any performance gains when injecting via qmail-inject instead of sendmail?

2001-03-29 Thread Simon K. Grabowski

Hi,

Is there any speed/performance gain if I inject messages
directly via /mail/qmail/bin/qmail-inject instead of using
sendmail replacement (/mail/qmail/bin/sendmail)?
I know that sendmail command ultimately uses qmail-inject
to inject the messages so I figured I'd cut the 'middle-men'.

It appears that there are no side-effects provided that
I add "Return-Path <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
in the beginning of the message.

Can there be any problems with such a set up?

Thanks!

-- Simon




Re: triple bounce, mailbox exist but don't receive

2001-03-29 Thread Chrisanthy Carlane

Guys,

I've solved the problem. Actually I didn't know what was the problem, I just
removed my Maildir, did "maildirmake" and chown it again and killall -HUP
qmail-send, and suddenly it works.

I am happy now!

CC

> Hi Guys,
>
> I'm totally confused!
> I hope someone can help me. My mailserver is running well, but yesterday,
> suddenly, the mails couldn't go into my mailbox (no mailbox here by that
> name #5.1.1), but it exist and WAS running well.  It seems the qmail
doesn't
> recognized that the username exist in /etc/passwd and the Maildir exist in
> the homedir.
> I tried to killall -HUP qmail-send.
>
> Here is the bounce message and the log message:
>
> = BOUNCE MSG ===
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at xxx.xxx
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
addresses.
> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)
>
> --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
>
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Received: (qmail 3843 invoked by uid 0); 29 Mar 2001 10:38:46 -
> Date: 29 Mar 2001 10:38:46 -
> Message-ID: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ==
> LOG FILES
>
> Mar 30 09:25:55 beta qmail: 985919155.723946 new msg 225150
> Mar 30 09:25:55 beta qmail: 985919155.724064 info msg 225150: bytes 184
from
> <> qp 4883 uid 505
> Mar 30 09:25:55 beta qmail: 985919155.728568 starting delivery 5891: msg
> 225150 to local @beta.xxx.xxx
> Mar 30 09:25:55 beta qmail: 985919155.728645 status: local 1/10 remote
0/20
> Mar 30 09:25:55 beta qmail: 985919155.730243 delivery 5891: success:
> Mar 30 09:25:55 beta qmail: 985919155.730316 status: local 0/10 remote
0/20
> Mar 30 09:25:55 beta qmail: 985919155.730356 end msg 225150
>
> =
>
>
>
>




Re: Random Bounce

2001-03-29 Thread Jean

As I indicated on my first post, this is our isp's server.  Consequently,
the bounce message is all I have to work with.  I was hoping someone would
give some general suggestions on where to look so that I could pass it on to
my isp.  Sorry to have troubled you all.

jean
- Original Message -
From: "Niles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "jean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: Random Bounce


> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
> > Well, here's the bounce msg.  Only the sender's name was changed.
> The
> > receipient, jmorgan, has a mailbox which works ALMOST all the time
> ;-)  To
> > my novice eyes, the problem is on my isp's server.
> >
> [stuff deleted]
>
> What do your mail log files indicate?
>
>
>




PAM-enabled checkpassword?

2001-03-29 Thread David Young

Is there a PAM-enabled checkpassword? www.qmail.org has a link to a patch
for checkpassword-0.81, but the only version available now seems to be
checkpassword-0.90.




triple bounce, mailbox exist but don't receive

2001-03-29 Thread Chrisanthy Carlane

Hi Guys,

I'm totally confused!
I hope someone can help me. My mailserver is running well, but yesterday,
suddenly, the mails couldn't go into my mailbox (no mailbox here by that
name #5.1.1), but it exist and WAS running well.  It seems the qmail doesn't
recognized that the username exist in /etc/passwd and the Maildir exist in
the homedir.
I tried to killall -HUP qmail-send.

Here is the bounce message and the log message:

= BOUNCE MSG ===
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at xxx.xxx
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Received: (qmail 3843 invoked by uid 0); 29 Mar 2001 10:38:46 -
Date: 29 Mar 2001 10:38:46 -
Message-ID: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
LOG FILES

Mar 30 09:25:55 beta qmail: 985919155.723946 new msg 225150
Mar 30 09:25:55 beta qmail: 985919155.724064 info msg 225150: bytes 184 from
<> qp 4883 uid 505
Mar 30 09:25:55 beta qmail: 985919155.728568 starting delivery 5891: msg
225150 to local @beta.xxx.xxx
Mar 30 09:25:55 beta qmail: 985919155.728645 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
Mar 30 09:25:55 beta qmail: 985919155.730243 delivery 5891: success:
Mar 30 09:25:55 beta qmail: 985919155.730316 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
Mar 30 09:25:55 beta qmail: 985919155.730356 end msg 225150

=






qmail-inject works but qmail-smtp doesn't

2001-03-29 Thread Michael Cartmel



Hi,
 
I'm not where the setup has gone wrong here. Follow 
the Howto to setup Qmail, everything looks ok.
 
Qmail-inject is able to send out no problems at 
all. I can send to any account, local or not.
I send a mail in from another host and it gets 
recieved by qmail ok but wont deliver it locallally.
I send a mail from say outlook express and it 
connects, sends ok, then the mail just sits in the queue and wont 
deliver.
The log says CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily and it 
doesn't seem to recognise when the mail is going to a local 
address.
 
I've gone over the FAQ and the mailing list archive 
and had no luck. I'm sure there's an easy answer here... can anyone 
help?
 
