I don't like the stiffness of the Belden wire (I bought some 5000UE).
The Canare 4S11 is nice and flexible; and convenient if both ends
provide for bi-wiring.
I also need small spades on the speaker end, and Bluejeans only offers
these large spades. And I'm somewhat skeptical of the quality
Cable Solutions offers the mini-spades if that's what you need Dave.
www.cs1.net
--
Curt962
Transporter...TouchBoom..
Curt962's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=31949
View this thread:
Curt962;621695 Wrote:
Cable Solutions offers the mini-spades if that's what you need Dave.
www.cs1.net
Thanks!
I've never seen such a detailed cable customization form. Fan out
length? That's class.
--
Daverz
Ron Olsen;621366 Wrote:
http://www.qed.co.uk/genreprt.pdf: A report from the cable manufacturer
that shows the advantages of their cables. At £35.00/metre, the QED
Genesis cables are not cheap.
My vote still goes to the low-cost ($1/ft) cables from Blue Jeans:
Ron Olsen;621366 Wrote:
http://www.qed.co.uk/genreprt.pdf: A report from the cable manufacturer
that shows the advantages of their cables.
Sounds like you didn´t even bother to read it.
--
johann
johann's Profile:
My vote still goes to the low-cost ($1/ft) cables from Blue Jeans:
[url Wrote:
http://www.bluejeanscable.com/store/speaker/index.htm[/url]
+1 for the Belden Canare cables. Get that stuff from a variety of
sources.
I looked at the tech paper...at least they don't make any outlandish
claims,
Curt962;621412 Wrote:
I looked at the QED tech paper...at least they don't make any outlandish
claims, but aside from publishing a really nice assessment of cables, I
don't see why I should buy their product.
I'm sure it's fine, but I'll pass.
I´m with you on that.
Just thought the utter
Found this link http://www.qed.co.uk/genreprt.pdf.
At least some cable manufacturers seem to use a scientific approach to
speaker cables.
--
johann
johann's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10177
I was an expensive-cable cynic of long standing, but for various reasons
did get around to trying different speaker cables. I'm now convinced
that there can be differences between different speaker cables, and I'm
a happy user of the QED Genesis mentioned in that report - not terribly
expensive,
artee;621361 Wrote:
I was an expensive-cable cynic of long standing, but for various reasons
did get around to trying different speaker cables. I'm now convinced
that there can be differences between different speaker cables, and I'm
a happy user of the QED Genesis mentioned in that report
You could well be right, as I haven't heard the Blue Jeans. I did have
some Naim speaker leads and there was an audible difference between
those and the QEDs.
I'm not saying that there's an audible difference between all speaker
leads, but I do assert that there is an audible difference between
I was sitting in the airport reading that...and was just dying to see
the capacitance measurements on the JPS cable.Guess they weren't
able to do that.
Curious, but I'll bet it would be brutal.
--
Curt962
Transporter...TouchBoom..
Daverz;619354 Wrote:
It was meant at a jab at Stereophile. They measure electronics and
speakers, but they don't measure cables. I like seeing the
measurements.
But it strikes me as having a lack of curiosity to not want to know why
the wires might sound different. And -- present
Earwaxer,,,we're not at a different level here. If we are, it's only a
different level of people willing to part with huge sums of money for
nothing.
For so many years, I did home demos of mega high end gearand I used
microphone cable (Belden if you must know) that sold for about
$0.39/ft.
Curt962;619363 Wrote:
Earwaxer,,,we're not at a different level here. If we are, it's only a
different level of people willing to part with huge sums of money for
nothing.
For so many years, I did home demos of mega high end gearand I used
microphone cable (Belden if you must know)
earwaxer9;619348 Wrote:
If metrics are what matter no-one would listen to tubes.
Daverz;619354 Wrote:
most audiophiles have far too high an opinion of their own
perceptiveness.
earwaxer9;619360 Wrote:
It HAS to sound better or who would buy it? People are not THAT stupid!
My opinion.
Got the same tee shirt I have a cardboard box filled with bizzare
cables, If I need to humble my ego i'll take a look at this pile of
junk, I could probably fetch something for it used but that would be
the same profiteering on the gullible but now done by myself.
