RE: Still not working!

[Ismael Touama]

Title: Message



Hi,
 

I didn't 
follow teh topic.
How do you 
install PHP to work with your apache ?
Did you 
enable particular api? Third part or something else ?
The order is 
kind of important.
What was the 
ways of the severals installation ?

 
--
ism

  -Message d'origine-De : 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la 
  part de Thomas E. DukesEnvoyé : jeudi 9 janvier 2003 
  12:56À : Redhat-List@Redhat. ComObjet : PHP: 
  Still not working!
  I know we have 
  beat this horse to death, but my php is still not working.  I have tried 
  all the suggestions everyone has posted but still, php is not 
  working.
   
  If some of you Red 
  Hat Tech Support people are 'listening', please feel free to jump in and 
  help.  I read the FAQ on your site, but it is for php3 and older versions 
  of RH (apache).
   
  TIA
   
  Palmetto Shopper http://www.palmettoshopper.comServing all of South Carolina and beyond!
   

RE: RE : installations problems with RH8.0

[Ismael Touama]

> Ismael,
>
> On this point all seems to be all right my HDD Is configured as a 
> master, but the bios say me that my disk is around 8Go (it's a 
> 10GO disk), and the linux system see the 10 GO. I 've 
> flashupdated my bios whith the most recent flash image (September 
> 1999) it doesn't work better now

Sorry, can't tell anymore...





-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: installations problems with RH8.0

[Ismael Touama]

> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI
> NOISIEL)
> Envoye : vendredi 20 decembre 2002 14:32
> A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : installations problems with RH8.0
> 
> 
> Hi all
> 
> I've a strange problem with the installation of a RH 8.0 on small system
> configuration (PI 133MHZ with 49MO).
> 
> 
> During the installation it take a long time to do anything (starting
> anaconda take me 40s), sometimes spend from a page to another coud take
> more than 5mn (eg. "Language choice" to "meridian time choice" etc..)
> 
> If anyone knows a solution, I am interested in it !!! 
> 
> Thanks
hi,

maybe check the HDs installation (master/slave)...

--
ism



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: boot disk

[Ismael Touama]

> 
> Hi,
> 
> mkbootdisk `uname-r`, I guess.
> You can in other way enter directly the version-of-your-kernel.
> 
> --
> ism

Sorry !
mkbootdisk `uname -r`



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: boot disk

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

mkbootdisk `uname-r`, I guess.
You can in other way enter directly the version-of-your-kernel.

--
ism


> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de M. Schild
> Envoye : mercredi 4 decembre 2002 11:50
> A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : boot disk
> 
> 
> Could anyone explain simply how to make a boot disk, please. I lost my 
> original one
> Maryse
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: The new Kernel

[Ismael Touama]

> On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 05:55:42PM -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
> > No problems for me yet on an RH 7.3 athlon 2.4.18-18 (or 17) 
> kernel or on
> > 8.0 on the same kernel versions. One is an Ultra/100 (7.3) and 
> the other is
> > an Ultra/66 (8.0) controller.
> 
> Weird!
> 
> I've got the latest firmware in the ultra66, how about you? (from memory,
> I think it's verson 2.0 build 18 (2.00b18).
> 
> Fred

> > 
> > 
> > > Is anyone else having trouble with the 2.4.18-x kernel?
> > >
> > > Specifically, it doesn't LIKE my promsie Ultra66 ATA 
> controller. Cannot
> > > (reliably) access the drive on /dev/hdg (promise controller, 
> second IDE
> > > channel, master). Tends to hang the mount or e2fsck or 
> whatever commands,
> > > tends to do weird things to the sytem such that it won't, 
> e.g., shutdown
> > > when told to.
> > >
> > > Happens on both the 2.4.18-17.7x and 2.4.18-18.7x kernels. the older
> > > 2.4.9-34 kernel seems to work fine with this device.
> > >
> > > It has been entered in to RH's bugzilla, but so far there are 
> no replies
> > > (except for my own additional comment).
> > 

Hi,

I'm on RH72.
And the new kernel installed is the same you got.
It seems I don't have bug or performance problems.
[Maybe at compiling MySQL but it's maybe my fault *??*].

Howerver, it seems the presence of the 'x' in the number
version issue a state not really relevant, isn't it ?
My question is simple : What is the thing to do (certainly a
update or whatever) to have a final version and state of the
last kernel issued by erratas...

Thank you
--
ism
"They try to build a prison" - Prison song / S.O.A.D



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: poptmodule.so

[Ismael Touama]

OK,

my problem is over.
Erratas weren't clear to me.
Erratas aren't clear to me.

It was a problem of dependencies resolution that
a rpm following solve. So I installed the rpm(s)
which problem occured and then apply the rpm that
correct this problem of dependencies resolution.

Thanks to Emmanuel,
ism



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: poptmodule.so

[Ismael Touama]

Hi Emmannuel, all,
 
> > I got it yet installed the 4.0.3-1.03 (the native one of my 
> installation).
> > Any more idea ?
> 
> Look in the updates.
> 
> Emmanuel

It's what I do for *several* days...
Look at this, I restart from the *beginning*.
[RH7.2 -i386-]
-Updated KDE packages are available
 Advisory: RHEA-2001:158-13 
 packages (in fact kdeadmin) outdated by:
-Updated rpm packages available
 Advisory: RHEA-2002:024-23 
 package (python-popt) outdated by:
-New python-popt packages available to fix incorrect dependency
 Advisory: RHBA-2002:052-07

I asked for some indications 1 or 2 weeks ago regarding
outdated packages but no feedbacks.
Nevertheless, must I just apply, in case of one package
outdated the packages corresponding to or all the packages
goin' with ?
I guess I have to apply all, when I try e.g kdeadmin-2.2.2-3
it output me a lot of dependencies regarding package I have 
to install.
I don't see what to do anymore except forcing, view I wish
I'll avoid.
--
ism

 
 



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: poptmodule.so

[Ismael Touama]

> 
> You need the rpm-python package, something like that

Thank you,

I got it yet installed the 4.0.3-1.03 (the native one of my installation).
Any more idea ?

ism



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

poptmodule.so

[Ismael Touama]

Hello,

I know it's recursive problem but I can't find any manipulation that
avoid me to have this error:
poptmodule.so is needed by up2date.2.8.39-1.7.2

I'm upgrading my system and for KDE update I encounter this problem.
[RHEA-2001:158 and then RHEA-2002:024-23 -in fact the last one-]

poptmodule.so is present here /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages.
I told ld.so.conf to reach here but nothin', I make a link between
the previous path until /usr/lib and then "/sbin/ldconfig -v" but
nothin too

The thing I don't understand too is that up2date.2.8.39-1.7.2
is still on my system.
What I can do in addition to my previous acts.
Thanks to help.

ism



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Failure on applying RHSA-2002: 197-06

[Ismael Touama]

> Here is the error (I put the output of rpm -Fvh *.rpm):
> 1- glibc-common ### [25%]
> 2- glibcwarning: /etc/localtime created as
>   /etc/localtime.rpmnew  ### [50%]
> 3-glibc-devel   ### [75%]
> 4-nscd  ### [100%]
>
> error : db3 error (-30998) from db->close : DB_INCOMPLETE :
> Cache flush was unable to complete.
> rpmdb: Overflow page 3 of invalid type
> rpmdb: Overflow page 1843 of invalid type
> error: db3 error (-30985) from db->verify : DB_VERIFY_BAD : Database
> verification failed.
>

OK I did:

rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db*
and then try again : rpm -Fvh
And change the error as is:

rpmdb: First overflow page 3 has prev_pgno
rpmdb: Overflow item incomplete on page 3
rpmdb: First overflow page 1843 has prev_pgno
rpmdb: Overflow item incomplete on page 3
rpmdb: Page 3 encountered twice in overflow traversal
rpmdb: db3 error (-30985) from db->verify : DB_VERIFY_BAD : Database
verification failed

And then after I did
rpm --rebuilddb
It found 2 damaged error and skip it... I did again rpm -Fvh *.rpm
and all seem OK, I don't understand what happenning but It seems to
be OK... It's finnaly OK.

ism
(rpm --rebuilddb is cool)



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Update

[Ismael Touama]

> Just recently installed Red-Hat Linux, and know nothing about linux in
> general.  When I go to the up2date service, there was a number of
> patches and updates.  All installed o.k., except the kernel files.  They
> just freeze, and do nothing.  Are these not updateable through the auto
> feature or what?  What am I doing wrong?
> 
> regards Greg

Hi,

just go here :
http://www.redhat.com/support/resources/kernel-upgrade

I know nothing about up2date.
By the way if someone can help for the topic I open today,
I would be pleased !

ism



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Failure on applying RHSA-2002: 197-06

[Ismael Touama]

Hi everyone,

I'm currently updating my RH7.2.
All was really clean until my 27th rpm.
It's RHSA-2002: 197-06 [Updated glibc packages
fix vulnerabilities in resolver] of the 2002-10-03.

In fact, it is the RHSA-2001:160-09 of the 2001-12-14
that I had to apply but this one was outdated by the first
mentionned errata.
Here is the error (I put the output of rpm -Fvh *.rpm):
1- glibc-common ### [25%]
2- glibcwarning: /etc/localtime created as
/etc/localtime.rpmnew  ### [50%]
3-glibc-devel   ### [75%]
4-nscd  ### [100%]

error : db3 error (-30998) from db->close : DB_INCOMPLETE :
Cache flush was unable to complete.
rpmdb: Overflow page 3 of invalid type
rpmdb: Overflow page 1843 of invalid type
error: db3 error (-30985) from db->verify : DB_VERIFY_BAD : Database
verification failed.

Can someone can tell me how to react now face to the problem
(what must I do ?).

Thanks for the help,
ism



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: RPMs chronological ?

[Ismael Touama]

> Hi,
> 
> I have to update a new system (fresh installation).
> I 'm downloading RPMs but sometimes the RPM is oudated
> by another one. So what about the sort of installations ?
> It seems to me that some RPM of 'replacement' are after
> some new kernell upgrade ? What the stuff here ? Will it
> create some problem or not ?
> 
> I'd like to have some council regarding this.
> 
> Thank you,
> ism
OK,

I guess my question is kind of stupid.
When i'll see a 'outdated' RPM I'll apply
the one which makes reference to. Even if
a kernel enhancement is between.

thx
ism



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RPMs chronological ?

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

I have to update a new system (fresh installation).
I 'm downloading RPMs but sometimes the RPM is oudated
by another one. So what about the sort of installations ?
It seems to me that some RPM of 'replacement' are after
some new kernell upgrade ? What the stuff here ? Will it
create some problem or not ?

I'd like to have some council regarding this.

Thank you,
ism



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

outdated by

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

I'm upgrading my system applying erratas for a 
brand new installation. I saw a thing that I never 
seen before regarding my little experience with erratas.
For some updates, packages, it's written down 'outdated by'.
I understand that as the package is now obsolet regarding the
following errata(s). Is that mean that we don't need to install it
and go ahead front of the RHSA indicated ? 
I ask this because of kernel upgrades that it advices, before upgrade,
having installed all erratas in the quite good chronology...

Thanks to help,
ism



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

erratas and architecture

[Ismael Touama]

hello world,

Is the lack of package for an i686 means that the
architcture of it has no bug or security problem, 
altought i386 got packages ?