        
Cheers,  -mic
 smime.p7s


Re: moving qmail from one machine to another

2001-03-29 Thread japc

On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 01:14:43PM -0800, Gary Shelton wrote:
> greetings:
> i'm in the planning stages of moving a web-frontend/qmail/mysql setup 
> from a single machine to a more distributed configuration with two 
> load-balanced machines running apache and qmail and a mysql database 
> server. the qmail queue is currently on an NFS mount (storage 
> appliance), and that won't be changing. mysql is of course storing the 
> authentication information. This whole setup is running on FreeBSD 
> 4.1-RELEASE. My questions are thus:
> Are there any issues with moving the qmail configuration from one 
> machine to another, aside from the concerns with name resolution/ip 
> configuration?
> Is it even possible for two qmail servers to share the same queues if 
> said queues are on NFS?
> Is there anything else i should be aware of when moving qmail from one 
> machine to two separate load-balanced servers?
> 
> tia
> 
> gary shelton
> 

Aren't you confusing the queue with the maildirs/storage?

If so there's no problem at all, you can even cp the ~control/* from one machine to 
another.

Hum... and remember to keep synced the time on the NFS server with that on the qmail 
servers.

-- 
Jose Celestino  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
"Every morning I read the obituaries; if my name's not there,
I go to work."



Re: SMTP Problem - (SMTP works but is very slow)

2001-03-29 Thread Greg White

On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 02:43:47PM -0800, John Cope wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm having a problem with SMTP.  It's working, but it's very-very slow (2-4
> minutes to complete), but is always successful.
> 
> I have qmail-smtpd being handled by tcpserver, which is configured as
> follows:
> 
> exec /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -p -R -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u $QMAILDUID -g
> $NOFILESGID -v -c100 0 smtp /apps/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1
> 

This is a FAQ -- please search the archives. You've got a reverse-DNS or
ident problem.

> I also have my rcpthosts file configured as follows:
> 
> domain_name.net
> hostname.domain_name.net
> localhost.domain_name.net

Really? How do you recieve any mail?

gregw@frodo:~$ dnsq ns domain_name.net a.gtld-servers.net
2 domain_name.net:
110 bytes, 1+0+1+0 records, response, authoritative, nxdomain
query: 2 domain_name.net
authority: net 86400 SOA a.gtld-servers.net hostmaster.nsiregistry.net
2001032900 1800 900 604800 86400
SNIP

-- 
Greg White
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent
revolution inevitable.
-- John F. Kennedy



Re: smtp delay with -H and -R

2001-03-29 Thread Russell P. Sutherland

* Ricardo Cerqueira ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [29 Mar 2001 19:41]:

> > Any ideas as to what the delay is caused by 
> DNS, probably
> > and/or how to eliminate it?
> from 'man tcpserver':
>-llocalname
>   Do not look up the local host name;  use  localname
>   for TCPLOCALHOST.
> So... try adding -l0 to the tcpserver flags

Thanks!

[ Why is it, 15 seconds before someone is kind enough to supply the
correct answer, you find it for yourself by further searching the
email archives?  There has to be a name for this phenomena ]

-- 
Quist ConsultingEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
219 Donlea DriveVoice: +1.416.696.7600
Toronto ON  M4G 2N1 Fax:   +1.416.978.6620
CANADA  WWW:   http://www.quist.ca



Re: smtp delay with -H and -R

2001-03-29 Thread Ricardo Cerqueira

On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:26:32PM -0500, Russell P. Sutherland wrote:
> I've experienced a situtation that is wierd...

[snip]

> 
> Any ideas as to what the delay is caused by 

DNS, probably

> and/or how to eliminate it?

from 'man tcpserver':

---
   -llocalname
  Do not look up the local host name;  use  localname
  for TCPLOCALHOST.
---

So... try adding -l0 to the tcpserver flags

RC

-- 
+---
| Ricardo Cerqueira  
| PGP Key fingerprint  -  B7 05 13 CE 48 0A BF 1E  87 21 83 DB 28 DE 03 42 
| Novis Telecom  -  Engenharia ISP / Rede Técnica 
| Pç. Duque Saldanha, 1, 7º E / 1050-094 Lisboa / Portugal
| Tel: +351 2 1010  - Fax: +351 2 1010 4459

 PGP signature


smtp delay with -H and -R

2001-03-29 Thread Russell P. Sutherland

I've experienced a situtation that is wierd...

I'm running qmail-smtpd/qmail-pop3d under daemontools.
Here's the run file:

#!/bin/sh
 
PATH=/var/qmail/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin
export PATH
  
QMAILDUID=`perl -e 'print scalar getpwnam qmaild'`
NOFILESGID=`perl -e 'print scalar getgrnam nofiles'`
   
exec tcpserver -v -R -H -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u$QMAILDUID -g$NOFILESGID 0 25 
qmail-smtpd 2>&1

When I connect to the daemon from the local machine using its IP address

telnet 216.13.139.139 25

there is a 10 second delay or so, as if a remote DNS or ident was being performed
and timing out.

However as you can see, I'm using both the -R and -H switches on tcpserver.

"telnet localhost 25" works fine/normally.

Any ideas as to what the delay is caused by and/or how to eliminate it?

