MeSue;643088 Wrote:
> It pretended to finish the scan, but something is still not right
> because it is only showing the 1200 songs from my last scan. I give
> up... going to try 7.5.6.
For the record, I installed 7.5.6 last night, and had a successful full
scan that took 3:30. The scheduled "n
Philip Meyer;643119 Wrote:
>
> I wonder how many 3rd party plugins still require updates? There
> doesn't appear to be a nice way of telling which ones are
> incompatible.
>
It's not that easy to handle this because:
1. We don't have any well defined API, so it's hard to say when
something is
Philip Meyer;643119 Wrote:
> >The abort scan feature _must_ be fixed. You cannot require users to
> >delete the cache folder or kill a scanner process to recover from a
> >botched scan. You must be able to get back to a place where you can
> at
> >least launch a full scan from scratch.
> >
> For
>The abort scan feature _must_ be fixed. You cannot require users to
>delete the cache folder or kill a scanner process to recover from a
>botched scan. You must be able to get back to a place where you can at
>least launch a full scan from scratch.
>
For what it's worth, I thought that Abort scan
bluegaspode;643104 Wrote:
> Obviously someone at Logitech decided its ready for a the masses now.
> Lets see what happens.
I wonder if they actually think this. It's very difficult to believe.
I'm more inclined to think that they've gotten to the point where
throwing beta software out into publi
JJZolx;643090 Wrote:
>
>
> I'm slowly losing hope that 7.6 will ever be ready for public
> consumption. I don't know what it all means for LMS's chances, but it
> isn't good.
Obviously someone at Logitech decided its ready for a the masses now.
Lets see what happens.
--
bluegaspode
Did you
What a nightmare.
The abort scan feature _must_ be fixed. You cannot require users to
delete the cache folder or kill a scanner process to recover from a
botched scan. You must be able to get back to a place where you can at
least launch a full scan from scratch.
I'm slowly losing hope that 7.6
It pretended to finish the scan, but something is still not right
because it is only showing the 1200 songs from my last scan. I give
up... going to try 7.5.6.
--
MeSue
SUE
1 Duet | 2 Booms | 1 Radio | 1 Touch (beta) | 1 SB2
HP MediaSmart EX470 | Squeezebox Server 7.5 | iPod Touch w/ iPeng
F
Seems like the clouds have started to clear...
About 3) What build version are you running? Andy recently did a
correction that might be related...
Revision 32822 - Directory Listing Modified Sat Jul 23 02:46:01 2011
UTC (2 days, 20 hours ago) by agrundman TTP 20923, fix abort scan when
doing an
Okay, I found a few things and managed to get a successful scan on a
sub-set of my library.
1) There were remnants of a Firefly Media Server service that kept
trying to start on my server, several times per minute. It had
thousands of entries in the event viewer. I haven't used this in ages
and
>Disable the included plugins as well. MusicIP has been problematic in
>7.6.
I haven't had any problems with MusicIP. It's about the only thing I haven't
had problems with!
I have MusicIP set to retrieve mixable status only.
___
beta mailing list
beta@
Sounds like you have a problem unrelated to 7.6.
I have an EX490 server & with 16,750 tracks, 7.5 would complete a full
scan in approx. 20 mins & 7.6 does it in 15 mins. My EX490 is only a
2.2GHz Celeron so not hugely more powerful than your EX470.
As Slate suggested, I would have expected you t
Also... There have been a lot of problems with 'Abort scan'. It may or
may not be working correctly.
After aborting make sure there's no scanner.exe process running. If
there is, kill it. If you're having problems running the initial scan,
then you may as well also shut down the server and comple
MeSue;643058 Wrote:
> I only have the default plug-ins at the moment.
Disable the included plugins as well. MusicIP has been problematic in
7.6.
You might want to point the server at some subset of your music library
until you get this sorted out. Better yet, I recommend creating a small
test l
I only have the default plug-ins at the moment. InstalledPlugins and
DownloadedPlugins folders are both empty. I was waiting to finish a
scan before adding plugins back. But, goodness, I sure didn't expect it
to be a multi-day ordeal!
Scanner.exe is is still in the task list, there is no crash sh
Philip Meyer;643051 Wrote:
> >If that's not it, disable all plugins, run a full scan, then gradually
> >add the plugins back in until you figure out which is trashing
> things.
