[Texascavers] clothing related

2009-12-15 Thread David
I know many of you like to wear North Face clothing, or camp in
North Face tents.

Here is a funny story:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091215/ap_on_fe_st/us_odd_north_face_lawsuit;_ylt=AiEZ6QvcVTOpQx2AiQaTbvXtiBIF;_ylu=X3oDMTJ1Z3FoZjNlBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkxMjE1L3VzX29kZF9ub3J0aF9mYWNlX2xhd3N1aXQEcG9zAzMEc2VjA3luX2FydGljbGVfc3VtbWFyeV9saXN0BHNsawN0aGVub3J0aGZhY2U-

-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



RE: [Texascavers] clothing related

2009-12-15 Thread Mark . Alman
That's hilarious (and a petty lawsuit)!



Mark



-Original Message-
From: David [mailto:dlocklea...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 3:36 AM
To: Cavers Texas
Subject: [Texascavers] clothing related

I know many of you like to wear North Face clothing, or camp in
North Face tents.

Here is a funny story:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091215/ap_on_fe_st/us_odd_north_face_lawsui
t;_ylt=AiEZ6QvcVTOpQx2AiQaTbvXtiBIF;_ylu=X3oDMTJ1Z3FoZjNlBGFzc2V0A2FwLzI
wMDkxMjE1L3VzX29kZF9ub3J0aF9mYWNlX2xhd3N1aXQEcG9zAzMEc2VjA3luX2FydGljbGV
fc3VtbWFyeV9saXN0BHNsawN0aGVub3J0aGZhY2U-

-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com


-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



[Texascavers] bulk mail and TX Caver mailing

2009-12-15 Thread Rod Goke
Back about 20 years ago the Texas Caver was mailed via bulk mail to minimize mailing costs. At that time, I was the person responsible for maintaining the TSA membership/subscription database on my computer (with a Z-80 processor and CP/M operating system, for any of you other old farts who can remember that far back) and for printing the mailing labels for each mailing of the Texas Caver. To facilitate bulk mailing, I wrote a dBASE program to print the mailing labels sorted and grouped according to the USPS requirements for bulk mailing. This was NOT simply a matter of sorting by zip code. I don't recall the exact rules for bulk mailing at that time, but they were approximately as follows:1. The total number of items mailed had to be at least 200 to qualify for bulk mail.2. Items had to be grouped and bundled according to 5-digit zip code, provided that there were at least some specified minimum number of items (probably about 10, but don't remember exactly) in each bundle, where all items within a bundle had to have the same 5-digit zip code.3. Items with zip codes that didn't qualify for the 5-digit bundles then had to be grouped and bundled in a similar manner according to the first 3 zip code digits.4. Items that didn't qualify for the 3-digit bundles then had to be grouped and bundled still further. I believe it was by state, and then, finally, a mixed state bundle. Also, I think we had a few subscriptions that were mailed out of the Country and had to be separated from the bulk mail bundles.I believe my program also counted and reported the number of items in each bulk mail bundle, in addition to the total number of bulk mail labels. I think it also printed the TSA membership expiration date on each label and included some special indication for those that were about to expire.Sticking labels and bundling Cavers for bulk mailing took a lot of work, but we didn't expect the editor do everything by himself. I printed the labels. Then we would often get several volunteers together to stick labels and arrange the bundles. These volunteers didn't have to understand the USPS rules for sorting bulk mail into bundles, since the label printing program took care of that. When several volunteers got together to share the work, it seemed more like an enjoyable social event than a burdensome chore. Similarly, we also devised ways to split the work of updating the database (for new memberships, membership renewals, address changes, etc.), and I wrote another dBASE program to facilitate this. Turning work into an opportunity for social interaction was, and still is, the most effective way I know to prevent volunteers from feeling burned out.At that time, the number of actual TSA members was often a little less than the 200 required for bulk mailing, but the database included enough free or exchange subscriptions mailed to cave owners, institutions, etc. that we were able to mail the required minimum. To achieve this, the database probably included more complimentary and exchange subscriptions than it would have otherwise, but the lower cost of bulk mail meant that we could actually save money by mailing a few extra copies. In fact, we might have even had a policy of mailing one copy after a person's membership expired and printing "EXPIRED" on the label to remind them to renew. I don't remember for sure about this, but I think I recall adding a feature to the label printing program to do this.TSA probably could save money by using bulk mail if they mail a sufficient quantity, but that quantity might be impractical to achieve if many people choose not to receive paper copies. If TSA does want to use bulk mail, I'd be glad to talk with whoever is currently responsible for the database and the mailing label printing to see if there is anything I can do to help.If TSA does not find it practical to use bulk mail, then we might consider other ways to reduce mailing cost without eliminating the quality printed copies that so many of us still value. For example, many of us in TSA regularly attend local grotto meetings and might be satisfied to pick up our printed copies at local grotto meetings instead of having them mailed to our homes. With this option, TSA could notify members via email whenever a new edition becomes available so that we would know to pick it up at the next grotto meeting and could access it electronically in the meantime. This method of distribution would require one volunteer in each grotto to receive a box of Cavers and to distribute them to the appropriate people. (I'd be willing to do this for the UT Grotto.) It might greatly reduce the number of Cavers that have to be mailed individually and have the added benefit of encouraging local grotto attendance. As a TSA member, I'd be happy to select this option and wouldn't even mind giving TSA my email address for this purpose if I could trust them not to list it on a website.Rod-Original Message-From: Chris 

RE: [Texascavers] TSA, Caver, and Caving

2009-12-15 Thread Mark . Alman
Thanks, Chris, for the kind words.
 
I live to serve!
 
 
 
Mark
 
 



From: Chris Vreeland [mailto:cvreel...@austin.rr.com]
Sent: Mon 12/14/2009 8:14 PM
To: texascavers Texas
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] TSA, Caver, and Caving


I just got my gorgeous hard copy of the Caver in the mail today, and have to 
say that as an old fart, I really like getting publications in the mail at 
seemingly random intervals, and sitting down in a chair to read them. Then, I 
enjoy putting them on my bookshelf.  

One thing I do not enjoy is driving to Office Max to stock up on ink cartridges.


If it takes another $5.00 a year to keep them coming, I think I can skip a pack 
of cigarettes in order to make that happen.

BTW, Thanks Mark, for an excellent issue! As a former editor, I thought i knew 
all about the unsung heroics of editing, but your tale of woe tops them all. 
Please keep up the good work!

 


[Texascavers] mala mujer

2009-12-15 Thread Nancy Weaver
This may be of some interest to those cavers who used to visit the El 
Abra - its an exchange about mala mujer with the amazing naturalist 
Jim Conrad who lives parttime in Mexico ( his very worthwhile 
newsletter available free! digitally!! at 
naturalist_newslet...@backyardnature.net - thank you Mixon for 
turning me onto this)



COW-ITCH
Here and there in the forest where it's particularly
protected from the sun and wind -- where it's moist
and shadowy -- you find shrubs or small trees with
thick, brittle branches and broad, veiny, shallowly
sawtooth-margined leaves, such as is shown at

wonder how this relates to the shrub/tree we called mala mujer in the 
arid impenetrable scrub forest of northern mexico - the long narrow 
El Abra range on the east coast south of Mante?  We were up there to 
chop our way to the various big pits that had been sighted by small 
plane - and distressingly found - when we would come back the next 
season, that our path had been taken over by mala mujer, an intensely 
reactive nettle plant which advantageously took the tiny amount of 
sunlight we opened up. 


No, this Cow Itch is in the Nettle Family while Mala Mujer, which stings
just like it, is in the Euphorb or Poinsettia Family. I've seen another
name for it,though, Mala Hombre, so you're not the first to see a
similarity in the stings.


and for those of you who enjoy caving reminiscences:

The pits were well worth the effort. One that involved a 3 day chop 
opened up on a 100foot diameter 60 foot deep wonderland where dozens 
of pairs of military macaws resided.  We simply sat (we had no rope 
with us that day) and observed them flying about from above for a 
timeless spell.  The El Abra has no water and no resources desired by 
the locals who live below and is almost completely left alone by 
humans.  It is so impenetrable that to even step a few feet off the 
trail we chopped and flagged was to invite being lost for days as one 
caver famously discovered.  In his 3 days of wandering increasingly 
deliriously he drank water from bromeliads and encountered a jaguar 
in a long eye locked moment in a twilight opening.  Afew years 
earlier,  the cavers stumbled across some very lost locals who had 
come up to hunt and returned them to their village, where a major 
fiesta was held in our honor and to celebrate their resurrection.  In 
all the years we spent exploring there, we met only one local who 
offered to *guide* us to a pit he had been to, years back.  He 
arrived while we were having coffee and with one of our volunteers 
took off at breakneck speed thru the jungle (there must be a word for 
arid jungle, but I cant think of it) periodically flagging, while the 
rest of us crashed along behind enlarging the path.  He led us 
straight to the pit in about 4 hours- well, as straight as one can go 
when the ground is extremely solutioned with ravines, leg breaking 
holes in the pinnacley karst covered in slippery entangling vines 
groundcover shrubs and trees.  A major feat of dead reckoning and 
memory and perhaps some other sense most of us no longer have access 
to.


texascavers Digest 15 Dec 2009 14:56:44 -0000 Issue 917

2009-12-15 Thread texascavers-digest-help
 TSA money is a noble goal but providing the membership with  
tangible services is really the purpose of the whole organization.  The  
membership is quite diverse and their needs should be accommodated as much  as 
possible, not made to feel defensive because they aren't the same as some  
faction within the group.  I'm disappointed that in the present discussion,  
there are some that feel that their view has got to be the only reasonable  
way.  Why not work toward a reasonable compromise that works for all the  
membership ?
 
The current discussion regarding whether or not a hardcopy version of  the 
TxCvr should be published has thus far produced nothing to provide better  
services for the membership and caused mostly dissension in an organization 
that  needs more members and participation.  I'm a little surprised that the  
Chairman thought this was an interesting way to stir up the restive  
masses.  Let sleeping dogs lie.
 
Jerry.
 
In a message dated 12/14/2009 8:31:16 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
gi...@att.net writes:

Don't  anyone forget that you can download your digital TEXAS CAVER file 
onto your  memory stick, take it to Kinkos or Office Depot and have it color 
laser  printed HARD COPY just like the editor does and save the TSA all that 
postage  and printing cost--and save the editor a lot of mental and physical 
hassle.  It's the best of both worlds.  
--Ediger





---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Actually Jerry, I'm the one who brought up (yet again) that we should
push for the Digital cheaper version of TSA and less paper waste.  I
don't think it was Mark's intention with his story.  I just took his
story and ran with it.

Gil's idea has merit, and it helps out all of the caving community,
not just TSA members.

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:02 AM,  jerryat...@aol.com wrote:
 Let's see now.  I pay for a Texas Caver with my dues to the TSA.  Then I
 receive my electronic copy off the TSA website.  Then I get in my car and
 drive to the FedEx or wherever to pay for a printed version.  All to save
 the TSA a little money and the editor some grief.  Now multiply this
 scenario 4 times a year for about half the TSA membership.  I don't believe
 that's a better world for anyone.

 I agree with Mixon that a two-tiered system has probably come of age for the
 TSA.  But it also means that dues should be proportionally reduced for those
 that choose to receive an electronic copy of the TxCvr.  Unless, of
 course, the reason for reducing the costs of the TxCvr is to create a large
 cash surplus for the TSA.

 Saving the TSA money is a noble goal but providing the membership with
 tangible services is really the purpose of the whole organization.  The
 membership is quite diverse and their needs should be accommodated as much
 as possible, not made to feel defensive because they aren't the same as some
 faction within the group.  I'm disappointed that in the present discussion,
 there are some that feel that their view has got to be the only reasonable
 way.  Why not work toward a reasonable compromise that works for all the
 membership ?

 The current discussion regarding whether or not a hardcopy version of the
 TxCvr should be published has thus far produced nothing to provide better
 services for the membership and caused mostly dissension in an organization
 that needs more members and participation.  I'm a little surprised that the
 Chairman thought this was an interesting way to stir up the restive masses.
 Let sleeping dogs lie.

 Jerry.

 In a message dated 12/14/2009 8:31:16 A.M. Central Standard Time,
 gi...@att.net writes:

 Don't anyone forget that you can download your digital TEXAS CAVER file onto
 your memory stick, take it to Kinkos or Office Depot and have it color laser
 printed HARD COPY just like the editor does and save the TSA all that
 postage and printing cost--and save the editor a lot of mental and physical
 hassle. It's the best of both worlds.
 --Ediger


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
I know many of you like to wear North Face clothing, or camp in
North Face tents.

Here is a funny story:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091215/ap_on_fe_st/us_odd_north_face_lawsuit;_ylt=AiEZ6QvcVTOpQx2AiQaTbvXtiBIF;_ylu=X3oDMTJ1Z3FoZjNlBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkxMjE1L3VzX29kZF9ub3J0aF9mYWNlX2xhd3N1aXQEcG9zAzMEc2VjA3luX2FydGljbGVfc3VtbWFyeV9saXN0BHNsawN0aGVub3J0aGZhY2U-
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
That's hilarious (and a petty lawsuit)!



Mark



-Original Message-
From: David [mailto:dlocklea...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 3:36 AM
To: Cavers Texas
Subject: [Texascavers] clothing related

I know many of you like to wear North Face clothing, or camp in
North Face tents.

Here is a funny story:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091215/ap_on_fe_st/us_odd_north_face_lawsui
t;_ylt=AiEZ6QvcVTOpQx2AiQaTbvXtiBIF;_ylu=X3oDMTJ1Z3FoZjNlBGFzc2V0A2FwLzI
wMDkxMjE1L3VzX29kZF9ub3J0aF9mYWNlX2xhd3N1aXQEcG9zAzMEc2VjA3luX2FydGljbGV
fc3VtbWFyeV9saXN0BHNsawN0aGVub

Re: [Texascavers] Please Become a Digital Online Member

2009-12-15 Thread ellie :)
I am happy to post the comment if you prefer not to.

On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
 Good night



 On Dec 15, 2009, at 12:38 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ttyl. Sleep time

 On 12/15/09, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
 Im sure we can come to an easy agreement at the meeting. The sentence
 I sent you to forward is very broad and we can add details to the
 actuall motion as the meeting day approaches. Just dont add or
 subtract from what I recommended for you to post. You could add...
 Silence is consent. That would be a nice touch

 On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
 have you had this discussion with anyone else?

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:20 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 Yes. Ive been sick for 4 days- ive been thinking a lot. Wish I had
 been in bed the whole time, no luck though

 On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
 Really think we should put that over Cavetex?

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:14 AM, ellie :)
 ellie.tho...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 So, copy and paste this following message and forward it to
 whatever
 related posts:
 I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free
 Texas Caver
 committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting  where
 registered members present can vote for a majority.
 Include meeting location details if desired.

 On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
 Sure, do you think we should bring up the 2 tier membership to
 go
 hand
 in hand with this?

 I dont' know what the costs should be, but people who want a
 hard
 cover should have to pay for that privilege :)



 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:57 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com
 
 wrote:
 Yes, many geek friends w/ technological skills.
 Will you be the Free Texas Caver committee chair? We can
 table the
 Texas Caver conversation now and you can bring it up for
 debate at
 the
 Jan meeting. At the Jan meeting, you will obtain the floor
 and make
 a
 motion to the TSA chair. He will then accept/reject and then
 the
 registered members present will vote and the majority wins.
 Sounds
 fun
 and simple, right? You in?

 On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
 I'm somewhat familiar with RRO, read through it years ago.

 Isn't that why you have geek friends?

 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:13 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com

 
 wrote:
 I majored in Business. I will forward you a script for the
 January
 business meeting- Roberts Rule of Order, its simple. Im
 embarrassed
 that I thought black meant red. I suck w/ computers.

 On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
 Just thoughts rambling through my head, never sat down and
 wrote
 down
 the
 ideas.

 No, went to AM for a few years for comp sci and switched
 to an
 aeronautical school to get my pilot's license.  Am back in
 computers
 tho, LOL

 :)

 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:10 PM, ellie :)
 ellie.tho...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 Free thinker! Did you go to a liberal arts school? I will
 lay
 out
 a
 simple, organized way to bring this issue up at the next
 meeting.
 I
 have thought it through but will not propose it myself. You
 probably
 have material prepared as well

 On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 wrote:
 I'm not condoning of getting rid of the membership fees,
 and
 while
 I
 think a few may quit paying if they can get the TC for
 free, I
 think
 that it will bring in more members in the long run.

 The information should be free.

 Charles

 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:07 PM, ellie :)
 ellie.tho...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 I didnt know you felt this way and thought as a TSA
 member,
 you
 would
 support having a small income for the organization. I
 will
 offer
 to
 give Gill my prize of a 2010 membership but in no way
 think
 that
 there
 should be no membership fees. I am glad he has someone to
 market
 for
 him though(you)-i wont

 On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 wrote:
 Gil, I seem to remember you making that statement
 within the
 last
 year
 or so, about the $100 donation.  I also seem to remark
 about
 matching
 that, and I'll stand by it.  I'll donate $100 as well.

 Charles

 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net
 
 wrote:
 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:35 PM, John P.
 Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

 I want to save the TSA from financial ruinI will
 go
 digital
 if
 Ediger
 renews his membership. Anyone else willing to make
 that
 commitment?

 Ediger will renew his lapsed TSA membership and
 donate $100
 to
 the
 TSA
 within seconds of The TEXAS CAVER being made a free
 publication
 to
 any
 caver
 who wants to sign up for a free subscription.
 Subscribing
 non-TSA
 members
 should be solicited to join TSA but membership should
 not be
 a
 requirement
 for receiving all the good caving information aimed at
 bettering
 the
 cause
 of caving in Texas. As a caver and TSA member I,
 personally,
 would
 want
 every caver 

Re: [Texascavers] Please Become a Digital Online Member

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
Nah, I'll reply to the next person who brings it up again.

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:31 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
 I am happy to post the comment if you prefer not to.

 On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
 Good night



 On Dec 15, 2009, at 12:38 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ttyl. Sleep time

 On 12/15/09, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
 Im sure we can come to an easy agreement at the meeting. The sentence
 I sent you to forward is very broad and we can add details to the
 actuall motion as the meeting day approaches. Just dont add or
 subtract from what I recommended for you to post. You could add...
 Silence is consent. That would be a nice touch

 On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
 have you had this discussion with anyone else?

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:20 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 Yes. Ive been sick for 4 days- ive been thinking a lot. Wish I had
 been in bed the whole time, no luck though

 On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
 Really think we should put that over Cavetex?

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:14 AM, ellie :)
 ellie.tho...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 So, copy and paste this following message and forward it to
 whatever
 related posts:
 I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free
 Texas Caver
 committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting  where
 registered members present can vote for a majority.
 Include meeting location details if desired.

 On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
 Sure, do you think we should bring up the 2 tier membership to
 go
 hand
 in hand with this?

 I dont' know what the costs should be, but people who want a
 hard
 cover should have to pay for that privilege :)



 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:57 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com
 
 wrote:
 Yes, many geek friends w/ technological skills.
 Will you be the Free Texas Caver committee chair? We can
 table the
 Texas Caver conversation now and you can bring it up for
 debate at
 the
 Jan meeting. At the Jan meeting, you will obtain the floor
 and make
 a
 motion to the TSA chair. He will then accept/reject and then
 the
 registered members present will vote and the majority wins.
 Sounds
 fun
 and simple, right? You in?

 On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
 I'm somewhat familiar with RRO, read through it years ago.

 Isn't that why you have geek friends?

 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:13 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com

 
 wrote:
 I majored in Business. I will forward you a script for the
 January
 business meeting- Roberts Rule of Order, its simple. Im
 embarrassed
 that I thought black meant red. I suck w/ computers.

 On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
 Just thoughts rambling through my head, never sat down and
 wrote
 down
 the
 ideas.

 No, went to AM for a few years for comp sci and switched
 to an
 aeronautical school to get my pilot's license.  Am back in
 computers
 tho, LOL

 :)

 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:10 PM, ellie :)
 ellie.tho...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 Free thinker! Did you go to a liberal arts school? I will
 lay
 out
 a
 simple, organized way to bring this issue up at the next
 meeting.
 I
 have thought it through but will not propose it myself. You
 probably
 have material prepared as well

 On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 wrote:
 I'm not condoning of getting rid of the membership fees,
 and
 while
 I
 think a few may quit paying if they can get the TC for
 free, I
 think
 that it will bring in more members in the long run.

 The information should be free.

 Charles

 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:07 PM, ellie :)
 ellie.tho...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 I didnt know you felt this way and thought as a TSA
 member,
 you
 would
 support having a small income for the organization. I
 will
 offer
 to
 give Gill my prize of a 2010 membership but in no way
 think
 that
 there
 should be no membership fees. I am glad he has someone to
 market
 for
 him though(you)-i wont

 On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 wrote:
 Gil, I seem to remember you making that statement
 within the
 last
 year
 or so, about the $100 donation.  I also seem to remark
 about
 matching
 that, and I'll stand by it.  I'll donate $100 as well.

 Charles

 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net
 
 wrote:
 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:35 PM, John P.
 Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

 I want to save the TSA from financial ruinI will
 go
 digital
 if
 Ediger
 renews his membership. Anyone else willing to make
 that
 commitment?

 Ediger will renew his lapsed TSA membership and
 donate $100
 to
 the
 TSA
 within seconds of The TEXAS CAVER being made a free
 publication
 to
 any
 caver
 who wants to sign up for a free subscription.
 Subscribing
 non-TSA
 members
 should be solicited to join TSA but membership should
 not be
 a
 requirement
 for receiving all the good caving 

Re: [Texascavers] Please Become a Digital Online Member

2009-12-15 Thread ellie :)
Thats not a way to be diplomatic. I was hoping to close the argument so I
could announce that the Spring convention website and fees. I thought to
delegate it to you since its your platform but I will bring it up myself,
Mark asked me if I would do it.