-- 
Quist ConsultingEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
219 Donlea DriveVoice: +1.416.696.7600
Toronto ON  M4G 2N1 Fax:   +1.416.978.6620
CANADA  WWW:   http://www.quist.ca



Re: SMTP Problem - (SMTP works but is very slow)

2001-03-29 Thread japc

Dns lookups are slowing it down. From the tcpserver man page:

  -H Do not look up the remote host name.

C ya.

On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 02:43:47PM -0800, John Cope wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm having a problem with SMTP.  It's working, but it's very-very slow (2-4
> minutes to complete), but is always successful.
> 
> I have qmail-smtpd being handled by tcpserver, which is configured as
> follows:
> 
> exec /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -p -R -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u $QMAILDUID -g
> $NOFILESGID -v -c100 0 smtp /apps/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1
> 
> I also have my rcpthosts file configured as follows:
> 
> domain_name.net
> hostname.domain_name.net
> localhost.domain_name.net
> 
> I'm running Courier-IMAP/POP3 as well, which are working just fine, all
> authenticating using LDAP.  Everything works fine except for SMTP.  All the
> logs show that everything is working just fine..
> 
> Any clues as to what could be going wrong  I've checked all the router
> ACL's, they look good..   I'm at a loss as to what this a could be..
> 
> John
> 
> 

-- 
Jose Celestino  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
"Every morning I read the obituaries; if my name's not there,
I go to work."



SMTP Problem - (SMTP works but is very slow)

2001-03-29 Thread John Cope

Hi,

I'm having a problem with SMTP.  It's working, but it's very-very slow (2-4
minutes to complete), but is always successful.

I have qmail-smtpd being handled by tcpserver, which is configured as
follows:

exec /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -p -R -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u $QMAILDUID -g
$NOFILESGID -v -c100 0 smtp /apps/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1

I also have my rcpthosts file configured as follows:

domain_name.net
hostname.domain_name.net
localhost.domain_name.net

I'm running Courier-IMAP/POP3 as well, which are working just fine, all
authenticating using LDAP.  Everything works fine except for SMTP.  All the
logs show that everything is working just fine..

Any clues as to what could be going wrong  I've checked all the router
ACL's, they look good..   I'm at a loss as to what this a could be..

John





Re: moving qmail from one machine to another

2001-03-29 Thread Charles Cazabon

Gary Shelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm in the planning stages of moving a web-frontend/qmail/mysql setup 
> from a single machine to a more distributed configuration with two 
> load-balanced machines running apache and qmail and a mysql database 
> server.

So far so good.

> the qmail queue is currently on an NFS mount (storage appliance), and that
> won't be changing.

Did you say this is alread up and running?  qmail requires the queue to be on
a local filesystem; most MTAs do if I understand properly.  NFS breaks all the
normal filesystem guarantees that qmail requires to be able to deliver mail
reliably.

> My questions are thus: Are there any issues with moving the qmail
> configuration from one machine to another, aside from the concerns with name
> resolution/ip configuration?

Only that you should stop qmail-smtpd and wait for the queue to empty on the
old machine before turning off qmail completely.

> Is it even possible for two qmail servers to share the same queues if 
> said queues are on NFS?

No.  qmail can't share it's queue at all, not even on a local filesystem.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



moving qmail from one machine to another

2001-03-29 Thread Gary Shelton

greetings:
i'm in the planning stages of moving a web-frontend/qmail/mysql setup 
from a single machine to a more distributed configuration with two 
load-balanced machines running apache and qmail and a mysql database 
server. the qmail queue is currently on an NFS mount (storage 
appliance), and that won't be changing. mysql is of course storing the 
authentication information. This whole setup is running on FreeBSD 
4.1-RELEASE. My questions are thus:
Are there any issues with moving the qmail configuration from one 
machine to another, aside from the concerns with name resolution/ip 
configuration?
Is it even possible for two qmail servers to share the same queues if 
said queues are on NFS?
Is there anything else i should be aware of when moving qmail from one 
machine to two separate load-balanced servers?

tia

gary shelton




Re: ticketing system?

2001-03-29 Thread Henning Brauer

On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 02:53:33PM -0500, Kurth Bemis wrote:
>   does anyone know of a ticketing system, written in PHP for qmail?  I 
> found RT (www.fsck.com/rt/) but its perl (bleh) just wondering if anyone 
> knows of anything that fits my request a little more :-)

Funny, I searched for one the whole day too. I don't have a problem with
perl (in contrast I'd prefer perl over php...), but it still does not fit my
needs. So if anyone knows a ticketing system which can be used without
closing each and every ticket manually on a web interface and does not use
simple incremental ticket numbers but date-based (20010329-0002 foe example)
please drop me a short note - hopefully I'll rerad it before i start to code
(in perl).

-- 
Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg
http://www.bsws.de | Germany



RE: ticketing system?

2001-03-29 Thread schoon

Your best bet is to take a look in freshmeat and see what's there. Perl
isn't for everyone, so don't be so hard on yourself! As for your last
question, search the archives - I'm sure someone has already solved that
problem.


.mark

>--
>From:  Kurth Bemis[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent:  Thursday, March 29, 2001 11:53 AM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject:   ticketing system?
>
>  does anyone know of a ticketing system, written in PHP for qmail?  I 
>found RT (www.fsck.com/rt/) but its perl (bleh) just wondering if anyone 
>knows of anything that fits my request a little more :-)
>
>also - I need a way to attach a text file to EVERY out going message.  Any 
>ideas on that?
>
>~kurth
>
>
>




MS SQL & QMAIL

2001-03-29 Thread Stefan Laudat

Are there any authentication modules for Micro$oft SQL 7/2000 for qmail or courier ?
I really don't want to use M$ Exchange as IMAP/POP toaster :(

-- 
Stefan Laudat
CCNA & CCAI
-
"God is big, so don't fuck with him."