And yes people are stupid
earwaxer9;619348 Wrote:
who cares? - been there with the chase for THD specs. I'm sure JPS has
them. Sound is what matters. If metrics are what matter no-one would
listen to tubes.
A difference in philosophy. I want my wire to be as neutral as
possible, with inaudible deviations from ideal
Mnyb;619384 Wrote:
Got the same tee shirt I have a cardboard box filled with bizzare
cables, If I need to humble my ego i'll take a look at this pile of
junk, I could probably fetch something for it used but that would be
the same profiteering on the gullible but now done by myself.
And
Some vdh some audioquest and alphacore etc, alas no powercables
powercables was getting hot while I got out off that.
My power cords are not standard but not very expensive, some are home
made.
Power cable acording to me grounded conectors twisted geometry and
shielded suitable cables is
After reading many of the posts on this topic, I was moved to flip
through the archives of my mind about some of the cable reviews that
left an impression on me. Most cable reviews are vague and of
questionable value due to the number of variables involved. I tend to
not take them seriously. This
earwaxer9;619311 Wrote:
Stereophile April 2007 - JPS Labs Aluminata series.
Do they link to JA's measurements? ;)
--
Daverz
Daverz's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32335
View this thread:
who cares? - been there with the chase for THD specs. I'm sure JPS has
them. Sound is what matters. If metrics are what matter no-one would
listen to tubes.
--
earwaxer9
System: modified Winsome Labs Mouse, modified Maggie MMG's, Transporter,
HSU sub 12, MSB DAC to 500 watt sub slave amp, JPS
earwaxer9;619348 Wrote:
who cares?
It was meant at a jab at Stereophile. They measure electronics and
speakers, but they don't measure cables. I like seeing the
measurements.
But it strikes me as having a lack of curiosity to not want to know why
the wires might sound different. And --
Hands down.
I went from Audioquest Slate to MIT T (forgot the proper name) series,
then MIT T biwire, then several 750's (biwire and single wire) and
finally own MIT Oracle v3 biwi. I clearly heard and hear the difference
between all these cables.
--
alekz
Equipment: Transporter/PS Audio
magiccarpetride;617581 Wrote:
Raise your hand if you're convinced that speaker cables make no
difference to sound quality.
They certainly make a difference for me - when I disconnect them, I
can't hear any music.
But hook up a pair of coat hangers and everything is just fine
opaqueice;618956 Wrote:
They certainly make a difference for me - when I disconnect them, I
can't hear any music.
But hook up a pair of coat hangers and everything is just fine
http://consumerist.com/2008/03/do-coat-hangers-sound-as-good-monster-cables.html
Agreed. Try the cryoed coat
I don't think there is any way -not- to hear differences after
installing a new cable. Our aural memory is just not that good.
--
Daverz
Daverz's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32335
View this
konut;618960 Wrote:
Agreed. Try the cryoed coat hangers. They are aMZing!
Ahhh I thought the Cryo-Hangers were a little veiled and closed in.
Then it came to me: Pyramids!
If they keep milk fresh, and knives sharp.what would happen
if.
OMG.Even live music sounds mid-fi
opaqueice;618956 Wrote:
They certainly make a difference for me - when I disconnect them, I
can't hear any music.
But hook up a pair of coat hangers and everything is just fine
http://consumerist.com/2008/03/do-coat-hangers-sound-as-good-monster-cables.html
A friend told me that coat
The hook end captures the wattage, so thats the amp side. Squigly end
is the speaker side. Don't over-think these things.
--
konut
konut's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1596
View this thread:
On 15/03/11 17:53, Howard Turkster wrote:
I'd be interested in how many people who believe there is no difference
in sound quality between Radio Shack speaker cable and
premium-labelled (and priced) speaker cable have A/B demoed the same
in their homes.
When I first broke in to the hobby,
If you can't hear the difference buy the cheapest. If you can hear a
difference, ask whether the cable is good, or defective; or whether
your hifi is good, or defective; or whether your hearing is good or
defective.
--
JezA
I guess while we're hearing differencesno system could ever be
considered complete without some Magic Pebbles.
http://www.machinadynamica.com/machina31.htm
I ate fruity pebbles for breakfastdidn't hear a damned thing except
some mild crunching. The sugar buzz was cool though.
