Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-28 Thread Ode Coyote


That's assuming that the experiment didn't take transmission possibilities 
into account and isolate the experiment from the general population. What 
sort of idiot wouldn't do that?


Silver is commonly used to sterilize surfaces and water supplies [NASA does 
that].  It's not at all difficult to prove that it works [or 
doesn't].  It's known and accepted by both the American  EPA and the 
Canadian counterparts of the EPA that silver kills microbes quite 
effectively and is virtually non toxic to mammals.  It's in their water 
quality standards reports. Almost any good reference book less than 40 
years old mentions that quality.

Why not air? [Hey, find out, right?]

 The problem is that people don't read their own 'bibles' and defer 
literacy to the programmed priesthood of the black or white world who can't 
[or won't] read with a discernment adequate to tell tons from micrograms.


Well, maybe Holy water is good stuff...but it ain't the only water around.


ken



I'm talking about a high medical risk because it is not a certainty that
this
would not infect others.   I'm not sure what you mean by the risk of
being laughed at.  But I can assure you that no one will be laughing if
I present something they have no experience with and then tell them
to nebulize it when they aren't nebulizing anything right now.  If you're
talking about being laughed at for the idea overall, yes, this would be
a concern for two reasons.  First, I'm trying to take advantage of the
opening to introduce CS to conventional medicine.  I want them to
seriously consider the idea. Second, I am concerned about the reputation
I've managed to cultivate in this group.  It's not every day that a person
who walks in the alternative medicine world is considered a peer by
physicians
and scientists.  I'm not about to do anything to damage this.  I'm playing
by their
rules and hopefully, I can get them to see the value of CS.  Then THEY can
figure out
how to administer it (with a few subtle hints).


Regards,
Catherine


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-27 Thread C Creel
Dear Ken,


  I said:

Well, taking into consideration that they are still having workers
contract SARS despite the fact they are being followed by teams of safety
police, it would probably not be considered riskless to try this.



  So, the risk is in being laughed at?   :-)
  I meant medical risk..but you knew that.


  **  I don't think I expressed myself well enough.  It seems you
are responding to something I didn't say.


I'm talking about a high medical risk because it is not a certainty that
this
would not infect others.   I'm not sure what you mean by the risk of
being laughed at.  But I can assure you that no one will be laughing if
I present something they have no experience with and then tell them
to nebulize it when they aren't nebulizing anything right now.  If you're
talking about being laughed at for the idea overall, yes, this would be
a concern for two reasons.  First, I'm trying to take advantage of the
opening to introduce CS to conventional medicine.  I want them to
seriously consider the idea. Second, I am concerned about the reputation
I've managed to cultivate in this group.  It's not every day that a person
who walks in the alternative medicine world is considered a peer by
physicians
and scientists.  I'm not about to do anything to damage this.  I'm playing
by their
rules and hopefully, I can get them to see the value of CS.  Then THEY can
figure out
how to administer it (with a few subtle hints).


Regards,
Catherine


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-27 Thread alltogethernow
Well, for what it's worth, I have been flooding my system with CS and
zapping for the last 5 days, and this monster will not die. I have
drank, nebulized, gargled, and iv twice, and then used a godzilla.
  My hair finally stopped hurting today. 
 We may be in for some trouble, unless someone here has a better
protocol.
 Maybe someone here can explain the logistics of dmso and so on.
 I just assumed that CS with a drop of h202 3-4 sessions a day in a neb.
would do it in, but it seems to have just offer temp. relief.
 On the other hand, it might buy some time, or provide extra kick for
prescribed medicine.  


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-26 Thread Jonathan B. Britten
This is a sensible comment.  There must be some way to rig up a device
to filter the exhalation, sort a reverse gas-mask device to filter the
exhalations rather than the inhalations.  Should be big bucks, too, for
anyone supplying such a device, which would be much cheaper than those
negative-pressure chambers they have in some hospitals.   Big bucks for
some first-rate medical vendors here if CS is shown to have an effect.  





David Bearrow wrote:
 
 I wouldn't think it to be unsafe to nebulize. Armed with this information
 we now know that one should nebulize alone so as to not increase the risk
 of infecting someone else. Or one could rig up a filter such as a tube with
 a CS soaked handkerchief rubber banded to the end to exhale through. Or a
 tube snaked out through the window to exhale through. There must be a way
 to reduce the risk of exhaling. But this fact that one exhales the virus
 shouldn't stop you from nebulizing.
 