Modified 5.3.4 error

2001-03-29 Thread Jeff_D_Sweeten

Does anyone out there have a patch for inserting the databytes control field in
the #5.3.4 error.  Management doesn't wnat to block huge mails unless we tell
the sender what our max is.

Jeff Sweeten
Aon Corp.





ticketing system?

2001-03-29 Thread Kurth Bemis

  does anyone know of a ticketing system, written in PHP for qmail?  I 
found RT (www.fsck.com/rt/) but its perl (bleh) just wondering if anyone 
knows of anything that fits my request a little more :-)

also - I need a way to attach a text file to EVERY out going message.  Any 
ideas on that?

~kurth




Re: Should I worry about these compile warnings?

2001-03-29 Thread Charles Cazabon

Sid Wilroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> maildirwatch.c:62: warning: return type of `main' is not `int'

You didn't actually include your question in the body of your message; bad
habit.

This is answered many times in the mailing list archives.  I suggest you
consult that before posting questions to the list.  It's clearly referenced
from www.qmail.org.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



Re: Should I worry about these compile warnings?

2001-03-29 Thread Daniel Kelley


no.

On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Sid Wilroy wrote:

> maildirwatch.c:62: warning: return type of `main' is not `int'
> ./load maildirwatch hfield.o headerbody.o maildir.o \
> prioq.o now.o getln.a env.a open.a strerr.a stralloc.a \
> alloc.a substdio.a error.a str.a
> 
> idedit.c:124: warning: return type of `main' is not `int'
> ./load idedit strerr.a substdio.a error.a str.a fs.a \
> wait.a open.a seek.a
> 
> install.c:156: warning: return type of `main' is not `int'
> ./load install-big fifo.o install.o auto_qmail.o \
> auto_split.o auto_uids.o strerr.a substdio.a open.a error.a \
> str.a fs.a
> 
> 
> 




Should I worry about these compile warnings?

2001-03-29 Thread Sid Wilroy

maildirwatch.c:62: warning: return type of `main' is not `int'
./load maildirwatch hfield.o headerbody.o maildir.o \
prioq.o now.o getln.a env.a open.a strerr.a stralloc.a \
alloc.a substdio.a error.a str.a

idedit.c:124: warning: return type of `main' is not `int'
./load idedit strerr.a substdio.a error.a str.a fs.a \
wait.a open.a seek.a

install.c:156: warning: return type of `main' is not `int'
./load install-big fifo.o install.o auto_qmail.o \
auto_split.o auto_uids.o strerr.a substdio.a open.a error.a \
str.a fs.a






Re: bug in qmail?

2001-03-29 Thread Charles Cazabon

Dean Browett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> I'm having a bit of a problem. I am trying to deliver mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] I keep getting the message:
> Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)
[...] 
> Extracts from /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
[...] 
> Extracts from /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains:
[...] 

Post the full output of qmail-showctl instead of snippets of what you think
might be relevant information.  Then we can help you.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



bug in qmail?

2001-03-29 Thread Dean Browett

Hi all,

I'm having a bit of a problem. I am trying to deliver mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I keep getting the message:
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)


I am stumped on this one. There are approximately 20 domains on this box and
this is the only domain that causes problems.


The following email addresses were fine.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


The following email addresses caused problems

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)

Extracts from /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts

fasttrack-assoc.com
fasttrack-cossa.com
fastabcde-fg.com

Extracts from /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains:

fasttrack-assoc.com:fasttrack-assoc.com__
fasttrack-cossa.com:fasttrack-cossa.com__
fastabcde-fg.com:fastabcde-fg.com__

Extracts from /etc/aliases

fasttrack-assoc.com__-dean:  dbrowett (local)
fasttrack-cossa.com__dean:  dbrowett (local)
fastabcde-fg.com__dean:dbrowett (local)

Any help would be appreciated

Thanks

Dean Browett








erorr when patch --verbose -p1 < /tmp/big-concurrency.patch

2001-03-29 Thread Sid Wilroy

--
Patching file `qmail-send.c' using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 262.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 908.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1547.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1555.
1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to qmail-send.c.rej
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|diff -u qmail-1.03.orig/spawn.c qmail-1.03/spawn.c
|--- qmail-1.03.orig/spawn.c Mon Jun 15 03:53:16 1998
|+++ qmail-1.03/spawn.c  Tue Jul 27 12:25:14 1999
--
Patching file `spawn.c' using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 63.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 73.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 156.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 205.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 241.
1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to spawn.c.rej
Hmm...  Ignoring the trailing garbage.
done


Johan Almqvist wrote:

> * Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010329 19:43]:
> > Thus spake Johan Almqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > I wonder if anyone has written a real "bouncesaying" (qmails bouncesaying
> > > just exits with an exit code that makes qmail-local do the actual
> > > bouncing.
> > And what is your problem with that?
>
> I can't manually bounce a message from, say, mutt.
>
> -Johan
> --
> Johan Almqvist
> http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/
>
>   
>Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature




Re: A real "bouncesaying"

2001-03-29 Thread Johan Almqvist

* Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010329 19:43]:
> Thus spake Johan Almqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I wonder if anyone has written a real "bouncesaying" (qmails bouncesaying
> > just exits with an exit code that makes qmail-local do the actual
> > bouncing.
> And what is your problem with that?

