Re: why vi don't use arrow key to move cursor???

2002-05-25 Thread Cameron Simpson

On 14:23 26 May 2002, Huter.Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|   I know the arrow key and the letter key can move cursor quite
| well,but I'm wondering why not just use arrow key?so I think there's
| now arrow key in the old keyboard and the old vi have *NO* choice but
| use letter key to move cursor?

Correct.

The other thing is that arrow keys send multibyte character sequences,
not single characters. These sequences commence with escape. Now,
imagine you're the vi programs listing to the typer. You get "ESC [
A". Now, did the user type ESC (to leave insert mode perhaps) and then
[ and then A, or did they type the up arrow?

The hueristic in curses is to watch the timing - if these characters
arrive close enough together they are considered an arrow key.

However, over a remote connection (telnet, ssh, busy serial line,
whatever) almost arbitrary timing gaps may appear between the charaters
and the curses program (vi in your example) can misread things.

Avoid the arrow keys - they are EVIL!

I tend to use backspace and space, minus and enter for single motions, and
the other motions: H, M, L, {, }, /pattern, w, W, b, B, etc for faster /
different motions. And of course j and k. I hardly ever use h and l.

hjkl are also the ergonomic keys for playing hack. Very important.
-- 
Cameron Simpson, DoD#743[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/

Sex without love is an empty experience, but, as empty experiences go,
 it's one of the best.  -- Woody Allen



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: why vi don't use arrow key to move cursor???

2002-05-25 Thread Vidiot

>hi,Vidiot!
>   I know the arrow key and the letter key can move cursor quite well,but I'm 
>wondering why not just use arrow key?so I think there's now arrow key in the old 
>keyboard and the old vi have *NO* choice but  use letter key to move cursor?who can 
>give me a picture of the oldest keyboard??

VI was developed long before the keyboards we use today were developed.
Back in the days before X was even developed, i.e., tty CRTs, using curses.

I don't have any photos of old keyboards.

MB
-- 
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   It is God's job to forgive bin Laden.
It is our job to set up the meeting.
U.S. Marine Corp.
Visit - URL: http://www.vidiot.com/  (Your link to Star Trek and UPN)



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: public_html pages stoped serving [fixed]

2002-05-25 Thread Greg Wright



*** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***

On 25/05/2002 at 9:50 AM Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] [gregausit/redhat-list]
wrote:

>Hi Greg:
>
>I found the problem.  Somehow the permissions on my password file got
>changed.  Must have been related to the filesystem filling up. Fixing that
>fixed the user pages.  Oh well, at least I was prodded into updating
Apache
>.

Oh good, I was also going to say make sure you know why the permissions
changed if it had :)



PS there is nothing wrong with using more than the main .conf file, however
you should know why you are doing so, IMO the mod_ssl version of apache
*needs* to be split across more than one .conf file.

Regards

Greg Wright
-- 

IT Consultant Sydney Australia PH 0418 292020 -- Int. +61 418 292020
Available for Global Contracts  US Fax -- 801 740 2874
Web  http://www.ausit.comE-mail Greg  AT  AusIT.com
Trading As -   AAA Computers -- providers of IT services.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: why vi don't use arrow key to move cursor???

2002-05-25 Thread Huter.Liu

hi,Vidiot!
I know the arrow key and the letter key can move cursor quite well,but I'm 
wondering why not just use arrow key?so I think there's now arrow key in the old 
keyboard and the old vi have *NO* choice but  use letter key to move cursor?who can 
give me a picture of the oldest keyboard??
thanks in advance.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2002-05-26





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Bad rpmdb, where'd this come from?

2002-05-25 Thread Harry Putnam


Running 7.1 and seems to have been running ok for quite a while.
Today running up2date -u as I do every so often I got a few updates.
imap, imlib, and fetchmail and sharutils.

I realized I had no need for imap so just rpm -e'd those instead of
installing the new ones.  When I did I got this message:

 rpm -e imap-devel

 rpmdb: Suspiciously high nelem of 4294967295 on page 0
 error: db4 error(-30979) from db->verify: DB_VERIFY_BAD: Database verification failed

Then running rpm -UvhF *.rpm on what was left

 Preparing...### [100%]
1:imlib  ### [ 20%]
2:fetchmail  ### [ 40%]
3:imlib-cfgeditor### [ 60%]
4:imlib-devel### [ 80%]
5:sharutils  ### [100%]
 rpmdb: Suspiciously high nelem of 4294967295 on page 0
 error: db4 error(-30979) from db->verify: DB_VERIFY_BAD: Database verification failed

The number after `high nelem of' in the first error may have been a
different number.  I didn' actually keep that one, and used one that
followed for example.

