[Texascavers] clothing related
I know many of you like to wear North Face clothing, or camp in North Face tents. Here is a funny story: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091215/ap_on_fe_st/us_odd_north_face_lawsuit;_ylt=AiEZ6QvcVTOpQx2AiQaTbvXtiBIF;_ylu=X3oDMTJ1Z3FoZjNlBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkxMjE1L3VzX29kZF9ub3J0aF9mYWNlX2xhd3N1aXQEcG9zAzMEc2VjA3luX2FydGljbGVfc3VtbWFyeV9saXN0BHNsawN0aGVub3J0aGZhY2U- - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
RE: [Texascavers] clothing related
That's hilarious (and a petty lawsuit)! Mark -Original Message- From: David [mailto:dlocklea...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 3:36 AM To: Cavers Texas Subject: [Texascavers] clothing related I know many of you like to wear North Face clothing, or camp in North Face tents. Here is a funny story: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091215/ap_on_fe_st/us_odd_north_face_lawsui t;_ylt=AiEZ6QvcVTOpQx2AiQaTbvXtiBIF;_ylu=X3oDMTJ1Z3FoZjNlBGFzc2V0A2FwLzI wMDkxMjE1L3VzX29kZF9ub3J0aF9mYWNlX2xhd3N1aXQEcG9zAzMEc2VjA3luX2FydGljbGV fc3VtbWFyeV9saXN0BHNsawN0aGVub3J0aGZhY2U- - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
[Texascavers] bulk mail and TX Caver mailing
Back about 20 years ago the Texas Caver was mailed via bulk mail to minimize mailing costs. At that time, I was the person responsible for maintaining the TSA membership/subscription database on my computer (with a Z-80 processor and CP/M operating system, for any of you other old farts who can remember that far back) and for printing the mailing labels for each mailing of the Texas Caver. To facilitate bulk mailing, I wrote a dBASE program to print the mailing labels sorted and grouped according to the USPS requirements for bulk mailing. This was NOT simply a matter of sorting by zip code. I don't recall the exact rules for bulk mailing at that time, but they were approximately as follows:1. The total number of items mailed had to be at least 200 to qualify for bulk mail.2. Items had to be grouped and bundled according to 5-digit zip code, provided that there were at least some specified minimum number of items (probably about 10, but don't remember exactly) in each bundle, where all items within a bundle had to have the same 5-digit zip code.3. Items with zip codes that didn't qualify for the 5-digit bundles then had to be grouped and bundled in a similar manner according to the first 3 zip code digits.4. Items that didn't qualify for the 3-digit bundles then had to be grouped and bundled still further. I believe it was by state, and then, finally, a mixed state bundle. Also, I think we had a few subscriptions that were mailed out of the Country and had to be separated from the bulk mail bundles.I believe my program also counted and reported the number of items in each bulk mail bundle, in addition to the total number of bulk mail labels. I think it also printed the TSA membership expiration date on each label and included some special indication for those that were about to expire.Sticking labels and bundling Cavers for bulk mailing took a lot of work, but we didn't expect the editor do everything by himself. I printed the labels. Then we would often get several volunteers together to stick labels and arrange the bundles. These volunteers didn't have to understand the USPS rules for sorting bulk mail into bundles, since the label printing program took care of that. When several volunteers got together to share the work, it seemed more like an enjoyable social event than a burdensome chore. Similarly, we also devised ways to split the work of updating the database (for new memberships, membership renewals, address changes, etc.), and I wrote another dBASE program to facilitate this. Turning work into an opportunity for social interaction was, and still is, the most effective way I know to prevent volunteers from feeling burned out.At that time, the number of actual TSA members was often a little less than the 200 required for bulk mailing, but the database included enough free or exchange subscriptions mailed to cave owners, institutions, etc. that we were able to mail the required minimum. To achieve this, the database probably included more complimentary and exchange subscriptions than it would have otherwise, but the lower cost of bulk mail meant that we could actually save money by mailing a few extra copies. In fact, we might have even had a policy of mailing one copy after a person's membership expired and printing "EXPIRED" on the label to remind them to renew. I don't remember for sure about this, but I think I recall adding a feature to the label printing program to do this.TSA probably could save money by using bulk mail if they mail a sufficient quantity, but that quantity might be impractical to achieve if many people choose not to receive paper copies. If TSA does want to use bulk mail, I'd be glad to talk with whoever is currently responsible for the database and the mailing label printing to see if there is anything I can do to help.If TSA does not find it practical to use bulk mail, then we might consider other ways to reduce mailing cost without eliminating the quality printed copies that so many of us still value. For example, many of us in TSA regularly attend local grotto meetings and might be satisfied to pick up our printed copies at local grotto meetings instead of having them mailed to our homes. With this option, TSA could notify members via email whenever a new edition becomes available so that we would know to pick it up at the next grotto meeting and could access it electronically in the meantime. This method of distribution would require one volunteer in each grotto to receive a box of Cavers and to distribute them to the appropriate people. (I'd be willing to do this for the UT Grotto.) It might greatly reduce the number of Cavers that have to be mailed individually and have the added benefit of encouraging local grotto attendance. As a TSA member, I'd be happy to select this option and wouldn't even mind giving TSA my email address for this purpose if I could trust them not to list it on a website.Rod-Original Message-From: Chris
RE: [Texascavers] TSA, Caver, and Caving
Thanks, Chris, for the kind words. I live to serve! Mark From: Chris Vreeland [mailto:cvreel...@austin.rr.com] Sent: Mon 12/14/2009 8:14 PM To: texascavers Texas Subject: Re: [Texascavers] TSA, Caver, and Caving I just got my gorgeous hard copy of the Caver in the mail today, and have to say that as an old fart, I really like getting publications in the mail at seemingly random intervals, and sitting down in a chair to read them. Then, I enjoy putting them on my bookshelf. One thing I do not enjoy is driving to Office Max to stock up on ink cartridges. If it takes another $5.00 a year to keep them coming, I think I can skip a pack of cigarettes in order to make that happen. BTW, Thanks Mark, for an excellent issue! As a former editor, I thought i knew all about the unsung heroics of editing, but your tale of woe tops them all. Please keep up the good work!
[Texascavers] mala mujer
This may be of some interest to those cavers who used to visit the El Abra - its an exchange about mala mujer with the amazing naturalist Jim Conrad who lives parttime in Mexico ( his very worthwhile newsletter available free! digitally!! at naturalist_newslet...@backyardnature.net - thank you Mixon for turning me onto this) COW-ITCH Here and there in the forest where it's particularly protected from the sun and wind -- where it's moist and shadowy -- you find shrubs or small trees with thick, brittle branches and broad, veiny, shallowly sawtooth-margined leaves, such as is shown at wonder how this relates to the shrub/tree we called mala mujer in the arid impenetrable scrub forest of northern mexico - the long narrow El Abra range on the east coast south of Mante? We were up there to chop our way to the various big pits that had been sighted by small plane - and distressingly found - when we would come back the next season, that our path had been taken over by mala mujer, an intensely reactive nettle plant which advantageously took the tiny amount of sunlight we opened up. No, this Cow Itch is in the Nettle Family while Mala Mujer, which stings just like it, is in the Euphorb or Poinsettia Family. I've seen another name for it,though, Mala Hombre, so you're not the first to see a similarity in the stings. and for those of you who enjoy caving reminiscences: The pits were well worth the effort. One that involved a 3 day chop opened up on a 100foot diameter 60 foot deep wonderland where dozens of pairs of military macaws resided. We simply sat (we had no rope with us that day) and observed them flying about from above for a timeless spell. The El Abra has no water and no resources desired by the locals who live below and is almost completely left alone by humans. It is so impenetrable that to even step a few feet off the trail we chopped and flagged was to invite being lost for days as one caver famously discovered. In his 3 days of wandering increasingly deliriously he drank water from bromeliads and encountered a jaguar in a long eye locked moment in a twilight opening. Afew years earlier, the cavers stumbled across some very lost locals who had come up to hunt and returned them to their village, where a major fiesta was held in our honor and to celebrate their resurrection. In all the years we spent exploring there, we met only one local who offered to *guide* us to a pit he had been to, years back. He arrived while we were having coffee and with one of our volunteers took off at breakneck speed thru the jungle (there must be a word for arid jungle, but I cant think of it) periodically flagging, while the rest of us crashed along behind enlarging the path. He led us straight to the pit in about 4 hours- well, as straight as one can go when the ground is extremely solutioned with ravines, leg breaking holes in the pinnacley karst covered in slippery entangling vines groundcover shrubs and trees. A major feat of dead reckoning and memory and perhaps some other sense most of us no longer have access to.
texascavers Digest 15 Dec 2009 14:56:44 -0000 Issue 917
TSA money is a noble goal but providing the membership with tangible services is really the purpose of the whole organization. The membership is quite diverse and their needs should be accommodated as much as possible, not made to feel defensive because they aren't the same as some faction within the group. I'm disappointed that in the present discussion, there are some that feel that their view has got to be the only reasonable way. Why not work toward a reasonable compromise that works for all the membership ? The current discussion regarding whether or not a hardcopy version of the TxCvr should be published has thus far produced nothing to provide better services for the membership and caused mostly dissension in an organization that needs more members and participation. I'm a little surprised that the Chairman thought this was an interesting way to stir up the restive masses. Let sleeping dogs lie. Jerry. In a message dated 12/14/2009 8:31:16 A.M. Central Standard Time, gi...@att.net writes: Don't anyone forget that you can download your digital TEXAS CAVER file onto your memory stick, take it to Kinkos or Office Depot and have it color laser printed HARD COPY just like the editor does and save the TSA all that postage and printing cost--and save the editor a lot of mental and physical hassle. It's the best of both worlds. --Ediger ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Actually Jerry, I'm the one who brought up (yet again) that we should push for the Digital cheaper version of TSA and less paper waste. I don't think it was Mark's intention with his story. I just took his story and ran with it. Gil's idea has merit, and it helps out all of the caving community, not just TSA members. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:02 AM, jerryat...@aol.com wrote: Let's see now. I pay for a Texas Caver with my dues to the TSA. Then I receive my electronic copy off the TSA website. Then I get in my car and drive to the FedEx or wherever to pay for a printed version. All to save the TSA a little money and the editor some grief. Now multiply this scenario 4 times a year for about half the TSA membership. I don't believe that's a better world for anyone. I agree with Mixon that a two-tiered system has probably come of age for the TSA. But it also means that dues should be proportionally reduced for those that choose to receive an electronic copy of the TxCvr. Unless, of course, the reason for reducing the costs of the TxCvr is to create a large cash surplus for the TSA. Saving the TSA money is a noble goal but providing the membership with tangible services is really the purpose of the whole organization. The membership is quite diverse and their needs should be accommodated as much as possible, not made to feel defensive because they aren't the same as some faction within the group. I'm disappointed that in the present discussion, there are some that feel that their view has got to be the only reasonable way. Why not work toward a reasonable compromise that works for all the membership ? The current discussion regarding whether or not a hardcopy version of the TxCvr should be published has thus far produced nothing to provide better services for the membership and caused mostly dissension in an organization that needs more members and participation. I'm a little surprised that the Chairman thought this was an interesting way to stir up the restive masses. Let sleeping dogs lie. Jerry. In a message dated 12/14/2009 8:31:16 A.M. Central Standard Time, gi...@att.net writes: Don't anyone forget that you can download your digital TEXAS CAVER file onto your memory stick, take it to Kinkos or Office Depot and have it color laser printed HARD COPY just like the editor does and save the TSA all that postage and printing cost--and save the editor a lot of mental and physical hassle. It's the best of both worlds. --Ediger ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- I know many of you like to wear North Face clothing, or camp in North Face tents. Here is a funny story: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091215/ap_on_fe_st/us_odd_north_face_lawsuit;_ylt=AiEZ6QvcVTOpQx2AiQaTbvXtiBIF;_ylu=X3oDMTJ1Z3FoZjNlBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkxMjE1L3VzX29kZF9ub3J0aF9mYWNlX2xhd3N1aXQEcG9zAzMEc2VjA3luX2FydGljbGVfc3VtbWFyeV9saXN0BHNsawN0aGVub3J0aGZhY2U- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- That's hilarious (and a petty lawsuit)! Mark -Original Message- From: David [mailto:dlocklea...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 3:36 AM To: Cavers Texas Subject: [Texascavers] clothing related I know many of you like to wear North Face clothing, or camp in North Face tents. Here is a funny story: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091215/ap_on_fe_st/us_odd_north_face_lawsui t;_ylt=AiEZ6QvcVTOpQx2AiQaTbvXtiBIF;_ylu=X3oDMTJ1Z3FoZjNlBGFzc2V0A2FwLzI wMDkxMjE1L3VzX29kZF9ub3J0aF9mYWNlX2xhd3N1aXQEcG9zAzMEc2VjA3luX2FydGljbGV fc3VtbWFyeV9saXN0BHNsawN0aGVub
Re: [Texascavers] Please Become a Digital Online Member
I am happy to post the comment if you prefer not to. On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Good night On Dec 15, 2009, at 12:38 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Ttyl. Sleep time On 12/15/09, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Im sure we can come to an easy agreement at the meeting. The sentence I sent you to forward is very broad and we can add details to the actuall motion as the meeting day approaches. Just dont add or subtract from what I recommended for you to post. You could add... Silence is consent. That would be a nice touch On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: have you had this discussion with anyone else? On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:20 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Yes. Ive been sick for 4 days- ive been thinking a lot. Wish I had been in bed the whole time, no luck though On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Really think we should put that over Cavetex? On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:14 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: So, copy and paste this following message and forward it to whatever related posts: I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting where registered members present can vote for a majority. Include meeting location details if desired. On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Sure, do you think we should bring up the 2 tier membership to go hand in hand with this? I dont' know what the costs should be, but people who want a hard cover should have to pay for that privilege :) On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:57 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, many geek friends w/ technological skills. Will you be the Free Texas Caver committee chair? We can table the Texas Caver conversation now and you can bring it up for debate at the Jan meeting. At the Jan meeting, you will obtain the floor and make a motion to the TSA chair. He will then accept/reject and then the registered members present will vote and the majority wins. Sounds fun and simple, right? You in? On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: I'm somewhat familiar with RRO, read through it years ago. Isn't that why you have geek friends? On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:13 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: I majored in Business. I will forward you a script for the January business meeting- Roberts Rule of Order, its simple. Im embarrassed that I thought black meant red. I suck w/ computers. On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Just thoughts rambling through my head, never sat down and wrote down the ideas. No, went to AM for a few years for comp sci and switched to an aeronautical school to get my pilot's license. Am back in computers tho, LOL :) On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:10 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Free thinker! Did you go to a liberal arts school? I will lay out a simple, organized way to bring this issue up at the next meeting. I have thought it through but will not propose it myself. You probably have material prepared as well On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: I'm not condoning of getting rid of the membership fees, and while I think a few may quit paying if they can get the TC for free, I think that it will bring in more members in the long run. The information should be free. Charles On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:07 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: I didnt know you felt this way and thought as a TSA member, you would support having a small income for the organization. I will offer to give Gill my prize of a 2010 membership but in no way think that there should be no membership fees. I am glad he has someone to market for him though(you)-i wont On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Gil, I seem to remember you making that statement within the last year or so, about the $100 donation. I also seem to remark about matching that, and I'll stand by it. I'll donate $100 as well. Charles On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:35 PM, John P. Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net wrote: I want to save the TSA from financial ruinI will go digital if Ediger renews his membership. Anyone else willing to make that commitment? Ediger will renew his lapsed TSA membership and donate $100 to the TSA within seconds of The TEXAS CAVER being made a free publication to any caver who wants to sign up for a free subscription. Subscribing non-TSA members should be solicited to join TSA but membership should not be a requirement for receiving all the good caving information aimed at bettering the cause of caving in Texas. As a caver and TSA member I, personally, would want every caver
Re: [Texascavers] Please Become a Digital Online Member
Nah, I'll reply to the next person who brings it up again. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:31 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: I am happy to post the comment if you prefer not to. On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Good night On Dec 15, 2009, at 12:38 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Ttyl. Sleep time On 12/15/09, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Im sure we can come to an easy agreement at the meeting. The sentence I sent you to forward is very broad and we can add details to the actuall motion as the meeting day approaches. Just dont add or subtract from what I recommended for you to post. You could add... Silence is consent. That would be a nice touch On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: have you had this discussion with anyone else? On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:20 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Yes. Ive been sick for 4 days- ive been thinking a lot. Wish I had been in bed the whole time, no luck though On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Really think we should put that over Cavetex? On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:14 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: So, copy and paste this following message and forward it to whatever related posts: I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting where registered members present can vote for a majority. Include meeting location details if desired. On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Sure, do you think we should bring up the 2 tier membership to go hand in hand with this? I dont' know what the costs should be, but people who want a hard cover should have to pay for that privilege :) On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:57 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, many geek friends w/ technological skills. Will you be the Free Texas Caver committee chair? We can table the Texas Caver conversation now and you can bring it up for debate at the Jan meeting. At the Jan meeting, you will obtain the floor and make a motion to the TSA chair. He will then accept/reject and then the registered members present will vote and the majority wins. Sounds fun and simple, right? You in? On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: I'm somewhat familiar with RRO, read through it years ago. Isn't that why you have geek friends? On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:13 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: I majored in Business. I will forward you a script for the January business meeting- Roberts Rule of Order, its simple. Im embarrassed that I thought black meant red. I suck w/ computers. On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Just thoughts rambling through my head, never sat down and wrote down the ideas. No, went to AM for a few years for comp sci and switched to an aeronautical school to get my pilot's license. Am back in computers tho, LOL :) On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:10 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Free thinker! Did you go to a liberal arts school? I will lay out a simple, organized way to bring this issue up at the next meeting. I have thought it through but will not propose it myself. You probably have material prepared as well On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: I'm not condoning of getting rid of the membership fees, and while I think a few may quit paying if they can get the TC for free, I think that it will bring in more members in the long run. The information should be free. Charles On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:07 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: I didnt know you felt this way and thought as a TSA member, you would support having a small income for the organization. I will offer to give Gill my prize of a 2010 membership but in no way think that there should be no membership fees. I am glad he has someone to market for him though(you)-i wont On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Gil, I seem to remember you making that statement within the last year or so, about the $100 donation. I also seem to remark about matching that, and I'll stand by it. I'll donate $100 as well. Charles On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:35 PM, John P. Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net wrote: I want to save the TSA from financial ruinI will go digital if Ediger renews his membership. Anyone else willing to make that commitment? Ediger will renew his lapsed TSA membership and donate $100 to the TSA within seconds of The TEXAS CAVER being made a free publication to any caver who wants to sign up for a free subscription. Subscribing non-TSA members should be solicited to join TSA but membership should not be a requirement for receiving all the good caving
Re: [Texascavers] Please Become a Digital Online Member
Thats not a way to be diplomatic. I was hoping to close the argument so I could announce that the Spring convention website and fees. I thought to delegate it to you since its your platform but I will bring it up myself, Mark asked me if I would do it. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote: Nah, I'll reply to the next person who brings it up again. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:31 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: I am happy to post the comment if you prefer not to. On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Good night On Dec 15, 2009, at 12:38 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Ttyl. Sleep time On 12/15/09, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Im sure we can come to an easy agreement at the meeting. The sentence I sent you to forward is very broad and we can add details to the actuall motion as the meeting day approaches. Just dont add or subtract from what I recommended for you to post. You could add... Silence is consent. That would be a nice touch On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: have you had this discussion with anyone else? On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:20 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Yes. Ive been sick for 4 days- ive been thinking a lot. Wish I had been in bed the whole time, no luck though On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Really think we should put that over Cavetex? On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:14 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: So, copy and paste this following message and forward it to whatever related posts: I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting where registered members present can vote for a majority. Include meeting location details if desired. On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Sure, do you think we should bring up the 2 tier membership to go hand in hand with this? I dont' know what the costs should be, but people who want a hard cover should have to pay for that privilege :) On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:57 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, many geek friends w/ technological skills. Will you be the Free Texas Caver committee chair? We can table the Texas Caver conversation now and you can bring it up for debate at the Jan meeting. At the Jan meeting, you will obtain the floor and make a motion to the TSA chair. He will then accept/reject and then the registered members present will vote and the majority wins. Sounds fun and simple, right? You in? On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: I'm somewhat familiar with RRO, read through it years ago. Isn't that why you have geek friends? On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:13 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: I majored in Business. I will forward you a script for the January business meeting- Roberts Rule of Order, its simple. Im embarrassed that I thought black meant red. I suck w/ computers. On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Just thoughts rambling through my head, never sat down and wrote down the ideas. No, went to AM for a few years for comp sci and switched to an aeronautical school to get my pilot's license. Am back in computers tho, LOL :) On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:10 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Free thinker! Did you go to a liberal arts school? I will lay out a simple, organized way to bring this issue up at the next meeting. I have thought it through but will not propose it myself. You probably have material prepared as well On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: I'm not condoning of getting rid of the membership fees, and while I think a few may quit paying if they can get the TC for free, I think that it will bring in more members in the long run. The information should be free. Charles On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:07 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: I didnt know you felt this way and thought as a TSA member, you would support having a small income for the organization. I will offer to give Gill my prize of a 2010 membership but in no way think that there should be no membership fees. I am glad he has someone to market for him though(you)-i wont On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Gil, I seem to remember you making that statement within the last year or so, about the $100 donation. I also seem to remark about matching that, and I'll stand by it. I'll donate $100 as well. Charles On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:35 PM, John P. Brooks
[Texascavers] all-electronic Texas Caver
While I'm in favor of paper copies of the Texas Caver as it presently exists, it is worth pointing out some advantages of going the route of making it _completely_ on the Web, with no paper distribution at all. 1) There would be virtually no costs in money of publishing. 2) Therefore it could be made freely available on the TSA Web site, as Gill suggests, without messing with things like passwords. Since the TC doesn't publish exact locations of wild caves anyway, I don't see any reason to hide its contents, except the possible problem of inviting non-cavers to TCR. (The editor might have to be careful not to print things that might be misunderstood by non-members, though.) 3) It would be easier on the editor, not only saving the effort of arranging printing and mailing, but also the nuisance of keeping each issue a multiple of 4 pages. 4) It could be entirely in color at no extra cost. (But don't use color gratuitously in ways that wouldn't work well in a black-and- white printout--much cheaper than color, at least on laser printers.) 5) It could appear at a higher frequency at no extra cost, since the covers wouldn't cost TSA any more than any other page and there wouldn't be any binding or mailing expenses. Monthly six-page issues would be little more work and no more cost than quarterly twenty-four page issues. 6) It could contain more material at little additional effort and no additional cost. For example, educational things about cave science or conservation could be reprinted from other sources to make the TC more of an educational resource. Even more photos. Maybe more of those book reviews that somebody keeps posting on this e-mail list... I could, of course, come up with a similar list of disadvantages. Nevertheless, if such a scheme resulted in a larger, more frequent, and more informative Texas Caver, I'd be in favor of it. What I don't see the point of is published a paper magazine and then trying to talk people out of getting a paper copy, not taking any real advantage of Web publishing and saving just part of the cost.--Mixon May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest. You may reply to the address this message came from, but for long-term use, save: Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] all-electronic Texas Caver
I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting where registered members present can vote for a majority. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote: While I'm in favor of paper copies of the Texas Caver as it presently exists, it is worth pointing out some advantages of going the route of making it _completely_ on the Web, with no paper distribution at all. 1) There would be virtually no costs in money of publishing. 2) Therefore it could be made freely available on the TSA Web site, as Gill suggests, without messing with things like passwords. Since the TC doesn't publish exact locations of wild caves anyway, I don't see any reason to hide its contents, except the possible problem of inviting non-cavers to TCR. (The editor might have to be careful not to print things that might be misunderstood by non-members, though.) 3) It would be easier on the editor, not only saving the effort of arranging printing and mailing, but also the nuisance of keeping each issue a multiple of 4 pages. 4) It could be entirely in color at no extra cost. (But don't use color gratuitously in ways that wouldn't work well in a black-and-white printout--much cheaper than color, at least on laser printers.) 5) It could appear at a higher frequency at no extra cost, since the covers wouldn't cost TSA any more than any other page and there wouldn't be any binding or mailing expenses. Monthly six-page issues would be little more work and no more cost than quarterly twenty-four page issues. 6) It could contain more material at little additional effort and no additional cost. For example, educational things about cave science or conservation could be reprinted from other sources to make the TC more of an educational resource. Even more photos. Maybe more of those book reviews that somebody keeps posting on this e-mail list... I could, of course, come up with a similar list of disadvantages. Nevertheless, if such a scheme resulted in a larger, more frequent, and more informative Texas Caver, I'd be in favor of it. What I don't see the point of is published a paper magazine and then trying to talk people out of getting a paper copy, not taking any real advantage of Web publishing and saving just part of the cost.--Mixon May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest. You may reply to the address this message came from, but for long-term use, save: Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] all-electronic Texas Caver
Fuck Yeah! I was hoping you would say Silence is consent, but its perfect. I hope you get a good response. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote: I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting where registered members present can vote for a majority. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote: While I'm in favor of paper copies of the Texas Caver as it presently exists, it is worth pointing out some advantages of going the route of making it _completely_ on the Web, with no paper distribution at all. 1) There would be virtually no costs in money of publishing. 2) Therefore it could be made freely available on the TSA Web site, as Gill suggests, without messing with things like passwords. Since the TC doesn't publish exact locations of wild caves anyway, I don't see any reason to hide its contents, except the possible problem of inviting non-cavers to TCR. (The editor might have to be careful not to print things that might be misunderstood by non-members, though.) 3) It would be easier on the editor, not only saving the effort of arranging printing and mailing, but also the nuisance of keeping each issue a multiple of 4 pages. 4) It could be entirely in color at no extra cost. (But don't use color gratuitously in ways that wouldn't work well in a black-and-white printout--much cheaper than color, at least on laser printers.) 5) It could appear at a higher frequency at no extra cost, since the covers wouldn't cost TSA any more than any other page and there wouldn't be any binding or mailing expenses. Monthly six-page issues would be little more work and no more cost than quarterly twenty-four page issues. 6) It could contain more material at little additional effort and no additional cost. For example, educational things about cave science or conservation could be reprinted from other sources to make the TC more of an educational resource. Even more photos. Maybe more of those book reviews that somebody keeps posting on this e-mail list... I could, of course, come up with a similar list of disadvantages. Nevertheless, if such a scheme resulted in a larger, more frequent, and more informative Texas Caver, I'd be in favor of it. What I don't see the point of is published a paper magazine and then trying to talk people out of getting a paper copy, not taking any real advantage of Web publishing and saving just part of the cost.--Mixon May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest. You may reply to the address this message came from, but for long-term use, save: Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] all-electronic Texas Caver
Oh yeah, I forgot that part of it :) Sorry, multi-tasking here at work. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:53 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Fuck Yeah! I was hoping you would say Silence is consent, but its perfect. I hope you get a good response. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting where registered members present can vote for a majority. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote: While I'm in favor of paper copies of the Texas Caver as it presently exists, it is worth pointing out some advantages of going the route of making it _completely_ on the Web, with no paper distribution at all. 1) There would be virtually no costs in money of publishing. 2) Therefore it could be made freely available on the TSA Web site, as Gill suggests, without messing with things like passwords. Since the TC doesn't publish exact locations of wild caves anyway, I don't see any reason to hide its contents, except the possible problem of inviting non-cavers to TCR. (The editor might have to be careful not to print things that might be misunderstood by non-members, though.) 3) It would be easier on the editor, not only saving the effort of arranging printing and mailing, but also the nuisance of keeping each issue a multiple of 4 pages. 4) It could be entirely in color at no extra cost. (But don't use color gratuitously in ways that wouldn't work well in a black-and-white printout--much cheaper than color, at least on laser printers.) 5) It could appear at a higher frequency at no extra cost, since the covers wouldn't cost TSA any more than any other page and there wouldn't be any binding or mailing expenses. Monthly six-page issues would be little more work and no more cost than quarterly twenty-four page issues. 6) It could contain more material at little additional effort and no additional cost. For example, educational things about cave science or conservation could be reprinted from other sources to make the TC more of an educational resource. Even more photos. Maybe more of those book reviews that somebody keeps posting on this e-mail list... I could, of course, come up with a similar list of disadvantages. Nevertheless, if such a scheme resulted in a larger, more frequent, and more informative Texas Caver, I'd be in favor of it. What I don't see the point of is published a paper magazine and then trying to talk people out of getting a paper copy, not taking any real advantage of Web publishing and saving just part of the cost.--Mixon May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest. You may reply to the address this message came from, but for long-term use, save: Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
RE: [Texascavers] all-electronic Texas Caver
I second, third, and fourth that motion. See y'all there! Mark -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 10:41 AM To: Cavetex Subject: Re: [Texascavers] all-electronic Texas Caver I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting where registered members present can vote for a majority. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote: While I'm in favor of paper copies of the Texas Caver as it presently exists, it is worth pointing out some advantages of going the route of making it _completely_ on the Web, with no paper distribution at all.
Re: [Texascavers] all-electronic Texas Caver
Sorry to call you on thisbutActually...you can't second, third or fourth a motion via email.nor can one make a motion via e mail.as the TSA by laws make no provisions for such proceedings. If in doubt, I always look to Roberts rules of order for guidance in such issuesbut must admit that this issue arose on a board of which I am a director..we had to change our by laws to allow such proceedings. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 15, 2009, at 11:27 AM, mark.al...@l-3com.com wrote: I second, third, and fourth that motion. See y'all there! Mark -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 10:41 AM To: Cavetex Subject: Re: [Texascavers] all-electronic Texas Caver I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting where registered members present can vote for a majority. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote: While I'm in favor of paper copies of the Texas Caver as it presently exists, it is worth pointing out some advantages of going the route of making it _completely_ on the Web, with no paper distribution at all. - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
[PBSS] Fw: [Texascavers] Next point of order...TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up!
- Original Message - From: ellie :) To: texascavers@texascavers.com Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:16 PM Subject: [Texascavers] Next point of order...TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up! TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up! http://www.cavetexas.org/events/TSASC/tsasc2010.html Fees: $15.00per person and $40.00 for a family of 3 or more. Please forward this and all 2010 TSA Spring Convention related announcements (invitation attached) to your favorite grotto, friends, family, coworkers, universities, vendors, land owners, cave-related organizations, neighbors, authors, professors, library, coffee shop, radio station, facebook, twitter, blog, and all others interested in info on caves and caving who might not be on this list serve. You can also visit the facebook event reminder page at: http://www.facebook.com/settings/?tab=privacy#/event.php?eid=219361835478ref=share Thank you to Butch for creating this page. ___ PBSS mailing list p...@caver.net http://caver.net/mailman/listinfo/pbss_caver.net
[Texascavers] Next point of order...TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up!
*TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up!* * * http://www.cavetexas.org/events/TSASC/tsasc2010.html Fees: $15.00per person and $40.00 for a family of 3 or more. Please forward this and all 2010 TSA Spring Convention related announcements (invitation attached) to your favorite grotto, friends, family, coworkers, universities, vendors, land owners, cave-related organizations, neighbors, authors, professors, library, coffee shop, radio station, facebook, twitter, blog, and all others interested in info on caves and caving who might not be on this list serve. You can also visit the facebook event reminder page at: http://www.facebook.com/settings/?tab=privacy#/event.php?eid=219361835478ref=share Thank you to Butch for creating this page.
Fwd: [Texascavers] Next point of order...TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up!
-- Forwarded message -- List-Post: texascavers@texascavers.com Date: Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:16 PM Subject: [Texascavers] Next point of order...TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up! To: texascavers@texascavers.com Texascavers@texascavers.com TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up! http://www.cavetexas.org/events/TSASC/tsasc2010.html Fees: $15.00per person and $40.00 for a family of 3 or more. Please forward this and all 2010 TSA Spring Convention related announcements (invitation attached) to your favorite grotto, friends, family, coworkers, universities, vendors, land owners, cave-related organizations, neighbors, authors, professors, library, coffee shop, radio station, facebook, twitter, blog, and all others interested in info on caves and caving who might not be on this list serve. You can also visit the facebook event reminder page at: http://www.facebook.com/settings/?tab=privacy#/event.php?eid=219361835478ref=share Thank you to Butch for creating this page.
Re: [Texascavers] Next point of order...TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up!
What about the winter meeting? Is there info online or just in emails? In the Texas Caver just mailed? Terry H. ellie :) wrote: *TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up!* * * http://www.cavetexas.org/events/TSASC/tsasc2010.html Fees: $15.00per person and $40.00 for a family of 3 or more. Please forward this and all 2010 TSA Spring Convention related announcements (invitation attached) to your favorite grotto, friends, family, coworkers, universities, vendors, land owners, cave-related organizations, neighbors, authors, professors, library, coffee shop, radio station, facebook, twitter, blog, and all others interested in info on caves and caving who might not be on this list serve. You can also visit the facebook event reminder page at: http://www.facebook.com/settings/?tab=privacy#/event.php?eid=219361835478ref=share http://www.facebook.com/settings/?tab=privacy#/event.php?eid=219361835478ref=share Thank you to Butch for creating this page. - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
why wont my mail sent to CaveTex?
why wont my mail sent to CaveTex? Is it because I am trying to attach stuff? I will send it again w/out attachments. Please dont let it post more than once.
Re: why wont my mail sent to CaveTex?
I actually don't have direct control of stuff being duplicatd, etc. But if you tried to send attachments, thats why it didn't go through. Attachments aren't allowed on the list, have to post to a site and use weblinks. Try again with no attachments. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: why wont my mail sent to CaveTex? Is it because I am trying to attach stuff? I will send it again w/out attachments. Please dont let it post more than once.
Re: why wont my mail sent to CaveTex?
I made a really cool invite-see attached On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote: I actually don't have direct control of stuff being duplicatd, etc. But if you tried to send attachments, thats why it didn't go through. Attachments aren't allowed on the list, have to post to a site and use weblinks. Try again with no attachments. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: why wont my mail sent to CaveTex? Is it because I am trying to attach stuff? I will send it again w/out attachments. Please dont let it post more than once. 2010 TSA Spring Convention.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document
Re: why wont my mail sent to CaveTex?
Very nice, want me to throw it on a website so you can link it? On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:20 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: I made a really cool invite-see attached On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: I actually don't have direct control of stuff being duplicatd, etc. But if you tried to send attachments, thats why it didn't go through. Attachments aren't allowed on the list, have to post to a site and use weblinks. Try again with no attachments. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: why wont my mail sent to CaveTex? Is it because I am trying to attach stuff? I will send it again w/out attachments. Please dont let it post more than once.
Re: why wont my mail sent to CaveTex?
I will ask Butch to put it on the TSA page, that way its the same internet thingy On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote: Very nice, want me to throw it on a website so you can link it? On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:20 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: I made a really cool invite-see attached On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: I actually don't have direct control of stuff being duplicatd, etc. But if you tried to send attachments, thats why it didn't go through. Attachments aren't allowed on the list, have to post to a site and use weblinks. Try again with no attachments. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: why wont my mail sent to CaveTex? Is it because I am trying to attach stuff? I will send it again w/out attachments. Please dont let it post more than once.
[Texascavers] TSA and TCMA Winter Business Meetings at Colorado Bend, Sunday, January 10th!
The TSA and TCMA Winter Business Meetings will be held at the Colorado Bend State Park Conference Center, on Sunday, January 10th, 2010. Here's your chance to meet the new TSA officers and hobnob with TCMA officers and fellow cavers! Come on down the second weekend of January for the CBSP Caving Project and stick around for the meetings Sunday, at 9am. Good times will occur and great accommodations are available at the Conference Center, or you may rough it at the Cavers Camp. Hope to see you and come lend us your thoughts and ideas to the direction of caving in Texas in 2010 and beyond! Information is available on the TSA Calendar at http://www.cavetexas.org/calendar/index.php and an announcement was made in this quarters Texas Caver. Cavingly, Ellie Watson
texascavers Digest 15 Dec 2009 20:23:49 -0000 Issue 918
texascavers Digest 15 Dec 2009 20:23:49 - Issue 918 Topics (messages 12992 through 13004): mala mujer 12992 by: Nancy Weaver Re: Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? 12993 by: Charles Goldsmith 12996 by: Sheryl Rieck 12998 by: Charles Goldsmith 13004 by: Rod Goke NSS members in Austin 12994 by: Mixon Bill 13003 by: Gill Edigar all-electronic Texas Caver 12995 by: Mixon Bill 12997 by: Charles Goldsmith 12999 by: Mark.Alman.l-3com.com Next point of order...TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up! 13000 by: ellie :) 13001 by: Terry Holsinger TSA and TCMA Winter Business Meetings at Colorado Bend, Sunday, January 10th! 13002 by: ellie :) Administrivia: To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: texascavers-digest-subscr...@texascavers.com To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: texascavers-digest-unsubscr...@texascavers.com To post to the list, e-mail: texascavers@texascavers.com -- ---BeginMessage--- This may be of some interest to those cavers who used to visit the El Abra - its an exchange about mala mujer with the amazing naturalist Jim Conrad who lives parttime in Mexico ( his very worthwhile newsletter available free! digitally!! at naturalist_newslet...@backyardnature.net - thank you Mixon for turning me onto this) COW-ITCH Here and there in the forest where it's particularly protected from the sun and wind -- where it's moist and shadowy -- you find shrubs or small trees with thick, brittle branches and broad, veiny, shallowly sawtooth-margined leaves, such as is shown at wonder how this relates to the shrub/tree we called mala mujer in the arid impenetrable scrub forest of northern mexico - the long narrow El Abra range on the east coast south of Mante? We were up there to chop our way to the various big pits that had been sighted by small plane - and distressingly found - when we would come back the next season, that our path had been taken over by mala mujer, an intensely reactive nettle plant which advantageously took the tiny amount of sunlight we opened up. No, this Cow Itch is in the Nettle Family while Mala Mujer, which stings just like it, is in the Euphorb or Poinsettia Family. I've seen another name for it,though, Mala Hombre, so you're not the first to see a similarity in the stings. and for those of you who enjoy caving reminiscences: The pits were well worth the effort. One that involved a 3 day chop opened up on a 100foot diameter 60 foot deep wonderland where dozens of pairs of military macaws resided. We simply sat (we had no rope with us that day) and observed them flying about from above for a timeless spell. The El Abra has no water and no resources desired by the locals who live below and is almost completely left alone by humans. It is so impenetrable that to even step a few feet off the trail we chopped and flagged was to invite being lost for days as one caver famously discovered. In his 3 days of wandering increasingly deliriously he drank water from bromeliads and encountered a jaguar in a long eye locked moment in a twilight opening. Afew years earlier, the cavers stumbled across some very lost locals who had come up to hunt and returned them to their village, where a major fiesta was held in our honor and to celebrate their resurrection. In all the years we spent exploring there, we met only one local who offered to *guide* us to a pit he had been to, years back. He arrived while we were having coffee and with one of our volunteers took off at breakneck speed thru the jungle (there must be a word for arid jungle, but I cant think of it) periodically flagging, while the rest of us crashed along behind enlarging the path. He led us straight to the pit in about 4 hours- well, as straight as one can go when the ground is extremely solutioned with ravines, leg breaking holes in the pinnacley karst covered in slippery entangling vines groundcover shrubs and trees. A major feat of dead reckoning and memory and perhaps some other sense most of us no longer have access to. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360 people have your email address and each others. Anyone of them could harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who posted an email to this list. Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people? The odds that one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA people, who are duly elected by some of these people. If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke
[Texascavers] NSS members in Austin
The annual NSS membership list has just been distributed (about five months late). There are interesting statistics about NSS membership on pages 65-67, worth calling to your attention, because I suspect most members never look at the miscellaneous stuff in the front of the book. Among other things, 787xx (Austin) is in the top ten three-digit ZIPs in NSS membership, with 92 NSS members. Top in the list is 300xx, with 220. That would be Atlanta and vicinity. (300 seems to cover a lot of suburbs of Atlanta, whereas all the 787 addresses are actually Austin.) Eight-five NSS members have listed the UT Grotto as their primary affiliation.. This is for purposes of allocating votes in the Congress of Grottos at NSS conventions, although so far as I know the UTG has never participated in living memory. There are twelve NSS groups with more NSS members than UTG (the Cave Diving Section has 1,022!), but many of them require NSS membership of their members. The lowest NSS number of a Texas NSS member is 509. Texas is among the top ten states, with 488 NSS members. This year's membership list is sorted by states, which makes it relatively easy for a group to see who in its area might need to be contacted with information about the club. One thing I was struck by when looking through Texas is the number of names with 787xx that I don't recognize. Of course, that doesn't mean I wouldn't recognize the faces; there is unfortunately little opportunity to learn peoples' names at meetings of fifty or events of four hundred. I'm bad about remembering names, too. Name tags seem Mickey Mouse, but --Mixon May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest. You may reply to the address this message came from, but for long-term use, save: Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] NSS members in Austin
Mixon-- Philosophically speaking: Did you check to see how many of those 488 Texas NSS members were among the fewer than 200 TSA members? Did you wonder why or why not? How many do you think would subscribe to a free digital TEXAS CAVER? And then be willing to join TSA afterwards? Maybe a hundred, huh? Might be worth trying even if they just got 50, huh? Would that be good for The CAVER? Would that be good for the TSA? Would that be good for Texas caving? Would that be good for me or you? --Ediger On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote: The annual NSS membership list has just been distributed (about five months late). There are interesting statistics about NSS membership on pages 65-67, worth calling to your attention, because I suspect most members never look at the miscellaneous stuff in the front of the book. Among other things, 787xx (Austin) is in the top ten three-digit ZIPs in NSS membership, with 92 NSS members. Top in the list is 300xx, with 220. That would be Atlanta and vicinity. (300 seems to cover a lot of suburbs of Atlanta, whereas all the 787 addresses are actually Austin.) Eight-five NSS members have listed the UT Grotto as their primary affiliation.. This is for purposes of allocating votes in the Congress of Grottos at NSS conventions, although so far as I know the UTG has never participated in living memory. There are twelve NSS groups with more NSS members than UTG (the Cave Diving Section has 1,022!), but many of them require NSS membership of their members. The lowest NSS number of a Texas NSS member is 509. Texas is among the top ten states, with 488 NSS members. This year's membership list is sorted by states, which makes it relatively easy for a group to see who in its area might need to be contacted with information about the club. One thing I was struck by when looking through Texas is the number of names with 787xx that I don't recognize. Of course, that doesn't mean I wouldn't recognize the faces; there is unfortunately little opportunity to learn peoples' names at meetings of fifty or events of four hundred. I'm bad about remembering names, too. Name tags seem Mickey Mouse, but --Mixon May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest. You may reply to the address this message came from, but for long-term use, save: Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] NSS members in Austin
Maybe someone on the TSA's Membership committee should write to the non members in the NSS and invite them to join or let us know why they are not interested. Is that not what the TSA has a memberships committee for? Terry H. Gill Edigar wrote: Mixon-- Philosophically speaking: Did you check to see how many of those 488 Texas NSS members were among the fewer than 200 TSA members? Did you wonder why or why not? How many do you think would subscribe to a free digital TEXAS CAVER? And then be willing to join TSA afterwards? Maybe a hundred, huh? Might be worth trying even if they just got 50, huh? Would that be good for The CAVER? Would that be good for the TSA? Would that be good for Texas caving? Would that be good for me or you? --Ediger On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com mailto:bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote: The annual NSS membership list has just been distributed (about five months late). There are interesting statistics about NSS membership on pages 65-67, worth calling to your attention, because I suspect most members never look at the miscellaneous stuff in the front of the book. Among other things, 787xx (Austin) is in the top ten three-digit ZIPs in NSS membership, with 92 NSS members. Top in the list is 300xx, with 220. That would be Atlanta and vicinity. (300 seems to cover a lot of suburbs of Atlanta, whereas all the 787 addresses are actually Austin.) Eight-five NSS members have listed the UT Grotto as their primary affiliation.. This is for purposes of allocating votes in the Congress of Grottos at NSS conventions, although so far as I know the UTG has never participated in living memory. There are twelve NSS groups with more NSS members than UTG (the Cave Diving Section has 1,022!), but many of them require NSS membership of their members. The lowest NSS number of a Texas NSS member is 509. Texas is among the top ten states, with 488 NSS members. This year's membership list is sorted by states, which makes it relatively easy for a group to see who in its area might need to be contacted with information about the club. One thing I was struck by when looking through Texas is the number of names with 787xx that I don't recognize. Of course, that doesn't mean I wouldn't recognize the faces; there is unfortunately little opportunity to learn peoples' names at meetings of fifty or events of four hundred. I'm bad about remembering names, too. Name tags seem Mickey Mouse, but --Mixon May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest. You may reply to the address this message came from, but for long-term use, save: Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu mailto:bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:sa...@amcs-pubs.org - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com mailto:texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com mailto:texascavers-h...@texascavers.com - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] NSS members in Austin
The TSA Chair second, third, and forthed Charles Goldsmiths motion to to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting where registered members present can vote for a majority. It will not be decided on till then. You can continue and continue and continue to make unfounded, pious rants and raves and bitch and cry but NO decision will be made until the January 10th TSA winter meeting. At the meeting we will discuss two-tier memberships, free membership options, and scholarships but again, NO decision will be made until the January 10th TSA winter meeting. None. Nada. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Terry Holsinger tr...@sprynet.com wrote: Maybe someone on the TSA's Membership committee should write to the non members in the NSS and invite them to join or let us know why they are not interested. Is that not what the TSA has a memberships committee for? Terry H. Gill Edigar wrote: Mixon-- Philosophically speaking: Did you check to see how many of those 488 Texas NSS members were among the fewer than 200 TSA members? Did you wonder why or why not? How many do you think would subscribe to a free digital TEXAS CAVER? And then be willing to join TSA afterwards? Maybe a hundred, huh? Might be worth trying even if they just got 50, huh? Would that be good for The CAVER? Would that be good for the TSA? Would that be good for Texas caving? Would that be good for me or you? --Ediger On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.commailto: bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote: The annual NSS membership list has just been distributed (about five months late). There are interesting statistics about NSS membership on pages 65-67, worth calling to your attention, because I suspect most members never look at the miscellaneous stuff in the front of the book. Among other things, 787xx (Austin) is in the top ten three-digit ZIPs in NSS membership, with 92 NSS members. Top in the list is 300xx, with 220. That would be Atlanta and vicinity. (300 seems to cover a lot of suburbs of Atlanta, whereas all the 787 addresses are actually Austin.) Eight-five NSS members have listed the UT Grotto as their primary affiliation.. This is for purposes of allocating votes in the Congress of Grottos at NSS conventions, although so far as I know the UTG has never participated in living memory. There are twelve NSS groups with more NSS members than UTG (the Cave Diving Section has 1,022!), but many of them require NSS membership of their members. The lowest NSS number of a Texas NSS member is 509. Texas is among the top ten states, with 488 NSS members. This year's membership list is sorted by states, which makes it relatively easy for a group to see who in its area might need to be contacted with information about the club. One thing I was struck by when looking through Texas is the number of names with 787xx that I don't recognize. Of course, that doesn't mean I wouldn't recognize the faces; there is unfortunately little opportunity to learn peoples' names at meetings of fifty or events of four hundred. I'm bad about remembering names, too. Name tags seem Mickey Mouse, but --Mixon May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest. You may reply to the address this message came from, but for long-term use, save: Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu mailto: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:sa...@amcs-pubs.org - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com mailto:texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com mailto:texascavers-h...@texascavers.com - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] NSS members in Austin
Or, maybe the TSA could do something really unique and progressive like sending free digital issues of The TEXAS CAVER to those NSS members not already subscribed--no membership committee, no procrastination, no hassles. See how many of them pick up the ball and join the TSA. Then those people would know something about the TSA, would be getting a free and valuable service from the TSA (perhaps for the first time in their caving careers), and just might figure that what they are getting could be worth joining the TSA for. Everybody wins. FREE. Nobody looses anything. Also FREE. --Ediger On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Terry Holsinger tr...@sprynet.com wrote: Maybe someone on the TSA's Membership committee should write to the non members in the NSS and invite them to join or let us know why they are not interested. Is that not what the TSA has a memberships committee for? Terry H. Gill Edigar wrote: Mixon-- Philosophically speaking: Did you check to see how many of those 488 Texas NSS members were among the fewer than 200 TSA members? Did you wonder why or why not? How many do you think would subscribe to a free digital TEXAS CAVER? And then be willing to join TSA afterwards? Maybe a hundred, huh? Might be worth trying even if they just got 50, huh? Would that be good for The CAVER? Would that be good for the TSA? Would that be good for Texas caving? Would that be good for me or you? --Ediger On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.commailto: bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote: The annual NSS membership list has just been distributed (about five months late). There are interesting statistics about NSS membership on pages 65-67, worth calling to your attention, because I suspect most members never look at the miscellaneous stuff in the front of the book. Among other things, 787xx (Austin) is in the top ten three-digit ZIPs in NSS membership, with 92 NSS members. Top in the list is 300xx, with 220. That would be Atlanta and vicinity. (300 seems to cover a lot of suburbs of Atlanta, whereas all the 787 addresses are actually Austin.) Eight-five NSS members have listed the UT Grotto as their primary affiliation.. This is for purposes of allocating votes in the Congress of Grottos at NSS conventions, although so far as I know the UTG has never participated in living memory. There are twelve NSS groups with more NSS members than UTG (the Cave Diving Section has 1,022!), but many of them require NSS membership of their members. The lowest NSS number of a Texas NSS member is 509. Texas is among the top ten states, with 488 NSS members. This year's membership list is sorted by states, which makes it relatively easy for a group to see who in its area might need to be contacted with information about the club. One thing I was struck by when looking through Texas is the number of names with 787xx that I don't recognize. Of course, that doesn't mean I wouldn't recognize the faces; there is unfortunately little opportunity to learn peoples' names at meetings of fifty or events of four hundred. I'm bad about remembering names, too. Name tags seem Mickey Mouse, but --Mixon May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest. You may reply to the address this message came from, but for long-term use, save: Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu mailto: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:sa...@amcs-pubs.org - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com mailto:texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com mailto:texascavers-h...@texascavers.com - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] NSS members in Austin
I get the feeling that Ellie doesn't want to discuss this anymore. I think it should be discussed at the Winter meeting. If you aren't a current member, come to the meeting, sign up and voice your opinion :) Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:44 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: The TSA Chair second, third, and forthed Charles Goldsmiths motion to to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting where registered members present can vote for a majority. It will not be decided on till then. You can continue and continue and continue to make unfounded, pious rants and raves and bitch and cry but NO decision will be made until the January 10th TSA winter meeting. At the meeting we will discuss two-tier memberships, free membership options, and scholarships but again, NO decision will be made until the January 10th TSA winter meeting. None. Nada. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Terry Holsinger tr...@sprynet.com wrote: Maybe someone on the TSA's Membership committee should write to the non members in the NSS and invite them to join or let us know why they are not interested. Is that not what the TSA has a memberships committee for? Terry H. Gill Edigar wrote: Mixon-- Philosophically speaking: Did you check to see how many of those 488 Texas NSS members were among the fewer than 200 TSA members? Did you wonder why or why not? How many do you think would subscribe to a free digital TEXAS CAVER? And then be willing to join TSA afterwards? Maybe a hundred, huh? Might be worth trying even if they just got 50, huh? Would that be good for The CAVER? Would that be good for the TSA? Would that be good for Texas caving? Would that be good for me or you? --Ediger On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com mailto:bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote: The annual NSS membership list has just been distributed (about five months late). There are interesting statistics about NSS membership on pages 65-67, worth calling to your attention, because I suspect most members never look at the miscellaneous stuff in the front of the book. Among other things, 787xx (Austin) is in the top ten three-digit ZIPs in NSS membership, with 92 NSS members. Top in the list is 300xx, with 220. That would be Atlanta and vicinity. (300 seems to cover a lot of suburbs of Atlanta, whereas all the 787 addresses are actually Austin.) Eight-five NSS members have listed the UT Grotto as their primary affiliation.. This is for purposes of allocating votes in the Congress of Grottos at NSS conventions, although so far as I know the UTG has never participated in living memory. There are twelve NSS groups with more NSS members than UTG (the Cave Diving Section has 1,022!), but many of them require NSS membership of their members. The lowest NSS number of a Texas NSS member is 509. Texas is among the top ten states, with 488 NSS members. This year's membership list is sorted by states, which makes it relatively easy for a group to see who in its area might need to be contacted with information about the club. One thing I was struck by when looking through Texas is the number of names with 787xx that I don't recognize. Of course, that doesn't mean I wouldn't recognize the faces; there is unfortunately little opportunity to learn peoples' names at meetings of fifty or events of four hundred. I'm bad about remembering names, too. Name tags seem Mickey Mouse, but --Mixon May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest. You may reply to the address this message came from, but for long-term use, save: Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu mailto:bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:sa...@amcs-pubs.org - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com mailto:texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com mailto:texascavers-h...@texascavers.com - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
[Texascavers] RE: NSS members in Austin
Neither do the rest of us! -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 3:11 PM To: ellie :) Cc: Terry Holsinger; texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] NSS members in Austin I get the feeling that Ellie doesn't want to discuss this anymore. - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
[Texascavers] Re: NSS Members in Austin
Mixon said: The annual NSS membership list has just been distributed (about five months late). Au contrere, Bill; it's right on time. The BOG got annoyed that the current year's MM always had last year's officers and directors in it, so it decreed that the MM henceforth be published after the convention, so that the newest incumbants would be included. Unfortunately, nobody thought to tell the MM editor, who was 99% finished with publishing it on time. She was well pissed to discover she had to start all over, not just to include the new officers/directors, but at Square One with the member listing in order to capture new members between June and November. It's a miracle we still have an editor. Alex -- Alex Sproul NSS 8086RL/FE NSS Webmaster - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
texascavers Digest 16 Dec 2009 01:55:47 -0000 Issue 919
texascavers Digest 16 Dec 2009 01:55:47 - Issue 919 Topics (messages 13005 through 13015): Re: NSS members in Austin 13005 by: Terry Holsinger 13006 by: ellie :) 13008 by: Gill Edigar 13009 by: Charles Goldsmith 13010 by: Jim Kennedy 13011 by: Alex Sproul Re: Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? 13007 by: Charles Goldsmith Officer's powers 13012 by: Gill Edigar 13013 by: Charles Goldsmith Re: Clean Water Action 13014 by: Don Cooper 13015 by: Robert B Administrivia: To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: texascavers-digest-subscr...@texascavers.com To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: texascavers-digest-unsubscr...@texascavers.com To post to the list, e-mail: texascavers@texascavers.com -- ---BeginMessage--- Maybe someone on the TSA's Membership committee should write to the non members in the NSS and invite them to join or let us know why they are not interested. Is that not what the TSA has a memberships committee for? Terry H. Gill Edigar wrote: Mixon-- Philosophically speaking: Did you check to see how many of those 488 Texas NSS members were among the fewer than 200 TSA members? Did you wonder why or why not? How many do you think would subscribe to a free digital TEXAS CAVER? And then be willing to join TSA afterwards? Maybe a hundred, huh? Might be worth trying even if they just got 50, huh? Would that be good for The CAVER? Would that be good for the TSA? Would that be good for Texas caving? Would that be good for me or you? --Ediger On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com mailto:bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote: The annual NSS membership list has just been distributed (about five months late). There are interesting statistics about NSS membership on pages 65-67, worth calling to your attention, because I suspect most members never look at the miscellaneous stuff in the front of the book. Among other things, 787xx (Austin) is in the top ten three-digit ZIPs in NSS membership, with 92 NSS members. Top in the list is 300xx, with 220. That would be Atlanta and vicinity. (300 seems to cover a lot of suburbs of Atlanta, whereas all the 787 addresses are actually Austin.) Eight-five NSS members have listed the UT Grotto as their primary affiliation.. This is for purposes of allocating votes in the Congress of Grottos at NSS conventions, although so far as I know the UTG has never participated in living memory. There are twelve NSS groups with more NSS members than UTG (the Cave Diving Section has 1,022!), but many of them require NSS membership of their members. The lowest NSS number of a Texas NSS member is 509. Texas is among the top ten states, with 488 NSS members. This year's membership list is sorted by states, which makes it relatively easy for a group to see who in its area might need to be contacted with information about the club. One thing I was struck by when looking through Texas is the number of names with 787xx that I don't recognize. Of course, that doesn't mean I wouldn't recognize the faces; there is unfortunately little opportunity to learn peoples' names at meetings of fifty or events of four hundred. I'm bad about remembering names, too. Name tags seem Mickey Mouse, but --Mixon May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest. You may reply to the address this message came from, but for long-term use, save: Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu mailto:bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:sa...@amcs-pubs.org - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com mailto:texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com mailto:texascavers-h...@texascavers.com ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- The TSA Chair second, third, and forthed Charles Goldsmiths motion to to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting where registered members present can vote for a majority. It will not be decided on till then. You can continue and continue and continue to make unfounded, pious rants and raves and bitch and cry but NO decision will be made until the January 10th TSA winter meeting. At the meeting we will discuss two-tier memberships, free membership options, and scholarships but again, NO decision will be made until the January 10th TSA winter meeting. None. Nada. On
[Texascavers] Fw: speloo greeting
This came to me and I think it was meant for someone else (in Australia) and maybe if someone knows who it might be and could forward it on to them. Thanks, Bill - Original Message - From: nambal ban bemo To: webmas...@caver.net Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 10:44 PM Subject: speloo greeting speleo greeting, hi___ I'M Nabeel, indonesian. glad to know you as a caver. I know you from the site of west australian cave assosiation. in Indonesia, I'M living in a karst area of java island.there are many karst cave around my home. and I had some speleological research (cave maping: exspecially),or event just havin' fun exploring some cave. any way, I hope you (and your team) are interested in researching some cave in indonesian karst. and if you are, I (and my team) would like to welcome and support your conservative cave project in our country. you just for now need to tell me some information, everything, you want me to send you by e-mail, and I would like to. alright, I'M waiting you send your e-mail back to me. I hope this e-mail isn't a waste of your time. last, I bet you're expecting of exploring in indonesia. thn'x (sory for my bad english) Kunjungi halaman depan Yahoo! Indonesia yang baru!
[Texascavers] a caver passed away
I just learned a few minutes ago, that an old caving friend of mine from Texas AM had passed away a few years ago. His name was Mason Estes. He made a trip to Huautla in 1987, but most of his caving was with the A.S.S. to caves near Bustamante, and west Texas. I will try to find an obituary, or get more details. If you knew any Aggie cavers back around 1986, he was the one with the deep froggy voice. His passion was rock-climbing, and that got him interested in caving. - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
texascavers Digest 16 Dec 2009 05:19:41 -0000 Issue 920
texascavers Digest 16 Dec 2009 05:19:41 - Issue 920 Topics (messages 13016 through 13023): Subscribers to digital publications 13016 by: Gill Edigar 13018 by: Charles Goldsmith 13019 by: Gill Edigar Re: Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? 13017 by: Rod Goke Re: Officer's powers 13020 by: Butch Fralia 13023 by: Gill Edigar Re: speloo greeting 13021 by: Bill Bentley a caver passed away 13022 by: David Administrivia: To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: texascavers-digest-subscr...@texascavers.com To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: texascavers-digest-unsubscr...@texascavers.com To post to the list, e-mail: texascavers@texascavers.com -- ---BeginMessage--- On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote: If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. That would not be good. But it would not be not good because of the reason being discussed here--spam, etc. There's another... Now I'm gonna tell you what I'm gonna tell you then I'm gonna tell you why--two paragraphs. The process should be some variation of this: Cavers can get 'invited to subscribe' to The TEXAS CAVER by any of several means--from the TSA or Grotto Home Pages, at Grotto meetings, the TSA convention, TCR, from fellow cavers, from handouts at projects such as CBSP, Gov Canyon, Punkin Deep, etc, or basically any way and place that cavers get together. Then, the caver will go to the link on the TSA web site and navigate to the Subscribe to The TEXAS CAVER button. Then, the caver will be asked for some vital information such as name, address, etc, NSS number, Grotto affiliation (or independent), and maybe even personal info such as family member names (which are mostly for photo identification purposes, not for publication, etc), age, years caving, and a brief caving bio, and the all important email address (which does not have to be the caver's primary one). Most of this info will be voluntary. Basically all that will be needed is a name and an email address and a password. The caver will also be asked to furnish a password for accessing his or her own personal subscription information. Then, whenever a new CAVER is ready to mail (or some breaking TSA caver-worthy news) the caver will be sent a message telling him or her to go access his or her subscription account, and to download a free digital copy of whatever is being offered--TEXAS CAVER or whatever. There could be some restrictions as to which publications can be downloaded without being a TSA member, such as a Members Manual, meeting minutes, etc. Then, they can download it and print it out in any way they choose, archiving the digital copy for posterity, and getting back to doing whatever they were doing before--or maybe read The CAVER. The mechanics of that process are not too hard to visualize--I hope. But there are some questions, I'm sure. So here are a few 'whys' to dispel some of um. Q. Why require a subscription? A. Because what we really want is to know who is this subscriber is and where they fit in the Texas caving scene. Basically we are trying to identify all the cavers in Texas so we can keep in contact with them--ostensibly through the auspices of The TEXAS CAVER--and influence them and they us. We will give you a free CAVER if you will be a part of our 'extended' TSA caving fraternity. This is a bribe from us to know who you are and that you are one of us--even though you may have been hiding for many years because you felt that the TSA doesn't care about you--doesn't want you to be a part of their elite group without you getting involved in their political intrigues or any other reasons you may have. Q, How does this help the TSA? A. The subscription gives the TSA a database for contacting outside cavers (not just TSA members) about important issues such as cave conservation, caver functions, projects, conventions, TCR and other events that cavers would be interested in. It also restricts (somewhat) the distribution of errant issues on the open market. That's not to say that I couldn't just print out 40 copies via my download and hand them out at Walgreens. It also provides a larger man-power base of both leaders and followers which will obviously contribute to projects, training, participation, writing articles, and a general contribution to more and better caving. Q. How will my email address be protected? A. The subscriber list will be maintained as a database, pretty much entirely electronically. The database, or selected fields, at least, should be available to subscribers as a caver service. Subscribers could elect to not make their email address and certain other fields visible. Also, certain low tech schemes such as embedding the letters 'TSA' into each email
Re: RE: [Texascavers] Re: Clean Water Action
Y'all ought to read Stewart Brand's WHOLE EARTH DISCIPLINE. I've thrown the book across the room a couple of times...he's quite the gadfly, as ever. TDec 14, 2009 05:52:19 PM, fh...@townandcountryins.com wrote: Sorry, I must take an opposing view. I consider myself an environmentalist but if there really is such a thing as “clean” coal technology I am for it. We have plenty of it. I also think that generating electricity from nuclear energy makes good sense. The best solution may be natural gas but our federal government needs to wake up to the fact that to get it we must drill for it as well as for oil as we will never be without the need for this commodity. It is crazy to be importing it from our enemies. No one loves our Texas Hill Country more than I but I don’t believe that these activities will be harmful if sensibly regulated which does not mean banning them. I believe that cavers who owned a tract of land would accept a very lucrative offer to lease it for oil and gas exploration. That’s not greed, its good sense. Let the naysayers come forth. Fritz From: Thomas Sitch [mailto:dreadfl...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 5:23 PMTo: texascavers@texascavers.comSubject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: Clean Water Action "Tell San Anonio's [and New Braunfels', and Georgetown's] Mayor and City Council Not To Support Nuclear Energy" "Support A Moratorium On New Permits For Coal-Burning Power Plants" I love political activists who are very specific on shutting down energy production but very vague on creating it, e.g. "Tell the Austin City Council To Support Clean Energy" How about "donate to build power lines to the T. Boons Pickins wind farms" or "research fund for cellulosic ethanol." Sorry, what was this about? Clean water? Yes, which goes to caves, and we don't have enough of it. Down with nuclear energy!! ~~T From: Logan McNattTo: George Veni Cc: texascavers@texascavers.comSent: Mon, December 14, 2009 4:51:20 PMSubject: [Texascavers] Re: Clean Water ActionI've been donating to Clean Water Action since 2000, and they are still a viable national organization with a Texas chapter based in Austin: http://www.cleanwateraction.org/txThe first thing that impressed me was they still have people going door to door once a year, at least in south Austin where Gill and I live.Although Annalisa of GEAA said CWA does not get involved in local issues, the issues on their website include:"The Coming Crisis: Water Availability and Municipal Conservation Efforts in Central Texas", "Tell the Austin City Council To Support Clean Energy""Tell San Anonio's [and New Braunfels', and Georgetown's] Mayor and City Council Not To Support Nuclear Energy""Increase Funding for State Parks""Get The Mercury Out Of Our Skies And Water""Support A Moratorium On New Permits For Coal-Burning Power Plants"Obviously they are an advocacy/lobbying group, so donations are not tax-deductible. I agree with Stephan that it seems like there is a lot of duplication of effort among the plethora of environmental groups, but many of the smaller groups are devoted to a specific geographic area or issue, and cannot actively lobby, unlike CWA.Logan George Veni wrote: Clean Water Action has been working in the Austin and San Antonio areas since at least the mid-1980s. They have worked to lobby government and agencies, and work cooperatively with other green groups to prevent water degradation. I haven’t seen them much in the past 10 years and don’t know if the organization crashed and is now recovering or if it simply got diverted to other projects in other areas. George From: bgillegi...@gmail.com [mailto:bgillegi...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Gill EdigarSent: Monday, December 14, 2009 12:39 PMTo: texascavers@texascavers.comSubject: [Texascavers] Change of Subject--Clean Water RE: Clean Water Action A few months ago a fellow came by the house representing an outfit called 'Clean Water Action' ostensibly soliciting funds to promote awareness of and promoting lobbying for clean water in some form or fashion. Since clean water is a current topic of interest in South Austin and other parts of the world it would be a good thing to hype if one wanted to make a few bucks from folks with good environmental intentions but who haven't the time to keep up with every environmental interest group that comes along. I gave them a few bucks and signed their petition and filled out a personal data card. A few days ago I got a phone call from them asking for a pretty good slug of money. I asked for more information. A letter followed but with nebulous details. Does anybody have any knowledge of these guys? Where do they fit in with SOS, the City of Austin, the various water conservation districts that some of our cavers work at? Can anybody cite me any references of their good work? Etc, etc? If they're on the up-and-up I want to support them, but I've never heard of them
Re: [Texascavers] Re: Clean Water Action
Something worth considering when taking it all into account: It takes a LOT of water to scrub coal-fired plant stack columns. A whole lot of water that becomes horribly contaminated with all the shit that WOULD have gone into the air. Then you're left with a clean air power plant with millions of gallons of contaminated water. Whatya gonna have - clean air or clean water??? So. Yeah - there's a LOTTA coal out there. Only there's just so much clean air / water -WaV On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Logan McNatt lmcn...@austin.rr.com wrote: I've been donating to Clean Water Action since 2000, and they are still a viable national organization with a Texas chapter based in Austin: http://www.cleanwateraction.org/tx The first thing that impressed me was they still have people going door to door once a year, at least in south Austin where Gill and I live. Although Annalisa of GEAA said CWA does not get involved in local issues, the issues on their website include: The Coming Crisis: Water Availability and Municipal Conservation Efforts in Central Texas, Tell the Austin City Council To Support Clean Energy Tell San Anonio's [and New Braunfels', and Georgetown's] Mayor and City Council Not To Support Nuclear Energy Increase Funding for State Parks Get The Mercury Out Of Our Skies And Water Support A Moratorium On New Permits For Coal-Burning Power Plants Obviously they are an advocacy/lobbying group, so donations are not tax-deductible. I agree with Stephan that it seems like there is a lot of duplication of effort among the plethora of environmental groups, but many of the smaller groups are devoted to a specific geographic area or issue, and cannot actively lobby, unlike CWA. Logan -- George Veni wrote: *Clean Water Action has been working in the Austin and San Antonio areas since at least the mid-1980s. They have worked to lobby government and agencies, and work cooperatively with other green groups to prevent water degradation. I haven’t seen them much in the past 10 years and don’t know if the organization crashed and is now recovering or if it simply got diverted to other projects in other areas. * *George * ** -- ** *From:* bgillegi...@gmail.com [mailto:bgillegi...@gmail.combgillegi...@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Gill Edigar *Sent:* Monday, December 14, 2009 12:39 PM *To:* texascavers@texascavers.com *Subject:* [Texascavers] Change of Subject--Clean Water RE: Clean Water Action A few months ago a fellow came by the house representing an outfit called 'Clean Water Action' ostensibly soliciting funds to promote awareness of and promoting lobbying for clean water in some form or fashion. Since clean water is a current topic of interest in South Austin and other parts of the world it would be a good thing to hype if one wanted to make a few bucks from folks with good environmental intentions but who haven't the time to keep up with every environmental interest group that comes along. I gave them a few bucks and signed their petition and filled out a personal data card. A few days ago I got a phone call from them asking for a pretty good slug of money. I asked for more information. A letter followed but with nebulous details. Does anybody have any knowledge of these guys? Where do they fit in with SOS, the City of Austin, the various water conservation districts that some of our cavers work at? Can anybody cite me any references of their good work? Etc, etc? If they're on the up-and-up I want to support them, but I've never heard of them before and want a better idea of who they are and what they really do. --Ediger - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] Re: Clean Water Action
Ah, dirty coal. Always reminds me of Dick van Dyke in Mary Poppins' scrubbin the chimneys. Or better yet, Jack Wild as the 'Artful Dodger' all covered in soot. A perfect marlboro commercial or the next poster child for the 'Nuke is Cleaner than Coal' lobby. To save water we could climb the stacks a 'PEE' into the emmisions. effectively creating our own SCR, Selective Catalytic Reduction. 4NO + 2(NH2 )2CO + O2 → 4N2 + 4H2O + 2CO2. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Don Cooper wavyca...@gmail.com wrote: Something worth considering when taking it all into account: It takes a LOT of water to scrub coal-fired plant stack columns. A whole lot of water that becomes horribly contaminated with all the shit that WOULD have gone into the air. Then you're left with a clean air power plant with millions of gallons of contaminated water. Whatya gonna have - clean air or clean water??? So. Yeah - there's a LOTTA coal out there. Only there's just so much clean air / water -WaV On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Logan McNatt lmcn...@austin.rr.comwrote: I've been donating to Clean Water Action since 2000, and they are still a viable national organization with a Texas chapter based in Austin: http://www.cleanwateraction.org/tx The first thing that impressed me was they still have people going door to door once a year, at least in south Austin where Gill and I live. Although Annalisa of GEAA said CWA does not get involved in local issues, the issues on their website include: The Coming Crisis: Water Availability and Municipal Conservation Efforts in Central Texas, Tell the Austin City Council To Support Clean Energy Tell San Anonio's [and New Braunfels', and Georgetown's] Mayor and City Council Not To Support Nuclear Energy Increase Funding for State Parks Get The Mercury Out Of Our Skies And Water Support A Moratorium On New Permits For Coal-Burning Power Plants Obviously they are an advocacy/lobbying group, so donations are not tax-deductible. I agree with Stephan that it seems like there is a lot of duplication of effort among the plethora of environmental groups, but many of the smaller groups are devoted to a specific geographic area or issue, and cannot actively lobby, unlike CWA. Logan -- George Veni wrote: *Clean Water Action has been working in the Austin and San Antonio areas since at least the mid-1980s. They have worked to lobby government and agencies, and work cooperatively with other green groups to prevent water degradation. I haven’t seen them much in the past 10 years and don’t know if the organization crashed and is now recovering or if it simply got diverted to other projects in other areas. * *George * ** -- ** *From:* bgillegi...@gmail.com [mailto:bgillegi...@gmail.combgillegi...@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Gill Edigar *Sent:* Monday, December 14, 2009 12:39 PM *To:* texascavers@texascavers.com *Subject:* [Texascavers] Change of Subject--Clean Water RE: Clean Water Action A few months ago a fellow came by the house representing an outfit called 'Clean Water Action' ostensibly soliciting funds to promote awareness of and promoting lobbying for clean water in some form or fashion. Since clean water is a current topic of interest in South Austin and other parts of the world it would be a good thing to hype if one wanted to make a few bucks from folks with good environmental intentions but who haven't the time to keep up with every environmental interest group that comes along. I gave them a few bucks and signed their petition and filled out a personal data card. A few days ago I got a phone call from them asking for a pretty good slug of money. I asked for more information. A letter followed but with nebulous details. Does anybody have any knowledge of these guys? Where do they fit in with SOS, the City of Austin, the various water conservation districts that some of our cavers work at? Can anybody cite me any references of their good work? Etc, etc? If they're on the up-and-up I want to support them, but I've never heard of them before and want a better idea of who they are and what they really do. --Ediger - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
[Texascavers] Officer's powers
An observation-- Officers are elected to run the day-to-day operations of companies, organizations, governments, and other such groups of people in lieu of having a council or committee mico-managing the trivial details. They are expected to make certain decisions on behalf of the organization without consulting the entire membership or executive council or board of governors. For instance, they would be expected to go buy a roll of tape or box of staples if they were needed for the conduct of business. Likewise, if a special mailing were required for a safety alert or an election they could conceivably be expected to spend $100 on postage stamps to see the mailing got to the members--without asking anybody. That is their job. Along that same train of thought, I would suggest that if the Chairman and newsletter editor decided to send out free digital copies as advertising to prospective new members of the various college clubs they would have it completely within their powers to do so--and be praised for their aggressiveness--and need to ask no one's permission. Indeed, there is a long and respected history of the TSA doing just that. No board action would be necessary--or even expected, for that matter. Especially if no expenditures were required. Now then, I'm not a TSA member so I would never presume to tell the TSA how to conduct its business. I'm merely speaking as an independent Texas caver bystander and interested observer. So, I have been both TSA Chairman and TEXAS CAVER editor on more than one occasion over the years. I would presume that most Texas cavers would suspect that I have a bit of experience with officer power and responsibilities and how they can get things constitutionally accomplished. Believe me, creativity can be a valuable tool in the running of a volunteer organization. Both Davy Crockett and Sam Houston used to proclaim, Be sure you're right and then go ahead. No officer will ever be chastised by the membership for handing out free advertising supporting the aims and goals of the organization and encouraging membership. It is the right thing to do. And no other current advertising brochure will fulfill that function better than a free digital copy of The TEXAS CAVER sent (or made available) to all non-TSA-member NSS cavers in Texas. So now, they can go ahead. No board action is required. It is an officer responsibility. I'm looking forward to seeing old Sam and Davy crack a smile over this one. --Ediger
Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers
Well Said Gill Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote: An observation-- Officers are elected to run the day-to-day operations of companies, organizations, governments, and other such groups of people in lieu of having a council or committee mico-managing the trivial details. They are expected to make certain decisions on behalf of the organization without consulting the entire membership or executive council or board of governors. For instance, they would be expected to go buy a roll of tape or box of staples if they were needed for the conduct of business. Likewise, if a special mailing were required for a safety alert or an election they could conceivably be expected to spend $100 on postage stamps to see the mailing got to the members--without asking anybody. That is their job. Along that same train of thought, I would suggest that if the Chairman and newsletter editor decided to send out free digital copies as advertising to prospective new members of the various college clubs they would have it completely within their powers to do so--and be praised for their aggressiveness--and need to ask no one's permission. Indeed, there is a long and respected history of the TSA doing just that. No board action would be necessary--or even expected, for that matter. Especially if no expenditures were required. Now then, I'm not a TSA member so I would never presume to tell the TSA how to conduct its business. I'm merely speaking as an independent Texas caver bystander and interested observer. So, I have been both TSA Chairman and TEXAS CAVER editor on more than one occasion over the years. I would presume that most Texas cavers would suspect that I have a bit of experience with officer power and responsibilities and how they can get things constitutionally accomplished. Believe me, creativity can be a valuable tool in the running of a volunteer organization. Both Davy Crockett and Sam Houston used to proclaim, Be sure you're right and then go ahead. No officer will ever be chastised by the membership for handing out free advertising supporting the aims and goals of the organization and encouraging membership. It is the right thing to do. And no other current advertising brochure will fulfill that function better than a free digital copy of The TEXAS CAVER sent (or made available) to all non-TSA-member NSS cavers in Texas. So now, they can go ahead. No board action is required. It is an officer responsibility. I'm looking forward to seeing old Sam and Davy crack a smile over this one. --Ediger
Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers
You missed the caver Christmas party. Sent via BlackBerry by ATT -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:48:43 To: Gill Edigargi...@att.net Cc: texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers Well Said Gill Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote: An observation-- Officers are elected to run the day-to-day operations of companies, organizations, governments, and other such groups of people in lieu of having a council or committee mico-managing the trivial details. They are expected to make certain decisions on behalf of the organization without consulting the entire membership or executive council or board of governors. For instance, they would be expected to go buy a roll of tape or box of staples if they were needed for the conduct of business. Likewise, if a special mailing were required for a safety alert or an election they could conceivably be expected to spend $100 on postage stamps to see the mailing got to the members--without asking anybody. That is their job. Along that same train of thought, I would suggest that if the Chairman and newsletter editor decided to send out free digital copies as advertising to prospective new members of the various college clubs they would have it completely within their powers to do so--and be praised for their aggressiveness--and need to ask no one's permission. Indeed, there is a long and respected history of the TSA doing just that. No board action would be necessary--or even expected, for that matter. Especially if no expenditures were required. Now then, I'm not a TSA member so I would never presume to tell the TSA how to conduct its business. I'm merely speaking as an independent Texas caver bystander and interested observer. So, I have been both TSA Chairman and TEXAS CAVER editor on more than one occasion over the years. I would presume that most Texas cavers would suspect that I have a bit of experience with officer power and responsibilities and how they can get things constitutionally accomplished. Believe me, creativity can be a valuable tool in the running of a volunteer organization. Both Davy Crockett and Sam Houston used to proclaim, Be sure you're right and then go ahead. No officer will ever be chastised by the membership for handing out free advertising supporting the aims and goals of the organization and encouraging membership. It is the right thing to do. And no other current advertising brochure will fulfill that function better than a free digital copy of The TEXAS CAVER sent (or made available) to all non-TSA-member NSS cavers in Texas. So now, they can go ahead. No board action is required. It is an officer responsibility. I'm looking forward to seeing old Sam and Davy crack a smile over this one. --Ediger - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers
Tool On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote: Well Said Gill Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote: An observation-- Officers are elected to run the day-to-day operations of companies, organizations, governments, and other such groups of people in lieu of having a council or committee mico-managing the trivial details. They are expected to make certain decisions on behalf of the organization without consulting the entire membership or executive council or board of governors. For instance, they would be expected to go buy a roll of tape or box of staples if they were needed for the conduct of business. Likewise, if a special mailing were required for a safety alert or an election they could conceivably be expected to spend $100 on postage stamps to see the mailing got to the members--without asking anybody. That is their job. Along that same train of thought, I would suggest that if the Chairman and newsletter editor decided to send out free digital copies as advertising to prospective new members of the various college clubs they would have it completely within their powers to do so--and be praised for their aggressiveness--and need to ask no one's permission. Indeed, there is a long and respected history of the TSA doing just that. No board action would be necessary--or even expected, for that matter. Especially if no expenditures were required. Now then, I'm not a TSA member so I would never presume to tell the TSA how to conduct its business. I'm merely speaking as an independent Texas caver bystander and interested observer. So, I have been both TSA Chairman and TEXAS CAVER editor on more than one occasion over the years. I would presume that most Texas cavers would suspect that I have a bit of experience with officer power and responsibilities and how they can get things constitutionally accomplished. Believe me, creativity can be a valuable tool in the running of a volunteer organization. Both Davy Crockett and Sam Houston used to proclaim, Be sure you're right and then go ahead. No officer will ever be chastised by the membership for handing out free advertising supporting the aims and goals of the organization and encouraging membership. It is the right thing to do. And no other current advertising brochure will fulfill that function better than a free digital copy of The TEXAS CAVER sent (or made available) to all non-TSA-member NSS cavers in Texas. So now, they can go ahead. No board action is required. It is an officer responsibility. I'm looking forward to seeing old Sam and Davy crack a smile over this one. --Ediger - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers
Putz! On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:47 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Tool On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Well Said Gill Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote: An observation-- Officers are elected to run the day-to-day operations of companies, organizations, governments, and other such groups of people in lieu of having a council or committee mico-managing the trivial details. They are expected to make certain decisions on behalf of the organization without consulting the entire membership or executive council or board of governors. For instance, they would be expected to go buy a roll of tape or box of staples if they were needed for the conduct of business. Likewise, if a special mailing were required for a safety alert or an election they could conceivably be expected to spend $100 on postage stamps to see the mailing got to the members--without asking anybody. That is their job. Along that same train of thought, I would suggest that if the Chairman and newsletter editor decided to send out free digital copies as advertising to prospective new members of the various college clubs they would have it completely within their powers to do so--and be praised for their aggressiveness--and need to ask no one's permission. Indeed, there is a long and respected history of the TSA doing just that. No board action would be necessary--or even expected, for that matter. Especially if no expenditures were required. Now then, I'm not a TSA member so I would never presume to tell the TSA how to conduct its business. I'm merely speaking as an independent Texas caver bystander and interested observer. So, I have been both TSA Chairman and TEXAS CAVER editor on more than one occasion over the years. I would presume that most Texas cavers would suspect that I have a bit of experience with officer power and responsibilities and how they can get things constitutionally accomplished. Believe me, creativity can be a valuable tool in the running of a volunteer organization. Both Davy Crockett and Sam Houston used to proclaim, Be sure you're right and then go ahead. No officer will ever be chastised by the membership for handing out free advertising supporting the aims and goals of the organization and encouraging membership. It is the right thing to do. And no other current advertising brochure will fulfill that function better than a free digital copy of The TEXAS CAVER sent (or made available) to all non-TSA-member NSS cavers in Texas. So now, they can go ahead. No board action is required. It is an officer responsibility. I'm looking forward to seeing old Sam and Davy crack a smile over this one. --Ediger - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers
Yeah, had some stuff come up that evening, but liked your video about the Jan presentation :) On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:10 PM, speleoste...@tx.rr.com wrote: You missed the caver Christmas party.
Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers
It was a light turnout. Bill --Original Message-- From: Charles Goldsmith To: Bill Steele RR Sent: Dec 15, 2009 6:27 PM Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers Yeah, had some stuff come up that evening, but liked your video about the Jan presentation :) On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:10 PM, speleoste...@tx.rr.com wrote: You missed the caver Christmas party. Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers
Tell me about it! Cavers are so funny. I love it when everyone gets so excited about going caving. That was not nice of me to call you a tool. I apologize. You are just fine and I appreciate the help. On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Putz! On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:47 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Tool On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Well Said Gill Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote: An observation-- Officers are elected to run the day-to-day operations of companies, organizations, governments, and other such groups of people in lieu of having a council or committee mico-managing the trivial details. They are expected to make certain decisions on behalf of the organization without consulting the entire membership or executive council or board of governors. For instance, they would be expected to go buy a roll of tape or box of staples if they were needed for the conduct of business. Likewise, if a special mailing were required for a safety alert or an election they could conceivably be expected to spend $100 on postage stamps to see the mailing got to the members--without asking anybody. That is their job. Along that same train of thought, I would suggest that if the Chairman and newsletter editor decided to send out free digital copies as advertising to prospective new members of the various college clubs they would have it completely within their powers to do so--and be praised for their aggressiveness--and need to ask no one's permission. Indeed, there is a long and respected history of the TSA doing just that. No board action would be necessary--or even expected, for that matter. Especially if no expenditures were required. Now then, I'm not a TSA member so I would never presume to tell the TSA how to conduct its business. I'm merely speaking as an independent Texas caver bystander and interested observer. So, I have been both TSA Chairman and TEXAS CAVER editor on more than one occasion over the years. I would presume that most Texas cavers would suspect that I have a bit of experience with officer power and responsibilities and how they can get things constitutionally accomplished. Believe me, creativity can be a valuable tool in the running of a volunteer organization. Both Davy Crockett and Sam Houston used to proclaim, Be sure you're right and then go ahead. No officer will ever be chastised by the membership for handing out free advertising supporting the aims and goals of the organization and encouraging membership. It is the right thing to do. And no other current advertising brochure will fulfill that function better than a free digital copy of The TEXAS CAVER sent (or made available) to all non-TSA-member NSS cavers in Texas. So now, they can go ahead. No board action is required. It is an officer responsibility. I'm looking forward to seeing old Sam and Davy crack a smile over this one. --Ediger - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers
No worries, i took it as good natured ribbing, i assumed thats how you meant it. :) On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:50 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Tell me about it! Cavers are so funny. I love it when everyone gets so excited about going caving. That was not nice of me to call you a tool. I apologize. You are just fine and I appreciate the help. On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Putz! On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:47 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Tool On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Well Said Gill Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote: An observation-- Officers are elected to run the day-to-day operations of companies, organizations, governments, and other such groups of people in lieu of having a council or committee mico-managing the trivial details. They are expected to make certain decisions on behalf of the organization without consulting the entire membership or executive council or board of governors. For instance, they would be expected to go buy a roll of tape or box of staples if they were needed for the conduct of business. Likewise, if a special mailing were required for a safety alert or an election they could conceivably be expected to spend $100 on postage stamps to see the mailing got to the members--without asking anybody. That is their job. Along that same train of thought, I would suggest that if the Chairman and newsletter editor decided to send out free digital copies as advertising to prospective new members of the various college clubs they would have it completely within their powers to do so--and be praised for their aggressiveness--and need to ask no one's permission. Indeed, there is a long and respected history of the TSA doing just that. No board action would be necessary--or even expected, for that matter. Especially if no expenditures were required. Now then, I'm not a TSA member so I would never presume to tell the TSA how to conduct its business. I'm merely speaking as an independent Texas caver bystander and interested observer. So, I have been both TSA Chairman and TEXAS CAVER editor on more than one occasion over the years. I would presume that most Texas cavers would suspect that I have a bit of experience with officer power and responsibilities and how they can get things constitutionally accomplished. Believe me, creativity can be a valuable tool in the running of a volunteer organization. Both Davy Crockett and Sam Houston used to proclaim, Be sure you're right and then go ahead. No officer will ever be chastised by the membership for handing out free advertising supporting the aims and goals of the organization and encouraging membership. It is the right thing to do. And no other current advertising brochure will fulfill that function better than a free digital copy of The TEXAS CAVER sent (or made available) to all non-TSA-member NSS cavers in Texas. So now, they can go ahead. No board action is required. It is an officer responsibility. I'm looking forward to seeing old Sam and Davy crack a smile over this one. --Ediger - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers
Thanks, --Ediger On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote: Well Said Gill
RE: [Texascavers] Officer's powers
On the home page: http://cavetexas.org/index.html of the TSA website there's a note to prospective members who might like a copy to e-mail the editor for such. I don't know if anyone has ever done this (asked for a copy) but it's available from that note. Butch Fralia -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 4:49 PM To: Gill Edigar Cc: texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers Well Said Gill Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote: An observation-- Officers are elected to run the day-to-day operations of companies, organizations, governments, and other such groups of people in lieu of having a council or committee mico-managing the trivial details. They are expected to make certain decisions on behalf of the organization without consulting the entire membership or executive council or board of governors. For instance, they would be expected to go buy a roll of tape or box of staples if they were needed for the conduct of business. Likewise, if a special mailing were required for a safety alert or an election they could conceivably be expected to spend $100 on postage stamps to see the mailing got to the members--without asking anybody. That is their job. Along that same train of thought, I would suggest that if the Chairman and newsletter editor decided to send out free digital copies as advertising to prospective new members of the various college clubs they would have it completely within their powers to do so--and be praised for their aggressiveness--and need to ask no one's permission. Indeed, there is a long and respected history of the TSA doing just that. No board action would be necessary--or even expected, for that matter. Especially if no expenditures were required. Now then, I'm not a TSA member so I would never presume to tell the TSA how to conduct its business. I'm merely speaking as an independent Texas caver bystander and interested observer. So, I have been both TSA Chairman and TEXAS CAVER editor on more than one occasion over the years. I would presume that most Texas cavers would suspect that I have a bit of experience with officer power and responsibilities and how they can get things constitutionally accomplished. Believe me, creativity can be a valuable tool in the running of a volunteer organization. Both Davy Crockett and Sam Houston used to proclaim, Be sure you're right and then go ahead. No officer will ever be chastised by the membership for handing out free advertising supporting the aims and goals of the organization and encouraging membership. It is the right thing to do. And no other current advertising brochure will fulfill that function better than a free digital copy of The TEXAS CAVER sent (or made available) to all non-TSA-member NSS cavers in Texas. So now, they can go ahead. No board action is required. It is an officer responsibility. I'm looking forward to seeing old Sam and Davy crack a smile over this one. --Ediger - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers
Yeah. It's been our practice--from the '70s at least to mail one to any caver who moves to Texas. We used to get a monthly mailing from the NSS with all the address changes. For a while we sent some surplus copies to Grottos to hand out to newbies. It definitely got some new members. --Ediger On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Butch Fralia bfra...@maverickgrotto.orgwrote: On the home page: http://cavetexas.org/index.html of the TSA website there's a note to prospective members who might like a copy to e-mail the editor for such. I don't know if anyone has ever done this (asked for a copy) but it's available from that note. Butch Fralia -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 4:49 PM To: Gill Edigar Cc: texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers Well Said Gill Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote: An observation-- Officers are elected to run the day-to-day operations of companies, organizations, governments, and other such groups of people in lieu of having a council or committee mico-managing the trivial details. They are expected to make certain decisions on behalf of the organization without consulting the entire membership or executive council or board of governors. For instance, they would be expected to go buy a roll of tape or box of staples if they were needed for the conduct of business. Likewise, if a special mailing were required for a safety alert or an election they could conceivably be expected to spend $100 on postage stamps to see the mailing got to the members--without asking anybody. That is their job. Along that same train of thought, I would suggest that if the Chairman and newsletter editor decided to send out free digital copies as advertising to prospective new members of the various college clubs they would have it completely within their powers to do so--and be praised for their aggressiveness--and need to ask no one's permission. Indeed, there is a long and respected history of the TSA doing just that. No board action would be necessary--or even expected, for that matter. Especially if no expenditures were required. Now then, I'm not a TSA member so I would never presume to tell the TSA how to conduct its business. I'm merely speaking as an independent Texas caver bystander and interested observer. So, I have been both TSA Chairman and TEXAS CAVER editor on more than one occasion over the years. I would presume that most Texas cavers would suspect that I have a bit of experience with officer power and responsibilities and how they can get things constitutionally accomplished. Believe me, creativity can be a valuable tool in the running of a volunteer organization. Both Davy Crockett and Sam Houston used to proclaim, Be sure you're right and then go ahead. No officer will ever be chastised by the membership for handing out free advertising supporting the aims and goals of the organization and encouraging membership. It is the right thing to do. And no other current advertising brochure will fulfill that function better than a free digital copy of The TEXAS CAVER sent (or made available) to all non-TSA-member NSS cavers in Texas. So now, they can go ahead. No board action is required. It is an officer responsibility. I'm looking forward to seeing old Sam and Davy crack a smile over this one. --Ediger - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
[Texascavers] Subscribers to digital publications
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote: If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. That would not be good. But it would not be not good because of the reason being discussed here--spam, etc. There's another... Now I'm gonna tell you what I'm gonna tell you then I'm gonna tell you why--two paragraphs. The process should be some variation of this: Cavers can get 'invited to subscribe' to The TEXAS CAVER by any of several means--from the TSA or Grotto Home Pages, at Grotto meetings, the TSA convention, TCR, from fellow cavers, from handouts at projects such as CBSP, Gov Canyon, Punkin Deep, etc, or basically any way and place that cavers get together. Then, the caver will go to the link on the TSA web site and navigate to the Subscribe to The TEXAS CAVER button. Then, the caver will be asked for some vital information such as name, address, etc, NSS number, Grotto affiliation (or independent), and maybe even personal info such as family member names (which are mostly for photo identification purposes, not for publication, etc), age, years caving, and a brief caving bio, and the all important email address (which does not have to be the caver's primary one). Most of this info will be voluntary. Basically all that will be needed is a name and an email address and a password. The caver will also be asked to furnish a password for accessing his or her own personal subscription information. Then, whenever a new CAVER is ready to mail (or some breaking TSA caver-worthy news) the caver will be sent a message telling him or her to go access his or her subscription account, and to download a free digital copy of whatever is being offered--TEXAS CAVER or whatever. There could be some restrictions as to which publications can be downloaded without being a TSA member, such as a Members Manual, meeting minutes, etc. Then, they can download it and print it out in any way they choose, archiving the digital copy for posterity, and getting back to doing whatever they were doing before--or maybe read The CAVER. The mechanics of that process are not too hard to visualize--I hope. But there are some questions, I'm sure. So here are a few 'whys' to dispel some of um. Q. Why require a subscription? A. Because what we really want is to know who is this subscriber is and where they fit in the Texas caving scene. Basically we are trying to identify all the cavers in Texas so we can keep in contact with them--ostensibly through the auspices of The TEXAS CAVER--and influence them and they us. We will give you a free CAVER if you will be a part of our 'extended' TSA caving fraternity. This is a bribe from us to know who you are and that you are one of us--even though you may have been hiding for many years because you felt that the TSA doesn't care about you--doesn't want you to be a part of their elite group without you getting involved in their political intrigues or any other reasons you may have. Q, How does this help the TSA? A. The subscription gives the TSA a database for contacting outside cavers (not just TSA members) about important issues such as cave conservation, caver functions, projects, conventions, TCR and other events that cavers would be interested in. It also restricts (somewhat) the distribution of errant issues on the open market. That's not to say that I couldn't just print out 40 copies via my download and hand them out at Walgreens. It also provides a larger man-power base of both leaders and followers which will obviously contribute to projects, training, participation, writing articles, and a general contribution to more and better caving. Q. How will my email address be protected? A. The subscriber list will be maintained as a database, pretty much entirely electronically. The database, or selected fields, at least, should be available to subscribers as a caver service. Subscribers could elect to not make their email address and certain other fields visible. Also, certain low tech schemes such as embedding the letters 'TSA' into each email address to be manually removed by the end user could offer some degree of security, but probably not worth it. Q. Will a Members Manual be published? A. A hard copy Members Manual is a handy reference for cavers who travel great distances to visit caves and caving events. But, as the Members Manual is a TSA list, perhaps only TSA members could be allowed to download it. That would provide incentive to join TSA. Properly loaded, a Members Manual could be available for downloading just like The TEXAS CAVER. Again, subscribers can elect to have their sensitive data available for viewing or printing. Q. How do we keep just anybody from accessing and printing out a copy of The CAVER or Member's Manual? A. Well, basically we can't. I can print one for my brother-in-law and he can leave it laying in the break room at work for anybody to
Re: [Texascavers] Subscribers to digital publications
Gill, why not simply put it on the webpage, with an optional form to fill out name, location, contact info, etc. The information should be free to all, the more people who get it, read it, the better. If people have to jump through hoops, it could possibly scare a few off. Getting the information out there into the hands of potential new members and cavers. Everyone is worried about spam, we have plenty and will only get more. If you are worried about people getting your email address out of a PDF, then don't put it into the PDF, its that simple. Contact info in the TC should point to the website contact page, it's just that simple, no more worries about spam. Sometimes it is really best to keep things simple, especially when trying to attract new members. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote: On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. That would not be good. But it would not be not good because of the reason being discussed here--spam, etc. There's another... Now I'm gonna tell you what I'm gonna tell you then I'm gonna tell you why--two paragraphs. The process should be some variation of this: Cavers can get 'invited to subscribe' to The TEXAS CAVER by any of several means--from the TSA or Grotto Home Pages, at Grotto meetings, the TSA convention, TCR, from fellow cavers, from handouts at projects such as CBSP, Gov Canyon, Punkin Deep, etc, or basically any way and place that cavers get together. Then, the caver will go to the link on the TSA web site and navigate to the Subscribe to The TEXAS CAVER button. Then, the caver will be asked for some vital information such as name, address, etc, NSS number, Grotto affiliation (or independent), and maybe even personal info such as family member names (which are mostly for photo identification purposes, not for publication, etc), age, years caving, and a brief caving bio, and the all important email address (which does not have to be the caver's primary one). Most of this info will be voluntary. Basically all that will be needed is a name and an email address and a password. The caver will also be asked to furnish a password for accessing his or her own personal subscription information. Then, whenever a new CAVER is ready to mail (or some breaking TSA caver-worthy news) the caver will be sent a message telling him or her to go access his or her subscription account, and to download a free digital copy of whatever is being offered--TEXAS CAVER or whatever. There could be some restrictions as to which publications can be downloaded without being a TSA member, such as a Members Manual, meeting minutes, etc. Then, they can download it and print it out in any way they choose, archiving the digital copy for posterity, and getting back to doing whatever they were doing before--or maybe read The CAVER. The mechanics of that process are not too hard to visualize--I hope. But there are some questions, I'm sure. So here are a few 'whys' to dispel some of um. Q. Why require a subscription? A. Because what we really want is to know who is this subscriber is and where they fit in the Texas caving scene. Basically we are trying to identify all the cavers in Texas so we can keep in contact with them--ostensibly through the auspices of The TEXAS CAVER--and influence them and they us. We will give you a free CAVER if you will be a part of our 'extended' TSA caving fraternity. This is a bribe from us to know who you are and that you are one of us--even though you may have been hiding for many years because you felt that the TSA doesn't care about you--doesn't want you to be a part of their elite group without you getting involved in their political intrigues or any other reasons you may have. Q, How does this help the TSA? A. The subscription gives the TSA a database for contacting outside cavers (not just TSA members) about important issues such as cave conservation, caver functions, projects, conventions, TCR and other events that cavers would be interested in. It also restricts (somewhat) the distribution of errant issues on the open market. That's not to say that I couldn't just print out 40 copies via my download and hand them out at Walgreens. It also provides a larger man-power base of both leaders and followers which will obviously contribute to projects, training, participation, writing articles, and a general contribution to more and better caving. Q. How will my email address be protected? A. The subscriber list will be maintained as a database, pretty much entirely electronically. The database, or selected fields, at least, should be available to subscribers as a caver service. Subscribers could elect to not make their email address and certain other fields visible. Also, certain low
Re: [Texascavers] Subscribers to digital publications
Im done. On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Gill, why not simply put it on the webpage, with an optional form to fill out name, location, contact info, etc. The information should be free to all, the more people who get it, read it, the better. If people have to jump through hoops, it could possibly scare a few off. Getting the information out there into the hands of potential new members and cavers. Everyone is worried about spam, we have plenty and will only get more. If you are worried about people getting your email address out of a PDF, then don't put it into the PDF, its that simple. Contact info in the TC should point to the website contact page, it's just that simple, no more worries about spam. Sometimes it is really best to keep things simple, especially when trying to attract new members. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote: On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. That would not be good. But it would not be not good because of the reason being discussed here--spam, etc. There's another... Now I'm gonna tell you what I'm gonna tell you then I'm gonna tell you why--two paragraphs. The process should be some variation of this: Cavers can get 'invited to subscribe' to The TEXAS CAVER by any of several means--from the TSA or Grotto Home Pages, at Grotto meetings, the TSA convention, TCR, from fellow cavers, from handouts at projects such as CBSP, Gov Canyon, Punkin Deep, etc, or basically any way and place that cavers get together. Then, the caver will go to the link on the TSA web site and navigate to the Subscribe to The TEXAS CAVER button. Then, the caver will be asked for some vital information such as name, address, etc, NSS number, Grotto affiliation (or independent), and maybe even personal info such as family member names (which are mostly for photo identification purposes, not for publication, etc), age, years caving, and a brief caving bio, and the all important email address (which does not have to be the caver's primary one). Most of this info will be voluntary. Basically all that will be needed is a name and an email address and a password. The caver will also be asked to furnish a password for accessing his or her own personal subscription information. Then, whenever a new CAVER is ready to mail (or some breaking TSA caver-worthy news) the caver will be sent a message telling him or her to go access his or her subscription account, and to download a free digital copy of whatever is being offered--TEXAS CAVER or whatever. There could be some restrictions as to which publications can be downloaded without being a TSA member, such as a Members Manual, meeting minutes, etc. Then, they can download it and print it out in any way they choose, archiving the digital copy for posterity, and getting back to doing whatever they were doing before--or maybe read The CAVER. The mechanics of that process are not too hard to visualize--I hope. But there are some questions, I'm sure. So here are a few 'whys' to dispel some of um. Q. Why require a subscription? A. Because what we really want is to know who is this subscriber is and where they fit in the Texas caving scene. Basically we are trying to identify all the cavers in Texas so we can keep in contact with them--ostensibly through the auspices of The TEXAS CAVER--and influence them and they us. We will give you a free CAVER if you will be a part of our 'extended' TSA caving fraternity. This is a bribe from us to know who you are and that you are one of us--even though you may have been hiding for many years because you felt that the TSA doesn't care about you--doesn't want you to be a part of their elite group without you getting involved in their political intrigues or any other reasons you may have. Q, How does this help the TSA? A. The subscription gives the TSA a database for contacting outside cavers (not just TSA members) about important issues such as cave conservation, caver functions, projects, conventions, TCR and other events that cavers would be interested in. It also restricts (somewhat) the distribution of errant issues on the open market. That's not to say that I couldn't just print out 40 copies via my download and hand them out at Walgreens. It also provides a larger man-power base of both leaders and followers which will obviously contribute to projects, training, participation, writing articles, and a general contribution to more and better caving. Q. How will my email address be protected? A. The subscriber list will be maintained as a database, pretty much entirely electronically. The database, or selected fields, at least, should be available to subscribers as a caver service. Subscribers could
Re: [Texascavers] Subscribers to digital publications
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote: Gill, why not simply put it on the webpage, with an optional form to fill out name, location, contact info, etc. The information should be free to all, the more people who get it, read it, the better. If people have to jump through hoops, it could possibly scare a few off. Getting the information out there into the hands of potential new members and cavers. Yes, basically right. But getting them information is only half of the goal. We want their info as well. We want to identify them. They are our target cavers--the ones we want to encourage to not only go caving safely but to join the TSA, the NSS, and to become an active part of the great unwashed caver community--not rogue warriors in the caving world. So, we need their information and we need to keep in touch with them. The hassle of filling out a subscription (which can be minimal) is itself a small filter to weed out trivial inquiries. We want accountability from both ends. Everyone is worried about spam, we have plenty and will only get more. If you are worried about people getting your email address out of a PDF, then don't put it into the PDF, its that simple. I personally am not worried about hard copy (such as pdf) lists being snagged for spam. Manually transcribing them is a bit more effort, though not a whole lot. It's the electronic files which can be manipulated in the computer to harvest email addresses that I don't want to see posted. Again, I guess they could be hidden. Contact info in the TC should point to the website contact page, it's just that simple, no more worries about spam. Yes Sometimes it is really best to keep things simple, especially when trying to attract new members. I'm OK with simple. Just keep in mind OUR needs from them and don't cut us off short from the value we place on our target audience. --Ediger
Re: [Texascavers] Subscribers to digital publications
I'm unsubcribing from Texascavers.com later tonight. I've had it. Bill Sent via BlackBerry by ATT -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:58:07 To: Gill Edigargi...@att.net Cc: texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Subscribers to digital publications Gill, why not simply put it on the webpage, with an optional form to fill out name, location, contact info, etc. The information should be free to all, the more people who get it, read it, the better. If people have to jump through hoops, it could possibly scare a few off. Getting the information out there into the hands of potential new members and cavers. Everyone is worried about spam, we have plenty and will only get more. If you are worried about people getting your email address out of a PDF, then don't put it into the PDF, its that simple. Contact info in the TC should point to the website contact page, it's just that simple, no more worries about spam. Sometimes it is really best to keep things simple, especially when trying to attract new members. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote: On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. That would not be good. But it would not be not good because of the reason being discussed here--spam, etc. There's another... Now I'm gonna tell you what I'm gonna tell you then I'm gonna tell you why--two paragraphs. The process should be some variation of this: Cavers can get 'invited to subscribe' to The TEXAS CAVER by any of several means--from the TSA or Grotto Home Pages, at Grotto meetings, the TSA convention, TCR, from fellow cavers, from handouts at projects such as CBSP, Gov Canyon, Punkin Deep, etc, or basically any way and place that cavers get together. Then, the caver will go to the link on the TSA web site and navigate to the Subscribe to The TEXAS CAVER button. Then, the caver will be asked for some vital information such as name, address, etc, NSS number, Grotto affiliation (or independent), and maybe even personal info such as family member names (which are mostly for photo identification purposes, not for publication, etc), age, years caving, and a brief caving bio, and the all important email address (which does not have to be the caver's primary one). Most of this info will be voluntary. Basically all that will be needed is a name and an email address and a password. The caver will also be asked to furnish a password for accessing his or her own personal subscription information. Then, whenever a new CAVER is ready to mail (or some breaking TSA caver-worthy news) the caver will be sent a message telling him or her to go access his or her subscription account, and to download a free digital copy of whatever is being offered--TEXAS CAVER or whatever. There could be some restrictions as to which publications can be downloaded without being a TSA member, such as a Members Manual, meeting minutes, etc. Then, they can download it and print it out in any way they choose, archiving the digital copy for posterity, and getting back to doing whatever they were doing before--or maybe read The CAVER. The mechanics of that process are not too hard to visualize--I hope. But there are some questions, I'm sure. So here are a few 'whys' to dispel some of um. Q. Why require a subscription? A. Because what we really want is to know who is this subscriber is and where they fit in the Texas caving scene. Basically we are trying to identify all the cavers in Texas so we can keep in contact with them--ostensibly through the auspices of The TEXAS CAVER--and influence them and they us. We will give you a free CAVER if you will be a part of our 'extended' TSA caving fraternity. This is a bribe from us to know who you are and that you are one of us--even though you may have been hiding for many years because you felt that the TSA doesn't care about you--doesn't want you to be a part of their elite group without you getting involved in their political intrigues or any other reasons you may have. Q, How does this help the TSA? A. The subscription gives the TSA a database for contacting outside cavers (not just TSA members) about important issues such as cave conservation, caver functions, projects, conventions, TCR and other events that cavers would be interested in. It also restricts (somewhat) the distribution of errant issues on the open market. That's not to say that I couldn't just print out 40 copies via my download and hand them out at Walgreens. It also provides a larger man-power base of both leaders and followers which will obviously contribute to projects, training, participation, writing articles, and a general contribution to more and better caving. Q. How will my email
Re: [Texascavers] Subscribers to digital publications
ok, so why you sending me this? On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:02 PM, speleoste...@tx.rr.com wrote: I'm unsubcribing from Texascavers.com later tonight. I've had it. Bill Sent via BlackBerry by ATT -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:58:07 To: Gill Edigargi...@att.net Cc: texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Subscribers to digital publications Gill, why not simply put it on the webpage, with an optional form to fill out name, location, contact info, etc. The information should be free to all, the more people who get it, read it, the better. If people have to jump through hoops, it could possibly scare a few off. Getting the information out there into the hands of potential new members and cavers. Everyone is worried about spam, we have plenty and will only get more. If you are worried about people getting your email address out of a PDF, then don't put it into the PDF, its that simple. Contact info in the TC should point to the website contact page, it's just that simple, no more worries about spam. Sometimes it is really best to keep things simple, especially when trying to attract new members. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote: On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. That would not be good. But it would not be not good because of the reason being discussed here--spam, etc. There's another... Now I'm gonna tell you what I'm gonna tell you then I'm gonna tell you why--two paragraphs. The process should be some variation of this: Cavers can get 'invited to subscribe' to The TEXAS CAVER by any of several means--from the TSA or Grotto Home Pages, at Grotto meetings, the TSA convention, TCR, from fellow cavers, from handouts at projects such as CBSP, Gov Canyon, Punkin Deep, etc, or basically any way and place that cavers get together. Then, the caver will go to the link on the TSA web site and navigate to the Subscribe to The TEXAS CAVER button. Then, the caver will be asked for some vital information such as name, address, etc, NSS number, Grotto affiliation (or independent), and maybe even personal info such as family member names (which are mostly for photo identification purposes, not for publication, etc), age, years caving, and a brief caving bio, and the all important email address (which does not have to be the caver's primary one). Most of this info will be voluntary. Basically all that will be needed is a name and an email address and a password. The caver will also be asked to furnish a password for accessing his or her own personal subscription information. Then, whenever a new CAVER is ready to mail (or some breaking TSA caver-worthy news) the caver will be sent a message telling him or her to go access his or her subscription account, and to download a free digital copy of whatever is being offered--TEXAS CAVER or whatever. There could be some restrictions as to which publications can be downloaded without being a TSA member, such as a Members Manual, meeting minutes, etc. Then, they can download it and print it out in any way they choose, archiving the digital copy for posterity, and getting back to doing whatever they were doing before--or maybe read The CAVER. The mechanics of that process are not too hard to visualize--I hope. But there are some questions, I'm sure. So here are a few 'whys' to dispel some of um. Q. Why require a subscription? A. Because what we really want is to know who is this subscriber is and where they fit in the Texas caving scene. Basically we are trying to identify all the cavers in Texas so we can keep in contact with them--ostensibly through the auspices of The TEXAS CAVER--and influence them and they us. We will give you a free CAVER if you will be a part of our 'extended' TSA caving fraternity. This is a bribe from us to know who you are and that you are one of us--even though you may have been hiding for many years because you felt that the TSA doesn't care about you--doesn't want you to be a part of their elite group without you getting involved in their political intrigues or any other reasons you may have. Q, How does this help the TSA? A. The subscription gives the TSA a database for contacting outside cavers (not just TSA members) about important issues such as cave conservation, caver functions, projects, conventions, TCR and other events that cavers would be interested in. It also restricts (somewhat) the distribution of errant issues on the open market. That's not to say that I couldn't just print out 40 copies via my download and hand them out at Walgreens. It also provides a larger man-power base of both leaders and followers which will obviously contribute to projects,
Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they don't even have my email address? ;-) ) I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to handle our email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA already has placed an online listing of its electronically registered members on its password protected website. Then look at Gill's recent proposal to make online access to the Texas Caver free for nonmembers. Neither of these things necessarily involves an irresponsible release of TSA members' email addresses when considered separately (although I still would rather not have my email address on even a members-only password protected online list). When both of these things are considered together, however, along with all the other turmoil about TSA digital publication policies, it is easy to imagine how people might provide their email addresses to TSA assuming one seemingly responsible privacy policy, only to discover later that TSA has changed its mind and has made the email address list more widely accessible than people had expected when they provided their addresses. I chose to throw this stone into the hornets nest, because I wanted people to actually start thinking about the issue, instead of just telling us don't worry, be happy. The problem would be easy to fix if TSA simply would make a commitment to its members that no member's email address will be included in any online list unless that member explicitly opts in for inclusion in the list. TSA members need to be able to register for website access without having their email addresses published in an online list. Rod -Original Message- From: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net Sent: Dec 14, 2009 11:17 AM To: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net Cc: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? For the record Mark, I wasn't blaming nor condeming the TSA, I was just stating the fact that I get hundreds of thousands of spam emails. Mark, I like the TSA and I think I get my moneys worth from volunteers who are very much appreciated. Bill - Original Message - From: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net To: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org; TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com; Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:24 AM Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? The TSA has my e mail.and I getoh maybe one or two junk mail messages per WEEK. Paranoia runs deep concerning e mail spam. But unjustly condemning the TSA for something they are not doing or really at fault for..hardly seems fair or reasonable. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 14, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net wrote: Rod, My ca...@caver.net email address gets a spam email message every 2 to 3 seconds... literally thousands per hour... all of it goes into a spam folder and good spam sorting software on the email server helps me figure what is crap and what is not... End of the day I am deleting a lot of spam... If someone were to go after the companies who are advertisng the drugs, diplomas and sex services then it mifght help curb it. I feel that a complete overhaul of how email works wouold be the answer, since you can currently send from and have the reply to address be different. A lot of the spam I gets looks as if it is coming to me from me... but buried in the header I find that it comes from Korea or China... Bill - Original Message - From: Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net To: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 2:04 AM Subject: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? All this talk about electronic vs. paper publication of the Texas Caver reminds me of a related issue: Is it safe to give your email address to TSA? For years TSA has been asking for our email addresses on the membership renewal forms, and I have been refusing to give them mine. During this same period, however, I have been providing my email address (along with mailing address and phone numbers) to the UT Grotto for publication in their UT Grotto Phone List. Why is it that I have felt that my email address was sufficiently safe with the UT Grotto but not with TSA? The answer is that the UT Grotto Phone List is published only in paper form, where email addresses and other personal information is not likely to be harvested by spammers, telemarketers, search
Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360 people have your email address and each others. Anyone of them could harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who posted an email to this list. Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people? The odds that one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA people, who are duly elected by some of these people. If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote: For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they don't even have my email address? ;-) ) I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to handle our email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA already has placed an online listing of its electronically registered members on its password protected website. Then look at Gill's recent proposal to make online access to the Texas Caver free for nonmembers. Neither of these things necessarily involves an irresponsible release of TSA members' email addresses when considered separately (although I still would rather not have my email address on even a members-only password protected online list). When both of these things are considered together, however, along with all the other turmoil about TSA digital publication policies, it is easy to imagine how people might provide their email addresses to TSA assuming one seemingly responsible privacy policy, only to discover later that TSA has changed its mind and has made the email address list more widely accessible than people had expected when they provided their addresses. I chose to throw this stone into the hornets nest, because I wanted people to actually start thinking about the issue, instead of just telling us don't worry, be happy. The problem would be easy to fix if TSA simply would make a commitment to its members that no member's email address will be included in any online list unless that member explicitly opts in for inclusion in the list. TSA members need to be able to register for website access without having their email addresses published in an online list. Rod -Original Message- From: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net Sent: Dec 14, 2009 11:17 AM To: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net Cc: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? For the record Mark, I wasn't blaming nor condeming the TSA, I was just stating the fact that I get hundreds of thousands of spam emails. Mark, I like the TSA and I think I get my moneys worth from volunteers who are very much appreciated. Bill - Original Message - From: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net To: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org; TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com; Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:24 AM Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? The TSA has my e mail.and I getoh maybe one or two junk mail messages per WEEK. Paranoia runs deep concerning e mail spam. But unjustly condemning the TSA for something they are not doing or really at fault for..hardly seems fair or reasonable. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 14, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net wrote: Rod, My ca...@caver.net email address gets a spam email message every 2 to 3 seconds... literally thousands per hour... all of it goes into a spam folder and good spam sorting software on the email server helps me figure what is crap and what is not... End of the day I am deleting a lot of spam... If someone were to go after the companies who are advertisng the drugs, diplomas and sex services then it mifght help curb it. I feel that a complete overhaul of how email works wouold be the answer, since you can currently send from and have the reply to address be different. A lot of the spam I gets looks as if it is coming to me from me... but buried in the header I find that it comes from Korea or China... Bill - Original Message - From: Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net To: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 2:04 AM Subject: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? All this talk about electronic
RE: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
