do not get used unless
your primary server goes down.
thanks
shafqat
--- On Mon, 3/9/09, Ramey, Anne wrote:
> From: Ramey, Anne
> Subject: Re: SLM 7.1 & Server group
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Date: Monday, March 9, 2009, 7:31 PM
> No, the instructions say to install o
.
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Shafqat Ayaz
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:21 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: SLM 7.1 & Server group
Hello Anne
We have done it and it works fine, we have had
you make any changes to the arconfig and armonitor files?
My environment is
ARS 7.0.1
SLM 7.1
Solaris 5.10
Oracle 10.2
Let me know if I can help in any other way.
thanks
shafqat
--- On Mon, 3/9/09, Ramey, Anne wrote:
> From: Ramey, Anne
> Subject: Re: SLM 7.1 & Server group
>
il 08, 2009 6:40 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Heterogeneous server group environment
** Hello listers!
Just wondering if someone managed to create a server group with both windows
2003 and Solaris servers on the same group?
We could not found an assertive YES or NO in the docs.
Thanks,
The servers also need to communicate to each other (the server group heart
beating)
Since they communicate via TCP/IP, having them in different platforms should be
doable
-Guillaume
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of LJ Longwing
Sent
**
Hi All,
I'm proposing a topic "Server Group - Beyond the Obvious" as sort of a follow on to my topic from a few years ago about how server groups work and how to install. I've learned a lot since about tweaks that are only lightly documented such as places where you have
I read about specifying the "Share" option when specifying the AR System
database when installing AR System Server.
I want to use the "Share" option to configure two Remedy servers to
reside in a Remedy Server Group.
Can I put a load balancer on top of a Remedy Server
We are going to create a server group for our production environment
including 2 servers.
Currently our users connect via the server remedy.domain.com, if we
create our server group as remedy, with they still be able to use
remedy.domain.com or do that have to modify it?
And just as a sanity
Double check the host names in all the ar.conf file
On Apr 20, 3:36 pm, William Rentfrow
wrote:
> I have a server group with 6 servers.
>
> Server #1 should be the admin server. For some reason server #6 is what
> all the servers believe is the admin server.
>
> I thought th
ot; delinquency messages in the server group logs-each server
> detecting the other as delinquent quite frequently, even when they are
> responding just fine. It happens at all hours, even after backups are
> finished and no one is in the office for the morning yet. The systems are
&g
Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of patchsk
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2011 7:20 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: server group delinquency, inaccurate
Have you checked the servergrp_board table in the database? Do they
match with the FQDN of the server
failover of the services to the next
highest ranked server takes place.
Although there's a dedicated server group thread that handles this process it's
not uncommon to see an occasional log entry reporting a delinquent server.
This happens due to slight timing variations o
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties only by an
authorized State Official.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Walters, Mark
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 10:51 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: se
2
2011 09:59:31.0267 */OK
00 > /* Wed Jun 22
2011 09:59:31.0272 */COMMIT WORK
But in the server group log on ncc391:
/* Wed Jun 22 2011 09:59:31.0224 */ Server ncc392.its.state.nc.us
determined to be delinquent with 4 operation(s) owned
/* Wed Jun 22 2011 10:00:01.0659 */ Server ncc
The lack of any logging for 2 minutes suggests the server hung for some reason
and, as you say, that's a different issue to the phantom failovers.
Looking at the log lines below;
But in the server group log on ncc391:
/* Wed Jun 22 2011 09:59:31.0224 */ Server ncc392.its.state.
June 23, 2011 4:28 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: server group delinquency, inaccurate
**
The lack of any logging for 2 minutes suggests the server hung for some reason
and, as you say, that's a different issue to the phantom failovers.
Looking at the log lines below;
But in the
I've seen this in server group logs from a number of customers and I'm not
aware of any way you can prevent it. It's just the result of the slight timing
variations when the server group thread does it's work. Other than the
additional log entries there should be no func
Hello List,
A question was striking in my mind whats the difference between server group
and load balancer in remedy?
Can we have a load balancer without server group ?
Can we have a server group without load balancer
server group
To upgrade servers that are a part of a server group, follow these
guidelines:
Stop all BMC Remedy AR System servers except the server that owns the
administrative operation.