Anyone know what is happening here?

  rpm -V rpm reveals this information:
   root # rpm -V rpm
  .UG. c /var/lib/rpm/Dirnames
  .UG. c /var/lib/rpm/Filemd5s
  .UG. c /var/lib/rpm/Installtid
  .UG. c /var/lib/rpm/Provideversion
  .UG. c /var/lib/rpm/Requireversion
  .UG. c /var/lib/rpm/Sha1header
  .UG. c /var/lib/rpm/Sigmd5
  .UG. c /var/lib/rpm/__db.001
  .UG. c /var/lib/rpm/__db.002

And a ls -al shows:
(NOTE: The two files beginning with double underscore do not show up)
   root # ls -la /var/lib/rpm 
  total 18612
  drwxr-xr-x2 rpm  rpm  4096 May 25 07:22 .
  drwxr-xr-x   15 root root 4096 Mar 19 11:46 ..
  -rw-r--r--1 rpm  rpm   5214208 May 25 07:11 Basenames
  -rw-r--r--1 rpm  rpm 12288 May 25 07:11 Conflictname
  -rw-r--r--1 root root86016 May 25 07:11 Dirnames
  -rw-r--r--1 root root   626688 May 25 07:11 Filemd5s
  -rw-r--r--1 rpm  rpm 12288 May 25 07:11 Group
  -rw-r--r--1 root root 8192 May 25 07:11 Installtid
  -rw-r--r--1 rpm  rpm 24576 May 25 07:11 Name
  -rw-r--r--1 rpm  rpm  14372864 May 25 07:11 Packages
  -rw-r--r--1 rpm  rpm 86016 May 25 07:11 Providename
  -rw-r--r--1 root root12288 May 25 07:11 Provideversion
  -rw-r--r--1 rpm  rpm118784 May 25 07:11 Requirename
  -rw-r--r--1 root root12288 May 25 07:11 Requireversion
  -rw-r--r--1 root root12288 May 25 07:11 Sha1header
  -rw-r--r--1 root root12288 May 25 07:11 Sigmd5
  -rw-r--r--1 rpm  rpm 12288 May 25 07:11 Triggername

Normal queries work as usual
   root # rpm -q sharutils
  sharutils-4.2.1-8.7.x

I fixed what appears to be a permissions error and reset everything to
rpm rpm.  That silenced rpm -V.

But it seems some things just don't work as they should:

 root # rpm -Uvh fetchmail-5.9.0-10.i386.rpm
   Preparing... ### [100%]
   1:fetchmail   ### [100%]

   rpmdb: Suspiciously high nelem of 4294967295 on page 0 error: db4
   error(-30979) from db->verify: DB_VERIFY_BAD: Database verification
   failed

Although the install seems to have worked:
   # rpm -q fetchmail
   fetchmail-5.9.0-10



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: difference between run levels 1 and S

2002-05-25 Thread Statux

I think we figured all of this out already. Runlevel 1 is a defined
runlevel (/etc/inittab) who's behavior is based on the related rc.d
scripts (Runlevel 1 could therefore spam the screen with ascii art
and do nothing more).

Runlevel S, obviously, is what one would use if you were just going to get
things going (good if you're building a system from scratch... or doing a
major rebuild of a b0rked setup).

Runlevel 1 would seem to be accessible via init/telinit (since
traditionally, runlevel 1 means that none of the network stuff is going
among other things), whereas Runlevel S would logically be best
(if not only) accessible by rebooting.

On Sat, 25 May 2002, Bret Hughes wrote:

> On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 15:15, rpjday wrote:
> >
> >   a number of people i've chatted with lately seemed to think
> > there was not much difference between run level 1 and run levels
> > s or S.  after i explained it a couple of times, it occurred to
> > me to make sure *i* understood it properly.
> >
> >   as i understand it, run level 1 is similar to the other numeric
> > run levels in that all of those run levels are defined in
> > /etc/inittab -- regardless of what numeric run level you're
> > going to, init consults /etc/inittab to determine what has
> > to happen, and this involves running the K and S scripts in
> > the appropriate directory.  for run level 1, this consists
> > almost exclusively of K scripts (not totally, though -- more
> > on that in a minute).
> >
> >   in addition, if you boot to run level 1 at, say, the grub
> > menu, /etc/inittab *must* exist since, obviously, it has to
> > be consulted.
> >
> >   run level S, though, is another matter, in that this takes
> > the system directly to a single-user mode *without* consulting
> > /etc/inittab -- useful if you've trashed that file.
>
> Hmmm.  Not sure that is true but the init man page does seem to have
> some conflicting info.
>
> >From the init man page:
>
> BOOTING
>After  init is invoked as the last step of the kernel boot
>sequence, it looks for the file  /etc/inittab  to  see  if
>there  is  an  entry  of  the  type initdefault (see init­
>tab(5)). The initdefault entry determines the initial run­
>level  of  the  system.   If there is no such entry (or no
>/etc/inittab at all), a runlevel must be  entered  at  the
>system console.
>
>Runlevel  S  or s bring the system to single user mode and
>do not require an  /etc/initttab  file.   In  single  user
>mode, a root shell is opened on /dev/console.
>
> then later:
>
> BOOTFLAGS
>It  is possible to pass a number of flags to init from the
>boot monitor (eg. LILO). Init accepts the following flags:
>
>-s, S, single
> Single  user  mode boot. In this mode /etc/inittab is
> examined and the bootup rc scripts  are  usually  run
> before the single user mode shell is started.
>
>1-5  Runlevel to boot into.
>
> Is the issue whether s is entered at boot or via telinit? Not sure but
> like Mr Wagner, I have always assumed 1 and s were the same but clearly
> they are not.
>
> Keep us informed of any progress you make on figuring this out.
>
> Bret
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>

-- 




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Console font lines per screen

2002-05-25 Thread Edward Marczak

On 5/22/02 11:32 PM, "Kevin Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, 22 May 2002 14:09:52 -0400, you wrote:
> 
>> I tried consolechars also, without success.  The SYSFONT line in i18n seems
>> to be what did it for me.  And yes, I needed a reboot.
> 
> Yes, it's a combination of the vga mode and the font. The i18n file is read
> by the setsysfont script in the rc.sysinit. I got the result I wanted, 50
> lines per screen,  by using a 132x25 (yes, twenty-five) vga setting (vga=7
> here), and Lat0-08 font. I don't really understand why, but this combination
> ends up with the required 50 lines.

Actually, I just installed 7.3 on my laptop (subject of a near-future post)
and to get 80x50, all I did was change the i18n file - no mucking about with
'vga=' anything.  I set it to lat0-08, and when it gets to 'loading default
font' it switches right in.
-- 
Ed Marczak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: why vi don't use arrow key to move cursor???

2002-05-25 Thread Jonathan Bartlett

On Sun, 26 May 2002, Huter.Liu wrote:

> hi,redhat-list!
>   I'm wondering why vi don't use arrow key to move cursor but use h,j,k,l???Is 
>the oldest keyborad have no arrow key??The arrow key,home key,and the additional 
>number keys is added later,isn't it??

The arrow keys work fine for me.  The reason that the _primary_ keys for
moving around are a bit strange is that it is the least demanding for your
fingers (you don't have to stretch or hunt for keys), thus keeping you
from pain in your hands and helping you accomplish your goals faster.

That said, the vi that comes with Red Hat allows you to use arrow keys if
you really want to, although I find the letter keys easier.  If this isn't
working for you, I don't know how to fix it, but someone else on the list
probably does.

Jon

> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 2002-05-26
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: why vi don't use arrow key to move cursor???

2002-05-25 Thread Vidiot

>hi,redhat-list!
>   I'm wondering why vi don't use arrow key to move cursor but use h,j,k,l???Is 
>the oldest keyborad have no arrow key??The arrow key,home key,and the additional 
>number keys is added later,isn't it??

Strange, the arrow keys work for me.

MB
-- 
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   It is God's job to forgive bin Laden.
It is our job to set up the meeting.
U.S. Marine Corp.
Visit - URL: http://www.vidiot.com/  (Your link to Star Trek and UPN)



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



why vi don't use arrow key to move cursor???

2002-05-25 Thread Huter.Liu

hi,redhat-list!
I'm wondering why vi don't use arrow key to move cursor but use h,j,k,l???Is 
the oldest keyborad have no arrow key??The arrow key,home key,and the additional 
number keys is added later,isn't it??
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2002-05-26




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Intel AnyPoint Wireless Network in Linux?

2002-05-25 Thread The Gyzmo


--- Steve Buehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You might want to go to intel.com and look at the
> specs for the card to see 
> if it supports linux and if it does, check to see if
> you have to download 
> drivers and/or what versions of linux all ready
> support it built in.  You 
> will probably get an answer faster that way.
> 
> Steve
> 

At intel.com, it doesn't look like Linux is supported,
or at least officially.

