ce of interference with PJCIS doing its job.
With Julia Banks' announcement she will move to the crossbenches, I will
take plenty of 6 to 4 against Dutton (MP?) getting his way and passing the
Assistance and Access Bill before Christmas.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 09:52
If Dutton is in fact ineligible to sit, then so too is his motion to
introduce the Bill to Parliament. Or such is the stuff of dreams?
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 09:39, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> Seems Dutton is about to get a lesson in constitutional law:
>
> S44 (i
of the House of Representatives.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 10:34, Paul Wilkins wrote:
>
> After the Department Home Affairs sitting on this Bill for over a year and
> conducting industry consultation they claim is confidential (ie: they have
> no one who
d serious crime in the context of rising
use of encryption.
Rising use of encryption is hardly news to anyone. After all, a rising tide
lifts all boats.
https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=a46f0ed4-fc0d-4e95-bbd3-ef8fafe419ab&subId=663130
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Sun, 25 Nov
rests,
not with the Crown as you might ingenuously assume, but with the carrier
who unwittingly acted as directed.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 06:38, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>
> ---
> ...the drafting certainly seems loose enough for a fut
for the foreseeable
future.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Sat, 24 Nov 2018 at 12:17, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> s/Fourth Amendment
>
> On Sat, 24 Nov 2018 at 12:15, Paul Wilkins
> wrote:
>
>> It's a very good question how, when anyone who knows what they're talking
&
s/Fourth Amendment
On Sat, 24 Nov 2018 at 12:15, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> It's a very good question how, when anyone who knows what they're talking
> about opposes the Bill
> as an effective and reasonable approach to fighting terrorism and serious
> crime in the contex
7;ve accused anyone
opposing the Bill to be weak on terrorism. So instead of a sensible public
discussion of how to enable legal intercept for encrypted communications,
we're getting the Liberal Trumpists using the Bill as a blunt object to
wedge Labor on terrorism and that's all that matt
it will be a Labor government administering it, and they
are more likely to want to pass their own rather than have to deal with the
Human Rights gaps, mass surveillance implications, technical anomalies, and
broken multi agency framework.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 at 16:48, Paul
ionate. The Department of Home
Affairs will do themselves no favours to create an evidentiary framework,
only to be thrown out by the courts because the evidentiary chain was
unlawful.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 at 14:34, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> *"it's going to o
eople, it's going to our government...
> [image: VentraIP Australia logo]
>
>
> *Bradley Silverman*Technical Operations \\ VentraIP Australia
> *M: *+61 418 641 103 | *P:* +61 3 9013 8464 | ventraip.com.au
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:17 AM Paul Wilkins
> wro
deal in the Upper House, with differently aligned
cross benchers.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 at 22:44, Bryan O'Reilly
wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
>
>
> I’m looking forward to your Lunchtime Lecture next week on this topic!
>
>
>
> Kind regard
so
wide of the mark or so cynical.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 at 04:15, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 18:12, Christian Heinrich
> wrote:
> >
> https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/news/victoria-police-arrest-three-people-a
ack of liability for
unlawful disclosures.
13 - Why has the government of the day referred this deeply flawed Bill to
the PJCIS, PJCHR, and the SSCSB, for review wasting public time and money,
rather than sending it back to Dep't Home Affairs for a complete overhaul
of it's scope and objec
g constitutional question, how, when Police
Powers lie with the States, what constitutional head of power supports the
Bill's scope, without enabling legislation from the States conferring power.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 at 10:34, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>
>
s they may need to pander to to remain in office.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 15:11, Christian Heinrich <
christian.heinr...@cmlh.id.au> wrote:
> Paul,
>
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 17:36, Paul Wilkins
> wrote:
> >
> > tracking convoys of (possib
A new hearing
<http://www.aph.gov.au/sitecore/content/Home/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Intelligence_and_Security/TelcoAmendmentBill2018/Public_Hearings>
has been added: *04 Dec 2018*
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 17:35, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> Consequently, should this Bill pass,
ic.com.au wrote:
>
>> Could they possibly give less notice Unbelievable!
