Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV uPnP server fails on a backend-only rpm-based installation.

2015-02-24 Thread John Pilkington
On 24/02/15 11:37, Stephen Collier wrote: On 24/02/2015 10:03 pm, John Pilkington wrote: This has recently come up on the mythtv-users list. It probably affects all rpm-based repos. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/users/583439#583439 The uPnP server needs devicemaster.xml, which

[ATrpms-users] MythTV uPnP server fails on a backend-only rpm-based installation.

2015-02-24 Thread John Pilkington
This has recently come up on the mythtv-users list. It probably affects all rpm-based repos. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/users/583439#583439 The uPnP server needs devicemaster.xml, which is built into the frontend rpm package although in the source code it's in mythtv/program

Re: [ATrpms-users] Scrpms Mythtv 27.3 Packages

2014-10-18 Thread John Pilkington
On 18/10/14 00:18, Stephen Collier wrote: On 18/10/2014 9:01 am, Stephen Collier wrote: On 18/10/2014 5:57 am, John Pilkington wrote: the usual el7 repos and assume that you have the mysql-community-release version, perhaps for other projects. Is there a simple way to switch an install of

Re: [ATrpms-users] Scrpms Mythtv 27.3 Packages

2014-10-17 Thread John Pilkington
On 17/10/14 18:48, Duncan Brown wrote: On 17/10/2014 15:35, John Pilkington wrote: On 10/10/14 09:25, Stephen Collier wrote: Thanks I hope the rpms are working well fit everyone. Stephen Hi Stephen: I now have an installation of SL7 in a 'new' box and hoped to install your 27.

Re: [ATrpms-users] Scrpms Mythtv 27.3 Packages

2014-10-17 Thread John Pilkington
On 10/10/14 09:25, Stephen Collier wrote: Thanks I hope the rpms are working well fit everyone. Stephen Hi Stephen: I now have an installation of SL7 in a 'new' box and hoped to install your 27.4 packages, although since I have moved the older box to master I shall probably want to go on to

Re: [ATrpms-users] fedora 20 - scrpms

2014-08-08 Thread John Pilkington
On 08/08/14 22:20, Nick Campbell wrote: Thanks John! I didn't realize you need them both active to work.. So that did work. I uninstalled my original nvidia-everything, and successfully installed the latest nvidia through the new repo. So I figured with this working repo and the availability

Re: [ATrpms-users] fedora 20 - scrpms

2014-08-08 Thread John Pilkington
On 08/08/14 17:04, Nick Campbell wrote: I am having some trouble with my mythtv fedora 20 install, and someone referred me to this thread: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/atrpms/users/17010#17010 suggesting I try this new repo scrpms. First a little background. I used atrpms to install al

Re: [ATrpms-users] EL7 mythtv 0.27 dependencies (strange Tbird error report)

2014-07-19 Thread John Pilkington
On 17/07/14 20:02, Stephen Collier wrote: VAAPI should work. I'll have a look later. Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S4 on the Telstra 4G network Hi: Interesting things happening on this list now; congratulations! This is OT but I thought it worth reporting that the post to which I'm replyin

Re: [ATrpms-users] EL6 and myth update

2013-10-06 Thread John Pilkington
On 06/10/13 12:15, Stephen Collier wrote: I've been using 0.27 and qt48 for a week on EL6 with no issues x86_64 and i686 frontend. Anyone wishing to test let me know and I'll drop them in my dropbox. qt48 doesn't now interfere with atrpms qt47. Cheers Stephen I don't know if this conflicts wi

[ATrpms-users] nvidia drivers

2013-05-23 Thread John Pilkington
This might be relevant to the new Myth builds, although I don't have vdpau-capable hardware. 304.51 worked; 304.64 didn't, so I just reverted. Later I tried 304.64 from rpmfusion, and had the same problem, apparent on trying to use OpenGL, but couldn't then revert. This fixed it: The pack

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-21 Thread John Pilkington
On 21/05/13 17:01, Kirk Bocek wrote: On 5/20/2013 10:25 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: I performed the less interesting 0.24.3-283 to 0.24.3-284 refresh. Looks fine. Spoke too soon. One of my two front ends is exhibiting jerky playback. This is my ultra-thin Nvidia-ION box in the bedroom. The beefie

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-21 Thread John Pilkington
On 21/05/13 13:39, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Collier Family mailto:judi...@bigpond.net.au>> wrote: On 21/05/2013 6:54 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: No, SL was eventually bit by the same problem, and the solution is still the same, downgrade qtwebkit to 2.0-3 (n

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-20 Thread John Pilkington
On 20/05/13 20:19, Kirk Bocek wrote: On 5/20/2013 12:05 PM, John Pilkington wrote: On 20/05/13 18:25, Kirk Bocek wrote: On 5/18/2013 2:15 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: Actually there will also be fresh 0.25.x packages as well, even fresh 0.24.x. I'm not sure whether you have to update tha

