (Our two cats use
  it as well, but only because it's a nice, warm place to
  take a nap).
 
  We respect each others privacy. Accordingly the
  security-level is set to *high*. We can't peep into
  each others stuff. Fine. But we have a lot in common.
  We have various family-related stuff, letters, and the
  family photo-album.
 
  Now, the last time the *sysadmin* (me) installed
  Mandrake he wanted to show off : creating a *common*
  partition on the 80 GB drive. In fact, besides the
  usual / , swap and /home partitions - all ReiserFS - he
  created a fourth : a FAT32 partition (/dev/hda4). The
  reason for FAT32 (VFAT) was simple : a Windows-FS. No
  permission issues, no security at all, free access to
  everyone, everything in public, belly-up.
 
  Surprise, surprise. Initially everything was perfect,
  but after a few weeks the FAT32 partition seems to
  close its *Gates*. - Normally it would have
  *dwrxrwxrwx* permissions, meaning that it was showing
  off nude in public. But maybe it's getting shy : now
  the permission are *dwrxr-xr-x*, meaning that only root
  (me again) can write to it.
 
  That - of course - triggered my filthy phantasy. I
  tried to become root and change the permissions by
  issuing the command : chmod 777 * .
 
  Guess what ?  : No effect at all !
 
  Then : chmod u+w * .. : Operation not permitted
  
 
  And so on and so forth.
 
  Conclusion : Bill Gates finally found a way to defeat
  even a linux - ROOT.
 
  At least on my box.
 
  Kaj Haulrich.

 were you changing permissions on the fils? try changing
 the mount points (ie. chmod 777
 /mnt/fatpartitionnamegoeshere

Nope Ed. I actually WAS in that directroy trying to change 
permissions. 

Operation not permitted

However, I think Miark solved the issue right now : umask=0 
0 0.

Kaj Haulrich.
--
Registered Linux user  # 214073 at http://counter.li.org
Powered by Linux  -  Mandrake 9.0 - kernel 2.4.19.24
Brought to you from my 100 % Micro$oft-free computer. 

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Starting MySQL at boot time

2003-03-21 Thread Christopher Shaffer
This did the trick:

   chkconfig --level 35 mysql on

Thanks, guys.

Chris Shaffer

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] 56k modem

2003-03-21 Thread Charles Roberts
Anonymous wrote:
I've reinstalled mandrake 9, and now the modem works;
however, the symptom (being able to surf for awhile,
then for some odd reason not) remains. This happened
with Redhat 8 as well ...
I'm testing an old machine with Mandrake 9 -- it has
an ISA internal 56k modem, and DOES NOT have that
symptom...I'm using the 2 machines simultaneously (2
different phone lines, same outlet) ...
I also bought and tested another modem, and the
symptom began immediately when I connected.
Mandrake 9 must not like PCI modems? Or what do you
think?
BTW, both modems are HARDWARE modems.

What are the troubleshooting steps I need to take (if
there are any, please be specific rather than general
about how to do these tests. I'm very much a newbie).
Rita

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Rita:
 I have been using this modem for several years with no problems. If 
you would like, I can send you the output of 'setserial'.

Charles



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] is this the last mandrake?

2003-03-21 Thread Lyvim Xaphir


--- robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 I hope so. Just as long as they don't start giving releases silly names 
 like Mandrake Millenium or Mandrake PX.
 
 By the way, what does the XP in Windows XP stand for?  Where I come 
 from, it means experience points, but that can't be it, because in any 
 decent RPG, you don't get experience points for stabbing other party 
 members in the back (Paranoia being a wonderful exception that really 
 captures the atmosphere of the IT world).
 
 Sir Robin
 

eXcrement Packaged

--LX

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] is this the last mandrake?

2003-03-21 Thread David E. Fox
 I hope so. Just as long as they don't start giving releases silly names 
 like Mandrake Millenium or Mandrake PX.

Well, they could start using Roman numerals a la Superbowls. :) I
really was expecting Superbowl XXX to be renamed Superbowl 30 here in
the US, in order to dissasociate it with pornography (i.e., the
other XXX) - nevver happened.

:)

 By the way, what does the XP in Windows XP stand for?  Where I come 
 from, it means experience points, but that can't be it, because in any 

eXtra Pricey




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] is this the last mandrake?

2003-03-21 Thread David E. Fox
 I'm sure another company or group of volunteers will take it up and make 
 a new distro called, I dunno, Ginseng Linux, maybe.

Sure, and then some weed freak from the (misguided) herbs and
so-called natural/homeopathic medicine group sues. :)

About the XP thing: I just thought about it, and maybe it's not 
really supposed to stand for anything, besides added marketing
hype. Lately here in the US, there's been a trend to add random,
seemingly meaningless extra letters to a product's name and it's
mothing but market-speak. It first became popular with car tires and
has spread into other markets, such as over-the-counter or
prescription drugs. 


 America there are more geek-savvy investors). A foundation seems like a 
 better way to run a Free software project, as the FSF, GNU and Debian 

As experience with 386bsd/netbsd/freebsd has shown, that model can
fractionalize as well and get bogged down with political issues -
this does seem to be the case with the splits in the BSD camp. I'm not
saying at all that Debian will do this, though. 

 have done (I admit this also has its problems, since such foundations 
 can become isolated from end-users  - I didn't go down the Debian

It seems that Debian may be more difficult, and I wouldn't recommend
it either to a linux newbie. 

 long and prospers, but if it doesn't, the software will live on.  You 
 can't keep a good idea down.

Certainly it will. But with a good set of standards in place which I
think already might exist, it shouldn't matter so much what
distribution I install -- in other words, do we need packages for
Mandrake, Debian, Red Hat, etc., etc.,? 
 

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] File encryption software

2003-03-21 Thread David E. Fox
 pkzip under dosemu. pkzip is not open source. dosemu is.

yeah and pkzip has to be the most widely-distributed and
most-unpaid-for piece of begware in DOS :).

Be that as it may, there are open-source alternatives to pkzip under
Windows as well - but they probably won't do encryption. 

There used to be a Unix command named 'crypt' but because of over-
reactions regarding so-called munitions there doesn't seem to be an
equivalent in Linux. But file-based encryptioo should be the primary
task of such a tool; archiving is secondary. In other words, you
shouldn't need pkzip because it can encrypt a .zip file - you can
store the data any way you want, archived or no, and then just
selectively encrypt.




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com