>>
>> Nathan Brookfield
>> Chief Executive Officer
>>
>> Simtronic Technologies Pty Ltd
>> http://www.simtronic.com.au
>>
>> On 15 Nov 2018, at 10:40, Paul Wilkins
necessary for the
enforcement of the criminal law.
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 16:37, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> Another avenue for LEAs to access metadata would be via 280(1)(b) where
> disclosure is required under a TCN/TAN (thereby overriding the disclosure
> prohibition o 276)(1)
>
> 280 A
any other case—the disclosure or use is required or authorised by or
under law.
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 15:35, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> Dutton's argument is premised on a false equivalence.
>
> It's perfectly possible to protect against terrorism without throwing out
> the b
Dutton's argument is premised on a false equivalence.
It's perfectly possible to protect against terrorism without throwing out
the baby with the bathwater, kicking doors in on data centres and
warrantless mass surveillance.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 15:25,
vision for voluntary disclosure by carriers to
LEAs, which either I can't find or has been amended.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 11:58, Paul Wilkins wrote:
>
> https://www.arnnet.com.au/article/648206/cisco-raises-grave-concerns-over-assistance-access-bill/
&
!
>
> Nathan Brookfield
> Chief Executive Officer
>
> Simtronic Technologies Pty Ltd
> http://www.simtronic.com.au
>
> On 15 Nov 2018, at 10:40, Paul Wilkins wrote:
>
> Media Release: Issue date: 14 November 2018
>
> *Second public hearing on the Encrypt
ons Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy:
https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=8012483f-e421-41a7-8bd4-1e8eb5eb39eb&subId=661745
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 10:47, Mark Andrews wrote:
> There was at-least 3 weeks notice of a meeting tomorrow in Sydney even
, 13 Nov 2018 at 11:36, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> Communications Alliance submission
> <https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=789049aa-edfc-48e2-a79c-0dd1c28f95b8&subId=662644>
> makes
> the point both s313 and s280 (1)(b) of the Telecommunications Act 1997
> are curre
What I think's interesting is that route filters are still the go to for
BGP authentication.
Nobody steals DNS to the degree of BGP, because DNS has solid PKI
authentication.
If RPKI only had the same chain of trust for in-addr.arpa as the rest of
DNS does back to iana.
Kind regards
e new bill, about a dozen LEAs will similarly be
able to rely on s313 and s280(1)(b) to get warrantless metadata access.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 at 13:09, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> Coexistence with Data Retention Regime (Under Telecommunications Act)
>
>
> Passage of
under the Telecommunications Act can be rendered by the service provider as
voluntary assistance.
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 11:50, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> Rob,
> Check your inbox/spam folder 29/10.
>
> Kind regards
> Paul Wilkins
>
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 08:33, Robert Hudson wro
ion plans.
Can anybody think of any unintended consequences this might have? Or how
this would not provide a better outcome to the alternative which is access
to metadata being requested separately from a dozen different Law
Enforcement Agencies?
Kind regard
Rob,
Check your inbox/spam folder 29/10.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 08:33, Robert Hudson wrote:
> Odd. I signed up to track the enquiry, but have had no notifications at
> all that additional hearings had been scheduled.
>
> There's an another additional
nnouncing two additional hearings 16/30 Nov,
are also asking for *supplementary submissions, to be received no later
than 26 November.*
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 13:07, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> We're at a critical juncture where the Minister for Home Affairs may get
&g
dustry to consider the broader issues at play and
the implications (and possible unintended consequences of the Bill).