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-20 Thread John Pilkington
On 20/05/13 18:25, Kirk Bocek wrote: On 5/18/2013 2:15 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: Actually there will also be fresh 0.25.x packages as well, even fresh 0.24.x. I'm not sure whether you have to update that way - this is something best asked on the mythtv-users list. I suspect you may update immediate

Re: [ATrpms-users] New build of Mythtv-0.26-fixes: lib problems

2013-05-19 Thread John Pilkington
On 26/03/13 21:55, John Pilkington wrote: I made new builds of 0.26-fixes el6 i386 on Tues 19 March and today. I had to make changes today to the mythmusic files lists to get the packaging into rpms to work, and I'm pretty sure that more ought to be made to account for the fact that myth

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 319.17 drivers

2013-05-14 Thread John Pilkington
On 04/05/13 08:20, O&M Ugarcina wrote: Hello Paulo, Looks like we have a new NVIDIA driver out . Seems to have some new features , would like to try it out . Can you please package up a src rpm when you have some spare time . Thanks much . Best Regards Milorad Hi: I don't really like doing

Re: [ATrpms-users] New build of Mythtv-0.26-fixes: lib problems

2013-04-18 Thread John Pilkington
On 18/04/13 01:27, judithc wrote: I'll send you the link later this morning. I had trouble with the i686 version on my frontend, it didn't like vdpau. I am running the x86-64 version on backend with no problems. If it is simpler I could give you access to my internal repo. Cheers Stephen I h

Re: [ATrpms-users] New build of Mythtv-0.26-fixes: lib problems

2013-04-02 Thread John Pilkington
On 30/03/13 08:23, John Pilkington wrote: On 26/03/13 23:20, John Pilkington wrote: On 26/03/13 21:55, John Pilkington wrote: I made new builds of 0.26-fixes el6 i386 on Tues 19 March and today. I had to make changes today to the mythmusic files lists to get the packaging into rpms to work

Re: [ATrpms-users] New build of Mythtv-0.26-fixes: lib problems

2013-03-30 Thread John Pilkington
On 26/03/13 23:20, John Pilkington wrote: On 26/03/13 21:55, John Pilkington wrote: I made new builds of 0.26-fixes el6 i386 on Tues 19 March and today. I had to make changes today to the mythmusic files lists to get the packaging into rpms to work, and I'm pretty sure that more ought

Re: [ATrpms-users] New build of Mythtv-0.26-fixes: lib problems

2013-03-26 Thread John Pilkington
On 26/03/13 21:55, John Pilkington wrote: I made new builds of 0.26-fixes el6 i386 on Tues 19 March and today. I had to make changes today to the mythmusic files lists to get the packaging into rpms to work, and I'm pretty sure that more ought to be made to account for the fact that myth

[ATrpms-users] New build of Mythtv-0.26-fixes: lib problems

2013-03-26 Thread John Pilkington
I made new builds of 0.26-fixes el6 i386 on Tues 19 March and today. I had to make changes today to the mythmusic files lists to get the packaging into rpms to work, and I'm pretty sure that more ought to be made to account for the fact that mythmusic has its own theme. But now today's lib pa

Re: [ATrpms-users] Nvidia 304 series

2013-03-19 Thread John Pilkington
On 11/11/12 09:18, O&M Ugarcina wrote: On 11/11/12 19:15, O&M Ugarcina wrote: On 23/10/12 10:49, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Sorry, I meant: rpmbuild -bs --rmsource nvidia-graphics304.51.spec Furthermore, one has to adapt the spec file to adjust the version. Axel also names th

Re: [ATrpms-users] Conflict

2013-03-04 Thread John Pilkington
On 04/03/13 08:41, Niklas Claesson wrote: Hi, I'm having problem installing VLC. Could someone please tell me what to do? There seem to be a conflict between epel and atrpms but I'm not familiar with yum so I don't know. = Error: Package: vlc-2.0.5-6.el6.

Re: [ATrpms-users] Building and running MythTV -0.26

2013-01-13 Thread John Pilkington
On 13/01/13 13:45, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 9:52 AM, John Pilkington mailto:j.p...@tesco.net>> wrote: After running Myth 0.26 for a few weeks on my SL6 laptop I thought I would like to experiment with patches and have tried rebuilding using Ste

[ATrpms-users] Building and running MythTV -0.26

2013-01-13 Thread John Pilkington
After running Myth 0.26 for a few weeks on my SL6 laptop I thought I would like to experiment with patches and have tried rebuilding using Stephen's specfile (posted 2 December) and a new git download. That worked fine, but afterwards the original installation wouldn't play properly. The pro

Re: [ATrpms-users] vlc dependencies problem on Scientific Linux 6.3

2013-01-13 Thread John Pilkington
On 13/01/13 10:23, Andreas Mahling wrote: 2013/1/12 John Pilkington mailto:j.p...@tesco.net>> > > Wow. I'm still using smart package manager, usually in graphic mode but with occasional command line excursions. Axel used to do the build for Fedora but last time I looked it

