On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 5:18 AM Juan F. Meleiro via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> I see. But in that case, isn't the rule authorizing that effect the
> lower-powered one? Because if not, a low-powered rule could define terms used
> in higher-powered ones to mean whatever it wants.
>
> For example,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 2:10 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Couldn't past wins be outright ruled somehow to not exist anymore if
> they're found to be in violation of something concerning it?
There's a couple separate issues - one part is just saying "that win
didn't count as
fter the week, that's that and, if the investigation is favorable, you get
> the actual win and the rest of things trigger.
>
> On Thursday, March 16, 2023, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 2:10 PM
Oh nice! I played with v.1 of the beacon a couple years ago, I like the
fact that you can specify a future timestamp and wait for the roll to
happen (assuming that’s how the beta version works).
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 8:47 AM juan via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 10:33 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-business
wrote:
> I intend to, with 2 agoran consent, impeach the referee. (I should be
> properly elected.)
Also, some context from Discord (since context-free support for
impeachment may seem unfair):
>
> 4st — Today at 9:20 AM
> Hmm tho
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 7:48 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> man. 20. mar. 2023 kl. 15:44 skrev ais523 via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org>:
>
> > On Mon, 2023-03-20 at 15:18 -0700, Forest Sweeney via agora-business
> wrote:
>
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 5:45 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> That's pretty fascinating.
>
> Are there any other notable "unwritten rules"? Precedents or other thing
> that are, in practice, as strong as actual explicit ruletext?
There should be nothing "as strong as actual rul
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 5:45 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
> > On 3/23/23 00:12, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> > > On another note, I don't find anything in the rules that allows us to add
> > > conditions to the performance of actions, unless I'm missing somethi
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 11:25 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion:
> I withdraw this CFJ.
> I respond to the CoE instead by accepting the error,
> and letting all declared ritual numbers that had this as dependency fail.
You may know this, but "accepting the error" does nothing as it is not
act
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 1:54 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion:
>
> > Secondly, is a repeated action the same as a conditional action?
>
> They function under roughly the same rules per precedent.
Except - now that we've rule-codified conditionals, we have to ask
"does this fall under the new rul
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 9:12 AM nix via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Basic Access
>
>
> 1. What email client(s) do you use to access Agora?
Currently (just recently) forced into gmail web or phone app, by
updates to my institution's policy;
Tbird for years has been preferred/still prefer
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 6:10 AM juan via agora-business
wrote:
> Append to Rule 2201 Self-Ratification the following text:
>
> "4. Retract the document, making it so as if it were never published."
I'm pretty sure this leads directly to Paradox (if the document was
never published
So, by my count there's 3 people who could win via radiance pretty
much at any time due to stamps. I sure don't begrudge the wins at
all, but it's extremely demotivtating to bother to get radiance, to
know it could be reset at any time on a whim. Really gives a "no
point in trying" feeling to rad
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 12:57 PM nix via agora-discussion
wrote:
> - Wooden Gavel, awardable by the Arbitor to the judge of a CFJ
> or series of CFJs with a strong and foundational impact on the
> judicial precedents of Agora (additional information: ID
> Numbe
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 10:27 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 4:29 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 12:57 PM nix via agora-discussion
> > wrote
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 3:03 PM nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> Oh also, everyone else should feel welcome to submit suggestions.
>
> On 4/3/23 14:56, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> > - Silver Quill, awardable by the Promotor to the author of a
> > proposal of outstanding meri
> Motion to extend filed: 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00
> Judged FALSE by Janet:01 Jan 1970 00:00:00
heh forgot to fill these in, defaulted to 0. Fixed in the archive as:
> History:
>
> Called by Juan: 27 Mar 2023 18:2
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:36 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Hm, I thought I already asked this, but I'd like to become "interested" as
> a judge.
> (must be my bad, since now I can't find it!)
You were added when you asked, just haven't rotated to the top yet,
from the Gazette:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:36 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Wow, ok. Just tried to be cheeky and make a fun little action. Note that
> > I also want forgiveness on a missed deadline. Just seemed fair.
>
>
> Sorry, no rebuke implied. And I admittedly didn't check whether you had
> ea
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 7:41 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> I think it is good to reward proposals. Proposals are the primary gameplay
> of ANY nomic, so I don't have any trouble with rewards. But I do see what
> you mean about how it is imbalanced: you could work hard on a proposa
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 11:47 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Is the timestamp of the mailing list itself the one that appears on the
> archive website?