 At 10:35 AM 4/25/03, you wrote:
SARS can be carried in droplets.  One would expel these when exhaling.
 Until we know that CS can kill SARS on contact it is unsafe to nebulize it.
 
 +-   Bentonite Clay for sale-+
 http://pages.sbcglobal.net/davebe/clay.html
 |  David Bearrow |
 |  dav...@sbcglobal.net  |
 +  Phone: (972)722-8319  +
 
 --
 The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
 
 Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
 
 To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
 
 Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
 
 List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-26 Thread Jason Eaton
Reid:

I enjoyed your comments.  I certainly agree.

We know from personal research and personal experience that isolated silver
is effective in-vivo against virii.  The barrier doesn't seem to be the
type, but rather, the location in the body and whether or not silver can be
delivered to the infection site in great enough concentration, consistently,
and for a long enough period of time to be effective.

I have been following four recent cases of Hep C and three cases of HIV (
full blown AIDS ).  The results, across the board, are very promising.  The
longest AIDS case I've followed has been a near-death scenario, with a
complete restoration of health for a seven year period via colloidal silver
use ( not an HIV negative, however ).

I'm not certain I accept the reasoning that one should not nebulize for fear
of spreading the infection.  In a hospital setting, you don't not use
silver via a nebulizer because you don't know if it works or not ( and
simply stick to oral colloidal silver use ), you isolate the individual and
take necessary precautions.  If one knows they have this condition, then it
is on the individual to be reasonably responsible with limitation of
contact.  If a person is not that responsible, then the philosophical point
is irrelevant anyway.

I never let academia get in the way of taking care of a condition with every
possible method available.  It might not work is not good enough for me.
It never has been, and never will be.  I would be more inclined to say that
it might not work as well via oral use.

This world is a very strange place.  Do the needs of the many outway the
needs of the few, or the one?  Before people are allowed to make policy, or
otherwise make decisions that can save or kill, I think this question should
be accurately analyzed and answered.

With Warm Regards,

Jason

- Original Message -
From: Reid Harvey pott...@wlink.com.np
To: silver list silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined


 CSEnthusiasts,
 In discussing the risk of spreading SARS in exhaled droplets it would
 seem to me there is an issue as to whether or not the treatment is for
 prevention or for cure.  For example, if we have a high degree of
 certainty that an individual does not have SARS then it would seem quite
 reasonable to be within their breething zone.

 And shouldn't we worry more that a person who may become infected
 through the droplets is someone who should be nebulizing, but may not
 be?  As to the possibility that the virus may not be cleared up through
 the use of CS, if this were true would it not be a first?  For what
 other virus has CS not indicated effective?

 My questions are just that, and not statements or any kind of challenge
 to what others are saying.  Thanks to all for sharing knowledge in these
 worrisome times.
 Reid

 David Bearrow said:
 I wouldn't think it to be unsafe to nebulize. Armed with this
 information we now know that one should nebulize alone so as to not
 increase the risk of infecting someone else. Or one could rig up a
 filter such as a tube with a CS soaked handkerchief rubber banded to the
 end to exhale through. Or a tube snaked out through the window to exhale
 through. There must be a way to reduce the risk of exhaling. But this
 fact that one exhales the virus shouldn't stop you from nebulizing.



 --
 The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

 Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

 To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

 Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

 List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com



Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-26 Thread C Creel
Dear Jason,

  You said:

I'm not certain I accept the reasoning that one should not nebulize for
fear
of spreading the infection.  In a hospital setting, you don't not use
silver via a nebulizer because you don't know if it works or not ( and
simply stick to oral colloidal silver use ), you isolate the individual and
take necessary precautions.  


  The point is if they think nebulizing is dangerous under these conditions
(and they do) then recommending nebulizing CS is going to be entirely
rejected.  I have one shot at this.  I want to take my best shot.  Trying to
talk an entire profession out of what they consider to be safety precautions
at a time when the majotiy of people with SARS in many hospitals are
hospital workers would not be productive.