To check this, open the Configuration tab on the AR System Administration:
Server Information form. For
All,
In previous ARS patch install instructions it was recommended that you:
1. Shut down the non-admin servers
2. Remove the admin server from the server group
o If it's on a load balancer, remove it from the LB as well
3. Disable escalations
4. Patch the
n Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Rick Phillips wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 8.1 ARS/Atrium/ITSM/SLM/SRM
>
> I have a server group that consists of an admin server and a single
> non-admin server. The admin server carries the load of all admin
> functions, while the non-admin server is only f
Thanks, LJ, I was just wondering if I could reduce my upgrade/patching
LOE (throughout the server group) by using a reduced number of installed
apps on machines I don't want involved in failover. I may have to open
a ticket with support on this.
rp
On 2/20/2015 10:47 AM, LJ LongWing
Phillips
Sent: 20 February 2015 22:01
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: 8.1 server group architecture
**
Thanks, LJ, I was just wondering if I could reduce my upgrade/patching LOE
(throughout the server group) by using a reduced number of installed apps on
machines I don't want involv
Regards,
*Carl Wilson*
*From:*Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Rick Phillips
*Sent:* 20 February 2015 22:01
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: 8.1 server group architecture
**
Thanks, LJ, I was just wondering if I could reduce my
Hi All,
Need your inputs for the below.
i. To Configure Atrium Integrator to support Failover mechanism in Server
Group what are the configurations we need to do?
in UDM:Config for primary server Is default needs to be checked? and whether
we need to provide ranking for the secondary server if
I am experimenting with a server group for 7.6.03, but had not planned to use a
load balancer for a variety of reasons. This is driven in part by the need to
run multiple mid-tiers with different settings for different groups, as we may
be forced to make mid-tier primary in 7.6.03 because so
We are running a ARS6.3 Server Group Configuration with the same Operations
running on both sides of a 2 server group. We configure the operation
ranking in the Server Group Operation Ranking form.
Periodically we have had an issue where if the Primary sever goes down
momentarily and then
; will be overwitten. But this is an
> installation in a secondary server (server group) and not the primary, and
> you can not proceed unless your click on agree.
>
> I can't chance it as it take ages to retore the database.
>
> Anyone come across this
Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Kunkel
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 8:56 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Server Group Error 8745
**
I spent almost a year going through stuff like this on a Unix server group.
We're up and stabl
Dear List
We are trying to set up a Server Group. Below is our environment. We
are running ARS 7.0.1 patch 3 on Sun Unix serverss with Solaris 9 with
and Oracle 10. DB #1 and DB #2 are remote databases.
In our development environment, the primary server is Server #1. In our
production
4:19 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Server Group Environment & Load Balance
** Hi All,
I'm looking for good document regarding Server Group Environment and Load
Balancer.
Please help me out.
Thanks & Regards,
Pintu.
_
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all
Thanks for your feedback.
I'm looking for good document for server group configuration as well.
please provide some info regarding the same.
Regards,
Pintu
"J.T. Shyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: **v\:*
{behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:
-2565
sf49fanv AIM IM
RogerNall Yahoo IM
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of pintu mallick
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 4:44 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Server Group Environment & Loa
> Cell: 973-652-6723
> FAX: 813-348-2565
> sf49fanv AIM IM
> RogerNall Yahoo IM
> --
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *pintu mallick
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 24,
4, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Jim Coryat (jcoryat) wrote:
> If your customers can take a little down time, our approach is to:
>
> Turn on administrator-only mode on servers in group
> Restart servers to kick rest of users out
> Break Server Group
> Shut down primary server (OLTP - Disabl
problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Ananth
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Jim Coryat (jcoryat) > wrote:
>
>> If your customers can take a little down time, our approach is to:
>>
>> Turn on administrator-only mode on servers in group
>> Restart servers to kick
In my experience the caching process does not occur at the same time.
