Re: [AFMUG] OT porn vs streaming

2020-01-24 Thread Jason McKemie
I'm actually kind of surprised more of the revenue isn't from porn in all reality. On Friday, January 24, 2020, Steve Jones wrote: > Porn makes a ton of ad revenue. Like most things, the content is only a > small part of the revenue. I don't know if they get kickbacks from the > malware, that's

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized operation in 3650 - 3700 MHz band

2020-01-24 Thread Jaime Solorza
I have seen some international Cambium radios the go from 4.9 to 6 4GHz I think I asked about the 6Ghz versions on list oncehave never seen the Cambium 3GHz stuff. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 12:41 PM Mathew Howard wrote: > Yeah, you're right... I think what I was thinking of is that the

Re: [AFMUG] OT porn vs streaming

2020-01-24 Thread Adam Moffett
Maybe it didn't mean 2x the traffic, but 2X the income maybe? Somebody is paying for it, and they were paying for it before Netflix was born. On 1/24/2020 8:45 PM, Darin Steffl wrote: This porn figure is wrong. I recall seeing some people sharing figures from procera or some other DPI and

Re: [AFMUG] OT porn vs streaming

2020-01-24 Thread chuck
Well, that is some of the best news I have heard today. Hate to think society is so depraved that porn is their only interest. From: Darin Steffl Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 6:45 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT porn vs streaming This porn figure is wrong.

Re: [AFMUG] MDU tenants sharing WiFi

2020-01-24 Thread Adam Moffett
Oh interesting.  Let them draw their own conclusions. On 1/24/2020 7:25 PM, Mark - Myakka Technologies wrote: Adam, e-mail something like the following letter to everyone in the building or at least on the floor. Make sure he knows he is 100% responsible for everything that happens on his

Re: [AFMUG] OT porn vs streaming

2020-01-24 Thread Ken Hohhof
Maybe they’re talking about live sex cams. But I don’t believe porn is 2X streaming. Unless there is a huge variation with demographics. I believe 80-90% of peak hour traffic is regular video streaming, so porn is in the 10-20% along with email, web browsing, shopping and homework.

Re: [AFMUG] Calix (was RE: Google/Nest WiFi speedtest)

2020-01-24 Thread Darin Steffl
Yes purchase direct. They have different sales regions so you'll have to reach out to them and ask for your rep. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 2:53 PM Jason McKemie < j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: > Gotcha, thanks. > > So you are buying your hardware direct from Calix? Do you have a contact

[AFMUG] OT porn vs streaming

2020-01-24 Thread chuck
I just read a factoid that porn is still 2X all streaming combined. What I don’t understand is where the money for porn comes from. Who is paying for this porn? Perhaps I don’t understand the appetite. A commodity that is ubiquitous, free and pretty much all the same but still creates huge

Re: [AFMUG] MDU tenants sharing WiFi

2020-01-24 Thread Mark - Myakka Technologies
Adam, e-mail something like the following letter to everyone in the building or at least on the floor. Make sure he knows he is 100% responsible for everything that happens on his Internet. We don't get too much sharing, but get the occasional person renting a second house on the

Re: [AFMUG] The Future

2020-01-24 Thread Mathew Howard
Yeah, that makes sense. I've never used DirecTV on demand myself, so I don't know what it does. I did do some testing with DirecTV now when it first came out, and it seemed to work more or less like Netflix. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 5:36 PM Ken Hohhof wrote: > I think the problem with DirecTV on

Re: [AFMUG] The Future

2020-01-24 Thread Ken Hohhof
I think the problem with DirecTV on demand is that unlike Netflix it has no adaptive video quality. It’s 5 Mbps or nothing. Actually if it tests that the connection can’t deliver 5 Mbps, you get a message that your Internet is too slow to watch now and you’ll have to download to your DVR and

Re: [AFMUG] FCC 3.5 GHz Spectrum Auction 105

2020-01-24 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 1/24/20 3:07 PM, Steve Jones wrote: You have to actually have gear up, it's not like n license where you just register. It's got to be live and transmitting, and it's verified every 4 minutes Right, someone gets the PALs, does nothing so it's usable as GAA, then at some point later start

Re: [AFMUG] FCC 3.5 GHz Spectrum Auction 105

2020-01-24 Thread Steve Jones
You have to actually have gear up, it's not like n license where you just register. It's got to be live and transmitting, and it's verified every 4 minutes On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 3:27 PM Seth Mattinen wrote: > On 1/24/20 12:55, Jason McKemie wrote: > > Maybe this doesn't work the same way, but

