Air dates
4.11 Jan. 16
4.12 Jan. 23
4.13 Jan. 30
4.14 Feb. 6
4.15 Feb. 13
4.16 Feb. 20
4.17 Feb. 27
4.18 March 6
4.19 March 13
4.20 March 20
A two hour TV movie "starting before the events of the miniseries"
will later in 2009.
http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [
On 12/04/2008, at 2:24 AM, Martin Lewis wrote:
> On 4/11/08, Charlie Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> I noticed that take,
>>
>> Takes, dude. More than once in the movie. Over and over, long takes.
>> OK, no single one of them quite as special as the first chunk of
>> Snake
>> Eyes, but a c
On 4/11/08, Charlie Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I noticed that take,
>
> Takes, dude. More than once in the movie. Over and over, long takes.
> OK, no single one of them quite as special as the first chunk of Snake
> Eyes, but a collection of great sequences.
The thing is the Snake Eyes
On 11/04/2008, at 12:09 PM, Curtis Burisch wrote:
>> Interesting premise, reasonably executed. What makes it stand out are
>> the long long (long) takes, 4 and 5 minute action sequences done with
>> steadycam. Great stuff.
>
> I noticed that take,
Takes, dude. More than once in the movie. Over an
>There have been between two- and three-hundred new sf novels
>published in English every year since the seventies, and probably the
>sixties when the paperback boom began. SF as a recognisable genre has
>been published since the nineteenth century with Wells and Verne. SF
>magazines began
On 11 Apr 2008, at 03:52, Curtis Burisch wrote:
> I have read almost all science fiction ever published, and my
> biggest gripe
> with the genre is that there are not enough authors publishing
> enough works
> to satisfy my appetite.
There have been between two- and three-hundred new sf nov
>Anyway, I hate it when someone criticizes my favorite shows, so I guess I
>should have known better.
I have to disagree with William's response in the strongest possible terms
-- not your response, Olin (what an unusual and wonderful name!)
I have read almost all science fiction ever published,
>Interesting premise, reasonably executed. What makes it stand out are
>the long long (long) takes, 4 and 5 minute action sequences done with
>steadycam. Great stuff.
I noticed that take, and rewound to watch it no less than 3 times. Great
cameraman there, great teamwork in a LARGE cast, and g
On 4/8/08, Curtis Burisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The first one only came out today in the UK! They are doing a bunch
> >of films, aren't they? Is it one for each main character?
>
> Oh, don't you have internet in UK? I'm in SA, saw the movie about a month
> ago :)
Well, I saw it yesterday
On 09/04/2008, at 2:14 PM, Julia Thompson wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Olin Elliott wrote:
>
>> Anyway, I hate it when someone criticizes my favorite shows, so I
>> guess
>> I should have known better.
>
> You provoked some good discussion. :)
>
> (Babylon 5 is still my favorite. De gustib
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Olin Elliott wrote:
> Anyway, I hate it when someone criticizes my favorite shows, so I guess
> I should have known better.
You provoked some good discussion. :)
(Babylon 5 is still my favorite. De gustibus non est disputandem, before
anyone jumps on me about that, m'ka
t;mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion<mailto:brin-l@mccmedia.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: Battlestar Galactica
On 9 Apr 2008, at 01:22, Olin Elliott wrote:
>
> I have to admit that I don't get the Battl
On 9 Apr 2008, at 01:22, Olin Elliott wrote:
>
> I have to admit that I don't get the Battlestar Galactica craze. I
> have tried diligently to watch it and though I recognize the quality
> of the storylines -- I think it is written just about as well as any
> drama cur
I have to admit that I don't get the Battlestar Galactica craze. I have tried
diligently to watch it and though I recognize the quality of the storylines --
I think it is written just about as well as any drama currently on television
-- and characterizations, it doesn't grab me
On 09/04/2008, at 2:45 AM, Curtis Burisch wrote:
>
> Saw "Children of Men" a few days ago. If you haven't seen this
> movie, you
> haven't lived. On IMDB, one critic wrote "[this movie] restored my
> faith in
> cinema".
Interesting premise, reasonably executed. What makes it stand out are
t
>The first one only came out today in the UK! They are doing a bunch
>of films, aren't they? Is it one for each main character?
Oh, don't you have internet in UK? I'm in SA, saw the movie about a month
ago :)
Didn't know they were doing one per character, but I suppose it makes sense.