Re: [ATrpms-users] vlc dependencies problem on Scientific Linux 6.3

2013-01-12 Thread John Pilkington
x27; for the various distros at the atrmps doku... Anyway, atrpms ist great work, thanks a lot Andreas 2013/1/11 John Pilkington mailto:j.p...@tesco.net>> On 09/01/13 21:25, Andreas Mahling wrote: Hello, I am on Scientific Linux 6.3, atrpms stable enabled and a

Re: [ATrpms-users] vlc dependencies problem on Scientific Linux 6.3

2013-01-11 Thread John Pilkington
On 09/01/13 21:25, Andreas Mahling wrote: Hello, I am on Scientific Linux 6.3, atrpms stable enabled and at highest priority. "yum install vlc" runs into error Error: Package: libvncserver-0.9.1-3.el6.x86_64 (atrpms) Requires: libminilzo.so.2()(64bit) Error: Package: vlc-2.0.5-6.el6

[ATrpms-users] f16 nvidia-graphics304.64 problem

2012-12-16 Thread John Pilkington
I saw new packages for nvidia-graphics 304.51-149 and 304.64-150 for kernel 3.6.10-2, which is in Fedora-testing, and gave them a try. I had 304.51 running under 3.6.2-1, but had a file conflict and had to remove it to install 304.64 On rebooting there was a quick report of a calibration fail

Re: [ATrpms-users] Mythtv 0.26

2012-12-16 Thread John Pilkington
On 16/12/12 09:26, John Pilkington wrote: I've put up a new version that fixes your problem and brings it to today's git http://dl.dropbox.com/u/98547397/EL6.3-mythtv-0.26-292-i686.tar.bz2 Thanks, Stephen. I'll fire it up. Playback of recordings now work

Re: [ATrpms-users] Mythtv 0.26

2012-12-16 Thread John Pilkington
I've put up a new version that fixes your problem and brings it to today's git http://dl.dropbox.com/u/98547397/EL6.3-mythtv-0.26-292-i686.tar.bz2 Thanks, Stephen. I'll fire it up. ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://l

Re: [ATrpms-users] Mythtv 0.26

2012-12-16 Thread John Pilkington
On 15/12/12 23:41, Collier Family wrote: On 15/12/2012 11:17 AM, John Pilkington wrote: On 14/12/12 10:48, O&M Ugarcina wrote: On 14/12/12 21:43, O&M Ugarcina wrote: On 14/12/12 09:23, Collier Family wrote: The following are in dropbox EL6.3 i686 mythtv 0.26-fixes http://dl.dropb

Re: [ATrpms-users] Mythtv 0.26

2012-12-14 Thread John Pilkington
On 14/12/12 10:48, O&M Ugarcina wrote: On 14/12/12 21:43, O&M Ugarcina wrote: On 14/12/12 09:23, Collier Family wrote: The following are in dropbox EL6.3 i686 mythtv 0.26-fixes http://dl.dropbox.com/u/98547397/EL6.3-mythtv-i686.tar.bz2 EL6.3 x86_64 mythtv 0.26-fixes http://dl.dropbox.com/u/985

Re: [ATrpms-users] Mythtv 0.26

2012-12-12 Thread John Pilkington
On 11/12/12 10:55, John Pilkington wrote: On 11/12/12 09:03, Collier Family wrote: I now have this on my frontend as well. I now have rpms for 6.3 x86_64, x386 and F17 x386 If anyone wants a copy I can add them to the dropbox. I've used atrpms for many years - thanks a lot Axel. Its j

Re: [ATrpms-users] Mythtv 0.26

2012-12-11 Thread John Pilkington
On 11/12/12 09:03, Collier Family wrote: I now have this on my frontend as well. I now have rpms for 6.3 x86_64, x386 and F17 x386 If anyone wants a copy I can add them to the dropbox. I've used atrpms for many years - thanks a lot Axel. Its just a little I can give back. Cheers Stephen T

Re: [ATrpms-users] Fedora 16 updates

2012-12-04 Thread John Pilkington
On 04/12/12 20:15, Gabe Rubin wrote: Hi List, Are rpms for Fedora 16 still being built? It has been a while since I have seen any updates (including Nvidia drivers and myth v.26) come out. Do I need to upgrade to a newer Fedora? Thanks http://dl.atrpms.net/ When Axel started ATrpms he was

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythtv-base-themes error upgrading to 0.26.0-1

2012-12-01 Thread John Pilkington
On 01/12/12 18:01, John Pilkington wrote: On 01/12/12 17:26, Jason Anderson wrote: Hi, I got the below error when trying to yum update mythtv from 0.25.3-290. It happened on all 3 of my boxes. Is there a way to prevent this by changing the packaging of 0.26.0-1? I was able to work around it