I’ve always applied changes on the admin server, and then waited 10 mins and
logged onto every other AR server in the server group individually to verify
the changes have cached. The reason I’ve found the need to do this
ITSM 7.6.04 sp2
Redhat VM, oracle 11g
Looking to run ITSM/ARS in a server group with two servers. Have installed one
server using the stack installer. Installed in less than 45 minutes with no
issues. Now I need to install ITSM/ARS on the second server but the stack
installer does not let you
, Kelly wrote:
>
> **
>
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I am working on a new configuration for ARS 7.6.4, with ITSM and Atrium
> CMDB. The server group documentation is mostly oriented around setting up
> load-shared systems, but also notes you can set up a user server (that
&g
...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Anthony K R
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 11:37 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: ARS 7.1 server group issue
**
Hi,
In Remedy server group environment, when the def changes on primary server
other servers either throw malloc error ( so the updates not reflected) or
crash
.
Tony Worthington
Sr. Technical Analyst
Kohl's Department Stores
N56 W17000 Ridgewood Drive
Menomonee Falls, WI 53051
262.703.5911 (phone)
tony.worthing...@kohls.com
www.Kohls.com
From:
Anthony K R
To:
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Date:
02/24/2009 12:36 PM
Subject:
ARS 7.1 server grou
servers?
. What is the disk space configuration on these servers?
. What cache mode are the servers in?
. Do all of them crash with the malloc error? Or, just specific
ones?
. Is this a new Server Group configuration? Or, did it work before,
but now does not
Nope.. never had that issue on this version nor the previous..
Joe
From: Anthony K R
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 1:36:31 PM
Subject: ARS 7.1 server group issue
**
Hi,
In Remedy server groupenvironment, when the defchangeson
:646.483.2779
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Anthony K R
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 1:37 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: ARS 7.1 server group issue
**
Hi,
In Remedy server group environment, when the def changes on
r has been recreated,
and the primary server then signals the secondary servers that there has been a
change...
When properly setup it does work as designed.
Anthony, are all your servers in the server group of the same configuration,
and running the same applications? What is the physical mem
e during a cache update.
Lyle
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 1:40 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
**
That sort of beats the whole purpose of the whole
Your AR Servers are probably on windows and connect to Oracle setup as
a Remote database?
Joe
From: Lyle Taylor
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 4:27:56 PM
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
**
I see server groups as being more
Correct……
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 3:20 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
**
Your AR Servers are probably on windows and connect to Oracle setup as
y the symptoms you described. Unfortunately
you got to live with it unless you decide to move to UNIX.
Joe
From: Lyle Taylor
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 6:02:40 PM
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
Correct……
From:A
esday, February 25, 2009 12:51 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
**
While AR is supposed to support it, in my experience it is best to shut
down everything but the primary server, make your changes, and then
bring everything back up again. Things just go
2009 11:13 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
**
Lyle,
That's good idea. We are not sure what else would trigger the re-cache.
We have not tested what would happen when Users/Groups are added.
Regards,
Anthony
From: Action Request System discu
space
* What cache mode are the servers in?
-Primary has 'Development', all other production.
* Do all of them crash with the malloc error? Or, just specific
ones?
-All
* Is this a new Server Group configuration? Or, did it work
before, but now does no
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 1:56 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
**
Anthony,
Have you named only 1 server as the server that you allow Admin
Operations on? Have you disabled it on the other servers? Also, I would
confirm on the rankings form that you ha
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
**
Recaching happens when groups are added in the group form.
Haven't checked with User entries.
Best Regards,
Uday Joshi
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.or
Tony,
Perfect. Yes, setting is right.
Regards,
Anthony
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Tony Worthington
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 12:54 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
I can
,
Anthony
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 7:50 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
**
Its a known issue where ARS on Windows connected to a Remote
entative for BMC Software, Inc.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Anthony K R
Sent: 25 February 2009 07:17
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
Joe,
The chunk setting should not cause malloc error. The
ey a role as a
> spokesperson, liaison or support representative for BMC Software, Inc.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arsl...@arslist.org] *On Behalf Of *Anthony K R
> *Sent:* 25 February 2009 07:17
>
> *To:* arslist@AR
:46 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
By default the maximum memory arserver can access on 32-bit Windows is 2GB. If
it tries to grow beyond this then it will fail. This is an OS limitation that
can be changed to 3GB by the addition of the /3GB switch to the
umber 1)
on ADMIN queue restarted.
Regards,
Anthony
From: Rathnappa, Anthony
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:57 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: RE: ARS 7.1 server group issue
I have verified the boot.ini file has /3G switch. Also using ‘dumpbin’ tool I
got confirmed that
Behalf Of Anthony K R
Sent: 25 February 2009 11:27
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
I have verified the boot.ini file has /3G switch. Also using ‘dumpbin’ tool I
got confirmed that arserver can address more than 2GB.
