Re: [newbie] GKrellM
Dnia wto 20. lipca 2004 14:36, Thereidos napisa: I'm having some problems turning on temperature meter in GKrellM 2.2.2. I think I might have missconfigured lm_sensors. What modules should be loaded to make it work? I've finally managed to find the right module to load. Funny, my V266B mother board is actually VT8233A which I have to run as Winbond W83627HF thru w83781d driver... -- Cezary 'Thereidos' Morga [EMAIL PROTECTED] GG# 169903 ICQ# 328-700-565 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:35:48PM +, John Richard Smith wrote: I installed gkrellm 2.1.7 off the mandrake discs, Sometimes , not every time, I get a shutdown error message about some line 254 which flashes by at great speed , and am unable to read all. I think I'm right in that it refers to gkrellmd, but I'm not entirely sure. snipote I thought *d referred to a daemon, and I don't think gkrellm acts as a daemon. Check man gkrellm and there is no mention of it running in daemon mode, or of the file you refer to in /etc/rc.d. I don't have that file in /etc/rc.d/* Are you using KDE? How are you starting gkrellm? How are you exiting? Todd Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
Todd Slater wrote: On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:35:48PM +, John Richard Smith wrote: I installed gkrellm 2.1.7 off the mandrake discs, Sometimes , not every time, I get a shutdown error message about some line 254 which flashes by at great speed , and am unable to read all. I think I'm right in that it refers to gkrellmd, but I'm not entirely sure. snipote I thought *d referred to a daemon, and I don't think gkrellm acts as a daemon. Check man gkrellm and there is no mention of it running in daemon mode, or of the file you refer to in /etc/rc.d. I don't have that file in /etc/rc.d/* No mention of a daemon in man or -help but maybe this /etc/rc.d/init.d/gkrellmd isn't really a daemon. you see when you go searching for this file it comed up/etc/rc0.d and I click on it, and it opens /etc/rc.d/init.d, so where the /rc.d bit comes from I know not. A bit odd . Are you using KDE? yes, How are you starting gkrellm? On the command line in a terminal, How are you exiting? rightmouse click the header bar to quit, or something like that. Todd However I get this message regardless of whether I have been using gkrellm, so I don't have to of had it up and running. Indeed upon first sight, I thought that's strange didn't use the thing, so it sort of suggested that maybe some other programme has been running it in the background maybe ? Just a thought. John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 05:36:28PM +0100, John Richard Smith wrote: Todd Slater wrote: On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:35:48PM +, John Richard Smith wrote: I installed gkrellm 2.1.7 off the mandrake discs, Sometimes , not every time, I get a shutdown error message about some line 254 which flashes by at great speed , and am unable to read all. I think I'm right in that it refers to gkrellmd, but I'm not entirely sure. snipote I thought *d referred to a daemon, and I don't think gkrellm acts as a daemon. Check man gkrellm and there is no mention of it running in daemon mode, or of the file you refer to in /etc/rc.d. I don't have that file in /etc/rc.d/* No mention of a daemon in man or -help but maybe this /etc/rc.d/init.d/gkrellmd isn't really a daemon. you see when you go searching for this file it comed up/etc/rc0.d and I click on it, and it opens /etc/rc.d/init.d, so where the /rc.d bit comes from I know not. A bit odd . Are you using KDE? yes, How are you starting gkrellm? On the command line in a terminal, How are you exiting? rightmouse click the header bar to quit, or something like that. Todd However I get this message regardless of whether I have been using gkrellm, so I don't have to of had it up and running. Indeed upon first sight, I thought that's strange didn't use the thing, so it sort of suggested that maybe some other programme has been running it in the background maybe ? Just a thought. I wonder what would happen if you moved that file out of /etc/rc.d and logged out and back in? I also wonder if a) this is something KDE did for you and b) does it have anything to do with being run as root? Sorry, just thinking out loud. Todd Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
Todd Slater wrote: On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 05:36:28PM +0100, John Richard Smith wrote: Todd Slater wrote: On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:35:48PM +, John Richard Smith wrote: I installed gkrellm 2.1.7 off the mandrake discs, Sometimes , not every time, I get a shutdown error message about some line 254 which flashes by at great speed , and am unable to read all. I think I'm right in that it refers to gkrellmd, but I'm not entirely sure. snipote I thought *d referred to a daemon, and I don't think gkrellm acts as a daemon. Check man gkrellm and there is no mention of it running in daemon mode, or of the file you refer to in /etc/rc.d. I don't have that file in /etc/rc.d/* No mention of a daemon in man or -help but maybe this /etc/rc.d/init.d/gkrellmd isn't really a daemon. you see when you go searching for this file it comed up/etc/rc0.d and I click on it, and it opens /etc/rc.d/init.d, so where the /rc.d bit comes from I know not. A bit odd . Are you using KDE? yes, How are you starting gkrellm? On the command line in a terminal, How are you exiting? rightmouse click the header bar to quit, or something like that. Todd However I get this message regardless of whether I have been using gkrellm, so I don't have to of had it up and running. Indeed upon first sight, I thought that's strange didn't use the thing, so it sort of suggested that maybe some other programme has been running it in the background maybe ? Just a thought. I wonder what would happen if you moved that file out of /etc/rc.d and logged out and back in? I also wonder if a) this is something KDE did for you and b) does it have anything to do with being run as root? Sorry, just thinking out loud. Todd I removed the gkrellmd from /etc/rc.d/init.d/gkrellmd and shut down and rebooted a few times without incident. Not a definative test because it always was about 50% of the time but looks promising.What would running as root have to do with it ? John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