>
> Could it be that CustomScan or Lazy Search is hooking into a new
> scanner event to process before it reports scan
Philip Meyer;643049 Wrote:
> Yes, you now have to wait for the first scan to fully finish before any
> music can be played.
True, but only during the initial scan. After you have a populated
library it's usable while a full scan is in progress.
--
JJZolx
---
>If that's not it, disable all plugins, run a full scan, then gradually
>add the plugins back in until you figure out which is trashing things.
Could it be that CustomScan or Lazy Search is hooking into a new scanner event
to process before it reports scan complete (in the past these would kick i
>Now almost 4 hours later it appears to be finished, but it is not
>showing the "scanning complete" message. The MusicIP import finished
>about a half an hour ago and the status screen is just sitting there.
>Scanner.exe is still showing activity on the server. Waiting, waiting,
>waiting...
This o
>How? When I browse artists, albums, etc. they are all blank.
Yes, you now have to wait for the first scan to fully finish before any music
can be played.
I don't know what would happen if you tried to browse music folder whilst a
scan is in progress - does this create content in the current DB
>Keep in mind that in 7.6 (with SQLite) the server and library are
>completely usable during a full clear & rescan, unlike in past.
What do you mean by that?
I never had a problem with pre-7.6 (MySQL) - what problems were there in the
past?
Do you mean that browsing was slow when scanning, or pl
MeSue;643046 Wrote:
> How? When I browse artists, albums, etc. they are all blank.
When doing a full clear & rescan, 7.6 now builds a whole new library
database on the side, while keeping the current one in place. After the
scan is finished the new one is swapped in.
Try disabling the MusicIP p
Now almost 4 hours later it appears to be finished, but it is not
showing the "scanning complete" message. The MusicIP import finished
about a half an hour ago and the status screen is just sitting there.
Scanner.exe is still showing activity on the server. Waiting, waiting,
waiting...
I'm really
You should be able to just abort the scan again, set new logging
settings and start over.
Keep in mind that in 7.6 (with SQLite) the server and library are
completely usable during a full clear & rescan, unlike in past.
--
JJZolx
mherger;643009 Wrote:
>
> I guess it's too late to ask, but did you enable all the scan.*
> debugging?
>
No, didn't think of it, but I will if it fails again. It's about
half-way through the second step (scanning new files).
--
MeSue
SUE
1 Duet | 2 Booms | 1 Radio | 1 Touch (beta) | 1 SB2
> It stalled again so I aborted, did cleanup, and started over with a
> "clear and rescan." Seems to be progressing normally this time--so far.
I guess it's too late to ask, but did you enable all the scan.* debugging?
--
Michael
___
beta mailing list
It stalled again so I aborted, did cleanup, and started over with a
"clear and rescan." Seems to be progressing normally this time--so far.
--
MeSue
SUE
1 Duet | 2 Booms | 1 Radio | 1 Touch (beta) | 1 SB2
HP MediaSmart EX470 | Squeezebox Server 7.5 | iPod Touch w/ iPeng
Find me on 'Last.FM'
Hmm sounds like a missing database index or something... anything in the
logfiles?
Based on my own experience I would have thought that it would take
40-45 min for a complete rescan.
Are you game on trying a "clear and full rescan"?!
--
slate
Main: Receiver (Audiocom) -> Beresford Caiman+ (G
This was the initial scan that started automatically after installing
7.6. After 9 hours of scanning I stopped it before bed. It had been
stuck on that one playlist for several hours.
I deleted a bunch of playlists, including some large ones that might
have had missing files in them. Then I rest
What type of rescan are you doing ? Is it a full rescan or just a rescan
for changed files or changed playlists ?
How large is your playlists ? (number of tracks)
--
erland
Erland Isaksson ('My homepage' (http://erland.isaksson.info))
(Developer of 'many plugins/applets'
(http://wiki.slimdevi
Scanning new files isn't exactly a barn burner either.
- What are the specs of your server?
- Are the files on a local hard drive or located elsewhere on a network
share?
- Are you using shortcuts/symlinks?
- How large are these playlists?