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythtv-base-themes error upgrading to 0.26.0-1

2012-12-01 Thread John Pilkington
On 01/12/12 17:26, Jason Anderson wrote: Hi, I got the below error when trying to yum update mythtv from 0.25.3-290. It happened on all 3 of my boxes. Is there a way to prevent this by changing the packaging of 0.26.0-1? I was able to work around it with 'rpm -e mythtv-themes --nodeps', but

Re: [ATrpms-users] Mythtv 0.26

2012-12-01 Thread John Pilkington
On 01/12/12 04:45, Collier Family wrote: I've finally got mythtv 0.26fixes running using axels spec with some mods on EL6. I can put spec files and srpms in my dropbox if anyone wants them. Cheers Stephen I wouldn't like you to think that a less-than-immediate response means that no-one wou

Re: [ATrpms-users] Mythtv logging

2012-11-29 Thread John Pilkington
On 29/11/12 13:45, Duncan Brown wrote: Hello All I'm not a huge fan of the current mythtv logging method which results in huge amounts of separate log files, so I've changed to using syslog. This involves changing the command in init.d/mythbackend to "--syslog local7" instead of "--logpath /var

Re: [ATrpms-users] Thoughts on myth 0.26

2012-10-25 Thread John Pilkington
On 25/10/12 18:41, Kirk Bocek wrote: On 10/24/2012 7:39 PM, Paul wrote: I can see MythTV 0.26 is now available ... thanks Has anyone installed it yet?.. any issues ? Paul On the el6 side, only 0.24.3 and 0.24.2 are available. http://dl.atrpms.net/el6-x86_64/atrpms/stable/ I mentioned th

[ATrpms-users] Can *only* find mythtv-0.24.3

2012-10-15 Thread John Pilkington
Today's site update seems to have wiped mythtv-0.25+. Just a heads-up. John P ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV php errors ?

2012-10-01 Thread John Pilkington
On 01/10/12 00:40, Paul wrote: On Mon 1/10/2012 8:00 AM, Paul wrote: On Mon 1/10/2012 7:57 AM, Paul wrote: Hello, I'm using the FC17 version of the MythTV 0.25.2 package and have been seeing these errors in my Apache logs (below). is this a known bug or can we get an update to resolve this

Re: [ATrpms-users] smolt script syntax errors in mythtv package

2012-09-27 Thread John Pilkington
On 27/09/12 17:39, Yeechang Lee wrote: John Pilkington says: I've just looked (for the first time) at the file you quote above. It's in the mythtv-common package. Mine starts: #!/usr/bin/env python2.7 # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- What does 'rpm -qi mythtv-common' say for Bu

Re: [ATrpms-users] smolt script syntax errors in mythtv package

2012-09-26 Thread John Pilkington
On 26/09/12 18:49, John Pilkington wrote: On 10/09/12 08:40, Paul wrote: I've been having issues starting the frontend , when I noticed the smolt scripts doesn't have the correct bang line eg /usr/share/mythtv/hardwareprofile/sendProfile.py /usr/bin/python2.7 # -*- coding: utf-8 -*

Re: [ATrpms-users] smolt script syntax errors in mythtv package

2012-09-26 Thread John Pilkington
On 10/09/12 08:40, Paul wrote: I've been having issues starting the frontend , when I noticed the smolt scripts doesn't have the correct bang line eg /usr/share/mythtv/hardwareprofile/sendProfile.py /usr/bin/python2.7 # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- # smolt - Fedora hardware profiler I looked at some

Re: [ATrpms-users] smolt script syntax errors in mythtv package

2012-09-25 Thread John Pilkington
On 25/09/12 11:50, Paul wrote: On Tue 18/09/2012 7:44 AM, Yeechang Lee wrote: Paul says: I've been having issues starting the frontend , when I noticed the smolt scripts doesn't have the correct bang line eg /usr/share/mythtv/hardwareprofile/sendProfile.py /usr/bin/python2.7 I have identifi

Re: [ATrpms-users] smolt script syntax errors in mythtv package

2012-09-10 Thread John Pilkington
On 10/09/12 15:57, Yeechang Lee wrote: Paul says: I looked at some of the other python scripts and they also seem to be wrong the original source should be #!/usr/bin/python has Atrpms modified this? I've noticed the same thing. I build all my MythTV packages from the SRPM and found that

Re: [ATrpms-users] Fc17 nvidia kmdls?

2012-09-04 Thread John Pilkington
On 27/08/12 19:30, George Galt wrote: All: Just as a test, I tried building nvidia-graphics302 for 3.5.2-1.fc17 and it seems to have worked. I used Paulo's guide and his scripts. I have not installed these files as my FC17 machine has an ATI card, but here is what I got from the build: 324135

[ATrpms-users] mythtvsetup problem with recent Fedora kernels

2012-08-27 Thread John Pilkington
I've just posted on mythtv-users; this is a heads-up. When I was running 0.24* mythtvsetup couldn't see my dvb-t tuners after the kernel moved beyond 3.3.7-1. I've just installed 0.25.2 and hadn't remembered that. I tried mythtvsetup, deleted all cards and now can't see them. That's in F16,

Re: [ATrpms-users] Fc17 nvidia kmdls?