Chris wrote: On Saturday 14 June 2003 07:54 am, Dennis Myers wrote: temp: +127.00 °C (hot:limit = +6°C, hysteresis = +5°C) ALARM (os: limit = +6°C, hysteresis = +5°C) ALARM Which I know is wrong for the temp and probably for the voltages. The memory reported is wrong, I have 256mb ram. When I rebooted awhile ago the cpu temp reported by the bios was 104F. Checking processes it shows lm_sensors is running and it shows start at boot. Another question I have is at the end of setting up lm_sensors it tells me to copy prog/init/lm_sensors.init to /etc/rc.d/init.d/lm_sensors can't find prog/init/lm_sensors but I guess since it did start at boot that this isn't necessary. My cpu info is an AMD 1.2Ghz T-Bird So, bottom line, where have I screwed up my setup Looks to me that your thermal sensors are either not detected or not there. Here are mine, and note the 3rd sensors is physically not there in the first place and so the programme makes it up. temp1: +37°C (limit = +60°C) sensor = thermistor temp2: +51.5°C (limit = +60°C, hysteresis = +50°C) sensor = thermistor temp3:+209.0°C (limit = +60°C, hysteresis = +50°C) sensor = thermistor John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
On Sunday 15 June 2003 08:06 am, Tom Brinkman wrote: to find out if your board uses a contact probe, or reads a cpu pin. Try runnin 'sensors-detect' again after lookin in bios and writing down the values you see there for voltages, fans, and temps. You should see within +/- 10% of these values when you're up and runnin. Voltages might drop a little under load, temp should be a few degrees C higher, several or more if you're usin F, shortly after booting nito the OS. Mass of the heatsink's base has a lot to do with this. If you're usin 'lm80' in rc.local, try 'lm75', or vice versa. lm75 should be better for kt133 chipsets. Tom, went to the site for my mobo, and checked on which model supports hardware monitoring, seems mine doesn't (I assume this is what I'm looking for)? My model is a FIC AZ11E. If I'm looking at the wrong thing, let me know and I'll continue my search. Which FIC motherboards support hardware monitoring? 1/1/2001 A: Hardware monitoring has two categories, those are CPU Thermal Protection and CPU/System Fan Control. The former checks when the CPU temperature is above safe range and sends a signal to turn on the system fan and slow down the CPU speed to let the temperature to go down. The latter lets the motherboard detect the voltage value and monitor the CPU fan and system fan working status. Model CPU Thermal Protect CPU/System Fan Control Voltage Report Chassis Intrusion VA-502 No No No No VA-503 Yes* Yes* Yes* No VA-503+ Yes* Yes* Yes* No VT-503 Yes* Yes* Yes* No PA-2007 Optional** (AD22105 chip) Optional (AD22105 chip) No No PT-2007 Optional (AD22105 chip) Optional (AD22105 chip) No No PA-2010+ Optional (AD22105 chip) Optional (AD22105 chip) No No PA-2011 Yes (AD22105 chip) Yes (AD22105 chip) No No PT-2011 PCB3.1/3.2 Yes (LM75 chip) Yes (LM75 chip) Yes (LM78 chip) No PA-2012 Optional (LM75 chip) Optional (LM75 chip) Optional (LM78 chip) No PT-2012 Optional (LM75 chip) Optional (LM75 chip) Optional (LM78 chip) No VL-601 Optional (LM75 chip) Optional (LM75 chip) Optional (LM78 chip) No VL-603 Yes Yes Yes No VB-601 Optional Optional Optional No KL-6011 Yes Yes Yes Yes KN-6000 Yes Yes Yes Yes KN-6010 Yes Yes Yes Yes -- Regards Chris Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org 8:41am up 12:40, 2 users, load average: 0.11, 0.10, 0.09 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 08:23:05 +0100 John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: note the 3rd sensors is physically not there in the first place and so the programme makes it up. temp3:+209.0°C (limit = +60°C, hysteresis = +50°C) sensor = too bad, you could cook your breakfast on there, and then some! Honey, get the rotisserie! Let's do a roast of beef! LOL... -- Joehill Registered Linux user #282046 Homepage: http://nodex.sytes.net 11:45:12 up 12:25, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
On Sunday June 15 2003 08:47 am, Chris wrote: On Sunday 15 June 2003 08:06 am, Tom Brinkman wrote: to find out if your board uses a contact probe, or reads a cpu pin. Try runnin 'sensors-detect' again after lookin in bios and writing down the values you see there for voltages, fans, and temps. You should see within +/- 10% of these values when you're up and runnin. Voltages might drop a little under load, temp should be a few degrees C higher, several or more if you're usin F, shortly after booting nito the OS. Mass of the heatsink's base has a lot to do with this. If you're usin 'lm80' in rc.local, try 'lm75', or vice versa. lm75 should be better for kt133 chipsets. Tom, went to the site for my mobo, and checked on which model supports hardware monitoring, seems mine doesn't (I assume this is what I'm looking for)? My model is a FIC AZ11E. If I'm looking at the wrong thing, let me know and I'll continue my search. Didn't sound right so I went to FIC's site and for the AZ11e it says, Hardware Monitoring: Temperature/ Voltage/ System fan control monitoring. Bottom line is what does it show in your bios on the 'Health Monitoring' page? If there's nothin in bios, then the board (or bios) doesn't support hardware monitoring. If you see monitoring values in bios, then it definitely does. 'Course it wouldn't be the first time things are advertised but not delivered ;) Was this a ready made system? Often OEM ONLY Spec boards drop features. http://www.fica.com/site/html/products/mb/detail.asp?C_ID=24068cat_id=24049 OK, so I'm bored waitin for the race to come on TV ;) I d/l'd the AZ11e's manual. Chapter 3, page 25, it shows the bios' Health Status page. Sort'a bare bones, only the cpu temp, cpu fan speed, and case fan speed are reported. No voltages. You won't get fan speeds unless you've got 3 wire fans and the case fan is plugged into the mobo header for it, not the PSU. If you do have the fans connected 3-wire to the mobo, edit sensors.conf and change the divisor to 2 for both. Try my suggestions above to get cpu temp workin. I've had to run sensor-detect a few times in the past in order to get the correct recognition. It won't hurt to run it multiple times. I'm almost sure you should use 'modprobe lm75' in rc.local regardless of what sensors-detect suggests. While you're lookin in the case, note the PSU watts and brand/ model number. Check it against AMD's recommended list. If it's not there, and at least 300w, I suggest you invest in one that is. Most come suitable for use with P4's too (special connector), so you'll be able to use it in a future system. Whether you stick with AMD or get a P4. -- Tom Brinkman Corpus Christi, Texas Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