Regards,
Catherine


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-26 Thread Ode Coyote


  Wouldn't one be exhaling CS droplets along with the virus?
 I should think that anything that does come out would be quite dead.
ken

At 12:43 PM 4/25/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I wouldn't think it to be unsafe to nebulize. Armed with this information 
we now know that one should nebulize alone so as to not increase the risk 
of infecting someone else. Or one could rig up a filter such as a tube 
with a CS soaked handkerchief rubber banded to the end to exhale through. 
Or a tube snaked out through the window to exhale through. There must be a 
way to reduce the risk of exhaling. But this fact that one exhales the 
virus shouldn't stop you from nebulizing.


At 10:35 AM 4/25/03, you wrote:

  SARS can be carried in droplets.  One would expel these when exhaling.
Until we know that CS can kill SARS on contact it is unsafe to nebulize it.


+-   Bentonite Clay for sale-+
http://pages.sbcglobal.net/davebe/clay.html
¦  David Bearrow ¦
¦  dav...@sbcglobal.net  ¦
+  Phone: (972)722-8319  +


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-26 Thread ian_ontario
Well, I can tell you that from current precautions being taken, anything
that would aresolize in a SARS patient's room is being stopped.  i.e. no
hand washing inside the room.  Holding to the theory that the virus is the
cause, they are saying that it stays live on surfaces for 24 hours. Anything
that aresolizes could conceivably contaminate every surface in a patient's
room and increase the possibility of transmission to care givers.  Even the
other day orders came through on patients' charts not to do chest
percussions or 'cupping'  for chest physio.  SARS makes for a dry cough but
other types of pneumonia are not dry and require chest physio. Even now, we
are double gowning, double gloving, double masking, full face shields,
microsan hand wash between phases of removal of layer inside and outside the
door.  Patients are all in negative pressure rooms.

Ian

- Original Message -
From: sol pcar...@wyoming.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined


 I missed something though I thought I had been following this thread.
 Why is it not advisable to nebulize CS for SARS?
 paula


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-26 Thread Ode Coyote


Since CS is not an FDA recognized drug [except in the negative sense] you 
will not find any RX approved CS.


 But any CS is a billion times less risky to use in any way than having 
SARS...just use the best you can find or make.
Generally speaking, what you make using basic protocals and care will be 
better than what you buy.
Most commercial producers go for speed of production...not quality and most 
commercially available CS is actually MSP [mild silver protein] and 
sometimes made by a chemical precipitate method.

 Read the fine print.

If the label says it may irritate eyes etc...if it says shake before 
using...it's probably not very good.


Ken



   IV protocol, anyone?  Amount, frequency?  I should probably recommend the
CS one can get by Rx only.  That would make the mainstream docs feel good
and safe I think.

  Thanks :-)

Regards,
Catherine


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-26 Thread Ode Coyote

 Idea:

Get the physician to make a culture from exhaled droplets before and after 
[during?] nebulizing with CS.
 A couple of breaths of CS vapor certainly won't hurt [or cure] anyone but 
should be quite revealing.


 It could turn out that running an ultrasonic humidifier with CS in it 
will completely protect anyone in the room...and maybe even cure the patient.


 You have desperation in your favor.
 In this case, there is very little risk and a possibility of major gain.
 IMO any physician that refuses to consider trying such a riskless 
experiment would be negligent.

ken


At 04:24 PM 4/25/2003 -0400, you wrote:

Dear Laura,


  You said:

Aren't there water molecules in regular exhalation?  Maybe nebulizing with
CS
if the CS didn't kill it on contact would increase the risk of SARS
transport
in that local area, but there is a large risk-benefit ratio here, as I see
it.


  ** Sure, there is some fluid in regular exhalations but there would be far
more nebulizing anything.  The purpose I'm asking the questions I am is
because I have an opportunity to present alternative options to people
treating people who have SARS .  I have to be scientific in my presentation
otherwise I'll lose them in the first three minutes.  Right now, they are
not nebulizing anything because of the higher risk of transmission.  What
has to be considered is the people giving the treatment and the air exchange
system in the hospitals.

What I'm after is any other way to get CS to the lungs - also, the
efficacy of CS on small envelope proteins.