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote:

 Nah, I'll reply to the next person who brings it up again.

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:31 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
  I am happy to post the comment if you prefer not to.
 
  On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
  Good night
 
 
 
  On Dec 15, 2009, at 12:38 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  Ttyl. Sleep time
 
  On 12/15/09, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
  Im sure we can come to an easy agreement at the meeting. The sentence
  I sent you to forward is very broad and we can add details to the
  actuall motion as the meeting day approaches. Just dont add or
  subtract from what I recommended for you to post. You could add...
  Silence is consent. That would be a nice touch
 
  On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
  have you had this discussion with anyone else?
 
  On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:20 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  Yes. Ive been sick for 4 days- ive been thinking a lot. Wish I had
  been in bed the whole time, no luck though
 
  On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
  Really think we should put that over Cavetex?
 
  On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:14 AM, ellie :)
  ellie.tho...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  So, copy and paste this following message and forward it to
  whatever
  related posts:
  I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free
  Texas Caver
  committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting  where
  registered members present can vote for a majority.
  Include meeting location details if desired.
 
  On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
  Sure, do you think we should bring up the 2 tier membership to
  go
  hand
  in hand with this?
 
  I dont' know what the costs should be, but people who want a
  hard
  cover should have to pay for that privilege :)
 
 
 
  On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:57 PM, ellie :) 
 ellie.tho...@gmail.com
  
  wrote:
  Yes, many geek friends w/ technological skills.
  Will you be the Free Texas Caver committee chair? We can
  table the
  Texas Caver conversation now and you can bring it up for
  debate at
  the
  Jan meeting. At the Jan meeting, you will obtain the floor
  and make
  a
  motion to the TSA chair. He will then accept/reject and then
  the
  registered members present will vote and the majority wins.
  Sounds
  fun
  and simple, right? You in?
 
  On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
  I'm somewhat familiar with RRO, read through it years ago.
 
  Isn't that why you have geek friends?
 
  On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:13 PM, ellie :) 
 ellie.tho...@gmail.com
 
  
  wrote:
  I majored in Business. I will forward you a script for the
  January
  business meeting- Roberts Rule of Order, its simple. Im
  embarrassed
  that I thought black meant red. I suck w/ computers.
 
  On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
  Just thoughts rambling through my head, never sat down and
  wrote
  down
  the
  ideas.
 
  No, went to AM for a few years for comp sci and switched
  to an
  aeronautical school to get my pilot's license.  Am back in
  computers
  tho, LOL
 
  :)
 
  On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:10 PM, ellie :)
  ellie.tho...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  Free thinker! Did you go to a liberal arts school? I will
  lay
  out
  a
  simple, organized way to bring this issue up at the next
  meeting.
  I
  have thought it through but will not propose it myself. You
  probably
  have material prepared as well
 
  On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
  wrote:
  I'm not condoning of getting rid of the membership fees,
  and
  while
  I
  think a few may quit paying if they can get the TC for
  free, I
  think
  that it will bring in more members in the long run.
 
  The information should be free.
 
  Charles
 
  On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:07 PM, ellie :)
  ellie.tho...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  I didnt know you felt this way and thought as a TSA
  member,
  you
  would
  support having a small income for the organization. I
  will
  offer
  to
  give Gill my prize of a 2010 membership but in no way
  think
  that
  there
  should be no membership fees. I am glad he has someone to
  market
  for
  him though(you)-i wont
 
  On 12/14/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
  wrote:
  Gil, I seem to remember you making that statement
  within the
  last
  year
  or so, about the $100 donation.  I also seem to remark
  about
  matching
  that, and I'll stand by it.  I'll donate $100 as well.
 
  Charles
 
  On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Gill Edigar 
 gi...@att.net
  
  wrote:
  On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:35 PM, John P.
  Brooks 

[Texascavers] all-electronic Texas Caver

2009-12-15 Thread Mixon Bill
While I'm in favor of paper copies of the Texas Caver as it presently  
exists, it is worth pointing out some advantages of going the route of  
making it _completely_ on the Web, with no paper distribution at all.


1) There would be virtually no costs in money of publishing.
2) Therefore it could be made freely available on the TSA Web site, as  
Gill suggests, without messing with things like passwords. Since the  
TC doesn't publish exact locations of wild caves anyway, I don't see  
any reason to hide its contents, except the possible problem of  
inviting non-cavers to TCR. (The editor might have to be careful not  
to print things that might be misunderstood by non-members, though.)
3) It would be easier on the editor, not only saving the effort of  
arranging printing and mailing, but also the nuisance of keeping each  
issue a multiple of 4 pages.
4) It could be entirely in color at no extra cost. (But don't use  
color gratuitously in ways that wouldn't work well in a black-and- 
white printout--much cheaper than color, at least on laser printers.)
5) It could appear at a higher frequency at no extra cost, since the  
covers wouldn't cost TSA any more than any other page and there  
wouldn't be any binding or mailing expenses. Monthly six-page issues  
would be little more work and no more cost than quarterly twenty-four  
page issues.
6) It could contain more material at little additional effort and no  
additional cost. For example, educational things about cave science or  
conservation could be reprinted from other sources to make the TC more  
of an educational resource. Even more photos. Maybe more of those book  
reviews that somebody keeps posting on this e-mail list...


I could, of course, come up with a similar list of disadvantages.  
Nevertheless, if such a scheme resulted in a larger, more frequent,  
and more informative Texas Caver, I'd be in favor of it. What I don't  
see the point of is published a paper magazine and then trying to talk  
people out of getting a paper copy, not taking any real advantage of  
Web publishing and saving just part of the cost.--Mixon


May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest.

You may reply to the address this message
came from, but for long-term use, save:
Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu
AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org


-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



Re: [Texascavers] all-electronic Texas Caver

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver
committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting  where
registered members present can vote for a majority.

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote:
 While I'm in favor of paper copies of the Texas Caver as it presently
 exists, it is worth pointing out some advantages of going the route of
 making it _completely_ on the Web, with no paper distribution at all.

 1) There would be virtually no costs in money of publishing.
 2) Therefore it could be made freely available on the TSA Web site, as Gill
 suggests, without messing with things like passwords. Since the TC doesn't
 publish exact locations of wild caves anyway, I don't see any reason to hide
 its contents, except the possible problem of inviting non-cavers to TCR.
 (The editor might have to be careful not to print things that might be
 misunderstood by non-members, though.)
 3) It would be easier on the editor, not only saving the effort of arranging
 printing and mailing, but also the nuisance of keeping each issue a multiple
 of 4 pages.
 4) It could be entirely in color at no extra cost. (But don't use color
 gratuitously in ways that wouldn't work well in a black-and-white
 printout--much cheaper than color, at least on laser printers.)
 5) It could appear at a higher frequency at no extra cost, since the covers
 wouldn't cost TSA any more than any other page and there wouldn't be any
 binding or mailing expenses. Monthly six-page issues would be little more
 work and no more cost than quarterly twenty-four page issues.
 6) It could contain more material at little additional effort and no
 additional cost. For example, educational things about cave science or
 conservation could be reprinted from other sources to make the TC more of an
 educational resource. Even more photos. Maybe more of those book reviews
 that somebody keeps posting on this e-mail list...

 I could, of course, come up with a similar list of disadvantages.
 Nevertheless, if such a scheme resulted in a larger, more frequent, and more
 informative Texas Caver, I'd be in favor of it. What I don't see the point
 of is published a paper magazine and then trying to talk people out of
 getting a paper copy, not taking any real advantage of Web publishing and
 saving just part of the cost.--Mixon
 
 May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest.
 
 You may reply to the address this message
 came from, but for long-term use, save:
 Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu
 AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org


 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com




Re: [Texascavers] all-electronic Texas Caver

2009-12-15 Thread ellie :)
Fuck Yeah! I was hoping you would say Silence is consent, but its perfect.
I hope you get a good response.

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote:

 I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver
 committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting  where
 registered members present can vote for a majority.

 Charles

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com
 wrote:
  While I'm in favor of paper copies of the Texas Caver as it presently
  exists, it is worth pointing out some advantages of going the route of
  making it _completely_ on the Web, with no paper distribution at all.
 
  1) There would be virtually no costs in money of publishing.
  2) Therefore it could be made freely available on the TSA Web site, as
 Gill
  suggests, without messing with things like passwords. Since the TC
 doesn't
  publish exact locations of wild caves anyway, I don't see any reason to
 hide
  its contents, except the possible problem of inviting non-cavers to TCR.
  (The editor might have to be careful not to print things that might be
  misunderstood by non-members, though.)
  3) It would be easier on the editor, not only saving the effort of
 arranging
  printing and mailing, but also the nuisance of keeping each issue a
 multiple
  of 4 pages.
  4) It could be entirely in color at no extra cost. (But don't use color
  gratuitously in ways that wouldn't work well in a black-and-white
  printout--much cheaper than color, at least on laser printers.)
  5) It could appear at a higher frequency at no extra cost, since the
 covers
  wouldn't cost TSA any more than any other page and there wouldn't be any
  binding or mailing expenses. Monthly six-page issues would be little more
  work and no more cost than quarterly twenty-four page issues.
  6) It could contain more material at little additional effort and no
  additional cost. For example, educational things about cave science or
  conservation could be reprinted from other sources to make the TC more of
 an
  educational resource. Even more photos. Maybe more of those book reviews
  that somebody keeps posting on this e-mail list...
 
  I could, of course, come up with a similar list of disadvantages.
  Nevertheless, if such a scheme resulted in a larger, more frequent, and
 more
  informative Texas Caver, I'd be in favor of it. What I don't see the
 point
  of is published a paper magazine and then trying to talk people out of
  getting a paper copy, not taking any real advantage of Web publishing and
  saving just part of the cost.--Mixon
  
  May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest.
  
  You may reply to the address this message
  came from, but for long-term use, save:
  Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu
  AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org
 
 
  -
  Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
  For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
 
 

 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com




Re: [Texascavers] all-electronic Texas Caver

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
Oh yeah, I forgot that part of it :)  Sorry, multi-tasking here at work.

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:53 AM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
 Fuck Yeah! I was hoping you would say Silence is consent, but its perfect.
 I hope you get a good response.

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 wrote:

 I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver
 committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting  where
 registered members present can vote for a majority.

 Charles

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com
 wrote:
  While I'm in favor of paper copies of the Texas Caver as it presently
  exists, it is worth pointing out some advantages of going the route of
  making it _completely_ on the Web, with no paper distribution at all.
 
  1) There would be virtually no costs in money of publishing.
  2) Therefore it could be made freely available on the TSA Web site, as
  Gill
  suggests, without messing with things like passwords. Since the TC
  doesn't
  publish exact locations of wild caves anyway, I don't see any reason to
  hide
  its contents, except the possible problem of inviting non-cavers to TCR.
  (The editor might have to be careful not to print things that might be
  misunderstood by non-members, though.)
  3) It would be easier on the editor, not only saving the effort of
  arranging
  printing and mailing, but also the nuisance of keeping each issue a
  multiple
  of 4 pages.
  4) It could be entirely in color at no extra cost. (But don't use color
  gratuitously in ways that wouldn't work well in a black-and-white
  printout--much cheaper than color, at least on laser printers.)
  5) It could appear at a higher frequency at no extra cost, since the
  covers
  wouldn't cost TSA any more than any other page and there wouldn't be any
  binding or mailing expenses. Monthly six-page issues would be little
  more
  work and no more cost than quarterly twenty-four page issues.
  6) It could contain more material at little additional effort and no
  additional cost. For example, educational things about cave science or
  conservation could be reprinted from other sources to make the TC more
  of an
  educational resource. Even more photos. Maybe more of those book reviews
  that somebody keeps posting on this e-mail list...
 
  I could, of course, come up with a similar list of disadvantages.
  Nevertheless, if such a scheme resulted in a larger, more frequent, and
  more
  informative Texas Caver, I'd be in favor of it. What I don't see the
  point
  of is published a paper magazine and then trying to talk people out of
  getting a paper copy, not taking any real advantage of Web publishing
  and
  saving just part of the cost.--Mixon
  
  May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest.
  
  You may reply to the address this message
  came from, but for long-term use, save:
  Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu
  AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org
 
 
  -
  Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
  For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
 
 

 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com





RE: [Texascavers] all-electronic Texas Caver

2009-12-15 Thread Mark . Alman
I second, third, and fourth that motion.

See y'all there!



Mark



-Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 10:41 AM
To: Cavetex
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] all-electronic Texas Caver

I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver
committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting  where
registered members present can vote for a majority.

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com
wrote:
 While I'm in favor of paper copies of the Texas Caver as it presently
 exists, it is worth pointing out some advantages of going the route of
 making it _completely_ on the Web, with no paper distribution at all.




Re: [Texascavers] all-electronic Texas Caver

2009-12-15 Thread John Brooks
Sorry to call you on thisbutActually...you can't second, third or 
fourth a motion via email.nor can one make a motion via e mail.as the 
TSA by laws make no provisions for such proceedings.
If in doubt, I always look to Roberts rules of order for guidance in such 
issuesbut must admit that this issue arose on a board of which I am a 
director..we had to change our by laws to allow such proceedings.



Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 15, 2009, at 11:27 AM, mark.al...@l-3com.com wrote:

I second, third, and fourth that motion.

See y'all there!



Mark



-Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 10:41 AM
To: Cavetex
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] all-electronic Texas Caver

I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver
committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting  where
registered members present can vote for a majority.

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com
wrote:
While I'm in favor of paper copies of the Texas Caver as it presently
exists, it is worth pointing out some advantages of going the route of
making it _completely_ on the Web, with no paper distribution at all.



-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com




[PBSS] Fw: [Texascavers] Next point of order...TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up!

2009-12-15 Thread Bill Bentley

- Original Message - 
From: ellie :) 
To: texascavers@texascavers.com 
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:16 PM
Subject: [Texascavers] Next point of order...TSA 2010 Spring Convention website 
is up!


TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up!



http://www.cavetexas.org/events/TSASC/tsasc2010.html

Fees: $15.00per person and $40.00 for a family of 3 or more.  

Please forward this and all 2010 TSA Spring Convention related announcements 
(invitation attached) to your favorite grotto, friends, family, coworkers, 
universities, vendors, land owners, cave-related organizations, neighbors, 
authors, professors, library, coffee shop, radio station, facebook, twitter, 
blog, and all others interested in info on caves and caving who might not be on 
this list serve. 

You can also visit the facebook event reminder page at: 
http://www.facebook.com/settings/?tab=privacy#/event.php?eid=219361835478ref=share

Thank you to Butch for creating this page.

___
PBSS mailing list
p...@caver.net
http://caver.net/mailman/listinfo/pbss_caver.net


[Texascavers] Next point of order...TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up!

2009-12-15 Thread ellie :)
*TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up!*
*
*
http://www.cavetexas.org/events/TSASC/tsasc2010.html

Fees: $15.00per person and $40.00 for a family of 3 or more.
Please forward this and all 2010 TSA Spring Convention related announcements
(invitation attached) to your favorite grotto, friends, family, coworkers,
universities, vendors, land owners, cave-related organizations, neighbors,
authors, professors, library, coffee shop, radio station, facebook, twitter,
blog, and all others interested in info on caves and caving who might not be
on this list serve.

You can also visit the facebook event reminder page at:
http://www.facebook.com/settings/?tab=privacy#/event.php?eid=219361835478ref=share

Thank you to Butch for creating this page.


Fwd: [Texascavers] Next point of order...TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up!

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
-- Forwarded message --
List-Post: texascavers@texascavers.com
Date: Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:16 PM
Subject: [Texascavers] Next point of order...TSA 2010 Spring
Convention website is up!
To: texascavers@texascavers.com Texascavers@texascavers.com


TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up!

http://www.cavetexas.org/events/TSASC/tsasc2010.html

Fees: $15.00per person and $40.00 for a family of 3 or more.

Please forward this and all 2010 TSA Spring Convention related
announcements (invitation attached) to your favorite grotto, friends,
family, coworkers, universities, vendors, land owners, cave-related
organizations, neighbors, authors, professors, library, coffee shop,
radio station, facebook, twitter, blog, and all others interested in
info on caves and caving who might not be on this list serve.

You can also visit the facebook event reminder page at:
http://www.facebook.com/settings/?tab=privacy#/event.php?eid=219361835478ref=share

Thank you to Butch for creating this page.


Re: [Texascavers] Next point of order...TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up!

2009-12-15 Thread Terry Holsinger

What about the winter meeting?
Is there info online or just in emails?
In the Texas Caver just mailed?

Terry H.

ellie :) wrote:

*TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up!*
*
*
http://www.cavetexas.org/events/TSASC/tsasc2010.html

Fees: $15.00per person and $40.00 for a family of 3 or more. 

Please forward this and all 2010 TSA Spring Convention related 
announcements (invitation attached) to your favorite grotto, friends, 
family, coworkers, universities, vendors, land owners, cave-related 
organizations, neighbors, authors, professors, library, coffee shop, 
radio station, facebook, twitter, blog, and all others interested in 
info on caves and caving who might not be on this list serve.


You can also visit the facebook event reminder page at: 
http://www.facebook.com/settings/?tab=privacy#/event.php?eid=219361835478ref=share 
http://www.facebook.com/settings/?tab=privacy#/event.php?eid=219361835478ref=share


Thank you to Butch for creating this page.



-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



why wont my mail sent to CaveTex?

2009-12-15 Thread ellie :)
why wont my mail sent to CaveTex? Is it because I am trying to attach stuff?
I will send it again w/out attachments. Please dont let it post more than
once.


Re: why wont my mail sent to CaveTex?

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
I actually don't have direct control of stuff being duplicatd, etc.
But if you tried to send attachments, thats why it didn't go through.
Attachments aren't allowed on the list, have to post to a site and use
weblinks.

Try again with no attachments.

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
 why wont my mail sent to CaveTex? Is it because I am trying to attach stuff?
 I will send it again w/out attachments. Please dont let it post more than
 once.



Re: why wont my mail sent to CaveTex?

2009-12-15 Thread ellie :)
I made a really cool invite-see attached

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote:

 I actually don't have direct control of stuff being duplicatd, etc.
 But if you tried to send attachments, thats why it didn't go through.
 Attachments aren't allowed on the list, have to post to a site and use
 weblinks.

 Try again with no attachments.

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
  why wont my mail sent to CaveTex? Is it because I am trying to attach
 stuff?
  I will send it again w/out attachments. Please dont let it post more than
  once.
 



2010 TSA Spring Convention.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


Re: why wont my mail sent to CaveTex?

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
Very nice, want me to throw it on a website so you can link it?

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:20 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
 I made a really cool invite-see attached

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 wrote:

 I actually don't have direct control of stuff being duplicatd, etc.
 But if you tried to send attachments, thats why it didn't go through.
 Attachments aren't allowed on the list, have to post to a site and use
 weblinks.

 Try again with no attachments.

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
  why wont my mail sent to CaveTex? Is it because I am trying to attach
  stuff?
  I will send it again w/out attachments. Please dont let it post more
  than
  once.
 




Re: why wont my mail sent to CaveTex?

2009-12-15 Thread ellie :)
I will ask Butch to put it on the TSA page, that way its the same internet
thingy

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote:

 Very nice, want me to throw it on a website so you can link it?

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:20 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
  I made a really cool invite-see attached
 
  On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 
  wrote:
 
  I actually don't have direct control of stuff being duplicatd, etc.
  But if you tried to send attachments, thats why it didn't go through.
  Attachments aren't allowed on the list, have to post to a site and use
  weblinks.
 
  Try again with no attachments.
 
  On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com
 wrote:
   why wont my mail sent to CaveTex? Is it because I am trying to attach
   stuff?
   I will send it again w/out attachments. Please dont let it post more
   than
   once.
  
 
 



[Texascavers] TSA and TCMA Winter Business Meetings at Colorado Bend, Sunday, January 10th!

2009-12-15 Thread ellie :)
The TSA and TCMA Winter Business Meetings will be held at the Colorado Bend
State Park Conference Center, on Sunday, January 10th, 2010.

Here's your chance to meet the new TSA officers and hobnob with TCMA
officers and fellow cavers! Come on down the second weekend of January for
the CBSP Caving Project and stick around for the meetings Sunday, at 9am.
Good times will occur and great accommodations are available at the
Conference Center, or you may rough it at the Cavers Camp. Hope to see you
and come lend us your thoughts and ideas to the direction of caving in Texas
in 2010 and beyond!

Information is available on the TSA Calendar at
http://www.cavetexas.org/calendar/index.php and an announcement was made in
this quarters Texas Caver.