On Sunday 15 June 2003 10:58 am, Tom Brinkman wrote: While you're lookin in the case, note the PSU watts and brand/ model number. Check it against AMD's recommended list. If it's not there, and at least 300w, I suggest you invest in one that is. Most come suitable for use with P4's too (special connector), so you'll be able to use it in a future system. Whether you stick with AMD or get a P4. It works!!! The pc health shows cpu temp, mobo temp, fan speed and voltages. The power supply btw is an Enermax 330W max and says it meets P4 specs. I rewrote my rc.local and ran the script as root and voila, gkrellm reports everything. Thanks for the help Tom, its people like you and others on this list that make learning linux easier. Chris -- Regards Chris Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org 11:56am up 27 min, 2 users, load average: 0.03, 0.05, 0.03 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 01:46, JoeHill wrote: On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 08:23:05 +0100 John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: note the 3rd sensors is physically not there in the first place and so the programme makes it up. temp3:+209.0°C (limit = +60°C, hysteresis = +50°C) sensor = too bad, you could cook your breakfast on there, and then some! Honey, get the rotisserie! Let's do a roast of beef! LOL... (And to think that my CPU temp never gets above 40C) -- Mon Jun 16 07:20:00 EST 2003 07:20:00 up 2 days, 14:34, 3 users, load average: 0.09, 0.24, 0.20 - |____ |kuhn media australia| | /-oo /| |'-. |http://kma.0catch.com | | .\__/ || | | || | _ / `._ \|_|_.-' |stephen kuhn| | | / \__.`=._) (_ | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | - linux user #:267497 linux machine #:194239 * MDK 9.1 RH 7.3 Mandrake Linux Kernel 2.4.21-11mdk Cooker for i586 - * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer * At the end of the semester you will recall having enrolled in a course at the beginning of the semester--and never attending. -- Laws of Applied Terror n6 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
On Sunday June 15 2003 12:06 pm, Chris wrote: It works!!! The pc health shows cpu temp, mobo temp, fan speed and voltages. The power supply btw is an Enermax 330W max and says it meets P4 specs. I rewrote my rc.local and ran the script as root and voila, gkrellm reports everything. Thanks for the help Tom, its people like you and others on this list that make learning linux easier. Chris Enermax is currently one'a the best, sounds great! Does it also have the special P4 connector? But, not sure from your success (BTW, congratulations ;) what fixed it? Please tell us just what you did, so others on the list might know. The manual said only cpu temp an fan speeds, but the picture sort'a indicated some voltages too, as the web site also stated. Do you get 'em? Was it just re-rerunin 'sensors-detect'? Was it usin 'lm75'? ...an so on. Anyhow, it points to the old adage... never give up ;) Now you can configure gkrellm to display just what you want. FWIW, I only concern my self with cpu temp and the cpu load gauge. I run it so just those two functions just fit on any window's title bar, positioned on the right side near the minimize, reduce, close buttons. All desktops, always on top, auto starts with KDE. The load gauge turns red an slaps me in the face when I do somethin that causes 100% cpu usage or processes gone wild. Both of which you don't wanna let go unchecked very too long. The temp gauge reminds me I need to turn the house's A/C temp down some, or clean the cpu's fan/heatsink. I'm lazy, I just run the A/C a little lower ;) -- Tom Brinkman Corpus Christi, Texas Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
On Sunday 15 June 2003 04:59 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote: Enermax is currently one'a the best, sounds great! Does it also have the special P4 connector? Sure does, But, not sure from your success (BTW, congratulations ;) what fixed it? Please tell us just what you did, so others on the list might know. The manual said only cpu temp an fan speeds, but the picture sort'a indicated some voltages too, as the web site also stated. Do you get 'em? Was it just re-rerunin 'sensors-detect'? Was it usin 'lm75'? ...an so on. Anyhow, it points to the old adage... never give up ;) Basiscally I just changed lm80 to lm75 in rc.local after making sure I had everything typed in correctly. Ran the rc.local script, then I ran sensors again and all the correct temps, voltages and fan speed showed up. I didn't have to use the lm_sensors plugin for gkrellm, I'm using the built-in and the temps reported are the same. I thank you again for your help. Chris -- Regards Chris Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org 5:14pm up 5:45, 2 users, load average: 0.03, 0.04, 0.00 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
On Saturday 14 June 2003 10:48 am, Chris wrote: Gkrellm is installed, however none of the plug-ins appear to be. When trying to install the plugins from my 9.0 cds I get everything installed. The dir /usr/lib/gkrellm/plugins is empty which is where I assume they are supposed to be located. Any advice? Do you have lm-sensors installed? If not install it. If you do, did you run (as root) sensors-detect? If not, run that and follow the prompts, with the instructions at the end carefully. Lm-sensors/gkrellm works great here. (some of the stuff you can do will depends on your motherboard, btw). -- /\ Dark Lord \/ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 09:48:39 -0500 Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: When trying to install the plugins from my 9.0 cds I get everything installed IIRC, this is a bug in 9.0, you may need to use the software manager in MCC -- Joehill Registered Linux user #282046 Homepage: http://nodex.sytes.net 12:07:44 up 11 days, 10:11, 4 users, load average: 0.02, 0.01, 0.00 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
On Saturday 14 June 2003 11:08 am, JoeHill wrote: On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 09:48:39 -0500 Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: When trying to install the plugins from my 9.0 cds I get everything installed IIRC, this is a bug in 9.0, you may need to use the software manager in MCC Just tried that Joe, if the gkrellm-plugins is checked I get everything installed, if its not checked the install goes ok, but no plugins. -- Regards Chris Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org 12:19pm up 3 days, 5:55, 4 users, load average: 0.05, 0.11, 0.05 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
