Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

Cambium answer of this Problem: Say you have two routers, router 1 at 10/100 for port 1 and 10/100/1000 for port 2 and router 2 communicates with router 1 using the 10/100/1000 and only has 10/100/1000 ports. Router 2 receives a burst of traffic and sends it to router 1 over 10/100/1000 port.

Re: [AFMUG] SFPs on Tower Radios

You're cracking me up with these Facebook posts Matt. -Ty On Mar 11, 2016 8:54 PM, "Mike Hammett" wrote: > Indeed, they'll need SFP+s. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > >

Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

Exactly. One box to rule them all. I know what all sites use. Right now I have POE injector, gig POE injector, and gig sync injector. We have the technology to make one universal product. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 12,

Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

That’s what I am saying even though I had not said it yet. Best regards, Brandon Yuchasz GogebicRange.net www.gogebicrange.net From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Forrest Christian (List Account) Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 7:48 PM To:

Re: [AFMUG] OT: Is it 1968 all over?

No thanks. From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 9:53 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Is it 1968 all over? Make America 1968 Again From: Jaime Solorza Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 10:40 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Is it 1968 all over? Yep On Mar 11,

Re: [AFMUG] OT: Is it 1968 all over?

Make America 1968 Again From: Jaime Solorza Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 10:40 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Is it 1968 all over? Yep On Mar 11, 2016 9:33 PM, "Chuck McCown" wrote: But in 68 the violence was outside the venue... From: Jaime Solorza

Re: [AFMUG] OT: Is it 1968 all over?

Yep On Mar 11, 2016 9:33 PM, "Chuck McCown" wrote: > But in 68 the violence was outside the venue... > > *From:* Jaime Solorza > *Sent:* Friday, March 11, 2016 8:33 PM > *To:* Animal Farm > *Subject:* [AFMUG] OT: Is it 1968 all over? >

Re: [AFMUG] OT: Is it 1968 all over?

But in 68 the violence was outside the venue... From: Jaime Solorza Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 8:33 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: [AFMUG] OT: Is it 1968 all over? Trump rally cancelled ...some skirmishes...The Whole World is Watching

Re: [AFMUG] Travis

Yeah, home. I wanted to paint the dome with the Sistine Chapel - God finger reaching out to Adam picture with my face as God. My wife totally nixed the idea. Mumbling something about someone having a god complex... -Original Message- From: Jerry Head Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016

Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

More ports is *never* bad. And if I don't use them all, so what. Something always comes up, like that micro-POP you never thought would grow. I have about a dozen sites which started out with 900 and 2.4 FSK omnis. They've grown to needing a full 4x90 cluster of both. Then I need a backhaul

[AFMUG] OT: worst boss ever?

http://loweringthebar.net/2016/03/has-your-boss-ever.html

[AFMUG] OT: Is it 1968 all over?

Trump rally cancelled ...some skirmishes...The Whole World is Watching

Re: [AFMUG] Travis

Chuck has a Chicano look a like who is an engineer with Lawrence Livermore and worked on shuttle escape hatch redesign after accident while at Rockwell and McDonald Douglashe was an engineer in my company from 92 to 94...I trying to find picture...it's uncanny... On Mar 11, 2016 6:23 PM,

Re: [AFMUG] SFPs on Tower Radios

Indeed, they'll need SFP+s. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Mathew Howard" To: "af" Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 8:51:12 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [AFMUG] Travis

Are you home? Is your ceiling really painted like a "Vanilla Sky"? Or is that an observation dome behind/above you? On 3/11/2016 7:23 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: Do you like me now???

Re: [AFMUG] SFPs on Tower Radios

SFPs may be obsolete before it happens... :P On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > I'm persistent. I gave out a bunch of SFPs a couple years ago to vendors > that weren't putting them on their radios. It apparently didn't work as > most of them have released

Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

I think sticking with 4 port and 12 port for the DIN rail version makes the most sense. If we only need 8 ports, we can just use two 4 ports, since it doesn't sound like an 8 port version would save much in the way of space or cost over two 4 ports anyway. On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Forrest

[AFMUG] The Dude as Syslog Server?