Yes for private archives, though with a UTC conversion.
There's been some tension on this over Agora's history. The timestam
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 11:59 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
> How bad would it be to send several emails in a short period of time with
> the hope that one of them has the best timing?
I think it's logical to try, but if it's a necessary strategy it
points to problem with the ga
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 12:12 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-04-11 at 13:54 -0500, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Your client itself will normally display the timestamp attached by the
> > sending machine. This is usually assumed to be honest, but could
> > actually be
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 7:16 AM nix via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 4/12/23 09:14, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Seeing this game play out, I think it would be possible to simplify the
> > Tournament rules greatly by just making win-granting a power that certain
> > Contracts c
Putting together a repeal proposal for regs rn.
Fair warning: I agree with the "daunting" feeling, but the rules text
for tournaments as contracts is no shorter than tournaments as
regulations (based on looking at a previous version), in fact to me
it's a bit more complex because contracts have t
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 10:52 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> What are generally the unwritten behaviour rules on Tournaments like these?
> - Can I collude with other players in private?
> - Can I participate without the intent to win, and instead just behave
> according to how I'
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 1:08 PM juan via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> --- DRAFT ---
> Title: The World's Enchantment
> Author: juan
> A.I.: 2.5
>
> Enact a rule called Golems with Power 2.5 and text
>
> {
> The Xaman is an Office.
>
> Clay is a currency tracked by the Xaman.
>
> Golems are entities
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 1:08 PM juan via agora-discussion
wrote:
> When the conditions specified by the Golem's Mind are met, the Golem is
> activated. When a Golem is activated, it performs the actions in its
> Scroll on behalf of its creator.
Only persons can perform actions on behalf of other
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 5:02 PM ais523 via agora-business
wrote:
> In conclusion: the way the reset from a radiance win works has
> something of a design conflict with the way that radiance is actually
> rewarded. Get rid of the reset, and suddenly that conflict is gone, and
> many mechanics that
On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 3:34 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
>
> Rule 1727 is also not explicit that Agora is in fact the
> same nomic that "rose like a phoenix from the ashes of Nomic World".
>
This has come up as a philosophical chat around here from time to time
(I don't think the
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 9:41 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Hm. Well, then, obviously, we need to implement some rules to prevent this
> situation from ever happening again, and then make Agora permanently
> unossifieable, so that if this question ever came up again, or if agora D
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 12:52 PM juan via agora-business
wrote:
>
> ABSTRACT: based on the considerably well-crafted analysis and extensive
> historical research, useful and insightful crafting of concepts, but an
> unfortunate lack of indexing references, I ask the author to REVIEW &
> RESUBMIT t
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 2:04 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> This violation has a (default) class of 2. The fact that the
> defendant revealed the situation right away is somewhat mitigating,
> while using the guise of an official position is somewhat aggravating.
> Balancing these, I conclude this inves
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 4:07 PM secretsnail9 via agora-business
wrote:
>
> I respond to all petitions made to me with "Wow look at this cool Awards
> Month intent":
>
> It's hard to pick a single proposal from the last year: feedback from
> everyone would be appreciated, if I missed something big!
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 3:47 PM Edward Murphy via agora-business
wrote:
>
> I intend to award Employee of the Year to either Janet or snail,
> subject to discussion.
Even if your "I intend with 2 Agoran consent everything I announced in
the past 6 hours" works, I'm unsure how to think about the a
While I was supportive of the delegation idea on discord, I’m coming around
to Yachay’s position. I’ve “taken breaks” from arbitor regularly - snail
and Jason both did the job for a bit last year - but when it was
technically resigning without the expectation of getting the job back I
think it fel
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 12:37 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/1/23 14:36, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Ideally, I think, everything is doable with automation. In practice tho,
> > I'm not sure what that looks like.
>
> Crucial typo. I think ideall
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 2:09 PM nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 4/23/23 18:45, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote:
> > I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Assessor
> > election.
> > * The Vote Collector is the ADoP.
> > * The valid o
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:38 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> [Proposal 8639
> failed to make this change because it used "amend" for a power change.
