Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lower cpu priority to perl scripts
If you are running on unix, the easiest way to probably do this is by calling the setpriority from within your perl script like this: setpriority(WHICH,WHO,PRIORITY); To set your current running perlscript to the lowest priority, you would call setpriority(0, $$, 20); $$ is your script's process ID, and 20 denotes the priority. (as you know, -20 is highest priority and 20 the lowest priority). Cheers, R. - Original Message From: Audio Phile [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 2:18:53 PM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lower cpu priority to perl scripts Tamer, Thank you very much for the reply. I googled around for the proper syntax of your suggestion as well as which config file I need to edit with it, but I came up with a big fat 0. Can you provide a few more details for me? Apologies in advance, I am a newbie with apache2 :) Tamer Embaby wrote: Audio, You can always start your scripts with [re]nice() syscall to lower your process (perl script in this case) priority. Regards, Tamer -Original Message- From: Audio Phile [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 8:57 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lower cpu priority to perl scripts I'd like to adjust the priority of /usr/bin/perl such that it will always run with very low priority. The PC that I'm using isn't very powerful. I'm running rrdweather on it and when a user hits the weather.cgi about 10 processes of perl scripts run, which totally throttles foreground applications until they finish. How can I assign /usr/bin/perl to always run with a really low CPU priority (a really high nice value) for any script it executes? Is this an apache2 setting or...? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 + ProxyErrorOverride errors
Hey Nick, thank you for your response. Yeah, I found a document describing the changes you guys made .. if I am not mistaking it stated that HTTP Status Codes in the 200 and 300 series are now excluded from the ErrorOverride; thus only override 40x and 50x status codes now. Unfortunately defaulting to the proxy's error pages in this case and trying to override the 401 is somewhat difficult since this is an authorization required status code coming from an IIS server with Integrated Windows Authentication. Is there any other way I could potentionally trap 404 errors from the back-end server and perform some sort of action on it? I don't think it's possible with mod_rewrite, but would this be possible with mod_filter? If not, would you know where - in the source code - they excluded the 20x and 30x statuscodes from ProxyErrorOverride?. I've been looking thru the code but have not yet been able to find it. :( Richard - Original Message From: Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 7:34:47 PM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 + ProxyErrorOverride errors Richard de Vries wrote: (all on one line, so chopped) We recently made some fixes to ProxyErrorOverride, but I don't recollect the details. Googling the dev list would no doubt find it. In the absence of a better solution, you could perhaps default to serving the proxy's error pages, but override that for selected statuses by configuring ErrorDocuments for them. -- Nick Kew - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 + ProxyErrorOverride errors
Hello everyone; it's been a while since I wrote to this list since everything has been smooth sailing so far ... but I did stumble on an issue just now that requires ya'lls expertise. I don't want to go into too much detail on why we're trying to do what we're doing, but basically I configured Apache 2.2.8 as reverse proxy server in front of an IIS Web Server with Integrated Windows Authentication enabled. Since we have the need to use Apache's 404 ErrorHandler to do some magic on 404 returns code, I had to toggle the ProxyErrorOverride flag On. This however breaks the authentication passthru. If I turn ProxyErrorOverride off again, the authentication works -- but I can no longer use the ErrorDocument 404. :( Is there any way I can turn ProxyErrorOverride off for 401 status codes? I suspect the answer is no ... if so, any other suggestions?. Thank you, Richard - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTTPD won't start. Fails with error message.
It appears something else is already listening on port 80 and as such Apache is unable to bind to that port. What happens when you do a telnet localhost 80. Do you get connected? - Original Message From: Mike - W0TMW [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 5:19:43 PM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTTPD won't start. Fails with error message. I'm building a server based on Fedora 7 and httpd won't start. I'm running out of space on another server and this one is intended as a replacement. I've looked through the archives, FAQs and while this issue is mentioned, that's all I can find---a mention with no help for resolution. The error is: Starting httpd: (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address 192.168.1.300:80 No listening sockets available, shutting down. Unable to open logs [Failed] I have another webserver that works just fine. The log directory have identical owners/groups permissions so there shouldn't a permissions problem for the logfiles. Plus the httpd.conf is identical. One works the other servers doesn't. Could anyone point me towards resolving this? Mike W -- Lose not thy airspeed lest the ground rises up and smites thee. - Anon. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTTPD won't start. Fails with error message.
How about a telnet 192.168.1.300 80 (in case you configured your Apache to only listen on this IP and not on the loopback device) - Original Message From: Mike - W0TMW [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 5:37:22 PM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTTPD won't start. Fails with error message. Connect to address 127.0.0.1 Connection refused. Lose not thy airspeed lest the ground rises up and smites thee. - Anon. Richard de Vries wrote: It appears something else is already listening on port 80 and as such Apache is unable to bind to that port. What happens when you do a telnet localhost 80. Do you get connected? - Original Message From: Mike - W0TMW [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 5:19:43 PM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTTPD won't start. Fails with error message. I'm building a server based on Fedora 7 and httpd won't start. I'm running out of space on another server and this one is intended as a replacement. I've looked through the archives, FAQs and while this issue is mentioned, that's all I can find---a mention with no help for resolution. The error is: Starting httpd: (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address 192.168.1.300:80 No listening sockets available, shutting down. Unable to open logs [Failed] I have another webserver that works just fine. The log directory have identical owners/groups permissions so there shouldn't a permissions problem for the logfiles. Plus the httpd.conf is identical. One works the other servers doesn't. Could anyone point me towards resolving this? Mike W - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache + SSL on Windows
What method did you use to remove the password from the private key you generated? --- Brian Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been trying for ages to get my server running SSL successfully. I don't need port 80 (unencrypted traffic) at all, just 411. I have the module set up just fine, and apache runs fine unless I define a valid cert and key: SSLCertificateFile pw/my-server.cert SSLCertificateKeyFile pw/my-server.key These are unencrypted (win32 doesn't support encrypted keys) SSL keys that are valid for apache (when they're not valid it tells me so and refuses to load them). But when I have these defined, and I start apache, the starting apache console window comes up and takes longer than usual, then just crashes and the vista Apache HTTP server stopped working and was closed window comes up. This is the entire debug log for an attempted start: [Fri Feb 16 01:29:29 2007] [info] Init: Seeding PRNG with 136 bytes of entropy [Fri Feb 16 01:29:29 2007] [info] Loading certificate private key of SSL-aware server [Fri Feb 16 01:29:29 2007] [debug] ssl_engine_pphrase.c(469): unencrypted RSA private key - pass phrase not required [Fri Feb 16 01:29:29 2007] [info] Init: Generating temporary RSA private keys (512/1024 bits) [Fri Feb 16 01:29:29 2007] [info] Init: Generating temporary DH parameters (512/1024 bits) [Fri Feb 16 01:29:29 2007] [info] Init: Initializing (virtual) servers for SSL [Fri Feb 16 01:29:29 2007] [info] Configuring server for SSL protocol [Fri Feb 16 01:29:29 2007] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(405): Creating new SSL context (protocols: SSLv2, SSLv3, TLSv1) [Fri Feb 16 01:29:29 2007] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(729): Configuring RSA server certificate [Fri Feb 16 01:29:29 2007] [warn] RSA server certificate CommonName (CN) `163.11.110.152:443' does NOT match server name!? [Fri Feb 16 01:29:29 2007] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(768): Configuring RSA server private key [Fri Feb 16 01:29:29 2007] [info] Server: Apache/2.2.3, Interface: mod_ssl/2.2.3, Library: OpenSSL/0.9.8d [Fri Feb 16 01:29:29 2007] [info] Init: Seeding PRNG with 136 bytes of entropy [Fri Feb 16 01:29:29 2007] [info] Loading certificate private key of SSL-aware server It abruptly ends at that last line. This is the relevant section from my httpd.conf. It's basically identical to ssl.conf and including that doesn't make a difference. And like I said, if I just take out those two cert/key lines then it will start fine (but of course tell me that there's no way ssl will work without a certificate). #SSL Listen 163.11.110.152:443 AddType application/x-x509-ca-cert .cert AddType application/x-pkcs7-crl.crl SSLMutex default SSLRandomSeed startup builtin SSLSessionCache none LogLevel debug VirtualHost 163.11.110.152:443 SSLEngine On SSLCertificateFile pw/my-server.cert SSLCertificateKeyFile pw/my-server.key /VirtualHost Does anyone know what's going on? I see hundreds of success stories around the internet about making the key file unencrypted, but mine is already unencrypted. Also it's Listening on a specific IP address, something that helped some other people. What else is there left ot try? -- Brian Gordon - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/ - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: apache/linux newbie has Test Page that won't die
Put a file called index.html in your docroot ... that's what resolved it for me. --- Urijah Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I pressed refresh about a million times, and used two different browsers. Try it yourself-- 208.109dot216.147 Thank you for trying though. On 2/8/07, Jonesy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:11:48 -0500, Urijah Kaplan wrote: Any suggestions? Browser cache? Jonesy -- Marvin L Jones| jonz | W3DHJ | linux 38.24N 104.55W | @ config.com | Jonesy | OS/2 *** Killfiling google posts: http://jonz.net/ng.htm - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Finding fabulous fares is fun. Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains. http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097 - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Help needed with basic auth
Did you make sure your scan included all .htaccess files. Depending on the syntax you ran to scan your Apache directory, it may not have scanned your .htaccess files. I am thinking one of these files may contain a reference to that file. --- Nathan Kellogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We were using basic auth fine until several days ago when we started getting this error: [error] [client 10.1.1.103] (OS 3)The system cannot find the path specified. : Could not open password file: C:/home/herbert/.access I don't understand why Apache is looking for this file. It is certainly not in any of the configuration. 'herbert' was one of the usernames but I have double checked by scanning the entire Apache2 directory and nothing found for this word except the error message. NO idea what c:/home/ is ! Here is the conf: Directory c:/dobsys/htdocs/ Options FollowSymLinks Order allow,deny Allow from all AuthType Basic AuthName Family Only AuthUserFile c:/dobsys/passwords Require valid user /Directory Thanks in advance for any suggestions offered! - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.58 + Solaris 5.9: status ...reading... TCP state FIN_WAIT_2
Interesting problem. I am running Apache 2.0.59 as a reverse proxy on multiple Solaris 9 and AIX servers and have never encountered these types of issues. Perhaps you should try upgrading to 2.0.59 on one of your development machines and see if that makes a difference. If not, it is most likely an OS and/or configuration issue. What other plugins are you running? Also, is this HTTP proxying, or HTTPS? - Original Message From: Chirouze Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 9:56:46 AM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.58 + Solaris 5.9: status ...reading... TCP state FIN_WAIT_2 Hi all, I'm facing a quite tricky situation with Apache 2.0.58 running on Solaris 5.9. Apache is running as a reverse proxy (mod_proxy + mod_rewrite). The maximum concurrent connections is set to 150. Because we reached the maximum a few times and got the reverse proxy saturated, we started monitoring the Apache status page (/status). We noticed that many requests were in the ..reading.. state (up to 40!), and they block a lot of slots. At first, we upgraded from 2.0.47 to 2.0.58 because it seemed there was a security hole in the earlier, fixed in 2.0.48. I found some explanation here: http://www.monkeybrains.net/~rudy/example/server_busy_state.html. The thing is, the situation is starting to appear again with 2.0.58. We've gone down to Unix and found that most of these requests were in FIN_WAIT_2 TCP state, and for a while (approx. 8min!!). We found this: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/misc/fin_wait_2.html. What it says, in a word, is that these things can happen and are normal: the connection stays in FIN_WAIT_2 state until the timeout, if clients do not close it properly. They just say it can be a problem on the Unix point of view because. I don't know if this is still true for 2.0 because the article was just copied from 1.3. The thing is, it says that The connections in FIN_WAIT_2 do not tie up an httpd process. For us, IT DOES! Every ..reading.. request happend to be in the FIN_WAIT_2 state. We have contacted Sun to get their opinion. The short answer is you can change the FIN_WAIT_2 timeout but be careful because wrong tuning will have negative impact. Maybe you should wonder why these connections stay alive. As far as I understood, the connection is not closed by the client. The server (Apache) does nothing wrong. But maybe it does, as it doesn't leave the process free? My questions are: Does anyone have heard about similar problems? Why do these connections hold a process of Apache while the documentation says it doesn't? Do you recon tuning the Unix timeout would help? (current value of tcp_fin_wait_2_flush_interval: 675000 ms - 11min!! This looks just huge!) Thanks in advance, Olivier Olivier CHIROUZE I0 Infrastructure Volvo Information Technology - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Removing or overwriting Server header field.
Joshua, that is not entirely true. By making believe you're running a different webserver than you really are ... you can potentionally buy yourself some valuable time. If an attacker wants to attack/criple your site, he/she will most likely first try all known vulnerabilities for that webserver first. So, if you make it appear you're running IIS, while in reality you're running Apache, there is a big chance you'll see IIS attacks hit your webserver first, which will hopefully set off your IDS. I have modsecurity running on my apache instances, and I often see all kinds of IIS exploits hitting my box. This then gives me time to look thru my various apache and firewall logs, and take some corrective measures like for instance slapping some IPTables rules on the box to block that IP. If I wouldn't be masking my web server, I'd probably get hit with Apache exploits right-away, which could potentionally give me less time to respond since an attacker could potentionally find either a way in and/or do damage much quicker. Granted, this is not ALWAYS the case ... but in my experience it really does help. --- Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/24/07, Simon Ashford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm... Doesn't seem to work. Still get Server: Apache in the HTTP headers regardless of SecServerSignature. Get the impression from various reading that the Server header is added by Apache pretty much at the very end of processing, after anything done by other modules. Probably something the developers ought to adddress. It would be nice, for example, to be able to put ServerTokens None or some such in the basic configuration file without needing any other modules loaded... Go search the dev list. You'll see that this question has been addressed in depth, probably a dozen different times. The answer is: You don't gain any security by omitting or lying in the Sever header, so it is your security audit that is faulty, not apache. (Many of us would still like to see the ServerTokens None option, but only to get rid of silly discussions like these. It doesn't actually do any good and can potentially do harm.) Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Removing or overwriting Server header field.