On Saturday 14 June 2003 01:20 pm, Chris wrote: On Saturday 14 June 2003 11:08 am, JoeHill wrote: On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 09:48:39 -0500 Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: When trying to install the plugins from my 9.0 cds I get everything installed IIRC, this is a bug in 9.0, you may need to use the software manager in MCC Just tried that Joe, if the gkrellm-plugins is checked I get everything installed, if its not checked the install goes ok, but no plugins. This is one of those rare instances where you may have to reboot, I can not find a way for the plugins to activate without a reboot. Same with lm_sensors. HTH -- Dennis M. linux user# 180842 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
On Saturday 14 June 2003 08:54 am, Dennis Myers wrote: This is one of those rare instances where you may have to reboot, I can not find a way for the plugins to activate without a reboot. Same with lm_sensors. HTH Actually, I've been able to get it to work after installing by (as root) doing: /etc/rc.d/rc.local Seems to work here. -- /\ Dark Lord \/ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
On Saturday 14 June 2003 07:54 am, Dennis Myers wrote: This is one of those rare instances where you may have to reboot, I can not find a way for the plugins to activate without a reboot. Same with lm_sensors. HTH Dennis, got lm_sensors installed, got the gkrellm sensor plugin installed, setup, but temp/fan readings aren't correct. If I run 'sensors' from the cl I get: [EMAIL PROTECTED] chris]$ sensors lm80-i2c-0-2d Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000 Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter +5V: +4.55 V (min = +4.74 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM VTT: +1.64 V (min = +1.90 V, max = +2.10 V) ALARM +3.3V: +2.50 V (min = +3.13 V, max = +3.46 V) ALARM +Vcore:+3.01 V (min = +1.80 V, max = +1.99 V) ALARM +12V: +13.26 V (min = +11.37 V, max = +12.57 V) ALARM -12V: -9.56 V (min = -12.41 V, max = -11.20 V) -5V: -3.77 V (min = -5.16 V, max = -4.64 V) ALARM fan1: 10629 RPM (min = 6000 RPM, div = 1) fan2: 9642 RPM (min = 6000 RPM, div = 1) temp: +127.00 °C (hot:limit = +6°C, hysteresis = +5°C) ALARM (os: limit = +6°C, hysteresis = +5°C) ALARM alarms: Board temperature input (LM75) ALARM alarms: Chassis intrusion detection ALARM eeprom-i2c-0-50 Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000 Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter Memory type:SDRAM DIMM SPD SDRAM Size (MB):128 eeprom-i2c-0-51 Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000 Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter Memory type:SDRAM DIMM SPD SDRAM Size (MB):128 Which I know is wrong for the temp and probably for the voltages. The memory reported is wrong, I have 256mb ram. When I rebooted awhile ago the cpu temp reported by the bios was 104F. Checking processes it shows lm_sensors is running and it shows start at boot. Another question I have is at the end of setting up lm_sensors it tells me to copy prog/init/lm_sensors.init to /etc/rc.d/init.d/lm_sensors can't find prog/init/lm_sensors but I guess since it did start at boot that this isn't necessary. My cpu info is an AMD 1.2Ghz T-Bird So, bottom line, where have I screwed up my setup? Thanks for any help -- Regards Chris Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org 5:09pm up 28 min, 2 users, load average: 0.06, 0.09, 0.08 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
On Saturday 14 June 2003 05:25 pm, Chris wrote: On Saturday 14 June 2003 07:54 am, Dennis Myers wrote: This is one of those rare instances where you may have to reboot, I can not find a way for the plugins to activate without a reboot. Same with lm_sensors. HTH Dennis, got lm_sensors installed, got the gkrellm sensor plugin installed, setup, but temp/fan readings aren't correct. If I run 'sensors' from the cl I get: [EMAIL PROTECTED] chris]$ sensors snip SDRAM Size (MB):128 eeprom-i2c-0-51 Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000 Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter Memory type:SDRAM DIMM SPD SDRAM Size (MB):128 Which I know is wrong for the temp and probably for the voltages. The memory reported is wrong, I have 256mb ram. When I rebooted awhile ago the cpu temp reported by the bios was 104F. Checking processes it shows lm_sensors is running and it shows start at boot. Another question I have is at the end of setting up lm_sensors it tells me to copy prog/init/lm_sensors.init to /etc/rc.d/init.d/lm_sensors can't find prog/init/lm_sensors but I guess since it did start at boot that this isn't necessary. My cpu info is an AMD 1.2Ghz T-Bird So, bottom line, where have I screwed up my setup? Thanks for any help Actually I have the message after install to copy to /etc/rc.* and modules config. What I did was a cut and paste of the text between the lines and paste the /etc/rc.* stuff into /etc/rc.d/rc.local paste it in right after the first paragraph . Then the stuff that it shows as pasting to modules.conf I do the same cut and paste of the relevent text only , in other words the stuff between the lines. Put it in /etc/modules.conf. I like kedit as my editor but to do this you have to open a console and at the prompt type in 'su' and then give the root password, then at the prompt type kedit and then in the small gui click on the open file folder icon and navigate to the /etc directory to make the changes above. You do need to do this so that it reads the sensors correctly. If need be do the sensors-detect as su again and it will take you through the whole set up once again. Once this is done you can adjust the sensors reading by changing the factor number to a decimal point value. Say to cut the temp reading in half just change the factor number to .5000 and so on. 4 decimal place adjustments can put you right on for starters but these readings are not 4 decimal places accurate. Look at them as aproximate and play it safe. HTH -- Dennis M. linux user #180842 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm
On Saturday 14 June 2003 02:53 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote: On Saturday 14 June 2003 08:54 am, Dennis Myers wrote: This is one of those rare instances where you may have to reboot, I can not find a way for the plugins to activate without a reboot. Same with lm_sensors. HTH Actually, I've been able to get it to work after installing by (as root) doing: /etc/rc.d/rc.local Seems to work here. Thanks for sharing that Ron, next time I will try doing that. Civileme always said that there is no reason to have to reboot in linux. Easy for him to say, cause he knows stuff that only he and Linus have talked about, betcha. Howsomever, your tip above is proof he is probably right. -- Dennis M. linux user #180842 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm on top