Regards,
Catherine


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-26 Thread C Creel

Since CS is not an FDA recognized drug [except in the negative sense] you
will not find any RX approved CS.

  Oops - I mis-spoke.  I meant pharmaceutical grade.  Sorry for the
confusion.

Catherine


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-26 Thread C Creel
Dear Ken,


   You said:

  You have desperation in your favor.


   **  True.   THis is the only reason they are even willing to give me an
audience.

   You said:

  In this case, there is very little risk and a possibility of major gain.
  IMO any physician that refuses to consider trying such a riskless
experiment would be negligent.


  **  Well, taking into consideration that they are still having workers
contract SARS despite the fact they are being followed by teams of safety
police, it would probably not be considered riskless to try this.


  Do you know anything about IV administration of CS?

  Thanks, Ken.

  BTW, I'm enjoying using your generator.  I appreciate the workmanship,
detailed instructions, customer service, and of course, price.

Regards,
Catherine


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-26 Thread Jason Eaton
Catherine:

Of course I understand!  I've been working on several very qualified
infectious disease specialists now for quite some time.

I had erronously assumed that the MD's were experienced in using colloidal
silver.

I also didn't want those on the street to be afraid of nebulizing.

On more than one occasion I have been approached by those I know who work in
hospital settings, who almost cannot bear NOT to take a few select
substances into their hospital.  I myself almost cannot bear to not walk in
myself and lend assistance to ease needless suffering and failing treatment
modalities.

The conversation always goes like this:  Would X work on this case of
gangrene ( as an example )?  We're going to have to take the leg!

My response goes something like this:  Yes it would.  But you can't risk
losing your license to practice.  Get them out of the hospital, and it would
be different.

Not be to overly harsh on the medical establishment, I had the opportunity
to follow a precident setting case of a failed surgical procedure where the
bowels were nicked.  The individual was sewn up, and within 24 hours
displayed signs of SEVERE bloating.  The surgeons went in and determined
that the bowels were nicked and leaking, and they could not perform a
surgical repair.

This individual was going to die.

They brought in a VAC wound care system.  The dressing changes would take
from 2 to 4 hours... Sometimes longer if they could not get a vaccum seal on
the irregular wound.  Every pad, seal, and dressing would have to be cut to
dimensions.  Once the vaccum seal had been successfully established, it
could be left on for extended periods of time.  If for whatever reason the
seal was broken, the whole dressing would have to be redone.

In such situations, antibiotics are useless.  When fecal matter is leaking
into the body, you cannot stop an infection.  The VAC system successfully
kept the wound isolated and sealed.  The infection was eliminated.  The
abdominal area was kept free of fecal matter, and the nicks in the
intestines healed.  The individual walked out of that hospital.

Best Regards,

Jason

- Original Message -
From: C Creel ccr...@adelphia.net
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 11:25 PM
Subject: Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined


 Dear Jason,

   You said:

 I'm not certain I accept the reasoning that one should not nebulize for
 fear
 of spreading the infection.  In a hospital setting, you don't not use
 silver via a nebulizer because you don't know if it works or not ( and
 simply stick to oral colloidal silver use ), you isolate the individual
and
 take necessary precautions.  


   The point is if they think nebulizing is dangerous under these
conditions
 (and they do) then recommending nebulizing CS is going to be entirely
 rejected.  I have one shot at this.  I want to take my best shot.  Trying
to
 talk an entire profession out of what they consider to be safety
precautions
 at a time when the majotiy of people with SARS in many hospitals are
 hospital workers would not be productive.

 Regards,
 Catherine


 --
 The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

 Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

 To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

 Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

 List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com



Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-26 Thread Jason Eaton
Catherine:

RX grading is not determined by the FDA.  It is determined by USP standards.

There are currently no USP standards for isolated silver products.  There
are people working on establishing these standards, however.

Best Regards,

Jason



- Original Message -
From: C Creel ccr...@adelphia.net
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined



 Since CS is not an FDA recognized drug [except in the negative sense]
you
 will not find any RX approved CS.

   Oops - I mis-spoke.  I meant pharmaceutical grade.  Sorry for the
 confusion.

 Catherine


 --
 The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

 Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

 To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

 Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

 List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com



Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-26 Thread Trem
Hi Catherine,

You mentioned the use of inhalers as being acceptable.  Why not use an empty
inhaler and fill it with CS.  That way there won't be any excess droplets
when the person exhales.

Trem

- Original Message -
From: C Creel ccr...@adelphia.net
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 11:25 PM
Subject: Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined


 Dear Jason,

   You said:

 I'm not certain I accept the reasoning that one should not nebulize for
 fear
 of spreading the infection.  In a hospital setting, you don't not use
 silver via a nebulizer because you don't know if it works or not ( and
 simply stick to oral colloidal silver use ), you isolate the individual
and
 take necessary precautions.  


   The point is if they think nebulizing is dangerous under these
conditions
 (and they do) then recommending nebulizing CS is going to be entirely
 rejected.  I have one shot at this.  I want to take my best shot.  Trying
to
 talk an entire profession out of what they consider to be safety
precautions
 at a time when the majotiy of people with SARS in many hospitals are
 hospital workers would not be productive.

 Regards,
 Catherine


 --
 The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

 Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

 To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

 Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

 List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com






Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-26 Thread C Creel
Dear Trem,

  You said:

You mentioned the use of inhalers as being acceptable.  Why not use an
empty
inhaler and fill it with CS.  That way there won't be any excess droplets
when the person exhales.


I agree.  This sounds like a way to go.

Regards,
Catherine


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-26 Thread Ode Coyote





   You said:

  In this case, there is very little risk and a possibility of major gain.
  IMO any physician that refuses to consider trying such a riskless
experiment would be negligent.







  **  Well, taking into consideration that they are still having workers
contract SARS despite the fact they are being followed by teams of safety
police, it would probably not be considered riskless to try this.


##  So, the risk is in being laughed at?   :-)
 I meant medical risk..but you knew that.




  Do you know anything about IV administration of CS?


 ### I believe that Nancy would be the one to ask...and has posted several 
items on the subject.
 I don't think it would be any different than using plain old distilled 
water in an IV, but I'm not a medico.
 I do know that the CS you and I make is no more irritating to the eyes 
than distilled water. [stings a little in the same way]




  Thanks, Ken.

  BTW, I'm enjoying using your generator.  I appreciate the workmanship,
detailed instructions, customer service, and of course, price.


 Thank YOU!
Ken



Regards,
Catherine


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread C Creel
Dear Scientifically Inclined List Mates ;-),



Please search your brains.  Did I see somewhere that CS works on small
envelope proteins?

If so, where did I see it?  Dare I push this any further and ask about spike
glycoproteins, and the nucleocapside proteins?


   Also, since nebulizing CS would not be advisable with SARS what would the
options be to get CS to the lungs?

Thanks in advance for all responses.

Regards,
Catherine




--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread Robert Berger
Catherine,

Personally I think the statement made earlier by the authorities that
nebulizing would increase  the danger of disease spread. I guess the SARS people
should stop breathing.

When I nebulize I continue breathing or should I just stop?? :-)

I don't want to contemplate the alternative!

Ole Bob




--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread Dan Nave
Why wouldn't nebulizing with CS be OK?  Each droplet of mist is saturated with 
CS.  If it will kill the pathogen in the lungs it will kill it in the droplet 
in the air so any mist breathed out would be sterile.  Or is this not the issue?

you wrote:
CSA question for the scientifically inclined
From: C Creel (view other messages by this author) 
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 06:23:23 



Dear Scientifically Inclined List Mates ;-),



Please search your brains.  Did I see somewhere that CS works on small
envelope proteins?

If so, where did I see it?  Dare I push this any further and ask about spike
glycoproteins, and the nucleocapside proteins?


   Also, since nebulizing CS would not be advisable with SARS what would the
options be to get CS to the lungs?

Thanks in advance for all responses.

Regards,
Catherine


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread sol
I missed something though I thought I had been following this thread.
Why is it not advisable to nebulize CS for SARS?
paula
- Original Message -
From: C Creel ccr...@adelphia.net
Also, since nebulizing CS would not be advisable with SARS what would
the
 options be to get CS to the lungs?





--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread C Creel
Dear Dave,

  You said:

Why wouldn't nebulizing with CS be OK?  Each droplet of mist is saturated
with CS.  If it will kill the pathogen in the lungs it will kill it in the
droplet in the air so any mist breathed out would be sterile.  Or is this
not the issue?