It may be a tiny roadblock as you put it, but it doesn't cost anything, nor does it hurt anything. So why wouldn't you do it? By its self it may not make a whole lot of difference, but combine a lot of these tiny roadblocks together and you'll have yourself a defense in depth strategy. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_in_depth). I do agree with you on your statement that real securty issues need to be worried about first. But if you have the time and resources to put up tiny roadblocks like this in addition to the real security concerns, why not! But this particular mod_security directive aside mod_security as an overall module is extremely powerful and can do much much more. R. --- Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/24/07, Richard de Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have modsecurity running on my apache instances, and I often see all kinds of IIS exploits hitting my box. This then gives me time to look thru my various apache and firewall logs, and take some corrective measures like for instance slapping some IPTables rules on the box to block that IP. Have you looked at some of the previous threads on this topic? I'm guessing no. Have you ever investigated how many people who DO NOT hide their apache Server identity also get hit by huge quantities of IIS attacks? The number is close to 100% from my observations. Here's the trick: There are basically two types of crackers you need to worry about, script-kiddies, and sophisticated hackers. The first type will try every possible exploit on every server they can find; they rarely if ever bother to look at the Server header or anything else. The latter type can easily figure out what kind of server you're running very unobtrusively whether or not you display the Server header. So in neither case will hiding the Server header buy you anything at all. Your argument seems to be that there may be a small number of crackers in between those two groups that might be delayed by a few minutes if you hide your Server header. I don't see any evidence that such crackers actually exist. And even if they did, your time would be much better spent worrying about real security issues than putting a tiny roadblock in their way. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unable to bind to port 443 on 2.2.4
Sounds like something else is already running on port 80. Is this on unix? Try finding out what is on port 80. If you have lsof installed, you can run the following as root: lsof -i TCP:80 --- Jain, Abhay K, INFOT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to use same instance of Aapche to process requests on port 80 (http) and port 443 (https). I could not start apache built with mod_ssl and ran with trace and found that the Apache process binds to port 443 successfully but the child process fails stating that port is already in use. I am not sure if it is due to my configuration. I edited virtual host for 443 in conf/extra/httpd-ssl.conf. Do I need to specify virtual host entry in httpd.conf? Do I also need to specify Listen 443 in httpd.conf? Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com. Try it now. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Release date for Apache 2.0.60?
I was just curious if anyone knew when we can expect Apache 2.0.60. Is this right around the corner, or still several months out? __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?
Or perhaps this .so got pulled from a different OS? It's been a while, but I think I got a similiar error when I accidentely tried using a .so compiled for linux on a solaris box. (Don't ask how this happened ... long story!) --- Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where did mod_dav_svn.so come from? Are you sure it is for the right version of apache? Joshua. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?
I am not familiar with this module so I don't know how it is being distributed ... but can't you just locate the source and compile it yourself? --- thomas Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: where can I find the mod_dav_svn.so for FC6? __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?
Hmmm ... perhaps this module got compiled with a compiler not compatible with the compiler used to compile apache. I personally would still try to get a hold of the source-code, and compile this module with apxs. R --- thomas Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: []# yum info mod_dav_svn Name : mod_dav_svn Arch : i386 Version: 1.4.2 Release: 2.fc6 Size : 135 k Repo : installed - __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Release date for Apache 2.0.60?
Thanks William. I am currently re-evaluating the version of Apache we're running and trying to plan around any planned updates. I would love to go to Apache 2.2.x, but some third party modules we're running are not yet compatible and I don't have access to their source-code. But anyway, thanks for the feedback! --- William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard de Vries wrote: I was just curious if anyone knew when we can expect Apache 2.0.60. Is this right around the corner, or still several months out? There are no plans whatsoever. I wouldn't worry yourself about it when 2.2.3 is current, 2.2.4 is around the corner and only 2.2.x and the future 2.4.x are being actively developed. The next time you see a 2.0.x release will likely be in response to some security flaw. If you are asking to obtain the current bug fixes, you were already on the wrong page. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite and HTTP headers. (Accept-Language)
I am an absolute newbie when it comes to mod_rewrite and I am still going thru some documentation to see whether I can make it do what I need. While I am going thru the docs and examples, I figured to post a message on this list as well, just in case someone knows the answer right from the top of their head. I am running Apache in front of servletexec (an application server) and we're having some application issues with certain locales. I would like to use mod_rewrite to analyze the Accept-Language header, and rewrite it if needed. Can mod_rewrite do this? Does anyone have an example? R __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Growing Error.log
I am running the logrotate program that comes with Apache to manager my logfiles on Windows. It will only roll them over, but at least this will stop the logfile from being in use, allowing you to run a daily batch file to either compress, delete and/or move the old logs. Additionally, you can download mod_security, and configure a rule to deny these types of requests and NOT log them. R. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] loadbalancing with Apache - Sticky Sessions
I'm experiencing some problems with our loadbalancer infrastructure over our Apache webservers and I've been asked to set some sort of Session ID either in the environment variables, or as part of the URL. Something the loadbalancers can use to determine session information. I was thinking of mod_rewrite perhaps but I have not been able to find any good information on generating session IDs etc. Does anyone have any good recommendations / suggestions? Richard Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] loadbalancing with Apache - Sticky Sessions
Thanks for the info ... I am definately going to look into this. From a quick glance I did learn that this is trictly cookie based. Do you know of anything that can generate a SID and attach it to the URL? --- Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 14, 2006, at 8:16 AM, Richard de Vries wrote: Does anyone have any good recommendations / suggestions? Would mod_usertrack do the trick? http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_usertrack.html S. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.temme.net/sander/ PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF Have a burning question? Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] user stats logs
To my knowledge there is not module that would give you realtime statistics, but you can definately install a stats-analysis package to run analysis on your weblogs. I myself use awstats. It's opensource and free. --- Liz Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Does apache keep stats of viewer? Such as # of viewers, the browsers the sites are being viewed from... Thanks for your input! Have a burning question? Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Godaddy ssl sertificate problem...
The problem is that your certificate has been signed
by a Certificate Authority which is not trusted by
many browsers.
Your HTTPS instance worked fine on my internet
explorer 7, but did indeed fail on firefox. An
examination of the certificate revealed that your
certificate was issued by StarField Secure
Certification Authority.
Quite honestly, I had never heard of these guys. I
always use thawte or verisign.
--- Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am having trouble with a certificate from
Godaddy.com. My website is
https://www.piercebroscoffee.com
On many browsers (Firefox, Epiphany, and even Lynx!)
I am not able to
validate the cert.
Here is a clue that I noticed:
It only fails if that is the first time that you
need to validate the
intermediate starfield cert. i.e. if you go to
https://godaddy.com, then
hit https://www.piercebroscoffee.com, there is no
problem!
I did everything that godaddy/starfield said I
needed to do. I
downloaded the intermediate certificate and here is
the entry in my
ssl.conf file: I am using apache 2, on RedHat 9.
VirtualHost www.piercebroscoffee.com:443
SuexecUserGroup java java
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DocumentRoot
/var/www/www.javahutroasters.com/html
ServerName www.piercebroscoffee.com
ErrorLog
logs/www.javahutroasters.com/ssl_error_log
TransferLog
logs/www.javahutroasters.com/ssl_access_log
CustomLog
logs/www.javahutroasters.com/ssl_request_log \
%t %h %{SSL_PROTOCOL}x %{SSL_CIPHER}x
\%r\ %b
SSLEngine on
SSLCipherSuite
ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+SSLv2:
+EXP:+eNULL
SSLCertificateFile
/etc/httpd/conf/ssl.crt/piercebroscoffee.com.crt
SSLCertificateKeyFile
/etc/httpd/conf/ssl.key/piercebroscoffee.com.key
SSLCertificateChainFile
/etc/httpd/conf/ssl.crt/sf_issuing.crt
Files ~ \.(cgi|shtml|phtml|php3?)$
SSLOptions +StdEnvVars
/Files
Directory
/var/www/www.javahutroasters.com/html
DirectoryIndex /cgi/javahut/service.html
AllowOverride AuthConfig
Options +Indexes +Includes
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
/Directory
ScriptAlias /cgi/
/var/www/www.javahutroasters.com/cgi/
Directory
/var/www/www.javahutroasters.com/cgi
SSLOptions +StdEnvVars
AllowOverride AuthConfig
Options +ExecCGI
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
/Directory
SetEnvIf User-Agent .*MSIE.* \
nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown \
downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0
/VirtualHost
Any Ideas as to what is going wrong?
thanks
Rick
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the
Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for
more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Want to start your own business?
Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Godaddy ssl sertificate problem...
Ok, after doing some more research, I need to take the
statement in which I said their certificates are not
trusted in many browsers back. It does appear that
most browsers trust StarTech.
I looked thru the CA certs in firefox and noticed it
has a trusted CA for StarTech. Hmmm very interesting.
I wonder if perhaps they updated their CA?
--- Richard de Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The problem is that your certificate has been signed
by a Certificate Authority which is not trusted by
many browsers.
Your HTTPS instance worked fine on my internet
explorer 7, but did indeed fail on firefox. An
examination of the certificate revealed that your
certificate was issued by StarField Secure
Certification Authority.
Quite honestly, I had never heard of these guys. I
always use thawte or verisign.
--- Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am having trouble with a certificate from
Godaddy.com. My website is
https://www.piercebroscoffee.com
On many browsers (Firefox, Epiphany, and even
Lynx!)
I am not able to
validate the cert.
Here is a clue that I noticed:
It only fails if that is the first time that you
need to validate the
intermediate starfield cert. i.e. if you go to
https://godaddy.com, then
hit https://www.piercebroscoffee.com, there is no
problem!
I did everything that godaddy/starfield said I
needed to do. I
downloaded the intermediate certificate and here
is
the entry in my
ssl.conf file: I am using apache 2, on RedHat 9.
VirtualHost www.piercebroscoffee.com:443
SuexecUserGroup java java
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DocumentRoot
/var/www/www.javahutroasters.com/html
ServerName www.piercebroscoffee.com
ErrorLog
logs/www.javahutroasters.com/ssl_error_log
TransferLog
logs/www.javahutroasters.com/ssl_access_log
CustomLog
logs/www.javahutroasters.com/ssl_request_log \
%t %h %{SSL_PROTOCOL}x %{SSL_CIPHER}x
\%r\ %b
SSLEngine on
SSLCipherSuite
ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+SSLv2:
+EXP:+eNULL
SSLCertificateFile
/etc/httpd/conf/ssl.crt/piercebroscoffee.com.crt
SSLCertificateKeyFile
/etc/httpd/conf/ssl.key/piercebroscoffee.com.key
SSLCertificateChainFile
/etc/httpd/conf/ssl.crt/sf_issuing.crt
Files ~ \.(cgi|shtml|phtml|php3?)$
SSLOptions +StdEnvVars
/Files
Directory
/var/www/www.javahutroasters.com/html
DirectoryIndex /cgi/javahut/service.html
AllowOverride AuthConfig
Options +Indexes +Includes
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
/Directory
ScriptAlias /cgi/
/var/www/www.javahutroasters.com/cgi/
Directory
/var/www/www.javahutroasters.com/cgi
SSLOptions +StdEnvVars
AllowOverride AuthConfig
Options +ExecCGI
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
/Directory
SetEnvIf User-Agent .*MSIE.* \
nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown \
downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0
/VirtualHost
Any Ideas as to what is going wrong?
thanks
Rick
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the
Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html
for
more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Want to start your own business?
Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the
Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for
more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] unwanted redirects from clients
You mentioned mod_security. That to me seems the best candidate to block these types of requests. Mod Security has an extensive ruleset and I am certain it will have a way to accomplish this. Unfortunately, I am pretty much a novice as it comes to mod_security myself so I am unable to give you the syntax for such a rule from the top of my head. What I suggest is that you drop your inquiry on the mod_security mailinglist. R __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'copy' : return code '0x1'
Hey everyone, Last week I wrote about some problems I'd been having with trying to get Apache to compile on Windows. I received a lot of great feedback and have narrowed the problem down to Visual Studio Express. I upgraded to Visual Studio Professional and all previous compilation issues have been resolved. I was finally able to finish a build of Apache, which seems to work quite nicely. However, I have a question about .pdb files. Please known I am a novice when it comes to compiling on Windows, so perhaps this is no big issue at all. Anyway, after my build, I noticed all these .pdb files in the Apache folder. According to the help pages these are Program Debug files. First question: Why am I getting these on a Release build. Second question: I opened properties on the Apache solution, went to linker, and set Generate Debug Info to No on the Release build. However, this gives me the following error during the build install: D:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\VC\bin\nmake.exe -nologo -f Makefile.win SHORT=R LONG=Release _copybin src_exe=pdb src_dll=pdb src_so=pdb quiet=- inst_exe=\Apache2\bin inst_dll=\Apache2\bin inst_so=\Apache2\modules copy Release\Apache.pdb \Apache2\bin .y The system cannot find the file specified. NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'copy' : return code '0x1' After which the install stops, leaving only a partial \Apache directory. (All Config files, gifs etc etc ar emissing) Third and final question: If I don't get a resolution for the second question, can I just delete all the .pdb files? Once again, I am totally new to compiling Apache on windows, so any help/feedback would greatly be appreciated. Thanks all! R. Sponsored Link For just $24.99/mo., Vonage offers unlimited local and long- distance calling. Sign up now. http://www.vonage.com/startsavingnow/ - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] step by step instructions for compiling Apache under Windows
Hi there, does anyone have any step by step instructions on how to compile Apache under windows. I did find a document on the apache website that describes how to compile Apache ... and as a matter of fact, it compiled just fine. But I am having a hell of a time figured out how the dependencies on some of those Visual C++ DLLS. There is some documentation out there, but me being a newbie to compiling applications for Windows am not able to make heads or tails out of it. These are the messages I am getting: The application failed to initialize properly (0x8003). Click on OK to terminate the application. Runtime Error! Program d:\Program Files\Apache\bin\ApacheMonitor.exe R6034 An application has made an attempt to load the C runtime library incorrectly. Please contact the application's support team for more information. Any help or pointers would greatly be appreciated. Thank guys. Richard Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates (http://voice.yahoo.com) - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] step by step instructions for compiling Apache under Windows
;/dsig:DigestMethoddsig:DigestValuehWq8zazTsMeKVxWFBa6bnv4hEOw=/dsig:DigestValue/asmv2:hash/file /assembly On 11/3/06, Richard de Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, does anyone have any step by step instructions on how to compile Apache under windows. I did find a document on the apache website that describes how to compile Apache ... and as a matter of fact, it compiled just fine. But I am having a hell of a time figured out how the dependencies on some of those Visual C++ DLLS. There is some documentation out there, but me being a newbie to compiling applications for Windows am not able to make heads or tails out of it. These are the messages I am getting: The application failed to initialize properly (0x8003). Click on OK to terminate the application. Runtime Error! Program d:\Program Files\Apache\bin\ApacheMonitor.exe R6034 An application has made an attempt to load the C runtime library incorrectly. Please contact the application's support team for more information. Any help or pointers would greatly be appreciated. Thank guys. Richard Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates (http://voice.yahoo.com) - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your email and see which of your friends are online - Right on the New Yahoo.com (http://www.yahoo.com/preview) - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] step by step instructions for compiling Apache under Windows
William, I am just having a hell of a time getting that to work, plus now I also need to get mod_ssl compiled. :( I am stuck on libapr, which is complaining about unresolved external objects. (see my previous email). I am using Visual C++ Express 2005, and on one website I read the following: The documenation states clearly that CryptReleaseContext, CryptCreateHash and others are not part of the crypt32.lib. They are located in advapi32.lib! Include it and you get rid of the problems. I am an absolute novice as far as compiling stuff on windows is concerned. Do you have any idea on what I need to do to get this resolved? R --- William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is really dodgy advice - download the MSVC 8 (2005) runtime installer directly from Microsoft and install it. Issue solved. If you are running the debug build, you have to do the -same thing- only you will find the debug MSVC runtime in your product tree, again, just install it. toadie D wrote: look for dir %WINDOWS%\WinSxS\x86_Microsoft.VC80.CRT_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b_8.0.50727.42_x-ww_0de06acd and the equivalent %WINDOWS\WinSxS\manifests\[same name as above] put the DLL as well as a copy of the manifest inside your bin dir. Here's a manifest that works on Win2K SP4 === ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 standalone=yes? assembly xmlns=urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1 manifestVersion=1.0 noInheritable/noInheritable assemblyIdentity type=win32 name=Microsoft.VC80.CRT version=8.0.50727.42 processorArchitecture=x86 publicKeyToken=1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b/assemblyIdentity file name=msvcr80.dll hash=2a0d797a8c5eac76e54e98db9682e0938c614b45 hashalg=SHA1asmv2:hash xmlns:asmv2=urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v2 xmlns:dsig=http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#;dsig:Transformsdsig:Transform Algorithm=urn:schemas-microsoft-com:HashTransforms.Identity/dsig:Transform/dsig:Transformsdsig:DigestMethod Algorithm=http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha1;/dsig:DigestMethoddsig:DigestValuephRUExlAeZ8BwmlD8VlO5udAnRE=/dsig:DigestValue/asmv2:hash/file file name=msvcp80.dll hash=cc4ca55fb6aa6b7bb8577ab4b649ab77e42f8f91 hashalg=SHA1asmv2:hash xmlns:asmv2=urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v2 xmlns:dsig=http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#;dsig:Transformsdsig:Transform Algorithm=urn:schemas-microsoft-com:HashTransforms.Identity/dsig:Transform/dsig:Transformsdsig:DigestMethod Algorithm=http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha1;/dsig:DigestMethoddsig:DigestValue7AY1JqoUvK3u/6bYWbOagGgAFbc=/dsig:DigestValue/asmv2:hash/file file name=msvcm80.dll hash=55e8e87bbde00d1d96cc119ccd94e0c02c9a2768 hashalg=SHA1asmv2:hash xmlns:asmv2=urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v2 xmlns:dsig=http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#;dsig:Transformsdsig:Transform Algorithm=urn:schemas-microsoft-com:HashTransforms.Identity/dsig:Transform/dsig:Transformsdsig:DigestMethod Algorithm=http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha1;/dsig:DigestMethoddsig:DigestValuehWq8zazTsMeKVxWFBa6bnv4hEOw=/dsig:DigestValue/asmv2:hash/file /assembly On 11/3/06, Richard de Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, does anyone have any step by step instructions on how to compile Apache under windows. I did find a document on the apache website that describes how to compile Apache ... and as a matter of fact, it compiled just fine. But I am having a hell of a time figured out how the dependencies on some of those Visual C++ DLLS. There is some documentation out there, but me being a newbie to compiling applications for Windows am not able to make heads or tails out of it. These are the messages I am getting: The application failed to initialize properly (0x8003). Click on OK to terminate the application. Runtime Error! Program d:\Program Files\Apache\bin\ApacheMonitor.exe R6034 An application has made an attempt to load the C runtime library incorrectly. Please contact the application's support team for more information. Any help or pointers would greatly be appreciated. Thank guys. Richard Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates (http://voice.yahoo.com) - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite not working
I have a very strange situation.
I am running two webservers. Both Apache 2.0.59 with
almost identical configuration. On both servers I
configured a mod_rewrite rule. It works on one, but
not on the other.
The webserver that does not work reports the following
error message:
[Thu Nov 02 08:22:16 2006] [error] [client
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] Options FollowSymLinks or
SymLinksIfOwnerMatch is off which implies that
RewriteRule directive is forbidden:
/var/www/html/secure
### config of the functioning webserver
Directory /var/www/html
#
# Possible values for the Options directive are
None, All,
# or any combination of:
# Indexes Includes FollowSymLinks
SymLinksifOwnerMatch ExecCGI MultiViews
#
# Note that MultiViews must be named
*explicitly* --- Options All
# doesn't give it to you.
#
# The Options directive is both complicated and
important. Please see
#
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#options
# for more information.
#
Options -ExecCGI -FollowSymlinks -Indexes
#
# AllowOverride controls what directives may be
placed in .htaccess files.
# It can be All, None, or any combination of
the keywords:
# Options FileInfo AuthConfig Limit
#
AllowOverride None
#
# Controls who can get stuff from this server.
#
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
/Directory
Location /secure
RewriteEngine on
RewriteBase /secure/
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off
RewriteRule (.*)
https://www.mydomain.com%{REQUEST_URI}
/Location
### config of the non-functioning webserver
#
Directory /var/www/html
#
# Possible values for the Options directive are
None, All,
# or any combination of:
# Indexes Includes FollowSymLinks
SymLinksifOwnerMatch ExecCGI MultiViews
#
# Note that MultiViews must be named
*explicitly* --- Options All
# doesn't give it to you.
#
# The Options directive is both complicated and
important. Please see
#
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#options
# for more information.
#
Options -ExecCGI -FollowSymlinks -Indexes
#
# AllowOverride controls what directives may be
placed in .htaccess files.
# It can be All, None, or any combination of
the keywords:
# Options FileInfo AuthConfig Limit
#
AllowOverride None
#
# Controls who can get stuff from this server.
#
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
/Directory
Location /secure
RewriteEngine on
RewriteBase /secure/
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off
RewriteRule (.*)
https://www.mydomain.com%{REQUEST_URI}
/Location
Any feedback would greatly be appreciated. Thanks
guys!
Richard
Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited
(http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited)
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite not working
There error message is quite explicit. On the working server, you must have someplace else in the config (or an .htaccess or an Include'd config file) where you are turning on Options FollowSymLinks or SymLinksIfOwnerMatch. That's just it, there is not. I don't have any .htaccess files either. Let me look thru the config files one more time, just in case We have the perfect Group for you. Check out the handy changes to Yahoo! Groups (http://groups.yahoo.com) - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite not working
I looked thru it again ... and I did a grep on Options on *ALL* the config files and I can't find anything. # This is the working config: $ grep Options * httpd.conf:Options None httpd.conf:# Possible values for the Options directive are None, All, httpd.conf:# Note that MultiViews must be named *explicitly* --- Options All httpd.conf:# The Options directive is both complicated and important. Please see httpd.conf:Options -ExecCGI -FollowSymlinks -Indexes httpd.conf:# Options FileInfo AuthConfig Limit httpd.conf:# (You will also need to add ExecCGI to the Options directive.) httpd.conf:# (You will also need to add Includes to the Options directive.) httpd-ssl.conf:# SSL Engine Options: httpd-ssl.conf:#SSLOptions +FakeBasicAuth +ExportCertData +StrictRequire httpd-ssl.conf:SSLOptions +StdEnvVars httpd-ssl.conf:#SSLOptions +StdEnvVars # This is the non-working config: $ grep Options * httpd.conf:Options None httpd.conf:# Possible values for the Options directive are None, All, httpd.conf:# Note that MultiViews must be named *explicitly* --- Options All httpd.conf:# The Options directive is both complicated and important. Please see httpd.conf:Options -ExecCGI -FollowSymlinks -Indexes httpd.conf:# Options FileInfo AuthConfig Limit httpd.conf:# (You will also need to add ExecCGI to the Options directive.) httpd.conf:# (You will also need to add Includes to the Options directive.) httpd-ssl.conf:# SSL Engine Options: httpd-ssl.conf:#SSLOptions +FakeBasicAuth +ExportCertData +StrictRequire httpd-ssl.conf:SSLOptions +StdEnvVars httpd-ssl.conf:SSLOptions +StdEnvVars There error message is quite explicit. On the working server, you must have someplace else in the config (or an .htaccess or an Include'd config file) where you are turning on Options FollowSymLinks or SymLinksIfOwnerMatch. That's just it, there is not. I don't have any .htaccess files either. Let me look thru the config files one more time, just in case We have the perfect Group for you. Check out the handy changes to Yahoo! Groups (http://groups.yahoo.com) - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited (http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited) - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite not working
I did that prior to the grep on Options and then copied all the included configuration files in the same directory, followed by the grep 'Options' *. I have 2 more servers that have the exact same configuration settings (other than the directives for the servername etc), which work properly too. It is just this one server that does not work. You could make the argument that this particular instance *does* work as designed since neither of the +FollowSymLinks or +SymLinksIfOwnerMatch are set ... but that doen't explain why mod_rewrite works on the other servers with -FollowSymLinks set. All instances are running on Solaris 9 ... it just doesn't make any sense. --- Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/2/06, Richard de Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I looked thru it again ... and I did a grep on Options on *ALL* the config files and I can't find anything. Do the same grep for Include to see what other config files you are using. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail (http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/) - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Previewing a Virtual Host before server name is available in DNS