Saw the Si
Already have "Razor." Thanks.
George A
- Original Message -
From: "William T Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion"
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: Battlestar Galactica
>
> On 6 Apr 2008
On 7 Apr 2008, at 16:58, Martin Lewis wrote:
> On 4/7/08, Curtis Burisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On another note, I also loved Futurama. There's a second Futurama
>> movie
>> coming out soon, FYI.
>
> The first one only came out today in the UK! They are doing a bunch
> of films, aren't
On 6 Apr 2008, at 08:00, G. D. Akin wrote:
> William T Goodall wrote:
>
> Subject: Battlestar Galactica
>
>
>> That was not disappointing.
>
>
> Please, please, please, announce **SPOILERS** if you talk about
>
On 7 Apr 2008, at 16:58, Martin Lewis wrote:
>
> PS BSG is balls.
As in the "the dog's" or "of steel" or "big hairy" or "minty" ?
None of the above Maru
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/
"There's no chanc
On 4/7/08, Curtis Burisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On another note, I also loved Futurama. There's a second Futurama movie
> coming out soon, FYI.
The first one only came out today in the UK! They are doing a bunch
of films, aren't they? Is it one for each main character?
Martin
PS BSG i
>That was not disappointing.
Best televised sci-fi series EVER. Ok, so there were a couple of slow points
in the plotline. But I can't wait for the rest of the series. And the movie.
Disappointed I WILL be when it all ends :(
On another note, I also loved Futurama. There's a second Futurama mov
Agreed! My wife and are definitely looking forward to the rest of the season.
- jmh
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Now that The Wire has finished its run, BSG is the best show on television.
john
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 11:13 PM, William T Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> That was not disappointing.
>
>
> Final 19 Maru
> --
> William T Goodall
> Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.
On Apr 6, 2008, at 12:00 AM, G. D. Akin wrote:
> P.S. Season 3 wasn't disappointing either.
Srsly?
There were things I liked, sure -- there were effects that were
visually gorgeous, frex the translight jump of the BSG as it fell into
atmo, I just about freaked as it vanished, leaving only a
William T Goodall wrote:
Subject: Battlestar Galactica
> That was not disappointing.
Please, please, please, announce **SPOILERS** if you talk about season 4.
I live in Korea. I just finished the season 3 DVD set last night (and can't
That was not disappointing.
Final 19 Maru
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities." ~Voltaire.
__
On 06/10/2007, at 1:13 PM, Gary Nunn wrote:
>
>
> > No spoilers
>
> Is anyone watching the Bionic Woman? I was pleasantly surprised
> by it.
Yes. Started last Thursday here in Ozland. Has promise.
>
> Of course Katee Sackhoff, from Battlestar Galactica,
> No spoilers
Is anyone watching the Bionic Woman? I was pleasantly surprised by it.
Of course Katee Sackhoff, from Battlestar Galactica, plays a renegade bionic
badass of undetermined allegiance.
Anyway, in one scene, the bionic woman walks by a TV that's playing
--- Nick Lidster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That wasnt the season premiere that was the midseason break ender that
> sci-fi channel is so found of doing. I guess you could call it season
> 9.5 But that is just a little foolish sounding.
Not to be snarky and bitchy, but you're the 3rd p
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of kerri miller
Sent: January 8, 2006 2:33 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: New Battlestar Galactica - no spoilers.
--- Max Battcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Harney wrote
--- Max Battcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Harney wrote:
> > One series that I hope wraps up in this or the next season is Stargate:
> > SG-1. Despite Ben Browder being one of my favorite actors, I think the
> > series has had a good run and really needs to conclude rather than
>
Michael Harney wrote:
One series that I hope wraps up in this or the next season is Stargate:
SG-1. Despite Ben Browder being one of my favorite actors, I think the
series has had a good run and really needs to conclude rather than
running it until it fizzles out like Sci-fi Channel seems inte
Michael Harney wrote:
> Given the Sci-fi Channel's past, I think it's a better hope that the
> show reaches a conclusion before it's canceled. I like this new BSG
> too, and I never was a fan of the original, so that says a lot, but
> Sci-fi only cares about the same thing that other networks do:
Gary Nunn wrote:
Anyway, I hope that BSG doesn't peak early and then go downhill.
Given the Sci-fi Channel's past, I think it's a better hope that the
show reaches a conclusion before it's canceled. I like this new BSG
too, and I never was a fan of the original, so that says a lot, but
I just watched the first episode, of the second part of season 2, that I had
saved on DVR from last night.
I have always liked it from the start, but that show just gets better and
better. I didn't see that end coming. Well, at least the end that will be
concluded next week.
Earlier in the w
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Warren Ockrassa
Sent: November 27, 2005 2:24 AM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Battlestar Galactica renewed
On Nov 22, 2005, at 4:09 PM, Kevin Street wrote:
> William T Goodall quoted:
>
>
Robert Seeberger wrote:
I don't find the suits identical myself. They would look quite strange
on the street here.
It's the ties that get me. Why are there ties?
The suit itself looks like a truncated version of the formal robes
from the original series. The cut looks odd to say the least, an
Richard Baker wrote:
> Rob said:
>
>> If someone finds a dumpster jarring in a scene on
>> "pretend-Caprica",
>> yet is not jarred by vehicles, asphalt, and average everyday
>> warehouses also seen in the background, then ones
>> suspension-of-disbelief is awfully selective.
>
> While we're at it,
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> At 01:43 PM Sunday 11/27/2005, Robert Seeberger wrote:
>> Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
>>> After a lengthy period of isolation, though, why should all of
>>> their
>>> artifacts look exactly like those found in contemporary North
>>> America? Even on Earth, you can tell a dif
Rob said:
If someone finds a dumpster jarring in a scene on "pretend-Caprica",
yet is not jarred by vehicles, asphalt, and average everyday
warehouses also seen in the background, then ones
suspension-of-disbelief is awfully selective.
While we're at it, can't we have them all speaking Caprica
At 01:43 PM Sunday 11/27/2005, Robert Seeberger wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> After a lengthy period of isolation, though, why should all of their
> artifacts look exactly like those found in contemporary North
> America? Even on Earth, you can tell a difference between the
> scenery, the clo
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> After a lengthy period of isolation, though, why should all of their
> artifacts look exactly like those found in contemporary North
> America? Even on Earth, you can tell a difference between the
> scenery, the clothing, etc., when you travel to Europe, Asia,
> Africa,
At 09:44 AM Sunday 11/27/2005, Robert Seeberger wrote:
Damon Agretto wrote:
>> I love the new BSG. I really do. It has complex character
>> development and a storyline that is mercifully bereft of the "reset
>> button" at episode's end. But damn, would it be so hard to not have
>> dumpsters in th
At 09:41 AM Sunday 11/27/2005, Robert Seeberger wrote:
Warren Ockrassa wrote:
>
>
> I love the new BSG. I really do. It has complex character
> development
> and a storyline that is mercifully bereft of the "reset button" at
> episode's end. But damn, would it be so hard to not have dumpsters
> i
Damon Agretto wrote:
>> I love the new BSG. I really do. It has complex character
>> development and a storyline that is mercifully bereft of the "reset
>> button" at episode's end. But damn, would it be so hard to not have
>> dumpsters in the background when shooting dialogue in some "alien"
>> wo
Warren Ockrassa wrote:
>
>
> I love the new BSG. I really do. It has complex character
> development
> and a storyline that is mercifully bereft of the "reset button" at
> episode's end. But damn, would it be so hard to not have dumpsters
> in
> the background when shooting dialogue in some "alie
I love the new BSG. I really do. It has complex character
development and a storyline that is mercifully bereft of the "reset
button" at episode's end. But damn, would it be so hard to not have
dumpsters in the background when shooting dialogue in some "alien"
world's back alley?
There's a
On Nov 22, 2005, at 4:09 PM, Kevin Street wrote:
William T Goodall quoted:
SCI FI Channel announced that it has renewed its original series
Battlestar Galactica for a third season. Production on the 20-episode
order is slated to begin in Vancouver, Canada, in February 2006 for
premiere later
William T Goodall quoted:
> SCI FI Channel announced that it has renewed its original series
> Battlestar Galactica for a third season. Production on the 20-episode
> order is slated to begin in Vancouver, Canada, in February 2006 for
> premiere later in the year, the network said.
T
http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue448/news.html
"Galactica Renewed For Season Three
SCI FI Channel announced that it has renewed its original series
Battlestar Galactica for a third season. Production on the 20-episode
order is slated to begin in Vancouver, Canada, in February 200
Gary Nunn wrote:
WARNING! - MAJOR SPOILER FOLLOWS for Stargate Atlantis.