Submission to PJCIS - BSA (Cisco, IBM et al.)(48)
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 16:48, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> I'm determined the Minister for Home Affairs doesn't get to
661197
Australian Human Rights Commission:
https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=a7b9ff25-7c09-41e9-b97a-56dae1ac0e94&subId=661055
PJCHR,starts @ p24:
https://www.aph.gov.au/~/media/Committees/Senate/committee/humanrights_ctte/reports/2018/Report%2011/c01.pdf?la=en
Kind regards
Paul Wi
*New PJCIS Public Hearings*
*16 Nov 2018:* Sydney, NSW
*30 Nov 2018:* Canberra, ACT
https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Intelligence_and_Security/TelcoAmendmentBill2018
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 13:23, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> Has anyone yet had the opportunity to th
Has anyone yet had the opportunity to think through the use of force
provisions? Does use of force extend beyond physical forced entry, to say,
hacking?
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 18:03, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> Compare:
>
> CHAIR: So the big companies like Faceboo
TOBER 2018
"The government has consulted *extensively* with industry and the public on
these measuresand has made amendments to reflect the feedback in the
legislation now before the parliament."
Minister for Home Affairs - Speech to Parliament 20 Sept 2018
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 16:0
mpacts on public safety,
cybersecurity, privacy and human rights, raising concern among industry,
consumer and civil society groups.
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 11:30, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> The PJCHR express extensive concerns with the bill.
>
>
> https://www.aph.gov.au/~/media/Commit
the safeguards in
terms of oversight and review would assist in determining the
proportionality of the measures.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 15:12, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> 21 October AEC had received 6890 postal votes out of 12,788 issued. Today,
> received postal votes is
21 October AEC had received 6890 postal votes out of 12,788 issued. Today,
received postal votes is 7,789. Sharma is trailing by 1,552. So I'm calling
it a Phelps' win and we will have minority government.
Phelps will win by at least 500 votes so no recount.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
l,
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 2:12 PM Paul Wilkins
> wrote:
> > Except that where subject to an order under 317j to conceal the
> existence of a TCN/TAN forms part of the terms.
>
> For PCI-DSS Requirement 4 Telstra [as an example I don't recommend]
> have mandat
knowing if such a direction exists. Consequently
every PCI compliance becomes suspect, and consequently the whole PCI
compliance regime is systematically weakened.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 13:04, Christian Heinrich <
christian.heinr...@cmlh.id.au> wrote:
> Paul,
hat
317G offers immunity against all TCN/TAN requests.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 11:30, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> Question: Is it possible to pass a PCI audit, while potentially bound to
> silence regarding:
>
>- source integrity
>- secret functionality
&g
liant"?
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 at 13:03, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> Oh, well almost elevated to Federal Parliament.
>
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 at 12:55, Paul Wilkins
> wrote:
>
>> The turnup on Saturday with the elevation of Kerryn Phelps to Federal
>&g
Oh, well almost elevated to Federal Parliament.
On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 at 12:55, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> The turnup on Saturday with the elevation of Kerryn Phelps to Federal
> Parliament means a very different playing field for Dutton. It's one thing
> to ask Labor to pass a Bill
tated priorities are environment and refugees, so obviously won't want
to scrape off the shiny new mint of political capital on Law and Order
issues, but she's been a strong human rights advocate, and the Bill raises
serious human rights issues.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Fri, 19 O
If you're concerned by the Bill's overreach, where it allows for arbitrary
and disproportionate interference in privacy, write the Parliamentary Joint
Committee on Human Rights: human.rig...@aph.gov.au
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 at 11:31, Paul Wilkins wrote:
>
Appeared this morning. Runs to 60pp vs 20pp for the Home Affairs submission.
https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=859d9cda-0f99-4bef-994f-edc6006c87bf&subId=661321
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 11:55, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> I'd also venture the roll call for Friday is in no small d
(2B) Without limiting subsection(2A), the injunction may:
(a) require the carriage service provider to take reasonable steps to do
either or both of the following:
(i) block domain names, URLs and IP addresses that provide access to the
online location and that are specified in the injunction;
(
I'd also venture the roll call for Friday is in no small degree window
dressing for Saturday's Wentworth turnout. I did forward my letter to PJCIS
onto Kerryn Phelps.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 11:48, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> The Committee is currently acceptin
2018.*
*https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Intelligence_and_Security/TelcoAmendmentBill2018
<https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Intelligence_and_Security/TelcoAmendmentBill2018>*
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 11:44, Paul Wilkins wrote:
&
y this is by design.