I can't manually bounce a message from, say, mutt.

-Johan
-- 
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/

 PGP signature


Re: A real "bouncesaying"

2001-03-29 Thread Felix von Leitner

Thus spake Johan Almqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I wonder if anyone has written a real "bouncesaying" (qmails bouncesaying
> just exits with an exit code that makes qmail-local do the actual
> bouncing.

And what is your problem with that?

Felix



Re: A real "bouncesaying"

2001-03-29 Thread Filip Salomonsson

Johan Almqvist:
> > With a few pointers from Frank Tegtmeyer, I've now made what I wanted
> > myself. Maybe someone else finds this useful...

Peter van Dijk:
> Without testing it, a short glance over the code reveals one quirk and
> one change I'd like:
>
> - You are using a predictable filename in /tmp without any security
>   whatsover. This allows a malicious users to overwrite files that you
>   own, perhaps gaining access to your account this way.
> - It says 'this is the qmail-send program'. It is not. 'qmail-send' is
>   not a fixed string in the QSBMF, so why not change it?

Also, why not use the $SENDER variable that qmail provides? Not to mention
that the address mentioned in the bounce message won't match the original
recipient when using virtualdomains. That might be trickier to fix, though.
Qmail isn't handling virtual domains correctly, as far as I can tell.

/filip




new TMS webpage (qmail-based anti-spam system)

2001-03-29 Thread Jason R. Mastaler

Some of you might be familiar with Thomas Erskine's ``Tagged Message
Sender''.  I've been using this software for a few weeks now and have
attempted to document in detail both the program itself and also my
particular use of it.
 
http://jason.mastaler.com/tms/> 

Enjoy,
Jason



Auto-appending signatures for single domain

2001-03-29 Thread Eric Bonharme
Title: Auto-appending signatures for single domain




Hello,
I've looked through all the documentation I could find and the
list's archive but can find no obvious mention of the following:
I run virtual domains and would like to add a typical 'we're not
responsible for anything' disclaimer at the bottom of all emails coming
FROM a particular domain.
E.g.: Say the domain is 'corporate.com'
Mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(local) to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remote)-> add disclaimer
Mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->don't
add disclaimer
Mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(local) -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(local or remote) -> do not add
I read somewhere that you had to patch qmail-remote but no
instructions on how to do this.  Any clues out there?
Eric
-- 

Eric Bonharme, E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MotorTRAK Ltd, AC Court, High Street, Thames Ditton, Surrey KT7 0SR
Tel: +44 (20) 8335 2000, Fax: +44 (20) 8335 2001



(and there's the cr*p:)

The
information contained in this message  is for the intended addressee
only and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the intended addressee, please delete this message and notify
the sender; do not copy or distribute this message or disclose its
contents to anyone. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are
those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of MotorTRAK
Limited or of any of its associated companies. No reliance may be
placed on this message without written confirmation from an authorised
representative of the company.



Divert RBL messages?

2001-03-29 Thread Johan Almqvist

Hi!

I'm looking for a way to divert messages that come from RBL listed hosts
on a system-wide basis... All messages from hosts that are in the RBL
should go to the spamtrap user for example...

-Johan
-- 
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/

 PGP signature


Re: qmail forwarding to another mailserver

2001-03-29 Thread Dave Sill

"VmTesting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Does someone has any idea how to forward with qmail all the e-mail's
>received by one mailserver to another mailserver ? Actually I want to
>forward only thouse users e-mails to another server which has no
>mailbox in the first server.

In ~alias/.qmail-default on "one server":

|/var/qmail/bin/forward "$LOCAL"@another.server

-Dave



Re: faster than bcc

2001-03-29 Thread Dave Sill

Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> >cat list.txt | xargs qmail-inject -a > >where list.txt is a list of addresses. Is this faster than bcc
>> >anyway?
> 
>> No. That creates one message per recipient--lots of disk I/O to do the
>> same thing as one message, many recipients.
>
>That should still do only one message, multiple recipients, shouldn't it?

Yeah, don't know what I was thinking. But I see another problem with
that command: it's feeding the list of recipients to xargs via stdin
and the message to qmail-inject, also via stdin. In my testing, xargs
is reading the message as stdin and calling qmail-inject with the
message contents on the command line. Oops.

-Dave



Re: more help sought with relay-ctrl (was oh no not another relaying question)

2001-03-29 Thread Charles Cazabon

Gary Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> I decided to go for the relay-ctrl idea suggested by Charles and James who
> responded to my last message. However, I've got a number of issues:-

Bruce Guenter, the author of relay-ctrl, maintains his own mailing lists for
his software.  You may want to try on those lists in future for particular
problems you have with his software.

> where references were made to configs being stored in directorys that don't
> exist I created the directories (as root) and I've not changed the owner or
> permissions.

Okay.  You may need to change some of them; it depends.

> I put the following in rc.local:
> 
> tcpserver -v -u 2850 -g 32750 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \
> 2>&1 | /var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd 3 &

You're missing the other argument you need:  

-x /etc/tcpcontrol/smtp.cdb

This is what actually allows the relaying, by setting the RELAYCLIENT
variable for IP addresses which have authenticated via POP3 in the previous
fifteen minutes.

> I put
> 
> */20 * * * * /usr/sbin/relay-ctrl-age
> 
> into my crontab... and here's my first problem. Cron is now outputting:-
> 
> /usr/bin/tcprules: No such file or directory
> 
> the tcprules is in fact in
> /usr/local/bin
> what's the best solution? symlink?