2012-08-25 Thread John Pilkington
On 25/08/12 11:28, O&M Ugarcina wrote: Hello Guys, If we look in those fc17 repos on atrpms , there will be no kmdls there for any kernel . I am suspecting that the modules are not building automatically as they should . It may have something to do with errors such as : Error: Package: nvidia-g

Re: [ATrpms-users] Fc17 nvidia kmdls?

2012-08-25 Thread John Pilkington
On 25/08/12 06:42, Paul wrote: I'm just about to upgrade to FC17, so will these KMDLs be available on ATRPMS or do I need to look elsewhere or build myself? thanks You are the only person who knows which kmdls you are likely to want. Which do you have installed in f16? Check to see if the c

Re: [ATrpms-users] FC15 nvidia KMDLs nvidia-graphics302

2012-08-24 Thread John Pilkington
On 24/08/12 06:17, Paul wrote: Hi, just checking when the kmdls for kernel.i686 0:2.6.43.8-1.fc15 will be available? I'm getting yum update errors. nvidia-graphics302.17-kmdl-2.6.43.8-2.fc15-302. Error: Package: nvidia-graphics295.20-295.20-142.fc15.i686 (atrpms) Requires:

Re: [ATrpms-users] Fc17 nvidia kmdls?

2012-08-21 Thread John Pilkington
On 21/08/12 11:15, O&M Ugarcina wrote: You cannot be certain that the repo will always carry a full working set of packages. This has been true for years. John P I am good with that however , there in not a single one for fc17 64bit , old or new in the whole repo . While for other sw there

Re: [ATrpms-users] Fc17 nvidia kmdls?

2012-08-21 Thread John Pilkington
On 21/08/12 10:35, O&M Ugarcina wrote: Hello Guys, Tried to install nvidia on fc17 64 bit and got this : Which leads to question , based on an old film from 1974 (Peter Graves) , Where have all the kmdls gone ? Best Regards Milorad What usually happens, I believe, is that kmdls disappea

Re: [ATrpms-users] atrpms status?

2012-08-05 Thread John Pilkington
On 05/08/12 12:03, John Pilkington wrote: On 05/08/12 11:21, Paul wrote: I'm currently using Fedora release 15 , and wanted to know what the status of ATRPM repo I'm wanting to upgrade to FC16 and just wanted to check if ALL the required packages will be available during the upgrad

Re: [ATrpms-users] atrpms status?

2012-08-05 Thread John Pilkington
On 05/08/12 11:21, Paul wrote: I'm currently using Fedora release 15 , and wanted to know what the status of ATRPM repo I'm wanting to upgrade to FC16 and just wanted to check if ALL the required packages will be available during the upgrade? Is the Repo still not being updated? ie I'm still s

Re: [ATrpms-users] nvidia-graphics for EL6

2012-07-25 Thread John Pilkington
On 25/07/12 14:43, Larry K wrote: Anyone? Is this working as intended? On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Larry K mailto:lunchtimela...@gmail.com>> wrote: Is nvidia-graphics for ELS6 correct in the repo? All I see via the website is two packages, one of which is a source rpm. It looks

Re: [ATrpms-users] Mythtv at 0.25.2

2012-07-18 Thread John Pilkington
On 18/07/12 20:57, Richard Shaw wrote: On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:49 PM, John Pilkington wrote: I did it because I thought it looked like a possible hack. I had seen files that it matched - but they were in BUILD. The ones there now are libmyth*-0.25.2_0_0_0.list. I'll give it another

Re: [ATrpms-users] Mythtv at 0.25.2

2012-07-18 Thread John Pilkington
On 18/07/12 19:08, Richard Shaw wrote: On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:59 PM, John Pilkington wrote: Here's a unified diff of the specfile I used and the error message at the end of the build, just in case someone might understand what's wrong. In the build attempt I just dropped the 0.2

Re: [ATrpms-users] Mythtv at 0.25.2

2012-07-18 Thread John Pilkington
6.0, mysql-devel +BuildRequires: qt4-devel >= 4.6.0, mysql-devel, qtwebkit-devel %{?with_pulseaudio:BuildRequires: pulseaudio-libs-devel >= 0.9.7} BuildRequires: alsa-lib-devel >= 1.0.18, arts-devel BuildRequires: jack-audio-connection-kit-devel @@ -972,6 +971,9 @@ %changelog +* Mon

Re: [ATrpms-users] Mythtv at 0.25.2

2012-07-18 Thread John Pilkington
On 18/07/12 14:51, Richard Shaw wrote: On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:26 AM, John Pilkington wrote: I have been trying to build 0.25.2 on sl6 32-bit using Axel's specfile as a starting point. All seems to go well until what is, I think, the final stage, when it finds two files listed twice

Re: [ATrpms-users] Mythtv at 0.25.2

2012-07-18 Thread John Pilkington
On 18/07/12 12:38, Brian Long wrote: I believe Axel is spending time with family so he's probably not in a place to kick off new builds. :) On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:15 AM, O&M Ugarcina mailto:mo.uc...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello Guys, Do we know Axel's whereabouts , is he OK ? It just

Re: [ATrpms-users] An update for Smart?