On Saturday 15 February 2003 12:53, Stephen Kuhn wrote: Keeping it on top is another issue - that depends on the WM you're using. If you're using KDE, you should be able to right-click the icon/name in the taskbar and choose SHOW ON ALL DESKTOPS (or something similar - I'm in Fluxbox now and don't want to kill all my processes) Same location, different option. To keep the window on top (in KDE), right-click on the running app in the taskbar and choose Always On Top. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm on top
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 02:37, Bill Winegarden wrote: Hi, I have gkrellm set to monitor my email. However, it has an annoying habit of automatically opening the kmail window even if it finds no new mail. I think it opens the kmail window every time it checks. Anyone else have this problem? Also, I like to have gkrellm running and I would like to know if there is setting to keep it on top. tia, Bill W. The Kmail issue should be easily resolved by going into the configuration of gKrellm (right click, configuration, etc etc) - have it check the mail, but not to run a command when mail arrives (or when clicked on). Keeping it on top is another issue - that depends on the WM you're using. If you're using KDE, you should be able to right-click the icon/name in the taskbar and choose SHOW ON ALL DESKTOPS (or something similar - I'm in Fluxbox now and don't want to kill all my processes) -- Sun, 16 Feb 2003 07:50:00 +1100 7:50am up 14:40, 4 users, load average: 0.48, 0.20, 0.39 -- |____ | kuhn media australia| | / ,, /| |'-. | http://kma.0catch.com | | .\__/ || | | |=| | _ / `._ \|_|_.-' | stephen kuhn| | | / \__.`=._) (_ | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | |/ ._/ || | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | |'. `\ | | |icq: 5483808 | | ;/ / | | | | | smk ) /_/| |.---.| | mobile: 0410-728-389| | ' `-`' | Berkeley, New South Wales, AU | -- linux user:267497 * RH 8.0 * PC/Mac/Linux/Networking/Consulting -- Trouble strikes in series of threes, but when working around the house the next job after a series of three is not the fourth job -- it's the start of a brand new series of three. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
RE: [newbie] GKRELLM and LM_SENSORS
Where did you guys get ksensors from anyway?? urpmi ksensors didn't work, so i went and got the srpm for the latest at sourceforge and tried to rebuild it.. got a rpmb directory not found message... a heads up in the right direction would be great.. rgds Frank -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Richard Smith Sent: Monday, 18 November 2002 3:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] GKRELLM and LM_SENSORS Pilagá wrote: El Dom 17 Nov 2002 18:58, John Richard Smith escribió: I just wanted to say that now that I have had time to really use both gkrellm and lm_sensors and mastered how to get the gui display up large enough to display the results to perfection I for one am impressed, and I for one, would like to see both intergrated into MCC. John Hola, John. I have changed gkrellm by ksensors. With ksensors you can dock in KDE panel the sensors that you really need, and you don't need a magnifier to see what is going there. Suerte. Yes the initial gkreallm gui is so tiny it's unreadable, but in fact it is fully reconfigurable to any size and shape you desire . Yes it takes more horsepower to display gui, but the ease with which it is possible to cover the changes in resource usage as different things happen is very helpful in understanding resource use, and in adition there is additional info in the gkreallm gui display than lm_sensors displays on it's own. John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
RE: [newbie] GKRELLM and LM_SENSORS
Title: RE: [newbie] GKRELLM and LM_SENSORS http://ksensors.sourceforge.net/ chose the redhat rpm and installed with kpackage. works fine using setup from su. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Franki Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 2:06 AM To: Newbie Subject: RE: [newbie] GKRELLM and LM_SENSORS Where did you guys get ksensors from anyway?? urpmi ksensors didn't work, so i went and got the srpm for the latest at sourceforge and tried to rebuild it.. got a rpmb directory not found message... a heads up in the right direction would be great.. rgds Frank -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Richard Smith Sent: Monday, 18 November 2002 3:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] GKRELLM and LM_SENSORS Pilagá wrote: El Dom 17 Nov 2002 18:58, John Richard Smith escribió: I just wanted to say that now that I have had time to really use both gkrellm and lm_sensors and mastered how to get the gui display up large enough to display the results to perfection I for one am impressed, and I for one, would like to see both intergrated into MCC. John Hola, John. I have changed gkrellm by ksensors. With ksensors you can dock in KDE panel the sensors that you really need, and you don't need a magnifier to see what is going there. Suerte. Yes the initial gkreallm gui is so tiny it's unreadable, but in fact it is fully reconfigurable to any size and shape you desire . Yes it takes more horsepower to display gui, but the ease with which it is possible to cover the changes in resource usage as different things happen is very helpful in understanding resource use, and in adition there is additional info in the gkreallm gui display than lm_sensors displays on it's own. John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [newbie] GKRELLM and LM_SENSORS
Myers, Dennis R NWO wrote: http://ksensors.sourceforge.net/ chose the redhat rpm and installed with kpackage. works fine using setup from su. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Franki Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 2:06 AM To: Newbie Subject: RE: [newbie] GKRELLM and LM_SENSORS Where did you guys get ksensors from anyway?? urpmi ksensors didn't work, so i went and got the srpm for the latest at sourceforge and tried to rebuild it.. got a rpmb directory not found message... a heads up in the right direction would be great.. rgds Yep, that worked for me on M9.0, I chose ksensors-0.7-2cr.i686.rpm I like it too, though I think there a few more things in gkrellm, but it's nice.I couln't find how to access ksensors at first a teminal didn't work and the /usr/bin/ksensors didn't work either , then I notices a new icon on my task bar. I also noticed a few more things on kdemenu-applications-monitoring-kde system monitoring kdemenu-applications-monitoring-kde system guard now maybe they were there before and I didn't notice them, but maybe some of these new sensors programmes put them there. John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
RE: [newbie] GKRELLM and LM_SENSORS