S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S
P
A
C
E
.
.
.
From the episode guide on scifi.com, it looks like this ship is going to
stick around, at least for a few episodes.
I thought I remembered someone saying (maybe it was in a pr
>
> Lexa Doig? Interesting. I didn't notice her, nor her credit
> on the last episode, but shall look forward to seeing how she
> fits into that role.
She was listed in this episode on the IMDB, but I watched it again and
didn't see her. However, a Google search produced this bit of informat
WARNING! - MAJOR SPOILER FOLLOWS for Stargate Atlantis.
S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S
P
A
C
E
.
.
.
> We are way behind the US on Atlantis, so forgive me if this
> sounds stupid, but are the Atlantis team in contact with SGC
> on a regular basis?
> I don't recall anyone getting direction from the
Max Battcher wrote:
From what I heard RDA isn't completely being phased out, but he's
going to be much more like the President in terms of on screen
"special appearances". I'm hoping that they play this really well,
because as the coordinator of Stargate operations across two galaxies
it mig
Gary Nunn wrote:
Warning... Some minor spoilers follow..
Stargate SG-1
Browder's first Stargate episode was last night.
Basically, it was John Crichton meets Stargate. All the Crichton humor,
mannerisms and arrogance was there, but I think that will work. Unless the
writers compl
a Stargate convention. Yes, I admit, I will pay the $35 for the photo-op with her.
http://www.creationent.com/cal/sgohio.htm
Stargate Atlantis
I'm still undecided about last nights episode. I loved this show last year,
but after last nights episode, well, let's just hope it gets better.
Batt
Short interview with Tricia Helfer from Battlestar Galactica. Nothing earth
shattering, but kind of interesting.
Ten Minutes with Tricia Helfer
written by Coury Turczyn on Friday, March 04, 2005
Number 6 from the New Battlestar Galactica Doesn't Want to be Just Another
"R
Ronn! wrote:
I will get around to seeing what is on it in the next few hours, either
. . . )
So Ronn, how are the computer wars progressing?
--
Doug
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
At 07:33 PM Monday 2/28/2005, Mauro Diotallevi wrote:
Just in case anyone here is interested, SciFi Channel has posted the
entire first episode (post-miniseries) of Battlestar Galactica, along
with a few short deleted scenes.
http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/33_full_episode/
MD
They were giving
Just in case anyone here is interested, SciFi Channel has posted the
entire first episode (post-miniseries) of Battlestar Galactica, along
with a few short deleted scenes.
http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/33_full_episode/
MD
___
http://www.mccmedia.com
(Update)
20 new episodes, shooting starts in March with new eps airing in the US
in the summer. No news of when SKY will show them in the UK - probably
with a later start given their preference for avoiding repeats and
hiatuses.
SPOILER ALERT! The linked story has some spoilerish casting inform
> Behalf Of Gary Denton
>
> The first series didn't crib only or mostly from the Mormons. It
often
> has general religious names and beliefs from thousands of years
ago.
> It was a reinforcement of the mythology of the series that they
are
> descendent's of a lost advanced society on earth. Or
On Feb 14, 2005, at 7:25 PM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 11:04 AM Monday 2/14/2005, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
My recall of it's vague too, but I believe the centurions had only
one brain lobe and the Imperious Leader had three; there was a
two-lobed version that never appeared in the series as well.
human-looking one with the conical(?)
head? Or was that an intermediate caste?
I think the IL was the humanoid one, yeah, with the weird red coral (?)
growing from his skull.
Also, didn't they spend an inordinate amount of time watching Fox
News Channel?
No, that last part was Babylon 5 not
At 11:04 AM Monday 2/14/2005, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
On Feb 13, 2005, at 3:40 PM, Damon Agretto wrote:
I think in the old series the Cylons were the robotic soldiers of a dead
race. IIRC the "original" Cylons were lizards or something...
My recall of it's vague too, but I believe the centurions ha
)
head? Or was that an intermediate caste?
> Also, didn't they spend an inordinate amount of time watching Fox
> News Channel?
No, that last part was Babylon 5 not Battlestar Galactica.
Rich
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On Feb 13, 2005, at 3:40 PM, Damon Agretto wrote:
I think in the old series the Cylons were the robotic soldiers of a
dead race. IIRC the "original" Cylons were lizards or something...
My recall of it's vague too, but I believe the centurions had only one
brain lobe and the Imperious Leader had t
I don't recall that in the original series there was much emphasis being
made on the idea of the Cylons being created by humans? Is that just my
fuzzy old memory, or is this whole "Terminator" kind of theme peculiar to
the new series?
I think in the old series the Cylons were the robotic soldie
Gary Denton wrote:
I think it is a reasonable space drive, hyper jumps of some unknow but
limited range, but don't see how the fleet is being tracked. I have
missed a number of episodes and may have missed the technobabble..
Don't we know at least one Cylon is aboard BSG? Couldn't they be send
I think it is a reasonable space drive, hyper jumps of some unknow but
limited range, but don't see how the fleet is being tracked. I have
missed a number of episodes and may have missed the technobabble..
The fleet ISN'T being tracked, as far as we know (or, the evidence doesn't
point that way
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:28:04 -0600, Steve Sloan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Damon Agretto wrote:
>
> > Which of course one should be willing to suspend in order to
> > enjoy SF. I personally like how they're handling this aspect.
> > Different enough from most other SF shows that have been on
Damon Agretto wrote:
> Which of course one should be willing to suspend in order to
> enjoy SF. I personally like how they're handling this aspect.
> Different enough from most other SF shows that have been on
> TV or the movies. Nothing original (and fans of Anime have
> seen this before), but no
On 10 Feb 2005, at 10:39 pm, Damon Agretto wrote:
Call me an old fart, but when I was growing up, series used to
produce 26-30
episodes a year. Now we' re happy with 13, and they probably won't
be in
consecutive weeks.
Yeah, but the series started mid-season.
Normal seasons include 24 episodes.
Nick Lidster wrote:
and kerri with teh multinationalism of this list, im sure there are
several memebrs that have seen the entire season.
You'd think the networks would be more aware of how much these shows are
being propagated around the world ahead of various broadcast dates,
especially a
--
Call me an old fart, but when I was growing up, series used to produce
26-30
episodes a year. Now we' re happy with 13, and they probably won't be in
consecutive weeks.
George A
well when aired on SkyOne the only break was over christmas
Call me an old fart, but when I was growing up, series used to produce 26-30
episodes a year. Now we' re happy with 13, and they probably won't be in
consecutive weeks.
Yeah, but the series started mid-season.
Normal seasons include 24 episodes.
Damon.
kerri miller asked:
> Wouldn't it be cool to have a show where the cast changed every week
> because it took them 14 generations to get to the next star system?
---
That WOULD be cool and COULD be very interesting, if done well.
William T Goodall wrote:
" SCI FI Channel has ordered a second season of its hit series
Battlestar Galactica, which has aired five episodes of its first season
of 13 episodes. Details of the renewal—including which cast members
will return, how many episodes will be produced and when the s
On Feb 10, 2005, at 1:49 PM, kerri miller wrote:
Wouldn't it be cool to have a show where the cast changed every week
because it took them 14 generations to get to the next star system?
That might be a stretch for most viewers, but a multiple year arc a la
B5 or possibly in the spirit of _Robotech
On Feb 10, 2005, at 1:46 PM, Damon Agretto wrote:
(Of course the lightspeed stuff is another
matter...)
Which of course one should be willing to suspend in
order to enjoy SF.
Mm, it was meant to be wry in juxtaposition to my praise of projectile
weapons. ;)
I personally like how they're
handling
--- Damon Agretto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (Of course the lightspeed stuff is another
> > matter...)
>
> Which of course one should be willing to suspend in
> order to enjoy SF.
Wouldn't it be cool to have a show where the cast changed every week
because it took them 14 generations to ge
> (Of course the lightspeed stuff is another
> matter...)
Which of course one should be willing to suspend in
order to enjoy SF. I personally like how they're
handling this aspect. Different enough from most other
SF shows that have been on TV or the movies. Nothing
original (and fans of Anime hav
On Feb 10, 2005, at 12:29 PM, kerri miller wrote:
I was never exposed to the original series, but I'm loving BG so
far - it has a wonderful B5 feel to the darkness.
The original series was OK in some respects, but *awfully* silly in
many others. Much of the mythology mentioned in it was lifted mor
--- Nick Lidster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm all full of TV happiness :)
> >
> > --
> > William T Goodall
>
>
> as am i...as am i.
me three! I was never exposed to the original series, but I'm loving BG so
far - it has a wonderful B5 feel to the darkness. ..AND isn't it nice to
s
I'm all full of TV happiness :)
--
William T Goodall
as am i...as am i.
i jsut hope i dont have to wait tillnext january for teh shows to aired on
skyone... as i have already seen this entire season
Nick "I love StarBuck" Lidster
___
http://www.mccme
http://scifi.com/scifiwire2005/index.php?id=30357
" SCI FI Channel has ordered a second season of its hit series
Battlestar Galactica, which has aired five episodes of its first season
of 13 episodes. Details of the renewal—including which cast members
will return, how many episodes wi
Damon Agretto wrote:
>>Starbuck's a chick??? Maru
>Yes, and much better for it, IMHO.
Given that Dirk Benedict is only about the single worst actor ever, I'd have to
agree. :-p
Jim
___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized porta
On Jan 24, 2005, at 8:31 PM, Damon Agretto wrote:
Starbuck's a chick??? Maru
Yes, and much better for it, IMHO.
Me too. I like her a lot more than Dirk Benedict's portrayal. Actually
watching the miniseries made me forcibly face how sexist the original
series was. Even by late 70s standards I thi
Starbuck's a chick??? Maru
Yes, and much better for it, IMHO.
Damon.
Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum."
http://www.geocities.com/garrand.geo/index.html
Now Building: UM's PzKpfw 38(t) Ausf. C
---
I'm very pleasantly surprised so far. I went in expecting crap-o-la, since for
every Farscape SciFi gives us five to ten Earthseas, but I caught the
miniseries a few weeks ago and have seen the three espisodes since, and I'm
hooked. It's on my short "must watch" list already.
Jim
Starbuck's
On Jan 24, 2005, at 5:04 PM, William T Goodall wrote:
I saw the second part of the two-part season finale tonight here in
the UK, and it was awesome. It seems to be doing well in the USA too,
so it is looking good for it be renewed.
Now I have a long wait to see what happens next...
Mm. Nearly a
On 22 Jan 2005, at 6:46 pm, Gary Nunn wrote:
WARNING - VERY minor spoilers of the first three episodes below
I liked the Galactica miniseries, but it felt emotionally
distant. I did not have that same feeling with Friday's
episodes. I am looking forward to seeing the rest of the
series, and
"Gary Nunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'"
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 3:16 PM
Subject: RE: Battlestar Galactica
WARNING - VERY minor spoilers of the first three episodes below
I liked the Galactica miniseries, but it felt emotionally
d
WARNING - VERY minor spoilers of the first three episodes below
> I liked the Galactica miniseries, but it felt emotionally
> distant. I did not have that same feeling with Friday's
> episodes. I am looking forward to seeing the rest of the
> series, and perhaps having a bit of discuss
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:10:06 +, William T Goodall
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Finally started airing in the USA last Friday. In the UK we saw the
> penultimate episode of the first (thirteen episode) season on Monday.
>
> (We got to see it first because SKY is putting in $400,000 per episode
t all.)
I think it's very good, and gets even better in the later episodes.
http://tinyurl.com/4pwsw
" The two-hour Jan. 14 premiere of SCI FI Channel's original series
Battlestar Galactica was the number-one cable program on that date in
key demographics and ranked as the highes
Last episode here until January 3rd. This one and last week's kept up
the standard of the show so far. Just four more to go in this 13 ep
season. We won't know if another series is commissioned until the US
viewing figures are in. So you USAns had better watch it!
S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S
P
A
C
E
S
P
O
On 29 Nov 2004, at 10:26 pm, Richard Baker wrote:
William said:
[For the benefit of foreigners...]
S
P
O
I
L
E
R
A
L
E
R
T
S
P
O
I
L
E
R
A
L
E
R
T
[...some of whom I bet will read this anyway]
[...and then regret it bitterly]
I have no idea what the point
of the "Cylon-occupied Caprica" thread is
William said:
> [For the benefit of foreigners...]
>
> S
> P
> O
> I
> L
> E
> R
>
> A
> L
> E
> R
> T
>
> S
> P
> O
> I
> L
> E
> R
>
> A
> L
> E
> R
> T
>
> [...some of whom I bet will read this anyway]
>
>> I have no idea what the point
>> of the "Cylon-occupied Caprica" thread is though.
>
>
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