> At 09:57 AM 5/25/2002 -0700, The Gyzmo wrote:
> >Hello.
> >
> >A friend recently gave me two Intel AnyPoint PCMCIA
> >cards to toy with and I got the USB based adapter
> >also. They work very well in Winbloze and I'd like
> to
> >use the PCMCIA cards for the two laptops in my
> house
> >rather than Ethernet.
> >
> >Is the Intel AnyPoint system supported with Linux
> >right now? I'd like to have my Linux gateway serve
> the
> >laptops through the wireless USB adapter also and I
> >don't want to have a Winbloze box to be the gateway
> >for the gateway.
> >
> >Whatever the procedure is, I don't mind having to
> >recompile the kernel if it doesn't require any
> >tweaking. I will be upgrading to Valhalla in the
> next
> >few days.
> >
> >Any help is greatly appreciated as Google hasn't
> >turned up anything.


=
+--+
|This message is from Serban Giuroiu, also known online|
|as  The Gyzmo.|
|EMAIL: g y z m o b r o @ y a h o o . com  | 
|AIM Screen Name: gyzmobro |
+--+
"Code Smarter, Not Harder" - off the Desaware t-shirt I have

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Archived snapshot of 6.1?

2002-05-25 Thread Emmanuel Seyman

On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 07:41:04PM -0300, Chris Watt wrote:
> 
> Redhat has every (non-beta) version they've released on their ftp site
> ftp.redhat.com, but it's a little busy most of the time.

More specifically:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/6.1/en/iso/i386/redhat-6.1-i386.iso

Good luck downloading.

Emmanuel



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Archived snapshot of 6.1?

2002-05-25 Thread Chris Watt

At 13:18 2002/05/24 -0700, Paul Thomas wrote:

>Does anyone know if there is a distro snapshot archived 
>someplace?

Redhat has every (non-beta) version they've released on their ftp site
ftp.redhat.com, but it's a little busy most of the time.
--

Q:  What's tiny and yellow and very, very, dangerous?
A:  A canary with the super-user password.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: difference between run levels 1 and S

2002-05-25 Thread Bret Hughes

On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 15:15, rpjday wrote:
> 
>   a number of people i've chatted with lately seemed to think
> there was not much difference between run level 1 and run levels
> s or S.  after i explained it a couple of times, it occurred to
> me to make sure *i* understood it properly.
> 
>   as i understand it, run level 1 is similar to the other numeric
> run levels in that all of those run levels are defined in
> /etc/inittab -- regardless of what numeric run level you're
> going to, init consults /etc/inittab to determine what has
> to happen, and this involves running the K and S scripts in
> the appropriate directory.  for run level 1, this consists
> almost exclusively of K scripts (not totally, though -- more
> on that in a minute).
> 
>   in addition, if you boot to run level 1 at, say, the grub
> menu, /etc/inittab *must* exist since, obviously, it has to
> be consulted.
> 
>   run level S, though, is another matter, in that this takes
> the system directly to a single-user mode *without* consulting
> /etc/inittab -- useful if you've trashed that file.

Hmmm.  Not sure that is true but the init man page does seem to have
some conflicting info.

>From the init man page:

BOOTING
   After  init is invoked as the last step of the kernel boot
   sequence, it looks for the file  /etc/inittab  to  see  if
   there  is  an  entry  of  the  type initdefault (see init­
   tab(5)). The initdefault entry determines the initial run­
   level  of  the  system.   If there is no such entry (or no
   /etc/inittab at all), a runlevel must be  entered  at  the
   system console.

   Runlevel  S  or s bring the system to single user mode and
   do not require an  /etc/initttab  file.   In  single  user
   mode, a root shell is opened on /dev/console.

then later:

BOOTFLAGS
   It  is possible to pass a number of flags to init from the
   boot monitor (eg. LILO). Init accepts the following flags:

   -s, S, single
Single  user  mode boot. In this mode /etc/inittab is
examined and the bootup rc scripts  are  usually  run
before the single user mode shell is started.

   1-5  Runlevel to boot into.

Is the issue whether s is entered at boot or via telinit? Not sure but
like Mr Wagner, I have always assumed 1 and s were the same but clearly
they are not.

Keep us informed of any progress you make on figuring this out.

Bret



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: otto mp3 streaming server

2002-05-25 Thread Emmanuel Seyman

On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 03:14:16AM +1000, Dan Horth wrote:
>
> any help or ideas as to how I can get my mp3 collection streaming
> around the house would be great!


Have you tried mod_mp3 ?

http://media.tangent.org/
http://enigma.freshrpms.net/rpm.html?id=810

Emmanuel

PS: Please wrap your lines every 72 chars.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Kernel oops

2002-05-25 Thread Statux

Whenever I change any hardware, I like to recompile the kernel to make
sure everything is peachy. Try recompiling the kernel and see what
happens.