I got mine from the gentoo portage tree...but I'm running gentoo not Mandrake :-). Terry Smith Cape Cod USA On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 03:06, Franki wrote: Where did you guys get ksensors from anyway?? urpmi ksensors didn't work, so i went and got the srpm for the latest at sourceforge and tried to rebuild it.. got a rpmb directory not found message... a heads up in the right direction would be great.. rgds Frank -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Richard Smith Sent: Monday, 18 November 2002 3:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] GKRELLM and LM_SENSORS Pilagá wrote: El Dom 17 Nov 2002 18:58, John Richard Smith escribió: I just wanted to say that now that I have had time to really use both gkrellm and lm_sensors and mastered how to get the gui display up large enough to display the results to perfection I for one am impressed, and I for one, would like to see both intergrated into MCC. John Hola, John. I have changed gkrellm by ksensors. With ksensors you can dock in KDE panel the sensors that you really need, and you don't need a magnifier to see what is going there. Suerte. Yes the initial gkreallm gui is so tiny it's unreadable, but in fact it is fully reconfigurable to any size and shape you desire . Yes it takes more horsepower to display gui, but the ease with which it is possible to cover the changes in resource usage as different things happen is very helpful in understanding resource use, and in adition there is additional info in the gkreallm gui display than lm_sensors displays on it's own. John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] GKRELLM and LM_SENSORS
El Lun 18 Nov 2002 07:13, escribieron: I also was not able to find a version of ksensors that would cleanly install in either M8.2 or M9.0, where did you get yours. Where did you guys get ksensors from anyway?? urpmi ksensors didn't work, so i went and got the srpm for the latest at sourceforge and tried to rebuild it.. got a rpmb directory not found message... a heads up in the right direction would be great.. rgds Frank Hola, Frank y John: I d'l ksensors from http://cachalot.ods.org/RPMS/ This is a SuSe 8.0 site, but the rpm was cleanly installed here. Suerte. -- Pilagá GNU/Linux Mandrake 9.0 9:48pm up 13 min, 2 users, load average: 0.08, 0.10, 0.08 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
RE: [newbie] GKRELLM and LM_SENSORS
DOH My rpmb error message was caused by not having rpm-build and rpm-devel installed.. urpmi rpm-build rpm-devel did the job... I can build stuff now.. :-) Sometimes I can be quite the dumbass :-) rgds Frank -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pilagá Sent: Tuesday, 19 November 2002 8:58 AM To: Mandrake Linux Subject: Re: [newbie] GKRELLM and LM_SENSORS El Lun 18 Nov 2002 07:13, escribieron: I also was not able to find a version of ksensors that would cleanly install in either M8.2 or M9.0, where did you get yours. Where did you guys get ksensors from anyway?? urpmi ksensors didn't work, so i went and got the srpm for the latest at sourceforge and tried to rebuild it.. got a rpmb directory not found message... a heads up in the right direction would be great.. rgds Frank Hola, Frank y John: I d'l ksensors from http://cachalot.ods.org/RPMS/ This is a SuSe 8.0 site, but the rpm was cleanly installed here. Suerte. -- Pilagá GNU/Linux Mandrake 9.0 9:48pm up 13 min, 2 users, load average: 0.08, 0.10, 0.08 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] GKRELLM and LM_SENSORS
Mine is a K7T266 Pro2 mobo ,it seems detect everything I have. John Terry Smith wrote: John, Refresh my memory...what mobo are you running? I had lm_sensors running on my Asus A7M266 (AMD chip) but it has never worked on my Asus A7V233 (Via chip). Maybe my kernel needs reconfiguring?? Terry Smith Cape Cod USA On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 02:55, John Richard Smith wrote: Pilagá wrote: El Dom 17 Nov 2002 18:58, John Richard Smith escribió: I just wanted to say that now that I have had time to really use both gkrellm and lm_sensors and mastered how to get the gui display up large enough to display the results to perfection I for one am impressed, and I for one, would like to see both intergrated into MCC. John Hola, John. I have changed gkrellm by ksensors. With ksensors you can dock in KDE panel the sensors that you really need, and you don't need a magnifier to see what is going there. Suerte. Yes the initial gkreallm gui is so tiny it's unreadable, but in fact it is fully reconfigurable to any size and shape you desire . Yes it takes more horsepower to display gui, but the ease with which it is possible to cover the changes in resource usage as different things happen is very helpful in understanding resource use, and in adition there is additional info in the gkreallm gui display than lm_sensors displays on it's own. John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] GKRELLM and LM_SENSORS
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 08:58, John Richard Smith wrote: I just wanted to say that now that I have had time to really use both gkrellm and lm_sensors and mastered how to get the gui display up large enough to display the results to perfection I for one am impressed, and I for one, would like to see both intergrated into MCC. John Much nicer as a panel-applet (for either KDE or Gnome/Gnome2 or IceWM) I don't mind gKrellm, but it's yet another floaty in the desktop area - which I don't mind in Enlightenment, but for KDE or Gnome, it sucks for my purposes. Panel-apps are nice cuz they're out of the way and integrated - when you're wanting to have as much desktop property as I like to have (even running at 1600x1200), ANYTHING that floats bloats, as it were... BTW, I saw (somewhere and I can't remember where) a really cool proggie that showed your temps/fan speeds/voltages in an OSD - but can't quite remember where the hec it was - but going to try to find it this week...THAT would definately turn a few heads... -- Mon Nov 18 09:00:00 EST 2002 |____ | | / \ /| |'-. | | .\__/ || | | | | _ / `._ \|_|_.-' | | | / \__.`=._) (_ |kuhn media australia | |/ ._/ || |http://kma.0catch.com | |'. `\ | | |stephen kuhn | ;/ / | | |email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | smk ) /_/| |.---.| |mobile: 0410-728-389 | ' `-`' |linux user:267497 God gave man two ears and one tongue so that we listen twice as much as we speak. -- Arab proverb Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] GKRELLM and LM_SENSORS