If everyone involved including you knew what it meant at the time so as to
miss the “error” entirely, how
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:17 AM Aspen via agora-business
wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:01 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/2/23 01:01, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:38 PM Janet Cobb via agor
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 10:28 AM nix via agora-business
wrote:
> If an officer specified a Delegate when taking a Vacation, and the
> Delegate has publicly consented, then the Delegate can act as if e
> is the holder of the Office while the officer is On Vacation.
I'm still against thi
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:28 AM nix via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 4/30/23 17:47, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> > I intend to award Employee of the Year to either Janet or snail,
> > subject to discussion.
> I'm not convinced this works as an official intent (I'm not even sure if
>
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 9:44 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
wrote:
> In response:
> I had written this thesis with exactly as you say also in mind. We take
> conclusions to their logical extremes without first testing and confirming
> via CFJ or otherwise if the Truth that we'd found ACTUAL
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 12:57 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> It's fine, I'm kind of curious myself too.
>
> On Thursday, May 4, 2023, Forest Sweeney via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 2:51 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-bus
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:43 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> If I were to interpret the ruleset as strictly as I would like to, I
> believe that no rule change whatsoever has happened since the clause "Any
> ambiguity in the specification of a rule change causes that change to
One other thing that's totally unspoken in the rules but exists in the
common-law of CFJs is that it's acceptable to find "to the
preponderance of evidence" for factual questions. This used to be
codified - but we repealed that codification for whatever reason. But
it was still established enough
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 5:00 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business
wrote:
>
> - It takes agency away from newer players and puts more into older ones
> which are more familiar with this obscure ancient arcana which has now
> supposedly been made relevant, which feels terrible.
>
Just on this not
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 8:03 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Having such an unwieldy amount of arcana puts a lot of power in being able
> to give out 'hedonistic' Judgements; ones that are heavily based on "well
> this is best for the game"/"this makes it playable"/etc, especiall
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 8:59 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> I'd like to mention that I don't feel like you're exercising the "highest
> reasonably possible standard of care" if your basis for if the crime has
> been committed or not is that it doesn't match the arcana, unless
ion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Easy, you could state that you're basing yourself off mere conjecture and
> that's the best you can do for now rather than using using language that
> states your position as a matter of fact.
>
> On Friday, May 12, 2023, Kerim Aydin via agora-
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 4:34 PM ais523 via agora-business
wrote:
> > Amend R478 by deleting the following text:
> >
> > Freedom of speech being essential for the healthy functioning of
> > any non-Imperial nomic, it is hereby resolved that no Player shall
> > be prohibited
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 10:17 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Also why is radiance at power 1.5 in the first place?
>
Was a minor design choice: because (in drafting points) I thought the
win condition itself (100+ points) should be a trifle more protected
than the award conditions.
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 2:59 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> A proto to revive the criminal court, revive the appellate court (but
> only for criminal cases), and fix investigators' obligations with
> respect to alleged infractions:
So, for a full criminal trial resulting in Blots, i
On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 3:10 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Hm. If we're trying to go the other way and make it as quick as possible,
> we could have the Arbitor's weekly report include a randomly selected
> "Dredd" Judge for that week (with some Dredds on the bench if the cur
On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 12:46 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 5/14/23 15:40, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 3:10 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> >> Hm. If we're trying to go the other way
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 4:34 PM nix via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 5/17/23 18:27, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> > The intent only exists if it worked...?
>
> True. But still, even if it succeeded, I would not personally support a
> badge.
>
I'm not sure conditional announcement
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 4:44 AM juan via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-05-17 23:21]:
> > On 5/17/23 20:13, nix via agora-business wrote:
> > > On 5/17/23 19:10, Christian Arguinzoni via agora-business wrote:
> > >> I would like to register for the nomic game Ago
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 11:09 AM nix via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 5/18/23 13:06, beokirby agora via agora-business wrote:
> > I intend to register as a player of Agora.
> > My name is beokirby.
> >
> > I will then grant myself a welcome package and envision a dream of gardens
> Welcome beoki
hanic and it doesn't mean what it reads on the
> tin.