Some very critical views are not to be heard from.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 21:13, Robert Hudson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The schedule for the first day of public hearings on the 19th of October
> (this Friday) has been released:
>
>
Robert,
When in Canberra, don't look for any support from PJCIS Chairman Andrew
Hastie, who is a Dutton supporter, and one of the leading conspirators in
rolling Turnbull.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 12:45, Robert Hudson wrote:
> PJCIS is listing 37 submissions -
> Regards,
>
> Robert
>
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 10:26, Paul Wilkins
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Rob,
>>
>> I want to say thanks to everyone who's made the effort for what's a
>> pretty thankless and costly investment of time - trying to convey a messa
public record to hold Home Affairs
to account for what's some pretty imperious unilateralism and shabby
disregard for the industry's and the public's concerns and best interests.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 09:46, Robert Hudson wrote:
> I have just sen
My submission is now up on PJCIS . Worth a read for anyone interested.
https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Intelligence_and_Security/TelcoAmendmentBill2018/Submissions
Kind Regards
Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 15:05, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> Oh ho!! Now the r
Wilkins
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 12:33, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> Dep't Home Affairs submission to PJCIS has turned up.
>
>
> https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=8704d357-2f09-4173-871a-f073166d4e10&subId=660956
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Paul Wilkins
>
>
Dep't Home Affairs submission to PJCIS has turned up.
https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=8704d357-2f09-4173-871a-f073166d4e10&subId=660956
Kind Regards
Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 12:14, Christian Heinrich <
christian.heinr...@cmlh.id.au> wrote:
> Paul,
TODAY all submissions to the Dep't Home Affairs are available.
https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about/consultations/assistance-and-access-bill-2018
Good job peeps, 24 hours before submissions close with JCIS.
Kind Regards
Paul Wilkins
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 12:42, Paul Wilkins wrote:
&g
.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 12:24, Peter Tonoli
wrote:
> hi Paul,
>
> Quoting Paul Wilkins :
>
> > Careful how you go there Paul. Dutton made the following statement to the
> > House 20th September 2018.
> >
> > "The government h
e and expressions of grave concern
will have Labor see sense and block the Bill. Which is a shame. The only
person with any skin in the game is Dutton. The Liberals have nothing to
gain in supporting this Bill.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
___
AusNOG ma
I suggest saving comments as to the veracity of the extensive consultation
process to what can be expressed within submissions to the PJCIS, which (as
long as you don't publish anywhere else) are subject to Parliamentary
privilege.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 18:22, Pau
t than just
Dutton's Office. But it will be very interesting to see where Labor draws
its policy direction from. The reach of police powers envisaged in the Bill
will find strong resistance in Labor ranks.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 at 19:34, Christian Heinrich <
christian.
S idea of timezone, and possibility for
confusion when the network and OS setting disagree.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Sun, 7 Oct 2018 at 07:37, Paul Gear wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In the past 10 or so years, I've used every major mobile carrier's
> network, through both the car
1 - Denials by Apple & Amazon are qualified
2 - Bloomberg are a reputable news agency
3 - They quote multiple sources
4 - They quote 30 approx companies affected
5 - This is a feasible vector, which means it's a risk
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 at 15:05, Matthew Mo
following year, for what it described as unrelated reasons.
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 at 10:29, Shannon Pearce wrote:
> Not sure how posting a link to the purported fake news article is proof
> said article is not fake?
>
> Shan.
>
> On 5 Oct 2018, at 10:27 am, Paul Wilkins wrote:
>
&
Negatory on the fake news.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-10-04/the-big-hack-how-china-used-a-tiny-chip-to-infiltrate-america-s-top-companies
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 at 10:25, Jay Dixon wrote:
> As our previous security manager at work put it in his thick Russian
> accent...