After startup the memory consumed is ~1.3GB, as shown
@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
Here is the entries from thread log;
/* Wed Feb 25 2009 05:16:37.8330 */ Thread Trace Log -- ON (AR Server
7.1.00 Patch 005 200809150630)
/* Wed Feb 25 2009 05:22:15.5140 */ InitServerCache Begin
/* Wed Feb 25 2009 05:22:29.0760
. Hopefully
we’ll have better luck there…
Lyle
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 7:20 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
**
Its a known issue where ARS on
1 (phone)
tony.worthing...@kohls.com
www.Kohls.com
From:
Anthony K R
To:
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Date:
02/25/2009 10:40 AM
Subject:
Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
Sent by:
"Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)"
Why is doing ?InitServerCache? instead of ?CopyCache??
-An
: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 11:56 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
Was thread logging enabled when the server was started?
The Init should look like this:
/* Sun Feb 22 2009 02:36:07.5150 */ Thread Trace Log -- ON (AR
Server 7.1.00 Patch 002 200802011900)
/* Sun
, February 25, 2009 1:12:30 PM
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
Interesting, I think this is the first time that I’ve heard someone
specifically call out Windows as being part of the problem rather than just a
remote Oracle database. Your response is actually encouraging, because we’re
going
Slow on windows because of Anti-virus scan?
-Anthony
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:22 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
**
I have noticed
:21 PM
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
Slow on windows because of Anti-virus scan?
-Anthony
From:Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:22 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1
to connecting to a
> Remote Oracle Database.
>
> Joe
>
> --
> *From:* Anthony K R
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:04:21 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
>
> Slow on windows because
If they had one! Do they? I did hear of third party connectors but not really
of a client written by MS..
Joe
From: Axton
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:21:40 PM
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
** Good thing it's n
* Axton
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:21:40 PM
> *Subject:* Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
>
> ** Good thing it's not as inefficient as the sql server client for
> unix/linux.
>
>
> Axton Grams
>
> The opinions, statements, and/or
: ARS 7.1 server group issue
** Nope, just my attempt at humor.
Axton
The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in this
E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc. My voluntary
participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role
#x27;t make one for
> UNIX considering that the SQL server now is not all that quirky as it used
> to be..
>
> Joe
>
> --
> *From:* Axton
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 25, 2009 5:52:40 PM
> *Subject:* Re: ARS 7.1
Darnit Axton, you got my hopes up for a secbut just one.
_
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Axton
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:53 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
** Nope, just
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 7:55:05 PM
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue
** Same reason that most all MS products only run on MS OS's. The answer is
right under your nose. Don't look too hard or you'll miss it.
Axton
The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of
7.1 server group issue
Interesting, I think this is the first time that I’ve heard someone
specifically call out Windows as being part of the problem rather than just a
remote Oracle database. Your response is actually encouraging, because we’re
going to be switching over to Linux with the
Good morning,
I am beginning to set up the second server that will then be configured in a
server group. The primary server is up and running as follows:
Windows 2003 Server
Oracle 10 DB (remote)
ARS 7.1 P6 - including email, approval, assignment, flashboards
CMDB 2.1 P4
AIE 7.1 P4
ITSM 7.0.3
Hey all,
Just wondering if anyone is getting issues with AR Server re-caching that
occurs on the non-admin AR Servers within an AR Server group.
We're seeing something where it's taking up to 7 minutes to perform a
re-cache. During this time, other services (SLM, Dispatcher, user tr
> Any issue with running a server group with
> Server 01 is in Ohio - Database here
> Server 02 is in Nebraska Connected to Database in Ohio
>
> OC-3 minimum connection
>
> Anyone see any issues with this ?
>
> P.S I know Nebraska would win the football game.. that is a
minute startup time depending on
several factors.
As for the server group capabilities, I don't see any reason that
things would not work as advertised.
It may be a bit tricky getting the network side of things set up
properly depending on how you want things to work. There are several
path
Mueller
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of patrick zandi
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 2:44 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Server Group -- not co located
**
Any issue with running a server group
Thanks Doug,
That is along the lines I was thinking..