My
Curt962;618493 Wrote:
I guess while we're hearing differencesno system could ever be
considered complete without some Magic Pebbles.
http://www.machinadynamica.com/machina31.htm
I ate fruity pebbles for breakfastdidn't hear a damned thing except
some mild crunching. The
On 16/03/11 14:04, JezA wrote:
If you can't hear the difference buy the cheapest. If you can hear a
difference, ask whether the cable is good, or defective; or whether
your hifi is good, or defective; or whether your hearing is good or
defective.
This is classic audiophile reasoning: if I
Robin Bowes;618495 Wrote:
On 16/03/11 14:04, JezA wrote:
If you can't hear the difference buy the cheapest. If you can hear a
difference, ask whether the cable is good, or defective; or whether
your hifi is good, or defective; or whether your hearing is good or
defective.
This is
On 16/03/11 15:31, JezA wrote:
Robin Bowes;618495 Wrote:
Could it possibly be that I don't hear a difference because there
*isn't* any difference??
Of course it could. But then again, there might be many other reasons
why you don't hear a difference that does exist. Don't worry about
Robin Bowes;618495 Wrote:
On 16/03/11 14:04, JezA wrote:
If you can't hear the difference buy the cheapest. If you can hear a
difference, ask whether the cable is good, or defective; or whether
your hifi is good, or defective; or whether your hearing is good or
defective.
This is
Hands up who can hear where the edits are in (say) a classical music
recording?
Does that mean there aren't any?
--
JezA
JezA's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=21219
View this thread:
On 16/03/11 17:38, JezA wrote:
Hands up who can hear where the edits are in (say) a classical music
recording?
Does that mean there aren't any?
Point taken.
However, when we say differences ( in this context ) we generally mean
audible differences.
And yes, that raises the question
On 14/03/11 15:22, JezA wrote:
Where else does the experience of music exist if not in your mind?
I absolutely agree - the enjoyment of music is a cerebral experience.
However, we're conflating two separate phenomena here, ie. a change to a
music reproduction system vs. a change in the
Robin Bowes;618158 Wrote:
On 14/03/11 15:22, JezA wrote:
Where else does the experience of music exist if not in your mind?
I absolutely agree - the enjoyment of music is a cerebral experience.
However, we're conflating two separate phenomena here, ie. a change to
a
music
Simon Marius' claims to have seen the moons of Jupiter were dismissed by
his critics as syphilitic hallucinations. Everyone knew the sun went
round the earth. He must have imagined them, mustn't he.
Don't hear what you don't want to hear.
--
JezA
Robin Bowes;618158 Wrote:
On 14/03/11 15:22, JezA wrote:
Where else does the experience of music exist if not in your mind?
I absolutely agree - the enjoyment of music is a cerebral experience.
However, we're conflating two separate phenomena here, ie. a change to
a
music
On 15/03/11 16:24, JezA wrote:
Simon Marius' claims to have seen the moons of Jupiter were dismissed by
his critics as syphilitic hallucinations. Everyone knew the sun went
round the earth. He must have imagined them, mustn't he.
Don't hear what you don't want to hear.
Any your point
On 15/03/11 16:28, magiccarpetride wrote:
JezA;618222 Wrote:
Simon Marius' claims to have seen the moons of Jupiter were dismissed by
his critics as syphilitic hallucinations. Everyone knew the sun went
round the earth. He must have imagined them, mustn't he.
Don't hear what you don't
On 15/03/11 16:29, magiccarpetride wrote:
sigh
And your point is?
R.
--
Feed that ego and you starve the soul - Colonel J.D. Wilkes
http://www.theshackshakers.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
Well, for an alleged troll post, I'd say this thread has at least
generated some good discussion, and perhaps some food for thought for
many.
Maybe a little bomb-throwing, but largely a civil discussion. That's
good.
As far as cables go? I believed in magic when I was 7. I don't now.
I'd be curious to know how many of the cable nay-sayers have demoed some
of the more expensive speaker wire vs. the standard Radio Shack wire in
good quality home set-ups.
