Peter M. Jansson said:
>> Compatibility with common apache features would go a long way
>> towards wider adoption of AS
>
> Unless it would speed migration away from AOLserver.
I don't see how it would speed the migration.. in fact it would have kept
me from moving my stuff away...by adding f
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 12:08:38PM +0200, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
>
> Funny that your putting this out :)
>
> Some years (1, 2?) ago, I was tinkering with the idea of how
> to bring DAV (faster) to AS and one of the considerations
> was to snap-in Apache-layer and use mod_dav as-is.
Musea Technolo
> Compatibility with common apache features would go a long way
> towards wider adoption of AS
Unless it would speed migration away from AOLserver.
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNO
ECTED]
> Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?
>
>
> Does it work using instructions in a .htaccess file?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tim Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 20
long way towards wider
adoption of AS
- Original Message -
From: "Mat Kovach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:39 AM
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:18:01PM -0
Does it work using instructions in a .htaccess file?
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?
> >
> > >
> I have a tinyurl.com clone written using AOLserver and
> Postgres (shouldn't be very hard to port to use about
> any DB) which does make "nice" urls
Spiffy, I did the same at http://oneweek.org a while back. Never
advertised it though, just gave it friends and people here on the
list.
Danie
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:18:01PM -0700, Patrick Spence wrote:
} the main one I am concerned with is a script for subscriptions that
} handles via .htaccess entries.. the next most used set is the rewrite
} stuff done by Gallery (gallery.menalto.com) which is primarily just
} rewrite commands to m
Yes, I am able and willing to do this. I was also taking over as
moderator for the core team meetings starting next week, but it appears
you and/or Mark now have the time to devote to that role and you have a
set of agenda items so I'll step back from that role.
/s.
On Friday, August 1, 2003, at 0
we need an owners for the webdav module and the rest of the modules as
well. scott, are you still able and willing to coordinate this effort?
it would be nice to have one point person for each module who would
coordinate feature requests, track bugs, review code, ect.
Dossy wrote:
>
> Yes, yes
In a message dated 8/1/2003 1:55:22 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Roberto Mello wrote:> - Readline support for nscp.That would be quite hard, since readline also has to guess the terminaltype and so on.Wouldn't it be much better to write nscp client in Tcl+readline or evenT
On 2003.08.01, Nathan Folkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In a message dated 8/1/03 6:08:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > I was tinkering with the idea of how
> > to bring DAV (faster) to AS
> >
> which reminds me... ;-) jay and i took dossy's orginal nsdav code and
> modified it to use td
On Friday 01 August 2003 13:19, you wrote:
> In a message dated 8/1/03 6:08:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I was tinkering with the idea of how
> > to bring DAV (faster) to AS
>
> which reminds me... ;-) jay and i took dossy's orginal nsdav code and
> modified it to use tdom for xml creation
In a message dated 8/1/03 6:08:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was tinkering with the idea of how
to bring DAV (faster) to AS
which reminds me... ;-) jay and i took dossy's orginal nsdav code and modified it to use tdom for xml creation and parsing. we'll be releasing it as soon as we find a
On Friday 01 August 2003 07:19, you wrote:
> Nathan Folkman said:
> > perhaps its time to look at what it would take to provide a simple apache
> > compatibility layer that would allow apache modules to be used
> > (unmodified)
> > within aolserver. i've not had time to fully investigate, so this c
>
> > 2: full emulation of mod_rewrite and .htaccess files
>
> I know this isn't what you want to hear, but ... if you want Apache,
> then run Apache. :-)
>
And the nsrewrite module worked last time I tried!
Tim Moss
SiteSpeed Ltd
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website:http://www.sit
Roberto Mello wrote:
- Readline support for nscp.
That would be quite hard, since readline also has to guess the terminal
type and so on.
Wouldn't it be much better to write nscp client in Tcl+readline or even
Tk. I have a pretty generic ztelnet module, which I use to connect.