Is anyone using The Dude as a syslog server? Any reason to avoid doing so?

Re: [AFMUG] Travis

don't you mean reflector? http://fpvlab.com/forums/showthread.php?10584-Beer-CanTenna-A-ground-antenna-for-433MHz-TX On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: > Where's your Dos XX or Tecate can? > On Mar 11, 2016 6:55 PM, "Forrest Christian (List

Re: [AFMUG] Travis

Where's your Dos XX or Tecate can? On Mar 11, 2016 6:55 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" < li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > But is it right or left hand circularized... I always get confused about > how to tell.. > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: > >>

Re: [AFMUG] Travis

But is it right or left hand circularized... I always get confused about how to tell.. On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: > Circular polarized. > > -Original Message- From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 > 6:31 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re:

Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

I really wanted the ears to be able to do this My desire was a 17" wide box, with removable ears which could mount either way to wall mount. After a dozen or so scary quotes and not finding any standard manufacturer which would do this, I gave up. The new enclosure has fixed ears...

Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

So, what I'm hearing you say is that you just want to buy a whole bunch of 12 port injectors and standardize on that? On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > I'd rather but a dozen 12 ports than 6 of one and 6 of another. > > Josh Luthman > Office:

Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

If you've got racks ... just buy one or two of the new rackmount injectors when they start shipping. The daisy chain thing for power, I've looked at a few times. There are issues with doing this that would take way too long to explain. The biggest issue is how quickly you run over the current

Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

I'd rather but a dozen 12 ports than 6 of one and 6 of another. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 11, 2016 8:38 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" < li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > Based on current plans, the rackmount

Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

Based on current plans, the rackmount version is going to be available in either 4, 8, 12 or 16 port versions or 6, 12 or 18 port versions, depending on whether I end up with 4 or 6 ports per 'chunk'.all of these will be upwardly expandable. So I think that handles pretty much anyone who

Re: [AFMUG] Travis

Circular polarized. -Original Message- From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 6:31 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Travis Even your stairway looks like an antenna. -Original Message- From: Chuck McCown Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 7:23 PM To:

Re: [AFMUG] Travis

Even your stairway looks like an antenna. -Original Message- From: Chuck McCown Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 7:23 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Travis Do you like me now???

Re: [AFMUG] Travis

I didn’t know that. Have always been amazed at how quick stuff gets delivered. From: Josh Luthman Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 6:29 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Travis They have a huge warehouse there. It's also where it was written :P Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340

Re: [AFMUG] Travis

They have a huge warehouse there. It's also where it was written :P Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 11, 2016 8:26 PM, "Chuck McCown" wrote: > Amazon. > > *From:* Josh Luthman >

Re: [AFMUG] SFPs on Tower Radios

+1 for persistence On Mar 11, 2016 7:26 PM, "Mike Hammett" wrote: > I'm persistent. I gave out a bunch of SFPs a couple years ago to vendors > that weren't putting them on their radios. It apparently didn't work as > most of them have released completely new products since then

Re: [AFMUG] SFPs on Tower Radios

I'm persistent. I gave out a bunch of SFPs a couple years ago to vendors that weren't putting them on their radios. It apparently didn't work as most of them have released completely new products since then without SFPs. I'm at it again. I'll be at it until it happens. - Mike Hammett

Re: [AFMUG] Travis

Amazon. From: Josh Luthman Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 6:25 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Travis SLC shipping. Must be nice. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 11, 2016 8:23 PM, "Chuck McCown"

Re: [AFMUG] Travis

SLC shipping. Must be nice. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 11, 2016 8:23 PM, "Chuck McCown" wrote: > Do you like me now??? > > > >

Re: [AFMUG] SFPs on Tower Radios

I have been complaining about this for years. I hope you have better luck than I. On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 7:18 PM Mike Hammett wrote: > > http://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-Feature-Requests-and/SFP-port-on-a-radio-kudo-if-you-want-it/idi-p/1391807 > >

Re: [AFMUG] SFPs on Tower Radios

http://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-Feature-Requests-and/SFP-port-on-a-radio-kudo-if-you-want-it/idi-p/1391807 http://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-Feature-Requests-and/SFP-Port-in-AF24-AF5/idi-p/613295 http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/Your-Ideas/SFPs/idi-p/41982 - Mike Hammett

Re: [AFMUG] SFPs on Tower Radios

Not a bad idea, but I think my schedule is full. :-\ - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Nate Burke" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 5:11:21 PM

Re: [AFMUG] SFPs on Tower Radios

Still not SFPs... - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Josh Reynolds" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 5:09:29 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] SFPs on Tower

Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

I have started using small wall mount racks at many locations. Outdoor cabinets with racks at others. Mikrotik Switches mount in racks neatly. At one location I am working on cleaning up I have: 1 SAF Licensed link 6 Canopy FSK 2.4 AP's 1 Canopy FSK 900 AP 4 Canopy 450 3.6 AP's 5 Canopy

Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

I have a site w/ 13 radios right now. 4x90 5GHz 450 cluster. 4x90 900 FSK cluster. Various other stuff, mostly PTP. So I'd say +1 to whoever said to make the rack-mount version shallow enough and ears allowed to be rotated 90 degrees for wall/panel mounting. But that would really only work if

[AFMUG] Broadcast Repeat Count

Assuming all our APs in the sector are humming along in sync with the same frame period and contention slots, does changing the broadcast repeat count on just one AP affect the rest of the sector at all? Also, the Cambium documentation says setting broadcast repeat count to 2 is optimal for

Re: [AFMUG] SFPs on Tower Radios

I think companies were founded over less. Get ready world for hammettradios.net! On 3/11/2016 5:02 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: Nothing PtMP short of $8k LTE radios have SFPs. I know licensed radios have them, but that's not my concern. Everyone knows this. - Mike Hammett Intelligent

Re: [AFMUG] SFPs on Tower Radios

There are several radios coming out this year that run on 2.5Gbps and 5Gbps ethernet... On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > Nothing PtMP short of $8k LTE radios have SFPs. > > I know licensed radios have them, but that's not my concern. > > Everyone knows

Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

In spite of the handful of those that might want a 16 or 18 port injector, I think you & packetflux would do better with a 12 port; or maybe even an 8 port. We have only one POP that would need the higher count. If you made a 16 or 18 port version, I would think rackmount only. bp

Re: [AFMUG] SFPs on Tower Radios

Nothing PtMP short of $8k LTE radios have SFPs. I know licensed radios have them, but that's not my concern. Everyone knows this. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Eric Kuhnke"

Re: [AFMUG] SFPs on Tower Radios

There are many others, in the sub-$5000 per link market a lot of companies are trying to get everyone to use 802.3at and 1000BaseT. There are some new 60 GHz short range radios that have no SFP. The more expensive 60 and 80 GHz radios do have optical interfaces. On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:54

Re: [AFMUG] SFPs on Tower Radios

LOL :) On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > Is Mimosa the only vendor not guilty of engineering and then releasing a > tower radio without SFP interfaces? Seriously, what's wrong with you guys? > This is gross negligence. > > > > - > Mike Hammett >

[AFMUG] SFPs on Tower Radios

Is Mimosa the only vendor not guilty of engineering and then releasing a tower radio without SFP interfaces? Seriously, what's wrong with you guys? This is gross negligence. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

See the 26-Aug-2015 release here: http://tickets.packetflux.com/kb/faq.php?id=4 -forrest On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Matt wrote: > We use EZ-cat connectors. Often when plugging in the connector we briefly > short it out on the metal of RJ45 jack. It would

Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

+1 to what Josh said... we don't do rackmount. It's going to be pretty rare for us to ever care about sync on more than 8 radios at a site, but it's not at all uncommon for us to have 10-12 radios total, and I do like the idea of just having one POE box for everything. That said, I don't know

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

We use EZ-cat connectors. Often when plugging in the connector we briefly short it out on the metal of RJ45 jack. It would be nice if the current trip would auto reset to. Really looking forward to this product. I think you should skip WispaAmerica and stay home and work on it. Lol. On Fri,

Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

a!!! buy ONE unit for ALL towers, one model spare for all the things People can already buy a DIN product and put it in a rack. You can't go the other way. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Forrest

Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

Ah, but you're putting the DIN on a panel inside an enclosure I assume. With a lot of rackmount items, you can rotate the angle brackets 90 degrees to panel mount them. OR you get one of those 4U patch panel racks that mounts on a wall and screw that to your panel. What I'm saying is, as

Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

Handful of orders these last couple weeks. 0 differences beyond the Ubnt out of stock stuff (yes that record is still broken). Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >

Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

What's the most you have radio-wise at these sites? My thought is something along the lines of.. If I have up to 4 radios at a site, I'd buy 1 syncinjector-sized din power injectors with 4 ports each for 1X the cost and 1X the space requirement If I have 5 - 8 radios at a site, I'd buy 2

Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

I think they were doing end of fiscal year inventory the last couple days. From: Bill Prince Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 3:07 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP Speaking of Streakwave. Is everyone else having issues with the deliveries getting stretched out

Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

I don't use Cambium, but we only have two sites with a rack, and 23 sites with DIN rail in smaller boxes. On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > I don't do racks at many locations. Certainly not looking forward to it > in the future. > > I have an 8

Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

There is a smaller CCR but it runs around $400 John Woodfield, President Delmarva WiFi Inc. 410-870-WiFi -Original Message- From: "Kurt Fankhauser" Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 4:01pm To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP i

Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

CRS might not have existed whenever they bought their 2011, but yeah CRS is a much better switch than a 2011 is. On 3/11/2016 4:26 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: I don't see anything in that saying the bandwidth from the 10/100 Ethernet switch chip to the CPU is limited to 100M, maybe I missed

Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

A couple weeks back someone pointed me to Roc-Noc, they are still showing 73 in stock. Might be a little more expensive. From: Kurt Fankhauser Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 3:01 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP i can't get a 3011 to try, streakwave doesn't

Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

I don't see anything in that saying the bandwidth from the 10/100 Ethernet switch chip to the CPU is limited to 100M, maybe I missed something. It does appear to be true the only connection between the 2 switch chips is bridging via the CPU. If using it primarily as a switch not a router, a

Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

I don't do racks at many locations. Certainly not looking forward to it in the future. I have an 8 port that does my APs - that's NSEW in two bands. I don't see us ever being able to utilize all of that bandwidth in this area. 12 would include my backhauls, but I don't care about sync'ing

[AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design.

So, I have in the fairly immediate future the new "universal" 4 port injector (in the same form factor as the existing syncinjectors) And the rackmount unit is progressing well, so that's coming as well - up to 16 or 18 ports per 1U And then we have the item the question is about. I

Re: [AFMUG] Product leak

Whew...for a moment I thought I read 12 inches and not yearsdamn and I am supposed to behave during Lent... On Mar 11, 2016 2:10 PM, "Ken Hohhof" wrote: > You’re welcome. > > *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm > *Sent:* Friday, March 11, 2016 2:34 PM >

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

It will most likely have 4 power buses assuming I don't run out of mechanical room - 2 for certain. Max 12A per bus. (So you can only power 12 airfibers per bus, sorry...) You will be able to jumper which bus(es) you will use on each port. And my intent is to set it up so if you jumper more

Re: [AFMUG] Product leak

You’re welcome. From: That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 2:34 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Product leak i find these innuendos offensive On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: If you want to keep it clean, there’s the old one-armed

Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

Speaking of Streakwave. Is everyone else having issues with the deliveries getting stretched out beyond what seems normal with them? bp On 3/11/2016 1:01 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: i can't get a 3011 to try, streakwave doesn't have stock, but i desparately need

Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

i can't get a 3011 to try, streakwave doesn't have stock, but i desparately need this, have a tower with high CPU usage on router and only a 2011 fill fit in the enclosure On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Bill Prince wrote: > Funny. We were just talking about this

Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

Funny. We were just talking about this yesterday. The 2011 is great for small POPs, except for the split 10/100 - 1000 ports. The 3011 would be perfect except it can only be had in a 19" rack form factor. Has anyone tried to stick the circuit board from a 3011 into a 2011 case? DC plant of

Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

If you really wanted to, it appears you could stuff the board from a rackmount 3011 into a 2011 desktop case. On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > My rackmount 2011's will probably get replaced with 3011's, but they > really need to bring out a smaller desktop

Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

That is what I took from this post: http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=63372 We had tons of issues at a site. Nothing made sense, CPU usage was in the teens, but we just saw terrible performance and packet loss at peak. Eventually we found out that we received more complaints on

Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

+1. I've seen a pic of a desktop 3011 floating around somewhere. They REALLY need to get it released... John Woodfield, President Delmarva WiFi Inc. 410-870-WiFi -Original Message- From: "Ken Hohhof" Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 3:43pm To: af@afmug.com Subject:

Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

My rackmount 2011's will probably get replaced with 3011's, but they really need to bring out a smaller desktop 3011 as well. -Original Message- From: Adam Moffett Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 2:23 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP Well that's news

Re: [AFMUG] Product leak

i find these innuendos offensive On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > If you want to keep it clean, there’s the old one-armed fisherman joke. > > (I caught a fish THIS big.) > > Otherwise, just say IT’S YUGE! > > > *From:* ch...@wbmfg.com > *Sent:* Friday,

Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

Well that's news to me! Holy crap. They should put a warning sticker on that. On 3/11/2016 2:20 PM, Joe Falaschi wrote: The other thing to keep in mind with the RB2011 is what port things are plugged into. Ports 6-10 only have a 100M aggregate link to ports 1-5. If the aggregate of ports

Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

Now that you've said that, when we initially hung that AP I left the power supply at the office. Thinking back I think I may have had another 1g POE with me but it just may have a CPE POE on it. Something for me to go look at after Louisville. Thanks! From: Af

Re: [AFMUG] Displaying backhaul traffic on a map live

I have made some of these maps for 48 and 96 port switches pointing to individual hadoop cluster members. Pointy-haired bosses LOVE them. ryan On 3/11/16 10:19 AM, George Skorup wrote: Yeah, that's nice. Sorry, I meant *my* map is not so pretty. On 3/11/2016 8:27 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

Re: [AFMUG] Displaying backhaul traffic on a map live

Yeah, that's nice. Sorry, I meant *my* map is not so pretty. On 3/11/2016 8:27 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: Could be prettier? That example Ryan posted is pretty enough for me. *From:* George Skorup *Sent:* Friday, March 11, 2016 1:06 AM *To:* af@afmug.com

Re: [AFMUG] FSK power problem?

Bummer. Woulda made it much easier to mix 450, 450i and lots of other 48v stuff. On 3/11/2016 9:49 AM, Matt Mangriotis wrote: You may have already seen the post in our forum, but in case you don’t frequent the site… the answer (posted by our engineering team) is NO, do not attempt to use

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Set Top NPRM

I just heard Wheeler advocating for transparency from ISPs WRT personal information "that they all collect". Wha? But as to your other comment. Don't forget the chainsaw. bp On 3/11/2016 10:02 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: Government trying to regulate technology does

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Set Top NPRM

Odd, it appears they may be letting the ILECs off the the hook for providing dial tone. And it also appears that the ILECs will be able to charge for providing back up power. -Original Message- From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 11:02 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re:

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Set Top NPRM

Government trying to regulate technology does seem to guarantee they are always fighting the last war. Or the one before that. Let's regulate set top boxes, just as they are going away! Let's require broadband providers to offer POTS and battery backup! And web browsing history, that's like

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Set Top NPRM

MVCO. On Mar 11, 2016 11:52 AM, wrote: > I have been following this. Really muddies the water, especially with OTT > getting increasingly more fully featured with common channels. The day is > coming that CATV systems will just be nothing more than another ISP with > everyone

Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

I have not yet. This happened right when we acquired another network so I haven’t had much time to spend diagnosing the issue. I did open a trouble ticket with Cambium but it was closed due to inactivity. -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Nate

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Set Top NPRM

I have been following this. Really muddies the water, especially with OTT getting increasingly more fully featured with common channels. The day is coming that CATV systems will just be nothing more than another ISP with everyone getting their content from a large aggregator and CDN. I would

Re: [AFMUG] 5GHz Omni standoff

Oh, I can do it for that price, but I have a distribution channel and they have to be able to have a margin too. From: Adam Moffett Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 9:54 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5GHz Omni standoff That price is a little crazy though. You could just maybe buy that

Re: [AFMUG] 5GHz Omni standoff

One thing to remember with this type of standoff mount is that the climber is probably going to be strapped to it with his feet planted against the tower (for a 2-3 ft standoff), or totally hanging from it (4-6 ft standoff). So it needs to be “man rated” or whatever the term is. Definitely

Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

Have you tried a router other than the 2011? I have 1 site where I have a 2011, and It might be having this problem, but haven't done much testing from the CPE side. Other sites with CRS or 1100's seem to be fine. On 3/11/2016 11:29 AM, Robert Haas wrote: For me, no. They are all 1gb.

Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

For me, no. They are all 1gb. -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sovereen, David A Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 3:42 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP Is this AP connected to a 100Mbps port while your others are

[AFMUG] FCC Set Top NPRM

http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2016/db0218/FCC-16-18A1.pdf This makes me giggle. As someone dealing with multiple content providers, middleware,, set top vendors, channel lineups, encryption systems, and the new purchase of a small satellite downlink farm, it's going to

Re: [AFMUG] Product leak

If you want to keep it clean, there’s the old one-armed fisherman joke. (I caught a fish THIS big.) Otherwise, just say IT’S YUGE! From: ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 10:34 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Product leak (insert Beavis and Butthead laugh) From: Adam

Re: [AFMUG] 5GHz Omni standoff

I have bought a ton of stuff from Connect-It. Their quality is amazing. One of the most heavy duty tower mounts I have ever used came from Connect-It. I have no idea how they get their prices so low, but it definitely is not by cutting corners on quality. On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Adam

Re: [AFMUG] 5GHz Omni standoff

That price is a little crazy though. You could just maybe buy that steel and weld that and galvanize it yourself for $78. Maybe they use slave labor. On 3/11/2016 11:46 AM, Bill Prince wrote: Neither. Just making a snide comment. But you're right. It depends on who/what you're getting.

Re: [AFMUG] 5GHz Omni standoff

Neither. Just making a snide comment. But you're right. It depends on who/what you're getting. Problem is that you never really know unless you've dealt with whomever. bp On 3/10/2016 8:20 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: Do you know this, or are you speculating? My

Re: [AFMUG] Product leak

"Guys never grow up, their toys just get more expensive." On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: > We're all secretly 12 years old. > > On 3/11/2016 11:29 AM, Jerry Head wrote: > > Be a real shame if the pole slipped out prematurely > > On 3/11/2016 10:12

Re: [AFMUG] Product leak

(insert Beavis and Butthead laugh) From: Adam Moffett Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 9:32 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Product leak We're all secretly 12 years old. On 3/11/2016 11:29 AM, Jerry Head wrote: Be a real shame if the pole slipped out prematurely On 3/11/2016

Re: [AFMUG] Product leak

We're all secretly 12 years old. On 3/11/2016 11:29 AM, Jerry Head wrote: Be a real shame if the pole slipped out prematurely On 3/11/2016 10:12 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: Something about how tightly my mount holds the pole? *From:* Rory Conaway *Sent:*

Re: [AFMUG] Product leak

Be a real shame if the pole slipped out prematurely On 3/11/2016 10:12 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: Something about how tightly my mount holds the pole? *From:* Rory Conaway *Sent:* Friday, March 11, 2016 8:41 AM *To:* af@afmug.com

Re: [AFMUG] Product leak

Something about how tightly my mount holds the pole? From: Rory Conaway Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 8:41 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Product leak I see a wife joke in here somewhere…. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Forrest Christian (List

Re: [AFMUG] FSK power problem?

You may have already seen the post in our forum, but in case you don’t frequent the site… the answer (posted by our engineering team) is NO, do not attempt to use voltages above 30 VDC. http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/PMP450-AP-48-volt-support/m-p/51650#M2172 To quote him: “You

  1   2   >