--
Howard Turkster
Howard Turkster's Profile:
On 15/03/11 16:47, Howard Turkster wrote:
I'd be curious to know how many of the cable nay-sayers have demoed some
of the more expensive speaker wire vs. the standard Radio Shack wire in
good quality home set-ups.
Howard,
I don't believe I've seen any cable nay-sayers around here. Do you
Howard, I don't believe that anyone here is suggesting that 50ft of
26awg is going to outperform a premium cable of any sort.
Curious that generic spool wire is more than adequate to wire up our
amplifier and speaker internals, but that's another discussion...
Some of us HAVE made comparisons
Robin Bowes;618158 Wrote:
On 14/03/11 15:22, JezA wrote:
Where else does the experience of music exist if not in your mind?
I absolutely agree - the enjoyment of music is a cerebral experience.
However, we're conflating two separate phenomena here, ie. a change to
a
music
Robin Bowes;618240 Wrote:
On 15/03/11 16:47, Howard Turkster wrote:
I'd be curious to know how many of the cable nay-sayers have demoed
some
of the more expensive speaker wire vs. the standard Radio Shack wire
in
good quality home set-ups.
Howard,
I don't believe I've seen any
I'd love to see some actual test data for the various speaker cables out
there. You know...resistance, inductance, capacitance... That might be
a real eye opener.
Then again
--
Curt962
Transporter...TouchBoom..
On 'this thread'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=78938highlight=power+cordpage=2)
John Swenson gave a decent argument, which he can no doubt support by
measurement, that power-cables can cause things to which they are
connected to behave differently in the audio domain.
A good
Jez...once again, I don't believe that anyone is disputing that cables
have an influencethe discussion is at what point do the influences
cease to make a meaningful difference, and...at what point do we wish
to stop funneling added money into the matter.
Apparently...there is no point.
Robin Bowes;618230 Wrote:
On 15/03/11 16:29, magiccarpetride wrote:
sigh
And your point is?
R.
--
Feed that ego and you starve the soul - Colonel J.D. Wilkes
http://www.theshackshakers.com/
Don't feed the troll!
--
magiccarpetride
JezA;618256 Wrote:
On 'this thread'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=78938highlight=power+cordpage=2)
John Swenson gave a decent argument, which he can no doubt support by
measurement, that power-cables can cause things to which they are
connected to behave differently in the
JezA;617955 Wrote:
A cable can't create information, so using DSP instead isn't the
answer.
The best you can hope for is that it doesn't lose any.
Some amplifiers are horrifically sensitive to speaker cables - Naim
amps, for example, go unstable (which is certainly measurable! and
I'm on board with Phil here. I worked in this business years ago, and
it was getting apparent what was happening 20+ years ago.
Separate conductors for lows/mids/highs.uh huh.That, and the
special copper (mined by hand)and all the rest.
Measure the shunt capacitance of said cable
Phil Leigh;618266 Wrote:
The LCR of the cables becomes part of the circuit they are attached
to.
No No No. The Thevenin equivalent circuit (Google it) and a bit of
schoolboy maffs show this is untrue.
An amplifier has near zero output impedance so resistive loss will only
affect the
JezA;618222 Wrote:
Simon Marius' claims to have seen the moons of Jupiter were dismissed by
his critics as syphilitic hallucinations. Everyone knew the sun went
round the earth. He must have imagined them, mustn't he.
What if all we ever had for 4 centuries were anecdotal sightings of the
JezA;618256 Wrote:
On 'this thread'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=78938highlight=power+cordpage=2)
John Swenson gave a decent argument, which he can no doubt support by
measurement, that power-cables can cause things to which they are
connected to behave differently in the
Waldo Pepper;618274 Wrote:
No No No. The Thevenin equivalent circuit (Google it) and a bit of
schoolboy maffs show this is untrue.
An amplifier has near zero output impedance so resistive loss will only
affect the volume by so little you cannot measure, yet even hear.
The capacitance is
adamdea;618277 Wrote:
My recollection is that JS' observation was that power cables could
affect equipment through transformer resonance or something similar
which I don't understand however his finding was that the effect of any
given cable on a particular system was unpredictable and that
Robin Bowes;618240 Wrote:
On 15/03/11 16:47, Howard Turkster wrote:
I'd be curious to know how many of the cable nay-sayers have demoed
some
of the more expensive speaker wire vs. the standard Radio Shack wire
in
good quality home set-ups.