On Fri, 24 May 2002, Ed Wilts wrote:

> In the last week or so, I've been starting to get kernel errors.  This is
> with the latest 7.1 updates.  Any ideas as to what's happening?  The latest
> change is that I replaced a 10GB Fujitsu drive with a Quantum 30GB fireball,
> but this drive should not have been accessed at this time (it's only used
> for backups, and they weren't running at this latest error).
>
> Thanks,
> .../Ed
>
> Unusual System Events
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> May 24 20:03:49 www kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
> at virtual address 0005
> May 24 20:03:49 www kernel:  printing eip:
> May 24 20:03:49 www kernel: c06c3f8e
> May 24 20:03:49 www kernel: *pde = 
> May 24 20:03:49 www kernel: Oops: 
> May 24 20:03:49 www kernel: Kernel 2.4.9-31
> May 24 20:03:49 www kernel: CPU:0
> May 24 20:03:49 www kernel: EIP:
> 0010:[8139too:__insmod_8139too_O/lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/drivers/net/+-1
> 35868530/96]Not tainted
> May 24 20:03:49 www kernel: EIP:0010:[]Not tainted
> May 24 20:03:49 www kernel: EFLAGS: 00010296
> May 24 20:03:49 www kernel: EIP is at ___strtok_R29805c13 [] 0x377dda
> May 24 20:03:49 www kernel: eax: 0005   ebx:    ecx: 
> edx: 
> May 24 20:03:49 www kernel: esi: c40af840   edi: ffea   ebp: 1000
> esp: c56c7f7c
> May 24 20:03:49 www kernel: ds: 0018   es: 0018   ss: 0018
> May 24 20:03:49 www kernel: Stack: 0005 c40af840 40018000 1000
> c40af860 fffd c01197f3 0046
> May 24 20:03:49 www kernel:c56c7fc4 000b c0300a60 c15444a0
> c01084fc c56c6000 402b2600 
> May 24 20:03:49 www kernel:bfffdc28 c0106f33  40018000
> 1000 402b2600  bfffdc28
> May 24 20:03:49 www kernel: Call Trace: [do_softirq+83/160] do_softirq
> [kernel] 0x53
> May 24 20:03:50 www kernel: Call Trace: [] do_softirq [kernel]
> 0x53
> May 24 20:03:50 www kernel: [system_call+51/64] system_call [kernel] 0x33
> May 24 20:03:50 www kernel: [] system_call [kernel] 0x33
> May 24 20:03:50 www kernel:
> May 24 20:03:50 www kernel:
> May 24 20:03:50 www kernel: Code: 2b 38 2b 53 50 2f 70 6e 2f 41 4e 63 36 0a
> 31 6f 71 64 33 4b
>
>
> Ed Wilts
> Mounds View, MN, USA
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>

-- 




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RE: difference between run levels 1 and S

2002-05-25 Thread Wagner, Joseph

It's my understanding that Linux 1 = Linux S

-Original Message-
From: rpjday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 3:16 PM
To: redhat mailing list
Subject: difference between run levels 1 and S



  a number of people i've chatted with lately seemed to think
there was not much difference between run level 1 and run levels
s or S.  after i explained it a couple of times, it occurred to
me to make sure *i* understood it properly.

  as i understand it, run level 1 is similar to the other numeric
run levels in that all of those run levels are defined in
/etc/inittab -- regardless of what numeric run level you're
going to, init consults /etc/inittab to determine what has
to happen, and this involves running the K and S scripts in
the appropriate directory.  for run level 1, this consists
almost exclusively of K scripts (not totally, though -- more
on that in a minute).

  in addition, if you boot to run level 1 at, say, the grub
menu, /etc/inittab *must* exist since, obviously, it has to
be consulted.

  run level S, though, is another matter, in that this takes
the system directly to a single-user mode *without* consulting
/etc/inittab -- useful if you've trashed that file.

  in fact, switching to run level 1 actually involves "K"illing
almost everything, then "S"tarting single user mode.

  so, is that a fair description?  am i missing anything
critical?  is there, somewhere, a decent writeup on this since
the man pages for both init and inittab don't discuss this
distinction as well as i'd like.

rday



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Intel AnyPoint Wireless Network in Linux?

2002-05-25 Thread Steve Buehler

You might want to go to intel.com and look at the specs for the card to see 
if it supports linux and if it does, check to see if you have to download 
drivers and/or what versions of linux all ready support it built in.  You 
will probably get an answer faster that way.