--
JJZolx
Code:
Scanning new playlists (25 of 31) Running 03:55:24
Seriously?
--
MeSue
SUE
1 Duet | 2 Booms | 1 Radio | 1 Touch (beta) | 1 SB2
HP MediaSmart EX470 | Squeezebox Server 7.5 | iPod Touch w/ iPeng
Find me on 'Last.FM' (http://www.last.f
OMG, it is going to take almost as long to scan playlists as it took to
scan the song files!
Code:
Discovering files (27688 of 27688) Complete 00:22:03
Scanning new files (25383 of 25383) Complete 02:40:54
Discovering playlists (49 of 49) Complete 00:00
>I see what you're saying about possibly being system-specific. That
>hadn't occurred to me.
I think it's more likely to be some environment issue. eg. processor speed,
HDD I/O speed, anti-virus package, version of Perl, etc.
Would it be possible to add more debug trace, to hone in on a specifi
JJZolx;641721 Wrote:
> I've tried like hell to get the scanner to crash, but just can't do it.
> I've tried adding APEv2 tags to a test library of Mp3 files, changed
> ID3 tags to ID3v2.4, tried tripling the size of the library. Nothing.
> Sails through every time.
>
> I see what you're saying a
andyg;641716 Wrote:
> Since it happens on random files, there's no guarantee that a copy of
> someone's library would reproduce the problem on another machine
> either. JJ why don't you help by testing the builds in the bug?
I've tried like hell to get the scanner to crash, but just can't do it.
Since it happens on random files, there's no guarantee that a copy of
someone's library would reproduce the problem on another machine
either. JJ why don't you help by testing the builds in the bug?
--
andyg
andyg's Profil
Wirrunna;641713 Wrote:
> That's bloody expensive from Australia.
With as many people as there are experiencing the scanner crashes, he
could probably have found someone in the same town that could have
handed it to him.
--
JJZolx
---
JJZolx;641530 Wrote:
> I think it would have been a lot easier to have had someone Fed-Ex you a
> disk with a library on it.
That's bloody expensive from Australia.
--
Wirrunna
A camel is a racehorse designed by a committee.
---
Random crashes effecting different systems randomly different?
Screams uninitialized memory somewhere to me.
--
bits
bits's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13375
View this thread: http://forums.sli
>> All of my mp3 files have id3v2.4 UTF-8 tags only. Predominantly tagged
>> using Mp3Tag and Foobar.
>
>You'll have to remind us how scanning is failing on your system. I
>don't see it in the discussion above.
Scanner randomly crashes. bug 17240 (now moved to 17173).
Added my comments in http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17173
r32752 OK
r32755 crashed
r32753 OK
r32754 OK
r32755 crashed on 3 runs with scanner logging set to debug.
A complete uninstall and delete of cache and prefs was performed before
each
install of a new version. The music library
I think it would have been a lot easier to have had someone Fed-Ex you a
disk with a library on it.
--
JJZolx
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices
http://svn.slimdevices.com/repos/slim/7.6/branches/bug17173/server/
--
andyg
andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=88639
___
For anyone running from SVN checkouts, what would be the SBS version
numbers that correspond to each of the builds that you're producing?
Anyone experiencing the problem and running from the Perl code could
just roll back to those versions and figure out which is the earliest
one to fail.
--
JJ
Please don't mix and match scanner.exe from a different version, you are
inviting all sorts of other problems such as incompatible databases,
etc. If you have scanner crashes, please see the bug which has
instructions on how you can help.
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17173
--
and
JJZolx;641508 Wrote:
> What software was used to encode these Mp3 files and was any other
> software used afterward to edit or add tags? What types of tags and
> character encodings are being used?
Jim, MP3Tag has been used to clean up these tags, the scanner logs from
the crashes mentioned earl
Philip Meyer;641516 Wrote:
>
> >What software was used to encode these Mp3 files and was any other
> >software used afterward to edit or add tags? What types of tags and
> >character encodings are being used?
>
> All of my mp3 files have id3v2.4 UTF-8 tags only. Predominantly tagged
> using Mp
>What software was used to encode these Mp3 files and was any other
>software used afterward to edit or add tags? What types of tags and
>character encodings are being used?