Re: [AFMUG] The Future

2020-01-24 Thread Mathew Howard
Same here. At one point, we just started telling people that DirecTV stuff doesn't work with our service... although I haven't heard of any of those recently, so it may not be as bad as it used to be. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 3:54 PM Robert Andrews wrote: > We find the worst is DirecTV. More

Re: [AFMUG] FCC 3.5 GHz Spectrum Auction 105

2020-01-24 Thread Mathew Howard
Exactly. I was under the impression that there weren't minimum service requirements for the CBRS PALs, and if that is the case, then there's really no incentive to deploy gear they're not going to use. But an investor could just pick up the PALs and sit on them until the GAA spectrum is all full,

Re: [AFMUG] MDU tenants sharing WiFi

2020-01-24 Thread Adam Moffett
We can't use our powers for evil, Darth Burke. On 1/24/2020 4:58 PM, Nate Burke wrote: Is this a residential MDU, or business? Maybe a random 'Cabling' issue causing sporadic connectivity During Peak streaming times?  Sometimes those problems are hard to track down.  Might take days, or

Re: [AFMUG] MDU tenants sharing WiFi

2020-01-24 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 1/24/20 13:53, Ken Hohhof wrote: There will also inevitably be issues with services like Hulu and Disney+ and Apple blocking shared IP addresses because they see too many logins or they flag one of the customers for using a VPN or proxy and then everybody on the shared IP gets blocked. I'm

Re: [AFMUG] MDU tenants sharing WiFi

2020-01-24 Thread Nate Burke
Is this a residential MDU, or business? Maybe a random 'Cabling' issue causing sporadic connectivity During Peak streaming times? Sometimes those problems are hard to track down. Might take days, or weeks On 1/24/2020 3:53 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: There will also inevitably be issues

Re: [AFMUG] MDU tenants sharing WiFi

2020-01-24 Thread Ken Hohhof
There will also inevitably be issues with services like Hulu and Disney+ and Apple blocking shared IP addresses because they see too many logins or they flag one of the customers for using a VPN or proxy and then everybody on the shared IP gets blocked. I'm assuming you are handing out distinct

Re: [AFMUG] The Future

2020-01-24 Thread Robert Andrews
We find the worst is DirecTV. More problems when customers are trying to download their services over internet than any others. On 01/24/2020 10:11 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: Yeah, Netflix ability to switch video quality / stream rate on the fly is actually pretty awesome. I know we all used

Re: [AFMUG] MDU tenants sharing WiFi

2020-01-24 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 1/24/20 13:33, Ken Hohhof wrote: Can't allow it. Your customer has agreed to your TOS, the freeloaders have not. If you get a DMCA notice or a subpoena for hacking or kiddie porn or soliciting sex with a minor or terrorism or whatever, you need to deal with your customer. Can't do that

Re: [AFMUG] MDU tenants sharing Wi-Fi

2020-01-24 Thread Brian Webster
Maybe require them to authorize by MACID or limit them to the number of devices they can have on the Wi-Fi? Nothing of that sort is going to be popular but maybe then they would realize you are on to them and stop the sharing policy. Another option if it is a managed router is to change the

Re: [AFMUG] MDU tenants sharing WiFi

2020-01-24 Thread Adam Moffett
Hahah Yeah the speed is kind of silly.  We're driven that direction by Charter/Spectrum.  They're advertising stupid high speeds these days.  To win the deal for this building we had to beat stupid speed with ludicrous speed.  There's an OLT in the basement so it's actually no big deal to

Re: [AFMUG] MDU tenants sharing WiFi

2020-01-24 Thread Ken Hohhof
Sounds like the old days when you'd ask someone what Internet service they use and they'd answer "Linksys" and you'd laugh but they weren't joking. -Original Message- From: AF On Behalf Of Adam Moffett Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 3:30 PM To: af@af.afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] MDU

Re: [AFMUG] MDU tenants sharing WiFi

2020-01-24 Thread Ken Hohhof
Can't allow it. Your customer has agreed to your TOS, the freeloaders have not. If you get a DMCA notice or a subpoena for hacking or kiddie porn or soliciting sex with a minor or terrorism or whatever, you need to deal with your customer. Can't do that with the freeloaders. Customer should