  **  The problem is it is pure speculation.  We can't yet say that CS
works until it works.  In the meantime, to nebulize could be spreading it.

  Currently, all breathing treatments are being done with inhalers for this
reason.

Regards,
Catherine

Regards,
Catherine


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread alltogethernow
I've been sick with something for the last 3 days akin to the symptoms
of sars, however, I'm assuming it's the flu or strep throat or such;
anyway, when I nebulize CS, the symptoms subside, so much so that on the
second day I felt good enough to lift weights, thinking I had kicked it,
but the next day it is back with a vengeance.
 Just finished 2 sessions, along with 2 kinds of zappers, and the
symptoms are diminished again, but not gone.
 At any rate, it's probably a good idea (for me) to self treat, and
avoid places like hospitals and drs offices. 
 I'm in Md. -no reported cases so far, that I know of.


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread C Creel
I missed something though I thought I had been following this thread.
Why is it not advisable to nebulize CS for SARS?


  Risk of spreading it further.

C


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread sol
Well, but I don't get that, why it would? I mean, the nebulizer I have is
designed to be held with the lips around it just like an inhaler, one holds
it there and breathes in through the mouth (closed around nebulizer tube)
and out through the nose. Presumably the people getting meds via inhaler
still breath out, etc, etc. I must be missing something about the particular
type of nebulizing they are concerned about? In observing my mother use her
inhaler meds, she, in fact, used to do a pretty good out breath after the
large inhale required, so she would have been huffing those SARS germs out
really well.
paula
- Original Message - 

   Risk of spreading it further.

 C





--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread C Creel
Dear Paula,


   You said:

Well, but I don't get that, why it would? I mean, the nebulizer I have is
designed to be held with the lips around it just like an inhaler, one holds
it there and breathes in through the mouth (closed around nebulizer tube)
and out through the nose. Presumably the people getting meds via inhaler
still breath out, etc, etc. I must be missing something about the particular
type of nebulizing they are concerned about? In observing my mother use her
inhaler meds, she, in fact, used to do a pretty good out breath after the
large inhale required, so she would have been huffing those SARS germs out
really well.


  SARS can be carried in droplets.  One would expel these when exhaling.
Until we know that CS can kill SARS on contact it is unsafe to nebulize it.

Regards,
Catherine


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread Sammark4
Aren't there water molecules in regular exhalation?  Maybe nebulizing with CS 
if the CS didn't kill it on contact would increase the risk of SARS transport 
in that local area, but there is a large risk-benefit ratio here, as I see 
it.  The last place I would want to be if I suspected I had SARS would be a 
hospital emergency room.

Laura

In a message dated 4/25/03 10:33:47 AM Central Daylight Time, 
ccr...@adelphia.net writes:

   SARS can be carried in droplets.  One would expel these when exhaling.
  Until we know that CS can kill SARS on contact it is unsafe to nebulize it.
  
  Regards,
  Catherine


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread David Bearrow
I wouldn't think it to be unsafe to nebulize. Armed with this information 
we now know that one should nebulize alone so as to not increase the risk 
of infecting someone else. Or one could rig up a filter such as a tube with 
a CS soaked handkerchief rubber banded to the end to exhale through. Or a 
tube snaked out through the window to exhale through. There must be a way 
to reduce the risk of exhaling. But this fact that one exhales the virus 
shouldn't stop you from nebulizing.


At 10:35 AM 4/25/03, you wrote:

  SARS can be carried in droplets.  One would expel these when exhaling.
Until we know that CS can kill SARS on contact it is unsafe to nebulize it.


+-   Bentonite Clay for sale-+
http://pages.sbcglobal.net/davebe/clay.html
¦  David Bearrow ¦
¦  dav...@sbcglobal.net  ¦
+  Phone: (972)722-8319  +


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread Ed Haskins
OK, I think I've got it . 

If I don't yet have the virus, it's unsafe to inhale, but ok to exhale .


If I've got the virus, it ok to inhale, but unsafe to exhale . 