It's pretty old and n
Nathan Folkman said:
> perhaps its time to look at what it would take to provide a simple apache
> compatibility layer that would allow apache modules to be used
> (unmodified)
> within aolserver. i've not had time to fully investigate, so this could be
> the
> wrong approach, and maybe wouldn't e
Peter M. Jansson said:
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Patrick Spence wrote:
>
>> Using filters is easy enough, I did it when I ran AS.. but I am running
>> some third party stuff that is made more capable/powerful with
>> mod_rewrite
>> and .htaccess... and some other software that requires .htaccess so it
In a message dated 7/31/03 8:30:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm in strong agreement. There's a lot in .htaccess that's fundamental
Apache architecture (AddHandler in a .htaccess file, for example -- that
just won't work with AOLserver as it stands, and the changes would go a
long way towar
In a message dated 7/31/03 8:28:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah, I don't think we really need full readline/ncurses in nscp. I
think just line editing capabilities (cursor forward, backwards, start
of line, end of line) would be a big win at this point.
Considering how "standard" VT100 i
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Patrick Spence wrote:
> Using filters is easy enough, I did it when I ran AS.. but I am running
> some third party stuff that is made more capable/powerful with mod_rewrite
> and .htaccess... and some other software that requires .htaccess so it
> makes it easier to work with.
Peter M. Jansson said:
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Dossy wrote:
>
>> > 2: full emulation of mod_rewrite and .htaccess files
>>
>> I know this isn't what you want to hear, but ... if you want Apache,
>> then run Apache. :-)
>
> I'm in strong agreement. There's a lot in .htaccess that's fundamental
> Ap
Dossy said:
>> 1: A better solution for virtual hosting
>> a: I don't have to run multiple instances of aolserver
>> b: the Pageroot variable is updated correctly so scripting
>> in languages like php can handle virtual hosting
>> c: logging to seperate files for each virtual s
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Dossy wrote:
> > 2: full emulation of mod_rewrite and .htaccess files
>
> I know this isn't what you want to hear, but ... if you want Apache,
> then run Apache. :-)
I'm in strong agreement. There's a lot in .htaccess that's fundamental
Apache architecture (AddHandler in a
On 2003.07.31, Brett Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is already a tclreadline binding.
> http://tclreadline.sourceforge.net
It'd be great except TclReadlineCmd calls Tcl_CreateFileHandler(0, ...)
for stdin. If you could pass it the input and output fd's, that'd be
perfect ...
Maybe
On 2003.07.31, Patrick Spence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Dossy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > - What's your single biggest gripe about AOLserver? If you could have
> > one thing changed or fixed, what would it be?
>
> There ya go, limiting it to ONE thing.. :) but I am difficult, and ne
> Lately, I've been thinking of switching to tclsh as
> my login shell (yes,
> I'm a nut) and I've heard from other folks that
> they'd like readline
> support in nscp ... so, I wonder ... what might it
> take for something
> like "package require readline" to work. So, if you
> really want
> read
On 2003.07.31, Roberto Mello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - What's your single biggest gripe about AOLserver? If you could have
> > one thing changed or fixed, what would it be?
>
> - Readline support for nscp.
Lately, I've been thinking of switching to tclsh as my login shell (yes,
I'm a nut
On Friday, August 1, 2003, at 07:54 AM, Rob Mayoff wrote:
+-- On Jul 31, Roberto Mello said:
| - Readline support for nscp.
You could just get a better client program. For example, connecting to
nscp from inside Emacs can give you editing and history support.
If you have a separate progra
+-- On Jul 31, Roberto Mello said:
| - Readline support for nscp.
You could just get a better client program. For example, connecting to
nscp from inside Emacs can give you editing and history support.
If you have a separate program that puts readline on top of a TCP
connection, you can u
I am glad to hear someone is working on Debian packages, as I am getting
ready to install Aolserver on a Debian server.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 02:53:36PM -0600, Roberto Mello wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:44:12PM -0400, Dossy wrote:
> > Are the weekly chats officially dead? I know Nate is
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:44:12PM -0400, Dossy wrote:
> Are the weekly chats officially dead? I know Nate is extraordinarily
> busy right now (well, aren't we all) but we could still get on the chat
> every week or every other week without him.
Indeed!
> Of course, it helps to have something to
- Original Message -
From: "Dossy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:44 PM
Subject: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?
> Are the weekly chats officially dead? I know Nate is extraordinarily
> busy right now (well, aren't we all) b
- What's your single biggest gripe about AOLserver? If you
could haveone thing changed or fixed, what would it be?
I discovered this in the last few days. If I instant message
someone a URL pointing to an image, it never gets logged in the
access log. Perhaps it's something to do with nsvhr/n
35 matches
Mail list logo