El Dom 17 Nov 2002 18:58, John Richard Smith escribió: I just wanted to say that now that I have had time to really use both gkrellm and lm_sensors and mastered how to get the gui display up large enough to display the results to perfection I for one am impressed, and I for one, would like to see both intergrated into MCC. John Hola, John. I have changed gkrellm by ksensors. With ksensors you can dock in KDE panel the sensors that you really need, and you don't need a magnifier to see what is going there. Suerte. -- Pilagá GNU/Linux Mandrake 9.0 7:35pm up 3:41, 3 users, load average: 0.01, 0.07, 0.09 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] GKRELLM and LM_SENSORS
Pilagá wrote: El Dom 17 Nov 2002 18:58, John Richard Smith escribió: I just wanted to say that now that I have had time to really use both gkrellm and lm_sensors and mastered how to get the gui display up large enough to display the results to perfection I for one am impressed, and I for one, would like to see both intergrated into MCC. John Hola, John. I have changed gkrellm by ksensors. With ksensors you can dock in KDE panel the sensors that you really need, and you don't need a magnifier to see what is going there. Suerte. Yes the initial gkreallm gui is so tiny it's unreadable, but in fact it is fully reconfigurable to any size and shape you desire . Yes it takes more horsepower to display gui, but the ease with which it is possible to cover the changes in resource usage as different things happen is very helpful in understanding resource use, and in adition there is additional info in the gkreallm gui display than lm_sensors displays on it's own. John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm stock quotes
Yep. Nada. Miark On 15 Nov 2002 10:52:44 +1100 Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 08:59, Miark wrote: I'd like to use gkrellm to get the Mandrakesoft stock price (MDKFF) but I've yet to figure it out. Anyone done this? Miark http://www/gkrellm.net Have you tried their homepage to see if there are any tips/hints as per setting up the stock quotes plugins? Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm volume plugin make error
I'm using gkrellm's plugins from: [quini@quinipt quini]$ rpm -qa|grep gkrellm gkrellm-themes-0.2-1mdk gkrellm-1.2.8-2mdk gkrellm-plugins-1.2.8-1mdk [quini@quinipt quini]$ And sound plugin is working for me... hope that helps ;) Es Dilluns 06 Maig 2002 02:18, en Todd Slater va escriure: I'm trying to get the volume plugin for gkrellm, but get this error when I run make: In file included from volume.c:26: volume.h:20:30: gkrellm/gkrellm.h: No such file or directory make: *** [volume.o] Error 1 The readme said to make sure to have installed the gkrellm header files in /usr/include/gkrellm or /usr/local/include/gkrellm. I assume this is my problem, but I can't find gkrellm.h anywhere on my system. Hints? -- Joan Tur. Ibiza - Spain AOL quini2k ICQ 11407395 www.ClubIbosim.org Linux: usuari registrat 190.783 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm volume plugin make error
Todd Slater wrote: I'm trying to get the volume plugin for gkrellm, but get this error when I run make: In file included from volume.c:26: volume.h:20:30: gkrellm/gkrellm.h: No such file or directory make: *** [volume.o] Error 1 The readme said to make sure to have installed the gkrellm header files in /usr/include/gkrellm or /usr/local/include/gkrellm. I assume this is my problem, but I can't find gkrellm.h anywhere on my system. Not if you don't install it, you won't. Install gkrellm-devel from your cds. ;-) Guy. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm volume plugin make error
On Mon, 06 May 2002 22:02:17 +0200 Guy Zelck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Todd Slater wrote: I'm trying to get the volume plugin for gkrellm, but get this error when I run make: In file included from volume.c:26: volume.h:20:30: gkrellm/gkrellm.h: No such file or directory make: *** [volume.o] Error 1 The readme said to make sure to have installed the gkrellm header files in/usr/include/gkrellm or /usr/local/include/gkrellm. I assume this is my problem, but I can't find gkrellm.h anywhere on my system. Not if you don't install it, you won't. Install gkrellm-devel from your cds. ;-) Guy. Doh! Thanks, Guy! -- Todd Slater 6:37pm up 22:49, 2 users, load average: 0.97, 0.46, 0.31 2.4.8-26mdk We are students of words; we are shut up in schools, and colleges, and recitation rooms, for ten or fifteen years, and come out at last with a bag of wind, a memory of words, and do not know a thing. (Ralph Waldo Emerson) Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] Gkrellm on top always plus all desktops
On Sunday 23 December 2001 09:39 pm, you wrote: Can anyone tell me what I need to do to have Gkrellm always on top and on all desktops? Nev /usr/bin/kstart --skiptaskbar --ontop --alldesktops /usr/local/bin/gkrellm well, that's what mine looks like anyway. kstart --help has some good info. -s Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] Gkrellm on top always plus all desktops
Thanks, it worked - much appreciated as I couldn't find it in the documentation that came with the rpm. Nev s wrote: On Sunday 23 December 2001 09:39 pm, you wrote: Can anyone tell me what I need to do to have Gkrellm always on top and on all desktops? Nev /usr/bin/kstart --skiptaskbar --ontop --alldesktops /usr/local/bin/gkrellm well, that's what mine looks like anyway. kstart --help has some good info. -s Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm on top ?
On July 13, 2001 03:00 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote: SNIP Well... I dunno ;) I created this text file, named it 'sensor-start' and then 'chmod +x'd it and put it in my user .kde/Autostart/ dir #!/bin/bash sleep 2s /usr/bin/kstart --ontop --alldesktops --skiptaskbar /usr/X11R6/bin/gkrellm (the last two lines above are all on one line. There's no man entry for kstart, but 'kstart --help' provides the options. The sleep 2 seconds is to give KDE plenty of time to finish loading, probly not necessary. I'd give credit to somebody for this, but I don't remember where I got it.) ... and it does auto start Gkrellm always on top, on all desktops. BUT it doesn't skip placing the app notification on the taskbar (panel). Dunno why? Probly somethin dumb and simple I'm missing. SNIP Hi Tom, I've been meaning to thank you for posting this a while ago, and wanted to let you know that I found a quick work around for not placing the gkrellm notification on the panel. I navigated to /home/acct/.kde/Autostart in Konqueror, right clicked and selected create new link to application, named it gkstart, and on the execute tab under command just copied, and pasted your line above ... /usr/bin/kstart --ontop --alldesktops --skiptaskbar /usr/X11R6/bin/gkrellm And, it works like a champ - thank you for the tip. Regards, SpeedMan Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] gkrellm on top ?