H .  I better work on this a bit more and get back to you .  :-)


- Original Message -
From: David Bearrow dav...@sbcglobal.net
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined


 I wouldn't think it to be unsafe to nebulize. Armed with this information
 we now know that one should nebulize alone so as to not increase the risk
 of infecting someone else. Or one could rig up a filter such as a tube
with
 a CS soaked handkerchief rubber banded to the end to exhale through. Or a
 tube snaked out through the window to exhale through. There must be a way
 to reduce the risk of exhaling. But this fact that one exhales the virus
 shouldn't stop you from nebulizing.

 At 10:35 AM 4/25/03, you wrote:
SARS can be carried in droplets.  One would expel these when exhaling.
 Until we know that CS can kill SARS on contact it is unsafe to nebulize
it.

 +-   Bentonite Clay for sale-+
 http://pages.sbcglobal.net/davebe/clay.html
 ¦  David Bearrow ¦
 ¦  dav...@sbcglobal.net  ¦
 +  Phone: (972)722-8319  +


 --
 The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

 Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

 To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

 Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

 List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com



Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread alltogethernow
My guess is that we will never know if CS works against sars unless
there is an extreme epidemic, because if you go and get a confirmation
now, you will probably be quarantined, rather than let loose to go home
and find out. ( Or, you might volunteer for your own safety.)
 But, only if it is a given that you, and those around you have it,
and you are left to your own, as in house or neighborhood quarantine,
will you get the opportunity to find out.  
 Another reason is that, at the first sign of symptoms, those of us that
can, will start treatment, and possibly knock it out before it gets
started. 
 I just went through 3 days of probable flu, and will never know for
sure, although I strongly doubt it was sars. 


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread C Creel
Dear David,


  You said:

I wouldn't think it to be unsafe to nebulize. Armed with this information
we now know that one should nebulize alone so as to not increase the risk
of infecting someone else. Or one could rig up a filter such as a tube with
a CS soaked handkerchief rubber banded to the end to exhale through. Or a
tube snaked out through the window to exhale through. There must be a way
to reduce the risk of exhaling. But this fact that one exhales the virus
shouldn't stop you from nebulizing.


  I'm talking about this for a very specific reason.  I have the opportunity
to
introduce CS to physicians working directly with SARS cases.  They are not
nebulizing anything due to fears of spreading SARS more.  I cannot appproach
them with an unfamiliar treatment (CS) and then expect them to take this
unfamiliar treatment and administer it in a way they have decided is to
dangerous.  The whole idea will be shot down and the opportunity to intoduce
CS will be lost (this time).  I don't want that to happen.

  A filter is an interesting idea but my concern is that each thing
introduced to them that is unfamiliar will make them more unable to see the
possibilities.

   I appreciate everyone's thoughts on this but please understand that I
have to operate within some established parameters.

Regards,
Catherine


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread David Bearrow

At 01:56 PM 4/25/03, you wrote:

  I'm talking about this for a very specific reason.  I have the opportunity
to
introduce CS to physicians working directly with SARS cases.  They are not
nebulizing anything due to fears of spreading SARS more.  I cannot appproach
them with an unfamiliar treatment (CS) and then expect them to take this
unfamiliar treatment and administer it in a way they have decided is to
dangerous.  The whole idea will be shot down and the opportunity to intoduce
CS will be lost (this time).  I don't want that to happen.


I understand your concern with attempting to introduce CS to physicians, 
however, the discussion brought confusion to some folks on the list who 
thought you were saying that they should not nebulize silver if they caught 
SARS. Most likely nebulizing CS will be beneficial to someone with SARS. 
The problem was not with this treatment but with getting a mainstream 
physician to accept this protocol.


The only way we will ever know if nebulizing will help is if someone tries it.

I'm not sure how to address your main concern which is to get the physician 
to consider using CS to treat SARS. There are many delivery methods you 
could use once you have the physician convinced to give it a trial, chief 
among them would be nebulizing and IV. But the trick is to convince him. 
Perhaps showing him the BYU study results might help.




+-- Bentonite Clay for sale (50 lb bag) -+
http://pages.sbcglobal.net/davebe/clay.html
¦  David Bearrow ¦
¦  dav...@sbcglobal.net  ¦
+  Phone: (972)722-8319  +


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread C Creel
Dear David,


  You said:

I'm not sure how to address your main concern which is to get the
physician
to consider using CS to treat SARS. There are many delivery methods you
could use once you have the physician convinced to give it a trial, chief
among them would be nebulizing and IV. But the trick is to convince him.
Perhaps showing him the BYU study results might help.