I know my hosting provider puts the document root for the virtual host in the document root of the main host. So I can look at it via http://mainhost.domain.com/docroot-of-subhost. Personally I don't like this at all. You could also create a /etc/host file entry on the server running your virtual host, configure an Apache proxy server on that host (different port) and configure that proxy to forward all the requests to your new virtual host, at which time it will utilize the alias in your /etc/hosts file. --- Amador, Orlando M. [OBIPR] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have configured 2 virtual host in the http.conf file. Both are working fine since we have configured the DNS server to point to the apache server. We need to configure a 3rd virtual host, but can't change the DNS to point to our apache server until it is approved. So the question is how we configure the new virtual host so it is visible without DNS? This is the same to what a web hosting company will do. One can preview the website under some URL of the main server. For example if the real server is named www.server1.com and the new virtual host is for www.server2.com, then one could type something like www.server1.com/server2 or similar and view the file from the virtual host (server2) instead. I read the virtual hosting documentation and did not find anything in this subject. I though that maybe ServerPath could do the trick, but id did not work. Tried to set serverpath to /server2/ and the requested www.server1.com/server2/ but it only complains that the URL was not found. I understand that we can set an entry in the host file to map the virtual host name to an IP, but this is not practical since we need to have several people in different workstations looking at this. How to the web hosting companies accomplish this? is it just with Apache or is it something else? Any suggestions? This is for Apache 2.0.52 running on Linux. Saludos, Orlando Orlando M. Amador Technology Lead Ortho Biologics LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] (787) 854-1800 x2294 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please reply to the sender, so that Johnson Johnson can arrange for proper delivery, and then please delete the message from your inbox. Thank you. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPass with exceptions
How about if you split your ProxyPass directives up in Location Blocks. Does that make a difference? i.e. Location /cob ProxyPass /cob http://192.168.1.1/cob ProxyPassReverse /cob http://192.168.1.1/cob /Location Location / ProxyPass / http://192.168.1.3/ ProxyPassReverse / http://192.168.1.3/ /Location --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to use the ProxyPass directive but am having mixed results on our Apache 2.2.2 reverse proxy server. Here is my config: ProxyPass /cob http://192.168.1.1/cob ProxyPassReverse /cob http://192.168.1.1/cob ProxyPass /web http://192.168.1.1/web ProxyPassReverse /web http://192.168.1.1/web ProxyPass /audio http://192.168.1.2:7756/audio ProxyPassReverse /audio http://192.168.1.2:7756/audio ProxyPass /video http://192.168.1.2:7757/video ProxyPassReverse /video http://192.168.1.2:7757/video ProxyPass / http://192.168.1.3/ ProxyPassReverse / http://192.168.1.3/ In above example, the ProxyPass directives related to the audio and video application server are working. For example, when I type in www.mydomain.com/video/x.wmv, I get the correct video and it streams properly. However, when I try typing in something like http://www.mydomain.com/cob/webapppage.nsf, I get an IIS error that the page cannot be found. The odd thing about this, as you may have guessed from the URL, is that the server hosting the webapppage.nsf is a Domino server and shouldn't be returning an IIS error. I'm guessing the last set of directives above is forcing the request through the 192.168.1.3 server which is an IIS server. In addition, when I hit the refresh button on the page cannot be found, it eventually comes up properly. Is the last group of directives above stomping on the directives before them? I tried using a proxypass /cob ! and proxypass /web ! as part of the last group of directives, hoping the directives above them would still proxy those requests correctly, but prevent the 192.168.1.3 IIS server from getting them based on the proxypass / http://192.168.1.3 directive. Any ideas why this would be happening or if there is a better configuration to accomplish what I'm trying to do? Here's an excerpt of the access log on the reverse proxy server: 192.168.1.200 - - [21/Sep/2006:09:52:44 -0700] GET /cob/webapppage.nsf HTTP/1.1 404 1635 http://www.mydomain.com/reports.htm; Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) 192.168.1.200 - - [21/Sep/2006:09:52:45 -0700] GET /cob/webapppage.nsf HTTP/1.1 302 - http://www.mydomain.com/reports.htm; Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Here's an excerpt of the error logs with debugging turned from the reverse proxy server: [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] mod_proxy_http.c(54): proxy: HTTP: canonicalising URL //192.168.1.1/cob/webapppage.nsf [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1373): [client 172.16.14.140] proxy: http: found worker http://192.168.1.1/cob for http://192.168.1.1/cob/webapppage.nsf, referer: http://www.mydomain.com/reports.htm [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] mod_proxy.c(736): Running scheme http handler (attempt 0) [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] mod_proxy_http.c(1661): proxy: HTTP: serving URL http://192.168.1.1/cob/webapppage.nsf [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1811): proxy: connecting http://192.168.1.1/cob/webapppage.nsf to 192.168.1.1:80 [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1911): proxy: connected /cob/webapppage.nsf to 192.168.1.3 [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(2005): proxy: HTTP: fam 2 socket created to connect to 192.168.1.1 [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(2101): proxy: HTTP: connection complete to 192.168.1.3 (192.168.1.3) [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] mod_proxy_http.c(1443): proxy: start body send [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] mod_proxy_http.c(1530): proxy: end body send [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1769): proxy: HTTP: has released connection for (192.168.1.3) [Thu Sep 21 09:52:45 2006] [debug] mod_proxy_http.c(54): proxy: HTTP: canonicalising URL //192.168.1.1/cob/webapppage.nsf [Thu Sep 21 09:52:45 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1373): [client 172.16.14.140] proxy: http: found worker http://192.168.1.1/cob for http://192.168.1.1/cob/webapppage.nsf, referer: http://www.mydomain.com/reports.htm [Thu Sep 21 09:52:45 2006] [debug] mod_proxy.c(736): Running scheme http handler (attempt 0) [Thu Sep 21 09:52:45 2006] [debug] mod_proxy_http.c(1661): proxy: HTTP: serving URL http://192.168.1.1/cob/webapppage.nsf [Thu Sep 21 09:52:45 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1754): proxy: HTTP: has acquired connection for (192.168.1.1) [Thu Sep 21 09:52:45 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1811): proxy: connecting http://192.168.1.1/cob/webapppage.nsf to 192.168.1.1:80
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPass with exceptions
Sorry, should have been: Location /cob ProxyPass http://192.168.1.1/cob ProxyPassReverse http://192.168.1.1/cob /Location Location / ProxyPass http://192.168.1.3/ ProxyPassReverse http://192.168.1.3/ /Location --- Richard de Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about if you split your ProxyPass directives up in Location Blocks. Does that make a difference? i.e. Location /cob ProxyPass /cob http://192.168.1.1/cob ProxyPassReverse /cob http://192.168.1.1/cob /Location Location / ProxyPass / http://192.168.1.3/ ProxyPassReverse / http://192.168.1.3/ /Location --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to use the ProxyPass directive but am having mixed results on our Apache 2.2.2 reverse proxy server. Here is my config: ProxyPass /cob http://192.168.1.1/cob ProxyPassReverse /cob http://192.168.1.1/cob ProxyPass /web http://192.168.1.1/web ProxyPassReverse /web http://192.168.1.1/web ProxyPass /audio http://192.168.1.2:7756/audio ProxyPassReverse /audio http://192.168.1.2:7756/audio ProxyPass /video http://192.168.1.2:7757/video ProxyPassReverse /video http://192.168.1.2:7757/video ProxyPass / http://192.168.1.3/ ProxyPassReverse / http://192.168.1.3/ In above example, the ProxyPass directives related to the audio and video application server are working. For example, when I type in www.mydomain.com/video/x.wmv, I get the correct video and it streams properly. However, when I try typing in something like http://www.mydomain.com/cob/webapppage.nsf, I get an IIS error that the page cannot be found. The odd thing about this, as you may have guessed from the URL, is that the server hosting the webapppage.nsf is a Domino server and shouldn't be returning an IIS error. I'm guessing the last set of directives above is forcing the request through the 192.168.1.3 server which is an IIS server. In addition, when I hit the refresh button on the page cannot be found, it eventually comes up properly. Is the last group of directives above stomping on the directives before them? I tried using a proxypass /cob ! and proxypass /web ! as part of the last group of directives, hoping the directives above them would still proxy those requests correctly, but prevent the 192.168.1.3 IIS server from getting them based on the proxypass / http://192.168.1.3 directive. Any ideas why this would be happening or if there is a better configuration to accomplish what I'm trying to do? Here's an excerpt of the access log on the reverse proxy server: 192.168.1.200 - - [21/Sep/2006:09:52:44 -0700] GET /cob/webapppage.nsf HTTP/1.1 404 1635 http://www.mydomain.com/reports.htm; Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) 192.168.1.200 - - [21/Sep/2006:09:52:45 -0700] GET /cob/webapppage.nsf HTTP/1.1 302 - http://www.mydomain.com/reports.htm; Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Here's an excerpt of the error logs with debugging turned from the reverse proxy server: [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] mod_proxy_http.c(54): proxy: HTTP: canonicalising URL //192.168.1.1/cob/webapppage.nsf [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1373): [client 172.16.14.140] proxy: http: found worker http://192.168.1.1/cob for http://192.168.1.1/cob/webapppage.nsf, referer: http://www.mydomain.com/reports.htm [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] mod_proxy.c(736): Running scheme http handler (attempt 0) [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] mod_proxy_http.c(1661): proxy: HTTP: serving URL http://192.168.1.1/cob/webapppage.nsf [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1811): proxy: connecting http://192.168.1.1/cob/webapppage.nsf to 192.168.1.1:80 [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1911): proxy: connected /cob/webapppage.nsf to 192.168.1.3 [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(2005): proxy: HTTP: fam 2 socket created to connect to 192.168.1.1 [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(2101): proxy: HTTP: connection complete to 192.168.1.3 (192.168.1.3) [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] mod_proxy_http.c(1443): proxy: start body send [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] mod_proxy_http.c(1530): proxy: end body send [Thu Sep 21 09:52:44 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1769): proxy: HTTP: has released connection for (192.168.1.3) [Thu Sep 21 09:52:45 2006] [debug] mod_proxy_http.c(54): proxy: HTTP: canonicalising URL //192.168.1.1/cob/webapppage.nsf [Thu Sep 21 09:52:45 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1373): [client 172.16.14.140] proxy: http: found worker http://192.168.1.1/cob for http://192.168.1.1/cob/webapppage.nsf, referer: http://www.mydomain.com/reports.htm [Thu Sep 21 09:52:45 2006] [debug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] duplicate emails
Is anyone else getting duplicate emails today? __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re:mod_ssl and mod_proxy RPS config file
Ah, I think your proxypassreverse statements are not 100% correct. Try disabling those and see if it makes a difference. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I must admit I am new to Apache so there may be some obvious errors in our reverse proxy server apache config...but here it is: Listen *:80 Listen *:443 LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so LoadModule proxy_connect_module modules/mod_proxy_connect.so LoadModule proxy_html_module modules/mod_proxy_html/mod_proxy_html.so LoadModule proxy_http_module modules/mod_proxy_http.so LoadModule rewrite_module modules/mod_rewrite.so LoadModule ssl_module modules/mod_ssl.so ProxyRequests Off NameVirtualHost *:80 VirtualHost *:443 ServerName www.mydomain.com ServerAlias mydomain.com DocumentRoot z:/Apache2/httpsdocs Directory z:/apache2/httpsdocs Options FollowSymLinks AllowOverride None Order allow,deny Allow from all /Directory SSLEngine on SSLProxyEngine on SSLCertificateFile z:/public.crt SSLCertificateKeyFile z:/private.key SSLCertificateChainFile z:/intermediate.crt ProxyPass /eConnect https://192.168.1.3:443/eConnect ProxyPassReverse /eConnect https://192.168.1.3:443/eConnect /VirtualHost VirtualHost *:80 ServerName www.mydomain.com ServerAlias mydomain.com DocumentRoot z:/Apache2 Directory z:/Apache2 Options FollowSymLinks AllowOverride None Order allow,deny Allow from all /Directory # #Proxy settings for Web App #1 # ProxyPass /audio http://192.168.1.1:3881/audio ProxyPassReverse /audio http://10.101.2.39:3881/audio # #Proxy settings for Web App #2 # ProxyPass /PIRPressSummary http://192.168.1.2:3882/PIRPressSummary ProxyPassReverse /PIRPressSummary http://192.168.1.2:3882/PIRPressSummary # #Proxy settings for Web App #3 # ProxyPass /eConnect http://192.168.1.3:3883/eConnect ProxyPassReverse /eConnect http://192.168.1.3:3883/eConnect # #Proxy settings for Primary website content # ProxyPass / http://192.168.1.100/ ProxyPassReverse / http://192.168.1.100/ /VirtualHost VirtualHost *:80 ServerName www.myseconddomain.com ServerAlias myseconddomain.com *.myseconddomain.com DocumentRoot z:/Apache2/myseconddomain Directory z:/Apache2/myseconddomain Options FollowSymLinks AllowOverride None Order allow,deny Allow from all /Directory ProxyPass / http://192.168.1.200:3342/ ProxyPassReverse / http://192.168.1.200:3342/ /VirtualHost IfModule ssl_module SSLRandomSeed startup builtin SSLRandomSeed connect builtin /IfModule We get the SSL warning when trying to access Web App #3 while going from HTTP section of the application to an HTTPS section and the URL from http://www.mydomain.com/eConnect/ to http://192.168.1.3/eConnect/. The certificate warning references the cert issued to the subdomain assigned to the Web App #3 server (subdomain.mydomain.com). The IP address that appears in the URL is the private IP of Web App #3 server. Steven Niedermeyer Bellingham, WA - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Non-SSL to 443: Some Servers close connection, others return a 400
I am running Apache 2.0.59 on a mix of servers. (Linux / Solaris, AIX). How come, when I make a plain HTTP request to an SSL Enabled port, the Solaris instances immediately close the connection. telnet www.abc.com 443 Trying... Connected to www.abc.com. Escape character is '^]'. GET / HTTP/1.0 Connection closed. While the Apache instances on AIX return a 400 Bad Request message, but WITHOUT a HTTP header: telnet www.abc.com 443 Trying... Connected to www.abc.com. Escape character is '^]'. GET / HTTP/1.0 !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN htmlhead title400 Bad Request/title /headbody h1Bad Request/h1 pYour browser sent a request that this server could not understand.br / Reason: You're speaking plain HTTP to an SSL-enabled server port.br / Instead use the HTTPS scheme to access this URL, please.br / blockquoteHint: a href=https://www.abc.com/;bhttps://www.abc.com//b/a/blockquote/p /body/html Connection closed. The configuration appears to be the same between the AIX and Solaris machines. I am puzzled! R __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 with SSL installation issue.
I remember seeing a similiar thread somewhere and I seem to recall it had to do with openssl 0.9.8b. Is openssl 0.9.8b a bugfix release over 0.9.8a, or a security fix? If 0.9.8b is only a bug fix, you could try it with 0.9.8a? --- Tom Ray [Lists] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was able to install Apache 2.0.59 without SSL on this server but we need SSL support now. I've tried to re-compile Apache without any luck. I can configure it just fine but I run make that's when I get an error. I'm getting this: modules/ssl/.libs/mod_ssl.a(ssl_engine_kernel.o): In function `ssl_hook_Access': /home/tech/upgrades/httpd-2.0.59/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_kernel.c:619: undefined reference to `X509_STORE_CTX_set_depth' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [httpd] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/tech/upgrades/httpd-2.0.59' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 I'm trying to install Apache 2.0.59 with Openssl 0.9.8b my configure command is: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apachessl2 --enable-so --enable-ssl --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl Any help would be greatly appreciated. TIA - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL negotiation fails
To my knowledge this is not possible. Don't forget, the SSL HandShake needs to be completed BEFORE your client can successfully retrieve any data from your webserver. So, if this handshake fails for whatever reason (including cancelation by the user), the connection is being torn down. i.e. Even if you could configure something on the webserver, it wouldn't matter because the client wishes to not proceed. If anyone disagrees with me, I would love to hear because I've had the need for something similiar. R --- Milan Tomic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any way to redirect user to some HTML page if HTTPS (SSL) negotiation fails (e.g. user press CANCEL button on Select Certificate dialog)? At present generic The page can not be found message shows. I think this is IE's built-in message. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 with SSL installation issue.
Hey, have a look at this thread. Maybe some of the suggestions will work for you ... keep us posted: http://www.howtoforge.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-1557.html --- Tom Ray [Lists] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 0.9.8a was the security fix and 0.9.8b was a compatibility fix. The problem is, I had 0.9.8a already installed on the machine and I had the same exact error. I thought upgrading to 0.9.8b would fix the problem, but it didn't. And I couldn't find anything really detailed when I Googled the error. Do you remember how long ago that thread was, I can go and sift through the archives. I remember seeing a similiar thread somewhere and I seem to recall it had to do with openssl 0.9.8b. Is openssl 0.9.8b a bugfix release over 0.9.8a, or a security fix? If 0.9.8b is only a bug fix, you could try it with 0.9.8a? --- Tom Ray [Lists] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was able to install Apache 2.0.59 without SSL on this server but we need SSL support now. I've tried to re-compile Apache without any luck. I can configure it just fine but I run make that's when I get an error. I'm getting this: modules/ssl/.libs/mod_ssl.a(ssl_engine_kernel.o): In function `ssl_hook_Access': /home/tech/upgrades/httpd-2.0.59/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_kernel.c:619: undefined reference to `X509_STORE_CTX_set_depth' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [httpd] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/tech/upgrades/httpd-2.0.59' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 I'm trying to install Apache 2.0.59 with Openssl 0.9.8b my configure command is: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apachessl2 --enable-so --enable-ssl --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl Any help would be greatly appreciated. TIA - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse SSL Proxy on multiple ports
For security reasons, I am running a reverese proxy in front of my WebSphere App server. The WAS App Server only listens to 127.0.0.1, and the ports that should be exposed externally (ie. 9080, 9443 etc) are proxied thru the proxy server that runs on the same machine. So basically the proxy is taking requests on the public IP addresses, and proxies them to 127.0.0.1:xxx Now my developers felt it was suddenly necesarry to have two application profiles that are esentially clones of eachother. So, in it's simplest terms, we now have the Application Server respond to 2 HTTP and 2 HTTPs ports. Getting the proxy to proxy two regular HTTP ports is easy; but how can I configure my proxy to also handle two HTTPS ports, without having to create new certificates for each? So, I want my SSL proxy to proxy HTTPS port 1000 to 127.0.0.1:1000, and HTTPS port 1001 to 127.0.0.1:1001. Unfortunately I don't seem to be able to use multiple named virtual hosts in the Proxy SSL Config with all the same SSL settings. (I get an error stating SSL can not be re-initialized from within the same config). Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks :) R __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTTP Server 2.0.47 and WebSphere plugin
Try looking thru your websphere logs as well as your http_plugin.log file. We are running a couple of WebSphere servers on AIX as well and never had any issues with Apache. I am having a difficult time understanding why you are using a proxy servlet? Why would you want to put so much overhead on the app server? If you do need to be able to proxy, why not configuring an Apache proxy server between your webserver and app server. That is what I do on our environments, though I only use it for security reasons. R. --- User [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, We have an application running on AIX 5.2 and WebSphere Platform 5.1 [ND 5.1.0 b0344.02], and (Apache) IBM HTTP Server 2.0.47. We have a Servlet underneath our application installed, which shall act as a proxy, i.e. so that it can serve other applications. This works completely correct on WebLogic with Apache web server on Solaris or Windows, but it does not work quite right on WebSphere on AIX. On WebSphere / AIX the proxy servlet correctly serves all dynamic pages of a separate application, however all static files, i.e. images and css stylesheets, do not come through at all. We get broken image links for those. Does anybody know some troubleshooting tips? We think that perhaps it has something to do with the web server configuration or the plugin file from WebSphere to the web server. Any suggestions are appreciated. Thanks. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache ./configure problems
Well, in all fairness, this screenshot only lists warnings. Granted, preferably you have none, but did this prevent you from actually compiling and running apache? --- Shawn Beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like I spoke to soon. Syncing the system headers did get rid of most of the errors not not all. Here are the errors I get now: checking netinet/sctp.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: netinet/sctp.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: netinet/sctp.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: netinet/sctp.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: netinet/sctp.h: section Present But Cannot Be Compiled configure: WARNING: netinet/sctp.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: netinet/sctp.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence configure: WARNING: ## -- ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to the AC_PACKAGE_NAME lists. ## configure: WARNING: ## -- ## checking for netinet/sctp.h... yes chec Any Ideas? Shawn Beard Web Administrator, MCSE, MCSA, MCP Iowa Foundation for Medical Care Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: 515-440-8581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/23/2006 7:59:03 AM Thank you! This worked. Shawn Beard Web Administrator, MCSE, MCSA, MCP Iowa Foundation for Medical Care Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: 515-440-8581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/22/2006 2:30:43 PM Richard de Vries wrote: Have a look at http://www.sunfreeware.com And if you want to build... read the big red notes about gcc and syncing system headers ;-) - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Email messages cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as transmitted information can be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services therefore does not accept liability for any error or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of email transmission. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and delete and destroy all copies of the original message. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache ./configure problems
No errors in the log file I assume? Are you starting apache via apachectl? Have you tried a truss -f on your apachectl to see what's going on. --- Shawn Beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes it did. We went ahead with the make and the make install. Then tried to start apache and it didnt start. Didnt give any errors. Just didnt start. We verified this by doing a grep for the httpd process. Shawn Beard Web Administrator, MCSE, MCSA, MCP Iowa Foundation for Medical Care Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: 515-440-8581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/23/2006 10:33:41 AM Well, in all fairness, this screenshot only lists warnings. Granted, preferably you have none, but did this prevent you from actually compiling and running apache? --- Shawn Beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like I spoke to soon. Syncing the system headers did get rid of most of the errors not not all. Here are the errors I get now: checking netinet/sctp.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: netinet/sctp.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: netinet/sctp.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: netinet/sctp.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: netinet/sctp.h: section Present But Cannot Be Compiled configure: WARNING: netinet/sctp.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: netinet/sctp.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence configure: WARNING: ## -- ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to the AC_PACKAGE_NAME lists. ## configure: WARNING: ## -- ## checking for netinet/sctp.h... yes chec Any Ideas? Shawn Beard Web Administrator, MCSE, MCSA, MCP Iowa Foundation for Medical Care Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: 515-440-8581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/23/2006 7:59:03 AM Thank you! This worked. Shawn Beard Web Administrator, MCSE, MCSA, MCP Iowa Foundation for Medical Care Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: 515-440-8581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/22/2006 2:30:43 PM Richard de Vries wrote: Have a look at http://www.sunfreeware.com And if you want to build... read the big red notes about gcc and syncing system headers ;-) - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Email messages cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as transmitted information can be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services therefore does not accept liability for any error or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of email transmission. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and delete and destroy all copies of the original message. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache ./configure problems
Have a look at http://www.sunfreeware.com -R --- Shawn Beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are trying to install Apache 2.0.58 on Solaris 10. After recieving the following warnings, we try to do the make but that errors out. Also, I tried finding it but does anyone know if there is a solaris 10 binary version available? Thanks. configure: WARNING: pthread.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: pthread.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: pthread.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: pthread.h: section Present But Cannot Be Compiled configure: WARNING: pthread.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: pthread.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence configure: WARNING: ## -- ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to the AC_PACKAGE_NAME lists. ## configure: WARNING: ## -- ## configure: WARNING: signal.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: signal.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: signal.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: signal.h: section Present But Cannot Be Compiled configure: WARNING: signal.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: signal.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence configure: WARNING: ## -- ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to the AC_PACKAGE_NAME lists. ## configure: WARNING: ## -- ## configure: WARNING: netinet/sctp.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: netinet/sctp.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: netinet/sctp.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: netinet/sctp.h: section Present But Cannot Be Compiled configure: WARNING: netinet/sctp.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: netinet/sctp.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence configure: WARNING: ## -- ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to the AC_PACKAGE_NAME lists. ## configure: WARNING: ## -- ## configure: WARNING: sys/signal.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: sys/signal.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: sys/signal.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: sys/signal.h: section Present But Cannot Be Compiled configure: WARNING: sys/signal.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: sys/signal.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence configure: WARNING: ## -- ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to the AC_PACKAGE_NAME lists. ## configure: WARNING: ## -- ## configure: WARNING: sys/wait.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: sys/wait.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: sys/wait.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: sys/wait.h: section Present But Cannot Be Compiled configure: WARNING: sys/wait.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: sys/wait.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence configure: WARNING: ## -- ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to the AC_PACKAGE_NAME lists. ## configure: WARNING: ## -- ## configure: WARNING: sys/processor.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: sys/processor.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: sys/processor.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: sys/processor.h: section Present But Cannot Be Compiled configure: WARNING: sys/processor.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: sys/processor.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence configure: WARNING: ## -- ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to the AC_PACKAGE_NAME lists. ## configure: WARNING: ## -- ## Shawn Beard Web Administrator, MCSE, MCSA, MCP Iowa Foundation for Medical Care Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: 515-440-8581 - Email messages cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as transmitted information can be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services therefore does not accept liability for any error or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] weblogic
WebLogic doesn't support Apache 2.2, and Apache 2.2 is not necesarrily downwards compatible with Apache 2.0.x. I recommend you downgrade to Apache 2.0.59 and stay on a supported platform. R --- Maria Elena Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am using Apache 2.2.3, with solaris 9 and when I am going to start it, it gives me the following mistake: bash-2.05$ Syntax error on line 132 of /opt/install/psbatlatam/apache2.2.3.frontend/conf/httpd.conf: API module structure `weblogic_module' in file /opt/install/psbatlatam/apache2.2.3.frontend/modules/mod_wl_20.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO? Already I have copied the file mod_wl_20.so in modules, and I have activated mod_so.c Please I need help, thank you very much :) - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Files .pkg
You can download installable packages from www.sunfreeware.com. In the right hand navigation, click solaris 9 and then click the apache xxx link. Be advised however that it may require some other packages it depends on to be installed as well. For example openSSL. I normally create my own solaris packages. What specific problem are you having? --- Maria Elena Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok thank Boyle Owen escribió: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 11:57 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Files .pkg I have to files: APACHE_FRONTEND_2_0_52.pkg and AR_APA_02_CFE_01_01.pkg, one is for apche installing and the other for the configuration, yes i have solaris 9, sorry i forgot say it. Can help me? That is quite an old version of apache. The current version of the 2.0 branch is 2.0.59. But why don't you use the latest 2.2.3? Anyway, you are installing a third-party version someone has built for solaris. That's OK, but you would be better asking the original supplier for help - especially if you have solaris problems that are nothing to do with apache. Alternatively, you could try http://www.sunfreeware.com/ for a more up-to-date package, or install the latest version from source: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/es/ Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. Boyle Owen escribió: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 11:40 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Files .pkg Hi, please, Can someone say to me that it is a file .pkg? They have said to me that I have to install it but with the pkgadd not to be able. Are you trying to install on solaris using pkgadd? Where did ou get the distribution from? Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. HELP!!!, thank you - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. === message truncated === __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Files .pkg
So, are you unable to install these two packages. Normally, you'd have to do a pkgadd -d ./APACHE_FRONTEND_2_0_52.pkg as root. Are you getting any error messages. If your packages are corrupted, you should download new ones from www.sunfreeware.com. His packages are normally very good, and pretty up to date. 2.0.52 is really very outdated as someone else already pointed out to you. --- Maria Elena Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank Richard for answered, my problem is that I have to files: APACHE_FRONTEND_2_0_52.pkg and AR_APA_02_CFE_01_01.pkg, one is for apche installing and the other for the configuration, yes i have solaris 9, sorry i forgot say it. Can help me? Richard de Vries escribió: You can download installable packages from www.sunfreeware.com. In the right hand navigation, click solaris 9 and then click the apache xxx link. Be advised however that it may require some other packages it depends on to be installed as well. For example openSSL. I normally create my own solaris packages. What specific problem are you having? --- Maria Elena Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok thank Boyle Owen escribió: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 11:57 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Files .pkg I have to files: APACHE_FRONTEND_2_0_52.pkg and AR_APA_02_CFE_01_01.pkg, one is for apche installing and the other for the configuration, yes i have solaris 9, sorry i forgot say it. Can help me? That is quite an old version of apache. The current version of the 2.0 branch is 2.0.59. But why don't you use the latest 2.2.3? Anyway, you are installing a third-party version someone has built for solaris. That's OK, but you would be better asking the original supplier for help - especially if you have solaris problems that are nothing to do with apache. Alternatively, you could try http://www.sunfreeware.com/ for a more up-to-date package, or install the latest version from source: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/es/ Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. Boyle Owen escribió: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 11:40 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Files .pkg Hi, please, Can someone say to me that it is a file .pkg? They have said to me that I have to install it but with the pkgadd not to be able. Are you trying to install on solaris using pkgadd? Where did ou get the distribution from? Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. HELP!!!, thank you - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: === message truncated === __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SSI includes on .jsp pages
I did some googling but did not find any solutions so I am hoping you guys may have some pointers. I have some JSP pages that are being handled thru a Application Server via an apache plugin. Basically, when a request comes in for the .jsp, Apache hands it off to the plugin, who sends it on to the App Server, which in turn processes it and returns the processed page. This processed page has a SSI directive I would like executed, but Apache is not touching it. The SSI directives on static files work just fine. The reason I want Apache to handle the SSI directive is because the virtual include in this case is living on the webserver, and NOT on the appserver. Any idea on how I can Apache to honor this SSI include? mod_include is enabled. Thank you! Richard __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache listening for UDP requests?
I haven't had a whole lot of luck yet sniffing UDP packets. I was able to get the sniffer runner, but there is hardly any UDP traffic. What I think is happening, is that these UDP ports are being used to communicate over the loopback (localhost) adapter. DNS resolution is disabled on these Apache instances, so that's definately not it either. The number of UDP ports seems to climb the longer Apache is running. --- Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could it possibly be for communication with a DNS server ? Have you tried sniffing UDP packets sent to/from this port? -ascs -Original Message- From: Richard de Vries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 7:07 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache listening for UDP requests? While debugging an issue on one of my apache webservers with lsof, I noticed the following: httpd 16679 http 23u IPv4 0x30008c5fa88 0t0 UDP *:41034 (Idle) httpd 16679 http 27u IPv4 0x30008bf4d20 0t0 UDP *:* (Unbound) httpd 16679 http 28u IPv4 0x30009526088 0t0 UDP *:* (Unbound) httpd 16679 http 29u IPv4 0x300084f32e8 0t0 UDP *:* (Unbound) httpd 16679 http 30u IPv4 0x30009590e68 0t0 UDP *:* (Unbound) httpd 16679 http 31u IPv4 0x300094087f0 0t0 UDP *:* (Unbound) httpd 16679 http 32u IPv4 0x30008edf0d0 0t0 UDP *:* (Unbound) What does this mean? Is Apache listening for UDP requests? If so, why? Richard - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache listening for UDP requests?
While debugging an issue on one of my apache webservers with lsof, I noticed the following: httpd 16679 http 23u IPv4 0x30008c5fa88 0t0 UDP *:41034 (Idle) httpd 16679 http 27u IPv4 0x30008bf4d20 0t0 UDP *:* (Unbound) httpd 16679 http 28u IPv4 0x30009526088 0t0 UDP *:* (Unbound) httpd 16679 http 29u IPv4 0x300084f32e8 0t0 UDP *:* (Unbound) httpd 16679 http 30u IPv4 0x30009590e68 0t0 UDP *:* (Unbound) httpd 16679 http 31u IPv4 0x300094087f0 0t0 UDP *:* (Unbound) httpd 16679 http 32u IPv4 0x30008edf0d0 0t0 UDP *:* (Unbound) What does this mean? Is Apache listening for UDP requests? If so, why? Richard __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse Proxy between WebSphere and the WebServer - prevent Bad Gateway errors.
Actually, without the Proxy, the WAS plugin properly detects an instance as being down and reroutes the requests to one of the other app servers. So, with the proxy, it keeps sending requests to the faulty server causing people to see frequent bad gateway errors. But, you are correct when dealing with an environment that only has one appserver that is down, or dealing with an environment with multiple app servers -- all of which are down. So, in my my multi-app server environment, the proxy is basically breaking the plugin's functionality to detect and reroute traffic. --- Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If it were not for the Proxy server, the user would just get a Connection refused or Unable to connect/Connection timed out which in my opinion is no better than that HTTP 502 (Bad Gateway). At least the proxy server gives you the option of serving a custom error page for the HTTP 502 using the ErrorDocument directive, explaining to the user that the server is temporarily unavailable. Then of course, if you are using the WebSphere plugin and you have multiple WAS backends, chances that no WAS is available at any given time should be pretty slim... -ascs -Original Message- From: Richard de Vries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 4:50 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse Proxy between WebSphere and the WebServer - prevent Bad Gateway errors. I was wondering if anyone on this list has ever configured a WebSphere environment with a reverse Proxy (Apache) sitting between the WebSphere App Server, and the WebServer. Why would you want to do that you may ask? The answer is simple ... to secure the WebSphere Application Server instance from people trying to bypass the webservers. Basically, I have WAS listening on the 127.0.0.1 adapter of the server, and have the Proxy Server listen on the public IP addresses. The proxy server in turn will proxy the incoming requests from the public IP to WAS on localhost. So far all is well. The problem comes with the WebSphere WebServer plugins. Since we're running our WAS in a clustered environment -- the WebSphere plugin does some loadbalancing and logic to determine what WAS instance is up. If an instance is down, it's supposed to send the request to one of the alternate servers. Unfortunately, with the Proxy server in the middle, the WAS plugin doesn't detect the WAS instance as being down, because even with the WAS instance down, the proxy is accepting connections. This then results in a Bad Gateway error. Any suggestions on how to circumvent this issue? Thank you :-) Richard - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] remote_host / remote_addr and Apache as a Reverse Proxy
Thanks Joshua. --- Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/27/06, Richard de Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is there any directive that can be set to have Apache as a reverse proxy report REMOTE_HOST and REMOTE_ADDR properly? (instead of those variables being set to the proxy server?) (Third time we've seen this question in the past week or so.) Apache sends the X-Forwarded-For header on the request to the origin server. If you are asking if it is possible for apache to set the actual IP address that is seen by the origin server, then the answer is no, this is not even theoretically possible. The origin server gets this information from the TCP/IP connection information, not from anything sent by the proxy. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse Proxy between WebSphere and the WebServer - prevent Bad Gateway errors.
True, it does routing and does simple port-checks I think to make sure the backend application server is up. If that backend server is down, it routes the request to an app server that is up. In the proxy'd environment, this can happen: a) the backend app server crashes / goes down b) the plugin, not knowing it's actually hitting a reverse proxy, does a port check and says Hey, the WAS instance is up, let me send this request to you. c) the proxy tries to pass the request on to the app, gets no response, and returns a bad gateway error message which in turn is presented back to the client. Without a proxy in the middle, this would happen: a) the backend app server crashes / goes down b) the plugin tries to talk to the app server, sees its down, and reroutes the request to a different app server. The client gets the right data back and would be none-the-wiser. So, how would I accomplish the latter with using the former? --- Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry; I did not really get it the first time around. The reverse proxy is located between the plugin and WAS. However I do not see why this should interfere with the work of the WAS plugin since the latter, as far as I recall, basically just performs routing based on the contents of the JSESSIONID cookie. -ascs -Original Message- From: Richard de Vries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 5:06 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse Proxy between WebSphere and the WebServer - prevent Bad Gateway errors. Actually, without the Proxy, the WAS plugin properly detects an instance as being down and reroutes the requests to one of the other app servers. So, with the proxy, it keeps sending requests to the faulty server causing people to see frequent bad gateway errors. But, you are correct when dealing with an environment that only has one appserver that is down, or dealing with an environment with multiple app servers -- all of which are down. So, in my my multi-app server environment, the proxy is basically breaking the plugin's functionality to detect and reroute traffic. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] remote_host / remote_addr and Apache as a Reverse Proxy
Hi, Is there any directive that can be set to have Apache as a reverse proxy report REMOTE_HOST and REMOTE_ADDR properly? (instead of those variables being set to the proxy server?) Thanks :-) R __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] query string from POST method
Have a look at mod_security. (http://www.modsecurity.org) R --- rturnbull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello to all, Is there a way though httpd proxy to show the arguments sent with a POST method? I have been trying to find a way to reveal arguments from our java application that are POST method to the server... for example http://someserver/TspLogin.do;jsessionid=HDFDFDDFDFD?Username=testpassword=blabhblah I have set up a httpd proxy and every other call that I make (MOSTLY GETS) reveals the query string, but no mater what config I give the server, I cannot get the POST. Please help. Thanks Ryan Turnbull - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache reverse proxy and IBM websphere
What do the Proxy and WebSphere logfiles reveal? Have you tried a manual HTTP connection from your proxy server to your webserver server. i.e. telnet websphere server websphere port GET /application name HTTP/1.0 R --- Gabriele Barberi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I already include the port but it doesn't work. The reverse proxy runs on an external server Regards Gabriele Doesn't WebSphere run on a specific port like 9080. (and not 80). Make sure to include that port in your forward statement. Thus: ProxyPass /websphere http://websphere-address:websphere-port/WS Does the reverse proxy run on the WebSphere server, or a server external to the websphere server? R. --- Barberi Gabriele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I need to implement a reverse proxy for export a local network server with WebSphere on the public web server. I'm currently running apache Hi all, I'm currently running apache 1.3.27 on a SuSE 8.2 and I need to use Websphere 5.1 from web. Websphere server is running on local network. I need to implement a reverse proxy for get access to WebSphere application from the public web server. For reverse proxy I used standard parameters ProxyRequest Off ProxyPass /websphere http://websphere-address/WS ProxyPassRequest /websphere http://websphere-address/WS Unfortunatly this doesn't work, it shows only the login form but I'm not able to get access to the application. Do I need other module or parameter? thanks a lot - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gallery version 2.0.2
You'll probably have better luck at finding an answer at gallery.menalto.com But what you might want to try, is setting the locking mechanism in your Gallery Configuration (Administration pages) to DB instead of files. R --- Cindy O'Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am a complete novice at this, but my professional has been unable to help me with a problem I've had with my gallery page. I used to be able to download pictures to albums and now I can't. I get an error message that reads: Can anyone help me with this? Error Detail - Error (ERROR_PLATFORM_FAILURE) : /home/wwwexpe/public_html/gallery/g2data/locks/0/7/7 a.. in modules/core/classes/FlockLockSystem.class at line 261 (gallerystatus::error) b.. in modules/core/classes/FlockLockSystem.class at line 69 (flocklocksystem::_acquirelock) c.. in modules/core/classes/helpers/GalleryLockHelper_simple.class at line 66 (flocklocksystem::acquirereadlock) d.. in modules/core/classes/GalleryCoreApi.class at line 2068 (gallerylockhelper_simple::acquirereadlock) e.. in modules/core/ItemAddAlbum.inc at line 53 (gallerycoreapi::acquirereadlock) f.. in main.php at line 174 (itemaddalbumcontroller::handlerequest) g.. in main.php at line 87 h.. in main.php at line 80 Gallery version 2.0.2 PHP version 4.4.2 apache Webserver Apache Database mysql 4.0.27-standard Toolkits SquareThumb, ImageMagick, NetPBM, Gd Operating system Linux server005.serverquality.com 2.6.11.7.dn2.p4 #2 SMP Mon Apr 11 11:00:44 EDT 2005 i686 Browser Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache reverse proxy and IBM websphere
Doesn't WebSphere run on a specific port like 9080. (and not 80). Make sure to include that port in your forward statement. Thus: ProxyPass /websphere http://websphere-address:websphere-port/WS Does the reverse proxy run on the WebSphere server, or a server external to the websphere server? R. --- Barberi Gabriele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I need to implement a reverse proxy for export a local network server with WebSphere on the public web server. I'm currently running apache Hi all, I'm currently running apache 1.3.27 on a SuSE 8.2 and I need to use Websphere 5.1 from web. Websphere server is running on local network. I need to implement a reverse proxy for get access to WebSphere application from the public web server. For reverse proxy I used standard parameters ProxyRequest Off ProxyPass /websphere http://websphere-address/WS ProxyPassRequest /websphere http://websphere-address/WS Unfortunatly this doesn't work, it shows only the login form but I'm not able to get access to the application. Do I need other module or parameter? thanks a lot - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Configuring Apache behind a wireless router
You will need to configure Apache to listen to the IP address on that specific machine behind your router; which is most likely a private address. i.e. 192.168.x.x or 10.10.x.x Then, in your router, go to port forwarding and tell it to forward all incoming request for port 80, to the private IP address your Apache server is running on. --- Josh Sephton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm trying to configure Apache to respond for requests to the external address of my LAN. Currently I have a Belkin wireless router into which my internet comes in through. I then have several Windows computers which connect to that router. One of these boxes has Apache2 installed on it. I want Apache to listen for requests on the external address, 201.x.x.15, at port 80, and then respond accordingly. SO far I have tried configuring Apache by putting Listen 201.x.x.15:80 in httpd.conf but this comes up with the error: The requested address is not valid in this context. :make_sock: could not bind to 201.x.x.15:80 no listening sockets available, shutting down Can anyone help me? Thanks, Josh - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apxs vs. configure to add modules
I had a similiar problem with the mod_proxy modules, but even specifiying these modules during the ./configure phase did not work properly for me. Try this: cd $source_dir/modules/proxy $apache-home/bin/apxs -i -a -c *.c R. --- JP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. My question is: Is there a proper method to adding delivered modules to httpd 2.2.2 after the initial run of configure, make, and install? That is, should I be able to use apxs to add modules, as DSOs, after the initial build, or should I be using configure to compile and add them? I'm using AIX 5.2ML7, C for AIX 5.2.0.9. Initially, I'd like to build httpd to use all shared objects, so I used this configure command: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --with-ssl=/usr/linux --enable-mods-shared=all --disable-deflate --without-berkeley-db Later, I tried to add mod_proxy, and mod_proxy_ajp using apxs: executed from $source_dir/modules/proxy apxs -i -a -c mod_proxy.c apxs -i -a -c mod_proxy_ajp.c They compiled and seemed to build/install correctly, but I got the following error when testing the config: /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -t httpd: Syntax error on line 102 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/local/apache/modules/mod_proxy.so into server: rtld: 0712-001 Symbol ap_proxy_lb_workers was referenced\n from module /usr/local/apache/modules/mod_proxy.so(), but a runtime definition\n of the symbol was not found. ... So, I eventually found the problem was that a library, proxy_util, was not being linked into mod_proxy.so by the apxs commands I used. It turns out that if the proxy modules are specified explicitly in the configure command, then the build is performed correctly. It occurred to me that maybe apxs is doing exactly what I told it to, and that I might be left up to the user to sort out dependencies. If I'm missing a flag or something in the apxs command, please let me know. Thanks for your help, JP - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apxs vs. configure to add modules