2012-07-15 Thread John Pilkington
On 19/06/12 11:01, John Pilkington wrote: Hi Axel: I still like to use the Smart package manager, although in Fedora it seems to have lost out to yum. It appears to have been dropped from f16, although I still see smart-gui and smart-update in the f16 base list as the f15-1.3.1 packages. The

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythtv problem with kernel 3.4.2-1.fc16.x86_64

2012-07-08 Thread John Pilkington
On 01/07/12 23:26, Scott Harris wrote: On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 2:15 PM, John Pilkington mailto:j.p...@tesco.net>> wrote: I've mentioned this in the 'ATrpms Status Update' thread and on the MythTV lists, but an update seems better in a new thread. Unde

Re: [ATrpms-users] updated Nvidia packages?

2012-07-07 Thread John Pilkington
On 07/07/12 00:44, Paul wrote: I'm wanting to upgrade my system from F15 to F16 but I notice some of the kmdl are unavailable from YUM So just wondering is it safe to upgrade , as I don't want to upgrade and not have the graphics drivers available. eg 5.20-295.20-142.fc15.i686 --> Finished Depe

[ATrpms-users] mythtv problem with kernel 3.4.2-1.fc16.x86_64

2012-07-01 Thread John Pilkington
I've mentioned this in the 'ATrpms Status Update' thread and on the MythTV lists, but an update seems better in a new thread. Under 3.4.2-1 I find that mythtvsetup doesn't recognise any of my tv tuner cards. I do have recordings made with this kernel using settings set up under 3.3.7-1 but so

Re: [ATrpms-users] ATrpms Status Update?

2012-06-29 Thread John Pilkington
On 28/06/12 13:43, John Pilkington wrote: On 27/06/12 16:08, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:03 AM, John Pilkington mailto:j.p...@tesco.net>> wrote: On 27/06/12 12:30, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:59 PM, John Pilkington mail

Re: [ATrpms-users] ATrpms Status Update?

2012-06-28 Thread John Pilkington
On 27/06/12 16:08, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:03 AM, John Pilkington mailto:j.p...@tesco.net>> wrote: On 27/06/12 12:30, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:59 PM, John Pilkington mailto:j.p...@tesco.net> &l

Re: [ATrpms-users] ATrpms Status Update?

2012-06-27 Thread John Pilkington
On 27/06/12 12:30, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:59 PM, John Pilkington mailto:j.p...@tesco.net>> wrote: It might be easier to look at the repo: http://dl.atrpms.net/f17-x86___64/atrpms/stable/nvidia-__graphics302.17-kmdl-3.4.3-1.__fc17-302.17-146.fc17.

Re: [ATrpms-users] ATrpms Status Update?

2012-06-26 Thread John Pilkington
On 26/06/12 20:32, George Galt wrote: On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:21 PM, George Galt wrote: On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:06 AM, O&M Ugarcina wrote: On 23/06/12 06:26, Paulo

Re: [ATrpms-users] An update for Smart?

2012-06-19 Thread John Pilkington
Hi Axel: I still like to use the Smart package manager, although in Fedora it seems to have lost out to yum. It appears to have been dropped from f16, although I still see smart-gui and smart-update in the f16 base list as the f15-1.3.1 packages. The Smart site is now at 1.4.1. Any chance y

Re: [ATrpms-users] Issues with nvidia packages on F17

2012-06-13 Thread John Pilkington
On 13/06/12 05:03, Chris Schanzle wrote: Hi, The modutils issue is gone, but still no joy: # yum install nvidia-graphics Loaded plugins: downloadonly, kmdl, langpacks, priorities, protectbase, refresh- : packagekit, security 3 packages excluded due to repository priority protections 0 packages

Re: [ATrpms-users] Error installing nvidia-drivers for F17

2012-05-31 Thread John Pilkington
On 31/05/12 13:32, John Welch wrote: Yeah, I was looking at my F16 systems and didn't have that kmod package. I know I've seen similarly named packages mentioned in conjunction with the RPMFusion repo so that's where my confusion came from. I just looked at the one system that I've upgrad

Re: [ATrpms-users] respin mythtv 0.25-fixes

2012-05-06 Thread John Pilkington
On 06/05/12 10:19, Axel Thimm wrote: Hi, the latest packages carry v0.25-60-gf444358. You can query rpm or use mythtv's internal versioning to check this. Now for checking what human-readable commit tag description f81f712537b63502814d1f274c7da14196cedd8c would get one would probably need to us

Re: [ATrpms-users] yum update attempt to Mythtv25_rc156 results in broken dependancies

2012-04-12 Thread John Pilkington
On 12/04/12 22:31, Bob Lightfoot wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Team: The following are my results on a working Production Bare Metal system trying to move from mythtv-0.24-2.281 to mythtv25_rc156. Command Given was yum update. Sincerely, Bob Lightfoot Hi

Re: [ATrpms-users] Rebuild MythTV?