Steve

At 09:57 AM 5/25/2002 -0700, The Gyzmo wrote:
>Hello.
>
>A friend recently gave me two Intel AnyPoint PCMCIA
>cards to toy with and I got the USB based adapter
>also. They work very well in Winbloze and I'd like to
>use the PCMCIA cards for the two laptops in my house
>rather than Ethernet.
>
>Is the Intel AnyPoint system supported with Linux
>right now? I'd like to have my Linux gateway serve the
>laptops through the wireless USB adapter also and I
>don't want to have a Winbloze box to be the gateway
>for the gateway.
>
>Whatever the procedure is, I don't mind having to
>recompile the kernel if it doesn't require any
>tweaking. I will be upgrading to Valhalla in the next
>few days.
>
>Any help is greatly appreciated as Google hasn't
>turned up anything.
>
>=
>+--+
>|This message is from Serban Giuroiu, also known online|
>|as  The Gyzmo.|
>|EMAIL: g y z m o b r o @ y a h o o . com  |
>|AIM Screen Name: gyzmobro |
>+--+
>"Code Smarter, Not Harder" - off the Desaware t-shirt I have
>
>__
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
>http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>___
>Redhat-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>--
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



difference between run levels 1 and S

2002-05-25 Thread rpjday


  a number of people i've chatted with lately seemed to think
there was not much difference between run level 1 and run levels
s or S.  after i explained it a couple of times, it occurred to
me to make sure *i* understood it properly.

  as i understand it, run level 1 is similar to the other numeric
run levels in that all of those run levels are defined in
/etc/inittab -- regardless of what numeric run level you're
going to, init consults /etc/inittab to determine what has
to happen, and this involves running the K and S scripts in
the appropriate directory.  for run level 1, this consists
almost exclusively of K scripts (not totally, though -- more
on that in a minute).

  in addition, if you boot to run level 1 at, say, the grub
menu, /etc/inittab *must* exist since, obviously, it has to
be consulted.

  run level S, though, is another matter, in that this takes
the system directly to a single-user mode *without* consulting
/etc/inittab -- useful if you've trashed that file.

  in fact, switching to run level 1 actually involves "K"illing
almost everything, then "S"tarting single user mode.

  so, is that a fair description?  am i missing anything
critical?  is there, somewhere, a decent writeup on this since
the man pages for both init and inittab don't discuss this
distinction as well as i'd like.

rday



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: RH 7.2 + icewm 1.0.9 => switching virtual desktops

2002-05-25 Thread Monte Milanuk

On Sat, 25 May 2002 01:03:30 -0500
ABrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> You should probably join the icewm mailing list, or as a minimum, look
> at the info provided on the homepage.
> 
> Quickly, edit ~/.icewm/preferences and/or ~/.icewm/keys. If the keys
> file doesn't exist you'll need to create it, and explanations are best
> left to the docs.
> 
> You can also change virtual desktops with CTRL-ALT- with
>  being the number of the desktop (1, 2, 3, etc).
> 
> If you haven't used it in awhile, you really need to check the docs
> and even join the mailing list. It's changed a lot and there are
> things that weren't there not too long ago.
> 
>

Thanks, that's what I was looking for.  I'll check out the icewm list. 
I used to be subscribed (year or two ago) but quit, as I started using
XFCE full time, and the list was pretty dead anyway at that time.

Monte

-- 
All right, breaks over.  Back on your heads!!



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



otto mp3 streaming server

2002-05-25 Thread Dan Horth

Hi - I was wondering if anyone has successfully set up otto on a Redhat 7.2 server - 
I've tried and failed... the project sounds great but the instructions are a bit vague 
for my level of admin skills, and I haven't had a reply from the developers...

http://www.cardhouse.com/otto/

I've followed the setup instructions - and managed to get all the required stuff set 
up (I think) although I did have problems installing the Mysql 1.2215 perl module - I 
ended up having to go for a later version... but the Mysql / perl bit doesn't seem to 
be the problem - I have been able to get otto to find and catalogue all my files but 
can't get anything played...

basically otto just skips through each track on the playlist - as if it tries to open 
the file and fails - so it moves on to the next one, and so on...

any help or ideas as to how I can get my mp3 collection streaming around the house 
would be great!

thanks, dan.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Intel AnyPoint Wireless Network in Linux?

2002-05-25 Thread The Gyzmo

Hello.

A friend recently gave me two Intel AnyPoint PCMCIA
cards to toy with and I got the USB based adapter
also. They work very well in Winbloze and I'd like to
use the PCMCIA cards for the two laptops in my house
rather than Ethernet.

Is the Intel AnyPoint system supported with Linux
right now? I'd like to have my Linux gateway serve the
laptops through the wireless USB adapter also and I
don't want to have a Winbloze box to be the gateway
for the gateway.

Whatever the procedure is, I don't mind having to
recompile the kernel if it doesn't require any
tweaking. I will be upgrading to Valhalla in the next
few days.

Any help is greatly appreciated as Google hasn't
turned up anything.

=
+--+
|This message is from Serban Giuroiu, also known online|
|as  The Gyzmo.|
|EMAIL: g y z m o b r o @ y a h o o . com  | 
|AIM Screen Name: gyzmobro |
+--+
"Code Smarter, Not Harder" - off the Desaware t-shirt I have

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: SCSI card RH 7.3

2002-05-25 Thread Mike Burger

The Adaptec 2940 series will work well.

On Sat, 25 May 2002, Andrew Judge wrote:

> Anyone have any suggestions for a good scsi card that will control a tape
> drive (68 pin Seagate 20/40) on RH 7.3?  I was thinking about a Adaptec
> 19160, but am not sure about compatibility since it is a little unclear on
> the HCL.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Andrew Judge
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: blew away a gig

2002-05-25 Thread Kent Borg

On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 12:01:02PM -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2002, daniel wrote:
> 
> > ext3 unfortunately
> > all the information i've found is for ext2
> > unrm won't even run with ext3
> 
> These are not explicitly ext3 tools

ext2 and ext3 are very compatible.  The difference on disk is that
ext3 has some extra journal data that ext2 will ignore.  The real
difference is in the kernel that knows how to do the journaling.

Once you have deleted the whole thing, these differences are
completely trivial, use any ext2 tools that you can that help.


Good luck,

-kb, the Kent who hasn't tried to undelete things on Linux.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: blew away a gig

2002-05-25 Thread Matthew Saltzman

On Fri, 24 May 2002, daniel wrote:

> ext3 unfortunately
> all the information i've found is for ext2
> unrm won't even run with ext3

These are not explicitly ext3 tools, but I had some success with
LDE (lde.sourceforge.net) and debugfs
(e2undel.sourceforge.net/recovery-howto.html).  A lot of patience and a
certain amount of creativity is required.

Good luck.

> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > ...and i need it all back.
> > > > >
> > > > > what are my chances of undeleting a gig?
> > > > > and how do i do it?
> > > > >
> > > > > i deleted the files from windows through samba

-- 
Matthew Saltzman

Clemson University Math Sciences
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: public_html pages stoped serving [fixed]

2002-05-25 Thread Scott

Hi Greg:

I found the problem.  Somehow the permissions on my password file got
changed.  Must have been related to the filesystem filling up. Fixing that
fixed the user pages.  Oh well, at least I was prodded into updating Apache
.

Thanks very much as always for your help,
Scott

> >All of my "public_html" (i.e. http://www.mydomain.com/~jones) web pages
> >stopped serving.  My non-public_html pages and virtual domains are
working
> >fine.

> >conf file has not changed and srm.comf has:
> >
> >DocumentRoot /home/httpd/html
> >UserDir public_html
> >
> >Can someone tell me what to check next or how to repair?

> You should only be using http(s)d.conf unless it is really old version.

In my efforts to fix, I installed the latest rpm. I'm now running 1.3.22.  I
re-edited the fresh config files and I am now only using httpd.conf, the
others are empty.





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: public_html pages stoped serving

2002-05-25 Thread Greg Wright



*** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***

On 25/05/2002 at 8:26 AM Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] [gregausit/redhat-list]
wrote:

>Greetings (help, help!)
>
>Last night I had a root filesystem fill due to a log file growing too
>large.
>I have corected that and all is back to normal except:
>
>All of my "public_html" (i.e. http://www.mydomain.com/~jones) web pages
>stopped serving.  My non-public_html pages and virtual domains are working
>fine.
>


>
>conf file has not changed and srm.comf has:
>
>DocumentRoot /home/httpd/html
>UserDir public_html
>
>Can someone tell me what to check next or how to repair?

You should only be using http(s)d.conf unless it is really old version.

Anyway, you do not say if it worked before, go to a shell and see if you
can access the directory as a different user, i.e user nobody needs to be
able to get to this file index.html, some versions of RH required manually
setting the directory permissions.



Regards

Greg Wright
-- 

IT Consultant Sydney Australia PH 0418 292020 -- Int. +61 418 292020
Available for Global Contracts  US Fax -- 801 740 2874
Web  http://www.ausit.comE-mail Greg  AT  AusIT.com
Trading As -   AAA Computers -- providers of IT services.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



public_html pages stoped serving

2002-05-25 Thread Scott

Greetings (help, help!)

Last night I had a root filesystem fill due to a log file growing too large.
I have corected that and all is back to normal except:

All of my "public_html" (i.e. http://www.mydomain.com/~jones) web pages
stopped serving.  My non-public_html pages and virtual domains are working
fine.

In my httpd error log I see:

[Sat May 25 08:11:04 2002] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx] File does not exist:
/home/httpd/html/~jones
If I try to implicitly send index.html I get:
[Sat May 25 08:12:10 2002] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx] File does not exist:
/home/httpd/html/~jones/index.html

But the file and directory do exist, there have been no changes.  They have
permissions drwxr-xr-x

I have restarted httpd - not luck.

I rebooted - still no luck

conf file has not changed and srm.comf has:

DocumentRoot /home/httpd/html
UserDir public_html

Can someone tell me what to check next or how to repair?

Thanks very much for any help,
Scott







___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: What is correct way to load modules before file systems are mounted?

2002-05-25 Thread John P Verel

Thanks!
On 05/25/02, 12:43:00AM -0500, ABrady wrote:
 
> Here's mine in its entirety, USB and all.

-- 
John P. Verel
Living Proof That Low Tech Beats High Tech!



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RE: running 7.2 and 7.3 side by side

2002-05-25 Thread rpjday

On 24 May 2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:

> On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 13:07, Ward William E DLDN wrote:
> > 
> > Benefits:
> > 
> > One, single /var so ALL logs still show up; and nicely,
> > during boot, it TELLS you what kernel you're booting to,
> > so you can decipher.
> 
> /var contains data that may not be compatible between 7.2 and 7.4.  For
> instance, PostgreSQL won't work.
> 
> Skip sharing /var.

(out of curiosity, how did this thread suddenly referring to "7.4"?
you guys must have a *serious* pre-alpha version or something. :-)

the more i think about this, the more i realize that this is related
to the file and directory layout being discussed in the FHS (filesystem
hierarchy standard).

the biggest hassle is clearly the /var directory, which currently
is a mess.  /var currently contains, on the one hand, truly variable
data (/var/log, /var/lock) that does not have to be carried across
to a new release, but also config and data files (/var/www, /var/ftp,
/var/named, etc.) that *could* be carried across (or, more 
specifically, *should* be carried across to a new release).

one of the proposals of the FHS was to create a new top-level
directory, /srv, for stuff to be *served*, such as /srv/ftp,
/srv/http and so on.  if things were designed more cleanly,
that would make my little exercise here a lot simpler.
so i'm going to peruse the last few months of the FHS archives
and think on this some more.

rday



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: conversion to pdf

2002-05-25 Thread Ben Logan

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 10:10:23PM -0700, Hidong Kim wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to convert images to PDF.  They're mostly JPEG images to
> start.  I convert them to PostScript in xv.  When I do this, the
> PostScript image comes out with huge white borders.  The JPEG images
> which are about 4" x 3" are always reformatted to PostScript on a 8.5" x
> 11" field.  How do I eliminate all of this extra white space?  Thanks,

Does xv have an option for setting the paper size?  If you have
ImageMagik installed (probably do), then you might try using 'convert'
instead.  'man convert' will give you the details.

Regards,
Ben

-- 
Ben Logan: ben at wblogan dot net
OpenPGP Key KeyID: A1ADD1F0

Police up your spare rounds and frags.  Don't leave nothin' for the dinks.
- Willem Dafoe in "Platoon"



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: SCSI card RH 7.3

2002-05-25 Thread Rick van der Linde

On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 09:43, Andrew Judge wrote:
> Anyone have any suggestions for a good scsi card that will control a tape
> drive (68 pin Seagate 20/40) on RH 7.3?  I was thinking about a Adaptec
> 19160, but am not sure about compatibility since it is a little unclear on
> the HCL.

It uses the AIC-7892 chip which is supported by Linux. I use the 29160
which uses the same chip. It works OK. I also use the 29040U2W which
seems to have a driver bottleneck at approx.65 MB/s. Other OS'es allow
it to operate it to approx. 78 MB/s (Soft RAID0).

Rick



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: SCSI card RH 7.3

2002-05-25 Thread Darryl Harvey

try initio 9100UW..


They seem to work well.

Rgds,
Darryl

At 07:43 PM 25/05/2002, you wrote:
>Anyone have any suggestions for a good scsi card that will control a tape
>drive (68 pin Seagate 20/40) on RH 7.3?  I was thinking about a Adaptec
>19160, but am not sure about compatibility since it is a little unclear on
>the HCL.
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>Andrew Judge
>
>
>
>
>___
>Redhat-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



SCSI card RH 7.3

2002-05-25 Thread Andrew Judge

Anyone have any suggestions for a good scsi card that will control a tape
drive (68 pin Seagate 20/40) on RH 7.3?  I was thinking about a Adaptec
19160, but am not sure about compatibility since it is a little unclear on
the HCL.


Best regards,

Andrew Judge




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list