In this case it might be ok.. The thought here was more of a
DNS - CNAME Remedy.Sub.Domain.com xxx.yyy.zzz.000 After server crashes (01
Server Group)
DNS - CNAME Remedy.Sub.Domain.com NEW.IP.For.ARS .. a hot HA, just change
the DNS record, but
Can we setup a server group failover without a load balancer?
We are in Sun Solaris 5.10
ARS 7.0.1
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks
Rezaul
E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this e-mail message and
any attachments are intended solely for the
addressee(s
archPage=true
If I recall, you'll need to register and log in to view the attachment.
There are also documents and whitepapers on the BMC support/documentation
site.
>Can I put a load balancer on top of a Remedy Server Group?
Yes.
>What is the recommended load balancing technology?
Th
answered inline
_
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilson, Bruce B
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 11:57 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Server Group - Load Balancing Questions
**
I read about specifying the "Share&qu
29/2008 01:05 PM
Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc
Subject
Re: Server Group - Load Balancing Questions
**
Kelly Deaver did a great presentation at RUG on this topic and the
presentation is available on the BMC/DN site.
Load Balancing and High Availability for B
ernalID=2841&fromSearchPage=true<http://developer.bmc.com:8080/jiveProd/entry%21default.jspa?categoryID=859&externalID=2841&fromSearchPage=true>
>
> If I recall, you'll need to register and log in to view the attachment.
> There are also documents and whitepapers on the BM
n Request System discussion list(ARSList)"
05/29/2008 01:14 PM
Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc
Subject
Re: Server Group - Load Balancing Questions
** Something to know if you're new to Remedy LB is that it doesn't truly
load-balance, defin
You will also need to make sure that you add entries in the AR System
Server Group Ranking form.
In here you need entries for all operations used by the AR Server and
you need to specify the server that will be the primary server for that
operation.
For example, only one server should process
I would add a few things:
Make sure that all of the paths to any called executables, macros, etc. are
the same on both servers, so that workflow won't break.
If you use any installed applications, ensure that you set up the order of
precedence in the AR System Server Group Ranking form.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lammey, Peter A.
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 12:47 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Question about server group setup
**
You will also need to make sure that you add entries in the AR
g license issue if fixed with the hot fix and
it does work
Guillaume
From: White, Ed
Sent: Thu 04/05/07 12:59 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Question about server group setup
**
Robert,
There used to be a white paper for doing this on the Support site. You will
have to make a co
Apparently the answer is to ...
1.)Take all servers out of the server group and shut them down
2.)Restart one of them log in and delete the AR Server Group
Operation Ranking form
3.)Re-configure the app server you want to be the Admin server in a
server group and re-start it.
4
Looking for some expertise on using this little gadget.
I have been experimenting with using arsignal -r to recache the servers in
our server group, as an alternate to restarting the ar system service on all
the servers. I'm thinking this will reduce the impact to the end users.
However,
So we currently have 6 AR servers in a server group - I'm adding some more.
Two of the new servers will be solely to support reporting.
I'm sort of mulling my options. I do not need them to be in the server group -
at least in the sense of taking over any functions if a task goes
Hi All,
I have two servers in a server group. I stopped one of the servers and then
restarted. Came up fine except for the email engine. Connection refused, to
host. Currently the second server is handling the email and connects to the
mailbox on a Linux server. Could this be normal? Only one
**
Load balancer without server group, assuming means with one Remedy server. You could be using the load balancer but it isn't really balancing anything, just taking a signal and passing it to a server.
Server Group without Load Balancer is more common. If you want one server for Use
Hi Group,
We have a server group environment but not leveraging load balancing
capabilities. Here is a brief overview on the production servers we have in
place. I am trying to understand or find some documentation to best utilize the
servers we have at hand. We have 3 application
That's what we do. You did leave a couple of things out, but I assume you are
doing these. I'm mentioning them just in case that's not true...
For #2 - when you say "remove it from the server group", I assume you're
un-checking the "server group member&quo
do. You did leave a couple of things out, but I assume you
> are doing these. I'm mentioning them just in case that's not true...
>
>
>
> For #2 - when you say "remove it from the server group", I assume you're
> un-checking the "server group member
101 - 200 of 385 matches
Mail list logo