2012-04-04 Thread John Pilkington
On 04/04/12 08:13, Duncan Brown wrote: On 03/04/2012 16:17, Ib Uhrskov wrote: Why isn't there a mythweb included in the 0.25 build? Regards Ib There is? http://dl.atrpms.net/all/mythweb-0.25-270_v0.25_beta.noarch.rpm Hmm. It looks as if I could download it although I can't open the 'al

[ATrpms-users] mythtv 0.25 new dependency: perl-IO-Socket-INET6

2012-03-24 Thread John Pilkington
When I tried to run the 0.25 version of the optimize_mythdb.pl script on my SL6 box I got the following error: $ perl /usr/share/doc/mythtv-docs-0.25/contrib/maintenance/optimize_mythdb.pl Base class package "IO::Socket::INET6" is empty. (Perhaps you need to 'use' the module which defines t

Re: [ATrpms-users] Problem with nvidia-graphics and kernel 3.2.9-1

2012-03-24 Thread John Pilkington
On 23/03/12 23:26, Larry K wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:05 AM, John Pilkington mailto:j.p...@tesco.net>> wrote: On 23/03/12 01:53, Larry K wrote: I am trying to install the nvidia driver on an fc16 box running kernel 3.2.9-1. uname -a Linux mythtv

Re: [ATrpms-users] Problem with nvidia-graphics and kernel 3.2.9-1

2012-03-23 Thread John Pilkington
On 23/03/12 01:53, Larry K wrote: I am trying to install the nvidia driver on an fc16 box running kernel 3.2.9-1. uname -a Linux mythtv 3.2.9-1.fc16.i686 #1 SMP Thu Mar 1 01:58:05 UTC 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux For a brief time, I had booted kernel 3.2.10-3, but I backed off that when I noti

Re: [ATrpms-users] How to resolve the libvpx problem

2012-03-16 Thread John Pilkington
On 16/03/12 12:39, Matt Lewandowsky wrote: Hi there, It's been really hard to ignore the numerous threads to this list, the tweets, the forum posts to the various distros' boards, the complaining on various IRC channels, et cetera, regarding the "new" libvpx requirement and the error along th

Re: [ATrpms-users] Understanding the relationship of atrpms and atrpms-testing repos

2012-03-14 Thread John Pilkington
On 13/03/12 22:40, John Pilkington wrote: On 13/03/12 21:03, Bob Lightfoot wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Community: I write this based on my recent experience with libvpx and what I believe I now understand about the atrpms-testing repo. I must backup and say that

Re: [ATrpms-users] Understanding the relationship of atrpms and atrpms-testing repos

2012-03-13 Thread John Pilkington
On 13/03/12 21:03, Bob Lightfoot wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Community: I write this based on my recent experience with libvpx and what I believe I now understand about the atrpms-testing repo. I must backup and say that when working in the fedora community th

Re: [ATrpms-users] Scientific Linux 6.2 - problem with yum releasever

2012-03-13 Thread John Pilkington
On 13/03/12 10:44, Neil Bird wrote: The stock atrpms yum repo file uses $releasever to index dl.atrpms.net, but on a fresh SL6 box I've just done, this manifests as “6.2” (from sl-release's RPM version?). However, dl.atrpms.net doesn't have a 6.2 dir. (only 6, 6.0 & 6.1). Do I just manually f

Re: [ATrpms-users] Thanks to Axel and John - ffmpeg, mplayer and mythtv updates now succeed

2012-03-12 Thread John Pilkington
On 12/03/12 16:26, Bob Lightfoot wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Community: Just for reference on my system which had ffmpeg, mplayer and mythtv all installed it was necessary to yum update libvpx - --enablerepo=atrpms-testing --disableplugin=* and then run yum update

Re: [ATrpms-users] ffmpeg update on systems also running mythtv

2012-03-11 Thread John Pilkington
On 11/03/12 19:34, Bob Lightfoot wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John: Let me try and be clearer about this. This system appears from what I can learn from yum to need libavcodec52 and libvpx.so.0 while the latest ffmpeg needs libvpx.so.1. Now the two appear to be

Re: [ATrpms-users] ffmpeg update and dependcy issues

2012-03-11 Thread John Pilkington
On 11/03/12 16:10, Bob Lightfoot wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've read through the postings of Volume 98 Issue 5 and if I follow correctly the command yum update ffmpeg --enablerepo=atrpms-testing should have succeeded on my Centos 6.2 X86_64 system but instead still fai