Thanks, Charles. I was wondering how/if to address this and you have done so rather succinctly. I agree 100% with you. Mark -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:48 AM To: Rod Goke Cc: Bill Bentley; John Brooks; Alman, Mark @ IRP; TexasCavers Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360 people have your email address and each others. Anyone of them could harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who posted an email to this list. Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people? The odds that one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA people, who are duly elected by some of these people. If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote: For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they don't even have my email address? ;-) ) I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to handle our email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA already has placed an online listing of its electronically registered members on its password protected website. Then look at Gill's recent proposal to make online access to the Texas Caver free for nonmembers. Neither of these things necessarily involves an irresponsible release of TSA members' email addresses when considered separately (although I still would rather not have my email address on even a members-only password protected online list). When both of these things are considered together, however, along with all the other turmoil about TSA digital publication policies, it is easy to imagine how people might provide their email addresses to TSA assuming one seemingly responsible privacy policy, only to discover later that TSA has changed its mind and has made the email address list more widely accessible than people had expected when they provided their addresses. I chose to throw this stone into the hornets nest, because I wanted people to actually start thinking about the issue, instead of just telling us don't worry, be happy. The problem would be easy to fix if TSA simply would make a commitment to its members that no member's email address will be included in any online list unless that member explicitly opts in for inclusion in the list. TSA members need to be able to register for website access without having their email addresses published in an online list. Rod -Original Message- From: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net Sent: Dec 14, 2009 11:17 AM To: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net Cc: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? For the record Mark, I wasn't blaming nor condeming the TSA, I was just stating the fact that I get hundreds of thousands of spam emails. Mark, I like the TSA and I think I get my moneys worth from volunteers who are very much appreciated. Bill - Original Message - From: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net To: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org; TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com; Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:24 AM Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? The TSA has my e mail.and I getoh maybe one or two junk mail messages per WEEK. Paranoia runs deep concerning e mail spam. But unjustly condemning the TSA for something they are not doing or really at fault for..hardly seems fair or reasonable. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 14, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net wrote: Rod, My ca...@caver.net email address gets a spam email message every 2 to 3 seconds... literally thousands per hour... all of it goes into a spam folder and good spam sorting software on the email server helps me figure what is crap and what is not... End of the day I am deleting a lot of spam... If someone were to go after the companies who are advertisng the drugs, diplomas and sex services then it mifght help curb it. I feel that a complete overhaul of how email works wouold be the answer, since you can currently send from and have the reply to address be different. A lot of the spam I gets
Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
For some reason, Rod rubs me the wrong way with this. He better stop scaring the people with this shit, some don't know any better. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:56 AM, mark.al...@l-3com.com wrote: Thanks, Charles. I was wondering how/if to address this and you have done so rather succinctly. I agree 100% with you. Mark -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:48 AM To: Rod Goke Cc: Bill Bentley; John Brooks; Alman, Mark @ IRP; TexasCavers Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360 people have your email address and each others. Anyone of them could harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who posted an email to this list. Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people? The odds that one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA people, who are duly elected by some of these people. If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote: For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they don't even have my email address? ;-) ) I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to handle our email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA already has placed an online listing of its electronically registered members on its password protected website. Then look at Gill's recent proposal to make online access to the Texas Caver free for nonmembers. Neither of these things necessarily involves an irresponsible release of TSA members' email addresses when considered separately (although I still would rather not have my email address on even a members-only password protected online list). When both of these things are considered together, however, along with all the other turmoil about TSA digital publication policies, it is easy to imagine how people might provide their email addresses to TSA assuming one seemingly responsible privacy policy, only to discover later that TSA has changed its mind and has made the email address list more widely accessible than people had expected when they provided their addresses. I chose to throw this stone into the hornets nest, because I wanted people to actually start thinking about the issue, instead of just telling us don't worry, be happy. The problem would be easy to fix if TSA simply would make a commitment to its members that no member's email address will be included in any online list unless that member explicitly opts in for inclusion in the list. TSA members need to be able to register for website access without having their email addresses published in an online list. Rod -Original Message- From: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net Sent: Dec 14, 2009 11:17 AM To: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net Cc: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? For the record Mark, I wasn't blaming nor condeming the TSA, I was just stating the fact that I get hundreds of thousands of spam emails. Mark, I like the TSA and I think I get my moneys worth from volunteers who are very much appreciated. Bill - Original Message - From: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net To: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org; TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com; Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:24 AM Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? The TSA has my e mail.and I getoh maybe one or two junk mail messages per WEEK. Paranoia runs deep concerning e mail spam. But unjustly condemning the TSA for something they are not doing or really at fault for..hardly seems fair or reasonable. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 14, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net wrote: Rod, My ca...@caver.net email address gets a spam email message every 2 to 3 seconds... literally thousands per hour... all of it goes into a spam folder and good spam sorting software on the email server helps me figure what is crap and what is not... End of the day I am deleting a lot of spam... If someone were to go after the companies who are advertisng the drugs, diplomas and sex
RE: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
For goodness sake! You should all go Google yourselves! ;-) Do you all complain this much when your snail mail address is sold and you receive 50lbs worth of junk mail each month? Sheryl (writing down all these email addresses so I can sell them. I need some cash.) -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:48 AM To: Rod Goke Cc: Bill Bentley; John Brooks; Mark Alman; TexasCavers Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360 people have your email address and each others. Anyone of them could harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who posted an email to this list. Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people? The odds that one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA people, who are duly elected by some of these people. If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote: For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they don't even have my email address? ;-) ) I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to handle our email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA already has placed an online listing of its electronically registered members on its password protected website. Then look at Gill's recent proposal to make online access to the Texas Caver free for nonmembers. Neither of these things necessarily involves an irresponsible release of TSA members' email addresses when considered separately (although I still would rather not have my email address on even a members-only password protected online list). When both of these things are considered together, however, along with all the other turmoil about TSA digital publication policies, it is easy to imagine how people might provide their email addresses to TSA assuming one seemingly responsible privacy policy, only to discover later that TSA has changed its mind and has made the email address list more widely accessible than people had expected when they provided their addresses. I chose to throw this stone into the hornets nest, because I wanted people to actually start thinking about the issue, instead of just telling us don't worry, be happy. The problem would be easy to fix if TSA simply would make a commitment to its members that no member's email address will be included in any online list unless that member explicitly opts in for inclusion in the list. TSA members need to be able to register for website access without having their email addresses published in an online list. Rod -Original Message- From: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net Sent: Dec 14, 2009 11:17 AM To: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net Cc: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? For the record Mark, I wasn't blaming nor condeming the TSA, I was just stating the fact that I get hundreds of thousands of spam emails. Mark, I like the TSA and I think I get my moneys worth from volunteers who are very much appreciated. Bill - Original Message - From: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net To: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org; TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com; Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:24 AM Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? The TSA has my e mail.and I getoh maybe one or two junk mail messages per WEEK. Paranoia runs deep concerning e mail spam. But unjustly condemning the TSA for something they are not doing or really at fault for..hardly seems fair or reasonable. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 14, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net wrote: Rod, My ca...@caver.net email address gets a spam email
Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
Sheryl, I already have the list, I'll send it to you, we'll split the cash :) Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Sheryl Rieck shri...@cableone.net wrote: For goodness sake! You should all go Google yourselves! ;-) Do you all complain this much when your snail mail address is sold and you receive 50lbs worth of junk mail each month? Sheryl (writing down all these email addresses so I can sell them. I need some cash.) -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:48 AM To: Rod Goke Cc: Bill Bentley; John Brooks; Mark Alman; TexasCavers Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360 people have your email address and each others. Anyone of them could harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who posted an email to this list. Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people? The odds that one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA people, who are duly elected by some of these people. If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote: For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they don't even have my email address? ;-) ) I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to handle our email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA already has placed an online listing of its electronically registered members on its password protected website. Then look at Gill's recent proposal to make online access to the Texas Caver free for nonmembers. Neither of these things necessarily involves an irresponsible release of TSA members' email addresses when considered separately (although I still would rather not have my email address on even a members-only password protected online list). When both of these things are considered together, however, along with all the other turmoil about TSA digital publication policies, it is easy to imagine how people might provide their email addresses to TSA assuming one seemingly responsible privacy policy, only to discover later that TSA has changed its mind and has made the email address list more widely accessible than people had expected when they provided their addresses. I chose to throw this stone into the hornets nest, because I wanted people to actually start thinking about the issue, instead of just telling us don't worry, be happy. The problem would be easy to fix if TSA simply would make a commitment to its members that no member's email address will be included in any online list unless that member explicitly opts in for inclusion in the list. TSA members need to be able to register for website access without having their email addresses published in an online list. Rod -Original Message- From: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net Sent: Dec 14, 2009 11:17 AM To: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net Cc: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? For the record Mark, I wasn't blaming nor condeming the TSA, I was just stating the fact that I get hundreds of thousands of spam emails. Mark, I like the TSA and I think I get my moneys worth from volunteers who are very much appreciated. Bill - Original Message - From: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net To: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org; TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com; Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:24 AM Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? The TSA has my e mail.and I getoh maybe one or two junk mail messages per WEEK. Paranoia runs deep concerning e mail spam. But unjustly condemning the TSA for something they are not doing or really at fault for..hardly seems fair or reasonable. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 14,
Fw: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
Ouch I am getting everything twice... open mouth insert emails... :) Bill - Original Message - From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org To: Sheryl Rieck shri...@cableone.net Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org; Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net; John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net; Mark Alman mark.al...@l-3com.com; TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 10:44 AM Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? Sheryl, I already have the list, I'll send it to you, we'll split the cash :) Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Sheryl Rieck shri...@cableone.net wrote: For goodness sake! You should all go Google yourselves! ;-) Do you all complain this much when your snail mail address is sold and you receive 50lbs worth of junk mail each month? Sheryl (writing down all these email addresses so I can sell them. I need some cash.) -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:48 AM To: Rod Goke Cc: Bill Bentley; John Brooks; Mark Alman; TexasCavers Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360 people have your email address and each others. Anyone of them could harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who posted an email to this list. Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people? The odds that one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA people, who are duly elected by some of these people. If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote: For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they don't even have my email address? ;-) ) I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to handle our email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA already has placed an online listing of its electronically registered members on its password protected website. Then look at Gill's recent proposal to make online access to the Texas Caver free for nonmembers. Neither of these things necessarily involves an irresponsible release of TSA members' email addresses when considered separately (although I still would rather not have my email address on even a members-only password protected online list). When both of these things are considered together, however, along with all the other turmoil about TSA digital publication policies, it is easy to imagine how people might provide their email addresses to TSA assuming one seemingly responsible privacy policy, only to discover later that TSA has changed its mind and has made the email address list more widely accessible than people had expected when they provided their addresses. I chose to throw this stone into the hornets nest, because I wanted people to actually start thinking about the issue, instead of just telling us don't worry, be happy. The problem would be easy to fix if TSA simply would make a commitment to its members that no member's email address will be included in any online list unless that member explicitly opts in for inclusion in the list. TSA members need to be able to register for website access without having their email addresses published in an online list. Rod -Original Message- From: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net Sent: Dec 14, 2009 11:17 AM To: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net Cc: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? For the record Mark, I wasn't blaming nor condeming the TSA, I was just stating the fact that I get hundreds of thousands of spam emails. Mark, I like the TSA and I think I get my moneys worth from volunteers who are very much appreciated. Bill - Original Message - From: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net To: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org; TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com; Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:24 AM Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? The TSA has my e mail.and I getoh maybe one or two junk mail messages per WEEK. Paranoia runs deep concerning e mail spam. But unjustly condemning the TSA for something they are not doing or really at fault for..hardly
RE: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
;-) -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 10:45 AM To: Sheryl Rieck Cc: Rod Goke; Bill Bentley; John Brooks; Mark Alman; TexasCavers Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? Sheryl, I already have the list, I'll send it to you, we'll split the cash :) Charles
Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
Take me off cavetex for now Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:48:15 To: Rod Gokerod.g...@ieee.org Cc: Bill Bentleyca...@caver.net; John Brooksjpbrook...@sbcglobal.net; Mark Almanmark.al...@l-3com.com; TexasCaverstexascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360 people have your email address and each others. Anyone of them could harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who posted an email to this list. Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people? The odds that one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA people, who are duly elected by some of these people. If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote: For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they don't even have my email address? ;-) ) I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to handle our email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA already has placed an online listing of its electronically registered members on its password protected website. Then look at Gill's recent proposal to make online access to the Texas Caver free for nonmembers. Neither of these things necessarily involves an irresponsible release of TSA members' email addresses when considered separately (although I still would rather not have my email address on even a members-only password protected online list). When both of these things are considered together, however, along with all the other turmoil about TSA digital publication policies, it is easy to imagine how people might provide their email addresses to TSA assuming one seemingly responsible privacy policy, only to discover later that TSA has changed its mind and has made the email address list more widely accessible than people had expected when they provided their addresses. I chose to throw this stone into the hornets nest, because I wanted people to actually start thinking about the issue, instead of just telling us don't worry, be happy. The problem would be easy to fix if TSA simply would make a commitment to its members that no member's email address will be included in any online list unless that member explicitly opts in for inclusion in the list. TSA members need to be able to register for website access without having their email addresses published in an online list. Rod -Original Message- From: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net Sent: Dec 14, 2009 11:17 AM To: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net Cc: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? For the record Mark, I wasn't blaming nor condeming the TSA, I was just stating the fact that I get hundreds of thousands of spam emails. Mark, I like the TSA and I think I get my moneys worth from volunteers who are very much appreciated. Bill - Original Message - From: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net To: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org; TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com; Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:24 AM Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? The TSA has my e mail.and I getoh maybe one or two junk mail messages per WEEK. Paranoia runs deep concerning e mail spam. But unjustly condemning the TSA for something they are not doing or really at fault for..hardly seems fair or reasonable. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 14, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net wrote: Rod, My ca...@caver.net email address gets a spam email message every 2 to 3 seconds... literally thousands per hour... all of it goes into a spam folder and good spam sorting software on the email server helps me figure what is crap and what is not... End of the day I am deleting a lot of spam... If someone were to go after the companies who are advertisng the drugs, diplomas and sex services then it mifght help curb it. I feel that a complete overhaul of how email works wouold be the answer, since you can currently send from and have the reply to address be different. A lot of the
Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
Charles, Your message below really misses the the point, and your personal attacks are totally unwarranted. Of course, we all run some risk that our email addresses will somehow get to spammers whenever we send them to anyone. Whenever you or I or anyone else posts a message to Texascavers we understand that our email addresses will be visible to others on the list, and we choose to do that. Harvesting email addresses one at a time from postings to this list as you suggested would be possible, of course, but it would be a slow and inconvenient way to collect a large list for spam, and I don't think either of us is seriously worried about that. The primary hazard is not that anyone in TSA or other caving organizations will deliberately pass information to spammers, but rather that some people downloading information with good intentions will inadvertently store it where spyware or other malware on an infected computer can search the downloaded files for email addresses, phone numbers, or other information that writers of the malware wish to harvest. This is something that easily can happen, and when it does, the person making information available to the malware might be totally unaware of what is going on. When people download individual email messages or other data items containing only a few email addresses or other sensitive items, then only those few items are vulnerable to harvesting by malware in any one incident. When people download an entire mailing list, however, then just one incident on one inadvertently infected computer can result in harvesting of the entire list. When many people download the list to many different computers, the risk to everyone on the list increases accordingly. So far as I know, the subscribers to Texascavers are not allowed to download that entire email address list, and I trust that Texascavers will continue to be managed in this responsible manner, especially since I haven't noticed any demand to do otherwise. The discussions I've heard and read about the TSA's online data resources, however, create much more uncertainty about how they will be managed. This is why it is important to have serious discussions of the issues beforehand to prevent problems, especially when some of them could be prevented so easily with a few minor policy decisions. Rod -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org Sent: Dec 15, 2009 10:48 AM To: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org Cc: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net, John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net, Mark Alman mark.al...@l-3com.com, TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360 people have your email address and each others. Anyone of them could harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who posted an email to this list. Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people? The odds that one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA people, who are duly elected by some of these people. If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote: For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they don't even have my email address? ;-) ) I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to handle our email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA already has placed an online listing of its electronically registered members on its password protected website. Then look at Gill's recent proposal to make online access to the Texas Caver free for nonmembers. Neither of these things necessarily involves an irresponsible release of TSA members' email addresses when considered separately (although I still would rather not have my email address on even a members-only password protected online list). When both of these things are considered together, however, along with all the other turmoil about TSA digital publication policies, it is easy to imagine how people might provide their email addresses to TSA assuming one seemingly responsible privacy policy, only to discover later that TSA has changed its mind and has made the email address list more widely accessible than people had expected when they provided their addresses.
Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
Rod and Charles (ONLY), At the Jan 10th meeting we will propose that restricted access free-loaders must create a user account to download the free old copies. Copies over one year old will be made free. Other restricted access free-loaders can apply for a scholarship if they would like to receive the most up-to-date digital copies for free- the scholarship will be a TSA expense. They must have been underground for at least 5 hours in the past year though. Underground being, in a cave, where it is dark. Its more reasonable than the original idea to require you be an NSS member or have involvement w/ a grotto or cave organization to be able to create a free user account. At the Jan 10th meeting! On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote: Charles, Your message below really misses the the point, and your personal attacks are totally unwarranted. Of course, we all run some risk that our email addresses will somehow get to spammers whenever we send them to anyone. Whenever you or I or anyone else posts a message to Texascavers we understand that our email addresses will be visible to others on the list, and we choose to do that. Harvesting email addresses one at a time from postings to this list as you suggested would be possible, of course, but it would be a slow and inconvenient way to collect a large list for spam, and I don't think either of us is seriously worried about that. The primary hazard is not that anyone in TSA or other caving organizations will deliberately pass information to spammers, but rather that some people downloading information with good intentions will inadvertently store it where spyware or other malware on an infected computer can search the downloaded files for email addresses, phone numbers, or other information that writers of the malware wish to harvest. This is something that easily can happen, and when it does, the person making information available to the malware might be totally unaware of what is going on. When people download individual email messages or other data items containing only a few email addresses or other sensitive items, then only those few items are vulnerable to harvesting by malware in any one incident. When people download an entire mailing list, however, then just one incident on one inadvertently infected computer can result in harvesting of the entire list. When many people download the list to many different computers, the risk to everyone on the list increases accordingly. So far as I know, the subscribers to Texascavers are not allowed to download that entire email address list, and I trust that Texascavers will continue to be managed in this responsible manner, especially since I haven't noticed any demand to do otherwise. The discussions I've heard and read about the TSA's online data resources, however, create much more uncertainty about how they will be managed. This is why it is important to have serious discussions of the issues beforehand to prevent problems, especially when some of them could be prevented so easily with a few minor policy decisions. Rod -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org Sent: Dec 15, 2009 10:48 AM To: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org Cc: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net, John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net, Mark Alman mark.al...@l-3com.com, TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360 people have your email address and each others. Anyone of them could harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who posted an email to this list. Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people? The odds that one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA people, who are duly elected by some of these people. If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote: For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they don't even have my email address? ;-) ) I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to handle our email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA already has placed an online listing of its electronically registered members on its password
Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
I disagree Ellie, we should put them on the main page, no login required and no wait period. That's my opinion On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:57 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Rod and Charles (ONLY), At the Jan 10th meeting we will propose that restricted access free-loaders must create a user account to download the free old copies. Copies over one year old will be made free. Other restricted access free-loaders can apply for a scholarship if they would like to receive the most up-to-date digital copies for free- the scholarship will be a TSA expense. They must have been underground for at least 5 hours in the past year though. Underground being, in a cave, where it is dark. Its more reasonable than the original idea to require you be an NSS member or have involvement w/ a grotto or cave organization to be able to create a free user account. At the Jan 10th meeting! On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote: Charles, Your message below really misses the the point, and your personal attacks are totally unwarranted. Of course, we all run some risk that our email addresses will somehow get to spammers whenever we send them to anyone. Whenever you or I or anyone else posts a message to Texascavers we understand that our email addresses will be visible to others on the list, and we choose to do that. Harvesting email addresses one at a time from postings to this list as you suggested would be possible, of course, but it would be a slow and inconvenient way to collect a large list for spam, and I don't think either of us is seriously worried about that. The primary hazard is not that anyone in TSA or other caving organizations will deliberately pass information to spammers, but rather that some people downloading information with good intentions will inadvertently store it where spyware or other malware on an infected computer can search the downloaded files for email addresses, phone numbers, or other information that writers of the malware wish to harvest. This is something that easily can happen, and when it does, the person making information available to the malware might be totally unaware of what is going on. When people download individual email messages or other data items containing only a few email addresses or other sensitive items, then only those few items are vulnerable to harvesting by malware in any one incident. When people download an entire mailing list, however, then just one incident on one inadvertently infected computer can result in harvesting of the entire list. When many people download the list to many different computers, the risk to everyone on the list increases accordingly. So far as I know, the subscribers to Texascavers are not allowed to download that entire email address list, and I trust that Texascavers will continue to be managed in this responsible manner, especially since I haven't noticed any demand to do otherwise. The discussions I've heard and read about the TSA's online data resources, however, create much more uncertainty about how they will be managed. This is why it is important to have serious discussions of the issues beforehand to prevent problems, especially when some of them could be prevented so easily with a few minor policy decisions. Rod -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org Sent: Dec 15, 2009 10:48 AM To: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org Cc: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net, John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net, Mark Alman mark.al...@l-3com.com, TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360 people have your email address and each others. Anyone of them could harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who posted an email to this list. Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people? The odds that one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA people, who are duly elected by some of these people. If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote: For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they don't even have my email address? ;-) ) I still am not confident,
Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
That will be a great item to bring up at the Jan 10th meeting. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote: I disagree Ellie, we should put them on the main page, no login required and no wait period. That's my opinion On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:57 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Rod and Charles (ONLY), At the Jan 10th meeting we will propose that restricted access free-loaders must create a user account to download the free old copies. Copies over one year old will be made free. Other restricted access free-loaders can apply for a scholarship if they would like to receive the most up-to-date digital copies for free- the scholarship will be a TSA expense. They must have been underground for at least 5 hours in the past year though. Underground being, in a cave, where it is dark. Its more reasonable than the original idea to require you be an NSS member or have involvement w/ a grotto or cave organization to be able to create a free user account. At the Jan 10th meeting! On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote: Charles, Your message below really misses the the point, and your personal attacks are totally unwarranted. Of course, we all run some risk that our email addresses will somehow get to spammers whenever we send them to anyone. Whenever you or I or anyone else posts a message to Texascavers we understand that our email addresses will be visible to others on the list, and we choose to do that. Harvesting email addresses one at a time from postings to this list as you suggested would be possible, of course, but it would be a slow and inconvenient way to collect a large list for spam, and I don't think either of us is seriously worried about that. The primary hazard is not that anyone in TSA or other caving organizations will deliberately pass information to spammers, but rather that some people downloading information with good intentions will inadvertently store it where spyware or other malware on an infected computer can search the downloaded files for email addresses, phone numbers, or other information that writers of the malware wish to harvest. This is something that easily can happen, and when it does, the person making information available to the malware might be totally unaware of what is going on. When people download individual email messages or other data items containing only a few email addresses or other sensitive items, then only those few items are vulnerable to harvesting by malware in any one incident. When people download an entire mailing list, however, then just one incident on one inadvertently infected computer can result in harvesting of the entire list. When many people download the list to many different computers, the risk to everyone on the list increases accordingly. So far as I know, the subscribers to Texascavers are not allowed to download that entire email address list, and I trust that Texascavers will continue to be managed in this responsible manner, especially since I haven't noticed any demand to do otherwise. The discussions I've heard and read about the TSA's online data resources, however, create much more uncertainty about how they will be managed. This is why it is important to have serious discussions of the issues beforehand to prevent problems, especially when some of them could be prevented so easily with a few minor policy decisions. Rod -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org Sent: Dec 15, 2009 10:48 AM To: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org Cc: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net, John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net, Mark Alman mark.al...@l-3com.com, TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360 people have your email address and each others. Anyone of them could harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who posted an email to this list. Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people? The odds that one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA people, who are duly elected by some of these people. If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote: For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the dedicated work that he and other TSA
Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
Rod, that wasn't a personal attack, if you took it as such, you need to re-read my message and think about how it was meant. The TSA having this list is no different than the NSS keeping a list of its members, and sending that list out in book format, plain and simple. Harvesting emails from a mailing list is very very simple, I have the complete list as owner of the list, but even another list, I can harvest with a simple script that would only take me a few minutes to write. It was a tongue in cheek comment about writing down email addresses by hand. Scammers/Spammers/Phishers don't do anything manually. Modern email applications cache email addresses that it sees, Malware can and does use these lists to send out spam. We've seen it recently on the mailing list. Your email address is not safe anywhere, you will just have to learn to face that fact in this modern age. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote: Charles, Your message below really misses the the point, and your personal attacks are totally unwarranted. Of course, we all run some risk that our email addresses will somehow get to spammers whenever we send them to anyone. Whenever you or I or anyone else posts a message to Texascavers we understand that our email addresses will be visible to others on the list, and we choose to do that. Harvesting email addresses one at a time from postings to this list as you suggested would be possible, of course, but it would be a slow and inconvenient way to collect a large list for spam, and I don't think either of us is seriously worried about that. The primary hazard is not that anyone in TSA or other caving organizations will deliberately pass information to spammers, but rather that some people downloading information with good intentions will inadvertently store it where spyware or other malware on an infected computer can search the downloaded files for email addresses, phone numbers, or other information that writers of the malware wish to harvest. This is something that easily can happen, and when it does, the person making information available to the malware might be totally unaware of what is going on. When people download individual email messages or other data items containing only a few email addresses or other sensitive items, then only those few items are vulnerable to harvesting by malware in any one incident. When people download an entire mailing list, however, then just one incident on one inadvertently infected computer can result in harvesting of the entire list. When many people download the list to many different computers, the risk to everyone on the list increases accordingly. So far as I know, the subscribers to Texascavers are not allowed to download that entire email address list, and I trust that Texascavers will continue to be managed in this responsible manner, especially since I haven't noticed any demand to do otherwise. The discussions I've heard and read about the TSA's online data resources, however, create much more uncertainty about how they will be managed. This is why it is important to have serious discussions of the issues beforehand to prevent problems, especially when some of them could be prevented so easily with a few minor policy decisions. Rod -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org Sent: Dec 15, 2009 10:48 AM To: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org Cc: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net, John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net, Mark Alman mark.al...@l-3com.com, TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360 people have your email address and each others. Anyone of them could harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who posted an email to this list. Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people? The odds that one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA people, who are duly elected by some of these people. If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it will be available on the front page. Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote: For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they don't even have my email address? ;-) ) I still am not confident, however, that TSA
Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
Charles, I agree with your technical comments about the many ways that malware can be used to harvest email addresses and other data and that there is no way to protect an email address 100% while using it for its normal purpose. That doesn't imply, however, that there is no point in trying reduce risk. Listening to a computer professional say Your email addresses aren't safe anywhere, so why bother trying to protect them? is like listening to restaurant cook say You're not safe from germs anywhere, so why bother washing hands or dishes? Like many email users, I've been using 2 email addresses for a number of years. I've used both of them frequently, but one I've tried to keep away from potential spam risks wherever practical and the other I've given out more freely. Of the two, the more protected one remained spam free much longer (about the first 2 years), and even after it began receiving spam, the quantity of spam received on the more protected address has remained conspicuously less than that received on the less protected address. This difference has remained noticeable even though I have used the more protected address frequently on Texascavers and for communication with numerous individuals. Someone with a much more carefully guarded email address still should be able to use it very safely in limited ways on caving related Internet services, as long as the people running those services practice reasonable privacy policies. For example, someone can subscribe to Texascavers without exposing his email address to everyone on the list as long as he only uses the subscription to receive messages from Texascavers, without ever posting to it (assuming, of course, that you don't change your policy and start allowing users to download the Texascavers address list). Similarly, TSA could serve its online users much more safely if it simply separated the email address list used for online registration from that published in a members manual. With this convention, a member could be assured that the email address he uses for online registration will be used only for that purpose and for official email sent to him by TSA and that this address would NOT automatically appear on any list made available to the general membership. For his listing in a members manual style list, each member could specify separately what, if any, email address he wants published. This would allow each user to choose whether to publish the same email address, a different (less protected) address, or none at all. Rod -Original Message- From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org Sent: Dec 15, 2009 4:09 PM To: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org Cc: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? Rod, that wasn't a personal attack, if you took it as such, you need to re-read my message and think about how it was meant. The TSA having this list is no different than the NSS keeping a list of its members, and sending that list out in book format, plain and simple. Harvesting emails from a mailing list is very very simple, I have the complete list as owner of the list, but even another list, I can harvest with a simple script that would only take me a few minutes to write. It was a tongue in cheek comment about writing down email addresses by hand. Scammers/Spammers/Phishers don't do anything manually. Modern email applications cache email addresses that it sees, Malware can and does use these lists to send out spam. We've seen it recently on the mailing list. Your email address is not safe anywhere, you will just have to learn to face that fact in this modern age. Charles On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote: Charles, Your message below really misses the the point, and your personal attacks are totally unwarranted. Of course, we all run some risk that our email addresses will somehow get to spammers whenever we send them to anyone. Whenever you or I or anyone else posts a message to Texascavers we understand that our email addresses will be visible to others on the list, and we choose to do that. Harvesting email addresses one at a time from postings to this list as you suggested would be possible, of course, but it would be a slow and inconvenient way to collect a large list for spam, and I don't think either of us is seriously worried about that. The primary hazard is not that anyone in TSA or other caving organizations will deliberately pass information to spammers, but rather that some people downloading information with good intentions will inadvertently store it where spyware or other malware on an infected computer can search the downloaded files for email addresses, phone numbers, or other information that writers of the malware wish to harvest. This is something that easily can happen, and when it does, the person making information available to the malware
RE: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
While it's possible that a malware program could harvest e-mail addresses for TSA members it's not very likely. It would have to be a specially written program that new how the display page is structured. It would also have to be installed on the computer of a person with member access. Else it would have to be a pretty good hacker to hack the web server itself for access. There are programs that search the web looking for unprotected e-mail addresses. Those e-mail addresses are sold to advertisers and spammers. These are called spiders. We have spiders search the TSA website almost daily looking for e-mail addresses. You can see it in the statistical analysis programs available with the website. They cannot get into the member area. There isn't a function set up to download all the online registered members. I have software that could do that but requires root access to the website that I'm the only one who has (there's a backup person with the root access information but not the software. The webhosting employees could dump the information and they should do so often to back up the website. I have to identify the IP address of my computer in the website control software to allow access to the membership list. The members list as seen in the member area is in an online database. That database has its own password. The queries that access the data run on the server and aren't seen off the server except by a TSA webmaster. The list uses dynamic code to produce the member list you see. All that code executes on the server and can't be seen by the outside world by right clicking in the browser window and selecting view source. Viewing the page requires a member be logged in to the website. It would be theoretically possible to intercept the information exchanged by your computer and the web-server but you'd have to be intercepted from somewhere on the internet backbone, at your ISP, or the web-server. I don't think there's that much interest in doing that with TSA data. There are 100 verified registered users and 95 of those are showing on the member list. There's an option you can select when you register or you can update to display your information on the user list. There are apparently five people who have clicked No - don't display me. If you don't want your information see outside the database, select no for the question display me on the member list. The e-mail addresses that are displayed are spoofed with a spoofing technique that allows them to be read and displayed correctly by your browser and e-mail program. To the knowledge of people who study such things, no one has changed the spider software to include checking for this spoofing. It must work because my e-mail address is publicly viewable on a number of websites but I get a pretty low level of SPAM. For that matter, there are so many unprotected/unspoofed e-mail addresses to swamp most databases so why bother? I don't know if this puts anyone's mind at ease but it's the way it works. Happy Holidays, Butch Fralia -Original Message- From: Rod Goke [mailto:rod.g...@earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 8:49 PM To: Charles Goldsmith; Rod Goke Cc: TexasCavers Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses? Charles, I agree with your technical comments about the many ways that malware can be used to harvest email addresses and other data and that there is no way to protect an email address 100% while using it for its normal purpose. That doesn't imply, however, that there is no point in trying reduce risk. Listening to a computer professional say Your email addresses aren't safe anywhere, so why bother trying to protect them? is like listening to restaurant cook say You're not safe from germs anywhere, so why bother washing hands or dishes? Like many email users, I've been using 2 email addresses for a number of years. I've used both of them frequently, but one I've tried to keep away from potential spam risks wherever practical and the other I've given out more freely. Of the two, the more protected one remained spam free much longer (about the first 2 years), and even after it began receiving spam, the quantity of spam received on the more protected address has remained conspicuously less than that received on the less protected address. This difference has remained noticeable even though I have used the more protected address frequently on Texascavers and for communication with numerous individuals. Someone with a much more carefully guarded email address still should be able to use it very safely in limited ways on caving related Internet services, as long as the people running those services practice reasonable privacy policies. For example, someone can subscribe to Texascavers without exposing his email address to everyone on the list as long as he only uses the subscription to receive messages from