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 8:22 PM ais523 via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 11:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> > > hehe we ca
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 11:22 AM ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 11:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> > hehe we can still fool old players sometimes - "intend" has a
> > "specific meaning" for registra
There's actually two criteria to think about here. One is the
criteria for intent announcements (R1728). but the other is the
criteria for rule change specifications in R105, specifically:
> A rule change is wholly prevented from taking effect unless its
> full text was published, along
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:32 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> wrote:
> > I informally risk being guilty of favoritism 7 days from now, by
> > saying that the combination of CFJ calling and parenthetical reminder
> > that
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 2:29 PM ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> Or perhaps this is just a case of "the ais523 who has been following
> Agora for over 15 years spots things that the ais523 who had been there
> for only one year didn't".
Lol, I meant to add myself that the rules underlying may
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 5:51 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> > Let's give everyone a more equal chance to be relevant.
> >
So right now, Officers' only reward is increased voting strength (I
believe), and the game is growing with lots of new players so
officers' work is getting
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:26 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> With radiance and Stamps seemingly on their way out, I believe that your
> Officer salary problem is part of a larger problem of Agora overall needing
> a proper economy again, not a voting strength problem.
So offer t
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:43 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> I don't intend to design an economy, because I don't think I'm competent
> enough to do so. I'll try to contribute where I can, though.
>
Ah, the typical take-away power with a promise, but an unfulfilled
one. No wo
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:50 AM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 09:37 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:26 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-
> > discussion wrote:
> > > With radiance and Stamps
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:50 AM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 09:37 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:26 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-
> > discussion wrote:
> > > With radiance and Stamps
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:41 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 5/19/23 12:26, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote
> >> 8978* Janet 3.0 Authorized initiation
> > FOR, although it doesn't actually solve the issue that brought this
> > up, as it doesn't ratify a
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 11:47 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
> So, only someone who already is in power and a beneficiary of the system
> should be entitled to propose change things?
Er, I never said you couldn't propose. I was giving you feedback on
how I felt about voting for
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:40 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I'd argue that I fit criteria 4 of Rule 2519 ("Consent"):
> "4. it is reasonably clear from context that e wanted the action to
> take place or assented to it taking place."
There's quite a few precedents in dif
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:49 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:46 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On 5/19/23 16:40, Forest Sweeney wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:31 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discus
I like the overall idea! Some comments:
On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 4:24 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Labor Tokens are a fixed asset, tracked by the (ADoP?).
I could see either fixed or liquid working here, though on first read
I agree with you on fixed, as it limits how trans
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:07 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> - I like the Focuses idea.
> - I think you'd really just want to use your Stamps to win rather than
> anything else. Maybe instead you can only Focus on something if you have
> the right Stamp or combination of Stamps
Here's a go at incorporating all these thoughts:
=
Proto: Human Resources v0.02
AI: 2
Retitle Rule 2632 (Complexity) to "Office Worth".
Amend Rule 2632 to read in full:
Complexity is a natural office switch reflecting how complex it is
to fulfill
On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 10:35 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business
wrote:
> I Judge TRUE, forced to play my last card and merely appeal to my personal
> opinion.
I think this is just fine, and a nice overall first judgement and
discussion of the issues. When we were discussing this on Discord,
On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 1:01 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2023-05-20 at 23:43 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Actually, in general persons ceasing to exist is likely to cause
> > problems, and the current ruleset is careful to avoid it (R869/51's "is
> > or e
> Rule 106 (Adopting Proposals, Power=3) states that adopted proposals
> "take effect", and:
>
>Except insofar as the actions performed by a proposal happen one
>after another, rather than simultaneously, a proposal's effect is
>instantaneous. A proposal can neither delay no
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 12:10 PM juan via agora-official
wrote:
> 2009-05-04 G.
Goethe is my former nickname so it's actually 2001-02-04 for me:
> v Goethe 2001-02-04 2003-03-24
Thanks much for checking.
-G.
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 12:44 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Yes, but wouldn't certain CfJs be likely to enter into Moot Tennis if we
> don't take the opinion of the majority as a tiebreaker as Judges? We can
> keep going back and forth with Moots, because 2+N Support seems fa
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 1:14 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> Actually, I was asked by ais523 to add to a CfJ a clarification on
> something, a 'sub-Judgement' of a sort.
>
> Would've it been possible for me to, for example, Judge TRUE, but also add
> a sub-Judgement that from he
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 6:43 AM juan via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> nix via agora-discussion [2023-05-24 18:19]:
> > On 5/24/23 18:17, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> > >> If emails are different and there is no note mentioning they
> > >> are the same person, they are not.