Re: [AFMUG] MDU tenants sharing WiFi

2020-01-24 Thread Adam Moffett
Is there a "no sharing" type of thing in your terms of service? IMO on residential there should be and people caught sharing should be shut off. Of course they could just go sign up with the cable company and go back to sharing, but at least it's not your problem anymore, and if the

Re: [AFMUG] FCC 3.5 GHz Spectrum Auction 105

2020-01-24 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 1/24/20 12:55, Jason McKemie wrote: Maybe this doesn't work the same way, but I've seen big companies deploy equipment on a band just to hold onto it.  There were minimum service requirements in those situations, but I'm enough of a cynic that I could see a big company deploying some

Re: [AFMUG] MDU tenants sharing WiFi

2020-01-24 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 1/24/20 13:14, Adam Moffett wrote: I prefer MDU's where the landlord pays for all the connections and includes them in the rent, but we have one where the landlord wanted us to sell separate accounts to each tenant. Well turns out we have a tenant with 500meg sharing his WiFi with

Re: [AFMUG] MDU tenants sharing WiFi

2020-01-24 Thread Tim Reichhart
Cut him off   -Original Message- > From: "Adam Moffett" > To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" > Date: 01/24/20 04:15 > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] MDU tenants sharing WiFi > > and if it matters this isn't like a 2 family house.  This is a > building with hundreds of units. > >

Re: [AFMUG] MDU tenants sharing WiFi

2020-01-24 Thread Adam Moffett
and if it matters this isn't like a 2 family house.  This is a building with hundreds of units. On 1/24/2020 4:14 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: I prefer MDU's where the landlord pays for all the connections and includes them in the rent, but we have one where the landlord wanted us to sell

[AFMUG] MDU tenants sharing WiFi

2020-01-24 Thread Adam Moffett
I prefer MDU's where the landlord pays for all the connections and includes them in the rent, but we have one where the landlord wanted us to sell separate accounts to each tenant. Well turns out we have a tenant with 500meg sharing his WiFi with neighboring units.  Found out when a cluster

Re: [AFMUG] FCC 3.5 GHz Spectrum Auction 105

2020-01-24 Thread Jason McKemie
Maybe this doesn't work the same way, but I've seen big companies deploy equipment on a band just to hold onto it. There were minimum service requirements in those situations, but I'm enough of a cynic that I could see a big company deploying some minimal amount of equipment just to screw

Re: [AFMUG] Calix (was RE: Google/Nest WiFi speedtest)

2020-01-24 Thread Jason McKemie
Gotcha, thanks. So you are buying your hardware direct from Calix? Do you have a contact there? On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 1:59 PM Darin Steffl wrote: > Calix used to be an add-on at $50 upfront and $10 per month. We've since > increased all our plans $10 per month and now the first router is

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized operation in 3650 - 3700 MHz band

2020-01-24 Thread Mathew Howard
Yeah, well, if they did actually have a radio set to use 3723-3732, I don't have much sympathy for them anyway. I suppose, one could accidentally get international radios, and then accidentally, set it to the wrong channel... but most likely, they were either completely aware they were using a

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized operation in 3650 - 3700 MHz band

2020-01-24 Thread Adam Moffett
I have less sympathy for them if they went out of their way to get an international AP because the US model wouldn't let them cheat.  It's harder to believe it was just ignorance at that point. I knew a guy who used to set all his Ubqiuiti's to "Hong Kong" so he could use DFS bands without

Re: [AFMUG] FCC 3.5 GHz Spectrum Auction 105

2020-01-24 Thread Mathew Howard
Do you really care if a competitor is using it, if you aren't using it? It seems like it's almost better if a competitor is using it, if you have the ability to kick them off when you actually do want to use it. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 1:48 PM Jason McKemie < j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com>

Re: [AFMUG] FCC 3.5 GHz Spectrum Auction 105

2020-01-24 Thread Jason McKemie
Wouldn't the incentive be to stop competitors from using that part of the band? On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 8:25 AM Mike Hammett wrote: > The intent here is to stop that. There is no incentive to put up > placeholder equipment. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions

Re: [AFMUG] Calix (was RE: Google/Nest WiFi speedtest)

2020-01-24 Thread Jason McKemie
So are you including this as part of the service or is it an add-on? Do you charge an upfront fee? On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:52 AM Darin Steffl wrote: > I didn't find it hard to get 1000+ of these deployed over 2 years. We are > a small wisp and we've only emailed existing customers about it

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized operation in 3650 - 3700 MHz band