  **Yes, I will be presenting the work from BYU.  Thank you for
mentioning the IV protocol. I'm so microfocused on the lungs at this point
(and exhausted) that I was only thinking about a direct delivery method to
the lungs.  Geeez...I think I need to take a breather and get my head back
on straight.


   IV protocol, anyone?  Amount, frequency?  I should probably recommend the
CS one can get by Rx only.  That would make the mainstream docs feel good
and safe I think.

  Thanks :-)

Regards,
Catherine


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread C Creel
My guess is that we will never know if CS works against sars unless
there is an extreme epidemic, because if you go and get a confirmation
now, you will probably be quarantined, rather than let loose to go home
and find out. ( Or, you might volunteer for your own safety.)


  **  We'll know if CS works if I can convince this group of physicians on
Sunday to use it.


 I just went through 3 days of probable flu, and will never know for
sure, although I strongly doubt it was sars. 

  **   I'd be shocked if it was.

Regards,
Catherine


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread C Creel
Dear Laura,


  You said:

Aren't there water molecules in regular exhalation?  Maybe nebulizing with
CS
if the CS didn't kill it on contact would increase the risk of SARS
transport
in that local area, but there is a large risk-benefit ratio here, as I see
it.


  ** Sure, there is some fluid in regular exhalations but there would be far
more nebulizing anything.  The purpose I'm asking the questions I am is
because I have an opportunity to present alternative options to people
treating people who have SARS .  I have to be scientific in my presentation
otherwise I'll lose them in the first three minutes.  Right now, they are
not nebulizing anything because of the higher risk of transmission.  What
has to be considered is the people giving the treatment and the air exchange
system in the hospitals.

What I'm after is any other way to get CS to the lungs - also, the
efficacy of CS on small envelope proteins.

Regards,
Catherine


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread sol
Bwahaha, Ed, let us all know when you come up with an answer how we can
still breathe and avoid the virus!
  Actually I did think we all exhaled droplets with every breath, if we
didn't it would mean our lungs were all dried out and we'd be dead.
  So far I just plan to keep spraying my eyes, face, and hands whenever I've
been out around people. Been doing this for many weeks now, and it is
keeping me from any colds, etc. so far. Its no trouble at all to carry a
little 2 oz spray bottle of CS with me everywhere.  I would sure hope
someone is going to be able to test the SARS virus with CS at some point.
Don't expect that to happen real soon, though.
paula

- Original Message -
From: Ed Haskins e...@loxinfo.co.th


 OK, I think I've got it . 

 If I don't yet have the virus, it's unsafe to inhale, but ok to exhale .
 

 If I've got the virus, it ok to inhale, but unsafe to exhale . 

 H .  I better work on this a bit more and get back to you . 
:-)





--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CSA question for the scientifically inclined

2003-04-25 Thread Reid Harvey
CSEnthusiasts,
In discussing the risk of spreading SARS in exhaled droplets it would
seem to me there is an issue as to whether or not the treatment is for
prevention or for cure.  For example, if we have a high degree of
certainty that an individual does not have SARS then it would seem quite
reasonable to be within their breething zone.

And shouldn't we worry more that a person who may become infected
through the droplets is someone who should be nebulizing, but may not
be?  As to the possibility that the virus may not be cleared up through
the use of CS, if this were true would it not be a first?  For what
other virus has CS not indicated effective?

My questions are just that, and not statements or any kind of challenge
to what others are saying.  Thanks to all for sharing knowledge in these
worrisome times.
Reid

David Bearrow said:
I wouldn't think it to be unsafe to nebulize. Armed with this
information we now know that one should nebulize alone so as to not
increase the risk of infecting someone else. Or one could rig up a
filter such as a tube with a CS soaked handkerchief rubber banded to the
end to exhale through. Or a tube snaked out through the window to exhale
through. There must be a way to reduce the risk of exhaling. But this
fact that one exhales the virus shouldn't stop you from nebulizing.



--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com