Thank for the detail,
ism



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Tape Drive

[Ismael Touama]

Hola,

I believe it's /dev/st0 for SCSI Tape.
Look here : http://rute.sourceforge.net

Great doc on entire linux stuff.

ism
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-admin@;redhat.com]De la
part de IS Department
Envoyé : samedi 19 octobre 2002 03:52
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Tape Drive


I have Redhat 8.0 installed on a Dell Poweredge 4200. This machine has a
SCSI 4mm DAT tape drive. I would like to use KDAT which comes with the
RedHat distro. Does anybody know how to find the name of the tape drive and
weather it even exists?

Thanks



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

up2date (was:Tonight I got hacked.)

[Ismael Touama]

> > Tonight I finally got hacked. 
> 
> If your system was kept up to date, you would be the first report I've
> seen of someone getting hacked.  It's critical for all
> Internet-accessible servers to be kept current with OS patches.  Red Hat
> provides for a *free* up2date service.  You absolutely must use it or an
> equivalent service to keep your packages current.
> 

Hi Ed,

I slightly deviate from the main topic cause your comment
suggest me some... comments.
I really don't know up2date, my server is not yet on any network.
I use to apply by myself the errata, downloaded by myself.
Will , when I'll connect my server on the net, up2date know what
erratas were applied ?
I assume yes because I presume that a check (diagnostic) is done
to determine which erratas is needed ?

Thanks,
ism



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Tonight I got hacked.

[Ismael Touama]

For some reason I never installed neither use.
But it's what I remain from what I read about
having a secure linux.

ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-admin@;redhat.com]De la
part de linux power
Envoyé : jeudi 17 octobre 2002 13:07
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: Tonight I got hacked.


Are u sure? I have no time to expriment.
 Ismael Touama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,

TirpWire is doing the stuff you want,

ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-admin@;redhat.com]De la
part de linux power
Envoyé : jeudi 17 octobre 2002 11:55
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: Tonight I got hacked.


Wiil you go through all the system scripts and find out which is been
changed?
If you think you are so damm good so tell me what to do?
"Robert P. J. Day" wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, linux power wrote:

> Tonight I finally got hacked. I'am connected to internet throug ADSL.
> Online all the time. I noticed it because the logging in iptables was
> turned off. It is impossible to turn it on again. I still got the
> warning about --log-prefix which is the right prefix to the logfile.
> Masquerade to the LAN compute! rs is also turned off. They have changed
> some scripts to do all this. The linux paradox. All is scripts that
> could be changed.
>
> So now I'am back again to windows XP. And that should anyway not be so
> difficult to hack.Perhaps I reorganize my systems and buy an old PC and
> install linux and use it only as a server whit nothing else installed so
> it will be easy to format when I've been visited.

i'm not sure someone who gets hacked and solves the prob! lem by switching
back to windows xp should be using an email address of "linux power."
just my $0.02.

rday



--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


http://home.no.net/~knutove/knut_ove_hauge_kuren.htm
Yahoo! Mail har fått nytt utseende
Nytt design, enklere å bruke, alltid tilgang til Adressebok, Kalender og!
Notisbok



--
redhat-list mailing listunsubscribe
mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


http://home.no.net/~knutove/knut_ove_hauge_kuren.htm
Prøv betaversjonen av den nye Yahoo! Mail
Nytt design, enklere å bruke, alltid tilgang til Adressebok, Kalender og
Notisbok



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Tonight I got hacked.

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

TirpWire is doing the stuff you want,

ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la
part de linux power
Envoyé : jeudi 17 octobre 2002 11:55
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: Tonight I got hacked.


Wiil you go through all the system scripts and find out which is been
changed?
If you think you are so damm good so tell me what to do?
 "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, linux power wrote:

> Tonight I finally got hacked. I'am connected to internet throug ADSL.
> Online all the time. I noticed it because the logging in iptables was
> turned off. It is impossible to turn it on again. I still got the
> warning about --log-prefix which is the right prefix to the logfile.
> Masquerade to the LAN computers is also turned off. They have changed
> some scripts to do all this. The linux paradox. All is scripts that
> could be changed.
>
> So now I'am back again to windows XP. And that should anyway not be so
> difficult to hack.Perhaps I reorganize my systems and buy an old PC and
> install linux and use it only as a server whit nothing else installed so
> it will be easy to format when I've been visited.

i'm not sure someone who gets hacked and solves the prob! lem by switching
back to windows xp should be using an email address of "linux power."
just my $0.02.

rday



--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


http://home.no.net/~knutove/knut_ove_hauge_kuren.htm
Yahoo! Mail har fått nytt utseende
Nytt design, enklere å bruke, alltid tilgang til Adressebok, Kalender og
Notisbok



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: X - Window Problem

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

You maybe log to much graphically as root.
Look at /tmp and /root (df or du) to see
if enough space is on your disk.
All I can say.
Also give more info, for better help,

ism

> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Santhosh
> Envoye : jeudi 3 octobre 2002 09:57
> A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : X - Window Problem
> 
> 
> 
> Hi !!
> 
> 
> When i type startx in a text mode i get this error  message:
> 
> 
> xauth: error in locking authority file /root/.Xauthority
> xauth: error in locking authority file /root/.Xauthority
> xauth: error in locking authority file /root/.Xauthority
> xauth: error in locking authority file /root/.Xauthority
> 
> 
> Then cannot launch the X-Windows
> Another problem is when I type useradd abc i get another error:
> 
> 
> useradd: unable to lock password file
> 
> 
> 
> Both of the problem are running on same computer.
> Can any body tell what is the problem?
> 
> 
> Santhosh.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Apache + ASP Module

[Ismael Touama]

Hello,

Installing the Appache::ASP API is not simple as you guess.
It has been quite time that I stop it du to some problem with
my server and ... linux learning too.
I will restart it in few weeks I hope.
First when I installed it, I only use the way of compilation to
install it. RPMs makes hanging the thing.
Secondly, you need mod_perl to make your script works. Indeed, the
scripting language on LINUX for ASP is perl. A module is in project
to have VBScript working on linux, but I don't know if Apache::ASP
go with.
Third, the order you install the different module or third part API
is important at a certain stage of the building.
More info here : http://www.apache-asp.org/

All I can say, otherwise I didn't saw ASP stuff on my rh7.2 !?
Will seek it better.

ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la
part de Greg Darby
Envoyé : mardi 17 septembre 2002 06:04
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Apache + ASP Module


Hi,

I am using Redhat 7.3 with Apache, SSL, Perl all running but now i need to
install the ASP Module to server Active Server Pages. As the Server is live
i am not sure what problems i may encounter so i hope someone may be able to
assist me.

Firstly i assume the ASP Module is availible on the 7.3 CD so in theory i
should be able to boot from the CDROM, select this addition and continue the
setup as per normal. Nothing else should change (i hope).

Secondly i am led to beleive the following needs to be done at the shell
rpm -q perl-Apache-ASP

Once this is done i customise the ASP Config, restart Apache and all should
be well.

Am i doing this right? I really do appreciate any help as i am new to the
wonderful world of Linux.

Regards

Greg Darby
Systems Administrator
Ramelec (SA) Pty Ltd
2 Ontario Avenue
Panorama  SA  5041

' Phone: +61 8 8374 2100
6 Fax: +61 8 8374 2102
) Mobile: 0418 820 163
* Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ý  www.ramelec.com.au



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: RAID1 with GRUB

[Ismael Touama]

> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Kent Borg
> Envoye : mercredi 4 septembre 2002 19:30
> A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: RAID1 with GRUB
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 06:09:40PM +0200, Ismael Touama wrote:
> > I'm sorry but I don't understand what do you mean about bootable
> > raid1...
> 
> I have a motherboard with two regular IDE controllers.  I put a hard
> disk on each, and set up a software raid that will boot from these two
> disks and run as raid 1.
>

As far as I know one controller is made for one *or two* disk.
The second is for CD-ROM or devices like that (not more that two too).
 
> I suspect that if I have a disk die I will likely crash (what with
> DMAs not completing and things like that), but that on reboot a
> remaining disk will run solo OK.  Not wanting to hit running disks
> with hammers and otherwise simulate failures, I admit I don't know
> ~how~ it might fail.  I just hope it makes things better on that day
> and makes things run faster in the meantime.
> 
> 
> -kb
> 
ism
> 
> 
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: RAID1 with GRUB

[Ismael Touama]

> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Kent Borg
> Envoye : mercredi 4 septembre 2002 17:28
> A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: RAID1 with GRUB
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 11:37:56AM +0200, Ismael Touama wrote:
> > What do you mean ?
> > My server is in RAID1 and got GRUB.
> > No particular problem to do it.
> 
> So how did you do it?
> 
> I tried to do a bootable raid 1 via the Red Hat 7.3 installer (or was
> it 7.2...?) but it was not bootable.  At the time I did a bunch of net
> searching on the topic and couldn't find anything up to date.
> 
> Can you post a description of your working setup, copy of your
> /boot/grub/grub.conf, etc.?

Hi,

My grub.conf tells nothing about raid1...
I'm sorry but I don't understand what do you mean about bootable raid1...
I'm on rh7.2, look for `find / -name '*raid*'` results to have some sample,
tools...
And I'm afraid that I am not enough experimented to help you.
But tell even thought what do you call bootable raid1,
plus... software or hardware raid ?

ism



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Premature end of file

[Ismael Touama]

Hi again,

I re-issue my demand.
Sometimes it puts '...end of file' sometimes '...end of archive'.
My version is 2.4.2.
It doesn't seem to contain a bug (erratas) and my kernel is the first
goes with 2.4.7-10.

Can someone help, thank you.
ism


> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Ismael Touama
> Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2002 12:02
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Premature end of file
>
>
> Hi,
>
> When trying to restore my data with cpio I've got
> the following as error outpout: premature end of file.
> What does it mean and how can I avoid it ?
>
> Thanks for help.
> olé
> ism
>
>
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Premature end of file

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

When trying to restore my data with cpio I've got
the following as error outpout: premature end of file.
What does it mean and how can I avoid it ?

Thanks for help.
olé
ism



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Restoring

[Ismael Touama]

Hi rhers,

I currently learn backing up and restoring my data.
I used cpio to backup my /usr partition as is:
find /usr print0 | cpio -ovc > /home/User/Backup/usr_bkp02092002

I delete intentionly /usr as root.
Now, cpio -idvm < /home/User/Backup/usr_bkp02092002 doesn't
restore my partition and so I lost my Xwindow and more...
Maybe, the find command didn't "find" the quite good files.
I can't test on my system cause no more /usr !! no more find !!

Now I've got the following
INIT: Id "x" respawning too fasr: disabled for 5 minutes.

So 2 questions.
How do I recover my /usr backup and what does this message
mean ?

Thank you for helping,
olé
ism
RedHat 7.2 - Dell PowerEdge 2500 - RAID 1





-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: RAID1 with GRUB

[Ismael Touama]

Hola,

What do you mean ?
My server is in RAID1 and got GRUB.
No particular problem to do it.

olé
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Philip Tong
Envoyé : mardi 3 septembre 2002 11:22
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RAID1 with GRUB


Does anyone know any documentation or can point me in the direction on
setting up a Bootable RAID1 disk set?



--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: ...Backup Laws

[Ismael Touama]

Hola,

I just find ARCserve on the application CD of RH7.K2 distro.
Can someone give some feedbacks about it ?
What's the main difference with arkeia (except network capabilities) ?