> > > Oh also this i
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 8:02 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> It's legal, it's just generally bad form.
In this case, I'm not even sure it's bad form. Since radiance can
only be danced up to the highest player's score, it adds an almost
Winsome-like dynamic, where if someone gets ahead
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 12:17 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business
wrote:
>
> I'm kind of surprised that this kind of CfJ hasn't been raised yet.
>
> I CfJ: "There are some persons right now who have more than 0 Rice"
To avoid an INSUFFICIENT judgement, can you add some context or
reasons you b
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 11:33 AM juan via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion [2023-05-25 07:11]:
> > The currently guiding precedent is in CFJ 1361: "a nickname is a name
> > that a Player chooses for emself, that can be reliably used to pick em
&g
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 11:01 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> > Now, it is sufficient to determine whether "that Rice Plan having that
> > player's Signature" is an action or not. I'd say that it is a regulated
> > action, fitting all three criteria for regulated actions: the rules hav
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 11:18 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On 5/26/23 14:14, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 11:01 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> >>> Now, it is sufficient to determine wheth
On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 2:34 AM Aspen via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 3:52 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-business
> wrote:
> >
> > I withdraw my consent from all rice plans.
> > If the Reimann hypothesis is true, I consent to all rice plans that will
> > not be harvested.
>
On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 2:34 AM Aspen via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 3:52 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-business
> wrote:
> >
> > I withdraw my consent from all rice plans.
> > If the Reimann hypothesis is true, I consent to all rice plans that will
> > not be harvested.
>
On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 8:13 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> That said, a
> new rule that has a "new" sort of toy - like Rice Plans - is a good
> potential target, but I'm pretty sure this attempt missed the mark.
Followup: Importantly, just recently, in CFJ 4013, I judged that
"consent" as a general c
On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 10:46 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-business
wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 10:46 AM Forest Sweeney
> wrote:
>
> > I withdraw my consent from all rice plans.
> >
What rules mechanism enabled you to do this?
-G.
On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 10:40 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-business
wrote:
> Thus, we reach that third interpretation: we are consenting to that rice
> plan obtaining or not obtaining your signature. You consent to the change,
> the action that occurs, or you reaffirm consent that inaction is
> acc
On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 12:10 PM secretsnail9 via agora-business
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 1, 2023, at 4:17 PM, secretsnail9 wrote:
> >
> >
> > I wield the radiance stone. (This increases my radiance by 3.)
> > I reach for the Minty stone.
> > I wield the recursion stone as the soul stone, specify
On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 5:04 PM ais523 via agora-business
wrote:
> It's also worth noting that G. explicitly stated in eir message that e
> consented to the Rice Plan – the subsequent withdrawal was sent in the
> same message. Although Agora assumes that multiple actions listed in
> the same messag
On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 5:54 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2023-06-04 at 17:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 5:04 PM ais523 via agora-business
> > wrote:
> > > It's also worth noting that G. explici
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 8:53 AM ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> > 9001~ snail 2.0 More Bright Abilities
> On this decision, I vote with a conditional vote: FOR if proposal 9000
> was adopted, otherwise AGAINST.
I don't think this conditional works as written - ADOPTED is
de
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 3:08 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-official
wrote:
> RICE HOLDINGS
> ==
> PlayerRice
> ---
> 4st 2 (+1)
Not needing a CoE because it's already been CoE'd, but there's no wa
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 3:08 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-official
wrote:
> Created: 2023-05-22 by juan
> Up: {Aspen, G., Janet, Murphy, ais523, cuddlybanana, juan}
> Down: {4st, beokirby, blob, iWright, nix, snail, Yachay}
> Signatures: ais523, juan, (G, if G hasn't withdrawn eir signature), Janet,
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 4:07 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 4:01 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 6:38 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > >
> > > Agoran Court Gazette (Arbitor's Weekly Report)
> > > Sun 04 Jun 2023
> > >
> > >
>
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 4:21 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Oooh, ok, I didn't read the rules, my bad. I also just forgot the case had
> been reopened by "I support and I do so"
Sorry, I usually try to remind people more explicitly, but also just
plain old forgot until you did t
901 - 1000 of 1014 matches
Mail list logo