Sure.  That works well.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



Re: Limit outbound connections but not for all domains

2001-03-29 Thread Charles Cazabon

Iñigo Martínez Lasala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Is there anyway to limit outbound connections with control/concurrentremote
> but not for all domains?  I want to limit outbound connections for all
> domains but one (it's an internal domain and the bandwidth is not limited,
> so there is no reason to limit this domain and I want immediate delivery
> too).

No easy way.  djb's .qmail-default/serialmail trick is designed for the
opposite case.  The only way that comes to mind is to set up two separate
instances of qmail on the box, one handling mail to the internal domain,
one for everything else.  The second hands mail for the internal domain off
to the first instance, which has a high concurrencyremote.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



qmail forwarding to another mailserver

2001-03-29 Thread VmTesting




Dear all,
Does someone has any idea how to forward with qmail all the e-mail's received 
by one mailserver to another 
mailserver ? Actually I want to forward only thouse users e-mails to another 
server which has no mailbox in the first server.
example:
We have server A and server B. Server A is MX for firstdomain.com and server 
B is MX fot seconddomain.com.
Server B has user called John Doe with e-mail address 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What I really like to achive is if someone send's email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] then server A checks if it has user Joe Doe 
with e-mail address [EMAIL PROTECTED] and if it doesn't find any reference 
to that user it just forwards e-mail to
server B which accepts it . It can be easily achieved by modifing 
/etc/aliases/ files but I want to get rid of modifing /etc/aliases/ files. 
Any idea ?
I hope example wasn't too hazy.
Thank you in advance, 
VM Testing
 


Re: Maildir problem

2001-03-29 Thread Charles Cazabon

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> I am using qmail 1.03 on Redhat 6.2 box.  I have just shifted from Mailbox
> format to Maildir format. And i am using qpopper-qmail-2.53-1-PAM.i386.rpm
> for pop daemon.

I could be mistaken, but I thought qpopper only supported mbox files.  If
you want to do POP3 with Maildirs in user home directories, switch to
qmail-pop3d, included in the qmail source.  That's what it's designed for.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



Re: shell vs qmail

2001-03-29 Thread Charles Cazabon

alexus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> for some unknown to me reason when i type
> 
> csh -cf '/var/qmail/rc &'
> 
> just like INSTALL says
> 
> it gives me PATH on screen

Pardon?

> and when it starts to run qmail-start
> it "freezes", well not really freezes.. but nothing is happened

Probably you just didn't get your prompt back.  What happens if you press
enter after this point?

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



Re: A real "bouncesaying"

2001-03-29 Thread Frank Tegtmeyer


> - It says 'this is the qmail-send program'. It is not. 'qmail-send' is
>   not a fixed string in the QSBMF, so why not change it?

True - when I first wrote it I took the text from Qmails bounces.
Feel free to change it :)

Regards, Frank
 



Re: A real "bouncesaying"

2001-03-29 Thread Peter van Dijk

On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 03:06:40PM +0200, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> * Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010329 11:21]:
> > I wonder if anyone has written a real "bouncesaying" (qmails bouncesaying
> > just exits with an exit code that makes qmail-local do the actual
> > bouncing.
> 
> With a few pointers from Frank Tegtmeyer, I've now made what I wanted
> myself. Maybe someone else finds this useful...

Without testing it, a short glance over the code reveals one quirk and
one change I'd like:

- You are using a predictable filename in /tmp without any security
  whatsover. This allows a malicious users to overwrite files that you
  own, perhaps gaining access to your account this way.
- It says 'this is the qmail-send program'. It is not. 'qmail-send' is
  not a fixed string in the QSBMF, so why not change it?

Greetz, Peter.



Re: help ( pop authenticate with ldap )

2001-03-29 Thread Henning Brauer

On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 10:21:08AM +0800, lucky wrote:
> i want to make pop authenticate by ldap .what i need and what shall i do ?

read about qmail-ldap at http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ldap/

> thanks
-- 
Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg
http://www.bsws.de | Germany



Re: Can you help me ??(about limit of the number of per process file hand

2001-03-29 Thread Henning Brauer

On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:04:59AM +0800, Baoguo Xu wrote:
> Dear Henning,
> I try ,but not success. There is content in file conf-cc:
> cc -O2
> DFD_SETSIZE=4096

As I've written it is -DFD_SETSIZE=4096.

-- 
Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg
http://www.bsws.de | Germany



Re: A real "bouncesaying"

2001-03-29 Thread Johan Almqvist

* Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010329 11:21]:
> I wonder if anyone has written a real "bouncesaying" (qmails bouncesaying
> just exits with an exit code that makes qmail-local do the actual
> bouncing.

With a few pointers from Frank Tegtmeyer, I've now made what I wanted
myself. Maybe someone else finds this useful...

-Johan
-- 
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/

 bouncesaying.sh
 PGP signature


unsubscribe me PLEASE - can't get qmail-unsubscribe@ to work

2001-03-29 Thread Col Wilson

[EMAIL PROTECTED]




more help sought with relay-ctrl (was oh no not another relaying question)

2001-03-29 Thread Gary Law

Hi again

I decided to go for the relay-ctrl idea suggested by Charles and James who
responded to my last message. However, I've got a number of issues:-

Instructions for installation suggest, sensibly, reading the man page for
relay-ctrl-age. the 'make install-root' seems to install the man pages but
'man' ignores them. So i 'cat'ted the man pages to extract what I needed to
know.

where references were made to configs being stored in directorys that don't
exist I created the directories (as root) and I've not changed the owner or
permissions.

I put the following in rc.local:

tcpserver -v -u 2850 -g 32750 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \
2>&1 | /var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd 3 &

commented out the reference to smtp in inetd.conf and sent a kill- HUP to
the process. Then ran the above from the command line as root. I can still
send and recieve mail (phew!).

I put

*/20 * * * * /usr/sbin/relay-ctrl-age

into my crontab... and here's my first problem. Cron is now outputting:-

/usr/bin/tcprules: No such file or directory

the tcprules is in fact in
/usr/local/bin
what's the best solution? symlink? what's calling this... can I edit a
variable somewhere to change this?

Also, I tried to symlink as suggested
/usr/lib/courier-imap/libexec/authlib/
to
  /usr/sbin/relay-ctrl-allow.

but there is no /usr/lib/courier-imap/libexec/authlib/ on my system. I am
using courier-imap but there appears to be no similar directory on my system
except
/usr/local/libexec/authlib
but nothing courier-imap specific.

All suggestions as to solutions gratefully recieved!

Thanks

gary





qmail Digest 29 Mar 2001 11:00:00 -0000 Issue 1318

2001-03-29 Thread qmail-digest-help


qmail Digest 29 Mar 2001 11:00:00 - Issue 1318

Topics (messages 59871 through 59962):

Re: DNS question
59871 by: David T. Ashley
59872 by: Frank Tegtmeyer

oh no, not another relaying question...
59873 by: Gary Law
59881 by: James Raftery
59884 by: Charles Cazabon

Syncing IMAP mailboxes
59874 by: Gavin Cameron
59908 by: Mike Jackson

qmail - Ezmlm
59875 by: Bird
59877 by: Frank Tegtmeyer

Re: qmailadmin 0.42
59876 by: Rodrigo P. Telles

Re: Can you help me ??(about limit of the number of per process file hand
59878 by: Henning Brauer
59944 by: Baoguo Xu
59956 by: Peter van Dijk

Re: qmail and sms
59879 by: Henning Brauer

qmail & imap
59880 by: Martin Edlman

Re: Update on qmail/Outlook hang
59882 by: Andrew Richards

Re: rcphosts error
59883 by: Charles Cazabon

Alternate MDA
59885 by: Alex Le Fevre
59890 by: Charles Cazabon
59893 by: Alex Le Fevre
59894 by: Charles Cazabon

qmail remote / local problems ...
59886 by: Simon Woodward

Maildir file naming convention
59887 by: Subba Rao
59889 by: Charles Cazabon
59895 by: Mark Delany
59898 by: Charles Cazabon
59915 by: Mark Delany
59918 by: Peter van Dijk
59921 by: Charles Cazabon
59923 by: Charles Cazabon
59926 by: Peter van Dijk
59927 by: Bruce Guenter
59935 by: Charles Cazabon
59939 by: Mark Delany
59946 by: Charles Cazabon

need to forward to 2 addresses
59888 by: Virginia Chism
59891 by: Charles Cazabon
59892 by: Michael Peppard
59916 by: Virginia Chism

Re: Random Bounce
59896 by: jean
59897 by: Niles
59900 by: Johan Almqvist

Re: [OT] supervise sshd?
59899 by: Bruce Guenter

unable to get BCC mail in Qmail
59901 by: Pradeep Tapase
59902 by: Johan Almqvist
59909 by: Charles Cazabon
59920 by: Henning Brauer

Removing from queue
59903 by: Alex Le Fevre
59910 by: Charles Cazabon
59940 by: Steve Smith

Rewriting domain name on outbound messages
59904 by: Dion.Vansevenant.mro.com
59911 by: Charles Cazabon
59951 by: Jörgen Persson

archives
59905 by: Kirti S. Bajwa
59912 by: Charles Cazabon
59917 by: Virginia Chism

Subject per recipient
59906 by: Michael T. Babcock
59913 by: Charles Cazabon

RE:RE: how can i run qmail on a port that is not 25 under tcpserver?
59907 by: Lucas

sqwebmail-1.2.5
59914 by: Bill Parker

qmail and hyphens in domain names
59919 by: Dean Browett

Problems getting qmail to work properly
59922 by: John  Cope
59928 by: Charles Cazabon
59929 by: Tim Hunter

Qmail  Implementation as anti-spam for Ms Exchange
59924 by: hantunes

faster than bcc
59925 by: Brett
59930 by: Charles Cazabon
59931 by: Peter van Dijk
59932 by: Dave Sill
59933 by: Mark Delany
59934 by: Brett
59936 by: Charles Cazabon
59937 by: Brett

[announcement] qmail-smtpd-requireauth version 0.10 available
59938 by: Danny Burkes
59962 by: Krzysztof Dabrowski

Re: migrating from MS Exchange to q-mail
59941 by: James R Grinter

SMTP not working .
59942 by: John  Cope
59943 by: Chris Johnson
59945 by: Jack Thomas

help ( pop authenticate with ldap )
59947 by: lucky

inquire
59948 by: KIM
59949 by: Jeremy Suo-Anttila

email message body
59950 by: Essy Ren

shell vs qmail
59952 by: alexus

qmail-ldap patch
59953 by: Elena Escolano Torner
59961 by: Andre Oppermann

Maildir problem
59954 by: lkhanna.hughes-ecomm.com
59955 by: Gerrit Pape

Limit outbound connections but not for all domains
59957 by: Iñigo Martínez Lasala

Not able to receive BCC mail in Qmail
59958 by: Pradeep Tapase
59960 by: Gerrit Pape

A real "bouncesaying"
59959 by: Johan Almqvist

Administrivia:

To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--





-Original Message-
From: David T. Ashley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 6:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DNS question


I read the HOWTO for q-mail, but there is one thing I don't understand.

It states that I need a DNS and that my machines have to be listed in the
DNS for qmail to work.

I have a hardware firewall (one of those $150 boxes) guarding my DSL line
with a static IP.  Is it good enough that my static IP has a r

Re: [announcement] qmail-smtpd-requireauth version 0.10 available

2001-03-29 Thread Krzysztof Dabrowski


Danny,, here is an excerpt from you docs:

10.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
and allows me to relay when I dial up, but only if I authenticate
first, via the rule: 
=.dialup.someisp.net:allow,RBLSMTPD="",REQUIREAUTH=""


What is the ADDED functionality of your patch? Just ot make it clear to
me.

1. if you  do:

10.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""

you will be able to realy with no problems from everythere

2. if you do:

=.dialup.someisp.net:allow

You will HAVE to authenticate, unless the receipient's domain is in your
rcpthosts file (which is 100% logical as you want to accept all mail for
your users from all sources).

So all the functionality that you say, your patch is providing ALREADY IS
in my patch :)

Kris
p.s. i recall you mailing me, right? sorry i did not answer because i
were sick lately and i was overwhelmed with the amount of mail



Re: qmail-ldap patch

2001-03-29 Thread Andre Oppermann

Elena Escolano Torner wrote:
> 
> Good morning everyone,
> i'm trying to get the qmail-ldap patch since yesterday, but the place
> where it used to be
> "http://www.nrg4u.com/qmail/qmail-ldap-1.03-2701.patch.gz" doesn't
> answer.
> I'm in a hurry, so please, if anyone of you have a copy of it or knows
> other URL where i could take it, i would appreciate your help.
> Regards and thanks in advance.

Yes, we have restructured our network and I didn't had time to
reconnect www.nrg4u.com before I felt asleep...

Will be online in a few hours.

-- 
Andre



Re: Not able to receive BCC mail in Qmail

2001-03-29 Thread Gerrit Pape

On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:03:08PM +0600, Pradeep Tapase wrote:
> Dear
> 
> I just newly installed Qmail on one server. But in this I was not able to get 
> BCC mails from any externel account such as yahoo or hotmail, but i can receive 
> localy. In qmail i configured it for Mailbox format. If any one can help in 
> this regards. if any one suggest me to configure procmail to receive BCC mail. 
> To fetchmail from our web server we uses fetchmail.
> 
> In fetchmail I doesn't uses any mda to transfer mail. fetchmail deliver mail to 
> SMTP port.
>
If You use fetchmail to pop mail from yahoo or hotmail and feed it to
localhost:25, this is an fetchmail issue. fetchmail must parse additional
header information added by hotmail's or yahoo's MTA.
Please ask Yout question in a fetchmail support forum.

Gerrit.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
innominate AG
 the linux architects
tel: +49.30.308806-0  fax: -77  http://www.innominate.com



A real "bouncesaying"

2001-03-29 Thread Johan Almqvist

Hi!

I wonder if anyone has written a real "bouncesaying" (qmails bouncesaying
just exits with an exit code that makes qmail-local do the actual
bouncing.

I want to pipe a message to bouncesaying from mutt, like this:

| boucesaying "No subject specified"

and it should use the Return-Path to address it and use <> as the
sender...

-Johan
-- 
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/

 PGP signature


Not able to receive BCC mail in Qmail

2001-03-29 Thread Pradeep Tapase

Dear

I just newly installed Qmail on one server. But in this I was not able to get 
BCC mails from any externel account such as yahoo or hotmail, but i can receive 
localy. In qmail i configured it for Mailbox format. If any one can help in 
this regards. if any one suggest me to configure procmail to receive BCC mail. 
To fetchmail from our web server we uses fetchmail.

In fetchmail I doesn't uses any mda to transfer mail. fetchmail deliver mail to 
SMTP port.

If any can suggest me changes in my configuration or to change some script also 
I will be thankful for him

Pradeep
NetAdmin
MET-IIT



Limit outbound connections but not for all domains

2001-03-29 Thread Iñigo Martínez Lasala

Hi everybody.

Is there anyway to limit outbound connections with control/concurrentremote
but not for all domains? 
I want to limit outbound connections for all domains but one (it's an
internal domain and the bandwidth is not limited, so there is no reason to
limit this domain and I want immediate delivery too).
Thanks in advance.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Manager
newKnow
Navaluenga 2, Las Rozas, Madrid, Spain
+34 91 6399000

This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any wrong transmission.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately destroy it
and kindly notify the sender by reply email.
You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or
copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of Newknow shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it. 




Re: Can you help me ??(about limit of the number of per process file hand

2001-03-29 Thread Peter van Dijk

On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:04:59AM +0800, Baoguo Xu wrote:
> Dear Henning,
> I try ,but not success. There is content in file conf-cc:
> cc -O2
> DFD_SETSIZE=4096

Put it on one line, like:

cc -O2 -DFD_SETSIZE=4096

Greetz, Peter.