>
> "you k
Preventing women being harassed at public conventions and stopping for red
traffic lights. Both are the same nanny state obtruding pesky value
signaling into the stream of social intercourse. Do like I do, and drive
straight through. Someone needs to stop the madness.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
to accept responsibility.
Instead, you referred Bevan to the police, which was an entirely
inappropriate abdication of yours and the board's personal/fiduciary/moral
responsibility.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 17:49, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> "Seems you've never
"Seems you've never been to a meeting."
The verity of this statement cannot be overexaggerated.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 17:42, Mark Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 16:50, Paul Wilkins
> wrote:
> >
> > The need for a Code of C
Thanks for that Nathan.
Though I have to disagree, and refer you to the Sex Discrimination Act,
where you can't structurally exclude women from engaging in public life.
Private Corporation regardless.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 17:11, Nathan Brookfield <
nathan
That they couldn't find a woman up to the required standard gives rise to
an unfortunate impression of the board acting as a boy's club.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 16:10, David Hughes wrote:
>
> We thank Bevan for raising this important issue and bringing it
and if
there's a breach of conduct, to ensure the problem is addressed and won't
happen again rather than swept under the carpet. It also goes to creating
an environment where people are comfortable there won't be adverse
consequences for raising or discussing legitimate concerns.
volve themselves in instances of criminal
behaviour. Most inappropriate workplace behaviour falls short and they
won't be interested.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 at 12:46, David Hughes wrote:
>
> *Bevan*,
>
> Any allegation of sexual harassment is a very serious ma
I stand corrected.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 12:40, Narelle Clark wrote:
>
> Wrong agency - it's Home Affairs (Peter Dutton is the minister) not the
> Attorney General's (Christian Porter) department.
>
> Narelle
>
> On Thu, Sep 27
he Bill is premature, deficient and
badly framed.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 11:07, Paul Wilkins wrote:
>
> https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/sep/27/australias-spyware-law-could-expose-phones-to-exploitation-business-group-warns
>
> Submission by
in Canberra if
> there is to be only one day. I'm still waiting on confirmation of venue.
>
> Paul.
>
>
> On 25/09/2018 5:05 PM, Paul Wilkins wrote:
>
> I'm thinking Dutton's decision to push ahead with an ill drawn bill wasn't
> completely isola
t computer. I think it's arguable the Bill doesn't extend to
compelling access to ancillary computers/network devices, needed to extract
data from the target computer.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 at 13:51, wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, Paul Wilkins wrote:
>
ed international law. The remaining
justifications for TCNs/TANs are to prosecute serious crime and terrorism,
which the government is within its constitutional powers to do.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 at 11:52, Narelle Clark wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:5
's been consulted. As to amendments, there has been the
removal of "protecting the public revenue" as an objective of the Bill,
which was probably illegal anyway..
The Bill's not ready to pass. Has Dutton tabled a hurried Bill only to
change the conversation in the House? Res
quot; as a relevant objective of TANs/TCNs.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 at 12:09, Robert Hudson wrote:
> ITPA will make another submission.
>
> I notice the comment period is again very short, and the page liked
> mentions nothing on the previouw submissions t
/Intelligence_and_Security/TelcoAmendmentBill2018
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
hether statutory safeguards are adequate.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 13:11, Mark Newton wrote:
> I challenge you to identify the last time the High Court invalidated any
> Australian legislation whatsoever on the grounds of conflict with the
> International C
tion.
I'm sure Mark you're aware the UK surveillance powers have had to be
redrafted after a challenge to the European Court of Human Rights.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 14:22, Mark Newton wrote:
> “Possible High Court challenge”?