Howard,
I don't believe I've seen any
OMG...that is beyond hilarious!!! Better still is to read the user
reviews...
I don't care how bad your day has been...you'll laugh hysterically!!!
--
Curt962
Transporter...TouchBoom..
Curt962's Profile:
magiccarpetride;618286 Wrote:
Not true. And here is the proof:
AudioQuest K2 terminated speaker cable - UST plugs 8' (2.44m) pair
(selling on amazon.com for $8450.00 --
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000J36XR2/ref=cm_rdp_product) is
getting rave reviews. No wonder, since it says on the
OT. but... I decided to see what other pricey items AudioQuest has to
offer here:
http://www.audioquest.com/pdfs/RetailPriceBook_v2010-May-web.pdf
and much to my embarrassment, I realized I actually own one of their
USB cables. I paid Crutchfield $29 for a AudioQuest Forest 5 foot USB
cable
Daverz;618278 Wrote:
I find this rather petulant. Do you have anything to suggest that
skepticism isn't warranted?
Nothing wrong with skepticism at all; a good skeptic would put the
claim to the test. So which cables have you listened to comparitively
in your system? Since you do not
JezA;618321 Wrote:
Nothing wrong with skepticism at all; a good skeptic would put the claim
to the test.
A good skeptic would wait for you to give some evidence for your
claims.
The whole point of skepticism is to sort through a world of competing
and contradictory truth claims to
pski;618404 Wrote:
This is getting to the point where reading is tedious
You is in the wrong place for easy titillation, that's fer sure.
--
Daverz
Daverz's Profile:
Muele;617598 Wrote:
Resist the temptation, don't feed the troll.
Don't now if the trollscore goes this low, but I would rate it 0/10
Forgot that it is a 0/10
--
Mnyb
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J
On 13/03/11 23:20, konut wrote:
My perceived preference is probably not scientifically measurable.
Can someone invent a pleasure meter?
If your preference is not scientifically measurable then it almost
certainly exists only in your mind.
R.
--
Feed that ego and you starve the soul - Colonel
Robin Bowes;617867 Wrote:
On 13/03/11 23:20, konut wrote:
My perceived preference is probably not scientifically measurable.
Can someone invent a pleasure meter?
If your preference is not scientifically measurable then it almost
certainly exists only in your mind.
R.
--
Feed that
On 14/03/11 12:42, Phil Leigh wrote:
Robin Bowes;617867 Wrote:
On 13/03/11 23:20, konut wrote:
My perceived preference is probably not scientifically measurable.
Can someone invent a pleasure meter?
If your preference is not scientifically measurable then it almost
certainly exists only
Where else does the experience of music exist if not in your mind?
--
JezA
JezA's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=21219
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=86298
Robin Bowes;617867 Wrote:
On 13/03/11 23:20, konut wrote:
My perceived preference is probably not scientifically measurable.
Can someone invent a pleasure meter?
If your preference is not scientifically measurable then it almost
certainly exists only in your mind.
R.
--
Feed that
Speaker cables DO make a difference! The question really is, at what
point does it make no sense to spend more money on exotic material and
outrageous prices? IE at what point is it good enough to get the job
done and above that one can't hear anymore difference or improvement.
Speaker cables
If ones system is to bright, this can be tamed just by choosing the proper ICs
and speaker cable to even out the effect.
[/QUOTE Wrote:
If one wants to tame, brighten, get fuller sound, get rid of bass bumps
or increase etc etc...you simply use the Inguz Eq plug-in and a RS sound
level
A cable can't create information, so DSP isn't the answer.
The best you can hope for is that it doesn't lose any.
Some amplifiers are horrifically sensitive to speaker cables - Naim
amps, for example, go unstable (which is certainly measurable!) unless
they have a couple of metres or so of
The only matter that counts IMO is resistance, capacitance and
inductance...
--
Fukinagashi
Fukinagashi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42922
View this thread:
JezA;617955 Wrote:
A cable can't create information, so using DSP instead isn't the
answer.