On July 16, 2001 08:08 am, Tom Brinkman wrote: I have installed lm_utils package. Added lines as directed in modules.conf file. # I2C module options alias char-major-89 i2c-dev I rebooted. But sensors command even as root gave statement [root@localhost /root]# sensors Can't access /proc file what to do? There should'a also been adapter and chipset drivers that needed to be added to /etc/rc.d/rc.local also. For example, mine currently are # I2C adapter drivers modprobe i2c-viapro modprobe i2c-isa # I2C chip drivers modprobe lm75 modprobe eeprom modprobe via686a for my BX based board they where: # I2C adapter drivers modprobe i2c-piix4 modprobe i2c-isa # I2C chip drivers modprobe eeprom modprobe w83781d Hope this helps, 'cause I'm fixin to go to St Loui in the mornin for the BGN race next week ;) Mine is i810 Kobian MB. I don't have any isa slot. Hence I excluded isa while configuring. I got blank comments for isa. nothing else I got? how to proceed further? -- L.V.Gandhi 203, Soundaryalahari Apartments, Lawsons Bay colony, Visakhapatnam, 530017 MECON, 5th Floor, RTC Complex, Visakhapatnam AP 530020 INDIA [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux user No.205042
Re: [newbie] gkrellm on top ?
On Sunday 15 July 2001 02:31 am, L.V.Gandhi wrote: On July 14, 2001 09:17 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote: On Saturday 14 July 2001 12:31 am, L.V.Gandhi wrote: On July 14, 2001 12:30 am, Tom Brinkman wrote: BTW, I configured Gkrellm to only show cpu temp, minimum height (2p), How to get to show cpu temp. I didn't find any options? When I run 'sensors' my cpu temp is shown as temp2. This is pretty standard I think, with 4 different mobo's cpu has always been temp2. Then in Gkrellm, Configuration, Sensorsnext to temp2 I type in CPU. Click OK, and Gkrellm should start displaying something like CPU 44C or you can choose to have it shown in Farenheit. I have installed lm_utils package. Added lines as directed in modules.conf file. # I2C module options alias char-major-89 i2c-dev I rebooted. But sensors command even as root gave statement [root@localhost /root]# sensors Can't access /proc file what to do? There should'a also been adapter and chipset drivers that needed to be added to /etc/rc.d/rc.local also. For example, mine currently are # I2C adapter drivers modprobe i2c-viapro modprobe i2c-isa # I2C chip drivers modprobe lm75 modprobe eeprom modprobe via686a for my BX based board they where: # I2C adapter drivers modprobe i2c-piix4 modprobe i2c-isa # I2C chip drivers modprobe eeprom modprobe w83781d Hope this helps, 'cause I'm fixin to go to St Loui in the mornin for the BGN race next week ;) -- Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Galveston Bay
Re: [newbie] gkrellm on top ?
On Saturday 14 July 2001 12:31 am, L.V.Gandhi wrote: On July 14, 2001 12:30 am, Tom Brinkman wrote: BTW, I configured Gkrellm to only show cpu temp, minimum height (2p), How to get to show cpu temp. I didn't find any options? When I run 'sensors' my cpu temp is shown as temp2. This is pretty standard I think, with 4 different mobo's cpu has always been temp2. Then in Gkrellm, Configuration, Sensorsnext to temp2 I type in CPU. Click OK, and Gkrellm should start displaying something like CPU 44C or you can choose to have it shown in Farenheit. -- Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Galveston Bay
Re: [newbie] gkrellm on top ?
On Thursday 12 July 2001 08:00 pm, Joan Tur wrote: I'm using KDE MDK8. I'd like gkrellm to stay on top of the other opened windows and not to appear in taskbar. Is that possible ? 8-? Well... I dunno ;) I created this text file, named it 'sensor-start' and then 'chmod +x'd it and put it in my user .kde/Autostart/ dir #!/bin/bash sleep 2s /usr/bin/kstart --ontop --alldesktops --skiptaskbar /usr/X11R6/bin/gkrellm (the last two lines above are all on one line. There's no man entry for kstart, but 'kstart --help' provides the options. The sleep 2 seconds is to give KDE plenty of time to finish loading, probly not necessary. I'd give credit to somebody for this, but I don't remember where I got it.) ... and it does auto start Gkrellm always on top, on all desktops. BUT it doesn't skip placing the app notification on the taskbar (panel). Dunno why? Probly somethin dumb and simple I'm missing. BTW, I configured Gkrellm to only show cpu temp, minimum height (2p), and 75p wide, and remember window position. Just fits on the top Window title bar near the buttons (1024x768). I also edited /etc/X11/fs/config , 'default-point-size = 130' (was 120) so that Gkrellm's and other apps fonts are bigger for my poor old eyes. Another mystery tho is that it still insists on showing my ppp load when I'm connected (?) Bothered me at first, but now I sort'a kind'a like that ; OC'd to 1.5+ gig Tbird is 42°C under moderate load as I type :) It's where I get most of my hot air ;~ -- Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Galveston Bay
Re: [newbie] gkrellm on top ?
On July 14, 2001 12:30 am, Tom Brinkman wrote: BTW, I configured Gkrellm to only show cpu temp, minimum height (2p), How to get to show cpu temp. I didn't find any options? -- L.V.Gandhi 203, Soundaryalahari Apartments, Lawsons Bay colony, Visakhapatnam, 530017 MECON, 5th Floor, RTC Complex, Visakhapatnam AP 530020 INDIA [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux user No.205042