>
> Jesus Christ,
and
proportionate" to the threat. Which is all very well and sets the scene for
possible High Court challenge if the Bill becomes law. All it needs is
someone prepared to risk prison on the odds of creating a precedent.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 at 11:45, Paul Wilkins
Pacific/Power Space, Cad Pacific, Cisco, CNC/Mastercam, DataStax,DocuSign,
IBM, Informatica, Intel, Mathworks, Microsoft, Okta, Oracle, PTC,
Salesforce, SAS Institute, Siemens PLM Software, Splunk, Symantec,
TrendMicro, Trimble Solutions Corporation, and Workday.
Kind Regards
Paul Wilkins
On Fri
with a liberal democracy, and proportionate to the
need for privacy. If I contribute to the process, it's to ensure a better
outcome than had I stood idle and silent.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 at 12:58, Mark Smith wrote:
> You realise you're being an enabler do
ch efforts. However,
it's going to be a struggle, given where, if you've noticed, gov.au is not
yet DNSSEC signed - which I find deliciously ironic, the government issuing
itself new powers to protect our cyber security, while their whole TLD
flaps in the breeze...
Kind regards
Paul Wilk
#x27;s a strong vindication for the processes of representative democracy
that so many have taken the time to make a contribution.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 at 09:49, Paul Brooks
wrote:
> Thanks Rob.
> Internet Australia's submission is at
> https://internet.org.au
oing to make for bad law, and unhappy
outcomes, both for law enforcement and service providers.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 at 12:14, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> Whether the bill meets its objectives (whatever they may be), and whether
> the bill passes in its present form i
tly upstream,
rather than in the public domain. A private citizen will only ever see the
number of Capability/Assistance Notices issued (see 317ZS Annual reports).
Which is meaningless. There needs to be correlation to investigations and
prosecutions, and their type and seriousness.
Kind regards
Pau
Not for profits still rely on a revenue stream. Time will tell.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 at 17:28, wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2018, Paul Wilkins wrote:
>
> > 1 - I take a dim view of the implied bad faith. You need to have a
> > think about the implicati
onus to offer
evidence. I o
n the other hand, have posted extensively on this thread, and quoted the
relevan
t legislation.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 at 01:04, Mark Newton wrote:
>
> On Sep 1, 2018, at 8:18 PM, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> >
> > Rather than
, including the police.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 11:43, Paul Brooks
wrote:
> On 4/09/2018 6:17 PM, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> >
> > I'd encourage others making submissions to raise the same point.
> Government has
> > clearly not considered thi
warrant.
I was pretty gob smacked.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 12:04, Narelle Clark wrote:
> Paul B - is that agency explicitly referred to or inferable readily in
> the legislation?
>
> Otherwise Paul W does have a point, there is the potential for the
>
The Communications Access Co-ordinator is established under the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 as the Secretary of
the Attorney-General’s Department. It's a position, not an agency.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 12:04, Narelle Clark wrote:
>
issions to raise the same point. Government
has clearly not considered this dimension, otherwise the first cab off the
rank in the bill's phrasing would be to create a new agency, or identifying
a single agency on which to confer these powers.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018
4 Sep 2018 at 17:56, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> "We have agreed to a Statement of Principles on Access to Evidence and
> Encryption
> <https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about/national-security/five-country-ministerial-2018/access-evidence-encryption>
> that sets out a framewor
> them. Why should AS** develop an exploit, when they can ask Apple or
>> Netgear or Samsung nicely to develop and install the exploit for them.
>>
>> We've spent decades educating users that the green padlock on a website
>> means something, and that 'IOT devices' such as your
th the process. Otherwise LEA will steam roll ahead with the
sort of ambit claims included in the bill.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 at 00:05, Paul Brooks
wrote:
> On 3/09/2018 11:47 AM, Chris Ford wrote:
>
> Paul,
>
>
> I agree with you in general as to the poi
3 - Also in this ideal world, this one government agency issuing the
warrant SSL
certificates, and collecting warrant data, would have it's DNS DNSSEC
signed ;)
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 at 16:56, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> Point taken that the point of insertion is i
101 - 200 of 272 matches
Mail list logo