2020-01-24 Thread Mathew Howard
Yeah, you're right... I think what I was thinking of is that the spectrum analyser can scan that range. I wouldn't be surprised if they were using some ROW radios, it looks like the PMP450 does come in a 3.55-3.8ghz variety. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 10:21 AM Adam Moffett wrote: > US models of

Re: [AFMUG] Smaller DC PSU/Charger combo

2020-01-24 Thread Mathew Howard
ehh... I don't really care if it takes a week to fully recharge the batteries. Long power outages aren't that common around here... On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:55 PM Adam Moffett wrote: > I had a number of sites with the TSP-600 + BCM48A. If I recall correctly > from the docs, it would use any

Re: [AFMUG] Smaller DC PSU/Charger combo

2020-01-24 Thread Ken Hohhof
Yep. The two products are at opposite ends of the spectrum when it comes to charging current. I actually ran into a problem one time because I didn’t size the AC breaker big enough. When the BCM was powering loads plus charging the batteries after a several hour outage, it would trip the AC

Re: [AFMUG] The Future

2020-01-24 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 1/24/20 10:58 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: Not personally, but I've seen a post on reddit where someone complained that his gigabit fiber was only testing at 770mbps, and how come he's not "getting what he's paying for". I hate those people so much I just tell them a) you're not paying for a

Re: [AFMUG] The Future

2020-01-24 Thread Adam Moffett
Not personally, but I've seen a post on reddit where someone complained that his gigabit fiber was only testing at 770mbps, and how come he's not "getting what he's paying for". You can talk to that guy about window sizes and MTU's, but it's probably a waste of time. On 1/24/2020 1:55 PM,

Re: [AFMUG] Smaller DC PSU/Charger combo

2020-01-24 Thread Josh Baird
The charging current on the BCMU360 is significantly lower than that of the BCM48A/B. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 1:55 PM Adam Moffett wrote: > I had a number of sites with the TSP-600 + BCM48A. If I recall correctly > from the docs, it would use any surplus wattage to charge the battery. > > So

Re: [AFMUG] The Future

2020-01-24 Thread chuck
I had one where Netflix was perfect, email was fine, browsing was fine but Hulu would not work and we needed to fix that. -Original Message- From: Shayne Lebrun Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 11:51 AM To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' Subject: Re: [AFMUG] The Future I always

Re: [AFMUG] Smaller DC PSU/Charger combo

2020-01-24 Thread Adam Moffett
I had a number of sites with the TSP-600 + BCM48A.  If I recall correctly from the docs, it would use any surplus wattage to charge the battery. So 600W - LoadW = chargingW. With a 200W load that could take 4x100ah batteries from dead to full in 12 hours.  I didn't think that was

Re: [AFMUG] The Future

2020-01-24 Thread Shayne Lebrun
I always liked the opposite. Tell them that they're using all of their bandwidth, and the answer is 'nobody is using the Internet! So-and-so is just watching TV!' -Original Message- From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020

Re: [AFMUG] The Future

2020-01-24 Thread Bill Prince
Oxymoronic trouble calls are kind of standard. bp On 1/24/2020 10:21 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: I love the my internet is not working but netflix is working Takes some folks a bit for that to soak in. -Original Message- From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 11:11 AM To:

Re: [AFMUG] The Future

2020-01-24 Thread chuck
I love the my internet is not working but netflix is working Takes some folks a bit for that to soak in. -Original Message- From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 11:11 AM To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' Subject: Re: [AFMUG] The Future Yeah, Netflix ability to

Re: [AFMUG] Smaller DC PSU/Charger combo

2020-01-24 Thread Ken Hohhof
Sorry, I got the acronyms wrong. I think I meant that at larger sites we’re using the BCM, or TSP-BCM, or whatever it’s called. The one that controls the power supply and powers the loads at the battery voltage. From: AF On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 12:06 PM To:

Re: [AFMUG] The Future

2020-01-24 Thread Ken Hohhof
Yeah, Netflix ability to switch video quality / stream rate on the fly is actually pretty awesome. I know we all used to bitch about Netflix, but now I actually hold it up as the gold standard. Does Netflix work? OK, your Internet works. If flavor of the week streaming service doesn't work

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Matt Hoppes
Absolutely... some people just want it "fixed" or to be shown what's wrong though. On 1/24/20 12:59 PM, Darin Steffl wrote: Matt, That response works but I believe you also need to suggest options for them to achieve the same thing like purchasing the USB ethernet adapter for example. I