Cavingly,

Ellie Watson


texascavers Digest 15 Dec 2009 20:23:49 -0000 Issue 918

2009-12-15 Thread texascavers-digest-help

texascavers Digest 15 Dec 2009 20:23:49 - Issue 918

Topics (messages 12992 through 13004):

mala mujer
12992 by: Nancy Weaver

Re: Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
12993 by: Charles Goldsmith
12996 by: Sheryl Rieck
12998 by: Charles Goldsmith
13004 by: Rod Goke

NSS members in Austin
12994 by: Mixon Bill
13003 by: Gill Edigar

all-electronic Texas Caver
12995 by: Mixon Bill
12997 by: Charles Goldsmith
12999 by: Mark.Alman.l-3com.com

Next point of order...TSA 2010 Spring Convention website is up!
13000 by: ellie :)
13001 by: Terry Holsinger

TSA and TCMA Winter Business Meetings at Colorado Bend, Sunday, January 10th!
13002 by: ellie :)

Administrivia:

To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
texascavers-digest-subscr...@texascavers.com

To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
texascavers-digest-unsubscr...@texascavers.com

To post to the list, e-mail:
texascavers@texascavers.com


--
---BeginMessage---
This may be of some interest to those cavers who used to visit the El 
Abra - its an exchange about mala mujer with the amazing naturalist 
Jim Conrad who lives parttime in Mexico ( his very worthwhile 
newsletter available free! digitally!! at 
naturalist_newslet...@backyardnature.net - thank you Mixon for 
turning me onto this)



COW-ITCH
Here and there in the forest where it's particularly
protected from the sun and wind -- where it's moist
and shadowy -- you find shrubs or small trees with
thick, brittle branches and broad, veiny, shallowly
sawtooth-margined leaves, such as is shown at

wonder how this relates to the shrub/tree we called mala mujer in the 
arid impenetrable scrub forest of northern mexico - the long narrow 
El Abra range on the east coast south of Mante?  We were up there to 
chop our way to the various big pits that had been sighted by small 
plane - and distressingly found - when we would come back the next 
season, that our path had been taken over by mala mujer, an intensely 
reactive nettle plant which advantageously took the tiny amount of 
sunlight we opened up. 


No, this Cow Itch is in the Nettle Family while Mala Mujer, which stings
just like it, is in the Euphorb or Poinsettia Family. I've seen another
name for it,though, Mala Hombre, so you're not the first to see a
similarity in the stings.


and for those of you who enjoy caving reminiscences:

The pits were well worth the effort. One that involved a 3 day chop 
opened up on a 100foot diameter 60 foot deep wonderland where dozens 
of pairs of military macaws resided.  We simply sat (we had no rope 
with us that day) and observed them flying about from above for a 
timeless spell.  The El Abra has no water and no resources desired by 
the locals who live below and is almost completely left alone by 
humans.  It is so impenetrable that to even step a few feet off the 
trail we chopped and flagged was to invite being lost for days as one 
caver famously discovered.  In his 3 days of wandering increasingly 
deliriously he drank water from bromeliads and encountered a jaguar 
in a long eye locked moment in a twilight opening.  Afew years 
earlier,  the cavers stumbled across some very lost locals who had 
come up to hunt and returned them to their village, where a major 
fiesta was held in our honor and to celebrate their resurrection.  In 
all the years we spent exploring there, we met only one local who 
offered to *guide* us to a pit he had been to, years back.  He 
arrived while we were having coffee and with one of our volunteers 
took off at breakneck speed thru the jungle (there must be a word for 
arid jungle, but I cant think of it) periodically flagging, while the 
rest of us crashed along behind enlarging the path.  He led us 
straight to the pit in about 4 hours- well, as straight as one can go 
when the ground is extremely solutioned with ravines, leg breaking 
holes in the pinnacley karst covered in slippery entangling vines 
groundcover shrubs and trees.  A major feat of dead reckoning and 
memory and perhaps some other sense most of us no longer have access 
to.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360
people have your email address and each others.  Anyone of them could
harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who
posted an email to this list.

Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people?  The odds that
one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA
people, who are duly elected by some of these people.

If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it
will be available on the front page.

Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad
press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA.

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke 

[Texascavers] NSS members in Austin

2009-12-15 Thread Mixon Bill
The annual NSS membership list has just been distributed (about five  
months late). There are interesting statistics about NSS membership on  
pages 65-67, worth calling to your attention, because I suspect most  
members never look at the miscellaneous stuff in the front of the  
book. Among other things, 787xx (Austin) is in the top ten three-digit  
ZIPs in NSS membership, with 92 NSS members. Top in the list is 300xx,  
with 220. That would be Atlanta and vicinity. (300 seems to cover a  
lot of suburbs of Atlanta, whereas all the 787 addresses are actually  
Austin.) Eight-five NSS members have listed the UT Grotto as their  
primary affiliation.. This is for purposes of allocating votes in  
the Congress of Grottos at NSS conventions, although so far as I know  
the UTG has never participated in living memory. There are twelve NSS  
groups with more NSS members than UTG (the Cave Diving Section has  
1,022!), but many of them require NSS membership of their members. The  
lowest NSS number of a Texas NSS member is 509. Texas is among the top  
ten states, with 488 NSS members.


This year's membership list is sorted by states, which makes it  
relatively easy for a group to see who in its area might need to be  
contacted with information about the club. One thing I was struck by  
when looking through Texas is the number of names with 787xx that I  
don't recognize. Of course, that doesn't mean I wouldn't recognize the  
faces; there is unfortunately little opportunity to learn peoples'  
names at meetings of fifty or events of four hundred. I'm bad about  
remembering names, too. Name tags seem Mickey Mouse, but

--Mixon

May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest.

You may reply to the address this message
came from, but for long-term use, save:
Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu
AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org


-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



Re: [Texascavers] NSS members in Austin

2009-12-15 Thread Gill Edigar
Mixon--
Philosophically speaking: Did you check to see how many of those 488 Texas
NSS members were among the fewer than 200 TSA members? Did you wonder why or
why not? How many do you think would subscribe to a free digital TEXAS
CAVER? And then be willing to join TSA afterwards? Maybe a hundred, huh?
Might be worth trying even if they just got 50, huh? Would that be good for
The CAVER? Would that be good for the TSA? Would that be good for Texas
caving? Would that be good for me or you?
--Ediger


On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote:

 The annual NSS membership list has just been distributed (about five months
 late). There are interesting statistics about NSS membership on pages 65-67,
 worth calling to your attention, because I suspect most members never look
 at the miscellaneous stuff in the front of the book. Among other things,
 787xx (Austin) is in the top ten three-digit ZIPs in NSS membership, with 92
 NSS members. Top in the list is 300xx, with 220. That would be Atlanta and
 vicinity. (300 seems to cover a lot of suburbs of Atlanta, whereas all the
 787 addresses are actually Austin.) Eight-five NSS members have listed the
 UT Grotto as their primary affiliation.. This is for purposes of
 allocating votes in the Congress of Grottos at NSS conventions, although so
 far as I know the UTG has never participated in living memory. There are
 twelve NSS groups with more NSS members than UTG (the Cave Diving Section
 has 1,022!), but many of them require NSS membership of their members. The
 lowest NSS number of a Texas NSS member is 509. Texas is among the top ten
 states, with 488 NSS members.

 This year's membership list is sorted by states, which makes it relatively
 easy for a group to see who in its area might need to be contacted with
 information about the club. One thing I was struck by when looking through
 Texas is the number of names with 787xx that I don't recognize. Of course,
 that doesn't mean I wouldn't recognize the faces; there is unfortunately
 little opportunity to learn peoples' names at meetings of fifty or events of
 four hundred. I'm bad about remembering names, too. Name tags seem Mickey
 Mouse, but
 --Mixon
 
 May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest.
 
 You may reply to the address this message
 came from, but for long-term use, save:
 Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu
 AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org


 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com




Re: [Texascavers] NSS members in Austin

2009-12-15 Thread Terry Holsinger
Maybe someone on the TSA's Membership committee should write to the non 
members in the NSS and invite them to join or let us know why they are 
not interested. Is that not what the TSA has a memberships committee for?


Terry H.

Gill Edigar wrote:

Mixon--
Philosophically speaking: Did you check to see how many of those 488 
Texas NSS members were among the fewer than 200 TSA members? Did you 
wonder why or why not? How many do you think would subscribe to a free 
digital TEXAS CAVER? And then be willing to join TSA afterwards? Maybe a 
hundred, huh? Might be worth trying even if they just got 50, huh? Would 
that be good for The CAVER? Would that be good for the TSA? Would that 
be good for Texas caving? Would that be good for me or you?  
--Ediger



On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com 
mailto:bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote:


The annual NSS membership list has just been distributed (about five
months late). There are interesting statistics about NSS membership
on pages 65-67, worth calling to your attention, because I suspect
most members never look at the miscellaneous stuff in the front of
the book. Among other things, 787xx (Austin) is in the top ten
three-digit ZIPs in NSS membership, with 92 NSS members. Top in the
list is 300xx, with 220. That would be Atlanta and vicinity. (300
seems to cover a lot of suburbs of Atlanta, whereas all the 787
addresses are actually Austin.) Eight-five NSS members have listed
the UT Grotto as their primary affiliation.. This is for purposes
of allocating votes in the Congress of Grottos at NSS conventions,
although so far as I know the UTG has never participated in living
memory. There are twelve NSS groups with more NSS members than UTG
(the Cave Diving Section has 1,022!), but many of them require NSS
membership of their members. The lowest NSS number of a Texas NSS
member is 509. Texas is among the top ten states, with 488 NSS members.

This year's membership list is sorted by states, which makes it
relatively easy for a group to see who in its area might need to be
contacted with information about the club. One thing I was struck by
when looking through Texas is the number of names with 787xx that I
don't recognize. Of course, that doesn't mean I wouldn't recognize
the faces; there is unfortunately little opportunity to learn
peoples' names at meetings of fifty or events of four hundred. I'm
bad about remembering names, too. Name tags seem Mickey Mouse, but
--Mixon

May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest.

You may reply to the address this message
came from, but for long-term use, save:
Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu mailto:bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu
AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:edi...@amcs-pubs.org or
sa...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:sa...@amcs-pubs.org


-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
mailto:texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
mailto:texascavers-h...@texascavers.com




-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



Re: [Texascavers] NSS members in Austin

2009-12-15 Thread ellie :)
The TSA Chair second, third, and forthed Charles Goldsmiths motion to to
table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver committee to be
discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting  where
registered members present can vote for a majority.

It will not be decided on till then. You can continue and continue and
continue to make unfounded, pious rants and raves and bitch and cry but NO
decision will be made until the January 10th TSA winter meeting.

At the meeting we will discuss two-tier memberships, free membership
options, and scholarships but again, NO decision will be made until the
January 10th TSA winter meeting. None. Nada.


On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Terry Holsinger tr...@sprynet.com wrote:

 Maybe someone on the TSA's Membership committee should write to the non
 members in the NSS and invite them to join or let us know why they are not
 interested. Is that not what the TSA has a memberships committee for?

 Terry H.

 Gill Edigar wrote:

 Mixon--
 Philosophically speaking: Did you check to see how many of those 488 Texas
 NSS members were among the fewer than 200 TSA members? Did you wonder why or
 why not? How many do you think would subscribe to a free digital TEXAS
 CAVER? And then be willing to join TSA afterwards? Maybe a hundred, huh?
 Might be worth trying even if they just got 50, huh? Would that be good for
 The CAVER? Would that be good for the TSA? Would that be good for Texas
 caving? Would that be good for me or you?  --Ediger


 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.commailto:
 bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote:

The annual NSS membership list has just been distributed (about five
months late). There are interesting statistics about NSS membership
on pages 65-67, worth calling to your attention, because I suspect
most members never look at the miscellaneous stuff in the front of
the book. Among other things, 787xx (Austin) is in the top ten
three-digit ZIPs in NSS membership, with 92 NSS members. Top in the
list is 300xx, with 220. That would be Atlanta and vicinity. (300
seems to cover a lot of suburbs of Atlanta, whereas all the 787
addresses are actually Austin.) Eight-five NSS members have listed
the UT Grotto as their primary affiliation.. This is for purposes
of allocating votes in the Congress of Grottos at NSS conventions,
although so far as I know the UTG has never participated in living
memory. There are twelve NSS groups with more NSS members than UTG
(the Cave Diving Section has 1,022!), but many of them require NSS
membership of their members. The lowest NSS number of a Texas NSS
member is 509. Texas is among the top ten states, with 488 NSS members.

This year's membership list is sorted by states, which makes it
relatively easy for a group to see who in its area might need to be
contacted with information about the club. One thing I was struck by
when looking through Texas is the number of names with 787xx that I
don't recognize. Of course, that doesn't mean I wouldn't recognize
the faces; there is unfortunately little opportunity to learn
peoples' names at meetings of fifty or events of four hundred. I'm
bad about remembering names, too. Name tags seem Mickey Mouse, but
--Mixon

May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest.

You may reply to the address this message
came from, but for long-term use, save:
Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu mailto:
 bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu
AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:edi...@amcs-pubs.org or
sa...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:sa...@amcs-pubs.org



-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
mailto:texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com

For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
mailto:texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com




Re: [Texascavers] NSS members in Austin

2009-12-15 Thread Gill Edigar
Or, maybe the TSA could do something really unique and progressive like
sending free digital issues of The TEXAS CAVER to those NSS members not
already subscribed--no membership committee, no procrastination, no hassles.
See how many of them pick up the ball and join the TSA. Then those people
would know something about the TSA, would be getting a free and valuable
service from the TSA (perhaps for the first time in their caving careers),
and just might figure that what they are getting could be worth joining the
TSA for. Everybody wins. FREE. Nobody looses anything. Also FREE.
--Ediger

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Terry Holsinger tr...@sprynet.com wrote:

 Maybe someone on the TSA's Membership committee should write to the non
 members in the NSS and invite them to join or let us know why they are not
 interested. Is that not what the TSA has a memberships committee for?

 Terry H.

 Gill Edigar wrote:

 Mixon--
 Philosophically speaking: Did you check to see how many of those 488 Texas
 NSS members were among the fewer than 200 TSA members? Did you wonder why or
 why not? How many do you think would subscribe to a free digital TEXAS
 CAVER? And then be willing to join TSA afterwards? Maybe a hundred, huh?
 Might be worth trying even if they just got 50, huh? Would that be good for
 The CAVER? Would that be good for the TSA? Would that be good for Texas
 caving? Would that be good for me or you?  --Ediger


 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.commailto:
 bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote:

The annual NSS membership list has just been distributed (about five
months late). There are interesting statistics about NSS membership
on pages 65-67, worth calling to your attention, because I suspect
most members never look at the miscellaneous stuff in the front of
the book. Among other things, 787xx (Austin) is in the top ten
three-digit ZIPs in NSS membership, with 92 NSS members. Top in the
list is 300xx, with 220. That would be Atlanta and vicinity. (300
seems to cover a lot of suburbs of Atlanta, whereas all the 787
addresses are actually Austin.) Eight-five NSS members have listed
the UT Grotto as their primary affiliation.. This is for purposes
of allocating votes in the Congress of Grottos at NSS conventions,
although so far as I know the UTG has never participated in living
memory. There are twelve NSS groups with more NSS members than UTG
(the Cave Diving Section has 1,022!), but many of them require NSS
membership of their members. The lowest NSS number of a Texas NSS
member is 509. Texas is among the top ten states, with 488 NSS members.

This year's membership list is sorted by states, which makes it
relatively easy for a group to see who in its area might need to be
contacted with information about the club. One thing I was struck by
when looking through Texas is the number of names with 787xx that I
don't recognize. Of course, that doesn't mean I wouldn't recognize
the faces; there is unfortunately little opportunity to learn
peoples' names at meetings of fifty or events of four hundred. I'm
bad about remembering names, too. Name tags seem Mickey Mouse, but
--Mixon

May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest.

You may reply to the address this message
came from, but for long-term use, save:
Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu mailto:
 bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu
AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:edi...@amcs-pubs.org or
sa...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:sa...@amcs-pubs.org



-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
mailto:texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com

For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
mailto:texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com




Re: [Texascavers] NSS members in Austin

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
I get the feeling that Ellie doesn't want to discuss this anymore.

I think it should be discussed at the Winter meeting.  If you aren't a
current member, come to the meeting, sign up and voice your opinion :)

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:44 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
 The TSA Chair second, third, and forthed Charles Goldsmiths motion to to
 table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver committee to be
 discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting  where
 registered members present can vote for a majority.

 It will not be decided on till then. You can continue and continue and
 continue to make unfounded, pious rants and raves and bitch and cry but NO
 decision will be made until the January 10th TSA winter meeting.

 At the meeting we will discuss two-tier memberships, free membership
 options, and scholarships but again, NO decision will be made until the
 January 10th TSA winter meeting. None. Nada.


 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Terry Holsinger tr...@sprynet.com wrote:

 Maybe someone on the TSA's Membership committee should write to the non
 members in the NSS and invite them to join or let us know why they are not
 interested. Is that not what the TSA has a memberships committee for?

 Terry H.

 Gill Edigar wrote:

 Mixon--
 Philosophically speaking: Did you check to see how many of those 488
 Texas NSS members were among the fewer than 200 TSA members? Did you wonder
 why or why not? How many do you think would subscribe to a free digital
 TEXAS CAVER? And then be willing to join TSA afterwards? Maybe a hundred,
 huh? Might be worth trying even if they just got 50, huh? Would that be good
 for The CAVER? Would that be good for the TSA? Would that be good for Texas
 caving? Would that be good for me or you?  --Ediger


 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com
 mailto:bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote:

    The annual NSS membership list has just been distributed (about five
    months late). There are interesting statistics about NSS membership
    on pages 65-67, worth calling to your attention, because I suspect
    most members never look at the miscellaneous stuff in the front of
    the book. Among other things, 787xx (Austin) is in the top ten
    three-digit ZIPs in NSS membership, with 92 NSS members. Top in the
    list is 300xx, with 220. That would be Atlanta and vicinity. (300
    seems to cover a lot of suburbs of Atlanta, whereas all the 787
    addresses are actually Austin.) Eight-five NSS members have listed
    the UT Grotto as their primary affiliation.. This is for purposes
    of allocating votes in the Congress of Grottos at NSS conventions,
    although so far as I know the UTG has never participated in living
    memory. There are twelve NSS groups with more NSS members than UTG
    (the Cave Diving Section has 1,022!), but many of them require NSS
    membership of their members. The lowest NSS number of a Texas NSS
    member is 509. Texas is among the top ten states, with 488 NSS
 members.

    This year's membership list is sorted by states, which makes it
    relatively easy for a group to see who in its area might need to be
    contacted with information about the club. One thing I was struck by
    when looking through Texas is the number of names with 787xx that I
    don't recognize. Of course, that doesn't mean I wouldn't recognize
    the faces; there is unfortunately little opportunity to learn
    peoples' names at meetings of fifty or events of four hundred. I'm
    bad about remembering names, too. Name tags seem Mickey Mouse, but
    --Mixon
    
    May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest.
    
    You may reply to the address this message
    came from, but for long-term use, save:
    Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu
 mailto:bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu
    AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:edi...@amcs-pubs.org or
    sa...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:sa...@amcs-pubs.org


    -
    Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
    mailto:texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
    For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
    mailto:texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com





[Texascavers] RE: NSS members in Austin

2009-12-15 Thread Jim Kennedy
Neither do the rest of us!

-Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 3:11 PM
To: ellie :)
Cc: Terry Holsinger; texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] NSS members in Austin

I get the feeling that Ellie doesn't want to discuss this anymore.


-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



[Texascavers] Re: NSS Members in Austin

2009-12-15 Thread Alex Sproul



Mixon said:
The annual NSS membership list has just been distributed (about five 
months late).


Au contrere, Bill; it's right on time.


The BOG got annoyed that the current year's MM always had last year's officers and 
directors in it, so it decreed that the MM henceforth be published after the convention, so that 
the newest incumbants would be included.


Unfortunately, nobody thought to tell the MM editor, who was 99% finished with publishing it 
on time. She was well pissed to discover she had to start all over, not just to include the new 
officers/directors, but at Square One with the member listing in order to capture new 
members between June and November. It's a miracle we still have an editor.


Alex


--
Alex Sproul
NSS 8086RL/FE
NSS Webmaster



-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



texascavers Digest 16 Dec 2009 01:55:47 -0000 Issue 919

2009-12-15 Thread texascavers-digest-help

texascavers Digest 16 Dec 2009 01:55:47 - Issue 919

Topics (messages 13005 through 13015):

Re: NSS members in Austin
13005 by: Terry Holsinger
13006 by: ellie :)
13008 by: Gill Edigar
13009 by: Charles Goldsmith
13010 by: Jim Kennedy
13011 by: Alex Sproul

Re: Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
13007 by: Charles Goldsmith

Officer's powers
13012 by: Gill Edigar
13013 by: Charles Goldsmith

Re: Clean Water Action
13014 by: Don Cooper
13015 by: Robert B

Administrivia:

To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
texascavers-digest-subscr...@texascavers.com

To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
texascavers-digest-unsubscr...@texascavers.com

To post to the list, e-mail:
texascavers@texascavers.com


--
---BeginMessage---
Maybe someone on the TSA's Membership committee should write to the non 
members in the NSS and invite them to join or let us know why they are 
not interested. Is that not what the TSA has a memberships committee for?


Terry H.

Gill Edigar wrote:

Mixon--
Philosophically speaking: Did you check to see how many of those 488 
Texas NSS members were among the fewer than 200 TSA members? Did you 
wonder why or why not? How many do you think would subscribe to a free 
digital TEXAS CAVER? And then be willing to join TSA afterwards? Maybe a 
hundred, huh? Might be worth trying even if they just got 50, huh? Would 
that be good for The CAVER? Would that be good for the TSA? Would that 
be good for Texas caving? Would that be good for me or you?  
--Ediger



On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com 
mailto:bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote:


The annual NSS membership list has just been distributed (about five
months late). There are interesting statistics about NSS membership
on pages 65-67, worth calling to your attention, because I suspect
most members never look at the miscellaneous stuff in the front of
the book. Among other things, 787xx (Austin) is in the top ten
three-digit ZIPs in NSS membership, with 92 NSS members. Top in the
list is 300xx, with 220. That would be Atlanta and vicinity. (300
seems to cover a lot of suburbs of Atlanta, whereas all the 787
addresses are actually Austin.) Eight-five NSS members have listed
the UT Grotto as their primary affiliation.. This is for purposes
of allocating votes in the Congress of Grottos at NSS conventions,
although so far as I know the UTG has never participated in living
memory. There are twelve NSS groups with more NSS members than UTG
(the Cave Diving Section has 1,022!), but many of them require NSS
membership of their members. The lowest NSS number of a Texas NSS
member is 509. Texas is among the top ten states, with 488 NSS members.

This year's membership list is sorted by states, which makes it
relatively easy for a group to see who in its area might need to be
contacted with information about the club. One thing I was struck by
when looking through Texas is the number of names with 787xx that I
don't recognize. Of course, that doesn't mean I wouldn't recognize
the faces; there is unfortunately little opportunity to learn
peoples' names at meetings of fifty or events of four hundred. I'm
bad about remembering names, too. Name tags seem Mickey Mouse, but
--Mixon

May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrails of the last priest.

You may reply to the address this message
came from, but for long-term use, save:
Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu mailto:bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu
AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:edi...@amcs-pubs.org or
sa...@amcs-pubs.org mailto:sa...@amcs-pubs.org


-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
mailto:texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
mailto:texascavers-h...@texascavers.com


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
The TSA Chair second, third, and forthed Charles Goldsmiths motion to to
table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver committee to be
discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting  where
registered members present can vote for a majority.

It will not be decided on till then. You can continue and continue and
continue to make unfounded, pious rants and raves and bitch and cry but NO
decision will be made until the January 10th TSA winter meeting.

At the meeting we will discuss two-tier memberships, free membership
options, and scholarships but again, NO decision will be made until the
January 10th TSA winter meeting. None. Nada.


On 

[Texascavers] Fw: speloo greeting

2009-12-15 Thread Bill Bentley
This came to me and I think it was meant for someone else (in Australia) and 
maybe if someone knows who it might be and could forward it on to them.
Thanks,
Bill
- Original Message - 
From: nambal ban bemo 
To: webmas...@caver.net 
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 10:44 PM
Subject: speloo greeting


speleo greeting,
hi___
I'M Nabeel, indonesian.  
glad to know you as a caver.
I know you from the site of west australian cave assosiation.
in Indonesia, I'M living in a karst area of java island.there are many karst 
cave around my home.
and I had some speleological research (cave maping: exspecially),or event just 
havin' fun exploring some cave.
any way, I hope you (and your team) are interested in researching some cave in 
indonesian karst.
and if you are, I (and my team) would like to welcome and support your 
conservative cave project in our country.
you just for now need to tell me some information, everything, you want me to 
send you by e-mail, and I would like to.
alright, I'M waiting you send your e-mail back to me.
I hope this e-mail isn't a waste of your time.
last, I bet you're expecting of exploring in indonesia.
thn'x
(sory for my bad english) 



Kunjungi halaman depan Yahoo! Indonesia yang baru! 

[Texascavers] a caver passed away

2009-12-15 Thread David
I just learned a few minutes ago, that an old caving friend
of mine from Texas AM had passed away a few years ago.

His name was Mason Estes.

He made a trip to Huautla in 1987, but most of his caving was
with the A.S.S. to caves near Bustamante, and west Texas.

I will try to find an obituary, or get more details.

If you knew any Aggie cavers back around 1986, he was the
one with the deep froggy voice.

His passion was rock-climbing, and that got him interested
in caving.

-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



texascavers Digest 16 Dec 2009 05:19:41 -0000 Issue 920

2009-12-15 Thread texascavers-digest-help

texascavers Digest 16 Dec 2009 05:19:41 - Issue 920

Topics (messages 13016 through 13023):

Subscribers to digital publications
13016 by: Gill Edigar
13018 by: Charles Goldsmith
13019 by: Gill Edigar

Re: Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
13017 by: Rod Goke

Re: Officer's powers
13020 by: Butch Fralia
13023 by: Gill Edigar

Re: speloo greeting
13021 by: Bill Bentley

a caver passed away
13022 by: David

Administrivia:

To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
texascavers-digest-subscr...@texascavers.com

To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
texascavers-digest-unsubscr...@texascavers.com

To post to the list, e-mail:
texascavers@texascavers.com


--
---BeginMessage---
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote:

 If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it
 will be available on the front page.


That would not be good. But it would not be not good because of the reason
being discussed here--spam, etc. There's another...

Now I'm gonna tell you what I'm gonna tell you then I'm gonna tell you
why--two paragraphs.

The process should be some variation of this:
   Cavers can get 'invited to subscribe' to The TEXAS CAVER by any of
several means--from the TSA or Grotto Home Pages, at Grotto meetings, the
TSA convention, TCR, from fellow cavers, from handouts at projects such as
CBSP, Gov Canyon, Punkin  Deep, etc, or basically any way and place that
cavers get together.
   Then, the caver will go to the link on the TSA web site and navigate to
the Subscribe to The TEXAS CAVER button.
   Then, the caver will be asked for some vital information such as name,
address, etc, NSS number, Grotto affiliation (or independent), and maybe
even personal info such as family member names (which are mostly for photo
identification purposes, not for publication, etc), age, years caving, and a
brief caving bio, and the all important email address (which does not have
to be the caver's primary one). Most of this info will be voluntary.
Basically all that will be needed is a name and an email address and a
password.
   The caver will also be asked to furnish a password for accessing his or
her own personal subscription information.
   Then, whenever a new CAVER is ready to mail (or some breaking TSA
caver-worthy news) the caver will be sent a message telling him or her to go
access his or her subscription account, and to download a free digital copy
of whatever is being offered--TEXAS CAVER or whatever. There could be some
restrictions as to which publications can be downloaded without being a TSA
member, such as a Members Manual, meeting minutes, etc.
   Then, they can download it and print it out in any way they choose,
archiving the digital copy for posterity, and getting back to doing whatever
they were doing before--or maybe read The CAVER.

The mechanics of that process are not too hard to visualize--I hope. But
there are some questions, I'm sure. So here are a few 'whys' to dispel some
of um.
Q. Why require a subscription?
   A. Because what we really want is to know who is this subscriber is and
where they fit in the Texas caving scene. Basically we are trying to
identify all the cavers in Texas so we can keep in contact with
them--ostensibly through the auspices of The TEXAS CAVER--and influence them
and they us. We will give you a free CAVER if you will be a part of our
'extended' TSA caving fraternity. This is a bribe from us to know who you
are and that you are one of us--even though you may have been hiding for
many years because you felt that the TSA doesn't care about you--doesn't
want you to be a part of their elite group without you getting involved in
their political intrigues or any other reasons you may have.
Q, How does this help the TSA?
   A. The subscription gives the TSA a database for contacting outside
cavers (not just TSA members) about important issues such as cave
conservation, caver functions, projects, conventions, TCR and other events
that cavers would be interested in. It also restricts (somewhat) the
distribution of errant issues on the open market. That's not to say that I
couldn't just print out 40 copies via my download and hand them out at
Walgreens. It also provides a larger man-power base of both leaders and
followers which will obviously contribute to projects, training,
participation, writing articles, and a general contribution to more and
better caving.
Q. How will my email address be protected?
   A. The subscriber list will be maintained as a database, pretty much
entirely electronically. The database, or selected fields, at least, should
be available to subscribers as a caver service. Subscribers could elect to
not make their email address and certain other fields visible. Also, certain
low tech schemes such as embedding the letters 'TSA' into each email 

Re: RE: [Texascavers] Re: Clean Water Action

2009-12-15 Thread tbsamsel


Y'all ought to read Stewart Brand's WHOLE EARTH DISCIPLINE. I've thrown the book across the room a couple of times...he's quite the gadfly, as ever.

TDec 14, 2009 05:52:19 PM, fh...@townandcountryins.com wrote:


Sorry, I must take an opposing view. I consider myself an environmentalist but if there really is such a thing as “clean” coal technology I am for it. We have plenty of it. I also think that generating electricity from nuclear energy makes good sense. The best solution may be natural gas but our federal government needs to wake up to the fact that to get it we must drill for it as well as for oil as we will never be without the need for this commodity. It is crazy to be importing it from our enemies. No one loves our Texas Hill Country more than I but I don’t believe that these activities will be harmful if sensibly regulated which does not mean banning them. I believe that cavers who owned a tract of land would accept a very lucrative offer to lease it for oil and gas exploration. That’s not greed, its good sense. Let the naysayers come forth.

Fritz





From: Thomas Sitch [mailto:dreadfl...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 5:23 PMTo: texascavers@texascavers.comSubject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: Clean Water Action


"Tell San Anonio's [and New Braunfels', and Georgetown's] Mayor and City Council Not To Support Nuclear Energy" 

"Support A Moratorium On New Permits For Coal-Burning Power Plants"



I love political activists who are very specific on shutting down energy production but very vague on creating it, e.g.



"Tell the Austin City Council To Support Clean Energy"



How about "donate to build power lines to the T. Boons Pickins wind farms" or "research fund for cellulosic ethanol."

Sorry, what was this about? Clean water? Yes, which goes to caves, and we don't have enough of it. Down with nuclear energy!!



~~T






From: Logan McNatt To: George Veni Cc: texascavers@texascavers.comSent: Mon, December 14, 2009 4:51:20 PMSubject: [Texascavers] Re: Clean Water ActionI've been donating to Clean Water Action since 2000, and they are still a viable national organization with a Texas chapter based in Austin: http://www.cleanwateraction.org/txThe first thing that impressed me was they still have people going door to door once a year, at least in south Austin where Gill and I live.Although Annalisa of GEAA said CWA does not get involved in local issues, the issues on their website include:"The Coming Crisis: Water Availability and Municipal Conservation Efforts in Central Texas", "Tell the Austin City Council To Support Clean Energy""Tell San Anonio's [and New Braunfels', and Georgetown's] Mayor and City Council Not To Support Nuclear Energy""Increase Funding for State Parks""Get The Mercury Out Of Our Skies And Water""Support A Moratorium On New Permits For Coal-Burning Power Plants"Obviously they are an advocacy/lobbying group, so donations are not tax-deductible. I agree with Stephan that it seems like there is a lot of duplication of effort among the plethora of environmental groups, but many of the smaller groups are devoted to a specific geographic area or issue, and cannot actively lobby, unlike CWA.Logan



George Veni wrote: 

Clean Water Action has been working in the Austin and San Antonio areas since at least the mid-1980s. They have worked to lobby government and agencies, and work cooperatively with other green groups to prevent water degradation. I haven’t seen them much in the past 10 years and don’t know if the organization crashed and is now recovering or if it simply got diverted to other projects in other areas. 
George 




From: bgillegi...@gmail.com [mailto:bgillegi...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Gill EdigarSent: Monday, December 14, 2009 12:39 PMTo: texascavers@texascavers.comSubject: [Texascavers] Change of Subject--Clean Water 
RE: Clean Water Action 

A few months ago a fellow came by the house representing an outfit called 'Clean Water Action' ostensibly soliciting funds to promote awareness of and promoting lobbying for clean water in some form or fashion. Since clean water is a current topic of interest in South Austin and other parts of the world it would be a good thing to hype if one wanted to make a few bucks from folks with good environmental intentions but who haven't the time to keep up with every environmental interest group that comes along. I gave them a few bucks and signed their petition and filled out a personal data card. A few days ago I got a phone call from them asking for a pretty good slug of money. I asked for more information. A letter followed but with nebulous details. 

Does anybody have any knowledge of these guys? Where do they fit in with SOS, the City of Austin, the various water conservation districts that some of our cavers work at? Can anybody cite me any references of their good work? Etc, etc? If they're on the up-and-up I want to support them, but I've never heard of them 

Re: [Texascavers] Re: Clean Water Action

2009-12-15 Thread Don Cooper
Something worth considering when taking it all into account:

It takes a LOT of water to scrub coal-fired plant stack columns.
A whole lot of water that becomes horribly contaminated with all the shit
that WOULD have gone into the air.
Then you're left with a clean air power plant with millions of gallons of
contaminated water.

Whatya gonna have - clean air or clean water???

So.  Yeah - there's a LOTTA coal out there.  Only there's just so much clean
air / water

-WaV

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Logan McNatt lmcn...@austin.rr.com wrote:

  I've been donating to Clean Water Action since 2000, and they are still a
 viable national organization with a Texas chapter based in Austin:
 http://www.cleanwateraction.org/tx
 The first thing that impressed me was they still have people going door to
 door once a year, at least in south Austin where Gill and I live.

 Although Annalisa of GEAA said CWA does not get involved in local issues,
 the issues on their website include:
 The Coming Crisis:  Water Availability and Municipal Conservation Efforts
 in Central Texas,
 Tell the Austin City Council To Support Clean Energy
 Tell San Anonio's [and New Braunfels', and Georgetown's] Mayor and City
 Council Not To Support Nuclear Energy
 Increase Funding for State Parks
 Get The Mercury Out Of Our Skies And Water
 Support A Moratorium On New Permits For Coal-Burning Power Plants

 Obviously they are an advocacy/lobbying group, so donations are not
 tax-deductible.  I agree with Stephan that it seems like there is a lot of
 duplication of effort among the plethora of environmental groups, but many
 of the smaller groups are devoted to a specific geographic area or issue,
 and cannot actively lobby, unlike CWA.

 Logan

 --
 George Veni wrote:

  *Clean Water Action has been working in the Austin and San Antonio areas
 since at least the mid-1980s. They have worked to lobby government and
 agencies, and work cooperatively with other green groups to prevent water
 degradation. I haven’t seen them much in the past 10 years and don’t know if
 the organization crashed and is now recovering or if it simply got diverted
 to other projects in other areas. *

 *George *

 **
 --
 **

 *From:* bgillegi...@gmail.com 
 [mailto:bgillegi...@gmail.combgillegi...@gmail.com]
 *On Behalf Of *Gill Edigar
 *Sent:* Monday, December 14, 2009 12:39 PM
 *To:* texascavers@texascavers.com
 *Subject:* [Texascavers] Change of Subject--Clean Water

 RE: Clean Water Action

 A few months ago a fellow came by the house representing an outfit called
 'Clean Water Action' ostensibly soliciting funds to promote awareness of
  and promoting lobbying for clean water in some form or fashion. Since clean
 water is a current topic of interest in South Austin and other parts of the
 world it would be a good thing to hype if one wanted to make a few bucks
 from folks with good environmental intentions but who haven't the time to
 keep up with every environmental interest group that comes along. I gave
 them a few bucks and signed their petition and filled out a personal data
 card. A few days ago I got a phone call from them asking for a pretty good
 slug of money. I asked for more information. A letter followed but with
 nebulous details.

 Does anybody have any knowledge of these guys? Where do they fit in with
 SOS, the City of Austin, the various water conservation districts that some
 of our cavers work at? Can anybody cite me any references of their good
 work? Etc, etc? If they're on the up-and-up I want to support them, but I've
 never heard of them before and want a better idea of who they are and what
 they really do.
  --Ediger

  -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail:
 texascavers-h...@texascavers.com


Re: [Texascavers] Re: Clean Water Action

2009-12-15 Thread Robert B
Ah, dirty coal.  Always reminds me of Dick van Dyke in Mary Poppins'
scrubbin the chimneys. Or better yet, Jack Wild as the 'Artful Dodger' all
covered in soot. A perfect marlboro commercial or the next poster child for
the 'Nuke is Cleaner than Coal' lobby.

To save water we could climb the stacks a 'PEE' into the emmisions.
effectively creating our own SCR, Selective Catalytic Reduction. 4NO + 2(NH2
)2CO + O2 → 4N2 + 4H2O + 2CO2.



On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Don Cooper wavyca...@gmail.com wrote:

 Something worth considering when taking it all into account:

 It takes a LOT of water to scrub coal-fired plant stack columns.
 A whole lot of water that becomes horribly contaminated with all the shit
 that WOULD have gone into the air.
 Then you're left with a clean air power plant with millions of gallons of
 contaminated water.

 Whatya gonna have - clean air or clean water???

 So.  Yeah - there's a LOTTA coal out there.  Only there's just so much
 clean air / water

 -WaV

 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Logan McNatt lmcn...@austin.rr.comwrote:

 I've been donating to Clean Water Action since 2000, and they are still a
 viable national organization with a Texas chapter based in Austin:
 http://www.cleanwateraction.org/tx
 The first thing that impressed me was they still have people going door to
 door once a year, at least in south Austin where Gill and I live.

 Although Annalisa of GEAA said CWA does not get involved in local issues,
 the issues on their website include:
 The Coming Crisis:  Water Availability and Municipal Conservation Efforts
 in Central Texas,
 Tell the Austin City Council To Support Clean Energy
 Tell San Anonio's [and New Braunfels', and Georgetown's] Mayor and City
 Council Not To Support Nuclear Energy
 Increase Funding for State Parks
 Get The Mercury Out Of Our Skies And Water
 Support A Moratorium On New Permits For Coal-Burning Power Plants

 Obviously they are an advocacy/lobbying group, so donations are not
 tax-deductible.  I agree with Stephan that it seems like there is a lot of
 duplication of effort among the plethora of environmental groups, but many
 of the smaller groups are devoted to a specific geographic area or issue,
 and cannot actively lobby, unlike CWA.

 Logan

 --
 George Veni wrote:

  *Clean Water Action has been working in the Austin and San Antonio areas
 since at least the mid-1980s. They have worked to lobby government and
 agencies, and work cooperatively with other green groups to prevent water
 degradation. I haven’t seen them much in the past 10 years and don’t know if
 the organization crashed and is now recovering or if it simply got diverted
 to other projects in other areas. *

 *George *

 **
 --
 **

 *From:* bgillegi...@gmail.com 
 [mailto:bgillegi...@gmail.combgillegi...@gmail.com]
 *On Behalf Of *Gill Edigar
 *Sent:* Monday, December 14, 2009 12:39 PM
 *To:* texascavers@texascavers.com
 *Subject:* [Texascavers] Change of Subject--Clean Water

 RE: Clean Water Action

 A few months ago a fellow came by the house representing an outfit called
 'Clean Water Action' ostensibly soliciting funds to promote awareness of
  and promoting lobbying for clean water in some form or fashion. Since clean
 water is a current topic of interest in South Austin and other parts of the
 world it would be a good thing to hype if one wanted to make a few bucks
 from folks with good environmental intentions but who haven't the time to
 keep up with every environmental interest group that comes along. I gave
 them a few bucks and signed their petition and filled out a personal data
 card. A few days ago I got a phone call from them asking for a pretty good
 slug of money. I asked for more information. A letter followed but with
 nebulous details.

 Does anybody have any knowledge of these guys? Where do they fit in with
 SOS, the City of Austin, the various water conservation districts that some
 of our cavers work at? Can anybody cite me any references of their good
 work? Etc, etc? If they're on the up-and-up I want to support them, but I've
 never heard of them before and want a better idea of who they are and what
 they really do.
 --Ediger

 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail:
 texascavers-h...@texascavers.com





[Texascavers] Officer's powers

2009-12-15 Thread Gill Edigar
An observation--
Officers are elected to run the day-to-day operations of companies,
organizations, governments, and other such groups of people in lieu of
having a council or committee mico-managing the trivial details. They are
expected to make certain decisions on behalf of the organization without
consulting the entire membership or executive council or board of governors.
For instance, they would be expected to go buy a roll of tape or box of
staples if they were needed for the conduct of business. Likewise, if a
special mailing were required for a safety alert or an election they could
conceivably be expected to spend $100 on postage stamps to see the mailing
got to the members--without asking anybody. That is their job. Along that
same train of thought, I would suggest that if the Chairman and newsletter
editor decided to send out free digital copies as advertising to prospective
new members of the various college clubs they would have it completely
within their powers to do so--and be praised for their aggressiveness--and
need to ask no one's permission. Indeed, there is a long and respected
history of the TSA doing just that. No board action would be necessary--or
even expected, for that matter. Especially if no expenditures were
required.

Now then, I'm not a TSA member so I would never presume to tell the TSA how
to conduct its business. I'm merely speaking as an independent Texas caver
bystander and interested observer. So, I have been both TSA Chairman and
TEXAS CAVER editor on more than one occasion over the years. I would presume
that most Texas cavers would suspect that I have a bit of experience with
officer power and responsibilities and how they can get things
constitutionally accomplished. Believe me, creativity can be a valuable tool
in the running of a volunteer organization. Both Davy Crockett and Sam
Houston used to proclaim, Be sure you're right and then go ahead. No
officer will ever be chastised by the membership for handing out free
advertising supporting the aims and goals of the organization and
encouraging membership. It is the right thing to do. And no other current
advertising brochure will fulfill that function better than a free digital
copy of The TEXAS CAVER sent (or made available) to all non-TSA-member NSS
cavers in Texas. So now, they can go ahead. No board action is required. It
is an officer responsibility. I'm looking forward to seeing old Sam and Davy
crack a smile over this one.
--Ediger


Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
Well Said Gill

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote:
 An observation--
 Officers are elected to run the day-to-day operations of companies,
 organizations, governments, and other such groups of people in lieu of
 having a council or committee mico-managing the trivial details. They are
 expected to make certain decisions on behalf of the organization without
 consulting the entire membership or executive council or board of governors.
 For instance, they would be expected to go buy a roll of tape or box of
 staples if they were needed for the conduct of business. Likewise, if a
 special mailing were required for a safety alert or an election they could
 conceivably be expected to spend $100 on postage stamps to see the mailing
 got to the members--without asking anybody. That is their job. Along that
 same train of thought, I would suggest that if the Chairman and newsletter
 editor decided to send out free digital copies as advertising to prospective
 new members of the various college clubs they would have it completely
 within their powers to do so--and be praised for their aggressiveness--and
 need to ask no one's permission. Indeed, there is a long and respected
 history of the TSA doing just that. No board action would be necessary--or
 even expected, for that matter. Especially if no expenditures were
 required.
 Now then, I'm not a TSA member so I would never presume to tell the TSA how
 to conduct its business. I'm merely speaking as an independent Texas caver
 bystander and interested observer. So, I have been both TSA Chairman and
 TEXAS CAVER editor on more than one occasion over the years. I would presume
 that most Texas cavers would suspect that I have a bit of experience with
 officer power and responsibilities and how they can get things
 constitutionally accomplished. Believe me, creativity can be a valuable tool
 in the running of a volunteer organization. Both Davy Crockett and Sam
 Houston used to proclaim, Be sure you're right and then go ahead. No
 officer will ever be chastised by the membership for handing out free
 advertising supporting the aims and goals of the organization and
 encouraging membership. It is the right thing to do. And no other current
 advertising brochure will fulfill that function better than a free digital
 copy of The TEXAS CAVER sent (or made available) to all non-TSA-member NSS
 cavers in Texas. So now, they can go ahead. No board action is required. It
 is an officer responsibility. I'm looking forward to seeing old Sam and Davy
 crack a smile over this one.
 --Ediger




Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers

2009-12-15 Thread speleosteele
You missed the caver Christmas party.

Sent via BlackBerry by ATT

-Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:48:43 
To: Gill Edigargi...@att.net
Cc: texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers
Well Said Gill

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote:
 An observation--
 Officers are elected to run the day-to-day operations of companies,
 organizations, governments, and other such groups of people in lieu of
 having a council or committee mico-managing the trivial details. They are
 expected to make certain decisions on behalf of the organization without
 consulting the entire membership or executive council or board of governors.
 For instance, they would be expected to go buy a roll of tape or box of
 staples if they were needed for the conduct of business. Likewise, if a
 special mailing were required for a safety alert or an election they could
 conceivably be expected to spend $100 on postage stamps to see the mailing
 got to the members--without asking anybody. That is their job. Along that
 same train of thought, I would suggest that if the Chairman and newsletter
 editor decided to send out free digital copies as advertising to prospective
 new members of the various college clubs they would have it completely
 within their powers to do so--and be praised for their aggressiveness--and
 need to ask no one's permission. Indeed, there is a long and respected
 history of the TSA doing just that. No board action would be necessary--or
 even expected, for that matter. Especially if no expenditures were
 required.
 Now then, I'm not a TSA member so I would never presume to tell the TSA how
 to conduct its business. I'm merely speaking as an independent Texas caver
 bystander and interested observer. So, I have been both TSA Chairman and
 TEXAS CAVER editor on more than one occasion over the years. I would presume
 that most Texas cavers would suspect that I have a bit of experience with
 officer power and responsibilities and how they can get things
 constitutionally accomplished. Believe me, creativity can be a valuable tool
 in the running of a volunteer organization. Both Davy Crockett and Sam
 Houston used to proclaim, Be sure you're right and then go ahead. No
 officer will ever be chastised by the membership for handing out free
 advertising supporting the aims and goals of the organization and
 encouraging membership. It is the right thing to do. And no other current
 advertising brochure will fulfill that function better than a free digital
 copy of The TEXAS CAVER sent (or made available) to all non-TSA-member NSS
 cavers in Texas. So now, they can go ahead. No board action is required. It
 is an officer responsibility. I'm looking forward to seeing old Sam and Davy
 crack a smile over this one.
 --Ediger



-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers

2009-12-15 Thread ellie :)
Tool

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote:

 Well Said Gill

 Charles

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote:
  An observation--
  Officers are elected to run the day-to-day operations of companies,
  organizations, governments, and other such groups of people in lieu of
  having a council or committee mico-managing the trivial details. They are
  expected to make certain decisions on behalf of the organization without
  consulting the entire membership or executive council or board of
 governors.
  For instance, they would be expected to go buy a roll of tape or box of
  staples if they were needed for the conduct of business. Likewise, if a
  special mailing were required for a safety alert or an election they
 could
  conceivably be expected to spend $100 on postage stamps to see the
 mailing
  got to the members--without asking anybody. That is their job. Along that
  same train of thought, I would suggest that if the Chairman and
 newsletter
  editor decided to send out free digital copies as advertising to
 prospective
  new members of the various college clubs they would have it completely
  within their powers to do so--and be praised for their
 aggressiveness--and
  need to ask no one's permission. Indeed, there is a long and respected
  history of the TSA doing just that. No board action would be
 necessary--or
  even expected, for that matter. Especially if no expenditures were
  required.
  Now then, I'm not a TSA member so I would never presume to tell the TSA
 how
  to conduct its business. I'm merely speaking as an independent Texas
 caver
  bystander and interested observer. So, I have been both TSA Chairman and
  TEXAS CAVER editor on more than one occasion over the years. I would
 presume
  that most Texas cavers would suspect that I have a bit of experience with
  officer power and responsibilities and how they can get things
  constitutionally accomplished. Believe me, creativity can be a valuable
 tool
  in the running of a volunteer organization. Both Davy Crockett and Sam
  Houston used to proclaim, Be sure you're right and then go ahead. No
  officer will ever be chastised by the membership for handing out free
  advertising supporting the aims and goals of the organization and
  encouraging membership. It is the right thing to do. And no other current
  advertising brochure will fulfill that function better than a free
 digital
  copy of The TEXAS CAVER sent (or made available) to all non-TSA-member
 NSS
  cavers in Texas. So now, they can go ahead. No board action is required.
 It
  is an officer responsibility. I'm looking forward to seeing old Sam and
 Davy
  crack a smile over this one.
  --Ediger
 
 

 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com




Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
Putz!

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:47 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
 Tool

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 wrote:

 Well Said Gill

 Charles

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote:
  An observation--
  Officers are elected to run the day-to-day operations of companies,
  organizations, governments, and other such groups of people in lieu of
  having a council or committee mico-managing the trivial details. They
  are
  expected to make certain decisions on behalf of the organization without
  consulting the entire membership or executive council or board of
  governors.
  For instance, they would be expected to go buy a roll of tape or box of
  staples if they were needed for the conduct of business. Likewise, if a
  special mailing were required for a safety alert or an election they
  could
  conceivably be expected to spend $100 on postage stamps to see the
  mailing
  got to the members--without asking anybody. That is their job. Along
  that
  same train of thought, I would suggest that if the Chairman and
  newsletter
  editor decided to send out free digital copies as advertising to
  prospective
  new members of the various college clubs they would have it completely
  within their powers to do so--and be praised for their
  aggressiveness--and
  need to ask no one's permission. Indeed, there is a long and respected
  history of the TSA doing just that. No board action would be
  necessary--or
  even expected, for that matter. Especially if no expenditures were
  required.
  Now then, I'm not a TSA member so I would never presume to tell the TSA
  how
  to conduct its business. I'm merely speaking as an independent Texas
  caver
  bystander and interested observer. So, I have been both TSA Chairman and
  TEXAS CAVER editor on more than one occasion over the years. I would
  presume
  that most Texas cavers would suspect that I have a bit of experience
  with
  officer power and responsibilities and how they can get things
  constitutionally accomplished. Believe me, creativity can be a valuable
  tool
  in the running of a volunteer organization. Both Davy Crockett and Sam
  Houston used to proclaim, Be sure you're right and then go ahead. No
  officer will ever be chastised by the membership for handing out free
  advertising supporting the aims and goals of the organization and
  encouraging membership. It is the right thing to do. And no other
  current
  advertising brochure will fulfill that function better than a free
  digital
  copy of The TEXAS CAVER sent (or made available) to all non-TSA-member
  NSS
  cavers in Texas. So now, they can go ahead. No board action is required.
  It
  is an officer responsibility. I'm looking forward to seeing old Sam and
  Davy
  crack a smile over this one.
  --Ediger
 
 

 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com





Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
Yeah, had some stuff come up that evening, but liked your video about
the Jan presentation :)

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:10 PM,  speleoste...@tx.rr.com wrote:
 You missed the caver Christmas party.



Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers

2009-12-15 Thread speleosteele
It was a light turnout. 

Bill

--Original Message--
From: Charles Goldsmith
To: Bill Steele RR
Sent: Dec 15, 2009 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers

Yeah, had some stuff come up that evening, but liked your video about
the Jan presentation :)

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:10 PM,  speleoste...@tx.rr.com wrote:
 You missed the caver Christmas party.



Sent via BlackBerry by ATT


Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers

2009-12-15 Thread ellie :)
Tell me about it! Cavers are so funny. I love it when everyone gets so
excited about going caving. That was not nice of me to call you a
tool. I apologize. You are just fine and I appreciate the help.

On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
 Putz!

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:47 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
 Tool

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 wrote:

 Well Said Gill

 Charles

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote:
  An observation--
  Officers are elected to run the day-to-day operations of companies,
  organizations, governments, and other such groups of people in lieu of
  having a council or committee mico-managing the trivial details. They
  are
  expected to make certain decisions on behalf of the organization
  without
  consulting the entire membership or executive council or board of
  governors.
  For instance, they would be expected to go buy a roll of tape or box of
  staples if they were needed for the conduct of business. Likewise, if a
  special mailing were required for a safety alert or an election they
  could
  conceivably be expected to spend $100 on postage stamps to see the
  mailing
  got to the members--without asking anybody. That is their job. Along
  that
  same train of thought, I would suggest that if the Chairman and
  newsletter
  editor decided to send out free digital copies as advertising to
  prospective
  new members of the various college clubs they would have it completely
  within their powers to do so--and be praised for their
  aggressiveness--and
  need to ask no one's permission. Indeed, there is a long and respected
  history of the TSA doing just that. No board action would be
  necessary--or
  even expected, for that matter. Especially if no expenditures were
  required.
  Now then, I'm not a TSA member so I would never presume to tell the TSA
  how
  to conduct its business. I'm merely speaking as an independent Texas
  caver
  bystander and interested observer. So, I have been both TSA Chairman
  and
  TEXAS CAVER editor on more than one occasion over the years. I would
  presume
  that most Texas cavers would suspect that I have a bit of experience
  with
  officer power and responsibilities and how they can get things
  constitutionally accomplished. Believe me, creativity can be a valuable
  tool
  in the running of a volunteer organization. Both Davy Crockett and Sam
  Houston used to proclaim, Be sure you're right and then go ahead. No
  officer will ever be chastised by the membership for handing out free
  advertising supporting the aims and goals of the organization and
  encouraging membership. It is the right thing to do. And no other
  current
  advertising brochure will fulfill that function better than a free
  digital
  copy of The TEXAS CAVER sent (or made available) to all non-TSA-member
  NSS
  cavers in Texas. So now, they can go ahead. No board action is
  required.
  It
  is an officer responsibility. I'm looking forward to seeing old Sam and
  Davy
  crack a smile over this one.
  --Ediger
 
 

 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com






Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
No worries, i took it as good natured ribbing, i assumed thats how you
meant it.  :)

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:50 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
 Tell me about it! Cavers are so funny. I love it when everyone gets so
 excited about going caving. That was not nice of me to call you a
 tool. I apologize. You are just fine and I appreciate the help.

 On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
 Putz!

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:47 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
 Tool

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 wrote:

 Well Said Gill

 Charles

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote:
  An observation--
  Officers are elected to run the day-to-day operations of companies,
  organizations, governments, and other such groups of people in lieu of
  having a council or committee mico-managing the trivial details. They
  are
  expected to make certain decisions on behalf of the organization
  without
  consulting the entire membership or executive council or board of
  governors.
  For instance, they would be expected to go buy a roll of tape or box of
  staples if they were needed for the conduct of business. Likewise, if a
  special mailing were required for a safety alert or an election they
  could
  conceivably be expected to spend $100 on postage stamps to see the
  mailing
  got to the members--without asking anybody. That is their job. Along
  that
  same train of thought, I would suggest that if the Chairman and
  newsletter
  editor decided to send out free digital copies as advertising to
  prospective
  new members of the various college clubs they would have it completely
  within their powers to do so--and be praised for their
  aggressiveness--and
  need to ask no one's permission. Indeed, there is a long and respected
  history of the TSA doing just that. No board action would be
  necessary--or
  even expected, for that matter. Especially if no expenditures were
  required.
  Now then, I'm not a TSA member so I would never presume to tell the TSA
  how
  to conduct its business. I'm merely speaking as an independent Texas
  caver
  bystander and interested observer. So, I have been both TSA Chairman
  and
  TEXAS CAVER editor on more than one occasion over the years. I would
  presume
  that most Texas cavers would suspect that I have a bit of experience
  with
  officer power and responsibilities and how they can get things
  constitutionally accomplished. Believe me, creativity can be a valuable
  tool
  in the running of a volunteer organization. Both Davy Crockett and Sam
  Houston used to proclaim, Be sure you're right and then go ahead. No
  officer will ever be chastised by the membership for handing out free
  advertising supporting the aims and goals of the organization and
  encouraging membership. It is the right thing to do. And no other
  current
  advertising brochure will fulfill that function better than a free
  digital
  copy of The TEXAS CAVER sent (or made available) to all non-TSA-member
  NSS
  cavers in Texas. So now, they can go ahead. No board action is
  required.
  It
  is an officer responsibility. I'm looking forward to seeing old Sam and
  Davy
  crack a smile over this one.
  --Ediger
 
 

 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com







Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers

2009-12-15 Thread Gill Edigar
Thanks,
--Ediger

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote:

 Well Said Gill




RE: [Texascavers] Officer's powers

2009-12-15 Thread Butch Fralia
On the home page:  http://cavetexas.org/index.html of the TSA website
there's a note to prospective members who might like a copy to e-mail the
editor for such.  I don't know if anyone has ever done this (asked for a
copy) but it's available from that note.

Butch Fralia


-Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 4:49 PM
To: Gill Edigar
Cc: texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers

Well Said Gill

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote:
 An observation--
 Officers are elected to run the day-to-day operations of companies,
 organizations, governments, and other such groups of people in lieu of
 having a council or committee mico-managing the trivial details. They are
 expected to make certain decisions on behalf of the organization without
 consulting the entire membership or executive council or board of
governors.
 For instance, they would be expected to go buy a roll of tape or box of
 staples if they were needed for the conduct of business. Likewise, if a
 special mailing were required for a safety alert or an election they could
 conceivably be expected to spend $100 on postage stamps to see the mailing
 got to the members--without asking anybody. That is their job. Along that
 same train of thought, I would suggest that if the Chairman and newsletter
 editor decided to send out free digital copies as advertising to
prospective
 new members of the various college clubs they would have it completely
 within their powers to do so--and be praised for their aggressiveness--and
 need to ask no one's permission. Indeed, there is a long and respected
 history of the TSA doing just that. No board action would be necessary--or
 even expected, for that matter. Especially if no expenditures were
 required.
 Now then, I'm not a TSA member so I would never presume to tell the TSA
how
 to conduct its business. I'm merely speaking as an independent Texas caver
 bystander and interested observer. So, I have been both TSA Chairman and
 TEXAS CAVER editor on more than one occasion over the years. I would
presume
 that most Texas cavers would suspect that I have a bit of experience with
 officer power and responsibilities and how they can get things
 constitutionally accomplished. Believe me, creativity can be a valuable
tool
 in the running of a volunteer organization. Both Davy Crockett and Sam
 Houston used to proclaim, Be sure you're right and then go ahead. No
 officer will ever be chastised by the membership for handing out free
 advertising supporting the aims and goals of the organization and
 encouraging membership. It is the right thing to do. And no other current
 advertising brochure will fulfill that function better than a free digital
 copy of The TEXAS CAVER sent (or made available) to all non-TSA-member NSS
 cavers in Texas. So now, they can go ahead. No board action is required.
It
 is an officer responsibility. I'm looking forward to seeing old Sam and
Davy
 crack a smile over this one.
 --Ediger



-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers

2009-12-15 Thread Gill Edigar
Yeah. It's been our practice--from the '70s at least to mail one to any
caver who moves to Texas. We used to get a monthly mailing from the NSS with
all the address changes. For a while we sent some surplus copies to Grottos
to hand out to newbies. It definitely got some new members.
--Ediger

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Butch Fralia
bfra...@maverickgrotto.orgwrote:

 On the home page:  http://cavetexas.org/index.html of the TSA website
 there's a note to prospective members who might like a copy to e-mail the
 editor for such.  I don't know if anyone has ever done this (asked for a
 copy) but it's available from that note.

 Butch Fralia


 -Original Message-
 From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 4:49 PM
 To: Gill Edigar
 Cc: texascavers@texascavers.com
 Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Officer's powers

 Well Said Gill

 Charles

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote:
  An observation--
  Officers are elected to run the day-to-day operations of companies,
  organizations, governments, and other such groups of people in lieu of
  having a council or committee mico-managing the trivial details. They are
  expected to make certain decisions on behalf of the organization without
  consulting the entire membership or executive council or board of
 governors.
  For instance, they would be expected to go buy a roll of tape or box of
  staples if they were needed for the conduct of business. Likewise, if a
  special mailing were required for a safety alert or an election they
 could
  conceivably be expected to spend $100 on postage stamps to see the
 mailing
  got to the members--without asking anybody. That is their job. Along that
  same train of thought, I would suggest that if the Chairman and
 newsletter
  editor decided to send out free digital copies as advertising to
 prospective
  new members of the various college clubs they would have it completely
  within their powers to do so--and be praised for their
 aggressiveness--and
  need to ask no one's permission. Indeed, there is a long and respected
  history of the TSA doing just that. No board action would be
 necessary--or
  even expected, for that matter. Especially if no expenditures were
  required.
  Now then, I'm not a TSA member so I would never presume to tell the TSA
 how
  to conduct its business. I'm merely speaking as an independent Texas
 caver
  bystander and interested observer. So, I have been both TSA Chairman and
  TEXAS CAVER editor on more than one occasion over the years. I would
 presume
  that most Texas cavers would suspect that I have a bit of experience with
  officer power and responsibilities and how they can get things
  constitutionally accomplished. Believe me, creativity can be a valuable
 tool
  in the running of a volunteer organization. Both Davy Crockett and Sam
  Houston used to proclaim, Be sure you're right and then go ahead. No
  officer will ever be chastised by the membership for handing out free
  advertising supporting the aims and goals of the organization and
  encouraging membership. It is the right thing to do. And no other current
  advertising brochure will fulfill that function better than a free
 digital
  copy of The TEXAS CAVER sent (or made available) to all non-TSA-member
 NSS
  cavers in Texas. So now, they can go ahead. No board action is required.
 It
  is an officer responsibility. I'm looking forward to seeing old Sam and
 Davy
  crack a smile over this one.
  --Ediger
 
 

 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com


 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com




[Texascavers] Subscribers to digital publications

2009-12-15 Thread Gill Edigar
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote:

 If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it
 will be available on the front page.


That would not be good. But it would not be not good because of the reason
being discussed here--spam, etc. There's another...

Now I'm gonna tell you what I'm gonna tell you then I'm gonna tell you
why--two paragraphs.

The process should be some variation of this:
   Cavers can get 'invited to subscribe' to The TEXAS CAVER by any of
several means--from the TSA or Grotto Home Pages, at Grotto meetings, the
TSA convention, TCR, from fellow cavers, from handouts at projects such as
CBSP, Gov Canyon, Punkin  Deep, etc, or basically any way and place that
cavers get together.
   Then, the caver will go to the link on the TSA web site and navigate to
the Subscribe to The TEXAS CAVER button.
   Then, the caver will be asked for some vital information such as name,
address, etc, NSS number, Grotto affiliation (or independent), and maybe
even personal info such as family member names (which are mostly for photo
identification purposes, not for publication, etc), age, years caving, and a
brief caving bio, and the all important email address (which does not have
to be the caver's primary one). Most of this info will be voluntary.
Basically all that will be needed is a name and an email address and a
password.
   The caver will also be asked to furnish a password for accessing his or
her own personal subscription information.
   Then, whenever a new CAVER is ready to mail (or some breaking TSA
caver-worthy news) the caver will be sent a message telling him or her to go
access his or her subscription account, and to download a free digital copy
of whatever is being offered--TEXAS CAVER or whatever. There could be some
restrictions as to which publications can be downloaded without being a TSA
member, such as a Members Manual, meeting minutes, etc.
   Then, they can download it and print it out in any way they choose,
archiving the digital copy for posterity, and getting back to doing whatever
they were doing before--or maybe read The CAVER.

The mechanics of that process are not too hard to visualize--I hope. But
there are some questions, I'm sure. So here are a few 'whys' to dispel some
of um.
Q. Why require a subscription?
   A. Because what we really want is to know who is this subscriber is and
where they fit in the Texas caving scene. Basically we are trying to
identify all the cavers in Texas so we can keep in contact with
them--ostensibly through the auspices of The TEXAS CAVER--and influence them
and they us. We will give you a free CAVER if you will be a part of our
'extended' TSA caving fraternity. This is a bribe from us to know who you
are and that you are one of us--even though you may have been hiding for
many years because you felt that the TSA doesn't care about you--doesn't
want you to be a part of their elite group without you getting involved in
their political intrigues or any other reasons you may have.
Q, How does this help the TSA?
   A. The subscription gives the TSA a database for contacting outside
cavers (not just TSA members) about important issues such as cave
conservation, caver functions, projects, conventions, TCR and other events
that cavers would be interested in. It also restricts (somewhat) the
distribution of errant issues on the open market. That's not to say that I
couldn't just print out 40 copies via my download and hand them out at
Walgreens. It also provides a larger man-power base of both leaders and
followers which will obviously contribute to projects, training,
participation, writing articles, and a general contribution to more and
better caving.
Q. How will my email address be protected?
   A. The subscriber list will be maintained as a database, pretty much
entirely electronically. The database, or selected fields, at least, should
be available to subscribers as a caver service. Subscribers could elect to
not make their email address and certain other fields visible. Also, certain
low tech schemes such as embedding the letters 'TSA' into each email address
to be manually removed by the end user could offer some degree of security,
but probably not worth it.
Q. Will a Members Manual be published?
   A. A hard copy Members Manual is a handy reference for cavers who travel
great distances to visit caves and caving events. But, as the Members Manual
is a TSA list, perhaps only TSA members could be allowed to download it.
That would provide incentive to join TSA. Properly loaded, a Members Manual
could be available for downloading just like The TEXAS CAVER. Again,
subscribers can elect to have their sensitive data available for viewing or
printing.
Q. How do we keep just anybody from accessing and printing out a copy of The
CAVER or Member's Manual?
   A. Well, basically we can't. I can print one for my brother-in-law and he
can leave it laying in the break room at work for anybody to 

Re: [Texascavers] Subscribers to digital publications

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
Gill, why not simply put it on the webpage, with an optional form to
fill out name, location, contact info, etc.  The information should be
free to all, the more people who get it, read it, the better.  If
people have to jump through hoops, it could possibly scare a few off.
Getting the information out there into the hands of potential new
members and cavers.

Everyone is worried about spam, we have plenty and will only get more.
 If you are worried about people getting your email address out of a
PDF, then don't put it into the PDF, its that simple.

Contact info in the TC should point to the website contact page, it's
just that simple, no more worries about spam.

Sometimes it is really best to keep things simple, especially when
trying to attract new members.

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote:
 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 wrote:

 If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it
 will be available on the front page.

 That would not be good. But it would not be not good because of the reason
 being discussed here--spam, etc. There's another...
 Now I'm gonna tell you what I'm gonna tell you then I'm gonna tell you
 why--two paragraphs.
 The process should be some variation of this:
    Cavers can get 'invited to subscribe' to The TEXAS CAVER by any of
 several means--from the TSA or Grotto Home Pages, at Grotto meetings, the
 TSA convention, TCR, from fellow cavers, from handouts at projects such as
 CBSP, Gov Canyon, Punkin  Deep, etc, or basically any way and place that
 cavers get together.
    Then, the caver will go to the link on the TSA web site and navigate to
 the Subscribe to The TEXAS CAVER button.
    Then, the caver will be asked for some vital information such as name,
 address, etc, NSS number, Grotto affiliation (or independent), and maybe
 even personal info such as family member names (which are mostly for photo
 identification purposes, not for publication, etc), age, years caving, and a
 brief caving bio, and the all important email address (which does not have
 to be the caver's primary one). Most of this info will be voluntary.
 Basically all that will be needed is a name and an email address and a
 password.
    The caver will also be asked to furnish a password for accessing his or
 her own personal subscription information.
    Then, whenever a new CAVER is ready to mail (or some breaking TSA
 caver-worthy news) the caver will be sent a message telling him or her to go
 access his or her subscription account, and to download a free digital copy
 of whatever is being offered--TEXAS CAVER or whatever. There could be some
 restrictions as to which publications can be downloaded without being a TSA
 member, such as a Members Manual, meeting minutes, etc.
    Then, they can download it and print it out in any way they choose,
 archiving the digital copy for posterity, and getting back to doing whatever
 they were doing before--or maybe read The CAVER.
 The mechanics of that process are not too hard to visualize--I hope. But
 there are some questions, I'm sure. So here are a few 'whys' to dispel some
 of um.
 Q. Why require a subscription?
    A. Because what we really want is to know who is this subscriber is and
 where they fit in the Texas caving scene. Basically we are trying to
 identify all the cavers in Texas so we can keep in contact with
 them--ostensibly through the auspices of The TEXAS CAVER--and influence them
 and they us. We will give you a free CAVER if you will be a part of our
 'extended' TSA caving fraternity. This is a bribe from us to know who you
 are and that you are one of us--even though you may have been hiding for
 many years because you felt that the TSA doesn't care about you--doesn't
 want you to be a part of their elite group without you getting involved in
 their political intrigues or any other reasons you may have.
 Q, How does this help the TSA?
    A. The subscription gives the TSA a database for contacting outside
 cavers (not just TSA members) about important issues such as cave
 conservation, caver functions, projects, conventions, TCR and other events
 that cavers would be interested in. It also restricts (somewhat) the
 distribution of errant issues on the open market. That's not to say that I
 couldn't just print out 40 copies via my download and hand them out at
 Walgreens. It also provides a larger man-power base of both leaders and
 followers which will obviously contribute to projects, training,
 participation, writing articles, and a general contribution to more and
 better caving.
 Q. How will my email address be protected?
    A. The subscriber list will be maintained as a database, pretty much
 entirely electronically. The database, or selected fields, at least, should
 be available to subscribers as a caver service. Subscribers could elect to
 not make their email address and certain other fields visible. Also, certain
 low 

Re: [Texascavers] Subscribers to digital publications

2009-12-15 Thread ellie :)
Im done.

On 12/15/09, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
 Gill, why not simply put it on the webpage, with an optional form to
 fill out name, location, contact info, etc.  The information should be
 free to all, the more people who get it, read it, the better.  If
 people have to jump through hoops, it could possibly scare a few off.
 Getting the information out there into the hands of potential new
 members and cavers.

 Everyone is worried about spam, we have plenty and will only get more.
  If you are worried about people getting your email address out of a
 PDF, then don't put it into the PDF, its that simple.

 Contact info in the TC should point to the website contact page, it's
 just that simple, no more worries about spam.

 Sometimes it is really best to keep things simple, especially when
 trying to attract new members.

 Charles

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote:
 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 wrote:

 If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it
 will be available on the front page.

 That would not be good. But it would not be not good because of the reason
 being discussed here--spam, etc. There's another...
 Now I'm gonna tell you what I'm gonna tell you then I'm gonna tell you
 why--two paragraphs.
 The process should be some variation of this:
    Cavers can get 'invited to subscribe' to The TEXAS CAVER by any of
 several means--from the TSA or Grotto Home Pages, at Grotto meetings, the
 TSA convention, TCR, from fellow cavers, from handouts at projects such as
 CBSP, Gov Canyon, Punkin  Deep, etc, or basically any way and place that
 cavers get together.
    Then, the caver will go to the link on the TSA web site and navigate to
 the Subscribe to The TEXAS CAVER button.
    Then, the caver will be asked for some vital information such as name,
 address, etc, NSS number, Grotto affiliation (or independent), and maybe
 even personal info such as family member names (which are mostly for photo
 identification purposes, not for publication, etc), age, years caving, and
 a
 brief caving bio, and the all important email address (which does not have
 to be the caver's primary one). Most of this info will be voluntary.
 Basically all that will be needed is a name and an email address and a
 password.
    The caver will also be asked to furnish a password for accessing his or
 her own personal subscription information.
    Then, whenever a new CAVER is ready to mail (or some breaking TSA
 caver-worthy news) the caver will be sent a message telling him or her to
 go
 access his or her subscription account, and to download a free digital
 copy
 of whatever is being offered--TEXAS CAVER or whatever. There could be some
 restrictions as to which publications can be downloaded without being a
 TSA
 member, such as a Members Manual, meeting minutes, etc.
    Then, they can download it and print it out in any way they choose,
 archiving the digital copy for posterity, and getting back to doing
 whatever
 they were doing before--or maybe read The CAVER.
 The mechanics of that process are not too hard to visualize--I hope. But
 there are some questions, I'm sure. So here are a few 'whys' to dispel
 some
 of um.
 Q. Why require a subscription?
    A. Because what we really want is to know who is this subscriber is and
 where they fit in the Texas caving scene. Basically we are trying to
 identify all the cavers in Texas so we can keep in contact with
 them--ostensibly through the auspices of The TEXAS CAVER--and influence
 them
 and they us. We will give you a free CAVER if you will be a part of our
 'extended' TSA caving fraternity. This is a bribe from us to know who you
 are and that you are one of us--even though you may have been hiding for
 many years because you felt that the TSA doesn't care about you--doesn't
 want you to be a part of their elite group without you getting involved in
 their political intrigues or any other reasons you may have.
 Q, How does this help the TSA?
    A. The subscription gives the TSA a database for contacting outside
 cavers (not just TSA members) about important issues such as cave
 conservation, caver functions, projects, conventions, TCR and other events
 that cavers would be interested in. It also restricts (somewhat) the
 distribution of errant issues on the open market. That's not to say that I
 couldn't just print out 40 copies via my download and hand them out at
 Walgreens. It also provides a larger man-power base of both leaders and
 followers which will obviously contribute to projects, training,
 participation, writing articles, and a general contribution to more and
 better caving.
 Q. How will my email address be protected?
    A. The subscriber list will be maintained as a database, pretty much
 entirely electronically. The database, or selected fields, at least,
 should
 be available to subscribers as a caver service. Subscribers could 

Re: [Texascavers] Subscribers to digital publications

2009-12-15 Thread Gill Edigar
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote:

 Gill, why not simply put it on the webpage, with an optional form to
 fill out name, location, contact info, etc.  The information should be
 free to all, the more people who get it, read it, the better.  If
 people have to jump through hoops, it could possibly scare a few off.
 Getting the information out there into the hands of potential new
 members and cavers.


Yes, basically right. But getting them information is only half of the
goal.
We want their info as well. We want to identify them. They are our target
cavers--the ones we want to encourage to not only go caving safely but to
join the TSA, the NSS, and to become an active part of the great unwashed
caver community--not rogue warriors in the caving world. So, we need their
information and we need to keep in touch with them. The hassle of filling
out a subscription (which can be minimal) is itself a small filter to weed
out trivial inquiries. We want accountability from both ends.


 Everyone is worried about spam, we have plenty and will only get more.
  If you are worried about people getting your email address out of a
 PDF, then don't put it into the PDF, its that simple.


I personally am not worried about hard copy (such as pdf) lists being
snagged for spam. Manually transcribing them is a bit more effort, though
not a whole lot. It's the electronic files which can be manipulated in the
computer to harvest email addresses that I don't want to see posted. Again,
I guess they could be hidden.


  Contact info in the TC should point to the website contact page, it's
 just that simple, no more worries about spam.


Yes


 Sometimes it is really best to keep things simple, especially when
 trying to attract new members.

 I'm OK with simple. Just keep in mind OUR needs from them and don't cut us
off short from the value we place on our target audience.

--Ediger


Re: [Texascavers] Subscribers to digital publications

2009-12-15 Thread speleosteele
I'm unsubcribing from Texascavers.com later tonight. I've had it.

Bill

Sent via BlackBerry by ATT

-Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:58:07 
To: Gill Edigargi...@att.net
Cc: texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Subscribers to digital publications
Gill, why not simply put it on the webpage, with an optional form to
fill out name, location, contact info, etc.  The information should be
free to all, the more people who get it, read it, the better.  If
people have to jump through hoops, it could possibly scare a few off.
Getting the information out there into the hands of potential new
members and cavers.

Everyone is worried about spam, we have plenty and will only get more.
 If you are worried about people getting your email address out of a
PDF, then don't put it into the PDF, its that simple.

Contact info in the TC should point to the website contact page, it's
just that simple, no more worries about spam.

Sometimes it is really best to keep things simple, especially when
trying to attract new members.

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote:
 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 wrote:

 If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it
 will be available on the front page.

 That would not be good. But it would not be not good because of the reason
 being discussed here--spam, etc. There's another...
 Now I'm gonna tell you what I'm gonna tell you then I'm gonna tell you
 why--two paragraphs.
 The process should be some variation of this:
    Cavers can get 'invited to subscribe' to The TEXAS CAVER by any of
 several means--from the TSA or Grotto Home Pages, at Grotto meetings, the
 TSA convention, TCR, from fellow cavers, from handouts at projects such as
 CBSP, Gov Canyon, Punkin  Deep, etc, or basically any way and place that
 cavers get together.
    Then, the caver will go to the link on the TSA web site and navigate to
 the Subscribe to The TEXAS CAVER button.
    Then, the caver will be asked for some vital information such as name,
 address, etc, NSS number, Grotto affiliation (or independent), and maybe
 even personal info such as family member names (which are mostly for photo
 identification purposes, not for publication, etc), age, years caving, and a
 brief caving bio, and the all important email address (which does not have
 to be the caver's primary one). Most of this info will be voluntary.
 Basically all that will be needed is a name and an email address and a
 password.
    The caver will also be asked to furnish a password for accessing his or
 her own personal subscription information.
    Then, whenever a new CAVER is ready to mail (or some breaking TSA
 caver-worthy news) the caver will be sent a message telling him or her to go
 access his or her subscription account, and to download a free digital copy
 of whatever is being offered--TEXAS CAVER or whatever. There could be some
 restrictions as to which publications can be downloaded without being a TSA
 member, such as a Members Manual, meeting minutes, etc.
    Then, they can download it and print it out in any way they choose,
 archiving the digital copy for posterity, and getting back to doing whatever
 they were doing before--or maybe read The CAVER.
 The mechanics of that process are not too hard to visualize--I hope. But
 there are some questions, I'm sure. So here are a few 'whys' to dispel some
 of um.
 Q. Why require a subscription?
    A. Because what we really want is to know who is this subscriber is and
 where they fit in the Texas caving scene. Basically we are trying to
 identify all the cavers in Texas so we can keep in contact with
 them--ostensibly through the auspices of The TEXAS CAVER--and influence them
 and they us. We will give you a free CAVER if you will be a part of our
 'extended' TSA caving fraternity. This is a bribe from us to know who you
 are and that you are one of us--even though you may have been hiding for
 many years because you felt that the TSA doesn't care about you--doesn't
 want you to be a part of their elite group without you getting involved in
 their political intrigues or any other reasons you may have.
 Q, How does this help the TSA?
    A. The subscription gives the TSA a database for contacting outside
 cavers (not just TSA members) about important issues such as cave
 conservation, caver functions, projects, conventions, TCR and other events
 that cavers would be interested in. It also restricts (somewhat) the
 distribution of errant issues on the open market. That's not to say that I
 couldn't just print out 40 copies via my download and hand them out at
 Walgreens. It also provides a larger man-power base of both leaders and
 followers which will obviously contribute to projects, training,
 participation, writing articles, and a general contribution to more and
 better caving.
 Q. How will my email 

Re: [Texascavers] Subscribers to digital publications

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
ok, so why you sending me this?

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:02 PM,  speleoste...@tx.rr.com wrote:
 I'm unsubcribing from Texascavers.com later tonight. I've had it.

 Bill

 Sent via BlackBerry by ATT

 -Original Message-
 From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:58:07
 To: Gill Edigargi...@att.net
 Cc: texascavers@texascavers.com
 Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Subscribers to digital publications
 Gill, why not simply put it on the webpage, with an optional form to
 fill out name, location, contact info, etc.  The information should be
 free to all, the more people who get it, read it, the better.  If
 people have to jump through hoops, it could possibly scare a few off.
 Getting the information out there into the hands of potential new
 members and cavers.

 Everyone is worried about spam, we have plenty and will only get more.
  If you are worried about people getting your email address out of a
 PDF, then don't put it into the PDF, its that simple.

 Contact info in the TC should point to the website contact page, it's
 just that simple, no more worries about spam.

 Sometimes it is really best to keep things simple, especially when
 trying to attract new members.

 Charles

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote:
 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 wrote:

 If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it
 will be available on the front page.

 That would not be good. But it would not be not good because of the reason
 being discussed here--spam, etc. There's another...
 Now I'm gonna tell you what I'm gonna tell you then I'm gonna tell you
 why--two paragraphs.
 The process should be some variation of this:
    Cavers can get 'invited to subscribe' to The TEXAS CAVER by any of
 several means--from the TSA or Grotto Home Pages, at Grotto meetings, the
 TSA convention, TCR, from fellow cavers, from handouts at projects such as
 CBSP, Gov Canyon, Punkin  Deep, etc, or basically any way and place that
 cavers get together.
    Then, the caver will go to the link on the TSA web site and navigate to
 the Subscribe to The TEXAS CAVER button.
    Then, the caver will be asked for some vital information such as name,
 address, etc, NSS number, Grotto affiliation (or independent), and maybe
 even personal info such as family member names (which are mostly for photo
 identification purposes, not for publication, etc), age, years caving, and a
 brief caving bio, and the all important email address (which does not have
 to be the caver's primary one). Most of this info will be voluntary.
 Basically all that will be needed is a name and an email address and a
 password.
    The caver will also be asked to furnish a password for accessing his or
 her own personal subscription information.
    Then, whenever a new CAVER is ready to mail (or some breaking TSA
 caver-worthy news) the caver will be sent a message telling him or her to go
 access his or her subscription account, and to download a free digital copy
 of whatever is being offered--TEXAS CAVER or whatever. There could be some
 restrictions as to which publications can be downloaded without being a TSA
 member, such as a Members Manual, meeting minutes, etc.
    Then, they can download it and print it out in any way they choose,
 archiving the digital copy for posterity, and getting back to doing whatever
 they were doing before--or maybe read The CAVER.
 The mechanics of that process are not too hard to visualize--I hope. But
 there are some questions, I'm sure. So here are a few 'whys' to dispel some
 of um.
 Q. Why require a subscription?
    A. Because what we really want is to know who is this subscriber is and
 where they fit in the Texas caving scene. Basically we are trying to
 identify all the cavers in Texas so we can keep in contact with
 them--ostensibly through the auspices of The TEXAS CAVER--and influence them
 and they us. We will give you a free CAVER if you will be a part of our
 'extended' TSA caving fraternity. This is a bribe from us to know who you
 are and that you are one of us--even though you may have been hiding for
 many years because you felt that the TSA doesn't care about you--doesn't
 want you to be a part of their elite group without you getting involved in
 their political intrigues or any other reasons you may have.
 Q, How does this help the TSA?
    A. The subscription gives the TSA a database for contacting outside
 cavers (not just TSA members) about important issues such as cave
 conservation, caver functions, projects, conventions, TCR and other events
 that cavers would be interested in. It also restricts (somewhat) the
 distribution of errant issues on the open market. That's not to say that I
 couldn't just print out 40 copies via my download and hand them out at
 Walgreens. It also provides a larger man-power base of both leaders and
 followers which will obviously contribute to projects, 

Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

2009-12-15 Thread Rod Goke
For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA membership 
ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that Mark has been 
doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the dedicated work that he 
and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I blame TSA for the small 
amount of spam that occasionally slips through the filters into my email 
account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they don't even have my email 
address? ;-) )

I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to handle our email 
addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA already has placed 
an online listing of its electronically registered members on its password 
protected website. Then look at Gill's recent proposal to make online access to 
the Texas Caver free for nonmembers. Neither of these things necessarily 
involves an irresponsible release of TSA members' email addresses when 
considered separately (although I still would rather not have my email address 
on even a members-only password protected online list). When both of these 
things are considered together, however, along with all the other turmoil about 
TSA digital publication policies, it is easy to imagine how people might 
provide their email addresses to TSA assuming one seemingly responsible privacy 
policy, only to discover later that TSA has changed its mind and has made the 
email address list more widely accessible than people had expected when they 
provided their addresses.

I chose to throw this stone into the hornets nest, because I wanted people to 
actually start thinking about the issue, instead of just telling us don't 
worry, be happy. The problem would be easy to fix if TSA simply would make a 
commitment to its members that no member's email address will be included in 
any online list unless that member explicitly opts in for inclusion in the 
list. TSA members need to be able to register for website access without having 
their email addresses published in an online list. 

Rod

-Original Message-
From: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net
Sent: Dec 14, 2009 11:17 AM
To: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net
Cc: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

For the record Mark, I wasn't blaming nor condeming the TSA, I was just 
stating the fact that I get hundreds of thousands of spam emails.
Mark, I like the TSA and I think I get my moneys worth from volunteers who 
are very much appreciated.

Bill
- Original Message - 
From: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net
To: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net
Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org; TexasCavers 
texascavers@texascavers.com; Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?


 The TSA has my e mail.and I getoh maybe one or two junk mail 
 messages per WEEK.
 Paranoia runs deep concerning e mail spam. But unjustly condemning the TSA 
 for something they are not doing or really at fault for..hardly seems 
 fair or reasonable.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Dec 14, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net wrote:

 Rod,
 My ca...@caver.net email address gets a spam email message every 2 to 3 
 seconds... literally thousands per hour... all of it goes into a spam 
 folder and good spam sorting software on the email server  helps me figure 
 what is crap and what is not... End of the day I am deleting a lot of 
 spam... If someone were to go after the companies who are advertisng the 
 drugs, diplomas and sex services then it mifght help curb it. I feel that 
 a complete overhaul of how email works wouold be the answer, since you can 
 currently send from and have the reply to address be different. A lot of 
 the spam I gets looks as if it is coming to me from me... but buried in 
 the header I find that it comes from Korea or China...

 Bill
 - Original Message - From: Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net
 To: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com
 Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org
 Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 2:04 AM
 Subject: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?


 All this talk about electronic vs. paper publication of the Texas Caver 
 reminds me of a related issue:

   Is it safe to give your email address to TSA?

 For years TSA has been asking for our email addresses on the membership 
 renewal forms, and I have been refusing to give them mine. During this 
 same period, however, I have been providing my email address (along with 
 mailing address and phone numbers) to the UT Grotto for publication in 
 their UT Grotto Phone List. Why is it that I have felt that my email 
 address was sufficiently safe with the UT Grotto but not with TSA? The 
 answer is that the UT Grotto Phone List is published only in paper form, 
 where email addresses and other personal information is not likely to be 
 harvested by spammers, telemarketers, search 

Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360
people have your email address and each others.  Anyone of them could
harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who
posted an email to this list.

Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people?  The odds that
one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA
people, who are duly elected by some of these people.

If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it
will be available on the front page.

Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad
press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA.

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote:
 For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA 
 membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that 
 Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the 
 dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I 
 blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the 
 filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they 
 don't even have my email address? ;-) )

 I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to handle our 
 email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA already has 
 placed an online listing of its electronically registered members on its 
 password protected website. Then look at Gill's recent proposal to make 
 online access to the Texas Caver free for nonmembers. Neither of these things 
 necessarily involves an irresponsible release of TSA members' email addresses 
 when considered separately (although I still would rather not have my email 
 address on even a members-only password protected online list). When both of 
 these things are considered together, however, along with all the other 
 turmoil about TSA digital publication policies, it is easy to imagine how 
 people might provide their email addresses to TSA assuming one seemingly 
 responsible privacy policy, only to discover later that TSA has changed its 
 mind and has made the email address list more widely accessible than people 
 had expected when they provided their addresses.

 I chose to throw this stone into the hornets nest, because I wanted people 
 to actually start thinking about the issue, instead of just telling us don't 
 worry, be happy. The problem would be easy to fix if TSA simply would make a 
 commitment to its members that no member's email address will be included in 
 any online list unless that member explicitly opts in for inclusion in the 
 list. TSA members need to be able to register for website access without 
 having their email addresses published in an online list.

 Rod

 -Original Message-
From: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net
Sent: Dec 14, 2009 11:17 AM
To: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net
Cc: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

For the record Mark, I wasn't blaming nor condeming the TSA, I was just
stating the fact that I get hundreds of thousands of spam emails.
Mark, I like the TSA and I think I get my moneys worth from volunteers who
are very much appreciated.

Bill
- Original Message -
From: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net
To: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net
Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org; TexasCavers
texascavers@texascavers.com; Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?


 The TSA has my e mail.and I getoh maybe one or two junk mail
 messages per WEEK.
 Paranoia runs deep concerning e mail spam. But unjustly condemning the TSA
 for something they are not doing or really at fault for..hardly seems
 fair or reasonable.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Dec 14, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net wrote:

 Rod,
 My ca...@caver.net email address gets a spam email message every 2 to 3
 seconds... literally thousands per hour... all of it goes into a spam
 folder and good spam sorting software on the email server  helps me figure
 what is crap and what is not... End of the day I am deleting a lot of
 spam... If someone were to go after the companies who are advertisng the
 drugs, diplomas and sex services then it mifght help curb it. I feel that
 a complete overhaul of how email works wouold be the answer, since you can
 currently send from and have the reply to address be different. A lot of
 the spam I gets looks as if it is coming to me from me... but buried in
 the header I find that it comes from Korea or China...

 Bill
 - Original Message - From: Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net
 To: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com
 Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org
 Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 2:04 AM
 Subject: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?


 All this talk about electronic 

RE: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

2009-12-15 Thread Mark . Alman

Thanks, Charles.


I was wondering how/if to address this and you have done so rather succinctly.



I agree 100% with you.




Mark



-Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:48 AM
To: Rod Goke
Cc: Bill Bentley; John Brooks; Alman, Mark @ IRP; TexasCavers
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360
people have your email address and each others.  Anyone of them could
harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who
posted an email to this list.

Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people?  The odds that
one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA
people, who are duly elected by some of these people.

If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it
will be available on the front page.

Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad
press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA.

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote:
 For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA 
 membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that 
 Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the 
 dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I 
 blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the 
 filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they 
 don't even have my email address? ;-) )

 I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to handle our 
 email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA already has 
 placed an online listing of its electronically registered members on its 
 password protected website. Then look at Gill's recent proposal to make 
 online access to the Texas Caver free for nonmembers. Neither of these things 
 necessarily involves an irresponsible release of TSA members' email addresses 
 when considered separately (although I still would rather not have my email 
 address on even a members-only password protected online list). When both of 
 these things are considered together, however, along with all the other 
 turmoil about TSA digital publication policies, it is easy to imagine how 
 people might provide their email addresses to TSA assuming one seemingly 
 responsible privacy policy, only to discover later that TSA has changed its 
 mind and has made the email address list more widely accessible than people 
 had expected when they provided their addresses.

 I chose to throw this stone into the hornets nest, because I wanted people 
 to actually start thinking about the issue, instead of just telling us don't 
 worry, be happy. The problem would be easy to fix if TSA simply would make a 
 commitment to its members that no member's email address will be included in 
 any online list unless that member explicitly opts in for inclusion in the 
 list. TSA members need to be able to register for website access without 
 having their email addresses published in an online list.

 Rod

 -Original Message-
From: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net
Sent: Dec 14, 2009 11:17 AM
To: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net
Cc: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

For the record Mark, I wasn't blaming nor condeming the TSA, I was just
stating the fact that I get hundreds of thousands of spam emails.
Mark, I like the TSA and I think I get my moneys worth from volunteers who
are very much appreciated.

Bill
- Original Message -
From: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net
To: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net
Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org; TexasCavers
texascavers@texascavers.com; Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?


 The TSA has my e mail.and I getoh maybe one or two junk mail
 messages per WEEK.
 Paranoia runs deep concerning e mail spam. But unjustly condemning the TSA
 for something they are not doing or really at fault for..hardly seems
 fair or reasonable.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Dec 14, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net wrote:

 Rod,
 My ca...@caver.net email address gets a spam email message every 2 to 3
 seconds... literally thousands per hour... all of it goes into a spam
 folder and good spam sorting software on the email server  helps me figure
 what is crap and what is not... End of the day I am deleting a lot of
 spam... If someone were to go after the companies who are advertisng the
 drugs, diplomas and sex services then it mifght help curb it. I feel that
 a complete overhaul of how email works wouold be the answer, since you can
 currently send from and have the reply to address be different. A lot of
 the spam I gets 

Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
For some reason, Rod rubs me the wrong way with this.

He better stop scaring the people with this shit, some don't know any better.

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:56 AM,  mark.al...@l-3com.com wrote:

 Thanks, Charles.


 I was wondering how/if to address this and you have done so rather succinctly.



 I agree 100% with you.




 Mark



 -Original Message-
 From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:48 AM
 To: Rod Goke
 Cc: Bill Bentley; John Brooks; Alman, Mark @ IRP; TexasCavers
 Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

 Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360
 people have your email address and each others.  Anyone of them could
 harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who
 posted an email to this list.

 Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people?  The odds that
 one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA
 people, who are duly elected by some of these people.

 If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it
 will be available on the front page.

 Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad
 press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA.

 Charles

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote:
 For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA 
 membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that 
 Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the 
 dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I 
 blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the 
 filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they 
 don't even have my email address? ;-) )

 I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to handle our 
 email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA already 
 has placed an online listing of its electronically registered members on its 
 password protected website. Then look at Gill's recent proposal to make 
 online access to the Texas Caver free for nonmembers. Neither of these 
 things necessarily involves an irresponsible release of TSA members' email 
 addresses when considered separately (although I still would rather not have 
 my email address on even a members-only password protected online list). 
 When both of these things are considered together, however, along with all 
 the other turmoil about TSA digital publication policies, it is easy to 
 imagine how people might provide their email addresses to TSA assuming one 
 seemingly responsible privacy policy, only to discover later that TSA has 
 changed its mind and has made the email address list more widely accessible 
 than people had expected when they provided their addresses.

 I chose to throw this stone into the hornets nest, because I wanted people 
 to actually start thinking about the issue, instead of just telling us 
 don't worry, be happy. The problem would be easy to fix if TSA simply 
 would make a commitment to its members that no member's email address will 
 be included in any online list unless that member explicitly opts in for 
 inclusion in the list. TSA members need to be able to register for website 
 access without having their email addresses published in an online list.

 Rod

 -Original Message-
From: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net
Sent: Dec 14, 2009 11:17 AM
To: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net
Cc: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

For the record Mark, I wasn't blaming nor condeming the TSA, I was just
stating the fact that I get hundreds of thousands of spam emails.
Mark, I like the TSA and I think I get my moneys worth from volunteers who
are very much appreciated.

Bill
- Original Message -
From: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net
To: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net
Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org; TexasCavers
texascavers@texascavers.com; Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?


 The TSA has my e mail.and I getoh maybe one or two junk mail
 messages per WEEK.
 Paranoia runs deep concerning e mail spam. But unjustly condemning the TSA
 for something they are not doing or really at fault for..hardly seems
 fair or reasonable.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Dec 14, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net wrote:

 Rod,
 My ca...@caver.net email address gets a spam email message every 2 to 3
 seconds... literally thousands per hour... all of it goes into a spam
 folder and good spam sorting software on the email server  helps me figure
 what is crap and what is not... End of the day I am deleting a lot of
 spam... If someone were to go after the companies who are advertisng the
 drugs, diplomas and sex 

RE: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

2009-12-15 Thread Sheryl Rieck
   For goodness sake!  You should all go Google yourselves!  ;-)  Do you
all complain this much when your snail mail address is sold and you receive
50lbs worth of junk mail each month?  
   
   Sheryl (writing down all these email addresses so I can sell them.  I
need some cash.)
   
   
   -Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:48 AM
To: Rod Goke
Cc: Bill Bentley; John Brooks; Mark Alman; TexasCavers
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
   
   Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over
360
   people have your email address and each others.  Anyone of them could
   harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of
who
   posted an email to this list.
   
   Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people?  The odds that
   one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA
   people, who are duly elected by some of these people.
   
   If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section,
it
   will be available on the front page.
   
   Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad
   press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA.
   
   Charles
   
   On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net
wrote:
For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my
TSA membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think
that Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the
dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I
blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the
filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they
don't even have my email address? ;-) )
   
I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to
handle our email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA
already has placed an online listing of its electronically registered
members on its password protected website. Then look at Gill's recent
proposal to make online access to the Texas Caver free for nonmembers.
Neither of these things necessarily involves an irresponsible release of TSA
members' email addresses when considered separately (although I still would
rather not have my email address on even a members-only password protected
online list). When both of these things are considered together, however,
along with all the other turmoil about TSA digital publication policies, it
is easy to imagine how people might provide their email addresses to TSA
assuming one seemingly responsible privacy policy, only to discover later
that TSA has changed its mind and has made the email address list more
widely accessible than people had expected when they provided their
addresses.
   
I chose to throw this stone into the hornets nest, because I
wanted people to actually start thinking about the issue, instead of just
telling us don't worry, be happy. The problem would be easy to fix if TSA
simply would make a commitment to its members that no member's email address
will be included in any online list unless that member explicitly opts in
for inclusion in the list. TSA members need to be able to register for
website access without having their email addresses published in an online
list.
   
Rod
   
-Original Message-
   From: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net
   Sent: Dec 14, 2009 11:17 AM
   To: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net
   Cc: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com
   Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
   
   For the record Mark, I wasn't blaming nor condeming the TSA, I was
just
   stating the fact that I get hundreds of thousands of spam emails.
   Mark, I like the TSA and I think I get my moneys worth from
volunteers who
   are very much appreciated.
   
   Bill
   - Original Message -
   From: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net
   To: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net
   Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org; TexasCavers
   texascavers@texascavers.com; Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org
   Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:24 AM
   Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
   
   
The TSA has my e mail.and I getoh maybe one or two junk
mail
messages per WEEK.
Paranoia runs deep concerning e mail spam. But unjustly
condemning the TSA
for something they are not doing or really at fault
for..hardly seems
fair or reasonable.
   
Sent from my iPhone
   
On Dec 14, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net
wrote:
   
Rod,
My ca...@caver.net email address gets a spam email 

Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
Sheryl, I already have the list, I'll send it to you, we'll split the cash :)

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Sheryl Rieck shri...@cableone.net wrote:
       For goodness sake!  You should all go Google yourselves!  ;-)  Do you
 all complain this much when your snail mail address is sold and you receive
 50lbs worth of junk mail each month?

       Sheryl (writing down all these email addresses so I can sell them.  I
 need some cash.)


       -Original Message-
 From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:48 AM
 To: Rod Goke
 Cc: Bill Bentley; John Brooks; Mark Alman; TexasCavers
 Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

       Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over
 360
       people have your email address and each others.  Anyone of them could
       harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of
 who
       posted an email to this list.

       Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people?  The odds that
       one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA
       people, who are duly elected by some of these people.

       If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section,
 it
       will be available on the front page.

       Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad
       press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA.

       Charles

       On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net
 wrote:
        For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my
 TSA membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think
 that Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the
 dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I
 blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the
 filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they
 don't even have my email address? ;-) )
       
        I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to
 handle our email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA
 already has placed an online listing of its electronically registered
 members on its password protected website. Then look at Gill's recent
 proposal to make online access to the Texas Caver free for nonmembers.
 Neither of these things necessarily involves an irresponsible release of TSA
 members' email addresses when considered separately (although I still would
 rather not have my email address on even a members-only password protected
 online list). When both of these things are considered together, however,
 along with all the other turmoil about TSA digital publication policies, it
 is easy to imagine how people might provide their email addresses to TSA
 assuming one seemingly responsible privacy policy, only to discover later
 that TSA has changed its mind and has made the email address list more
 widely accessible than people had expected when they provided their
 addresses.
       
        I chose to throw this stone into the hornets nest, because I
 wanted people to actually start thinking about the issue, instead of just
 telling us don't worry, be happy. The problem would be easy to fix if TSA
 simply would make a commitment to its members that no member's email address
 will be included in any online list unless that member explicitly opts in
 for inclusion in the list. TSA members need to be able to register for
 website access without having their email addresses published in an online
 list.
       
        Rod
       
        -Original Message-
       From: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net
       Sent: Dec 14, 2009 11:17 AM
       To: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net
       Cc: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com
       Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
       
       For the record Mark, I wasn't blaming nor condeming the TSA, I was
 just
       stating the fact that I get hundreds of thousands of spam emails.
       Mark, I like the TSA and I think I get my moneys worth from
 volunteers who
       are very much appreciated.
       
       Bill
       - Original Message -
       From: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net
       To: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net
       Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org; TexasCavers
       texascavers@texascavers.com; Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org
       Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:24 AM
       Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
       
       
        The TSA has my e mail.and I getoh maybe one or two junk
 mail
        messages per WEEK.
        Paranoia runs deep concerning e mail spam. But unjustly
 condemning the TSA
        for something they are not doing or really at fault
 for..hardly seems
        fair or reasonable.
       
        Sent from my iPhone
       
        On Dec 14, 

Fw: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

2009-12-15 Thread Bill Bentley

Ouch I am getting everything twice... open mouth insert emails... :)

Bill
- Original Message - 
From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org

To: Sheryl Rieck shri...@cableone.net
Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org; Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net; John 
Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net; Mark Alman mark.al...@l-3com.com; 
TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com

Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?


Sheryl, I already have the list, I'll send it to you, we'll split the cash 
:)


Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Sheryl Rieck shri...@cableone.net wrote:

For goodness sake! You should all go Google yourselves! ;-) Do you
all complain this much when your snail mail address is sold and you 
receive

50lbs worth of junk mail each month?

Sheryl (writing down all these email addresses so I can sell them. I
need some cash.)


-Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:48 AM
To: Rod Goke
Cc: Bill Bentley; John Brooks; Mark Alman; TexasCavers
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over
360
people have your email address and each others. Anyone of them could
harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of
who
posted an email to this list.

Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people? The odds that
one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA
people, who are duly elected by some of these people.

If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section,
it
will be available on the front page.

Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad
press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA.

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net
wrote:
 For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my
TSA membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, 
think

that Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the
dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I
blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the
filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they
don't even have my email address? ;-) )

 I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to
handle our email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that 
TSA

already has placed an online listing of its electronically registered
members on its password protected website. Then look at Gill's recent
proposal to make online access to the Texas Caver free for nonmembers.
Neither of these things necessarily involves an irresponsible release of 
TSA
members' email addresses when considered separately (although I still 
would

rather not have my email address on even a members-only password protected
online list). When both of these things are considered together, however,
along with all the other turmoil about TSA digital publication policies, 
it

is easy to imagine how people might provide their email addresses to TSA
assuming one seemingly responsible privacy policy, only to discover later
that TSA has changed its mind and has made the email address list more
widely accessible than people had expected when they provided their
addresses.

 I chose to throw this stone into the hornets nest, because I
wanted people to actually start thinking about the issue, instead of just
telling us don't worry, be happy. The problem would be easy to fix if 
TSA
simply would make a commitment to its members that no member's email 
address
will be included in any online list unless that member explicitly opts 
in

for inclusion in the list. TSA members need to be able to register for
website access without having their email addresses published in an online
list.

 Rod

 -Original Message-
From: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net
Sent: Dec 14, 2009 11:17 AM
To: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net
Cc: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

For the record Mark, I wasn't blaming nor condeming the TSA, I was
just
stating the fact that I get hundreds of thousands of spam emails.
Mark, I like the TSA and I think I get my moneys worth from
volunteers who
are very much appreciated.

Bill
- Original Message -
From: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net
To: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net
Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org; TexasCavers
texascavers@texascavers.com; Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?


 The TSA has my e mail.and I getoh maybe one or two junk
mail
 messages per WEEK.
 Paranoia runs deep concerning e mail spam. But unjustly
condemning the TSA
 for something they are not doing or really at fault
for..hardly 

RE: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

2009-12-15 Thread Sheryl Rieck
   ;-)
   
   
   
   -Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 10:45 AM
To: Sheryl Rieck
Cc: Rod Goke; Bill Bentley; John Brooks; Mark Alman; TexasCavers
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
   
   Sheryl, I already have the list, I'll send it to you, we'll split the
cash :)
   
   Charles
   




Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

2009-12-15 Thread mmcart1061
Take me off cavetex for now
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:48:15 
To: Rod Gokerod.g...@ieee.org
Cc: Bill Bentleyca...@caver.net; John Brooksjpbrook...@sbcglobal.net; Mark 
Almanmark.al...@l-3com.com; TexasCaverstexascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360
people have your email address and each others.  Anyone of them could
harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who
posted an email to this list.

Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people?  The odds that
one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA
people, who are duly elected by some of these people.

If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it
will be available on the front page.

Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad
press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA.

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote:
 For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA 
 membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that 
 Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the 
 dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I 
 blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the 
 filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they 
 don't even have my email address? ;-) )

 I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to handle our 
 email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA already has 
 placed an online listing of its electronically registered members on its 
 password protected website. Then look at Gill's recent proposal to make 
 online access to the Texas Caver free for nonmembers. Neither of these things 
 necessarily involves an irresponsible release of TSA members' email addresses 
 when considered separately (although I still would rather not have my email 
 address on even a members-only password protected online list). When both of 
 these things are considered together, however, along with all the other 
 turmoil about TSA digital publication policies, it is easy to imagine how 
 people might provide their email addresses to TSA assuming one seemingly 
 responsible privacy policy, only to discover later that TSA has changed its 
 mind and has made the email address list more widely accessible than people 
 had expected when they provided their addresses.

 I chose to throw this stone into the hornets nest, because I wanted people 
 to actually start thinking about the issue, instead of just telling us don't 
 worry, be happy. The problem would be easy to fix if TSA simply would make a 
 commitment to its members that no member's email address will be included in 
 any online list unless that member explicitly opts in for inclusion in the 
 list. TSA members need to be able to register for website access without 
 having their email addresses published in an online list.

 Rod

 -Original Message-
From: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net
Sent: Dec 14, 2009 11:17 AM
To: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net
Cc: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

For the record Mark, I wasn't blaming nor condeming the TSA, I was just
stating the fact that I get hundreds of thousands of spam emails.
Mark, I like the TSA and I think I get my moneys worth from volunteers who
are very much appreciated.

Bill
- Original Message -
From: John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net
To: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net
Cc: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org; TexasCavers
texascavers@texascavers.com; Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?


 The TSA has my e mail.and I getoh maybe one or two junk mail
 messages per WEEK.
 Paranoia runs deep concerning e mail spam. But unjustly condemning the TSA
 for something they are not doing or really at fault for..hardly seems
 fair or reasonable.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Dec 14, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net wrote:

 Rod,
 My ca...@caver.net email address gets a spam email message every 2 to 3
 seconds... literally thousands per hour... all of it goes into a spam
 folder and good spam sorting software on the email server  helps me figure
 what is crap and what is not... End of the day I am deleting a lot of
 spam... If someone were to go after the companies who are advertisng the
 drugs, diplomas and sex services then it mifght help curb it. I feel that
 a complete overhaul of how email works wouold be the answer, since you can
 currently send from and have the reply to address be different. A lot of
 the 

Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

2009-12-15 Thread Rod Goke
Charles,

Your message below really misses the the point, and your personal attacks are 
totally unwarranted. Of course, we all run some risk that our email addresses 
will somehow get to spammers whenever we send them to anyone. Whenever you or I 
or anyone else posts a message to Texascavers we understand that our email 
addresses will be visible to others on the list, and we choose to do that. 
Harvesting email addresses one at a time from postings to this list as you 
suggested would be possible, of course, but it would be a slow and inconvenient 
way to collect a large list for spam, and I don't think either of us is 
seriously worried about that.

The primary hazard is not that anyone in TSA or other caving organizations will 
deliberately pass information to spammers, but rather that some people 
downloading information with good intentions will inadvertently store it where 
spyware or other malware on an infected computer can search the downloaded 
files for email addresses, phone numbers, or other information that writers of 
the malware wish to harvest. This is something that easily can happen, and when 
it does, the person making information available to the malware might be 
totally unaware of what is going on. When people download individual email 
messages or other data items containing only a few email addresses or other 
sensitive items, then only those few items are vulnerable to harvesting by 
malware in any one incident. When people download an entire mailing list, 
however, then just one incident on one inadvertently infected computer can 
result in harvesting of the entire list. When many people download the list to 
many different computers, the risk to everyone on the list increases 
accordingly.

So far as I know, the subscribers to Texascavers are not allowed to download 
that entire email address list, and I trust that Texascavers will continue to 
be managed in this responsible manner, especially since I haven't noticed any 
demand to do otherwise. The discussions I've heard and read about the TSA's 
online data resources, however, create much more uncertainty about how they 
will be managed. This is why it is important to have serious discussions of the 
issues beforehand to prevent problems, especially when some of them could be 
prevented so easily with a few minor policy decisions.