Re: [ATrpms-users] atrpms-users Digest, Vol 98, Issue 5

2012-03-11 Thread John Pilkington
On 11/03/12 15:49, Bob Lightfoot wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/11/2012 07:00 AM, atrpms-users-requ...@atrpms.net wrote: Message: 7 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:36:31 +0100 From: Axel Thimm To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net" Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] problem u

Re: [ATrpms-users] problem updating ffmpeg

2012-03-10 Thread John Pilkington
On 10/03/12 22:44, Peter Scott wrote: In trying to update ffmpeg, I get this message: ERROR: Package: libavcodec53-0.10-54.el6.x86_64 (atrpms) Requires: libvpx.so.1()(64bit) but libvpx does not seem to be available. Any thoughts about this? -- Peter Looks similar

Re: [ATrpms-users] EL6: Error upgrading to latest nvidia-graphics290.10-kmdl

2012-03-05 Thread John Pilkington
On 05/03/12 15:58, Karl M. Davis wrote: For the last week or so, I've been receiving an error trying to update my RHEL6 system. I'm fairly new to RedHat and yum (I typically run Ubuntu and apt), so this problem has me particularly stumped. I'm hopeful someone here can point me in the right direct

Re: [ATrpms-users] vlc segfault after today's (non-vlc) upgrades

2012-02-26 Thread John Pilkington
On 26/02/12 15:07, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti mailto:pro...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:22 AM, John Pilkington mailto:j.p...@tesco.net>> wrote: I upgraded a few packages this morning, inclu

[ATrpms-users] vlc segfault after today's (non-vlc) upgrades

2012-02-26 Thread John Pilkington
I upgraded a few packages this morning, including the new nvidia-long-lived and IIRC some ssh-related ones, but not the new F15-64-bit kernel, and rebooted. Now vlc segfaults when asked to play a file; I haven't seen any other problems. $vlc /mnt/sam1/recb/1009_20120225185800.mpg VLC media pl

Re: [ATrpms-users] Problems after fc14 upgrade

2012-02-22 Thread John Pilkington
On 22/02/12 14:25, George Galt wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Larry K wrote: I just used yum upgrade to go from fc12 to fc14, and mostly, it went well. I have the system up, and was able to install the latest nvidia-graphics package using yum. now, when I try to install mythtv, I ge

Re: [ATrpms-users] vlc output distorted

2012-02-13 Thread John Pilkington
On 13/02/12 11:56, John Pilkington wrote: Maybe this is related in some way to what I see on my SL6/KDE laptop. During boot I get a 'Notification from Phonon' that my audio device does not work and it's falling back to pulse server. After that, sound, through the headphone soc

Re: [ATrpms-users] vlc output distorted

2012-02-13 Thread John Pilkington
On 13/02/12 11:30, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Bob Tennent mailto:rdtenn...@gmail.com>> wrote: >|Most probaby the relevant files are under ~/.config, ~/.local and >|~/.cache. Paulos suggestion is very good, creating a new user with a >|default config

[ATrpms-users] An update for Smart?

2012-02-10 Thread John Pilkington
Hi Axel: While wondering whether to do anything about the libvpx deps problem, which has now appeared on F15 a few days after a message storm on the Fedora list, I realised that a new release of the Smart package manager has been out for some months. I'm still using Smart although clearly yum

Re: [ATrpms-users] Weird yum update error

2012-01-31 Thread John Pilkington
On 31/01/12 17:11, Gabe Rubin wrote: Can anyone help debug this error or let me know what I need to update? Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: Running Transaction Check ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve: /boot/vmlinuz-3.1.4-1.fc16.i686 is needed by (installed) nvidia-graphics275.36

Re: [ATrpms-users] f15 kernel version

2012-01-27 Thread John Pilkington
All kmdls back in sync now: Thanks again! For the past week I've been seeing very slow boots, with the pauses apparently coinciding with 'Start and stop mysqld server' and 'sm-client'. It may have started with a kde-related update, or maybe with my move to behind a router. Seems to work in

Re: [ATrpms-users] PIL.i686 0:1.1.7-10.el6 returns 404

2012-01-25 Thread John Pilkington
On 25/01/12 08:52, razza lists wrote: I am getting the following when I try to yum PIL (as part of a MythTV install): Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package PIL.i686 0:1.1.7-10.el6 will be installed http://dl.atrpms.net/el6-i386/atrpms/stable/repodata/47e4bc1cae196f8

[ATrpms-users] f15 kernel version

2012-01-17 Thread John Pilkington
This morning f15 updates has a new kernel, 2.6.41.9-1 ATrpms stable for fc15@x86_64 has kmdls for 3.1.9.9-1 and a few for 2.6.41.4-1, which is what I'm using now. ?? Thanks! John P ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists

  1   2   3   4   5   >