Re: [AFMUG] Smaller DC PSU/Charger combo

2020-01-24 Thread Ken Hohhof
I don’t think so. Or keeping mind that the BCMU is also providing a DC-DC converter function when it is running on battery, you could look for a 12V system and then a smallish 12-48 converter. Actually I would not run a 200 watt site off a BCMU or, for that matter, a single 12V battery

Re: [AFMUG] The Future

2020-01-24 Thread Bill Prince
A few years ago, I did some testing with Netflix. I found that it would "function" down to just under 700 Kbps. For SD quality, about double that, or 1.5 Mbps. For HD, you needed a bit more than double that, or about 3 Mbps. I did some more recent tests with Prime. It would consume 5-10 Mbps

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Darin Steffl
Matt, That response works but I believe you also need to suggest options for them to achieve the same thing like purchasing the USB ethernet adapter for example. I find customers like options or more than one choice. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 11:52 AM Matt Hoppes <

Re: [AFMUG] Calix (was RE: Google/Nest WiFi speedtest)

2020-01-24 Thread Darin Steffl
I didn't find it hard to get 1000+ of these deployed over 2 years. We are a small wisp and we've only emailed existing customers about it twice and many switch to it. Also anytime a customer calls and doesn't have one, we upsell. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 11:27 AM Ken Hohhof wrote: > Calix CPE is

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Matt Hoppes
Our answer: I'm sorry but if you can't plug in to test we can send a tech out if you're 100% certain there is an issue, but if it turns out to work fine when plugged in there will be a $50 dispatch fee. On 1/24/20 12:35 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: Out of curiosity, what do you tell customers who

[AFMUG] Smaller DC PSU/Charger combo

2020-01-24 Thread Josh Baird
For micropops, we typically use some a Traco TSP-BCMU360 paired with a Meanwell SDR-240-48. This is great, but it's a bit overkill for some very small micropops (1-2 AP, BH) that we are looking at deploying. I really don't need ~220-240W that this configuration supplies. The challenge is that I

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Darin Steffl
Ken, It is definitely becoming more frequent that we hear they don't have any devices with ethernet, especially Apple households. We tell them to find one or buy the adapter like you do. Or we can come out and test with an $80 service call charge. We also do not guarantee residential speeds but

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread chuck
I guess it depends on if you have to put on a battery backed power supply too. From: Jason McKemie Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 9:50 AM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest Last time I checked the 844E + Calix ONT was actually cheaper than

Re: [AFMUG] The Future

2020-01-24 Thread Robert Andrews
That's basically what I tell all my RV friends that are on the road complaining about streaming. Solves most of their problems at all the weird places... On 01/23/2020 01:17 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: Yeah, last I looked that's what they said the lowest quality needed. A few years back I did

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Ken Hohhof
Out of curiosity, what do you tell customers who say they don’t own a computer? Not being hypothetical or argumentative, I am actually getting that maybe 50% of the time now. If they say their computer is a laptop without an Ethernet jack, I tell them to buy a $5 Ethernet cable and a $20

[AFMUG] Calix (was RE: Google/Nest WiFi speedtest)

2020-01-24 Thread Ken Hohhof
Calix CPE is probably an easier decision for a FISP, or for a new WISP just starting deployment, or for a big provider that deploys a pallet load of routers every day. For an established small WISP with maybe a couple thousand existing customers and a modest number of new customers monthly,

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Nate Burke
Back to your topic, yes, I believe that they have accuracy problems. I've only had an issue with 1 customer so far. Had a 20x5 connection from us. He sent me the screenshot from the app. Looks like his router was running tests every 2 days. They were all below 4mb/s. All RF tests were

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Ken Hohhof
Maybe start a new Calix thread? My original post was about the speedtest built into Google routers and if anyone knew how it worked and whether it has accuracy problems. I dislike the Google/Nest routers and discourage customers from using them, but saying I should deploy Calix everywhere

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Jason McKemie
Mike - What is pricing like on the routers / management? Have you compared the router performance to something like the 844E? On Friday, January 24, 2020, Mike Hammett wrote: > The road we're going down is likely Comtrend routers with a Finepoint ACS. > > The Calix system is just a fork of an

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Jason McKemie
Last time I checked the 844E + Calix ONT was actually cheaper than the 844G. On Friday, January 24, 2020, Josh Luthman wrote: > Hard disagree. The 844G is *CHEAP* compared to ONT+WiFi Router in terms > of hardware. Having one box/troubleshoot point is a nice cost savings, too. > > Josh