Ok, how about cd $source_dir/modules/proxy $apache-home/bin/apxs -i -a -c *proxy*.c I know I got it to work using some sort of wildcards. I'll try to see if I can find it back in my shell's history. --- JP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had a similiar problem with the mod_proxy modules, but even specifiying these modules during the ./configure phase did not work properly for me. Try this: cd $source_dir/modules/proxy $apache-home/bin/apxs -i -a -c *.c R. Hey. Here's what I get: Put apxs in PATH. cd $source_dir/modules/proxy $apxs -i -a -c *.c /usr/local/apache/build/libtool --silent --mode=compile cc -prefer-pic -U__STR__ -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_USE_IRS -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -g -qHALT=E -I/usr/local/apache/include -I/usr/local/apache/include -I/usr/local/apache/include -c -o ajp_header.lo ajp_header.c touch ajp_header.slo ... /usr/local/apache/build/libtool --silent --mode=link cc -o ajp_header.la -rpath /usr/local/apache/modules -module -avoid-version -Wl,-brtl proxy_util.lo mod_proxy_http.lo mod_proxy_ftp.lo mod_proxy_connect.lo mod_proxy_balancer.lo mod_proxy_ajp.lo mod_proxy.lo ajp_msg.lo ajp_link.lo ajp_header.lo apxs:Error: Sorry, cannot determine bootstrap symbol name. apxs:Error: Please specify one with option `-n'. I think it's hanging up on the libraries that aren't modules themselves like proxy_util, ajp_msg, etc. JP - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cgi permission
Check your selinux settings. From within your desktop System - Administration - Security Level and Firewall --- Amir Aavani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I recently installed FC5 on my laptop, Before that I had FC4 with latest version of httpd. On FC4, i developed a cgi application (using fpc) which read/write from/to some files. The files where on my desktop, i.e /home/Amir/Desktop/1 . Also, I set the User and Group parameters in httpd.conf to Amir. The file worked correctly on FC4. But now my file can't read/write from that file (any file, I changed the place of the file). I checked if my configuration was correct, I asked my cgi application to print the effective user ID by whom it is run. Any suggestion My httpd version is httpd-2.2.0-5.1.2 yours Amir - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Correction Question: SSLCertificateFile: RedHat (RHEL4) apache startup failure: ebxml-registry-repository on tomcat on port 6480, with Mambo LAMP Portal on port 8080: Despite S
Are you using a seperate configuration file for your SSL instance? Let's start with a couple of basic things. 1) Do you have the SSL configuration between IfModule tags?. If so, what is your set to in this case? 2) SSLCertificateFile and SSLCertificateKeyFile point to valid files right? Can you do a ls -al on that file location? 3) Sometimes, some programs refuse to enable SSL if the certificates are publicly readable. How are your permissions on these files? Let's start with these steps, then work ourselves thru your configuration. I don't think re-installing apache would necesarrily fix anything. Richard --- Rex Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Richard, I appreciate that you took the time to answer. So far you are the only one. This installation is on RedHat Enterprise Linux4 and Apache2.0 and I have tried the Key-Certificate generation instructions detailed in the System Administration Guide Ch. 26.6-26.8, I tried the freebsd instructions at the url you advised, and what happened was that the certificate signing request could not open the key. I have also downloaded and tried with openssl-0.9.8b. I was able to generate the server.key and server.crt but httpd still does not start. The Admin Guide instructions also result in what ought to be a valid server key in the ssl.key directory and a server.crt in the ssl.crt directory as specified in the ssl.conf file in the /etc/httpd/conf directory, but httpd still does not start Here is the terminal output when attempting to start httpd: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# service httpd start Starting httpd: [Mon May 08 06:20:21 2006] [warn] The Alias directive in /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf at line 557 will probably never match because it overlaps an earlier AliasMatch. Warning: DocumentRoot [/home/xxx/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28] does not exist [FAILED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# Here is the httpd error_log for that sequence: [Mon May 08 06:20:21 2006] [notice] core dump file size limit raised to 4294967295 bytes [Mon May 08 06:20:22 2006] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: /usr/sbin/suexec) [Mon May 08 06:20:22 2006] [error] Server should be SSL-aware but has no certificate configured [Hint: SSLCertificateFile] It's beginning to look like I will have to reinstall apache. Regards, Rex what error are you getting? Try following the instructions at this URL. They've always worked for me: http://www.corserv.com/freebsd/apache-ssl-howto.html --- Rex Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please see my previous post for details. I said that mod_ssl was not installed, but a double check showed that it is. My question is only about filenames for SSLCertificateFile and/or SSLCertificateKeyFile. ApacheSSL Documentation says at http://www.apache-ssl.org/docs.html#SSLCertificateFile: This is your PEM-encoded server certificate (strictly, it is what SSLeay calls PEM, which isn't really). Example: SSLCertificateFile /usr/local/apache/certs/my.server.pem What the process described in RedHat Sys. Admin. Guide Ch. 26.6-26.8 produces in the file ssl.conf located in /etc/httpd/conf.d/ used to configure SSL support is: SSLCertificateFile /etc/httpd/conf/ssl.crt/server.crt and SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/httpd/conf/ssl.key/server.key There is a file named server.crt in the specified location, and an server.key file in its corresponding location. Could this lack of a PEM-encoded server certificate, however it is produced, the root cause of httpd start failure? I have downloaded and installed openssl-0.9.8b and I have also now generated a privkey.pem and a cacert.pem and I have put them in the same directories as the ssl.conf file specified, and edited that file to reflect that, rebooted and httpd still fails to start. Regards, Rex Brooks -- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-849-2309 - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-849-2309 - The official User-To-User support forum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.58: mod_proxy.so: symbol ap_proxyerror: referenced symbol not found
While trying to run my apache instance as a proxy, I get the following error: Cannot load /bmc/local/apps/apache/modules/mod_proxy.so into server: ld.so.1: httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /bmc/local/apps/apache/modules/mod_proxy.so: symbol ap_proxyerror: referenced symbol not found I have my config stripped down to a bare minimum. The load-order of my modules are as follows: LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so LoadModule headers_module modules/mod_headers.so LoadModule proxy_connect_module modules/mod_proxy_connect.so LoadModule proxy_http_module modules/mod_proxy_http.so Any suggestions? Thanks guys! R __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.56 release date
Has anyone heard any rumble yet about the Apache 2.0.56 release date?. If I am mistaking Apache 2.0.56-dev has been out for quite some time already, and Apache 2.0.55 does have a couple of known issues/vulnerabilities. R __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there a how-to for building an Apacher server farm?
At work I've built several webserver farms. You will need to configure multiple apache webservers, and put a loadbalancer in front of it. Either a hardware based loadbalancer,or software-based loadbalancer such as PLB. If you want multiple levels of redundancy, you can configure a load-balanced loadbalancer environment. Your DNS would resolve to your loadbalancer, which would in turn distribute the load over your various webservers. This loadbalancer should in turn monitor your apache instances and take an instance out of it's available webservers table if it goes down. Feel free to email me individually if you require more information. R --- Tony Stocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I've spent the better part of the afternoon Googling for a decent how-to on how one goes about creating a web server farm. There are tons of documents that refer to the concept as an accepted practice, but I can't find anything that discusses how one goes about creating one. My basic goal is to create a server farm that balances load among n servers, and creates fault tolerance because as long as (n - (n-1) ) servers are up then my web site(s) are available. This seems to be a basic concept and one that's been around for a long time, but even in the Apache mailing list archives I can't find anything applicable. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks muchly! Tony __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Making Apache 2.2 work with Weblogic 8.1 (both on Solaris 9)
I had a similar situation with WebSphere. It's just not compatible. I would definately recommend asking for a Apache 2.2 WebLogic plugin, but there is a good chance they won't have one for you. So, in the end you may have to back down to Apache 2.0.55. R --- Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/24/06, D J Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I installed Apache 2.2 (using GNU gcc) on Solaris 9, Bea Weblogic8.1 on Solaris on two different servers. Both products works fine independently. Now I followed directions to configure the the Apache HTTP Server plug-in I did the following 1) Copied /opt/bea/weblogic81/server/lib/solaris/mod_wl_20.so from Weblogic server to /usr/local/apache2/modules directory in the Apache Server Apache 2.2 is not binary compatible with modules designed for Apache 2.0 (although it is largely source-compatible). So you'll need to ask Bea for a version compiled for 2.2. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maurizio Salviato/PAM/IT � in ferie.
If you want a timely and/or meaningful reply, you should really consider writing your messages in english. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sarò assente dall'ufficio a partire da Mar 04/04/2006 fino a Gio 20/04/2006. Risponderò al messaggio al mio ritorno. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maurizio Salviato/PAM/IT � in ferie.
hehe ... :-) --- Boyle Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Richard de Vries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mittwoch, 12. April 2006 15:01 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maurizio Salviato/PAM/IT è in ferie. If you want a timely and/or meaningful reply, you should really consider writing your messages in english. My Italian is a bit rusty, but I think he's informing us he'll be out of the office for his holidays. Don't worry, he'll respond to all messages on his return on 20/Apr - so we can flame him then. Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sarò assente dall'ufficio a partire da Mar 04/04/2006 fino a Gio 20/04/2006. Risponderò al messaggio al mio ritorno. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Diese E-mail ist eine private und persönliche Kommunikation. Sie hat keinen Bezug zur Börsen- bzw. Geschäftstätigkeit der SWX Gruppe. This e-mail is of a private and personal nature. It is not related to the exchange or business activities of the SWX Group. Le présent e-mail est un message privé et personnel, sans rapport avec l'activité boursière du Groupe SWX. This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (70007)The timeout specified has expired: SSL input filter read failed.
Perhaps a known issue, though I haven't been able to find much info on it. Is anyone experiencing the following error.log entries on their SSL instance: [Tue Apr 11 23:29:18 2006] [info] (70007)The timeout specified has expired: SSL input filter read failed. the HTTPs instance *appears* to work just fine, but it floods my logs with these messages. R. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] return 404 for specific url ?
Hey there, it sounds like you should be able to get this to work with mod_rewrite ... but either way, you should have a look at mod_security. (http://www.modsecurity.org/) It can do that, and so much more! R. --- peter pilsl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to configure a virtual host to return 404 for a specific request I tried mod_rewrite RewriteRule ^/(forbidden_.*) - [R=404] but this does not work. Also didnt find anything in mod_alias. I would need to redirect to a nonexisting url, so the browser would receive a 301 first and then get the 404, which is not what I need !! The first answer need to be a 404. I hope there is a solution inside apache, otherwise I would need to rewrite my application to return 404 itself. thnx, p - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --enable-mods-shared=all vs --enable-so
What exactly is the difference between --enable-mods-shared=all and --enable-so. Is there a difference? R __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --enable-mods-shared=all vs --enable-so
Hey, thanks for that excellent anwser. Cheers! --- Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/15/06, Richard de Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What exactly is the difference between --enable-mods-shared=all and --enable-so. Is there a difference? The first compiles all modules as dynamic modules. The second compiles all modules as static modules, but includes mod_so which enables the later addition of dynamic modules. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [newbie]Setting a secured apache server
You oughta look into mod-security. It allows you to do some real neat stuff as far as securing a webserver is concerned. --- Kishore Jalleda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes SSL would be your best bet, with .htaccess your passwords would be travelling in plain text, so go for SSL... Kishore Jalleda On 3/14/06, Toto Capuccino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, I am using a monitoring tool -nagios- that is running through a web interface where you can configure things. I really want avoid people from being able to log to that server or to know wich is coming in and out of the traffic. I am actually using authentication with .htaccess file. Is that the most secured authentication method ? Yes i know it is a naive question and i am sure the answer is no, so i should ask which authentication method is the best? I want to strongly encrypt the traffic...should i use SSL for that ? Thanks for your info. -- Le bon sens est la chose du monde la mieux partagée. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] best practices - virtualhosts section or not?