Rod


-Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
Sent: Dec 15, 2009 10:48 AM
To: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org
Cc: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net, John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net, 
Mark Alman mark.al...@l-3com.com, TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360
people have your email address and each others.  Anyone of them could
harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who
posted an email to this list.

Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people?  The odds that
one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA
people, who are duly elected by some of these people.

If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it
will be available on the front page.

Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad
press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA.

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote:
 For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA 
 membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that 
 Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the 
 dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I 
 blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the 
 filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they 
 don't even have my email address? ;-) )

 I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to handle our 
 email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA already 
 has placed an online listing of its electronically registered members on its 
 password protected website. Then look at Gill's recent proposal to make 
 online access to the Texas Caver free for nonmembers. Neither of these 
 things necessarily involves an irresponsible release of TSA members' email 
 addresses when considered separately (although I still would rather not have 
 my email address on even a members-only password protected online list). 
 When both of these things are considered together, however, along with all 
 the other turmoil about TSA digital publication policies, it is easy to 
 imagine how people might provide their email addresses to TSA assuming one 
 seemingly responsible privacy policy, only to discover later that TSA has 
 changed its mind and has made the email address list more widely accessible 
 than people had expected when they provided their addresses.

 

Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

2009-12-15 Thread ellie :)
Rod and Charles (ONLY),

At the Jan 10th meeting we will propose that restricted access free-loaders
must create a user account to download the free old copies. Copies over one
year old will be made free.

Other restricted access free-loaders can apply for a scholarship if they
would like to receive the most up-to-date digital copies for free- the
scholarship will be a TSA expense. They must have been underground for at
least 5 hours in the past year though. Underground being, in a cave, where
it is dark.

Its more reasonable than the original idea to require you be an NSS member
or have involvement w/ a grotto or cave organization to be able to create a
free user account.

At the Jan 10th meeting!

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote:

 Charles,

 Your message below really misses the the point, and your personal attacks
 are totally unwarranted. Of course, we all run some risk that our email
 addresses will somehow get to spammers whenever we send them to anyone.
 Whenever you or I or anyone else posts a message to Texascavers we
 understand that our email addresses will be visible to others on the list,
 and we choose to do that. Harvesting email addresses one at a time from
 postings to this list as you suggested would be possible, of course, but it
 would be a slow and inconvenient way to collect a large list for spam, and I
 don't think either of us is seriously worried about that.

 The primary hazard is not that anyone in TSA or other caving organizations
 will deliberately pass information to spammers, but rather that some people
 downloading information with good intentions will inadvertently store it
 where spyware or other malware on an infected computer can search the
 downloaded files for email addresses, phone numbers, or other information
 that writers of the malware wish to harvest. This is something that easily
 can happen, and when it does, the person making information available to the
 malware might be totally unaware of what is going on. When people download
 individual email messages or other data items containing only a few email
 addresses or other sensitive items, then only those few items are vulnerable
 to harvesting by malware in any one incident. When people download an entire
 mailing list, however, then just one incident on one inadvertently infected
 computer can result in harvesting of the entire list. When many people
 download the list to many different computers, the risk to everyone on the
 list increases accordingly.

 So far as I know, the subscribers to Texascavers are not allowed to
 download that entire email address list, and I trust that Texascavers will
 continue to be managed in this responsible manner, especially since I
 haven't noticed any demand to do otherwise. The discussions I've heard and
 read about the TSA's online data resources, however, create much more
 uncertainty about how they will be managed. This is why it is important to
 have serious discussions of the issues beforehand to prevent problems,
 especially when some of them could be prevented so easily with a few minor
 policy decisions.

 Rod


 -Original Message-
 From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 Sent: Dec 15, 2009 10:48 AM
 To: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org
 Cc: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net, John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net,
 Mark Alman mark.al...@l-3com.com, TexasCavers 
 texascavers@texascavers.com
 Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
 
 Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360
 people have your email address and each others.  Anyone of them could
 harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who
 posted an email to this list.
 
 Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people?  The odds that
 one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA
 people, who are duly elected by some of these people.
 
 If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it
 will be available on the front page.
 
 Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad
 press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA.
 
 Charles
 
 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote:
  For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA
 membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think that
 Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the
 dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I
 blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the
 filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they
 don't even have my email address? ;-) )
 
  I still am not confident, however, that TSA can be trusted to handle our
 email addresses responsibly. Look at Jerry's observation that TSA already
 has placed an online listing of its electronically registered members on its
 password 

Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
I disagree Ellie, we should put them on the main page, no login
required and no wait period.

That's my opinion

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:57 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
 Rod and Charles (ONLY),

 At the Jan 10th meeting we will propose that restricted access free-loaders
 must create a user account to download the free old copies. Copies over one
 year old will be made free.

 Other restricted access free-loaders can apply for a scholarship if they
 would like to receive the most up-to-date digital copies for free- the
 scholarship will be a TSA expense. They must have been underground for at
 least 5 hours in the past year though. Underground being, in a cave, where
 it is dark.

 Its more reasonable than the original idea to require you be an NSS member
 or have involvement w/ a grotto or cave organization to be able to create a
 free user account.

 At the Jan 10th meeting!

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote:

 Charles,

 Your message below really misses the the point, and your personal attacks
 are totally unwarranted. Of course, we all run some risk that our email
 addresses will somehow get to spammers whenever we send them to anyone.
 Whenever you or I or anyone else posts a message to Texascavers we
 understand that our email addresses will be visible to others on the list,
 and we choose to do that. Harvesting email addresses one at a time from
 postings to this list as you suggested would be possible, of course, but it
 would be a slow and inconvenient way to collect a large list for spam, and I
 don't think either of us is seriously worried about that.

 The primary hazard is not that anyone in TSA or other caving organizations
 will deliberately pass information to spammers, but rather that some people
 downloading information with good intentions will inadvertently store it
 where spyware or other malware on an infected computer can search the
 downloaded files for email addresses, phone numbers, or other information
 that writers of the malware wish to harvest. This is something that easily
 can happen, and when it does, the person making information available to the
 malware might be totally unaware of what is going on. When people download
 individual email messages or other data items containing only a few email
 addresses or other sensitive items, then only those few items are vulnerable
 to harvesting by malware in any one incident. When people download an entire
 mailing list, however, then just one incident on one inadvertently infected
 computer can result in harvesting of the entire list. When many people
 download the list to many different computers, the risk to everyone on the
 list increases accordingly.

 So far as I know, the subscribers to Texascavers are not allowed to
 download that entire email address list, and I trust that Texascavers will
 continue to be managed in this responsible manner, especially since I
 haven't noticed any demand to do otherwise. The discussions I've heard and
 read about the TSA's online data resources, however, create much more
 uncertainty about how they will be managed. This is why it is important to
 have serious discussions of the issues beforehand to prevent problems,
 especially when some of them could be prevented so easily with a few minor
 policy decisions.

 Rod


 -Original Message-
 From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
 Sent: Dec 15, 2009 10:48 AM
 To: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org
 Cc: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net, John Brooks
  jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net, Mark Alman mark.al...@l-3com.com, TexasCavers
  texascavers@texascavers.com
 Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
 
 Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360
 people have your email address and each others.  Anyone of them could
 harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who
 posted an email to this list.
 
 Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people?  The odds that
 one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA
 people, who are duly elected by some of these people.
 
 If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it
 will be available on the front page.
 
 Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad
 press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA.
 
 Charles
 
 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote:
  For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA
  membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think 
  that
  Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the
  dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I
  blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the
  filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they
  don't even have my email address? ;-) )
 
  I still am not confident, 

Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

2009-12-15 Thread ellie :)
That will be a great item to bring up at the Jan 10th meeting.

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgwrote:

 I disagree Ellie, we should put them on the main page, no login
 required and no wait period.

 That's my opinion

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:57 PM, ellie :) ellie.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
  Rod and Charles (ONLY),
 
  At the Jan 10th meeting we will propose that restricted access
 free-loaders
  must create a user account to download the free old copies. Copies over
 one
  year old will be made free.
 
  Other restricted access free-loaders can apply for a scholarship if they
  would like to receive the most up-to-date digital copies for free- the
  scholarship will be a TSA expense. They must have been underground for at
  least 5 hours in the past year though. Underground being, in a cave,
 where
  it is dark.
 
  Its more reasonable than the original idea to require you be an NSS
 member
  or have involvement w/ a grotto or cave organization to be able to create
 a
  free user account.
 
  At the Jan 10th meeting!
 
  On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net
 wrote:
 
  Charles,
 
  Your message below really misses the the point, and your personal
 attacks
  are totally unwarranted. Of course, we all run some risk that our email
  addresses will somehow get to spammers whenever we send them to anyone.
  Whenever you or I or anyone else posts a message to Texascavers we
  understand that our email addresses will be visible to others on the
 list,
  and we choose to do that. Harvesting email addresses one at a time from
  postings to this list as you suggested would be possible, of course, but
 it
  would be a slow and inconvenient way to collect a large list for spam,
 and I
  don't think either of us is seriously worried about that.
 
  The primary hazard is not that anyone in TSA or other caving
 organizations
  will deliberately pass information to spammers, but rather that some
 people
  downloading information with good intentions will inadvertently store it
  where spyware or other malware on an infected computer can search the
  downloaded files for email addresses, phone numbers, or other
 information
  that writers of the malware wish to harvest. This is something that
 easily
  can happen, and when it does, the person making information available to
 the
  malware might be totally unaware of what is going on. When people
 download
  individual email messages or other data items containing only a few
 email
  addresses or other sensitive items, then only those few items are
 vulnerable
  to harvesting by malware in any one incident. When people download an
 entire
  mailing list, however, then just one incident on one inadvertently
 infected
  computer can result in harvesting of the entire list. When many people
  download the list to many different computers, the risk to everyone on
 the
  list increases accordingly.
 
  So far as I know, the subscribers to Texascavers are not allowed to
  download that entire email address list, and I trust that Texascavers
 will
  continue to be managed in this responsible manner, especially since I
  haven't noticed any demand to do otherwise. The discussions I've heard
 and
  read about the TSA's online data resources, however, create much more
  uncertainty about how they will be managed. This is why it is important
 to
  have serious discussions of the issues beforehand to prevent problems,
  especially when some of them could be prevented so easily with a few
 minor
  policy decisions.
 
  Rod
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
  Sent: Dec 15, 2009 10:48 AM
  To: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org
  Cc: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net, John Brooks
   jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net, Mark Alman mark.al...@l-3com.com,
 TexasCavers
   texascavers@texascavers.com
  Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?
  
  Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360
  people have your email address and each others.  Anyone of them could
  harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who
  posted an email to this list.
  
  Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people?  The odds that
  one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA
  people, who are duly elected by some of these people.
  
  If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it
  will be available on the front page.
  
  Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad
  press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA.
  
  Charles
  
  On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net
 wrote:
   For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA
   membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too,
 think that
   Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the
   dedicated work that he and other TSA 

Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
Rod, that wasn't a personal attack, if you took it as such, you need
to re-read my message and think about how it was meant.

The TSA having this list is no different than the NSS keeping a list
of its members, and sending that list out in book format, plain and
simple.

Harvesting emails from a mailing list is very very simple, I have the
complete list as owner of the list, but even another list, I can
harvest with a simple script that would only take me a few minutes to
write.

It was a tongue in cheek comment about writing down email addresses by
hand.  Scammers/Spammers/Phishers don't do anything manually.

Modern email applications cache email addresses that it sees, Malware
can and does use these lists to send out spam.  We've seen it recently
on the mailing list.

Your email address is not safe anywhere, you will just have to learn
to face that fact in this modern age.

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote:
 Charles,

 Your message below really misses the the point, and your personal attacks are 
 totally unwarranted. Of course, we all run some risk that our email addresses 
 will somehow get to spammers whenever we send them to anyone. Whenever you or 
 I or anyone else posts a message to Texascavers we understand that our email 
 addresses will be visible to others on the list, and we choose to do that. 
 Harvesting email addresses one at a time from postings to this list as you 
 suggested would be possible, of course, but it would be a slow and 
 inconvenient way to collect a large list for spam, and I don't think either 
 of us is seriously worried about that.

 The primary hazard is not that anyone in TSA or other caving organizations 
 will deliberately pass information to spammers, but rather that some people 
 downloading information with good intentions will inadvertently store it 
 where spyware or other malware on an infected computer can search the 
 downloaded files for email addresses, phone numbers, or other information 
 that writers of the malware wish to harvest. This is something that easily 
 can happen, and when it does, the person making information available to the 
 malware might be totally unaware of what is going on. When people download 
 individual email messages or other data items containing only a few email 
 addresses or other sensitive items, then only those few items are vulnerable 
 to harvesting by malware in any one incident. When people download an entire 
 mailing list, however, then just one incident on one inadvertently infected 
 computer can result in harvesting of the entire list. When many people 
 download the list to many different computers, the risk to everyone on the 
 list increases accordingly.

 So far as I know, the subscribers to Texascavers are not allowed to download 
 that entire email address list, and I trust that Texascavers will continue to 
 be managed in this responsible manner, especially since I haven't noticed any 
 demand to do otherwise. The discussions I've heard and read about the TSA's 
 online data resources, however, create much more uncertainty about how they 
 will be managed. This is why it is important to have serious discussions of 
 the issues beforehand to prevent problems, especially when some of them could 
 be prevented so easily with a few minor policy decisions.

 Rod


 -Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
Sent: Dec 15, 2009 10:48 AM
To: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org
Cc: Bill Bentley ca...@caver.net, John Brooks jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net, 
Mark Alman mark.al...@l-3com.com, TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

Rod, your paranoia is unwarranted here, only by the fact that over 360
people have your email address and each others.  Anyone of them could
harvest most of the emails after a bit of time by keeping track of who
posted an email to this list.

Do you completely trust every one of these 360 people?  The odds that
one of them would sell out is far greater than one of the TSA
people, who are duly elected by some of these people.

If the TC goes free, it won't be in the password protected section, it
will be available on the front page.

Blaming the TSA for something that has never happened is just bad
press, and you should know better, as a member of the TSA.

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote:
 For the record, I like TSA, too, which is why I've maintained my TSA 
 membership ever since moving to Texas about 25 years ago. I, too, think 
 that Mark has been doing a great job as editor, and I much appreciate the 
 dedicated work that he and other TSA volunteers have been doing. Nor do I 
 blame TSA for the small amount of spam that occasionally slips through the 
 filters into my email account. (How could I blame TSA for that when they 
 don't even have my email address? ;-) )

 I still am not confident, however, that TSA 

Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

2009-12-15 Thread Rod Goke
Charles,

I agree with your technical comments about the many ways that malware can be 
used to harvest email addresses and other data and that there is no way to 
protect an email address 100% while using it for its normal purpose. That 
doesn't imply, however, that there is no point in trying reduce risk. Listening 
to a computer professional say Your email addresses aren't safe anywhere, so 
why bother trying to protect them? is like listening to restaurant cook say 
You're not safe from germs anywhere, so why bother washing hands or dishes?

Like many email users, I've been using 2 email addresses for a number of years. 
I've used both of them frequently, but one I've tried to keep away from 
potential spam risks wherever practical and the other I've given out more 
freely. Of the two, the more protected one remained spam free much longer 
(about the first 2 years), and even after it began receiving spam, the quantity 
of spam received on the more protected address has remained conspicuously less 
than that received on the less protected address. This difference has remained 
noticeable even though I have used the more protected address frequently on 
Texascavers and for communication with numerous individuals. 

Someone with a much more carefully guarded email address still should be able 
to use it very safely in limited ways on caving related Internet services, as 
long as the people running those services practice reasonable privacy policies. 
For example, someone can subscribe to Texascavers without exposing his email 
address to everyone on the list as long as he only uses the subscription to 
receive messages from Texascavers, without ever posting to it (assuming, of 
course, that you don't change your policy and start allowing users to download 
the Texascavers address list).

Similarly, TSA could serve its online users much more safely if it simply 
separated the email address list used for online registration from that 
published in a members manual. With this convention, a member could be 
assured that the email address he uses for online registration will be used 
only for that purpose and for official email sent to him by TSA and that this 
address would NOT automatically appear on any list made available to the 
general membership. For his listing in a members manual style list, each 
member could specify separately what, if any, email address he wants published. 
This would allow each user to choose whether to publish the same email address, 
a different (less protected) address, or none at all.

Rod

-Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
Sent: Dec 15, 2009 4:09 PM
To: Rod Goke rod.g...@ieee.org
Cc: TexasCavers texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

Rod, that wasn't a personal attack, if you took it as such, you need
to re-read my message and think about how it was meant.

The TSA having this list is no different than the NSS keeping a list
of its members, and sending that list out in book format, plain and
simple.

Harvesting emails from a mailing list is very very simple, I have the
complete list as owner of the list, but even another list, I can
harvest with a simple script that would only take me a few minutes to
write.

It was a tongue in cheek comment about writing down email addresses by
hand.  Scammers/Spammers/Phishers don't do anything manually.

Modern email applications cache email addresses that it sees, Malware
can and does use these lists to send out spam.  We've seen it recently
on the mailing list.

Your email address is not safe anywhere, you will just have to learn
to face that fact in this modern age.

Charles

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Rod Goke rod.g...@earthlink.net wrote:
 Charles,

 Your message below really misses the the point, and your personal attacks 
 are totally unwarranted. Of course, we all run some risk that our email 
 addresses will somehow get to spammers whenever we send them to anyone. 
 Whenever you or I or anyone else posts a message to Texascavers we 
 understand that our email addresses will be visible to others on the list, 
 and we choose to do that. Harvesting email addresses one at a time from 
 postings to this list as you suggested would be possible, of course, but it 
 would be a slow and inconvenient way to collect a large list for spam, and I 
 don't think either of us is seriously worried about that.

 The primary hazard is not that anyone in TSA or other caving organizations 
 will deliberately pass information to spammers, but rather that some people 
 downloading information with good intentions will inadvertently store it 
 where spyware or other malware on an infected computer can search the 
 downloaded files for email addresses, phone numbers, or other information 
 that writers of the malware wish to harvest. This is something that easily 
 can happen, and when it does, the person making information available to the 
 malware 

RE: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

2009-12-15 Thread Butch Fralia
While it's possible that a malware program could harvest e-mail addresses for 
TSA members it's not very likely.  It would have to be a specially written 
program that new how the display page is structured.  It would also have to be 
installed on the computer of a person with member access.  Else it would have 
to be a pretty good hacker to hack the web server itself for access.

There are programs that search the web looking for unprotected e-mail 
addresses.  Those e-mail addresses are sold to advertisers and spammers.  These 
are called spiders.  We have spiders search the TSA website almost daily 
looking for e-mail addresses.  You can see it in the statistical analysis 
programs available with the website.  They cannot get into the member area.  

There isn't a function set up to download all the online registered members.  I 
have software that could do that but requires root access to the website that 
I'm the only one who has (there's a backup person with the root access 
information but not the software.  The webhosting employees could dump the 
information and they should do so often to back up the website.  I have to 
identify the IP address of my computer in the website control software to allow 
access to the membership list.

The members list as seen in the member area is in an online database.  That 
database has its own password.  The queries that access the data run on the 
server and aren't seen off the server except by a TSA webmaster.  The list uses 
dynamic code to produce the member list you see.  All that code executes on the 
server and can't be seen by the outside world by right clicking in the browser 
window and selecting view source.  

Viewing the page requires a member be logged in to the website.  It would be 
theoretically possible to intercept the information exchanged by your computer 
and the web-server but you'd have to be intercepted from somewhere on the 
internet backbone, at your ISP, or the web-server.  I don't think there's that 
much interest in doing that with TSA data.  There are 100 verified registered 
users and 95 of those are showing on the member list.  There's an option you 
can select when you register or you can update to display your information on 
the user list.  There are apparently five people who have clicked No - don't 
display me.  If you don't want your information see outside the database, 
select no for the question display me on the member list.  

The e-mail addresses that are displayed are spoofed with a spoofing technique 
that allows them to be read and displayed correctly by your browser and e-mail 
program.  To the knowledge of people who study such things, no one has changed 
the spider software to include checking for this spoofing.  It must work 
because my e-mail address is publicly viewable on a number of websites but I 
get a pretty low level of SPAM.  For that matter, there are so many 
unprotected/unspoofed e-mail addresses to swamp most databases so why bother?

I don't know if this puts anyone's mind at ease but it's the way it works.  

Happy Holidays,

Butch Fralia




-Original Message-
From: Rod Goke [mailto:rod.g...@earthlink.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 8:49 PM
To: Charles Goldsmith; Rod Goke
Cc: TexasCavers
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Can TSA be trusted with email addresses?

Charles,

I agree with your technical comments about the many ways that malware can be 
used to harvest email addresses and other data and that there is no way to 
protect an email address 100% while using it for its normal purpose. That 
doesn't imply, however, that there is no point in trying reduce risk. Listening 
to a computer professional say Your email addresses aren't safe anywhere, so 
why bother trying to protect them? is like listening to restaurant cook say 
You're not safe from germs anywhere, so why bother washing hands or dishes?

Like many email users, I've been using 2 email addresses for a number of years. 
I've used both of them frequently, but one I've tried to keep away from 
potential spam risks wherever practical and the other I've given out more 
freely. Of the two, the more protected one remained spam free much longer 
(about the first 2 years), and even after it began receiving spam, the quantity 
of spam received on the more protected address has remained conspicuously less 
than that received on the less protected address. This difference has remained 
noticeable even though I have used the more protected address frequently on 
Texascavers and for communication with numerous individuals. 

Someone with a much more carefully guarded email address still should be able 
to use it very safely in limited ways on caving related Internet services, as 
long as the people running those services practice reasonable privacy policies. 
For example, someone can subscribe to Texascavers without exposing his email 
address to everyone on the list as long as he only uses the subscription to 
receive messages from