I don´t understand that statement and don´t know what one has to do
with the other. IMO, no cable that fulfills general requirements for
its purpose, can be the weakest link. I did state, given that
Back in the 1970s, my stereo system's sound seemed to gradually get
garbled. I assumed it was the electronics going bad, but I eventually
discovered the culprit was massive corrosion on the copper strands of
the zip cord I was using as speaker wires. (Now all the copper speaker
wire is OFC, so
iPhone;617945 Wrote:
Speaker cables DO make a difference! The question really is, at what
point does it make no sense to spend more money on exotic material and
outrageous prices? IE at what point is it good enough to get the job
done and above that one can't hear anymore difference or
Eriko;617959 Wrote:
I don´t understand that statement and don´t know what one has to do with
the other. IMO, no cable that fulfills general requirements for its
purpose, can be the weakest link. I did state, given that one has a
transparent system (meaning having all the information there),
I've never known an audiophile that was happy with the achieved result.
If they were, they'd be called Musicphiles.
What makes one feel warm and fuzzy today...is a source of angst in the
months to come. As soon as ONE reviewer hears something wrong, the
quest begins anew.
--
Curt962
JezA;617975 Wrote:
If a cable loses information DSP can't create it. You are thinking about
hi-fi in terms of tonal balance. There's a lot more to it than that.
Could you DSP me into Eric Clapton?
Doesn´t look like you´re reading carefully enough what I´m saying or
responding too.
My first
Curt962;617979 Wrote:
I've never known an audiophile that was happy with the achieved result.
If they were, they'd be called Musicphiles.
What makes one feel warm and fuzzy today...is a source of angst in the
months to come. As soon as ONE reviewer hears something wrong, the
JezA;617955 Wrote:
If you can't hear differences between cables it may mean that your
equipment isn't sensitive to them or it may mean that you aren't. So
either way don't worry. But if your mind is closed to the possibility
that some cables may have an audible effect on some systems, then
Daverz;618002 Wrote:
Except that differences between cables is the dogma, with no
scientific support for it. As long as we specify a minimum gauge for a
given length of wire (and 16AWG is probably adequate in most cases).
Why do you say 16AWG is adequate? What scientific support do you have
Eriko;617988 Wrote:
Doesn´t look like you´re reading carefully enough what I´m saying or
responding too.
My first reply, was to the statement using a cable to tame a bright
system., which has indeed to do with tonal balance. I also said, given
a cable that meets all general requirements
magiccarpetride;617712 Wrote:
Imagine if someone were to offer you to choose, for free, between a pair
of Cardas or Nordost speaker cables. Would you consider it a toss-off,
thinking that basically it's the same difference, or would you first
spend some time auditioning these two cables, in
JezA;618022 Wrote:
Why do you say 16AWG is adequate? What scientific support do you have
for that claim?
It's based on electrical properties of copper. You can find various
tables like this one:
http://www.roger-russell.com/wire/wire.htm#wiretable
which is based on the resistance of the
Why 5%? Why not 3.6%? Or 6.2%? Where are the double-blind peer reviewed
published studies to support such a claim?
Nowhere.
It's just another opinion dressed up with a few graphs, some woefully
incomplete electronics and plenty of gratuitous insults.
--
JezA
JezA;618052 Wrote:
Why 5%? Why not 3.6%? Or 6.2%? Where are the double-blind peer reviewed
published studies to support such a claim?
Nowhere.
It's just another opinion dressed up with a few graphs, some woefully
incomplete electronics and plenty of gratuitous insults.
These numbers
JezA;618025 Wrote:
If a cable changes the tonal balance of a system it must be losing
information. In particular, information about the tonal balance of the
recording!
You can only say this if you KNOW what the tonal balance of the
recording actually is...
Fortunately, this is easy to check
JezA;618022 Wrote:
Why do you say 16AWG is adequate? What scientific support do you have
for that claim?
It certainly isn't sufficient for a Naim amp for example.
Like I said, if you can't hear the differences don't worry about it.
Yes... Naim in their infinite wisdom decided they could
Howard Turkster;617824 Wrote:
Switching from standard 12 AWG cable to Chord Co. Rumour cable was one
of the better upgrades I've made to my sytem, after upgrading the RCA
interconnects.
And as good as those was replacing the A/C outlets with some
respectable Porter Port outlets for $36
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