So I am trying to install this 3rd party application, and it simply won't install without a virtualhost section in my httpd.conf. Since my web server is only running 1 webserver/instance ... I did not define a virtualhost section. So, I am kinda curious. Is it strange to not define a virtualhost section? Is it a best practice to define one anyway? What does everybody think? Richard __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] best practices - virtualhosts section or not?
Thank you very much for your excellent reply. Glad to hear it is not at all unusual to not use VHs for the main/default site. I agree, adding additional hosts would definately require the use of VH blocks, unless each one would get their own httpd.conf and run as a seperate instance. --- Boyle Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Richard de Vries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Montag, 13. März 2006 14:59 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] best practices - virtualhosts section or not? So I am trying to install this 3rd party application, and it simply won't install without a virtualhost section in my httpd.conf. Since my web server is only running 1 webserver/instance ... I did not define a virtualhost section. So, I am kinda curious. Is it strange to not define a virtualhost section? Is it a best practice to define one anyway? What does everybody think? If you don't *need* one, there's no reason to use one. Eg, if you have only one site. As soon as you have more than one site, you *need* VHs (be they name-based, port-based or IP based). Some people think it's tidier and more symmetric to have every site in a VH. Others think it's better to have a main or default site outside all the VHs so have N-1 VHs. It's up to you... Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. Richard __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Diese E-mail ist eine private und persönliche Kommunikation. Sie hat keinen Bezug zur Börsen- bzw. Geschäftstätigkeit der SWX Gruppe. This e-mail is of a private and personal nature. It is not related to the exchange or business activities of the SWX Group. Le présent e-mail est un message privé et personnel, sans rapport avec l'activité boursière du Groupe SWX. This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl and multiple daemons
I have the need to run multiple daemons off of the same apache base install. Each daemon will have it's own configuration file of course, but since they are all configured pretty much the same (same modules etc) I don't see a need to have several apache installs. So, I'd have one install, i.e. /usr/apache/ with multiple configs, i.e /usr/apache/conf/httpd-host1.conf /usr/apache/conf/httpd-host2.conf /usr/apache/conf/httpd-host3.conf Is there an apachectl script that allows for multiple daemons to be managed? (start/stop/restart) ? R __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installation / Permissions Problem Apache 1.3.31 with Mod_SSL
I had a similar problem once, though the explanation of the root cause is quite long. Try changing the path info to the 8.1 naming convention. i.e. c:\progra~1\apache\ etc instead of c:\program files\apache\ and see if that makes a difference for you. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howdy, I'm trying to set up Apache 1.3.31 with Mod_SSL on a win 2003 server. I was given a local administrator user account to do the install. However when I try to install apache as a service from the command line, I get 'cannot find file' errors related to 2 LoadModule directives (Mod_SSL.so and php4apache.dll). The files exist where I've indicated in httpd.conf so I'm assuming that I have a permissions problem. Thing is, I have the whole setup (with MySQL and PHP) working on my desktop, so I know it works. Again, I'm guessing that it's a permissions problem, but I've opened up the directories and files and propagated changes to children. Anybody have any suggestions? Thanks. David - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite directive in main config does not trickle down into the https instance
Hey all,
I configured a couple of mod_rewrite directives in the
main configuration file to disable the TRACE/TRACK
methods. However, these rules do not seem to make it
into the HTTPS instance; even though I put them in the
main config, and not in the virtual hosts.
# Disable/Block TRACE/TRACK requests.
RewriteEngine on
RewriteOptions inherit
RewriteLog logs/mod_rewrite.log
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^(TRACE|TRACK)
RewriteRule .* - [F]
I was hoping to not have to explicitly put these rules
in the SSL's config, to keep things clean and simple.
Any suggestions ?
Thank you!
R
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite directive in main config does not trickle down into the https instance
excellent feedback. Thank you!
I was unaware of the TraceEnable method. I must have
read over it :(
I agree, it's not really dangerous anymore, but it's
something that should be considered when applying a
defense-in-depth strategy.
Thanks again for the prompt reply!
--- Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/10/06, Richard de Vries
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
I configured a couple of mod_rewrite directives in
the
main configuration file to disable the TRACE/TRACK
methods. However, these rules do not seem to make
it
into the HTTPS instance; even though I put them in
the
main config, and not in the virtual hosts.
# Disable/Block TRACE/TRACK requests.
RewriteEngine on
RewriteOptions inherit
RewriteLog logs/mod_rewrite.log
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^(TRACE|TRACK)
RewriteRule .* - [F]
I was hoping to not have to explicitly put these
rules
in the SSL's config, to keep things clean and
simple.
1. You are wasting your time because the TRACK
method doesn't even
exist in Apache and the TRACE method is not
dangerous.
2. If you really want to waste your time, then use a
recent version of
apache that has the TraceEnable directive to solve
this problem.
3. If you must use mod_rewrite, then put
RewriteEngine On
RewriteOptions inherit
inside the VirtualHost block for your ssl vhost.
Joshua.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the
Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for
more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] email sending utility
Indigostar has a sendmail for Windows application. You can find it here: http://www.indigostar.com/sendmail.htm If you google, you may even find a similar free application somewhere. --- Shipra Mehta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am using Apache for windows XP v. 2.0.55. I would like to send email to user (user specified email address in input type = text name =email) with a file containing results of a program called by my cgi file. I am not able to use sendmail (I guess it works for unix). Could you help me with this problem of email utility in apache for windows. Shipra Mehta --- - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CustomLog logs/access_log combined not working from within IfModule log_config_module/IfModule
Hmm ... nope, that didn't work either :(
Just for fun I used an IfModule directive from an
other module that is loaded ... i..e IfModule
ssl_module which I know works on other configuration
directives, but as soon as I put it around the
CustomLog logs/access_log common statement, it does
the same thing.
This is absolutely bizarre!. It's almost as if the
CustomLog configuration variable simply does not
work when placed within IfModule/IfModule
statements.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try adding .c to the directive. This is probably
where
your problem lies.
This is what I have:
IfModule log_config_module
IfModule log_config_module.c
Keith
In theory, theory and practice are the same;
In practice they are not.
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Richard de Vries wrote:
To: users@httpd.apache.org
From: Richard de Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CustomLog logs/access_log
combined not working from
within IfModule log_config_module/IfModule
I am having the weirdest problem. Running Apache
2.0.55 on Solaris 9, I am unable to get Apache to
generate and write to the access_log file while
the
CustomLog directive is enclosed in the IfModule
/IfModule tags.
This is what I have:
IfModule log_config_module
#
# The following directives define some format
nicknames for use with
# a CustomLog directive (see below).
#
LogFormat %h %l %u %t \%r\ %s %b
\%{Referer}i\ \%{User-Agent}i\ combined
LogFormat %h %l %u %t \%r\ %s %b common
CustomLog logs/access.log combined
/IfModule
It simply doesnt work.
If I remove the IfModule/IfModule tags, it
does
work. I made sure I am loading the
log_config_module
LoadModule access_module modules/mod_access.so
LoadModule alias_module modules/mod_alias.so
LoadModule auth_module modules/mod_auth.so
LoadModule dir_module modules/mod_dir.so
LoadModule dumpio_module modules/mod_dumpio.so
LoadModule include_module modules/mod_include.so
LoadModule log_config_module
modules/mod_log_config.so
LoadModule log_forensic_module
modules/mod_log_forensic.so
LoadModule logio_module modules/mod_logio.so
LoadModule security_module modules/mod_security.so
LoadModule mime_module modules/mod_mime.so
LoadModule rewrite_module modules/mod_rewrite.so
LoadModule ssl_module modules/mod_ssl.so
LoadModule unique_id_module
modules/mod_unique_id.so
I even proved this to myself by removing the
LoadModule log_config_module xxx line, at which
point Apache complains about the CustomLog
directive.
So I know the module is loaded.
I tried to reproduce this behavior on my Fedora 4
linux box with Apache 2.0.55 (RPM) and it does the
same thing.
I am not using any virtual hosts and/or SSL, and
yes,
the logs and log directory have the appropriate
permissions.
Has anyone seen / experienced this before?
Richard
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the
Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html
for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the
Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for
more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CustomLog logs/access_log combined not working from within IfModule log_config_module/IfModule
Ok .. sorry, my mistake.
Your suggestion of adding .c did work, but not when
applying it to the module alias .. DUH.
so this does not work:
IfModule log_config_module.c
but this DOES work:
IfModule mod_log_config.c
Do you happen to know why this is?. Why do some
IfModule statements work fine on the module
name/alias, and others require it to be the
mod_real_name.c ?
--- Richard de Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmm ... nope, that didn't work either :(
Just for fun I used an IfModule directive from an
other module that is loaded ... i..e IfModule
ssl_module which I know works on other
configuration
directives, but as soon as I put it around the
CustomLog logs/access_log common statement, it does
the same thing.
This is absolutely bizarre!. It's almost as if the
CustomLog configuration variable simply does not
work when placed within IfModule/IfModule
statements.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try adding .c to the directive. This is probably
where
your problem lies.
This is what I have:
IfModule log_config_module
IfModule log_config_module.c
Keith
In theory, theory and practice are the same;
In practice they are not.
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Richard de Vries wrote:
To: users@httpd.apache.org
From: Richard de Vries
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CustomLog logs/access_log
combined not working from
within IfModule
log_config_module/IfModule
I am having the weirdest problem. Running Apache
2.0.55 on Solaris 9, I am unable to get Apache
to
generate and write to the access_log file while
the
CustomLog directive is enclosed in the
IfModule
/IfModule tags.
This is what I have:
IfModule log_config_module
#
# The following directives define some
format
nicknames for use with
# a CustomLog directive (see below).
#
LogFormat %h %l %u %t \%r\ %s %b
\%{Referer}i\ \%{User-Agent}i\ combined
LogFormat %h %l %u %t \%r\ %s %b common
CustomLog logs/access.log combined
/IfModule
It simply doesnt work.
If I remove the IfModule/IfModule tags, it
does
work. I made sure I am loading the
log_config_module
LoadModule access_module modules/mod_access.so
LoadModule alias_module modules/mod_alias.so
LoadModule auth_module modules/mod_auth.so
LoadModule dir_module modules/mod_dir.so
LoadModule dumpio_module modules/mod_dumpio.so
LoadModule include_module modules/mod_include.so
LoadModule log_config_module
modules/mod_log_config.so
LoadModule log_forensic_module
modules/mod_log_forensic.so
LoadModule logio_module modules/mod_logio.so
LoadModule security_module
modules/mod_security.so
LoadModule mime_module modules/mod_mime.so
LoadModule rewrite_module modules/mod_rewrite.so
LoadModule ssl_module modules/mod_ssl.so
LoadModule unique_id_module
modules/mod_unique_id.so
I even proved this to myself by removing the
LoadModule log_config_module xxx line, at
which
point Apache complains about the CustomLog
directive.
So I know the module is loaded.
I tried to reproduce this behavior on my Fedora
4
linux box with Apache 2.0.55 (RPM) and it does
the
same thing.
I am not using any virtual hosts and/or SSL, and
yes,
the logs and log directory have the appropriate
permissions.
Has anyone seen / experienced this before?
Richard
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the
Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html
for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the
Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html
for
more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the
Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for
more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
[EMAIL PROTECTED] CustomLog logs/access_log combined not working from within IfModule log_config_module/IfModule
I am having the weirdest problem. Running Apache
2.0.55 on Solaris 9, I am unable to get Apache to
generate and write to the access_log file while the
CustomLog directive is enclosed in the IfModule
/IfModule tags.
This is what I have:
IfModule log_config_module
#
# The following directives define some format
nicknames for use with
# a CustomLog directive (see below).
#
LogFormat %h %l %u %t \%r\ %s %b
\%{Referer}i\ \%{User-Agent}i\ combined
LogFormat %h %l %u %t \%r\ %s %b common
CustomLog logs/access.log combined
/IfModule
It simply doesnt work.
If I remove the IfModule/IfModule tags, it does
work. I made sure I am loading the log_config_module
LoadModule access_module modules/mod_access.so
LoadModule alias_module modules/mod_alias.so
LoadModule auth_module modules/mod_auth.so
LoadModule dir_module modules/mod_dir.so
LoadModule dumpio_module modules/mod_dumpio.so
LoadModule include_module modules/mod_include.so
LoadModule log_config_module modules/mod_log_config.so
LoadModule log_forensic_module
modules/mod_log_forensic.so
LoadModule logio_module modules/mod_logio.so
LoadModule security_module modules/mod_security.so
LoadModule mime_module modules/mod_mime.so
LoadModule rewrite_module modules/mod_rewrite.so
LoadModule ssl_module modules/mod_ssl.so
LoadModule unique_id_module modules/mod_unique_id.so
I even proved this to myself by removing the
LoadModule log_config_module xxx line, at which
point Apache complains about the CustomLog directive.
So I know the module is loaded.
I tried to reproduce this behavior on my Fedora 4
linux box with Apache 2.0.55 (RPM) and it does the
same thing.
I am not using any virtual hosts and/or SSL, and yes,
the logs and log directory have the appropriate
permissions.
Has anyone seen / experienced this before?
Richard
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