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Mike Hammett
I'm not coming up with my own anything. I'm not having to code anything. It's standards. Standards that Calix took and pay-walled. The software I'm using is the same software Calix forked. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized operation in 3650 - 3700 MHz band

2020-01-24 Thread Adam Moffett
US models of the 450 definitely won't let you do that. On 1/24/2020 10:18 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: I checked some of their registrations, and it looks like they're mostly PMP450 and a few Ubiquiti radios. It's been awhile since I've done anything with Canopy 3.65ghz stuff, but it seems to me

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Darin Steffl
I'd say I have the technical ability to do something other than Calix but you are correct, I do not have the desire to do anything else. I'm busy adding revenue into the company by upgrading the network, increasing plan prices, adding TV & Phone, targeting business customers, etc. All of this is

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Cassidy B. Larson
We looked at numerous alternatives before we settled on Calix. It’s been extremely good for us. We pulled in six figures last year in managed router revenue.. what did I pay Calix for their cloud option? Less than 2% I think. We have the technical chops to make whatever work. Customers don’t

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Mike Hammett
That would be incorrect. I have Calix DSLAMs and have worked with Calix for a few years. Their paid support leaves much to be desired. Obvious SNMP bug is obvious and they don't care. I'm not going to say the Calix product is a bad product, but there's a severe amount of fanboyism around

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized operation in 3650 - 3700 MHz band

2020-01-24 Thread Mathew Howard
I checked some of their registrations, and it looks like they're mostly PMP450 and a few Ubiquiti radios. It's been awhile since I've done anything with Canopy 3.65ghz stuff, but it seems to me like you might be able to set them that high... or maybe they have some non-US radios... On Fri, Jan

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Darin Steffl
Mike, It's apparent to me that you have not demoed or had physical Calix products in your hand before. What you just proposed requires much more hands-on setup and support than Calix which is all handled by them with a technical team to back it up. Your solution requires you to deploy one or more

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Josh Baird
The 844E is not bad. Their management platform is crazy stupid expensive with minimums that are typically too high for small to medium size WISPs. There is also the problem of actually getting their hardware. They don't make it easy. Sure, you can always run your own ACS, but it's not going to

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Mike Hammett
The road we're going down is likely Comtrend routers with a Finepoint ACS. The Calix system is just a fork of an earlier Finepoint product. TR-069 and TR-143 manage most of the fancy features people that love Calix love to boast about. The advantage of something like this is that there is

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Josh Luthman
Hard disagree. The 844G is *CHEAP* compared to ONT+WiFi Router in terms of hardware. Having one box/troubleshoot point is a nice cost savings, too. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 9:31 AM Mike Hammett

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Tushar Patel
And the Alternatives are? Tushar From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 8:31 AM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest There's no way Calix will get a dime from me. Everything is

Re: [AFMUG] Google/Nest WiFi speedtest

2020-01-24 Thread Mike Hammett
There's no way Calix will get a dime from me. Everything is so expensive compared to alternatives. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Jason McKemie" To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users

Re: [AFMUG] Basic Tower Mount 6 Inch - 800-M-TOW-6

2020-01-24 Thread Lincs_chel
Hi Chuck; OK.  Thanks very much. Lincoln On 23/01/2020 11:12 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: They all do... It depends on which holes you use for the bolts. *From:* Lincs_chel *Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2020 7:10 PM *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group *Subject:* [AFMUG] Basic Tower Mount 6

Re: [AFMUG] FCC 3.5 GHz Spectrum Auction 105

2020-01-24 Thread Mike Hammett
The intent here is to stop that. There is no incentive to put up placeholder equipment. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Adam Moffett" To: af@af.afmug.com Sent: Thursday, January

Re: [AFMUG] FCC 3.5 GHz Spectrum Auction 105

2020-01-24 Thread Mike Hammett
There was a lot of talk about that and we specifically don't want that. We get use of their space if they're not actually using it. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Jason McKemie"

Re: [AFMUG] CPI training & exam

2020-01-24 Thread Mike Hammett
CPNI vs. CPI - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: ch...@wbmfg.com To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 4:11:26 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] CPI training &

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized operation in 3650 - 3700 MHz band

2020-01-24 Thread Dennis Burgess via AF
Wonder what gear they were using. ☹ That allowed them to transmit that high? [LTI-Full_175px] Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE, MTCSE, HE IPv6 Sage, Cambium ePMP Certified Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition” Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik