Mostly just throwing fuel on the fire and poking things, for fun :) (That's
why I'm not objecting officially.)
Firstly, "Ownership" takes precedence (by power) over "Promises", and the
actions happen in sequence, so Ownership takes precedence over Promises
which attempts to change the owner of
On Tue, 2024-04-30 at 09:52 -0700, 4st nomic via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I object.
> Per Rule 2576 "Ownership", the asset goes into abeyance as soon as the
> owner is ambiguous.
> The owner becomes ambiguous at step 2, wherein we are not sure if ais523
> can take the asset due to the ensuing
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:03 AM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 4/30/24 11:52, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> > I object.
> > Per Rule 2576 "Ownership", the asset goes into abeyance as soon as the
> > owner is ambiguous.
> > The owner becomes
On 4/30/24 11:52, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> I object.
> Per Rule 2576 "Ownership", the asset goes into abeyance as soon as the
> owner is ambiguous.
> The owner becomes ambiguous at step 2, wherein we are not sure if ais523
> can take the asset due to the ensuing contradiction.
>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 9:52 AM 4st nomic via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I object.
> Per Rule 2576 "Ownership", the asset goes into abeyance as soon as the
> owner is ambiguous.
> The owner becomes ambiguous at step 2, wherein we are not sure if ais523
> can take
I object.
Per Rule 2576 "Ownership", the asset goes into abeyance as soon as the
owner is ambiguous.
The owner becomes ambiguous at step 2, wherein we are not sure if ais523
can take the asset due to the ensuing contradiction.
Therefore, both CFJs should be FALSE, as neither party can cash a
On 4/30/24 02:43, wunst via agora-business wrote:
>> 9102~ juniper 1.0 An Overpowering Proposal
> AGAINST
>> 9103~ juniper 1.0 Dictator Takes the Quorum
> AGAINST
>> 9104~ snail 1.0 Stamp Raffle fix
> FOR
>> 9105~ snail
I support each intent.
- Jaff
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 11:34 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I intend, with support from Jaff, to flip the Delegate of Assessor to Jaff.
>
> I intend, with support from Jaff, to flip the Delegate of Stonemason to
> Jaff.
On Sun, 2024-04-28 at 15:38 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> I was looking for (but couldn't find) one or two other cases that G. was
> involved in, along the lines of:
>
> * A player plays card X which gives em card Y, then plays card Y
> which retroactively negates eir
If I am not mistaken, then chain of ownership since the last time Agora
owned the stone is:
Gaelan -> ais523 -> Murphy -> Jaff -> Janet -> Ben
So I am not a valid target.
- Jaff
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 4:14 AM Agora amdw42 via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I wield
On 4/22/24 23:11, Kiako via agora-business wrote:
> I recuse myself from CFJs 4075 and 4076, if able, with the following
> statement:
>
> I seem to have gotten distracted from Agora, and I don't think I have
> a good enough grasp of Agora's handling of paradoxes (and am perhaps too
>
Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2024-04-23 00:59]:
> On 4/23/24 00:55, mqyhlkahu via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Janet (randomnetcat) responded to our Declaration of Intent to Push the
> > Boulder[1] with the following[2]:
> >
> >> this is *very* close to accidentally being a
On 4/23/24 00:55, mqyhlkahu via agora-discussion wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Janet (randomnetcat) responded to our Declaration of Intent to Push the
> Boulder[1] with the following[2]:
>
>> this is *very* close to accidentally being a tabled intent under R1728 rather
>> than actually pushing the bolder.
>
Hello,
Janet (randomnetcat) responded to our Declaration of Intent to Push the
Boulder[1] with the following[2]:
> this is *very* close to accidentally being a tabled intent under R1728 rather
> than actually pushing the bolder.
To our understanding, our action is not a Tabled Action[3] because
On 4/23/24 00:21, mqyhlkahu via agora-business wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We formally declare our intent to perform the following action(s):
> {{{
> In accordance with [1], we announce that we Push the Boulder, thereby
> increasing its Height by 1.
>
>[1] Rule 2683/1 (Power=0.5)
> }}}
>
Hello,
> Under what name do you wish to be known?
Any names listed in set [1] are acceptable. Please note that the listed names
are _not_ case-insensitive — they are all fully lower-cased, even when they
appear in contexts which would typically require upper-casing or title-casing,
such as at
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 9:08 PM Jaff via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I will point out that there are multiple ways to take actions of an office
> without holding it which this wouldn't cover, such as delegation. I think a
> safer fix would be preventing a player
On 4/21/24 22:43, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Spending Stone: As the Stonemason, I don't want to incentivize massive
>> numbers of wieldings in the same message because that increases my
>> workload.
>>
> This one doesn't make sense, the stones would probably be wielded anyways,
>
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 9:10 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 4/21/24 18:04, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 3:12 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> >>> 9099~
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 7:41 PM Matt Smyth via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> And at what point in the rules does it say when you are able to close
> registration for the raffle? The emails seem to show that you started,
> registered, then closed the raffle within
On 4/21/24 20:11, Matt Smyth via agora-discussion wrote:
> I edit the proposal as such:
>
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, 9:41 am Matt Smyth via agora-business, <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> I submit the following proposal:
>>
>> {{{
>> Title: An Overpowering Proposal
>> Adoption Index:
On 4/21/24 18:04, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 3:12 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>>> 9099~ snail 2.0 Quantum Superstone
>> AGAINST
>>
>>
>>> 9100~ snail 2.0 Spending
I will point out that there are multiple ways to take actions of an office
without holding it which this wouldn't cover, such as delegation. I think a
safer fix would be preventing a player who holds an office from taking
actions corresponding to another office such that holding both would make
And at what point in the rules does it say when you are able to close
registration for the raffle? The emails seem to show that you started,
registered, then closed the raffle within about ten minutes. Surely there's
something to prevent this from happening?
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, 10:37 am
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 7:06 PM Matt Smyth via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, 10:04 am secretsnail9 via agora-business, <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > I temporarily deputize as Collector to publish the following Raffle
> Result.
I edit the proposal as such:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, 9:41 am Matt Smyth via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> {{{
> Title: An Overpowering Proposal
> Adoption Index: 1.0
> Author: juniper
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend Rule 2472 (Office
I'll modify the proposal
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, 10:05 am Matt Smyth, wrote:
> My idea was quorum-minus-one times default voting, so that it takes e.g.
> if there were eleven voters then dictator would count as 5 votes (or voting
> strength, etc.) if one person has one vote. This means it requires
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, 10:04 am secretsnail9 via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I temporarily deputize as Collector to publish the following Raffle Result.
>
> Raffle Participants:
> snail
>
> Raffle Winner:
> snail
> --
> snail
>
So you collected your own stamp?
___
My idea was quorum-minus-one times default voting, so that it takes e.g. if
there were eleven voters then dictator would count as 5 votes (or voting
strength, etc.) if one person has one vote. This means it requires the
Dictator and one player to vote the same way for a proposal to pass.
On Mon,
I object to any attempts to declare apathy
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of
secretsnail9 via agora-business
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2024 7:56:24 PM
To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
Cc: secretsnail9
Subject: BUS: (@collector) raffle time
I enter the
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 6:41 PM Matt Smyth via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> {{{
> Title: An Overpowering Proposal
> Adoption Index: 1.0
> Author: juniper
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend Rule 2472 (Office Incompatibilities) by appending
>
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 3:12 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > 9099~ snail 2.0 Quantum Superstone
>
> AGAINST
>
>
> > 9100~ snail 2.0 Spending Stone
>
> AGAINST
>
>
> > 9101~ snail 2.0
On 4/18/24 08:26, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> I think crystal poaching is fine: it's competitive teamwork! I've poached
> Janet for example. Perhaps coauthors need to be rewarded also?
I mean, I wasn't thrilled by that. I think it's reasonable to want to
reap the rewards from your
I think crystal poaching is fine: it's competitive teamwork! I've poached
Janet for example. Perhaps coauthors need to be rewarded also?
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024, 11:01 PM secretsnail9 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > 9094~ snail, R. Lee 1.0 More
> 9094~ snail, R. Lee 1.0 More instability with a hyphen
> PRESENT, but I'm quite peeved - it would have been polite to let me know
> about the error so I could correct it instead of submitting your own
> proposal and getting the crystal benefits therefrom.
The trouble with this
Deregistering players, fine
But insisting on being a player but not doing much is a little confusing to
me
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024, 6:22 AM juan via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> 4st nomic via agora-discussion [2024-04-15 21:57]:
> > I'm confused about the reasoning
4st nomic via agora-discussion [2024-04-15 21:57]:
> I'm confused about the reasoning behind doing this...?
What part of it?
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024, 1:17 PM Rose Strong via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > I activate myself.
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024, 4:03 PM
I'm confused about the reasoning behind doing this...?
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024, 1:17 PM Rose Strong via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I activate myself.
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024, 4:03 PM juan wrote:
>
> > As per rule 2646, for each of the following players, who have been
On 4/14/24 23:11, Quadrantal via agora-business wrote:
> For each proposal below, I vote as follows, if I am so eligible.
>
> //Pretty sure I registered before all of þese, but one can never be too
> careful
Just to clarify, you are eligible for all of them, because you only need
to be
Hah! Even here, I'm not safe from linguistics; I suppose I brought þis
on myself.
My limited knowledge of phonology would agree wiþ you, though I'm no
expert. Unfortunately for linguistic accuracy, however, my use of þe
þorn is mostly currently limited to replacements by an autohotkey
On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 22:11 -0400, Quadrantal via agora-business wrote:
> I push þe boulder.
>
> --
>
> The above message shall be read, to the fullest extent possible, as if
> it was sent with the digraph "th" in place of all occurrences of the
> character thorn ("þ"), and such digraphs were
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 1:35 AM Ben Matthies via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Let's try again...
>
> With support from ais523 and Janet, and without objections, I become
> delegate for Tailor.
>
> I take the promise "Tailor Delegation 2024-04-04" by Murphy from the
>
MLE Slone via agora-business [2024-04-10 12:07]:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:15 PM juan via agora-official
> wrote:
> [snip]
> > Maud
> > (v) Maud (1999-04-20--2006-12-13)
> > (v) Maud (2007-03-07--2007-05-14)
> [snip]
> > --
> > juan
> > Registrar, Absurdor
>
> This information is not
On 4/10/24 10:06, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> The Officeholder of Spendor is hereby flipped to nix.
>
> }
For bystander context, I consented to this.
--
nix
Arbitor
Got my mail identities mixed up. To clarify this is just me.
--wunst
On 09.04.24 08:34, Ben Matthies wrote:
Let's try again...
With support from ais523 and Janet, and without objections, I become
delegate for Tailor.
I take the promise "Tailor Delegation 2024-04-04" by Murphy from the
On 4/8/24 18:42, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> I object
> The possessive and the plural are not typos
The full context:
> Amend R2578 to read in full:
>
> A fungible asset is one where two instances of it are considered
> equivalent if they have the same owner, for the
On 4/8/24 18:45, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> I object on secondary grounds that rule 2578 "currencies" does not contain
> "entities"
It does as a result of a resolved proposal, I just noticed it while
working on the (unpublished) updated ruleset.
--
Janet Cobb
Assessor,
I object on secondary grounds that rule 2578 "currencies" does not contain
"entities"
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024, 3:43 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 4/8/24 14:52, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> > I intend, without object, to clean Rule 2578 by
I object
The possessive and the plural are not typos
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024, 11:52 AM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I intend, without object, to clean Rule 2578 by replacing the sole
> instance of "entities" with "entity's".
>
> --
> Janet Cobb
>
>
> On Apr 7, 2024, at 1:21 PM, Jaff via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> I envision my dream of wealth.
This fails: dreams were repealed this morning.
Gaelan
> On Apr 7, 2024, at 1:19 PM, ais523 via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> I call for judgement on the statement "Yachay CAN cash Promise Q,
> either by directly cashing it, or by transferring it from the Library
> to emself and then cashing it."
>
> I call for judgement on the statement "I CAN
O that's what "mature" means
Thank you very much
-wunst
On 04.04.24 20:11, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
On 4/4/24 14:05, wunst via agora-discussion wrote:
I do so (1 and 2).
I award myself a Cyan ribbon.
@ais523 Thanks for the clarification
@Murphy Have a nice vacation
These
I do so (1 and 2).
I award myself a Cyan ribbon.
@ais523 Thanks for the clarification
@Murphy Have a nice vacation
On 04.04.24 18:46, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 18:40 +0200, wunst via agora-business wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to
1) become delegate for
Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business [2024-04-01 19:22]:
> Quite a lot has happened in the last couple of hours. I have taken complete
> control of Agora.
>
> Full explanation here: ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGxIE1hr0w4 )
I intend to declare anger.
--
juan
On 4/1/24 12:22, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
> Quite a lot has happened in the last couple of hours. I have taken complete
> control of Agora.
>
> Full explanation here: ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGxIE1hr0w4 )
Finally, a dictator with a good platform. I feel like this
I do, sorry for the delay.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 5:47 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 3/19/24 16:06, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
> > That is a good point, I self-file a motion to reconsider.
>
> Do you intend to rejudge this yourself, or
On 3/19/24 16:06, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
> That is a good point, I self-file a motion to reconsider.
Do you intend to rejudge this yourself, or would you like it to be
assigned to someone else?
--
nix
Arbitor
On 3/25/24 18:10, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 3/16/24 22:08, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> So, a potential point of disagreement here is what *exactly* this
>> standard is requiring. Importantly, I think it's unclear whether the
>> requirement for the "specification of the
Huh. You cannot officially require the referee to investigate a non-player
via noting.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024, 12:14 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I create the following proposal:
>
> ---
> Title: yes, yes, I got the memo
> Author: Gaelan
> AI: 1.7
>
On 3/16/24 22:08, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> So, a potential point of disagreement here is what *exactly* this
> standard is requiring. Importantly, I think it's unclear whether the
> requirement for the "specification of the method" includes a requirement
> for the specification to be
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 4:33 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I grant the following promise to the Library: {
> Conditions: the bearer has transferred me, in the same message, 7 radiance.
>
> I wield the Hot Potato Stone, specifying the bearer.
> }
>
>
> On Mar 25, 2024, at 8:53 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> I suggest "un-noted" to prevent all instances of noting 1 infraction
> multiple times.
That doesn’t fix the original issue, as an infraction can be
investigated without being noted. And I don’t really think
> On Mar 25, 2024, at 8:06 PM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On 25/03/2024 19:13, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
>> Amend rule 2478 (“Justice”) by replacing: {
>> A player CAN, by announcement, "note" an unforgiven infraction
>> committed by any other
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 3:07 PM Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 25/03/2024 19:13, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
> > Amend rule 2478 (“Justice”) by replacing: {
> > A player CAN, by announcement, "note" an unforgiven infraction
On 25/03/2024 19:13, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
> Amend rule 2478 (“Justice”) by replacing: {
> A player CAN, by announcement, "note" an unforgiven infraction
> committed by any other player in the last 14 days, specifying the
> incident and the rule it violates (or name of the
On 3/23/24 13:52, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
> I recuse myself from my CFJs (4063 and 4057). I'm sorry - I've
> overextended myself these last couple of months and dropped a lot of the
> balls I'm juggling, exactly like I said I'd learned not to when I
> rejoined last year,
I joined the raffle no?
- R.Lee
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024, 10:30 am secretsnail9 via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I publish the following Raffle Result.
>
> Raffle Participants:
> Mercury
>
> Raffle Winner:
> Mercury
> --
> snail
>
On 3/24/24 17:56, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> Well, I for one am confused. What was this even /intended/ to do? It
> appears to fail to resolve anything, due to ambiguity. Or was it
> intended as "I already published a corrected resolution, now I'm
> just quoting said correction in
Janet wrote:
I previously wrote:
PROPOSALS
=
PROPOSAL 9068 (Agora of Empires)
AUTHOR: Yachay Wayllukuq
CLASS: ORDINARY
FOR (2): Murphy%, Yachay Wayllukuq%
AGAINST (2): Aris%, Janet+
PRESENT (2): juan$, snail^
BALLOTS: 6
AI (F/A): 10/14 (AI=1.0)
POPULARITY: 0.000
OUTCOME: REJECTED
On 24/03/2024 12:44, Gaealn Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Mar 24, 2024, at 12:21 PM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>> hmm... the "Optionally" removes any obligation, but does mean that if
>> there are any documents the Archivist deems worthy of archival (even
>>
> On Mar 24, 2024, at 12:21 PM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On 24/03/2024 09:16, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:> *
> Optionally, any other documents the Archivist deems worthy
>> of archival.
>
> hmm... the "Optionally" removes any obligation,
On 24/03/2024 09:16, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:> *
Optionally, any other documents the Archivist deems worthy
> of archival.
hmm... the "Optionally" removes any obligation, but does mean that if
there are any documents the Archivist deems worthy of archival (even
non-Agoran
On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 5:22 AM ais523 via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-03-24 at 05:08 +1100, Sarah S. via agora-business wrote:
> > I amend the Empireworld by announcement (progressing the narrative in
> > a
> > 'reasonable fashion' so it reads the
Gratuitous:
Game action isn't a defined term; the only rule to use it is rule 101.
Whether something is a game action doesn't matter for any practical
purpose. Even in this case, which involved a claim made under penalty of
faking, the actual truthfulness of the statement is irrelevant, in
Ah. Then yes, I'd definitely refile the case.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024, 10:38 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 3/18/24 01:14, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On 3/17/24 22:14, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> >> What evidence do you
On 3/18/24 01:14, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 3/17/24 22:14, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
>> What evidence do you have that rule numbers and Id numbers are the same?
>> Because arguing that this case is false has definitive disastrous effects,
>> so is there another way to
On 3/17/24 22:14, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> What evidence do you have that rule numbers and Id numbers are the same?
> Because arguing that this case is false has definitive disastrous effects,
> so is there another way to judge this case outside of those two options?
The earliest
What evidence do you have that rule numbers and Id numbers are the same?
Because arguing that this case is false has definitive disastrous effects,
so is there another way to judge this case outside of those two options?
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024, 6:52 PM Aris via agora-business <
Jackrabbit.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 5:52 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 3/17/24 19:25, Jackrabbit via agora-business wrote:
> > I register, grant myself a welcome package, and envision my dream as
> wealth.
>
>
> Welcome! Under what name do you wish
Janet wrote:
... Okay, so it turns out I can't read and "denial" isn't by
announcement (I could have sworn it was at some point, but I can't find
that). So the above probably did not discharge my duty.
Rule 2201 (Self-Ratification), in part (according to the latest SLR,
modulo all existential
On 3/17/24 15:08, nix via agora-business wrote:
> [Right now, sentences like "Blank are an asset ownable by..." is
> interpreted to adding to a default within R2576. This seems unintuitive.
> This proposal makes that default only apply if there's no mention of
> ownership.]
That doesn't belong
> On Mar 17, 2024, at 12:45 PM, Sarah S. via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 11:42 PM Sarah S. via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> I register, claim a welcome package, and dream of Wealth
>>
>
> Sorry, this is R. Lee
>
> --
> R. Lee
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 11:42 PM Sarah S. via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I register, claim a welcome package, and dream of Wealth
>
Sorry, this is R. Lee
--
R. Lee
On 3/16/24 14:58, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> One quick thought to add: I suspect one or two people will want to
> reconsider this. If they do, I strongly suggest they come up with
> compelling arguments for why this was missed by every CFJ on Rule 105,
> every Promotor, and every player in
On 3/16/24 14:55, nix via agora-business wrote:
> Given that agoran tradition has suggested that this formulation works
> for at least 4 years and perhaps more than a decade, that no previous
> CFJ has raised any concerns about this (despite many CFJs scrutinizing
> Rules 105 and 106), and that
typo: 4059 is assigned to murphy, 4069 is assigned to me
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 10:45 AM nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> The Arbitor's office kindly asks the following judges to either assign a
> judgment, recuse, or file for extension for the corresponding
On 3/11/2024 12:16 AM, Kiako via agora-business wrote:
Perhaps this would be better in a world where the effects of dreams
are more heavily impacted by the dreamers dreaming them. (I might toy
with this idea actually, this sounds interesting...)
Had a bit of fun drafting this. Don't know if
juan via agora-business [2024-03-11 12:45]:
> secretsnail9 via agora-business [2024-03-10 19:50]:
> > I push the boulder.
>
> You'd just done it.
Aw, UTC.
--
juan
I vote as follows and have updated the spreadsheet. Please let me know if I
have incorrectly edited said spreadsheet. I give permission for, as long as my
votes remain the same and unaffected by the motion, for my row in the
spreadsheet to be moved.
> 9070~ Yachay 1.0
snail wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 6:03 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
On 3/10/24 19:01, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 5:45 PM ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
On Sun,
On 3/9/24 18:51, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> I grant myself a welcome package.
>
> I don't think i've gotten one yet.
>
> CFJ: snail was granted a stamp in this message.
>
> arguments for TRUE:
> When i registered, i was granted some assets that did not include a
> stamp of my own
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 6:03 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 3/10/24 19:01, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 5:45 PM ais523 via agora-discussion <
> > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun,
On Sun, 2024-03-10 at 18:01 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
wrote:
> from Rule 2481 (Festival Restrictions) Power 3.1:
>
> {
> While Agora's Festivity is nonzero, the following apply:
> ...
>
> 2. Quorum for Agoran Decisions is equal to half the number of
> Festive
On 3/10/24 19:01, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 5:45 PM ais523 via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2024-03-10 at 15:38 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>> If so, and if Kate indeed gained five
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 5:45 PM ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-03-10 at 15:38 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > If so, and if Kate indeed gained five Ribbons on 2023-08-31, and no
> > one else gained as many, then:
> >
On Sun, 2024-03-10 at 15:38 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
wrote:
> If so, and if Kate indeed gained five Ribbons on 2023-08-31, and no
> one else gained as many, then:
> * Only Kate's vote counted on any proposal resolved after 230.
> * Only Kate's support counted on any tabled
nix wrote:
I assign CFJ 4059 to Murphy.
https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg45651.html
("As a result of the 2023 Agoran't Birthday Tournament, Murphy won the
game.")
Draft judgement:
Without performing an exhaustive analysis of the Agoran't archives, I'm
assuming
On Sun, 2024-03-10 at 12:46 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> Aris wrote:
>
> > Erm... that CFJ doesn't do what you want it to. CFJs are supposed to be
> > statements, not questions, and interpreting something out of context is
> > different from interpreting it in context.
>
>
Aris wrote:
Erm... that CFJ doesn't do what you want it to. CFJs are supposed to be
statements, not questions, and interpreting something out of context is
different from interpreting it in context.
At one point we did legislate that, for CFJs asking yes/no questions, a
judgement of
Janet wrote:
On 3/4/24 13:19, Goren Barak via agora-business wrote:
ѣѧѤѴ ѩќѹѩ,
Ѳ ћѧђѤѺ ѝѦђёѹѰ њѲ ѨѐѩєѰ ѓ ·њѧѯ ѯ ·ќѹѧѯ
ё ѳњѡѧђё, ѮѲё "Ѳ ѳњѡѧђё ё ѝѦђёѹѰ њѲ ѨѐѩєѰ"
ќѫћњѲ ѩќѹѩ
Transliterated from the Shavian alphabet to standard English:
{
Hello Agora,
I declare victory by apathy for Ben and
101 - 200 of 30836 matches
Mail list logo