Thank you, I go all over the web...
olé
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Ismael Touama
Envoyé : mercredi 28 août 2002 09:53
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : ...Backup Laws


Hi everyone,

I saw Ashley K.M send a topic on backups.
I wish you give some links where I can learn
to make backups. This including different case
so I can restore in the best and quick way lost
data, configuration or partition...
I'd like to know what partition to backup, what
kind of restore it gives, what to do when made
an integral backup and these incrementals ones
when just a partition had been erased...
What to do i.e when installed and configured
MySQL day d,  and then after installing and configured
severals stuff on my system until incremental backup
on day d+9, and crash my MySQL server...
All of thing like this that make me prevent huge cases
of losing face when something wrong happen.

Thank you for all good doc (is there nothing on it
on sourceforgee ?)...

olé,
ism



--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

...Backup Laws

[Ismael Touama]

Hi everyone,

I saw Ashley K.M send a topic on backups.
I wish you give some links where I can learn
to make backups. This including different case
so I can restore in the best and quick way lost
data, configuration or partition...
I'd like to know what partition to backup, what
kind of restore it gives, what to do when made
an integral backup and these incrementals ones
when just a partition had been erased...
What to do i.e when installed and configured
MySQL day d,  and then after installing and configured
severals stuff on my system until incremental backup
on day d+9, and crash my MySQL server...
All of thing like this that make me prevent huge cases
of losing face when something wrong happen.

Thank you for all good doc (is there nothing on it
on sourceforgee ?)...

olé,
ism



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Download RH Betas

[Ismael Touama]

hi,

try sunsite.unc.educ.

olé,
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Spanke, Alexander
Envoyé : mardi 27 août 2002 12:27
À : 'RedHat General - Mailinglist'
Objet : Download RH Betas


Hi,

Where can i download the limbo beta ?

Alex



--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: [fastdep] error 135

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

You maybe have to look, check your command line.
You maybe enter a bad syntax or something like that.

Secondly, pay caution to your kernel, look at erratas.

bbsc
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la
part de Lisa
Envoyé : jeudi 25 juillet 2002 14:53
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [fastdep] error 135


Hi, does anyone know what causes the following error. I get it when I run
make dep. Running RedHat linux version 7.2

Kernel is version 2.4


make[4]: Entering directory`/usr/src/linux-2.4.7-10/drivers/ide'
/usr/src/linux-2.4.7-10/scripts/mkdep -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.7-10
/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -
fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Wno-unused -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary
=2 -march=i686  -- aec62xx.c ali14xx.c alim15x3.c amd7409.c amd74xx.c
ataraid.c ataraid.h buddha.c cmd640.c cmd64x.c cs5530.c cy82c693.c dtc2278.c
falconide.c gayle.c hd.c hpt34x.c hpt366.c hptraid.c hptraid.h ht6560b.c
icside.c ide-adma.c ide.c ide-cd.c ide-cd.h ide-cs.c ide-disk.c ide-dma.c
ide-features.c ide-floppy.c ide-geometry.c ide_modes.h ide-pci.c ide-pmac.c
ide-pnp.c ide-probe.c ide-proc.c ide-tape.c ide-timing.h it8172.c macide.c
ns87415.c opti621.c pdc202xx.c pdc4030.c pdc4030.h pdcadma.c pdcraid.c
pdcraid.h piix.c q40ide.c qd6580.c rapide.c rz1000.c serverworks.c sis5513.c
sl82c105.c slc90e66.c trm290.c umc8672.c via82cxxx.c > .depend
make[4]: *** [fastdep] Error 135
make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.7-10/drivers/ide'
make[3]: *** [_sfdep_ide] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.7-10/drivers'
make[2]: *** [fastdep] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.7-10/drivers'
make[1]: *** [_sfdep_drivers] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.7-10'
make: *** [dep-files] Error 2



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: PHP Vulnerability

[Ismael Touama]

Hi Emmanuel,

> > My RH7.3 has PHP version 4.1.2-7. In the php.net it
> > tells that PHP versions 4.2.0 and 4.2.1 have the
> > vunarability. Are you shure we have to do the patch?

> You don't.
> No Red Hat distrib is vulnerable to the latest PHP bug.

> Emmanuel
How can you ensure of that ?
I should have the same behave than João.
RH73 was out before the found of this vulnerabilty isn't it ?

Thank you,
bbsc
ism



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: apache

[Ismael Touama]

hi,

it's the principle of apache, it "prepares" child
process to hook up the appending request.

bbsc
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Ximo Llacer
Envoyé : mardi 23 juillet 2002 10:56
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : apache



I'd like to know why in my system there are many process about apache.

USER   PID %CPU %MEM   VSZ  RSS TTY  STAT START   TIME COMMAND
root   861  0.0  4.8 79056 6140 ?SJul22   0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd 
-DHAVE_ACCESS -DHAV
apache 880  0.0  4.9 79136 6316 ?SJul22   0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd 
-DHAVE_ACCESS -DHAV
apache 881  0.0  4.9 79124 6296 ?SJul22   0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd 
-DHAVE_ACCESS -DHAV
apache 882  0.0  4.9 79124 6296 ?SJul22   0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd 
-DHAVE_ACCESS -DHAV
apache 886  0.0  5.1 79164 6472 ?SJul22   0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd 
-DHAVE_ACCESS -DHAV
apache 887  0.0  4.9 79124 6296 ?SJul22   0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd 
-DHAVE_ACCESS -DHAV
apache 888  0.0  4.9 79124 6296 ?SJul22   0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd 
-DHAVE_ACCESS -DHAV
apache 889  0.0  4.9 79124 6296 ?SJul22   0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd 
-DHAVE_ACCESS -DHAV
apache 904  0.0  4.9 79124 6296 ?SJul22   0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd 
-DHAVE_ACCESS –DHAV

Un Cordial Saludo / Best regards
Ximo Llácer
Dpto Sistemas  (GrupoInterpack )
G 0034 61767050 •Ê 0034 61767158
0 




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: X crashed

[Ismael Touama]

I forgot, for several fonts

FontPath"/Your/CORRECT/Path/To/Your/Font/"  #don't know if it's
#slash terminated

You have to put the FontPath directive (?) in the right good order.

bbsc
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Ismael Touama
Envoye : vendredi 19 juillet 2002 11:29
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: X crashed


Hi,

I have the same the problem than you, for different reason.
When you install a new police font you have to say to your
XF86Config file where's the police is located.

I hope it's not a Type1 one.  If not you can do the following.
Edit with vi /etc/X11/XF86Config file. And then add the font path
as is in the section "Files", under FontPath "unix/:-1" (or 7100):

FontPath"/Your/CORRECT/Path/To/Your/Font/"  #don't know if it's
#slash terminated

After you may have to *may* have to reload xfs.
By the way, don't remeber if xfs have to be stopped
when installing new font.
Don't forget to pass at the right runlevel.

If what I saw is not accurate hope someone complete this.

*By the way again*, I can't stop xfs (xfs dead or it fails each time
evenat shutdown). Is someone can help ?
I got font, and space disk problem that causes my X-window can't start.
Xconfigurator can show me the graphical mode but that's all. I can turn
at runlevel 5.

Thank you.
bbsc
ism





-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Roger
Envoye : vendredi 19 juillet 2002 10:36
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : X crashed


hi

I am running Redhat 7.2. I just installed KFontinst and installed some
fonts of micrsoft windows to Redhat. But after I installed these and
attemped to restart X, it was crashed. and the error output is like
following


could not open default font 'fixed'


XIO: fatal IO error 104 (Connection reset by peer) on X server ":0.0"
after 0 requests (0 known processed) with 0 events remaining.

How can i return the X back before i installed the new fonts or how can I
make it works again with the new fonts?

any suggestion will be appreciated ~

Roger



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: X crashed

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

I have the same the problem than you, for different reason.
When you install a new police font you have to say to your
XF86Config file where's the police is located.

I hope it's not a Type1 one.  If not you can do the following.
Edit with vi /etc/X11/XF86Config file. And then add the font path
as is in the section "Files", under FontPath "unix/:-1" (or 7100):

FontPath"/Your/CORRECT/Path/To/Your/Font/"  #don't know if it's
#slash terminated

After you may have to *may* have to reload xfs.
By the way, don't remeber if xfs have to be stopped
when installing new font.
Don't forget to pass at the right runlevel.

If what I saw is not accurate hope someone complete this.

*By the way again*, I can't stop xfs (xfs dead or it fails each time
evenat shutdown). Is someone can help ?
I got font, and space disk problem that causes my X-window can't start.
Xconfigurator can show me the graphical mode but that's all. I can turn
at runlevel 5.

Thank you.
bbsc
ism





-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Roger
Envoye : vendredi 19 juillet 2002 10:36
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : X crashed


hi

I am running Redhat 7.2. I just installed KFontinst and installed some
fonts of micrsoft windows to Redhat. But after I installed these and
attemped to restart X, it was crashed. and the error output is like
following


could not open default font 'fixed'


XIO: fatal IO error 104 (Connection reset by peer) on X server ":0.0"
after 0 requests (0 known processed) with 0 events remaining.

How can i return the X back before i installed the new fonts or how can I
make it works again with the new fonts?

any suggestion will be appreciated ~

Roger



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Erratas regarding uninstalling and re-installing RPMs

[Ismael Touama]

Hi again,

I re-issue my demand, because I wasn't able to locate
my problem, so I gonna erase Xfree86 package and so on
xfs.
Thanks you for helping:

<07172002>
Hi,

I' ve got some problem with my Font Server, so my
X-window can not start. Regarding differents applied
erratas can I erase XFree RPMs nicely without bugs or
security problems ? I assume I'll have to reinstall 
latest erratas... But won't there be a conflict or
whatever with kernel as true as we must apply all erratas
in the quite good order...

Helps suggested...

Thanks a lot,
bbsc
ism


Tahnks again
bbsc
ism



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Erratas regarding uninstalling and re-installing RPMs

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

I' ve got some problem with my Font Server, so my
X-window can not start. Regarding differents applied
erratas can I erase XFree RPMs nicely without bugs or
security problems ? I assume I'll have to reinstall 
latest erratas... But won't there be a conflict or
whatever with kernel as true as we must apply all erratas
in the quite good order...

Helps suggested...

Thanks a lot,
bbsc
ism




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Which var and tmp files can I erase ?

[Ismael Touama]

> > Fatal server error:
> > Could not open default default font 'fixed' 

> This is a font problem. I'm not sure which font file contains fixed, but 
> you should probably just verify all font packages with:

>   rpm -qa | fgrep fonts | xargs rpm -V

> and reinstall any font packages which have errors.

Hi & thanx,

the provided command line does not work on my system.
[no arguments provided for the verification]

Are you sure that is in anyway a memory problem ?
I lead myself into differents way and I agree with a fonts
server problem (xfs fails) and I guess it can be a memory
(certainly virtual) or a space disk problem.

Thanks again.

bbsc
ism



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Which var and tmp files can I erase ?

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

I lost my X server from few days and I think it's
due to my /tmp and in other way /var files.
The maintenance system (tmpwatch) seems to had not
work correctly. I'd like to delete some files that
take space on my disk. 
Someones told me to pass in runlevel 1 and then do
the suppression, other told me to take of it. Can I
erase all from /tmp ? And which kind of files can I
delete from /var.

For info, I got in /var/log/XFree86.0.log:
Could not init font path element unix/:7100, removing from list!

Fatal server error:
Could not open default default font 'fixed' 

I restart xfs using chkconfig at level 3 & 5,
turn to level 5 and then startx but it' always the same.

Ca someone lead me please ?
First I really want to see if the problem is due to /tmp,
sencond, I want to avoid the problem reoccuring.

Thank you,

bbsc
ism



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RH7.2 & MySQL-3.23.51 compilation issues.

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

I gonna install MySQL on my system.
I 'm reading MySQL's manualand see that there
can be some problem with some Redhat Linux distros...
What are these problems ?


Is the 7.2 is concerned ? So in this case and like the
manual shows, i put the following at configuration time:

./configure --with-client-ldflags=-all-static \
--with-mysqld-ldflags=-all-static

Finally, I have a "lot" of option to transmit to 'configure',
apparently not on a single-line...is that quite right ?

Thank you,
bbsc
ism





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: newbie apache problem

[Ismael Touama]

OK thanks,

Anyway I saw your solution and keep it preciously caus' I'm
learning this beast...

bbsc !
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Anthony E. Greene
Envoye : vendredi 21 juin 2002 15:23
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: newbie apache problem


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 21-Jun-2002/14:11 +0200, Ismael Touama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If started or not, try to locate you daemon httpd and then you can
>running it...
>To solve your hostname pb, go to your httpd.conf and then change
>the good directive...sorry it's out of my head, can't tell more.

You can tell Apache what hostname to use in httpd.conf with the ServerName
directive, but that is usually not the best solution. Apache normally does
not have this problem unless the machine's hosts file is not setup
correctly. If you fix the hosts file, Apache will run fine. If you do not
fix the hosts file, you may find that some other services have problems
too.

Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Chat: TonyG05  HomePage: <http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/>
Linux: the choice of a GNU Generation. <http://www.linux.org/>

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene 0x6C94239D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

iD8DBQE9Eyi4pCpg3WyUI50RAgPuAKChD0KeYf76pa5hSknrzMVJw3vStgCeJIgF
7LgVE18L5Cu5FG7QuvaE8rg=
=JPQF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: newbie apache problem

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

what do you do to run him ?
I guess hostname problem is not that your apache don't want to start.
It may be started yet.
Verify this by typing in : ps -aux | grep httpd

If started or not, try to locate you daemon httpd and then you can
running it...
To solve your hostname pb, go to your httpd.conf and then change
the good directive...sorry it's out of my head, can't tell more.

bbsc,
ism



-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Pierre Hardy
Envoyé : vendredi 21 juin 2002 11:54
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : newbie apache problem


I'm new to linux and even newer to Apache. Apache wont' start.  It says
that it's unable to resolve hostname.  Any help please...



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Mozilla at the first connection

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

when entering http://localhost, my mozilla hangs and take a near..
hmm' hmm', 77 sec !! to charge the page !!
Konqueror tkae it less a second !
When i reload the page with mozilla, it takes les than a second.

Is someone know such a behavior ?
THank you
bbsc 
ism
(apache1.3.24/mod_perl1.26,Apache::ASP, Apache::Filter, Apaceh::SSI)
I guess my Apache::SSI & Apache::Filter are really bad installed
or configured.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

72 and 86,7 Mo of RPMs

[Ismael Touama]

Hi everyone,

For near a month, I didn't check for erratas...
So I did it yesterday, I just finish : 72 rpms !
OK I made a big stupid installation of rh7.2.

But it takes  a while !!
And I ask myself if is it  the good way to 
keep up to date my system ?
*with no use of up2date or something else*

Couldn't be possible to wrappe all rpms
from a fixed date ? Or something dynamic 
[I choose a date, I paste the list of my
rpms installed and then it prepares me a 
a relevant, chronologic up to date and
dowloadable package list...] ?

Is that kind of utopist ? I mean, is that
thing possible ? I guess It can interest
people who don't have a large band-with...

I don't know if my web-programming skills
are enough, but I'm ready to do the stuff.
So what do you think about ?

bbsc,
ism



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

STEPBACK

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

regarding erratas and the kind of stupid installation I made
here for my first contact with linux, I' d like to come to
a kind of initial state with a really minimum and customized
configuration, with just what I need to process good work without
losing my time ftp-ing several rpm erratas that I don't need.

So what's the way to have a minimum conf (without I downgrade
my Kernel of course).

I guessed to rpm -e *.
Totally radical method.
Furthermore I'd like to avoid rpms, except maybe for modules.

What do you think about this ?
Thanks for all advices (-I need it-),
bbsc,
ism



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Why not from the current directory ?

[Ismael Touama]

bigGreatThanksHipHipHipToYou Emmanuel.
You gave the answers to many question I asked myself but didn't
find anywhere !
See Ya soon
bbsc
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Emmanuel Seyman
Envoye : mardi 21 mai 2002 15:35
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: Why not from the current directory ?


On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 02:37:57PM +0200, Ismael Touama wrote:
> 
> Why must we use this prefix to make works a program ?

When you type a command, the system looks in a predefined list of
directories for the command. If it finds it, it runs it. Otherwise,
you'll get the standard "file or directory" not found.

FWIW the list in definned in the PATH environment variable and you
can get the list by typing `echo $PATH` .

When you install the apache rpm, the binaries are stored in (from
memory) /usr/bin which is in $PATH. When you compile the tarball,
they will be installed in /usr/local/apache/bin which isn't in
the $PATH and you'll need to specify the directory in which the
command is yourself.

You can do this by cd-ing to the directory in which the command is
and typing `./command` (where command is the name of the program
you want to launch). This works because "." is a shortcut for the
directory you are in at the moment. "." is *not* in $PATH because
this represents a security risk (since there's no way to be sure that
you'll always be in a safe directory). You can add it to the list
but that isn't recommended.

Emmanuel



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Why not from the current directory ?

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

Big thanks cuz' I didn't knew why sometimes some cmd
were preceded by ./
It works but before I custom my web server it worked
alone (without the ./).

Why must we use this prefix to make works a program ?
thx,
bbsc,
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Tom Wilson
Envoyé : mardi 21 mai 2002 14:07
À : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Objet : RE: Why not from the current directory ?


Ismael Touama wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently install mod_perl-1.26 + apache_1.3.20.
> This, had modify my web utils as httpd, apachectl
> in the bin directory of /usr/local/apache.
> I can use it except when i'm in the /usr/local/apache/bin .
> Is there something wrong ?
> Why I cannot !

Did you use the ./ before the name of the binary?  Example:  ./apachectl

You have to include the ./ if you are executing it from the directory it is
located in.

--
Tom Wilson



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Why not from the current directory ?

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

I recently install mod_perl-1.26 + apache_1.3.20.
This, had modify my web utils as httpd, apachectl
in the bin directory of /usr/local/apache.
I can use it except when i'm in the /usr/local/apache/bin .
Is there something wrong ?
Why I cannot !

Thank you for any explanations...
bbsc,
ism



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE:APACHE and its releases (was: Redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #4390 - 13 msgs)

[Ismael Touama]

apache.org ?

bbsc,
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Hilkiah Lavinier
Envoyé : jeudi 16 mai 2002 14:25
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: Redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #4390 - 13 msgs


Hi does anyone know of a website which compares and contrasts Apache 1.xx
with 2.xx?  I' thinking of upgrading to Apache 2.xx (I dont have a public
webserver, just a personal webserver for my web development and stuff).

regards,
HL

--
"Linux poses a real challenge for those with a taste for late-night
hacking (and/or conversations with God)."
(By Matt Welsh)


..\  /.. HILKIAH G. LAVINIER, [aka ¥eL10WwU]
...\/... 9 Earls Court SQ., SW5 9BY, London
.._||_.. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
./ ||... [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.\_||_.. Tel : 0796 807 8247  Fax: 603 697 8299
...||... ICQ # 8978201, Yahoo: hilkiah, MSN: hilkiahlavinier



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: What are you doing for virus protection

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

the few I know:
- Don't go over the internet as root.
- Put an IDS (as tripwire) on your linux machine
  (against trojans)
- Be aware of patchs, new releases and then upgrade.
- Linux don't fear a lot of virus 3 or 6 I believe.
  If infected, the only touched will be the one who's 
  logged on. 
- Worm can also disturb bandwith (and probably other
  task) but they're not critical.
- Put a firewall

The more dangerous is TROJAN and CRACKERS.
(By the way, where can I find a guru ? 
_Matrix's_Smiley_ )

So, OMHO,
bbsc,
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Scott Skrogstad
Envoye : jeudi 16 mai 2002 14:40
A : Red Hat Mailing list
Objet : What are you doing for virus protection


I run a small ISP and of course my customers have asked me to put up some 
virus protection on my server.  I was just trying to get some info from 
the list what everyone is using.  I am not a linux guru so something RPM 
would be nice and that has regular updates.

-- 
Scott Skrogstad
Computer Integration Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800-522-3475 Phone
http://www.mysteryelephant.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Konkeror & Mozilla

[Ismael Touama]

Ok
i found that in fact Mozilla was english's language configurated... but !
But the page "turn his language" but the appearance is not the same.

HTML isn't here to be traduce by browser in a same way ?
Kind of weird to me.
thx
bbsc
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Ismael Touama
Envoyé : jeudi 16 mai 2002 12:06
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Konkeror & Mozilla


Hi all.

What's the trouble the way these browser are requesting my web server !?
I enter this-> http://localhost

*KONKEROR: Handle the request in the time and gives the right good
page i guess, in my own tongue.

*MOZILLA: Handle the request but after 99.986 secs of research.
Furthermore it gives me the same page but in english version.
What's the drama !
Someone got ideas ?
thx;
bbsc
ism



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Konkeror & Mozilla

[Ismael Touama]

Hi all.

What's the trouble the way these browser are requesting my web server !?
I enter this-> http://localhost 

*KONKEROR: Handle the request in the time and gives the right good
page i guess, in my own tongue.

*MOZILLA: Handle the request but after 99.986 secs of research.
Furthermore it gives me the same page but in english version.
What's the drama !
Someone got ideas ?
thx;
bbsc
ism



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: [OT] About 7.3

[Ismael Touama]

From: "Ismael Touama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> But now, what is actually the method to implement OS that
> they're in constant evolution.

Upgrade.  Most people only tweak a few applications.  The rest of package
will upgrade with no problem.

$ So what ?! sorry, don't understand...
$ I don't speak about linux user, I speak 
$ about linux developpers.
$ The whole redhat team.

> What's the major difference or technology bounce between
> one project to another one. :o\
> I'm kind of lost as for what policy is bringing up at RedHat.
> (and other distro).

Uhh I'm going to have to plead the 5th amendment on these questions.

$ " You have rights to keep silence."
$ " All you can say can be remind against"
$ " you !"

$ So I improve you don't want to tell some silly things ;op
$ bbsc,
$ ism

-eric



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

TR: What's the deal after compilling....

[Ismael Touama]

Oï,

Yesterday I erase my binary rpm based apache distribution.
I compile and then install (make install) mod_perl and apache_1.3.24.
Still yesterday httpd -l gave me the right good modules.

But today I can't use httpd anymore !
I've got severals:
# find / -name httpd
/home/httpd
/usr/share/doc/qt-devel-2.3.1/examples/httpd   # whiwh is this one !!?
/usr/local/apache/bin/htpd   # the previous apcahe (rpm based)
/usr/local/mod_perl-1.26/t/httpd# from my mod_perl, didn't try it
/usr/local/apache_1.3.24/src/httpd  # my new fresh, compiled apache
/var/log/httpd
/etc/httpd

None do the good stuff.
bash yells "command not found" bozo !

So I missed one thing, no httpd start, no apachectl !

Can someone explain me the tricks ?
Must I re-compile again ?
What must I do to tell the system keeping last compilation that
I install ?

Thx,
bbsc,
ism



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[OT] About 7.3

[Ismael Touama]

Hi rhml,

Rh7.3 is out, and i ask myself some questions.
My knowledge of how linux get work is seemlessly NULL.

We've just buy rh7.2(january), and I upgrade my kernell
after having upgrade soft, rpms... concerned by erratas.

But now, what is actually the method to implement OS that
they're in constant evolution.
What's the major difference or technology bounce between
one project to another one. :o\
I'm kind of lost as for what policy is bringing up at RedHat.
(and other distro).
Which kernell is used for the 7.2 and which one for 7.3 ?

Sorry for these multiple question.
It is just by curiosity, so don't waste your time if you busy.
*who is not busy ?*
It's just to bring little bit more linux culture in my head, 
waiting for investigation of my own.

Thx,
bbsc,
ism



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: how to change the sys date

[Ismael Touama]

try to running tzselect, it is to set your initial clock component.
But man before.

bbsc,
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Amir Tal
Envoyé : lundi 6 mai 2002 17:44
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: how to change the sys date


On Monday 06 May 2002 18:38, Jianping Zhu wrote:
> I have a redhat 7.2 machine. The date of this machine is someday in 1988.
> I can use the command data to change it ot current date. But when I
> restart the computer. it's date will go back to 1988.
> How can I solve this problem?
> Thanks

check that the RTC is set correctly. sounds like your hardware clock is
causing this problem..
check it in the system's BIOS.

tal.


>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

--
---
[root@localhost /]# make love
make: stop : dont know how to make love
[root@localhost /]#ls
Amir Tal,
ICQ : 15748705
http://www.whatsup.org.il
---



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

The year's sylliest question

[Ismael Touama]

Hi rhl,

I don't manage finding my sources for apache on my rh72.
Is the installation include all sources for each soft
of my configuration ?
Do rpms' installations disable sources installation too ?

Thanks in all case to indicates me my sources for apache-1.3.20
which is on my system.

Regards all,
ism 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: stability

[Ismael Touama]

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Mike Burger
Envoye : jeudi 11 avril 2002 17:42
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: stability


Booting from floppy won't do anything for you on the Apache/ASP front.

All booting from Floppy will do is get you a working boot...the floppy
that you build will simply have the kernel, and the current boot
parameters (where the root partition is, etc)...it will still boot the
init scripts that are stored on your hard drive.

On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Ismael Touama wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I intend to use a disket-boot to find my system stable.
> Is it a good idea ?
> Indeed I made a lot of faked operation intending to instal/ configure
> Apache::ASP and I'm affraid now my system stinks !
> I don't have important data stored on it so can I ?
>
> Thank you, the request is quite urgent so that I could take my work
quickly.
> ism
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: undoing perl Makefile.PL

[Ismael Touama]

OK, being paranoid,...yeah...
hmm' and if I boot on my floppy on last Kernell ?
Is that OK to find a more stable system ?
Is that delete all created files I made or put on ?
I hope so, so that paranoid won't run me anymore !!
YEAH !
THX,
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Cameron Simpson
Envoye : vendredi 12 avril 2002 09:16
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: undoing perl Makefile.PL


On 14:09 10 Apr 2002, Ismael Touama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| in order to set the mod_perl module to apache I run the following command
| line:
| perl Makefile.PL
|
| But I guess I take a bad module.
| I want to restart the operation but with a clean & stable state,
| so I want to reset this command, is there a way ?

Being paranoid, I just remove the module source and unpack a fresh copy from
the tarball. Most likely you can just say:

perl Makefile.PL

again, but how do you know? I don't, so I back out and do it all again.
It's not too hard.
--
Cameron Simpson, DoD#743[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/

It's amazing how much 'mature wisdom' resembles being too tired.
- Lazarus Long



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

stability

[Ismael Touama]

Hi!

I intend to use a disket-boot to find my system stable.
Is it a good idea ?
Indeed I made a lot of faked operation intending to instal/ configure
Apache::ASP and I'm affraid now my system stinks !
I don't have important data stored on it so can I ?

Thank you, the request is quite urgent so that I could take my work quickly.
ism



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[OT] undoing perl Makefile.PL

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

in order to set the mod_perl module to apache I run the following command
line:
perl Makefile.PL

But I guess I take a bad module.
I want to restart the operation but with a clean & stable state,
so I want to reset this command, is there a way ?

Thank you for really needed help!
ism



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

UPS

[Ismael Touama]

Hi !

Don't find any documentation on redhat's site concerning UPS...
Can someone give one ?
Find some stuff but i'd like to have redhat one...
thx,
ism



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: all RPMs ?

[Ismael Touama]

What do you mean by 'swap proc system'?

> I was just speaking about /proc/swaps...
> but I don't believe it's the matter...






___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: all RPMs ?

[Ismael Touama]

I would suggest, if you want to be able to have the benefits of RPMs
without the muss and fuss, get checkinstall (freshmeat, some other
places) and use it to make RPMs of binaries created with the make/make
install process. I wouldn't depend on them redistributable. But it
certainly makes management of installed programs easier to deal with,
and you won't have to wait for somebody else to create an RPM just to
install something that can easily be cleaned up. In addition, there's no
need to keep the source tree around just to uninstall the files.

There are a few (very few) instances when this won't work either. But it
works in enough, and it's so simple to work with, it's certainly worth a
test drive.

$ OK just uninstall soft from a not proper and huge installation...
$ First one.

-- 
If at first you don't succeed, get a job with Microsoft.
$ Thank$, really plea$sed...


___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: all RPMs ?

[Ismael Touama]

Great thanks...
Will see...
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Gordon Messmer
Envoyé : vendredi 29 mars 2002 03:10
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: all RPMs ?


This is a MIME-formatted message.  If you see this text it means that your
E-mail software does not support MIME-formatted messages.

--=_ascension.dragonsdawn.net-30635-1017367798-0001-2
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 08:51, Ismael Touama wrote:
>=20
> I don't uinderstand one (and more...) thing in Linux implementation.
> Are all softwares installed as RPMs ? or is there another issue.

Not necessarily.  You may compile software from source and install it
with the standard (./configure; make; make install) build method.=20
However, software installed without the package manager (rpm) don't get
any of its benefits.

If you install from source, you can not verify the files using rpm -V.=20
You also can't remove them using rpm -e. =20

Most software "makefiles" have a rule to uninstall the software.  If you
still have the source tree around, you can 'cd' there and 'make
uninstall'.

> I had probleme with MM siftware (brahms) and in fact I don't have any
> needs of multimedia player,viewer, listener... on my server.

I'm not sure I follow that statement.  Red Hat Linux includes xmms for
playing mp3 and ogg files (among others...).  If you want to view video
files, your best bet is to install xine or mplayer.  You can find them
on http://freshmeat.net.  Xine provides rpm packages for RHL 7.2.

> So when rpm -qa | grep brahms -> nothing found

That's to be expected if you compiled the software yourself.

> I know I made a bad installation in the sense I installedll packages from
> the CD...
> but I run a server !! So what's the matter ?! Can it be swap proc system =
?

Not following this either.  Installing packages from the CD is a proper
way to install software.  What do you mean by 'swap proc system'?

> By the way lets comme to my first problem How can i uninstall a program o=
r a
> soft
> that rpm -qa | grep thisFprogram don't find...

You don't.  rpm manages software installed or packages in rpm format.=20
If you compile it yourself, you have to manage it yourself, too.  See if
the software provides for 'make uninstall'.



--=_ascension.dragonsdawn.net-30635-1017367798-0001-2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEUEABECAAYFAjyjzPUACgkQ0rdf78Ca6+tOvwCgoNUknvkV6gkbQ916LE9KVTZO
Fk4AmIzw0ZLOmXjChEP4OX4chYtpy/A=
=YaFA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--=_ascension.dragonsdawn.net-30635-1017367798-0001-2--



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

all RPMs ?

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

I don't uinderstand one (and more...) thing in Linux implementation.
Are all softwares installed as RPMs ? or is there another issue.
I had probleme with MM siftware (brahms) and in fact I don't have any
needs of multimedia player,viewer, listener... on my server.
So when rpm -qa | grep brahms -> nothing found
the same with XMMS even if I find these soft on package manager (graphical)
!
So i tried almost to erase them by uninstalling them, always with the GUI
(from KDE),
and nothing...it seems to crawl...
I know I made a bad installation in the sense I installedll packages from
the CD...
but I run a server !! So what's the matter ?! Can it be swap proc system ?
By the way lets comme to my first problem How can i uninstall a program or a
soft
that rpm -qa | grep thisFprogram don't find...
If someone can tell end tell more about these strange behaviour, I would be
pleased.

thx,
ism.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: librpm.so.0 librpmio.so.0

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

rpm -ql your.rpm

lists all files that you.rpm needs,
so then after you can simply cp to your/directory/that/lacks/of/this/file...
...so I guess.

ism


-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Billy R Nordyke
Envoye : mardi 26 mars 2002 16:53
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : librpm.so.0 librpmio.so.0


Hi All,

perl-Perl-RPM-0.291-2.i386.rpm requires the files listed in the subject
above.  I believe they are included in rpm-4.0.2-8.  I have rpm-4.0.4-7x
installed.  It seems if I could find the above files and cp them to
/usr/lib they would be available.  Is there a way to extract them from
rpm-4.0.2-8?

Thanks,

Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

About last announced PHP vulnerability...

[Ismael Touama]

Hi there,

on the errata page it is downloadable only for i386 architecture.
Is that mean that I do not need these rpms if I'm on i686 ?
On my system a rpm -qa |grep 'php' gives details above...
asp2php-0.75.17-1
php-4.0.6-7
asp2php-gtk-0.75.17-1
php-imap-4.0.6-7
php-pgsqlp-4.0.6-7
php-ldap-4.0.6-7

May i update these packages ?
I have still upgrded my kernel...
thx,ism



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Apache

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

I just read doc to install and configure Apache.
So I saw that :

The cgi-bin directory is set up to allow the execution of CGI scripts, with
the ExecCGI option. If you need to execute a CGI script in another
directory, you will need to set ExecCGI for that directory. For example, if
your cgi-bin is /var/www/cgi-bin, but you want to execute CGI scripts from
within /home/my_cgi_directory, add an ExecCGI directive to a set of
Directory directives like the following to your httpd.conf file:


Options +ExecCGI



To allow CGI script execution in /home/my_cgi_directory, you will need to
take a few extra steps besides setting ExecCGI. You will also need to have
the AddHandler directive uncommented to identify files with the .cgi
extension as CGI scripts. See the section called AddHandler for instructions
on setting AddHandler.
[http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-7.1-Manual/ref-guide/s1-config
uration-config.html#S2-CONFIGURATION-ADDHANDLER]
 Permissions for CGI scripts, and the entire path to the scripts, must be
set to 0755. Finally, the owner of the script and the owner of the directory
must be the same user.

I don't really understand what you've done right or not but
hopt this help.
SeeYaLater
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Anthony E. Greene
Envoye : jeudi 21 mars 2002 16:15
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: Apache


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Brandon Caudle wrote:
>I am running Redhat 7.1, with apache 1.3.22
>http://64.130.55.193/server-status for more info.  I can't get cgi scripts
>to work, i can get perl scripts to work, but cgi scripts they return a
>premature end of header, all the perl scripts and all the cgi scripts are
>a+x with the user and group of apache.  Any ideas??

Make sure the CGI scripts generate the Content-Type header, followed by a
blank line. In perl, it would look like this:

  print "Content-Type: text/html\n\n";


Tony
- --
Anthony E. Greene 
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Chat: TonyG05  HomePage: 
Linux: the choice of a GNU Generation. 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene 0x6C94239D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

iD8DBQE8mfj2pCpg3WyUI50RAotXAKCKBtjhX4ISqyuvmF8PmXV0es1pOACfYTtZ
whi5chNwuIxgBUZnOvydPok=
=YAoh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: md5 GPG NOT OK

[Ismael Touama]

OK.
It says that signature was done on wed 27th feb 2002, the key is DSA ID
DB42A60E.
gpg: fail to check signature: public key not found
nameof.rpm:
MD5 sum OK: [...and his key...]

What ! it sounds strange to me.
I don't understand what you've say ... "make sure ... keyring".
Well I assume it's about public key.

Thanks,
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Envoyé : mercredi 20 mars 2002 16:36
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: md5 GPG NOT OK


"Ismael Touama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> HEllo,
>
> done this rpm --checksig kernel-2.4.9-31
> and GPG key is not OK...
> I downloaded it(s)[several RPMs] from mirror.
> Is that quite normal or do I have to take care ?

What does "rpm -Kv" said? Make sure that the user running the test has
the Red Hat GPG key in his keyring.

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.

[Ismael Touama]

Thanks, it's what i've done.
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Emmanuel Seyman
Envoye : mercredi 20 mars 2002 14:24
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.


On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 12:38:08PM +0100, Ismael Touama wrote:
>
> it's done but ...you wrote:
> "mkbootdisk X.Y.Z-1.2.3
> where X.Y.Z-1.2.3 is your *former* kernel.
> 
> You mean actual now 2.4.9-31
> I have still bootdisquette 2.4.7-10

Actually, it's better to make a bootdisk with a kernel
that you know works.
That way, if anything happens during the upgrade, you can easily
boot the computer on the bootdisk.

That said, you can have a bootdisk for both kernels.

Emmanuel



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.

[Ismael Touama]

hi,

it's done but ...you wrote:
"mkbootdisk X.Y.Z-1.2.3

where X.Y.Z-1.2.3 is your *former* kernel.
Take the disquette out and reboot."

You mean actual now 2.4.9-31
I have still bootdisquette 2.4.7-10
so...

ism 




-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Emmanuel Seyman
Envoye : mardi 19 mars 2002 17:39
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.


On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 05:17:06PM +0100, Ismael Touama wrote:
>
> Results during upgrade is as this:
> kernel..[25%]

You need this.

> kernel-debug[50%]

You probably do not need this.

> kernel-enterprise...[75%]
> kernel-smp..[100%]

You do not need this.

> Is there someone who can explain this to me ?

You screwed up.
Type the following command:

rpm -e kernel-debug kernel-entreprise kernel-smp

Then edit /etc/grub.conf and check that all images are valid.
Insert a disquette and type (as root):

mkbootdisk X.Y.Z-1.2.3

where X.Y.Z-1.2.3 is your *former* kernel.
Take the disquette out and reboot.

Emmanuel



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

md5 GPG NOT OK

[Ismael Touama]

HEllo,

done this rpm --checksig kernel-2.4.9-31
and GPG key is not OK...
I downloaded it(s)[several RPMs] from mirror.
Is that quite normal or do I have to take care ?
Thank you.
ism



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.

[Ismael Touama]

first link has still been read before my upgrade, don't saw anything
treating about what's smp, enterprise and debug kernel's...
So I read the rest...

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Saul Arias
Envoyé : mardi 19 mars 2002 17:54
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.


http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-7.2-Manual/custom-guide/kernel.
html

And while you're at it, read this also:

http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-7.2-Manual/custom-guide/ch-rpm.
html

On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 10:17, Ismael Touama wrote:
> Is there someone who can explain this to me ?
> Or giving a link...





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.

[Ismael Touama]

Don't care my little tweety ;op I know that.
I intend to know what is current to Linux.
My own bash, my own kernel, my own compilation,
my own system...so by the way, I let me the time...
thx
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Paul Stewart
Envoye : mardi 19 mars 2002 17:51
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.


Personally, I *never* use RPM for upgrades... Especially a kernel itself
due to "tweaking" that most people want/need for their specific system..

Just a helpful thought.. Learn how to do a source kernel build...:)

Paul


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Emmanuel Seyman
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.


On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 05:17:06PM +0100, Ismael Touama wrote:
>
> Results during upgrade is as this:
> kernel..[25%]

You need this.

> kernel-debug[50%]

You probably do not need this.

> kernel-enterprise...[75%]
> kernel-smp..[100%]

You do not need this.

> Is there someone who can explain this to me ?

You screwed up.
Type the following command:

rpm -e kernel-debug kernel-entreprise kernel-smp

Then edit /etc/grub.conf and check that all images are valid. Insert a
disquette and type (as root):

mkbootdisk X.Y.Z-1.2.3

where X.Y.Z-1.2.3 is your *former* kernel.
Take the disquette out and reboot.

Emmanuel



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.

[Ismael Touama]

Thanks emmannuel I will read Saul's links and 
then apply what you suggest. I have still a boot floppy
from my former config.
However I don't understand "screwed up"...you mean that I
waste my work ?
hmm', why don't erase directly the new image, as you say,
directly in grub.conf ? Ho, I will see by reading previous
mentionnezd links I suppose. I've still reboot and then notice
no problems for the moment.
Ok let's go reading and then after tomorrow will be time for APACHE !!
Thx,
ism


-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Emmanuel Seyman
Envoye : mardi 19 mars 2002 17:39
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.


On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 05:17:06PM +0100, Ismael Touama wrote:
>
> Results during upgrade is as this:
> kernel..[25%]

You need this.

> kernel-debug[50%]

You probably do not need this.

> kernel-enterprise...[75%]
> kernel-smp..[100%]

You do not need this.

> Is there someone who can explain this to me ?

You screwed up.
Type the following command:

rpm -e kernel-debug kernel-entreprise kernel-smp

Then edit /etc/grub.conf and check that all images are valid.
Insert a disquette and type (as root):

mkbootdisk X.Y.Z-1.2.3

where X.Y.Z-1.2.3 is your *former* kernel.
Take the disquette out and reboot.

Emmanuel



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.

[Ismael Touama]

thx...Saul

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Saul Arias
Envoyé : mardi 19 mars 2002 17:54
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.


http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-7.2-Manual/custom-guide/kernel.
html

And while you're at it, read this also:

http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-7.2-Manual/custom-guide/ch-rpm.
html

On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 10:17, Ismael Touama wrote:
> Is there someone who can explain this to me ?
> Or giving a link...





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Kernell upgrade and 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent.

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,
I'd just update my kernel. 
I've to change grub.conf now!
Results during upgrade is as this:
kernel..[25%]
kernel-debug[50%]
kernel-enterprise...[75%]
kernel-smp..[100%]

Is there someone who can explain this to me ?
Or giving a link...
Thank you,
ism
"Somehow we're all, learning to crawl!" -Burning Heads-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: /boot/grub/grub.conf 644

[Ismael Touama]

Oh sorry !
I didn't understand you were speaking about rights.
So if it's really in /boot/grub directory, you right,
it seems quite worrying...I have 600.
Also its maybe the rights link that can be disturbing too.
I have 777 !! (it may be normal for linked files [don't know yet links])
Ok, and it 's also troubling that the encryoted password can be read by all
!!
Ok it's disturbing me too so if you have more info ...
Thx
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Ismael Touama
Envoye : mardi 19 mars 2002 12:39
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: /boot/grub/grub.conf 644


Apparently and in my memory,
when I installed/choose this loader,
it hangs this new encryption.
Indeed I have a md5 password (?) line in my grub.conf.
However it hadn't been mentionned relative to ths update kernel
in the section speaking about ... ?
I don't mind, cause if the line appears it's you choose this
authentification,
if not, choice hadn't been done.
So two choices, to types of file structure.
...I guess.
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de David Talkington
Envoye : jeudi 14 mars 2002 21:54
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : /boot/grub/grub.conf 644


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Is there any particular reason that this file, which contains an MD5
password, should be world readable?  I really don't like that.

- -d

- --
David Talkington

PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6

iQA/AwUBPJEN7r9BpdPKTBGtEQI5yQCgn/f/Ic6acCq2drwzwmakkcjgYcUAn3Bz
CbeUnfw9LIqDo48zrbAmyPfQ
=UFw7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: /boot/grub/grub.conf 644

[Ismael Touama]

Apparently and in my memory,
when I installed/choose this loader,
it hangs this new encryption.
Indeed I have a md5 password (?) line in my grub.conf.
However it hadn't been mentionned relative to ths update kernel
in the section speaking about ... ?
I don't mind, cause if the line appears it's you choose this
authentification,
if not, choice hadn't been done.
So two choices, to types of file structure.
...I guess.
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de David Talkington
Envoye : jeudi 14 mars 2002 21:54
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : /boot/grub/grub.conf 644


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Is there any particular reason that this file, which contains an MD5
password, should be world readable?  I really don't like that.

- -d

- --
David Talkington

PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6

iQA/AwUBPJEN7r9BpdPKTBGtEQI5yQCgn/f/Ic6acCq2drwzwmakkcjgYcUAn3Bz
CbeUnfw9LIqDo48zrbAmyPfQ
=UFw7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: dependencies errata ecaetera - END -

[Ismael Touama]

That 's the end,
1 week later :
# rpm -qa | grep glibc
glibc-common-2.2.4-19.3
glibc-2.2.4-19.3
glibc-devel-2.2.4-19.3
#

wOO !
Kernell can test my patience !!?
So i play the game, and seem to reapeat, reapeat, reapeat...
but THX !
ism


-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Emmanuel Seyman
Envoye : vendredi 15 mars 2002 14:33
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: dependencies errata ecaetera


On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 02:07:17PM +0100, Ismael Touama wrote:
> 
> $ It's my system who asked for ! as I wrote, for depedencies...
> $ The strangest is that upgrade didn't seem to be made.

- Erase all the glibc related rpms that you have on your system.
- Download the following rpms from the nearest updates mirror ftp.

i686/glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm
i386/glibc-devel-2.2.4-19.3.i386.rpm
i386/glibc-common-2.2.4-19.3.i386.rpm

- Put these 3 files in an empty directory
- cd into that directory
- Run the command `rpm -Fvh glibc-*`

If this doesn't work, please post the output of the command that failed.

Emmanuel



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: dependencies errata ecaetera

[Ismael Touama]

OK good lunch and it's quite OK.
Don't know how, don't know why but this time it work.
I HAVE MY glibc RPMs UPGRADED !!!
Except the devel one which is still to the 2.2.4-13is that bad ? *I
think so*
This time ### apears on the screen unless
this morning.
However, for common lib it has just did it until 50% !?
Hooo ! Maybe because of the -devel !!
Ok let's process and then ... KERNELL
Thank you Emmanuel.
Hope I wasn't too much a schmock!
ism.


-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Ismael Touama
Envoye : vendredi 15 mars 2002 14:07
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: dependencies errata ecaetera




On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 12:41:50PM +0100, Ismael Touama wrote:
>
> $ I 'm on i686 so I expect I just need :
> - glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm [RHBA-2001:121-06]*
> - glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm [RHSA-2001:160-09]*

Keep only the one which is in the updates directory right now

$ I applied the 121-06 first and then 160-09.
$ Considered to this in errata description about kernell:
"Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata
relevant to your system have been applied. "

> - glibc-common-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm

This rpm doesn't exist.
Only the glibc rpm is availible for i686.
Use the i386 rpm for -common and -devel .

> - glibc-2.2.4-13.i686.rpm [for dependencies]
> - glibc-common-2.2.4-13.i386.rpm [for dependencies]

You shouldn't need these, as far as I know.

$ It's my system who asked for ! as I wrote, for depedencies...
$ The strangest is that upgrade didn't seem to be made.

Emmanuel

ism

___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: dependencies errata ecaetera

[Ismael Touama]

On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 12:41:50PM +0100, Ismael Touama wrote:
> 
> $ I 'm on i686 so I expect I just need :
> - glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm [RHBA-2001:121-06]*
> - glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm [RHSA-2001:160-09]*

Keep only the one which is in the updates directory right now

$ I applied the 121-06 first and then 160-09.
$ Considered to this in errata description about kernell:
"Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata
relevant to your system have been applied. "

> - glibc-common-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm

This rpm doesn't exist.
Only the glibc rpm is availible for i686.
Use the i386 rpm for -common and -devel .

> - glibc-2.2.4-13.i686.rpm [for dependencies]
> - glibc-common-2.2.4-13.i386.rpm [for dependencies]

You shouldn't need these, as far as I know.

$ It's my system who asked for ! as I wrote, for depedencies...
$ The strangest is that upgrade didn't seem to be made.

Emmanuel

ism

___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: dependencies errata ecaetera

[Ismael Touama]

Hi!
-Start E.S-
Create a directory.
Put all the glibc related rpms from the updates in that directory.
You should have:

glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i386.rpm  glibc-devel-2.2.4-19.3.i386.rpm
glibc-common-2.2.4-19.3.i386.rpm   glibc-profile-2.2.4-19.3.i386.rpm
-End E.S-

$ I 'm on i686 so I expect I just need :
- glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm [RHBA-2001:121-06]*
- glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm [RHSA-2001:160-09]*
- glibc-common-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm
- glibc-2.2.4-13.i686.rpm [for dependencies]
- glibc-common-2.2.4-13.i386.rpm [for dependencies]
- glibc-common-2.2.4-19.3.i386.rpm [for dependencies]

Am I right or wrong ?
I did the operation but couldn't put all in the same folder (*).
So i done it in two times, all was seemed OK but, when I rpm -qa |grep
glibc,
here is the result:
glibc-2.2.4-13
glibc-devel-2.2.4-13
glibc-common-2.2.4-13

What's the hell ?
Kernell will be for later.
Thanks
ism doesn't go on kernell

---


Cd to that directory and run the command:
rpm -Fvh glibc-*

If that doesn't work, please post the out of the command to the list.

> I wanted to rpm -ivh kernell today but it's missed !

Run the command `uname -m`.
Download the kernel in that directory from the updates and all the
kernel-related rpms from the i386 directory.

Run the commands:
rpm -Fvh kernel-*-2.4.9*
rpm -ivh kernel-2.4.9-6.2.15.$ARCH.rpm (where $ARCH is the
result of `uname -m`)
Reboot.

Emmanuel



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: RE: dependencies errata ecaetera

[Ismael Touama]

thanks ok I will try but I don't understand how rpm -qa
makes his search.
Didn't search installed rpm in  a database ? Or the file ?
I put rpm for i386 in i386 folder, and rpm for i686 in i686 folder.
Quite amazing to me.
Wait a minute... I do the tricks...
Furthermore 2 rpms are having the same name...for two differents
vulnerabilities, weird.
Ok I proceeded in two step.
I did like you said for the first vulnerability [OK]
Did the second one in it own directory [OK]
Conclusion [Thanks]
ism goes on kernell.



-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 14 mars 2002 20:09
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: RE: dependencies errata ecaetera


Hi. cd to the directory where you have *all* the new glibc rpms and do:

rpm -Fvh glibc-2.2.4-19.3*

and all should be fine.

- Original Message -----
From: Ismael Touama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:46 pm
Subject: RE: dependencies errata ecaetera

> Hi,
>
> I rpm -Fvh the revelant glibc RPMs.
> when made rpm -qa |grep glibc got:
> glibc-2.2.4-13
> glibc-devel-2.2.4-13
> glibc-common-2.2.4-13
>
> So try to make the definitiv upgrade (2.2.4-19.3),
> and again failed dependencies glibc-common 2.2.4-13 is
> needed by glibc-2.2.13 !!!
> G' I did the same with rpm -Uvh...and again !!
> Even after reboot...
> What's the matter please ?
> I don't understand anymore.
> I wanted to rpm -ivh kernell today but it's missed !
>
> Thanks for the help.
> ism
>
>
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Saul Arias
> Envoyé : mercredi 13 mars 2002 19:34
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : RE: dependencies errata ecaetera
>
>
> Relax, Ismael. You can safely install i386.rpm packages on your
> Pentium2 / Pentium 3 / Pentium 4 / Athlon box.
>
> If you don't find the package you need on the i686 directory, just
> grabthe package from i386 and install it.
>
> google is your friend, a search yielded the following thread,
> which you
> might want to read:
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&th=9c68cdfcf3725643&rnum=3
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 12:08, Ismael Touama wrote:
> > I saw that but I'm on i686 !!
> > Could you detail ?
> > I can take packages from i386 to put on my i686 architecture ?
> > Why is there not in both  architecture ?
> > Gosh ! headache !
> > Thank you.
> > ism
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: dependencies errata ecaetera

[Ismael Touama]

Hi,

I rpm -Fvh the revelant glibc RPMs.
when made rpm -qa |grep glibc got:
glibc-2.2.4-13
glibc-devel-2.2.4-13
glibc-common-2.2.4-13

So try to make the definitiv upgrade (2.2.4-19.3),
and again failed dependencies glibc-common 2.2.4-13 is
needed by glibc-2.2.13 !!!
G' I did the same with rpm -Uvh...and again !!
Even after reboot...
What's the matter please ?
I don't understand anymore.
I wanted to rpm -ivh kernell today but it's missed !

Thanks for the help.
ism



-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Saul Arias
Envoyé : mercredi 13 mars 2002 19:34
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: dependencies errata ecaetera


Relax, Ismael. You can safely install i386.rpm packages on your Pentium
2 / Pentium 3 / Pentium 4 / Athlon box.

If you don't find the package you need on the i686 directory, just grab
the package from i386 and install it.

google is your friend, a search yielded the following thread, which you
might want to read:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&th=9c68cdfcf3725643&rnum=3

Hope this helps.

On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 12:08, Ismael Touama wrote:
> I saw that but I'm on i686 !!
> Could you detail ?
> I can take packages from i386 to put on my i686 architecture ?
> Why is there not in both  architecture ?
> Gosh ! headache !
> Thank you.
> ism





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: dependencies errata ecaetera

[Ismael Touama]

Yes keeping cool my head.
Yes google is my friend I know that...
but sometime friends are bowling out each other, isn't it !
So really thanks for this nice link that clears my head.
Have good day boy.
ism
"I say right, left !
Yes sir, yes sir"

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Saul Arias
Envoyé : mercredi 13 mars 2002 19:34
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: dependencies errata ecaetera


Relax, Ismael. You can safely install i386.rpm packages on your Pentium
2 / Pentium 3 / Pentium 4 / Athlon box.

If you don't find the package you need on the i686 directory, just grab
the package from i386 and install it.

google is your friend, a search yielded the following thread, which you
might want to read:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&th=9c68cdfcf3725643&rnum=3

Hope this helps.

On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 12:08, Ismael Touama wrote:
> I saw that but I'm on i686 !!
> Could you detail ?
> I can take packages from i386 to put on my i686 architecture ?
> Why is there not in both  architecture ?
> Gosh ! headache !
> Thank you.
> ism





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: dependencies errata ecaetera

[Ismael Touama]

I saw that but I'm on i686 !! 
Could you detail ?
I can take packages from i386 to put on my i686 architecture ?
Why is there not in both  architecture ?
Gosh ! headache !
Thank you.
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Emmanuel Seyman
Envoye : mercredi 13 mars 2002 18:57
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: dependencies errata ecaetera


On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 06:08:46PM +0100, Ismael Touama wrote:
>
> Argh'! no one can help ?
> Sorry but didn't find good information, plus don't find
> glibc-common.2.2.4-19.3.

It's in the i386 directory of the updates.

Emmanuel



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: dependencies errata ecaetera

[Ismael Touama]

Argh'! no one can help ?
Sorry but didn't find good information, plus don't find
glibc-common.2.2.4-19.3.

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Ismael Touama
Envoyé : mercredi 13 mars 2002 14:52
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : dependencies errata ecaetera


Oï,

Intended to upgrade and correct my system, I have to upgrade these RPMs:
> glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm [RHBA-2001:121-06]
> glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm [RHSA-2001:160-09] ~don't understand why the
same name, even if same element~
> kernel-2.4.9-31.i686.rpm
  kernel-debug-2.4.9-31.i686.rpm
  kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-31.i686.rpm
  kernel-smp-2.4.9-31.i686.rpm [ RHSA-2002:028-13 ] ~to apply in last~

So made for RHBA-2001:121-06:
rpm -Fvhi glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm  ~in the good directory~
error :failed dependencies:
glibc-common = 2.2.4-19.3 is needed by glibc-2.2.4-19.3

So reach for it on my system, and indeed is nowhere.
Try to download it but don't find it !!
I miss something I guess.

My proc sys is i686.
Can someone drive me a little?
Thx
ism



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

dependencies errata ecaetera

[Ismael Touama]

Oï,

Intended to upgrade and correct my system, I have to upgrade these RPMs:
> glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm [RHBA-2001:121-06]
> glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm [RHSA-2001:160-09] ~don't understand why the
same name, even if same element~
> kernel-2.4.9-31.i686.rpm
  kernel-debug-2.4.9-31.i686.rpm
  kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-31.i686.rpm
  kernel-smp-2.4.9-31.i686.rpm [ RHSA-2002:028-13 ] ~to apply in last~

So made for RHBA-2001:121-06:
rpm -Fvhi glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm  ~in the good directory~
error :failed dependencies:
glibc-common = 2.2.4-19.3 is needed by glibc-2.2.4-19.3

So reach for it on my system, and indeed is nowhere.
Try to download it but don't find it !!
I miss something I guess.

My proc sys is i686.
Can someone drive me a little?
Thx
ism



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: *****SPAM*****

[Ismael Touama]

OKHEY! thanks,

You filter spam with spamassins.
So you mean samba + spamassins ?
Don't ever use samba cause my server's not on the LAN
(not funny, just time for me to get my server more comfortable with).
In fact my english understood doesn't the passage about samba
in you're previous message.
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Gerry Doris
Envoyé : mardi 12 mars 2002 17:19
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: *SPAM* Re: [HS] SPAM


> SPAM:  Start SpamAssassin results
> -- SPAM: This mail is probably spam.  The original
> message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar
> unwanted mail in future. SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for
> more details.
> SPAM:
> SPAM: Content analysis details:   (7.5 hits, 7 required)
> SPAM: Hit! (1.0 point)   BODY: Claims you can be removed from the list
> SPAM: Hit! (4.5 points)  BODY: List removal information
> SPAM: Hit! (2.0 points)  BODY: Talks about opting in
> SPAM:
> SPAM:  End of SpamAssassin results
> -
>
> Your are absolutely correct.  Mailing lists  is one major source for
> spam address.  This is why I have complained many times to the redhat
> list managers to remove the reference to the person who originally sent
> the mail.  I finally gave up, it seemed it was falling on deaf ears.
>
> Ismael Touama wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since I suscribe to the list I receive a lot of mail of this
>> kind. -only pure spam speaking money sex etc-
>> Am I the only one or do you recieve the same ?
>> Is there none an anti-spam ?
>> I believe it's since i'm here.
>> Thx,
>> ism
>>
>> -Message d'origine-

Bullshit removed...

As you can see above, I use spamassassin to flag spam messages which are
then automatically sorted.  Those from proven spam sites go directly
to /dev/null.  Others like this are put into a holding directory for me to
double check.

I also do a virus scan of all incoming mail using mailscanner and regularly
pick up virus laden attachments.  The samba list used to be really bad
until they started scanning for both virus and spam.

Unfortunately programs like these fill a real need in today's world!

Gerry
--
"The lyfe so short the craft so long to learne"  Chaucer




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: [HS] SPAM

[Ismael Touama]

Oh yes it's f*ck*d my aliases up !!
What's the hell !! Why does it encrypt sometimes in the
header and sometimes it kind of decrypts !!?
There's a problem.
I assume client can't do anything, but the admin of th list can.
Gosh !

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Robert Canary
Envoye : mardi 12 mars 2002 17:28
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [HS] SPAM


That is text generated from the email client!

Pay attention.  Look in the headers!!!

Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Robert Canary wrote:
>  ^
> Note: No e-mail address here!
>
> > Your are absolutely correct.  Mailing lists  is one major source for
> > spam address.  This is why I have complained many times to the redhat
> > list managers to remove the reference to the person who originally sent
> > the mail.  I finally gave up, it seemed it was falling on deaf ears.
>
> Apparently, e-mail addresses don't appear in the attributions, but they do
> appear in people's signatures (if people provide them there).  How would
> you suggest that they be removed?  How wold you suggest that people
> provide off-list contact information if all strings of the form
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] were deleted?
>
> > Ismael Touama wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Since I suscribe to the list I receive a lot of mail of this
> > > kind. -only pure spam speaking money sex etc-
> > > Am I the only one or do you recieve the same ?
> > > Is there none an anti-spam ?
> > > I believe it's since i'm here.
> > > Thx,
> > > ism
> >[...]
> > --
> > robert canary
> > system services
> > OhioCounty.Net
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   ^^^
> Note e-mail address here!
>
> > (270)298-9331 Office
> > (270)298-7449 Fax
>
> --
> Matthew Saltzman
>
> Clemson University Math Sciences
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

--
robert canary
system services
OhioCounty.Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(270)298-9331 Office
(270)298-7449 Fax



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Why so slow !!!!

[Ismael Touama]

Sure it's more efficient, 10 times faster ! thanks.
I'm kind of stupid!Suure

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Hal Burgiss
Envoye : mardi 12 mars 2002 17:34
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: Why so slow 


On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 04:17:57PM +0100, Ismael Touama wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Why does the ftp download is so long to transfert data ?
> At the begining it's quite allright.
> But really fast it goes under 5Ko/s 
> My championship record : 1 ko/s 
> Is it my connection (-I'm on ADSL !a download spreading hell!-, the
distance
> or so ?
> Thanks for details cause rpm are not some light files
> tortoisism.

Some more detail would certainly be good. Where are you downloading
from? Redhat ftp? If so, try one of the many, many mirrors. That's the
problem...everybody hits the main site when a new release or new
errata comes out.

--
Hal Burgiss




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: [HS] SPAM

[Ismael Touama]

Heyhey !! look, thanks to Robert info :
see the first msg that I send this morning concerning this topic.
It's an italian guy (using of course linux), look the header :

We can see i'm in fact on wanadoo, but we can see his IP.

Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mel-rti18.wanadoo.fr (192.168.156.137) by ms24-2.wanadoo.fr;
12 Mar 2002 01:53:29 +0100
Received: from smtp3-out.lerelaisinternet.com (194.206.126.77) by
mel-rti18.wanadoo.fr (6.0.039)
id 3C8564FB0078BC4C for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 12 Mar 2002
01:53:29 +0100
Received: from av2.lerelaisinternet.com (AV2.lerelaisinternet.com
[192.168.164.204])
by smtp3-out.lerelaisinternet.com (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id
g2C0rVud030658
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 01:53:31 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by av2.lerelaisinternet.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) id g2C0rT912682
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 01:53:29 +0100
Received: from smtp2-in.lerelaisinternet.com
(pri-smtp2-in.lerelaisinternet.com [192.168.164.194])
by av2.lerelaisinternet.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g2C0rRf12670
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 01:53:27 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from yahoo.com (cache.unicap.br [200.249.25.14])
by smtp2-in.lerelaisinternet.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with SMTP id
g2C0rOht019294
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 01:53:27 +0100
Received: from rly-yk05.mx.aol.com ([151.30.67.11])
by mx.rootsystems.net with asmtp; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 08:53:38 -0800
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <004a44c65a7a$2478b8a3$0de02cb1@srychj>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ADV:Your product advertised to 200k people for $50 8550DMOl7
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 11:41:51 -1100
MiME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="=_NextPart_000_00A0_31C15D6E.B1776A57"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: Analyse Anti-Virus (LeRelaisInternet.Com)

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Ismael Touama
Envoyé : mardi 12 mars 2002 09:33
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [HS] SPAM


Hi,

Since I suscribe to the list I receive a lot of mail of this
kind. -only pure spam speaking money sex etc-
Am I the only one or do you recieve the same ?
Is there none an anti-spam ?
I believe it's since i'm here.
Thx,
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : mardi 12 mars 2002 23:42
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : ADV:Your product advertised to 200k people for $50 8550DMOl7


Thanks!
E-mail advertising works!  I will put an email, just like this one,
in the hands of two-hundred thousand people, just like you,
for $50.00.  That's it.  You email me ad-copy, pay me, and that
day I go to work for you.  I can also set you up with an
autoresponder service that can qualify and collect basic
information from these emails.  Use this Opt-In list to distribute
further ad-copy, newsletters, or discount coupons...
Full disclosure of needed stats.

For contact information send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks!

To be removed send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with REMOVE as the
subject.
8114Aeaj6-574bWnU1023nHIm4-550tHZC6133WrIk6-409KTGw9132ZVWV5-251MBrK6l65



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: [HS] SPAM

[Ismael Touama]

It s kind of what I say...
I don't ask for nothing, it gives me.

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Robert Canary
Envoye : mardi 12 mars 2002 17:23
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [HS] SPAM


Tell Outlook Express to show all headers and you will see it.  I am
using Netscape, which shows all headers.  And it shows your address
plain as day.

From: "Ismael Touama" 

Ismael Touama wrote:
>
> It doesn't appear below but appear above in expeditor field!!
> I'm on Outlook, soory for the insult.
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Matthew Saltzman
> Envoye : mardi 12 mars 2002 16:52
> A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: [HS] SPAM
>
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Robert Canary wrote:
>  ^
> Note: No e-mail address here!
>
> > Your are absolutely correct.  Mailing lists  is one major source for
> > spam address.  This is why I have complained many times to the redhat
> > list managers to remove the reference to the person who originally sent
> > the mail.  I finally gave up, it seemed it was falling on deaf ears.
>
> Apparently, e-mail addresses don't appear in the attributions, but they do
> appear in people's signatures (if people provide them there).  How would
> you suggest that they be removed?  How wold you suggest that people
> provide off-list contact information if all strings of the form
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] were deleted?
>
> > Ismael Touama wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Since I suscribe to the list I receive a lot of mail of this
> > > kind. -only pure spam speaking money sex etc-
> > > Am I the only one or do you recieve the same ?
> > > Is there none an anti-spam ?
> > > I believe it's since i'm here.
> > > Thx,
> > > ism
> >[...]
> > --
> > robert canary
> > system services
> > OhioCounty.Net
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   ^^^
> Note e-mail address here!
>
> > (270)298-9331 Office
> > (270)298-7449 Fax
>
> --
> Matthew Saltzman
>
> Clemson University Math Sciences
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

--
robert canary
system services
OhioCounty.Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(270)298-9331 Office
(270)298-7449 Fax



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: [HS] SPAM

[Ismael Touama]

It doesn't appear below but appear above in expeditor field!!
I'm on Outlook, soory for the insult.

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Matthew Saltzman
Envoye : mardi 12 mars 2002 16:52
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [HS] SPAM


On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Robert Canary wrote:
 ^
Note: No e-mail address here!

> Your are absolutely correct.  Mailing lists  is one major source for
> spam address.  This is why I have complained many times to the redhat
> list managers to remove the reference to the person who originally sent
> the mail.  I finally gave up, it seemed it was falling on deaf ears.

Apparently, e-mail addresses don't appear in the attributions, but they do
appear in people's signatures (if people provide them there).  How would
you suggest that they be removed?  How wold you suggest that people
provide off-list contact information if all strings of the form
[EMAIL PROTECTED] were deleted?

> Ismael Touama wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since I suscribe to the list I receive a lot of mail of this
> > kind. -only pure spam speaking money sex etc-
> > Am I the only one or do you recieve the same ?
> > Is there none an anti-spam ?
> > I believe it's since i'm here.
> > Thx,
> > ism
>[...]
> --
> robert canary
> system services
> OhioCounty.Net
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ^^^
Note e-mail address here!

> (270)298-9331 Office
> (270)298-7449 Fax


-- 
Matthew Saltzman

Clemson University Math Sciences
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: [HS] SPAM

[Ismael Touama]

But isn't there a tool in redhat distribution that disable
or unfortunate spam even if I know it would be difficult !!?
Nevertheless, Neveranswer !

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Robert Canary
Envoyé : mardi 12 mars 2002 16:11
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [HS] SPAM


Your are absolutely correct.  Mailing lists  is one major source for
spam address.  This is why I have complained many times to the redhat
list managers to remove the reference to the person who originally sent
the mail.  I finally gave up, it seemed it was falling on deaf ears.

Ismael Touama wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Since I suscribe to the list I receive a lot of mail of this
> kind. -only pure spam speaking money sex etc-
> Am I the only one or do you recieve the same ?
> Is there none an anti-spam ?
> I believe it's since i'm here.
> Thx,
> ism
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Envoyé : mardi 12 mars 2002 23:42
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : ADV:Your product advertised to 200k people for $50 8550DMOl7
>
> Thanks!
> E-mail advertising works!  I will put an email, just like this one,
> in the hands of two-hundred thousand people, just like you,
> for $50.00.  That's it.  You email me ad-copy, pay me, and that
> day I go to work for you.  I can also set you up with an
> autoresponder service that can qualify and collect basic
> information from these emails.  Use this Opt-In list to distribute
> further ad-copy, newsletters, or discount coupons...
> Full disclosure of needed stats.
>
> For contact information send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thanks!
>
> To be removed send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with REMOVE as the
> subject.
> 8114Aeaj6-574bWnU1023nHIm4-550tHZC6133WrIk6-409KTGw9132ZVWV5-251MBrK6l65
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

--
robert canary
system services
OhioCounty.Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(270)298-9331 Office
(270)298-7449 Fax



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Why so slow !!!!

[Ismael Touama]

Hello again,

Why does the ftp download is so long to transfert data ?
At the begining it's quite allright.
But really fast it goes under 5Ko/s 
My championship record : 1 ko/s 
Is it my connection (-I'm on ADSL !a download spreading hell!-, the distance
or so ?
Thanks for details cause rpm are not some light files
tortoisism.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list