All of my mp3 files have id3v2.4 UTF-8 tags only. Predominantly tagged using
Mp3Tag and Foobar.
___
Phil Leigh;641505 Wrote:
> Yes but only for a very small number of people, so it must be an edge
> condition. Let's see what Andy's cunning plan reveals...
The weird thing is that there seem to be a lot of things that come into
play.
I once uploaded a number of files that fully reproducibly cras
Wirrunna;641404 Wrote:
> All crashs were while scanning MP3 files.
What software was used to encode these Mp3 files and was any other
software used afterward to edit or add tags? What types of tags and
character encodings are being used?
--
JJZolx
-
JJZolx;641498 Wrote:
> This thread began talking about completely different scanning problems
> (there are more than just a few). The crashing problems have been noted
> in about 100 other threads, being that they've existed for more than
> three months in two successive releases of SBS.
Yes but
andyg;641463 Wrote:
> FYI I'd like to start keeping all discussion about this problem in one
> place, this bug: http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17173
>
> See my most recent comment there for info about my plan of action.
This thread began talking about completely different scanning
FYI I'd like to start keeping all discussion about this problem in one
place, this bug: http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17173
See my most recent comment there for info about my plan of action.
--
andyg
andyg's
I've never seen these issues in my own setup, but I'm using FLAC and I'm
running on Linux and a rather small library.
Is there anyone else that have seen the problems on some other platform
than Windows ?
Is there anyone else that have seen the problem in a library without
MP3 files ?
Is there an
We can't really get anywhere unless we can reproduce the problem. Is it
possible to narrow it down to the minimum set of files necessary to
cause the crash?
--
andyg
andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.ph
> Installed 7.6 r32713 on my Win XP test box, set (scan.scanner) - Music &
Nothing in the log files?
--
Michael
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
mherger;641405 Wrote:
> > Funny thing is, 7.6 r32108 completes a clear & rescan without a hitch
> > every time.
>
> This would actually confirm the theory that 7.5.3 was ok, while 7.5.4
> is
> broken: the same scanner changes applied between the two were applied
> in
> 7.6/32119. Thanks for
> Funny thing is, 7.6 r32108 completes a clear & rescan without a hitch
> every time.
This would actually confirm the theory that 7.5.3 was ok, while 7.5.4 is
broken: the same scanner changes applied between the two were applied in
7.6/32119. Thanks for the additional data point. We'll have to
Installed 7.6 r32713 on my Win XP test box, set (scan.scanner) - Music &
Playlist Folder Scanning to debug and fired up a clear & rscan. Tried 3
times, same crash but at different places according to the scanner log.
All crashs were while scanning MP3 files.
Funny thing is, 7.6 r32108 completes a
frank1969;639501 Wrote:
>
> I think it's helpful if I open NEW threads for any bug I identified -
> and most bugs I can reproduce day by day ...
>
I think it would be great if you searched a bit in bugs.slimdevices.com
to see if you find the corresponding bug report and add a link to the
bug re
My 0.02$
Some changes still needs a complete rescan ( new and changed is not
picking up everything ).
This should be easy ? Scanning a whole library or adding every allbum
one by one or changing them should give completely identical dB if not
then something is wrong ?
On the positive side scanni
I got a pretty large database (~ 240.000 files / mp3) too but I'm only
doing small changes every day (adding 2 or 3 albums, re-tagging 2 or 3
albums, re-naming 2 or 3 albums/folders), so I can see very clearly
what changes are made to the db and I can confirm:
Scanner in 7.6 is MUCH quicker than
JJZolx;639459 Wrote:
>
> My biggest problems with 7.6 are the usability issues introduced by
> 'onebrowser', mostly in the web interface.
>
I've probably asked this before but are there any specific issues you
find particularly annoying ?
I'm just asking because if there are serious usabilit
Philip Meyer;639460 Wrote:
> >If this is done for every single track, and you're deleting thousands
> >of tracks, it gets very time consuming. Normally, deletions are going
> >to be in very small quantities. Moving a few albums isn't going to be
> >noticeable, but a few dozen or a few hundred cou
>If this is done for every single track, and you're deleting thousands
>of tracks, it gets very time consuming. Normally, deletions are going
>to be in very small quantities. Moving a few albums isn't going to be
>noticeable, but a few dozen or a few hundred could be.
Has this changed in 7.6?
I t
verypsb;639428 Wrote:
> Scanning problems have been present from the first betas, and they're
> still there... I don't get the impression Logitech is trying to solve
> the scanning problems. Instead they're creating a new build, LMS. Why?
> 7.6 still is very unstable...
I don't think 7.6 is so m
audiomuze;639423 Wrote:
> I've been running 7.6.x for as many months as it's been a beta. I've no
> idea what development work is still going into it, but there remain
> serious issues with the scanner logic where rescanning is concerned. I
> have a large library and in general terms when addin
+1
Scanning problems have been present from the first betas, and they're
still there... I don't get the impression Logitech is trying to solve
the scanning problems. Instead they're creating a new build, LMS. Why,
I think, when 7.6 still is very unstable...
--
verypsb
1x Boom, 1x Classic, 2x
I've been running 7.6.x for as many months as it's been a beta. I've no
idea what development work is still going into it, but there remain
serious issues with the scanner logic where rescanning is concerned. I
have a large library and in general terms when adding a few albums or
making a small
It ought to use test.mysb.com, but how do I ascertain it indeed does?
--
copperstate
copperstate's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34756
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.p
copperstate;602199 Wrote:
> It does look like both were trying to scan for artwork, but it seems
> like the artwork download does not work any more as I see lots of "404
> Not Found" and (some) "500 Internal Server Error" errors in the
> server.log.
Did you configure your SBS to use test.mysb.c
It does look like both were trying to scan for artwork, but it seems
like the artwork download does not work any more as I see lots of "404
Not Found" and (some) "500 Internal Server Error" errors in the
server.log.
--
copperstate
---
Perhaps only the internal scanner (new & changed) downloads artwork?
Which itself would be a bug if true.
--
JJZolx
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slim
andyg;602004 Wrote:
> Turn off download artwork.
You are right, it looks much better now: :)
Music Scan Details (*look for new and changed music, dsl modem on,
artwork download off*)
Discovering files (4250 of 4250) Complete 00:00:10
Scanning new files (3 of 3) Complete 00:00:00
Pre-
Music Scan Details (*look for new and changed music, dsl modem on*)
Discovering files (4250 of 4250) Complete 00:00:07
Removing deleted files (2 of 2) Complete 00:00:00
Scanning new files (39 of 39) Complete 00:18:09
Downloading Artwork (2416 of 2416) Complete 00:12:57
Pre-ca
andyg;602004 Wrote:
> Turn off download artwork.
Ok, I will try that next. :) But why is looking for changes taking so
much longer than a clean rescan?
--
copperstate
copperstate's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/
Does it work faster the next time ?
I'm guessing downloading artwork only happens once, after you have the
artwork it shouldn't have to retrieve new images from the Internet.
--
erland
Erland Isaksson ('My homepage' (http://erland.isaksson.info))
(Developer of 'many plugins/applets'
(http://wi
Turn off download artwork.
--
andyg
andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84728
Using my (rather small) lib "clean & rescan" takes approx. 15 min
whereas "look for new and changed music" takes about 1h30min.
Squeezebox Server Status
Version: 7.6.0 - r31716 @ Mon Jan 10 05:38:31 PST 2011
Server HTTP Port Number: 9000
Operating system: Mac OS X 10.6.6 - EN - utf8
Platform Arc
oreillymj;590850 Wrote:
> This m3u worked up until recently. Now the web ui shows the playlist
> entries, but the Jive remote hangs when trying to display the playlist
> entries.
> Actually all playlist files with URL's hang on the Jive remote, but
> they work just fine when I view and play them
I'm having a similar problem when scanning my DB.
If the music folder is small (say 4000 music files) the scan works
fine. If it's larger than that the scanner aborts with:
main::main (348) Error: Failed when running main scan:
[Carp::Clan::__ANON__(): DBI Exception: DBD::SQLite::db selectrow_ar
Andy: from my limited testing, ANY flac with a COVERART b64 encoded jpg
vorbis tag will now crash the scanner. I've filed bug 16613:
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16613
This COVERART scheme seems to me to be an obsolete way to embed artwork
in flacs, now that Josh formally supports
OK, my upload just timed out. I'll have to wait until I can get to a
non-stupid internet connection to post that file.
--
gharris999
gharris999's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=115
View this thre
Andy: I don't know if this is a broadly reproducible bug, or a special
case. So I'll hold off on filing a bug unless you direct me to. But I
am uploading to hybridized.org a zip file named ScanKiller01.zip
containing a flac which stops the scanner in it's tracks. I can't see
anything particular
OK, but I'll need to do some more testing first to make sure that that's
really what's crashing the scanner.
--
gharris999
gharris999's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=115
View this thread: http://
Maybe not, go ahead and file a bug.
--
andyg
andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=82585
___
So, Andy:
Does the current 7.6 scanner still support the old flac "non official"
embedded artwork in the style of:
COVERART=very_long_string_of_b64_encoded_jpeg_data
??
I still have a few of those sorts of files in my collection and the
artwork pre-cache routine is hanging on one of those.
-
OK certainly could be a bug in my code somewhere too. :) I hope you can
find the offending file.
--
andyg
andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.c
Thanks for that. A quick...
find ./ -name *.mp3 | wc -l
..tells me that I've got 89 mp3 files in the library.
I will be surprised (and embarrassed) if any of my flacs have ID3v2
tags.
Doing this test:
find . -name "*.flac" -exec id3v2 -l {} \; >id3v2_tags.txt
sed -n '/No ID3 tag/!p' id3v2_ta
Hmm normally it logs the filename but it will log "data" if the artwork
is embedded and can't be accessed directly, but this shouldn't be the
case with FLAC. Is your library 100% FLAC?
You can enable artwork debug for more info.
--
andyg
--
PS: after scanner.pl hangs, and after clicking the "abort scan" link in
the SBS web UI, the scanner.pl task remains running (as seen via ps ax)
and is seemingly immune to a "kill" command. A system reboot seems to
be required to get rid of it.
--
gharris999
Info:
Version: 7.6.0 - rTRUNK @ UNKNOWN
Hostname: scserver.da
Server IP Address: 192.168.0.198
Server HTTP Port Number: 9000
Operating system: Red Hat - EN - utf8
Platform Architecture: i686-linux
Perl Version: 5.10.0 - i386-linux-thread-multi
Database Version: DBD::SQLite 1.30_06 (sqlite 3.7.2)
Are you running SQLite or mysql as your database?
On a windows box or ?
Anything in the logfiles?
It is still the general opinion that there are issues with mysql now
that SQLite is the default database.
AFAIK a full scan will start the scanner, and a "scan for new" will use
the internal scanner
I've been away for 3 months so I'm not up on the current state of
things. But, having just jumped from SVN 30996 to 31431, I find that I
now can't complete a scan of my music library. It seems to hang in the
pre-caching artwork phase.
Also, even though I have
-Settings->Advanced->Performance->
andyg;576620 Wrote:
> On Sep 14, 2010, at 11:16 PM, JJZolx wrote:
>
> >
> > Ok, WAL was disabled. I can see that the files are no longer there
> when
> > running a full rescan. But those full rescans are still extremely
> slow.
> > It has to be due to some other change made in 31284.
>
> I b
Just to make clear
On my server I am using the new Beta V2 version of MSE which is now
rated for WHS, not the V1 which is not rated for WHS. (But still
running MSE V1 on my other Vista computers).
For those interested, my AV experiences with MSE have been good. No
infections despite some interest
i think when people exclude files they do *.myi and some others, seaarch
the forums. and last i heard, MSE exclusion of files feature doesn't
work.
--
MrSinatra
www.lion-radio.org
using:
sb2 & sbc (my home) / sbrec & ipeng (parent's home) - sbs 7.5.2b - win
xp pro sp3 ie8 - p4(ht) 3.2ghz, 2gi
My Duet / SB server installation is on an HP MediaSmart EX485 (with
E5200 CPU upgrade, V2.5 server software) Windows Home Server, using the
new MSE beta for my AV.
I was having 'issues' with 7.5.1 so I thought I'd try 7.6 which does
run where previously 7.5.1 wouldn't.
I also repeatedly ended u
Now I'm basically seeing the same thing in 7.6. I think it's something
to do with the WAL update.
--
JJZolx
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
